Epithelial proliferation and hormone receptor status in the normal post-menopausal breast and the effects of hormone replacement therapy

Estrogen and progesterone signalling in the normal breast and its implications for cancer development

The ovarian hormones estrogen and progesterone are master regulators of the development and function of a broad spectrum of human tissues, including the breast, reproductive and cardiovascular systems, brain and bone. Acting through the nuclear estrogen (ER) and progesterone receptors (PR), both play complex and essential coordinated roles in the extensive development of the lobular alveolar epithelial structures of the normal breast during puberty, the normal menstrual cycle and pregnancy. The past decade has seen major advances in understanding the mechanisms of action of estrogen and progesterone in the normal breast and in the delineation of the complex hierarchy of cell types regulated by ovarian hormones in this tissue. There is evidence for a role for both ER and PR in driving breast cancer, and both are favourable prognostic markers with respect to outcome. In this review, we summarize current knowledge of the mechanisms of action of ER and PR in the normal breast, and implications for the development and management of breast cancer.

Minireview: Progesterone Regulation of Proliferation in the Normal Human Breast and in Breast Cancer: A Tale of Two Scenarios?

Progesterone (P), which signals through the P receptor (PR), is critical in normal development of the breast, but its signaling axis is also a major driver of breast cancer risk. Here we review recent advances in the understanding of P signaling in the normal human breast, with a focus on the importance of the balance between autocrine and paracrine signaling. To date, most data (which derive largely from mouse models or human breast cancer cell line studies) have demonstrated that the vast majority of PR+ cells appear to act as "sensor" cells, which respond to P stimulation by translating these hormonal cues into paracrine signals. However, growing evidence suggests that, dependent on the cellular context, P may also signal in an autocrine manner in a subset of cells in the normal mouse mammary gland and human breast. It has been suggested that it may be dysregulation of this autocrine signaling, resulting in a "switch" from a predominance of paracrine signaling to autocrine signaling in PR+ cells, which is an early event during breast tumorigenesis. This review summarizes current evidence in the literature that demonstrates the mechanisms through which P acts in the normal human breast, as well as highlighting the important questions that remain unanswered.

Progesterone regulation of stem and progenitor cells in normal and malignant breast

Progesterone plays an important, if not controversial, role in mammary epithelial cell proliferation and differentiation. Evidence supports that progesterone promotes rodent mammary carcinogenesis under some conditions, progesterone receptors (PR) are necessary for murine mammary gland tumorigenesis, and exogenous progestin use in post-menopausal women increases breast cancer risk. Thus, the progesterone/PR signaling axis can promote mammary tumorigenesis, albeit in a context-dependent manner. A mechanistic basis for the tumor promoting actions of progesterone has thus far remained unknown. Recent studies, however, have identified a novel role for progesterone in controlling the number and function of stem and progenitor cell populations in the normal human and mouse mammary glands, and in human breast cancers. These discoveries promise to reshape our perception of progesterone function in the mammary gland, and have spawned new hypotheses for how progestins may increase the risk of breast cancer. Here we review studies on progesterone regulation of mammary stem cells in normal and malignant tissue, and their implications for breast cancer risk, tumorigenesis, and tumor behavior.

Cellular and hormonal content of breast nipple aspirate fluid in relation to the risk of breast cancer

In research settings, the measurement of serum and urine hormone concentrations has shown modest positive relationships with breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women. However, the local production of sex steroids in the breast is a significant contributor to the hormonal environment of the breast. Nipple aspiration fluid provides a window into this environment and allows the measurement of hormone and protein content which may show stronger relations to breast cancer risk, and therefore enable both more accurate risk assessment, and the use of preventive measures directed to the lowering of local breast hormonal exposure.

Human breast cell proliferation and its relationship to steroid receptor expression

The steroidal regulation of proliferation and differentiation in the rodent mammary gland is well described, but how ovarian hormones regulate these processes in the human remains poorly understood. To investigate this, we developed the athymic nude mouse model in which intact normal human breast tissue is grafted subcutaneously and treated with estrogen and/or progesterone at human physiological serum levels. We demonstrated, first, that estrogen and not progesterone is the major epithelial cell mitogen in the adult non-pregnant, non-lactating breast, second, that estrogen induces progesterone receptor (PR) expression and, third, that PR expression is maximally induced at low estrogen concentrations while a higher amount of estrogen was required to induce proliferation. These data raised the question of whether one cell type possessed differential responses to high and low estrogen concentrations or whether PR expression and proliferation occurred in two cell populations. Using double-label immunofluorescence, we demonstrated that steroid receptor expression and cell proliferation (Ki67 antigen) occurred in separate cell populations in normal human breast epithelium, and that cells expressing the estrogen receptor-alpha (ERalpha) invariably contained the PR. We also found that this dissociation between steroid receptor expression and cell proliferation in normal epithelium was disrupted at an early stage in breast tumor formation. Recent findings presented herein support the proposal that some ERalpha/PR-positive epithelial cells are quiescent breast stem cells that act as 'steroid hormone sensors'. Such hormone sensor cells are likely to secrete positive or negative paracrine/juxtacrine factors dependent on the prevailing estrogen or progesterone concentration to influence the proliferative activity of adjacent ERalpha/PR-negative epithelial cells.

The oophorectomy effect on Walker 256 tumor inoculated into the vagina and uterine cervix of female rats

PURPOSE

Verify the effect of oophorectomy on the evolution of the Walker 256 tumor inoculated into the vagina and cervix of female rats.

METHODS

Ten Wistar, female rats were used, distributed into two groups with 05 animals each: Tumor group (TG): Rats inoculated with Walker 256 tumor; Oophorectomy group (OG): oophorectomized rats inoculated with Walker 256 tumor. The day before the tumor vaginal inoculation, acetic acid was inoculated into the vaginas of both groups of rats; the following day, the vaginal walls were scarified with an endocervix brush, and then Walker 256 tumor was inoculated. After 12 days, the tumor was removed together with the vagina and uterine horns for macro and microscopic analyses. The data were submitted to statistical analyses.

RESULTS

There was no statistical difference between the two groups; however it was observed that the behavior of tumor growth on the OG group presented greater invasion, compromising the uterine horns.

CONCLUSION

The results of the study on the GO group presented a macroscopic behavior different from the TG group, however, both of them presented similar development in terms of tumor mass.

Effects of pre- and postmenopausal use of exogenous hormones on receptor content in normal human breast tissue: a randomized study

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effects of exposure to endogenous and exogenous hormones on estrogen receptor-alpha (ERalpha) and progesterone receptor (PR) levels in normal human breast tissue.

METHODS

In a randomized study of women scheduled for mammary reduction plasty (n = 81), ERalpha and PR content in breast parenchyma was analyzed in premenopausal (n = 49) and postmenopausal (n = 16) women. Premenopausal women were randomized to surgery in the follicular or luteal phase of the menstrual cycle or after oral contraceptive treatment for 2 months. Postmenopausal women were randomized to sequential or estrogen-only therapy for 2 months prior to surgery.

RESULTS

ERalpha content was higher in parous than in nulliparous (p = 0.009) premenopausal women and displayed a positive association with age (r(s) = 0.51, p = 0.0002). Compared with premenopausal women in the follicular phase, postmenopausal women had higher ERalpha content (p = 0.040) whereas premenopausal women on oral contraception had lower ERalpha (p = 0.048) and PR (p = 0.007) content. Smokers had lower PR content than non-smokers (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

In the present study ERalpha content was higher in parous than in non-parous women and associated with premenopausal age. Short-term oral contraceptives yielded lower ERalpha and PR contents. Postmenopausal estrogen/progestogen combined therapy yielded lower PR content than estrogen-only therapy.

Postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy: endometrial and breast effects

The history of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) dates back to the late 1800s, when animal extracts of ovaries were first used. With the development of synthetic hormones, widespread use in postmenopausal women extended throughout the industrialized world, so that by the late 1900s roughly one-third to one-half of all postmenopausal women in the United States and Europe were taking HRT. Two events changed the course of use of HRT: the association of an increased rate of endometrial carcinoma with estrogen-only HRT and the association of an increased breast cancer rate with combined estrogen and progestin HRT. This review explores the evidence of the effects of HRT on the endometrium and the breast, with emphasis on the pathologic changes.

Ovarian steroids and the human breast: regulation of stem cells and cell proliferation

Ovarian steroidal control of mammary gland proliferation and differentiation is not well defined in the human. We therefore developed the athymic nude mouse model in which intact normal human breast tissue is xenografted subcutaneously and treated with human physiological serum levels of oestrogen (E) and/or progesterone (P). We showed that: (i) E, and not P, is the major steroid hormone inducing proliferation of epithelial cells in the adult non-pregnant, non-lactating breast; (ii) E induces progesterone receptor (PR) expression; and (iii) PR expression is maximally induced at low E concentrations while a higher amount of E was required to induce proliferation. Using double label immuno-fluorescence, we demonstrated that cells expressing the oestrogen receptor-alpha (ER alpha) invariably contained the PR but that steroid receptor expression and cell proliferation (Ki67 antigen) were dissociated. Recently, we have demonstrated that some ER alpha/PR-positive epithelial cells are quiescent breast stem cells suggesting that they act as "steroid hormone sensors" that secrete paracrine factors to regulate the proliferative activity of adjacent ER alpha/PR-negative epithelial cells. The dissociation between steroid receptor expression and cell proliferation in normal epithelium was lost at an early stage in ER alpha/PR-positive breast tumour formation perhaps indicating that they arise from deregulation of the normally quiescent breast stem cells.

Progestins and progesterone in hormone replacement therapy and the risk of breast cancer

Controlled studies and most observational studies published over the last 5 years suggest that the addition of synthetic progestins to estrogen in hormone replacement therapy (HRT), particularly in continuous-combined regimen, increases the breast cancer (BC) risk compared to estrogen alone. By contrast, a recent study suggests that the addition of natural progesterone in cyclic regimens does not affect BC risk. This finding is consistent with in vivo data suggesting that progesterone does not have a detrimental effect on breast tissue. The increased BC risk found with the addition of synthetic progestins to estrogen could be due to the regimen and/or the kind of progestin used. Continuous-combined regimen inhibits the sloughing of mammary epithelium that occurs after progesterone withdrawal in a cyclic regimen. More importantly, the progestins used (medroxyprogesterone acetate and 19-Nortestosterone-derivatives) are endowed with some non-progesterone-like effects, which can potentiate the proliferative action of estrogens. Particularly relevant seem to be the metabolic and hepatocellular effects (decreased insulin sensitivity, increased levels and activity of insulin-like growth factor-I, and decreased levels of SHBG), which contrast the opposite effects induced by oral estrogen.

Development of a novel method for measuring in vivo breast epithelial cell proliferation in humans

Cell proliferation plays an important role in all stages of carcinogenesis. Currently, no safe, direct, in vivo method of measuring breast epithelial cell (BEC) proliferation rates in humans exists. Static immunohistochemical markers of cell proliferation, such as Ki-67 and PCNA indices, have technical limitations including high inter-lab variability, inaccuracy in the presence of agents that cause G1/S cell cycle block and inadequate sensitivity in post-menopausal women with low BEC proliferation rates. We describe here a safe, direct method of measuring BEC proliferation rates in vivo in women using heavy water ((2)H(2)O) labeling coupled with mass spectrometric analysis. Proliferation of normal and tumor BEC was measured from breast tissue biopsies in women undergoing mastectomy (n = 11) and normal BEC from healthy volunteers (n = 16). Women took heavy water (50-150 ml per day) for 1-4 weeks. Pre-menopausal women had significantly higher proliferation rates than post-menopausal women (0.7 +/- 0.1 versus 0.2 +/- 0.1 new cells per day, respectively), and tumor BEC had different proliferation rates than normal BEC from the same breast. The method is analytically reproducible and remains sensitive in the range of low proliferation rates. In summary, this novel method of measuring BEC proliferation in vivo holds promise for assessing the effects of anti-proliferative chemopreventive and chemotherapeutic agents.

Role of progestins with partial antiandrogenic effects

An experts' meeting on the 'Role of progestins with partial antiandrogenic effects' was held in Berlin from January 19 to 22, 2001. The meeting was chaired by Dr R. Sitruk-Ware (New York, USA) and participants included Ms F. Fruzzetti (Pisa, Italy), J. Hanker (Trier, Germany), J. Huber (Vienna, Austria), F. Husmann (Bad Sassendorf, Germany), S. O. Skouby (Copenhagen, Denmark), J. H. H. Thijssen (Utrecht, The Netherlands), and R. Druckmann (Nice, France). The present paper reports the conclusions of the meeting. However, the publication of the Women's Health Initiative study, which appeared after the meeting, led to additional comments and revisions.

Steroidal hormones and proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis in breast cells

The impact of estrogens (E) and progestins (P) on the breast is crucial. Recent epidemiological studies raised a great concern concerning breast cancer risk and hormone replacement therapy (HRT). However, the effects of HRT in breast tissue remain unclear. Biological data predominantly show that P are antiproliferative and proapoptotic at least for normal breast cells. These antiproliferative effects of P are well described at the cellular level. Whereas E2 increases the level of the various cyclins involved in the cell cycle progression and decreases the cyclin kinase inhibitors, p21 and p27, progestins act in an opposite manner. In addition, they both modulate the phosphorylated rate of Rb involved into the S phase progression. Various proteins of the apoptotic cascade are also targets for E2 and P. We showed that bcl-2, p53 and caspase 3 are oppositely modulated by E2 and P in normal and breast cancer cell cultures. It is very possible that in vivo the balance between E2/P, the type of P, specific phenotypes could explain increasing risk during HRT, which appears to be mainly a promoter effect on preexisting transformed cells.

Lessons to be learned from clinical studies on hormones and the breast

Estrogen is a well-known mitogen in human breast epithelium but the action of progestogen is complex and incompletely understood. During the last years, accumulating data from animal, clinical and observational studies suggest a proliferative effect in breast tissue when progestogen is added to estrogen. Findings in surrogate markers like breast density add to clinical and epidemiological reports indicating that continuous combined HRT may carry a higher risk of breast cancer than treatment with estrogen alone. Whether the results are valid for all progestogens remains to elucidated. It is also clear that not all women respond in the same way to the same treatment and the biological basis for the marked individual variation in breast response has to be clarified. Further knowledge about the role of androgens and of the impact of different treatment regimens is important and prospective randomized clinical studies are needed.

Cellular homeostasis and the breast

Increasing our knowledge regarding the control of cellular homeostasis in the normal human breast is important in understanding how breast tumours arise and whether compounds used for hormone replacement therapy are able to promote tumour formation In our studies on tissue from pre-menopausal, non-pregnant, non-lactating women, oestradiol is the main ovarian steroid mitogen for the breast epithelium whereas progesterone has little or no effect. Oestradiol appears to influence proliferative activity indirectly via oestrogen-receptor positive cells which control the activity of adjacent division competent cells by means of paracrine or juxtacrine growth factors. After the menopause, however, a mitogenic effect of progesterone becomes apparent which may be due to the reduction in endogenous oestradiol levels or, possibly, to tissue specific alterations in steroid sensitivity. Whatever the mechanism, the proliferative effects of progesterone on the post-menopausal breast have implications for the use of HRT.

Tools for making correct decisions regarding hormone therapy. Part II. organ response and clinical applications

OBJECTIVE

To review existing scientific knowledge of the complicated and variable behavior and response to hormone therapy (HT) of different organs during aging, and to summarize long-term consequences on human health.

DESIGN

A MEDLINE computer search was performed to identify relevant articles.

RESULT(S)

Five body organs were evaluated. [1]. Physiologic aging of the bone has deleterious consequences on women's health and quality of life. Bone fractures could be attributed to the combination of estrogen depletion and osteoporosis, mechanisms of applied forces, and disturbed brain function, partially reversible by timely estrogen administration. [2]. Estrogen seems to have a profound neuroprotective effect. As physiologic aging of the brain is an unhealthy phenomenon, possible intervention is justified. The therapeutic time window seems crucial. [3]. The differentiation between response of a healthy or already damaged organ to sex hormones is the key factor to understanding the possible cardioprotective effects. [4]. Based on doubling time of tumor cells, intracrinology, epidemiological data on breast cancer, and behavior of breast cancer survivors in response to estrogen treatment, estrogen seems to be mainly a promoter and even a protector of breast cancer survivors. [5]. Colon cancer appears to be an estrogen-dependent tumor with a wide therapeutic window, as every report regardless of age and dose demonstrates protective effects.

CONCLUSION(S)

Knowledge of each organ's response to aging and sex hormone substitutions demonstrates that the organs could benefit from properly designed intervention. In the wake of the publication of the Women's Health Initiative study, which shocked the medical community, we suggest that the results be reevaluated according to the aforementioned principles, and that menopausal medicine could play an important role.

Steroid receptors and proliferation in the human breast

Despite recent gains in our knowledge of the hormonal control of proliferation and differentiation in the rodent mammary gland, the factors regulating these processes in the human are poorly understood. We have developed a model in which intact normal human breast tissue is grafted subcutaneously into adult female athymic nude mice and treated with oestrogen (E) and/or progesterone (P) at human physiological serum levels. We have shown that (i) E and not P is the major epithelial cell mitogen in the adult non-pregnant, non-lactating breast, (ii) E induces progesterone receptor (PR) expression and (iii) PR expression is maximally induced at low E concentrations while a higher amount of E is required to stimulate proliferation. These data raised the question of whether one cell type demonstrated two different responses to the two different E concentrations or whether PR expression and proliferation occurred in separate cell populations. Using dual label immunofluorescence, we showed that steroid receptor expression and proliferation (Ki67 antigen) are detected in separate cell populations in normal human breast epithelium, and that cells expressing the oestrogen receptor-alpha (ERalpha) invariably contained the PR. We also reported that this separation between steroid receptor expression and proliferation observed in the normal human epithelium is disrupted at an early stage in breast tumourigenesis. One interpretation supported by our recent findings is that some ERalpha/PR-positive epithelial cells are quiescent breast stem cells that act as "steroid hormone sensors". Such hormone sensor cells might secrete positive or negative paracrine/juxtacrine factors dependent on the prevailing E or P concentration to influence the proliferative activity of adjacent ERalpha/PR-negative epithelial cells.

ACOG committee opinion. Risk of breast cancer with estrogen-progestin replacement therapy

Recent articles have examined the association between the use of combination estrogen-progestin regimens for hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and the risk of breast cancer. The objective of this Committee Opinion is to evaluate critically the presented evidence. Although epidemiologic studies suggest that the addition of progestins to estrogens may increase the risk of breast cancer, this increased risk has not been proved. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists continues to recommend that HRT be considered as a treatment to relieve vasomotor symptoms and genitourinary tract atrophy and to reduce the risk of osteoporosis and, potentially, cardiovascular disease. Postmenopausal women should be apprised of the current understanding of the risks and benefits of HRT. When considering the use of HRT for longer than 5 years, the clinician and individual patient should weigh the benefits versus the potential side effects and risks for that particular patient.

Postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy: effects on normal mammary gland in humans and in a mouse postmenopausal model

Endogenous estrogen exposure has long been implicated in the causation of breast cancer through a mechanism of epithelial cell proliferation. Whether estrogen, progesterone, or both exhibit mitogenic activity and promote carcinogenesis in the human breast has been the subject of considerable debate. The purpose of this review article is to examine the evidence for the effects of hormone replacement therapy in its various forms on the biology of the postmenopausal breast both in humans and in an animal model, and to identify the gaps in knowledge that research will need to address to further understand this complex issue.

Progesterone receptors--animal models and cell signalling in breast cancer. Implications for breast cancer of inclusion of progestins in hormone replacement therapies

Progestins are included in menopausal hormone replacement therapy to counteract the increased risk for endometrial cancer associated with estrogen replacement therapy. Studies of hormone replacement therapy and breast cancer risk and of changes in mammographic density according to different regimens of hormone replacement therapy suggest that, for the most part, estrogen-progestin replacement therapy has a more adverse effect on breast cancer risk than does estrogen replacement therapy. Many questions remain unresolved, however, including risk associated with different regimens of estrogen-progestin replacement therapy, and whether the effects vary according to tumor characteristics, such as histology, extent of disease, and hormone receptor status.

Management of hot flashes in breast-cancer survivors

Hot flashes can be a major problem for patients with a history of breast cancer. Although oestrogen can alleviate hot flashes to a large extent in most patients, there has been debate about the safety of oestrogen use in survivors of breast cancer. The decrease in hot flashes achieved with progestational agents is similar to that seen with oestrogen therapy but, again, there is some debate about the safety of progestational agents in patients with a history of breast cancer. Several alternative substances have therefore been investigated. These include a belladonna alkaloid preparation, clonidine, soy phyto-oestrogens, vitamin E, gabapentin, and several of the newer antidepressants, with venlafaxine being the best studied to date. Several studies in progress may provide better non-hormonal means of treating hot flashes in the future.

Tumour biology of a breast cancer at least partly reflects the biology of the tissue/epithelial cell of origin at the time of initiation - a hypothesis

A hypothesis is presented suggesting that initiation of breast epithelial cell freezes the cell at least partly according to the development/differention of cell at the time of initiation. Tumour biology will mimic the physiology of normal cell development at the time of initiation and this is preserved at least partly onwards. Also preferentially, tumours will develop from the cell type that is proliferating at the time of initiation. This may explain the overrepresentation of different types of histology in breast cancer in relation to age of the woman. The development of each tumour may follow at least partly a distinct pathway of evolution.

Hormone replacement therapy with estrogen or estrogen plus medroxyprogesterone acetate is associated with increased epithelial proliferation in the normal postmenopausal breast

The relative effects of postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy (HRT) with estrogen alone vs. estrogen+progestin on breast cell proliferation and on breast cancer risk are controversial. A cross-sectional observational study was carried out to examine the proliferative effects of HRT with estrogen or estrogen plus the progestin, medroxyprogesterone acetate, in breast tissue of postmenopausal women. Benign breast biopsies from 86 postmenopausal women were analyzed with antiproliferating cell nuclear antigen (anti-PCNA) and Ki67 antibodies to measure relative levels of cell proliferation. Epithelial density and estrogen and progesterone receptor status were also determined. The women were categorized either as users of: 1) estrogen (E) alone; 2) estrogen+medroxyprogesterone acetate (E+P); or 3) no HRT. Compared with no HRT, the breast epithelium of women who had received either E+P or E alone had significantly higher PCNA proliferation indices, and treatment with E+P had a significantly higher index (PCNA and Ki67) than treatment with E alone. Breast epithelial density was significantly greater in postmenopausal women treated with E and E+P, compared with no HRT. Thus, the present study shows that postmenopausal HRT with E+P was associated with greater breast epithelial cell proliferation and breast epithelial cell density than E alone or no HRT. Furthermore, with E+P, breast proliferation was localized to the terminal duct-lobular unit of the breast, which is the site of development of most breast cancers. Further studies are needed to assess the possible association between the mitogenic activity of progestins and breast cancer risk.

A mouse model to study the effects of hormone replacement therapy on normal mammary gland during menopause: enhanced proliferative response to estrogen in late postmenopausal mice

Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) with estrogen alleviates menopausal symptoms and is effective in reducing osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease when taken in early postmenopause. Older, late postmenopausal women who never previously received HRT are also believed to benefit from estrogen treatment. On the other hand, increased lifetime exposure of the mammary gland to estrogen may increase the risk of breast cancer. The development of suitable experimental animal model systems can advance our understanding of the effects of estrogen and the timing of HRT on the postmenopausal breast. Toward this end, early and late postmenopausal states were induced in mice by short vs. long term ovariectomy (1 vs. 5 weeks), and the effects of 17beta-estradiol (E) on mammary gland morphology, cell proliferation, and progesterone receptor (PR) levels were investigated. We report that in late postmenopausal mice, E caused a pronounced enlargement of duct ends and 6.5- and 4-fold greater mitogenic responses in the duct end epithelium and adjacent stromal cells, respectively, compared with the response in early postmenopausal mice. Furthermore, after long term, daily treatment with E, steady state levels of proliferation remained 2-fold higher than those of similarly treated, early postmenopausal mice. E failed to increase mammary PR levels in late postmenopausal, but not in early postmenopausal mice. Stimulation of duct ends by E and lack of PR inducibility are characteristics of the immature pubertal mammary gland and indicate that the late postmenopausal mammary gland resembled the immature state. In contrast, minimal E-induced proliferation and increased PR inducibility, characteristics of the adult, sexually mature mammary gland, were retained in early postmenopausal mice. The lack of difference in the numbers of estrogen receptor-positive epithelial or stromal cells or in estrogen receptor cellular concentration after short vs. long term ovariectomy indicates that the observed greater efficacy of E is mediated at a step beyond receptor-ligand binding. This mouse model of experimentally induced early vs. late postmenopausal states should prove useful in better understanding alterations in hormone responsiveness and their implications for timing of HRT on the human breast.