1
|
Moore A, Bennett B, Taylor-Stokes G, McDonald L, Daumont MJ. Malignant pleural mesothelioma: treatment patterns and humanistic burden of disease in Europe. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:693. [PMID: 35739480 PMCID: PMC9229520 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09750-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive and rare tumour with poor prognosis. Most patients are diagnosed with advanced disease and there is a paucity of data on the humanistic burden of MPM in terms of impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and activity. This study examined real-world treatment patterns and humanistic disease burden of MPM in Europe. Methods Physicians abstracted demographic/clinical characteristics and treatment data from MPM-patient medical records; MPM patients self-completed a questionnaire including symptoms, 3-level-EQ-5D questionnaire and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Lung Cancer Symptom Scale for Mesothelioma (LCSS-Meso), and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) questionnaire. Results Physicians (n = 171) abstracted data of 1390 patients; 767/1390 patients self-completed questionnaires. Patients were elderly with advanced, unresectable MPM. Treatment patterns followed guidelines with most (81%) patients receiving platinum+antifolate chemotherapy at first line (1 L). Maintenance treatment use was high (51.1%) despite no recommended maintenance therapies. Symptom burden was high and health states and HRQoL were poor at 1; declining further with progression. Overall mean (SD): LCSS-Average Symptom Burden Index score was 48.8 (19.3; n = 758); EQ-5D Utility Index score was 0.510 (0.349; n = 763); EQ-5D VAS score was 54.2 (20.3;n = 766); LCSS-3-Item Global Index score was 143.2 (64.5; n = 762); LCSS-normal activities score was 51.9 (24.6;n = 765); WPAI-activity impairment was 56.0% (23.2%; n = 737). Conclusion The humanistic burden of MPM is high, despite treatments being prescribed as per available guidance. Treatments that delay progression and provide palliation of symptoms are most likely to improve/maintain HRQoL. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09750-7.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Moore
- Adelphi Real World, Adelphi Mill, Grimshaw Lane, Bollington, Macclesfield, Cheshire, SK10 5JB, UK.
| | | | - Gavin Taylor-Stokes
- Adelphi Real World, Adelphi Mill, Grimshaw Lane, Bollington, Macclesfield, Cheshire, SK10 5JB, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lymphocyte predominance in blood, pleural fluid, and tumour stroma; a prognostic marker in pleural mesothelioma. BMC Pulm Med 2022; 22:173. [PMID: 35501755 PMCID: PMC9063088 DOI: 10.1186/s12890-022-01968-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2021] [Accepted: 03/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background As promising novel treatments develop for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), early prognostication has become increasingly important. Circulating and local inflammatory cells are known to play a significant role in other tumour types. We assessed the proportion of lymphocyte populations within blood, pleural fluid and tumour stroma to prognosticate patients with MPM at diagnosis. Methods Consecutive patients diagnosed with biopsy-proven MPM were prospectively recruited to an observational cohort study and followed up for a minimum of 7.5 years. Blood and pleural fluid results at presentation were extracted from the medical records. Biopsy specimens were independently reviewed by 2 pathologists who scored the degree of lymphocytic and neutrophilic infiltration. Results Baseline results were available for 184 patients. The predominant pleural fluid cell type was calculable for 84 patients and 118 patients had biopsy specimens available for review. A low blood neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR < 4) inferred a better prognosis with a median survival of 420 days versus 301 days (p < 0.01). Survival was better for patients with a lymphocyte-predominant pleural effusion (430 vs 306 days, p < 0.01). Lymphocyte infiltration of tumour stroma was also associated with improved survival (n = 92, survival 430 days) compared with neutrophilic or acellular samples (n = 26, survival 342 days p < 0.01). In multivariable modelling lymphocyte predominance in blood, pleural fluid and tumour stroma were all associated with a better prognosis. Conclusions Lymphocyte predominance within tumour stroma, pleural fluid or blood infers a better prognosis in patients with MPM.
Collapse
|
3
|
Walker SP, Bintcliffe O, Keenan E, Stadon L, Evison M, Haris M, Nagarajan T, West A, Ionescu A, Prudon B, Guhan A, Mustafa R, Herre J, Arnold D, Bhatnagar R, Kahan B, Miller RF, Rahman NM, Maskell NA. Randomised trial of indwelling pleural catheters for refractory transudative pleural effusions. Eur Respir J 2021; 59:13993003.01362-2021. [PMID: 34413152 DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01362-2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2021] [Accepted: 06/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Thapas Nagarajan
- Macclesfield General Hospital, East Cheshire NHS Trust, Macclesfield, UK
| | - Alex West
- Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | | | | | - Anur Guhan
- University Hospital Ayr, NHS Ayrshire and Arran, Ayrshire, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Brennan Kahan
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Schumann SO, Kocher G, Minervini F. Epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment of the malignant pleural mesothelioma, a narrative review of literature. J Thorac Dis 2021; 13:2510-2523. [PMID: 34012597 PMCID: PMC8107529 DOI: 10.21037/jtd-20-2761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
The malignant pleural mesothelioma is a very aggressive tumor which is arising from mesothelial cells and is associated with asbestos exposure. It is a heterogeneous cancer that shows a complex pattern of molecular changes, including genetic, chromosomic, and epigenetic abnormalities. The malignant pleural mesothelioma is characterized by a silent and slow clinical progression with an average period of 20–40 years from the asbestos exposure phase to the start of the symptoms. Unfortunately, to date, the therapeutic options are very limited, especially if the tumor is detected late. This narrative review provides an extended overview of the present evidence in the literature regarding the epidemiology, diagnostic pathways and treatment approaches of the malignant pleural mesothelioma. The treatment of mesothelioma has evolved slowly over the last 20 years not only from a surgical point of view but also radiotherapy, chemotherapy and immunotherapy play nowadays a key role. Several surgical strategies are available ranging from extrapleural pneumonectomy to cytoreductive surgery but a multidisciplinary approach seems to be mandatory because a single approach has not proved to date to be resolutive. New non-surgical treatment options appear to be promising but the results have to be taken in account with caution because clear evidence with high-quality studies is still lacking
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gregor Kocher
- Division of General Thoracic Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - Fabrizio Minervini
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kantor T, Wakeam E. Landmark Trials in the Surgical Management of Mesothelioma. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:2037-2047. [PMID: 33521898 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-09589-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2020] [Accepted: 12/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The treatment of mesothelioma has evolved slowly over the last 20 years. While surgery as a standalone treatment has fallen out of favor, the importance of multimodality treatment consisting of combinations of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery have become more common in operable, fit patients. In this review, we discuss trials in surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation that have shaped contemporary multimodality treatment of this difficult malignancy, and we touch on the new and emerging immunotherapeutic and targeted agents that may change the future treatment of this disease. We also review the multimodality treatment regimens, with particular attention to trimodality therapy and neoadjuvant hemithoracic radiation strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taylor Kantor
- Section of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Elliot Wakeam
- Section of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sanghera S, Coast J. Measuring Quality-Adjusted Life-Years When Health Fluctuates. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2020; 23:343-350. [PMID: 32197730 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.09.2753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2019] [Revised: 09/12/2019] [Accepted: 09/20/2019] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
Recurrent fluctuations in health states can occur as a result of long-term conditions with episodic symptoms or through side effects of cycles of treatment. Fluctuations and associated duration of symptoms can be predictable (eg, side effects of chemotherapy treatment) or unpredictable (eg, relapse in multiple sclerosis). Such recurrent fluctuations in health states can have an important impact on a person's health-related quality of life. When symptoms vary by time of day, day of the week, or during the month, it is challenging to obtain reliable health-related quality of life estimates for use in assessing cost-effectiveness of interventions. The adequacy of the quality of life estimate will be affected by (1) the standard recall period associated with the chosen measure (eg, "health today" EQ-5D, "past 4 weeks" for SF-36/SF-6D) and the way that respondents understand and make judgments about these recall periods, (2) the chosen time points for assessing health-related quality of life in relation to the fluctuations in health, and (3) the assumptions used to interpolate between measurement time points and thus calculate the quality-adjusted life-years. These issues have not received sufficient methodological attention and instead remain poorly accounted for in economic analyses. There is potential for these issues to considerably distort treatment decisions away from the optimal allocation. This article brings together evidence from health economics, psychology, and behavioral economics to explore these challenges in depth; presents the solutions that have been applied to date; and details a methodological research agenda for measuring quality-adjusted life-years in recurrent fluctuating health states.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabina Sanghera
- Health Economics Bristol, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, England, UK.
| | - Joanna Coast
- Health Economics Bristol, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, England, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Chemotherapy Versus Supportive Care for Unresected Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma. Clin Lung Cancer 2019; 20:263-269. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2019.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2018] [Revised: 02/19/2019] [Accepted: 03/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
8
|
Eberst G, Anota A, Scherpereel A, Mazieres J, Margery J, Greillier L, Audigier-Valette C, Moro-Sibilot D, Molinier O, Léna H, Rivière F, Monnet I, Gounant V, Janicot H, Gervais R, Locher C, Charton E, Morin F, Zalcman G, Westeel V. Health-Related Quality of Life Impact from Adding Bevacizumab to Cisplatin-Pemetrexed in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma in the MAPS IFCT-GFPC-0701 Phase III Trial. Clin Cancer Res 2019; 25:5759-5765. [DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-2860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2018] [Revised: 03/18/2019] [Accepted: 06/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
9
|
Hino O, Abe M, Han B, Yan Y. In commemoration of the 2018 Mataro Nagayo Prize: A road to early diagnosis and monitoring of asbestos-related mesothelioma. Cancer Sci 2019; 110:1518-1524. [PMID: 30888083 PMCID: PMC6500980 DOI: 10.1111/cas.14001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2018] [Revised: 03/11/2019] [Accepted: 03/13/2019] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Primarily caused by exposure to asbestos, mesothelioma is a typical occupational disease. The latency of mesothelioma is as long as 20-40 years, and the cancer initially progresses mainly along the surfaces of pleura or peritoneum without forming masses. As symptoms do not develop until late stages, it has been challenging to diagnose this disease in its early stages and to carry out complete surgical removal. In responding to Japan's asbestos crisis in the mid-2000s, we have developed and improved ERC/MSLN-based serum and radiological markers and pioneered the use of an N-ERC ELISA kit for screening populations at risk for asbestos exposure. In the present article, we review our research toward early diagnosis of asbestos-related mesothelioma before symptoms develop and share our clinical experience of screening, diagnosing and monitoring of this disease. This paper is dedicated to the author (Dr Okio Hino) to commemorate the honor bestowed upon him as the recipient of the Mataro Nagayo Prize in 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Okio Hino
- Department of Pathology and Oncology, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Molecular Pathogenesis, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masaaki Abe
- Department of Pathology and Oncology, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Bo Han
- Department of Molecular Pathogenesis, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yan Yan
- Department of Molecular Pathogenesis, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Jeffery E, Lee YCG, Newton RU, Lyons-Wall P, McVeigh J, Nowak AK, Cheah HM, Nguyen B, Fitzgerald DB, Creaney J, Straker L, Peddle-McIntyre CJ. Body composition and nutritional status in malignant pleural mesothelioma: implications for activity levels and quality of life. Eur J Clin Nutr 2019; 73:1412-1421. [PMID: 30886321 DOI: 10.1038/s41430-019-0418-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2018] [Revised: 02/17/2019] [Accepted: 02/20/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an incurable cancer and optimizing daily physical activity and quality of life are key goals of patient management. Little is known about the prevalence of pre-sarcopenia and malnutrition in MPM or their associations with patient outcomes. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of pre-sarcopenia and malnutrition in MPM and investigate if activity levels and quality of life differed according to body composition and nutritional status. SUBJECTS/METHODS Patients with a diagnosis of MPM were recruited. Pre-sarcopenia was defined as low appendicular skeletal muscle mass (≤ 7.26 kg/m2 for men and ≤ 5.45 kg/m2 for women), measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Malnutrition was defined as a rating of B or C on the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment. Outcome measures included objective activity levels (Actigraph GT3X) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL; Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy General). RESULTS Sixty-one people participated (79% male, median age 69 [IQR 62-74] years and median BMI 25.8 [IQR 24.3-28.4] kg/m2). Fifty-four percent were pre-sarcopenic and 38% were malnourished. Percent of time spent in light activity/day was lower in participants with pre-sarcopenia compared with non-sarcopenic participants (median 25.4 [IQR 19.8-32.1]% vs. 32.3 [27.1-35.6]%; p = 0.008). Participants with malnutrition had poorer HRQoL than well-nourished participants (mean 69.0 (16.3) vs. 84.4 (13.3); p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Participants with MPM had high rates of pre-sarcopenia and malnutrition. Pre-sarcopenia was associated with poorer activity levels, whilst malnutrition was associated with poorer quality of life. Interventions that aim to address reduced muscle mass and weight loss, should be tested in MPM to assess their impact on patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Jeffery
- Exercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia.,School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia
| | - Y C Gary Lee
- Respiratory Department, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA, 6009, Australia.,Institute for Respiratory Health, Nedlands, WA, 6009, Australia.,Medical School, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
| | - Robert U Newton
- Exercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia.,School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia.,School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia
| | - Philippa Lyons-Wall
- School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia
| | - Joanne McVeigh
- School of Occupational Therapy, Speech Therapy and Social Work, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.,Movement Physiology Laboratory, School of Physiology, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, 2000, South Africa
| | - Anna K Nowak
- Medical School, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia.,Medical Oncology Department, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA, Australia.,National Centre for Asbestos Related Diseases, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
| | - Hui Min Cheah
- Medical School, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
| | - Bella Nguyen
- Medical Oncology Department, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA, Australia
| | - Deirdre B Fitzgerald
- Respiratory Department, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA, 6009, Australia
| | - Jenette Creaney
- Institute for Respiratory Health, Nedlands, WA, 6009, Australia.,Medical School, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia.,National Centre for Asbestos Related Diseases, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
| | - Leon Straker
- School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Carolyn J Peddle-McIntyre
- Exercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia. .,School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ben Bouazza Y, Van Meerbeeck JP. The use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the management of malignant pleural mesothelioma: a descriptive literature survey. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2018; 7:507-515. [PMID: 30450288 DOI: 10.21037/tlcr.2018.07.08] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Background Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) remains a highly symptomatic and aggressive malignancy. The treatment options are for most patients limited to palliative chemotherapy and best supportive care. Therefore, the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) is recommended for the improvement of the quality of care. The aim of this literature survey is to provide an up to date review of the use of PROMs in mesothelioma. A concise comparison is made of the identified instruments. Methods We searched PubMed, Web of Science and Google Scholar for the use of PROMs in MPM. Quality of the study and risk of bias were assessed using the appraisal tools recommended by the Dutch Cochrane Center. Results A total of 31 articles on PROMs in MPM were identified that met the inclusion criteria and a total of 14 instruments. The instruments are categorized in generic (n=2), cancer-specific (n=4), lung cancer-specific (n=3), mesothelioma-specific (n=2) and symptom-specific (n=3). They were mostly used in clinical trials. Conclusions PROMs have the potential to improve the management of MPM. No particular instrument is specifically recommended, although there is a preference for patient-reported disease-specific instruments encompassing the concept of health-related quality of life (hrQoL) and relevant symptoms. Such instruments are the EORTC QLQ-LC13, LCSS-Meso and FACT-L, which measure the impact of malignant mesothelioma and its treatment on patients. Assessments should be made on baseline and post-treatment. The frequency of assessments should be further evaluated in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jan P Van Meerbeeck
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Care, Antwerp University, Antwerpen, Belgium.,Department of Pulmonology, Department of Thoracic Oncology, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.,Multidisciplinary Oncological Center Antwerp (MOCA), Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Palat G, Stenlander C, Jacob J, Sinha S, Rapelli V, Wiebe T, Brun E, Segerlantz M. Specialized Palliative Care and the Quality of Life for Hospitalized Cancer Patients at a Low-Resource Hospital in India. Indian J Palliat Care 2018; 24:289-299. [PMID: 30111942 PMCID: PMC6069622 DOI: 10.4103/ijpc.ijpc_95_18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM This study aimed to compare the quality of life (QoL) of cancer patients, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance of 3-4, in contact with or without contact, with a specialized palliative care unit (PCU) at a low-resource governmental cancer hospital, as well as studying the impact of this contact on the QoL in their caregivers. MATERIALS AND METHODS Hospitalized patients with an ECOG performance of 3 or 4 and their primary caregiver were asked to participate in this observational study. Patients in contact with the specialized PCU and their closest caregivers formed Group A, while patients and families without this contact formed Group B. Contact was mainly one consultation. The patients were asked to complete the Palliative Care Outcome Scale (POS), and the caregivers were asked to complete the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the distress thermometer (DT). RESULTS There was no statistically significant difference between the median POS values of the patient groups, neither regarding the total sum nor per any item. There were also no statistically significant differences between the median HADS values and median DT values when comparing the caregivers to Group A and B. CONCLUSION Consultation with a specialized PCU at this tertiary referral center did not alter the QoL of patients with an ECOG performance of 3-4 nor did it affect the psychological well-being of their caregivers. We argue that monitoring prescribed treatment and follow-up is a necessary component of PC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gayatri Palat
- Palliative Access (PAX) Program, MNJ Institute of Oncology and Regional Cancer Centre, Hyderabad, Telungana, India
- Two Worlds Cancer Collaboration-INCTR, Canada
- Department of Pain and Palliative Medicine, MNJ Institute of Oncology and Regional Cancer Centre, Hyderabad, Telungana, India
| | | | - Jean Jacob
- Two Worlds Cancer Collaboration-INCTR, Canada
- Department of Pain and Palliative Medicine, MNJ Institute of Oncology and Regional Cancer Centre, Hyderabad, Telungana, India
| | - Sudha Sinha
- Medical Oncology, MNJ Institute of Oncology and Regional Cancer Centre, Hyderabad, Telungana, India
| | - Vineela Rapelli
- Palliative Care Program, MNJ Institute of Oncology and Regional Cancer Centre, Hyderabad, Telungana, India
| | - Thomas Wiebe
- Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Department of Clinical Sciences and Paediatrics, Lund, Sweden
| | - Eva Brun
- Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Department of Clinical Sciences and Oncology, Lund, Sweden
| | - Mikael Segerlantz
- Lund University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Institute for Palliative Care, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Nagamatsu Y, Oze I, Aoe K, Hotta K, Kato K, Nakagawa J, Hara K, Kishimoto T, Fujimoto N. Quality of life of survivors of malignant pleural mesothelioma in Japan: a cross sectional study. BMC Cancer 2018; 18:350. [PMID: 29587685 PMCID: PMC5872515 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-4293-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2017] [Accepted: 03/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies have indicated that people with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) have a poor quality of life (QOL); however, information about the QOL of people with MPM in Japan is anecdotal. The aims of this study were to investigate the QOL of survivors of MPM in Japan and to determine the factors that correlate with their QOL. METHODS This was a cross sectional study. The included patients were those diagnosed with MPM in Japan. We created a self-administered questionnaire consisting of 64 questions. The questionnaires were sent to hospitals and patient advocacy groups, distributed to the patients, completed, and sent back to the researchers by postal mail. QOL was assessed with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 16 questionnaire (QLQ) and the short version of the core domains of the Comprehensive Quality of Life Outcome questionnaire (CoQoLo). RESULTS In total, 133 questionnaires were collected. The QLQ assessments demonstrated that the survivors of MPM most frequently complained of fatigue, pain, sleep disturbances, and dyspnea. The symptom scales were acceptable, but the functional scales were significantly poorer for the patients with poor performance statuses (PSs). The short CoQoLo assessment was very unfavorable for 'Being free from physical pain.' Being a long-term survivor and a survivor with a poor PS were significantly correlated with poor global health status. CONCLUSIONS Survivors of MPM have impaired function, a variety of symptoms, and lower QOL. Survivors of MPM, even those in good physical condition, need broad support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasuko Nagamatsu
- Graduate School of Nursing Science, St. Luke's International University, 10-1 Akashicho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 1040044, Japan
| | - Isao Oze
- Division of Molecular and Clinical Epidemiology, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, 1-1 Kanokoden, Chigusa-ku, Nagoya, 4648681, Japan
| | - Keisuke Aoe
- National Hospital Organization Yamaguchi-Ube Medical Center, Department of Medical Oncology, 685 Higashikiwa, Ube, 7550241, Japan
| | - Katsuyuki Hotta
- Center for Innovative Clinical Medicine, Okayama University Hospital, 2-5-1 Shikatacho, Okayama, 7008558, Japan
| | - Katsuya Kato
- Department of Radiology, Kawasaki General Medical Center, 2-6-1 Nakasange, Okayama, 7008505, Japan
| | - Junko Nakagawa
- Department of Nursing, Okayama Rosai Hospital, 1-10-25 Chikkomidorimachi, Okayama, 7028055, Japan
| | - Keiko Hara
- Department of Nursing, Okayama Rosai Hospital, 1-10-25 Chikkomidorimachi, Okayama, 7028055, Japan
| | - Takumi Kishimoto
- Department of Medicine, Okayama Rosai Hospital, 1-10-25 Chikkomidorimachi, Okayama, 7028055, Japan
| | - Nobukazu Fujimoto
- Department of Medical Oncology, Okayama Rosai Hospital, 1-10-25 Chikkomidorimachi, Okayama, 7028055, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kindler HL, Ismaila N, Armato SG, Bueno R, Hesdorffer M, Jahan T, Jones CM, Miettinen M, Pass H, Rimner A, Rusch V, Sterman D, Thomas A, Hassan R. Treatment of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Oncol 2018; 36:1343-1373. [PMID: 29346042 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.76.6394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 258] [Impact Index Per Article: 43.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To provide evidence-based recommendations to practicing physicians and others on the management of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Methods ASCO convened an Expert Panel of medical oncology, thoracic surgery, radiation oncology, pulmonary, pathology, imaging, and advocacy experts to conduct a literature search, which included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and prospective and retrospective comparative observational studies published from 1990 through 2017. Outcomes of interest included survival, disease-free or recurrence-free survival, and quality of life. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations. Results The literature search identified 222 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline. Recommendations Evidence-based recommendations were developed for diagnosis, staging, chemotherapy, surgical cytoreduction, radiation therapy, and multimodality therapy in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/thoracic-cancer-guidelines and www.asco.org/guidelineswiki .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hedy L Kindler
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Nofisat Ismaila
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Samuel G Armato
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Raphael Bueno
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Mary Hesdorffer
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Thierry Jahan
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Clyde Michael Jones
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Markku Miettinen
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Harvey Pass
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Andreas Rimner
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Valerie Rusch
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Daniel Sterman
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Anish Thomas
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Raffit Hassan
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
Mesothelioma is an aggressive cancer of pleural and peritoneal cells that is difficult to diagnose and monitor. Numerous studies have attempted to identify a blood- or pleural fluid-based biomarker that could be used in the diagnostic pathway. More recently, there has been interest in the ability of serum/plasma biomarkers to monitor mesothelioma, given the development of newer treatments and limitations of radiological assessment. The majority of research has focused on soluble mesothelin, a soluble glycoprotein expressed by mesothelial cells. Although soluble mesothelin lacks the sensitivity to be used as a standalone diagnostic marker, serial measurements may be informative, with rising concentrations indicating disease progression and poor survival. High concentrations of other soluble glycoproteins, such as osteopontin, fibulin-3 and vascular endothelial growth factor are independently associated with poor prognosis at baseline, although further research is required to ascertain any role outside of clinical trials. More recent literature has focused on the development of novel biomarkers from discovery cohorts. Although many DNA and mRNA biomarkers show promise in the diagnosis or screening of mesothelioma, none have been prospectively evaluated for use in clinical practice. In this review article, we highlight the potential utility of biomarkers and evaluate the existing literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David T Arnold
- Academic Respiratory Unit, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Nick A Maskell
- Academic Respiratory Unit, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Tompa E, Kalcevich C, McLeod C, Lebeau M, Song C, McLeod K, Kim J, Demers PA. The economic burden of lung cancer and mesothelioma due to occupational and para-occupational asbestos exposure. Occup Environ Med 2017; 74:816-822. [PMID: 28756416 PMCID: PMC5740539 DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2016-104173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2016] [Revised: 05/10/2017] [Accepted: 05/20/2017] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To estimate the economic burden of lung cancer and mesothelioma due to occupational and para-occupational asbestos exposure in Canada. METHODS We estimate the lifetime cost of newly diagnosed lung cancer and mesothelioma cases associated with occupational and para-occupational asbestos exposure for calendar year 2011 based on the societal perspective. The key cost components considered are healthcare costs, productivity and output costs, and quality of life costs. RESULTS There were 427 cases of newly diagnosed mesothelioma cases and 1904 lung cancer cases attributable to asbestos exposure in 2011 for a total of 2331 cases. Our estimate of the economic burden is $C831 million in direct and indirect costs for newly identified cases of mesothelioma and lung cancer and $C1.5 billion in quality of life costs based on a value of $C100 000 per quality-adjusted life year. This amounts to $C356 429 and $C652 369 per case, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The economic burden of lung cancer and mesothelioma associated with occupational and para-occupational asbestos exposure is substantial. The estimate identified is for 2331 newly diagnosed, occupational and para-occupational exposure cases in 2011, so it is only a portion of the burden of existing cases in that year. Our findings provide important information for policy decision makers for priority setting, in particular the merits of banning the mining of asbestos and use of products containing asbestos in countries where they are still allowed and also the merits of asbestos removal in older buildings with asbestos insulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emile Tompa
- Institute for Work and Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Economics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Chris McLeod
- Institute for Work and Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,School of Population and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Martin Lebeau
- Institut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et en sécurité du travail (IRSST), Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Chaojie Song
- Occupation Cancer Research Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kim McLeod
- School of Population and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Joanne Kim
- Occupation Cancer Research Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Paul A Demers
- Occupation Cancer Research Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Prognostication and monitoring of mesothelioma using biomarkers: a systematic review. Br J Cancer 2017; 116:731-741. [PMID: 28170372 PMCID: PMC5355927 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2017.22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2016] [Revised: 01/02/2017] [Accepted: 01/11/2017] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Radiological markers of treatment response and prognostication in malignant pleural mesothelioma have limitations due to the morphology of the disease. Serum or pleural fluid biomarkers that could act as an adjunct to radiological assessment would be of significant value. The aim of this review was to collate and summarise the literature relating to this topic. Methods: A systematic review was performed on the databases Pubmed and EMBASE to identify relevant studies. Two independent researchers read the abstracts and used the Quality in Prognostic Studies tool to assess the quality of the evidence. Results: Forty-five studies were identified from the current literature. Twenty studies investigated the role of serum soluble mesothelin with majority suggesting that it has variable utility as a baseline test but when measured serially correlates with treatment response and prognosis. Several studies demonstrated that serum osteopontin correlated with survival at baseline. Other biomarkers have shown prognostic utility in individual studies but are yet to be reproduced in large cohort studies. Conclusions: From the available literature no serum or pleural fluid biomarker was identified that could be recommended currently for routine clinical practice. However, a falling serum soluble mesothelin might correlate with treatment response and improved survival.
Collapse
|
18
|
Nowak AK, Lesterhuis-Vasbinder D, Lesterhuis WJ. New directions in mesothelioma treatment. Lung Cancer Manag 2015. [DOI: 10.2217/lmt.15.32] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
For most patients with mesothelioma, symptom control and palliative chemotherapy are mainstays of care. First-line cisplatin/pemetrexed chemotherapy has demonstrated survival and quality-of-life benefits. A randomized controlled trial adding bevacizumab to cisplatin and pemetrexed recently reported improved survival and time to progression, and may constitute a new standard of care where economically viable. Immunotherapy is under active investigation and positive results have been reported from single-arm studies of the anti-CTLA4 antibody tremelimumab; the anti-PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab; and mesothelin-targeting strategies. Symptom control remains critical for patient well-being, and includes management of pleural effusion, analgesia, treatment of symptomatic masses and management of systemic symptoms. There is increasing evidence that tunneled pleural catheters are preferred over talc pleurodesis for recurrent pleural effusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna K Nowak
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Hospital Ave, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia
- School of Medicine & Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, M503 35 Stirling Hwy Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
- National Research Centre for Asbestos Related Diseases, M503 35 Stirling Hwy Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
| | - Dorit Lesterhuis-Vasbinder
- School of Medicine & Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, M503 35 Stirling Hwy Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
- National Research Centre for Asbestos Related Diseases, M503 35 Stirling Hwy Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
| | - Willem Joost Lesterhuis
- School of Medicine & Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, M503 35 Stirling Hwy Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
- National Research Centre for Asbestos Related Diseases, M503 35 Stirling Hwy Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
The South West Area Mesothelioma and Pemetrexed trial: a multicentre prospective observational study evaluating novel markers of chemotherapy response and prognostication. Br J Cancer 2015; 112:1175-82. [PMID: 25756396 PMCID: PMC4385956 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2015.62] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Revised: 01/25/2015] [Accepted: 01/27/2015] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Robust markers that predict prognosis and detect early treatment response in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) would enhance patient care. Methods: Consecutive patients with MPM who were considered fit for first-line chemotherapy were prospectively recruited. Patients of similar performance status opting for best supportive care were included as a comparator group. Baseline and interval CT, PET-CT and serum markers (mesothelin, fibulin-3 and neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR)) were obtained, and patients followed up for a minimum 12 months. Findings: Seventy-three patients were recruited (58 chemotherapy/15 comparator arm). Baseline TGV (total glycolytic volume on PET-CT) was an independent predictor of worse overall survival (OS) (P=0.001). Change in interval TGV(baseline/after two cycles of chemotherapy) did not predict OS or chemotherapy response on CT. Baseline NLR<4 was an independent predictor of better OS (median survival 453 (IQR 272–576) days vs NLR⩾4, 257 (IQR 147–490), P=0.002). Although baseline serum mesothelin did not predict OS, a falling level at 8 weeks significantly predicted longer time to progression (TTP) (P<0.001). Interpretation: Neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio and baseline TGV predict prognosis in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), but PET-CT is unhelpful in monitoring chemotherapy response. Serum mesothelin is a useful early treatment response marker when measured serially during chemotherapy and may have a role in evaluating patients' treatment response.
Collapse
|