Comprehensive geriatric assessment in 326 older women with early breast cancer

Development and validation of a prediction model for frailty in breast cancer patients with extended survival

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer (BC) patients with extended survival show a higher incidence of frailty. This study aimed to develop and validate a novel model combining sociodemographic factors (SF) and disease-related factors (DRF) to identify frailty in BC patients with extended survival.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study examined data from 1167 patients admitted to a large urban academic medical centre. Three types of predictive models were constructed in the training set (817 patients): the SF model, the DRF model, and the SF + DRF model (combined model). The model performance and effectiveness were assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration plots and decision curves analysis (DCA). Then the model was subsequently validated on the validation set.

RESULTS

The incidence of frailty in BC patients with extended survival was 35.8%. We identified six independent risk factors including age, health status, chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, number of comorbidities and oral medications. Ultimately, we constructed an optimal model (combined model C) for frailty. The predictive model showed significantly high discriminative accuracy in the training set AUC: 0.754, (95% CI, 0.719-0.789; sensitivity: 76.8%, specificity: 62.2%) and validation set AUC: 0.805, (95% CI, 0.76-0.85), sensitivity: 60.8%, specificity: 87.1%) respectively. A prediction nomogram was constructed for the training and validation sets. Calibration and DCA were performed, which indicated that the clinical model presented satisfactory calibration and clinical utility. Ultimately, we implemented the prediction model into a mobile-friendly web application that provides an accurate and individualized prediction for BC.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study demonstrated that the prevalence of frailty in BC patients with extended survival was 35.8%. We developed a novel model for screening frailty, which may provide evidence for frailty screening and prevention.

Triple-negative and Her2-positive breast cancer in women aged 70 and over: prognostic impact of age according to treatment

Background

Elderly breast cancer (BC) patients have been underrepresented in clinical trials whereas ~60% of deaths from BC occur in women aged 70 years and older. Only limited data are available on the prognostic impact of age according to treatment, especially in the triple-negative (TN) and Her2-positive because of the lower frequency of these subtypes in elderly patients. We report herein the results of a multicenter retrospective study analyzing the prognostic impact of age according to treatment delivered in TN and Her2-positive BC patients of 70 years or older, including comparison by age groups.

Methods

The medical records of 31,473 patients treated from January 1991 to December 2018 were retrieved from 13 French cancer centers for retrospective analysis. Our study population included all ≥70 patients with TN or Her2-positive BC treated by upfront surgery. Three age categories were determined: 70-74, 75-80, and > 80 years.

Results

Of 528 patients included, 243 patients were 70-74 years old (46%), 172 were 75-80 years (32.6%) and 113 were >80 years (21.4%). Half the population (51.9%, 274 patients) were TN, 30.1% (159) Her2-positive/hormone receptors (HR)-positive, and, 18% (95) Her2-positive/endocrine receptors (ER)-negative BC. Advanced tumor stage was associated with older age but no other prognostic factors (tumor subtype, tumor grade, LVI). Adjuvant chemotherapy delivery was inversely proportional to age. With 49 months median follow-up, all patient outcomes (overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS)) significantly decreased as age increased. In multivariate analysis, age >80, pT2-3 sizes, axillary macrometastases, lymphovascular involvement, and HR-negativity tumor negatively affected DFS and OS. Comparison between age >80 and <=80 years old showed worse RFS in patients aged > 80 (HR=1.771, p=0.031).

Conclusion

TN and Her2-positive subtypes occur at similar frequency in elderly patients. Older age is associated with more advanced tumor stage presentation. Chemotherapy use decreases with older age without worse other pejorative prognostic factors. Age >80, but not ≤80, independently affected DFS and OS.

Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment for Older Women with Early-Stage (Non-Metastatic) Breast Cancer-An Updated Systematic Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

A previous systematic review by our team (2012) undertook comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) in breast cancer and concluded there was not sufficient evidence to instate CGA as mandatory practice. SIOG/EUSOMA guidelines published in 2021 advocate the use of CGA in breast cancer patients. The aim is to perform an updated systematic review of the literature.

METHODS

A systematic review of studies published between 2012 and 2022 that assessed the use of CGA in breast cancer was performed on Cochrane, PubMed and Embase.

RESULTS

A total of 18 articles including 4734 patients with breast cancer were identified. The studies covered four themes for use of CGA in breast cancer: (1) to determine factors influencing survival (2) as an adjunct to treatment decision-making (3) to measure quality of life, and (4) to determine which tools should be included. There was evidence to support the use of CGA in themes 1-3; however, it is uncertain which assessment tools are best to use (theme 4).

CONCLUSIONS

CGA can be used to determine factors affecting survival and quality of life in breast cancer patients and can therefore be used to aid treatment decision-making. Further work is required to determine gold standard CGA.

Adjuvant treatment decisions among adults aged 65 years and older with early-stage hormone receptor positive breast cancer seen in a simple multidisciplinary clinic versus standard consultation

INTRODUCTION

Randomized studies support de-escalation of adjuvant therapy for a target population of older adults ≥65 years with stage I, estrogen-receptor (ER) positive breast cancer after breast conserving surgery. We sought to evaluate the impact of a simplified multidisciplinary clinic (s-MDC) in this population by comparing treatment patterns and patient perceptions of adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) and hormone therapy (HT) between patients seen in s-MDC vs. standard consultations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for patients in the above target population who underwent surgery between August 2020 and May 2022 at our institution. Two cohorts were included: (1) patients seen in s-MDC, and (2) patients seen in standard clinic separately by medical and radiation oncology (non-s-MDC cohort). The non-s-MDC patients declined, could not attend, and/or were not referred to the s-MDC. Patients in the s-MDC cohort were prospectively administered validated questionnaires to evaluate patient reported data including the Decision Autonomy Preference Scale (DAPS), e-Prognosis, and Medical Maximizing-Minimizing Scale (MMS). Chi square, t-tests, and non-parametric equivalents compared demographics, and logistic regression evaluated RT and HT use and survey score outcomes between cohorts.

RESULTS

A total of 127 patients met inclusion criteria, with 33 s-MDC and 94 non-s-MDC patients. There was no difference between the cohorts in age, margin status, histology, grade, or focality. In the s-MDC cohort there were significantly more patients without sentinel lymph node biopsy (71.3% vs 42.4%, p = 0.003) and mean tumor size was smaller (0.69 vs. 0.96 cm, p < 0.003), and Charlson comborbidity index (CCI) was higher (5.21 vs 4.96, p = 0.038). There was no significant difference in receipt of RT (65% s-MDC vs 77% standard; odds ratio [OR] = 0.55, p = 0.189), HT (78% ss-MDC vs 72% standard; OR = 1.36, p = 0.513), or both (50% s-MDC vs 59% standard; OR = 0.7, p = 0.429). The s-MDC cohort was significantly more likely to undergo accelerated (vs. standard hypofractionated) RT (70% vs 39%; OR = 3.59, p = 0.020). In s-MDC patients with completed questionnaires (n = 33), all whose selected "mostly patient (n=6)" based decision making by DAPS chose RT while all "mostly doctor (n=1)" chose no RT. Based on e-Prognosis, there were lower odds of RT for increasing Schonberg score/ higher 10 yr mortality risk (OR 0.600, p = 0.048). MMS score ≥ 40 ("maximizer") was strongly linked with the use of RT (OR 18.57, p = 0.011).

DISCUSSION

For adults ≥65 years with early stage, ER positive breast cancer, s-MDC participation was not significantly associated with lower use of adjuvant RT or HT versus standard consultation but was significantly associated with shorter RT courses. DAPS and MMS results indicate that patient treatment preference may be predictable, highlighting an opportunity to tailor consultation discussions and recommendations based on intrinsic patient preferences and individual goals.

Management and Outcomes of Older Patients (Age ≥ 70 Years) with Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma and Role of Geriatric Assessment and Oncological Multidimensional Prognostic Index (Onco-MPI) in a Real-World Setting

Background: Incidences of soft tissue sarcomas (STS) steadily increase with age. Yet, despite the high prevalence in advanced age, older patients (pts) are underrepresented in sarcoma clinical trials and evidence-based guidelines for chemotherapy are lacking. International oncological societies suggest using geriatric tools to evaluate older patients with cancer to optimise treatment indication. Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is a multidimensional assessment of older subjects, based on which pts can be classified as fit, vulnerable or frail. Onco-MPI (multidimensional prognostic index) is a CGA-based score which also considers tumour characteristics, classifying pts into three risk groups of death at one year: high-risk, intermediate-risk and low-risk. Methods: This is a single-centre retrospective study which aims at describing real-word management and outcomes of older pts with advanced stage STS and at assessing the ability of CGA and onco-MPI to predict survival in these pts. Consecutive pts with advanced stage STS aged 70 years or older and treated at the Istituto Oncologico Veneto from January 2009 to June 2020 were retrieved from a prospectively maintained database. Pts' demographics, CGA assessments and tumour characteristics were analysed. Statistical analysis was performed with R version 3.4.3 Results: Out of 101 pts, with a median age of 77 years, 76 received chemotherapy (75.3%), which was anthracycline-based for 46 pts (60.5%). Anthracyclines were used in a higher proportion in fit pts (58.9% fit vs. 45.1% vulnerable vs. 12.5% frail pts). Frail pts and pts in the onco-MPI high-risk group experienced a higher rate of chemotherapy-related toxicities. Median OS was 13.8 months (95% CI 11.3-17.7 months). According to CGA, the median OS was 19.53 months (95% CI 15.23-36.8) for fit pts, 12.83 months (95% CI 9.7-17.5) for vulnerable and 7.75 months (95% CI 2.73-30) for frail pts (p = 0.005). Onco-MPI confirmed a predictive value for 1-year survival with intermediate risk pts not reaching a median OS at 1 year, and high-risk pts having a median one-year OS of 11.5 months (95%CI 9.7-NA), p = 0.02. In multivariate analysis, onco-MPI and CGA were associated with survival (high risk onco-MPI: HR 5.5, 95%CI 1.25-24.7 p = 0.02; fitness at CGA HR 0.552 95% 0.314-0.973; p = 0.040) as well as chemotherapy use (HR 0.24, 95% CI 0.11-0.51, p < 0.005). Conclusions: Both CGA and onco-MPI retain prognostic value for survival in pts with metastatic STS. Pts frail/vulnerable at CGA and pts within the onco-MPI high risk category should be offered an oncogeriatric management approach in order to optimise treatment-related survival and reduce toxicity.

Geriatric assessment for older patients with breast cancer: A single-institution study

Introduction

Although geriatric assessment (GA) has been used for a long time in the field of geriatrics and internal medicine, there are few studies on its application in the field of breast surgery. Therefore, the utility of specific GA domains for the assessment of older patients with breast cancer remains unclear. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the association between specific GA domains and the survival rate of older patients with breast cancer.

Methods

We used the database of Peking Union Medical College Hospital to identify older patients who were newly diagnosed with breast cancer between 2012 and 2018 and retrospectively analysed the data of 541 patients aged ≥65 years. Patients with metastatic cancer and those with missing vital status data were excluded. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival. The GA domains used in this study included functional status, comorbidities, and psychological state. Multivariate regression analysis was used to estimate hazard ratios for these three domains.

Results

After a median follow-up of 72 months, we observed a significant relationship between functional impairment and mortality (adjusted HR: 3.06, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.83-5.10, P<0.001). Similarly, patients with severe comorbidities (adjusted HR: 2.35; 95% CI: 1.16-4.75, P=0.017) and an impaired psychological state (adjusted HR: 2.82, 95% CI: 1.45-5.50, P=0.002) showed worse OS rates. Accordingly, addition of the three GA domains to the basic model, which included age, tumour stage, lymph node stage, and intrinsic molecular subtype as baseline variables, yielded higher C-statistics for mortality analysis (from 0.713 to 0.740).

Conclusion

To our knowledge, this is the first study to include specific GA domains in a prognostic model for older patients with breast cancer in China. Three domains, namely functional status, comorbidities, and psychological state, should be considered for survival analyses in this particular population. The full model including these three GA domains may be more accurate in predicting the survival of older patients with breast cancer.

The prevalence of frailty among breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Coexistence of frailty and breast cancer (BC) is related to a higher risk of hospitalization, mortality, and falls. Given the potential reversibility of frailty, investigating its epidemiology in BC is of great importance. However, estimates of the prevalence of frailty in BC patients vary considerably. We synthesized the existing body of literature on the prevalence of frailty among BC patients.

METHODS

We searched English databases (Cochrane Library, PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science) and Chinese databases (CNKI, WanFang, CBM, and VIP database) from the inception to April 15, 2021, and collected observational studies about the prevalence of frailty among BC patients. The robustness of the pooled estimates was validated by analysis of different subgroups, meta-regression, and sensitivity. All data were analyzed using Stata 15.1.

RESULTS

In total, 4645 articles were screened and data from 24 studies involving 13,510 subjects were used in the meta-analysis. The prevalence of frailty among BC patients in individual studies varied from 5 to 71%. The pooled prevalence of frailty was 43% (95% confidence intervals (CI): 36% to 50%, I² = 98.4%, P < 0.05). Subgroup analyses revealed that the therapeutic method, frailty scales, age, frailty stage, regions, publication years, and study quality were associated with the prevalence of frailty among BC patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of frailty among BC patients was relatively high, and the conditions of BC treatment can increase the risk of frailty. Understanding the effects of frailty on BC, especially in elderly patients, can provide the healthcare personnel with the theoretical basis for patients' management and treatment.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: An Advanced Personalized Multidisciplinary Prehabilitation Model (APMP-M) to Optimize Outcomes

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is increasingly being employed in the management of breast cancer patients. Efforts and resources have been devoted over the years to the search for an optimal strategy that can improve outcomes in the neoadjuvant setting. Today, a multidisciplinary approach with the application of evidence-based medicine is considered the gold standard for the improvement of oncological results and patient satisfaction. However, several clinical complications and psychological issues due to various factors can arise during neoadjuvant therapy and undermine outcomes. To ensure that health care needs are adequately addressed, clinicians must consider that women with breast cancer have a high risk of developing "unmet needs" during treatment, and often require a clinical intervention or additional care resources to limit possible complications and psychological issues that can occur during neoadjuvant treatment. This work describes a multidisciplinary model developed at "Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli" (FPG) in Rome in an effort to optimize treatment, ease the application of evidence-based medicine, and improve patient quality of life in the neoadjuvant setting. In developing our model, our main goal was to adequately meet patient needs while preventing high levels of distress.

Association of Chemotherapy With Survival in Elderly Patients With Multiple Comorbidities and Estrogen Receptor-Positive, Node-Positive Breast Cancer

Importance

Breast cancer risk and comorbidities increase with age. Data are lacking on the association of adjuvant chemotherapy with survival in elderly patients with multiple comorbidities and node-positive breast cancer.

Objective

To examine the association of chemotherapy with survival in elderly patients with multiple comorbidities and estrogen receptor-positive, node-positive breast cancer.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective cohort study included patients in the US National Cancer Database who were 70 years or older; had a Charlson/Deyo comorbidity score of 2 or 3; had estrogen receptor-positive, ERBB2 (formerly HER2 or HER2/neu)-negative breast cancer; and underwent surgery for pathologic node-positive breast cancer from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2014. Propensity scores were used to match patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy with those not receiving adjuvant chemotherapy based on age, comorbidity score, facility type, facility location, pathologic T and N stage, and receipt of adjuvant endocrine and radiation therapy. Data analysis was performed from December 13, 2018, to April 28, 2020.

Exposures

Chemotherapy.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The association of adjuvant chemotherapy with overall survival was estimated using a double robust Cox proportional hazards regression model.

Results

Of a total of 2 445 870 patients in the data set, 1592 patients (mean [SD] age, 77.5 [5.5] years; 1543 [96.9%] female) met the inclusion criteria and were included in the initial nonmatched analysis. Of these patients, 350 (22.0%) received chemotherapy and 1242 (78.0%) did not. Compared with patients who did not receive chemotherapy, patients who received chemotherapy were younger (mean age, 74 vs 78 years; P < .001), had larger primary tumors (pT3/T4 tumors: 72 [20.6%] vs 182 [14.7%]; P = .005), and had higher pathologic nodal burden (75 [21.4%] vs 81 [6.5%] with stage pN3 disease and 182 [52.0%] vs 936 [75.4%] with stage pN1 disease; P < .001). More patients who received chemotherapy also received other adjuvant treatments, including endocrine therapy (309 [88.3%] vs 1025 [82.5%]; P = .01) and radiation therapy (236 [67.4%] vs 540 [43.5%]; P < .001). In the matched cohort, with a median follow-up of 43.1 months (95% CI, 39.6-46.5 months), no statistically significant difference was found in median overall survival between the chemotherapy and no chemotherapy groups (78.9 months [95% CI, 78.9 months to not reached] vs 62.7 months [95% CI, 56.2 months to not reached]; P = .13). After adjustment for potential confounding factors, receipt of chemotherapy was associated with improved survival (hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.48-0.93; P = .02).

Conclusions and Relevance

This cohort study found that in node-positive, estrogen receptor-positive elderly patients with breast cancer and multiple comorbidities, receipt of chemotherapy was associated with improved overall survival. Despite attempts to adjust for selection bias, these findings suggest that physicians carefully selected patients likely to derive treatment benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy based on certain unmeasured variables. A standardized, multidisciplinary approach to care may be associated with long-term treatment outcomes in this subset of the population.

The Frailty Syndrome: A Critical Issue in Geriatric Oncology

The number of older adults with cancer is growing in the United States, and there is a relative paucity of data relating the presence of frailty with its outcomes of interest. The authors present the surgical oncology, radiation oncology, and medical oncology literature with respect to the presence of frailty in older adults with cancer. More research is needed to understand how the presence of frailty should be used by surgical, radiation, and medical oncologists to guide patient counseling and treatment planning.

Radiotherapy for nonagenarians: the value of biological versus chronological age

Background

The number of nonagenarian cancer patients (≥ 90 years) is continuously increasing, and radiotherapy is performed in a relevant proportion of patients, as surgery and chemotherapy are often not feasible for these patients. However, the evidence regarding the feasibility and treatment outcomes after radiotherapy for this patient group is very limited.

Methods

All nonagenarian patients receiving (chemo) radiotherapy between 2009 and 2019 at the University of Freiburg - Medical Center were analyzed for patterns of care, overall survival (OS) and therapy-associated toxicities according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Uni- and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to assess the influence of patient- and treatment-related factors on patient outcomes.

Results

One hundred nineteen patients with a total of 137 irradiated lesions were included in this analysis. After a median follow-up of 27 months, median OS was 10 months with a 3-year OS amounting to 11.1%. Univariate analyses demonstrated that a reduced performance status (HR = 1.56, 95% CI 1.00–2.45, p < 0.05), a higher burden of comorbidities (HR = 2.00, 95% CI 1.00–4.10, p < 0.05) and higher UICC tumor stages (HR = 2.21, 95% CI 1.14–4.26, p < 0.05) were associated with impaired survival rates. Split-course treatments (HR = 2.05, 95% CI 1.07–3.94, p < 0.05), non-completion of radiotherapy (HR = 7.17, 95% CI 3.88–13.26, p < 0.001) and palliative treatments (HR = 2.84, 95% CI 1.68–4.81, p < 0.05) were found to result in significantly reduced OS. In the multivariate analysis, split-course concepts (HR = 2.21, 95% CI 1.10–4.37, p < 0.05) and palliative treatments (HR = 3.19, 95% CI 1.77–5.75, p < 0.001) significantly deteriorated outcomes, while impaired ECOG status (HR = 1.49, 95% CI 0.91–2.43, p = 0.11) did not. The vast majority of patients reported either no (n = 40; 33.6%) or grade 1–2 acute toxicities (n = 66; 55.5%), and only very few higher-grade toxicities were observed in our study.

Conclusion

Radiotherapy for nonagenarian patients is generally feasible and associated with a low toxicity profile. Given the relatively poor OS rates and the importance of the quality of life for this patient group, individualized treatment regimens including hypofractionation concepts should be considered.

[Cross-speciality geriatrics: A health-care challenge for the 21st century]

Increasing numbers of older persons are being treated by specialties other than Geriatric Medicine. Specialists turn to Geriatric Teams when they need to accurately stratify their patients' risk and prognosis, predict the potential impact of their, often, invasive interventions, optimise their clinical status, and contribute to discharge planning. Oncology and Haematology, Cardiology, General Surgery, and other surgical departments are examples where such collaborative working is already established, to a varying extent. The use of the term "Cross-speciality Geriatrics" is suggested when geriatric care is provided in clinical areas traditionally outside the reach of Geriatric Teams. The core principles of Geriatric Medicine (comprehensive geriatric assessment, patient-centred multidisciplinary targeted interventions, and input at point-of-care) are adapted to the specifics of each specialty and applied to frail older patients in order to deliver a holistic assessment/treatment, better patient/carer experience, and improved clinical outcomes. Using Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment methodology and Frailty scoring in such patients provides invaluable prognostic information, helps in decision making, and enables personalised treatment strategies. There is evidence that such an approach improves the efficiency of health care systems and patient outcomes. This article includes a review of these concepts, describes existing models of care, presents the most commonly used clinical tools, and offers examples of excellence in this new era of geriatric care. In an ever ageing population it is likely that teams will be asked to provide Cross-specialty Geriatrics across different Health Care systems. The fundamentals for its implementation are in place, but further evidence is required to guide future development and consolidation, making it one of the most important challenges for Geriatrics in the coming years.

Addressing frailty in patients with breast cancer: A review of the literature

Various studies have documented variation in the management of older patients with breast cancer, and some of this variation stems from different approaches to balancing the expected benefit of different treatments, with the ability of patients to tolerate them. Frailty is an emerging concept that can help to make clinical decisions for older patients more consistent, not least by providing a measure of 'biological' ageing. This would reduce reliance on 'chronological' age, which is not a reliable guide for decisions on the appropriate breast cancer care for older patients. This article examines the potential of frailty assessment to inform on breast cancer treatments. Overall, the current evidence highlights various benefits from implementing comprehensive geriatric assessment and screening for frailty in breast cancer patients. This includes a role in supporting the selection of appropriate therapies and improving physical fitness prior to treatment. However, there are challenges in implementing routine frailty assessments in a breast cancer service. Studies have used a diverse array of frailty assessment instruments, which hampers the generalisability of research findings. Consequently, a number of issues need to be addressed to clearly establish the optimal timing of frailty assessment and the role of geriatric medicine specialists in the breast cancer care pathway.

Outcome of patients with breast cancer in the oldest old (≥80 years)

PURPOSE

In the present study, we present a large institutional study to determine the influence of age≥ 80 years on breast cancer presentation and prognosis.

METHODS

The study is a retrospective analysis of our prospectively maintained breast cancer database study using data from of women managed from January 2007 through December 2013. Clinicopathologic characteristics were correlated with outcomes according to age (<80 years and ≥ 80 years).

RESULTS

During the study period, 2083 women with invasive breast cancer were included of which 160 women aged ≥ 80 years (7.7 %). Overall survival was lower in the oldest old than in younger counterparts (p < 0.0001) as was distant metastasis free survival (p = 0.004). Differences in management included more radical surgeries and less chemotherapy and radiotherapy in case of age≥ 80 years. By multivariate analysis, age ≥ 80 years was an independent predictive factor of poor overall survival.

CONCLUSION

In the present study, age ≥ 80 years was an independent predictive factor of poor overall survival.

Surgery in the Older Patient with Breast Cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Breast cancer incidence and mortality increase with age. Older patients (≥ 70) are often excluded from studies. Due to multiple factors, it is unclear whether this population is best-treated using standard guidelines. Here, we review surgical management in older women with breast cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

Geriatric assessments can guide treatment recommendations and aid in predicting survival and quality of life. Surgery remains a principal component of breast cancer treatment in older patients, though differences exist compared with younger women, including higher mastectomy rates and evidence-based support of omission of post-lumpectomy radiation or axillary dissection in subsets of patients. In those forgoing surgical management, there is increased use of endocrine therapy. Hospice is also a valuable element of end-of-life care. Physicians should utilize geriatric assessment to make treatment recommendations for older breast cancer patients, including omission of radiation therapy, alterations to standard surgeries, or enrollment in hospice care.

Breast Cancer in Women Aged 80 Years or Older: An Analysis of Treatment Patterns and Disease Outcomes

No clear standard treatment guidelines exist for older women with breast cancer. In this study we aimed to examine the practice patterns and treatment outcomes of women ≥80 years old with invasive breast cancer. A retrospective chart review at a single academic institution was performed of 124 women diagnosed with stage I to III invasive breast cancer aged ≥80 years between 2005 and 2014. Median age of diagnosis was 84 years. Fifty-nine of the cancers (48%) were detected using mammography. One hundred twelve patients (90%) underwent surgery. There was no difference in comorbidities between the surgical and nonsurgical group (P = .800). In multivariate analysis, age was predictive of receiving surgery (P < .001). Overall survival probability was higher for those who received hormonal therapy (P = .002), radiation therapy (P = .041), and those with lower-stage tumors (P = .018). Surgery was not predictive of survival. It is important to consider comorbidities, complications and, longevity when determining whether elderly women diagnosed with breast cancer benefit from surgery.

Axillary Nodal Evaluation in Elderly Breast Cancer Patients: Potential Effects on Treatment Decisions and Survival

BACKGROUND

Recent studies suggest that surgical lymph node (LN) evaluation may be omitted in select elderly breast cancer patients as it may not influence adjuvant therapy decisions. To evaluate differences in adjuvant therapy receipt and overall survival (OS), we compared clinically node-negative (cN0) elderly patients who did and did not undergo axillary surgery.

METHODS

Patients aged ≥70 years in the National Cancer Database (2004-2014) with cT1-3, cN0 breast cancer were divided into two cohorts-those with surgical LN evaluation (one or more nodes removed) and those without (no nodes removed). Propensity scores were used to match patients based on age, year of diagnosis, tumor grade, cT stage, estrogen receptor status, and Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the effect of LN surgery on OS.

RESULTS

Overall, 133,778 patients were matched, of whom 102,247 patients (76.4%) underwent nodal surgery. Patients undergoing nodal surgery were more likely to receive chemotherapy (pN1-3: 22.2%; pN0: 5.8%; cN0-no nodal surgery: 2.8%; p < 0.001), radiation (pN1-3: 49.7%; pN0: 47.5%; cN0-no nodal surgery: 26%; p < 0.001), and endocrine therapy (pN1-3: 72%; pN0: 58.5%; cN0-no nodal surgery: 46.5%; p < 0.001). After adjustment for known covariates, patients who did not undergo nodal surgery had a worse OS (hazard ratio 1.66, 95% confidence interval 1.61-1.70).

CONCLUSIONS

For elderly cN0 breast cancer patients, axillary surgery was associated with higher rates of adjuvant therapy and improved OS. A selective approach to omitting nodal surgery should be considered in elderly patients with cN0 breast cancer as axillary staging may influence subsequent treatment decisions and long-term outcomes.