Anlotinib as a third-line therapy in patients with refractory advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a multicentre, randomised phase II trial (ALTER0302). Br J Cancer. 2018;118:654-661. [PMID: 29438373 PMCID: PMC5846072 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2017.478]

Anlotinib in combination with docetaxel for advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer after failure of platinum-based treatment: A phase 1/2 trial

BACKGROUND

The combination of anlotinib with chemotherapy has demonstrated encouraging efficacy in the treatment of nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The objective of this phase 1/2 trial was to establish the maximum tolerated dose of anlotinib in combination with docetaxel and to assess the efficacy and safety of this regimen in patients with advanced NSCLC who had progressed after platinum-based chemotherapy.

METHODS

In the phase 1 trial, eight patients were enrolled to determine the maximum tolerated dose, which was identified as 10 mg for anlotinib in combination with docetaxel. In the phase 2 trial, in total, 88 patients were randomized, with 57 receiving anlotinib at the established maximum tolerated dose alongside docetaxel and 31 receiving docetaxel monotherapy. Tumor response was evaluated in 88 patients.

RESULTS

In the phase 2 study, the combination of anlotinib and docetaxel demonstrated a significant improvement in progression-free survival compared with docetaxel monotherapy (median, 5.39 vs. 2.56 months; hazard ratio, 0.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.21-0.63; p = .0002). The objective response rate was also superior in the combination group (26.32% vs. 6.45%). The median overall survival was 16.82 months for the combination group versus 9.86 months for the monotherapy group (hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.47-1.66; p = .7114). Safety analysis included 96 patients, and the most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events were decreased neutrophil count and decreased white blood cell count.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of anlotinib to docetaxel was characterized by a manageable safety profile and also resulted in a significant improvement in progression-free survival among patients with advanced NSCLC who had previously failed platinum-based chemotherapy (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03726736).

Efficacy of toripalimab in combination with anlotinib in recurrent undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma of the sinonasal region: a case report with biomarker analysis

Background

Soft tissue sarcoma (STS) typically originates in the muscles and is associated with a poor prognosis. Undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) is the most commonly diagnosed subtype of STS; however, UPS occurring in the sinonasal region is exceedingly rare and lacks effective treatment options.

Objective

This case report presents a patient with sinonasal UPS who experienced disease progression after surgery and chemotherapy but showed a positive response to combination therapy with toripalimab and anlotinib. Additionally, it explores the underlying biomarkers associated with this case.

Case

A 63-year-old woman with no significant past medical history was diagnosed with sinonasal UPS. The lesions recurred despite seven extensive surgical resections, and standard chemotherapy failed to control the disease, leading to progressive disease (PD).

Results

The patient was treated with a combination of toripalimab and anlotinib, resulting in a significant partial response (PR) after just two cycles. Continued PR was observed after an additional six cycles, indicating the potential for a prolonged response with ongoing therapy. Genotyping and immunohistochemistry revealed that the sarcoma cells were rapidly dividing and enriched in vasculature prior to systemic treatment.

Conclusion

These findings suggest that the combination of toripalimab and anlotinib may be an effective treatment option for advanced cases of UPS in the sinonasal region.

Efficacy and safety of anlotinib plus EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in slow- or locally progressing non-small cell lung cancer after adjuvant therapy

Background

Anlotinib, a small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), suppresses angiogenesis and tumor progression. As the mechanisms underlying the resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-TKIs are complex and diverse, further exploration of new treatment strategies is necessary. Combination therapy with EGFR-TKIs and anlotinib targets multiple signaling pathways, enhancing efficacy in patients with EGFR-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of anlotinib with EGFR-TKIs in patients with NSCLC who developed resistance to postoperative adjuvant therapy.

Methods

From January 2020 to December 2023, 48 patients at the Department of Thoracic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, who developed resistance to adjuvant therapy were included in this retrospective study. All patients received anlotinib (10-12 mg, po, d1-14, q3w) alongside their original EGFR-TKI regimen. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), while secondary endpoints included 6- and 12-month PFS rates, overall survival (OS), and safety. PFS was defined as the time from the initiation of anlotinib plus EGFR-TKI to disease progression or death, and OS was defined as the time from the start of anlotinib plus EGFR-TKI to death from any cause.

Results

Among the 48 patients, 23 previously received first- or second-generation EGFR-TKIs, and 25 received third-generation EGFR-TKIs. As of March 25, 2024, the median follow-up duration was 33.3 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 23.2-43.3]. The median PFS was 9.5 months (95% CI: 4.8-14.3), and 6- and 12-month PFS rates were 70.8% and 47.9%, respectively. For patients previously treated with first-/second- and third-generation EGFR-TKIs, the median PFS was 10.3 months (95% CI: 6.1-14.4) and 7.7 months (95% CI: 4.8-10.6), with a 6-month PFS rate of 69.6% and 72.0%, respectively, and a 12-month PFS rate of 47.8% and 48.0%, respectively. The median OS was 31.0 months [95% CI: not reached (NR)-NR], with 6-month and 12-month rates of 91.7% and 85.4%, respectively. For patients previously treated with first-/second- and third-generation EGFR-TKIs, the median OS was NR and 20.3 months (95% CI: 10.7-30.0), respectively; meanwhile, the OS rates were 95.7% and 88.0% at 6 months, and 91.3% and 80.0% at 12 months, respectively. The incidence rates of any grade and grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were 75.0% (36/48) and 10.4% (5/48), respectively. The most common TRAEs included hypertension (17/48, 35.4%), proteinuria (15/48, 31.3%), rash (11/48, 22.9%), fatigue (5/48, 10.4%), and diarrhea (4/48, 8.3%), and no new safety events were observed. Dose reduction and discontinuation of anlotinib were reported in four (8.3%) and five (10.4%) patients previously treated with first-/second- and third-generation EGFR-TKIs, respectively.

Conclusions

Patients with NSCLC who developed resistance to postoperative EGFR-TKIs demonstrated promising efficacy and manageable safety, extending the treatment window and survival opportunities.

Osimertinib plus anlotinib for advanced NSCLC with acquired EGFR T790M mutation: results from a multicenter phase II study with ctDNA analysis

BACKGROUND

Osimertinib is a standard treatment for first- or second-line therapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). However, options are limited for patients with acquired EGFR T790M mutations resistant to first- or second-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). This study assessed the efficacy and safety of combining osimertinib with anlotinib in this patient population and explored circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a biomarker of treatment outcomes.

METHODS

In this prospective, single-arm, phase II trial, 31 patients with advanced NSCLC resistant to prior first- or second-generation EGFR-TKIs therapy received osimertinib (80 mg daily) and anlotinib (12 mg daily on days 1-14 of each 21-day cycle). Efficacy endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). ctDNA was analyzed using next-generation sequencing (NGS) to monitor mutation status and treatment response.

RESULTS

The median PFS was 16.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 9.8-23.6, 90% CI 14.2-20.9), and the median OS was 31.4 months (95% CI 27.3-not reached). The objective response rate (ORR) was 45.2% (95% CI 30.6-66.6%), with a disease control rate (DCR) of 96.8% (95% CI 86.3-100.0%). ctDNA analysis showed that activating EGFR mutation clearance after two treatment cycles correlated with significantly longer PFS and OS. The regimen was well-tolerated, with no grade 4 or higher adverse events observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Osimertinib combined with anlotinib demonstrates promising long-term efficacy and manageable safety in EGFR T790M-positive NSCLC. Clearance of ctDNA, particularly of EGFR mutations, could serve as a valuable predictive biomarker, supporting the implementation of personalized treatment strategies.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04029350.

Development and validation of a risk-prediction model for adverse drug reactions in real-world cancer patients treated with anlotinib

Background

The risk factors related to the adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of anlotinib have been rarely investigated. In addition, a corresponding risk prediction model has not been established in China pertaining to anlotinib-related ADRs.

Objectives

To manage ADRs more efficiently and improve the prognosis of patients administered anlotinib.

Design

A retrospective analysis was conducted using the medical records of patients diagnosed with cancer who were administered anlotinib after hospitalization between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2023.

Methods

We performed a combination of univariate analysis and multivariate binary logistic regression analysis to identify significant factors that can accurately predict ADRs. Model fitting was performed using forward selection. The accuracy of the prediction model was expressed as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The final ADR risk model was validated.

Results

In this study, 300 patients who were administered anlotinib were included. Among them, 238 (79.33%) patients experienced at least one ADR. Diagnosis, combination treatment, distant metastasis, treatment lines, and cumulative dose were independent risk factors for the ADRs of anlotinib. The AUC and the concordance index of the nomogram constructed from the above five factors were 0.790 and 0.789, respectively. The results of the Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed that the model was a good fit (p = 0.811). In addition, the decision curve analysis demonstrated a significantly higher net benefit of the model. The external validation indicated that the prediction nomogram was reliable.

Conclusion

We developed and validated a simple model to use the ADR risk score in patients who were administered anlotinib. This risk prediction model was well-calibrated and discriminative. It can be used as a reference for clinical decision-making. It has clinical significance for preventing ADRs, improving the prognosis of patients, and providing support for the rational use of drugs.

Dramatic response of advanced pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma to tislelizumab combined with anlotinib: a case report

Pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma (PSC) is a scarce pathologic type of lung cancer of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that exhibits resistance to conventional chemotherapy and radiotherapy, resulting in a poor prognosis. Herein, a 67-year-old man was admitted to the hospital in January 2022 with a diagnosis of PSC for over 6 months and a newly discovered brain metastasis for 4 days. He had previously undergone two unsuccessful chemotherapy regimens: bevacizumab combined with pemetrexed and loplatin, and albumin-bound paclitaxel combined with loplatin. Radiotherapy was performed for the brain and skull metastases, followed by treatment with tislelizumab combined with anlotinib, a programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor with anti angiogenic drug, respectfully. The patient initially received nine cycles of treatment with tislelizumab and anlotinib, resulting in a significant shrinkage of the lung tumor. Subsequently, anlotinib was discontinued due to bleeding in the brain metastasis, and the patient received two additional cycles of tislelizumab. Following improvement in the hemorrhage from brain metastasis, the patient received two cycles of treatment with tislelizumab and anlotinib. Treatment was subsequently interrupted for 1 month due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, which then resumed with two additional cycles of tislelizumab and anlotinib. Finally, the patient refused to continue treatment due to the progression of the brain metastasis and economic conditions, despite the stable condition. At this point, the patient has achieved over a year of progression-free survival, with overall survival exceeding 39 months. This case illustrates the efficacy and safety of combining antitumor immunotherapy with anlotinib, a targeted anti-angiogenic therapy.

N6-Methyladenosine modification mediated by METTL3 promotes DNA-PKcs expression to induce anlotinib resistance in osteosarcoma

BACKGROUND

Acquired anlotinib resistance is still a key challenge in osteosarcoma treatment. Unravelling the mechanisms underlying anlotinib resistance is the key to optimising its efficacy for treating osteosarcoma. Previous studies have explored the pivotal function of the DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit (DNA-PKcs) with regard to osteosarcoma chemoresistance.

METHODS

We used bioinformatics analysis to predict DNA-PKcs and Beclin-1 interactions, confirmed through immunofluorescence (IF) and co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP). Dual-luciferase analyses and Methylated RNA immunoprecipitation (MeRIP) were implemented to detect the detected m6A modifications. RNA fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH)-IF co-localisation and RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP) were conducted to explore the interplay between PRKDC mRNA and the indicated proteins.

RESULTS

Anlotinib-treated osteosarcoma cells exhibited increased DNA-PKcs levels, and silencing DNA-PKcs augmented osteosarcoma sensitivity to anlotinib. DNA-PKcs affects anlotinib-induced autophagy by interacting with Beclin-1 and regulating its ubiquitination. Notably, PRKDC mRNA, encoding DNA-PKcs, underwent N6-Methyladenosine (m6A) modification. Methyltransferase-like 3 (METTL3) positively regulated DNA-PKcs expression. Functionally, METTL3 enhances anlotinib resistance in osteosarcoma, which is reversed by PRKDC knockdown. Mechanistically, METTL3 binds to PRKDC mRNA and facilitates m6A methylation. Additionally, m6A methylated PRKDC mRNA is identified via YTH N6-methyladenosine RNA-binding protein 1 (YTHDF1), augmenting its expression.

CONCLUSION

These findings revealed that DNA-PKcs promotes anlotinib resistance by regulating protective autophagy, while METTL3 induces PRKDC m6A modification, enhancing its expression. Thus, targeting METTL3/PRKDC may be a novel strategy for improving therapeutic efficacy in human osteosarcoma.

KEY POINTS

DNA-PKcs knockdown heightens osteosarcoma sensitivity to anlotinib. DNA-PKcs modulates anlotinib-induced protective autophagy through interacts with Beclin-1 and regulates its ubiquitination. m6A modification of OLE_LINK82PRKDC mRNA induced by METTL3 contributes to anlotinib resistance in osteosarcoma. m6A methylation of PRKDC mRNA recognised by YTHDF1 amplifies the expression of DNA-PKcs.

A phase II trial of anlotinib plus EGFR-TKIs in advanced non-small cell lung cancer with gradual, oligo, or potential progression after EGFR-TKIs treatment (CTONG-1803/ALTER-L001)

BACKGROUND

The study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combined anlotinib and EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had gradual, oligo, or potential progression after previous EGFR-TKIs treatment.

METHODS

We conducted an open-label, single-arm, multicenter, phase II trial in China. Eligible patients were 18-75 years old with histologically or cytologically confirmed NSCLC who were EGFR mutation positive and showed gradual, oligo, or potential progression after EGFR-TKIs. Anlotinib (12 mg/day) was administered orally for 2 weeks and then off 1 week in a 3-week cycle. EGFR-TKIs were continue used. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints included 6- and 12-month PFS rate, objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS) and safety.

RESULTS

From July 2019 to December 2022, 120 patients were enrolled. The median PFS (mPFS) was 9.1 months (95% CI 6.8-11.7). The PFS rates at 6 and 12 months was 68.5% and 38.8% respectively. For 86 patients with first-line 1st /2nd generation EGFR-TKIs, the mPFS was 9.2 months (95% CI 6.7-12.6). For 32 patients with first-line 3rd generation EGFR-TKIs, the mPFS was 10.3 months (95% CI 6.1-13.3). Overall ORR and DCR were 6.7% (95% CI 2.9-12.7) and 87.5% (95% CI 80.2-92.8), respectively. 52.5% of patients had grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).

CONCLUSION

Anlotinib in combination with continuation of EGFR-TKIs prolonged the clinical benefit of EGFR-TKIs, demonstrating favorable survival outcomes and manageable toxicity in NSCLC treated with EGFR-TKIs and had specific progression modes, such as gradual progression.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT04007835.

A phase II study of anlotinib plus whole brain radiation therapy for patients with NSCLC with multiple brain metastases

BACKGROUND

Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) is the mainstay of treatment for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with multiple brain metastases (BMs); however, the BRAIN study showed that the efficacy of WBRT is unsatisfactory. This prospective phase II study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of WBRT combined with anlotinib, a novel anti-angiogenic multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), in patients with multiple BMs (>3) from advanced NSCLC.

METHODS

Patients with advanced NSCLC with multiple BMs who had received two or more lines of treatment were eligible for enrolment into this study. All patients were treated with anlotinib (8-12 mg, QD, on days 1-14 of a 21-day cycle) combined with WBRT (DT 30 Gy/12 F), followed by maintenance therapy with anlotinib until disease progression or treatment intolerance. The primary endpoint of this study was the intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS). The secondary endpoints were intracranial objective response rate (iORR), intracranial disease control rate (iDCR), overall survival (OS) and treatment safety.

RESULTS

Between May 2019 and January 2021, 28 patients were enrolled, all of whom were evaluable for efficacy and safety. The median age was 57.7 years, and 46.4% were male. Twenty-five patients had adenocarcinoma (89.3%), six had EGFR mutations (21.4%) and two had ALK mutations (7.1%). The median iPFS was 11.1 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 5.4-16.8 months) and the median OS was 13.4 months (95% CI: 5.2-21.6 months). The iORR was 71.4% (six complete responses + 14 partial responses). The most frequently observed adverse events (AEs) were hypertension (71.4%), fatigue (64.3%), anorexia (46.4%), and foot and hand skin reactions (25.0%). No patients developed ≥ grade 4 AEs. No intracranial haemorrhages occurred during treatment. Dose adjustment due to AEs occurred in 17.9% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Anlotinib combined with WBRT is effective and well-tolerated in patients with NSCLC with multiple BMs.

Case Report: Efficacy of anlotinib and sintilimab in treating lung adenocarcinoma with RET fusion and PD-L1 expression

We report a case of an advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patient with brain metastasis, RET fusion, and high expression of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) at initial treatment. After receiving radiotherapy for the brain metastasis, the patient started with anlotinib and added immunotherapy with sintilimab. The patient had a good response to anlotinib and sintilimab treatment, tolerated the adverse reactions, and had a progression-free survival (PFS) of over 17 months. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first clinical case report in the literature describing the benefit of anlotinib and sintilimab treatment for non-small cell lung cancer with RET fusion and high PD-L1 expression. This study explores the biomarker selection for targeted therapy and combined immunotherapy in NSCLC patients.

TQB2450 with or without anlotinib as maintenance treatment in subjects with locally advanced/unresectable non-small cell lung cancer that have not progressed after prior concurrent/sequential chemoradiotherapy (R-ALPS): study protocol for a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase III trial

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). TQB2450 (benmelstobart) is a novel humanized immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody against programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1). Anlotinib, an oral multitargeted anti-angiogenic agent with potential synergy with ICIs, has shown efficacy in relapsed and advanced NSCLC. Accumulating preclinical data suggest a synergism between immunological and anti-angiogenic therapies through the improvement of the immune microenvironment of the tumor. In this study, we hypothesized that the combination of TQB2450 and anlotinib as maintenance treatment would enable further improvements in the outcomes of patients with locally advanced/unresectable NSCLC without driver mutations that have not progressed after definitive chemoradiotherapy.

Methods

The Radiotherapy and Anlotinib Let PD-L1 Superb (R-ALPS) study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase III study (Clinicaltrials.gov identifier, NCT04325763). A total of 534 eligible participants will be randomized to receive TQB2450 (1,200 mg) plus anlotinib (8 mg), or TQB2450 (1,200 mg) plus placebo, or placebo as maintenance therapy. Progression-free survival (PFS), assessed by the independent review committee is the primary endpoint. The secondary endpoints include additional measures of efficacy, safety, and biomarkers. An interim analysis of the effectiveness will be conducted when 70% (286 cases) of the total PFS events have been reached.

Discussion

The development of the R-ALPS study will contribute to a deeper insight into the interplay between immunotherapy and anti-angiogenic therapy and thus might expand the treatment options available to patients with locally advanced or unresectable NSCLC.

Trial Registration

Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04325763. Date of registration: May 27, 2020. Protocol version: Version 4.0, Sep 16, 2022 (https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04325763).

Anlotinib treatment for rapidly progressing pediatric embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma in the maxillary gingiva: a case report

BACKGROUND

Embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma (ERMS) is a highly aggressive form of soft-tissue sarcoma that predominantly affects children. Due to limited benefits and resistance to therapy, there is an unmet need to explore alternative therapeutic strategies.

CASE PRESENTATION

In this report, we present a rare case of pediatric ERMS located on the right side of the maxillary gingiva. A composite reference guide integrating clinical, radiographic, and histopathologic findings was used for a definitive diagnosis. Targeted next-generation sequencing of tumor biopsy was performed to identify genetic alterations. A 12-year-old female was admitted to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) and underwent a tracheotomy to relieve asphyxiation caused by a 5.5 cm diameter mass compressing the tongue root and pharyngeal cavity. Hematoxylin and eosin staining revealed a hybrid morphology characterized by clusters of round and spindle cells. Further immunohistochemistry assays indicated positive immunoreactivity for desmin, myogenin, and MyoD1. Various genetic alterations were identified, including mutations in GNAS, HRAS, LRP1B, amplification of MDM2 and IGF1R, and two novel IGF1R fusions. Negative PAX-FOXO1 fusion status supported the clinical diagnosis of ERMS. Initial treatment involved standard chemotherapy; however, the tumor persisted in its growth, reaching a maximum volume of 12 cm × 6 cm × 4 cm by the completion of treatment. Subsequent oral administration of anlotinib yielded a significant antitumor response, characterized by substantial tumor necrosis and size reduction. Following the ligation of the tumor pedicle and its removal, the patient developed a stabilized condition and was successfully discharged from PICU.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study highlights the importance of accurate diagnosis established on multifaceted assessment for the effective treatment of ERMS. We present compelling evidence supporting the clinical use of anlotinib as a promising treatment strategy for pediatric ERMS patients, especially for those resistant to conventional chemotherapy.

Assessment of the efficacy and safety of anlotinib for the treatment of recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

The current research aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib, an orally administered small-molecular tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), in the treatment of recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

METHODS

Patients with recurrent EOC subjected to treatment with anlotinib in Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University from 2020 to 2022 were included. The evaluation involved a thorough review of medical records, focusing on parameters such as the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), survival outcomes, and safety profile.

RESULTS

This study recorded 51 patients, with 26 patients undergoing anlotinib monotherapy. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.0 months, whereas the median overall survival (OS) was not reached. Seven cases underwent a combined treatment of anlotinib with chemotherapy. Among them, two patients achieved partial response (PR), two were categorized as stable disease (SD), and three were identified as having progressive disease (PD). The ORR and DCR were 28.5% (2/7) and 57.1% (4/7), respectively. Additionally, 18 cases received anlotinib maintenance therapy, and the median PFS and the median OS were 7.0 months and 25.5 months, respectively. The most prevalent adverse effects included fatigue (38.6%), hypertension (27.3%), nausea and vomiting (25.0%) and hand-foot syndrome (25.0%).

CONCLUSION

Anlotinib demonstrated mild efficacy in the treatment of recurrent EOC, whether employed as monotherapy, chemotherapy-combined therapy, or maintenance therapy. The safety profile was proven manageable and well-tolerated, suggesting that anlotinib may emerge as a viable and novel treatment option for recurrent EOC.

Efficacy and safety of a novel TKI (anlotinib) for the treatment of advanced digestive system neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib targeted therapy for the treatment of patients with advanced digestive system neoplasms (DSNs).

Methods

Clinical trials were extracted from PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and the Wanfang database up to October 2023. Outcome measures, including therapeutic efficacy, quality of life (QOL) and adverse events, were extracted and evaluated.

Results

Twenty trials, including 1,613 advanced DSNs patients, were included. The results indicated that, compared with conventional treatment alone, the combination of anlotinib targeted therapy with conventional treatment significantly improved the patients' 6-months overall survival (OS, OR=1.76, CI=1.53 to 2.02, P<0.00001), overall response (ORR, OR=1.76, CI=1.53 to 2.02, P<0.00001) and disease control rate (DCR, OR=1.51, 95% CI=1.25 to 1.84, P<0.0001). Moreover, the group that received the combined therapy had higher rates of hypertension (P<0.00001), proteinuria (P<0.00001), fatigue (P<0.00001), diarrhea (P<0.00001), hypertriglyceridemia (P=0.02), alanine aminotransfease (ALT)increased (P=0.004), aspartate transaminase (AST) increased (P=0.006), anorexia (P<0.00001), weight loss (P=0.002), abdominal pain (P=0.0006), hypothyroidism (P=0.02), prolonged QT interval (P=0.04). Analyses of other adverse events, such as gastrointestinal reaction, leukopenia, and neutropenia, did not reveal significant differences (P>0.05).

Conclusion

The combination of anlotinib targeted therapy and conventional treatment is more effective for DSNs treatment than conventional treatment alone. However, this combined treatment could lead to greater rates of hypertension, albuminuria and hand-foot syndrome. Therefore, the benefits and risks should be considered before treatment.

Anlotinib hydrochloride consolidation after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: a truncated, randomized, multicenter, clinical study (ALTER-L029)

Anlotinib is an antiangiogenic drug that shows good efficacy and safety in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of anlotinib for consolidation therapy in patients with stage III locally advanced, unresectable NSCLC after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT). This was a randomized, parallel-controlled, open-label, multicenter, phase II trial of patients with unresectable/nonoperated NSCLC treated with cCRT. The participants were randomized 2:1 to the anlotinib or control group. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints were the disease control rate (DCR) and overall survival. This study was terminated early due to poor recruitment. Nine and two participants were randomly assigned to the anlotinib and control groups, respectively. One participant in the control group was excluded due to taking prohibited medications before the first efficacy evaluation. In the anlotinib group, the median age was 63 (range, 37-74) years. Two participants achieved partial response, six stable disease, and one progressive disease as best response. The DCR was 88.9%. The median PFS was 11.5 months, and the 12-month PFS rate was 33.9%. All related adverse events were grade 1 or 2. Two participants had a dose adjustment during the study. The evaluable data suggest that anlotinib alone was effective and tolerable in consolidation therapy after cCRT in patients with stage III unresectable NSCLC. The results need to be confirmed by a large-sample trial. This clinical trial was registered on www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03743129). Registration date: 6 September 2018.

Maintenance therapy with anlotinib after induction therapy with platinum-based chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A pooled analysis of 2 single-arm trials

BACKGROUND

Maintenance therapy could significantly improve the prognosis of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving chemotherapy. Anlotinib is effective, tolerable, and convenient in administration as a third-line treatment for NSCLC. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of maintenance therapy with anlotinib after platinum-based induction chemotherapy for patients with advanced NSCLC.

METHODS

This pooled analysis of 2 multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 clinical trials (ALTER-L014 and ALTER-L011) enrolled patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC and without known sensitive mutations in China between September 2018 and January 2021. The primary outcome was progression-free survival. The secondary outcomes were objective response rate, disease control rate, overall survival, and safety.

RESULTS

The data of 23 patients were pooled, with 15 from ALTER-L014 and 8 from ALTER-L011. At the cutoff date of June 13, 2021, the median progression-free survival since the start of maintenance therapy was 5.95 (95% confidence interval, 4.30-8.80) months. Nineteen patients had stable disease, 1 had a partial response and 3 had progressive disease. The objective response rate was 4.35%, while disease control rate was 86.96%. The median overall survival of the patients since the start of maintenance therapy was 18.60 (95% confidence interval, 6.87-22.80) months. The incidence of adverse events of grade ≥ 3 was 21.7%.

CONCLUSION

Anlotinib might offer a new option for maintenance treatment in patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC without known sensitive mutations after standard first-line platinum-based chemotherapy.

Safety and efficacy of multi-target TKI combined with nivolumab in check-point inhibitor-refractory patients with advanced NSCLC: a prospective, single-arm, two-stage study

BACKGROUND

Resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) represents a major unmet medical need in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibition may reverse a suppressive microenvironment and recover sensitivity to subsequent ICIs.

METHODS

This phase Ib/IIa, single-arm study, comprised dose-finding (Part A) and expansion (Part B) cohorts. Patients with ICIs-refractory NSCLC were enrolled to receive anlotinib (a multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor) orally (from days 1 to 14 in a 21-day cycle) and nivolumab (360 mg every 3 weeks, intravenously) on a 21-day treatment cycle. The first 21-day treatment cycle was a safety observation period (phase Ib) followed by a phase II expansion cohort. The primary objectives were recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D, part A), safety (part B), and objective response rate (ORR, part B), respectively.

RESULTS

Between November 2020 and March 2022, 34 patients were screened, and 21 eligible patients were enrolled (6 patients in Part A). The RP2D of anlotinib is 12 mg/day orally (14 days on and 7 days off) and nivolumab (360 mg every 3 weeks). Adverse events (AEs) of any cause and treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) were reported in all treated patients. Two patients (9.5%) experienced grade 3 TRAE. No grade 4 or higher AEs were observed. Serious AEs were reported in 4 patients. Six patients experienced anlotinib interruption and 4 patients experienced nivolumab interruption due to TRAEs. ORR and disease control rate (DCR) was 19.0% and 76.2%, respectively. Median PFS and OS were 7.4 months (95% CI, 4.3-NE) and 15.2 months (95% CI, 12.1-NE), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that anlotinib combined with nivolumab shows manageable safety and promising efficacy signals. Further studies are warranted.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT04507906 August 11, 2020.

Efficacy and safety of EGFR-TKIs for non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials

BACKGROUND

We conducted this meta-analysis based on updated literature and research to compare the efficacy and safety of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) as treatments for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, Medline and Web of Science databases to perform a systematic literature search based on random control trials. In these articles, EGFR-TKIs were compared with placebos, chemotherapy, or whole-brain irradiation as treatments for NSCLC. In this research, a meta-analysis of the literature was performed to produce a combined risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) for progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events. The data were synthesized with Review Manager 5.3 software, which was used to manage the process.

RESULTS

There were 15 random control trials included in the study, involving 4249 patients in total. There was evidence that EGFR-TKIs can significantly prolong OS (RR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.75-1) and PFS (RR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.66-0.86) in NSCLC patients. There was an increase in the incidence of adverse events after treatment with EGFR-TKI, including diarrhea (RR: 0.18, 95% CI: 0.10-0.26), infection (RR: 0.09, 95% CI: 0.02-0.16), and rash (RR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.22-0.51).

CONCLUSIONS

It has been shown that EGFR-TKIs prolong OS and PFS in patients with NSCLC. NSCLC patients may benefit from EGFR-TKIs as an important treatment option in order to prolong their survival.

Efficacy and safety of anlotinib in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors or not as advanced non-small cell lung cancer treatment: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Background

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a leading cause of cancer mortality. Combined anlotinib and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) therapy may have synergistic antitumor effects in NSCLC. This study aimed to comparing the efficacy and safety of anlotinib and ICIs treatment, monotherapy and combination in NSCLC.

Methods

We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis of 14 studies involving 4,308 NSCLC patients across four regimens: anlotinib, ICIs, anlotinib plus ICIs, and placebo. Efficacy outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR). Safety outcomes included treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), TRAE grade three or higher (TRAE ≥3). Analyses were performed in RevMan 5.3 and R 3.5.1 (gemtc package). P<0.05 or effect estimate with 95% confidence interval (CI) that did not include 1 indicated statistical significance.

Results

Fourteen publications involving 4,308 patients across four treatment regimens (anlotinib, ICIs, anlotinib plus ICIs, placebo) were included. For PFS, network meta-analysis showed all three interventions significantly improved PFS versus placebo. Anlotinib plus ICIs demonstrated the greatest PFS improvement [hazard ratio (HR) =0.24; 95% CI: 0.14, 0.36], followed by anlotinib (HR =0.37; 95% CI: 0.23, 0.58), and ICIs (HR =0.43; 95% CI: 0.27, 0.67). For OS, compared to placebo, anlotinib plus ICIs showed the greatest OS improvement (HR =0.52; 95% CI: 0.33, 0.74), followed by anlotinib (HR =0.66; 95% CI: 0.47, 0.95), and ICIs (HR =0.72; 95% CI: 0.54, 0.97). For ORR, anlotinib plus ICIs demonstrated the greatest improvement versus placebo [odds ratio (OR) =5.29; 95% CI: 3.32, 8.58], followed by anlotinib (OR =4.38; 95% CI: 2.42, 8.19), and ICIs (OR =2.17; 95% CI: 1.65, 2.89). For DCR, anlotinib plus ICIs showed the greatest improvement versus placebo (OR =13.32; 95% CI: 4.99, 45.09), followed by anlotinib (OR =5.56; 95% CI: 2.17, 14.38), and ICIs (OR =3.46; 95% CI: 1.29, 10.85). Compared to placebo, anlotinib was associated with the highest risk of TRAEs (OR =3.67, 95% CI: 1.12, 15.77), followed by ICIs (OR =1.83; 95% CI: 1.26, 2.69). Due to lack of data on anlotinib plus ICIs, no comparison was conducted. For grade ≥3 TRAEs, compared to placebo, anlotinib increased the risk (OR =3.67; 95% CI: 1.12, 15.77), while anlotinib plus ICIs (OR =2.45; 95% CI: 0.51, 11.6) and ICIs (OR =1.29; 95% CI: 0.33, 4.38) did not increase the risk.

Conclusions

Anlotinib combined with ICIs demonstrates improved efficacy over monotherapy for NSCLC treatment, without increased adverse events.

Anlotinib plus docetaxel vs. docetaxel alone for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients who failed first-line treatment: A multicenter, randomized phase II trial

OBJECTIVES

Given the modest efficacy of docetaxel in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), this study assesses the therapeutic potential and safety profile of anlotinib in combination with docetaxel compared to docetaxel monotherapy as a second-line therapy for patients with advanced NSCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this phase II study, patients with advanced NSCLC experiencing failure with first-line platinum-based regimens were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either anlotinib plus docetaxel or docetaxel alone. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), with overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety as secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

A total of 83 patients were randomized. The combination of anlotinib and docetaxel significantly extended median PFS to 4.4 months compared to 1.6 months for docetaxel alone (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.38, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.23-0.63, P = 0.0002), and also demonstrated superior ORR (32.5 % vs. 9.3 %, P = 0.0089) and DCR (87.5 % vs. 53.5 %, P = 0.0007). Median OS was observed at 12.0 months in the combination group vs. 10.9 months in the monotherapy group (HR = 0.82, 95 % CI: 0.47-1.43, P = 0.4803). For patients previously treated with immunotherapy, the median PFS was notably longer at 7.8 vs. 1.7 months (HR = 0.22, 95 % CI: 0.09-0.51, P = 0.0290). The incidence of grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events, predominantly leukopenia (15.0 % vs. 7.0 %) and neutropenia (10.0 % vs. 5.0 %), was manageable across both groups.

CONCLUSION

Anlotinib plus docetaxel offers a viable therapeutic alternative for patients with advanced NSCLC who failed first-line platinum-based treatments.

Anlotinib inhibits growth of human esophageal cancer TE-1 cells by negative regulating PI3K/Akt signaling pathway

Anlotinib is effective in treatment of many kinds of malignant cancer, but its antineoplastic effects on esophageal cancer remains unclear. This study aims to investigate its impact on esophageal cancer and the underlying mechanisms. Anlotiniband 5-fluorouracil + cisplatin (5-FU + DDP) was administered separately to human esophageal cancer TE- 1 cells tumor xenograft mouse models every 3 days. Tumor size and body weight were measured before each treatment and at the end of the experiment. In vitro studies were conducted using TE- 1 cells to examine the effects of Anlotinib. Cell viability, migration, proliferation, apoptosis, cell cycle, their regulatory proteins and the transcriptomic changes were analyzed. Anlotinib reduced tumor size, tumor weight, and the ratio of tumor weight to body weight in vivo. It decreased the viability of TE- 1 cells, with a 50% growth-inhibitory concentration of 9.454 μM for 24 h, induced apoptosis, and arrested TE- 1 cell cycle in the S phase. It inhibited migration and proliferation while negatively regulating the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. Enhanced expressions of P21, Bax, and lowered expressions of cyclin A1, cyclin B1, CDK1, PI3K, Akt, p-Akt, and Bcl-2 were observed after Anlotinib treatment. Anlotinib exhibits antineoplastic activity against human esophageal cancer TE- 1 cells by negatively regulating the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway, consequently altering the expressions of proteins related to proliferation, apoptosis, and the cell cycle.

Bioinformatics-based screening and analysis of the key genes involved in the influence of antiangiogenesis on myeloid-derived suppressor cells and their effects on the immune microenvironment

This study aimed to screen differentially expressed genes (DEGs) involved in the influence of antiangiogenic therapy on myeloid-derived suppressor cell (MDSC) infiltration and investigate their mechanisms of action. Data on DEGs after the action of antiangiogenic drugs in a pan-cancer context were obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analyses were performed using the clusterProfiler package in R software. Single-sample gene set enrichment analysis was performed using the gene set variation analysis package to evaluate the levels of immune cells and the activity of immune-related pathways. The relationships of DEGs with the infiltration levels of MDSCs and specific immune cell subpopulations were investigated via gene module analysis. The top 10 key genes were subsequently obtained from PPI network analysis using the cytoHubba plugin of the Cytoscape platform. When the DEGs of the four datasets were intersected, a DEG in the intersection of three datasets and 12 DEGs in the intersection of two datasets were upregulated, and 28 DEGs in the intersection of two datasets were downregulated. GO and KEGG pathway enrichment analyses revealed that the DEGs were associated with multiple important signaling pathways closely related to tumor onset and development, including cell differentiation, cell proliferation, the cell cycle, and immune responses. Most downregulated genes in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) were positively correlated with MDSC expression. Only MGP was negatively correlated; the correlation between CACNG6 and MDSC expression was statistically insignificant. In lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC), the relationships of PMEPA1, PCDH7, NEURL1B, and CACNG6 with MDSC expression were statistically insignificant; MGP was negatively correlated with MDSC expression. The top 10 key genes with the highest degree scores obtained using the cytoHubba plugin of Cytoscape were AURKB, RRM2, BUB1, NUSAP1, PRC1, TOP2A, NCAPH, CENPA, KIF2C, and CCNA2. Most of these genes were upregulated in LUAD and associated with immune cell infiltration and prognosis in tumors. An analysis of the relationships between DEGs and infiltration by other specific immune cells revealed the presence of consistent patterns in the downregulated genes, which exhibited positive correlations with the levels of Th2 cells, γδ T cells, and CD56dim NK cells, and negative correlations with other infiltrating immune cells. Antiangiogenic therapy may regulate MDSC infiltration through multiple important signaling pathways closely associated with tumor onset and development, such as cell differentiation, cell proliferation, the cell cycle, and immune responses. Antiangiogenic drugs may exert effects by affecting various types of infiltrating cells associated with immune suppression.

SOD2 confers anlotinib resistance via regulation of mitochondrial damage in OSCC

OBJECTIVE

Previous studies had revealed that anlotinib had outstanding anti-tumor efficacy on oral squamous cell carcinoma. However, the underlying mechanism is still unclear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Anlotinib resistant OSCC cells were established and analyzed by RNA-sequencing. The correlations between SOD2 expression and anlotinib resistance were investigated in OSCC cells and PDX models. Functional assays were performed to verify the SOD2 expression and anlotinib resistance in OSCC cells.

RESULTS

Anlotinib resistant genes were enriched in the biological processes of mitochondrion organization and the gene pathway of reactive oxygen species. SOD2 expression level was positively correlated with the resistance of anlotinib in OSCC cells and PDX models. Higher SOD2 expression of OSCC cells was more resistant to anlotinib. Anlotinib induced ROS generation, apoptosis and mitochondrial damage in OSCC cells, which can be enhanced by SOD2 knockdown and decreased by SOD2 overexpression. Mitochondrial damage was identified as swelling and cristae disappearance morphology under TEM, decreased mitochondrial membrane potential and lower MFN2 expression.

CONCLUSIONS

SOD2 may be capable of protecting mitochondria by downregulating ROS generation, which contributes to the resistance of anlotinib in OSCC cells. SOD2 can be utilized as a potential therapeutic target to improve the anti-cancer efficacy of anlotinib in OSCC.

Small Molecule Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs) for Glioblastoma Treatment

In the last decade, many small molecules, usually characterized by heterocyclic scaffolds, have been designed and synthesized as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Among them, several compounds have been tested at preclinical and clinical levels to treat glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). GBM is the most common and aggressive type of cancer originating in the brain and has an unfavorable prognosis, with a median survival of 15-16 months and a 5-year survival rate of 5%. Despite recent advances in treating GBM, it represents an incurable disease associated with treatment resistance and high recurrence rates. For these reasons, there is an urgent need for the development of new pharmacological agents to fight this malignancy. In this review, we reported the compounds published in the last five years, which showed promising activity in GBM preclinical models acting as TKIs. We grouped the compounds based on the targeted kinase: first, we reported receptor TKIs and then, cytoplasmic and peculiar kinase inhibitors. For each small molecule, we included the chemical structure, and we schematized the interaction with the target for some representative compounds with the aim of elucidating the mechanism of action. Finally, we cited the most relevant clinical trials.

In Situ Nanofiber Patch Boosts Postoperative Hepatocellular Carcinoma Immune Activation by Trimodal Combination Therapy

Poor clinical efficacy associated with postoperative hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) often results from recurrence and metastasis. Hence, research has focused on establishing an effective multimodal therapy. However, complex combinations of active ingredients require multiple functions in therapeutic systems. Herein, a portable nanofiber patch composing germanium phosphorus (GeP) and anlotinib (AL) was designed to form a versatile platform for molecularly targeted photothermal-immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) trimodal combination therapy. The patches possess hydrophilic, satisfactory mechanical, and excellent photothermal conversion properties. Moreover, they achieve a penetrating and sustained drug release. The near-infrared light-assisted GeP-induced temperature increase regulates AL release, downregulating the expression of vascular-related factor receptors, triggering immunogenic cell death of tumor cells, and inducing dendritic cell maturation. Simultaneously, ICB therapy (programmed cell death ligand 1, PD-L1) was introduced to improve treatment outcomes. Notably, this trimodal combination therapy significantly inhibits vascular hypergrowth, enhances effector T-cell infiltration, and sensitizes the PD-L1 antibody response, boosting immunotherapy to suppress residual HCC recurrence and metastasis. Further validation of the genome sequencing results revealed cell pathways related primarily to regulatory immune effects. This study demonstrates the use of an effective and practical nanofiber patch to improve multimodal therapy of postoperative HCC, with high clinical translation value.

Recent advances of anti-angiogenic inhibitors targeting VEGF/VEGFR axis

Vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF), Vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFR) and their downstream signaling pathways are promising targets in anti-angiogenic therapy. They constitute a crucial system to regulate physiological and pathological angiogenesis. In the last 20 years, many anti-angiogenic drugs have been developed based on VEGF/VEGFR system to treat diverse cancers and retinopathies, and new drugs with improved properties continue to emerge at a fast rate. They consist of different molecular structures and characteristics, which enable them to inhibit the interaction of VEGF/VEGFR, to inhibit the activity of VEGFR tyrosine kinase (TK), or to inhibit VEGFR downstream signaling. In this paper, we reviewed the development of marketed anti-angiogenic drugs involved in the VEGF/VEGFR axis, as well as some important drug candidates in clinical trials. We discuss their mode of action, their clinical benefits, and the current challenges that will need to be addressed by the next-generation of anti-angiogenic drugs. We focus on the molecular structures and characteristics of each drug, including those approved only in China.

A Pilot Study of Anlotinib as a Combination Treatment in Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

AIMS

To investigate the short-term objective response and treatment toxicity of anlotinib as a combination treatment in patients with Recurrent or Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (RM-NPC).

METHODS

Patients with RM-NPC who received anlotinib as a combination treatment between March 2021 and July 2022 were retrospectively analyzed.The efficacy and safety of anlotinib as a combination treatment were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 17 patients with RM-NPC were included in this study. Of these patients, 2 (11.8%) had local recurrence, 4 (23.5%) had cervical lymph node recurrence, and 11 (64.9%) had distant failure. The most common metastatic site was the liver (47.1%), followed by the lung (23.5%) and bone (23.5%). Anlotinib was given as first-line treatment in 3 patients (17.6%), second lines treatment in 7 patients (41.2%), and third to six-lines treatment in 7 patients (41.2%). All patients received anlotinib combined with chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy. One patient achieved a complete response (5.9%), 7 patients had a partial response (41.2%), 5 patients had stable disease (29.4%), and 4 patients had progressive disease (23.5%). The overall disease control rate and the overall response rate were 76.5% and 47.1%, respectively. The median progression-free survival was 8.1 months, and the median overall survival was not reached. The incidence of grade 3 adverse events was 30%. No unexpected side effects or treatment-related death were observed.

CONCLUSION

Anlotinib, as a combination treatment, has a promising antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile in patients with RM-NPC. Our results add to the growing evidence that supports the benefits of combining antiangiogenic drugs in RM-NPC. Randomized controlled clinical trials investigating the evaluation of anlotinib are warranted.

Efficacy and Safety of Anlotinib in EGFR-Positive Patients with Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma Compared with Chemotherapy: A Retrospective Study

There are no standard third-line or beyond treatments for patients with driver mutation-positive advanced lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Anlotinib was approved as a third-line multitarget drug in China in 2018. Limited data are available regarding the efficacy and safety of anlotinib compared with chemotherapy. To investigate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib compared with traditional chemotherapy in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-positive advanced LUAD. We conducted a retrospective study of 83 EGFR mutation-positive patients with advanced LUAD between 2011 and 2022. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were the primary endpoints, whereas the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were the secondary endpoints. Anlotinib-related adverse events (AEs) were recorded to evaluate the safety of anlotinib. 39 patients with LUAD received anlotinib and 44 patients with LUAD received chemotherapy were enrolled in the study. Patients treated with anlotinib exhibited longer PFS (11.2 vs 4.5 months, P < .01) and OS (18.8 vs 15.8 months, P < .05) than patients treated with chemotherapy. There were no significant differences in ORR (7.9% vs 20.5%, P = .129) or DCR (100% vs 93.2%, P = .120) between the two groups. Anlotinib-related AEs grading 3-4 level were observed in 2 (5.1%) patients, no anlotinib-related death was recorded. Cox regression analyses of PFS and OS showed that brain metastases and age < 30 years at diagnosis had negative effects on clinical outcomes. Anlotinib is effective and safe in patients with EGFR-positive advanced LUAD. Patients without brain metastases had better clinical outcomes.

Advances of clinically approved small-molecule drugs for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer continues to pose a significant challenge as a prominent contributor to global cancer-related mortality. Despite the considerable strides made in therapeutic interventions within the past decade, a substantial population of patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) still face the grim reality of an incurable condition. In the realm of optimal management strategies for individuals afflicted with locally advanced, yet amenable to surgical resection, NSCLC, a therapeutic approach encompassing chemoradiation stands as a fundamental component. Significant strides have been made in the therapeutic landscape of NSCLC during the preceding two decades, facilitating an enhanced comprehension of the underlying disease biology, and mechanisms governing tumor progression, as well as advancements in early detection modalities and multimodal therapeutic interventions. Nevertheless, the overall rates of curative interventions and survival outcomes for NSCLC continue to exhibit a discouragingly low trajectory, particularly in the context of metastatic disease. Hence, the imperative for sustained research endeavors in the realm of novel pharmaceutical agents and combinatorial therapeutic approaches remains paramount, with the overarching objective of broadening the scope of clinical advantages conferred upon a wider demographic of patients, thereby fostering tangible improvements in outcomes pertaining to NSCLC. The primary objective of this review is to provide an all-encompassing examination encompassing the clinical application and synthetic routes of specific drugs, with the explicit aim of disseminating invaluable knowledge that can inform future research and development endeavors focused on NSCLC.

Etoposide soft capsule combined with anlotinib in the third-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study

Background

The physical tolerance in the advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patient often deteriorates, with a limited effective rate of the third-line treatment. This study retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and safety of etoposide soft capsules combined with anlotinib in the third-line treatment of advanced NSCLC.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted on 46 patients with advanced NSCLC who had failed second-line treatment. Progression-free survival (PFS) of advanced NSCLC patients served as an endpoint. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were applied to evaluate the short-term efficacy of anlotinib treatment in advanced NSCLC patients.

Results

Among 46 third-line NSCLC patients, none had complete remission (CR), 9 had partial remission (PR), 29 had stable disease (SD), and 8 had progressive disease (PD). The objective response rate (ORR) was 19.57%, the disease control rate (DCR) was 82.61%, the median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 6.3 months, and the median overall survival (mOS) was 10.1 months. Common adverse reactions included fatigue, hypertension, nausea, stomatitis, leukopenia, hand-foot syndrome, abnormal liver function, proteinuria, hemoptysis, and hypothyroidism, among others. The incidence of grade 3 adverse reactions was 8.9%, and there were no grade 4 adverse reactions.

Conclusions

Etoposide soft capsule combined with anlotinib demonstrated a marked effect on the third-line treatment of advanced NSCLC patients, and is well tolerated.

Anlotinib combined with pembrolizumab as first-line treatment for advanced pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma: a case report and literature review

Pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma (PSC) is an uncommon variant of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), known for its unfavorable prognosis. Previous studies have elucidated that PSC generally exhibits a significant expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), an elevated tumor mutation burden, and marked vascular invasion. These factors imply the possible effectiveness of treatments like immunotherapy and anti-angiogenic therapy. The subject of this case was a 65-year-old male diagnosed with advanced PSC, characterized by high PD-L1 expression and devoid of known driver gene mutations. Owing to the restrictions imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic, the patient initially underwent home-based treatment with anlotinib, which led to symptomatic improvement after a single treatment cycle. Subsequent hospitalization allowed for the administration of anlotinib plus Pembrolizumab, resulting in a partial response. Radiotherapy was necessitated due to local disease progression. But after 15 cycles of treatment with Pembrolizumab, hyperprogression was observed. The patient's overall survival spanned 14 months, with no evident adverse reactions to the medications. Genomic analysis revealed potential associations between treatment efficacy and mutations in the TP53, NF1, and MET genes. This case underscores the effectiveness and safety of a first-line treatment regimen combining pan-target anti-angiogenic therapy (anlotinib) with anti-tumor immunotherapy.

A Retrospective Study of Anlotinib Combined with Anti-PD-1 Inhibitors in the 2nd or Later-Line Treatment of Advanced Solid Tumors

Objective

To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of anlotinib combined with anti-PD-1 inhibitors in the 2nd or later-line treatment of advanced solid tumors.

Patients and Methods

A total of 63 patients with advanced solid tumors who had failed or could not endure the adverse reactions after receiving first-line or more systematic treatment in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University from March 2019 to April 2023 were treated with anlotinib Hydrochloride capsule combined with anti-PD-1 inhibitors. The efficacy and adverse reactions were evaluated according to RECIST1.1 and NCICTC4.0 standards.

Results

The percentage of overall response rate of 63 patients during the combination administration indicated that complete response was 1.6% (n=1), partial response was 23.8% (n=15), stable disease was 39.7% (n=25) and progressive disease was 34.9% (n=22), yielding objective response rate (ORR) of 25.4% and disease control rate (DCR) of 65.1%. Furthermore, the median PFS of 63 patients with advanced solid tumors was 7 months and the median OS was not reached, and the median follow-up time is 4.5 months. In subgroup analysis, there was no significant difference in PFS between first-line, second-line, third-line and above (p=0.631); there was no significant difference in PFS between PD-1 positive patients and PD-1 negative patients (p=0.094); there was no significant difference in PFS between patients who had previously used anti-PD-1 inhibitors and patients who had not used before (p=0.204). The most common adverse reactions were hypertension, hand-foot syndrome, and fatigue, with an incidence of 28.4% (18/63), 25.6% (14/63), and 25.6% (14/63), respectively. Most of the adverse reactions were grade 1-2, and there were no grade 4 adverse reactions.

Conclusion

Anlotinib combined with anti-PD-1 inhibitors demonstrated promising efficacy and tolerable safety for patients with advanced solid tumors in the 2nd or later-line treatment.

Safety and Efficacy of Anlotinib Hydrochloride Plus Temozolomide in Patients with Recurrent Glioblastoma

PURPOSE

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly vascularized tumor with few treatment options after disease recurrence. Here, we report the efficacy and safety of anlotinib hydrochloride plus temozolomide in patients with recurrent GBM.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with first definite postsurgical progression of histologically confirmed GBM preceded by standard radiotherapy and temozolomide chemotherapy were eligible for inclusion. All patients received temozolomide (150-200 mg/m2, orally, every day (QD) d1-5/4 wk) and anlotinib (10 mg, orally, QD, d1-14/3 wk) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate by the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients were enrolled between May 2020 and July 2021, with a median age of 55 (range 27-68) years old. According to the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria, tumor response occurred in 17 patients, of which 9 patients had a complete response, and the objective response rate was 81.0% [95% confidence interval (CI), 62.6-99.3]. The disease control rate was 95.2% (95% CI, 76.2-99.9), with three additional patients achieving a stable disease without tumor progression. The median PFS was 7.3 months (95% CI, 4.9-9.7), and the 6-month PFS rate was 61.9% (95% CI, 39.3-84.6). The median overall survival was 16.9 months (95% CI, 7.8-26.0). The most common adverse events were leukocytopenia (66.7%), thrombocytopenia (38.1%), and hypertriglyceridemia (38.1%). Five patients had nine grade 3 adverse events, with a 23.8% incidence rate. Two patients discontinued therapy due to ischemic stroke (grade 3) and wound dehiscence (grade 1), respectively. No grade 4 or treatment-related deaths occurred in this study.

CONCLUSIONS

Anlotinib combined with temozolomide is efficacious and tolerated in patients with recurrent GBM.

Anlotinib exerts an anti-T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia effect in vitro and in vivo

BACKGROUND

Despite some progress having been made regarding the treatment of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL), the prognosis of T-ALL, particularly adult T-ALL, is still poor. Identifying novel, effective anti-T-ALL drugs is of great significance. Anlotinib, an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor currently utilized in the treatment of lung cancer, exhibited a promising anti-T-ALL effect. A comprehensive study should therefore be conducted to explore both the in vitro as well as in vivo mechanisms of the anti-T-ALL effects of anlotinib.

METHODS

CCK8 assays and flow cytometry were employed to investigate the viability, cell cycle distribution, and apoptosis of T-ALL cell lines when treated with anlotinib. T-ALL xenograft mouse models were established to examine the in vivo antileukemic effects of anlotinib. Cellular and molecular analysis of T-ALL were conducted to define the underlying mechanisms.

RESULTS

In vitro, anlotinib significantly inhibited the viability, induced G2/M phase arrest and apoptosis in T-ALL cell lines in a concentration-dependent pattern. In vivo, anlotinib also demonstrated a strong anti-tumor effect at doses that are well-tolerated. Interestingly, anlotinib could decrease the protein levels of the intracellular domains of NOTCH1 (ICN1) and c-Myc, two important targets for T-ALL. Mechanistically, anlotinib-induced c-Myc reduction was associated with proteasome-mediated degradation, while the ICN1 reduction was not due to protein degradation or transcriptional repression.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study showed that anlotinib may be a promising anti-T-ALL candidate drug, and simultaneous reduction of the protein levels of both ICN1 and c-Myc may contribute to the anti-T-ALL efficacy of anlotinib.

Anlotinib as a maintenance treatment for advanced soft tissue sarcoma after first-line chemotherapy (ALTER-S006): a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial

Background

No standard maintenance treatment has been obtained to prolong the response duration of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) after first-line chemotherapy. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib as a maintenance treatment after chemotherapy in STS.

Methods

In this multicentre, open-label, single-arm phase 2 trial, patients with advanced STS who achieved partial response or stable disease after first-line anthracycline-based chemotherapy were enrolled between April 2019 and January 2022. All patients received anlotinib as a maintenance treatment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) of anlotinib maintenance treatment. Other endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and safety. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03890068.

Findings

At the data cut-off date (August 8, 2022), 49 patients were enrolled, including 17 with liposarcoma (35%) and 15 with leiomyosarcoma (31%). After a median follow-up of 17.1 months (IQR 9.0-27.2), the median PFS from the beginning of maintenance treatment was 9.1 months (95% CI 5.7-12.5), and the median OS was not reached, and the 1-year OS rate for anlotinib maintenance treatment was 98.0%. The best ORR and DCR were 16% (8/49, 95% CI 7-30) and 94% (46/49, 95% CI 83-99), respectively. Most of the treatment-related adverse events were grade 1-2. Of the grade 3-4 adverse events, the most common were hypertension (10%) and hand-foot syndrome reaction (6%).

Interpretation

Postchemotherapy maintenance treatment with anlotinib exhibits promising efficacy and tolerable toxicity in patients with advanced STS.

Funding

Chia Tai Tianqing Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd., the National Key Research and Development Program of China, and the National Natural Science Foundation of China.

Anlotinib reduces the suppressive capacity of monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells and potentiates the immune microenvironment normalization window in a mouse lung cancer model

By exploring the effects of an antiangiogenic small molecule drug named anlotinib on the levels of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) in a mouse xenograft model of lung cancer, the role of anti-angiogenesis in remodeling the immune microenvironment was discussed. In addition, the impact of anlotinib on the normalization of the immune microenvironment and time window was examined, providing a theoretical basis for the optimization of clinical strategies applying anlotinib combined with PD-1 inhibitors. On the basis of the LLC mouse xenograft model, MDSCs and MDSCs + immune microenvironment were examined in tissues, respectively, according to different samples. The former observation included the control (group A) and anlotinib monotherapy (group B) groups; the latter also included the control (group C) and anlotinib monotherapy (group D) groups. The levels of MDSCs in peripheral blood at different time points were analyzed by flow cytometry, and the levels of MDSCs in tissue samples at different time points were evaluated by immunofluorescence and immunohistochemistry. The volumes of subcutaneous xenografts were significantly smaller in the anlotinib treatment group compared with the control group ( P  < 0.005). Flow cytometry showed that compared with the control group, the intratumoral percentages of total MDSCs ( P  < 0.01) and mononuclear-MDSCs ( P  < 0.05) were significantly decreased on days 3 and 17 after anlotinib treatment in peripheral blood samples; however, there was no significant difference in granulocytic-MDSCs changes between the experimental and control groups. Immunofluorescence showed that the levels of MDSCs in both the experimental and control groups reached the lowest points 10 days after drug administration, and were significantly lower in the experimental group than in the control group ( P  < 0.05). Anlotinib reduces the levels of MDSCs in the mouse xenograft model of lung cancer, with the characteristics of time window. This study provides a basis for further exploring strategies for anti-angiogenic treatment combined with immunotherapy in lung cancer based on time-window dosing.

Efficacy and Safety of Anlotinib-Containing Regimens in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Real-World Study

Purpose

Anlotinib is widely used in the clinical treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), alone or in combination with other anticancer drugs. The aim of this study was to investigate the real-world efficacy and safety of anlotinib-containing regimens.

Patients and Methods

Confirmed advanced NSCLC patients who had received anlotinib alone or in combination were enrolled. An overall analysis of the efficacy and safety of anlotinib was performed in all patients, and then subgroup analysis was used to further compare the efficacy between anlotinib monotherapy and combination therapy. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were ADR, ORR, and DCR.

Results

A total of 240 patients were included. The overall median PFS was 8.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.1-9.9 months). Anlotinib treatment regimens (monotherapy or combination therapy) and whether they received previous antiangiogenesis were associated with PFS. Anlotinib plus immunotherapy achieved longer PFS than anlotinib monotherapy (median PFS: 10.5 vs 6.5 months, p=0.007). Stratification analysis showed the PFS of anlotinib plus immunotherapy was significantly longer in male, adenocarcinoma, <=65 years old, patients stage IV, EGFR wild type, with extrathoracic metastasis, performance status scores ≥2, the first-line treatment, patients with a history of hypertension and no previous antiangiogenesis than anlotinib monotherapy. The median PFS of anlotinib plus chemotherapy, targeted therapy was slightly longer than anlotinib alone (respectively, 10.5 vs 6.5 months, p=0.095; 9.5 vs 6.5 months, p=0.177). Adverse reactions were mostly mild and acceptable, with hypertension being the most common.

Conclusion

Anlotinib is effective and tolerable in advanced NSCLC patients. Immunotherapy combination with anlotinib significantly improved PFS. The efficacy of anlotinib may be impaired by previous antiangiogenic therapy, which can be investigated in further studies.

Orbital adenoid cystic carcinoma treated by radiotherapy combined with anlotinib in a 13-year-old girl: A case report

RATIONALE

Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) of orbit is a very rare epithelial tumor, often originating from the lacrimal glands. At the same time, treatment options are currently limited, such as radiation, chemotherapy. We report a case of a patient treated with antirotinib combined with radiotherapy.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 13-year-old girl was initially admitted with "left eye swelling for over half a year, 12 days after surgery for left orbital adenoid cystic carcinoma". Initial swelling of the lateral upper eyelid of the left eye, with gradual enlargement and occasional pain.

DIAGNOSES

Left orbital adenoid cystic carcinoma.

INTERVENTIONS

After diagnosis of orbital ACC, she underwent resection of the left orbital mass, and received 33 times of adjuvant radiotherapy, but brain metastases appeared later. She refused further treatment, and received 25 times of radiotherapy and anlotinib therapy after the disease progressed again.

OUTCOMES

Now the patient has been followed up for 8 months, but no progress was found.

LESSONS

Based on this, we hypothesized that radiation therapy in combination with anlotinib is effective for ACC or ACC metastases.

International expert consensus on diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer complicated by chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer combined by chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (LC-COPD) is a common comorbidity and their interaction with each other poses significant clinical challenges. However, there is a lack of well-established consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of LC-COPD.

METHODS

A panel of experts, comprising specialists in oncology, respiratory medicine, radiology, interventional medicine, and thoracic surgery, was convened. The panel was presented with a comprehensive review of the current evidence pertaining to LC-COPD. After thorough discussions, the panel reached a consensus on 17 recommendations with over 70% agreement in voting to enhance the management of LC-COPD and optimize the care of these patients.

RESULTS

The 17 statements focused on pathogenic mechanisms (n=2), general strategies (n=4), and clinical application in COPD (n=2) and lung cancer (n=9) were developed and modified. These statements provide guidance on early screening and treatment selection of LC-COPD, the interplay of lung cancer and COPD on treatment, and considerations during treatment. This consensus also emphasizes patient-centered and personalized treatment in the management of LC-COPD.

CONCLUSIONS

The consensus highlights the need for concurrent treatment for both lung cancer and COPD in LC-COPD patients, while being mindful of the mutual influence of the two conditions on treatment and monitoring for adverse reactions.

A MRI-based radiomics model for predicting the response to anlotinb combined with temozolomide in recurrent malignant glioma patients

OBJECTIVE

Anlotinib is a multitarget anti-angiogenic drug that combined with temozolomide (TMZ) can effectively prolongs the overall survival (OS) of recurrent malignant glioma(rMG),but some patients do not respond to anlotinib combined with TMZ. These patients were associated with a worse prognosis and lack effective identification methods. Therefore, it is necessary to differentiate patients who may have good response to anlotinb in combination with TMZ from those who are not, in order to provide personalized targeted therapies.

METHODS

Fifty three rMG patients (42 in training cohort and 11 in testing cohort) receiving anlotinib combined with TMZ were enrolled. A total of 3668 radiomics features were extracted from the recurrent MRI images. Radiomics features are reduced and filtered by hypothesis testing and Least Absolute Shrinkage And Selection (LASSO) regression. Eight machine learning models construct the radiomics model, and then screen out the optimal model. The performance of the model was assessed by its discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness with validation.

RESULTS

Fifty three patients with rMG were enrolled in our study. Thirty four patients displayed effective treatment response, showed a higher survival benefits than non-response group, the median progression-free survival(PFS) was 8.53 months versus 5.33 months (p = 0.06) and the median OS was 19.9 months and 7.33 months (p = 0.029), respectively. Three radiomics features were incorporated into the model construction as final variables after LASSO regression analysis. In testing cohort, Logistic Regression (LR) model has the best performance with an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.93 compared with other models, which can effectively predict the response of rMG patients to anlotinib in combination with TMZ. The calibration curve confirmed the agreement between the observed actual and prediction probability. Within the reasonable threshold probability range (0.38-0.88), the radiomics model shows good clinical utility.

CONCLUSIONS

The above-described radiomics model performed well, which can serve as a clinical tool for individualized prediction of the response to anlotinb combined with TMZ in rMG patients.

Emerging agents for the treatment of advanced or metastatic NSCLC without actionable genomic alterations with progression on first-line therapy

INTRODUCTION

Lung cancer is the second most common cancer in the world and the leading cause of cancer-related mortality. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), as monotherapy or in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy, have emerged as the standard of care first-line treatment option for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without actionable genomic alterations (AGAs). Despite significant improvements in patient outcomes with these regimens, primary or acquired resistance is common and most patients develop disease progression, resulting in poor survival.

AREAS COVERED

We review the current treatments commonly used for NSCLC without AGAs in the first-line and subsequent settings and describe the unmet needs for these patients in the second-line setting, including a lack of standard definitions for primary and required resistance, and few effective treatment options for patients who develop progression of their disease on first-line therapy. We describe key mechanisms of resistance to ICIs and emerging therapies that are being investigated for patients who develop progression on ICIs and platinum-based chemotherapy.

EXPERT OPINION

Emerging agents in development have a variety of different mechanisms of action and will likely change standard of care for second-line therapy and beyond for patients with NSCLC without AGAs in the future.

Tocilizumab (monoclonal anti-IL-6R antibody) reverses anlotinib resistance in osteosarcoma

Purpose

Anlotinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) has been in clinical application to inhibit malignant cell growth and lung metastasis in osteosarcoma (OS). However, a variety of drug resistance phenomena have been observed in the treatment. We aim to explore the new target to reverse anlotinib resistance in OS.

Materials and Methods

In this study, we established four OS anlotinib-resistant cell lines, and RNA-sequence was performed to evaluate differentially expressed genes. We verified the results of RNA-sequence by PCR, western blot and ELISA assay. We further explored the effects of tocilizumab (anti- IL-6 receptor), either alone or in combined with anlotinib, on the inhibition of anlotinib-resistant OS cells malignant viability by CCK8, EDU, colony formation, apoptosis, transwell, wound healing, Cytoskeletal stain assays, and xenograft nude mouse model. The expression of IL-6 in 104 osteosarcoma samples was tested by IHC.

Results

We found IL-6 and its downstream pathway STAT3 were activated in anlotinib-resistant osteosarcoma. Tocilizumab impaired the tumor progression of anlotinib-resistant OS cells, and combined treatment with anlotinib augmented these effects by inhibiting STAT3 expressions. IL-6 was highly expressed in patients with OS and correlated with poor prognosis.

Conclusion

Tocilizumab could reverse anlotinib resistance in OS by IL-6/STAT3 pathway and the combination treatment with anlotinib rationalized further studies and clinical treatment of OS.

Central retinal vein occlusion with cerebral infarction secondary to anlotinib treatment: a case report and literature review

Purpose: We present a rare case of an elderly man with minimal pre-existing thromboses risk, who experienced central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) and cerebral infarction after oral intake of the anti-cancer drug anlotinib, likely due to a drug-related complication. Observations: A male, aged 65 years, sought care at the ophthalmology department because of acute painless 5-day vision loss in the right eye, in combination with cerebral infarction history, after oral intake of anlotinib for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) for over 16 months. Clinical assessment and ancillary examination verified a right eye central retinal vein occlusion diagnosis. Anlotinib is a multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is reported to potently suppress vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor, in order to exert strong antitumor angiogenesis and inhibit tumor occurrence. Although anlotinib is only regarded as a possible thrombosis risk factor, it is possible that anlotinib administration markedly enhanced vaso-occlusive risk within this patient. Conclusion and significance: Herein, we present the first report of anlotinib-induced CRVO and cerebral infarction to our knowledge. Given our evidences, anlotinib usage is intricately linked to sight- and life-threatening thrombotic effects even among patients with reduced thrombophilic risk. Hence, patients receiving this drug must be carefully monitored for possible drug-related complications.

Efficacy and Safety Analysis of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors plus Angiogenesis Inhibitors for the Treatment of Advanced Driver-negative NSCLC in Elderly Patients: A Retrospective Study

Background and Objective: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with angiogenesis inhibitors may have synergistic effects in elderly patients with advanced driver-negative NSCLC, but its true efficacy remains unclear. In addition, chemotherapy tolerance in elderly NSCLC patients is poor, and the precise identification of the population that may benefit from ICIs combined with angiogenesis inhibitors is also the focus of current research. Methods: We retrospectively compared the efficacy and safety of ICIs combined with or without antiangiogenic agents in elderly patients with advanced driver-gene negative NSCLC ≥65 years of age in the Cancer Center of Suzhou Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University. The primary endpoint was PFS. Secondary endpoints were OS, ORR, and immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Results: A total of 36 patients in the IA group (immune checkpoint inhibitors plus angiogenesis inhibitors group) and 43 patients in the NIA group (immune checkpoint inhibitors without angiogenesis inhibitors group) were enrolled in the study between January 1, 2019 and December 31, 2021. The median follow-up time for patients in the IA group and NIA group was 18.2 months (95%CI: 14 - 22.5 months) and 21.4 months (95%CI: 16.7 -26.1 months), respectively. The median PFS and median OS were longer in the IA group compared to the NIA group (8.1 months vs 5.3 months; HR for PFS: 0.778, 95%CI: 0.474-1.276, P=0.32; NA vs 30.9 months; HR for OS: 0.795, 95%CI: 0.396-1.595, P=0.519). There were no significant differences in median PFS and median OS between the two groups. Subgroup analysis showed that patients in the IA group had significantly longer PFS in the subgroup with PD-L1 expression ≥50% (P=0.017), and the association between different groups and disease progression was still different in the two subgroups (P for interaction = 0.002). There was no significant difference in ORR between the two groups (23.3% vs 30.5%, P=0.465). The incidence of irAEs in the IA group was lower than that in the NIA group (39.5% vs 19.4%, P=0.05), and the cumulative incidence of treatment interruptions due to irAEs was significantly reduced (P=0.045). Conclusion: In elderly patients with advanced driver-negative NSCLC, the addition of antiangiogenic agents to ICIs therapy did not provide significant clinical benefit, but the incidence of irAEs and treatment interruptions due to irAEs was significantly reduced. In the subgroup analysis, we found that the clinical benefit of this combination therapy was observed in patients with PD-L1 expression ≥50%, which warrants further exploration.

Efficacy and safety of combined immunotherapy and antiangiogenic therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a real-world observation study

PURPOSE

This study was performed to investigate the efficacy and safety of combined immunotherapy and antiangiogenic therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the real world.

METHODS

Data on clinicopathological features, efficacy and adverse events (AEs) were collected retrospectively in advanced NSCLC patients who received immunotherapy combined with antiangiogenic therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 85 advanced NSCLC patients were enrolled. The patients had a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 7.9 months and a median overall survival (OS) of 18.60 months. The objective response rate and disease control rate were 32.9% and 83.5%, respectively. Subgroup analysis revealed that NSCLC patients with stage IV (p = 0.042), brain metastasis (p = 0.016) and bone metastasis (p = 0.016) had shorter PFS. NSCLC patients with brain metastasis (p = 0.025), liver metastasis (p = 0.012), bone metastasis (p = 0.014) and EGFR mutations (p = 0.033) had shorter OS. Multivariate analysis revealed that brain metastasis (HR = 1.798, 95% CI: 1.038, 3.112, p = 0.036) and bone metastasis (HR = 1.824, 95% CI: 1.077, 3.090, p = 0.025) were independent predictive factors of PFS, and bone metastasis (HR = 2.00, 95% CI: 1.124, 3.558, p = 0.018) was an independent predictive factor of OS. In addition, patients receiving immunotherapy combined with antiangiogenic therapy in second-line therapy had longer OS than those receiving immunotherapy in third- or later-line therapy (p = 0.039). Patients with EGFR mutations who received combination therapy had worse OS than those with KRAS mutations (p = 0.026). Furthermore, PD-L1 expression was associated with treatment responses in advanced NSCLC (χ2 = 22.123, p = 0.000). AEs of different grades occurred in 92.9% (79/85) of NSCLC patients, most of which were mild grade 1/2 AEs. No grade 5 fatal AEs occurred.

CONCLUSION

Immunotherapy combined with antiangiogenic therapy was an option for advanced NSCLC patients with good safety and tolerability. Brain metastases and bone metastases were potentially independent negative predictors of PFS. Bone metastases were a potential independent negative predictor of OS. PD-L1 expression was a potential predictor of response for immunotherapy combined with antiangiogenic therapy.

Long-term survival with anlotinib as a front-line treatment in an elderly NSCLC patient: A case report

BACKGROUND

Half of the population of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients are older than 70 years and have limited therapeutic options due to poor tolerance and being excluded in most clinical trials. Anlotinib hydrochloride, a novel oral multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has been approved for the standard third-line treatment for NSCLC in China. Herein we report an elderly NSCLC patient without any driver gene mutations who was undergoing anlotinib as a front-line treatment and who achieved long-term survival.

CASE SUMMARY

The 77-year-old male patient was admitted to the hospital for chest tightness after engaging in physical activity for a week. The patient has been diagnosed with stage IIIB driver gene-negative squamous cell lung carcinoma. After that, he was treated with anlotinib for 2 years and 10 months from the first diagnosis until the last disease progression. Briefly, anlotinib combined with platinum-based chemotherapy was performed as the first-line therapy over six cycles. After 6 more cycles of anlotinib monotherapy maintenance, disease progression occurred. Then, anlotinib combined with tegafur was administered as a salvage treatment, and the disease was controlled again. After 29 cycles of anlotinib combined with tegafur regimens, the disease progressed finally. The patient achieved a total of 34 months of progression-free survival after anlotinib was used as the front-line treatment. He is still alive with a good performance status now (performance status score: 1).

CONCLUSION

This patient achieved long-term survival using anlotinib as a front-line regimen combined with chemotherapy.

MNK/eIF4E inhibition overcomes anlotinib resistance in non-small cell lung cancer

Anlotinib is approved for refractory cases in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This is a novel oral multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor, but patients inevitably face prospects of drug resistance during the treatment process. Using anlotinib-resistant NSCLC models, this work investigated the underlying molecular mechanism and systematically addressed the issue of anlotinib resistance. We demonstrated that expression and activity of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) were upregulated in NSCLC cells due to prolonged exposure to anlotinib. eIF4E depletion resulted in significant effects to anlotinib-resistant cells, showing proliferation inhibition and apoptosis inducement. We further showed that MAP kinase interacting serine/threonine kinase (MNK)-dependent eIF4E inhibition by cercosporamide was active against anlotinib-resistant cells and significantly augmented anlotinib's efficacy in parental NSCLC cells. Importantly, observations from in-vitro experiments are consistent in in vivo anlotinib-resistant and anlotinib-sensitive NSCLC cancer xenograft mouse models. Our work is the first to reveal that eIF4E is involved intimately in anlotinib resistance development in NSCLC, and this eIF4E activation can be reversed by cercosporamide or other MNK inhibitors.

Anlotinib prove to be a potential therapy for the treatment of pulmonary fibrosis complicated with lung adenocarcinoma

Pulmonary fibrosis is a chronic interstitial fibrosis lung disease with high mortality, which is often complicated with lung cancer. The incidence of IPF complicated with lung cancer is getting higher and higher. At present, there is no consensus on the management and treatment of pulmonary fibrosis patients with lung cancer. There is an urgent need to develop preclinical drug evaluation methods for IPF with lung cancer and potential therapeutic drugs for IPF with lung cancer. The pathogenic mechanism of IPF is similar to that of lung cancer, and the multi-effect drugs with anticancer and anti-fibrosis will have potential value in the treatment of IPF complicated with lung cancer. In this study, we established an animal model of IPF complicated with lung cancer in situ to evaluate the therapeutic effect of the antiangiogenic drug anlotinib. The pharmacodynamic results in vivo showed that anlotinib could significantly improve the lung function of IPF-LC mice, reduce the content of collagen in lung tissue, increase the survival rate of mice, and inhibit the growth of lung tumor in mice. The results of Western blot and immunohistochemical analysis of lung tissue showed that anlotinib significantly inhibited the expression of fibrosis marker protein α-SMA, Collagen I and Fibronectin and tumor proliferation marker protein PCNA in mouse lung tissue, and down-regulated the content of serum tumor marker CEA. Through transcriptome analysis, we found that anlotinib regulates MAPK signal pathway, PARP signal pathway and coagulation cascade signal pathway in lung cancer and pulmonary fibrosis, which all play an important role in lung cancer and pulmonary fibrosis. In addition, there is crosstalk between the signal pathway participated by the target of anlotinib and MAPK, JAK/STAT and mTOR signal pathway. In summary, anlotinib will be a candidate for IPF-LC treatment.