Outcome of patients with relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who fail second-line salvage regimens in the International CORAL study

Axicabtagene ciloleucel compared to standard of care in Canadian patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma: a cost-effectiveness analysis of the ZUMA-7 trial

AIMS AND BACKGROUND

In the pivotal ZUMA-7 trial, second-line (2L) treatment with axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) had superior clinical outcomes compared to standard of care (SOC; salvage chemoimmunotherapy followed by high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplant in responders) in patients with large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) who were refractory or relapsed (r/r) within 12 months of completion of frontline therapy. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of axi-cel compared to SOC for 2L LBCL in Canada.

METHODS

A 3-health state partitioned-survival model was used to estimate the cost-effectiveness of axi-cel vs. SOC from a Canadian healthcare system perspective. Clinical outcomes were informed by ZUMA-7. The model calculated expected quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), total costs, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).

RESULTS

Over a lifetime horizon, the model estimated a total of 9.48 and 7.25 QALYs, and total costs of $569,168 and $337,906 for axi-cel and SOC, respectively, resulting in an ICER of $103,810/QALY. When adjusting for the substantial proportion of patients in the SOC arm who received cellular therapy as subsequent treatment, the ICER was reduced to $78,555/QALY.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with axi-cel in 2L is a cost-effective option that addresses an important unmet clinical need for Canadian patients with r/r LBCL.

Atezolizumab, obinutuzumab and venetoclax for the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory B non-Hodgkin lymphoma: Final analysis of a phase II trial from the LYSA group

Developing new therapeutic regimens for relapsed/refractory (R/R) B non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) patients remains a significant unmet clinical need. Our objective was to evaluate atezolizumab (ATE), obinutuzumab (OBI) and venetoclax (VEN) combination in patients with R/R NHL who had received at least one prior anti-CD20-containing immunochemotherapy regimen. We report here the final analysis of the phase II LYSA-promoted multicentre trial (NCT03276468) of this combination in follicular lymphoma (FL, n = 58), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL, n = 58) and marginal zone lymphoma (MZL, n = 20). The primary end-point for FL and DLBCL was not met: ATE, OBI, and VEN resulted in an overall response rate (ORR) at the end of induction (EOI) of 53.6% for FL (cohort 1) and 23.6% for DLBCL (cohort 2) when a minimum of 70% and 48% was expected respectively. The median progression-free survival was 11.0 and 2.7 months in cohorts 1 and 2 respectively. In cohort 3 (MZL), the ORR at the EOI was evaluated at 66.7%. The most frequent adverse events (AEs) were cytopenias. We also observed 7.4% of autoimmune AE imputable to the combination. In this phase II study, ATE, OBI and VEN demonstrated moderate efficacy and a manageable toxicity profile when used as induction and maintenance therapy.

Semiquantitative PET Parameters Refine Prognosis in CAR T-Treated Lymphoma After 1 and 3 Months: A Prospective Single-Center Study

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapy has shown remarkable efficacy in treating relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma. However, for nearly half of these patients, the therapy eventually does not achieve durable remission. We investigated whether semiquantitative PET parameters (namely, SUVmax, metabolic tumor volume [MTV], and total lesion glycolysis [TLG]) could improve risk stratification 1 mo (PET1m) and 3 mo (PET3m) after CAR T infusion. Methods: In this prospective, single-center cohort study, patients with large B-cell lymphoma received axicabtagene ciloleucel or tisagenlecleucel. [18F]FDG PET/CT scans were acquired at baseline, 1 mo, and 3 mo after infusion. MTV and TLG were calculated using a threshold SUVmax of 4 or greater. Patients were followed for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and duration of response (DoR). The imaging assessment was based on the Lugano recommendation for response assessment. Prognostic factors were identified using univariate and multivariate Cox regression. Results: Sixty-one patients were enrolled, with a median follow-up of 18 mo. Twenty-eight (46%) patients died. Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank tests indicated a significant association of elevated Deauville score (DS), SUVmax, MTV, and TLG with OS (all P < 0.05). DS cutoff was arbitrarily fixed at 4. The optimal SUVmax, MTV, and TLG cutoffs at PET1m were 9.1, 60.8, and 97.0, respectively; whereas at PET3m, they were 6.3, 120.1, and 436.9, respectively. Patients with an SUVmax of 6.3 or greater at PET3m had an 8-fold increase in risk of death (hazard ratio [HR], 8.15; 95% CI, 2.81-23.6; P < 0.01) compared with those below this cutoff. Similarly, higher MTV (≥120.1) at PET3m yielded a nearly 10-fold risk (HR, 9.87; 95% CI, 3.65-26.7; P < 0.01). DS, SUVmax, MTV, and TLG at both PET1m and PET3m were associated with OS and PFS (all P < 0.05), whereas PET3m parameters also correlated with DoR (P < 0.05). Harrell C-index values were higher for PET3m measures than for PET1m, though differences were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). On multivariable analysis, older age (HR, 1.10), bridging therapy (HR, 10.91), elevated lactate dehydrogenase (HR, 6.43), increased fibrinogen (HR, 5.27), and higher SUVmax at PET3m (HR, 11.03) independently predicted poorer OS. There were no significant associations between SUVmax, MTV, and TLG with CAR T-related toxicities. Conclusion: Semiquantitative PET parameters, such as SUVmax, MTV, and TLG, at 1 mo and 3 mo after CAR T-cell therapy correlate significantly with OS, PFS, and DoR. [18F]FDG PET/CT at 3 mo may offer slightly stronger prognostic discrimination, but both time points can be used for early risk stratification.

Real-World Effectiveness of Chemoimmunotherapy and Novel Therapies for Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Aggressive Large B-Cell Lymphoma

INTRODUCTION

Clinical trials provide meaningful data regarding the safety and efficacy of novel therapies but there is often a lag between the time of new drug approval and information on posttreatment clinical outcomes in real-world practice. This study evaluated clinical outcomes in a large real-world population of patients with relapsed and/or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (r/r LBCL) treated with chemoimmunotherapy or novel therapies in second or later lines of therapy (2L+).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from the Lymphoma Epidemiology of Outcomes (LEO) Consortium of Real-World Evidence (CReWE) cohort (1/1/2015-2/15/2023) were analyzed. Patients' demographic and clinical characteristics were described and response rates, duration of response, progression-free survival, and overall survival were evaluated. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess associations between patient clinical characteristics and outcomes.

RESULTS

The 2L+ cohort included patients treated with chemoimmunotherapy (N = 593), lenalidomide-based therapy (n = 60), polatuzumab vedotin-based therapy (N = 116), tafasitamab-based therapy (N = 55), and loncastuximab tesirine (N = 42). Most patients who received prior chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) were refractory to the treatment. Across all patients, overall response rates were <50%, with one-quarter achieving complete response and median duration of response and overall survival were short (<6 and <10 months, respectively) among patients treated with chemoimmunotherapy or novel therapies. The prognosis was worse for patients who had previously received CAR-T. Primary refractory status, high-risk disease, and failing 3 or more lines of therapy were significantly associated with worse outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Patients with r/r LBCL have unfavorable outcomes and need more effective treatment alternatives.

Outcome correlates of approved CD19-targeted CAR T cells for large B cell lymphoma

CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells have provided a breakthrough in the treatment of patients with relapsed and/or refractory large B cell lymphoma (LBCL). Currently, three CD19-targeted CAR T cell products are approved by the FDA and various other regulators for the treatment of patients with LBCL: axicabtagene ciloleucel, tisagenlecleucel and lisocabtagene maraleucel. Response rates following infusion of these CD19-targeted CAR T cells have been promising; however, approximately half of treated patients show relapse within 2 years. Furthermore, receiving these agents can be associated with serious toxicities, including cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome. In this Review, we summarize the factors associated with the efficacy, including response and survival outcomes, and toxicity of CD19-targeted CAR T cells in pivotal clinical trials and large real-world datasets describing the outcomes of patients with LBCL who received treatment with these products.

Interaction between stromal cells and tumor cells promotes GCB-DLBCL cell survival via the CD40/RANK-KDM6B-NF-κB axis

The stromal cells as the main component of the tumor microenvironment in germinal center B cell-like diffuse large B cell lymphoma (GCB-DLBCL) probably is accountable for therapy resistance and relapse. To investigate the interaction between tumor cells and stromal cells, we established GCB-DLBCL patient-derived xenograft models to isolate primary tumor cells and coculture them with stromal cells. Additionally, we presented GCB-DLBCL cases with histopathologic confirmation and analyzed the online databases to explore the underlying mechanisms. We demonstrated that CD40 ligand (CD40L) expressed on stromal cells activated the CD40 pathway in GCB-DLBCL tumor cells, protecting tumor cells from apoptosis and up-regulating RANK ligand (RANKL). The RANKL expressed on tumor cells enhanced the expression of CD40L and BAFF in stromal cells, which in turn promoted tumor cells survival through activating NF-κB signaling. Significantly, the activation of CD40 pathway up-regulated KDM6B, a lysine-specific demethylase, and KDM6B further enhanced the transcription activity of NF-κB signaling, which has not been reported in B cells. Here, we provided compelling evidence that the interaction between stromal cells and tumor cells functions as a bona fide anti-apoptotic factor in GCB-DLBCL. This interaction mainly involves the CD40/RANK-KDM6B-NF-κB axis, which represents a promising therapeutic target for GCB-DLBCL.

Lisocabtagene maraleucel for relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma: a cell therapy consortium real-world analysis

ABSTRACT

Lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) is an autologous CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma. We present a multicenter retrospective study evaluating safety, efficacy, and resource use of liso-cel in the standard-of-care setting. Patients received commercial liso-cel at 7 US medical centers, and patient selection, toxicity management, and disease assessment followed institutional practices. Among 101 patients who received infusion, the median age was 71 years (35% aged ≥75 years), 68% had a Charlson comorbidity index score of ≥3, and 10% had secondary central nervous system involvement. Median number of prior therapies was 3; and because of comorbidities, 33% would have been ineligible for the TRANSCEND study. Bridging therapy was used in 60% (43% received polatuzumab-based treatment). Any-grade cytokine-release syndrome occurred in 49% (3% grade ≥3) with any-grade immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome occurring in 26% (10% grade ≥3). The overall response rate (ORR) to bridging therapy was 45%, with 18% achieving a complete response (CR). Following liso-cel infusion, the day 90 ORR was 66% (60% CR); and with a median follow-up of 15.5 months, 12-month progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 55% and 68%, respectively. A normal lactate dehydrogenase level before lymphodepletion was associated with improved PFS and OS. These analyses confirm similar efficacy and safety of commercial liso-cel compared with pivotal trial results. Notably, these outcomes were achieved in patients predominantly of advanced age and with significant comorbidities. Results also likely reflect advancements in patient selection, toxicity management, and the use of novel bridging strategies.

Matching-adjusted indirect comparison of efficacy and safety of lisocabtagene maraleucel and mosunetuzumab for the treatment of third-line or later relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma

BACKGROUND

The treatment landscape for relapsed or refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL) has changed with the introduction of anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies, including lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) and CD20 × CD3 bispecific T-cell-engaging monoclonal antibodies such as mosunetuzumab. Liso-cel and mosunetuzumab have demonstrated positive benefit-risk profiles for third-line or later (3L+) treatment of patients with R/R FL and are approved treatments for these patients. In the absence of a prospective, randomized study, we conducted an unanchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) to assess the efficacy and safety of liso-cel and mosunetuzumab for 3L+ treatment in patients with R/R FL.

METHODS

Unanchored MAICs were performed to estimate relative treatment effects between TRANSCEND FL (NCT04245839) and GO29781 (NCT02500407). For TRANSCEND FL, the leukapheresis set (N = 114) was used for primary comparisons of the following efficacy endpoints: objective response rate (ORR), complete response (CR) rate, duration of response (DOR), and progression-free survival (PFS). The treated set (N = 107) was used for comparisons of the following safety endpoints: cytokine release syndrome (CRS), neurological events (NE), serious infections, and use of corticosteroids or tocilizumab for CRS. Sensitivity analyses were conducted for efficacy using the TRANSCEND FL treated efficacy set (N = 101).

RESULTS

After adjustment, liso-cel was associated with higher ORR (odds ratio [OR] = 3.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.48‒9.67]) and CR rate (OR = 6.46, 95% CI 2.85‒14.65), and improved DOR (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.45, 95% CI 0.26‒0.77) and PFS (HR = 0.28, 95% CI 0.16‒0.49) compared with mosunetuzumab. Results remained consistent across sensitivity analyses. Liso-cel had a lower incidence of grade ≥ 3 CRS (OR = 0.45, 95% CI 0.04‒5.13), grade 3‒4 serious infections (OR = 0.35, 95% CI 0.12‒1.03), and corticosteroid use for CRS management (OR = 0.14, 95% CI 0.03‒0.65); however, liso-cel exhibited higher incidence of any-grade CRS (OR = 1.86, 95% CI 1.01‒3.43), any-grade NEs (OR = 2.16, 95% CI 0.72‒6.44), and tocilizumab use for CRS management (OR = 2.27, 95% CI 0.86‒5.99).

CONCLUSIONS

Findings highlight a potential positive benefit-risk profile of liso-cel over mosunetuzumab as a 3L+ treatment for R/R FL.

Efficacy and Safety of CART Cell Therapy in Aggressive B-Cell Lymphomas Involving the Gastrointestinal Tract

OBJECTIVE

Currently, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CART) therapy represents a highly effective approach for relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphomas. However, it also carries treatment-related risks. Limited data are available on the risks associated with CART therapy in patients with gastrointestinal involvement in B-cell lymphomas. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective cohort study to address this gap in knowledge.

METHODS

During the period from May 2019 to August 2022, a total of 26 patients recurrent/refractory with recurrent/refractory B-cell lymphoma involving the gastrointestinal tract enrolled. Pathology confirmed CD19 antigen expression in tumor tissues. The disease status of patients who failed multiple lines of therapy was progressive disease (PD). Before CART cell infusion, patients received an FC regimen (fludarabine and cyclophosphamide) lymphodepletion. Quantitative PCR and flow cytometry were adopted for monitoring CART cell kinetics and function, with a focus on gastrointestinal AEs during treatment. The overall response rate (ORR) of the 26 patients was 61.5% (16/26), while the complete response rate (CR) was 23.1% (6/26). Their median follow-up time was 22.49 months, while the medians of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 10.88 and 5.47 months, respectively. The 1-year OS and PFS rates were 45% and 42.3%, respectively. The prevalence of gastrointestinal complications was 21/26 (80.7%), including gastrointestinal hemorrhage in 11/26 (42.3%), emesis and diarrhea in 9/26 (34.6%), as well as intestinal obstruction in 2/26 (7.7%). A total of three patients (3/26, 11.5%) died of gastrointestinal hemorrhage. The gastrointestinal hemorrhage group exhibited markedly lower ORR and inferior OS compared to the non-hemorrhage group.

CONCLUSION

Generally, the CART cell therapy is valid in relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphoma with gastrointestinal involvement, but gastrointestinal bleeding is a unique risk factor that requires special attention, particularly in patients with high gastrointestinal tumor burden, as it is associated with poor efficacy and survival.

A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel versus Tisagenlecleucel in the Treatment of Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma Based on a Real-World French Registry

INTRODUCTION

Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) and tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) are chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies that were evaluated in third and later line (3L+) relapsed or refractory (r/r) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in the ZUMA-1 and JULIET trials, respectively. As of October 2021, the DESCAR-T registry included 729 French patients with 3L+ r/r DLBCL who received axi-cel or tisa-cel. Using these data, propensity score matching was used to conduct an adjusted comparison between axi-cel and tisa-cel. Axi-cel was associated with statistically significant improvements in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and significantly more frequent Grade ≥ 3 immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), compared with tisa-cel. There was no significant difference in Grade ≥ 3 cytokine release syndrome (CRS). The current analysis assessed the cost-effectiveness of axi-cel versus tisa-cel in the treatment of 3L+ r/r DLBCL using propensity score-matched data from the DESCAR-T registry.

METHODS

A partitioned survival model was used to extrapolate costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) over a lifetime. Survival curves for PFS and OS were based on independent mixture cure models fitted to digitized Kaplan-Meier data for the propensity score-matched DESCAR-T populations. Average duration of intensive care unit stays for each of axi-cel and tisa-cel in DESCAR-T were used to inform adverse event costs. Selected parametric survival distributions were based on clinical expert validation. Utility values were derived from ZUMA-1, and costs were obtained from French registries and published sources. List prices were used for both axi-cel and tisa-cel. Costs and outcomes were discounted at an annual rate of 2.5%.

RESULTS

Axi-cel is associated with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €15,520 per QALY compared with tisa-cel.

CONCLUSION

Based on explicit willingness-to-pay thresholds applied in Europe, axi-cel is expected to be a cost-effective use of healthcare resources in real-world clinical settings compared with tisa-cel in 3L+ r/r DLBCL.

Development and validation of prognostic models based on 18F-FDG PET radiomics, metabolic parameters, and clinical factors for elderly DLBCL patients

This study aimed to assess the predictive value of baseline 18F-FDG PET radiomics features, metabolic parameters, and clinical factors for PFS and OS in elderly DLBCL patients. Using LASSO COX regression, we derived Radscore from PET radiomics features. We constructed and externally validated prognostic models, evaluating their performance through various metrics. From 341 training set patients and 83 external validation set patients revealed significant correlations between PET radiomics features and survival outcomes. Multivariate COX analysis identified associations of radiomics features (Radscore), metabolic parameters (TMTV, Dmax), and clinical factors (ECOG PS, hemoglobin level) with PFS and OS. In external validation, the combined model incorporating radiomic features, metabolic parameters, and clinical factors showed superior predictive performance for PFS and OS compared to other models. The combined model had higher C-index values for both PFS and OS, and its td-ROC curves exhibited significantly higher AUCs. Calibration curves demonstrated good consistency, and DCA revealed a higher net benefit for the combined model. In conclusion, the combined model that incorporated 18F-FDG PET radiomics features, metabolic parameters, and clinical factors demonstrated superior prognostic predictive ability, providing a useful tool for personalized treatment decisions in elderly DLBCL patients.

Autologous Stem Cell Transplant in Fit Patients With Late Relapsed Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma That Responded to Salvage Chemotherapy

The standard of care (SOC) for fit patients with relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) ≥12 months after completing frontline therapy is salvage chemotherapy (ST) followed by autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). However, this strategy may not be optimal for patients with certain clinical characteristics. We retrospectively studied 151 patients with DLBCL that relapsed ≥12 months after R-CHOP or R-CHOP-like frontline therapy who underwent ST and ASCT at Mayo Clinic between July 2000 and December 2017 or the University of Iowa between April 2003 and April 2020. Clinical characteristics, treatment information, and outcome data were abstracted. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from the time of ASCT were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The median time from frontline therapy completion to 1st relapse was 26.9 months. The median line of ST was 1 (range 1-3), and 17 (11%) patients required >1 line of ST. Best response before ASCT was partial response (PR) in 60 (40%) and complete response (CR) in 91 (60%) patients. The median age at ASCT was 64 yr (range 19-78), and 36 (24%) patients were of ≥70 yr. The median follow-up after ASCT was 87.3 months. The median PFS and OS were 54.5 and 88.9 months, respectively. There was no significant difference in PFS and OS based on the age at ASCT (including patients aged ≥70-78 yr), sex, transplant era, time to relapse, LDH, extranodal site involvement, and central nervous system/nerve involvement at relapse. However, patients with advanced-stage relapse had inferior PFS than those with early-stage relapse (median 45.3 versus 124.7 months, P = .045). Patients who required > 1 line of ST, compared to those requiring 1 line, had significantly inferior PFS (median 6.1 versus 61.4 months, P < .0001) and OS (17.8 versus 111.7 months, P = .0004). There was no statistically significant difference in survival in patients who achieved PR versus CR, though numerically inferior in the former, with median PFS of 38.9 versus 59.3 months (P = .23) and median OS of 78.3 versus 111.7 months (P = .62). Patients achieving CR after 1 line of ST had excellent post-ASCT outcomes, with median PFS of 63.7 months. In conclusion, survival after ASCT was unfavorable in patients with late relapsed DLBCL (≥12 months) who required more than 1 line of ST to achieve PR or CR, and such patients should be treated with alternative therapies. Conversely, survival was favorable in patients who required only 1 line of ST, supporting the current clinical practice of ASCT consolidation in these patients. Moreover, outcomes were favorable in patients aged ≥70 to 78 yr at ASCT, similar to younger patients, highlighting the safety and feasibility of this approach in such patients.

EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 health utilities scores of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients in China

BACKGROUND

This study evaluates the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of persons with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) by using EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 and compares the measurement properties of the two instruments.

METHOD

DLBCL patients were identified via a patient group and were surveyed using web-based questionnaires. Demographic information, socioeconomic status (SES), clinical characteristics, and EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 responses were collected and statistically described. The association between the EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 dimensions were analyzed using the Spearman's correlation coefficient, whereas the correlation of the utility scores was evaluated using Pearson's correlation coefficient. The agreement between the responses of the two instruments were examined using a Bland-Altman (B-A) plot. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to compare the utility scores across subgroups in different clinical states (a t-test was used if there were two subgroups). In addition, the graded response model (GRM) was used to describe the discrimination ability and difficulty characteristics of the dimensions in the two instruments.

RESULTS

In total, 582 valid responses were collected, among which 477 respondents were associated with initial-treatment and 105 respondents were relapsed/refractory (RR) patients. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 utility scores of the DLBCL patients were 0.828 (0.222) and 0.641 (0.220), respectively. The correlation between the EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 dimensions ranged from 0.299 to 0.680, and the correlation between their utility scores was 0.787. The B-A plot demonstrated an acceptable but not strong agreement between EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 utility scores. The GRM model results indicated that all dimensions of each instrument were highly discriminating overall, but EQ-5D-5L had suboptimal discriminative power among patients with good health.

CONCLUSION

Both the EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 showed valid properties to assess the HRQoL of DLBCL patients. However, utility scores derived from the two instruments had substantial difference, thereby prohibiting the interchangeable use of utilities from the two instruments.

Specific Mutation Predict Relapse/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Background

The application of rituximab has significantly enhanced the overall survival rates in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Regrettably, a significant number of patients still progress to relapse/refractory DLBCL (rrDLBCL).

Methods

Herein, we employed targeted sequencing of 55 genes to investigate if gene mutations could predict the progression to rrDLBCL. Additionally, we compared the mutation profiles at the time of DLBCL diagnosis with those found in rrDLBCL cases.

Results

Our findings highlighted significantly elevated mutation frequencies of TP53, MEF2B and CD58 in diagnostic biopsies from patients who progressed to relapse or refractory disease, with CD58 mutations exclusively observed in the rrDLBCL group. In assessing the predictive power of mutation profiles for treatment responses in primary DLBCL patients, we found that the frequency of CARD11 mutations was substantially higher in non-response group as compared with those who responded to immunochemotherapy. In addition, we revealed mutations in HIST2H2AB, BCL2, NRXN3, FOXO1, HIST1H1C, LYN and TBL1XR1 genes were only detected in initial diagnostic biopsies, mutations in the EBF1 gene were solely detected in the rrDLBCL patients.

Conclusion

Collectively, this study elucidates some of the genetic mechanisms contributing to the progression of rrDLBCL and suggests that the presence of CD58 mutations might serve as a powerful predictive marker for relapse/refractory outcomes in primary DLBCL patients.

Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in older patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma: A multicenter study

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy, despite being a potentially curative therapy in relapsed or refractory (RR) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL), remains underutilized in older patients due to limited clinical data. We therefore studied the safety and efficacy of CAR-T therapy in older patients with RR LBCL in the real-world setting. Patients aged ≥65 years with RR LBCL, treated with anti-CD19 CAR-T therapy at 7 US institutions were included in this multicenter, retrospective, observational study. In total, 226 patients were included. Median age at infusion was 71 years (range 65-89). Best objective and complete response rates were 86% and 62%, respectively. Median follow-up after infusion was 18.3 months. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.9 months, with 6- and 12-month PFS estimates of 54% and 44%, respectively. The nonrelapse mortality (NRM) rate was 10.9% at day 180, primarily due to infections, and not impacted by the age groups. Grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity occurred in 7% and 26%, respectively. In univariate analysis, no significant difference in PFS was seen regardless of the age groups or CAR-T type, whereas ECOG PS ≥2, elevated LDH, bulky disease, advanced stage, extranodal involvement, the need for bridging therapy, and prior bendamustine exposure were associated with shorter PFS. These findings support the use of CAR-T in older patients, including those aged ≥80 years. The age at CAR-T therapy did not influence safety, survival, and NRM outcomes. Older patients should not be excluded from receiving CAR-T therapy solely based on their chronological age.

Several factors that predict the outcome of large B-cell lymphoma patients who relapse/progress after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy can be identified before cell administration

AIM

The aim of this study was to analyse the outcomes of patients with large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) treated with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-Tx), with a focus on outcomes after CAR T-cell failure, and to define the risk factors for rapid progression and further treatment.

METHODS

We analysed 107 patients with LBCL from the Czech Republic and Slovakia who were treated in ≥3rd-line with tisagenlecleucel or axicabtagene ciloleucel between 2019 and 2022.

RESULTS

The overall response rate (ORR) was 60%, with a 50% complete response (CR) rate. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 4.3 and 26.4 months, respectively. Sixty-three patients (59%) were refractory or relapsed after CAR-Tx. Of these patients, 39 received radiotherapy or systemic therapy, with an ORR of 22% (CR 8%). The median follow-up of surviving patients in whom treatment failed was 10.6 months. Several factors predicting further treatment administration and outcomes were present even before CAR-Tx. Risk factors for not receiving further therapy after CAR-Tx failure were high lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels before apheresis, extranodal involvement (EN), high ferritin levels before lymphodepletion (LD) and ECOG PS >1 at R/P. The median OS-2 (from R/P after CAR-Tx) was 6.7 months (6-month 57.9%) for treated patients and 0.4 months (6-month 4.2%) for untreated patients (p < 0.001). The median PFS-2 (from R/P after CAR-Tx) was 3.2 months (6-month 28.5%) for treated patients. The risk factors for a shorter PFS-2 (n = 39) included: CRP > limit of the normal range (LNR) before LD, albumin < LNR and ECOG PS > 1 at R/P. All these factors, together with LDH > LNR before LD and EN involvement at R/P, predicted OS-2 for treated patients.

CONCLUSION

Our findings allow better stratification of CAR-Tx candidates and stress the need for a proactive approach (earlier restaging, intervention after partial remission achievement).

CAR T cells vs bispecific antibody as third- or later-line large B-cell lymphoma therapy: a meta-analysis

ABSTRACT

This meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy and bispecific antibodies for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL). We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases until July 2023 for trials assessing CAR T-cell therapies and CD20×CD3 bispecific antibodies as third or subsequent lines in R/R DLBCL. Random-effects models estimated the complete response (CR) rate and secondary outcomes, with meta-regressions adjusting for relevant covariates. Sixteen studies comprising 1347 patients were included in the pooled analysis. The pooled CR rate for bispecific antibodies was 0.36 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.29-0.43), compared with 0.51 (95% CI, 0.46-0.56) for CAR T-cell therapy (P < .01). This superiority persisted when comparing the CAR T-cell-naive patients within the bispecific antibody group, with a CR rate of 0.37 (95% CI, 0.32-0.43). Multivariable meta-regression also revealed better efficacy of CAR T cells with adjustment for the proportion of double-hit lymphoma. The pooled 1-year progression-free survival rate mirrored these findings (0.32 [95% CI, 0.26-0.38] vs 0.44 [95% CI, 0.41-0.48]; P < .01). For adverse events of grade ≥3, the bispecific antibody had incidences of 0.02 (95% CI, 0.01-0.04) for cytokine release syndrome, 0.01 (95% CI, 0.00-0.01) for neurotoxicity, and 0.10 (95% CI, 0.03-0.16) for infections. The CAR T cell had rates of 0.08 (95% CI, 0.03-0.12), 0.11 (95% CI, 0.06-0.17), and 0.17 (95% CI, 0.11-0.22), respectively, with significant differences observed in the first 2 categories. In summary, CAR T-cell therapy outperformed bispecific antibody in achieving higher CR rates, although with an increase in severe adverse events.

Defining primary refractory large B-cell lymphoma

ABSTRACT

Patients with large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) that fail to achieve a complete response (CR) or who relapse early after anthracycline-containing immunochemotherapy (IC) have a poor prognosis and are commonly considered to have "primary refractory disease." However, different definitions of primary refractory disease are used in the literature and clinical practice. In this study, we examined variation in the time to relapse used to define refractory status and association with survival outcomes in patients with primary refractory LBCL in a single-center prospective cohort with validation in an independent multicenter cohort. Patients with newly diagnosed LBCL were enrolled in the Molecular Epidemiological Resource cohort (MER; N = 949) or the Lymphoma Epidemiology of Outcomes cohort (LEO; N = 2755) from September 2002 to May 2021. Primary refractory LBCL was defined as no response (stable disease [SD]) or progressive disease (PD) during, or by the end of, frontline (1L) IC (primary PD; PPD); partial response at end of treatment (EOT PR); or relapse within 3 to 12 months after achieving CR at EOT to 1L IC (early relapse). In the MER cohort, patients with PPD had inferior overall survival (OS; 2-year OS rate: 15% MER, 31% LEO) when compared with other subgroups considered in defining primary refractory disease, EOT PR (2-year OS rate: 38% MER, 50% LEO) and early relapse (2-year OS rate: 44% MER, 58% LEO). Among patients receiving 1L IC with curative intent, we identified that patients with PPD are the key subgroup with poor outcomes. We propose a definition of primary refractory LBCL as SD or PD during, or by the end of, 1L treatment.

Novel CAR T cell therapies for patients with large B cell lymphoma

Approximately 60-70% of patients with large B cell lymphoma (LBCL) achieve long-term remission or a cure after initial treatment. However, patients who relapse or are refractory to initial treatment have a poor prognosis. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has recently attracted attention for its potential to provide a cure or long-term remission even for LBCL that has relapsed or is refractory to conventional chemotherapy. Currently, three CAR T cell products are clinically available for LBCL: tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel), axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) and lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel). These CAR T cell products were initially approved as third- or later-line therapies worldwide. Recently, axi-cel and liso-cel have become feasible as second-line therapies for patients with early relapsed or refractory disease after first-line chemotherapy. Although a large body of data on CAR T cell therapy has been accumulated, the clinical question of how to choose between these three available CAR T cell products has yet to be resolved. The appropriate approach to treatment selection for patients who relapse after CAR T cell therapy also remains unclear. This review discusses treatment strategies to maximize the benefits of CAR T cell therapy.

Outcomes of subsequent antilymphoma therapies after second-line axicabtagene ciloleucel or standard of care in ZUMA-7

ABSTRACT

The optimal management of patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) after disease progression or lack of response to second-line (2L) therapy remains unclear. Here, we report outcomes among patients who received subsequent antilymphoma therapy per investigator discretion separately by their randomized 2L arm in ZUMA-7, namely axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) vs standard of care (SOC). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated from 3L therapy initiation. In the SOC arm, 127 of 179 randomized patients (71%) received 3L therapy. Median PFS among those who received 3L cellular immunotherapy (n = 68) vs those who did not (n = 59) was 6.3 vs 1.9 months, respectively; median OS was 16.3 vs 9.5 months, respectively. In the axi-cel arm, 84 of 180 randomized patients (47%) received 3L therapy. Median PFS among those who received 3L chemotherapy (n = 60) vs cellular immunotherapy (n = 8) was 1.7 vs 3.5 months, respectively; median OS was 8.1 months vs not reached, respectively. Of the 60 patients who received 3L chemotherapy, 10 underwent stem cell transplantation (SCT) after salvage chemotherapy. Median PFS was 11.5 vs 1.6 months, and median OS was 17.5 vs 7.2 months for those who did vs did not reach SCT, respectively. Eight patients received 3L cellular immunotherapy after 2L axi-cel. Of these, 6 patients received subsequent SCT in any line; all 6 were alive at data cutoff. These findings help inform subsequent treatment choices after 2L therapy failure for relapsed/refractory LBCL. The trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03391466.

FDA Approval Summary: Lisocabtagene Maraleucel for Second-Line Treatment of Large B-Cell Lymphoma

In June 2022, the FDA extended the indication for lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) to include adults with large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) who have refractory disease or relapse within 12 months of first-line chemoimmunotherapy (CIT), as well as transplant-ineligible adults with refractory disease or relapse after first-line CIT. Two clinical trials evaluating a single infusion of liso-cel preceded by lymphodepleting chemotherapy supported the second-line indications. TRANSFORM is a randomized, phase 3, open-label trial comparing liso-cel with standard second-line therapy, including planned autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), in 184 transplant-eligible patients. On interim analysis, event-free survival (EFS) by independent review committee (IRC) assessment was statistically significantly improved for the liso-cel arm, with a stratified hazard ratio of 0.34 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.22-0.51; P < 0.0001]; the estimated median EFS was 10.1 months in the liso-cel arm versus 2.3 months in the control arm. PILOT is a single-arm phase 2 trial of second-line liso-cel in patients who were transplant-ineligible due to age or comorbidities but had adequate organ function for chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. Among 61 patients who received liso-cel (median age, 74 years), the IRC-assessed complete response rate was 54% (95% CI, 41-67). Among patients achieving complete response, the estimated 1-year rate of continued response was 68% (95% CI, 45-83). Of the 268 patients combined who received liso-cel as second-line therapy for LBCL, cytokine release syndrome occurred in 45% (Grade 3, 1.3%) and CAR T-cell-associated neurologic toxicities occurred in 27% (Grade 3, 7%), warranting a continued risk evaluation and mitigation strategy.

Network meta-analysis of CAR T-Cell therapy for the treatment of 3L+ R/R LBCL after using published comparative studies

INTRODUCTION

Studies have compared chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies and salvage chemotherapy in relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) patients, but further evidence of their relative effectiveness is warranted.

METHODS

Our systematic review identified studies comparing efficacy and safety outcomes of axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel), lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) and tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) trials to salvage chemotherapy cohorts in LBCL patients with ≥2 prior lines of treatment; and an extended evidence network included indirect comparisons comparing CAR T-cell therapies. We conducted network meta-analyzes using Bayesian hierarchical modeling.

RESULTS

Three studies comparing ZUMA-1 (axi-cel), TRANSCEND (liso-cel) and JULIET (tisa-cel) trials to salvage chemotherapy within the SCHOLAR-1 cohort were identified. Axi-cel (odds ratio [OR]:5.63; 95% credible interval [CrI]:2.66-12.42) and liso-cel (OR:4.26; 95%CrI:2.33-7.93) showed a significant increased overall response rate compared to tisa-cel, but not to one-another. Axi-cel demonstrated significant improvements in overall survival relative to liso-cel (hazard ratio [HR]:0.54; 95%CrI:0.37-0.79) and tisa-cel (HR:0.47; 95%CrI:0.26-0.88). Higher rates of grade ≥3 neurological events were observed with axi-cel than with tisa-cel and liso-cel.

CONCLUSIONS

We highlight important differences in clinical outcomes between CAR T-cell therapies. Axi-cel demonstrated improved overall survival compared to tisa-cel and liso-cel, and both axi-cel and liso-cel showed higher response rates compared to tisa-cel.

Glofitamab as a salvage treatment for B-cell lymphomas in the real world: A multicenter study in Taiwan

BACKGROUND

Glofitamab is a bispecific antibody with promise for treating relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphoma according to a phase 1/2 clinical trial. This study examined its real-world effectiveness.

METHODS

This was an investigator-initiated, multicenter retrospective study including 34 patients who had relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphomas after at least three prior lines of therapy and received glofitamab monotherapy in a compassionate use program in Taiwan between January 2021 and October 2022.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 15.9 months, 56% of patients responded to glofitamab and 23% achieved complete remission. Response to the previous line of therapy significantly correlated with response to glofitamab (p = .020). Most responses were durable; only five out of the 19 responders had documented disease recurrence at the data cutoff date. The estimated progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.2 months, and the estimated 1-year PFS was 33% for the entire cohort. PFS was better for responders than nonresponders (median PFS, 16.9 vs. 1.8 months; 1-year PFS, 60% vs. 0%). Forty-three cytokine release syndrome (CRS) events were observed, three of which were grade 3; all were manageable without glofitamab discontinuation. No immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity was reported. Among seven hepatitis B virus (HBV) carriers (six had antiviral prophylaxis) and 14 patients with remote HBV (four had antiviral prophylaxis), no HBV reactivation was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

In this real-world cohort, glofitamab exhibited effectiveness comparable to trial results without excessive CRS or new safety issues. With appropriate prophylaxis, glofitamab-treated patients with chronic or remote HBV infection are unlikely to experience virus reactivation.

Combinational therapy of CAR T-cell and HDT/ASCT demonstrates impressive clinical efficacy and improved CAR T-cell behavior in relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Approximately two-thirds of patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (R/R LBCL) do not respond to or relapse after anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR T)-cell therapy, leading to poor outcomes. Previous studies have suggested that intensified lymphodepletion and hematological stem cell infusion can promote adoptively transferred T-cell expansion, enhancing antitumor effects. Therefore, we conducted a phase I/II clinical trial in which CNCT19 (an anti-CD19 CAR T-cell) was administered after myeloablative high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (HDT/ASCT) in patients with R/R LBCL.

METHODS

Transplant-eligible patients with LBCL who were refractory to first-line immunochemotherapy or experiencing R/R status after salvage chemotherapy were enrolled. The study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this combinational therapy. Additionally, frozen peripheral blood mononuclear cell samples from this trial and CNCT19 monotherapy studies for R/R LBCL were used to evaluate the impact of the combination therapy on the in vivo behavior of CNCT19 cells.

RESULTS

A total of 25 patients with R/R LBCL were enrolled in this study. The overall response and complete response rates were 92.0% and 72.0%, respectively. The 2-year progression-free survival rate was 62.3%, and the overall survival was 68.5% after a median follow-up of 27.0 months. No unexpected toxicities were observed. All cases of cytokine release syndrome were of low grade. Two cases (8%) experienced grade 3 or higher CAR T-cell-related encephalopathy syndrome. The comparison of CNCT19 in vivo behavior showed that patients in the combinational therapy group exhibited enhanced in vivo expansion of CNCT19 cells and reduced long-term exhaustion formation, as opposed to those receiving CNCT19 monotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The combinational therapy of HDT/ASCT and CNCT19 demonstrates impressive efficacy, improved CNCT19 behavior, and a favorable safety profile.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS

ChiCTR1900025419 and NCT04690192.

Cost-effectiveness analysis 3L of axicabtagene ciloleucel vs tisagenlecleucel and lisocabtagene maraleucel in Japan

Aim: Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) was performed to compare axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) with tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) and lisocabtagene (liso-cel) for treatment of relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma in adult patients after ≥2 lines of therapy in Japan. Materials & methods: Cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted using the partition survival mixture cure model based on the ZUMA-1 trial and adjusted to the JULIET and TRANSCEND trials using matching-adjusted indirect comparisons. Results & conclusion: Axi-cel was associated with greater incremental life years (3.13 and 2.85) and incremental quality-adjusted life-years (2.65 and 2.24), thus generated lower incremental direct medical costs (-$976.29 [-¥137,657] and -$242.00 [-¥34,122]), compared with tisa-cel and liso-cel. Axi-cel was cost-effective option compared with tisa-cel and liso-cel from a Japanese payer's perspective.

Clinical pharmacology strategies to accelerate the development of polatuzumab vedotin and summary of key findings

The favorable benefit-risk profile of polatuzumab vedotin, as demonstrated in a pivotal Phase Ib/II randomized study (GO29365; NCT02257567), coupled with the need for effective therapies in relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), prompted the need to accelerate polatuzumab vedotin development. An integrated, fit-for-purpose clinical pharmacology package was designed to support regulatory approval. To address key clinical pharmacology questions without dedicated clinical pharmacology studies, we leveraged non-clinical and clinical data for polatuzumab vedotin, published clinical data for brentuximab vedotin, a similar antibody-drug conjugate, and physiologically based pharmacokinetic and population pharmacokinetic modeling approaches. We review strategies and model-informed outcomes that contributed to regulatory approval of polatuzumab vedotin plus bendamustine and rituximab in R/R DLBCL. These strategies made polatuzumab vedotin available to patients earlier than previously possible; depending on the strength of available data and the regulatory/competitive environment, they may also prove useful in accelerating the development of other agents.

Real-world outcomes following third or subsequent lines of therapy: A Danish population-based study on 189 patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphomas

Outcome data of patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) beyond the second line are scarce outside of clinical trials. Novel therapies in the R/R setting have been approved based on single-arm trials, but results need to be contextualized by real-world outcomes. Medical records from 3753 Danish adults diagnosed with DLBCL were reviewed. Patients previously treated with rituximab and anthracycline-based chemotherapy who received the third or later line (3 L+) of treatment after 1 January 2015, were included. Only 189 patients with a median age of 71 years were eligible. The median time since the last line of therapy was 6 months. Patients were treated with either best supportive care (22%), platinum-based salvage therapy (13%), low-intensity chemotherapy (22%), in clinical trial (14%) or various combination treatments (32%). The 2-year OS-/PFS estimates were 25% and 12% for all patients and 49% and 17% for those treated with platinum-based salvage therapy. Age ≥70, CNS involvement, elevated LDH and ECOG ≥2 predicted poor outcomes, and patients with 0-1 of these risk factors had a 2-year OS estimate of 65%. Only a very small fraction of DLBCL patients received third-line treatment and were eligible for inclusion. Outcomes were generally poor, but better in intensively treated, fit young patients with limited disease.

Two-year follow-up of lisocabtagene maraleucel in relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma in TRANSCEND NHL 001

ABSTRACT

Lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) demonstrated significant efficacy with a manageable safety profile as third-line or later treatment for patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) in the TRANSCEND NHL 001 study. Primary end points were adverse events (AEs), dose-limiting toxicities, and objective response rate (ORR) per independent review committee. Key secondary end points were complete response (CR) rate, duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). After 2-year follow-up, patients could enroll in a separate study assessing long-term (≤15 years) safety and OS. Liso-cel-treated patients (N = 270) had a median age of 63 years (range, 18-86 years) and a median of 3 prior lines (range, 1-8) of systemic therapy, and 181 of them (67%) had chemotherapy-refractory LBCL. Median follow-up was 19.9 months. In efficacy-evaluable patients (N = 257), the ORR was 73% and CR rate was 53%. The median (95% confidence interval) DOR, PFS, and OS were 23.1 (8.6 to not reached), 6.8 (3.3-12.7), and 27.3 months (16.2-45.6), respectively. Estimated 2-year DOR, PFS, and OS rates were 49.5%, 40.6%, and 50.5%, respectively. In the 90-day treatment-emergent period (N = 270), grade 3 to 4 cytokine release syndrome and neurological events occurred in 2% and 10% of patients, respectively. The most common grade ≥3 AEs in treatment-emergent and posttreatment-emergent periods, respectively, were neutropenia (60% and 7%) and anemia (37% and 6%). Liso-cel demonstrated durable remissions and a manageable safety profile with no new safety signals during the 2-year follow-up in patients with R/R LBCL. These trials were registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT02631044 and #NCT03435796.

XPO1 Enables Adaptive Regulation of mRNA Export Required for Genotoxic Stress Tolerance in Cancer Cells

Exportin-1 (XPO1), the main soluble nuclear export receptor in eukaryotic cells, is frequently overexpressed in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). A selective XPO1 inhibitor, selinexor, received approval as single agent for relapsed or refractory (R/R) DLBCL. Elucidating the mechanisms by which XPO1 overexpression supports cancer cells could facilitate further clinical development of XPO1 inhibitors. We uncovered here that XPO1 overexpression increases tolerance to genotoxic stress, leading to a poor response to chemoimmunotherapy. Upon DNA damage induced by MYC expression or exogenous compounds, XPO1 bound and exported EIF4E and THOC4 carrying DNA damage repair mRNAs, thereby increasing synthesis of DNA damage repair proteins under conditions of increased turnover. Consequently, XPO1 inhibition decreased the capacity of lymphoma cells to repair DNA damage and ultimately resulted in increased cytotoxicity. In a phase I clinical trial conducted in R/R DLBCL, the combination of selinexor with second-line chemoimmunotherapy was tolerated with early indication of efficacy. Overall, this study reveals that XPO1 overexpression plays a critical role in the increased tolerance of cancer cells to DNA damage while providing new insights to optimize the clinical development of XPO1 inhibitors.

SIGNIFICANCE

XPO1 regulates the dynamic ribonucleoprotein nuclear export in response to genotoxic stress to support tolerance and can be targeted to enhance the sensitivity of cancer cells to endogenous and exogenous DNA damage. See related commentary by Knittel and Reinhardt, p. 3.

Kymriah® (tisagenlecleucel) - An overview of the clinical development journey of the first approved CAR-T therapy

The emergence of cell and gene therapies has dramatically changed the treatment paradigm in oncology and other therapeutic areas. Kymriah® (tisagenlecleucel), a CD19-directed genetically modified autologous T-cell immunotherapy, is currently approved in major markets for the treatment of relapsed/refractory (r/r) pediatric and young adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia, r/r diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, and r/r follicular lymphoma. This article presents a high-level overview of the clinical development journey of tisagenlecleucel, including its efficacy outcomes and safety considerations.

Infectious complications of car T-cell therapy: A longitudinal risk model

BACKGROUND

CAR T-cell therapy, where a patient's own T cells are re-engineered to express a receptor to a target of interest, is becoming an increasingly utilized cancer-directed therapy. There are significant toxicities that contribute to a novel state of immunocompromise, leading to new patterns of infectious complications that require further detailed study.

METHODS

We created a single-center cohort of adult recipients of CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy and assessed infectious outcomes, supportive care received, toxicities, and markers of immune function up to 2 years following CAR T-cell therapy. Descriptive statistics were used as appropriate for analysis. We additionally conducted time-to-event analysis assessing time-to-first infection with either log-rank testing or Cox regression with univariate analysis, before including significant predictors into a multivariate Cox model of time to infection.

RESULTS

We identified 73 patients who received CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy who predominantly had diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Within 30 days of cell infusion, bacterial and Candida infections were the most common, with 64% of infections due to these organisms. Between 30 days and 2 years postinfusion, respiratory viruses and pneumonia were the most frequent infections, with 68% of infections due to these etiologies. Receipt of tocilizumab, development of immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), or lower neutrophil count were associated with quicker onset of infection in a multivariate Cox model.

CONCLUSIONS

Respiratory viruses remain an important infectious complication of CAR T-cell therapy following the first year. The model may be a useful tool to identify patients at the highest risk of infection.

Mosunetuzumab monotherapy is active and tolerable in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

As part of a phase 1 or 2 study, this single-arm expansion cohort established the efficacy and safety of mosunetuzumab monotherapy in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) (received ≥2 previous lines of therapy). Intravenous mosunetuzumab was administered with cycle (C) 1 step-up dosing for cytokine release syndrome (CRS) mitigation: C1 day (D) 1: 1 mg; C1D8 2 mg; C1D15 and C2D1: 60 mg; C3 + D1: 30 mg. Hospitalization was not mandatory. Patients with complete response (CR) completed treatment after C8; those with partial response or stable disease continued treatment for a total of 17 cycles. The primary end point was CR rate (best response), assessed against a historical control CR rate (20%) by independent review facility. Eighty-eight patients (73.9% de novo DLBCL; 26.1% transformed follicular lymphoma) were enrolled; all had received previous anthracycline and anti-CD20 therapy. Overall response and CR rates were 42.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 31.6-53.1) and 23.9% (95% CI, 15.4-34.1), respectively; CR rate did not reach statistical significance vs the historical control (P = .36). Median time to first response was 1.4 months. Median progression-free survival was 3.2 months (95% CI, 2.2-5.3). The CR rate in 26 patients who received previous chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy was 12%. CRS was one of the most common adverse events (26.1% of patients); predominantly grade 1 to 2 and primarily in C1. Four patients (4.5%) discontinued mosunetuzumab owing to adverse events. Mosunetuzumab demonstrated notable efficacy and a manageable safety profile in patients with R/R DLBCL, including those previously treated with CAR-Ts. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02500407.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Relmacabtagene Autoleucel for Relapsed or Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma in China

OBJECTIVES

Relmacabtagene autoleucel (relma-cel) was recently approved in China for treating relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (r/r LBCL). We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis from the perspective of Chinese healthcare system.

METHODS

A mixture-cure model was developed to project life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted LYs (QALYs), and overall direct cost with a lifetime horizon for patients with r/r LBCL treated with relma-cel versus salvage chemotherapy. Patient-level data from RELIANCE trial and published data from Collaborative Trial in Relapsed Aggressive Lymphoma extension study were used to inform the model. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was estimated and cost-effectiveness was evaluated at the willingness-to-pay threshold of 3 times the national gross domestic product per capita.

RESULTS

The model projected that treatment with relma-cel was associated with incremental gains of 5.11 LYs and 5.26 QALYs compared with salvage chemotherapy at an increased cost of ¥1 067 430 (∼$154 152), resulting in an ICER of ¥203 137 (∼$29 435) per QALY. The model was most sensitive to the uncertainty around the estimated cure rate. The ICER of relma-cel was within the willingness-to-pay threshold in the base case and the probability of relma-cel treatment being considered cost-effective was approximately 74%.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with salvage chemotherapy, treatment with relma-cel for r/r LBCL in patients who have failed at least 2 lines of systemic therapy is within the cost-effective range from the perspective of Chinese healthcare system and represents a good use of healthcare resources.

Clinical relevance of MYC/BCL2 expression and cell of origin in patients with diffuse large b-cell lymphoma treated with autologous transplant

Dual expression of MYC and BCL2 proteins (double-expressor lymphoma [DEL]) as well as cell of origin (COO) are important prognostic factors in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) after conventional chemotherapy. We studied the prognostic impact of DEL and COO in patients with relapsed DLBCL treated with autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Three-hundred and three patients with stored tissue samples were identified. Classification was successful in 267 patients: 161 (60%) were DEL/non-double hit (DHL), 98 (37%) were non-DEL/non-DHL, and 8 (3%) were DEL/DHL. Compared to non-DEL/non-DHL, DEL/DHL had worse overall survival while DEL/non-DHL did not significantly differ in overall survival. On multivariable analysis, DEL/DHL, age >60 years, and >2 prior therapies, but not COO, were important prognostic factors for overall survival. When we explored the interaction of COO and BCL2 expression, patients with germinal center B-cell (GCB)/BCL2 (+) had inferior progression-free survival (PFS) compared to GCB/BCL2 (-) patients (HR, 4.97; P = 0.027). We conclude that the DEL/non-DHL and non-DEL/non-DHL subtypes of DLBCL have similar survival after ASCT. The negative impact of GCB/BCL2 (+) on PFS warrants future trials targeting BCL2 after ASCT. The inferior outcomes in DEL/DHL need to be verified in a larger number of patients.

Clinical outcomes in transplant-eligible patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after second-line salvage chemotherapy: A retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

The prognosis of patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is poor. Although patients who fail first-line salvage chemotherapy are candidates for second-line salvage chemotherapy, the optimal treatment strategy for these patients has not yet been established.

METHODS

The present, single-center, retrospective study included transplant-eligible patients with R/R DLBCL who received second-line salvage chemotherapy with curative intent.

RESULTS

Seventy-six patients with R/R DLBCL received second-line salvage chemotherapy. Eighteen (23.7%) patients were responders to the first-line salvage chemotherapy. The overall response rate was 39.5%, and overall survival (OS) was significantly longer in patients who responded to second-line salvage chemotherapy than those who did not. Forty-one patients who proceeded to potentially curative treatment (autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation [ASCT], chimeric antigen receptor [CAR] T-cell therapy, or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation) had a better prognosis than those who did not. Among the 46 patients who failed to respond to the second-line salvage regimen, only 18 (39.1%) could proceed to the curative treatments. However, among the 30 patients who responded to the second-line salvage regimen, 23 (76.7%) received one of the potentially curative treatments. Among 34 patients who received CAR T-cell therapy, OS was significantly longer in those who responded to salvage chemotherapy immediately prior to CAR T-cell therapy than in those who did not respond. In contrast, the number of prior lines of chemotherapy was not identified as a statistically significant prognostic factor of survival. No significant difference was detected in OS between patients receiving ASCT and those receiving CAR T-cell therapy after the response to second-line salvage chemotherapy.

DISCUSSION

In this study, we demonstrated that chemosensitivity remained a crucial factor in predicting survival outcomes following CAR T-cell therapy irrespective of the administration timing, and that both ASCT and CAR T-cell therapy were acceptable after the response to second-line salvage chemotherapy.

Survival with Axicabtagene Ciloleucel in Large B-Cell Lymphoma

BACKGROUND

In an analysis of the primary outcome of this phase 3 trial, patients with early relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma who received axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel), an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, as second-line treatment had significantly longer event-free survival than those who received standard care. Data were needed on longer-term outcomes.

METHODS

In this trial, we randomly assigned patients with early relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma in a 1:1 ratio to receive either axi-cel or standard care (two to three cycles of chemoimmunotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation in patients who had a response). The primary outcome was event-free survival, and key secondary outcomes were response and overall survival. Here, we report the results of the prespecified overall survival analysis at 5 years after the first patient underwent randomization.

RESULTS

A total of 359 patients underwent randomization to receive axi-cel (180 patients) or standard care (179 patients). At a median follow-up of 47.2 months, death had been reported in 82 patients in the axi-cel group and in 95 patients in the standard-care group. The median overall survival was not reached in the axi-cel group and was 31.1 months in the standard-care group; the estimated 4-year overall survival was 54.6% and 46.0%, respectively (hazard ratio for death, 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54 to 0.98; P = 0.03 by stratified two-sided log-rank test). This increased survival with axi-cel was observed in the intention-to-treat population, which included 74% of patients with primary refractory disease and other high-risk features. The median investigator-assessed progression-free survival was 14.7 months in the axi-cel group and 3.7 months in the standard-care group, with estimated 4-year percentages of 41.8% and 24.4%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.67). No new treatment-related deaths had occurred since the primary analysis of event-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

At a median follow-up of 47.2 months, axi-cel as second-line treatment for patients with early relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma resulted in significantly longer overall survival than standard care. (Funded by Kite; ZUMA-7 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03391466.).

Long-term effectiveness and safety of high dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation in daily practice in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

We retrospectively evaluated long-term outcomes of high dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplant (HDC/ASCT) in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Between 2004 and 2020, 46 DLBCL patients received HDC/ASCT in our institution, including 12 patients (26.1%), who received as an upfront setting (UFS). At a median follow-up time of 69 months (range, 2-169 months), the 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 82.5% (95%CI, 46.1-95.3%) in the UFS, and 57.8% (95%CI, 38.1-73.2%) in the relapsed or refractory (R/R) patients (n=34), respectively. The 5-year PFS rates were 62.3% (95%CI, 34.0-81.3%) in primary resistant (n=13) or early relapsing (within 1 year from the initial diagnosis) patients (n=4), and 53.3% (95%CI, 25.9-74.6%) in those relapsing >1 year after the initial diagnosis (n=17), with no statistically significant difference (p=0.498). In R/R patients, multivariate analysis showed that the remission status before HDC/ASCT was an independent poor prognostic factor for progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 17.0; 95%CI, 3.35-86.6; p=0.000630) and high-risk category in the international prognostic index for OS (HR, 9.39; 95%CI, 1.71-51.6; p=0.0100). The incidence of non-relapse mortality by 5 years, and 10 years were 12.2%, and 15.2%, respectively. Eleven patients (23.9%) developed second malignancies, which was the most frequent late complication after HDC/ASCT, with 5-year, and 10-year cumulative incidence of 16.9%, 22.5%, respectively. In conclusion, HDC/ASCT is effective for chemo-sensitive R/R DLBCL regardless of the timing and lines of therapy. However, careful observation is required, considering the long-term complications such as secondary malignancies.

Outcomes of polatuzumab vedotin-containing regimens in real-world setting of relapsed and or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients: a matched-control analysis from the Thai Lymphoma Study Group (TLSG)

Relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL) is a challenging condition to treat, and there is an unmet clinical need for effective therapies. Recently, polatuzumab vedotin (Pola), an anti-CD79b antibody-drug-conjugate (ADC), combined with bendamustine-rituximab (BR), has been approved for R/R DLBCL patients. However, real-world data on Pola-based regimens in R/R DLBCL patients, especially in Thailand, are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Pola-based salvage treatment in R/R DLBCL patients in Thailand. Thirty-five patients who received Pola-based treatment were included in the study, and their data were compared to 180 matched patients who received non-Pola-based therapy. The overall response rate (ORR) in the Pola group was 62.8%, with complete remission and partial remission rates of 17.1% and 45.7%, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 10.6 months and 12.8 months, respectively. The study found a significantly higher ORR in Pola-based salvage treatments compared to non-Pola-based therapy (62.8% vs. 33.3%). The survival outcomes were also significantly superior in the Pola group, with longer median PFS and OS than the control group. Grades 3-4 adverse events (AEs) were mainly hematological, and they were tolerable. In conclusion, this study provides real-world evidence of the efficacy and safety of Pola-based salvage treatment in R/R DLBCL patients in Thailand. The results of this study are promising and suggest that Pola-based salvage treatment could be a viable option for R/R DLBCL patients who have limited treatment options.

Safety and efficacy of tisagenlecleucel in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell lymphoma: the first real-world evidence in Japan

BACKGROUND

Tisagenlecleucel, an autologous CD19-directed T-cell immunotherapy, can induce a durable response in adult patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) B-cell lymphoma.

METHODS

To elucidate the outcome of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in Japanese, we retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of 89 patients who received tisagenlecleucel for r/r diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n = 71) or transformed follicular lymphoma (n = 18).

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 6.6-months, 65 (73.0%) patients achieved a clinical response. The overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) rates at 12 months were 67.0% and 46.3%, respectively. Overall, 80 patients (89.9%) had cytokine release syndrome (CRS), and 6 patients (6.7%) had a grade ≥ 3 event. ICANS occurred in 5 patients (5.6%); only 1 patient had grade 4 ICANS. Representative infectious events of any grade were cytomegalovirus viremia, bacteremia and sepsis. The most common other adverse events were ALT elevation, AST elevation, diarrhea, edema, and creatinine elevation. No treatment-related mortality was observed. A Sub-analysis showed that a high metabolic tumor volume (MTV; ≥ 80 ml) and stable disease /progressive disease before tisagenlecleucel infusion were both significantly associated with a poor EFS and OS in a multivariate analysis (P < 0.05). Notably, the combination of these 2 factors efficiently stratified the prognosis of these patients (HR 6.87 [95% CI 2.4-19.65; P < 0.05] into a high-risk group).

CONCLUSION

We report the first real-world data on tisagenlecleucel for r/r B-cell lymphoma in Japan. Tisagenlecleucel is feasible and effective, even in late line treatment. In addition, our results support a new algorithm for predicting the outcomes of tisagenlecleucel.

Lisocabtagene maraleucel as second-line therapy for large B-cell lymphoma: primary analysis of the phase 3 TRANSFORM study

This global phase 3 study compared lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) with a standard of care (SOC) as second-line therapy for primary refractory or early relapsed (≤12 months) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Adults eligible for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT; N = 184) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to liso-cel (100 × 106 chimeric antigen receptor-positive T cells) or SOC (3 cycles of platinum-based immunochemotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT in responders). The primary end point was event-free survival (EFS). In this primary analysis with a 17.5-month median follow-up, median EFS was not reached (NR) for liso-cel vs 2.4 months for SOC. Complete response (CR) rate was 74% for liso-cel vs 43% for SOC (P < .0001) and median progression-free survival (PFS) was NR for liso-cel vs 6.2 months for SOC (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.400; P < .0001). Median overall survival (OS) was NR for liso-cel vs 29.9 months for SOC (HR = 0.724; P = .0987). When adjusted for crossover from SOC to liso-cel, 18-month OS rates were 73% for liso-cel and 54% for SOC (HR = 0.415). Grade 3 cytokine release syndrome and neurological events occurred in 1% and 4% of patients in the liso-cel arm, respectively (no grade 4 or 5 events). These data show significant improvements in EFS, CR rate, and PFS for liso-cel compared with SOC and support liso-cel as a preferred second-line treatment compared with SOC in patients with primary refractory or early relapsed LBCL. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03575351.

Use of a real-world synthetic control arm for direct comparison of lisocabtagene maraleucel and conventional therapy in relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma

This study used a real-world population as a synthetic comparator for the single-arm TRANSCEND NHL 001 study (TRANSCEND; NCT02631044) to evaluate the efficacy of lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) compared with conventional (noncellular) therapies in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Inclusion and exclusion criteria for the real-world study closely matched the enrollment criteria in TRANSCEND. The analytic comparator cohort was created by matching and balancing observed baseline characteristics of real-world patients with those in TRANSCEND using propensity score methodology. Efficacy outcomes comparing liso-cel- (n = 257) and conventional therapy-treated (n = 257) patients, respectively, significantly favored liso-cel: overall response rate (74% vs 39%; p < 0.0001), complete response rate (50% vs 24%; p < 0.0001), median overall survival (23.5 vs 6.8 months; p < 0.0001), and median progression-free survival (3.5 vs 2.2 months; p < 0.0001). These results demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful benefit of liso-cel in patients with third- or later-line R/R LBCL relative to conventional therapies.Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02631044.

Augmented ICE in Patients With Poor-Risk Refractory and Relapsed Lymphomas

BACKGROUND

In patients with relapsed/refractory lymphoma after first line therapy, chemosensitivity to salvage chemotherapy is the main determinant of outcome pre-autologous stem cell transplant . With novel therapies not yet widely available and poor responses to conventional dose salvage therapy such as ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide (ICE) in patients with early relapse within 12 months and primary refractory disease, there is capacity to dose intensify ifosfamide and etoposide (augmented ICE).

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated patients who received augmented ICE between 2010 and 2020 and report on response, deliverability, toxicities, and outcome. Patients were transplant eligible with diffuse large-B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) or Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) with refractory disease or relapse within 12 months. Dose of augmented ICE versus standard ICE was ifosfamide 10 versus 5 g/m² and etoposide 600 versus 300 mg/m². Carboplatin dose with a calculated area under curve of 5 was unchanged. Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody was given in patients with CD20 positive lymphoma. Responding patients who achieved complete response or partial response proceeded to transplant.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients with DLBCL (n = 13) and HL (n = 8) received augmented ICE. Nineteen of 21 completed 2 cycles. Overall response rates were 85% (DLBCL) and 100% (HL). Most patients required transfusion, 2 developed reversible ifosfamide encephalopathy and 86% febrile neutropenia. Eighteen patients proceeded to transplant. 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in DLBCL were 62% and 45%, and in HL, 100% and 88%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Augmented ICE is associated with high response rate and transplant realization at the expense of toxicity.

The role of additional chemotherapy prior to autologous HCT in patients with relapse/refractory DLBCL in partial remission-A retrospective multicenter study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the role of additional chemotherapy before autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in patients with relapse/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who achieve partial remission following first salvage therapy.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter retrospective study of all adult patients with DLBCL who underwent HCT between 2008 and 2020 and achieved partial response (PR) after the first salvage and were either referred directly to HCT (n = 47) or received additional salvage therapy before HCT (n = 22).

RESULTS

Post-HCT CR rate and progression-free survival were comparable between the two groups (66% vs. 68%, p = .86 and median not reached vs. 10.2 months [95% confidence interval, CI 7.1-12.3], p = .27, respectively). Median overall survival (OS) and estimated 3-year OS favored patients who were directly referred to HCT (105.8 [95% CI 63-148] months vs. 14.5 [95% CI 0-44] months, p = .035, and 65% [95% CI 51%-75%] vs. 40% [95% CI 21%-53%], p = .035, respectively). In Cox regression model, while International Prognostic Index and primary refractory versus relapse disease did not impact OS, allocation to a second salvage regimen and older age were both associated with inferior survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.57 95% CI 1.1-5.8, p = .023 and HR = 1.04 95% CI 0.99-1.2, p = .064, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Referring patients with chemotherapy-sensitive disease in PR directly to HCT is associated with better OS compared to those receiving additional lines of treatment.

Novel CD19-specific γ/δ TCR-T cells in relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

BACKGROUND

T cell receptor (TCR)-T cells possess similar effector function, but milder and more durable signal activation compared with chimeric antigen receptor-T cells. TCR-T cell therapy is another active field of cellular immunotherapy for cancer.

METHODS

We previously developed a human anti-CD19 antibody (ET190L1) and generated novel CD19-specific γ/δ TCR-T cells, ET019003, by fusing the Fab fragment of ET190L1 with γ/δ TCR constant chain plus adding an ET190L1-scFv/CD28 co-stimulatory molecule. ET019003 cells were tested in preclinical studies followed by a phase 1 clinical trial.

RESULTS

ET019003 cells produced less cytokines but retained comparable antitumor potency than ET190L1-CAR-T cells in vivo and in vitro. In the first-in-human trial, eight patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL were treated. CRS of grade 1 was observed in three (37.5%) patients; ICANS of grade 3 was noted in one (12.5%) patient. Elevation of serum cytokines after ET019003 infusion was almost modest. With a median follow-up of 34 (range 6-38) months, seven (87.5%) patients attained clinical responses and six (75%) achieved complete responses (CR). OS, PFS and DOR at 3 years were 75.0%, 62.5%, and 71.4%, respectively. Notably, patient 1 with primary CNS lymphoma did not experience CRS or ICANS and got an ongoing CR for over 3 years after infusion, with detectable ET019003 cells in CSF. ET019003 showed striking in vivo expansion and persisted in 50% of patients at 12 months. Three patients received a second infusion, one for consolidation therapy after CR and two for salvage therapy after disease progression, but no response was observed. ET019003 expansion was striking in the first infusion, but poor in the second infusion.

CONCLUSIONS

CD19-specific γ/δ TCR-T cells, ET019003, had a good safety profile and could induce rapid responses and durable CR in patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL, even primary CNS lymphoma, presenting a novel and potent therapeutic option for these patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT04014894.

Cost-utility and value of information analysis of tisagenlecleucel for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the Irish healthcare setting

BACKGROUND

The evidence base of tisagenlecleucel is uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of tisagenlecleucel. To conduct expected value of perfect information (EVPI) and partial EVPI (EVPPI) analyses.

STUDY DESIGN

A three-state partitioned survival model. A short-term decision tree partitioned patients in the tisagenlecleucel arm according to infusion status. Survival was extrapolated to 5 years; general population mortality with a standardised mortality ratio was then applied. EVPI and EVPPI were scaled up to population according to the incidence of the decision.

SETTING

Irish healthcare payer.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL).

INTERVENTIONS

Tisagenlecleucel versus Salvage Chemotherapy (with or without haematopoietic stem cell transplant).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Population EVPI and EVPPI.

RESULTS

At list prices, the ICER was €119,509 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) (incremental costs €218,092; incremental QALYs 1.82). Probability of cost-effectiveness, at a €45,000 per QALY threshold, was 0%. Population EVPI was €0.00. Population EVPI, at the price of tisagenlecleucel that reduced the ICER to €45,000 per QALY, was €3,989,438. Here, survival analysis had the highest population EVPPI (€1,128,053).

CONCLUSION

Tisagenlecleucel is not cost-effective, versus salvage chemotherapy (with or without haematopoietic stem cell transplant), for R/R DLBCL in Ireland. At list prices, further research to decrease decision uncertainty may not be of value.

Outcomes of first therapy after CD19-CAR-T treatment failure in large B-cell lymphoma

Persistence or recurrence of large B-cell lymphoma after CD19-CAR-T is common, yet data guiding management are limited. We describe outcomes and features following CAR-T treatment failure. Of 305 adults who received CD19-CAR-T, 182 experienced disease recurrence or progression (1-year cumulative incidence 63% [95%CI: 57-69]). Of 52 post-CAR-T biopsies evaluated by flow cytometry, 49 (94%) expressed CD19. Subsequent anti-cancer treatment was administered in 135/182 (74%) patients with CAR-T treatment failure. Median OS from the first post-CAR-T treatment was 8 months (95%CI 5.6-11.0). Polatuzumab-, standard chemotherapy-, and lenalidomide-based treatments were the most common approaches after CAR-T. No complete responses (CRs) were observed with conventional chemotherapy, while CR rates exceeding 30% were seen following polatuzumab- or lenalidomide-based therapies. Factors associated with poor OS among patients treated post-CAR-T were pre-CAR-T bulky disease (HR 2.27 [1.10-4.72]), lack of response to CAR-T (2.33 [1.02-5.29]), age >65 years (HR 2.65 [1.49-4.73]) and elevated LDH at post-CAR-T treatment (HR 2.95 [1.61-5.38]). The presence of ≥2 of these factors was associated with inferior OS compared to ≤1 (56% vs. 19%). In this largest analysis to date of patients who progressed or relapsed after CD19-CAR-T, survival is poor, though novel agents such as polatuzumab and lenalidomide may have hold promise.

Salvage Using Polatuzumab Vedotin Based Therapy in Relapsed Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphomas: Early Experience from a Real-World Middle-Income Setting Using Named-Patient Compassionate Access Program

Polatuzumab vedotin is a novel immunotherapy antibody-drug conjugate targeting CD79b. It has been used in relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphomas since its FDA approval in 2019. Presently, this drug is unaffordable or unavailable for patients in Lower-Middle Income Countries (LMIC) like India. This is a retrospective study of adult (> 18 years) patients with R/R large B-cell lymphoma failing two prior lines of therapy, who received Polatuzumab based salvage therapy on a compassionate or named-patient access program. Between May 2019 and April 2022, 10 patients received Polatuzumab vedotin, and 9 were evaluable. The most common regimen used was Polatuzumab-Bendamustine-Rituximab. Out of 43 infusions administered, the adverse event profile was manageable [One grade-2 infusion reaction, 4 patients developed grade 3-4 hematological toxicity and none had grade 3-4 non-hematological toxicities]. Ten infusions were administered in the day care service. After a median of 4.5 cycles (range 1-8), 4 patients achieved CR, 2 had partial response (PR), and 3 had progressive disease (PD). With a median follow up of 491 days (range 8-1048 days), four patients are alive (three in CR and one in PR), three patients have died and three patients were lost to follow up. Early real-world experience from a LMIC setting demonstrates feasibility and a favourable safety profile of Polatuzumab vedotin based approach, along with encouraging response rates in a subset of patients.

Bioinformatics Analysis of miRNAs Targeting TRAF5 in DLBCL Involving in NF-κB Signaling Pathway and Affecting the Apoptosis and Signal Transduction

Background

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is an aggressive B-cell lymphoma with high heterogeneity. There is an unmet need to investigate valid indicators for the diagnosis and therapy of DLBCL.

Methods

GEO database was utilized to screen for differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and differential miRNAs in DLBCL tissues. The Gene Ontology (GO) and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) were applied to analyse DEGs. Then multiple databases were searched for related miRNAs within DLBCL, TNF receptor-associated factor 5 (TRAF5) and NF-kappa B (NF-κB) signaling pathways. The KOBAS database was used to assist in the screening of miRNAs of interest and construct the regulatory network of miRNA-mRNA. Finally, the expression level and diagnostic performance of miRNAs were analyzed with GEO datasets, and DEGs were identified from the GEPIA database.

Results

DEGs were significantly concentrated in the NF-κB signaling pathway and cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction, and involved in the process of immune response and protein binding. MiR-15a-5p, miR-147a, miR-192-5p, miR-197-3p, miR-532-5p, and miR-650 were revealed to be targeting TRAF5 and participating in NF-κB signaling pathway and might impact the apoptosis and signal transduction of DLBCL. In the GEPIA database, TRAF5 was significantly overexpressed in DLBCL. The expression of miR-197-3p was upregulated within GEO datasets, while the rest of the miRNAs were downregulated in DLBCL.

Conclusions

Subsets of miRNAs may participate in the NF-κB signaling pathway by co-targeting TRAF5 and could be prospective biomarkers exploring the pathogenesis of DLBCL.

Glofitamab for Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

BACKGROUND

The prognosis for patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is poor. Glofitamab is a bispecific antibody that recruits T cells to tumor cells.

METHODS

In the phase 2 part of a phase 1-2 study, we enrolled patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL who had received at least two lines of therapy previously. Patients received pretreatment with obinutuzumab to mitigate cytokine release syndrome, followed by fixed-duration glofitamab monotherapy (12 cycles total). The primary end point was complete response according to assessment by an independent review committee. Key secondary end points included duration of response, survival, and safety.

RESULTS

Of the 155 patients who were enrolled, 154 received at least one dose of any study treatment (obinutuzumab or glofitamab). At a median follow-up of 12.6 months, 39% (95% confidence interval [CI], 32 to 48) of the patients had a complete response according to independent review. Results were consistent among the 52 patients who had previously received chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (35% of whom had a complete response). The median time to a complete response was 42 days (95% CI, 42 to 44). The majority (78%) of complete responses were ongoing at 12 months. The 12-month progression-free survival was 37% (95% CI, 28 to 46). Discontinuation of glofitamab due to adverse events occurred in 9% of the patients. The most common adverse event was cytokine release syndrome (in 63% of the patients). Adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 62% of the patients, with grade 3 or higher cytokine release syndrome in 4% and grade 3 or higher neurologic events in 3%.

CONCLUSIONS

Glofitamab therapy was effective for DLBCL. More than half the patients had an adverse event of grade 3 or 4. (Funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03075696.).