MASTL is essential for anaphase entry of proliferating primordial germ cells and establishment of female germ cells in mice

Protein-targeting reverse genetic approaches: the future of oocyte and preimplantation embryo research

Reverse genetic approaches are the standard in molecular biology to determine a protein's function. Traditionally, nucleic acid targeting via gene knockout (DNA) and knockdown (RNA) has been the method of choice to remove proteins-of-interest. However, the nature of mammalian oocyte maturation and preimplantation embryo development can make nucleic acid-targeting approaches difficult. Gene knockout allows time for compensatory mechanisms and secondary phenotypes to develop which can make interpretation of a protein's function difficult. Furthermore, genes can be essential for animal and/or oocyte survival, and therefore, gene knockout is not always a viable approach to investigate oocyte maturation and preimplantation embryo development. Conversely, RNA-targeting approaches, i.e. RNA interference (RNAi) and morpholinos, rely on protein half-life and therefore are unable to knockdown every protein-of-interest. An increasing number of reverse genetic approaches that directly target proteins have been developed to overcome the limitations of nucleic acid-based approaches, including Trim-Away and auxin-inducible degradation. These protein-targeting approaches give researchers exquisite and fast control of protein loss. This review will discuss how Trim-Away and auxin-inducible degradation can overcome many of the challenges of nucleic acid-based reverse genetic approaches. Furthermore, it highlights the unique research opportunities these approaches afford, such as targeting post-translationally modified proteins.

Clinical and gonadal transcriptome analysis of 38,XX disorder of sex development pigs†

Pigs serve as a robust animal model for the study of human diseases, notably in the context of disorders of sex development (DSD). This study aims to investigate the phenotypic characteristics and molecular mechanisms underlying the reproductive and developmental abnormalities of 38,XX ovotestis-DSD (OT-DSD) and 38,XX testis-DSD (T-DSD) in pigs. Clinical and transcriptome sequencing analyses were performed on DSD and normal female pigs. Cytogenetic and SRY analyses confirmed that OT/T-DSD pigs exhibited a 38,XX karyotype and lacked the SRY gene. The DSD pigs had higher levels of follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, and progesterone, but lower testosterone levels when compared with normal male pigs. The reproductive organs of OT/T-DSD pigs exhibit abnormal development, displaying both male and female characteristics, with an absence of germ cells in the seminiferous tubules. Sex determination and development-related differentially expressed genes shared between DSD pigs were identified in the gonads, including WT1, DKK1, CTNNB1, WTN9B, SHOC, PTPN11, NRG1, and NXK3-1. DKK1 is proposed as a candidate gene for investigating the regulatory mechanisms underlying gonadal phenotypic differences between OT-DSD and T-DSD pigs. Consequently, our findings provide insights into the molecular pathogenesis of DSD pigs and present an animal model for studying into DSD in humans.

The Synchronized Progression from Mitosis to Meiosis in Female Primordial Germ Cells between Layers and Broilers

Layer and broiler hens show a dramatic difference in the volume and frequency of egg production. However, it is unclear whether the intrinsic competency of oocyte generation is also different between the two types of chicken. All oocytes were derived from the primordial germ cells (PGC) in the developing embryo, and female PGC proliferation (mitosis) and the subsequent differentiation (meiosis) determine the ultimate ovarian pool of germ cells available for future ovulation. In this study, we systematically compared the cellular phenotype and gene expression patterns during PGC mitosis (embryonic day 10, E10) and meiosis (E14) between female layers and broilers to determine whether the early germ cell development is also subjected to the selective breeding of egg production traits. We found that PGCs from E10 showed much higher activity in cell propagation and were enriched in cell proliferation signaling pathways than PGCs from E14 in both types of chicken. A common set of genes, namely insulin-like growth factor 2 (IGF2) and E2F transcription factor 4 (E2F4), were identified as the major regulators of cell proliferation in E10 PGCs of both strains. In addition, we found that E14 PGCs from both strains showed an equal ability to initiate meiosis, which was associated with the upregulation of key genes for meiotic initiation. The intrinsic cellular dynamics during the transition from proliferation to differentiation of female germ cells were conserved between layers and broilers. Hence, we surmise that other non-cell autonomous mechanisms involved in germ-somatic cell interactions would contribute to the divergence of egg production performance between layers and broilers.

Early Gonadal Development and Sex Determination in Mammal

Sex determination is crucial for the transmission of genetic information through generations. In mammal, this process is primarily regulated by an antagonistic network of sex-related genes beginning in embryonic development and continuing throughout life. Nonetheless, abnormal expression of these sex-related genes will lead to reproductive organ and germline abnormalities, resulting in disorders of sex development (DSD) and infertility. On the other hand, it is possible to predetermine the sex of animal offspring by artificially regulating sex-related gene expression, a recent research hotspot. In this paper, we reviewed recent research that has improved our understanding of the mechanisms underlying the development of the gonad and primordial germ cells (PGCs), progenitors of the germline, to provide new directions for the treatment of DSD and infertility, both of which involve manipulating the sex ratio of livestock offspring.

HIV-1 Establishes a Sanctuary Site in the Testis by Permeating the BTB Through Changes in Cytoskeletal Organization

Studies suggest that HIV-1 invades the testis through initial permeation of the blood-testis barrier (BTB). The selectivity of the BTB to antiretroviral drugs makes this site a sanctuary for the virus. Little is known about how HIV-1 crosses the BTB and invades the testis. Herein, we used 2 approaches to examine the underlying mechanism(s) by which HIV-1 permeates the BTB and gains entry into the seminiferous epithelium. First, we examined if recombinant Tat protein was capable of perturbing the BTB and making the barrier leaky, using the primary rat Sertoli cell in vitro model that mimics the BTB in vivo. Second, we used HIV-1-infected Sup-T1 cells to investigate the activity of HIV-1 infection on cocultured Sertoli cells. Using both approaches, we found that the Sertoli cell tight junction permeability barrier was considerably perturbed and that HIV-1 effectively permeates the BTB by inducing actin-, microtubule-, vimentin-, and septin-based cytoskeletal changes in Sertoli cells. These studies suggest that HIV-1 directly perturbs BTB function, potentially through the activity of the Tat protein.

Recent Research Advances in Mitosis during Mammalian Gametogenesis

Mitosis is a highly sophisticated and well-regulated process during the development and differentiation of mammalian gametogenesis. The regulation of mitosis plays an essential role in keeping the formulation in oogenesis and gametogenesis. In the past few years, substantial research progress has been made by showing that cyclins/cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) have roles in the regulation of meiosis. In addition, more functional signaling molecules have been discovered in mitosis. Growing evidence has also indicated that miRNAs influence cell cycling. In this review, we focus on specific genes, cyclins/Cdk, signaling pathways/molecules, and miRNAs to discuss the latest achievements in understanding their roles in mitosis during gametogenesis. Further elucidation of mitosis during gametogenesis may facilitate delineating all processes of mammalian reproduction and the development of disease treatments.

Comparative analysis of single-cell RNA sequencing data from mouse spermatogonial and mesenchymal stem cells to identify differentially expressed genes and transcriptional regulators of germline cells

Identifying effective internal factors for regulating germline commitment during development and for maintaining spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs) self-renewal is important to understand the molecular basis of spermatogenesis process, and to develop new protocols for the production of the germline cells from other cell sources. Therefore, this study was designed to investigate single-cell RNA-sequencing data for identification of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in 12 mouse-derived single SSCs (mSSCs) in compare with 16 mouse-derived single mesenchymal stem cells. We also aimed to find transcriptional regulators of DEGs. Collectively, 1,584 up-regulated DEGs were identified that are associated with 32 biological processes. Moreover, investigation of the expression profiles of genes including in spermatogenesis process revealed that Dazl, Ddx4, Sall4, Fkbp6, Tex15, Tex19.1, Rnf17, Piwil2, Taf7l, Zbtb16, and Cadm1 are presented in the first 30 up-regulated DEGs. We also found 12 basal transcription factors (TFs) and three sequence-specific TFs that control the expression of DEGs. Our findings also indicated that MEIS1, SMC3, TAF1, KAT2A, STAT3, GTF3C2, SIN3A, BDP1, PHC1, and EGR1 are the main central regulators of DEGs in mSSCs. In addition, we collectively detected two significant protein complexes in the protein-protein interactions network for DEGs regulators. Finally, this study introduces the major upstream kinases for the main central regulators of DEGs and the components of core protein complexes. In conclusion, this study provides a molecular blueprint to uncover the molecular mechanisms behind the biology of SSCs and offers a list of candidate factors for cell type conversion approaches and production of germ cells.