Single-dose pharmacokinetics of piperacillin and tazobactam in patients with renal disease

Removal of common antimicrobial agents by sustained low-efficiency dialysis

Adequate dosing of antimicrobials is paramount for treating infections in critically ill patients undergoing kidney replacement therapy; however, little is known about antimicrobial removal by sustained low-efficiency dialysis (SLED). The objective was to quantify the removal of cefepime, daptomycin, meropenem, piperacillin-tazobactam, and vancomycin in patients undergoing SLED. Adult patients ≥18 years with acute kidney injury (AKI) or end-stage kidney disease receiving one of the select antimicrobials and requiring SLED were included. Blood and dialysate flow rates were maintained at 250 and 100 mL/min, respectively. Simultaneous arterial and venous blood samples for the analysis of antibiotic concentrations were collected hourly for 8 hours during SLED (on-SLED). Arterial samples were collected every 2 hours for up to 6 hours while not receiving SLED (off-SLED) for the calculation of SLED clearance, half-life (t1/2) on-SLED and off-SLED, and the fraction of removal by SLED (fD). Twenty-one patients completed the study: 52% male, mean age (±SD) 53 ± 13 years, and mean weight of 98 ± 30 kg. Eighty-six percent had AKI, and 4 patients were receiving cefepime, 3 daptomycin, 10 meropenem, 6 piperacillin-tazobactam, and 13 vancomycin. The average SLED time was 7.3 ± 1.1 hours, and the mean ultrafiltration rate was 95 ± 52 mL/hour (range 10-211). The t1/2 on-SLED was substantially lower than the off-SLED t1/2 for all antimicrobials, and the SLED fD varied between 44% and 77%. An 8-hour SLED session led to significant elimination of most antimicrobials evaluated. If SLED is performed, modification of the dosing regimen is warranted to avoid subtherapeutic concentrations.

Antibiotic dosing recommendations in critically ill patients receiving new innovative kidney replacement therapy

BACKGROUND

The Tablo Hemodialysis System is a new innovative kidney replacement therapy (KRT) providing a range of options for critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. The use of various effluent rate and treatment durations/frequencies may clear antibiotics differently than traditional KRT. This Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) study was to develop antibiotic doses likely to attain therapeutic targets for various KRT combinations.

METHODS

Published body weights and pharmacokinetic parameter estimates were used to predict drug exposure for cefepime, ceftazidime, imipenem, meropenem and piperacillin/tazobactam in virtual critically ill patients receiving five KRT regimens. Standard free β-lactam plasma concentration time above minimum inhibitory concentration targets (40-60%fT> MIC and 40-60%fT> MICx4) were used as efficacy targets. MCS assessed the probability of target attainment (PTA) and likelihood of toxicity for various antibiotic dosing strategies. The smallest doses attaining PTA ≥ 90% during 1-week of therapy were considered optimal.

RESULTS

MCS determined β-lactam doses achieving ∼90% PTA in all KRT options. KRT characteristics influenced antibiotic dosing. Cefepime and piperacillin/tazobactam regimens designed for rigorous efficacy targets were likely to exceed toxicity thresholds.

CONCLUSION

The flexibility offered by new KRT systems can influence β-lactam antibiotic dosing, but doses can be devised to meet therapeutic targets. Further clinical validations are warranted.

Predicting the Effect of Renal Function on Systemic Clearance: Is a simple scaling method sufficient?

PURPOSE

To employ a simple scaling method to predict systemic or oral clearance for drugs that are primarily renally cleared knowing the fraction eliminated in urine (f_e) and a patient's renal function relative to healthy controls (S_GFR).

METHODS

Observations evaluating drug clearance as a function of creatinine clearance for renally cleared drugs (f_e >0.3) were obtained from literature sources. The analysis comprised of 82 unique drugs from 124 studies including 31 drugs with replicate studies. A simple scaler for renal function was employed and compared to the linear regression of available data. For drugs in which replicate studies were available, the ability of the linear regression (Cl vs Cl_CR) from one pharmacokinetic study was used to predict observations from an assigned replicate and compared to the scaling approach.

RESULTS

For patients categorized as severe kidney disease (Cl_CR fixed at 20 ml/min), the scalar tended to over predict some observations, but 92% of the predictions were within 50 - 200% of the observed data. For drugs with available replicates, the scalar was as good or better in predicting the influence of Cl_CR on systemic clearance from a separate study when comparing against the linear regression approach.

CONCLUSION

A scaling approach to account for alterations in drug clearance appears to have its advantages and represents a simple and generalizable method for guiding dose adjustments in patients with decreased renal function for drugs that are renally cleared (f_e >0.3). In addition to its use in clinical practice, validation of this approach may have implications in facilitating more efficient drug development processes for designing dose-adjusted pharmacokinetic studies in patients with renal disease.

Evaluation of Piperacillin/Sulbactam, Piperacillin/Tazobactam and Cefoperazone/Sulbactam Dosages in Gram-Negative Bacterial Bloodstream Infections by Monte Carlo Simulation

The optimal regimens of piperacillin/sulbactam (PIS 2:1), piperacillin/tazobactam (PTZ 8:1), and cefoperazone/sulbactam (CSL 2:1) are not well defined in patients based on renal function. This study was conducted to identify optimal regimens of BLBLIs in these patients. The antimicrobial sensitivity test was performed by a two-fold agar dilution method. Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) was used to simulate the probability of target attainment (PTA) and the cumulative fraction of response (CFR) for various dosing regimens in patients with different renal functions. For strains with an MIC ≤ 8/4 mg/L, PIS 4.5 g q6h achieved 99.03%PTA in the subset of patients with creatinine clearance (CrCL) > 90 mL/min. For patients with CrCL 60-90 mL/min, PIS 4.5 g q6h achieved 81.2% CFR; for those with CrCL 40-59 mL/min, PIS 4.5 g q8h achieved 80.25% CFR. However, for patients infected by ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae, PIS 4.5 g q6h achieved a CFR lower than 80%. For patients infected by A. baumannii with a CrCL of 31-60 mL/min, PIS 6.0 g q8h and 4.5 g q6h achieved 81.24% and 82.42% CFR, respectively. For those infected by P. aeruginosa, PIS 4.5 g q6h reached 90% CFR. PIS and PTZ achieved a similar CFR when piperacillin was at the same dose. The CFRs of CSL were much lower than those of the other two agents in Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa infections. The antibacterial spectrum of PIS is superior to that of PTZ and CSL. Higher dosages and dosing adjustment according to renal function should be considered to treat Gram-negative bacterial BSIs.

Intermittent Intravenous Piperacillin Pharmacokinetics in Automated Peritoneal Dialysis Patients

Background

Use of intermittent antibiotic dosing is increasing in the treatment of peritoneal dialysis (PD)-related peritonitis. We studied the pharmacokinetics of intravenous (IV) piperacillin in automated PD patients.

Patients and Methods

Eight patients (3 males, 5 females) were recruited and received a single IV dose of piperacillin (35 mg/kg actual body weight). Blood and dialysate samples were collected at the beginning, middle, and end of dwells 1 – 3 (on cycler), and end of dwells 4 – 5 (off cycler) for a 24-hour period. Baseline and 24-hour urine samples (nonanuric patients, n = 7) were collected. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated assuming a one-compartment model. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and piperacillin clearance (CL) values were normalized to 1.73 m2.

Results

The patients were 49.5 ± 10.1 years of age (mean ± SD) and had been receiving PD for a median of 3 months (range 2 – 66 months). Dwell times were 2.25 ± 0.06 hours on cycler and 7.26 ± 0.14 hours off cycler. Piperacillin half-life was not statistically different on or off the cycler (on cycler 1.99 ± 0.39 hr, off cycler 4.39 ± 5.4 hr; p = 0.12) and remained insignificant, even accounting for an outlier (on cycler 2.01 ± 0.41 hr, off cycler 2.54 ± 1.48 hr; p = 0.19). Piperacillin total CL (CLT) was 31.29 ± 6.02 mL/minute. Renal CL (CLR) and PD CL (CLPD) accounted for 8.8% and 16.8% of CLT; CLR correlated well with GFR (CLR = 0.86 GFR + 0.1; p < 0.000 03). Mean piperacillin serum and dialysate end-of-dwell concentrations were above minimum inhibitory concentration of susceptible organisms (8 μg/mL) for the three cycler exchanges only. Serum and dialysate concentrations predicted using a one-compartment model suggest that IV piperacillin 4000 mg would provide adequate concentrations for susceptible organisms over a 12-hour period.

Conclusion

The current IV piperacillin dosing recommendations of 4000 mg every 12 hours for PD-related peritonitis are appropriate for patients on automated PD. Intermittent intraperitoneal piperacillin is not recommended.

Pharmacokinetics of piperacillin in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury receiving sustained low-efficiency diafiltration

Background

Piperacillin is a β-lactam penicillin antibiotic commonly used for the empirical therapy of sepsis and other hospital-acquired infections. However, knowledge regarding the effect of sustained low-efficiency diafiltration (SLED-f), a technique increasingly being used in ICUs, on piperacillin pharmacokinetics (PK) and dosing in critically ill patients is lacking.

Objectives

To describe the PK of piperacillin during SLED-f and compare the results with those reported for other forms of renal replacement therapies.

Methods

Serial blood samples were collected at pre- and post-filter ports within the SLED-f circuit during SLED-f in one session and from an arterial catheter during sampling without SLED-f. Piperacillin concentrations were measured using a validated chromatography method. Non-compartmental PK analysis of the data was performed.

Results

The median clearance and area under the concentration-time curve during SLED-f were 6 L/h and 532 mg·h/L, respectively. Fifty-eight percent of piperacillin was cleared by a single SLED-f session (6 h) compared with previous reports of 30%-45% clearance by a 3.5 h intermittent haemodialysis session. Clearance, half-life and area under the concentration-time curve during SLED-f obtained from this study were comparable with those reported in the post-dilution mode of continuous veno-venous haemodiafiltration studies.

Conclusions

As it can be challenging to accurately predict when SLED-f will be initiated in the critically ill, a maintenance dose of at least 4 g every 12 h with at least a 2 g replacement dose post-SLED-f would be a practical approach to piperacillin dosing in ICU patients with anuria receiving SLED-f with a duration similar to the current study.

Antibiotics and chronic kidney disease: Dose adjustment update for infectious disease clinical practice

Antibiotic prescription in chronic kidney disease patients poses a twofold problem. The appropriate use of antibacterial agents is essential to ensure efficacy and to prevent the emergence of resistance, and dosages should be adapted to the renal function to prevent adverse effects. SiteGPR is a French website for health professionals to help with prescriptions to chronic kidney disease patients. A working group of infectious disease specialists and nephrology pharmacists reviewed the indications, dosing regimens, administration modalities, and dose adjustments of antibiotics marketed in France for patients with renal failure. Data available on the SiteGPR website and detailed in the present article aims to provide an evidence-based update of infectious disease recommendations to health professionals managing patients with chronic kidney disease.

Frequency of Acute Kidney Injury Caused by Tazobactam/Piperacillin in Patients with Pneumonia and Chronic Kidney Disease: A Retrospective Observational Study

 Tazobactam/piperacillin (TAZ/PIPC) is a combination antibiotic frequently used to treat pneumonia. It has recently been reported that TAZ/PIPC worsens renal function in patients with existing renal impairment. Creatinine clearance is generally between 10 and 40 mL/min in Japanese patients, so TAZ/PIPC is given at a dose of 2.25 g three times daily or 4.5 g twice daily. If pneumonia is severe or intractable, the dose frequency may be increased to 2.25 g four times daily and 4.5 g three times daily. We examined the effect of these different dosing regimens on renal function. We studied a cohort of 57 patients with impaired renal function hospitalized with pneumonia and treated with TAZ/PIPC between January 2015 and November 2016. Patients were classified into four groups according to TAZ/PIPC dose: 2.25 g three times daily (Group A); 2.25 g four times daily (B); 4.5 g twice daily (C) and 4.5 g three times daily (D). We examined the frequency of acute kidney injury (AKI) and treatment effectiveness. In Groups A, B, C and D, AKI occurred in 5.6%, 0.0%, 25.0% and 38.5% of patient. In groups C and D, hydration and dose reduction were required to address early signs of impending AKI. Our findings suggest that the higher TAZ/PIPC dose of 4.5 g was responsible for the decline in renal function, even if the dose frequency was reduced.

Simplifying Piperacillin/Tazobactam Dosing: Pharmacodynamics of Utilizing Only 4.5 or 3.375 g Doses for Patients With Normal and Impaired Renal Function

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the pharmacodynamic exposure of piperacillin/tazobactam across the renal function range using 4.5 or 3.375 g dosing regimens.

METHODS

A 5000-patient Monte Carlo simulation was conducted to determine the probability of achieving 50% free time above the minimum inhibitory concentration ( fT > MIC) for piperacillin. Proposed regimens, using solely 4.5 or 3.375 g strengths, were compared with regimens listed in piperacillin/tazobactam prescribing information over creatinine clearance (CrCl) ranges of 120 mL/min to hemodialysis. The probability of target attainment (PTA) at MICs ≤ 16 μg/mL was compared between proposed and standard regimens.

RESULTS

At CrCl 41 to 120 mL/min, prolonged infusions of 4.5 g (3 hours) and 3.375 g (4 hours) every 6 hours resulted in ≥95% PTA versus ≥76% for standard regimens (0.5 hour). At CrCl 20 to 40 mL/min, 4.5 and 3.375 g every 8 hours as prolonged infusions achieved slightly higher PTA (≥98%) versus standard regimens (≥93%). Similarly, PTA achieved with prolonged infusions of 4.5 and 3.375 g every 12 hours (≥93%) was comparable with those of standard regimens (≥91%) at CrCl 1 to 19 mL/min. In hemodialysis, 100% PTA was achieved with prolonged infusion regimens.

CONCLUSION

Piperacillin/tazobactam regimens designed around the 4.5 or 3.375 g dose and prolonged infusions provided similar or better PTA at MICs ≤ 16 μg/mL compared with standard regimens. These observations may support the stocking and use of a single piperacillin/tazobactam strength to simplify dosing.

Status of Hemodialysis of Drugs in 2002

Hemodialysis is a life-sustaining chronic therapy for individuals with end stage renal disease (ESRD). It is also frequently used for days to weeks for patients with acute renal failure who are awaiting the recovery of their kidneys from the acute toxic or traumatic event. Both populations of patients often require complex pharmacotherapeutic regimens, and it is not uncommon for them to be receiving 10 or more concomitant medications. Optimization of care for these patients is dependent on the selection of the most appropriate drug as well as dosage regimen design, which accounts for the influence of hemodialysis therapy on drug disposition. During the last 10 to 15 years there have been several significant changes in the prescribed dose of dialysis and the composition and size of dialyzers available for use. Furthermore, reuse of dialyzers, which was rare in the early 1980s, is now common; it is employed with over 70% of patients with ESRD. The new synthetic dialyzers, which are now used for over 60% of ESRD patients in the United States, are uniformly associated with dramatic improvements in drug removal; dialysis clearance increases of 3 to 10 fold were common for the few drugs evaluated. The influence of these changes in hemodialysis therapy on drug disposition are discussed in a quantitative fashion, and a conceptual framework for drug therapy regimen decision making is presented. For the majority of the drugs reviewed, however, there were no data in the literature regarding dialyzability with currently available dialyzers. The generation of dialyzability data for old and new pharmacotherapeutic agents with state of the art dialysis procedures is clearly needed.

Population pharmacokinetic analysis of piperacillin in burn patients

Piperacillin in combination with tazobactam, a β-lactamase inhibitor, is a commonly used intravenous antibiotic for the empirical treatment of infection in intensive care patients, including burn patients. The purpose of this study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model for piperacillin in burn patients and to predict the probability of target attainment (PTA) using MICs and concentrations simulated from the PK model. Fifty burn patients treated with piperacillin-tazobactam were enrolled. Piperacillin-tazobactam was administered via infusion for approximately 30 min at a dose of 4.5 g (4 g piperacillin and 0.5 g tazobactam) every 8 h. Blood samples were collected just prior to and at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 h after the end of the infusion at steady state. The population PK model of piperacillin was developed using NONMEM. A two-compartment first-order elimination PK model was finally chosen. The covariates included were creatinine clearance (CLCR), day after burn injury (DAI), and sepsis. The final PK parameters were clearance (liters/h) (equal to 16.6 × [CLCR/132] + DAI × [-0.0874]), central volume (liters) (equal to 25.3 + 14.8 × sepsis [0 for the absence or 1 for the presence of sepsis]), peripheral volume (liters) (equal to 16.1), and intercompartmental clearance (liters/h) (equal to 0.636). The clearance and volume of piperacillin were higher than those reported in patients without burns, and the terminal half-life and PTA decreased with the increased CLCR. Our PK model suggests that higher daily doses or longer durations of infusion of piperacillin should be considered, especially for burn patients with a CLCR of ≥ 160 ml/min.

Impact of renal function on the pharmacokinetics and safety of ceftolozane-tazobactam

Ceftolozane-tazobactam is a novel antipseudomonal cephalosporin with a β-lactamase inhibitor. We investigated the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of ceftolozane-tazobactam in subjects with various degrees of renal function. In two phase I, open-label studies, a single dose of ceftolozane-tazobactam was administered as a 1-h intravenous infusion to 24 subjects with normal, mild, or moderate renal impairment (1,000/500 mg) and six subjects with severe renal impairment (500/250 mg). Six subjects with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) received two doses of ceftolozane-tazobactam (500/250 mg each), pre- and posthemodialysis (post-HD). PK parameters were determined by noncompartmental methods. Plasma exposure to ceftolozane-tazobactam increased as renal function declined with only slightly increased exposures in subjects with mild renal impairment; the median area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-∞) for ceftolozane and tazobactam increased 1.4- and 1.2-fold, respectively. In subjects with moderate renal impairment, the AUC0-∞ increased 2.5- and 2.2-fold for ceftolozane and tazobactam, respectively. In subjects with severe renal impairment, the dose-normalized median AUC0-∞ for ceftolozane and tazobactam increased 4.4- and 3.8-fold, respectively. In ESRD subjects, ceftolozane and tazobactam concentrations declined rapidly following the start of HD, with approximately 66 and 56% reductions in overall exposure based on the AUC0-∞ before and after dialysis. Slight increases in exposure with mild renal impairment do not warrant a dose adjustment; however, subjects with moderate or severe renal impairment and those on HD require a decrease in the dose, a change in the frequency of administration, or both to achieve exposures within the established safety and efficacy margins of ceftolozane-tazobactam. Ceftolozane-tazobactam was well tolerated by all renal impairment groups.

Influence of Renal Function on the Pharmacokinetics of Piperacillin/Tazobactam in Intensive Care Unit Patients During Continuous Venovenous Hemofiltration

The pharmacokinetics of piperacillin/tazobactam (4 g/0.5 g every 6 or 8 hours, by 20-minute intravenous infusion) were studied in 14 patients with acute renal failure who underwent continuous venovenous hemofiltration with AN69 membranes. Patients were grouped according to severity (CL(CR) < or =10 mL/min, 10 < CL(CR) < or =50 mL/min, and CL(CR) > 50 mL/min). A noncompartmental analysis was performed. The sieving coefficient (0.78 +/- 0.28) was similar to the unbound fraction (0.65 +/- 0.24) for tazobactam, but it was significantly different (0.34 +/- 0.25) from the unbound fraction (0.78 +/- 0.14) for piperacillin. Extracorporeal clearance was 37.0% +/- 28.8%, 12.7% +/- 12.6%, and 2.8% +/- 3.2% for piperacillin in each group and 62.5% +/- 44.9%, 35.4% +/- 17.0%, and 13.1% +/- 8.0% for tazobactam. No patients presented tazobactam accumulation. In patients with CL(CR) < 50 mL/min, t(%)ss >MIC90 values were 100% for a panel of 19 pathogens, but in those with CL(CR) > 50 mL/min, t(%)ss >MIC90 indexes were 55.5% and 16.6% for pathogens with MIC90 values of 32 and 64. The extracorporeal clearance of piperacillin/tazobactam is clinically significant in patients with CL(CR) > 50 mL/min, in which the risk of underdosing and clinical failure is important and extra doses are required.

Nonlinear pharmacokinetics of piperacillin in healthy volunteers--implications for optimal dosage regimens

AIMS

(i) To describe the first-order and mixed-order elimination pathways of piperacillin, (ii) to determine the between occasion variability (BOV) of pharmacokinetic parameters and (iii) to propose optimized dosage regimens.

METHODS

We performed a five-period replicate dose study in four healthy volunteers. Each subject received 4g piperacillin as a single 5min intravenous infusion in each study period. Drug analysis was performed by HPLC. We used NONMEM and S-ADAPT for population pharmacokinetic analysis and Monte Carlo simulation to predict the probability of target attainment (PTA) with a target time of non-protein bound concentration above MIC >50% of the dosing interval.

RESULTS

A model with first-order nonrenal elimination and parallel first-order and mixed-order renal elimination had the best predictive performance. For a 70kg subject we estimated 4.40lh(-1) for nonrenal clearance, 5.70lh(-1) for first-order renal clearance, 170mgh(-1) for V(max) , and 49.7mgl(-1) for K(m) for the mixed-order renal elimination. The BOV was 39% for V(max) , 117% for K(m) , and 8.5% for total clearance. A 30min infusion of 4g every 6h achieved robust (≥90%) PTAs for MICs ≤12mgl(-1) . As an alternative mode of administration, a 5h infusion of 6g every 8h achieved robust PTAs for MICs ≤48mgl(-1) .

CONCLUSIONS

Part of the renal elimination of piperacillin is saturable at clinically used doses. The BOV of total clearance and volume of distribution were low. Prolonged infusions achieved better PTAs compared with shorter infusions at similar daily doses. This benefit was most pronounced for MICs between 12 and 48mgl(-1) .

Steady-state pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of piperacillin/tazobactam administered by prolonged infusion in hospitalised patients

The objective of this study was to evaluate the steady-state pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of piperacillin/tazobactam, administered by prolonged infusion, in hospitalised patients requiring antimicrobial therapy. Thirteen patients received 4.5 g every 8 h (q8h), infused over 4 h, and pharmacokinetic parameters were determined by non-compartmental methods. Monte Carlo simulations (10,000 patients) were performed to calculate the cumulative fraction of response (CFR) for seven gram-negative pathogens using minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) data from the Meropenem Yearly Susceptibility Test Information Collection (2004-2007, USA) as well as the probability of target attainment (PTA) at MICs ranging from 1 microg/mL to 64 microg/mL. The pharmacodynamic target was free piperacillin concentration remaining above the MIC for 50% of the dosing interval. Mean+/-standard deviation maximum and minimum serum concentrations, half-life, volume of distribution at steady-state and systemic clearance of piperacillin were 108.2+/-31.7 microg/mL, 27.6+/-26.3 microg/mL, 2.1+/-1.2 h, 22.1+/-4.0 L and 8.6+/-3.0 L/h, respectively. The CFR was > 90% for Escherichia coli, Serratia marcescens and Citrobacter spp., 88.6% for Enterobacter spp., 87% for Klebsiella pneumoniae, 85.5% for Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 52.8% for Acinetobacter spp. The PTA was 100%, 81.1% and 12.3% at MICs of < or = 16 microg/mL, 32 microg/mL and 64 microg/mL, respectively. Piperacillin/tazobactam 4.5 g q8h infused over 4 h provides excellent target attainment for bacterial pathogens with MICs < or = 16 microg/mL. However, the CFR was < 90% for four of the seven gram-negative pathogens evaluated.

Continuous-infusion beta-lactam antibiotics during continuous venovenous hemofiltration for the treatment of resistant gram-negative bacteria

OBJECTIVE

To describe the rationale, principles, and dosage calculations for continuous-infusion beta-lactam antibiotics to treat multidrug-resistant bacteria in patients undergoing continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH).

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE search (1968-November 2008) of the English-language literature was performed using the terms continuous infusion and Pseudomonas or Acinetobacter; hemofiltration or CVVH or hemodiafiltration or CVVHDF or continuous renal replacement therapy or pharmacokinetics; and terms describing different beta-lactam antibiotics.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

In vitro, in vivo, and human studies were evaluated that used continuous-infusion beta-lactam antibiotics to treat Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii infections. Studies were reviewed that described the pharmacokinetics of beta-lactam antibiotics during CVVH as well as other modalities of continuous renal replacement therapy.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Continuous infusion of beta-lactam antibiotics, maintaining drug concentrations 4-5 times higher than the minimum inhibitory concentration, is a promising approach for managing infections caused by P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii. Safe yet effective continuous infusion therapy is made difficult by the occurrence of acute renal failure and the need for renal replacement therapy. Case series and pharmacokinetic properties indicate that several beta-lactam antimicrobials that have been studied for continuous infusion, such as cefepime, ceftazidime, piperacillin, ticarcillin, clavulanic acid, and tazobactam, are significantly cleared by hemofiltration. Methodology and formulas are provided that allow practitioners to calculate dosage regimens and reach target drug concentrations for continuous beta-lactam antibiotic infusions during CVVH based on a literature review, pharmacokinetic principles, and our experience at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous infusion of beta-lactam antibiotics may be a useful treatment strategy for multidrug-resistant gram-negative infections in the intensive care unit. Well-established pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic principles can be used to safely reach and maintain steady-state target concentrations of beta-lactam antibiotics in critical illness complicated by acute renal failure requiring CVVH.

Piperacillin/tazobactam-induced seizure rapidly reversed by high flux hemodialysis in a patient on peritoneal dialysis

Despite popular use of piperacillin, the dire neurotoxicity associated with piperacillin still goes unrecognized, leading to a delay in appropriate management. We report a 57-year-old woman with end-stage renal disease receiving continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD), who developed slurred speech, tremor, bizarre behavior, progressive mental confusion, and 2 episodes of generalized tonic-clonic seizure (GTCS) after 5 doses of piperacillin/tazobactam (2 g/250 mg) were given for bronchiectasis with secondary infection. The laboratory data revealed normal plasma electrolyte and ammonia levels but leukocytosis. Neurologic examinations showed dysarthria and bilateral Babinski sign. Computed tomography of brain and electroencephalogram were unremarkable. Despite the use of antiepileptic agents, another GTCS episode recurred after the sixth dose of piperacillin/tazobactam. Brain magnetic resonance imaging did not demonstrate acute infarction and organic brain lesions. Initiation of high-flux hemodialysis rapidly reversed the neurologic symptoms within 4 hours. Piperacillin-induced encephalopathy should be considered in any uremic patients with unexplained neurological manifestations. CAPD is inefficient in removing piperacillin, whereas hemodialysis can rapidly terminate the piperacillin-induced encephalopathy.

Influence of renal function on trough serum concentrations of piperacillin in intensive care unit patients

OBJECTIVE

To explore the effects of renal function estimated by measured creatinine clearance (Cl(CR)) on trough serum concentration (C(min)) of piperacillin given to critically ill patients.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

SETTING

An intensive care unit and research ward in a university hospital.

PATIENTS

Seventy critically ill patients, including 22 with severe trauma.

INTERVENTIONS

All subjects received an intravenous infusion of piperacillin 4 g three times (n = 61) or four times (n = 9) per day. Piperacillin C(min) values were determined 24 h after treatment started and compared to the French breakpoint defining antibiotic susceptibility against Enterobacteriaceae (8 mg/l) or Pseudomonas sp. (16 mg/l).

RESULTS

Median (range) piperacillin C(min) was 11.9 (< 1-156.3) mg/l, with a great variability among patients. Although the median value was close to the breakpoints, sub-therapeutic plasma levels were frequently observed. Piperacillin C(min) was lower than the breakpoint for Enterobacteriaceae in 37% of patients, and lower than the breakpoint for P. aeruginosa in 67% of them. A strong relationship was observed between piperacillin C(min) and Cl(CR): the higher the Cl(CR,) the lower the piperacillin C(min )in serum. For patients with a Cl(CR) < 50 ml/min, enough piperacillin C(min) was achieved in most patients with 12 g piperacillin per day. For patients with higher Cl(CR) values, a piperacillin daily dose of 16 g or more may be warranted.

CONCLUSIONS

In critically ill patients, therapeutic monitoring must be part of the routine, and knowledge of Cl(CR) value may be useful for the choice of adequate initial piperacillin dosing.

Clinical correlation of the CLSI susceptibility breakpoint for piperacillin- tazobactam against extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella species

We assessed infections caused by extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli or Klebsiella spp. treated with piperacillin-tazobactam to determine if the susceptibility breakpoint predicts outcome. Treatment was successful in 10 of 11 nonurinary infections from susceptible strains and in 2 of 6 infections with MICs of >16/4 mug/ml. All six urinary infections responded to treatment regardless of susceptibility.

Human variability in the renal elimination of foreign compounds and renal excretion-related uncertainty factors for risk assessment

Renal excretion is an important route of elimination for xenobiotics and three processes determine the renal clearance of a compound [glomerular filtration (about 120 ml/min), active renal tubular secretion (>120 ml/min) and passive reabsorption (<120 ml/min)]. Human variability in kinetics has been quantified using a database of 15 compounds excreted extensively by the kidney (>60% of a dose) to develop renal-excretion related uncertainty factors for the risk assessment of environmental contaminants handled via this route. Data were analysed from published pharmacokinetic studies (after oral and intravenous dosing) in healthy adults and other subgroups using parameters relating primarily to chronic exposure [renal and total clearances, area under the plasma concentration time-curve (AUC)] and acute exposure (Cmax). Interindividual variability in kinetics was low for both routes of exposure, with coefficients of variation of 21% (oral) and 24% (intravenous) that were largely independent of the renal processes involved. Renal-excretion related uncertainty factors were below the default kinetic uncertainty factor of 3.16 for most subgroups analysed with the exception of the elderly (oral data) and neonates (intravenous data) for whom renal excretion-related factors of 4.2 and 3.2 would be required to cover up to 99% of these subgroups respectively.

Pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics of cefepime and piperacillin-tazobactam against Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae strains producing extended-spectrum beta-lactamases: report from the ARREST program

The frequency of resistance to beta-lactams among nosocomial isolates has been increasing due to extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing enteric bacilli. Although clinical outcome data are desirable, assessment of clinical efficacy has been limited due to the lack of a statistically meaningful number of well-documented cases. Since time above the MIC (T>MIC) is the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) measure that best correlates with in vivo activity of beta-lactams, a stochastic model was used to predict the probability of PK-PD target attainment ranging from 30 (P30) to 70% (P70) T>MIC, for standard dosing regimens of both piperacillin-tazobactam and cefepime against Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae ESBL phenotypes. The P70/30 T>MIC for cefepime at 2 g every 12 h against E. coli and K. pneumoniae was 0.99/1.0 and 0.96/1.0 and for a regimen of 1 g every 12 h was 0.96/1.0 and 0.93/0.99, respectively. For piperacillin-tazobactam at 3.375 g every 4 h against E. coli and K. pneumoniae, the P70/30 T>MIC was 0.77/0.96 and 0.48/0.77 and for a regimen of 3.375 g every 6 h was 0.28/0.91 and 0.16/0.69, respectively. These data suggest that the probability of achieving T>MIC target attainment rates is generally higher with cefepime than with piperacillin-tazobactam for present-day ESBL-producing strains when one uses contemporary dosing regimens.

Evaluation of a novel method to estimate absolute bioavailability of drugs from oral data

The goal of this investigation was to evaluate the performance of a novel method allowing estimation of absolute bioavailability from oral data only. In contrast to the traditional method, which compares areas under the drug concentration time curves after oral and intravenous administration in subjects with normal renal function, the novel method uses total and renal clearance values following oral administration from subjects with varying renal functions to estimate bioavailability. The novel method can also provide estimates for nonrenal clearance.Published data on total clearance and renal clearance of drugs obtained from subjects with variable renal functions were collected, the novel method applied, estimates of bioavailability and nonrenal clearance obtained and compared with reported estimates by the traditional methods. In addition computations were performed to assess various factors that could possibly affect the reliability of the novel method. The results indicated that the novel method provides accurate estimates for bioavailability of drugs meeting the prerequisites: linear kinetics, predominant renal excretion in normals, absence of metabolic polymorphism and independence of bioavailability and nonrenal clearance from renal function. The average (standard deviation) of the prediction error and bias of the bioavailability estimates by the novel method was 7.8 (6.0) and -1.4 (9.8)%, respectively. The estimates for nonrenal clearance by the novel method were less accurate. The computations confirmed that the estimates by the novel method are sensitive to renal-function dependent changes in nonrenal clearance and bioavailability and also depend on the extent of renal excretion of a drug. In conclusion, the novel method's main use is to diagnose absence or presence of changes in bioavailability and non-renal clearance of drugs in populations with varying renal function.

Treatment of peritonitis in APD: pharmacokinetic principles

Clinicians treating peritoneal dialysis (PD)-associated peritonitis should be aware that continuous ambulatory PD (CAPD) and automated PD (APD) have different effects on the pharmacokinetics of antibiotics. Results from various APD and comparative CAPD pharmacokinetic studies are reviewed. In APD patients, antibiotic half-lives were shorter during the cycler exchanges. Antibiotic peritoneal clearance was greater in patients treated with APD than those treated with CAPD regimens. Antibiotic clearance depends upon residual renal function and dialysate flow rate. To ensure that maximal antibiotic bioavailability occurs with intermittent intraperitoneal (IP) dosing, it is recommended that the antibiotic-containing dialysate must dwell at least 4 hours to ensure an adequate antibiotic depot in the body. Knowledge of antibiotic disposition in PD patients will assist clinicians in appropriate IP antibiotic dose selection and prevention of dose-related adverse effects.

Ureidopenicillins and beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations

Although research and development of new penicillins have declined, penicillins continue to be essential antibiotics for the treatment and prophylaxis of infectious diseases. The most recent additions are the ureidopenicillins and beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations. This article reviews the spectrum of activity, toxicity, pharmacokinetics, and clinical uses of the ureidopenicillins, and the beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination agents.

Surgery and intensive care procedures affect the target site distribution of piperacillin

OBJECTIVE

Therapeutic failure of antibiotic therapy has been ascribed to pharmacokinetic alterations in compromised patient populations. The present study, therefore, aimed at examining the influences of cardiac surgery and intensive care procedures on the postoperative target site distribution of piperacillin. For this purpose, the penetration of piperacillin to the interstitial space fluid, the relevant target site for most bacterial infections, was compared between patients after aortic valve replacement and healthy volunteers.

DESIGN

Comparative study in two study populations.

SETTING

The intensive care unit and research ward of a university hospital.

PATIENTS

The study population included six otherwise healthy patients scheduled to undergo aortic valve replacement and a control group of six healthy male volunteers.

INTERVENTIONS

After the administration of a single i.v. infusion of 4.0 g piperacillin, free piperacillin concentrations were measured in the interstitium of skeletal muscle and subcutaneous tissue by in vivo microdialysis and in venous serum. Piperacillin concentrations were assayed with reversed phase high-performance liquid chromatography.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Interstitial piperacillin concentrations in muscle and subcutaneous adipose tissue were significantly lower in patients compared with volunteers with the area under the curve for the interstitium/area under the curve for serum concentration ratios ranging from 0.25 to 0.27 and from 0.43 to 1.22 in patients and volunteers, respectively (p < .05 between groups). The terminal elimination half-life was markedly prolonged in patients, leading to a concomitant increase in t > minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values, the relevant surrogate for therapeutic success of therapy with beta-lactam antibiotics, for strains with MIC50 <4 microg/mL. For strains with MIC50 >20 microl/mL, however, inadequate target site concentrations were attained in the patient population.

CONCLUSIONS

During the postoperative and intensive care periods, target site concentrations of piperacillin are markedly altered and decreased. This may also be true for other antibiotic agents and may have clinical implications in that current dosing guidelines may result in inadequate target site concentrations for high-MIC strains. Conceivably, this could lead to therapeutic failure in some patients.

Pharmacokinetics of Intraperitoneal Piperacillin/Tazobactam in Patients on Peritoneal Dialysis with and without Pseudomonas Peritonitis

Objective

The objective of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetics of intraperitoneal (IP) administration of the antibiotic combination piperacillin/tazobactam (PIP/TAZ) to patients on chronic ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) with and without pseudomonas peritonitis.

Design

Open-labeled study.

Setting

The study was carried out in the CAPD unit of Assaf Harofeh Medical Center, Zerifin, Israel.

Patients and Methods

Six patients participated in the study, 4 had pseudomonas peritonitis, all were given an IP loading dose of 4 g/0.5 g PIP/TAZ. Twenty-four hours after the initial dose, a maintenance dose of 0.5 g/0.0625 g PIP/TAZ was administered with each dialysate exchange for a period of 1 week. The patients without peritonitis received only the loading dose. High performance liquid chromatography was used to determine the concentrations of PIP/TAZ in plasma obtained at 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 360, 480, 600, 720, and 1440 minutes after administration. Samples of the dialysate fluid for determination of PIP/TAZ concentration were collected at 6, 10, 14, 24, and 72, 120, and 168 hours.

Results

After the loading dose, the highest plasma PIP concentration (Cmax) was 51.6 ± 21.25 μg/mL and appeared at 1.5 ± 0.45 hours (tmax). During the maintenance period plasma PIP concentration was 5.2 ± 4.75 μg/mL. Tazobactam was detected in the plasma of 1 patient only. The concentration of TAZ in the dialysate fluid during the maintenance period was 2.3 ± 0.5 μg/mL.

Conclusions

Piperacillin administered IP at 4 g reached plasma concentrations comparable to intravenous administration and considered therapeutic (above the MIC90for Pseudomonas aeruginosa) in CAPD patients with or without peritonitis. The maintenance dose, however, should be augmented. Tazobactam could not be detected in the plasma of most patients and the therapeutic implications of IP administration of TAZ cannot be directly correlated to intravenous administration.

Piperacillin and tazobactam exhibit linear pharmacokinetics after multiple standard clinical doses

A population pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis was conducted to determine if piperacillin and tazobactam exhibited linear or nonlinear PKs and if incremental changes in the daily dosage of piperacillin affected tazobactam PKs. Four dosage groups were evaluated after multiple dosing regimens. Concentrations of drug in plasma and amounts in urine were best fitted by using a linear two-compartment PK model. No significant difference between dosing groups was seen for any piperacillin or tazobactam PK parameters. Both drugs exhibited linear PKs when given at usual clinical doses. Tazobactam PKs did not appear to be affected by the different dosing regimens of piperacillin.

Pharmacokinetics of drugs used in critically ill adults

Critically ill patients exhibit a range of organ dysfunctions and often require treatment with a variety of drugs including sedatives, analgesics, neuromuscular blockers, antimicrobials, inotropes and gastric acid suppressants. Understanding how organ dysfunction can alter the pharmacokinetics of drugs is a vital aspect of therapy in this patient group. Many drugs will need to be given intravenously because of gastrointestinal failure. For those occasions on which the oral route is possible, bioavailability may be altered by hypomotility, changes in gastrointestinal pH and enteral feeding. Hepatic and renal dysfunction are the primary determinants of drug clearance, and hence of steady-state drug concentrations, and of efficacy and toxicity in the individual patient. Oxidative metabolism is the main clearance mechanism for many drugs and there is increasing recognition of the importance of decreased activity of the hepatic cytochrome P450 system in critically ill patients. Renal failure is equally important with both filtration and secretion clearance mechanisms being required for the removal of parent drugs and their active metabolites. Changes in the steady-state volume of distribution are often secondary to renal failure and may lower the effective drug concentrations in the body. Failure of the central nervous system, muscle, the endothelial system and endocrine system may also affect the pharmacokinetics of specific drugs. Time-dependency of alterations in pharmacokinetic parameters is well documented for some drugs. Understanding the underlying pathophysiology in the critically ill and applying pharmacokinetic principles in selection of drug and dose regimen is, therefore, crucial to optimising the pharmacodynamic response and outcome.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of two multiple-dose piperacillin-tazobactam regimens

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of two multiple-dose regimens of piperacillin-tazobactam (3.375 g every 6 h and 4.5 g every 8 h) were evaluated at steady state for 12 healthy adult volunteers. Inhibitory and bactericidal activities for the two regimens were determined with five American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) organisms (Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Bacteroides fragilis). The percentage of time that plasma concentrations remained above the MIC (T > MIC) for each organism and dosage regimen was calculated. Areas under the inhibitory (AUIC0-24) and bactericidal activity (AUBC0-24) curves were calculated with the trapezoidal rule by using the reciprocal of the inhibitory and bactericidal titers determined for each dosage regimen. In order to assess the validity of predicted measures of bactericidal (AUC0-24/MBC) and inhibitory (AUC0-24/MIC) activity to determine bacteriological response to beta-lactam antimicrobial agents, AUC0-24/MBC and AUC0-24/MIC values were compared with measured AUBC0-24 and AUIC0-24 values. Total body clearance values were equivalent for piperacillin (183.96 +/- 22.66 versus 181.72 +/- 19.54 ml/min/1.73 m2, P > 0.05) and tazobactam (184.71 +/- 19.89 versus 184.87 +/- 18.35 ml/min/1.73 m2, P > 0.05) following the administration of the 3.375-g-every-6-h and 4.5-g-every-8-h dosages, respectively. Comparison of area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0-24) for piperacillin (967.74 +/- 135.56 microg x h/ml versus 978.88 +/- 140.96 microg x h/ml) and tazobactam (120.14 +/- 15.78 microg x h/ml versus 120.01 +/- 16.22 microg x h/ml) revealed no significant differences (P > 0.05) between the 3.375-g-every-6-h and 4.5-g-every-8-h regimens, respectively. Both regimens provided T > MIC values of > 60% for all organisms tested. Measured values of bactericidal (AUBC) and inhibitory (AUIC) activity were significantly different (P < 0.05) from predicted values (AUC0-24/MBC and AUC0-24/MIC) for all organisms studied with the exception of the bactericidal activity for P. aeruginosa and S. aureus. Additionally, ATCC organisms possessing the same MICs and MBCs exhibited great differences in measured AUBC0-24 and AUIC0-24 values. Reasons for this difference may be inherent differences in organism specific susceptibility.

Antimicrobial agents for the dermatologist. I. Beta-lactam antibiotics and related compounds

We review the newer antimicrobial agents that are being employed by dermatologists with increased frequency as well as some of the more commonly used older agents. Particular emphasis is based on selection factors such as causative pathogens and their resistance profiles, routes of administration, toxicity, drug interactions, and dosing requirements. Emphasis in this review is on the newer classes of antimicrobials such as third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins; beta-lactam, beta-lactamase inhibitor combination agents; monobactams; carbapenems; macrolides; and fluoroquinolones. Dermatologic indications and treatment alternatives are highlighted; this will expand the practicing clinician's therapeutic armamentarium and enable him/her to make rational decisions concerning treatment approaches to infectious disease problems encountered in daily practice.

A practical look at the clinical usefulness of the beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations

OBJECTIVE

To aid clinicians in developing an approach to the use of intravenous beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitors on a patient-specific basis. To achieve this, the pharmacology, in vitro activity, and clinical use of the intravenous beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations in the treatment of selected infections seen in hospitalized patients are discussed.

DATA IDENTIFICATION

An English-language literature search using MEDLINE (1987-1995); Index Medicus (1987-1995); program and abstracts of the 32nd (1992), 33rd (1993), 34th (1994), and 35th (1995) Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy; bibliographic reviews of review articles; and package inserts.

STUDY SELECTION

In vitro and in vivo studies on the pharmacokinetics, microbiology, pharmacology, and clinical effectiveness of ampicillin/sulbactam, ticarcillin/clavulanate, and piperacillin/tazobactam were evaluated.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Many properties of the beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations are similar. Differences in dosing, susceptibilities, and clinical applications are important considerations for clinicians. Potential roles for these agents in the clinical setting include pneumonia, intraabdominal infections, and soft tissue infections. A short discussion on susceptibility data interpretation is also presented.

CONCLUSIONS

There are important differences among the available beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations, such as spectra of activity, which need to be considered in choosing an agent for a patient-specific case. These products can be useful alternatives to conventional two- to three-drug regimens in mixed infections such as foot infections in patients with diabetes and hospital-acquired intraabdominal infections.

Piperacillin/tazobactam: a new beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination

OBJECTIVE

To discuss the antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, and adverse effect profile of piperacillin/tazobactam, a new beta-lactan/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination.

DATA SOURCES

Literature was identified by MEDLINE search of the medical literature, review of selected references, and data provided by the manufacturer.

STUDY SELECTION

In vitro susceptibility data were surveyed from studies following the methods of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Data evaluating clinical efficacy were selected from all published trials and abstracts. Additional information concerning safety, chemistry, and pharmacokinetics was reviewed.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The antimicrobial activity of piperacillin is enhanced by addition of tazobactam against gram-positive, gram-negative, and anaerobic bacteria. Tazobactam is active against a broad spectrum of plasmid and chromosomally mediated enzymes and has minimal ability to induce class I chromosomally mediated beta-lactamase enzymes. Piperacillin/tazobactam's expanded activity appears encouraging in the treatment of mixed aerobic and anaerobic infections. Direct comparisons of ticarcillin/clavulanate and piperacillin/tazobactam for the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections showed piperacillin/tazobactam to be clinically superior, and in the treatment of skin and soft tissue infections the 2 agents were comparable. For the treatment of intraabdominal infections, piperacillin/tazobactam was at least as effective as imipenem/cilastatin and clindamycin plus gentamicin.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of tazobactam with piperacillin results in an antimicrobial agent with enhanced activity against most beta-lactamase-producing organisms. Preliminary data indicate that piperacillin/tazobactam has proven clinical efficacy in the treatment of a variety of infections, especially polymicrobic infections.

Pharmacokinetics of tazobactam M1 metabolite after administration of piperacillin/tazobactam in subjects with renal impairment

Tazobactam is a new derivative of penicillinic acid sulfone, which functions as an irreversible inhibitor of many beta-lactamases. The disposition of tazobactam M1 metabolite after intravenous (i.v.) infusion of 3 g of piperacillin/0.375 g of tazobactam was evaluated in 26 subjects with various degrees of renal impairment. Participants in the study were 18 subjects with creatinine clearances (ClCR) ranging from 7.4-41.8 mL/min, 4 subjects maintained on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD), and 4 subjects undergoing chronic hemodialysis (HD). The pharmacokinetic parameters of piperacillin and tazobactam were evaluated and were similar to previous reports. Tazobactam M1 metabolite maximum plasma concentration increased as renal function declined. The terminal elimination half-life and area under the plasma concentration-time curve of the tazobactam M1 metabolite increased as renal function declined. The mean rate of recovery of the tazobactam M1 metabolite in hemodialysate during a 3- to 4.2-hour HD session 1 hour after the i.v. infusion of piperacillin/tazobactam was 25.3%. However, when HD was performed at 36-48 hours after the i.v. infusion, 57.6% of the tazobactam dose was recovered as M1 metabolite, suggesting further conversion of tazobactam to M1 metabolite. Peritoneal dialysis removed 15.8% (n = 2) of the tazobactam dose as the M1 metabolite. Using a dose of 3 g of piperacillin/0.375 g of tazobactam, the predicted maximum steady-state plasma concentrations of the tazobactam M1 metabolite are 14.6 micrograms/mL, 34.8 micrograms/mL, and 48.8 micrograms/mL for subjects with ClCR 20-40 mL/min (every 6 hour dosing), ClCR < 20 mL/min (every 8 hour dosing), and on CAPD (every 12 hour dosing), respectively.

Single-dose pharmacokinetics of piperacillin and tazobactam in infants and children

The pharmacokinetics of piperacillin and tazobactam were assessed after single-dose administration to 47 infants and children. Study subjects ranging in age from 2 months to 12 years were randomized to receive one of two different doses of a piperacillin-tazobactam combination (8:1): a low dose (n = 23) of 50 and 6.25 mg of piperacillin and tazobactam per kg of body weight, respectively, or a high dose (n = 24) of 100 and 12.5 mg, respectively. The pharmacokinetic behavior of tazobactam was very similar to that observed for piperacillin, supporting the use of these two agents in a fixed-dose combination. No differences in the pharmacokinetics of piperacillin or tazobactam were observed between the two doses administered. The elimination parameters half-life and total body clearance decreased and increased, respectively, with increasing age, whereas volume parameters (volume of distribution and steady-state volume of distribution) remained relatively constant for both compounds. The primary metabolite of tazobactam, metabolite M1, was measurable in the plasma of 18 of the 47 study subjects; 17 of these 18 subjects received the high doses. More than 70% of the administered piperacillin and tazobactam doses were excreted unchanged in the urine over a 6-h collection period. These data combined with the known in vitro susceptibilities of a broad range of pediatric bacterial pathogens indicate that a dose of 100 mg of piperacillin and 12.5 of mg tazobactam per kg of body weight administered as a fixed-dose combination every 6 to 8 h would be appropriate to initiate clinical efficacy studies in infants and children for the treatment of systemic infections arising outside of the central nervous system.

Penetration of piperacillin-tazobactam into bronchial secretions after multiple doses to intensive care patients

The penetration of piperacillin-tazobactam in eight mechanically ventilated intensive care patients (age, 56.0 +/- 12.2 years, and weight, 76.5 +/- 15.2 kg [means +/- standard deviations]) with bacterial pneumonia was investigated. They were given intravenous doses of piperacillin (4 g) and tazobactam (0.5 g) as 30-min infusions every 6 h. The kinetic study was performed after the fourth dose on day 2 of treatment. Samples of blood and bronchial secretions (BS) were collected before the fourth dosing and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 h after the end of infusion. Drug concentrations in both sera and BS were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. Concentrations (in micrograms per milliliter) in serum were 184.80 +/- 63.03 and 40.03 +/- 30.79 for piperacillin and 23.05 +/- 7.53 and 4.86 +/- 4.54 for tazobactam at 0.5 and 6 h, respectively, after the end of infusion. The corresponding concentrations (in micrograms per milliliter) in BS were 29.33 +/- 25.08 and 20.25 +/- 19.11 for piperacillin and 6.86 +/- 4.25 and 4.25 +/- 2.78 for tazobactam. The percentages for the extent of penetration of piperacillin and tazobactam, as defined by the BS/serum area under the curve ratio, were 35.70 and 78.42%, respectively. These data indicate good penetration of both piperacillin and tazobactam into BS. The concentrations of tazobactam in BS are persistent and high enough to exceed the values found to be effective in vitro against the tazobactam-susceptible beta-lactamases produced by the most important pathogens responsible for nosocomial pneumonia.

Pharmacodynamics of piperacillin alone and in combination with tazobactam against piperacillin-resistant and -susceptible organisms in an in vitro model of infection

The pharmacodynamics of dosage regimens of piperacillin alone or in combination with tazobactam against piperacillin-resistant or -susceptible bacteria were studied in an in vitro model of infection. Experiments were conducted by using a fixed daily exposure of 12 g of piperacillin, given as 3 g alone or in combination with tazobactam at 0.375 g every 6 h, or the same total dose of the combination given as 4 g of piperacillin plus 0.5 g of tazobactam every 8 h. The addition of tazobactam to piperacillin, irrespective of the dosing interval, did not alter the killing of piperacillin-susceptible organisms (Escherichia coli J53 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853). In contrast, experiments with an isogenic TEM-3-containing transconjugant of E. coli J53 (E. coli J53.2-TEM-3) that was resistant to piperacillin (MIC, 128 micrograms/ml) showed that the addition of tazobactam resulted in bacterial killing similar to that observed with the wild-type strain. Although tazobactam concentrations fell to less than 4 mg/liter (the concentration associated with a reduction in the piperacillin MIC from 128 to 2 mg/liter) 2 to 3 h after a dose, a similar degree of bacterial killing was observed when the same total 24-h dose of piperacillin-tazobactam was fractionated into dosing intervals of every 6 or 8 h. Investigations with Staphylococcus aureus 7176 (piperacillin MIC, 128 micrograms/ml) showed that the addition of tazobactam, again irrespective of dosing interval, also resulted in net bacterial killing which was not seen with piperacillin alone. These data support the use of extended dosing intervals (every 8 h) of piperacillin-tazobactam in the treatment of infections caused by piperacillin-resistant bacteria.

Pharmacokinetic characteristics of piperacillin/tazobactam

Piperacillin/tazobactam is a new combination of a broad-spectrum penicillin and a beta-lactamase inhibitor. In studies in healthy volunteers, the pharmacokinetics of piperacillin combined with tazobactam were similar to those of piperacillin alone. In contrast, tazobactam administered with piperacillin achieved higher plasma concentrations and had a longer half-life than tazobactam administered alone. Intravenous infusion of 4.0 g piperacillin with 0.5 g tazobactam over 5 min resulted in mean maximum plasma concentrations of 380 micrograms piperacillin/ml and 35.3 micrograms tazobactam/ml; half-lives were 1.14 h for piperacillin and 0.92 h for tazobactam. Within 30 min of infusion, piperacillin/tazobactam achieves 16-85% of plasma concentrations in skin, muscle, lung, gallbladder, and intestinal mucosa. Plasma and tissue levels remain above the MIC90s of major pathogens for 2 h post administration. These findings show that piperacillin/tazobactam is truly synergistic combination which can be expected to be effective in treating a wide variety of infections in the clinical setting.

Piperacillin/tazobactam. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic potential

Combining tazobactam, a beta-lactamase inhibitor, with the ureidopenicillin, piperacillin, successfully restores the activity of piperacillin against beta-lactamase-producing bacteria. Tazobactam has inhibitory activity, and therefore protects piperacillin against Richmond and Sykes types II, III, IV and V beta-lactamases, staphylococcal penicillinase and extended-spectrum beta-lactamases. However, tazobactam has only species-specific activity against class I chromosomally-mediated enzymes. Resistant organisms include some Citrobacter spp., Enterobacter spp., Serratia spp., Xanthomonas maltophilia and Enterococcus faecium. Consistent with its in vitro activity, preliminary clinical data indicate that the fixed combination of piperacillin/tazobactam (dose ratio 8:1) is effective in the treatment of moderate to severe polymicrobial infections, including intra-abdominal, skin and soft-tissue and lower respiratory tract infections. In limited comparative trials, piperacillin/tazobactam demonstrated equivalent or better efficacy than standard comparator regimens in these infections. Piperacillin/tazobactam in combination with an aminoglycoside was effective in the empirical treatment of fever in patients with neutropenia and compared favourably with ceftazidime in combination with an aminoglycoside, although second-line therapy with a glycopeptide antibiotic may be indicated in unresponsive episodes. Data from phase III trials indicate that piperacillin/tazobactam has a tolerability profile typical of a penicillin agent. Piperacillin/tazobactam provides a broad spectrum of antibacterial activity in a convenient single formulation suitable for use in the treatment of polymicrobial infections. Possible limitations concern its restricted activity against class I beta-lactamases, enzymes that are becoming increasingly important in the nosocomial environment. Combined therapy with an aminoglycoside may be necessary in more serious infections.