1
|
Gaydarska H, Takashima K, Shahrier S, Raz A, Minari J. The interplay of ethics and genetic technologies in balancing the social valuation of the human genome in UNESCO declarations. Eur J Hum Genet 2024; 32:725-730. [PMID: 38355962 PMCID: PMC11153547 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-024-01549-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Revised: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 02/16/2024] Open
Abstract
This study investigates changes in the social valuation of the human genome over the more than 30 years since the establishment of the Human Genome Project. It offers a descriptive sociological analysis of the three waves of this valuation, mainly by considering three key UNESCO declarations and a relevant report. These waves represent a shifting balance between collectivism and individualism, starting with a broadly constructed valuation of the human genome as common human heritage and moving toward a valuation of dynamic applications within various social and medical contexts (e.g., personalized genomic medicine and genome editing). We seek to broaden the analytical perspective by examining how the declarations' ethical foci are framed within the context of rapidly evolving genetic technologies and their social applications. We conclude by discussing continuity and change in value balancing vis-à-vis changing genomic technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hristina Gaydarska
- Uehiro Research Division for iPS Cell Ethics, Center for iPS Cell Research and Application (CiRA), Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kayo Takashima
- Uehiro Research Division for iPS Cell Ethics, Center for iPS Cell Research and Application (CiRA), Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Shibly Shahrier
- Teesside University International Business School, Teesside University, Tees Valley, UK
| | - Aviad Raz
- Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beersheba, Israel.
| | - Jusaku Minari
- Uehiro Research Division for iPS Cell Ethics, Center for iPS Cell Research and Application (CiRA), Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Eichinger J, Zimmermann B, Elger B, McLennan S, Filges I, Koné I. 'It's a nightmare': informed consent in paediatric genome-wide sequencing. A qualitative expert interview study from Germany and Switzerland. Eur J Hum Genet 2023; 31:1398-1406. [PMID: 37773517 PMCID: PMC10689462 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-023-01468-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Revised: 08/27/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The use of genome-wide sequencing (GWS) in paediatrics has added complexity to informed consent (IC) and pretest counselling because of the vast number and interpretation of potential findings, and their implications. However, empirical data from continental Europe on these issues remains limited. This study therefore aimed to explore the experiences and views of medical geneticists working with children in Germany and Switzerland regarding the challenges of obtaining valid IC in paediatric GWS. Qualitative interviews with 20 medical geneticists were analysed employing reflexive thematic analysis. In the interviews, many medical geneticists questioned the validity of parents' IC due to the enormous amount of relevant information given and the variety and complexity of the possible test outcomes. Key barriers identified included familial implications, administrative challenges and struggles with non-directiveness. Medical geneticists' suggestions for improvement included increasing the number of genetics professionals and better information material, which is crucial as GWS becomes a diagnostic standard in the early care pathways of children. An adjustment of aspirations from still existing ideal of traditional fully IC to appropriate IC seems to be needed. Such a more realistic and ethically sound adaptation of the requirements for IC can lead to better 'informedness' and improve the validity of the consent. This might also help reduce the moral distress for the medical geneticists involved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanna Eichinger
- Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
| | - Bettina Zimmermann
- Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Institute of History and Ethics in Medicine, TUM School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Institute of Philosophy & Multidisciplinary Center for Infectious Diseases, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Bernice Elger
- Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Center for Legal Medicine (CURML), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Stuart McLennan
- Institute of History and Ethics in Medicine, TUM School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Isabel Filges
- Medical Genetics, Institute of Medical Genetics and Pathology, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Insa Koné
- Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
van der Hout S, Woudstra AJ, Dondorp W, Sallevelt S, de Die-Smulders C, Paulussen ADC, de Wert G. Consanguineous couples' experiences and views regarding expanded carrier screening: Barriers and facilitators in the decision-making process. Eur J Hum Genet 2023; 31:1317-1322. [PMID: 37280360 PMCID: PMC10242213 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-023-01402-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Revised: 05/12/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Expanded carrier screening (ECS) entails a screening offer for multiple recessive disorders at the same time, and allows testing of individuals or couples regardless of ancestry or geographic origin. Children of consanguineous couples have a higher-than-average risk of manifesting autosomal recessive disorders. This study aims to contribute to the responsible implementation of ECS for consanguineous couples. Seven semi-structured interviews were conducted with consanguineous couples who had recently participated in Whole Exome Sequencing (WES)-based ECS at Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), the Netherlands. The test offered at MUMC+ covers a large number of disease-related genes (~2000), including severe, relatively mild, early- and late-onset disorders. Respondents were interviewed about their views on, and experiences with participation in WES-based ECS. Overall, participation was experienced as worthwhile: it enabled respondents to make informed choices with regard to family planning as well as to take on the presumed parental responsibility to deliver their children as healthy as possible. Furthermore, our findings suggest that (1) true consent for having this test requires timely information about the possible implications of a positive test result for specific categories of findings, as well as about the success rates of the available reproductive options; (2) the clinical geneticist can play a pivotal part in informing participants as well as providing clear information about autosomal recessive inheritance; (3) more research is needed to explore what type of genetic risk information is considered 'meaningful' by participants and actually contributes to reproductive decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanne van der Hout
- Department of Health, Ethics & Society, CAPHRI-School for Public Health and Primary Care and GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Anke J Woudstra
- Department of Health, Ethics & Society, CAPHRI-School for Public Health and Primary Care and GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Wybo Dondorp
- Department of Health, Ethics & Society, CAPHRI-School for Public Health and Primary Care and GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Suzanne Sallevelt
- Paediatric and Reproductive Genetics Unit, Women's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Christine de Die-Smulders
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Center and GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Aimee D C Paulussen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Center and GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Guido de Wert
- Department of Health, Ethics & Society, CAPHRI-School for Public Health and Primary Care and GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
White S, Haas M, Laginha KJ, Laurendet K, Gaff C, Vears D, Newson AJ. What's in a name? Justifying terminology for genomic findings beyond the initial test indication: A scoping review. Genet Med 2023; 25:100936. [PMID: 37454281 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2023.100936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2023] [Revised: 07/07/2023] [Accepted: 07/09/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Genome sequencing can generate findings beyond the initial test indication that may be relevant to a patient or research participant's health. In the decade since the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics published its recommendations for reporting these findings, consensus regarding terminology has remained elusive and a variety of terms are in use globally. We conducted a scoping review to explore terminology choice and the justifications underlying those choices. Documents were included if they contained a justification for their choice of term(s) related to findings beyond the initial genomic test indication. From 3571 unique documents, 52 were included, just over half of which pertained to the clinical context (n = 29, 56%). We identified four inter-related concepts used to defend or oppose terms: expectedness of the finding, effective communication, relatedness to the original test indication, and how genomic information was generated. A variety of justifications were used to oppose the term "incidental," whereas "secondary" had broader support as a term to describe findings deliberately sought. Terminology choice would benefit from further work to include the views of patients. We contend that clear definitions will improve ethical debate and support communication about genomic findings beyond the initial test indication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie White
- Sydney Health Ethics, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia; Australian Genomics, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Matilda Haas
- Australian Genomics, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Kitty-Jean Laginha
- Sydney Health Ethics, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia; Australian Genomics, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Kirsten Laurendet
- Sydney Health Ethics, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia; Australian Genomics, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Clara Gaff
- Australian Genomics, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Danya Vears
- Australian Genomics, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Ainsley J Newson
- Sydney Health Ethics, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia; Australian Genomics, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dondorp W, de Wert G. Towards responsible ctDNA-based multi-cancer screening: a preliminary exploration and discussion of ethically relevant aspects. EXTRACELLULAR VESICLES AND CIRCULATING NUCLEIC ACIDS 2022; 3:235-243. [PMID: 39697487 PMCID: PMC11648474 DOI: 10.20517/evcna.2022.23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2022] [Revised: 08/07/2022] [Accepted: 08/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2024]
Abstract
While testing for easily accessible biomarkers in the circulation ("liquid biopsy") has found its way to clinical cancer care, a further expected development is its use as a "universal" early detection test in population screening for cancer. A promising marker for such screening is circulating cell-free fragments of tumor DNA, shed into the circulation during tumor cell turnover. Several blood-based "multicancer early detection (MCED) tests" have recently been developed - but still need validation in large-scale studies involving non-patient populations. In this paper, we proactively explore the ethical aspects of this development. We refer to an often quoted synthesis of the internationally accepted framework of principles for responsible screening as first drawn up for the World Health Organisation (WHO) by Wilson and Junger 50 years ago and further developed and fine-tuned ever since. As our analysis suggests, some specific ethical issues and concerns about potential MCED screening connect to the fact that cancer is not just one disease. As a consequence, not all findings will have the same clinical utility. We discuss this against the background of earlier debates pertaining to broad scope forms of screening in other contexts, specifically newborn and reproductive genetic screening. We highlight the guidance provided by some of the criteria from the screening framework that seems most relevant in this connection: the need for screening objectives to be defined at the outset, the need for mechanisms to minimize potential risks, and the requirement that, for those participating in the screening, the overall benefits outweigh the harm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wybo Dondorp
- Department of Health, Ethics & Society (HES), School for Oncology and Reproduction (GROW), School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, HA Maastricht 6229, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rahimzadeh V, Friedman JM, de Wert G, Knoppers BM. Exome/Genome-Wide Testing in Newborn Screening: A Proportionate Path Forward. Front Genet 2022; 13:865400. [PMID: 35860465 PMCID: PMC9289115 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.865400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2022] [Accepted: 05/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Population-based newborn screening (NBS) is among the most effective public health programs ever launched, improving health outcomes for newborns who screen positive worldwide through early detection and clinical intervention for genetic disorders discovered in the earliest hours of life. Key to the success of newborn screening programs has been near universal accessibility and participation. Interest has been building to expand newborn screening programs to also include many rare genetic diseases that can now be identified by exome or genome sequencing (ES/GS). Significant declines in sequencing costs as well as improvements to sequencing technologies have enabled researchers to elucidate novel gene-disease associations that motivate possible expansion of newborn screening programs. In this paper we consider recommendations from professional genetic societies in Europe and North America in light of scientific advances in ES/GS and our current understanding of the limitations of ES/GS approaches in the NBS context. We invoke the principle of proportionality-that benefits clearly outweigh associated risks-and the human right to benefit from science to argue that rigorous evidence is still needed for ES/GS that demonstrates clinical utility, accurate genomic variant interpretation, cost effectiveness and universal accessibility of testing and necessary follow-up care and treatment. Confirmatory or second-tier testing using ES/GS may be appropriate as an adjunct to conventional newborn screening in some circumstances. Such cases could serve as important testbeds from which to gather data on relevant programmatic barriers and facilitators to wider ES/GS implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vasiliki Rahimzadeh
- Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Jan M. Friedman
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Guido de Wert
- Department of Health, Ethics and Society, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Schoot VVD, Viellevoije SJ, Tammer F, Brunner HG, Arens Y, Yntema HG, Oerlemans AJM. The impact of unsolicited findings in clinical exome sequencing, a qualitative interview study. Eur J Hum Genet 2021; 29:930-939. [PMID: 33637888 PMCID: PMC8187681 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-021-00834-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2020] [Accepted: 02/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Unsolicited findings (UFs) in clinical exome sequencing are variants that are unrelated to the initial clinical question the DNA test was performed for, but that may nonetheless be of medical relevance to patients and/or their families. There is limited knowledge about the impact of UFs on patients' lives. In order to characterise patient perceptions of the impact of an UF, we conducted 20 semi-structured face-to-face interviews with patients and/or their relatives to whom an UF predisposing to oncological disease (n = 10) or predisposing to a cardiac condition (n = 10) had been disclosed. We have identified a psychological, physical and financial aspect of the perceived impact of UF disclosure in exome sequencing. Actionability, understanding, patients' pre-test health and social context were influencing factors, according to our participants. Although most expressed considerable psychological impact initially, all but one participant would choose to undergo genetic testing again, knowing what they know now. These novel findings provide insight in patients' perspectives on the impact of UF disclosure. Our study highlights the value of incorporating patients' perceptions in UF disclosure policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vyne van der Schoot
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Simone J Viellevoije
- Department of Human Genetics, Donders Centre for Neuroscience, Radboud university medical center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- IQ healthcare, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud university medical center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Femke Tammer
- Department of Human Genetics, Donders Centre for Neuroscience, Radboud university medical center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Han G Brunner
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Human Genetics, Donders Centre for Neuroscience, Radboud university medical center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Yvonne Arens
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Helger G Yntema
- Department of Human Genetics, Donders Centre for Neuroscience, Radboud university medical center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Anke J M Oerlemans
- Department of Human Genetics, Donders Centre for Neuroscience, Radboud university medical center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
- IQ healthcare, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud university medical center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
The promise of public health ethics for precision medicine: the case of newborn preventive genomic sequencing. Hum Genet 2021; 141:1035-1043. [PMID: 33715055 DOI: 10.1007/s00439-021-02269-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2020] [Accepted: 02/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Precision medicine aims to tailor medical treatment to match individual characteristics and to stratify individuals to concentrate benefits and avoid harm. It has recently been joined by precision public health-the application of precision medicine at population scale to decrease morbidity and optimise population health. Newborn preventive genomic sequencing (NPGS) provides a helpful case study to consider how we should approach ethical questions in precision public health. In this paper, I use NPGS as a case in point to argue that both precision medicine and precision public health need public health ethics. I make this argument in two parts. First, I claim that discussions of ethics in precision medicine and NPGS tend to focus on predominantly individualistic concepts from medical ethics such as autonomy and empowerment. This highlights some deficiencies, including overlooking that choice is subject to constraints and that an individual's place in the world might impact their capacity to 'be responsible'. Second, I make the case for using a public health ethics approach when considering ethics and NPGS, and thus precision public health more broadly. I discuss how precision public health needs to be construed as a collective enterprise and not just as an aggregation of individual interests. I also show how analysing collective values and interests through concepts such as solidarity can enrich ethical discussion of NPGS and highlight previously overlooked issues. With this approach, bioethics can contribute to more just and more appropriate applications of precision medicine and precision public health, including NPGS.
Collapse
|
9
|
Vears DF, Borry P, Savulescu J, Koplin JJ. Old Challenges or New Issues? Genetic Health Professionals' Experiences Obtaining Informed Consent in Diagnostic Genomic Sequencing. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2020; 12:12-23. [PMID: 33017265 PMCID: PMC8120994 DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2020.1823906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Background While integrating genomic sequencing into clinical care carries clear medical benefits, it also raises difficult ethical questions. Compared to traditional sequencing technologies, genomic sequencing and analysis is more likely to identify unsolicited findings (UF) and variants that cannot be classified as benign or disease-causing (variants of uncertain significance; VUS). UF and VUS pose new challenges for genetic health professionals (GHPs) who are obtaining informed consent for genomic sequencing from patients. Methods We conducted semi-structured interviews with 31 GHPs across Europe, Australia and Canada to identify some of these challenges. Results Our results show that GHPs find it difficult to prepare patients to receive results because a vast amount of information is required to fully inform patients about VUS and UF. GHPs also struggle to engage patients – many of whom may be focused on ending their ‘diagnostic odyssey’ – in the informed consent process in a meaningful way. Thus, some questioned how ‘informed’ patients actually are when they agree to undergo clinical genomic sequencing. Conclusions These findings suggest a tension remains between sufficient information provision at the risk of overwhelming the patient and imparting less information at the risk of uninformed decision-making. We suggest that a shift away from ‘fully informed consent’ toward an approach aimed at realizing, as far as possible, the underlying goals that informed consent is meant to promote.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danya F Vears
- Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.,Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia.,Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Center for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Leuven, Belgium.,Leuven Institute for Human Genetics and Society, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Pascal Borry
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Center for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Leuven, Belgium.,Leuven Institute for Human Genetics and Society, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Julian Savulescu
- Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.,Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia.,Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Julian J Koplin
- Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.,Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wang S, Bonomi L, Dai W, Chen F, Cheung C, Bloss CS, Cheng S, Jiang X. Big Data Privacy in Biomedical Research. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIG DATA 2020; 6:296-308. [PMID: 32478127 PMCID: PMC7258042 DOI: 10.1109/tbdata.2016.2608848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Biomedical research often involves studying patient data that contain personal information. Inappropriate use of these data might lead to leakage of sensitive information, which can put patient privacy at risk. The problem of preserving patient privacy has received increasing attentions in the era of big data. Many privacy methods have been developed to protect against various attack models. This paper reviews relevant topics in the context of biomedical research. We discuss privacy preserving technologies related to (1) record linkage, (2) synthetic data generation, and (3) genomic data privacy. We also discuss the ethical implications of big data privacy in biomedicine and present challenges in future research directions for improving data privacy in biomedical research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuang Wang
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093
| | - Luca Bonomi
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093
| | - Wenrui Dai
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093
| | - Feng Chen
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093
| | - Cynthia Cheung
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093
| | - Cinnamon S Bloss
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093
| | - Samuel Cheng
- School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Tulsa, OK, 74135
| | - Xiaoqian Jiang
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Assessing patient readiness for personalized genomic medicine. J Community Genet 2019; 10:109-120. [PMID: 29804257 PMCID: PMC6325047 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-018-0365-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2017] [Accepted: 04/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The Human Genome Project and the continuing advances in DNA sequencing technology have ushered in a new era in genomic medicine. Successful translation of genomic medicine into clinical care will require that providers of this information are aware of the level of understanding, attitudes, perceived risks, benefits, and concerns of their patients. We used a mixed methods approach to conduct in-depth interviews with participants in the NCI-funded Breast Cancer Family Registry (BCFR). Our goal was to gain a better understanding of attitudes towards different types and amounts of genomic information, current interest in pursuing genomic testing, and perceived risks and benefits. We interviewed 32 women from the six BCFR sites in the USA, Canada, and Australia. In this sample of women with a personal or family history of breast cancer, we found high acknowledgement of the potential of genetics/genomics to improve their own health and that of their family members through lifestyle changes or alterations in their medical management. Respondents were more familiar with cancer genetics than the genetics of other diseases. Concerns about the testing itself included a potential sense of loss of control over health, feelings of guilt on passing on a mutation to a child, loss of privacy and confidentiality, questions about the test accuracy, and the potential uncertainty of the significance of test results. These data provide important insights into attitudes about the introduction of increasingly complex genetic testing, to inform interventions to prepare individuals for the introduction of this new technology into their clinical care.
Collapse
|
12
|
Gyngell C, Newson AJ, Wilkinson D, Stark Z, Savulescu J. Rapid Challenges: Ethics and Genomic Neonatal Intensive Care. Pediatrics 2019; 143:S14-S21. [PMID: 30600266 PMCID: PMC6379057 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2018-1099d] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
NICUs are a priority implementation area for genomic medicine. Rapid genomic testing in the NICU is expected to be genomic medicine's "critical application," providing such clear benefits that it drives the adoption of genomics more broadly. Studies from multiple centers worldwide have now demonstrated the clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of rapid genomic sequencing in this setting, paving the way for widespread implementation. However, the introduction of this potentially powerful tool for predicting future impairment in the NICU also raises profound ethical challenges. Developing models of good practice that incorporate the identification, exploration, and analysis of ethical issues will be critical for successful implementation. In this article, we analyze 3 such issues: (1) the value and meaning of gaining consent to a complex test in a stressful, emotionally charged environment; (2) the effect of rapid diagnosis on parent-child bonding and its implications for medical and family decisions, particularly in relation to treatment limitation; and (3) distributive justice (ie, whether the substantial cost and diversion of resources to deliver rapid genomic testing in the NICU can be justified).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Gyngell
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia,Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Ainsley J. Newson
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney Health Ethics, Sydney, Australia
| | - Dominic Wilkinson
- John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK,Faculty of Philosophy, Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Zornitza Stark
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; .,Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.,Australian Genomics Health Alliance, Parkville, Australia
| | - Julian Savulescu
- Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia,Faculty of Philosophy, Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Recontacting patients in clinical genetics services: recommendations of the European Society of Human Genetics. Eur J Hum Genet 2018; 27:169-182. [PMID: 30310124 PMCID: PMC6336881 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-018-0285-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2018] [Revised: 09/19/2018] [Accepted: 09/25/2018] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Technological advances have increased the availability of genomic data in research and the clinic. If, over time, interpretation of the significance of the data changes, or new information becomes available, the question arises as to whether recontacting the patient and/or family is indicated. The Public and Professional Policy Committee of the European Society of Human Genetics (ESHG), together with research groups from the UK and the Netherlands, developed recommendations on recontacting which, after public consultation, have been endorsed by ESHG Board. In clinical genetics, recontacting for updating patients with new, clinically significant information related to their diagnosis or previous genetic testing may be justifiable and, where possible, desirable. Consensus about the type of information that should trigger recontacting converges around its clinical and personal utility. The organization of recontacting procedures and policies in current health care systems is challenging. It should be sustainable, commensurate with previously obtained consent, and a shared responsibility between healthcare providers, laboratories, patients, and other stakeholders. Optimal use of the limited clinical resources currently available is needed. Allocation of dedicated resources for recontacting should be considered. Finally, there is a need for more evidence, including economic and utility of information for people, to inform which strategies provide the most cost-effective use of healthcare resources for recontacting.
Collapse
|
14
|
Gorwood P, Le Strat Y, Ramoz N. Genetics of addictive behavior: the example of nicotine dependence. DIALOGUES IN CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE 2018. [PMID: 29302221 PMCID: PMC5741107 DOI: 10.31887/dcns.2017.19.3/pgorwood] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
The majority of addictive disorders have a significant heritability—roughly around 50%. Surprisingly, the most convincing association (a nicotinic acetylcholine receptor CHRNA5-A3-B4 gene cluster in nicotine dependence), with a unique attributable risk of 14%, was detected through a genome-wide association study (GWAS) on lung cancer, although lung cancer has a low heritability. We propose some explanations of this finding, potentially helping to understand how a GWAS strategy can be successful. Many endophenotypes were also assessed as potentially modulating the effect of nicotine, indirectly facilitating the development of nicotine dependence. Challenging the involved phenotype led to the demonstration that other potentially overlapping disorders, such as schizophrenia and Parkinson disease, could also be involved, and further modulated by parent monitoring or the existence of a smoking partner. Such a complex mechanism of action is compatible with a gene-environment interaction, most clearly explained by epigenetic factors, especially as such factors were shown to be, at least partly, genetically driven.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip Gorwood
- INSERM U894, Center of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Paris, France; University Paris-Descartes; Paris, France; Sainte-Anne Hospital (CMME), Paris, France
| | - Yann Le Strat
- INSERM U894, Center of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Paris, France; Hopital Louis Mourier (AP-HP), Colombes, France
| | - Nicolas Ramoz
- INSERM U894, Center of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Paris, France; University Paris-Descartes
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Mastantuoni E, Saccone G, Al-Kouatly HB, Paternoster M, D'Alessandro P, Arduino B, Carbone L, Esposito G, Raffone A, De Vivo V, Maruotti GM, Berghella V, Zullo F. Expanded carrier screening: A current perspective. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2018; 230:41-54. [PMID: 30240948 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.09.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2018] [Revised: 08/09/2018] [Accepted: 09/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Prenatal carrier screening has expanded to include a large number of genes offered to all couples considering pregnancy or with an ongoing pregnancy. Expanded carrier screening refers to identification of carriers of single-gene disorders outside of traditional screening guidelines. Expanded carrier screening panels include numerous autosomal recessive and X-linked genetic conditions, including those with a very low carrier frequency, as well as those with mild or incompletely penetrant phenotype. Therefore, the clinical utility of these panels is still subject of debate. Priority should be given to carrier screening panels that include a comprehensive set of severe childhood-onset disorders. Psychosocial support and genetic couseling should be available prior to screening and for the return of positive results. Systems are needed to reduce the risk of misinterpreting results. Finally, attention should be paid on the impact of expanded carrier screening on health care organizations and burden of cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrica Mastantuoni
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Gabriele Saccone
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
| | - Huda B Al-Kouatly
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Mariano Paternoster
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Pietro D'Alessandro
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Bruno Arduino
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Luigi Carbone
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Giuseppina Esposito
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Antonio Raffone
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Valentino De Vivo
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Maria Maruotti
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Berghella
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Fulvio Zullo
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Johnston J, Lantos JD, Goldenberg A, Chen F, Parens E, Koenig BA. Sequencing Newborns: A Call for Nuanced Use of Genomic Technologies. Hastings Cent Rep 2018; 48 Suppl 2:S2-S6. [PMID: 30133723 PMCID: PMC6901349 DOI: 10.1002/hast.874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Many scientists and doctors hope that affordable genome sequencing will lead to more personalized medical care and improve public health in ways that will benefit children, families, and society more broadly. One hope in particular is that all newborns could be sequenced at birth, thereby setting the stage for a lifetime of medical care and self-directed preventive actions tailored to each child's genome. Indeed, commentators often suggest that universal genome sequencing is inevitable. Such optimism can come with the presumption that discussing the potential limits, cost, and downsides of widespread application of genomic technologies is pointless, excessively pessimistic, or overly cautious. We disagree. Given the pragmatic challenges associated with determining what sequencing data mean for the health of individuals, the economic costs associated with interpreting and acting on such data, and the psychosocial costs of predicting one's own or one's child's future life plans based on uncertain testing results, we think this hope and optimism deserve to be tempered. In the analysis that follows, we distinguish between two reasons for using sequencing: to diagnose individual infants who have been identified as sick and to screen populations of infants who appear to be healthy. We also distinguish among three contexts in which sequencing for either diagnosis or screening could be deployed: in clinical medicine, in public health programs, and as a direct-to-consumer service. Each of these contexts comes with different professional norms, policy considerations, and public expectations. Finally, we distinguish between two main types of genome sequencing: targeted sequencing, where only specific genes are sequenced or analyzed, and whole-exome or whole-genome sequencing, where all the DNA or all the coding segments of all genes are sequenced and analyzed. In a symptomatic newborn, targeted or genome-wide sequencing can help guide other tests for diagnosis or for specific treatment that is urgently needed. Clinicians use the infant's symptoms (or phenotype) to interrogate the sequencing data. These same complexities and uncertainties, however, limit the usefulness of genome-wide sequencing as a population screening tool. While we recognize considerable benefit in using targeted sequencing to screen for or detect specific conditions that meet the criteria for inclusion in newborn screening panels, use of genome-wide sequencing as a sole screening tool for newborns is at best premature. We conclude that sequencing technology can be beneficially used in newborns when that use is nuanced and attentive to context.
Collapse
|
17
|
Mazzucco W, Pastorino R, Lagerberg T, Colotto M, d'Andrea E, Marotta C, Marzuillo C, Villari P, Federici A, Ricciardi W, Boccia S. Current state of genomic policies in healthcare among EU member states: results of a survey of chief medical officers. Eur J Public Health 2018; 27:931-937. [PMID: 27687585 PMCID: PMC5881673 DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckw155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background A need for a governance of genomics in healthcare among European Union (EU) countries arose during an international meeting of experts on public health genomics (PHG). We have conducted a survey on existing national genomic policies in healthcare among Chief Medical Officers (CMOs) of the 28 EU member states, plus Norway. Methods A questionnaire was sent to CMOs after a meeting on the policy implications of PHG held during the Italian presidency of the Council of EU in 2014. The survey was closed in November 2015. Results CMOs response rate was 65.5% (19/29). Twelve (63.2%) reported that their countries had a policy for genomics in healthcare in place, and 15 (78.9%) reported that public funding existed. Public research facilities for the development of such policies were documented in 13 (68.4%) countries, and 15 (83.3%) had working groups devoted to policy development. National agencies carrying out Health Technology Assessment of genomic-based technologies were present in nine countries (50%). Sixteen (88.9%) countries reported having agencies dealing with ethical issues related to genomic technologies. About 55% of countries disclosed the lack of information campaigns aimed at citizens, and 44.4% reported they had a legal framework for direct-to-consumer genetic tests. Conclusion Belgium, France, Italy, Spain and UK documented the presence of a policy on genomics in healthcare. While many caveats are necessary because of the methodology, results suggest a need for a co-ordinated effort to foster development and harmonization of dedicated policies across EU to responsibly integrate genomics policies into existing health systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Mazzucco
- Section of Hygiene, Institute of Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.,Department of Science for Health Promotion and Mother to Child Care "G. D'Alessandro", University of Palermo, Italy
| | - R Pastorino
- Section of Hygiene, Institute of Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - T Lagerberg
- Section of Hygiene, Institute of Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.,Better Value HealthCare, Oxford, UK
| | - M Colotto
- Section of Hygiene, Institute of Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - E d'Andrea
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - C Marotta
- Section of Hygiene, Institute of Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - C Marzuillo
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - P Villari
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | - W Ricciardi
- Section of Hygiene, Institute of Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.,National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy
| | - S Boccia
- Section of Hygiene, Institute of Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario 'Agostino Gemelli', Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Best M, Newson AJ, Meiser B, Juraskova I, Goldstein D, Tucker K, Ballinger ML, Hess D, Schlub TE, Biesecker B, Vines R, Vines K, Thomas D, Young MA, Savard J, Jacobs C, Butow P. The PiGeOn project: protocol of a longitudinal study examining psychosocial and ethical issues and outcomes in germline genomic sequencing for cancer. BMC Cancer 2018; 18:454. [PMID: 29685123 PMCID: PMC5914013 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-4366-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2017] [Accepted: 04/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Advances in genomics offer promise for earlier detection or prevention of cancer, by personalisation of medical care tailored to an individual’s genomic risk status. However genome sequencing can generate an unprecedented volume of results for the patient to process with potential implications for their families and reproductive choices. This paper describes a protocol for a study (PiGeOn) that aims to explore how patients and their blood relatives experience germline genomic sequencing, to help guide the appropriate future implementation of genome sequencing into routine clinical practice. Methods We have designed a mixed-methods, prospective, cohort sub-study of a germline genomic sequencing study that targets adults with cancer suggestive of a genetic aetiology. One thousand probands and 2000 of their blood relatives will undergo germline genomic sequencing as part of the parent study in Sydney, Australia between 2016 and 2020. Test results are expected within12–15 months of recruitment. For the PiGeOn sub-study, participants will be invited to complete surveys at baseline, three months and twelve months after baseline using self-administered questionnaires, to assess the experience of long waits for results (despite being informed that results may not be returned) and expectations of receiving them. Subsets of both probands and blood relatives will be purposively sampled and invited to participate in three semi-structured qualitative interviews (at baseline and each follow-up) to triangulate the data. Ethical themes identified in the data will be used to inform critical revisions of normative ethical concepts or frameworks. Discussion This will be one of the first studies internationally to follow the psychosocial impact on probands and their blood relatives who undergo germline genome sequencing, over time. Study results will inform ongoing ethical debates on issues such as informed consent for genomic sequencing, and informing participants and their relatives of specific results. The study will also provide important outcome data concerning the psychological impact of prolonged waiting for germline genomic sequencing. These data are needed to ensure that when germline genomic sequencing is introduced into standard clinical settings, ethical concepts are embedded, and patients and their relatives are adequately prepared and supported during and after the testing process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Best
- Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), Level 6 North, Lifehouse (C39Z), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia. .,Sydney Health Ethics, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
| | - Ainsley J Newson
- Sydney Health Ethics, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Bettina Meiser
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - Ilona Juraskova
- Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making, School of Psychology (CeMPED - Psychology), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - David Goldstein
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - Kathy Tucker
- Hereditary Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - Mandy L Ballinger
- Cancer Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, 384 Victoria St, Darlinghurst, NSW, 2021, Australia
| | - Dominique Hess
- Cancer Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, 384 Victoria St, Darlinghurst, NSW, 2021, Australia
| | - Timothy E Schlub
- Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Barbara Biesecker
- National Human Genome Research, National Institutes of Health, 31 Center Drive, MSC 2073, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Richard Vines
- Rare Cancers, PO Box 440, Bowral, NSW, 2576, Australia
| | - Kate Vines
- Rare Cancers, PO Box 440, Bowral, NSW, 2576, Australia
| | - David Thomas
- Cancer Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, 384 Victoria St, Darlinghurst, NSW, 2021, Australia
| | - Mary-Anne Young
- Genome One, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, 384 Victoria St, Darlinghurst, NSW, 2021, Australia
| | - Jacqueline Savard
- Sydney Health Ethics, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Chris Jacobs
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - Phyllis Butow
- Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), Level 6 North, Lifehouse (C39Z), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.,Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making, School of Psychology (CeMPED - Psychology), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Morrissey C, Walker RL. The Ethics of General Population Preventive Genomic Sequencing: Rights and Social Justice. THE JOURNAL OF MEDICINE AND PHILOSOPHY 2018; 43:22-43. [PMID: 29342286 PMCID: PMC5901094 DOI: 10.1093/jmp/jhx034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Advances in DNA sequencing technology open new possibilities for public health genomics, especially in the form of general population preventive genomic sequencing (PGS). Such screening programs would sit at the intersection of public health and preventive health care, and thereby at once invite and resist the use of clinical ethics and public health ethics frameworks. Despite their differences, these ethics frameworks traditionally share a central concern for individual rights. We examine two putative individual rights-the right not to know, and the child's right to an open future-frequently invoked in discussions of predictive genetic testing, in order to explore their potential contribution to evaluating this new practice. Ultimately, we conclude that traditional clinical and public health ethics frameworks, and these two rights in particular, should be complemented by a social justice perspective in order adequately to characterize the ethical dimensions of general population PGS programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clair Morrissey
- University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Genomic Testing in The Paediatric Population: Ethical Considerations in Light of Recent Policy Statements. Mol Diagn Ther 2017; 20:407-14. [PMID: 27251403 DOI: 10.1007/s40291-016-0210-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Genomic testing is rapidly becoming established in clinical practice and research. In this paper we consider the ethical issues arising in genomic testing in children, focusing on the clinical context. After describing how genomics can be said to depart from genetics in ethically relevant ways, we introduce two case studies involving ethical issues in paediatric genomic testing. We then summarise and critically engage with recent professional statements regarding genomic testing in children; notably the 2015 position statement from the American Society for Human Genetics. To provide a conceptual framework for these debates, we then synthesise recent bioethics literature regarding appropriate concepts to use when making decisions regarding children, and applying them to genomic testing. We recommend an approach to genomic testing in children that is child-focused and flexibly applied, driven by a core clinical question. Finally, we examine the role that age and emerging capacity should play in these debates.
Collapse
|
21
|
Plöthner M, Frank M, von der Schulenburg JMG. Cost analysis of whole genome sequencing in German clinical practice. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2017; 18:623-633. [PMID: 27380512 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-016-0815-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2015] [Accepted: 06/23/2016] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Whole genome sequencing (WGS) is an emerging tool in clinical diagnostics. However, little has been said about its procedure costs, owing to a dearth of related cost studies. This study helps fill this research gap by analyzing the execution costs of WGS within the setting of German clinical practice. METHODOLOGY First, to estimate costs, a sequencing process related to clinical practice was undertaken. Once relevant resources were identified, a quantification and monetary evaluation was conducted using data and information from expert interviews with clinical geneticists, and personnel at private enterprises and hospitals. This study focuses on identifying the costs associated with the standard sequencing process, and the procedure costs for a single WGS were analyzed on the basis of two sequencing platforms-namely, HiSeq 2500 and HiSeq Xten, both by Illumina, Inc. In addition, sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the influence of various uses of sequencing platforms and various coverage values on a fixed-cost degression. RESULTS In the base case scenario-which features 80 % utilization and 30-times coverage-the cost of a single WGS analysis with the HiSeq 2500 was estimated at €3858.06. The cost of sequencing materials was estimated at €2848.08; related personnel costs of €396.94 and acquisition/maintenance costs (€607.39) were also found. In comparison, the cost of sequencing that uses the latest technology (i.e., HiSeq Xten) was approximately 63 % cheaper, at €1411.20. CONCLUSIONS The estimated costs of WGS currently exceed the prediction of a 'US$1000 per genome', by more than a factor of 3.8. In particular, the material costs in themselves exceed this predicted cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marika Plöthner
- Center for Health Economics Research Hannover (CHERH), Leibniz University Hannover, Otto-Brenner-Straße 1, 30159, Hannover, Germany.
| | - Martin Frank
- Center for Health Economics Research Hannover (CHERH), Leibniz University Hannover, Otto-Brenner-Straße 1, 30159, Hannover, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Henneman L, Borry P, Chokoshvili D, Cornel MC, van El CG, Forzano F, Hall A, Howard HC, Janssens S, Kayserili H, Lakeman P, Lucassen A, Metcalfe SA, Vidmar L, de Wert G, Dondorp WJ, Peterlin B. Responsible implementation of expanded carrier screening. Eur J Hum Genet 2016; 24:e1-e12. [PMID: 26980105 PMCID: PMC4867464 DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 208] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2015] [Revised: 11/09/2015] [Accepted: 11/18/2015] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
This document of the European Society of Human Genetics contains recommendations regarding responsible implementation of expanded carrier screening. Carrier screening is defined here as the detection of carrier status of recessive diseases in couples or persons who do not have an a priori increased risk of being a carrier based on their or their partners' personal or family history. Expanded carrier screening offers carrier screening for multiple autosomal and X-linked recessive disorders, facilitated by new genetic testing technologies, and allows testing of individuals regardless of ancestry or geographic origin. Carrier screening aims to identify couples who have an increased risk of having an affected child in order to facilitate informed reproductive decision making. In previous decades, carrier screening was typically performed for one or few relatively common recessive disorders associated with significant morbidity, reduced life-expectancy and often because of a considerable higher carrier frequency in a specific population for certain diseases. New genetic testing technologies enable the expansion of screening to multiple conditions, genes or sequence variants. Expanded carrier screening panels that have been introduced to date have been advertised and offered to health care professionals and the public on a commercial basis. This document discusses the challenges that expanded carrier screening might pose in the context of the lessons learnt from decades of population-based carrier screening and in the context of existing screening criteria. It aims to contribute to the public and professional discussion and to arrive at better clinical and laboratory practice guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lidewij Henneman
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Section Community Genetics and EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pascal Borry
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Davit Chokoshvili
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Centre for Medical Genetics Ghent, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Martina C Cornel
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Section Community Genetics and EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Carla G van El
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Section Community Genetics and EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Heidi C Howard
- Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Sandra Janssens
- Centre for Medical Genetics Ghent, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Hülya Kayserili
- Department of Medical Genetics, Koç University School of Medicine (KUSoM), Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Phillis Lakeman
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anneke Lucassen
- Department of Clinical Ethics and Law (CELS), University of Southampton and Wessex Clinical Genetic Service, Southampton, UK
| | - Sylvia A Metcalfe
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute and Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Lovro Vidmar
- Clinical Institute of Medical Genetics, Ljubljana University Medical Centre, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Guido de Wert
- Department of Health, Ethics & Society, Research Schools CAPHRI and GROW, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Wybo J Dondorp
- Department of Health, Ethics & Society, Research Schools CAPHRI and GROW, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Borut Peterlin
- Clinical Institute of Medical Genetics, Ljubljana University Medical Centre, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Daly MB. Family Communication of Genetic Risk: A Personalized Approach. CURRENT GENETIC MEDICINE REPORTS 2016. [DOI: 10.1007/s40142-016-0088-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
24
|
Kranendonk EJ, Ploem MC, Hennekam RCM. Regulating biobanking with children's tissue: a legal analysis and the experts' view. Eur J Hum Genet 2016; 24:30-6. [PMID: 25873015 PMCID: PMC4795222 DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.59] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2014] [Revised: 02/20/2015] [Accepted: 02/24/2015] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Many current paediatric studies concern relationships between genes and environment and discuss aetiology, treatment and prevention of Mendelian and multifactorial diseases. Many of these studies depend on collection and long-term storage of data and biological material from affected children in biobanks. Stored material is a source of personal information of the donor and his family and could be used in an undesirable context, potentially leading to discrimination and interfering with a child's right to an open future. Here, we address the normative framework regarding biobanking with residual tissue of children, protecting the privacy interests of young biobank donors (0-12 years). We analyse relevant legal documents concerning storage and use of children's material for research purposes. We explore the views of 17 Dutch experts involved in paediatric biobank research and focus on informed consent for donation of leftover tissue as well as disclosure of individual research findings resulting from biobank research. The results of this analysis show that experts have no clear consensus about the appropriate rules for storage of and research with children's material in biobanks. Development of a framework that provides a fair balance between fundamental paediatric research and privacy protection is necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elcke J Kranendonk
- Department of Public Health, AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M Corrette Ploem
- Department of Public Health, AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Raoul C M Hennekam
- Departments of Paediatrics and Translational Genetics, AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Beckmann JS. Can we afford to sequence every newborn baby's genome? Hum Mutat 2015; 36:283-6. [PMID: 25546530 DOI: 10.1002/humu.22748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2014] [Accepted: 12/17/2014] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Whole-exome sequencing and whole-genome sequencing are gradually entering into the clinical arena. Drops in sequencing prices have led some to suggest that these analyses could be extended to the screening of whole populations or subsets thereof. Herein, we argue that this optimism is presently still unfounded. While cost estimates take into account the generation of sequence data, they fail to properly evaluate both the price of accurate and efficient interpretation and of the proper return of genomic information to the consulting individuals. Thus, short of inventing new, cost-effective ways of achieving these goals, the latter are likely to ruin our healthcare systems. We posit that due to lack of available resources, generalization of this practice remains, for the time being, unrealistic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacques S Beckmann
- Clinical Bioinformatics, SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
Whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing for clinical applications is now an integral part of medical genetics practice. The term newborn screening refers to public health programs designed to screen newborns for various treatable metabolic conditions, by measuring levels of circulating blood metabolites. The availability and significant decrease in sequencing costs has raised the question of whether metabolic newborn screening should be replaced by whole-genome or whole-exome sequencing. While newborn genome sequencing can potentially increase the number of disorders identified by newborn screening, the generalization of its practice raises a number of important ethical issues. This short article argues that there are medical, psychological, ethical and economic reasons why widespread dissemination of newborn screening is still premature.
Collapse
|
27
|
Dondorp W, de Wert G, Bombard Y, Bianchi DW, Bergmann C, Borry P, Chitty LS, Fellmann F, Forzano F, Hall A, Henneman L, Howard HC, Lucassen A, Ormond K, Peterlin B, Radojkovic D, Rogowski W, Soller M, Tibben A, Tranebjærg L, van El CG, Cornel MC. Non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy and beyond: challenges of responsible innovation in prenatal screening. Eur J Hum Genet 2015; 23:1438-50. [PMID: 25782669 PMCID: PMC4613463 DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.57] [Citation(s) in RCA: 204] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2014] [Revised: 02/15/2015] [Accepted: 02/19/2015] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
This paper contains a joint ESHG/ASHG position document with recommendations regarding responsible innovation in prenatal screening with non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT). By virtue of its greater accuracy and safety with respect to prenatal screening for common autosomal aneuploidies, NIPT has the potential of helping the practice better achieve its aim of facilitating autonomous reproductive choices, provided that balanced pretest information and non-directive counseling are available as part of the screening offer. Depending on the health-care setting, different scenarios for NIPT-based screening for common autosomal aneuploidies are possible. The trade-offs involved in these scenarios should be assessed in light of the aim of screening, the balance of benefits and burdens for pregnant women and their partners and considerations of cost-effectiveness and justice. With improving screening technologies and decreasing costs of sequencing and analysis, it will become possible in the near future to significantly expand the scope of prenatal screening beyond common autosomal aneuploidies. Commercial providers have already begun expanding their tests to include sex-chromosomal abnormalities and microdeletions. However, multiple false positives may undermine the main achievement of NIPT in the context of prenatal screening: the significant reduction of the invasive testing rate. This document argues for a cautious expansion of the scope of prenatal screening to serious congenital and childhood disorders, only following sound validation studies and a comprehensive evaluation of all relevant aspects. A further core message of this document is that in countries where prenatal screening is offered as a public health programme, governments and public health authorities should adopt an active role to ensure the responsible innovation of prenatal screening on the basis of ethical principles. Crucial elements are the quality of the screening process as a whole (including non-laboratory aspects such as information and counseling), education of professionals, systematic evaluation of all aspects of prenatal screening, development of better evaluation tools in the light of the aim of the practice, accountability to all stakeholders including children born from screened pregnancies and persons living with the conditions targeted in prenatal screening and promotion of equity of access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wybo Dondorp
- Department of Health, Ethics & Society, Research Schools CAPHRI and GROW, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Guido de Wert
- Department of Health, Ethics & Society, Research Schools CAPHRI and GROW, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Yvonne Bombard
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St Michael's Hospital & Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Diana W Bianchi
- Department of Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Carsten Bergmann
- Center for Human Genetics Bioscientia, Ingelheim, Germany
- Department of Medicine, University Freiburg Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Pascal Borry
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Leuven University, Belgium
| | - Lyn S Chitty
- Clinical and Molecular Genetics Unit, UCL Institute of Child Health, Great Ormond Street Hospital and UCLH NHS Foundations Trusts, London, UK
| | - Florence Fellmann
- Service of Medical Genetics, University Hospital of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Lidewij Henneman
- Section Community Genetics, Department of Clinical Genetics and EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Heidi C Howard
- Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Anneke Lucassen
- Department of Clinical Ethics and Law (CELS), University of Southampton and Wessex Clinical Genetic Service, Southampton, UK
| | - Kelly Ormond
- Department of Genetics and Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Borut Peterlin
- Clinical Institute of Medical Genetics, Ljubljana University Medical Centre, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Dragica Radojkovic
- Laboratory for Molecular Biology, Institute of Molecular Genetics and Genetic Engineering (IMGGE), University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Wolf Rogowski
- Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Gesundheit und Umwelt, Helmholtz Zentrum, München, Germany
| | - Maria Soller
- Division Clinical Genetics, University and Regional Laboratories Region Skåne, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Aad Tibben
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Lisbeth Tranebjærg
- Department of Audiology, Bispebjerg Hospital/Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Genetics, The Kennedy Center, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Institute of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, ICMM, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Carla G van El
- Section Community Genetics, Department of Clinical Genetics and EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martina C Cornel
- Section Community Genetics, Department of Clinical Genetics and EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Cheng R, Leung RKK, Chen Y, Pan Y, Tong Y, Li Z, Ning L, Ling XB, He J. Virtual Pharmacist: A Platform for Pharmacogenomics. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0141105. [PMID: 26496198 PMCID: PMC4619711 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2015] [Accepted: 10/03/2015] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
We present Virtual Pharmacist, a web-based platform that takes common types of high-throughput data, namely microarray SNP genotyping data, FASTQ and Variant Call Format (VCF) files as inputs, and reports potential drug responses in terms of efficacy, dosage and toxicity at one glance. Batch submission facilitates multivariate analysis or data mining of targeted groups. Individual analysis consists of a report that is readily comprehensible to patients and practioners who have basic knowledge in pharmacology, a table that summarizes variants and potential affected drug response according to the US Food and Drug Administration pharmacogenomic biomarker labeled drug list and PharmGKB, and visualization of a gene-drug-target network. Group analysis provides the distribution of the variants and potential affected drug response of a target group, a sample-gene variant count table, and a sample-drug count table. Our analysis of genomes from the 1000 Genome Project underlines the potentially differential drug responses among different human populations. Even within the same population, the findings from Watson's genome highlight the importance of personalized medicine. Virtual Pharmacist can be accessed freely at http://www.sustc-genome.org.cn/vp or installed as a local web server. The codes and documentation are available at the GitHub repository (https://github.com/VirtualPharmacist/vp). Administrators can download the source codes to customize access settings for further development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronghai Cheng
- Department of Biology, South University of Science and Technology of China, Shenzhen, China
| | - Ross Ka-Kit Leung
- Division of Genomics and Bioinformatics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Yao Chen
- Department of Biology, South University of Science and Technology of China, Shenzhen, China
| | - Yidan Pan
- Department of Biology, South University of Science and Technology of China, Shenzhen, China
| | - Yin Tong
- Department of Biology, South University of Science and Technology of China, Shenzhen, China
| | - Zhoufang Li
- Department of Biology, South University of Science and Technology of China, Shenzhen, China
| | - Luwen Ning
- Department of Biology, South University of Science and Technology of China, Shenzhen, China
| | - Xuefeng B. Ling
- Departments of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America
| | - Jiankui He
- Department of Biology, South University of Science and Technology of China, Shenzhen, China
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Guchet X. What's in a word? The person of personalized (nano)medicine. Nanomedicine (Lond) 2015; 10:3167-79. [DOI: 10.2217/nnm.15.145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Personalized medicine has recently become a main goal for healthcare policy. It is often defined as the tailoring of diagnosis and therapies to the genetic profile of each patient, and as such it is supposed to overcome the major thorny issues at stake in biomedicine today. This challenging program is primarily carried out by new approaches in biomedical imaging, molecular analysis, drug delivery and follow-up, taking more and more advantage of nanotechnology. However, in current literature and debates, the term ‘personalized medicine’ appears to be polysemous. The paper examines this polysemy. It links it to rival epistemic and technological choices in research programs, and it finally argues that this techno-epistemic plurality echoes conflicting expectations and values among today's biomedicine actors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xavier Guchet
- Department of Philosophy, COSTECH (EA 2223), University of Technology of Compiègne (UTC), France
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
FRIEDMAN EITAN. Next generation sequencing for newborn screening: are we there yet? Genet Res (Camb) 2015; 97:e17. [PMID: 26392239 PMCID: PMC6863637 DOI: 10.1017/s001667231500018x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2015] [Accepted: 08/07/2015] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Screening programs for asymptomatic newborns (newborn screening - NBS) have increasingly been implemented in many westernized countries since the end of the 20th century (Wilson et al., 2010). The major goal of these programs is to unselectively screen all newborns for a well defined group of severe, rare, clearly identifiable and actionable conditions. These conditions should be diagnosed and treated in a timely fashion to ensure short and long term health of the newborn as an infant and an adult. As such, NBS programs are one of the pivotal public health achievements of the past decade (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2011) that have led to the saving of lives and improving quality of life as well as posing less financial burden on the health care system. Technically the currently practiced screening process is performed 48 hours after birth, using a minute amount of blood collected on a dried blood spot card, which is subsequently subjected to biochemical analysis predominantly using mass spectrometry assays.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- EITAN FRIEDMAN
- Director, Oncogenetics Unit, Institute of Human Genetics, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
- Departments of Internal Medicine and Genetics and Biochemistry, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University Tel-Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Dondorp W, Page-Christiaens G, de Wert G. Genomic futures of prenatal screening: ethical reflection. Clin Genet 2015; 89:531-8. [DOI: 10.1111/cge.12640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2015] [Revised: 07/07/2015] [Accepted: 07/07/2015] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- W.J. Dondorp
- Department of Health, Ethics and Society, Research Schools GROW, CAPHRI; Maastricht University; Maastricht The Netherlands
| | - G.C.M.L. Page-Christiaens
- Wilhelmina Children's Hospital Birth Centre; Utrecht University Medical Centre; Utrecht The Netherlands
| | - G.M.W.R de Wert
- Department of Health, Ethics and Society, Research Schools GROW, CAPHRI; Maastricht University; Maastricht The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Daly MB. A Family-Centered Model for Sharing Genetic Risk. THE JOURNAL OF LAW, MEDICINE & ETHICS : A JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF LAW, MEDICINE & ETHICS 2015; 43:545-551. [PMID: 26479564 PMCID: PMC4617664 DOI: 10.1111/jlme.12297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
The successes of the Human Genome Project have ushered in a new era of genomic science. To effectively translate these discoveries, it will be critical to improve the communication of genetic risk within families. This will require a systematic approach that accounts for the nature of family relationships and sociocultural beliefs. This paper proposes the application of the Family Systems Illness Model, used in the setting of cancer care, to the evolving field of genomics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary B. Daly
- Chair, Department of Clinical Genetics, Timothy R. Talbot Jr. Chair for Cancer Research, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19111, 609-397-9112 (home), 908-304-2236 (cell), 215-728-2791 (work), 215-214-3999 (fax)
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Harper J, Geraedts J, Borry P, Cornel MC, Dondorp WJ, Gianaroli L, Harton G, Milachich T, Kaariainen H, Liebaers I, Morris M, Sequeiros J, Sermon K, Shenfield F, Skirton H, Soini S, Spits C, Veiga A, Vermeesch JR, Viville S, de Wert G, Macek M. Current issues in medically assisted reproduction and genetics in Europe: research, clinical practice, ethics, legal issues and policy. Hum Reprod 2014; 29:1603-9. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deu130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
|
34
|
To disclose, or not to disclose? Context matters. Eur J Hum Genet 2014; 23:279-84. [PMID: 24916647 PMCID: PMC4062531 DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2014.108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2014] [Revised: 04/15/2014] [Accepted: 04/29/2014] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Progress in understanding childhood disease using next-generation sequencing (NGS) portends vast improvements in the nature and quality of patient care. However, ethical questions surrounding the disclosure of incidental findings (IFs) persist, as NGS and other novel genomic technologies become the preferred tool for clinical genetic testing. Thus, the need for comprehensive management plans and multidisciplinary discussion on the return of IFs in pediatric research has never been more immediate. The aim of this study is to explore the views of investigators concerning the return of IFs in the pediatric oncology research context. Our findings reveal at least four contextual themes underlying the ethics of when, and how, IFs could be disclosed to participants and their families: clinical significance of the result, respect for individual, scope of professional responsibilities, and implications for the healthcare/research system. Moreover, the study proposes two action items toward anticipatory governance of IF in genetic research with children. The need to recognize the multiplicity of contextual factors in determining IF disclosure practices, particularly as NGS increasingly becomes a centerpiece in genetic research broadly, is heightened when children are involved. Sober thought should be given to the possibility of discovering IF, and to proactive discussions about disclosure considering the realities of young participants, their families, and the investigators who recruit them.
Collapse
|
35
|
Tsongalis GJ. The thrills and agonies of using next-generation sequencing for somatic mutation detection in cancer. Per Med 2014; 11:369-371. [PMID: 29783481 DOI: 10.2217/pme.14.20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
36
|
Godfrey E, Clark P. Developing standards for chromosomal microarray testing counselling in paediatrics. Acta Paediatr 2014; 103:574-7. [PMID: 24528481 DOI: 10.1111/apa.12601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2013] [Accepted: 02/11/2014] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Chromosomal microarray testing (CMA) generally aids paediatric genetic diagnosis. However, pre-CMA counselling is important as results can be ambiguous, generate uncertainty and raise ethical issues. We developed standards for counselling and giving families results; using these we evaluated practice for children seen by the Auckland Developmental Paediatric team in 2011. Pretest discussion was documented in 14 of 28 subjects and potential outcomes in 4of 28. 8 of 28 received information leaflets, 1 of 28 gave signed consent. 3 of 3 with abnormal results and 4 of 5 with variants of unknown significance (VOUS) were offered clinical genetics referral. 8 of 20 families with normal results were written to; two with abnormal results were informed face-to-face and one in writing; most VOUS were communicated by phone, voicemail or letter. CONCLUSION CMA testing requires clear patient information sheets and in-depth pretest discussion for informed consent, timely feedback of results and genetics referral as appropriate. Authoritative guidelines and training are needed to strengthen CMA counselling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Godfrey
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Wienke S, Brown K, Farmer M, Strange C. Expanded carrier screening panels-does bigger mean better? J Community Genet 2014; 5:191-8. [PMID: 24062228 PMCID: PMC3955460 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-013-0169-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2013] [Accepted: 08/28/2013] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Wienke
- Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA,
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Knoppers BM, Senecal K, Borry P, Avard D. Whole-Genome Sequencing in Newborn Screening Programs. Sci Transl Med 2014; 6:229cm2. [DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3008494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
|
39
|
Harper JC, Geraedts J, Borry P, Cornel MC, Dondorp W, Gianaroli L, Harton G, Milachich T, Kääriäinen H, Liebaers I, Morris M, Sequeiros J, Sermon K, Shenfield F, Skirton H, Soini S, Spits C, Veiga A, Vermeesch JR, Viville S, de Wert G, Macek M. Current issues in medically assisted reproduction and genetics in Europe: research, clinical practice, ethics, legal issues and policy. European Society of Human Genetics and European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. Eur J Hum Genet 2013; 21 Suppl 2:S1-21. [PMID: 24225486 PMCID: PMC3831061 DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2013.219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
In March 2005, a group of experts from the European Society of Human Genetics and European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology met to discuss the interface between genetics and assisted reproductive technology (ART), and published an extended background paper, recommendations and two Editorials. Seven years later, in March 2012, a follow-up interdisciplinary workshop was held, involving representatives of both professional societies, including experts from the European Union Eurogentest2 Coordination Action Project. The main goal of this meeting was to discuss developments at the interface between clinical genetics and ARTs. As more genetic causes of reproductive failure are now recognised and an increasing number of patients undergo testing of their genome before conception, either in regular health care or in the context of direct-to-consumer testing, the need for genetic counselling and preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) may increase. Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) thus far does not have evidence from randomised clinical trials to substantiate that the technique is both effective and efficient. Whole-genome sequencing may create greater challenges both in the technological and interpretational domains, and requires further reflection about the ethics of genetic testing in ART and PGD/PGS. Diagnostic laboratories should be reporting their results according to internationally accepted accreditation standards (International Standards Organisation - ISO 15189). Further studies are needed in order to address issues related to the impact of ART on epigenetic reprogramming of the early embryo. The legal landscape regarding assisted reproduction is evolving but still remains very heterogeneous and often contradictory. The lack of legal harmonisation and uneven access to infertility treatment and PGD/PGS fosters considerable cross-border reproductive care in Europe and beyond. The aim of this paper is to complement previous publications and provide an update of selected topics that have evolved since 2005.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joyce C Harper
- UCL Centre for PG&D, Institute for Womens Health, University College London, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|