Urea movement across erythrocyte membrane during artificial kidney treatment

Renal Replacement Modality Affects Uremic Toxins and Oxidative Stress

Nowadays, the high prevalence of kidney diseases and their related complications, including endothelial dysfunction and cardiovascular disease, represents one of the leading causes of death in patients with chronic kidney diseases. Renal failure leads to accumulation of uremic toxins, which are the main cause of oxidative stress development. The renal replacement therapy appears to be the best way to lower uremic toxin levels in patients with end-stage renal disease and reduce oxidative stress. At this moment, despite the increasing number of recognized toxins and their mechanisms of action, it is impossible to determine which of them are the most important and which cause the greatest complications. There are many different types of renal replacement therapy, but the best treatment has not been identified yet. Patients treated with diffusion methods have satisfactory clearance of small molecules, but the clearance of medium molecules appears to be insufficient, but treatment with convection methods cleans medium molecules better than small molecules. Hence, there is an urgent need of new more validated, appropriate, and reliable information not only on toxins and their role in metabolic disorders, including oxidative stress, but also on the best artificial renal replacement therapy to reduce complications and prolong the life of patients with chronic kidney disease.

Urea Determination in Dialysis, based on a Differential pH Technique

The application of a new technique, based on differential measurements of pH, to determine urea concentration in patients of a dialysis center, is reported. Urea in plasma, whole blood or dialysis fluids is measured by an enzymatic reaction, with urease; the procedure, requiring 10 μL of sample, is simple, fast and correlates well with a reference spectrophotometric method, in the 0-300 mg/dL concentration range, according to the equation y = 1.0291 x - 0.0777; r = 0.9991; n = 73.

Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy (CRRT) in the Intensive Care Unit

This review is specifically designed to address the topic of CRRT based on the needs and interests of intensivists. Some of the materials, concepts, and formulas presented in this review have been drawn from a previous chapter authored by myself and intended for individuals whose primary interest is specifically dialysis[1]. Since this previous chapter was authored in 1994, similar material presented in this review has been updated in order to present the most current information.

Searching for uremic toxins

Treatment of uremia by hemodialysis has become widespread over the last 40 years and has improved substantially over that time. However, people treated with this modality continue to suffer from multiple disabilities. Retention of organic solutes, especially those poorly removed by hemodialysis, likely contributes to these disabilities. Certain classes of solutes are removed less well than urea by hemodialysis and by the normal kidney. These include protein-bound solutes, relatively large solutes, sequestered compounds, and substances removed at rates higher than urea by the normal kidney. Several strategies could be used to discover the solutes responsible for residual morbidities in standardly dialyzed people. Rather than continue to focus only on urea removal as an index for dialysis adequacy, finding additional approaches for removing toxic solutes with characteristics different from urea (and the similar small solutes it represents) is a desirable and feasible goal.

Predilution versus postdilution continuous venovenous hemofiltration: no effect on filter life and azotemic control in critically ill patients on heparin

In continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH), the delivery of replacement fluid in pre- or postdilution mode remains the subject of controversy. We compared both modes in terms of filter life, dose, and azotemic control. All patients admitted to the intensive care units of a university hospital between November 2004 and December 2006 receiving CVVH and systemic anticoagulation with heparin were retrospectively studied. Thirty-six patients treated by CVVH in predilution and 27 in postdilution mode were studied, with 132 filters in the former and 111 in the latter. The filter life [median ± interquartile range (IQR)] was 24 ± 38 hours and 29 ± 46 hours (p = 0.58) in the pre- and postdilution modes, respectively. Although the fall in creatinine and urea depended on the dose, 19% greater delivered dose in the post- than predilution mode did not impact on azotemic control. In critically ill, heparinized patients on CVVH, filter life and azotemic control are similar in pre- and postdilution modes and underscore the clinical applicability of the predilution mode.

Methylamine clearance by haemodialysis is low

BACKGROUND

Dialysis adequacy is currently judged by measures of urea clearance. However, urea is relatively non-toxic and has properties distinct from large classes of other retained solutes. In particular, intracellularly sequestered solutes are likely to behave differently than urea.

METHODS

We studied an example of this class, the aliphatic amine monomethylamine (MMA), in stable haemodialysis outpatients (n = 10) using an HPLC-based assay.

RESULTS

Mean MMA levels pre-dialysis in end-stage renal disease subjects were 76 +/- 15 microg/L compared to 32 +/- 4 microg/L in normal subjects (n = 10) (P < 0.001). Mean urea reduction was 62% while the reduction ratio for MMA was 43% (P < 0.01). MMA levels rebounded in the 1 hour post-dialytic period to 85% of baseline, whereas urea levels rebounded only to 47% of baseline. MMA had a much larger calculated volume of distribution compared to urea, consistent with intracellular sequestration. Measures of intra-red blood cell (RBC) MMA concentrations confirmed greater levels in RBCs than in plasma with a ratio of 4.9:1. Because of the intracellular sequestration of MMA, we calculated its clearance using that amount removed from whole blood. Clearances for urea averaged 222 +/- 41 ml/min and for MMA 121 +/- 14 ml/min, while plasma clearance for creatinine was 162 +/- 20 ml/min (P < 0.01, for all differences). Using in vitro dialysis, in the absence of RBCs, solute clearance rates were similar: 333 +/- 6, 313 +/- 8 and 326 +/- 4 ml/min for urea, creatinine and MMA, respectively. These findings suggest that the lower MMA clearance relative to creatinine in vivo is a result of MMA movement into RBCs within the dialyser blood path diminishing its removal by dialysis.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, we find that, in conventional haemodialysis, MMA is not cleared as efficiently as urea or creatinine and raise the possibility that RBCs may limit its dialysis not merely by failing to discharge it, but by further sequestering it as blood passes through the dialyser.

Determinants of small solute clearance in hemodialysis

Recent outcome trials in chronic dialysis patients raise concerns about the relationship between delivered urea Kt/V and survival. Nevertheless, measurement of delivered small solute clearance remains the most common approach to quantify therapy. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the numerous factors influencing small solute clearance during hemodialysis. Although the focus of the review is on the manner in which dialyzer characteristics influence small solute clearances, factors related to other aspects of the extracorporeal circuit and to the patient will also be discussed.

Comparison of solute clearance in three modes of continuous renal replacement therapy

OBJECTIVES

To compare the clearances of low molecular weight molecules using three modalities of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) at the low blood flow rates typically used in pediatric patients.

DESIGN

A controlled, in vitro laboratory study.

SETTING

Research laboratory of a health sciences university.

SUBJECTS

AN69 dialysis hemofilter.

INTERVENTIONS

CRRT was performed using a 0.6 m(2) AN69 hemofilter. Human whole blood and plasma were combined to achieve a hematocrit of approximately 30%. Urea and creatinine were added to obtain concentrations of approximately 54 mmol/L of blood urea nitrogen and 1770 micromol/L of creatinine. Clearance data for urea and creatinine at a blood flow rate of 60 mL/min were generated using predilution continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH), postdilution CVVH, and continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Clearance of all three modalities was compared at a replacement solution (CVVH) or dialysate (CVVHD) flow rate of 16.7% of the blood flow rate. Both postdilution CVVH and CVVHD had a urea clearance of 11.3 mL/min, which was 15% greater than the 9.8 mL/min urea clearance of predilution CVVH (p <.005). Creatinine clearance with postdilution CVVH (10.7 mL/min) was 15% greater than the 9.0 mL/min clearance produced by predilution CVVH (p < 0.01). Predilution CVVH and CVVHD were compared at a flow rate of either replacement solution (CVVH) or dialysate (CVVHD) of 33% and 50% of the blood flow rate. Postdilution CVVH was not performed at high ultrafiltration rates due to the potential problem of hemoconcentration. CVVHD clearances of urea and creatinine were statistically superior to predilution CVVH at both flow rates.

CONCLUSIONS

CVVHD was superior to predilution CVVH for clearance of urea and creatinine. Postdilution CVVH and CVVHD gave nearly equivalent clearances. At the low blood flow rates used in pediatric patients, which raise concerns about high ultrafiltration during postdilution CVVH causing excessive hemoconcentration and filter clotting, CVVHD appears to be the optimal modality for maximizing clearance of small solutes during CRRT.

Solute mass balance during isovolaemic high volume haemofiltration

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of changing the amount of pre-dilution replacement fluid on the sieving coefficient (SC) and mass transfer of small solutes during isovolaemic high-volume haemofiltration (HVHF).

DESIGN AND SETTING

Prospective interventional study in the intensive care unit of a tertiary university hospital.

PATIENTS

Eight patients with septic shock.

INTERVENTIONS

Isovolaemic HVHF (6 l/h of replacement fluid) was performed. The proportion of replacement fluid delivered in pre-filter was altered to progressively decrease it from 6 to 0 l/h. Samples were simultaneously taken from the "pre-filter", "post-filter" and ultrafiltrate (UF) sampling ports.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Sodium, potassium, chloride, total calcium, total magnesium, phosphate, total CO(2), urea, creatinine and glucose concentrations were measured in each sample. The sieving coefficients of chloride, total CO(2), phosphate, urea and glucose were higher than 1 in most pre-dilution states. The sieving coefficients of sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, total CO(2) and urea decreased significantly with decreasing pre-dilution fluid rate. The sieving coefficients of chloride and glucose increased with decreasing pre-dilution fluid rate. There was a significant mass gain of sodium and glucose under all pre-dilution conditions. Mass chloride gains decreased with decreasing pre-dilution rates and changed into chloride loss during 6 l/h of post-dilution. Decreasing pre-dilution improved urea and creatinine mass removal.

CONCLUSIONS

Small solute SC and mass transfer during isovolaemic HVHF are significantly affected by the proportion of replacement fluid administered pre-filter. Isovolaemic HVHF is neither isonatraemic nor isochloraemic.

Dialyzer fiber bundle volume and kinetics of solute removal in continuous venovenous hemodialysis

The relationship between dialyzer fiber bundle volume (FBV), dialyzer life span, and small-solute clearance has yet to be clearly defined in continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD). This study sought to define this relationship using novel ultrasound dilution technology. We studied 55 sessions in 31 intensive care unit patients on CVVHD therapy. A session was defined as the life span of a single dialyzer. The following variables were assessed every 6 hours throughout each session, starting within 1 hour of initiation of that session: FBV, access recirculation, extracorporeal blood flow rate, effluent (EUN) to blood urea nitrogen (BUN) concentration ratio, effluent creatinine to blood creatinine concentration ratio, and urea nitrogen and creatinine clearances. Data were analyzed using random-effects linear models to estimate trends. Several dialysis-related and solute-removal parameters were analyzed for association with each other. Systemic or dialysis circuit heparin was administered in 28 of 55 sessions. One hundred seventy sets of FBV, 101 sets of urea clearance, and 102 sets of creatinine clearance measurements were performed. There was a declining trend for FBV (0.8 mL/h), heart rate (0.25 beats/min/h), and measured blood flow (0.33 mL/min/h; P < 0.05). Apart from dialysate inflow rate (P = 0.044), there was no significant correlation with EUN-BUN ratio. Session duration was associated with dialysis access site; the femoral access provided longer dialysis sessions than subclavian and internal jugular accesses (P = 0.029). We conclude that small-solute removal remains stable over the course of our CVVHD system life spans despite significant loss of hemodialyzer FBV.

Mixed predilution and postdilution online hemodiafiltration compared with the traditional infusion modes

BACKGROUND

On postdilution hemodiafiltration (post-HDF), convective removal of medium-high molecular weight solutes is, at the highest ultrafiltration rates, limited by high blood viscosity and protein concentration. Prefilter reinfusion (pre-HDF) may overcome this problem, but plasma dilution may affect the overall efficiency of the technique. In this study, an experimental system of online HDF with combined prefilter and postfilter infusion (mixed HDF) was evaluated and compared with the traditional predilution and postdilution modes.

METHODS

Removal of urea (U), creatinine (Cr), phosphate (Phos), and beta(2)-microglobulin (beta(2)m), ultrafiltration coefficients of the dialyzer (K(UF)), and rheologic conditions of the blood circuit were evaluated during the three infusion modes (a total of 36 runs lasting 180 min), performed with a polysulfone hemofilter 1.8 m(2), blood flow (Q(b)) 400 mL/min, dialysate flow (Q(d)) 700 mL/min, and infusion rate 120 mL/min (pre-HDF and post-HDF), or 60 + 60 mL/min (mixed HDF).

RESULTS

The mean effective U and Cr clearances and urea index of dialysis dose (eKt/V) were significantly higher on post-HDF than on pre-HDF (K(WB) (U) 210 vs. 193 mL/min, K(DQ) (Cr) 152 vs. 142 mL/min, eKt/V 1.41 vs. 1.30), while mixed HDF did not show significant differences versus post-HDF (K(WB) (U) 201 mL/min, K(DQ) (Cr) 149 mL/min). K(DQ) for Phos and beta(2)m were higher on post-HDF in only absolute values. Similar differences were found for instantaneous dialyzer clearances (K(I)) at 60, 120, and 180 minutes of the sessions, with a common trend to decrease with time. K(UF) and the apparent beta(2)m sieving coefficient showed their lowest values toward the end of post-HDF sessions. Increasing filtration fractions (FFs) were associated with increasing transmembrane pressure (TMP) and solute clearances up to FF values of 0.45. These were values achieved in only post-HDF, at which point the curve of the relationship between TMP and FF assumed its steepest exponential trend.

CONCLUSIONS

Mixed HDF, by better preserving the characteristics of water and solute transport of the membrane, ensured safer operating conditions than post-HDF, while achieving similar removal of small- and large-size solutes. Optimizing the ratio of prefilter/postfilter infusion and the total infusion according to the relationships found in our study between solute clearances, FF, and TMP, convective flux and transport may avoid excessive hemoconcentration and dangerous pressure gradients.

The effect of exercise during haemodialysis on solute removal

BACKGROUND

Urea rebound results as urea re-equilibrates between intracellular and intravascular compartments post haemodialysis. The mechanism of the rebound is thought to be due to either a reduced diffusion rate or blood flow. It is hypothesized that low blood flow in the skeletal muscles might be responsible. We tested this by studying the effect of exercise during dialysis on the removal of urea, creatinine and potassium.

METHODS

Eleven patients (aged 32-78 years) on haemodialysis (4-58 months) were studied on paired dialysis sessions; one with exercise and the other as a control. Patients pedalled on a cycle for 5-20 min at submaximal workload followed by 10 min rest to achieve a total of 60 min exercise. Plasma concentrations of urea, creatinine and potassium were measured pre-, post- and 30-min post dialysis. The post-dialysis rebound (% rebound) and reduction ratios (RR) of the solutes and equilibrated (two-pool) urea Kt/V were calculated for comparison.

RESULTS

The rebound of all three solutes was reduced significantly following exercise. The rebound of urea decreased from 12.4 to 10.9% (median, P<0.01 Wilcoxon signed rank test), creatinine from 21.2 to 17.2% (P<0.001) and potassium from 62 to 44% (P<0.05). Kt/V and RR increased significantly as a result: Kt/V urea from 1.00 to 1.15 (P=0.001), RR urea from 0.63 to 0.68 (P<0.001); Kt/V creatinine from 0.71 to 0.84 (P<0.01); and RR creatinine from 0.51 to 0.57 (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Exercise increased the efficiency of dialysis by reducing the rebound of solutes due to increased perfusion of the skeletal muscles.

A proposed glossary for dialysis kinetics

Quantification of the dialysis dose and assessment of nutritional status and response to nutritional therapy have become standard parts of the management of the chronic dialysis patient. Although advances in these areas have led to a more rational basis for therapy, certain misconceptions and points of confusion appear to have occurred. Recognizing the importance of a standard nomenclature to the development of concepts and the communication of research findings, we have attempted to compile a list of terms that are commonly used in the field of dialysis. New terms have been proposed for current ones that do not seem adequate. In addition, we have discussed potential methodologies for obtaining more accurate data for dialysis kinetics and for precise monitoring of nutritional intake and status. It is hoped that this glossary will stimulate discussion that will lead to refinements in terminology and concepts that will, in turn, improve research and practice in nephrology. It is anticipated that many of these definitions and recommendations will be modified or superseded as the management of patients with renal failure continues to advance.

Pitfalls of in vivo dialyzer clearance measurement

Dialyzer small-molecule clearance measurements are commonly made to help identify the cause of inadequate dialysis prescriptions, to determine the efficacy of reuse procedures, or to choose between different types of dialyzers. Clearance measurements can be blood-side- or dialysate-side-based. While blood-side clearance measurement is the classical technique, it suffers from several serious flaws that decrease its accuracy. Chief among these are the inability to accurately measure the blood flow rate and the difficulty in accounting for the presence of nonaqueous components in the blood. Using a dialysate-based clearance measurement technique overcomes these problems for most solutes, provided appropriate guidelines are followed. This article reviews the theory behind both blood- and dialysate-side techniques as well as discussing the practical application of that theory to clearance measurement.

Amino acid losses during hemodialysis: effects of high-solute flux and parenteral nutrition in acute renal failure

BACKGROUND

During standard hemodialysis, amino acid losses are substantial, amounting to 6 to 9 g per treatment. When these nutritional supplements are infused during dialysis, losses are increased, but a net positive balance can be achieved if the infusion rate is high enough. High-flux dialyzers, used with increasing frequency in modern dialysis centers because of their more permeable synthetic membranes, should cause further amino acid losses; however, the increase has not been measured, and the effect on plasma levels has not been examined. Assessment of net balance requires measurement of blood concentrations as well as of clearance.

METHODS

To quantitate the effect of high-flux dialysis on amino acid balance, we measured clearances, plasma levels, and losses of individual amino acids during hemodialysis in patients with acute renal failure who required daily parenteral nutrition.

RESULTS

Nearly all predialysis amino acid levels in plasma were within the normal range, probably because of control of uremia with prior dialyses and from continuous infusion. In paired studies, clearances were higher (150 +/- 15 mL/min vs 107 +/- 11 mL/min, p < .01), and levels fell more at mid-dialysis with high-flux membranes (28% +/- 5%) than with conventional cellulosic membranes (4 +/- 5%, p < .05). Mean losses of amino acid were 5.2 +/- 0.6 g per conventional dialysis, representing 60% of the total infused, and 7.3 +/- 1.8 g per high-flux dialysis, or 80% of the simultaneous infusion. Fractional losses decreased at higher infusion rates, but losses of individual amino acids varied from one fourth to more than 10 times the amount infused. Compared with other small solutes, plasma levels were relatively well maintained even during high-flux dialysis, a factor that enhanced removal by the dialyzer. Total balance depended more on the infusion rate than on the dialysis membrane.

CONCLUSIONS

These studies show that positive balance can be achieved with concurrent infusion during dialysis, especially at higher amino acid delivery rates. High-flux dialysis causes a greater disturbance of amino acid equilibrium than conventional dialysis does, but 24-hour gains far exceeded losses in the dialysate for most of the amino acids.

Urea kinetic modeling: an in vitro and in vivo comparative study

The urea kinetic model (UK) and the direct dialysis quantification method based on dialysate collection (DDQ) were used to determine the urea distribution volume (V) identified with the total body water and the urea generation rate (G) for different dialysis times, both in vivo during short hemodialysis (N = 20) and in vitro using an experimental single-pool urea system (N = 10). Both UK and DDQ allowed a satisfactory in vitro estimation of V and G for all dialysis times. On the other hand in vivo V and G estimations by both methods showed an increase of more than 50% between the determinations performed after 30 minutes of dialysis and at the end of dialysis. Our theoretical analysis shows that the in vivo changes of V are compatible with those expected for a two-compartment system in which one compartment is cleared faster than the other. Furthermore, given that urea is allowed to equilibrate in the body at the end of dialysis, DDQ permits an accurate estimate of V, G and PCR even for short hemodialysis, which UK does not.

Adequacy of hemodialysis

Despite technical advances in the delivery of hemodialysis over the past decade, the mortality rate of hemodialysis-dependent, end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients in the United States remains high. The increase in the number and severity of comorbid conditions of patients entering ESRD is a factor contributing to this high mortality. Nevertheless, there is increasing evidence that the dose of dialysis received by US patients is inadequate and that this plays a major role in the observed high mortality. In this review, we examine some of the parameters used to judge the adequacy of dialysis, as well as factors that can result in differences between prescribed and delivered dose of hemodialysis. Based on available evidence, we propose that for most patients the optimum dose of dialysis, above which further improvement of morbidity and mortality is doubtful, is represented by a delivered dose of dialysis equivalent to a Kt/V of 1.4 or greater, using biocompatible membranes. The prescription of this optimal dose of dialysis must be coupled with an ongoing effort to monitor delivery of the appropriate dose.

Therapy of renal anemia in children and adolescents with recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO)

Eleven anemic children and adolescents with a median age of 14 years (range six months-20 years) on chronic hemodialysis were treated with recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) intravenously three times a week for an average of 9.2 months. After eight weeks of therapy, hematocrit rose from 20.3 +/- 1.4% to 31.7 +/- 0.7% (0.20 +/- 0.01 to 0.31 +/- 0.007, p less than 0.001, mean +/- SEM). After reaching the target hematocrit of 30% to 33% (0.30 to 0.33), doses were adjusted individually. Blood transfusions were eliminated in all but one patient. All patients experienced an increase in appetite and energy level. Serum ferritin concentrations decreased in all patients who reached target hematocrit and seven required iron supplementation. Hypertension worsened in two patients and developed in two others. One patient's vascular access clotted. Dialysis efficiency and heparin requirements during dialysis did not change significantly. We conclude that rHuEPO is safe, effective, and should be recommended as treatment for anemia in children and adolescents on hemodialysis, but close monitoring for the development of hypertension and/or iron deficiency is necessary.

Evaluation of hemodialysis patients treated with erythropoietin

We evaluated 20 hemodialysis patients who had been treated with erythropoietin (Epo). All patients had hemoglobin levels below 8.5 g/dL. They were randomized to receive either Epo (100 U/kg) or placebo three times per week for 12 weeks. All patients on Epo had a significant (P less than 0.001) elevation of hematocrit levels (19.7% v 35.7%). They also had a significant (P less than 0.05) increase in midweek predialysis blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels, 27.8 versus 29.6 mmol/L (78 v 83 mg/dL), and serum phosphorus, 1.8 versus 2.1 mm/L (5.7 v 6.6 mg/dL). Protein catabolic rate also increased significantly (P less than 0.05). No changes were seen in the levels of serum creatinine and potassium, but episodes of hyperkalemia were more frequent in patients on Epo. No changes were seen in patients on placebo. When hematocrit increased, the clearance of blood-water for urea decreased 9%, and the clearance of creatinine, potassium, and phosphorus decreased 15%. Patients on Epo increased both their appetite and protein intake. More frequent episodes of hyperkalemia and elevated phosphorus level resulted from a combination of increased intake and decreased dialyzer clearance. We may need blood-water clearance to calculate Kt/V.

Effect of hematocrit on solute removal during high efficiency hemodialysis

The effect of changing hematocrit (Hct) on solute removal during high efficiency hemodialysis was evaluated in 12 patients. In five subjects, Hct was raised by recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) treatment, and in the other seven by blood transfusion. Solute removal was assessed by measuring: (1) whole blood (kb), blood water (kbw) and dialysate (kd) clearances; (2) the amount of solute in the spent dialysate; (3) the fractional decrement of serum solute concentration achieved by hemodialysis; and (4) urea kinetics, including kt/V and protein catabolic rate (PCR). The results showed that increasing the Hct did result in a slight reduction in some solute clearances. The decrement, however, was minor (5 to 8%), whereas the rise in Hct was marked (55 and 65%) in the transfused and EPO-treated groups, respectively. More importantly, linear regression analysis of kd/kb ratios versus Hct indicated that a rise of Hct from 20 to 40% would reduce creatinine and phosphate clearance by 8 and 13%, respectively. By contrast, assessment of the absolute amount of solute removed in the spent dialysate failed to detect differences between the two study periods. Additionally, a rise in Hct also did not affect urea kinetic parameters including kt/V and PCR. Based on these data, it appears prudent to increase hemodialysis prescription by 10 to 15% when Hct is raised to near 40% to avoid excessive retention of molecules with slow transcellular movement.

Solute kinetics in hypertonic hemodiafiltration and standard hemodialysis

Hemodiafiltration (HDF) is a new dialysis treatment that combines convective and diffusive forces. In order to assess the efficiency of a peculiar model of hypertonic HDF (H HDF), we studied eight uremic patients when they were undergoing five sessions of H HDF of 180 minutes duration and two sessions of standard hemodialysis (HD) of 270 minutes duration with a comparable blood (approximately 400 mL/min) and dialysate flow rate (approximately 520 mL/min). The plasma water clearances (Kw) of small [urea (U), creatinine (C), uric acid (UA), and phosphorus (P)] and middle molecules [netilmicin (N) and inulin (I)] were exceedingly higher in H HDF than in HD; however, because of the different treatment times, U and C removal (R) in HD overcame and UA and P R in HD equalized that in H HDF. The factor time was not sufficient to HD to compensate for the large difference in Kw in the case of I. Additional studies were performed in seven out of the eight patients after two sessions of H HDF and one session of HD. Two significantly higher rebounds were observed when comparing both treatments: for U after HD and for parathyroid hormone (PTH) after H HDF; however, PTH Cx/Cs ratios (ratios of the plasma water concentration of PTH at any postdialysis time to the plasma water concentration of PTH at the start of the run) were not different in both treatments, meaning that there was an increased PTH secretion in the early post H HDF hours in order to compensate for the larger PTH R with H HDF.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration in acute renal failure

This extensive review describes the settings for continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration (CAVH) and attempts to compare it to traditional dialysis therapies for acute renal failure. In addition hemodynamic stability, membrane biocompatibility, nutrition, fluid and solute removal, operational characteristics, anticoagulation, replacement solutions, drug removal, complications, and trouble shooting during CAVH are all discussed in detail. The cost of CAVH v dialysis is equal. CAVH is probably the renal replacement therapy of choice for hemodynamically unstable patients with acute renal failure and contraindications to peritoneal dialysis.