Once upon a time in dialysis: the last days of Kt/V?

Use of water in dialysis and its impact on the environment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The climate crisis poses significant challenges across various sectors, including healthcare, where resource consumption often exacerbates environmental issues. This review addresses concerns over current levels of water use for dialysis treatment, a critical procedure for patients with kidney failure. Despite its life-saving importance, the dialysis process consumes large quantities of water, contributing to water scarcity and increased carbon emissions associated with water treatment and distribution.

RECENT FINDINGS

Through a comprehensive analysis of current practices, we identify inefficiencies and propose sustainable alternatives aimed at reducing water usage in dialysis.

SUMMARY

Findings indicate that optimizing treatment protocols and considering innovative technologies can significantly mitigate the environmental impact while maintaining patient care standards. This review underscores the urgent need for the healthcare sector to adopt sustainable practices in response to the climate crisis.

Research progress on measurement methods and evaluation of the hemodialysis adequacy index Kt/V

The most common form of replacement therapy for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is hemodialysis, and the adequacy of hemodialysis is strongly associated with the quality of life and long-term survival of patients. Kt/V is currently one of the most important indicators for evaluating the adequacy of hemodialysis. There are many methods for measuring Kt/V, such as blood collection and measurement, dialysate measurement, bioresistive resistance, WinNonlin software analysis, and artificial intelligence. There are different views on the importance of Kt/V as an indicator of the adequacy of hemodialysis. This article provides a literature review of the various methods of measuring Kt/V and on different perspectives on Kt/V as an evaluation of hemodialysis adequacy.

Adjusting dialysis dose (Kt) scaled to Body Surface Area (BSA) could be a more logical approach

The dialysis dose, quantified as Kt, is conventionally scaled to the urea distribution volume (V) to calculate the Kt/V ratio as an indicator of dialysis adequacy. However, the body surface area (BSA) is recognized as a more accurate reflection of metabolic activity compared to V. This study presents evidence supporting the enhanced efficacy of the Kt/BSA ratio as an indicator of hemodialysis adequacy. The study population comprised 211 individuals undergoing hemodialysis, all of whom had Kt/V values determined. Body composition was assessed using bioimpedance techniques, and BSA was calculated employing the DuBois and DuBois formula. The ratio of V/BSA served as the conversion factor to derive Kt/BSA from the standard Kt/V. Participants were categorized by gender, and a comparative analysis was performed on dialysis-related parameters alongside body composition indicators. Concurrently, linear regression analysis was applied to Kt/V and Kt/BSA, as well as to pairs of V and BSA, to elucidate the relationships among these variables. The average Kt/V ratio was 1.50 with a standard deviation of 0.28. The Kt/V ratio was significantly higher in women (P < 0.01). Conversely, the Kt value, when not adjusted for body size, was significantly lower in women (P < 0.01). Upon scaling Kt to BSA to calculate Kt/BSA, the gender difference in dialysis dose adequacy was no longer statistically significant (P = 0.06). Men exhibited a significantly higher mean V/BSA ratio. Additionally, women had a slightly higher mean percentage of fat mass (P < 0.01). In contrast, women had a lower mean percentage of muscle mass (P < 0.01). Our findings suggest that the Kt/V ratio may underestimate the required hemodialysis dose for women. There was no gender difference when Kt scaling to BSA. Consequently, the Kt/BSA ratio, which accounts for body surface area, may play a significant role in more accurately scaling the hemodialysis dose.

Precision Dialysis: Leveraging Big Data and Artificial Intelligence

The long-term mortality of patients with kidney failure remains unacceptably high. There are a multitude of reasons for the unfavorable status quo of dialysis care, such as the inadequate and suboptimal pattern of uremic toxin removal resulting in a metabolic and hemodynamic "roller coaster" induced by thrice-weekly in-center hemodialysis. Innovation in dialysis delivery systems is needed to build an adaptive and self-improving process to change the status quo of dialysis care with the aim of transforming it from being reactive to being proactive. The introduction of more physiologic and smart dialysis systems using artificial intelligence (AI) incorporating real-time data into the process of dialysis delivery is a realistic target. This would enable machine learning from both individual and collective patient treatment data. This has the potential to shift the paradigm from the practice of population-driven, evidence-based data to precision medicine. In this review, we describe the different components of an AI system, discuss the studied applications of AI in the field of dialysis, and outline parameters that can be used for future smart, adaptive dialysis delivery systems. The desired output is precision dialysis; a self-improving process that has the ability to prognosticate and develop instant and individualized predictive models.

The impact of dialysate flow rate on haemodialysis adequacy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Patients with kidney failure treated with maintenance haemodialysis (HD) require appropriate small molecule clearance. Historically, a component of measuring 'dialysis adequacy' has been quantified using urea kinetic modelling that is dependent on the HD prescription. However, the impact of dialysate flow rate on urea clearance remains poorly described in vivo and its influence on other patient-important outcomes of adequacy is uncertain.

Methods

We searched Embase, MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library from inception until April 2022 for randomized controlled trials and observational trials comparing a higher dialysate flow rate (800 ml/min) and lower dialysate flow rate (300 ml/min) with a standard dialysis flow rate (500 ml/min) in adults (age ≥18 years) treated with maintenance HD (>90 consecutive days). We conducted a random effects meta-analysis to estimate the pooled mean difference in dialysis adequacy as measured by Kt/V or urea reduction ratio (URR).

Results

A total of 3118 studies were identified. Of those, nine met eligibility criteria and four were included in the meta-analysis. A higher dialysate flow rate (800 ml/min) increased single-pool Kt/V by 0.08 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.05-0.10, P < .00001] and URR by 3.38 (95% CI 1.97-4.78, P < .00001) compared with a dialysate flow rate of 500 ml/min. Clinically relevant outcomes including symptoms, cognition, physical function and mortality were lacking and studies were generally at a moderate risk of bias due to issues with randomization sequence generation, allocation concealment and blinding.

Conclusion

A higher dialysate flow increased urea-based markers of dialysis adequacy. Additional high-quality research is needed to determine the clinical, economic and environmental impacts of higher dialysate flow rates.

The influence of hemodialysis on intracranial pressure waveform in patients with chronic kidney disease: an observational study

BACKGROUND

Among the complications related to chronic kidney disease (CKD), those of a neurological nature stand out, and for a better quality of life for patients, the diagnosis and treatment of these complications is fundamental.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess the effect of hemodialysis on intracranial pressure waveform (ICPw) in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing hemodialysis and those who are not yet undergoing substitutive therapy.

DESIGN AND SETTING

An observational study was conducted in two stages at a kidney replacement therapy center in Brazil. The first was a longitudinal study and the second was a cross-sectional study.

METHODS

Forty-two patients on hemodialysis were included in the first stage of the study. In the second stage, 226 participants were included. Of these, 186 were individuals with chronic kidney disease (who were not undergoing substitutive therapy), and 40 did not have the disease (control group). The participants' intracranial compliance was assessed using the non-invasive Brain4care method, and the results were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference between the hemodialysis and non-hemodialysis groups, with the former having better ICPw conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Hemodialysis influenced the improvement in ICPw, probably due to the decrease in the patients' extra-and intracellular volumes. Furthermore, ICPw monitoring can be a new parameter to consider when defining the moment to start substitutive therapy.

Comparison of Clinical Performance Between Two Types of Symmetric-Tip Hemodialysis Catheters: A Single-Centre, Randomized Trial

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical performance of a newly designed, symmetric-tip Arrow-Clark™ VectorFlow® tunnelled haemodialysis catheter, with a Glidepath™, symmetric-tip tunnelled haemodialysis catheter.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From November 2018 to October 2020, patients with End-Stage Renal Disease requiring a de novo tunnelled catheter for hemodialysis, were randomized to Vectorflow® (n = 50) or to Glidepath™ catheter (n = 48). The primary outcome was catheter patency at one year following catheter insertion. Catheter failure was defined as the removal of the catheter due to infectious complications, or low blood flow rate by intraluminal thrombosis or fibrin sheath occlusion. Secondary outcomes were blood flow rate, fractional urea clearance and urea reduction ratio during dialysis.

RESULTS

Demographic characteristics were not different between the two groups. At three months and on the one-year endpoint the patency rates with the Vectorflow® catheter were 95.83% and 83.33% respectively, compared to 93.02% at both endpoints with the Glidepath™ catheter (P = 0.27). Catheter failure to infectious complications or low blood flow rate was similar in both groups. Catheter blood flow rate reached the threshold of 300 ml/min at all time points for both catheters. All patients had a high mean fractional urea clearance (1.6-1.7).

CONCLUSIONS

The catheter patency rate was not significantly different in patients with a VectorFlow® or a Glidepath™ catheter. Both catheters presented satisfactory dialysis adequacy over one year.

Deciphering the core elements around haemodialysis therapy

The projected future demand for renal replacement therapies for patients with end-stage renal failure requires preparedness at different levels. The deliberations focus predominantly on the disproportionately high financial burden of care for patients on routine dialysis therapy compared with other chronic conditions. However, even today there are concerns regarding the shortage of healthcare workers in the field of nephrology. A substantial increase in trained healthcare professionals is needed for the future delivery and care of patients requiring haemodialysis (HD) that 89% of patients on dialysis receive; a sustainable health workforce is the cornerstone of any healthcare system. The multimorbid nature of chronic kidney disease as well as the complexity—especially the technical aspects—of HD are deterrents for pursuing nephrology as a career. An educational platform that critically examines the essential issues and components of HD therapy was thus considered appropriate to create or renew interest in nephrology. By providing broader and newer perspectives of some of the core principles around which HD evolves, with this set of articles we seek to facilitate a better appreciation of HD. We believe that such a reappraisal of either poorly understood or ill-defined principles, including usage of terminology that is imprecise, will help facilitate a better understanding of the functioning principles of HD.

Choices in hemodialysis therapies: variants, personalized therapy and application of evidence-based medicine

The extent of removal of the uremic toxins in hemodialysis (HD) therapies depends primarily on the dialysis membrane characteristics and the solute transport mechanisms involved. While designation of ‘flux’ of membranes as well toxicity of compounds that need to be targeted for removal remain unresolved issues, the relative role, efficiency and utilization of solute removal principles to optimize HD treatment are better delineated. Through the combination and intensity of diffusive and convective removal forces, levels of concentrations of a broad spectrum of uremic toxins can be lowered significantly and successfully. Extended clinical experience as well as data from several clinical trials attest to the benefits of convection-based HD treatment modalities. However, the mode of delivery of HD can further enhance the effectiveness of therapies. Other than treatment time, frequency and location that offer clinical benefits and increase patient well-being, treatment- and patient-specific criteria may be tailored for the therapy delivered: electrolytic composition, dialysate buffer and concentration and choice of anticoagulating agent are crucial for dialysis tolerance and efficacy. Evidence-based medicine (EBM) relies on three tenets, i.e. clinical expertise (i.e. doctor), patient-centered values (i.e. patient) and relevant scientific evidence (i.e. science), that have deviated from their initial aim and summarized to scientific evidence, leading to tyranny of randomized controlled trials. One must recognize that practice patterns as shown by Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study and personalization of HD care are the main driving force for improving outcomes. Based on a combination of the three pillars of EBM, and particularly on bedside patient–clinician interaction, we summarize what we have learned over the last 6 decades in terms of best practices to improve outcomes in HD patients. Management of initiation of dialysis, vascular access, preservation of kidney function, selection of biocompatible dialysers and use of dialysis fluids of high microbiological purity to restrict inflammation are just some of the approaches where clinical experience is vital in the absence of definitive scientific evidence. Further, HD adequacy needs to be considered as a broad and multitarget approach covering not just the dose of dialysis provided, but meeting individual patient needs (e.g. fluid volume, acid–base, blood pressure, bone disease metabolism control) through regular assessment—and adjustment—of a series of indicators of treatment efficiency. Finally, in whichever way new technologies (i.e. artificial intelligence, connected health) are embraced in the future to improve the delivery of dialysis, the human dimension of the patient–doctor interaction is irreplaceable. Kidney medicine should remain ‘an art’ and will never be just ‘a science’.

The membrane perspective of uraemic toxins: which ones should, or can, be removed?

Informed decision-making is paramount to the improvement of dialysis therapies and patient outcomes. A cornerstone of delivery of optimal dialysis therapy is to delineate which substances (uraemic retention solutes or 'uraemic toxins') contribute to the condition of uraemia in terms of deleterious biochemical effects they may exert. Thereafter, decisions can be made as to which of the accumulated compounds need to be targeted for removal and by which strategies. For haemodialysis (HD), the non-selectivity of membranes is sometimes considered a limitation. Yet, considering that dozens of substances with potential toxicity need to be eliminated, and targeting removal of individual toxins explicitly is not recommended, current dialysis membranes enable elimination of several molecules of a broad size range within a single therapy session. However, because HD solute removal is based on size-exclusion principles, i.e. the size of the substances to be removed relative to the mean size of the 'pores' of the membrane, only a limited degree of selectivity of removal is possible. Removal of unwanted substances during HD needs to be weighed against the unavoidable loss of substances that are recognized to be necessary for bodily functions and physiology. In striving to improve the efficiency of HD by increasing the porosity of membranes, there is a greater potential for the loss of substances that are of benefit. Based on this elementary trade-off and availability of recent guidance on the relative toxicity of substances retained in uraemia, we propose a new evidence-linked uraemic toxin elimination (ELUTE) approach whereby only those clusters of substances for which there is a sufficient body of evidence linking them to deleterious biological effects need to be targeted for removal. Our approach involves correlating the physical properties of retention solutes (deemed to express toxicity) with key determinants of membranes and separation processes. Our analysis revealed that in attempting to remove the relatively small number of 'larger' substances graded as having only moderate toxicity, uncontrolled (and efficient) removal of several useful compounds would take place simultaneously and may compromise the well-being or outcomes of patients. The bulk of the uraemic toxin load comprises uraemic toxins below <30 000 Da and are adequately removed by standard membranes. Further, removal of a few difficult-to-remove-by-dialysis (protein-bound) compounds that express toxicity cannot be achieved by manipulation of pore size alone. The trade-off between the benefits of effective removal of the bulk of the uraemic toxin load and risks (increased loss of useful substances) associated with targeting the removal of a few larger substances in 'high-efficiency' HD treatment strategies needs to be recognized and better understood. The removability during HD of substances, be they toxic, inert or beneficial, needs be revised to establish the pros and cons of current dialytic elimination strategies.  .

Effect of low-flux and high-flux dialysis membrane on plasma concentrations of cardiac troponin I

Aim: Cardiac troponin I (cTnI) concentration stability during dialysis have not been fully elucidated. The aim is to evaluate the effect of a single dialysis session on plasma cTnI. Patients & methods: From 122 consecutive anuric adult patients (75 [61.5%] men, age 27-86 years, median 67) on chronic hemodialysis blood samples for cTnI measurement were taken before and after a dialysis. Results: Dialysis had no effect on high-flux membranes (geometric means ratio = 0.99, 0.94-1.05, df 119, t = -0.19, multiplicity adjusted p = 0.847), but cTnI levels were higher after dialysis in patients on low-flux membranes (geometric means ratio = 1.14, 1.02-1.27, df 119, t = 2.59, adjusted p = 0.021). Conclusion: Dialysis session using low-flux membranes might increase the plasma cTnI.

Neuropathy - Exponent of Accelerated Involution in Uremia: The Role of Carbamylation

Premature loss of functional integrity of the nervous system in chronic renal failure (CRF) as a consequence of persistent biological activities of the general uremic milieu is almost identical to its structural and functional involution during the process of physiological ageing, but disproportionate and independent of chronological age. In the hyperuremic status of CRF (urea - carbamide), forced carbamylation, as a non-enzymatic post-translational modification (NEPTM) of proteins and amino acids, by changing their biological properties and decreasing proteolysis capacity, represents pathogenetic potential of intensified molecular ageing and accelerated, pathological involution. Physiological predisposition and the exposure of neuropathy before complications of other organs and organ systems in CRF, due to the simultaneous and mutually pathogenetically related uremic lesion and the tissue and vascular segment of the nervous system, direct interest towards proteomic analytical techniques of quantification of carbamylated products as biomarkers of uremic neurotoxicity. Hypothetically, identical to the already established applications of other NEPTM products in practice, they have the potential of clinical methodology in the evaluation of uremic neuropathy and its contribution to the general prediction, but also to the change of the conventional CRF classification. In addition, the identification and therapeutic control of the substrate of accelerated involution, responsible for the amplification of not only neurological but also general degenerative processes in CRF, is attractive in the context of the well-known attitude towards aging.

Monitoring dialysis adequacy: history and current practice

Dialysis adequacy for pediatric patients has largely followed the trends in adult dialysis by judging the success or adequacy of peritoneal or hemodialysis with urea kinetic modeling. While this provides a starting point to establish a dose of dialysis, it is clear that urea is only part of the picture. Many clinical parameters and interventions now have been identified that are just as impactful on mortality and morbidly as urea clearance. As such, our concept of adequacy is evolving to include non-urea parameters and assessing the impact that following an "adequate therapy" has on patient lives. As we move to a new era, we consider the impact these therapies have on patients and how it affects the quality of their lives; we must take these factors into consideration to achieve a therapy that is not just adequate, but livable.

Dialysis dose and mortality in hemodialysis: Is higher better?

BACKGROUND

The effect of dialysis dose on mortality remains unsettled. Current guidelines recommend to target a spKt/V at 1.20 to 1.40 per tri-weekly dialysis session. However, the optimal dialysis dose remains mostly disputed.

METHODS

In a nationwide registry of all incident patients receiving thrice-weekly hemodialysis, 32 283 patients had available data on dialysis dose, estimated by Kt/V and its variants Kt and Kt/A. Survival was analyzed with a multivariate Cox model and a concurrent risk model accounting for renal transplantation. A predictive model of Kt in the upper quartile was developed.

RESULTS

Regardless of the indicator, a higher dose of dialysis was consistently associated with better survival. The survival differential of Kt was the most discriminating, but marginally, compared to the survival differential according to Kt/V and Kt/A. Patient survival was higher in the upper quartile of Kt (> 69L/s), then deteriorated as the Kt decreased with a difference in survival between the upper and lower quartile of 23.6% at five years. Survival differences across Kt distribution were similar after accounting for kidney transplantation as a competing risk. Predictive factors for Kt in the upper quartile were arteriovenous fistula versus catheters and graft, hemodiafiltration versus hemodialysis, scheduled dialysis start versus emergency start, long weekly dialysis duration, spKt/V measurement versus double pool eKt/V.

CONCLUSION

Our data confirm the existence of a relationship between dialysis dose and survival, which persisted despite correcting for known confounders. A model for predicting a high dose of dialysis is proposed with practical relevance.

Serum total indoxyl sulfate and clinical outcomes in hemodialysis patients: results from the Japan Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study

BACKGROUND

Uremic toxins are associated with various chronic kidney disease-related comorbidities. Indoxyl sulfate (IS), a protein-bound uremic toxin, reacts with vasculature, accelerating atherosclerosis and/or vascular calcification in animal models. Few studies have examined the relationship of IS with clinical outcomes in a large cohort of hemodialysis (HD) patients.

METHODS

We included 1170 HD patients from the Japan Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study Phase 5 (2012-15). We evaluated the associations of serum total IS (tIS) levels with all-cause mortality and clinical outcomes including cardiovascular (CV)-, infectious- and malignancy-caused events using Cox regressions.

RESULTS

The median (interquartile range) serum tIS level at baseline was 31.6 μg/mL (22.6-42.0). Serum tIS level was positively associated with dialysis vintage. Median follow-up was 2.8 years (range: 0.01-2.9). We observed 174 deaths (14.9%; crude rate, 0.06/year). Serum tIS level was positively associated with all-cause mortality [adjusted hazard ratio per 10 μg/mL higher, 1.16; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-1.28]. Association with cause-specific death or hospitalization events, per 10 μg/mL higher serum tIS level, was 1.18 (95% CI 1.04-1.34) for infectious events, 1.08 (95% CI 0.97-1.20) for CV events and 1.02 (95% CI 0.87-1.21) for malignancy events after adjusting for covariates including several nutritional markers.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large cohort study of HD patients, serum tIS level was positively associated with all-cause mortality and infectious events.

Kt/V: achievement, predictors and relationship to mortality in hemodialysis patients in the Gulf Cooperation Council countries: results from DOPPS (2012-18)

BACKGROUND

Dialysis adequacy, as measured by single pool Kt/V, is an important parameter for assessing hemodialysis (HD) patients' health. Guidelines have recommended Kt/V of 1.2 as the minimum dose for thrice-weekly HD. We describe Kt/V achievement, its predictors and its relationship with mortality in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) (Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates).

METHODS

We analyzed data (2012-18) from the prospective cohort Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study for 1544 GCC patients ≥18 years old and on dialysis >180 days.

RESULTS

Thirty-four percent of GCC HD patients had low Kt/V (<1.2) versus 5%-17% in Canada, Europe, Japan and the USA. Across the GCC countries, low Kt/V prevalence ranged from 10% to 54%. In multivariable logistic regression, low Kt/V was more common (P < 0.05) with larger body weight and height, being male, shorter treatment time (TT), lower blood flow rate (BFR), greater comorbidity burden and using HD versus hemodiafiltration. In adjusted Cox models, low Kt/V was strongly related to higher mortality in women [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.09-3.34] but not in men (HR = 1.16, 95% CI 0.70-1.92). Low BFR (<350 mL/min) and TT (<4 h) were common; 41% of low Kt/V cases were attributable to low BFR or TT (52% for women and 36% for men).

CONCLUSION

Relatively large proportions of GCC HD patients have low Kt/V. Increasing BFR to ≥350 mL/min and TT to ≥4 h thrice weekly will reduce low Kt/V prevalence and may improve survival in GCC HD patients-particularly among women.

Pharmacokinetics of Tobramycin Administered at the Beginning of Intermittent Hemodialysis Session (ESRD Study)

Background and Objectives:

There is a renewed interest in the successful use of aminoglycosides due to increasing resistance in gram-negative infections. Few studies to date have examined the pharmacokinetics (PK) of intradialytic infusions of tobramycin. This study sought to characterize the pharmacokinetic profile of intradialytically administered tobramycin in infected patients receiving chronic intermittent hemodialysis and to determine whether it is possible to achieve favorable PK targets.

Design, Setting, Participants, and Measurements:

In this prospective pharmacokinetic study, a single dose (5 mg/kg) of tobramycin was administered intradialytically to 11 noncritically ill patients undergoing chronic intermittent hemodialysis. Blood samples were collected at selected time to determine tobramycin serum concentrations. The PK analysis was performed using Phoenix™ NLME. The efficacy exposure outcome for nonsevere gram-negative infections sensitive to tobramycin with a minimum inhibitory concentration ≤1 were maximum concentration (Cmax ≥ 10 mg/L) and area under the curve (AUC24 h > 30 mg⋅h/L). For toxicity, the goal was to identify plasma trough concentrations <2 mg/L.

Results:

Tobramycin disposition was best described by a one-compartment model using a total clearance composed of the systemic clearance and a transitory hemodialysis clearance. Tobramycin mean (SD) C_max, trough levels, and AUC_24h were 13.1 (1.3) mg/L, 1.32 (0.47) mg/L, and 61 (23) mg⋅h/L, respectively. Monte Carlo simulation run with 1000 virtual patients showed that a 5 mg/kg dose of tobramycin administered intradialytically can outperformed the usual low-dose postdialysis dosing (80% meeting all targets versus <1%, respectively).

Conclusions:

A single high dose of tobramycin can achieve favorable PK outcome when administered using intradialytic infusions in hemodialysis patients. This practical dosing regimen may represent an effective and safer alternative to the usual dosing in the treatment of nonsevere gram-negative infections.

Removal of Urea, β2-Microglobulin, and Indoxyl Sulfate Assessed by Absorbance and Fluorescence in the Spent Dialysate During Hemodialysis

In this study, simultaneous removal assessment of marker molecules from three uremic toxin groups was performed during different hemodialysis treatment modalities using optical characteristics of spent dialysate. Results from optical measurements were compared with the results from chemical laboratory. Ten chronic dialysis patients, mean age 59 ± 15 years, were included in the study during 40 hemodialysis sessions. Low-flux hemodialysis (HD), high-flux hemodialysis (HF), and postdilutional online hemodiafiltration (HDF) with different settings were used. The reduction ratio (RR) and total removed solute (TRS) of three uremic solutes were determined: small molecular weight urea, middle molecular β2-microglobulin (B2M), and protein-bound indoxyl sulfate (IS). Concentrations of these solutes in the spent dialysate were measured by laboratory (lab) and optical (opt) methods, in the serum by laboratory methods, and calculated RR values in percentage were compared accordingly. Total removed solute was obtained from the total dialysate collection (TDC) using lab and opt methods. The highest RR values were found for urea and B2M, and the lowest for IS. The difference between RR of lab and opt results estimated as mean accuracy (BIAS) was ≤8.1% for all three solutes. Good correspondence between TRS lab vs. opt was achieved, resulting in strong linear correlation values R from 0.727 for urea to 0.971 for IS. Accuracy for TRS values as BIAS ± standard error (SE), comparing lab vs. opt, showed no statistical difference for any of the observed uremic solutes (P > 0.05). The accuracy of the optical method was not influenced by the dialysis modality (HD, HF, and HDF).

Comparison of dialysis dose through real-time Kt/V by ultraviolet absorbance of spent dialysate, single-pool Daugirdas II, and Kt/BSA according to sex and age

BACKGROUND

Kt/V OnLine (Kt/VOL) avoids inaccuracies associated with the estimation of urea volume distribution (V). The study aimed to compare Kt/VOL, Kt/V Daugirdas II, and Kt/BSA according to sex and age.

METHODS

Urea volume distribution and body surface area were obtained by Watson and Haycock formulas in 47 patients. V/BSA was considered as a conversion factor from Kt/V to Kt/BSA. Dry weight was determined before the study. Kt/VOL was obtained on DIALOG machines.

RESULTS

Pearson correlation between Kt/VOL vs Kt/VII and Kt/VOL vs Kt/BSA was significant for males (r = 0.446, P = 0.012 and r = -0.476 P = 0.007) and individuals < 65 years (0.457, P = 0.019 and -0.549 P = 0.004), but not for females and individuals ≥ 65 years. V/BSA between individuals < 65 and individuals ≥ 65 years were 18.28 ± 0.15 and 18.18 ± 0.16 P = 0.000). No agreement between Kt/VII vs Kt/BSA. Men and individuals > 65 years received a larger dialysis dose than, respectively, females and individuals < 65 years, in the comparison between Kt/VOL versus Kt/VII. V/BSA ratios among men and women were respectively 18.29 ± 0.13 and 18.12 ± 0.15 P = 0.000.

CONCLUSIONS

Kt/VOL allows recognition of real-time dose regardless of sex and age.

Contribution of 'clinically negligible' residual kidney function to clearance of uremic solutes

BACKGROUND

Residual kidney function (RKF) is thought to exert beneficial effects through clearance of uremic toxins. However, the level of native kidney function where clearance becomes negligible is not known.

METHODS

We aimed to assess whether levels of nonurea solutes differed among patients with 'clinically negligible' RKF compared with those with no RKF. The hemodialysis study excluded patients with urinary urea clearance >1.5 mL/min, below which RKF was considered to be 'clinically negligible'. We measured eight nonurea solutes from 1280 patients participating in this study and calculated the relative difference in solute levels among patients with and without RKF based on measured urinary urea clearance.

RESULTS

The mean age of the participants was 57 years and 57% were female. At baseline, 34% of the included participants had clinically negligible RKF (mean 0.7 ± 0.4 mL/min) and 66% had no RKF. Seven of the eight nonurea solute levels measured were significantly lower in patients with RKF than in those without RKF, ranging from -24% [95% confidence interval (CI) -31 to -16] for hippurate, -7% (-14 to -1) for trimethylamine-N-oxide and -4% (-6 to -1) for asymmetric dimethylarginine. The effect of RKF on plasma levels was comparable or more pronounced than that achieved with a 31% higher dialysis dose (spKt/Vurea 1.7 versus 1.3). Preserved RKF at 1-year follow-up was associated with a lower risk of cardiac death and first cardiovascular event.

CONCLUSIONS

Even at very low levels, RKF is not 'negligible', as it continues to provide nonurea solute clearance. Management of patients with RKF should consider these differences.

Are Currently Used Bioimpedance Methods in Hemodialysis Comparable for Calculating Dialysis Dose?

Bioelectrical impedance analysis has increasingly been incorporated into hemodialysis units (HD) as a useful, noninvasive technique for evaluating overall fluid status. The aims of this study were to verify whether the information obtained from two different bioelectrical impedance analysis methods (spectroscopy bioimpedance [BCM] and single-frequency bioelectric impedance vector analysis [SF-BIVA]) was comparable for analyzing fluid status, and to determine their impact when used to calculate dialysis dose. This observational cross-sectional study included 78 HD patients who underwent one measurement with BCM and one with SF-BIVA in the same dialysis session. For calculating the dialysis dose, total body water or urea distribution volume (V) was calculated by the Watson formula and compared with the V obtained from the two devices. The difference in V between the two devices was 5.4 L (P < 0.001). Given the existent correlation between V_BCM and V_SF-BIVA , we were able to apply a formula (corrected V = V_SF-BIVA = 1.04 × V_BCM + 4.85, r = 0.93), allowing comparison of the two bioimpedance methods. The mean dialysis dose for BCM device (Kt_ID /V_BCM ) was 2.49 ± 0.85, much higher than Kt_ID /V_SF-BIVA (2.06 ± 0.72) mainly due to the V obtained with the different devices, with Kt_ID /V_Watson being 2.03 ± 0.67. The results on volume distribution showed an acceptable correlation but the devices were not comparable due to intermethod differences observed. Dialysis centers using SF-BIVA will obtain much lower dialysis dose, but by applying our formula, the Kt/V would resemble that obtained by the BCM device.

A swan song for Kt/Vurea

Dialyzer clearance of urea multiplied by dialysis time and normalized for urea distribution volume (Kt/V_urea or simply Kt/V) has been used as an index of dialysis adequacy since more than 30 years. This article reviews the flaws of Kt/V, starting with a lack of proof of concept in three randomized controlled hard outcome trials (RCTs), and continuing with a long list of conditions where the concept of Kt/V was shown to be flawed. This information leaves little room for any conclusion other than that Kt/V, as an indicator of dialysis adequacy, is obsolete. The dialysis patient might benefit more if, instead, the nephrology community concentrates in the future on pursuing the optimal dialysis dose that conforms with adequate quality of life and on factors that are likely to affect outcomes more than Kt/V. These include residual renal function, volume status, dialysis length, ultrafiltration rate, the number of intra-dialytic hypotensive episodes, interdialytic blood pressure, serum potassium and phosphate, serum albumin, and C reactive protein.

Dialysis initiation, modality choice, access, and prescription: conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference

Globally, the number of patients undergoing maintenance dialysis is increasing, yet throughout the world there is significant variability in the practice of initiating dialysis. Factors such as availability of resources, reasons for starting dialysis, timing of dialysis initiation, patient education and preparedness, dialysis modality and access, as well as varied "country-specific" factors significantly affect patient experiences and outcomes. As the burden of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) has increased globally, there has also been a growing recognition of the importance of patient involvement in determining the goals of care and decisions regarding treatment. In January 2018, KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) convened a Controversies Conference focused on dialysis initiation, including modality choice, access, and prescription. Here we present a summary of the conference discussions, including identified knowledge gaps, areas of controversy, and priorities for research. A major novel theme represented during the conference was the need to move away from a "one-size-fits-all" approach to dialysis and provide more individualized care that incorporates patient goals and preferences while still maintaining best practices for quality and safety. Identifying and including patient-centered goals that can be validated as quality indicators in the context of diverse health care systems to achieve equity of outcomes will require alignment of goals and incentives between patients, providers, regulators, and payers that will vary across health care jurisdictions.

The effects of intradialytic exercise on hemodialysis adequacy: A systematic review

Dialysis adequacy is an independent predictor of high mortality rates in hemodialysis patients. Intradialytic exercise is a potential strategy to increase uremic solute removal by increasing blood flow to low perfusion tissue beds. The purpose of this review is to establish the efficacy of intradialytic exercise for hemodialysis adequacy. Additionally, this review aims to provide practical information to aid health care professionals implement intradialytic exercise for dialysis adequacy. Database and hand searches identified 15 published interventional studies that implemented intradialytic exercise for dialysis adequacy as a primary outcome measure in adult maintenance hemodialysis patients. Data pertaining to dialytic solute clearance of urea, creatinine, beta₂ microglobulin, phosphate, and potassium were extracted. Mean differences, normalized to percentages, and effect sizes were calculated and reported. The current data pertaining to the use of intradialytic exercise for improving dialysis adequacy in terms of Kt/V_urea or small molecule uremic toxin clearance are equivocal. Limited data showed that intradialytic exercise has no effect middle molecule toxin (beta₂ - microglobulin) clearance. Intradialytic exercise favored increased phosphate removal showing medium to large effects for reduced serum concentrations, reduced rebound and increased clearance. In summary, supervised light to moderate intradialytic aerobic cycling appears to be beneficial for increasing phosphate removal and may be an adjunct therapy for patients failing to meet clinical phosphate targets. Further work is required to establish the effect of intradialytic exercise on Kt/V_urea and other middle molecule and protein bound solutes. Research aimed at establishing the most effective exercise prescription for improved solute clearance is warranted.

Computer Simulations of Continuous Flow Peritoneal Dialysis Using the 3-Pore Model-A First Experience

Background:Continuous flow peritoneal dialysis (CFPD) is performed using a continuous flux of dialysis fluid via double or dual-lumen PD catheters, allowing a higher dialysate flow rate (DFR) than conventional treatments. While small clinical studies have revealed greatly improved clearances using CFPD, the inability to predict ultrafiltration (UF) may confer a risk of potentially harmful overfill. Here we performed physiological studies of CFPD in silico using the extended 3-pore model.Method:A 9-h CFPD session was simulated for: slow (dialysate to plasma creatinine [D/P crea] < 0.6), fast (D/P crea > 0.8) and average (0.6 ≤ D/P crea ≤ 0.8) transporters using 1.36%, 2.27%, or 3.86% glucose solutions. To avoid overfill, we applied a practical equation, based on the principle of mass-balance, to predict the UF rate during CFPD treatment.Results:Increasing DFR > 100 mL/min evoked substantial increments in small- and middle-molecule clearances, being 2 - 5 times higher compared with a 4-h continuous ambulatory PD (CAPD) exchange, with improvements typically being smaller for average and slow transporters. Improved UF rates, exceeding 10 mL/min, were achieved for all transport types. The β₂-microglobulin clearance was strongly dependent on the UF rate and increased between 60% and 130% as a function of DFR. Lastly, we tested novel intermittent-continuous regimes as an alternative strategy to prevent overfill, being effective for 1.36% and 2.27%, but not for 3.86% glucose.Conclusion:While we find substantial increments in solute and water clearance with CFPD, previous studies have shown similar improvements using high-volume tidal automated PD (APD). Lastly, the current in silico results need confirmation by studies in vivo.

A new technique for low-volume continuous sampling of spent dialysate: a validation study

The measure of hemodialysis (HD) adequacy recommended nowadays by most guidelines, Kt/V-urea, presents significant drawbacks. Direct dialysis quantification (DDQ) through total dialysate collection (TDC), considered the gold standard measure of HD adequacy, is cumbersome, which precludes its widespread use in clinical practice. The present study aims to validate a low-volume continuous sampling of spent dialysate (CSSD). Cross-sectional study carried out at a university hospital. Throughout 4-h hemodialysis sessions, urea removal was measured by three DDQ methods: TDC, CSSD, and fractional sampling of dialysate (FSD). The primary outcome was the comparison between the total mass of urea removed measured by TDC and the dialysate sampling techniques. The comparison between urea distribution volume (UDV) estimated by anthropometric method and through DDQ was a secondary outcome. The analysis was done through linear regression and Bland-Altman concordance method. Twenty HD sessions were studied. The mean amount of urea collected in TDC and calculated from the 40-mL sample of CSSD were 33.70 ± 11.70 g and 33.90 ± 11.70 g, respectively [r 0.96, p < 0.0001; bias - 0.2 (95% CI - 1.8 to 1.4); limits of agreement - 6.8 to 6.4]. The anthropometric measure, when compared with DDQ method, underestimated UDV in patients with smaller body size. This new simple, inexpensive, and small volume CSSD technique can provide accurate information about the total amount of solutes removed by hemodialysis.

Reporting of "dialysis adequacy" as an outcome in randomised trials conducted in adults on haemodialysis

Background

Clinical trials are most informative for evidence-based decision-making when they consistently measure and report outcomes of relevance to stakeholders, especially patients, clinicians, and policy makers. However, sometimes terminology used is interpreted differently by different stakeholders, which might lead to confusion during shared decision making. The construct dialysis adequacy is frequently used, suggesting it is an important outcome both for health care professionals as for patients.

Objective

To assess the scope and consistency of the construct dialysis adequacy as reported in randomised controlled trials in hemodialysis, and evaluate whether these align to the insights and understanding of this construct by patients.

Methods

To assess scope and consistency of dialysis adequacy by professionals, we performed a systematic review searching the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) up to July 2017. We identified all randomised controlled trails (RCT) including patients on hemodialysis and reporting dialysis adequacy, adequacy or adequacy of dialysis and extracted and classified all reported outcomes. To explore interpretation and meaning of the construct of adequacy by patients, we conducted 11 semi-structured interviews with HD patients using thematic analysis. Belgian registration number B670201731001.

Findings

From the 31 included trials, we extracted and classified 98 outcome measures defined by the authors as adequacy of dialysis, of which 94 (95%) were biochemical, 3 (3%) non-biochemical surrogate and 2 (2%) patient-relevant. The three most commonly reported measures were all biochemical. None of the studies defined adequacy of dialysis as a patient relevant outcome such as survival or quality of life. Patients had a substantially different understanding of the construct dialysis adequacy than the biochemical interpretation reported in the literature. Being alive, time spent while being on dialysis, fatigue and friendliness of staff were the most prominent themes that patients linked to the construct of dialysis adequacy.

Conclusion

Adequacy of dialysis as reported in the literature refers to biochemical outcome measures, most of which are not related with patient relevant outcomes. For patients, adequate dialysis is a dialysis that enables them to spend as much quality time in their life as possible.

Middle molecule elimination in expanded haemodialysis: only convective transport?

Background

New high-retention onset dialysers have shown improved efficacy in the elimination of uraemic toxins, and their depurative capacity has been compared with high convective volumes of online haemodiafiltration. Haemodialysis (HD) using high-flux membranes leads to convective transport by internal filtration [direct filtration (DF)/backfiltration (BF)] and allows the removal of middle molecules (MMs). The aim of this study was to assess solute transport mechanisms in expanded HD (HDx).

Methods

In 14 4-h HDx sessions with Theranova-500 dialysers under similar dialysis conditions (blood flow 400 mL/min, dialysate flow 700 mL/min, dialysate temperature 35.5°C), pressures at the inlet and outlet of both dialyser compartments (P _bi, P _bo, P _di and P _do) were collected hourly to estimate DF/BF volumes by semi-empirical methods. Uraemic toxins with various molecular weights were measured pre-dialysis, at 1 h (pre-filter and post-filter) and post-dialysis to calculate molecules' reduction over time and dialyser in vivo clearances.

Results

Ultrafiltration was 1.47 ± 0.9 L and Kt/V 1.74 ± 0.3. Hydrodynamic data (P _bi: 259 ± 39, P _bo: 155 ± 27, P _di: 271 ± 30, P _do: 145 ± 29 mmHg and oncotic pressure 22.0 ± 3.5 mmHg) allowed the estimation of DF/BF rates. DF flow ranged from 29.5 ± 4.2 to 31.3 ± 3.9 mL/min and BF flow ranged from 25.1 ± 2.3 to 23.4 ± 2.6 mL/min. The highest calculated DF volume was 7506.8 ± 935.3 mL/session. Diffusive clearances (K _d) of all solutes were higher than their convective transport (all P < 0.001) except for prolactin (23 kDa) clearances, which showed no differences. Total clearances of all solutes were correlated with their K _d (ρ = 0.899-0.987, all P < 0.001) and Kt/V correlated with all reduction rates (ρ = 0.661-0.941, P = 0.010 to <0.001). DF flow was only associated with urea (ρ = -0.793, P = 0.001), creatinine (ρ = -0.675, P = 0.008) and myoglobin clearance (ρ = 0.653, P = 0.011).

Conclusion

Results suggest that diffusive transport is a main mechanism of MM elimination in HDx. HDx offers an efficient depuration of MM without the need for high convective volumes.

Urea and chronic kidney disease: the comeback of the century? (in uraemia research)

Urea, a marker of uraemic retention in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and of adequacy of intradialytic solute removal, has traditionally been considered to be biologically inert. However, a number of recent experimental data suggest that urea is toxic at concentrations representative for CKD. First of all, at least five studies indicate that urea itself induces molecular changes related to insulin resistance, free radical production, apoptosis and disruption of the protective intestinal barrier. Second, urea is at the origin of the generation of cyanate, ammonia and carbamylated compounds, which as such all have been linked to biological changes. Especially carbamylation has been held responsible for post-translational protein modifications that are involved in atherogenesis and other functional changes. In observational clinical studies, these carbamylated compounds were associated with cardiovascular and overall morbidity and mortality. These findings shed new light on the validity of Kt/Vurea as a marker of dialysis adequacy. Yet, also the views that the kinetics of urea are not representative of the kinetics of several other uraemic retention solutes, and that urea cannot be held responsible for all complex metabolic and clinical changes responsible for the uraemic syndrome, still remain valid. Future efforts to improve the outcome of patients with CKD might be directed at further improving removal of solutes implied in the uraemic syndrome, including but not restricted to urea, also taking into account the impact of the intestine and (residual) renal function on solute concentration.

Generation, clearance, toxicity, and monitoring possibilities of unaccounted uremic toxins for improved dialysis prescriptions

Current dialysis-dosing calculations provide an incomplete assessment of blood purification. They exclude clearances of protein-bound uremic toxins (PB-UTs), such as polyamines, p-cresol sulfate, and indoxyl sulfate, relying solely on the clearance of urea as a surrogate for all molecules accumulating in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). PB-UTs clear differently in dialysis but also during normal renal function. The kidney clears PB toxins via the process of secretion, whereas it clears urea through filtration. Herein, we review the clearance, accumulation, and toxicity of various UTs. We also suggest possible methods for their monitoring toward the ultimate goal of a more comprehensive dialysis prescription. A more inclusive dialysis prescription would retain the kidney-filtration surrogate, urea, and consider at least one PB toxin as a surrogate for UTs cleared through cellular secretion. A more comprehensive assessment of UTs that includes both secretion and filtration is expected to result in a better understanding of ESRD toxicity and consequently, to reduce ESRD mortality.

Is High-Volume Online Hemodiafiltration Associated With Malnutrition?

Chronic malnutrition is a common problem in patients with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis. Some studies have reported albumin loss into dialysis fluid during postdilution online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF). The aim of the study was to assess the nutritional status of patients on high-volume OL-HDF and to demonstrate that higher convective clearances are not associated with malnutrition due to possible loss of nutrients with ultrafiltration. Demographic and clinical data, corporal composition with bioimpedance spectroscopy, dialysis features, albumin loss into dialysis fluid and laboratory parameters were collected in twenty-eight patients with ESRD undergoing postdilution OL-HDF with stable convective volumes over 28 L/session. Convective volume (CV) in the last six months was 32.51 ± 3.52 L per session. Cross-sectional analysis of dialysis features showed 32.7 ± 3.34 L of CV and high reduction rates of beta-2-microglobulin (84.2 ± 3.8%) and cystatin-C (81.6 ± 3.47%). Beta-2-microglobulin reduction showed a positive correlation with prealbumin levels (P = 0.048). CV was only correlated with cystatin-C reduction (P = 0.025). Estimated albumin loss into dialysis fluid (1.82 ± 1.05 g/session) was not related to laboratory or bioimpedance nutritional parameters, or to CV. Among patients with higher CV, serum albumin levels maintained more stability during the observational period. High volume OL-HDF results in better convective clearances and is not associated with malnutrition. Albumin and nutrients loss into dialysis fluid should not be a limiting factor of the substitution volume.

Should we look beyond Kt/V urea in assessing dialysis adequacy?

Since the advent of maintenance dialysis therapy, our interpretation of what adequate dialysis really is has broadened and become more controversial. This is not only due to our changing and aging dialysis population but also to our evolving knowledge base. As nephrologists, we strive to achieve both quality and (often) quantity of life for our patients and we feel reassured when we have a quantifiable marker to show for our efforts. However, we suggest that adequate dialysis reaches far beyond the realms of attaining a particular biochemical result. Dialysis adequacy should encompass a more comprehensive assessment of patient well-being. This metric could comprise quality of life and patient-specified goals, sufficient small solute and middle molecule clearance, optimal blood pressure control, and effective bone-mineral balance, all in the context of minimizing mortality and morbidity, and a livable dialysis regimen for the patient.

Biochemical and Clinical Impact of Organic Uremic Retention Solutes: A Comprehensive Update

In this narrative review, the biological/biochemical impact (toxicity) of a large array of known individual uremic retention solutes and groups of solutes is summarized. We classified these compounds along their physico-chemical characteristics as small water-soluble compounds or groups, protein bound compounds and middle molecules. All but one solute (glomerulopressin) affected at least one mechanism with the potential to contribute to the uremic syndrome. In general, several mechanisms were influenced for each individual solute or group of solutes, with some impacting up to 7 different biological systems of the 11 considered. The inflammatory, cardio-vascular and fibrogenic systems were those most frequently affected and they are one by one major actors in the high morbidity and mortality of CKD but also the mechanisms that have most frequently been studied. A scoring system was built with the intention to classify the reviewed compounds according to the experimental evidence of their toxicity (number of systems affected) and overall experimental and clinical evidence. Among the highest globally scoring solutes were 3 small water-soluble compounds [asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA); trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO); uric acid], 6 protein bound compounds or groups of protein bound compounds [advanced glycation end products (AGEs); p-cresyl sulfate; indoxyl sulfate; indole acetic acid; the kynurenines; phenyl acetic acid;] and 3 middle molecules [β₂-microglobulin; ghrelin; parathyroid hormone). In general, more experimental data were provided for the protein bound molecules but for almost half of them clinical evidence was missing in spite of robust experimental data. The picture emanating is one of a complex disorder, where multiple factors contribute to a multisystem complication profile, so that it seems of not much use to pursue a decrease of concentration of a single compound.

Carbon Adsorbents With Dual Porosity for Efficient Removal of Uremic Toxins and Cytokines from Human Plasma

The number of patients with chronic kidney disease increases while the number of available donor organs stays at approximately the same level. Unavoidable accumulation of the uremic toxins and cytokines for these patients comes as the result of malfunctioning kidneys and their high levels in the blood result in high morbidity and mortality. Unfortunately, the existing methods, like hemodialysis and hemofiltration, provide only partial removal of uremic toxins and/or cytokines from patients' blood. Consequently, there is an increasing need for the development of the extracorporeal treatments which will enable removal of broad spectrum of uremic toxins that are usually removed by healthy kidneys. Therefore, in this work we developed and tested ordered mesoporous carbons as new sorbents with dual porosity (micro/meso) that provide selective and efficient removal of a broad range of uremic toxins from human plasma. The new sorbents, CMK-3 are developed by nanocasting methods and have two distinct pore domains, i.e. micropores and mesopores, therefore show high adsorption capacity towards small water soluble toxins (creatinine), protein-bound molecules (indoxyl sulfate and hippuric acid), middle molecules (β-2-microglobulin) and cytokines of different size (IL-6 and IL-8). Our results show that small amounts of CMK-3 could provide selective and complete blood purification.

Urea, a true uremic toxin: the empire strikes back

Blood levels of urea rise with progressive decline in kidney function. Older studies examining acute urea infusion suggested that urea was well-tolerated at levels 8-10× above normal values. More recent in vitro and in vivo work argue the opposite and demonstrate both direct and indirect toxicities of urea, which probably promote the premature aging phenotype that is pervasive in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Elevated urea at concentrations typically encountered in uremic patients induces disintegration of the gut epithelial barrier, leading to translocation of bacterial toxins into the bloodstream and systemic inflammation. Urea induces apoptosis of vascular smooth muscle cells as well as endothelial dysfunction, thus directly promoting cardiovascular disease. Further, urea stimulates oxidative stress and dysfunction in adipocytes, leading to insulin resistance. Finally, there are widespread indirect effects of elevated urea as a result of the carbamylation reaction, where isocyanic acid (a product of urea catabolism) alters the structure and function of proteins in the body. Carbamylation has been linked with renal fibrosis, atherosclerosis and anaemia. In summary, urea is a re-emerging Dark Force in CKD pathophysiology. Trials examining low protein diet to minimize accumulation of urea and other toxins suggest a clinical benefit in terms of slowing progression of CKD.

Quantification of carbamylated albumin in serum based on capillary electrophoresis

Protein carbamylation, a nonenzymatic posttranslational modification promoted during uremia, is linked to a poor prognosis. In the present study, carbamylation of serum albumin was assayed using the symmetry factor on a capillary electrophoresis instrument (Helena V8). The symmetry factor has been defined as the distance from the center line of the peak to the back slope, divided by the distance from the center line of the peak to the front slope, with all measurements made at 10% of the maximum peak height. Serum albumin, creatinine, and urea concentrations were assayed using routine methods, whereas uremic toxins were determined using HPLC. In vitro carbamylation induced a marked albumin peak asymmetry. Reference values for the albumin symmetry factor were 0.69-0.92. In kidney patients, albumin peak asymmetry corresponded to the chronic kidney disease stage (p < 0.0001). The symmetry factor correlated well with serum urea (r = -0.5595, p < 0.0001) and creatinine (r = -0.5986, p < 0.0001) concentrations. Several protein-bound uremic toxins showed a significant negative correlation with the symmetry factor. Morphology of the albumin fraction was not affected by presence of glycated albumin and protein-bound antibiotics. In conclusion, the presented method provides a simple, practical way for monitoring protein carbamylation.

Training with an Electric Exercise Bike versus a Conventional Exercise Bike during Hemodialysis for Patients with End-stage Renal Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Objective

Hemodialysis (HD) patients have lower fitness levels than healthy subjects because of various structural, metabolic, and functional abnormalities secondary to uremic changes in skeletal muscles. Aerobic and resistance exercises are beneficial in improving not only physical function, including maximal oxygen uptake and muscle strength, but also anthropometrics, nutritional status, and hematologic indices. The use of electric ergometers that place light loads on patients has been implemented at many dialysis facilities in Japan. However, reports comparing the effects on body function of electric and variable-load ergometers are few. This study aimed to compare electric ergometers and variable-load ergometers in terms of exercise outcomes in HD patients.

Methods

A total of 15 ambulatory HD patients were randomly divided into two groups: the variable-load ergometer group (n=8) and the electric ergometer group (n=7). HD patients exercised at a level based on their physical function three times a week for 12 weeks.

Results

After the 12-week intervention period, only the variable-load ergometer group experienced significant increases in lower extremity muscle strength and exercise tolerance.

Conclusion

This study confirmed that conventional aerobic training and electric bike exercise during HD were efficacious and safe without causing sudden hypotension or any other side effects. However, exercise using a variable-load ergometer may be more effective than exercise using an electric bike in improving the physical function of HD patients. Exercise using a variable-load ergometer elicited specific whole-body and local effects.

Is Hemodialysis Patient Survival Dependent upon Small Solute Clearance (Kt/V)?: If So How Can Kt/V be Adjusted to Prevent Under Dialysis in Vulnerable Groups?

Small solute clearance achieved during a single hemodialysis session has been traditionally evaluated by urea clearance, normalized for total body water (Kt/Vurea) for more than 30 years. By consensus, the target sessional KtVurea for thrice weekly treatments has been increased from 0.9 to 1.2 over the years. Although this is supported by observational studies, there is a fundamental lack of prospective studies to support this threshold target. In clinical practice achieving sessional Kt/Vurea targets are most closely followed in the US. Yet there appears to be a paradox in that by following Kt/Vurea targets in the US hemodialysis patient survival is better for men and the obese, the opposite of what is seen in the general population. Delivery of a lower dose of hemodialysis to women and smaller men can be explained by underestimation of total body water. The advent of bioimpedance techniques which can measure both body water and body composition will potentially allow a rescaling and re-evaluation of the importance of small solute clearances (Kt/Vurea) in the hemodialysis patient population.

The impact of blood flow rate during hemodialysis on all-cause mortality

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Inadequacy of dialysis is associated with morbidity and mortality in chronic hemodialysis (HD) patients. Blood flow rate (BFR) during HD is one of the important determinants of increasing dialysis dose. However, the optimal BFR is unclear. In this study, we investigated the impact of the BFR on all-cause mortality in chronic HD patients.

METHODS

Prevalent HD patients were selected from Clinical Research Center registry for end-stage renal disease cohort in Korea. We categorized patients into two groups by BFR < 250 and ≥ 250 mL/min according to the median value of BFR 250 mL/min in this study. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 1,129 prevalent HD patients were included. The number of patients in the BFR < 250 mL/min was 271 (24%) and in the BFR ≥ 250 mL/min was 858 (76%). The median follow-up period was 30 months. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the mortality rate was significantly higher in patients with BFR < 250 mL/min than those with BFR ≥ 250 mL/min (p = 0.042, log-rank). In the multivariate Cox regression analyses, patients with BFR < 250 mL/min had higher all-cause mortality than those with BFR ≥ 250 mL/min (hazard ratio, 1.66; 95% confidence interval, 1.00 to 2.73; p = 0.048).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data showed that BFR < 250 mL/min during HD was associated with higher all-cause mortality in chronic HD patients.

New low-flux mixed matrix membranes that offer superior removal of protein-bound toxins from human plasma

Hemodialysis is a widely available and well-established treatment for patients with End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD). However, although life-sustaining, patient mortality rates are very high. Several recent studies corroborated the link between dialysis patients' outcomes and elevated levels of protein-bound uremic toxins (PBUT) that are poorly removed by conventional hemodialysis. Therefore, new treatments are needed to improve their removal. Recently, our group showed that the combination of dialysis and adsorption on one membrane, the mixed matrix membrane (MMM), can effectively remove those toxins from human plasma. However, these first MMMs were rather large in diameter and their mass transport characteristics needed improvement before application in the clinical setting. Therefore, in this study we developed a new generation of MMMs that have a smaller diameter and optimized characteristics offering superior ability in removing the PBUT indoxyl sulfate (IS) and p-cresyl sulfate (pCS) in comparison to first generation MMMs (30 and 125% respectively), as well as, a commercial dialysis membrane (more than 100% better removal).

Incremental Hemodialysis: How I Do It

Incremental hemodialysis (incrHD) is not widely used nor is it well understood. In addition, and perhaps with more impact, governmental regulations in the United States and their consequential influences on dialysis provider organizations have made the practice of incrHD more difficult than traditional thrice weekly in-center HD. IncrHD is critically dependent on the amount of residual kidney function (RKF) as well as the individualized goals of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) management. RKF has to be assessed frequently and dialysis adjusted accordingly. Home HD lends itself to an incremental approach more so than in-center HD. This may be due to more experience of the provider, more knowledge of the therapy by the patient and family, the availability of dialysis platforms conducive to incrHD, and/or that its less onerous regulation by the government. I have had a long and successful experience performing incremental dialysis (both peritoneal and hemodialysis) and share here my practice strategies and approaches for incrHD.

American Society of Nephrology Quiz and Questionnaire 2015: ESRD/RRT

The Nephrology Quiz and Questionnaire remains an extremely popular session for attendees of the Annual Kidney Week Meeting of the American Society of Nephrology. During the 2015 meeting, the conference hall was once again overflowing with eager quiz participants. Topics covered by the experts included electrolyte and acid-base disorders, glomerular disease, ESRD and dialysis, and kidney transplantation. Complex cases representing each of these categories together with single best answer questions were prepared and submitted by the panel of experts. Before the meeting, training program directors of nephrology fellowship programs and nephrology fellows in the United States answered the questions through an internet-based questionnaire. During the live session, members of the audience tested their knowledge and judgment on the same series of case-oriented questions in a quiz. The audience compared their answers in real time using a cellphone application containing the answers of the nephrology fellows and training program directors. The results of the online questionnaire were displayed, and then, the quiz answers were discussed. As always, the audience, lecturers, and moderators enjoyed this highly educational session. This article recapitulates the session and reproduces selected content of educational value for the readers of the Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology Enjoy the clinical cases and expert discussions.