1
|
Chen JI, Bui D, Iwashyna TJ, Shahoumian TA, Hickok A, Shepherd-Banigan M, Hawkins EJ, Naylor J, Govier DJ, Osborne TF, Smith VA, Bowling CB, Boyko EJ, Ioannou GN, Maciejewski ML, O'Hare AM, Viglianti EM, Bohnert ASB, Hynes DM. Impact of SARS-CoV-2 Infection on Long-Term Depression Symptoms among Veterans. J Gen Intern Med 2024:10.1007/s11606-024-08630-z. [PMID: 38625482 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-024-08630-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/17/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prior research demonstrates that SARS-COV-2 infection can be associated with a broad range of mental health outcomes including depression symptoms. Veterans, in particular, may be at elevated risk of increased depression following SARS-COV-2 infection given their high rates of pre-existing mental and physical health comorbidities. However, few studies have tried to isolate SARS-COV-2 infection associations with long term, patient-reported depression symptoms from other factors (e.g., physical health comorbidities, pandemic-related stress). OBJECTIVE To evaluate the association between SARS-COV-2 infection and subsequent depression symptoms among United States Military Veterans. DESIGN Survey-based non-randomized cohort study with matched comparators. PARTICIPANTS A matched-dyadic sample from a larger, stratified random sample of participants with and without known to SARS-COV-2 infection were invited to participate in a survey evaluating mental health and wellness 18-months after their index infection date. Sampled participants were stratified by infection severity of the participant infected with SARS-COV-2 (hospitalized or not) and by month of index date. A total of 186 participants in each group agreed to participate in the survey and had sufficient data for inclusion in analyses. Those in the uninfected group who were later infected were excluded from analyses. MAIN MEASURES Participants were administered the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 as part of a phone interview survey. Demographics, physical and mental health comorbidities were extracted from VHA administrative data. KEY RESULTS Veterans infected with SARS-COV-2 had significantly higher depression symptoms scores compared with those uninfected. In particular, psychological symptoms (e.g., low mood, suicidal ideation) scores were elevated relative to the comparator group (MInfected = 3.16, 95%CI: 2.5, 3.8; MUninfected = 1.96, 95%CI: 1.4, 2.5). Findings were similar regardless of history of depression. CONCLUSION SARS-COV-2 infection was associated with more depression symptoms among Veterans at 18-months post-infection. Routine evaluation of depression symptoms over time following SARS-COV-2 infection is important to facilitate adequate assessment and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason I Chen
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care (CIVIC), VA Portland Health Care System (HCS), Portland, OR, USA.
- Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
| | - David Bui
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care (CIVIC), VA Portland Health Care System (HCS), Portland, OR, USA
| | - Theodore J Iwashyna
- Departments of Medicine and Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor HCS, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | - Alex Hickok
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care (CIVIC), VA Portland Health Care System (HCS), Portland, OR, USA
| | - Megan Shepherd-Banigan
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham VA HCS, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Eric J Hawkins
- Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound HCS, Seattle, WA, USA
- Center of Excellence in Substance Addiction Treatment and Education, VA Puget Sound HCS, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jennifer Naylor
- School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- VISN 6 Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, Durham, NC, USA
- Durham VA HCS, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Diana J Govier
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care (CIVIC), VA Portland Health Care System (HCS), Portland, OR, USA
- OHSU-Portland State University School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Thomas F Osborne
- VA Palo Alto HCS, Palo Alto, CA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Valerie A Smith
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham VA HCS, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - C Barrett Bowling
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham VA HCS, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Durham VA Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Durham VA HCS, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Edward J Boyko
- Seattle Epidemiologic Research Information Center, VA Puget Sound HCS, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - George N Ioannou
- Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound HCS, Seattle, WA, USA
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Matthew L Maciejewski
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham VA HCS, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Ann M O'Hare
- Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound HCS, Seattle, WA, USA
- Hospital and Specialty Medicine Service, VA Puget Sound HCS, Seattle, WA, USA
- University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Elizabeth M Viglianti
- Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor HCS, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Amy S-B Bohnert
- Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor HCS, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Denise M Hynes
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care (CIVIC), VA Portland Health Care System (HCS), Portland, OR, USA
- College of Public Health and Human Sciences, and Center for Quantitative Life Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA
- School of Nursing, Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU), Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Johansen KL, Gilbertson DT, Li S, Li S, Liu J, Roetker NS, Ku E, Schulman IH, Greer RC, Chan K, Abbott KC, Butler CR, O'Hare AM, Powe NR, Reddy YNV, Snyder J, St Peter W, Taylor JS, Weinhandl ED, Wetmore JB. US Renal Data System 2023 Annual Data Report: Epidemiology of Kidney Disease in the United States. Am J Kidney Dis 2024; 83:A8-A13. [PMID: 38519262 DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2024.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/24/2024]
|
3
|
Iwashyna TJ, Smith VA, Seelye S, Bohnert ASB, Boyko EJ, Hynes DM, Ioannou GN, Maciejewski ML, O'Hare AM, Viglianti EM, Berkowitz TS, Pura J, Womer J, Kamphuis LA, Monahan ML, Bowling CB. Self-Reported Everyday Functioning After COVID-19 Infection. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e240869. [PMID: 38427352 PMCID: PMC10907923 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.0869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Changes in everyday functioning are crucial to assessing the long-term impact of COVID-19 infection. Objective To examine the impact of COVID-19 infection on everyday functioning 18 months after infection among veterans with and without histories of COVID-19 infection. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study used data from the US Veterans Affairs (VA) and included 186 veterans who had COVID-19 between October 2020 and April 2021 (ie, COVID-19 cohort) and 186 matched comparators who did not have documented COVID-19 infections (ie, control cohort). This match balanced the risk of COVID-19 based on 39 variables measured in the 24 months before infection or match, using principles of target trial emulation. Data were analyzed from December 2022 to December 2023. Exposure First documented COVID-19. Main Outcome and Measures The differences in self-reported everyday functioning 18 months after COVID-19 infection were estimated and compared with their matched comparators. Within-matched pair logistic and linear regressions assessed differences in outcomes and were weighted to account for sampling and nonresponse. Results Among the 186 matched pairs of participants, their weighted mean age was 60.4 (95% CI, 57.5 to 63.2) years among veterans in the COVID-19 cohort (weighted sample, 91 459 of 101 133 [90.4%] male; 30 611 [30.3%] Black or African American veterans; 65 196 [64.4%] White veterans) and 61.1 (95% CI, 57.8 to 64.4) years among their comparators in the control cohort (91 459 [90.4%] male; 24 576 [24.3%] Black or African American veterans; 70 157 [69.4%] White veterans). A high proportion of veterans in the COVID-19 cohort (weighted percentage, 44.9% [95% CI, 34.2% to 56.2%]) reported that they could do less than what they felt they could do at the beginning of 2020 compared with the control cohort (weighted percentage, 35.3%; [95% CI, 25.6% to 46.4%]; within-matched pair adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.52 [95% CI, 0.79 to 2.91]). There was no association of documented COVID-19 infection with fatigue, substantial pain, limitations in either activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living, severely curtailed life-space mobility, employment, or mean health-related quality of life on a utility scale. Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study of veterans with and without documented COVID-19, many reported a substantial loss of everyday functioning during the pandemic regardless of whether or not they had a documented infection with COVID-19. Future work with larger samples is needed to validate the estimated associations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theodore J Iwashyna
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor VA, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Department of Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor
- School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
- School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Valerie A Smith
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Sarah Seelye
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor VA, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Amy S B Bohnert
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor VA, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Departments of Anesthesiology, Epidemiology, and Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor
| | - Edward J Boyko
- Seattle Epidemiologic Research and Information Center, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
- University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Denise M Hynes
- VA Portland Healthcare System, Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, Portland, Oregon
- College of Health, and Center for Quantitative Life Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis
- School of Nursing, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland
| | - George N Ioannou
- University of Washington, Seattle
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System Hospital and Specialty Medicine Service and Seattle-Denver Center of Innovation for Veteran Centered and Value Driven Care, Seattle, Washington
| | - Matthew L Maciejewski
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
- School of Nursing, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland
| | - Ann M O'Hare
- University of Washington, Seattle
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System Hospital and Specialty Medicine Service and Seattle-Denver Center of Innovation for Veteran Centered and Value Driven Care, Seattle, Washington
| | - Elizabeth M Viglianti
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor VA, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Department of Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor
| | - Theodore S Berkowitz
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - John Pura
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - James Womer
- School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Lee A Kamphuis
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor VA, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Max L Monahan
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor VA, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - C Barrett Bowling
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
- Durham Veterans Affairs Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hynes DM, Niederhausen M, Chen JI, Shahoumian TA, Rowneki M, Hickok A, Shepherd-Banigan M, Hawkins EJ, Naylor J, Teo A, Govier DJ, Berry K, McCready H, Osborne TF, Wong E, Hebert PL, Smith VA, Bowling CB, Boyko EJ, Ioannou GN, Iwashyna TJ, Maciejewski ML, O'Hare AM, Viglianti EM, Bohnert ASB. Risk of Suicide-Related Outcomes After SARS-COV-2 Infection: Results from a Nationwide Observational Matched Cohort of US Veterans. J Gen Intern Med 2024; 39:626-635. [PMID: 37884839 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-023-08440-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Negative mental health-related effects of SARS-COV-2 infection are increasingly evident. However, the impact on suicide-related outcomes is poorly understood, especially among populations at elevated risk. OBJECTIVE To determine risk of suicide attempts and other self-directed violence (SDV) after SARS-COV-2 infection in a high-risk population. DESIGN We employed an observational design supported by comprehensive electronic health records from the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) to examine the association of SARS-COV-2 infection with suicide attempts and other SDV within one year of infection. Veterans with SARS-COV-2 infections were matched 1:5 with non-infected comparators each month. Three periods after index were evaluated: days 1-30, days 31-365, and days 1-365. PARTICIPANTS VHA patients infected with SARS-COV-2 between March 1, 2020 and March 31, 2021 and matched non-infected Veteran comparators. MAIN MEASURES Suicide attempt and other SDV events for the COVID-19 and non-infected comparator groups were analyzed using incidence rates per 100,000 person years and hazard ratios from Cox regressions modeling time from matched index date to first event. Subgroups were also examined. KEY RESULTS 198,938 veterans with SARS-COV-2 (COVID-19 group) and 992,036 comparators were included. Unadjusted one-year incidence per 100,000 for suicide attempt and other SDV was higher among the COVID-19 group: 355 vs 250 and 327 vs 235, respectively. The COVID-19 group had higher risk than comparators for suicide attempts: days 1-30 hazard ratio (HR) = 2.54 (CI:2.05, 3.15), days 31-365 HR = 1.30 (CI:1.19, 1.43) and days 1-365 HR = 1.41 (CI:1.30, 1.54), and for other SDV: days 1-30 HR = 1.94 (CI:1.51, 2.49), days 31-365 HR = 1.32 (CI:1.20, 1.45) and days 1-365 HR = 1.38 (CI:1.26, 1.51). CONCLUSIONS COVID-19 patients had higher risks of both suicide attempts and other forms of SDV compared to uninfected comparators, which persisted for at least one year after infection. Results support suicide risk screening of those infected with SARS-COV-2 to identify opportunities to prevent self-harm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denise M Hynes
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care (CIVIC), VA Portland Health Care System (HCS), Portland, OR, USA.
- College of Health, and Center for Quantitative Life Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA.
- School of Nursing, Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU), Portland, OR, USA.
| | - Meike Niederhausen
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care (CIVIC), VA Portland Health Care System (HCS), Portland, OR, USA
- OHSU-Portland State University School of Public Health, OHSU, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Jason I Chen
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care (CIVIC), VA Portland Health Care System (HCS), Portland, OR, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, OHSU, Portland, OR, USA
| | | | - Mazhgan Rowneki
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care (CIVIC), VA Portland Health Care System (HCS), Portland, OR, USA
| | - Alex Hickok
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care (CIVIC), VA Portland Health Care System (HCS), Portland, OR, USA
| | - Megan Shepherd-Banigan
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham VA HCS, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Eric J Hawkins
- Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound HCS, Seattle, WA, USA
- Center of Excellence in Substance Addiction Treatment and Education, VA Puget Sound HCS, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jennifer Naylor
- School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Education and Clinical Center, VISN 6 Mental Illness Research, Durham, NC, USA
- Durham VA HCS, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Alan Teo
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care (CIVIC), VA Portland Health Care System (HCS), Portland, OR, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, OHSU, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Diana J Govier
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care (CIVIC), VA Portland Health Care System (HCS), Portland, OR, USA
- OHSU-Portland State University School of Public Health, OHSU, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Kristin Berry
- Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound HCS, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Holly McCready
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care (CIVIC), VA Portland Health Care System (HCS), Portland, OR, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, OHSU, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Thomas F Osborne
- VA Palo Alto HCS, Palo Alto, CA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Edwin Wong
- Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound HCS, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Paul L Hebert
- Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound HCS, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Valerie A Smith
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham VA HCS, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - C Barrett Bowling
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham VA HCS, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Durham VA Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Durham VA HCS, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Edward J Boyko
- Seattle Epidemiologic Research Information Center, VA Puget Sound HCS, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - George N Ioannou
- Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound HCS, Seattle, WA, USA
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Theodore J Iwashyna
- Departments of Medicine and Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor HCS, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Matthew L Maciejewski
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham VA HCS, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Ann M O'Hare
- Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound HCS, Seattle, WA, USA
- Hospital and Specialty Medicine Service, VA Puget Sound HCS, Seattle, WA, USA
- University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Elizabeth M Viglianti
- Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor HCS, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Amy S-B Bohnert
- Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor HCS, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tsujimoto Y, Aoki T, Shimizu S, Kawarazaki H, Kohatsu K, Nakata T, O'Hare AM, Shibagaki Y, Yamamoto Y, Miyashita J. Perspectives on the optimal timing of advance care planning among Japanese patients undergoing dialysis and clinicians: a cross-sectional study. Clin Exp Nephrol 2024:10.1007/s10157-024-02458-x. [PMID: 38402499 DOI: 10.1007/s10157-024-02458-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 02/26/2024]
Abstract
KEY MESSAGES The majority of dialysis patients and clinicians favor early advance care planning in our sample. Yet, there is a disconnect: only 11% of patients discussed future care with their clinicians. Our findings indicate Japanese dialysis patients and clinicians support proactive advance care planning at or before dialysis initiation. BACKGROUND Little is known about the optimal timing of discussions about advance care planning among dialysis patients and clinicians engaged in dialysis care. We aimed to explore the preferred timing for advance care planning and assess actual participation in advance care planning among dialysis patients and their clinicians. METHODS A scenario-based survey on Japanese patients aged ≥65 years on dialysis and clinicians involved in their dialysis care was performed. Participants were asked if they would feel prepared to engage in advance care planning with their clinicians, offering a choice among four hypothetical stages within the illness trajectory, extending from the initiation of dialysis to a later phase characterized by the patient's extreme frailty. RESULTS Overall, 181 patients and 128 clinicians participated in the study. Among these, 131 (72%) patients, and 84 (66%) clinicians indicated that they would prefer to initiate advance care planning around the time of dialysis initiation. Only 20 patients (11%) indicated that they had participated in advance care planning with at least one clinician, including 11 (6%) who indicated that they had discussed their preferences around life-sustaining treatments and 8 (4%) who had discussed their preferences around dialysis continuation. CONCLUSIONS While fewer than 11% of patients undergoing dialysis and their clinicians enrolled in our study had participated in advance care planning, most indicated that they would be comfortable initiating the discussion around the time of dialysis initiation. These findings suggest untapped opportunities to engage patients in advance care planning early in the course of their dialysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasushi Tsujimoto
- Oku Medical Clinic, Osaka, Japan.
- Department of Health Promotion and Human Behavior, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine/School of Public Health, Kyoto, Japan.
- Scientific Research Works Peer Support Group, Osaka, Japan.
| | - Takuya Aoki
- Section of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Community Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Sayaka Shimizu
- Section of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Community Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hiroo Kawarazaki
- Department of Nephrology, Inagi Municipal Hospital, Inagi, Japan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Teikyo University Mizonokuchi Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Kaori Kohatsu
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, St Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Takeshi Nakata
- Department of Endocrinology, Metabolism, Rheumatology and Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Yufu, Japan
| | - Ann M O'Hare
- Hospital and Specialty Medicine Service, Veteran Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System and University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Yugo Shibagaki
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, St Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Yosuke Yamamoto
- Department of Healthcare Epidemiology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine/School of Public Health, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Jun Miyashita
- Department of General Medicine, Shirakawa Satellite for Teaching And Research (STAR), Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tian FF, Hall YN, Griffin S, Kranze T, Marcella D, Watnick S, O'Hare AM. The Complex Patchwork of Transportation for In-Center Hemodialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2023; 34:1621-1627. [PMID: 37527287 PMCID: PMC10561812 DOI: 10.1681/asn.0000000000000193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Accepted: 07/02/2023] [Indexed: 08/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Reliable transportation is an important determinant of access to health care and health outcomes that carries particular significance for people with ESKD. In the United States, there are almost half a million patients receiving treatment with in-center dialysis, translating into more than 70 million roundtrips to dialysis centers annually. Difficulty with transportation can interfere with patients' quality of life and contribute to missed or shortened dialysis treatments, increasing their risk for hospitalization. Medicare, the principal payer for dialysis in this country, has not traditionally provided coverage for nonemergency medical transportation, placing the burden of traveling to and from the dialysis center on patients and families and a range of other private and public entities that were not designed and are poorly equipped for this purpose. Here, we review the relationship between access to reliable transportation and health outcomes such as missed and shortened dialysis treatments, hospitalizations, and quality of life. We also describe current approaches to the delivery of transportation for patients receiving in-center hemodialysis, highlighting potential opportunities for improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frances F. Tian
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
- Kidney Research Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Yoshio N. Hall
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
- Kidney Research Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
| | | | - Torie Kranze
- National Kidney Foundation of Louisiana New Orleans, Louisiana
| | | | - Suzanne Watnick
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
- Northwest Kidney Centers, Seattle, Washington
| | - Ann M. O'Hare
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
- Kidney Research Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Smith VA, Berkowitz TSZ, Hebert P, Wong ES, Niederhausen M, Pura JA, Berry K, Green P, Korpak A, Fox A, Baraff A, Hickok A, Shahoumian TA, Bohnert ASB, Hynes DM, Boyko EJ, Ioannou GN, Iwashyna TJ, Bowling CB, O'Hare AM, Maciejewski ML. Correction: Design and analysis of outcomes following SARS-CoV-2 infection in veterans. BMC Med Res Methodol 2023; 23:194. [PMID: 37620765 PMCID: PMC10463685 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-023-02021-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/26/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Valerie A Smith
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Theodore S Z Berkowitz
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Paul Hebert
- Health Services Research & Development Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value- Driven Care, and Gastroenterology section, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Edwin S Wong
- Health Services Research & Development Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value- Driven Care, and Gastroenterology section, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Meike Niederhausen
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA
- Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU), Portland, OR, USA
- Portland State University School of Public Health, Portland, OR, USA
| | - John A Pura
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Kristin Berry
- Health Services Research & Development Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value- Driven Care, and Gastroenterology section, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA
- Seattle Epidemiologic Research and Information Center, VA Puget Sound, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Pamela Green
- Health Services Research & Development Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value- Driven Care, and Gastroenterology section, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Anna Korpak
- Seattle Epidemiologic Research and Information Center, VA Puget Sound, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Alexandra Fox
- Seattle Epidemiologic Research and Information Center, VA Puget Sound, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Aaron Baraff
- Seattle Epidemiologic Research and Information Center, VA Puget Sound, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Alex Hickok
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Troy A Shahoumian
- Population Health: Health Solutions, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Amy S B Bohnert
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, VA, MI, USA
- Departments of Anesthesiology and Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Denise M Hynes
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA
- College of Public Health and Human Sciences, Center for Quantitative Life Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA
| | - Edward J Boyko
- Seattle Epidemiologic Research and Information Center, VA Puget Sound, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - George N Ioannou
- Health Services Research & Development Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value- Driven Care, and Gastroenterology section, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Theodore J Iwashyna
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, VA, MI, USA
- National Clinical Scholars Program, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - C Barrett Bowling
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
- Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Ann M O'Hare
- Health Services Research & Development Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value- Driven Care, and Gastroenterology section, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA
- Division of Nephrology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Matthew L Maciejewski
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Shapiro LN, Gray MF, Freitag C, Taneja P, Kariya H, Crane PK, O'Hare AM, Vig EK, Taylor JS. Expanding the ethnographic toolkit: Using medical documents to include kinless older adults living with dementia in qualitative research. J Aging Stud 2023; 65:101140. [PMID: 37268383 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaging.2023.101140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2022] [Revised: 05/01/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
Ethnographic research with cognitively impaired older adults can be challenging, in part because cognitive impairment raises questions about the ability to provide informed consent. Relying on proxy consent is a commonly used strategy, but often excludes people with dementia who lack close kin (de Medeiros, Girling, & Berlinger, 2022). In this paper, we describe how we have analyzed existing research data from a well-established and ongoing prospective cohort study, the Adult Changes in Thought Study, along with unstructured text from the medical records of participants who had no living spouse or adult children when they developed dementia, as a way of studying the circumstances, life trajectories, caregiving resources, and care needs of this vulnerable and difficult-to-research group. In this article, we detail this methodology, exploring what can and cannot be gleaned from it, what the ethical implications may be, and how and whether this type of research can be considered ethnographic. In conclusion, we argue that collaborative interdisciplinary research using existing, longitudinal research data and text from medical records deserves to be considered as a potentially useful addition to the ethnographic toolkit. We anticipate that this is a methodology that could be applied more broadly, and paired with more traditional ethnographic methods, might be one way to make research with this population more inclusive.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lily N Shapiro
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Ann M O'Hare
- University of Washington and VA Puget Sound Health Care System, USA
| | - Elizabeth K Vig
- University of Washington and VA Puget Sound Health Care System, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bohnert AS, Kumbier K, Rowneki M, Gupta A, Bajema K, Hynes DM, Viglianti E, O'Hare AM, Osborne T, Boyko EJ, Young-Xu Y, Iwashyna TJ, Maciejewski M, Schildhouse R, Dimcheff D, Ioannou GN. Adverse outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection with delta and omicron variants in vaccinated versus unvaccinated US veterans: retrospective cohort study. BMJ 2023; 381:e074521. [PMID: 37220941 DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2022-074521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine the association between covid-19 vaccination types and doses with adverse outcomes of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection during the periods of delta (B.1.617.2) and omicron (B.1.1.529) variant predominance. DESIGN Retrospective cohort. SETTING US Veterans Affairs healthcare system. PARTICIPANTS Adults (≥18 years) who are affiliated to Veterans Affairs with a first documented SARS-CoV-2 infection during the periods of delta (1 July-30 November 2021) or omicron (1 January-30 June 2022) variant predominance. The combined cohorts had a mean age of 59.4 (standard deviation 16.3) and 87% were male. INTERVENTIONS Covid-19 vaccination with mRNA vaccines (BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) and mRNA-1273 (Moderna)) and adenovirus vector vaccine (Ad26.COV2.S (Janssen/Johnson & Johnson)). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Stay in hospital, intensive care unit admission, use of ventilation, and mortality measured 30 days after a positive test result for SARS-CoV-2. RESULTS In the delta period, 95 336 patients had infections with 47.6% having at least one vaccine dose, compared with 184 653 patients in the omicron period, with 72.6% vaccinated. After adjustment for patient demographic and clinical characteristics, in the delta period, two doses of the mRNA vaccines were associated with lower odds of hospital admission (adjusted odds ratio 0.41 (95% confidence interval 0.39 to 0.43)), intensive care unit admission (0.33 (0.31 to 0.36)), ventilation (0.27 (0.24 to 0.30)), and death (0.21 (0.19 to 0.23)), compared with no vaccination. In the omicron period, receipt of two mRNA doses were associated with lower odds of hospital admission (0.60 (0.57 to 0.63)), intensive care unit admission (0.57 (0.53 to 0.62)), ventilation (0.59 (0.51 to 0.67)), and death (0.43 (0.39 to 0.48)). Additionally, a third mRNA dose was associated with lower odds of all outcomes compared with two doses: hospital admission (0.65 (0.63 to 0.69)), intensive care unit admission (0.65 (0.59 to 0.70)), ventilation (0.70 (0.61 to 0.80)), and death (0.51 (0.46 to 0.57)). The Ad26.COV2.S vaccination was associated with better outcomes relative to no vaccination, but higher odds of hospital stay and intensive care unit admission than with two mRNA doses. BNT162b2 was generally associated with worse outcomes than mRNA-1273 (adjusted odds ratios between 0.97 and 1.42). CONCLUSIONS In veterans with recent healthcare use and high occurrence of multimorbidity, vaccination was robustly associated with lower odds of 30 day morbidity and mortality compared with no vaccination among patients infected with covid-19. The vaccination type and number of doses had a significant association with outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Sb Bohnert
- Lieutenant Colonel Charles S Kettles VA Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Kyle Kumbier
- Lieutenant Colonel Charles S Kettles VA Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Mazhgan Rowneki
- Center of Innovation to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Healthcare System, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Ashwin Gupta
- Lieutenant Colonel Charles S Kettles VA Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Kristina Bajema
- Center of Innovation to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Healthcare System, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Denise M Hynes
- Center of Innovation to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Healthcare System, Portland, OR, USA
- Health Management and Policy, School of Social and Behavioral Health Sciences, College of Public Health and Human Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA
- Health Data and Informatics Program, Center for Genome Research and Biocomputing, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA
| | - Elizabeth Viglianti
- Lieutenant Colonel Charles S Kettles VA Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Ann M O'Hare
- Nephrology, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Healthcare System and University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- VA Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value Driven Care, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Thomas Osborne
- National Center for Collaborative Healthcare Innovation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Edward J Boyko
- General Internal Medicine, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Healthcare System and University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Yinong Young-Xu
- White River Junction Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, VT, USA
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA
| | | | - Matthew Maciejewski
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Richard Schildhouse
- Lieutenant Colonel Charles S Kettles VA Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Derek Dimcheff
- Lieutenant Colonel Charles S Kettles VA Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - George N Ioannou
- Health Services Research and Development, Center of Innovation, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle, WA, USA
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Singh N, Grivas P, Makris UE, Suarez-Almazor ME, O'Hare AM, Barton JL. Use of Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Supporting Shared Decision-Making Between Patients With Cancer and Clinicians. ACR Open Rheumatol 2023. [PMID: 37166652 DOI: 10.1002/acr2.11552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2023] [Revised: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 04/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/12/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Petros Grivas
- University of Washington and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle
| | - Una E Makris
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
| | | | - Ann M O'Hare
- Department of Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System and University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Jennifer L Barton
- Oregon Health and Science University and Department of Veterans Affairs Portland Health Care System, Portland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lee CS, Krakauer C, Su YR, Walker RL, Blazes M, McCurry SM, Bowen JD, McCormick WC, Lee AY, Boyko EJ, O'Hare AM, Larson EB, Crane PK. Diabetic Retinopathy and Dementia Association, Beyond Diabetes Severity. Am J Ophthalmol 2023; 249:90-98. [PMID: 36513155 PMCID: PMC10106379 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2022.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2022] [Revised: 12/02/2022] [Accepted: 12/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate whether associations between diabetic retinopathy (DR) and dementia and Alzheimer's disease (AD) remain significant after controlling for several measures of diabetes severity. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. METHODS Adult Changes in Thought (ACT) is a prospective cohort study of adults aged ≥65 years, randomly selected and recruited from the membership rolls of Kaiser Permanente Washington, who are dementia free at enrollment and followed biennially until incident dementia. The ACT participants were included in this study if they had type 2 diabetes mellitus at enrollment or developed it during follow-up, and data were collected through September, 2018 (3516 person-years of follow-up). Diabetes was defined by ≥ 2 diabetes medication fills in 1 year. Diagnosis of DR was based on International Classification of Diseases Ninth and Tenth Revision codes. Estimates of microalbuminuria, long-term glycemia, and renal function from longitudinal laboratory records were used as indicators of diabetes severity. Alzheimer's disease and dementia were diagnosed using research criteria at expert consensus meetings. RESULTS A total of 536 participants (median baseline age 75 [interquartile range 71-80], 54% women) met inclusion criteria. Significant associations between DR >5 years duration with dementia (hazard ratio 1.81 [95% CI 1.23, 2.65]) and AD (1.80 [1.15, 2.82]) were not altered by adjustment for estimates of microalbuminuria, long-term glycemia, and renal function (dementia: 1.69 [1.14, 2.50]; AD: 1.73 [1.10, 2.74]). CONCLUSIONS Among people with type 2 diabetes, DR itself appears to be an important biomarker of dementia risk in addition to glycemia and renal complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cecilia S Lee
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA (C.S.L., M.B., A.Y.L.); Roger and Angie Karalis Johnson Retina Center, Seattle, Washington, USA (C.S.L., M.B., A.Y.L.).
| | - Chloe Krakauer
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA (C.K.); Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA (C.K., Y-R.S., R.L.W., E.B.L.)
| | - Yu-Ru Su
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA (C.K., Y-R.S., R.L.W., E.B.L.)
| | - Rod L Walker
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA (C.K., Y-R.S., R.L.W., E.B.L.)
| | - Marian Blazes
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA (C.S.L., M.B., A.Y.L.); Roger and Angie Karalis Johnson Retina Center, Seattle, Washington, USA (C.S.L., M.B., A.Y.L.)
| | - Susan M McCurry
- School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA (S.M.M.)
| | - James D Bowen
- Department of Neurology, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA (J.D.B.)
| | - Wayne C McCormick
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA (W.C.M., E.J.B, E.B.L., P.K.C.)
| | - Aaron Y Lee
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA (C.S.L., M.B., A.Y.L.); Roger and Angie Karalis Johnson Retina Center, Seattle, Washington, USA (C.S.L., M.B., A.Y.L.)
| | - Edward J Boyko
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA (W.C.M., E.J.B, E.B.L., P.K.C.); Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle, Washington, USA (E.J.B., A.M.O)
| | - Ann M O'Hare
- Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle, Washington, USA (E.J.B., A.M.O)
| | - Eric B Larson
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA (C.K., Y-R.S., R.L.W., E.B.L.); Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA (W.C.M., E.J.B, E.B.L., P.K.C.)
| | - Paul K Crane
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA (W.C.M., E.J.B, E.B.L., P.K.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Smith VA, Berkowitz TSZ, Hebert P, Wong ES, Niederhausen M, Pura JA, Berry K, Green P, Korpak A, Fox A, Baraff A, Hickok A, Shahoumian TA, Bohnert ASB, Hynes DM, Boyko EJ, Ioannou GN, Iwashyna TJ, Bowling CB, O'Hare AM, Maciejewski ML. Design and analysis of outcomes following SARS-CoV-2 infection in veterans. BMC Med Res Methodol 2023; 23:81. [PMID: 37016340 PMCID: PMC10071454 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-023-01882-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 03/03/2023] [Indexed: 04/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Understanding how SARS-CoV-2 infection impacts long-term patient outcomes requires identification of comparable persons with and without infection. We report the design and implementation of a matching strategy employed by the Department of Veterans Affairs' (VA) COVID-19 Observational Research Collaboratory (CORC) to develop comparable cohorts of SARS-CoV-2 infected and uninfected persons for the purpose of inferring potential causative long-term adverse effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the Veteran population. METHODS In a retrospective cohort study, we identified VA health care system patients who were and were not infected with SARS-CoV-2 on a rolling monthly basis. We generated matched cohorts within each month utilizing a combination of exact and time-varying propensity score matching based on electronic health record (EHR)-derived covariates that can be confounders or risk factors across a range of outcomes. RESULTS From an initial pool of 126,689,864 person-months of observation, we generated final matched cohorts of 208,536 Veterans infected between March 2020-April 2021 and 3,014,091 uninfected Veterans. Matched cohorts were well-balanced on all 39 covariates used in matching after excluding patients for: no VA health care utilization; implausible age, weight, or height; living outside of the 50 states or Washington, D.C.; prior SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis per Medicare claims; or lack of a suitable match. Most Veterans in the matched cohort were male (88.3%), non-Hispanic (87.1%), white (67.2%), and living in urban areas (71.5%), with a mean age of 60.6, BMI of 31.3, Gagne comorbidity score of 1.4 and a mean of 2.3 CDC high-risk conditions. The most common diagnoses were hypertension (61.4%), diabetes (34.3%), major depression (32.2%), coronary heart disease (28.5%), PTSD (25.5%), anxiety (22.5%), and chronic kidney disease (22.5%). CONCLUSION This successful creation of matched SARS-CoV-2 infected and uninfected patient cohorts from the largest integrated health system in the United States will support cohort studies of outcomes derived from EHRs and sample selection for qualitative interviews and patient surveys. These studies will increase our understanding of the long-term outcomes of Veterans who were infected with SARS-CoV-2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valerie A Smith
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Theodore S Z Berkowitz
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Paul Hebert
- Health Services Research & Development Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, and Gastroenterology section, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Edwin S Wong
- Health Services Research & Development Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, and Gastroenterology section, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Meike Niederhausen
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA
- Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU), Portland, OR, USA
- Portland State University School of Public Health, Portland, OR, USA
| | - John A Pura
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Kristin Berry
- Health Services Research & Development Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, and Gastroenterology section, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA
- Seattle Epidemiologic Research and Information Center, VA Puget Sound, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Pamela Green
- Health Services Research & Development Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, and Gastroenterology section, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Anna Korpak
- Seattle Epidemiologic Research and Information Center, VA Puget Sound, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Alexandra Fox
- Seattle Epidemiologic Research and Information Center, VA Puget Sound, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Aaron Baraff
- Seattle Epidemiologic Research and Information Center, VA Puget Sound, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Alex Hickok
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Troy A Shahoumian
- Population Health: Health Solutions, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Amy S B Bohnert
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, VA, MI, USA
- Departments of Anesthesiology and Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Denise M Hynes
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA
- College of Public Health and Human Sciences, Center for Quantitative Life Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA
| | - Edward J Boyko
- Seattle Epidemiologic Research and Information Center, VA Puget Sound, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - George N Ioannou
- Health Services Research & Development Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, and Gastroenterology section, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Theodore J Iwashyna
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, VA, MI, USA
- National Clinical Scholars Program, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - C Barrett Bowling
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
- Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Ann M O'Hare
- Health Services Research & Development Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, and Gastroenterology section, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA
- Division of Nephrology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Matthew L Maciejewski
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Johansen KL, Chertow GM, Gilbertson DT, Ishani A, Israni A, Ku E, Li S, Li S, Liu J, Obrador GT, Schulman I, Chan K, Abbott KC, O'Hare AM, Powe NR, Roetker NS, Scherer JS, St Peter W, Snyder J, Winkelmayer WC, Wong SPY, Wetmore JB. US Renal Data System 2022 Annual Data Report: Epidemiology of Kidney Disease in the United States. Am J Kidney Dis 2023; 81:A8-A11. [PMID: 36822739 PMCID: PMC10807034 DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2022.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 47.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
|
14
|
Taylor JS, Figueroa Gray MS, Mar CM, Crane PK, Kariya H, Freitag C, Taneja P, Ramaprasan A, Shell Duncan B, O'Hare AM, Berridge C, Vig EK, Wheeler SGB, Thakral M, Hawkes RJ, Larson EB. Kinless Older Adults with Dementia: Qualitative Analysis of Data from the Adult Changes in Thought (ACT) Study. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2023; 78:1060-1072. [PMID: 36809476 DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbad030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2022] [Indexed: 02/23/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To examine the circumstances and needs of older adults who were "kinless," defined as having no living spouse or children, when they developed dementia. METHODS We conducted a secondary analysis of information from the Adult Changes in Thought (ACT) Study. Among 848 participants diagnosed with dementia between 1992 and 2016, we identified 64 who had no living spouse or child at dementia onset. We then conducted a qualitative analysis of administrative documents pertaining to these participants: handwritten comments recorded after each study visit, and medical history documents containing clinical chart notes from participants' medical records. RESULTS In this community dwelling cohort of older adults diagnosed with dementia, 8.4% were kinless at dementia onset. Participants in this sample had an average age of 87 years old, half lived alone, and one-third lived with unrelated persons. Through inductive content analysis we identified four themes that describe their circumstances and needs: 1) life trajectories, 2) caregiving resources, 3) care needs and gaps, and 4) turning points in caregiving arrangements. DISCUSSION Our qualitative analysis reveals that the life trajectories that led members of the analytic cohort to be kinless at dementia onset were quite varied. This research highlights the importance of non-family caregivers, and participants' own roles as caregivers. Our findings suggest that providers and health systems may need to work with other parties to directly provide dementia caregiving support rather than rely on family, and address factors such as neighborhood affordability that particularly affect older adults who have limited family support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Corinne M Mar
- International Clinical Research Center, Department of Global Health, University of Washington
| | - Paul K Crane
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington
| | - Hitomi Kariya
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington
| | | | | | | | | | - Ann M O'Hare
- Division of Nephrology, University of Washington
| | | | - Elizabeth K Vig
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington.,Geriatrics and Extended Care, VA Puget Sound Health Care System
| | | | - Manu Thakral
- Manning College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Boston
| | - Rene J Hawkes
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute
| | - Eric B Larson
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ioannou GN, Bohnert ASB, O'Hare AM, Boyko EJ, Maciejewski ML, Smith VA, Bowling CB, Viglianti E, Iwashyna TJ, Hynes DM, Berry K. Effectiveness of mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine Boosters Against Infection, Hospitalization, and Death: A Target Trial Emulation in the Omicron (B.1.1.529) Variant Era. Ann Intern Med 2022; 175:1693-1706. [PMID: 36215715 PMCID: PMC9575390 DOI: 10.7326/m22-1856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effectiveness of a third mRNA COVID-19 vaccine dose (booster dose) against the Omicron (B.1.1.529) variant is uncertain, especially in older, high-risk populations. OBJECTIVE To determine mRNA booster vaccine effectiveness (VE) against SARS-CoV-2 infection, hospitalization, and death in the Omicron era by booster type, primary vaccine type, time since primary vaccination, age, and comorbidity burden. DESIGN Retrospective matched cohort study designed to emulate a target trial of booster vaccination versus no booster, conducted from 1 December 2021 to 31 March 2022. SETTING U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs health care system. PARTICIPANTS Persons who had received 2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine doses at least 5 months earlier. INTERVENTION Booster monovalent mRNA vaccination (Pfizer-BioNTech's BNT162b2 or Moderna's mRNA-1273) versus no booster. MEASUREMENTS Booster VE. RESULTS Each group included 490 838 well-matched persons, who were predominantly male (88%), had a mean age of 63.0 years (SD, 14.0), and were followed for up to 121 days (mean, 79.8 days). Booster VE more than 10 days after a booster dose was 42.3% (95% CI, 40.6% to 43.9%) against SARS-CoV-2 infection, 53.3% (CI, 48.1% to 58.0%) against SARS-CoV-2-related hospitalization, and 79.1% (CI, 71.2% to 84.9%) against SARS-CoV-2-related death. Booster VE was similar for different booster types (BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273), age groups, and primary vaccination regimens but was significantly higher with longer time since primary vaccination and higher comorbidity burden. LIMITATION Predominantly male population. CONCLUSION Booster mRNA vaccination was highly effective in preventing death and moderately effective in preventing infection and hospitalization for up to 4 months after administration in the Omicron era. Increased uptake of booster vaccination, which is currently suboptimal, should be pursued to limit the morbidity and mortality of SARS-CoV-2 infection, especially in persons with high comorbidity burden. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George N Ioannou
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Washington, and Research and Development and Division of Gastroenterology, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington (G.N.I.)
| | - Amy S B Bohnert
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan Medical School, and Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan (A.S.B.B.)
| | - Ann M O'Hare
- Nephrology, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, and University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (A.M.O.)
| | - Edward J Boyko
- General Internal Medicine, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, and University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (E.J.B.)
| | - Matthew L Maciejewski
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, and Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, and Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (M.L.M.)
| | - Valerie A Smith
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, and Department of Population Health Sciences and Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (V.A.S.)
| | - C Barrett Bowling
- Durham Veterans Affairs Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC), and Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina (C.B.B.)
| | - Elizabeth Viglianti
- Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Health System, and Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (E.V., T.J.I.)
| | - Theodore J Iwashyna
- Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Health System, and Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (E.V., T.J.I.)
| | - Denise M Hynes
- Center of Innovation to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Healthcare System, Portland, Oregon, and Health Management and Policy, School of Social and Behavioral Health Sciences, College of Public Health and Human Sciences, and Health Data and Informatics Program, Center for Quantitative Life Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon (D.M.H.)
| | - Kristin Berry
- Research and Development, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington (K.B.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Butler CR, Sharma RK, Eneanya ND, Bernacki GM, Ghuman JK, Curtis JR, O'Hare AM. Differences Among Racial and Ethnic Minority Groups in the Unmet Existential and Supportive Care Needs of People Receiving Dialysis. JAMA Intern Med 2022; 182:992-995. [PMID: 35816354 PMCID: PMC9274444 DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.1677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
This cohort study examines differences regarding existential and supportive care needs for patients with kidney disease between individuals of racial and ethnic minority groups compared with White individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine R Butler
- Kidney Research Institute and Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Washington, Seattle.,Veterans Affairs Health Services Research & Development Seattle-Denver Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Seattle, Washington
| | - Rashmi K Sharma
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.,Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Nwamaka D Eneanya
- Palliative and Advanced Illness Research Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Gwen M Bernacki
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Washington and Veterans Administration Puget Sound Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Seattle
| | - Jasleen K Ghuman
- Kidney Research Institute and Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - J Randall Curtis
- Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence, University of Washington, Seattle.,Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Ann M O'Hare
- Kidney Research Institute and Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Washington, Seattle.,Veterans Affairs Health Services Research & Development Seattle-Denver Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wong SPY, Foglia MB, Cohen J, Oestreich T, O'Hare AM. The VA Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Initiative: A qualitative analysis of veterans with advanced kidney disease. J Am Geriatr Soc 2022; 70:2517-2529. [PMID: 35435246 PMCID: PMC9790645 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.17807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Revised: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Documentation of patients' goals of care is integral to promoting goal-concordant care. In 2017, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) launched a system-wide initiative to standardize documentation of patients' preferences for life-sustaining treatments (LST) and related goals-of-care conversations (GoCC) that included using a note template in its national electronic medical record system. We describe implementation of the LST note based on documentation in the medical records of patients with advanced kidney disease, a group that has traditionally experienced highly intensive patterns of care. METHODS We performed a qualitative analysis of documentation in the VA electronic medical record for a national random sample of 500 adults with advanced kidney disease for whom at least one LST note was completed between July 2018 and March 2019 to identify prominent themes pertaining to the content and context of LST notes. RESULTS During the observation period, a total of 723 (mean 1.5, range 1-6) LST notes were completed for this cohort. Two themes emerged from the analysis: (1) Reactive approach: LST notes were largely completed in response to medical crises, in which they focused on short-term goals and preferences rather than patients' broader health and goals, or certain clinical encounters designated by the initiative as "triggering events" for LST note completion; (2) Practitioner-driven: Documentation suggested that practitioners would attempt to engage patients/surrogates in GoCC to lay out treatment options in order to move care forward, but patients/surrogates sometimes appeared reluctant to engage in GoCC and had difficulty communicating in ways that practitioners could understand. CONCLUSIONS Standardized documentation of patients' treatment preferences and related GoCC was used to inform in-the-moment decision-making during acute illness and certain junctures in care. There is opportunity to expand standardized documentation practices and related GoCC to address patients'/surrogates' broader health concerns and goals and to enhance their engagement in these processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan P. Y. Wong
- Division of NephrologyVA Puget Sound Health Care SystemSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Mary Beth Foglia
- VA National Center for Ethics in Health CareSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Jennifer Cohen
- VA National Center for Ethics in Health CareSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Taryn Oestreich
- Division of NephrologyVA Puget Sound Health Care SystemSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Ann M. O'Hare
- Division of NephrologyVA Puget Sound Health Care SystemSeattleWashingtonUSA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
O'Hare AM, Butler CR, Laundry RJ, Showalter W, Todd-Stenberg J, Green P, Hebert PL, Wang V, Taylor JS, Van Eijk M, Matthews KL, Crowley ST, Carey E. Implications of Cross-System Use Among US Veterans With Advanced Kidney Disease in the Era of the MISSION Act: A Qualitative Study of Health Care Records. JAMA Intern Med 2022; 182:710-719. [PMID: 35576068 PMCID: PMC9112136 DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.1379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Since 2014, when Congress passed the Veterans Access Choice and Accountability (Choice) Act (replaced in 2018 with the more comprehensive Maintaining Internal Systems and Strengthening Integrated Outside Networks [MISSION] Act), the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has been paying for US veterans to receive increasing amounts of care in the private sector (non-VA care or VA community care). However, little is known about the implications of these legislative changes for the VA system. OBJECTIVE To describe the implications for the VA system of recent increases in VA-financed non-VA care. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This qualitative study was a thematic analysis of documentation in the electronic health records (EHRs) of a random sample of US veterans with advanced kidney disease between June 6, 2019, and February 5, 2021. EXPOSURES Mentions of community care in participant EHRs. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Dominant themes pertaining to VA-financed non-VA care. RESULTS Among 1000 study participants, the mean (SD) age was 73.8 (11.4) years, and 957 participants (95.7%) were male. Three interrelated themes pertaining to VA-financed non-VA care emerged from qualitative analysis of documentation in cohort member EHRs: (1) VA as mothership, which describes extensive care coordination by VA staff members and clinicians to facilitate care outside the VA and the tendency of veterans and their non-VA clinicians to rely on the VA to fill gaps in this care; (2) hidden work of veterans, which describes the efforts of veterans and their family members to navigate the referral process, and to serve as intermediaries between VA and non-VA clinicians; and (3) strain on the VA system, which describes a challenging referral process and the ways in which cross-system care has stretched the traditional roles of VA staff and clinicians and interfered with VA care processes. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The findings of this qualitative study describing VA-financed non-VA care for veterans with advanced kidney disease spotlight the substantial challenges of cross-system use and the strain placed on the VA system, VA staff and clinicians, and veterans and their families in recent years. These difficult-to-measure consequences of cross-system care should be considered when budgeting, evaluating, and planning the provision of VA-financed non-VA care in the private sector.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann M O'Hare
- Hospital and Specialty Medicine Service, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington.,VA Health Services Research and Development, Seattle-Denver COIN, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington.,Department of Medicine and Kidney Research Institute, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Catherine R Butler
- Hospital and Specialty Medicine Service, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington.,VA Health Services Research and Development, Seattle-Denver COIN, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington.,Department of Medicine and Kidney Research Institute, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Ryan J Laundry
- VA Health Services Research and Development, Seattle-Denver COIN, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
| | - Whitney Showalter
- VA Health Services Research and Development, Seattle-Denver COIN, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
| | - Jeffrey Todd-Stenberg
- VA Health Services Research and Development, Seattle-Denver COIN, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
| | - Pam Green
- VA Health Services Research and Development, Seattle-Denver COIN, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
| | - Paul L Hebert
- VA Health Services Research and Development, Seattle-Denver COIN, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington.,Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Virginia Wang
- Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina.,Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine Durham, North Carolina.,Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Janelle S Taylor
- Department of Anthropology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Susan T Crowley
- Department of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.,VA Connecticut Health Care System, West Haven, Connecticut
| | - Evan Carey
- Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Denver.,Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Denver
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Butler CR, O'Hare AM, Wong SPY. Supporting scholarship in palliative care across the medical specialties. J Pain Symptom Manage 2022; 63:e665-e666. [PMID: 35595386 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine R Butler
- Division of Nephrology (C.R.B.,A.M.H., S.P.Y.W.), VA Puget Sound Health Care System, University of Washington, Seattle WA
| | - Ann M O'Hare
- Division of Nephrology (C.R.B.,A.M.H., S.P.Y.W.), VA Puget Sound Health Care System, University of Washington, Seattle WA
| | - Susan P Y Wong
- Division of Nephrology (C.R.B.,A.M.H., S.P.Y.W.), VA Puget Sound Health Care System, University of Washington, Seattle WA.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Johansen KL, Chertow GM, Gilbertson DT, Herzog CA, Ishani A, Israni AK, Ku E, Li S, Li S, Liu J, Obrador GT, O'Hare AM, Peng Y, Powe NR, Roetker NS, St Peter WL, Saeed F, Snyder J, Solid C, Weinhandl ED, Winkelmayer WC, Wetmore JB. US Renal Data System 2021 Annual Data Report: Epidemiology of Kidney Disease in the United States. Am J Kidney Dis 2022; 79:A8-A12. [PMID: 35331382 PMCID: PMC8935019 DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2022.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 112] [Impact Index Per Article: 56.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
|
21
|
Ioannou GN, Locke ER, O'Hare AM, Bohnert ASB, Boyko EJ, Hynes DM, Berry K. COVID-19 Vaccination Effectiveness Against Infection or Death in a National U.S. Health Care System : A Target Trial Emulation Study. Ann Intern Med 2022; 175:352-361. [PMID: 34928700 PMCID: PMC8697485 DOI: 10.7326/m21-3256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about real-world COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness (VE) in racially and ethnically diverse, elderly populations with high comorbidity burden. OBJECTIVE To determine the effectiveness of messenger RNA COVID-19 vaccines. DESIGN Target trial emulation study comparing newly vaccinated persons with matched unvaccinated controls. SETTING U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs health care system. PARTICIPANTS Among persons receiving care in the Veterans Affairs health care system (n = 5 766 638), those who received at least 1 dose of the Moderna or Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine from 11 December 2020 to 25 March 2021 (n = 2 099 871) were matched to unvaccinated controls in a 1:1 ratio according to demographic, clinical, and geographic characteristics. INTERVENTION Follow-up for SARS-CoV-2 infection or SARS-CoV-2-related death, defined as death within 30 days of infection, began after the vaccination date or an identical index date for the matched unvaccinated controls and continued until up to 30 June 2021. MEASUREMENTS Vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection or SARS-CoV-2-related death. RESULTS Vaccinated and unvaccinated groups were well matched; both were predominantly male (92.9% vs. 93.4%), had advanced age (mean, 68.7 years in both groups), had diverse racial and ethnic distribution (for example, Black: 17.3% vs. 17.0%, Hispanic: 6.5% vs. 6.1%), and had substantial comorbidity burden. Vaccine effectiveness 7 or more days after the second vaccine dose was 69% (95% CI, 67% to 70%) against SARS-CoV-2 infection and 86% (CI, 82% to 89%) against SARS-CoV-2-related death and was similar when follow-up was extended to 31 March versus 30 June. Vaccine effectiveness against infection decreased with increasing age and comorbidity burden. LIMITATION Predominantly male population and lack of data on SARS-CoV-2 variants. CONCLUSION In an elderly, diverse, high-comorbidity population, COVID-19 VE against infection was substantially lower than previously reported, but VE against death was high. Complementary infection mitigation efforts remain important for pandemic control, even with vaccination. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George N Ioannou
- Division of Gastroenterology, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System and University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (G.N.I.)
| | - Emily R Locke
- Research and Development, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington (E.R.L., K.B.)
| | - Ann M O'Hare
- Division of Nephrology, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System and University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (A.M.O.)
| | - Amy S B Bohnert
- Departments of Anesthesiology and Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical School and VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan (A.S.B.)
| | - Edward J Boyko
- General Medicine Service, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System and University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (E.J.B.)
| | - Denise M Hynes
- Center of Innovation to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Healthcare System, Portland, and Health Management and Policy, School of Social and Behavioral Health Sciences, College of Public Health and Human Sciences, Health Data and Informatics Program, Center for Quantitative Life Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon (D.M.H.)
| | - Kristin Berry
- Research and Development, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington (E.R.L., K.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Bernacki GM, McDermott CL, Matlock DD, O'Hare AM, Brumback L, Bansal N, Kirkpatrick JN, Engelberg RA, Curtis JR. Advance Care Planning Documentation and Intensity of Care at the End of Life for Adults With Congestive Heart Failure, Chronic Kidney Disease, and Both Illnesses. J Pain Symptom Manage 2022; 63:e168-e175. [PMID: 34363954 PMCID: PMC8814047 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.07.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2021] [Revised: 07/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/30/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Heart failure (HF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are associated with high morbidity and mortality, especially in combination, yet little is known about the impact of these conditions together on end-of-life care. OBJECTIVES Compare end-of-life care and advance care planning (ACP) documentation among patients with both HF and CKD to those with either condition. METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of deceased patients (2010-2017) with HF and CKD (n = 1673), HF without CKD (n = 2671), and CKD without HF (n = 1706), excluding patients with cancer or dementia. We compared hospitalizations and intensive care unit (ICU) admissions in the last 30 days of life, hospital deaths, and ACP documentation >30 days before death. RESULTS 39% of patients with HF and CKD were hospitalized and 33% were admitted to the ICU in the last 30 days vs. 30% and 28%, respectively, for HF, and 26% and 23% for CKD. Compared to patients with both conditions, those with only 1 were less likely to be admitted to the hospital [HF: adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.72, 95%CI 0.63-0.83; CKD: aOR 0.63, 95%CI 0.53-0.75] and ICU (HF: aOR 0.83, 95%CI 0.71-0.94; CKD: aOR 0.68, 95%CI 0.56-0.80) and less likely to have ACP documentation (aOR 0.53, 95%CI 0.47-0.61 and aOR 0.70, 95%CI 0.60-0.81). CONCLUSIONS Decedents with both HF and CKD had more ACP documentation and received more intensive end-of-life care than those with only 1 condition. These findings suggest that patients with co-existing HF and CKD may benefit from interventions to ensure care received aligns with their goals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gwen M Bernacki
- Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence, University of Washington (G.M.B., C.L.M., J.R.C.), Seattle, WA; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington (G.M.B., J.N.K.), Seattle, WA; Hospital and Specialty Medicine Service, VA Puget Sound Health Care System (G.M.B., A.M.H. ), Seattle, WA.
| | - Cara L McDermott
- Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence, University of Washington (G.M.B., C.L.M., J.R.C.), Seattle, WA
| | - Daniel D Matlock
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine (D.D.M.), Aurora, CO; VA Eastern Colorado Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (D.D.M.), Denver, CO
| | - Ann M O'Hare
- Hospital and Specialty Medicine Service, VA Puget Sound Health Care System (G.M.B., A.M.H. ), Seattle, WA; Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington (A.M.O., N.B.), Seattle; Kidney Research Institute, University of Washington (A.M.O., N.B.)
| | - Lyndia Brumback
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington (L.B.), Seattle
| | - Nisha Bansal
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington (A.M.O., N.B.), Seattle; Kidney Research Institute, University of Washington (A.M.O., N.B.)
| | - James N Kirkpatrick
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington (G.M.B., J.N.K.), Seattle, WA; Department of Bioethics and Humanities, University of Washington (J.N.K., R.A.E.), Seattle, WA
| | - Ruth A Engelberg
- Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence, University of Washington (G.M.B., C.L.M., J.R.C.), Seattle, WA; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington (R.A.E., J.R.C.), Seattle, WA; Department of Bioethics and Humanities, University of Washington (J.N.K., R.A.E.), Seattle, WA
| | - Jared Randall Curtis
- Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence, University of Washington (G.M.B., C.L.M., J.R.C.), Seattle, WA; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington (R.A.E., J.R.C.), Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Affiliation(s)
- Ann M O'Hare
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.,Hospital and Specialty Medicine, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
| | - Rudolph A Rodriguez
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.,Hospital and Specialty Medicine, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
| | - Andrew D Rule
- Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
O'Hare AM. Error in Number of Eligible Patients in Survey of Self-reported Prognostic Expectations of People Undergoing Dialysis. JAMA Intern Med 2021; 181:1264-1265. [PMID: 34251392 PMCID: PMC9675052 DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.3259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ann M O'Hare
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Scherer JS, Milazzo KC, Hebert PL, Engelberg RA, Lavallee DC, Vig EK, Kurella Tamura M, Roberts G, Curtis JR, O'Hare AM. Association Between Self-reported Importance of Religious or Spiritual Beliefs and End-of-Life Care Preferences Among People Receiving Dialysis. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e2119355. [PMID: 34347059 PMCID: PMC8339933 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.19355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Although people receiving maintenance dialysis have limited life expectancy and a high burden of comorbidity, relatively few studies have examined spirituality and religious beliefs among members of this population. OBJECTIVE To examine whether there is an association between the importance of religious or spiritual beliefs and care preferences and palliative care needs in people who receive dialysis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A cross-sectional survey study was conducted among adults who were undergoing maintenance dialysis at 31 facilities in Seattle, Washington, and Nashville, Tennessee, between April 22, 2015, and October 2, 2018. The survey included a series of questions assessing patients' knowledge, preferences, values, and expectations related to end-of-life care. Data were analyzed from February 12, 2020, to April 21, 2021. EXPOSURES The importance of religious or spiritual beliefs was ascertained by asking participants to respond to this statement: "My religious or spiritual beliefs are what really lie behind my whole approach to life." Response options were definitely true, tends to be true, tends not to be true, or definitely not true. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASUREMENTS Outcome measures were based on self-reported engagement in advance care planning, resuscitation preferences, values regarding life prolongation, preferred place of death, decision-making preference, thoughts or discussion about hospice or stopping dialysis, prognostic expectations, and palliative care needs. RESULTS A total of 937 participants were included in the cohort, of whom the mean (SD) age was 62.8 (13.8) years and 524 (55.9%) were men. Overall, 435 (46.4%) participants rated the statement about religious or spiritual beliefs as definitely true, 230 (24.6%) rated it as tends to be true, 137 (14.6%) rated it as tends not to be true, and 135 (14.4%) rated it as definitely not true. Participants for whom these beliefs were more important were more likely to prefer cardiopulmonary resuscitation (estimated probability for definitely true: 69.8% [95% CI, 66.5%-73.2%]; tends to be true: 60.8% [95% CI, 53.4%-68.3%]; tends not to be true: 61.6% [95% CI, 53.6%-69.6%]; and definitely not true: 60.6% [95% CI, 52.5%-68.6%]; P for trend = .003) and mechanical ventilation (estimated probability for definitely true: 42.6% [95% CI, 38.1%-47.0%]; tends to be true: 33.5% [95% CI, 25.9%-41.2%]; tends not to be true: 35.1% [95% CI, 27.2%-42.9%]; and definitely not true: 27.9% [95% CI, 19.6%-36.1%]; P for trend = .002) and to prefer a shared role in decision-making (estimated probability for definitely true: 41.6% [95% CI, 37.7%-45.5%]; tends to be true: 35.4% [95% CI, 29.0%-41.8%]; tends not to be true: 36.0% [95% CI, 26.7%-45.2%]; and definitely not true: 23.8% [95% CI, 17.3%-30.3%]; P for trend = .001) and were less likely to have thought or spoken about stopping dialysis. These participants were no less likely to have engaged in advance care planning, to value relief of pain and discomfort, to prefer to die at home, to have ever thought or spoken about hospice, and to have unmet palliative care needs and had similar prognostic expectations. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The finding that religious or spiritual beliefs were important to most study participants suggests the value of an integrative approach that addresses these beliefs in caring for people who receive dialysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer S Scherer
- Division of Geriatrics and Palliative Care, Department of Internal Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York
| | - Kaylin C Milazzo
- Division of Geriatrics and Palliative Care, Department of Internal Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York
- Department of Spiritual Care, NYU Langone Health, New York
| | - Paul L Hebert
- Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle
- US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Services Research and Development Center of Innovation, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
| | - Ruth A Engelberg
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
- Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Danielle C Lavallee
- Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle
- British Columbia Academic Health Science Network, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Elizabeth K Vig
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
- Geriatrics and Extended Care, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
| | - Manjula Kurella Tamura
- Division of Nephrology, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, California
- Geriatric Research and Education Clinical Center and Division of Nephrology, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California
| | - Glenda Roberts
- Kidney Research Institute, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - J Randall Curtis
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
- Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Ann M O'Hare
- US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Services Research and Development Center of Innovation, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
- Kidney Research Institute, University of Washington, Seattle
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
- Hospital Specialty and Medicine Service, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
O'Hare AM, Rodriguez RA, van Eijk M. Supporting the Employment Goals of People With Kidney Disease. Am J Kidney Dis 2021; 78:772-773. [PMID: 34312057 DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2021.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2021] [Accepted: 05/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ann M O'Hare
- Hospital and Specialty Medicine Service, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Departments of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
| | - Rudolph A Rodriguez
- Hospital and Specialty Medicine Service, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Departments of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Marieke van Eijk
- Department of Anthropology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Center for Workforce Studies, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
O'Hare AM, Berry K, Fan VS, Crothers K, Eastment MC, Dominitz JA, Shah JA, Green P, Locke E, Ioannou GN. Age differences in the association of comorbid burden with adverse outcomes in SARS-CoV-2. BMC Geriatr 2021; 21:415. [PMID: 34229623 PMCID: PMC8258273 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-021-02340-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 06/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Older age and comorbid burden are both associated with adverse outcomes in SARS-CoV-2, but it is not known whether the association between comorbid burden and adverse outcomes differs in older and younger adults. Objective To compare the relationship between comorbid burden and adverse outcomes in adults with SARS-CoV-2 of different ages (18–64, 65–79 and ≥ 80 years). Design, setting, and participants Observational longitudinal cohort study of 170,528 patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 in the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Care System between 2/28/20 and 12/31/2020 who were followed through 01/31/2021. Measurements Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI); Incidence of hospitalization, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mechanical ventilation, and death within 30 days of a positive SARS-CoV-2 test. Results The cumulative 30-day incidence of death was 0.8% in cohort members < 65 years, 7.1% in those aged 65–79 years and 20.6% in those aged ≥80 years. The respective 30-day incidences of hospitalization were 8.2, 21.7 and 29.5%, of ICU admission were 2.7, 8.6, and 11% and of mechanical ventilation were 1, 3.9 and 3.2%. Median CCI (interquartile range) ranged from 0.0 (0.0, 2.0) in the youngest, to 4 (2.0, 7.0) in the oldest age group. The adjusted association of CCI with all outcomes was attenuated at older ages such that the threshold level of CCI above which the risk for each outcome exceeded the reference group (1st quartile) was lower in younger than in older cohort members (p < 0.001 for all age group interactions). Limitations The CCI is calculated based on diagnostic codes, which may not provide an accurate assessment of comorbid burden. Conclusions Age differences in the distribution and prognostic significance of overall comorbid burden could inform clinical management, vaccination prioritization and population health during the pandemic and argue for more work to understand the role of age and comorbidity in shaping the care of hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-021-02340-5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A M O'Hare
- Division of Nephrology, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Healthcare System and University of Washington, 1660 South Columbian Way, Seattle, WA, 98108, USA. .,Research and Development, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | - K Berry
- Research and Development, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - V S Fan
- Research and Development, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA.,Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Healthcare System and University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - K Crothers
- Research and Development, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA.,Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Healthcare System and University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - M C Eastment
- Division of Allergy and Infectious Disease, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Healthcare System and University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - J A Dominitz
- Research and Development, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA.,Division of Gastroenterology, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Healthcare System and University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - J A Shah
- Division of Allergy and Infectious Disease, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Healthcare System and University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - P Green
- Research and Development, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - E Locke
- Research and Development, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - G N Ioannou
- Research and Development, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA.,Division of Gastroenterology, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Healthcare System and University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Ioannou GN, O'Hare AM, Berry K, Fan VS, Crothers K, Eastment MC, Locke E, Green P, Shah JA, Dominitz JA. Trends over time in the risk of adverse outcomes among patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Clin Infect Dis 2021; 74:416-426. [PMID: 33973000 PMCID: PMC8136056 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciab419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background We aimed to describe trends in adverse outcomes among patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 between February and September 2020 within a national healthcare system. Methods We identified enrollees in the national U.S. Veterans Affairs healthcare system who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 between 2/28/2020 and 9/30/2020 (n=55,952), with follow-up extending to 11/19/2020. We determined trends over time in incidence of the following outcomes that occurred within 30 days of testing positive: hospitalization, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mechanical ventilation and death. Results Between February and July 2020, there were marked downward trends in the 30-day incidence of hospitalization (44.2% to 15.8%), ICU admission (20.3% to 5.3%), mechanical ventilation (12.7% to 2.2%), and death (12.5% to 4.4%), which subsequently plateaued between July and September 2020. These trends persisted after adjustment for sociodemographic characteristics, comorbid conditions, documented symptoms and laboratory tests, including among subgroups of patients hospitalized, admitted to the ICU or treated with mechanical ventilation. From February to September, there were decreases in the use of hydroxychloroquine (56.5% to 0%), azithromycin (48.3% to 16.6%) vasopressors (20.6% to 8.7%), and dialysis (11.6% to 3.8%) and increases in the use of dexamethasone (3.4% to 53.1%), other corticosteroids (4.9% to 29.0%) and remdesivir (1.7% to 45.4%) among hospitalized patients. Conclusions The risk of adverse outcomes in SARS-CoV-2-positive patients decreased markedly between February and July, with subsequent stabilization from July to September. These trends were not explained by changes in measured baseline patient characteristics and may reflect changing treatment practices or viral pathogenicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George N Ioannou
- Division of Gastroenterology, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Healthcare System and University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Ann M O'Hare
- Division of Nephrology, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Healthcare System and University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Kristin Berry
- Research and Development, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Vincent S Fan
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Healthcare System and University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Kristina Crothers
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Healthcare System and University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - McKenna C Eastment
- Division of Allergy and Infectious Disease, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Healthcare System and University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Emily Locke
- Research and Development, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Pamela Green
- Research and Development, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Javeed A Shah
- Division of Allergy and Infectious Disease, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Healthcare System and University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jason A Dominitz
- Division of Gastroenterology, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Healthcare System and University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Johansen KL, Chertow GM, Foley RN, Gilbertson DT, Herzog CA, Ishani A, Israni AK, Ku E, Kurella Tamura M, Li S, Li S, Liu J, Obrador GT, O'Hare AM, Peng Y, Powe NR, Roetker NS, St Peter WL, Abbott KC, Chan KE, Schulman IH, Snyder J, Solid C, Weinhandl ED, Winkelmayer WC, Wetmore JB. US Renal Data System 2020 Annual Data Report: Epidemiology of Kidney Disease in the United States. Am J Kidney Dis 2021; 77:A7-A8. [PMID: 33752804 DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2021.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 295] [Impact Index Per Article: 98.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
30
|
Butler CR, Wong SPY, Vig EK, Neely CS, O'Hare AM. Professional roles and relationships during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study among US clinicians. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e047782. [PMID: 33766845 PMCID: PMC7995668 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2020] [Revised: 03/09/2021] [Accepted: 03/11/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The COVID-19 pandemic has transformed healthcare delivery in the USA, but there has been little empirical work describing the impact of these changes on clinicians. We conducted a study to address the following question: how has the pandemic impacted US clinicians' professional roles and relationships? DESIGN Inductive thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews. SETTING Clinical settings across the USA in April and May of 2020. PARTICIPANTS Clinicians with leadership and/or clinical roles during the COVID-19 pandemic. MEASURES Emergent themes related to professional roles and relationships. RESULTS Sixty-one clinicians participated in semi-structured interviews. Study participants were practising in 15 states across the USA, and the majority were White physicians from large academic centres. Three overlapping and inter-related themes emerged from qualitative analysis of interview transcripts: (1) disruption: boundaries between work and home life became blurred and professional identity and usual clinical roles were upended; (2) constructive adaptation: some clinicians were able to find new meaning in their work and described a spirit of collaboration, shared goals, open communication and mutual respect among colleagues; and (3) discord and estrangement: other clinicians felt alienated from their clinical roles and experienced demoralising work environments marked by division, value conflicts and mistrust. CONCLUSIONS Clinicians encountered marked disruption of their professional roles, identities and relationships during the pandemic to which they and their colleagues responded in a range of different ways. Some described a spirit of collaboration and camaraderie, while others felt alienated by their new roles and experienced work environments marked by division, value conflicts and mistrust. Our findings highlight the importance of effective teamwork and efforts to support clinician well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine R Butler
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology and the Kidney Research Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Department of Hospital and Specialty Medicine, Nephrology Section and Health Services Research & Development, Seattle-Denver Center of Innovation, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Susan P Y Wong
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology and the Kidney Research Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Department of Hospital and Specialty Medicine, Nephrology Section and Health Services Research & Development, Seattle-Denver Center of Innovation, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Elizabeth K Vig
- Department of Hospital and Specialty Medicine, Geriatrics and Extended Care Section, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Claire S Neely
- Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement, Bloomington, Minnesota, USA
| | - Ann M O'Hare
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology and the Kidney Research Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Department of Hospital and Specialty Medicine, Nephrology Section and Health Services Research & Development, Seattle-Denver Center of Innovation, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Butler CR, Wightman A, Richards CA, Laundry RS, Taylor JS, Hebert PL, Liu CF, O'Hare AM. Thematic Analysis of the Health Records of a National Sample of US Veterans With Advanced Kidney Disease Evaluated for Transplant. JAMA Intern Med 2021; 181:212-219. [PMID: 33226419 PMCID: PMC7684522 DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.6388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE To be considered for a kidney transplant, patients with advanced kidney disease must participate in a formal evaluation and selection process. Little is known about how this process proceeds in real-world clinical settings. OBJECTIVE To characterize the transplant evaluation process among a representative national sample of US veterans with advanced kidney disease who were referred to a kidney transplant center. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This qualitative study was a thematic analysis of clinician notes in the electronic health records of US veterans referred for kidney transplant evaluation. In a random sample of 4000 patients with advanced kidney disease between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2014, cared for in the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) health care system, there were 211 patients who were referred to a transplant center during the follow-up period. This group was included in the qualitative analysis and was followed up until their date of death or the end of the follow-up period on October 8, 2019. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Dominant themes pertaining to the kidney transplant evaluation and selection process identified through thematic analysis. RESULTS Among 211 study patients, the mean (SD) age was 57.9 (9.5) years, and 202 patients (95.7%) were male. The following 4 dominant themes regarding the transplant evaluation process emerged: (1) far-reaching and inflexible medical evaluation, in which patients were expected to complete an extensive evaluation that could have substantial physical and emotional consequences, made little accommodation for their personal values and needs, and impacted other aspects of their care; (2) psychosocial valuation, in which the psychosocial component of the transplant assessment could be subjective and intrusive and could place substantial demands on patients' family members; (3) surveillance over compliance, in which the patients' ability and willingness to follow medical recommendations was an important criterion for transplant candidacy and their adherence to a wide range of recommendations and treatments was closely monitored; and (4) disempowerment and lack of transparency, in which patients and their local clinicians were often unsure about what to expect during the evaluation process or about the rationale for selection decisions. For the evaluation process to proceed, local clinicians had to follow transplant center requirements even when they believed the requirements did not align with best practices or the patients' needs. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this qualitative study of US veterans with advanced kidney disease evaluated for transplant, clinician documentation in the medical record indicated that, to be considered for a kidney transplant, patients were required to participate in a rigid, demanding, and opaque evaluation and selection process over which they and their local clinicians had little control. These findings highlight the need for a more evidence-based, individualized, and collaborative approach to kidney transplant evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine R Butler
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.,Hospital and Specialty Medicine, Geriatrics and Extended Care and Seattle-Denver Health Services Research and Development Center of Innovation, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
| | - Aaron Wightman
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle.,Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington
| | - Claire A Richards
- Hospital and Specialty Medicine, Geriatrics and Extended Care and Seattle-Denver Health Services Research and Development Center of Innovation, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington.,School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Ryan S Laundry
- Hospital and Specialty Medicine, Geriatrics and Extended Care and Seattle-Denver Health Services Research and Development Center of Innovation, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
| | - Janelle S Taylor
- Department of Anthropology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Paul L Hebert
- Hospital and Specialty Medicine, Geriatrics and Extended Care and Seattle-Denver Health Services Research and Development Center of Innovation, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington.,Department of Health Services Research, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Chuan-Fen Liu
- Hospital and Specialty Medicine, Geriatrics and Extended Care and Seattle-Denver Health Services Research and Development Center of Innovation, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington.,Department of Health Services Research, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Ann M O'Hare
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.,Hospital and Specialty Medicine, Geriatrics and Extended Care and Seattle-Denver Health Services Research and Development Center of Innovation, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Affiliation(s)
- Ann M. O'Hare
- University of Washington and VA Puget Sound Health Care System Seattle WA USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Wang V, Swaminathan S, Corneau EA, Maciejewski ML, Trivedi AN, O'Hare AM, Mor V. Association of VA Payment Reform for Dialysis with Spending, Access to Care, and Outcomes for Veterans with ESKD. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2020; 15:1631-1639. [PMID: 32963019 PMCID: PMC7646236 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.02100220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2020] [Accepted: 08/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Because of the limited capacity of its own dialysis facilities, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Veterans Health Administration routinely outsources dialysis care to community providers. Prior to 2011-when the VA implemented a process of standardizing payments and establishing national contracts for community-based dialysis care-payments to community providers were largely unregulated. This study examined the association of changes in the Department of Veterans Affairs payment policy for community dialysis with temporal trends in VA spending and veterans' access to dialysis care and mortality. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS An interrupted time series design and VA, Medicare, and US Renal Data System data were used to identify veterans who received VA-financed dialysis in community-based dialysis facilities before (2006-2008), during (2009-2010), and after the enactment of VA policies to standardize dialysis payments (2011-2016). We used multivariable, differential trend/intercept shift regression models to examine trends in average reimbursement for community-based dialysis, access to quality care (veterans' distance to community dialysis, number of community dialysis providers, and dialysis facility quality indicators), and 1-year mortality over this time period. RESULTS Before payment reform, the unadjusted average per-treatment reimbursement for non-VA dialysis care varied widely ($47-$1575). After payment reform, there was a 44% reduction ($44-$250) in the adjusted price per dialysis session (P<0.001) and less variation in payments for dialysis ($73-$663). Over the same time period, there was an increase in the number of community dialysis facilities contracting with VA to deliver care to veterans with ESKD from 19 to 37 facilities (per VA hospital), and there were no changes in either the quality of community dialysis facilities or crude 1-year mortality rate of veterans (12% versus 11%). CONCLUSIONS VA policies to standardize payment and establish national dialysis contracts increased the value of VA-financed community dialysis care by reducing reimbursement without compromising access to care or survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Virginia Wang
- Center of Innovation for Health Services Research, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina .,Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.,Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Shailender Swaminathan
- Center of Innovation for Long Term Services and Supports, Providence Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Providence, Rhode Island.,Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Emily A Corneau
- Center of Innovation for Long Term Services and Supports, Providence Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Matthew L Maciejewski
- Center of Innovation for Health Services Research, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina.,Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.,Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Amal N Trivedi
- Center of Innovation for Long Term Services and Supports, Providence Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Providence, Rhode Island.,Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Ann M O'Hare
- Center for Health Services Research in Older Adults, Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington.,Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Vincent Mor
- Center of Innovation for Long Term Services and Supports, Providence Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Providence, Rhode Island.,Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Oestreich T, Sayre G, O'Hare AM, Curtis JR, Wong SPY. Perspectives on Conservative Care in Advanced Kidney Disease: A Qualitative Study of US Patients and Family Members. Am J Kidney Dis 2020; 77:355-364.e1. [PMID: 33010356 PMCID: PMC8148987 DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2020.07.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2020] [Accepted: 07/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Rationale & Objective: Little is known about perceptions of conservative care among patients with advanced kidney disease in the United States. Study Design: Qualitative study using cognitive interviewing about attitudes regarding conservative care using decision aids on treatments for advanced kidney disease developed outside the United States. Setting & Participants: 14 patients 75 years or older with advanced kidney disease, defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤ 20 mL/min/1.73 m2 and not receiving maintenance dialysis, and 6 of their family members. Analytical Approach: Thematic analysis of participants’ reactions to descriptions of conservative care taken from various clinical care decision aids. Results: Participants were mostly White (n = 15) and had at least some college education (n = 16). Four themes emerged from analysis of interviews: (1) core elements of conservative care: aspects of conservative care that were appealing to participants included a whole-person, team-based, and structured approach to care that focused on symptom management, maintaining current lifestyle, and managing health setbacks; (2) importance of how conservative care is framed: participants were more receptive to conservative care when this was framed as an active rather than passive treatment approach and were receptive to statements of uncertainty about future course of illness and prognosis; (3) an explicit approach to shared decision making: participants believed decisions about conservative care and dialysis should address considerations about risk and benefits of treatment options, family and clinician perspectives, and patients’ goals, values, and preferences; and (4) relationship between conservative care and dialysis: although conservative care models outside the United States are generally intended to serve as an alternative to dialysis, participants’ comments implied that they did not see conservative care and dialysis as mutually exclusive. Limitations: Themes identified may not generalize to the broader population of US patients with advanced kidney disease and their family members. Conclusions: Participants were favorably disposed to a whole-person multidisciplinary approach to conservative care, especially when framed as an active treatment approach. Models of conservative care excluding the possibility of dialysis were less embraced, suggesting that current models will require adaptation to meet the needs of US patients and their families. Conservative care is an important therapeutic option for patients with advanced kidney disease who believe that the burdens of dialysis are not outweighed by its potential benefits. However, efforts in this country to develop conservative options for patients who wish to pursue dialysis have lagged considerably behind those in other countries. In this study, we interviewed older patients with advanced kidney disease but not receiving maintenance dialysis and their family members about their reactions to descriptions of conservative care taken from decision aids developed in other countries. The findings suggest how models of conservative care developed in other countries could be adapted to meet the needs and preferences of US patients and their family members.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taryn Oestreich
- University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Health Services Research and Development Center, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA
| | - George Sayre
- University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Health Services Research and Development Center, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA
| | - Ann M O'Hare
- University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Health Services Research and Development Center, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA
| | - J Randall Curtis
- University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Susan P Y Wong
- University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Health Services Research and Development Center, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Butler CR, Reese PP, Perkins JD, Hall YN, Curtis JR, Kurella Tamura M, O'Hare AM. End-of-Life Care among US Adults with ESKD Who Were Waitlisted or Received a Kidney Transplant, 2005-2014. J Am Soc Nephrol 2020; 31:2424-2433. [PMID: 32908000 DOI: 10.1681/asn.2020030342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2020] [Accepted: 06/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The care of patients in the United States who have ESKD is often shaped by their hopes and prognostic expectations related to kidney transplant. Little is known about how patients' engagement in the transplant process might relate to patterns of end-of-life care. METHODS We compared six measures of intensity of end-of-life care among adults in the United States with ESKD who died between 2005 and 2014 after experiencing differing exposure to the kidney transplant process. RESULTS Of 567,832 decedents with ESKD, 27,633 (5%) had a functioning kidney transplant at the time of death, 14,653 (3%) had a failed transplant, 16,490 (3%) had been removed from the deceased donor waitlist, 17,010 (3%) were inactive on the waitlist, 11,529 (2%) were active on the waitlist, and 480,517 (85%) had never been waitlisted for or received a transplant (reference group). In adjusted analyses, compared with the reference group, patients exposed to the transplant process were significantly more likely to have been admitted to an intensive care unit and to have received an intensive procedure in the last 30 days of life; they were also significantly more likely to have died in the hospital. Those who died on the transplant waitlist were also less likely than those in the reference group to have been enrolled in hospice and to have discontinued dialysis before death. CONCLUSIONS Patients who had engaged in the kidney transplant process received more intensive patterns of end-of-life care than other patients with ESKD. These findings support the relevance of advance care planning, even for this relatively healthy segment of the ESKD population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine R Butler
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine and the Kidney Research Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Peter P Reese
- Renal-Electrolyte and Hypertension Division, Department of Medicine and Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - James D Perkins
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Yoshio N Hall
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine and the Kidney Research Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - J Randall Curtis
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine and the Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Manjula Kurella Tamura
- Division of Nephrology, Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California
| | - Ann M O'Hare
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine and the Kidney Research Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.,Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Heath Care System, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Saran R, Pearson A, Tilea A, Shahinian V, Bragg-Gresham J, Heung M, Hutton DW, Steffick D, Zheng K, Morgenstern H, Gillespie BW, Leichtman A, Young E, O'Hare AM, Fischer M, Hotchkiss J, Siew E, Hynes D, Fried L, Balkovetz D, Sovern K, Liu CF, Crowley S. Burden and Cost of Caring for US Veterans With CKD: Initial Findings From the VA Renal Information System (VA-REINS). Am J Kidney Dis 2020; 77:397-405. [PMID: 32890592 DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2020.07.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2020] [Accepted: 07/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Kidney disease is a common, complex, costly, and life-limiting condition. Most kidney disease registries or information systems have been limited to single institutions or regions. A national US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Renal Information System (VA-REINS) was recently developed. We describe its creation and present key initial findings related to chronic kidney disease (CKD) without kidney replacement therapy (KRT). Data from the VA's Corporate Data Warehouse were processed and linked with national Medicare data for patients with CKD receiving KRT. Operational definitions for VA user, CKD, acute kidney injury, and kidney failure were developed. Among 7 million VA users in fiscal year 2014, CKD was identified using either a strict or liberal operational definition in 1.1 million (16.4%) and 2.5 million (36.3%) veterans, respectively. Most were identified using an estimated glomerular filtration rate laboratory phenotype, some through proteinuria assessment, and very few through International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision coding. The VA spent ∼$18 billion for the care of patients with CKD without KRT, most of which was for CKD stage 3, with higher per-patient costs by CKD stage. VA-REINS can be leveraged for disease surveillance, population health management, and improving the quality and value of care, thereby enhancing VA's capacity as a patient-centered learning health system for US veterans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rajiv Saran
- Department of Internal Medicine - Nephrology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI.
| | - Aaron Pearson
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Anca Tilea
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Vahakn Shahinian
- Department of Internal Medicine - Nephrology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Jennifer Bragg-Gresham
- Department of Internal Medicine - Nephrology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Michael Heung
- Department of Internal Medicine - Nephrology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - David W Hutton
- Department of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Diane Steffick
- Department of Internal Medicine - Nephrology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Kai Zheng
- Department of Informatics, University of California - Irvine, Irvine, CA
| | - Hal Morgenstern
- Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Department of Urology, Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Brenda W Gillespie
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Alan Leichtman
- Department of Internal Medicine - Nephrology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Eric Young
- Arbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Ann M O'Hare
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Department of Medicine - Nephrology, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA
| | - Michael Fischer
- Center of Innovation for Complex Chronic Healthcare, Hines VA Hospital, Hines, IL
| | - John Hotchkiss
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Pittsburgh VA Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Eddie Siew
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Nashville VA Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | | | - Linda Fried
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | - Karen Sovern
- Department of Veterans Affairs, Center Office of Analytics and Business Intelligence
| | | | - Susan Crowley
- Section of Nephrology, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Affiliation(s)
- Ann M O'Hare
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Jassal SV, Larkina M, Jager KJ, Murtagh FEM, O'Hare AM, Hanafusa N, Morgenstern H, Port FK, McCullough K, Pisoni R, Tentori F, Perlman R, Swartz RD. International variation in dialysis discontinuation in patients with advanced kidney disease. CMAJ 2020; 192:E995-E1002. [PMID: 32868271 DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.191631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Decisions about dialysis for advanced kidney disease are often strongly shaped by sociocultural and system-level factors rather than the priorities and values of individual patients. We examined international variation in the uptake of conservative approaches to the care of patients with advanced kidney disease, in particular discontinuation of dialysis. METHODS We employed an observational cohort study design using data collected from patients maintained on long-term hemodialysis between 1996 and 2015 in facilities across 12 developed countries participating in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS). The main outcome was discontinuation of dialysis therapy. We analyzed the association between several patient characteristics and time to dialysis discontinuation by country and phase of study entry. RESULTS A total of 259 343 DOPPS patients contributed data to the study, of whom 48 519 (18.7%) died during the study period. Of the decedents, 5808 (12.0%) discontinued dialysis before death. Rates of discontinuation were higher within the first few months after initiation of dialysis, among older adults, among those with a greater number of comorbidities and among those living in an institution. After adjustment for age, sex, dialysis duration, diabetes and dialysis era, rates of discontinuation were highest in Canada, the United States and Australia/New Zealand (33.8, 31.4 and 21.5 per 1000/yr, respectively) and lowest in Japan and Italy (< 0.1 per 1000/yr). Crude discontinuation rates were highest in dialysis facilities that were more likely to offer comprehensive conservative renal care to older adults. INTERPRETATION We found persistent international variation in average rates of dialysis discontinuation not explained by differences in patient case-mix. These differences may reflect physician-, facility- and society-level differences in clinical practice. There may be opportunities for international cross-collaboration to improve support for patients with end-stage renal disease who prefer a more conservative approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarbjit V Jassal
- University Health Network (Jassal), Toronto, Ont.; Arbor Research Collaborative for Health (Larkina, Port, McCullough, Pisoni), Ann Arbor, Mich.; ERA-EDTA Registry (Jager), Department of Medical Informatics, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre (Murtagh), Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK; VA Puget Sound Health Care System (O'Hare), Seattle, Wash.; Department of Blood Purification (Hanafusa), Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan; Departments of Epidemiology (Morgenstern) and Environmental Health Sciences (Morgenstern), School of Public Health, and Department of Urology (Morgenstern), Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.; DaVita Outcomes Research and Patient Empowerment (Tentori), Denver, Colo.; Divisions of Nephrology (Perlman, Swartz) and Palliative Care (Swartz), Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich.
| | - Maria Larkina
- University Health Network (Jassal), Toronto, Ont.; Arbor Research Collaborative for Health (Larkina, Port, McCullough, Pisoni), Ann Arbor, Mich.; ERA-EDTA Registry (Jager), Department of Medical Informatics, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre (Murtagh), Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK; VA Puget Sound Health Care System (O'Hare), Seattle, Wash.; Department of Blood Purification (Hanafusa), Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan; Departments of Epidemiology (Morgenstern) and Environmental Health Sciences (Morgenstern), School of Public Health, and Department of Urology (Morgenstern), Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.; DaVita Outcomes Research and Patient Empowerment (Tentori), Denver, Colo.; Divisions of Nephrology (Perlman, Swartz) and Palliative Care (Swartz), Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich
| | - Kitty J Jager
- University Health Network (Jassal), Toronto, Ont.; Arbor Research Collaborative for Health (Larkina, Port, McCullough, Pisoni), Ann Arbor, Mich.; ERA-EDTA Registry (Jager), Department of Medical Informatics, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre (Murtagh), Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK; VA Puget Sound Health Care System (O'Hare), Seattle, Wash.; Department of Blood Purification (Hanafusa), Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan; Departments of Epidemiology (Morgenstern) and Environmental Health Sciences (Morgenstern), School of Public Health, and Department of Urology (Morgenstern), Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.; DaVita Outcomes Research and Patient Empowerment (Tentori), Denver, Colo.; Divisions of Nephrology (Perlman, Swartz) and Palliative Care (Swartz), Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich
| | - Fliss E M Murtagh
- University Health Network (Jassal), Toronto, Ont.; Arbor Research Collaborative for Health (Larkina, Port, McCullough, Pisoni), Ann Arbor, Mich.; ERA-EDTA Registry (Jager), Department of Medical Informatics, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre (Murtagh), Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK; VA Puget Sound Health Care System (O'Hare), Seattle, Wash.; Department of Blood Purification (Hanafusa), Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan; Departments of Epidemiology (Morgenstern) and Environmental Health Sciences (Morgenstern), School of Public Health, and Department of Urology (Morgenstern), Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.; DaVita Outcomes Research and Patient Empowerment (Tentori), Denver, Colo.; Divisions of Nephrology (Perlman, Swartz) and Palliative Care (Swartz), Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich
| | - Ann M O'Hare
- University Health Network (Jassal), Toronto, Ont.; Arbor Research Collaborative for Health (Larkina, Port, McCullough, Pisoni), Ann Arbor, Mich.; ERA-EDTA Registry (Jager), Department of Medical Informatics, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre (Murtagh), Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK; VA Puget Sound Health Care System (O'Hare), Seattle, Wash.; Department of Blood Purification (Hanafusa), Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan; Departments of Epidemiology (Morgenstern) and Environmental Health Sciences (Morgenstern), School of Public Health, and Department of Urology (Morgenstern), Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.; DaVita Outcomes Research and Patient Empowerment (Tentori), Denver, Colo.; Divisions of Nephrology (Perlman, Swartz) and Palliative Care (Swartz), Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich
| | - Norio Hanafusa
- University Health Network (Jassal), Toronto, Ont.; Arbor Research Collaborative for Health (Larkina, Port, McCullough, Pisoni), Ann Arbor, Mich.; ERA-EDTA Registry (Jager), Department of Medical Informatics, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre (Murtagh), Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK; VA Puget Sound Health Care System (O'Hare), Seattle, Wash.; Department of Blood Purification (Hanafusa), Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan; Departments of Epidemiology (Morgenstern) and Environmental Health Sciences (Morgenstern), School of Public Health, and Department of Urology (Morgenstern), Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.; DaVita Outcomes Research and Patient Empowerment (Tentori), Denver, Colo.; Divisions of Nephrology (Perlman, Swartz) and Palliative Care (Swartz), Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich
| | - Hal Morgenstern
- University Health Network (Jassal), Toronto, Ont.; Arbor Research Collaborative for Health (Larkina, Port, McCullough, Pisoni), Ann Arbor, Mich.; ERA-EDTA Registry (Jager), Department of Medical Informatics, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre (Murtagh), Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK; VA Puget Sound Health Care System (O'Hare), Seattle, Wash.; Department of Blood Purification (Hanafusa), Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan; Departments of Epidemiology (Morgenstern) and Environmental Health Sciences (Morgenstern), School of Public Health, and Department of Urology (Morgenstern), Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.; DaVita Outcomes Research and Patient Empowerment (Tentori), Denver, Colo.; Divisions of Nephrology (Perlman, Swartz) and Palliative Care (Swartz), Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich
| | - Friedrich K Port
- University Health Network (Jassal), Toronto, Ont.; Arbor Research Collaborative for Health (Larkina, Port, McCullough, Pisoni), Ann Arbor, Mich.; ERA-EDTA Registry (Jager), Department of Medical Informatics, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre (Murtagh), Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK; VA Puget Sound Health Care System (O'Hare), Seattle, Wash.; Department of Blood Purification (Hanafusa), Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan; Departments of Epidemiology (Morgenstern) and Environmental Health Sciences (Morgenstern), School of Public Health, and Department of Urology (Morgenstern), Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.; DaVita Outcomes Research and Patient Empowerment (Tentori), Denver, Colo.; Divisions of Nephrology (Perlman, Swartz) and Palliative Care (Swartz), Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich
| | - Keith McCullough
- University Health Network (Jassal), Toronto, Ont.; Arbor Research Collaborative for Health (Larkina, Port, McCullough, Pisoni), Ann Arbor, Mich.; ERA-EDTA Registry (Jager), Department of Medical Informatics, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre (Murtagh), Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK; VA Puget Sound Health Care System (O'Hare), Seattle, Wash.; Department of Blood Purification (Hanafusa), Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan; Departments of Epidemiology (Morgenstern) and Environmental Health Sciences (Morgenstern), School of Public Health, and Department of Urology (Morgenstern), Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.; DaVita Outcomes Research and Patient Empowerment (Tentori), Denver, Colo.; Divisions of Nephrology (Perlman, Swartz) and Palliative Care (Swartz), Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich
| | - Ronald Pisoni
- University Health Network (Jassal), Toronto, Ont.; Arbor Research Collaborative for Health (Larkina, Port, McCullough, Pisoni), Ann Arbor, Mich.; ERA-EDTA Registry (Jager), Department of Medical Informatics, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre (Murtagh), Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK; VA Puget Sound Health Care System (O'Hare), Seattle, Wash.; Department of Blood Purification (Hanafusa), Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan; Departments of Epidemiology (Morgenstern) and Environmental Health Sciences (Morgenstern), School of Public Health, and Department of Urology (Morgenstern), Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.; DaVita Outcomes Research and Patient Empowerment (Tentori), Denver, Colo.; Divisions of Nephrology (Perlman, Swartz) and Palliative Care (Swartz), Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich
| | - Francesca Tentori
- University Health Network (Jassal), Toronto, Ont.; Arbor Research Collaborative for Health (Larkina, Port, McCullough, Pisoni), Ann Arbor, Mich.; ERA-EDTA Registry (Jager), Department of Medical Informatics, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre (Murtagh), Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK; VA Puget Sound Health Care System (O'Hare), Seattle, Wash.; Department of Blood Purification (Hanafusa), Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan; Departments of Epidemiology (Morgenstern) and Environmental Health Sciences (Morgenstern), School of Public Health, and Department of Urology (Morgenstern), Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.; DaVita Outcomes Research and Patient Empowerment (Tentori), Denver, Colo.; Divisions of Nephrology (Perlman, Swartz) and Palliative Care (Swartz), Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich
| | - Rachel Perlman
- University Health Network (Jassal), Toronto, Ont.; Arbor Research Collaborative for Health (Larkina, Port, McCullough, Pisoni), Ann Arbor, Mich.; ERA-EDTA Registry (Jager), Department of Medical Informatics, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre (Murtagh), Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK; VA Puget Sound Health Care System (O'Hare), Seattle, Wash.; Department of Blood Purification (Hanafusa), Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan; Departments of Epidemiology (Morgenstern) and Environmental Health Sciences (Morgenstern), School of Public Health, and Department of Urology (Morgenstern), Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.; DaVita Outcomes Research and Patient Empowerment (Tentori), Denver, Colo.; Divisions of Nephrology (Perlman, Swartz) and Palliative Care (Swartz), Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich
| | - Richard D Swartz
- University Health Network (Jassal), Toronto, Ont.; Arbor Research Collaborative for Health (Larkina, Port, McCullough, Pisoni), Ann Arbor, Mich.; ERA-EDTA Registry (Jager), Department of Medical Informatics, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre (Murtagh), Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK; VA Puget Sound Health Care System (O'Hare), Seattle, Wash.; Department of Blood Purification (Hanafusa), Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan; Departments of Epidemiology (Morgenstern) and Environmental Health Sciences (Morgenstern), School of Public Health, and Department of Urology (Morgenstern), Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.; DaVita Outcomes Research and Patient Empowerment (Tentori), Denver, Colo.; Divisions of Nephrology (Perlman, Swartz) and Palliative Care (Swartz), Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Scherer JS, O'Hare AM. Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders among Patients with ESKD Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit: A Bird's Eye View. J Am Soc Nephrol 2020; 31:2232-2234. [PMID: 32866110 DOI: 10.1681/asn.2020081160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer S Scherer
- Division of Nephrology, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York.,Division of Geriatrics and Palliative Care, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York
| | - Ann M O'Hare
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington .,Hospital and Specialty Medicine Service, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
O'Hare AM, Butler CR, Taylor JS, Wong SPY, Vig EK, Laundry RS, Wachterman MW, Hebert PL, Liu CF, Rios-Burrows N, Richards CA. Thematic Analysis of Hospice Mentions in the Health Records of Veterans with Advanced Kidney Disease. J Am Soc Nephrol 2020; 31:2667-2677. [PMID: 32764141 DOI: 10.1681/asn.2020040473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2020] [Accepted: 06/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with advanced kidney disease are less likely than many patients with other types of serious illness to enroll in hospice. Little is known about real-world clinical decision-making related to hospice for members of this population. METHODS We used a text search tool to conduct a thematic analysis of documentation pertaining to hospice in the electronic medical record system of the Department of Veterans Affairs, for a national sample of 1000 patients with advanced kidney disease between 2004 and 2014 who were followed until October 8, 2019. RESULTS Three dominant themes emerged from our qualitative analysis of the electronic medical records of 340 cohort members with notes containing hospice mentions: (1) hospice and usual care as antithetical care models: clinicians appeared to perceive a sharp demarcation between services that could be provided under hospice versus usual care and were often uncertain about hospice eligibility criteria. This could shape decision-making about hospice and dialysis and made it hard to individualize care; (2) hospice as a last resort: patients often were referred to hospice late in the course of illness and did not so much choose hospice as accept these services after all treatment options had been exhausted; and (3) care complexity: patients' complex care needs at the time of hospice referral could complicate transitions to hospice, stretch the limits of home hospice, and promote continued reliance on the acute care system. CONCLUSIONS Our findings underscore the need to improve transitions to hospice for patients with advanced kidney disease as they approach the end of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann M O'Hare
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington .,Hospital and Specialty Medicine, Geriatrics and Extended Care and Seattle-Denver Health Services Research and Development Center for Innovation, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
| | | | - Janelle S Taylor
- Department of Anthropology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Susan P Y Wong
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.,Hospital and Specialty Medicine, Geriatrics and Extended Care and Seattle-Denver Health Services Research and Development Center for Innovation, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
| | - Elizabeth K Vig
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.,Hospital and Specialty Medicine, Geriatrics and Extended Care and Seattle-Denver Health Services Research and Development Center for Innovation, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
| | - Ryan S Laundry
- Hospital and Specialty Medicine, Geriatrics and Extended Care and Seattle-Denver Health Services Research and Development Center for Innovation, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
| | - Melissa W Wachterman
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Veterans Affairs Boston Health Care System, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Paul L Hebert
- Hospital and Specialty Medicine, Geriatrics and Extended Care and Seattle-Denver Health Services Research and Development Center for Innovation, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington.,Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Chuan-Fen Liu
- Hospital and Specialty Medicine, Geriatrics and Extended Care and Seattle-Denver Health Services Research and Development Center for Innovation, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington.,Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Nilka Rios-Burrows
- Chronic Kidney Disease Initiative, Division of Diabetes Translation, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Claire A Richards
- Hospital and Specialty Medicine, Geriatrics and Extended Care and Seattle-Denver Health Services Research and Development Center for Innovation, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington.,School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Butler CR, Taylor JS, Reese PP, O'Hare AM. Thematic analysis of the medical records of patients evaluated for kidney transplant who did not receive a kidney. BMC Nephrol 2020; 21:300. [PMID: 32711468 PMCID: PMC7382039 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-020-01951-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2020] [Accepted: 07/15/2020] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Background A potential pitfall of policies intended to promote referral for kidney transplant is that greater numbers of patients may be evaluated for transplant without experiencing the intended benefit of receiving a kidney. Little is known about the potential implications of this experience for patients. Methods We performed a thematic analysis of clinician documentation in the electronic medical records of all adults at a single medical center with advanced kidney disease who were referred to the local transplant coordinator for evaluation between 2008 and 2018 but did not receive a kidney. Results 148 of 209 patients referred to the local kidney transplant coordinator at our center (71%) had not received a kidney by the end of follow-up. Three dominant themes emerged from qualitative analysis of documentation in the medical records of these patients: 1) Forward momentum: patients found themselves engaged in an iterative process of testing and treatment that tended to move forward unless an absolute contraindication to transplant was identified or patients disengaged; 2) Potential for transplant shapes other medical decisions: engagement in the transplant evaluation process could impact many other aspects of patients’ care; and 3) Personal responsibility and psychological burden for patients and families: clinician documentation suggested that patients felt personally responsible for the course of their evaluation and that the process could take an emotional toll on them and their family members. Conclusions Engagement in the kidney transplant evaluation process can be a significant undertaking for patients and families and may impact many other aspects of their care. Policies to promote referral for kidney transplant should be coupled with efforts to strengthen shared decision-making to ensure that the decision to undergo transplant evaluation is framed as an explicit choice with benefits, risks, and alternatives and patients have an opportunity to shape their involvement in this process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine R Butler
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine and the Kidney Research Institute, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, Campus Box 356521, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
| | - Janelle S Taylor
- Department of Anthropology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Peter P Reese
- Renal-Electrolyte & Hypertension Division and Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ann M O'Hare
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine and the Kidney Research Institute, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, Campus Box 356521, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.,Nephrology Section, Hospital and Specialty Medicine and Seattle-Denver Health Services Research and Development Center of Innovation, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Butler CR, Vig EK, O'Hare AM, Liu CF, Hebert PL, Wong SPY. Ethical Concerns in the Care of Patients with Advanced Kidney Disease: a National Retrospective Study, 2000-2011. J Gen Intern Med 2020; 35:1035-1043. [PMID: 31654358 PMCID: PMC7174459 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-019-05466-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2019] [Revised: 07/26/2019] [Accepted: 09/19/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Understanding ethical concerns that arise in the care of patients with advanced kidney disease may help identify opportunities to support medical decision-making. OBJECTIVE To describe the clinical contexts and types of ethical concerns that arise in the care of patients with advanced kidney disease. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS A total of 28,568 Veterans with advanced kidney disease between 2000 and 2009 followed through death or 2011. EXPOSURE Clinical scenarios that prompted clinicians to consider an ethics consultation as documented in the medical record. MAIN MEASURES Dialysis initiation, dialysis discontinuation, receipt of an intensive procedure during the final month of life, and hospice enrollment. KEY RESULTS Patients had a mean age of 67.1 years, and the majority were male (98.5%) and white (59.0%). Clinicians considered an ethics consultation for 794 patients (2.5%) over a median follow-up period of 2.7 years. Ethical concerns involved code status (37.8%), dialysis (54.5%), other invasive treatments (40.6%), and noninvasive treatments (61.1%) and were related to conflicts between patients, their surrogates, and/or clinicians about treatment preferences (79.3%), who had authority to make healthcare decisions (65.9%), and meeting the care needs of patients versus obligations to others (10.6%). Among the 20,583 patients who died during follow-up, those for whom clinicians had considered an ethics consultation were less likely to have been treated with dialysis (47.6% versus 62.0%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.63, 95% CI 0.53-0.74), more likely to have discontinued dialysis (32.5% versus 20.9%, aOR 2.07, CI 1.61-2.66), and less likely to have received an intensive procedure in the last month of life (8.9% versus 18.9%, aOR 0.41, CI 0.32-0.54) compared with patients without documentation of clinicians having considered consultation. CONCLUSIONS Clinicians considered an ethics consultation for patients with advanced kidney disease in situations of conflicting preferences regarding dialysis and other intensive treatments, especially when these treatments were not pursued.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine R Butler
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | - Elizabeth K Vig
- Geriatrics and Extended Care, VA Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle, WA, USA.,Division of Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Ann M O'Hare
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.,Health Service Research and Development Center of Innovation, VA Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Chuan-Fen Liu
- Health Service Research and Development Center of Innovation, VA Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle, WA, USA.,Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Paul L Hebert
- Health Service Research and Development Center of Innovation, VA Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle, WA, USA.,Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Susan P Y Wong
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.,Health Service Research and Development Center of Innovation, VA Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
O'Hare AM, Kurella Tamura M, Lavallee DC, Vig EK, Taylor JS, Hall YN, Katz R, Curtis JR, Engelberg RA. Assessment of Self-reported Prognostic Expectations of People Undergoing Dialysis: United States Renal Data System Study of Treatment Preferences (USTATE). JAMA Intern Med 2019; 179:1325-1333. [PMID: 31282920 PMCID: PMC6618699 DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.2879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Prognostic understanding can shape patients' treatment goals and preferences. Patients undergoing dialysis in the United States have limited life expectancy and may receive end-of-life care directed at life extension. Little is known about their prognostic expectations. OBJECTIVE To understand the prognostic expectations of patients undergoing dialysis and how these relate to care planning, goals, and preferences. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Cross-sectional survey study of 996 eligible patients treated with regular dialysis at 31 nonprofit dialysis facilities in 2 metropolitan areas (Seattle, Washington, and Nashville, Tennessee) between April 2015 and October 2018. After a pilot phase, 1434 eligible patients were invited to participate (response rate, 69.5%). To provide a context for interpreting survey participants' prognostic estimates, United States Renal Data System standard analysis files were used to construct a comparison cohort of 307 602 patients undergoing in-center hemodialysis on January 1, 2006, and followed for death through July 31, 2017. Final analyses for this study were conducted between November 2018 and March 2019. EXPOSURES Responses to the question "How long would you guess people your age with similar health conditions usually live?" (<5 years, 5-10 years, >10 years, or not sure). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Self-reported (1) documentation of a surrogate decision-maker, (2) documentation of treatment preferences, (3) values around life prolongation, (4) preferences for receipt of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and mechanical ventilation, and (5) desired place of death. RESULTS Of the 996 survey respondents, the mean (SD) age was 62.7 (13.9) years, and 438 (44.0%) were women. Overall, 112 (11.2%) survey respondents selected a prognosis of fewer than 5 years, 150 (15.1%) respondents selected 5 to 10 years, 330 (33.1%) respondents selected more than 10 years, and 404 (40.6%) were not sure. By comparison, 185 427 (60.3%) prevalent US in-center patients undergoing hemodialysis died within 5 years, 58 437 (19.0%) died within 5 to 10 years, and 63 738 (20.7%) lived more than 10 years. In analyses adjusted for participant characteristics, survey respondents with a prognostic expectation of more than 10 years (vs <5 years) were less likely to report documentation of a surrogate decision-maker (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.6; 95% CI, 0.4-0.9) and treatment preferences (aOR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-0.6) and to value comfort over life extension (aOR, 0.1; 95% CI, 0.04-0.3), and were more likely to want cardiopulmonary resuscitation (aOR, 5.3; 95% CI, 3.2-8.7) and mechanical ventilation (aOR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.2-3.7). The respondents who reported that they were not sure about prognosis had similar associations. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Uncertain and overly optimistic prognostic expectations may limit the benefit of advance care planning and contribute to high-intensity end-of-life care in patients undergoing dialysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann M O'Hare
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.,Kidney Research Institute, University of Washington, Seattle.,VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
| | - Manjula Kurella Tamura
- Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, California.,Division of Nephrology, Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California
| | | | - Elizabeth K Vig
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.,VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
| | | | - Yoshio N Hall
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.,Kidney Research Institute, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Ronit Katz
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.,Kidney Research Institute, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - J Randall Curtis
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.,Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Ruth A Engelberg
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.,Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence, University of Washington, Seattle
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Wong SPY, Boyapati S, Engelberg RA, Thorsteinsdottir B, Taylor JS, O'Hare AM. Experiences of US Nephrologists in the Delivery of Conservative Care to Patients With Advanced Kidney Disease: A National Qualitative Study. Am J Kidney Dis 2019; 75:167-176. [PMID: 31570175 DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2019] [Accepted: 07/05/2019] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE It is relatively unusual for US patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) to forgo initiation of maintenance dialysis. Our objective was to describe practice approaches of US nephrologists who have provided conservative care for members of this population. STUDY DESIGN Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS A national sample of 21 nephrologists experienced in caring for patients with advanced CKD who decided not to start dialysis. ANALYTICAL APPROACH Grounded theory methods to identify dominant themes reflecting nephrologists' experiences with and approaches to conservative care for patients with advanced CKD. RESULTS Nephrologists who participated in this study were primarily from academic practices (n=14) and urban areas (n=15). Two prominent themes emerged from qualitative analysis reflecting nephrologists' experiences with and approaches to conservative care: (1) person-centered practices, which described a holistic approach to care that included basing treatment decisions on what mattered most to individual patients, framing dialysis as an explicit choice, being mindful of sources of bias in medical decision making, and being flexible to the changing needs, values, and preferences of patients; and (2) improvising a care infrastructure, which described the challenges of managing patients conservatively within health systems that are not optimally configured to support their needs. Participating nephrologists described cobbling together resources, assuming a range of different health care roles, preparing patients to navigate health systems in which initiation of dialysis served as a powerful default, and championing the principles of conservative care among their colleagues. LIMITATIONS The themes identified likely are not generalizable to most US nephrologists. CONCLUSIONS Insights from a select group of US nephrologists who are early adopters of conservative care signal the need for a stronger cultural and health system commitment to building care models capable of supporting patients who choose to forgo dialysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan P Y Wong
- Kidney Research Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Health Services Research and Development Center, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA; Division of Nephrology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
| | | | - Ruth A Engelberg
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | | | - Janelle S Taylor
- Department of Anthropology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Ann M O'Hare
- Kidney Research Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Health Services Research and Development Center, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA; Division of Nephrology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Saran R, Robinson B, Abbott KC, Agodoa LYC, Bhave N, Bragg-Gresham J, Balkrishnan R, Dietrich X, Eckard A, Eggers PW, Gaipov A, Gillen D, Gipson D, Hailpern SM, Hall YN, Han Y, He K, Herman W, Heung M, Hirth RA, Hutton D, Jacobsen SJ, Jin Y, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Kapke A, Kovesdy CP, Lavallee D, Leslie J, McCullough K, Modi Z, Molnar MZ, Montez-Rath M, Moradi H, Morgenstern H, Mukhopadhyay P, Nallamothu B, Nguyen DV, Norris KC, O'Hare AM, Obi Y, Park C, Pearson J, Pisoni R, Potukuchi PK, Rao P, Repeck K, Rhee CM, Schrager J, Schaubel DE, Selewski DT, Shaw SF, Shi JM, Shieu M, Sim JJ, Soohoo M, Steffick D, Streja E, Sumida K, Tamura MK, Tilea A, Tong L, Wang D, Wang M, Woodside KJ, Xin X, Yin M, You AS, Zhou H, Shahinian V. US Renal Data System 2017 Annual Data Report: Epidemiology of Kidney Disease in the United States. Am J Kidney Dis 2019; 71:A7. [PMID: 29477157 DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 483] [Impact Index Per Article: 96.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
46
|
Abstract
This cohort study examines the incidence of mortality 1 year after the start of hemodialysis in patients 65 years and older.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa W Wachterman
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Veterans Affairs Boston Health Care System, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ann M O'Hare
- Hospital and Specialty Medicine Service, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
| | - Omari-Khalid Rahman
- Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Karl A Lorenz
- Section of Palliative Care, Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Edward R Marcantonio
- Division of General Medicine, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Amy S Kelley
- Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Wong SPY, O'Hare AM. "Not Shared" Need Not Mean "Not Patient Centered": Deciding That a Patient Is Not a Candidate-Reply. JAMA Intern Med 2019; 179:852. [PMID: 31157853 DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.1237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Susan P Y Wong
- Health Service Research and Development Center, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington.,Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Ann M O'Hare
- Health Service Research and Development Center, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington.,Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Wang V, Coffman CJ, O'Hare AM, Maciejewski ML. Authors' Reply. J Am Soc Nephrol 2019; 30:1338-1339. [PMID: 31097610 DOI: 10.1681/asn.2019040402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Virginia Wang
- Health Services Research and Development, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina; .,Department of Population Health Sciences.,Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, and
| | - Cynthia J Coffman
- Health Services Research and Development, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina.,Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Ann M O'Hare
- Center for Health Services Research in Older Adults, Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington; and.,Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Matthew L Maciejewski
- Health Services Research and Development, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina.,Department of Population Health Sciences.,Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, and
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
O'Hare AM, Murphy E, Butler CR, Richards CA. Achieving a person-centered approach to dialysis discontinuation: An historical perspective. Semin Dial 2019; 32:396-401. [PMID: 30968459 DOI: 10.1111/sdi.12808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
In this essay, we describe the evolution of attitudes toward dialysis discontinuation in historical context, beginning with the birth of outpatient dialysis in the 1960s and continuing through the present. From the start, attitudes toward dialysis discontinuation have reflected the clinical context in which dialysis is initiated. In the 1960s and 1970s, dialysis was only available to select patients and concerns about distributive justice weighed heavily. Because there was strong enthusiasm for new technology and dialysis was regarded as a precious resource not to be wasted, stopping treatment had negative moral connotations and was generally viewed as something to be discouraged. More recently, dialysis has become the default treatment for advanced kidney disease in the United States, leading to concerns about overtreatment and whether patients' values, goals, and preferences are sufficiently integrated into treatment decisions. Despite the developments in palliative nephrology over the past 20 years, dialysis discontinuation remains a conundrum for patients, families, and professionals. While contemporary clinical practice guidelines support a person-centered approach toward stopping dialysis treatments, this often occurs in a crisis when all treatment options have been exhausted. Relatively little is known about the impact of dialysis discontinuation on the experiences of patients and families and there is a paucity of high-quality person-centered evidence to guide practice in this area. Clinicians need better insights into decision-making, symptom burden, and other palliative outcomes that patients might expect when they discontinue dialysis treatments to better support decision-making in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann M O'Hare
- University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.,VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
| | | | - Catherine R Butler
- University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.,VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
| | - Claire A Richards
- University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.,VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Freidin N, O'Hare AM, Wong SPY. Person-Centered Care for Older Adults With Kidney Disease: Core Curriculum 2019. Am J Kidney Dis 2019; 74:407-416. [PMID: 30982551 DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.01.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2018] [Accepted: 01/31/2019] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
This Core Curriculum article models a person-centered approach to care for older adults with kidney disease. We provide background information on the principles of person-centered care and outline ways in which this approach contrasts with the more disease-based approaches that dominate current medical education and practice. Using hypothetical cases, we discuss 3 clinical scenarios that arise commonly when caring for older adults with kidney disease: (1) a moderate reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate, (2) new-onset nephrotic-range proteinuria, and (3) the prospect of starting dialysis. For each scenario, we summarize relevant available evidence and model what a person-centered approach might look like. In discussing each scenario, we highlight: (1) the considerable heterogeneity in clinical presentation, circumstances, priorities, and values that exist among older adults with kidney disease; (2) the importance of interpreting available evidence and clinical practice guidelines in the context of what is relevant to each patient; (3) methods for grounding discussions about care and treatment options in the realities of each patient's situation and what is most meaningful to them; and (4) the importance of setting aside one's own biases and practice style to ensure that patients' own values and goals guide their care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie Freidin
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington and VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA
| | - Ann M O'Hare
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington and VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA.
| | - Susan P Y Wong
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington and VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|