Management of patients with hepatitis B who require immunosuppressive therapy

Clinical correlation and survival analysis of hepatitis B virus infection in oral squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective study of 1373 patients

BACKGROUND

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection poses a significant global public health challenge and is found closely related to extrahepatic cancers, including head and neck cancer. Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is the major category of head and neck cancer. This retrospective study was conducted to explore the clinical correlation and survival analysis of OSCC patients with HBV.

METHODS

The study involved 1,373 patients with OSCC treated at the Hospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University from 2012 to 2022. Propensity score matching was used to analyze the clinical correlations and survival outcomes, specifically overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), in patients with or without hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seropositivity. Subgroup analyses were conducted for both the early and advanced stages of OSCC. The benefits of neck dissection in OSCC patients with HBV infection were further investigated.

RESULTS

The prevalence of HBV infection in our cohort was 12.0%. The HBsAg (+) group had a higher percentage of individuals under 60 (73.3% versus 63.7%, p = 0.016). Post-matching for age, sex, pathological T category, pathological N category, and neck dissection, the OSCC patients with HBsAg (+) had lower 5-year OS and DFS rates rather than HBsAg (-) patients, especially those with advanced stage and cervical lymph node metastasis. HBsAg (-) was confirmed as an independent protective prognostic indicator for both OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.34-0.79; p = 0.002) and DFS (HR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.50-0.96; p = 0.027). Notably, elective neck dissection was recognized as an independent protective factor influencing 5-year OS and DFS. While DOI and pathological N category were both confirmed as the risk factors for prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

HBsAg is a potential prognostic marker for OSCC. It is essential to screen for HBV infection prior to initiating tumor treatment. Additionally, serological testing, antiviral prophylaxis and therapy play crucial roles in preventing HBV reactivation during the course of tumor treatment. In cases of early OSCC associated with HBV infection, elective neck dissection has been shown to reduce the rates of recurrence and metastasis significantly.

Epidemiology and clinical outcomes in skin and soft tissue nontuberculous mycobacteria infections: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are emerging pathogens responsible for increasing skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) globally. However, the diagnosis and treatment of NTM SSTIs face significant challenges due to the lack of standardized guidelines. This study reviewed the clinical characteristics, diagnostic challenges, and treatment outcomes of NTM SSTIs in a large cohort from a tertiary referral center in Beijing, China.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 142 patients diagnosed with NTM SSTIs at a tertiary hospital from 2014 to 2023. Data collected included clinical presentation, microbiologic and histopathologic findings, diagnostic methods, treatment regimens, and outcomes. The patients were categorized based on NTM species, and immunocompromised status.

RESULTS

The cohort included patients with various NTM species, with M. marinum, M. avium complex (MAC), and M. abscessus complex (MABC) being the most common. The number of patients with NTM infections increased annually (p < 0.01). Fifty-four patients (38.0 %) were immunocompromised. The likelihood of immunosuppression was significantly higher in the MAC group (90.0 %, p = 0.02) and M. kansasii group (80.0 %). The highest proportion of sporotrichosis-pattern lesions was observed in M. marinum infections (p = 0.03). MAC primarily caused extracutaneous disseminated infections (p = 0.05), and immunosuppressed patients were more likely to have extracutaneous infections (79.6 %, p = 0.01). Of the 41 disseminated infection cases, 17.1 % had prior pulmonary NTM infections later disseminated to the skin and had a significantly worse prognosis (p < 0.01). Most misdiagnosed cases (82.6 %) were initially considered skin tuberculosis and bacterial infections. Amikacin was the most consistently effective antibiotic, while resistance to cefoxitin and imipenem was common in MABC and M. chelonae. The MABC strains exhibited 40 % resistance to clarithromycin. Drug side effects occurred in 30.3 % of patients, with 8.5 % switching medications due to adverse impacts. The longest treatment duration was in M. kansasii cases (371.4 days, p = 0.03). Immunosuppressed patients received more drugs (Mean ± SD: 3.0 ± 0.9 vs 2.8 ± 0.7, p = 0.02), whereas showed a nonsignificant trend toward longer treatment durations.

CONCLUSIONS

The study highlighted significant challenges in differentiating NTM infections from other conditions and managing their diverse clinical manifestations. Enhanced diagnostic tools and standardized treatment guidelines are essential to improve patient outcomes and manage the increasing burden of NTM SSTIs.

Surveillance Following Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Loss: An Issue Requiring Attention

Due to the lack of agents that directly target covalently closed circular DNA and integrated HBV DNA in hepatocytes, achieving a complete cure for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) remains challenging. The latest guidelines recommend (hepatitis B surface antigen) HBsAg loss as the ideal treatment target for improving liver function, histopathology, and long-term prognosis. However, even after HBsAg loss, hepatitis B virus can persist, with a risk of recurrence, reactivation, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Therefore, follow-up and surveillance are still necessary. With increasing treatment options available for achieving HBsAg loss in patients with CHB, developing effective surveillance strategies has become crucial. Recent studies on outcomes following HBsAg loss provide new insights for refining current surveillance strategies, though further improvement is needed through long-term observation and follow-up.

Fulminant hepatitis in a hepatitis B surface antigen-positive patient with adult T-cell leukemia-lymphoma after mogamulizumab monotherapy

We report a case of fulminant hepatitis in a hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive patient with aggressive adult T-cell leukemia-lymphoma who received monotherapy with an anti-CCR4 monoclonal antibody, mogamulizumab, with decreased hepatitis B virus (HBV)- DNA levels by entecavir prophylaxis. Although HBV reactivation-related hepatitis was considered in the differential diagnosis, the patient did not meet the conventional criteria for HBV reactivation and was finally diagnosed with drug-induced hepatitis. Considering that the immunoenhancing effects of mogamulizumab can lead to HBV reactivation-related hepatitis in HBsAg-positive patients, we should differentiate drug-induced hepatitis from HBV reactivation, especially in patients receiving immunomodulatory drugs, if HBV-DNA levels are reduced by antiviral prophylaxis.

Preceding hepatitis B virus infection is highly prevalent in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder in Taiwan

BACKGROUND

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is an autoimmune inflammatory disease of the central nervous system, characterized by pathogenic anti-Aquaporin-4 antibodies (AQP4-Ab). Given that infections can trigger autoimmune responses, we investigated the association between Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and NMOSD.

METHODS

HBV and hepatitis C virus serologies were analyzed in 105 NMOSD patients, 85 multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, and 1,661 healthy Taiwanese controls. Participants were classified into four HBV infection statuses (acute, chronic, resolved, and never infected), and further grouped by vaccination status. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) for NMOSD development in individuals with chronic or resolved HBV infection.

RESULTS

Among those born before the Taiwan's universal vaccination program, 63.4 % of NMOSD patients had resolved HBV infection, compared to 30.6 % of MS patients and 16.4 % of controls. Resolved HBV infection was associated with a 2.3-fold increased risk for NMOSD development (95 % CI, 1.4-3.8), but not with MS risk. In the post-vaccination cohort, resolved HBV infection remained more frequent in NMOSD patients (8.7 %) than in MS (0 %) and controls (1.8 %). NMOSD patients with resolved HBV infection had later disease onset by 14.6 years and higher Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores compared to those without HBV infection, even after adjusting for age and sex (3.5 ± 1.9 vs. 2.2 ± 1.8, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Preceding HBV infection is prevalent among Taiwanese NMOSD patients and is associated with increased disease risk, older age at onset, and greater disability. Screening for HBV is essential for NMOSD patients, particularly in endemic regions.

Does the ultrasensitive HBsAg Next assay enhance Hepatitis B diagnosis? An evaluation of analytical performances

BACKGROUND

Accurate laboratory confirmation for Hepatitis B diagnosis and monitoring are crucial. Recently an ultrasensitive immunoassay test, the HBsAg Next (HBsAgNx), has been reported approximately eight times more sensitive than current HBsAg assays. The aim of our study was to assess the analytical performances of this new test.

METHODOLOGY

253 clinical samples from Saint Louis University Hospital were analyzed, splitted into four panels: (1) routine prospectively screening serums (n = 196), (2) retrospective serum samples before HBV reactivation (HBV-R) (n = 18), (3) occult HBV infection (OBI) (n = 10) and (4) a selection of wild type HBV genotypes (n = 29) RESULTS: Panel 1, showed robust agreement with the HBsAg Qualitative II (HBsAgQII) assay (Cohen's kappa = 0.83). Despite this agreement, 7 false positive with the HBsAgQII assay were found negative with HBsAgNx. One OBI was detected only with HBsAgNx. Panel 2 showed potential time savings in diagnosing HBV-R using HBsAgNx among 4/18 HBsAg positives samples. Panel 3 highlighted the ability of HBsAgNx to detect HBsAg in OBI patients defined by negative for HBsAg with HBsAgQII assay and positive for HBV DNA. Furthermore, the HBsAgNx assay detected all different genotypes.

CONCLUSION

The study highlights the effectiveness of the HBsAgNx assay, showing its performance. It excels in detecting weakly positive samples and addressing challenging cases. HBsAgNx assay demonstrates promising analytical performances, with improved sensitivity and specificity compared to standard HBsAgQII assay, able to detect all genotypes. Its potential impact on early detecting and monitoring reactivations, and occult infections could be very useful in clinical practice.

Management of infections for patient treated with ibrutinib in clinical practice

Ibrutinib, a highly effective inhibitor of the Bruton tyrosine kinase, has significantly transformed the therapeutic approach in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Despite these advancements, the disease continues to be characterized by immune dysfunction and increased susceptibility to infections, with mortality rates from infections showing no significant improvement over the past few decades. Therefore, timely prevention, recognition, and treatment of infections remains an important aspect of the standard management of a patient with CLL. A panel of hematologists with expertise in CLL met to discuss existing literature and clinical insights for the management of infectious in CLL undergoing ibrutinib treatment. Despite not being a fully comprehensive review on the topic, this work provides a set of practical recommendations that can serve as a guide to healthcare professionals who manage these patients in their daily clinical practice.

Acute liver failure: A practical update

Acute liver failure is a rare and dynamic condition, with a broad aetiology and an incompletely understood pathophysiology. Management of this life-threatening disease requires critical care and organ support and frequently early liver transplantation. Proper identification, prevention and treatment of complications such as intracranial hypertension and sepsis are critical to optimising outcomes. The identification of the cause of acute liver failure and the prompt initiation of the aetiological treatment can also improve prognosis. Survival has progressively improved in parallel to advances in medical treatment. Intracranial hypertension complicating hepatic encephalopathy is less frequent than in the past and intracranial pressure monitoring now relies on non-invasive techniques. Current prognostic models have good accuracy to identify patients who will die without liver transplantation but are not able to identify those in whom transplantation is futile. New prognostic markers to select patients for transplantation are still in the pipeline. Therapeutic plasma exchange and, in some centers, early renal replacement therapy are well established treatments for the disease. The use of other artificial liver devices in clinical practice is not supported by evidence. This review is intended to provide a clinical update on the management of acute liver failure, incorporating the most recent advances in the field.

Paclitaxel-induced Immune Dysfunction and Activation of Transcription Factor AP-1 Facilitate Hepatitis B Virus Replication

Background and Aims

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation is commonly observed in individuals with chronic HBV infection undergoing antineoplastic drug therapy. Paclitaxel (PTX) treatment has been identified as a potential trigger for HBV reactivation. This study aimed to uncover the mechanisms of PTX-induced HBV reactivation in vitro and in vivo, which may inform new strategies for HBV antiviral treatment.

Methods

The impact of PTX on HBV replication was assessed through various methods including enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, dual-luciferase reporter assay, quantitative real-time PCR, chromatin immunoprecipitation, and immunohistochemical staining. Transcriptome sequencing and 16S rRNA sequencing were employed to assess alterations in the transcriptome and microbial diversity in PTX-treated HBV transgenic mice.

Results

PTX enhanced the levels of HBV 3.5-kb mRNA, HBV DNA, HBeAg, and HBsAg both in vitro and in vivo. PTX also promoted the activity of the HBV core promoter and transcription factor AP-1. Inhibition of AP-1 gene expression markedly suppressed PTX-induced HBV reactivation. Transcriptome sequencing revealed that PTX activated the immune-related signaling networks such as IL-17, NF-κB, and MAPK signaling pathways, with the pivotal common key molecule being AP-1. The 16S rRNA sequencing revealed that PTX induced dysbiosis of gut microbiota.

Conclusions

PTX-induced HBV reactivation was likely a synergistic outcome of immune suppression and direct stimulation of HBV replication through the enhancement of HBV core promoter activity mediated by the transcription factor AP-1. These findings propose a novel molecular mechanism, underscoring the critical role of AP-1 in PTX-induced HBV reactivation.

Chronic hepatitis B and occult infection in chemotherapy patients - evaluation in oncology and hemato-oncology settings: The CHOICE study

BACKGROUND

Reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a well-known risk that can occur spontaneously or following immunosuppressive therapies, including cancer chemotherapy. HBV reactivation can cause significant morbidity and even mortality, which are preventable if at-risk individuals are identified through screening and started on antiviral prophylaxis.

AIM

To determine the prevalence of chronic HBV (CHB) and occult HBV infection (OBI) among oncology and hematology-oncology patients undergoing chemotherapy.

METHODS

In this observational study, the prevalence of CHB and OBI was assessed among patients receiving chemotherapy. Serological markers of HBV infection [hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)/anti-hepatitis B core antigen (HBc)] were evaluated for all patients. HBV DNA levels were assessed in those who tested negative for HBsAg but positive for total anti-HBc.

RESULTS

The prevalence of CHB in the study cohort was determined to be 2.3% [95% confidence interval (95%CI): 1.0-4.2]. Additionally, the prevalence of OBI among the study participants was found to be 0.8% (95%CI: 0.2-2.3).

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study highlight the importance of screening for hepatitis B infection in oncology and hematology-oncology patients undergoing chemotherapy. Identifying individuals with CHB and OBI is crucial for implementing appropriate antiviral prophylaxis to prevent the reactivation of HBV infection, which can lead to increased morbidity and mortality.

Risk of Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation in Patients with Resolved Infection on Therapy with Corticosteroids and Conventional Synthesis Immunosuppressants for Kidney Disease: A Single-Center Analysis of 258 Patients

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The risk of hepatitis B virus reactivation in patients with a previously resolved hepatitis B virus infection on therapy with corticosteroids and conventional synthesis immunosuppressants for kidney disease has not been well described.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective study on the risk of hepatitis B virus reactivation in patients with a previously resolved hepatitis B virus infection on therapy with corticosteroids and conventional synthesis immunosuppressants for kidney disease between January 2012 and December 2021 in the Department of Nephrology at Ruijin Hospital.

RESULTS

A total of 258 patients with a previously resolved hepatitis B virus infection [all treated with high-dose corticosteroids, of whom 192 were receiving corticosteroids combined with conventional synthesis immunosuppressant therapy, including cyclophosphamide (155), cyclosporine A (14), mycophenolate mofetil (14), and tacrolimus (9)] were enrolled. During a mean follow-up time of 21.66 months (range 9-70 months), hepatitis B virus reactivation was not observed in these patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with a previously resolved hepatitis B virus infection on therapy with corticosteroids and conventional synthesis immunosuppressants for kidney disease, hepatitis B virus reactivation was not common and severe, suggesting that universal prophylaxis may not be justified or cost-effective in this clinical setting.

Universal Viral Screening of Patients with Newly Diagnosed Cancer in the United States: A Cost-efficiency Evaluation

Recommendations for universal screening of patients with cancer for hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are inconsistent. A recent multisite screening study (S1204) from the SWOG Cancer Research Network found that a substantial number of patients with newly diagnosed cancer had previously unknown viral infections. The objective of this study was to determine the cost-efficiency of universal screening of patients with newly diagnosed cancer. We estimated the cost-efficiency of universal screening of new cancer cases for HBV, HCV, or HIV, expressed as cost per virus detected, from the health care payer perspective. The prevalence of each virus among this cohort was derived from S1204. Direct medical expenditures included costs associated with laboratory screening tests. Costs per case detected were estimated for each screening strategy. Secondary analysis examined the cost-efficiency of screening patients whose viral status at cancer diagnosis was unknown. Among the possible options for universal screening, screening for HBV alone ($581), HCV alone ($782), HBV and HCV ($631) and HBV, HCV, and HIV ($841) were most efficient in terms of cost per case detected. When screening was restricted to patients with unknown viral status, screening for HBV alone ($684), HBV and HCV ($872), HBV and HIV ($1,157), and all three viruses ($1,291) were most efficient in terms of cost per newly detected case. Efficient viral testing strategies represent a relatively modest addition to the overall cost of managing a patient with cancer. Screening for HBV, HCV, and HIV infections may be reasonable from both a budget and clinical standpoint.

SIGNIFICANCE

Screening patients with cancer for HBV, HCV, and HIV is inconsistent in clinical practice despite national recommendations and known risks of complications from viral infection. Our study shows that while costs of viral screening strategies vary by choice of tests, they present a modest addition to the cost of managing a patient with cancer.

Hepatitis B reactivation in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy shows promise as a treatment option for various cancers. However, there is growing concern over potential complications from hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation after checkpoint blockade immunotherapy. Although most of the previous clinical trials on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) excluded patients with HBV, a few case reports and retrospective studies of HBV reactivation have been published. The aim of this study is to assess the risk of hepatitis B virus reactivation (HBVr) in patients receiving ICIs for advanced cancer.

METHODS

English and Chinese language literature published prior to April 30, 2023, was searched in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane, SinoMed, CNKI and Wanfang Data for studies reporting HBVr rates in cancer patients treated with ICIs. A pooled risk estimate was calculated for HBVr rates with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

Data from 34 studies including 7126 patients were retrieved and analyzed. The pooled HBVr rate in cancer patients treated with ICIs was 1.3% (I2 = 90.44%, 95% CI: 0.2-2.9%, P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed that patients diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), HBV carriers, and patients from Asian regions or in developing countries have a higher rate of HBVr.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis demonstrated a low risk of HBVr in patients treated with ICIs for advanced cancer. ICI treatment may be safely used in patients with existing HBV infection or chronic hepatitis B, accompanied by regular monitoring and appropriate antiviral prophylaxis if necessary.

ALSUntangled #67: rituximab

ALSUntangled reviews alternative and off-label treatments on behalf of people with ALS who ask about them. Here we review rituximab, a drug which specifically depletes B lymphocytes. We show a current lack of evidence for a role of these cells in ALS progression. The one patient we found who described using Rituximab for their ALS found no benefit. Given all this, and the known serious risks of rituximab, we advise against its use as an ALS treatment.

Hepatitis B virus reactivation in seronegative occult hepatitis B patient receiving ibrutinib therapy

BACKGROUND

Ibrutinib is a Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor approved for the treatment for several mature B-cell malignancies. Reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a well-described complication in patients with chronic HBV infection or prior HBV exposure undergoing cytotoxic or immunosuppressive chemotherapy for hematologic malignancies. This phenomenon has been frequently reported with rituximab. However, published data on the risk of HBV reactivation induced by ibrutinib are scarce. Cases of HBV reactivation in hematologic patients receiving ibrutinib therapy have recently been described, but limited only to overt hepatitis B patients or seropositive occult hepatitis B patients.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report the first case of HBV reactivation during ibrutinib treatment in an asymptomatic 82-year-old woman with seronegative occult hepatitis B patient (i.e., negative for HBsAg, anti-HBc and anti-HBs). Four months after ibrutinib treatment, her liver function test (LFT) was deranged, with seroconversion to HBsAg positivity. Serum hepatitis B virus DNA was quantified to be 1.92 × 10⁸ IU/ml. Antiviral treatment was initiated, and viral load was gradually suppressed with improvement in LFT.

CONCLUSIONS

Our case illustrated that in populations with a high incidence of HBV exposure, systematic screening for HBV exposure is essential prior to ibrutinib treatment, followed by serial monitoring of serologic and molecular markers of hepatitis B. There is a need for an international consensus to support the recommendation of antiviral prophylaxis against HBV reactivation in patients using ibrutinib.

A Prospective Study of Preemptive Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Therapy in HBsAg-Positive Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Receiving Rituximab Plus Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine, and Prednisone

INTRODUCTION

This prospective study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of preemptive antiviral therapy with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) for HBsAg-positive patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma receiving rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) chemotherapy.

METHODS

We enrolled 73 patients from 20 institutions. The primary end point was the absolute risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related hepatitis during preemptive TDF therapy and for 24 weeks after withdrawal from TDF. Hepatitis was defined as a more than 3-fold increase in serum alanine aminotransferase from baseline or an alanine aminotransferase level of ≥100 U/L. HBV-related hepatitis was defined as hepatitis with an increase in serum HBV-DNA to >10 times that of the pre-exacerbation baseline or an absolute increase of ≥20,000 IU/mL compared with the baseline.

RESULTS

No patient developed HBV reactivation or HBV-related hepatitis during preemptive antiviral therapy (until 48 weeks after completion of R-CHOP chemotherapy) with TDF. All adverse events were grade 1 or 2. HBV reactivation was reported in 17 (23.3%) patients. All HBV reactivation was developed at a median of 90 days after withdrawal from TDF (range, 37-214 days). Six (8.2%) patients developed HBV-related hepatitis at a median of 88 days after withdrawal from TDF (range, 37-183 days).

DISCUSSION

Preemptive TDF therapy in HBsAg-positive patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma receiving R-CHOP chemotherapy was safe and effective for preventing HBV-related hepatitis. However, a long-term maintenance strategy of preemptive TDF therapy should be recommended because of the relatively high rate of HBV-related hepatitis after withdrawal from TDF ( ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02354846).

New Perspectives on Development of Curative Strategies for Chronic Hepatitis B

A functional cure of chronic hepatitis B defined as sustained hepatitis B surface antigen loss after finite course of therapy is rarely achieved with current therapy but is the goal of novel treatments. Understanding the virological and immunological mechanisms of hepatitis B virus persistence has enabled the identification of novel treatment targets, drug discovery, and the evaluation of novel agents in clinical trials. Lessons were learned from early phase 1 and phase 2 trials regarding the antiviral activity and safety profile of these agents. There is a strong rationale to combine agents to reduce viral replication, reduce viral antigen load, invigorate immune responses, and induce specific adaptive immune responses. Nucleos(t)ide analogs will likely remain an essential backbone of future combinations to control viral replication and prevent resistance to antiviral drugs. In this review, we discuss perspectives on approaches to achieving functional cure, with a review of virological and immunological strategies, highlighting challenges and unresolved questions with the various attempts to achieve cure, as well as exploring alternative endpoints such as partial cure and new noninvasive viral and immunological biomarkers to stratify patients and predict/monitor antiviral response.

Hepatitis B

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a major public health problem, with an estimated 296 million people chronically infected and 820 000 deaths worldwide in 2019. Diagnosis of HBV infection requires serological testing for HBsAg and for acute infection additional testing for IgM hepatitis B core antibody (IgM anti-HBc, for the window period when neither HBsAg nor anti-HBs is detected). Assessment of HBV replication status to guide treatment decisions involves testing for HBV DNA, whereas assessment of liver disease activity and staging is mainly based on aminotransferases, platelet count, and elastography. Universal infant immunisation, including birth dose vaccination is the most effective means to prevent chronic HBV infection. Two vaccines with improved immunogenicity have recently been approved for adults in the USA and EU, with availability expected to expand. Current therapies, pegylated interferon, and nucleos(t)ide analogues can prevent development of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma, but do not eradicate the virus and rarely clear HBsAg. Treatment is recommended for patients with cirrhosis or with high HBV DNA levels and active or advanced liver disease. New antiviral and immunomodulatory therapies aiming to achieve functional cure (ie, clearance of HBsAg) are in clinical development. Improved vaccination coverage, increased screening, diagnosis and linkage to care, development of curative therapies, and removal of stigma are important in achieving WHO's goal of eliminating HBV infection by 2030.

Hepatitis B virus reactivation associated with Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors: a retrospective study of pharmacovigilance databases and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Recently, there have been clinical reports of hepatitis B virus reactivation (HBVr) related with Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors. However, there were no studies to investigate the association between HBVr and different JAK inhibitors.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This study was a retrospective review utilizing the FAERS pharmacovigilance database and a systematic literature search for all cases of HBVr reported with JAK inhibitors. Disproportionality analysis and Bayesian analysis were used in data detection to screen the suspected HBVr after the administration of different JAK inhibitors, based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) pharmacovigilance database from Q4 2011 to Q1 2022.

RESULTS

There were a total number of 2097 (0.02%) reports of HBVr in FAERS, of which 41 (1.96%) were associated with JAK inhibitors. Baricitinib appeared to have the strongest signal among four JAK inhibitors, based on the highest reporting odds ratio (ROR = 4.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.67-11.89). Ruxolitinib also showed signals, whereas no signals were detected among Tofacitinib and Upadacitinib.

CONCLUSION

While there may be an association between JAK inhibitors and HBVr, it appears to be a numerically uncommon occurrence. Further studies are needed to optimize the safety profiles of JAK inhibitors.

Hepatitis B flare: the good, the bad and the ugly

INTRODUCTION

Hepatitis B flare, defined as an event of abrupt ALT elevation to >5x ULN, is a frequent episode during the natural course or during/after antiviral therapy of chronic HBV infection, in both HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients with chronic hepatitis B or liver cirrhosis.

AREAS COVERED

The definition, pathogenesis, clinical presentation, and management of hepatitis B flares in the published literature were reviewed. Hepatitis B flares have been considered as a result of the robust immune response of the patient to an upsurging HBV/HBV-antigen(s). 'Host-dominating flares,' reflect effective immune response, may resolve with ALT normalization and decline of HBV/ antigen(s). Contradictorily, 'virus-dominating flares,' reflect ineffective immune response, are usually followed by persistent/intermittent hepatitis and may even develop hepatic decompensation/failure.

EXPERT OPINION

Not all hepatitis B flares require antiviral therapy, and close observation with combined HBsAg/ALT kinetics along the ascending ALT during hepatitis flare may differentiate hepatitis flares for an appropriate treatment/retreatment decision. More studies are needed to verify this proposal. Further immunologic studies using multiple samples during hepatitis B flare are important to clarify the precise underlying mechanisms as the basis for further improvement in the management of hepatitis flare.

Efficacy and Renal Safety of Prophylactic Tenofovir Alafenamide for HBV-Infected Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy

There are no data comparing the efficacy and safety of prophylactic entecavir (ETV), tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) for HBV-infected cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and renal safety of ETV, TDF and TAF in this setting. HBsAg-positive cancer patients treated with ETV (n = 582), TDF (n = 200) and TAF (n = 188) during chemotherapy were retrospectively enrolled. Antiviral efficacy and risk of renal events were evaluated. The rate of complete viral suppression at 1 year was 94.7%, 94.7% and 96.1% in ETV, TDF and TAF groups, respectively (p = 0.877). A significant proportion of patients developed renal dysfunction during chemotherapy. The incidences of acute kidney injury (AKI) and chronic kidney disease stage migration were comparable among the ETV, TDF and TAF groups. TAF was relatively safe in patients with predisposing factors of AKI, including hypoalbuminemia and cisplatin use. In patients who were switched from TDF to TAF during chemotherapy, the renal function remained stable and viral suppression was well maintained after switching. In conclusion, TAF had good renal safety and comparable efficacy with ETV and TDF for HBV-infected cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Switching from TDF to TAF during chemotherapy is safe, without a loss of efficacy.

Hepatitis B Surface Antibody (Anti-HBs) Kinetics during Rituximab Chemotherapy and Performance of Hepatitis B Vaccine before Immunosuppression: Two Prospective Studies

Rituximab promotes strong immunosuppression leading to a high risk of hepatitis B reactivation (HBV-R) and chronic infection. Current recommendations on HBV-R prevention are expensive and poorly individualized. In resolved hepatitis B patients, previous studies suggest that anti-HBs titers before immunosuppression can predict HBV-R risk. However, guidelines claim that additional data are necessary before recommending spare drug prophylaxis in patients with high anti-HBs titers. On the other hand, in patients with no previous contact with HBV, guidelines recommend vaccine before immunosuppression despite minimal evidence available. To shed light on these knowledge gaps, two prospective studies were conducted to evaluate anti-HBs in hematological cancer patients treated with rituximab. In the first study, anti-HBs-positive patients were referred for following up antibody titers before and during immunosuppression. Patients with anti-HBs ≥ 100 mIU/mL before immunosuppression had no negative seroconversion (anti-HBs loss), in contrast to 18% of those with anti-HBs < 100 mIU/mL. In the second study, patients with no previous contact with HBV were invited to receive HBV vaccine before rituximab chemotherapy. None seroconverted with anti-HBs. In conclusion, both studies reinforce the need to review concepts about HBV prevention during immunosuppression on current guidelines. Narrowing the use of drug prophylaxis and improving vaccine indications are recommended.

HBV Reactivation in Patients with Past Infection Affected by Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma and Treated with Anti-CD20 Antibody Based Immuno-Chemotherapy: A Multicenter Experience

Hepatitis B virus reactivation (HBVr) can develop in HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) positive or HBsAg-negative and anti-hepatitis B core antigen antibodies (anti-HBc) positive (past HBV infection) patients receiving immuno-chemotherapy for hematological malignancies. A higher rate of HBVr is associated with the use of rituximab (R) in patients with past HBV infection, thus justifying an antiviral prophylaxis. In this study we evaluated the incidence of HBVr in a real-life cohort of 362 anti-HBc-positive subjects affected by non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), mainly receiving lamivudine (LAM) prophylaxis (93%) and all undergoing a R-containing regimen. A retrospective, multicenter, observational study was conducted in 4 Italian Hematology Departments. The primary endpoint was the incidence of virologic (HBV DNA-positive), serologic (HBsAg-positive) and clinical (ALT increase > 3 × upper limit of normal) HBVr, which occurred in five, four and one patients, respectively, with a total HBVr rate of 1.4%. None of them had to discontinue the chemotherapy program, while two patients required a delay. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were reported during LAM prophylaxis in three patients (0.9%). In conclusion, this study confirms the efficacy and safety of LAM prophylaxis in anti-HBc-positive patients undergoing R-containing regimens.

Hepatitis B virus reactivation in rheumatoid arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disease characterized by proliferative synovitis, which can cause cartilage and bone damage as well as functional limitations. Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs have significantly improved the prognosis of RA patients. However, people with RA, when combined with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, may experience reactivation of HBV during treatment with anti-rheumatic drugs. The outcome of HBV reactivation (HBVr) varies from liver inflammation to liver failure, while insufficient HBV screening in RA patients has been reported in various countries. Therefore, it is necessary to identify patients at high risk before starting immunosuppressive therapy. The immune response plays an important role in anti-HBV infection. However, most anti-rheumatic drugs exert an inhibitory effect on the body's immune system, resulting in HBVr. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct a comprehensive evaluation based on host factors, viral factors, and drug factors. In this paper, we summarize the mechanism of HBVr, the risk of HBVr caused by anti-rheumatic drugs, and the appropriate diagnosis and treatment process for RA patients so that clinicians can have a more comprehensive understanding of HBVr in RA patients.

Average corticosteroid dose and risk for HBV reactivation and hepatitis flare in patients with resolved hepatitis B infection

OBJECTIVES

Corticosteroids remain the mainstay of treatment for rheumatic diseases but can cause hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in patients with resolved HBV infection. Risk assessment and stratification are needed to guide the management of these patients before corticosteroid therapy.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled patients with negative hepatitis B surface antigen positive Anti-hepatitis B core status with or without corticosteroid use and determined corticosteroid exposure by calculating cumulative dose and time-weighted average daily dose of prednisone. The primary outcome was the time to a composite of HBV reactivation, hepatitis flare or severe hepatitis.

RESULTS

Among 1303 participants, the median of cumulative dose and time-weighted average dose of prednisone used in this cohort was 3000 mg (IQR: 300-6750 mg) and 15 mg/day (IQR: 10-20 mg/day), respectively. In multivariable analyses, cumulative dose showed inverted V-shaped relationship with primary events, which peaked at a cumulative dose of 1506 mg (HR: 3.72; 95% CI, 1.96 to 7.08). Quartiles of time-weighted average dose were independently associated with a monotonic increase in event risk (HR per quartile increase: 2.15; 95% CI, 1.56 to 2.98), reaching an HR of 49.48 (95% CI, 6.24 to 392.48) in the top quartile. The incidence of primary outcome was 16.67 per 100 person-years in the top quartile of time-weighted average dose (Q4>20 mg/day). Other quartiles all had an incidence of primary outcome less than 10 per 100 person-years.

CONCLUSION

Patients with time-weighted average prednisone dose greater than 20 mg/day would be classified as the high risk for HBV reactivation or hepatitis flare. Prophylactic Anti-HBV therapy may be needed for these high-risk patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR1900023955.

Hepatitis B virus reactivation: overview and management

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) can hide in the liver in the form of covalently closed circular DNA. When the body’s immunity changes, HBV reactivation (HBV-R) can occur. The risk of HBV-R is determined by the complex interaction among virological factors, medication factors and host factors. However, many patients do not know that they are infected with HBV, and doctors often do not invest enough time to systematically evaluate the patient’s HBV-R risk factors before immunosuppressive treatment. Therefore, HBV clinical screening should be vigorously promoted to achieve early detection and early prevention for patients with high risk of HBV-R. The mechanism, clinical features, risk factors, HBV-R under different disease etiologies, prevention and treatment of HBV-R were summarized to improve the in-depth understanding and awareness.

Hepatitis B Virus Infection in Patients Receiving Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Considering a steady increase in the number of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantations (allo-HSCT) worldwide and the significant proportion of the world’s population that has been exposed to hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, HBV reactivation following allo-HSCT remains an important issue for post-transplant morbidity and mortality. Antiviral prophylaxis can reduce HBV replication, severity of HBV-related hepatitis, and mortality; therefore, identification of patients at risk is crucial. It is recommended that all recipients and donors should be screened for active or prior HBV infection, including HBsAg, antiHBc, and antiHBs. Adoptive immunity transfer from the donor seems to have protective effects against HBV reactivation. Antiviral prophylaxis should be initiated in all HBsAg-positive patients. HBsAg-negative, antiHBc-positive patients remain at risk; therefore, antiviral prophylaxis should be considered if baseline serum HBV DNA is detectable. In HBsAg-negative, antiHBc-positive patients without detectable HBV DNA, close monitoring of viral load with an on-demand therapy is necessary. Entecavir or tenofovir rather than lamivudine are more appropriate for the emergence of lamivudine resistance. The treatment duration remains unclear, with 6- to 12-month therapy after cessation of immunosuppressive therapy commonly recommended. Here we review the updated evidence and recent recommendations regarding HBV reactivation in patients undergoing allo-HSCT for individualized therapy.

Novel strategies for the early diagnosis of hepatitis B virus reactivation

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation under systemic chemotherapy or immunosuppressive therapy is a serious complication among HBV-resolved patients. Some medications, such as more than 2 weeks of corticosteroid therapy, can influence HBV reactivation; therefore, screening tests that measure hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B core antibody, and hepatitis B surface antibody before therapy are required. Additionally, because HBV reactivation has been reported in patients positive for HBsAg treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), the prophylactic administration of nucleos(t)ide analogues prior to administering ICIs is recommended for HBsAg-positive patients. Under these circumstances, highly sensitive novel biomarkers are expected to be used for the early diagnosis of HBV reactivation. A fully automated high-sensitivity HBsAg assay (detection limit: 5 mIU/ml) by Lumipulse HBsAg-HQ, with 10-fold higher sensitivity than that of conventional assays, is currently used. Furthermore, ultra-sensitive HBsAg assays using a semi-automated immune complex transfer chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay (ICT-CLEIA; detection limit: 0.5 mIU/ml) have been developed. Recently, a fully automated, novel high-sensitivity hepatitis B core-related antigen assay (iTACT-HBcrAg; cut-off value: 2.1 Log U/mL) has been developed and reported. The utility of ICT-CLEIA and iTACT-HBcrAg for the diagnosis of HBV reactivation appears comparable to the use of HBV DNA. In this review, we provide the latest information related to medications that influence HBV reactivation and recently developed novel biomarkers that predict and monitor HBV reactivation.

Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of PEGylated Interferon-α2b Treatment in Inactive Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Carriers

Introduction

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is associated with the onset of several major liver diseases. Inactive hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) carriers (IHCs) may be successfully treated with PEGylated interferon-α2b (PEG-IFNα2b)-based antiviral therapy; however, studies on this treatment have been insufficient. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of PEG-IFNα2b treatment in IHCs.

Methods

Nineteen IHCs were treated with subcutaneous PEG-IFNα2b (180 μg/week) for 48 weeks (treatment group). Patients were followed up for 24 weeks after treatment discontinuation. Twenty untreated control patients were observed for 72 weeks (control group). HBsAg clearance (HBsAg < 0.05 IU/mL), HBsAg seroconversion, and alanine aminotransferase levels were monitored.

Results

Of the 19 patients treated with PEG-IFNα2b, 16 showed HBsAg loss (84.2%), and 13 showed HBsAg seroconversion (68.4%) at 72 weeks. All patients in the treatment group exhibited virological response (serum HBV DNA level < 10 IU/mL) at the time of drug withdrawal. In the control group, no patients experienced HBsAg loss during the observational period. There were no serious adverse events during treatment, and the therapy was well tolerated.

Conclusions

Short PEG-IFNα2b therapy in IHCs produced a high functional cure rate and good safety profile, suggesting that PEG-IFNα2b treatment may be the best choice for clinical cure of some IHCs.

Prevention of hepatitis B reactivation in patients requiring chemotherapy and immunosuppressive therapy

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation can lead to severe acute hepatic failure and death in patients with HBV infection. HBV reactivation (HBVr) most commonly develops in patients undergoing cancer chemotherapy, especially B cell-depleting agent therapy such as rituximab and ofatumumab for hematological or solid organ malignancies and that receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation without antiviral prophylaxis. In addition, the potential consequences of HBVr is particularly a concern when patients are exposed to either immunosuppressive or biologic therapies for the management of rheumatologic diseases, inflammatory bowel disease and dermatologic diseases. Thus, screening with HBV serological markers and prophylactic or pre-emptive antiviral treatment with nucleos(t)ide analogues should be considered in these patients to diminish the risk of HBVr. This review discusses the clinical manifestation, prognosis and management of HBVr, risk stratifications of cancer chemotherapy and immunosuppressive therapy and international guideline recommendations for the prevention of HBVr in patients with HBV infection and resolved hepatitis B.

Management of hepatitis B virus infection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease under immunosuppressive treatment

Hepatitis B remains a significant global clinical problem, despite the implementation of safe and effective vaccination programs. The prevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) largely follows the regional epidemiologic status. Serological screening with hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), and antibodies to hepatitis B surface (anti-HBs) and core (anti-HBc) proteins is a key element in the management of IBD patients and, ideally, should be performed at IBD diagnosis. Stratification of individual cases should be done according to the serologic profile and the IBD-specific treatment, with particular emphasis in patients receiving immunosuppressive regimens. In patients who have not contracted HBV, vaccination is indicated to accomplish protective immunity. Vaccination in immunosuppressed patients, however, is a challenging issue and several strategies for primary and revaccination have been proposed. The risk of HBV reactivation in patients with IBD should be considered in both HBsAg-positive and HBsAg-negative/anti-HBc-positive patients, when immunosuppressive therapies are administered. HBV reactivation is preventable via the administration of prophylactic nucleot(s)ide analogues and should be the standard approach in HBsAg-positive patients. HBsAg-negative/anti-HBc-positive patients represent a non-homogeneous group and bear a significantly lower risk of HBV reactivation. Biochemical, serological and molecular monitoring is currently the recommended approach for anti-HBc patients. Acute HBV infection is rarely reported in IBD patients. In the present review, we outline the problems associated with HBV infection in patients with IBD and present updated evidence for their management.

Fatal Hepatitis C after Chemotherapy in a Patient with Malignant Lymphoma: Possible Reactivation of Seronegative Occult Hepatitis C Virus Infection Due to Chemotherapy

A 79-year-old man with lymphoma who tested negative for anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody received rituximab-containing chemotherapy. Liver dysfunction of unknown cause had persisted since the second cycle of chemotherapy. Ten months after treatment, he rapidly developed massive ascites and atrophy of the liver, and we detected HCV RNA in his serum using real time polymerase chain reaction. Furthermore, medical interviews showed that the patient had no episodes for acute HCV infection, but he did have a history of unspecified liver dysfunction. These findings support the possibility of the reactivation of seronegative occult HCV infection due to chemotherapy in a cancer patient.

Prophylactic antiviral therapy for hepatitis B virus surface antigen-positive patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with rituximab-containing chemotherapy

We conducted a nationwide retrospective analysis of 116 hepatitis B virus (HBV) surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and 278 HBsAg-negative patients with DLBCL, as a control cohort, who received rituximab-containing regimens as an induction chemotherapy at 30 Japanese medical centers between January 2004 and December 2014. Hepatitis was defined as an absolute serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level of ≥100 U/L. HBV reactivation-related hepatitis was defined as hepatitis with an absolute serum HBV DNA level of ≥3.3 log IU/mL or an absolute increase of ≥2 log compared with the baseline value. HBsAg-positive patients were divided into three groups based on anti-HBV prophylactic therapy: no nucleos(t)ide analogue (non-NA, n = 9), lamivudine (LAM, n = 20), and entecavir (ETV, n = 87). The 4-year cumulative incidence (CI) of hepatitis in HBsAg-positive and HBsAg-negative patients was 21.1% and 14.6% (P = .081), respectively. The 4-year CI of HBV reactivation-related hepatitis was higher in HBsAg-positive patients than in HBsAg-negative patients (8.0% vs 0.4%; P < .001). Among HBsAg-positive patients, the 4-year CI of HBV reactivation-related hepatitis was the highest in the non-NA group (33.3%), followed by the LAM (15.0%) and ETV (3.8%) groups (P < .001). Of note, 3 non-NA patients (33%) and 1 LAM patient (5%) (but no ETV patients) died due to HBV hepatitis. Based on Cox multivariate analysis, HBsAg positivity was not associated with poor overall survival. Prophylactic use of ETV would reduce the occurrence of HBV reactivation-related hepatitis and mortality in HBsAg-positive DLBCL patients receiving rituximab-containing chemotherapy.

Hepatitis B virus reactivation in cancer patients receiving direct-acting antivirals for hepatitis C virus infection

Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) against hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection can cause hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in HBV/HCV co-infected patients. Cancer patients undergoing immunosuppressant treatment or chemotherapy are at risk for HBV reactivation. To our knowledge, no prospective studies have examined the risk of HBV reactivation during DAA treatment for HCV infection in cancer patients with HBV/HCV co-infection. Here, we report the results of one such study. In a prospective observational study, we enrolled HCV-infected cancer patients undergoing DAA treatment at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center between January 2015 and March 2018. Data regarding demographics, cancer history, and prior HCV treatment history were collected. Patients were assessed for HBV status before DAA treatment and for HBV-related outcomes, including HBV reactivation, hepatitis flare, and HBV-associated hepatitis, during DAA treatment. Demographic and treatment variables were analyzed using descriptive statistics. One hundred sixty-six patients were analyzed. Forty-eight patients received systemic chemotherapy within 6 months before to 6 months after treatment with DAAs. Ledipasvir plus sofosbuvir was the most common DAA regimen, administered to 88 patients (53%). Fifty-one patients (31%) had past HBV infection, and 4 (2.4%) had chronic HBV infection. No patient experienced HBV reactivation, hepatitis flare, or HBV-associated hepatitis induced by DAA treatment. In HCV-infected cancer patients, DAA treatment is safe regardless of whether patients have past or chronic HBV infection. However, HBV screening is still recommended before the initiation of and during DAA treatment, as is anti-HBV prophylactic treatment in selected cases.

Safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of TQ-A3334, an oral toll-like receptor 7 agonist in healthy individuals

BACKGROUND & AIMS

TQ-A3334, a selective, oral toll-like receptor (TLR)-7 agonist, is being developed to treat chronic hepatitis B (CHB). This study evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of TQ-A3334 in healthy participants.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

The effects of a single-ascending dose of TQ-A3334 (0.2-1.8 mg) combined with food (1.2 mg) were evaluated in 48 healthy participants.

RESULTS

No serious adverse events or discontinuations occurred in the study. The most common adverse reactions were lymphocyte count decreased and headache, which were generally consistent with IFN-α exposure and the mechanism of action of a TLR7 agonist. TQ-A3334 was rapidly absorbed, with a time to maximum plasma concentration of 0.42-0.5 h. Systemic exposure (C_max and AUC) to TQ-A3334 increased with a slight saturation proportion to dose. Food reduced the exposure of TQ-A3334. The concentrations of MCP-1, ISG-15, MX-1, and OAS-1 were observed to be slightly dose-dependent, ranging from 1.0 to 1.8 mg TQ-A3334.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral doses of 0.2-1.8 mg appeared to be safe and tolerated. PD activity was seen at doses ranging from 1.0 to 1.8 mg, indicating its possible future use to treat CHB.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial is registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial website (http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn/index.html # CTR20182248).

COVID-19 Among Patients With Hepatitis B or Hepatitis C: A Systematic Review

Context: Hepatic manifestations of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) are common among people living with Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) and Hepatitis C Virus (HCV). Objectives: This systematic review aimed to summarize the evidence on COVID-19 patients living with HBV or HCV co-infections. Data Sources: We searched multiple electronic databases and preprint servers from December 1, 2019, to August 9, 2020. Study Selection: Studies were included if they reported quantitative empirical data on COVID-19 patients living with HBV or HCV co-infections. Data Extraction: Descriptive analyses were reported, and data were synthesized narratively. The quality assessment was completed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools. Results: Out of the 941 uniquely identified records, 27 studies were included. Of the eligible studies, 232 COVID-19 patients were living with HBV and 22 were living with HCV. Most patients were male, and the mean age was 49.8 and 62.8 years in patients living with HBV and HCV, respectively. Among the reported cases of SARS-CoV-2-HBV co-infection, the proportions of death were 4.7% and 15% in cross-sectional and case series/report studies, respectively. The death proportion was 8.3% among the reported cases of SARS-CoV-2-HCV co-infection. Among COVID-19 patients, 34.1% and 76.2% reported at least one comorbidity besides HBV and HCV infections, mainly hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus. The most common COVID-19-related symptoms in both HBV and HCV groups were fever, cough, dyspnea, fatigue, and gastrointestinal symptoms. Conclusions: While understanding the pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 requires further investigations, the careful assessment of hepatic manifestations and chronic infections, such as HBV and HCV upon the admission of COVID-19 patients could help reduce multimorbidity among HBV or HCV patients and lead to more favorable health outcomes among them.

Second Mexican consensus on biologic therapy and small-molecule inhibitors in inflammatory bowel disease

INTRODUCTION

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic and incurable entity. Therapy with anti-TNF-α agents was the first biologic therapy approved in Mexico for IBD. New biologic agents, such as vedolizumab and ustekinumab, have recently been added, as have small-molecule inhibitors.

AIM

To update the biologic therapeutic approach to IBD in Mexico with new anti-TNF-α agents and novel biologics whose mechanisms of action induce and maintain remission of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis (UC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Mexican specialists in the areas of gastroenterology and inflammatory bowel disease were summoned to participate. The consensus was divided into 3 modules, with 49 statements. The Delphi method was applied, sending the statements to all participants to be analyzed and edited, before the face-to-face meeting. During said meeting, the clinical studies were shown, emphasizing the level of clinical evidence, and the final discussion and voting round on the level of agreement of all the statements was conducted.

RESULTS

In this second Mexican consensus, recommendations are made for new anti-TNF-α agents, such as golimumab, new biologics with other mechanisms of action, such as vedolizumab and ustekinumab, as well as for the small-molecule inhibitor, tofacitinib.

CONCLUSIONS

The updated recommendations focus on patient-reported outcomes, biologic therapy, small-molecule inhibitors, and the safety aspects of each of the drugs.

Retrospective observational study of temporal trends and outcomes of hepatitis B screening in patients receiving rituximab

OBJECTIVE

Hepatitis B reactivation (HBr) is strongly associated with rituximab therapy. Guidelines advise hepatitis B screening and use of preventive nucleoside analogue (NA) in patients at risk. In this study, we examined screening trends, post-screening interventions and outcomes in patients receiving rituximab in light of recommendations.

DESIGN

Retrospective, observational study.

SETTING

Single, tertiary care centre in the USA.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients receiving rituximab from January 2005 to December 2017.

PRIMARY OUTCOME

Trends of hepatitis B screening prior to initiation of rituximab.

SECONDARY OUTCOME

Results of hepatitis B screening, use of preventive NA therapy and HBr incidence.

RESULTS

Over 13 years, 2219 patients received rituximab. Screening, with at least hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc) prior to the first dose of rituximab, improved from 20% to 97%. Because only 4.5% of patients had a positive anti-HBc, the overall HBr incidence was very low (0.42%). In susceptible patients, the incidence of HBr was 8%. In at-risk patients given preventive NA, 96% remained free of HBr. However, only 23% received a preventive NA and no temporal improvement in compliance was seen. Of those with HBr, 87.5% were hepatitis B surface antigen (HbsAg-)/anti-HBc+.

CONCLUSIONS

In those treated with rituximab, we demonstrated near-universal anti-HBc screening. Screening unlinked to preventive NA use, in those who are anti-HBc+, is ineffective in reducing HBr. HBr has a high fatality rate. The majority of cases occurred in those who were HBsAg negative. Efforts are needed to educate providers who use rituximab not only to screen for anti-HBc, but to provide preventive NA to those who test positive.

Prevalence of Hepatitis B Virus Markers in Patients with Autoimmune Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases in Italy

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection may be reactivated by immunosuppressive drugs in patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases. This study evaluates HBV serum markers' prevalence in rheumatic outpatients belonging to Spondyloarthritis, Chronic Arthritis and Connective Tissue Disease diagnostic groups in Italy. The study enrolled 302 subjects, sex ratio (M/F) 0.6, mean age ± standard deviation 57 ± 15 years, 167 (55%) of whom were candidates for immunosuppressive therapy. The Spondyloarthritis group included 146 subjects, Chronic Arthritis 75 and Connective Tissue Disease 83 (two patients had two rheumatic diseases; thus, the sum is 304 instead of 302). Ten subjects (3%) reported previous anti-HBV vaccination and tested positive for anti-HBs alone with a titer still protective (>10 IU/mL). Among the remaining 292 subjects, the prevalence of positivity for HBsAg, isolated anti-HBc, anti-HBc/anti-HBs, and any HBV marker was 2%, 4%, 18%, and 24%, respectively. A total of 26/302 (9%) patients with γ-globulin levels ≤0.7 g/dL were more frequently (p = 0.03455) prescribed immunosuppressive therapy, suggesting a more severe rheumatic disease. A not negligible percentage of rheumatic patients in Italy are at potential risk of HBV reactivation related to immunosuppressive therapy. Before starting treatment, subjects should be tested for HBV markers. Those resulting positive should receive treatment or prophylaxis with Nucleos (t) ides analogue (NUCs) at high barrier of resistance, or pre-emptive therapy, according to the pattern of positive markers. HB vaccination is recommended for those who were never exposed to the virus.

A case series of COVID-19 patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection

Previous studies reported that coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was likely to result in liver injury. However, few studies reported the impacts of COVID-19 on liver function in patients with chronic liver diseases. We aimed to describe a case series of COVID-19 patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Confirmed hospitalized COVID-19 patients from hospitals in 10 cities of Jiangsu province, China, were retrospectively included between 18 January 2020 and 26 February 2020. Demographic information, epidemiologic data, clinical features, and treatment data were extracted from medical records. Seven COVID-19 patients with chronic HBV infection were included. Six (85.7%) patients were male. The patients aged from 33 to 49 years. Two patients had HBV-related cirrhosis. One patient (14.3%) was positive for serum HBV e-antigen. On admission, 1 (14.3%) patient had mildly elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level (>40 U/L) and 1 (14.3%) had elevated aspartate aminotransferase (AST) level (>40 U/L). The serum albumin level and platelet counts were decreased in two patients with HBV-related liver cirrhosis. Three (42.9%) patients had elevated ALT level and 2 (28.6%) patients had elevated AST level in hospitalization. However, the peak ALT and AST level during hospitalization was 51 U/L and 44 U/L, respectively. As of 29 February 2020, all patients were discharged. No patient was admitted to the intensive care units or developed liver failure during hospitalization. The abnormalities of liver function are not uncommon on COVID-19 patients with chronic HBV infection in our case series. However, no patient developed severe liver-related complications during hospitalization.

Serum ammonia is a strong prognostic factor for patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure

Ammonia is thought to be central to the pathogenesis of hepatic encephalopathy (HE), but its prognostic role in acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is still unknown. We aimed to determine the association between serum ammonia level and short-term prognosis in ACLF. Furthermore, we performed an in-depth evaluation of the independent effect of serum ammonia level on the short-term prognosis of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation-induced ACLF patients. We identified 174 patients as part of prospective observational studies in patients with ACLF. Plasma ammonia levels were measured on admission, and several prognostic scores were used to determine the prognostic effect of ammonia. The 28-day patient survival was determined. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to identify the cut-off points for ammonia values, and multivariable analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazard regression model. Plasma ammonia was significantly higher in nonsurvivors (83.53 ± 43.78 versus 67.13 ± 41.77 µmol/L, P = 0.013), and ACLF patients with hyperammonemia had significantly higher 28-day mortality than those without hyperammonemia. Ammonia was also closely related to ACLF grade (P < 0.001) and organ failure, including liver (P = 0.048), coagulation (P < 0.001) and brain (P < 0.001). HBV reactivation serves as the main precipitating factor in the ACLF population. Subgroup analysis showed that ammonia is also a strong prognostic factor in the HBV reactivation-induced ACLF population. Ammonia level is closely correlated with failure of other organs and is an independent risk factor for mortality in ACLF and the special population defined as HBV reactivation-related ACLF. Based on the results from our study, we measured serum ammonia in the population with ACLF, which strongly indicates their prognosis. It serves as an important biomarker and a therapeutic target.

Screening siRNAs against host glycosylation pathways to develop novel antiviral agents against hepatitis B virus

AIM

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) relies on glycosylation for crucial functions, such as entry into host cells, proteolytic processing and protein trafficking. The aim of this study was to identify candidate molecules for the development of novel antiviral agents against HBV using an siRNA screening system targeting the host glycosylation pathway.

METHODS

HepG2.2.15.7 cells that consistently produce HBV were employed for our in vitro study. We investigated the effects of siRNAs that target 88 different host glycogenes on hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and HBV DNA secretion using the siRNA screening system.

RESULTS

We identified four glycogenes that reduced HBsAg and/or HBV DNA secretion; however, the observed results for two of them may be due to siRNA off-target effects. Knocking down ST8SIA3, a member of the sialyltransferase family, significantly reduced both HBsAg and HBV DNA secretion. Knocking down GALNT7, which transfers N-acetylgalactosamine to initiate O-linked glycosylation in the Golgi apparatus, also significantly reduced both HBsAg and HBV DNA levels.

CONCLUSIONS

These results showed that knocking down the ST8SIA3 and GALNT7 glycogenes inhibited HBsAg and HBV DNA secretion in HepG2.2.15.7 cells, indicating that the host glycosylation pathway is important for the HBV life cycle and could be a potential target for the development of novel anti-HBV agents.