Blast phase myeloproliferative neoplasm: Mayo-AGIMM study of 410 patients from two separate cohorts

Outcomes of intensive and nonintensive blast-reduction strategies in accelerated and blast-phase MPN

ABSTRACT

Transformation of BCR::ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) to an accelerated or blast phase is associated with poor outcomes. The efficacy of acute myeloid leukemia (AML)-type intensive and nonintensive hypomethylating agent-based regimens is not well studied. We therefore performed a retrospective analysis of patients with MPN-AP/BP (N = 138) treated with intensive (N = 81) and nonintensive (N = 57) blast-reduction strategies. We used clinically relatable response criteria developed at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre. The overall best response, comprising complete remission (CR), complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi), and reversion to chronic phase MPN (cMPN), in the intensive and nonintensive groups was 77% (62 of 81) and 39% (21 of 54), respectively. Similar overall best response rates were observed in patients receiving induction with daunorubicin combined with cytarabine arabinoside (daunorubicin + ara-C) (74% [23 of 31]) or FLAG-IDA/NOVE-HiDAC (78% [39 of 50], P = .78). However, patients receiving daunorubicin + ara-C more often required second inductions (29% [9 of 31] vs 4% [2 of 50], P = .002). Most responses in the entire cohort were reversions to cMPN (55 of 83 [66%]). CR and CRi comprised 30% (25 of 83) and 4% (3 of 83) of responses, respectively. Mutations in TP53 (overall response [OR] 8.2 [95% confidence interval [CI] 2.01, 37.1], P = .004) and RAS pathway (OR 5.1 [95%CI 1.2, 23.7], P = .03) were associated with inferior treatment response for intensively treated patients, and poorer performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) was associated with inferior treatment response in both intensively (OR 10.4 [95% CI 2.0, 78.5], P = .009) and nonintensively treated groups (OR 12 [95% CI 2.04, 230.3], P = .02). In patients with paired samples before and after therapy (N = 26), there was a significant residual mutation burden remaining irrespective of response to blast-reduction therapy.

STAT5a and SH2B3 novel mutations display malignancy roles in a triple-negative primary myelofibrosis patient

Primary myelofibrosis (PMF) patients frequently have JAK2 (V617F), CALR (exon 9), or MPL (W515 or exon 10) strong driver gene mutation, which triggers abnormal activation of the JAK2-STATs signaling pathway that plays a complex role in the occurrence of PMF. However, about 10-15% of PMF patients have no above typical mutations in these strong driver genes, known as being "triple-negative", which are associated with poor prognosis. In this paper, we reported a unique secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML) case transformed from triple-negative PMF combined with lung cancer and erythroderma occurrence at the same time, which has not been reported so far. Through whole blood exome sequencing, four novel noncanonical mutations were detected in key regulatory genes SH2B3 (Q748 and S710) and STAT5a (C350 and K354). Meanwhile, STAT5a-S710 and SH2B3-K354 noncanonical mutations gained strong malignant biofunction on promoting cell growth and tumorigenesis by accelerating the G1/S transition. In the mechanistic study, these pernicious phenotypes driven by noncanonical mutations might be initial PMF by activating p-STAT5a/c-Myc/CyclinD1 and p-STAT3/p-AKT/p-ERK1/2 signaling axes. Therefore, our study explored the deleterious roles of novel noncanonical mutations in STAT5a and SH2B3, which may serve as susceptibility genes and display the oncogenic biofunction in the progression of PMF to acute myeloid leukemia-M2a (AML-M2a).

Efficacy and safety of combination therapies vs monotherapy of hypomethylating agents in accelerated or blast phase of Philadelphia negative myeloproliferative neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of evidence regarding whether combination therapy of hypomethylating agents (HMAs) has better outcomes than HMA monotherapy in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-negative accelerated or blast phase myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN-AP/BP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane library databases were searched for studies from inception of each database until 31 December 2021. Data extraction and synthesis were conducted following the PRISMA reporting guideline.

RESULTS

It was found that HMAs plus venetoclax therapy yielded a higher CR/CRi rate than HMAs alone [36% vs 19%, p = .0204] and a higher CR rate than HMAs plus ruxolitinib [22% vs 8%, p = .0313]. HMAs plus ruxolitinib combination showed a higher ORR than HMA monotherapy [45% vs 30%, p = .0395], but there was no improvement in CR/CRi. The one-year and two-year OS rate for patients treated with HMAs plus venetoclx/ruxolitinib demonstrated a trend towards prolonged survival than HMAs alone [HMAs plus venetoclax: 24% vs 11%, p = .1295 and 12% vs 3%, p = .2357; HMAs plus ruxolitinib: 25% vs 11%, p = .0774 and 33% vs 3%, p = .051].

CONCLUSION

It was confirmed that HMA in combination with venetoclax is an effective and well-tolerated option in MPN-AP/BP patients in pre- as well as post-haematopoietic stem cell transplantation settings. HMA plus ruxolitinib therapy was revealed to be effective in patients with MPN-AP.Key MessagesCombination therapy with HMAs and venetoclax/ruxolitinib was associated with improved outcomes than HMAs alone in MPN-AP/BP patients.Further large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm regarding to the optimal treatment for this patient population.

A globally applicable "triple A" risk model for essential thrombocythemia based on Age, Absolute neutrophil count, and Absolute lymphocyte count

We examined the individual prognostic contribution of absolute neutrophil (ANC), lymphocyte (ALC), and monocyte (AMC) counts, on overall (OS), leukemia-free (LFS), and myelofibrosis-free (MFFS) survival in essential thrombocythemia (ET). Informative cases (N = 598; median age 59 years; females 62%) were retrospectively accrued from a Mayo Clinic database: JAK2 59%, CALR 27%, triple-negative 11%, and MPL 3%; international prognostic scoring system for ET (IPSET) risk high 21%, intermediate 42%, and low 37%; 7% (37/515) had abnormal karyotype and 10% (21/205) adverse mutations (SF3B1/SRSF2/U2AF1/TP53). At median 8.4 years, 163 (27%) deaths, 71 (12%) fibrotic, and 20 (3%) leukemic transformations were recorded. Multivariable analysis resulted in HR (95% CI) of 16.5 (9.9-27.4) for age > 70 years, 3.7 (2.3-6.0) for age 50-70 years, 2.4 (1.7-3.3) for ANC ≥8 × 109 /L, and 1.9 (1.4-2.6) for ALC <1.7 × 109 /L. The corresponding HR-based scores were 4, 2, 1, and 1, resulting in an new 4-tiered AgeAncAlc (AAA; triple A) risk model: high (5-6 points; median survival 8 years; HR 30.1, 95% CI 17.6-54), intermediate-2 (4 points; median 13.5 years; HR 12.7, 95% CI 7.1-23.0), intermediate-1 (2-3 points; median 20.7 years; HR 3.8, 95% CI 2.3-6.4) and low (0-1 points; median 47 years). The AAA model (Akaike Information Criterion [AIC] 621) performed better than IPSET (AIC 647) and was subsequently validated by an external University of Florence ET cohort (N = 485). None of the AAA variables predicted LFS while ALC <1.7 × 109 /L was associated with inferior MFFS (p = .01). Adverse mutations (p < .01) and karyotype (p < .01) displayed additional prognostic value without disqualifying the prognostic integrity of the AAA model. This study proposes a simple and globally applicable survival model for ET, which can be used as a platform for further molecular refinement. This study also suggests a potential role for immune-related biomarkers, as a prognostic tool in myeloproliferative neoplasms.

How I treat transplant-eligible patients with myelofibrosis

Despite the approval of Janus kinase inhibitors and novel agents for patients with myelofibrosis (MF), disease-modifying responses remain limited, and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains the only potentially curative treatment option. The number of HSCTs for MF continues to increase worldwide, but its inherent therapy-related morbidity and mortality limit its use for many patients. Furthermore, patients with MF often present at an older age, with cytopenia, splenomegaly, and severe bone marrow fibrosis, posing challenges in managing them throughout the HSCT procedure. Although implementation of molecular analyses enabled improved understanding of disease mechanisms and subsequently sparked development of novel drugs with promising activity, prospective trials in the HSCT setting are often lacking, making an evidence-based decision process particularly difficult. To illustrate how we approach patients with MF with respect to HSCT, we present 3 different clinical scenarios to capture relevant aspects that influence our decision making regarding indication for, or against, HSCT. We describe how we perform HSCT according to different risk categories and, furthermore, discuss our up-to-date approach to reduce transplant-related complications. Last, we show how to harness graft-versus-MF effects, particularly in the posttransplant period to achieve the best possible outcomes for patients.

Clonal dynamics and copy number variants by single-cell analysis in leukemic evolution of myeloproliferative neoplasms

Transformation from chronic (CP) to blast phase (BP) in myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) remains poorly characterized, and no specific mutation pattern has been highlighted. BP-MPN represents an unmet need, due to its refractoriness to treatment and dismal outcome. Taking advantage of the granularity provided by single-cell sequencing (SCS), we analyzed paired samples of CP and BP in 10 patients to map clonal trajectories and interrogate target copy number variants (CNVs). Already at diagnosis, MPN present as oligoclonal diseases with varying ratio of mutated and wild-type cells, including cases where normal hematopoiesis was entirely surmised by mutated clones. BP originated from increasing clonal complexity, either on top or independent of a driver mutation, through acquisition of novel mutations as well as accumulation of clones harboring multiple mutations, that were detected at CP by SCS but were missed by bulk sequencing. There were progressive copy-number imbalances from CP to BP, that configured distinct clonal profiles and identified recurrences in genes including NF1, TET2, and BCOR, suggesting an additional level of complexity and contribution to leukemic transformation. EZH2 emerged as the gene most frequently affected by single nucleotide and CNVs, that might result in EZH2/PRC2-mediated transcriptional deregulation, as supported by combined scATAC-seq and snRNA-seq analysis of the leukemic clone in a representative case. Overall, findings provided insights into the pathogenesis of MPN-BP, identified CNVs as a hitherto poorly characterized mechanism and point to EZH2 dysregulation as target. Serial assessment of clonal dynamics might potentially allow early detection of impending disease transformation, with therapeutic implications.

Updates on accelerated and blast phase myeloproliferative neoplasms: Are we making progress?

Management approaches for accelerated and blast phase myeloproliferative neoplasms remain challenging for clinicians and patients alike. Despite many therapeutic advances, outcomes for those patients who are not allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplant eligible remain, in general, very poor. Estimated survival rates for such blast phase patients is frequently reported as less than 6 months. No specific immunological, genomic or clinicopathological signature currently exists that accurately predicts the risk and timing of transformation, which frequently induces a high degree of anxiety among patients and clinicians alike. Within this review article, we provide an up-to-date summary of current understanding of the underlying pathogenesis of accelerated and blast phase disease and discuss current therapeutic approaches and realistic outcomes. Finally, we discuss how the horizon may look with the introduction of more novel agents into the clinical arena.

Blast phase myeloproliferative neoplasm with prior exposure to ruxolitinib: comparative analysis of mutations and survival

Not available.

Cost-effectiveness of ropeginterferon alfa-2b-njft for the treatment of polycythemia vera

Aim: Patients with polycythemia vera (PV), a rare and chronic blood cancer, are at a higher risk for thromboembolic events, progression to myelofibrosis, and leukemic transformation. In 2021, ropeginterferon alfa-2b-njft (BESREMi®) was approved in the US to treat adults with PV. The purpose of this study is to estimate the cost-effectiveness of ropeginterferon alfa-2b-njft, used as a first- or second-line treatment, for the treatment of patients with PV in the US. Materials & methods: A Markov cohort model was developed from the healthcare system perspective in the United States. Model inputs were informed by the PROUD-PV and CONTINUATION-PV studies and published literature. The model population included both low-risk and high-risk patients with PV. The model compared ropeginterferon alfa-2b-njft used either as first- or second-line versus an alternative treatment pathway of first-line hydroxyurea followed by ruxolitinib. Results: Over the modeled lifetime, ropeginterferon alfa-2b-njft provided an additional 0.4 higher quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and 0.4 life-years with an added cost of USD60,175, resulting in a cost per QALY of USD141,783. The model was sensitive to treatment costs, the percentage of patients who discontinue hydroxyurea, the percentage of ropeginterferon alfa-2b-njft users who switch to monthly dosing, the percentage of ropeginterferon alfa-2b-njft users as 2nd line treatment, and the treatment response rates. A younger patient age at baseline and a higher percentage of patients with low-risk disease improved the cost-effectiveness of ropeginterferon alfa-2b-njft. Conclusion: Ropeginterferon alfa-2b-njft is a cost-effective treatment option for a broad range of patients with PV, including both low- and high-risk patients and patients with and without prior cytoreductive treatment with hydroxyurea.

Incidence of blast phase in myelofibrosis according to anemia severity

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a clonal malignancy frequently characterized by anemia and in 10%-20% of cases it can evolve into blast phase (BP). Anemia in MF is associated with reduced survival and -in primary MF- also with an increased probability of BP. Conventional treatments for anemia have limited effectiveness in MF. Within a dataset of 1752 MF subjects largely unexposed to ruxolitinib (RUX), BP incidence was 2.5% patients per year (p-y). This rate reached respectively 4.3% and 4.5% p-y in case of patients with common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) grade 3/4 and grade 2 anemia, respectively, that represented together 32% of the cohort. Among 273 MF cases treated with RUX, BP incidence was 2.89% p-y and it reached 4.86% p-y in subjects who started RUX with CTCAE grade 2 anemia (one third of total). Within patients with red blood cell transfusion-dependency at 6 months of RUX (21% of the exposed), BP rate was 4.2% p-y. Our study highlights a relevant incidence of BP in anemic MF patients, with a similar rate whether treated with or without RUX. These findings will help treating physicians to make decisions on the safety profile of innovative anemia treatments.

Blast phase myeloproliferative neoplasm: contemporary review and 2024 treatment algorithm

Leukemic transformation in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), also referred to as "blast-phase MPN", is the most feared disease complication, with incidence estimates of 1-4% for essential thrombocythemia, 3-7% for polycythemia vera, and 9-13% for primary myelofibrosis. Diagnosis of MPN-BP requires the presence of ≥20% circulating or bone marrow blasts; a lower level of excess blasts (10-19%) constitutes "accelerated phase" disease (MPN-AP). Neither "intensive" nor "less intensive" chemotherapy, by itself, secures long-term survival in MPN-BP. Large-scale retrospective series have consistently shown a dismal prognosis in MPN-BP, with 1- and 3-year survival estimates of <20% and <5%, respectively. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (AHSCT) offers the possibility of a >30% 3-year survival rate and should be pursued, ideally, while the patient is still in chronic phase disease. The value of pre-transplant bridging chemotherapy is uncertain in MPN-AP while it is advised in MPN-BP; in this regard, we currently favor combination chemotherapy with venetoclax (Ven) and hypomethylating agent (HMA); response is more likely in the absence of complex/monosomal karyotype and presence of TET2 mutation. Furthermore, in the presence of an IDH mutation, the use of IDH inhibitors, either alone or in combination with Ven-HMA, can be considered. Pre-transplant clearance of excess blasts is desired but not mandated; in this regard, additional salvage chemotherapy is more likely to compromise transplant eligibility rather than improve post-transplant survival. Controlled studies are needed to determine the optimal pre- and post-transplant measures that target transplant-associated morbidity and post-transplant relapse.

Treating accelerated and blast phase myeloproliferative neoplasms: progress and challenges

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are a group of clonal hematologic malignancies that include polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and myelofibrosis (MF). MPNs are characterized by activating mutations in the JAK/STAT pathway and an increased risk of transformation to an aggressive form of acute leukemia, termed MPN-blast phase (MPN-BP). MPN-BP is characterized by the presence of ⩾20% blasts in the blood or bone marrow and is almost always preceded by an accelerated phase (MPN-AP) defined as ⩾10-19% blasts in the blood or bone marrow. These advanced forms of disease are associated with poor prognosis with a median overall survival (mOS) of 3-5 months in MPN-BP and 13 months in MPN-AP. MPN-AP/BP has a unique molecular landscape characterized by increased intratumoral complexity. Standard therapies used in de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have not demonstrated improvement in OS. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) remains the only curative therapy but is associated with significant morbidity and mortality and infrequently utilized in clinical practice. Therefore, an urgent unmet need persists for effective therapies in this advanced phase patient population. Here, we review the current management and future directions of therapy in MPN-AP/BP.

Outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant in patients diagnosed with blast phase of myeloproliferative neoplasms: A retrospective study from the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) provides the only potential route to long-term remission in patients diagnosed with blast phase transformation of myeloproliferative neoplasm (BP-MPN). We report on a large, retrospective European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry-based study of BP-MPN patients undergoing allo-HCT. BP-MPN patients undergoing first allo-HCT between 2005 and 2019 were included. A total of 663 patients were included. With a median follow-up of 62 months, the estimated 3-year overall survival (OS) was 36% (95% confidence interval [CI], 32-36). Factors associated with lower OS were Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) <90 (hazard ratio [HR] 1.65, p < .001) and active disease at allo-HCT (HR 1.45, p < .001), whereas patients undergoing allo-HCT more recently associated with a higher OS (HR 0.96, p = .008). In a selected patient's population, the 3-year OS of patients undergoing allo-HCT in complete response (CR) and with a KPS ≥90 was 60%. KPS < 90 (HR 1.4, p = .001) and active disease (HR 1.44, p = .0004) were associated with a lower progression-free survival (PFS). Conversely, most recent allo-HCT associated with a higher PFS (HR 0.96, p = .008). Active disease at allo-HCT (HR 1.34, p = .03) was associated with a higher cumulative incidence of relapse (RI) and allo-HCT in earlier calendar years (HR 0.96, p = .02) associated with a lower RI. Last, KPS < 90 (HR 1.91, p < .001), active disease (HR 1.74, p = .003) and allo-HCT from mismatched related donors were associated with a higher non-relapse mortality (HR 2.66, p = .003). In this large series of BP-MPN patients, about one third were alive at 3 years after transplantation. Patients undergoing allo-HCT in the more recent era, with a KPS ≥90 and in CR at transplant had a better prognosis.

Atypical chronic myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm, not otherwise specified: 2023 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management

DISEASE OVERVIEW

Atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (aCML) and myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative (MDS/MPN) neoplasms, not otherwise specified (NOS), are MDS/MPN overlap neoplasms characterized by leukocytosis, in the absence of monocytosis and eosinophilia, with <20% blasts in the blood and bone marrow.

DIAGNOSIS

aCML, previously known as aCML, BCR::ABL1 negative, was renamed as aCML by the ICC classification, and as MDS/MPN with neutrophilia by the 5th edition of the WHO classification. This entity is characterized by dysplastic neutrophilia with immature myeloid cells comprising ≥10% of the white blood cell count, with prominent dysgranulopoiesis. MDS/MPN-NOS consists of MDS/MPN overlap neoplasms not meeting criteria for defined categories such as chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), MDS/MPN-ring sideroblasts-thrombocytosis (MDS/MPN-RS-T), and aCML.

MUTATIONS AND KARYOTYPE

Cytogenetic abnormalities are seen in 40-50% of patients in both categories. In aCML, somatic mutations commonly encountered include ASXL1, SETBP1, ETNK1, and EZH2 whereas MDS/MPN-NOS can be further stratified by mutational profiles into CMML-like, MDS/MPN-RS-T-like, aCML-like, TP35-mutated, and "others", respectively.

RISK STRATIFICATION

The Mayo Clinic aCML model stratifies patients based on age >67 years, hemoglobin <10 g/dl, and the presence of TET2 mutations into low-risk (0-1 points) and high-risk (>2 points) groups, with median survivals of 18 and 7 months, respectively. MDS/MPN-NOS patients have traditionally been risk stratified using MDS risk models such as IPSS and IPSS-R.

TREATMENT

Leukocytosis and anemia are managed like lower risk MPN and MDS. DNMT inhibitors have been used in both entities with suboptimal response rates. Allogeneic stem cell transplant remains the only curative strategy but is associated with high morbidity and mortality.

Analysis of somatic mutations in the <i>JAK2</i>, <i>CALR</i>, <i>MPL</i> and <i>ASXL1</i> genes and evaluation of their impact on the survival of patients with myelofibrosis

Background. The development of myelofibrosis (MF) is driven by complex molecular genetic events that include driver somatic mutations responsible for the constitutive activation of the JAK/STAT signaling pathway (JAK2, CALR, and MPL), additional mutations affecting epigenetic regulators (TET2, ASXL1, IDH1/2, etc.) and RNA splicing (SRSF2, U2AF1, SF3B1, etc.), as well as genetic aberrations that contribute to genomic instability and disease progression.

Aim. To analyze driver (JAK2, CALR, MPL) and prognostic (ASXL1) somatic mutations in patients with MF and evaluate their impact on survival.

Materials and methods. The study included 29 patients diagnosed with MF, selected by hematologists from the City Clinical Hospital No. 7 and Regional Clinical Hospital (Krasnoyarsk).

Results. 26 (89.6 %) out of 29 examined patients had some driver mutations in JAK2, CALR, MPL genes. The p.V617F mutation in the JAK2 gene was found in 20 (68.9 %) patients. Mutations in the CALR gene were detected in 4 (13.8 %) patients, mutations in the MPL gene were found in 3 patients (10.3 %). In 1 of 26 patients, 2 driver mutations were present simultaneously. 3 (10.3 %) patients were triple negative. Mutations in the ASXL1 gene were detected in 12 (41.4 %) out of 29 examined patients. Conducted targeted NGS (next generation sequencing) for 13 out of 29 patients revealed additional genetic variants that contribute to the understanding of the development mechanism and disease course. When evaluating the overall survival in the groups of patients diagnosed with MF examined by us, depending on the combination of driver (JAK2, CALR, MPL) and prognostic (ASXL1) mutations, no statistically significant differences were found (p = 0.12). This appears to be due to the small sample size. At the same time, assessment of patient survival depending on ASXL1 status showed that in the presence of mutations in the ASXL1 gene, the median survival was 45 months (range 7–120 months), while in the absence of mutations it was 48 months (range 21–359 months) (p = 0.03).

Conclusion. The results obtained allow us to assume that the presence of mutations in the ASXL1 gene is an unfavorable factor in the course of the disease.

New Treatments for Myelofibrosis

OPINION STATEMENT

Currently approved therapies for myelofibrosis (MF) consist of JAK inhibitors, which produce meaningful improvements in spleen size and symptom burden but do not significantly impact leukemic progression. In addition, many patients develop resistance or intolerance to existing therapies and are left without meaningful therapeutic options. There has been recent rapid development of agents in MF that may be able to fill these unmet needs. Importantly, most treatments currently in clinical development have targets outside the JAK-STAT pathway, including BET, BCL-2/BCL-xL, PI3k, HDM2, PIM-1, SINE, telomerase, LSD1, and CD123. These therapies are being tested in combination with JAK inhibitors in the front-line setting and in patients with a suboptimal response, as well as a single agent after JAK inhibitor failure. This next generation of agents is likely to produce a paradigm shift in MF treatment with a focus on combination treatment targeting multiple areas of MF pathophysiology.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions | Accelerated Phase of MPN: What It Is and What to Do About It

Progression of Philadelphia-chromosome negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) to the accelerated phase (AP) or blast phase (BP) is associated with poor outcomes. As our understanding of the molecular drivers of MPN progression has grown, there has been increasing investigation into the use of novel targeted approaches in the treatment of these diseases. In this review we summarize the clinical and molecular risk factors for progression to MPN-AP/BP followed by discussion of treatment approach. We also highlight outcomes using conventional approaches such as intensive chemotherapy and hypomethylating agents along with considerations around allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. We then focus on novel targeted approaches in MPN-AP/BP including venetoclax-based regimens, IDH inhibition, and ongoing prospective clinical trials.

ENABLE: treatment combination including decitabine and venetoclax in acute myeloid leukemia secondary to myeloproliferative neoplasms

The management of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (blast phase) secondary to myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) is extremely challenging and the outcome dismal, with a median overall survival of about 3-6 months. Effective therapeutic approaches are lacking, especially when intensive strategies followed by allogeneic transplantation are not feasible. The combination of venetoclax and hypomethylating agents has recently been established as standard for newly diagnosed, unfit patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia, but the application of this therapeutic modality has not been tested prospectively in the specific context of blast-phase MPNs. ENABLE is an open, phase II clinical trial aimed at verifying the efficacy and safety of the combination of venetoclax and decitabine in patients with post-MPN blast phase.

Hitting the brakes on accelerated and blast-phase myeloproliferative neoplasms: current and emerging concepts

The BCR-ABL-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) have a variable risk of progressing to accelerated- or blast-phase MPN (MPN-AP/MPN-BP), defined by the presence of 10% to 19% and more than or equal to 20% myeloid blasts in the peripheral blood or bone marrow, respectively. The molecular processes underlying the progression to MPN-AP/MPN-BP are becoming increasingly understood with the acquisition of additional mutations in epigenetic modifiers (eg, ASXL1, EZH2, TET2), TP53, the Ras pathway, or splicing factors (eg, SRSF2, U2AF1), having been described as important steps in this evolutionary process. At least partially driven by the enrichment of these high-risk molecular features, the prognosis of patients with MPN-BP remains inferior to other patients with acute myeloid leukemia, with a median overall survival of 3 to 6 months. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation remains the only potentially curative therapeutic modality, but only a minority of patients are eligible. In the absence of curative intent, therapeutic strategies or palliative treatment with hypomethylating agents as monotherapy or in combination with ruxolitinib or venetoclax can be considered. Several novel agents are in various stages of clinical development but are not available for routine use at this point, highlighting the need for ongoing research and the prioritization of clinical trial enrollment when feasible.

Novel Molecular Insights into Leukemic Evolution of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: A Single Cell Perspective

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are clonal disorders originated by the serial acquisition of somatic mutations in hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells. The major clinical entities are represented by polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and primary myelofibrosis (PMF), that are caused by driver mutations affecting JAK2, MPL or CALR. Disease progression is related to molecular and clonal evolution. PV and ET can progress to secondary myelofibrosis (sMF) but can also evolve to secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML). PMF is associated with the highest frequency of leukemic transformation, which represents the main cause of death. sAML is associated with a dismal prognosis and clinical features that differ from those of de novo AML. The molecular landscape distinguishes sAML from de novo AML, since the most frequent hits involve TP53, epigenetic regulators, spliceosome modulators or signal transduction genes. Single cell genomic studies provide novel and accurate information about clonal architecture and mutation acquisition order, allowing the reconstruction of clonal dynamics and molecular events that accompany leukemic transformation. In this review, we examine our current understanding of the genomic heterogeneity in MPNs and how it affects disease progression and leukemic transformation. We focus on molecular events elicited by somatic mutations acquisition and discuss the emerging findings coming from single cell studies.

Acute Myeloid Leukemia Following Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: A Review of What We Know, What We Do Not Know, and Emerging Treatment Strategies

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) arising from myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) represents a small subtype of secondary AML (sAML). This entity is well known to be associated with poor responses to available treatment options and dismal outcomes. To date, there are no standardized treatment options and there has been very little therapeutic advancement in recent years. This is a stark contrast to other subsets of AML for which there have been significant advances in therapeutic approaches, especially for patients with targetable mutations. We aim to focus our review on the incidence, risk factors for leukemogenesis, pathogenesis, molecular landscape, and emerging therapeutic options in post-myeloproliferative neoplasm acute myeloid leukemia (post-MPN AML).

HOXA9 has the hallmarks of a biological switch with implications in blood cancers

Blood malignancies arise from the dysregulation of haematopoiesis. The type of blood cell and the specific order of oncogenic events initiating abnormal growth ultimately determine the cancer subtype and subsequent clinical outcome. HOXA9 plays an important role in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) prognosis by promoting blood cell expansion and altering differentiation; however, the function of HOXA9 in other blood malignancies is still unclear. Here, we highlight the biological switch and prognosis marker properties of HOXA9 in AML and chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). First, we establish the ability of HOXA9 to stratify AML patients with distinct cellular and clinical outcomes. Then, through the use of a computational network model of MPN, we show that the self-activation of HOXA9 and its relationship to JAK2 and TET2 can explain the branching progression of JAK2/TET2 mutant MPN patients towards divergent clinical characteristics. Finally, we predict a connection between the RUNX1 and MYB genes and a suppressive role for the NOTCH pathway in MPN diseases.

Impact of molecular profiling on the management of patients with myelofibrosis

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) characterized by a highly heterogeneous clinical course, which can be complicated by severe constitutional symptoms, massive splenomegaly, progressive bone marrow failure, cardiovascular events, and development of acute leukemia. Constitutive signaling through the JAK-STAT pathway plays a fundamental role in its pathogenesis, generally due to activating mutations of JAK2, CALR and MPL genes (i.e., the MPN driver mutations), present in most MF patients. Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) panel testing has shown that additional somatic mutations can already be detected at the time of diagnosis in more than half of patients, and that they accumulate along the disease course. These mutations, mostly affecting epigenetic modifiers or spliceosome components, may cooperate with MPN drivers to favor clonal dominance or influence the clinical phenotype, and some, such as high molecular risk mutations, correlate with a more aggressive clinical course with poor treatment response. The current main role of molecular profiling in clinical practice is prognostication, principally for selecting high-risk patients who may be candidates for transplantation, the only curative treatment for MF to date. To this end, contemporary prognostic models incorporating molecular data are useful tools to discriminate different risk categories. Aside from certain clinical situations, decisions regarding medical treatment are not based on patient molecular profiling, yet this approach may become more relevant in novel treatment strategies, such as the use of vaccines against the mutant forms of JAK2 or CALR, or drugs directed against actionable molecular targets.

Ruxolitinib combined with prednisone, thalidomide and danazol in patients with myelofibrosis: Results of a pilot study

Ruxolitinib is a safe and effective therapy of myeloproliferative neoplasm-associated (MPN) myelofibrosis. However, often there are dose reductions and/or therapy interruptions because of therapy-related adverse events (AEs), especially anemia and thrombocytopenia. We previously reported combined therapy with prednisone, thalidomide and danazol (PTD) reversed anemia and thrombocytopenia in people with MPN-associated myelofibrosis. We wondered whether adding PTD to ruxolitinib might mitigate the hematologic AEs and thereby avoid the dose reduction of ruxolitinib and improve the efficacy. To test this hypothesis, we conducted a baseline hemoglobin and platelet concentration assignment prospective observational study in 72 patients comparing 3-month dose adjustment and efficacy of ruxolitinib with (N = 53, the study group) or without (N = 19, the control group) PTD. According to the platelet counts, the median daily ruxolitinib doses in the study group increased from 30 to 40 mg by week 12, whereas in the control group it remained at 30 mg (p = 0.019). In the study group 35 patients had a hemoglobin increase ≥10 g/L compared with no patient receiving ruxolitinib only (p < 0.001). Platelet increases >100 × 10E+9/L were seen in 56.6% and 5.3% of patients in the two groups, respectively (p < 0.001). In patients with anemia and thrombocytopenia, 18 patients in the study group had an anemia response at week 12 and 12 had a platelet increase of ≥50 × 10E+9/L. No patient in the control group achieved either response (p < 0.001 and p = 0.078). The study group had a more spleen response than the control group (p = 0.046). Peripheral edema and transaminase elevation were the main nonhematologic AEs of PTD. These AEs can be alleviated by adjusting the danazol dose. In conclusion, adding PTD to ruxolitinib improved ruxolitinib-associated anemia and thrombocytopenia, and resulted in a higher ruxolitinib dose.

Mutational landscape of blast phase myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN-BP) and antecedent MPN

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) have an inherent tendency to evolve to the blast phase (BP), characterized by ≥20% myeloblasts in the blood or bone marrow. MPN-BP portends a dismal prognosis and currently, effective treatment modalities are scarce, except for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in selected patients, particularly those who achieve complete/partial remission. The mutational landscape of MPN-BP differs from de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in several key aspects, such as significantly lower frequencies of FLT3 and DNMT3A mutations, and higher incidence of IDH1/2 and TP53 in MPN-BP. Herein, we comprehensively review the impact of the three signaling driver mutations (JAK2 V617F, CALR exon 9 indels, MPL W515K/L) that constitutively activate the JAK/STAT pathway, and of the other somatic non-driver mutations (epigenetic, mRNA splicing, transcriptional regulators, and mutations in signal transduction genes) that cooperatively or independently promote MPN progression and leukemic transformation. The MPN subtype, harboring two or more high-molecular risk (HMR) mutations (epigenetic regulators and mRNA splicing factors) and "triple-negative" PMF are among the critical factors that increase risk of leukemic transformation and shorten survival. Primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is the most aggressive MPN; and polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET) are relatively indolent subtypes. In PV and ET, mutations in splicing factor genes are associated with progression to myelofibrosis (MF), and in ET, TP53 mutations predict risk for leukemic transformation. The advent of targeted next-generation sequencing and improved prognostic scoring systems for PMF inform decisions regarding allo-HSCT. The emergence of treatments targeting mutant enzymes (e.g., IDH1/2 inhibitors) or epigenetic pathways (BET and LSD1 inhibitors) along with new insights into the mechanisms of leukemogenesis will hopefully lead the way to superior management strategies and outcomes of MPN-BP patients.

Role of JAK inhibitors in myeloproliferative neoplasms: current point of view and perspectives

Classic Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) include polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and myelofibrosis (MF), classified as primary (PMF), or secondary to PV or ET. All MPN, regardless of the underlying driver mutation in JAK2/CALR/MPL, are invariably associated with dysregulation of JAK/STAT pathway. The discovery of JAK2V617F point mutation prompted the development of small molecules inhibitors of JAK tyrosine kinases (JAK inhibitors-JAKi). To date, among JAKi, ruxolitinib (RUX) and fedratinib (FEDR) are approved for intermediate and high-risk MF, and RUX is also an option for high-risk PV patients inadequately controlled by or intolerant to hydroxyurea. While not yet registered, pacritinib (PAC) and momelotinib (MMB), proved to be effective particularly in thrombocytopenic and anemic MF patients, respectively. In most cases, JAKi are effective in reducing splenomegaly and alleviating disease-related symptoms. However, almost 50% lose response by three years and dose-dependent toxicities may lead to suboptimal dosing or treatment discontinuation. To date, although not being disease-modifying agents, JAKi represent the therapeutic backbone particularly in MF patient. To optimize therapeutic strategies, many trials with drug combinations of JAKi with novel molecules are ongoing. This review critically discusses the role of JAKi in the modern management of patients with MPN.

Myelofibrosis: Genetic Characteristics and the Emerging Therapeutic Landscape

Primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is one of three myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) that are morphologically and molecularly inter-related, the other two being polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET). MPNs are characterized by JAK-STAT-activating JAK2, CALR, or MPL mutations that give rise to stem cell-derived clonal myeloproliferation, which is prone to leukemic and, in case of PV and ET, fibrotic transformation. Abnormal megakaryocyte proliferation is accompanied by bone marrow fibrosis and characterizes PMF, while the clinical phenotype is pathogenetically linked to ineffective hematopoiesis and aberrant cytokine expression. Among MPN-associated driver mutations, type 1-like CALR mutation has been associated with favorable prognosis in PMF, while ASXL1, SRSF2, U2AF1-Q157, EZH2, CBL, and K/NRAS mutations have been shown to be prognostically detrimental. Such information has enabled development of exclusively genetic (GIPSS) and clinically integrated (MIPSSv2) prognostic models that facilitate individualized treatment decisions. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation remains the only treatment modality in MF with the potential to prolong survival, whereas drug therapy, including JAK2 inhibitors, is directed mostly at the inflammatory component of the disease and is therefore palliative in nature. Similarly, disease-modifying activity remains elusive for currently available investigational drugs, while their additional value in symptom management awaits controlled confirmation. There is a need for genetic characterization of clinical observations followed by in vitro and in vivo preclinical studies that will hopefully identify therapies that target the malignant clone in MF to improve patient outcomes.

Ruxolitinib Reduces Oxidative Stress in Patients With Primary Myelofibrosis: A Multicenter Study

Introduction

Primary myelofibrosis (PM) has a lower overall survival rate than other myeloproliferative neoplasms, and leukemic transformation is the most common cause of death. Increased oxidative stress has an important role in leukemic transformation in these patients. In this study, we aimed to find an answer to the question, "Could Ruxolitinib, which has been widely used in patients with myelofibrosis in recent years, have a role in reducing oxidative stress in these patients?".

Methods

A total of 106 patients with PM and 111 healthy volunteers were included in this study. We collected the serum samples of healthy volunteers and patients with myelofibrosis at the time of diagnosis and one month after the initiation of Ruxolitinib treatment. Ischemia modified albumin (IMA), native thiol, total thiol, and disulfide levels were studied. The disulfide/native thiol, disulfide/total thiol, and native thiol/total thiol ratios were calculated.

Results

IMA, native thiol, total thiol, disulfide levels, disulfide/native thiol, and disulfide/total thiol ratios at the time of diagnosis were significantly different in patients with myelofibrosis compared to the control group (p=0.001). Ruxolitinib significantly reduced oxidative stress when the measurements in the first month after Ruxolitinib were compared with those at the time of diagnosis (p=0.001). In patients with ASXL1 mutation, intermediate-2 risk, and high-risk according to the Dipps-plus score, the decrease in oxidative stress in the first month of treatment was more significant than at the time of diagnosis.

Conclusion

Ruxolitinib may be an effective treatment for reducing oxidative stress in patients with PM. The reduction in oxidative stress parameters with treatment in patients with ASXL1 mutation, intermediate-2, and high-risk patients was observed to be higher.

Progression of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (MPN): Diagnostic and Therapeutic Perspectives

Classical BCR-ABL-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are a heterogeneous group of hematologic malignancies, including essential thrombocythemia (ET), polycythemia vera (PV), and primary myelofibrosis (PMF), as well as post-PV-MF and post-ET-MF. Progression to more symptomatic disease, such as overt MF or acute leukemia, represents one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality. There are clinically evident but also subclinical types of MPN progression. Clinically evident progression includes evolution from ET to PV, ET to post-ET-MF, PV to post-PV-MF, or pre-PMF to overt PMF, and transformation of any of these subtypes to myelodysplastic neoplasms or acute leukemia. Thrombosis, major hemorrhage, severe infections, or increasing symptom burden (e.g., pruritus, night sweats) may herald progression. Subclinical types of progression may include increases in the extent of bone marrow fibrosis, increases of driver gene mutational allele burden, and clonal evolution. The underlying causes of MPN progression are diverse and can be attributed to genetic alterations and chronic inflammation. Particularly, bystander mutations in genes encoding epigenetic regulators or splicing factors were associated with progression. Finally, comorbidities such as systemic inflammation, cardiovascular diseases, and organ fibrosis may augment the risk of progression. The aim of this review was to discuss types and mechanisms of MPN progression and how their knowledge might improve risk stratification and therapeutic intervention. In view of these aspects, we discuss the potential benefits of early diagnosis using molecular and functional imaging and exploitable therapeutic strategies that may prevent progression, but also highlight current challenges and methodological pitfalls.

Immune Dysregulation and Infectious Complications in MPN Patients Treated With JAK Inhibitors

BCR-ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms are burdened by a reduced life expectancy mostly due to an increased risk of thrombo-hemorrhagic events, fibrotic progression/leukemic evolution, and infectious complications. In these clonal myeloid malignancies, JAK2V617F is the main driver mutation, leading to an aberrant activation of the Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK-STAT) signaling pathway. Therefore, its inhibition represents an attractive therapeutic strategy for these disorders. Several JAK inhibitors have entered clinical trials, including ruxolitinib, the first JAK1/2 inhibitor to become commercially available for the treatment of myelofibrosis and polycythemia vera. Due to interference with the JAK-STAT pathway, JAK inhibitors affect several components of the innate and adaptive immune systems such as dendritic cells, natural killer cells, T helper cells, and regulatory T cells. Therefore, even though the clinical use of these drugs in MPN patients has led to a dramatic improvement of symptoms control, organ involvement, and quality of life, JAK inhibitors–related loss of function in JAK-STAT signaling pathway can be a cause of different adverse events, including those related to a condition of immune suppression or deficiency. This review article will provide a comprehensive overview of the current knowledge on JAK inhibitors’ effects on immune cells as well as their clinical consequences, particularly with regards to infectious complications.

Classical Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs): A continuum of different disease entities

Classical Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are clonal hematopoietic stem cell-derived disorders characterized by uncontrolled proliferation of differentiated myeloid cells and close pathobiologic and clinical features. According to the 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification, MPNs include polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and primary myelofibrosis (PMF). The 2016 revision aimed in particular at strengthening the distinction between masked PV and JAK2-mutated ET, and between prefibrotic/early (pre-PMF) and overt PMF. Clinical manifestations in MPNs include constitutional symptoms, microvascular disorders, thrombosis and bleeding, splenomegaly secondary to extramedullary hematopoiesis, cytopenia-related symptoms, and progression to overt MF and acute leukemia. A dysregulation of the JAK/STAT pathway is the unifying mechanistic hallmark of MPNs, and is guided by somatic mutations in driver genes including JAK2, CALR and MPL. Additional mutations in myeloid neoplasm-associated genes have been also identified, with established prognostic relevance, particularly in PMF. Prognostication of MPN patients relies on disease-specific clinical models. The increasing knowledge of MPN biology led to the development of integrated clinical and molecular prognostic scores that allow a more refined stratification. Recently, the therapeutic landscape of MPNs has been revolutionized by the introduction of potent, selective JAK inhibitors (ruxolitinib, fedratinib), that proved effective in controlling disease-related symptoms and splenomegaly, yet leaving unmet critical needs, owing the lack of disease-modifying activity. In this review, we will deal with molecular, clinical, and therapeutic aspects of the three classical MPNs aiming at highlighting either shared characteristics, that overall define a continuum within a single disease family, and uniqueness, at the same time.

A case of a primary myelofibrosis with progression and related literature review of progression phase genetics

Philadelphia (BCR-ABL)-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) include polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and primary myelofibrosis (PMF). MPN can transform into an accelerated or a blast phase, which is associated with poor response to standard therapy and low overall median survival. We present an interesting case of a patient with a history of PMF and progression and summarize the current studies on genetic features of myeloproliferative neoplasms in blast phase (MPN-BP) with an emphasis on PMF. Although MPN-BP show ≥20% blasts in peripheral blood or bone marrow, it is not considered as acute myeloid leukemia (AML) according to the WHO classification. While MPNs-BP typically lack genetic mutations seen in de novo AML, they commonly harbor IDH1/2, SRSF2, ASXL1, and TP53 mutations, similar to the genetic profiles of acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC).

3+7 Combined Chemotherapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Is It Time to Say Goodbye?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

With the recent approval of multiple new drugs for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), the relevance of conventional treatment approaches, such as daunorubicin and cytarabine ("3+7") induction chemotherapy, has been challenged. We review the AML risk stratification, the efficacy of the newly approved drugs, and the role of "3+7".

RECENT FINDINGS

Treatment of AML is becoming more niched with specific subtypes more appropriately treated with gemtuzumab, midostaurin, and CPX-351. Although lower intensity therapies can yield high response rates, they are less efficient at preventing relapses. The only curative potential for poor-risk AML is still an allogeneic stem cell transplant. The number of AML subtypes where 3+7 alone is an appropriate therapeutic option is shrinking. However, it remains the backbone for combination therapy with newer agents in patients suitable for intensive chemotherapy.

Integration of Molecular Information in Risk Assessment of Patients with Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are clonal disorders of a hematopoietic stem cell, characterized by an abnormal proliferation of largely mature cells driven by mutations in JAK2, CALR, and MPL. All these mutations lead to a constitutive activation of the JAK-STAT signaling, which represents a target for therapy. Beyond driver ones, most patients, especially with myelofibrosis, harbor mutations in an array of "myeloid neoplasm-associated" genes that encode for proteins involved in chromatin modification and DNA methylation, RNA splicing, transcription regulation, and oncogenes. These additional mutations often arise in the context of clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP). The extensive characterization of the pathologic genome associated with MPN highlighted selected driver and non-driver mutations for their clinical informativeness. First, driver mutations are enlisted in the WHO classification as major diagnostic criteria and may be used for monitoring of residual disease after transplantation and response to treatment. Second, mutation profile can be used, eventually in combination with cytogenetic, histopathologic, hematologic, and clinical variables, to risk stratify patients regarding thrombosis, overall survival, and rate of transformation to secondary leukemia. This review outlines the molecular landscape of MPN and critically interprets current information for their potential impact on patient management.

Venetoclax with azacitidine or decitabine in blast-phase myeloproliferative neoplasm: A multicenter series of 32 consecutive cases

Venetoclax (Ven) combined with a hypomethylating agent (HMA) has now emerged as an effective treatment regimen for acute myeloid leukemia, in both de novo and relapsed/refractory setting. The current multicenter study retrospectively examined Ven + HMA treatment outcome among 32 patients (median age 69 years; 59% males) with blast‐phase myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN‐BP). Pre‐leukemic phenotype included essential thrombocythemia (ET)/post‐ET myelofibrosis (34%), polycythemia vera (PV)/post‐PV myelofibrosis (38%) and primary myelofibrosis (28%). Twenty‐nine study patients were fully annotated cytogenetically and molecularly (NGS): 69% harbored complex karyotype and/or mutations, including TP53 (41%), IDH1/2 (21%), ASXL1 (21%), N/KRAS (14%), SRSF2 (10%), EZH2 (10%) and U2AF1 (7%). All patients received Ven combined with either azacitidine (n = 12) or decitabine (n = 20); either up front (n = 23) or after failing another induction therapy (n = 9). Complete remission with (CR) or without (CRi) count recovery was achieved in 14 (44%) patients and was more likely to occur in the absence of pre‐leukemic PV/post‐PV myelofibrosis phenotype (p < .01), complex karyotype (p < .01) or K/NRAS (p = .03) mutations; seven of eight patients (88%) without vs four of 21 (19%) with complex karyotype or K/NRAS mutation achieved CR/CRi (p < .01); all 11 informative patients with pre‐leukemic PV/post‐PV myelofibrosis phenotype displayed complex karyotype (p < .01). In contrast, neither TP53 (p = .45) nor IDH1/2 (p = .63) mutations affected response. Compared to historical controls treated with HMA alone (n = 26), the CR/CRi rate (44% vs 4%) and median survival (8 vs 5.5 months) were more favorable with Ven + HMA, but without significant difference in overall survival. Importantly, six patients with CR/CRi subsequently received allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (AHSCT). Note, Ven + HMA produces robust CR/CRi rates in MPN‐BP, especially in the absence of RAS mutations and complex karyotype, thus enabling AHSCT, in some patients.

LKB1/STK11 Is a Tumor Suppressor in the Progression of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

The myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) frequently progress to blast phase disease, an aggressive form of acute myeloid leukemia. To identify genes that suppress disease progression, we performed a focused CRISPR/Cas9 screen and discovered that depletion of LKB1/Stk11 led to enhanced in vitro self-renewal of murine MPN cells. Deletion of Stk11 in a mouse MPN model caused rapid lethality with enhanced fibrosis, osteosclerosis, and an accumulation of immature cells in the bone marrow, as well as enhanced engraftment of primary human MPN cells in vivo. LKB1 loss was associated with increased mitochondrial reactive oxygen species and stabilization of HIF1α, and downregulation of LKB1 and increased levels of HIF1α were observed in human blast phase MPN specimens. Of note, we observed strong concordance of pathways that were enriched in murine MPN cells with LKB1 loss with those enriched in blast phase MPN patient specimens, supporting the conclusion that STK11 is a tumor suppressor in the MPNs. SIGNIFICANCE: Progression of the myeloproliferative neoplasms to acute myeloid leukemia occurs in a substantial number of cases, but the genetic basis has been unclear. We discovered that loss of LKB1/STK11 leads to stabilization of HIF1a and promotes disease progression. This observation provides a potential therapeutic avenue for targeting progression.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1307.

Acute promyelocyte leukemia arose from CALR 1 mutated post essential thrombocythemia- myelofibrosis with splanchnic vein thrombosis: A case report

Major disease complications for patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET) include thrombosis and fibrotic or leukemic transformation. Calreticulin (CALR) mutation type 1 frequencies in ET are estimated between 7% and 11% and ET patients carrying CALR type 1 mutation are associated with lower risk of thrombosis but higher risk of myelofibrosis transformation compared to ET patients with JAK2 mutation. Leukemic transformation rates at 20 years are estimated at less than 5% for ET and risk factors for leukemic transformation are advanced age, thrombosis history, leukocytosis, and anemia. Amongst the subtypes of blast phase myeloproliferative neoplasms, acute promyelocytic leukemia is extremely rare. Herein, we present a case of a promyelocytic blast crisis of post-ET myelofibrosis with associated life-threatening splanchnic vein thrombosis. This case suggests that inflammation plays a key role in thrombotic events and fibrotic/leukemic transformation in ET patients, regardless the molecular landscape.

Genetic factors rather than blast reduction determine outcomes of allogeneic HCT in BCR-ABL-negative MPN in blast phase

There is a limited understanding of the clinical and molecular factors associated with outcomes of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in patients with BCR-ABL-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms in blast phase (MPN-BP). Using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database, we evaluated HCT outcomes in 177 patients with MPN-BP. Ninety-five (54%) had sufficient DNA for targeted next-generation sequencing of 49 genes clinically relevant in hematologic malignancies. At 5 years, overall survival (OS), cumulative incidence of relapse, and nonrelapse mortality of the study cohort was 18%, 61%, and 25%, respectively. In a multivariable model, poor-risk cytogenetics was associated with inferior OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.71; 95% CI, 1.21-2.41) due to increased relapse (HR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.32-2.82). Transplants using mobilized peripheral blood (PB) were associated with better OS (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.38-0.96). No difference in outcomes was observed in patients undergoing HCT with PB/BM blasts <5% vs those with active leukemia. Among the 95 patients with molecular data, mutation of TP53, present in 23%, was the only genetic alteration associated with outcomes. In a multivariate model, TP53-mutant patients had inferior OS (HR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.14-3.49) and increased incidence of relapse (HR, 2.59; 95% CI, 1.41-4.74). There were no differences in the spectrum of gene mutations, number of mutations, or variant allele frequency between patients undergoing HCT with PB/BM blasts <5% vs those with active leukemia. Genetic factors, namely cytogenetic alterations and TP53 mutation status, rather than degree of cytoreduction predict outcomes of HCT in MPN-BP. No meaningful benefit of conventional HCT was observed in patients with MPN-BP and mutated TP53.