ALK rearranged renal cell carcinoma (ALK-RCC): a multi-institutional study of twelve cases with identification of novel partner genes CLIP1, KIF5B and KIAA1217

The New WHO Category of "Molecularly Defined Renal Carcinomas": Clinical and Diagnostic Features and Management Implications

The evolution of classification of renal tumors has been impacted since the turn of the millennium by rapid progress in histopathology, immunohistochemistry, and molecular genetics. Together, these features have enabled firm recognition of specific, classic types of renal cell carcinomas, such as clear cell renal cell carcinoma, that in current practice trigger histologic-type specific management and treatment protocols. Now, the fifth Edition World Health Classification's new category of "Molecularly defined renal carcinomas" changes the paradigm, defining a total of seven entities based specifically on their fundamental molecular underpinnings. These tumors, which include TFE3-rearranged, TFEB-altered, ELOC-mutated, fumarate hydratase-deficient, succinate dehydrogenase-deficient, ALK-rearranged, and SMARCB1-deficient renal medullary carcinoma, encompass a wide clinical and histopathologic phenotypic spectrum of tumors. Already, important management aspects are apparent for several of these entities, while emerging therapeutic angles are coming into view. A brief, clinically-oriented introduction of the entities in this new category, focusing on relevant diagnostic, molecular, and management aspects, is the subject of this review.

ALK-rearranged mesenchymal neoplasms: a clinicopathological and molecular study of eight additional cases of an emerging group of tyrosine kinase fusion mesenchymal tumours

AIMS

Mesenchymal neoplasms characterised by ALK fusions mainly include inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour (IMT) and epithelioid fibrous histiocytoma (EFH). Most recently, ALK-rearranged mesenchymal tumours that are not IMT or EFH have been reported. Our aim is to further characterise eight such neoplasms, with a detailed clinicopathological, immunohistochemical and molecular analysis.

METHODS

Clinicopathological features were assessed and partner agnostic targeted RNA-sequencing on clinically validated platforms was performed.

RESULTS

The patients consisted of seven males and one female with a median age of 47 years (28 -59 years). The tumours ranged in size from 2.0 to 10.0 cm (mean=3.0 cm) and involved superficial and deep soft tissue (n=6) and visceral locations (n=2). Of the seven patients with follow-up (9-130 months), two developed distant metastases and five had no disease recurrence or metastasis. The tumours demonstrated diverse architectures and variable cellularity and cellular morphologies. The main constitutive cells appeared in elongated spindled in three, primitive to ovoid in two and round to epithelioid in three cases. We expanded the histopathological spectrum to include mildly to moderately cellular spindled to stellate cells in a multinodular growth in a prominent myxoid and vascularised stroma (n=2). All tumours expressed ALK(D5F3); seven were positive for S100 protein and six were positive for CD34. By fluorescence in situ hybridisation, ALK rearrangement was identified in all eight tumours. ALK fusion partners were identified by RNA-sequencing in all cases, including previously reported: EML4 (n=3), DCTN (n=1), CLIP1 (n=1) and PLEKHH2 (n=1), and also two novel fusion partners: TKT (n=1) and MMP2 (n=1).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study expands the clinicopathological and molecular spectrum of ALK-rearranged mesenchymal neoplasms.

ALK Inhibition With Alectinib for Refractory Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma With ALK Rearrangement: A Rare Case Report and Literature Review

ALK-rearranged RCC refractory to several lines of treatment has a durable response when treated with alectinib.

Sarcomatoid and Rhabdoid Renal Cell Carcinoma: Clinical, Pathologic, and Molecular Genetic Features

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with sarcomatoid and rhabdoid morphologies has an aggressive biological behavior and a typically poor prognosis. The current 2022 WHO classification of renal tumors does not include them as distinct histologic entities but rather as transformational changes that may arise in a background of various distinct histologic types of RCC. The sarcomatoid component shows malignant spindle cells that may grow as intersecting fascicles, which is reminiscent of pleomorphic undifferentiated sarcoma. The rhabdoid cells are epithelioid cells with eccentrically located vesicular nuclei with prominent nucleoli and large intracytoplasmic eosinophilic inclusions. Studies have shown that RCCs with sarcomatoid and rhabdoid differentiation have distinctive molecular features. Sarcomatoid RCC harbors shared genomic alterations in carcinomatous and rhabdoid components, but also enrichment of specific genomic alterations in the sarcomatoid element, suggesting molecular pathways for development of sarcomatoid growth from a common clonal ancestor. Rhabdoid differentiation also arises through clonal evolution although less is known of specific genomic alterations in rhabdoid cells. Historically, treatment has lacked efficacy, although recently immunotherapy with PD-1/PD-L1/CTLA-4 inhibitors has produced significant clinical responses. Reporting of sarcomatoid and rhabdoid features in renal cell carcinoma is required by the College of American Pathologists and the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting. This manuscript reviews the clinical, pathologic, and molecular features of sarcomatoid RCC and rhabdoid RCC with emphasis on the morphologic features of these tumors, significance of diagnostic recognition, the molecular mechanisms of tumorigenesis and differentiation along sarcomatoid and rhabdoid lines, and advances in treatment, particularly immunotherapy.

[2022 WHO classification of renal cell carcinomas: Focus on papillary renal cell carcinoma]

Renal cell carcinomas (RCC) represent a group of heterogeneous tumors whose classification has greatly evolved since 1981. The latest update in 2022 classifies all renal cell carcinomas into six categories according to their morphology or the detection of specific molecular alterations. Molecular disassembly of renal cell carcinomas with papillary features has enabled the identification of new entities characterized by a specific molecular alteration, such as Fumarate Hydratase (FH) deficient RCC, TFE3-rearranged RCC or TFEB-altered RCC. This new classification allows for a more accurate diagnosis but requires a thorough knowledge of the genomic alterations to search for with immunohistochemical or molecular biology techniques. According to the new WHO 2022 classification, papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRC) type 1 or type 2 classification is no longer recommended. A classification based on nucleolar ISUP grade must be preferred: low-grade PRC (ISUP 1-2) or high-grade PRC (ISUP 3-4). The other prognostic factors remain the same: the pTNM stage, lymphovascular invasion, and the presence or absence of dedifferentiated areas referring to sarcomatoid or rhabdoid features. Of note, the presence of necrosis is not currently recognized as a poor prognostic element for this type of carcinoma. The diagnosis of high-grade PRC is from now on a diagnosis of exclusion. It can only be sustained after having ruled out TFE3-rearranged RCC, TFEB-altered RCC, and FH-deficient RCC. For clinicians, the diagnosis of PRC implies suggesting an oncogenetic consultation to screen for an associated genetic tumor syndrome regardless of the patient's age.

Update on Selected High-grade Renal Cell Carcinomas of the Kidney: FH-deficient, ALK-rearranged, and Medullary Carcinomas

High-grade renal cell carcinoma (RCC), often diagnosed at advanced stages, significantly contributes to renal cancer-related mortality. This review explores the progress in understanding specific subtypes of high-grade RCC, namely fumarate hydratase (FH)-deficient RCC, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearranged RCC, and SMARCB1-deficient renal medullary carcinoma, all of which are now recognized as molecularly defined entities in the WHO classification system (2022). While these entities each exhibit a morphologic spectrum that overlaps with other high-grade RCC, ancillary tools developed based on their distinctive molecular alterations can help establish a specific diagnosis, underscoring the importance of integrating molecular findings into diagnostic paradigms. It is important to exclude these specific tumor types in cases with similar morphologic spectrum before rendering a diagnosis of high-grade papillary RCC, collecting duct carcinoma, or RCC, NOS. Several gray areas exist within the spectrum of high-grade uncommon types of RCC, necessitating continued research to enhance diagnostic precision and therapeutic options.

Genomic alterations and diagnosis of renal cancer

The application of molecular profiling has made substantial impact on the classification of urogenital tumors. Therefore, the 2022 World Health Organization incorporated the concept of molecularly defined renal tumor entities into its classification, including succinate dehydrogenase-deficient renal cell carcinoma (RCC), FH-deficient RCC, TFE3-rearranged RCC, TFEB-altered RCC, ALK-rearranged RCC, ELOC-mutated RCC, and renal medullary RCC, which are characterized by SMARCB1-deficiency. This review aims to provide an overview of the most important molecular alterations in renal cancer, with a specific focus on the diagnostic value of characteristic genomic aberrations, their chromosomal localization, and associations with renal tumor subtypes. It may not yet be the time to completely shift to a molecular RCC classification, but undoubtedly, the application of molecular profiling will enhance the accuracy of renal cancer diagnosis, and ultimately guide personalized treatment strategies for patients.

ALK-rearranged renal cell carcinoma (ALK-RCC): Evaluation of histomorphological and immunohistochemical features by analysis of 276 renal cell carcinoma cases in Turkey

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement-associated renal cell carcinoma (ALK-RCC) is characterized by ALK fusion at chromosome 2p23. It has recently been included as a recognized entity with the 5th edition of the WHO classification urinary and male genital tumor. However, our knowledge about ALK-RCC is limited due to the small number of reported cases. In our study, we aimed to contribute the histomorphological and immunohistochemical features of ALK-rearranged renal cell carcinoma cases. We reviewed 276 cases diagnosed as RCC in order to detect ALKRCCs.We used immunohistochemistry to screen ALK rearrangement and then confirmed the ALK rearrangement by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) method. ALK was immunohistochemically positive in 8 of 276 cases. ALK rearrangement was detected by FISH in 3 of 8 cases. These cases were previously diagnosed as clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CRCC), papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC), and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (ChRCC). Their histomorphological findings were diverse, and all three cases exhibited different immunohistochemical findings. Survival of these patients ranged between 6 and 24 months. ALK immunohistochemical findings were also different in each case as perinuclear, weak cytoplasmic, and membranous.ALK RCCs appear to be very rare tumors with heterogeneous histomorphological and immunohistochemical features. Although immunohistochemistry may be useful to detect ALK positivity, genetic evaluation is required to confirm the diagnosis. With identifying ALK-RCCs, ALK inhibitors, which are currently used in the treatment of lung adenocarcinomas, can be used as a targeted therapy option in ALK-RCCs.

Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Review of Prospective Clinical Trials

OPINION STATEMENT

PRCC is a unique histologic entity compared to other forms of renal cell carcinoma, harboring distinct molecular drivers. The WHO 2022 classification is further emphasizing the molecular biology by making molecular classifications of PRCC subclassifications and discontinuing the morphologic type 1 and type 2 classification system. We agree with this functional classification system and encourage all future clinical trials to only include patients with similar diagnosis instead of conducting basket trials (including all nccRCC together) which limits the scientific value of those conclusions. Based on recent disease-specific clinical trial (S1500, PAPMET), the current standard of care for patients with treatment naïve PRCC is cabozantinib. Prospective clinical trials clearly establish that immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy has meaningful activity in PRCC. The data to date include only single-arm clinical trials of combination immune therapy. Despite the positive and encouraging results, we need validation through randomized studies because of the overestimation of effect size seen in single-arm trials. These randomized trials are currently underway and enrolling. We strongly encourage all physicians to support these studies and enroll patients with PRCC to these trials in order to continue improving the standard of care.

Kidney Tumors: New and Emerging Kidney Tumor Entities

This review summarizes current knowledge on several novel and emerging renal entities, including eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), RCC with fibromyomatous stroma, anaplastic lymphoma kinase-rearranged RCC, low-grade oncocytic renal tumor, eosinophilic vacuolated tumor, thyroidlike follicular RCC, and biphasic hyalinizing psammomatous RCC. Their clinical features, gross and microscopic morphology, immunohistochemistry, and molecular and genetic features are described. The diagnosis of most of them rests on recognizing their morphologic features using immunohistochemistry. Accurate diagnosis of these entitles will further reduce the category of "unclassifiable renal carcinomas/tumors" and will lead to better clinical management and improved patient prognostication.

A Rare Case of Myxoid Adrenocortical Carcinoma

Myxoid adrenocortical carcinoma (myxoid ACC) is a rare subtype of adrenal cortical carcinoma with only a few cases reported in the literature. This tumor is characterized by small to large neoplastic cells in cords, diffuse sheets, or nodular architecture, which are surrounded by variable amounts of myxoid material. We are presented with an elderly female with a suprarenal mass which revealed a tumor composed of neoplastic cells surrounded by scant to abundant myxoid stroma. Expression for Melan-A, Inhibin, Synaptophysin, and Pancytokeratin, as well as a Ki-67 proliferative index of 15%, warrant a diagnosis of myxoid ACC.

Exploration of clinicopathological features of rearranged renal cell carcinoma and TFE3, TFEB, and ALK staining performance in renal entities

Rearranged renal cell carcinomas (RCC) are rare types of kidney cancer. The clinicopathological features of rearranged RCC require further validation. The pathological diagnosis usually depends on immunohistochemistry and molecular analysis. This study aimed to explore the expression features of anti-TFE3, TFEB, and ALK in different renal entities. In addition, we collected thirty-six TFE3-rearranged RCC, two TFEB-altered RCC, and one ALK-rearranged RCC to explore their clinicopathological features. We observed that TFE3 can sometimes be weakly expressed in non-TFE3-rearranged RCC. TFE3-rearranged RCC usually exhibited strong TFE3 expression. However, clear cell RCC and FH-deficient RCC also displayed strong TFE3 expression. TFEB also can be weakly expressed in clear cell RCC. However, ALK IHC showed a relatively high specificity and was negative for all non-ALK-rearranged RCC. The ALK-rearranged RCC was analyzed using next generation sequencing to explore gene alterations, and we identified a novel gene partner, SLIT1. ALK-rearranged RCC appears to have eosinophilic cytoplasm. Tumor cells with clear cytoplasm may exclude this diagnosis. Psammomatous bodies (22/38) and pattern multiplicity (35/38) were observed in more than half of the patients. In conclusion, weak TFE3 expression did not indicate TFE3 rearrangement. Strong TFE3 expression had a higher value for indicating TFE3-rearranged RCC, although other entities can also exhibit a strong pattern. Young age combined with morphological features (psammomatous calcification and pattern multiplicity) may indicate the diagnosis of rearranged RCC.

ALK-rearranged renal cell carcinoma with TPM3::ALK gene fusion and review of the literature

ALK-rearranged renal cell carcinoma (ALK-RCC) is a very rare novel molecularly defined entity in the recently published fifth edition of the World Health Organization classification of tumours. We describe a case of ALK-RCC in a 76-year-old female. The tumour was composed of discohesive rhabdoid cells and pleomorphic, multinucleated cells (equivalent to ISUP/WHO grade 4). The tumour showed expression with PAX8, Keratin 7 and alpha methylacyl CoA racemase. ALK (D5F3 clone) was strongly and diffusely positive. ALK-FISH showed significant split signals of ALK, confirming the diagnosis. RNA sequencing showed TPM3::ALK rearrangement. Including the current case, there are 14 reported ALK-RCC cases with the same TPM3 fusion partner gene. Review of these published cases highlights their morphological heterogeneity and stresses the importance of running ALK immunohistochemistry on difficult cases to classify renal tumours. This is important while identification of ALK-RCC has clinical significance due to the availability of targeted therapy with ALK inhibitors.

ALK-rearranged Mesenchymal Neoplasms: A Report of 9 cases Further Expanding the Clinicopathologic Spectrum of Emerging Kinase Fusion Positive Group of Tumors

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusions are oncogenic drivers in diverse cancer types. Although well established in inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT) and epithelioid fibrous histiocytoma (EFH), ALK rearrangements also occur in the emerging family of kinase fusion-positive mesenchymal neoplasms. We investigated 9 ALK-rearranged mesenchymal neoplasms (exclusive of IMT and EFH) arising in 6 males and 3 females with a wide age range of 10 to 78 years old (median 42 years). Tumors involved superficial and deep soft tissue (6) and viscera (3). Three were myxoid or collagenous low-grade paucicellular tumors with haphazardly arranged spindled cells. Three were cellular tumors with spindled cells in intersecting short fascicles or solid sheets. Three cases consisted of uniform epithelioid cells arranged in nests or solid sheets, with prominent mitotic activity and necrosis. Band-like stromal hyalinization was present in 6 cases. All tumors expressed ALK; four were positive for S100 and five were positive for CD34, while all were negative for SOX10. By targeted RNA sequencing, the breakpoints involved ALK exon 20; the 5' partners included KLC1, EML4, DCTN1, PLEKHH2, TIMP3, HMBOX1, and FMR1. All but two patients presented with localized disease. One patient had distant lung metastases; another had diffuse pleural involvement. Of the six cases with treatment information, five were surgically excised [one also received neoadjuvant radiation therapy (RT)], and one received RT and an ALK inhibitor. Of the four patients with follow-up (median 5.5 months), one remained alive with stable disease and three were alive without disease. We expand the clinicopathologic spectrum of ALK-fused mesenchymal neoplasms, including a low-grade malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor-like subset and another subset characterized by epithelioid and high-grade morphology.

"Collecting duct carcinoma of the kidney: diagnosis and implications for management"

Collecting duct carcinoma of the kidney is a rare and aggressive subtype of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) arising from the distal convoluted tubules. At the time of diagnosis, patients are more frequently symptomatic, with advanced locoregional stage, and have metastatic disease. The 2016 WHO Classification of Tumours of the Urinary System defined diagnostic criteria for this entity. However, the diagnostic features continue to evolve, with typical, but not entirely specific, histologic and immunophenotypic characteristics. In addition, the lack of consistent molecular alterations makes collecting duct carcinoma a diagnosis of exclusion, with historical cases being re-classified as fumarate hydratase deficient RCC, ALK rearranged RCC, renal medullary carcinoma or high-grade urothelial carcinoma. The rarity and poor prognosis of the tumor makes it difficult to reach consensus guidelines to guide therapy. In this manuscript we review the clinicopathologic features of collecting duct carcinoma including pathologic diagnostic criteria, molecular characteristics and differential diagnosis, and their possible implications for management.

An update on the pathology of collecting duct & papillary renal cell carcinoma with a discussion of SNP-Arrays as an emerging laboratory technique

The diagnostic criteria and management of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has evolved significantly in the last two decades. Increased molecular profiling of RCC has yielded further refinement of existing diagnostic categories. This is particularly true for papillary RCC, which has evolved into multiple molecularly distinct entities. Collecting duct carcinoma, on the other hand, continues to be defined based on traditional histology-based criteria, although it is now possible to exclude various categories of tumors that share overlapping morphologic features. In this context, it is important to note that pathology laboratories have varying degrees of access to complex molecular technologies required to profile tumors in routine clinical practice. Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) based copy number profiling represents one modality of testing which is becoming widely available and is being increasingly utilized to profile renal tumors. In this special Seminars issue, we explore the evolution of Collecting Duct & Papillary RCC as diagnostic entities, with a detailed discussion of SNP array-based copy number profiling in contemporary clinical practice.

Kidney Tumors: New and Emerging Kidney Tumor Entities

This review summarizes current knowledge on several novel and emerging renal entities, including eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), RCC with fibromyomatous stroma, anaplastic lymphoma kinase-rearranged RCC, low-grade oncocytic renal tumor, eosinophilic vacuolated tumor, thyroidlike follicular RCC, and biphasic hyalinizing psammomatous RCC. Their clinical features, gross and microscopic morphology, immunohistochemistry, and molecular and genetic features are described. The diagnosis of most of them rests on recognizing their morphologic features using immunohistochemistry. Accurate diagnosis of these entitles will further reduce the category of "unclassifiable renal carcinomas/tumors" and will lead to better clinical management and improved patient prognostication.

Case report: ALK-rearranged spindle and epithelioid cell neoplasms with S100 and CD34 co-expression: Additional evidence of kinase fusion-positive soft tissue tumors

ALK rearrangements have rarely been reported in S100- and CD34-co-expressing soft tissue neoplasms with lipofibromatosis-like neural tumor (LPFNT) pattern or stromal and perivascular hyalinization, mimicking NTRK-rearranged spindle cell tumors. Here, we reported ALK fusions involving related partner genes in two adult soft tissue tumors with S100 and CD34 co-expression, and conducted a literature review of mesenchymal tumors harboring ALK or other kinase fusions. Case 1 was a 25-year-old female who underwent excision of a soft tissue mass in the anterior thigh region. Morphologically, the tumor was composed of spindle cells adjacent to epithelioid cells embedded in myxedematous and hyalinized stroma, with infiltrative boundary. Spindle cells mixed with inflammatory infiltration resembling inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT) were seen sporadically. However, brisk mitosis and focal necrosis was also observed, indicating an intermediate-grade sarcoma. In case 2, the left side of the neck of a 34-year-old man was affected. The tumor was composed of monomorphic spindle cells arranged in fascicular growth or patternless pattern, with stromal and perivascular hyalinization. Sparse inflammatory cell infiltration was also observed. Both tumors showed CD34, S100, and ALK-D5F3 immunoreactivity. Next generation sequencing (NGS) test identified a PLEKHH2::ALK fusion in case 1, which was confirmed by RT-PCR and Sanger sequencing, whereas the RT-PCR (ARMS method) test detected an EML4::ALK fusion in case 2. In conclusion, this study expands the morphological and genetic landscape of tumors with S100 and CD34 co-expression harboring kinase fusions, and suggests that kinase fusion-positive mesenchymal neoplasms are becoming an enlarging entity with a variety of morphological patterns.

GATA3 aids in distinguishing fumarate hydratase-deficient renal cell carcinoma from papillary renal cell carcinoma

GATA3 has been reported to be positive in clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma and papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity. However, its features in high-grade RCC remain unclear. Despite the emergence of novel renal entities, FH-deficient RCC remains one of the most aggressive renal neoplasms. The diagnosis is mainly based on the loss of FH at the protein level. Previous studies have shown that inclusion-like nuclei, multiple architectural patterns, FH loss, and 2SC positivity can differentiate FH-deficient RCC from other RCC. In some FH-deficient RCC cases, FH is normally expressed and is difficult to diagnose. This study included 11 FH-deficient RCC, and GATA3 showed different expression in seven cases. However, 147 papillary renal cell carcinomas were included, and GATA3 expression was negative. A comparison of clinicopathological aspects between 11 FH-deficient RCC and 30 high-grade PRCC showed statistical significance in age, size, multiple architectural patterns, inclusion-like nuclei, and prognosis. However, PRCC exhibited similar characteristics. CK7, GATA3, and FH profiles were also statistically significant. Different chromosomal alterations were found in FH-deficient RCC, and chromosomal alterations were not different between FH-deficient RCC and PRCC. GATA3 was positive in 33 % (7/21) of collecting duct carcinomas and negative in other high-grade renal neoplasms. GATA3 is negative in PRCC, but can be positive in FH-deficient RCC and collecting duct carcinoma. GATA3 expression may indicate a worse outcome in high-grade RCC with papillary architecture. We recommend GATA3 IHC for the differential diagnosis and prognostic assessment of high-grade RCC with papillary architecture.

ALK rearrangement-associated renal cell carcinoma morphologically mimicking mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma: a case report

BACKGROUND

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangement-associated renal cell carcinoma (ALK-RCC) is an extremely rare tumor and ALK-RCC that mimics mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma (MTSCC) has been very reported only in one instance.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 42-year-old Japanese woman was admitted to our hospital for the treatment of a left renal tumor measuring 5 cm in maximum dimension. She underwent a laparoscopic left nephrectomy. Histologically, the tumor formed tubular or focally papillary structures with a small amount of spindle-shaped tumor cells against the background of prominent extracellular mucin. Although the tumor cells were negative for immunohistochemistry (IHC) of alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR) and lymph node metastasis was presented (these are atypical findings for MTSCC), we initially diagnosed the tumor as MTSCC based on its morphological characteristics with mucin deposition. However, an additional IHC analysis revealed that the tumor cells were diffusely positive for ALK-IHC. In addition, TPM3 exon 8 - ALK exon 20 fusion gene was detected by RNA sequencing. The tumor was thus correctly diagnosed as ALK rearrangement-associated renal cell carcinoma (ALK-RCC).

CONCLUSIONS

Since the use of molecular targeted therapy with an ALK inhibitor for ALK-RCC is promising, the correct pathological diagnosis of ALK-RCC is quite important. We strongly recommend that ALK-IHC be routinely performed for renal tumors with negative AMACR staining that mimic MTSCC.

Expanding the clinicopathological spectrum of succinate dehydrogenase-deficient renal cell carcinoma with a focus on variant morphologies: a study of 62 new tumors in 59 patients

Most succinate dehydrogenase (SDH)-deficient renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) demonstrate stereotypical morphology characterized by bland eosinophilic cells with frequent intracytoplasmic inclusions. However, variant morphologic features have been increasingly recognized. We therefore sought to investigate the incidence and characteristics of SDH-deficient RCC with variant morphologies. We studied a multi-institutional cohort of 62 new SDH-deficient RCCs from 59 patients. The median age at presentation was 39 years (range 19-80), with a slight male predominance (M:F = 1.6:1). A relevant family history was reported in 9 patients (15%). Multifocal or bilateral tumors were identified radiologically in 5 patients (8%). Typical morphology was present at least focally in 59 tumors (95%). Variant morphologies were seen in 13 (21%) and included high-grade nuclear features and various combinations of papillary, solid, and tubular architecture. Necrosis was present in 13 tumors, 7 of which showed variant morphology. All 62 tumors demonstrated loss of SDHB expression by immunohistochemistry. None showed loss of SDHA expression. Germline SDH mutations were reported in all 18 patients for whom the results of testing were known. Among patients for whom follow-up data was available, metastatic disease was reported in 9 cases, 8 of whom had necrosis and/or variant morphology in their primary tumor. Three patients died of disease. In conclusion, variant morphologies and high-grade nuclear features occur in a subset of SDH-deficient RCCs and are associated with more aggressive behavior. We therefore recommend grading all SDH-deficient RCCs and emphasize the need for a low threshold for performing SDHB immunohistochemistry in any difficult to classify renal tumor, particularly if occurring at a younger age.

The significance of the fusion partner gene genomic neighborhood analysis in translocation-defined tumors

INTRODUCTION

This study presents a novel molecular parameter potentially co-defining tumor biology-the total tumor suppressor gene (TSG) count at chromosomal loci harboring genes rearranged in fusion-defined tumors. It belongs to the family of molecular parameters created using a black-box approach.

METHOD

It is based on a public curated Texas TSG database. Its data are regrouped based on individual genes loci using another public database (Genecards). The total TSG count for NTRK (NTRK1; OMIM: 191315; NTRK2; OMIM: 600456; NTRK3; OMIM: 191316), NRG1 (OMIM: 142445), and RET (OMIM: 164761) rearranged tumors in patients treated with a theranostic approach is calculated using the results of recently published studies.

RESULTS

Altogether 138 loci containing at least three TSGs are identified. These include 21 "extremely hot" spots, with 10 to 28 TSGs mapping to a given locus. However, the study falls short of finding a correlation between tumor regression or patient survival and the TSG count owing to a low number of cases meeting the study criteria.

CONCLUSION

The total TSG count alone cannot predict the biology of translocation-defined tumors. The addition of other parameters, including microsatellite instability (MSI), tumor mutation burden (TMB), homologous recombination repair deficiency (HRD), and copy number heterogeneity (CNH), might be helpful. Thus a multi-modal data integration is advocated. We believe that large scale studies should evaluate the significance and value of the total TSG count.

Updates in Grading of Renal Cell Carcinomas Beyond Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma and Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma

The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends grading of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and papillary RCC using the WHO/International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade, which is primarily based on nuclear features. As the spectrum of RCC continues to evolve, with more recently described subtypes in the past decade, literature evidence on grading these subtypes is limited or not available for some tumor types. Herein, we outline a pragmatic approach to the topic of grading RCC, dividing the contemporarily described RCC subtypes into 7 categories based on the potential clinical applicability of grading as a useful prognostic parameter: (1) RCC subtypes that are reasonably validated and recommended for WHO/ISUP grading; (2) RCC subtypes where WHO/ISUP is not applicable; (3) RCC subtypes where WHO/ISUP grading is potentially clinically useful; (4) inherently aggressive RCC subtypes where histologic classification itself confers an aggressive biologic potential; (5) renal epithelial tumors where WHO/ISUP grading provides potentially misleading prognostic implication; (6) renal epithelial neoplasms where low WHO/ISUP grade features are a prerequisite for accurate histologic classification; and (7) renal epithelial neoplasms with no or limited data on grading or incomplete understanding of the biologic potential. Our aim in outlining this approach is 2-fold: (a) identify the gaps in understanding and application of grading in RCC subtypes so that researchers in the field may perform additional studies on the basis of which the important pathologic function of assignment of grade may be recommended to be performed as a meaningful exercise across a wider spectrum of RCC; and (b) to provide guidance in the interim to surgical pathologists in terms of providing clinically useful grading information in RCC based on currently available clinicopathologic information.

Activity of ALK Inhibitors in Renal Cancer with ALK Alterations: A Systematic Review

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) associated with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangements (ALK-RCC) is currently considered an “emerging or provisional” tumor entity by the last World Health Organization classification published in 2016. Although several studies assessing ALK-RCC’s clinical and histological characteristics have been published in recent years, only a few publications have evaluated the activity of ALK inhibitors (ALK-i) in this subgroup of patients. Considering the well-recognized efficacy of this evolving class of targeted therapies in other ALK-positive tumors, we conducted a systematic review to evaluate the reported activity of ALK-i in the ALK-RCC subtype. MEDLINE was searched from its inception to 7 January 2022 for case reports and case series on adult metastatic ALK-RCC patients treated with ALK-i whose therapeutic outcomes were available. A virtual cohort of ALK-RCC patients was created. Our results showed a favorable activity of first- and second-generation ALK-i in pretreated ALK-RCC patients in terms of either radiological response or performance status improvement. We hope that the present work will prompt the creation of large, multi-institutional clinical trials to confirm these promising early data.

Renal cell carcinoma in children and adolescents: A retrospective study of a French-Italian series of 93 cases

BACKGROUND

Renal cell carcinomas represent 2 to 5% of kidney malignancies in children and adolescents. Appropriate diagnostic and classification are crucial for the correct management of the patients and in order to avoid inappropriate preoperative chemotherapy, which is usually recommended if a Wilms tumor is suspected.

METHODS

a French-Italian series of 93 renal cell carcinomas collected from 1990 to 2019 in patients aged less than 18 years old was reclassified according to the 2016 WHO classification and the latest literature. TFE3 and TFEB FISH analyses and a panel of immunohistochemical stains were applied.

RESULTS

The median age at diagnosis was 11 years (range: 9 months - 17 years). MiT family (MiTF) translocation renal cell carcinomas accounted for 52% of the tumors, followed by papillary renal cell carcinomas (20%) and unclassified renal cell carcinomas (13%). Other subtypes, such as SDHB-deficient and Fumarate hydratase-deficient renal cell carcinomas, represented 1 to 3% of the cases. We also described a case of ALK-rearranged renal cell carcinoma with a metanephric adenoma-like morphology.

CONCLUSION

A precise histological diagnosis is mandatory as targeted therapy could be applied for some RCC subtypes, i.e., MiTF-translocation and ALK-translocation renal cell carcinomas. Moreover, some RCC subtypes may be associated with a predisposition syndrome that will impact patients' and family's management and genetic counseling. A precise RCC subtype is also mandatory for the clinical management of the patients and the inclusion in new prospective clinical trials.

Concomitant novel ALK-SSH2, EML4-ALK and ARID2-ALK, EML4-ALK double-fusion variants and confer sensitivity to crizotinib in two lung adenocarcinoma patients, respectively

Introduction

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangements, have been identified in approximately 2-7% of patients with lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). However, co-occurrence of double ALK fusions in one patient was rare. Herein, we reported two Chinese female LUAD patients with confirmed double ALK fusion variants by next generation sequencing.

Case presentation

Case 1, a 38-year-old female was diagnosed as peripheral LUAD in left upper lobe with synchronous multiple intrapulmonary metastases (pT2N0M1b, stage IVa). And case 2, a 58-year-old female had left lower lobe primary LUAD and synchronous multiple lung metastases (pT4N2M1b, stage IVa). In both patients, tumor cells displayed strong expression of ALK protein. Genetic profiling by next generation sequencing showed both patients concurrently harbored two types of ALK rearrangements. Case 1 had an unreported ALK-SSH2/EML4-ALK double fusions, and case 2 had an another novel ARID2-ALK/EML4‐ALK double fusions. Both of these patients responded to ALK inhibitor crizotinib.

Conclusions

Our study reported two novel ALK fusion partners never reported, which expands the knowledge of ALK fusion spectrum and provides insight into therapeutic options for patients with double ALK fusions.

What's new in the WHO 2022 classification of kidney tumours?

The World Health Organization (WHO) 2022 classification of urinary and male genital tumours (5th edition) has significantly improved our understanding of the morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular characteristics of renal tumours. The aim of this review is to outline the most important changes and diagnostic updates in the WHO 2022 classification of kidney tumours. A major change in this edition is the grouping of renal tumours into broader categories that include "clear cell renal tumours", "papillary renal tumours", "oncocytic and chromophobe renal tumours", "collecting duct tumours" as well as adding two categories of "other renal tumours" and "molecularly defined renal carcinomas". Novel entities included in the WHO 2022 classification are eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma (ESC RCC), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearranged RCC and ELOC (formerly TCEB1)-mutated RCC. The category of "other renal tumours" includes a group of diverse, unrelated renal tumours that do not fit into other categories. The group of "molecularly defined renal carcinomas" reflects recent discoveries in the renal tumour genomics. These molecularly-defined renal entities demonstrate a set of morphologic features reflecting genotype-phenotype relationships. Final diagnosis of such entities rests on phenotypic and immunohistochemical (IHC) correlation, usually associated with IHC surrogate makers that reflect specific genetic abnormalities.

ALK rearrangements in infantile fibrosarcoma-like spindle cell tumours of soft tissue and kidney

AIMS

Recurrent alterations in receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) and downstream effectors are described in infantile fibrosarcoma (IFS)/cellular congenital mesoblastic nephroma (cCMN) and a subset of spindle cell sarcomas, provisionally designated 'NTRK-rearranged' spindle cell neoplasms. These two groups of tumours demonstrate overlapping morphologies and harbour alterations in NTRK1/2/3, RET, MET, ABL1, ROS1, RAF1 and BRAF, although their relationship is not fully elucidated. We describe herein a cohort of paediatric tumours with clinicopathological features not typical for inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour, but rather with similarities to cCMN/IFS harbouring ALK fusions.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Clinicopathological features were assessed and partner agnostic targeted RNA sequencing on clinically validated platforms were performed. Tumours occurred in patients aged from 2 to 10 years (median age 2 years) with a 2:2 male to female ratio and an average size of 8.4 cm. Two tumours arose in soft tissues and two in the kidney. Morphological features included spindle to ovoid cells arranged in long fascicles or haphazardly within a myxoid to collagenised stroma; a subset of cases had either dilated, ectatic vessels or focal perivascular hyalinosis. By immunohistochemistry, all cases tested showed cytoplasmic expression of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) and one case demonstrated co-expression of CD34 and S100.

CONCLUSIONS

This series of ALK-rearranged IFS-like tumours expands the spectrum of targetable kinases altered in these tumours and reinforces the potential overlap between IFS/cCMN-like tumours and the provisional entity of 'NTRK-rearranged' spindle cell neoplasms.

Immunohistochemistry for the diagnosis of renal epithelial neoplasms

Despite the increasing number of newly identified renal neoplasms, the diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) can usually be reached with careful histologic examination and a limited immunohistochemical (IHC) panel. Clear cell, papillary, chromophobe RCC and oncocytoma account for more than 90% of renal neoplasia in adults, and sophisticated ancillary tools are usually unnecessary. Renal tumors with entity-defining genetic alterations may ultimately require molecular confirmation via cytogenetics or sequencing technologies, such as RCC with TFE3, TFEB, or ALK gene rearrangements, or TFEB amplified RCC. In fumarate hydratase-deficient and succinate dehydrogenase-deficient RCC, highly specific IHC markers can strongly suggest the diagnosis. In the metastatic setting, PAX8 and carbonic anhydrase 9 are among the most helpful markers for confirming RCC and clear cell type, respectively; however, caution should be exercised in the absence of a current or historical renal mass. In diagnostically challenging cases, such as renal eosinophilic tumors with low-grade nuclear features, or infiltrative high-grade tumors, careful examination coupled with a judicious panel of IHC markers usually resolves the diagnosis. This review offers concise algorithms for diagnosis of kidney neoplasia with the latest recognized, provisional, and emerging entities to daily pathology practice.

The CLIP1-LTK fusion is an oncogenic driver in non-small-cell lung cancer

Lung cancer is one of the most aggressive tumour types. Targeted therapies stratified by oncogenic drivers have substantially improved therapeutic outcomes in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)¹. However, such oncogenic drivers are not found in 25-40% of cases of lung adenocarcinoma, the most common histological subtype of NSCLC². Here we identify a novel fusion transcript of CLIP1 and LTK using whole-transcriptome sequencing in a multi-institutional genome screening platform (LC-SCRUM-Asia, UMIN000036871). The CLIP1-LTK fusion was present in 0.4% of NSCLCs and was mutually exclusive with other known oncogenic drivers. We show that kinase activity of the CLIP1-LTK fusion protein is constitutively activated and has transformation potential. Treatment of Ba/F3 cells expressing CLIP1-LTK with lorlatinib, an ALK inhibitor, inhibited CLIP1-LTK kinase activity, suppressed proliferation and induced apoptosis. One patient with NSCLC harbouring the CLIP1-LTK fusion showed a good clinical response to lorlatinib treatment. To our knowledge, this is the first description of LTK alterations with oncogenic activity in cancers. These results identify the CLIP1-LTK fusion as a target in NSCLC that could be treated with lorlatinib.

Translocation carcinomas of the kidney

The MiT subfamily of transcription factors includes TFE3, TFEB, TFEC, and MITF. Gene fusions involving two of these transcription factors have been well-characterized in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The TFE3-rearranged RCC (also known as Xp11 translocation RCC) was first officially recognized in the 2004 World Health Organization (WHO) renal tumor classification. The TFEB-rearranged RCC, which typically harbor a t(6;11)(p21;q12) translocation which results in a MALAT1-TFEB gene fusion, were first officially recognized in the 2016 WHO renal tumor classification. These two subtypes of translocation RCC have many similarities. Both disproportionately involve young patients, although adult translocation RCC overall outnumber pediatric cases. Both often have unusual and distinctive morphologies; the TFE3-rearranged RCCs frequently have clear cells with papillary architecture and abundant psammoma bodies, while the TFEB-rearranged RCCs frequently have a biphasic appearance with both small and large epithelioid cells and nodules of basement membrane material. However, the morphology of these two neoplasms can overlap, with one mimicking the other or other more common renal neoplasms. Both of these RCC underexpress epithelial immunohistochemical markers, such as cytokeratin and epithelial membrane antigen, relative to most other RCC. Unlike other RCC, both frequently express the cysteine protease cathepsin k and often express melanocytic markers like HMB45 and Melan A. Finally, TFE3 and TFEB have overlapping functional activity as these two transcription factors frequently heterodimerize and bind to the same targets. Therefore, these two neoplasms are now grouped together under the heading of "MiT family translocation RCC." Approximately 50 renal cell carcinomas with gene fusions involving the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene have now been reported. While those with a Vinculin-ALK fusion have distinctive features (predilection to affect children with sickle cell trait and to show solid architecture with striking cytoplasmic vacuolization), other ALK-fusion RCCs have more varied clinical presentations and pathologic features. This review summarizes our current knowledge of these recently described RCC.

[SMARCB1(INI1)-deficient renal cell carcinoma: medullary and beyond : Evolving concepts]

During the last decades, the SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling complex has received enormous recognition as a major player in the molecular pathogenesis of diverse neoplasms. Accordingly, SWI/SNF defects affecting different subunits of the complex became defining genetic features in the nosology of different neoplastic entities. In the kidney, loss of SMARCB1(INI1) as a major component of the SWI/SNF complex has emerged as the defining genetic marker for renal medullary carcinoma and pediatric malignant rhabdoid tumor. Diagnosis of these two rare entities is based on a set of defined demographic, clinicopathological, immunophenotypic, and genetic (SMARCB1 loss) criteria. Moreover, the sickle cell trait is considered a prerequisite for renal medullary carcinoma. Current knowledge illustrates that SMARCB1 loss is encountered in three major tumor categories in the kidney: (1) histologically defined neoplasms that are primarily driven by de novo SMARCB1 loss (renal medullary carcinoma and malignant rhabdoid tumor); (2) SMRACB1-deficient renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with variable non-specific histology ranging from collecting duct-like, papillary high-grade (papillary type 2), or medullary-like (lacking sickle cell trait), to fully undifferentiated; and (3) biphasic (dedifferentiated) RCC showing a variable SMARCB1-deficient undifferentiated component. The latter variant most frequently originates from pre-existing clear cell RCC but may rarely superimpose on papillary or chromophobe RCC. This review summarizes the major defining features of the emerging SMARCB1-deficient renal neoplasms. All SMARCB1-deficient carcinomas have a poor prognosis in common. Therefore, exact diagnosis of these tumors is a prerequisite for studies investigating new therapies.

Undifferentiated and dedifferentiated urological carcinomas: lessons learned from the recent developments

Loss of the morphological and immunophenotypic characteristics of a neoplasm is a well-known phenomenon in surgical pathology and occurs across different tumor types in almost all organs. This process may be either partial, characterized by transition from well differentiated to undifferentiated tumor component (=dedifferentiated carcinomas) or complete (=undifferentiated carcinomas). Diagnosis of undifferentiated carcinoma is significantly influenced by the extent of sampling. Although the concept of undifferentiated and dedifferentiated carcinoma has been well established for other organs (e.g. endometrium), it still has not been fully defined for urological carcinomas. Accordingly, undifferentiated/ dedifferentiated genitourinary carcinomas are typically lumped into the spectrum of poorly differentiated, sarcomatoid, or unclassified (NOS) carcinomas. In the kidney, dedifferentiation occurs across all subtypes of renal cell carcinoma (RCC), but certain genetically defined RCC types (SDH-, FH- and PBRM1- deficient RCC) seem to have inherent tendency to dedifferentiate. Histologically, the undifferentiated component displays variable combination of four patterns: spindle cells, pleomorphic giant cells, rhabdoid cells, and undifferentiated monomorphic cells with/without prominent osteoclastic giant cells. Any of these may occasionally be associated with heterologous mesenchymal component/s. Their immunophenotype is often simple with expression of vimentin and variably pankeratin or EMA. Precise subtyping of undifferentiated (urothelial versus RCC and the exact underlying RCC subtype) is best done by thorough sampling supplemented as necessary by immunohistochemistry (e.g. FH, SDHB, ALK) and/ or molecular studies. This review discusses the morphological and molecular genetic spectrum and the recent develoments on the topic of dedifferentiated and undifferentiated genitourinary carcinomas.

Molecular Alterations in Pediatric Fibroblastic/Myofibroblastic Tumors: An Appraisal of a Next Generation Sequencing Assay in a Retrospective Single Centre Study

BACKGROUND

Pediatric fibroblastic/myofibroblastic tumors (PFMTs) can be challenging to definitively classify. Large case series or diagnostic updates have not been recently published despite identification of molecular alterations that could improve diagnostic accuracy. Our review of the literature found that over two-thirds of the more than 30 types of PFMTs harbor recurrent molecular alterations. We performed an institutional review of PFMTs to highlight limitations of a predominantly morphological classification, and evaluated the utility of a next-generation sequencing assay to aid diagnosis.

METHODS

PFMTs identified over a period of 12 years were reviewed, categorized per the new WHO classification, and tested using the Oncomine Childhood Cancer Research Assay.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven specimens from 58 patients were reviewed; 50 were chosen for molecular analysis, 16 (32%) lacking definitive classification. We identified alterations, some novel, in 33% of assayed cases. Expected alterations were identified for most known diagnoses and mutations were identified in 6 of 16 tumors (38%) that were initially unclassified.

CONCLUSION

We confirmed a significant subset of PFMTs remain difficult to classify using current criteria, and that a combined DNA/RNA assay can identify alterations in many of these cases, improving diagnostic certainty and suggesting a clinical utility for challenging cases.

Pathology and systemic therapy of non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma: an overview

Introduction: Non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) represents a highly heterogenous group of kidney cancer entities. As most clinical trials predominantly include patients with clear cell RCC (ccRCC), nccRCC treatment guidelines are mainly extrapolated from recommendations in ccRCC. Here, we review and elucidate current data on the pathologic classification and treatment of nccRCC.Areas covered: This article gives an overview of the WHO classification of RCC, showing the histological diversity of nccRCC and focusing particularly on entities first characterized since 2016, their specific molecular behavior and their role as indicators for hereditary cancer syndromes. In this context, we discuss the available data on nccRCC treatment oprtions such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors, mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, cytotoxic chemotherapy, and immune checkpoint inhibitors.Expert opinion: Although nccRCCs are relatively uncommon, entities of this type account for a subgroup of up to 20-25% of all RCCs. Advances in histopathology and molecular genetics, together with evidence gained from retrospective and prospective clinical data, have improved understanding of these tumors in recent years. Nevertheless, selective trials of current and novel therapies including new targeted agents in patients with nccRCC are urgently needed to further improve treatment guidelines.

Intra-abdominal EWSR1/FUS-CREM-rearranged malignant epithelioid neoplasms: two cases of an emerging aggressive entity with emphasis on misleading immunophenotype

CREB family (CREB1, ATF1, and CREM) gene fusions are defining markers in diverse mesenchymal neoplasms (clear cell sarcoma, angiomatoid fibrous histiocytoma, and others). However, neoplasms harboring EWSR1-CREM/FUS-CREM fusions are rare and poorly characterized. We describe two cases (55-year-old male with 7.5 cm renal mass and 32-year-old female with 5.5 cm mesenteric mass) illustrating their misleading immunophenotypes. Histologically, both showed eosinophilic and focally clear epithelioid cells arranged into sheets, nests, and trabeculae. Immunohistochemistry showed ALK, EMA, and AE1/AE3 immunoreactivity suggesting ALK-rearranged renal cell carcinoma (Case 1) and coexpression of keratin, EMA, synaptophysin, and chromogranin-A, suggesting neuroendocrine neoplasm (Case 2). Targeted RNA sequencing revealed EWSR1-CREM (Case 1) and FUS-CREM (Case 2) fusions. These cases add to the spectrum of CREM fusion-positive intra-abdominal epithelioid neoplasms. Their unusual immunophenotype and unexpected sites represent major pitfalls, underline a wide differential diagnosis, and emphasize the value of molecular testing in correctly diagnosing them.

New developments in existing WHO entities and evolving molecular concepts: The Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) update on renal neoplasia

The Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) reviewed recent advances in renal neoplasia, particularly post-2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification, to provide an update on existing entities, including diagnostic criteria, molecular correlates, and updated nomenclature. Key prognostic features for clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remain WHO/ISUP grade, AJCC/pTNM stage, coagulative necrosis, and rhabdoid and sarcomatoid differentiation. Accrual of subclonal genetic alterations in clear cell RCC including SETD2, PBRM1, BAP1, loss of chromosome 14q and 9p are associated with variable prognosis, patterns of metastasis, and vulnerability to therapies. Recent National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines increasingly adopt immunotherapeutic agents in advanced RCC, including RCC with rhabdoid and sarcomatoid changes. Papillary RCC subtyping is no longer recommended, as WHO/ISUP grade and tumor architecture better predict outcome. New papillary RCC variants/patterns include biphasic, solid, Warthin-like, and papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity. For tumors with 'borderline' features between oncocytoma and chromophobe RCC, a term "oncocytic renal neoplasm of low malignant potential, not further classified" is proposed. Clear cell papillary RCC may warrant reclassification as a tumor of low malignant potential. Tubulocystic RCC should only be diagnosed when morphologically pure. MiTF family translocation RCCs exhibit varied morphologic patterns and fusion partners. TFEB-amplified RCC occurs in older patients and is associated with more aggressive behavior. Acquired cystic disease (ACD) RCC-like cysts are likely precursors of ACD-RCC. The diagnosis of renal medullary carcinoma requires a negative SMARCB1 (INI-1) expression and sickle cell trait/disease. Mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma (MTSCC) can be distinguished from papillary RCC with overlapping morphology by losses of chromosomes 1, 4, 6, 8, 9, 13, 14, 15, and 22. MTSCC with adverse histologic features shows frequent CDKN2A/2B (9p) deletions. BRAF mutations unify the metanephric family of tumors. The term "fumarate hydratase deficient RCC" ("FH-deficient RCC") is preferred over "hereditary leiomyomatosis and RCC syndrome-associated RCC". A low threshold for FH, 2SC, and SDHB immunohistochemistry is recommended in difficult to classify RCCs, particularly those with eosinophilic morphology, occurring in younger patients. Current evidence does not support existence of a unique tumor subtype occurring after chemotherapy/radiation in early childhood.

Novel, emerging and provisional renal entities: The Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) update on renal neoplasia

The Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) undertook a critical review of the recent advances in renal neoplasia, particularly focusing on the newly accumulated evidence post-2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification. In the era of evolving histo-molecular classification of renal neoplasia, morphology is still key. However, entities (or groups of entities) are increasingly characterized by specific molecular features, often associated either with recognizable, specific morphologies or constellations of morphologies and corresponding immunohistochemical profiles. The correct diagnosis has clinical implications leading to better prognosis, potential clinical management with targeted therapies, may identify hereditary or syndromic associations, which may necessitate appropriate genetic testing. We hope that this undertaking will further facilitate the identification of these entities in practice. We also hope that this update will bring more clarity regarding the evolving classification of renal neoplasia and will further reduce the category of "unclassifiable renal carcinomas/tumors". We propose three categories of novel entities: (1) "Novel entity", validated by multiple independent studies; (2) "Emerging entity", good compelling data available from at least two or more independent studies, but additional validation is needed; and (3) "Provisional entity", limited data available from one or two studies, with more work required to validate them. For some entities initially described using different names, we propose new terminologies, to facilitate their recognition and to avoid further diagnostic dilemmas. Following these criteria, we propose as novel entities: eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma (ESC RCC), renal cell carcinoma with fibromyomatous stroma (RCC FMS) (formerly RCC with leiomyomatous or smooth muscle stroma), and anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangement-associated renal cell carcinoma (ALK-RCC). Emerging entities include: eosinophilic vacuolated tumor (EVT) and thyroid-like follicular renal cell carcinoma (TLFRCC). Finally, as provisional entities, we propose low-grade oncocytic tumor (LOT), atrophic kidney-like lesion (AKLL), and biphasic hyalinizing psammomatous renal cell carcinoma (BHP RCC).

Pediatric Mesothelioma With ALK Fusions: A Molecular and Pathologic Study of 5 Cases

Pediatric mesotheliomas are rare and their pathogenesis remains undefined. In this study, we report 5 cases of malignant mesothelioma in children, characterized by fusions involving the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene. Four cases occurred in females involving the abdominal cavity and were characterized by a pure epithelioid morphology. The fifth arose in the tunica vaginalis of a 15-year-old male and displayed a biphasic epithelioid-sarcomatoid phenotype. All cases demonstrated the classic morphologic and immunohistochemical features of malignant mesothelioma, including tubulopapillary architecture and cuboidal epithelioid cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm and uniform nuclei with vesicular chromatin. Immunohistochemically, all cases showed labeling for ALK, cytokeratins, WT1, and calretinin, while lacking expression of adenocarcinoma immunomarkers. Four cases demonstrated weak-moderate labeling for PAX8 protein, which resulted in diagnostic challenges with primary peritoneal serous carcinoma. The ALK genetic abnormalities were investigated by a combination of molecular methods. Archer FusionPlex was performed in 2 cases, showing fusions between ALK with either STRN or TPM1 genes, resulting in a transcript that retained the ALK kinase domain. One case was further studied by DNA targeted sequencing, but no additional genetic alterations were observed. In 1 case, cytogenetic analysis showed the presence of a t(2;15)(p23;q22) and fluorescence in situ hybridization confirmed the ALK gene break-apart. In the remaining 2 cases, ALK gene rearrangements were demonstrated by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Unlike adult mesotheliomas, which are tightly linked to asbestos exposure, often show loss of BAP1 expression and have complex karyotypes, ALK-rearranged mesothelioma appears to be similar to other fusion-positive mesotheliomas, such as those harboring EWSR1/FUS-ATF1 fusions, sharing significant morphologic overlap, occurring in young patients and displaying a simple, translocation-driven genetic profile.

[Histological subtypes of renal cell carcinoma : Overview and new developments]

BACKGROUND

The classification of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has changed remarkably in recent years.

OBJECTIVES

This is a short overview of the classification of RCC, focusing on new developments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature search was performed resulting in an overview of the classification of RCC. Emerging entities were discussed in detail.

RESULTS

Apart from the RCC subtypes in the WHO classification of 2016, several emerging entities came up over the last few years that are characterized by typical morphology, immunophenotype, and especially specific genetic alterations.

CONCLUSION

Precise classification of RCC is the key to better prognostic assessment with potential tumor-specific therapy and plays an important role in the recognition of possible association with hereditary tumor syndromes.

Systemic Therapies for the Management of Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: What Works, What Doesn't, and What the Future Holds

Non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) is a broad term that refers to a diverse group of tumors, each with its own distinct biologic and therapeutic profile. The management of nccRCCs is often based on extrapolating data from clinical trials in the more common clear cell renal cell carcinoma, but our emerging prospective and retrospective clinical experience in nccRCC allows us to make more precise recommendations tailored to each histology. The systemic therapy options for metastatic nccRCC include targeted therapies such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and, for specific rare subtypes, cytotoxic chemotherapy. Each nccRCC histology may respond differently to these regimens, which makes accurate pathologic diagnosis imperative. In the present review, we discuss the available clinical and biological data that can help guide systemic therapy recommendations for specific nccRCC subtypes.

ALK Rearrangements Characterize 2 Distinct Types of Salivary Gland Carcinomas: Clinicopathologic and Molecular Analysis of 4 Cases and Literature Review

The majority of salivary gland carcinomas are characterized by recurrent gene fusions that proved highly valuable diagnostically, but only rarely of therapeutic impact. Most of these fusion-positive carcinomas belong to the low-grade or intermediate-grade biological category. To date, only 5 cases of salivary gland carcinomas carrying an oncogenic ALK fusion have been reported in 4 recent studies, but their phenotypic spectrum and their nosological classification remain uncharacterized. We herein describe in detail the clinicopathologic and molecular features of 4 ALK-fusion-positive salivary carcinomas and review previously reported cases to assess if they could be classified into a defined World Health Organization (WHO) category. Patients were 3 men and 1 woman aged from 67 to 79 years (median: 70 y). All tumors originated in the parotid gland. Their size ranged from 1.1 to 3 cm (mean, 2 cm). Three tumors were de novo high-grade salivary duct carcinomas (SDCs) and 1 was a low-grade intercalated-type intraductal carcinoma. Histologically, high-grade tumors were predominantly solid, composed of intimately admixed basal (CK5+, androgen-) and luminal (CK5-, androgen+) components. The remarkable basal component showed squamoid basophilic pattern imparting an adenosquamous-like appearance in all cases. Conventional apocrine intraductal high-grade carcinoma was noted in 1 case. Prominent intraductal growth of the solid basal component (highlighted by p63 staining) was seen in all cases. The tumor cells expressed CK7 (3/3), mammaglobin (3/3, 1 focal), GATA3 (3/3, 1 focal), variably CK5 (3/3), and focally the androgen receptor (1/3), but lacked expression of HER2/neu, SOX10, MUC4, TTF1, S100, and Napsin A. The low-grade tumor showed classic histologic and immunophenotypic features of intercalated-type noninvasive intraductal carcinoma. Molecular profiling showed rearrangements involving exon 20 of ALK in all cases, confirmed by ALK immunohistochemistry (IHC and FISH). The fusion partner was EML4 (n=2) and STRN (n=1) in high-grade tumors and EML4 in the intraductal carcinoma. Two patients with high-grade tumors developed progressive disease (1 died at 9 mo; 1 alive under palliative therapy at 5 mo). This series and a review of 5 published cases indicate that ALK rearrangements characterize 2 distinct subsets of salivary gland carcinomas in the spectrum of high-grade androgen-poor, basal-like SDC (total reported: 5 cases) and low-grade intercalated-type intraductal carcinomas (4 cases). Given the therapeutic relevance of ALK fusions, inclusion of ALK IHC in any atypical-looking or androgen-poor SDC and in high-grade adenocarcinoma-not otherwise specified is recommended. Absence of aberrant ALK expression in genetically characterized secretory (n=15) and intraductal (n=9) carcinomas lacking ALK fusions underlines the value of ALK IHC as a diagnostic screening method for identifying potential cases.

Towards a new WHO classification of renal cell tumor: what the clinician needs to know-a narrative review

In 1952, renal cell carcinomas had been divided into 2 categories—clear cell or granular cell—depending upon their cytoplasmic staining characteristics. In the following years, the inventory of renal epithelial tumors has expanded by the addition of tumors named by their architectural pattern (i.e., papillary RCC, tubulocystic RCC), anatomic location (i.e., collecting duct carcinoma, renal medullary carcinoma), associated diseases (i.e., acquired cystic disease-associated RCCs). With the extensive application of molecular diagnostic techniques, it becomes possible to detect genetic distinctions between various types of renal neoplasm and discover new entities, otherwise misdiagnosed or diagnosed as unclassified RCC. Some tumors such as ALK rearrangement-associated RCC, MiT family translocation renal carcinomas, SDH-deficient renal cancer or FH-deficient RCC, are defined by their molecular characteristics. The most recent World Health Organization (WHO) classification of renal neoplasms account for more than 50 entities and provisional entities. New entities might be included in the upcoming WHO classification. The aim of this review is to summarise and discuss the newly acquired data and evidence on the clinical, pathological, molecular features and on the prognosis of new RCC entities, which will hopefully increase the awareness and the acceptance of these entities among clinicians and improve prognostication for individual patients.

Classification of renal cell tumors – current concepts and use of ancillary tests: recommendations of the Brazilian Society of Pathology

Classification of renal cell carcinomas has become more challenging. The 2016 WHO classification included 14 different subtypes and 4 emerging/provisional entities, and recent literature indicates new entities to be incorporated. Nomenclature is based on cytoplasmic appearance, architecture, combination of morphologies, anatomic location, underlying disease, familial syndromes, and specific genetic alterations. Immunohistochemistry is useful in selected cases while it can be insufficient in entities that require molecular confirmation of a specific gene alteration. The aim of these recommendations is to provide a reasonable and optimized approach for the use of ancillary tests in subtyping renal tumors, particularly in resource-limited settings.