1
|
Buck CO. Utilizing preterm infant body composition assessments to guide neonatal nutrition. Curr Opin Pediatr 2025; 37:191-197. [PMID: 39831772 PMCID: PMC11882371 DOI: 10.1097/mop.0000000000001434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The use of body composition to assess the quality of infant growth may add valuable information to pediatric clinical care. Preterm infants have differences in their fat and muscle mass development compared with infants born at term, which may be related to their early nutritional exposures. This review focuses on recent studies examining early nutrition in preterm infants and related body composition outcomes in the newborn period and beyond. RECENT FINDINGS Overall, the evidence shows that early nutrient delivery in parenteral nutrition and through formula supplementation or human milk fortification is associated with increased fat-free mass or lean mass in early life. However, future research is needed to fully understand the link between these body composition changes and longitudinal outcomes in preterm infants. SUMMARY Inclusion of body composition assessments in preterm infant nutrition research is critical to understand the factors associated with differences in adiposity and lean mass development in preterm infants. Medical fragility in preterm infants limits the routine use of body composition assessment tools which are currently validated, and additional studies are needed to thoroughly assess other methods which may be more feasible to integrate into bedside routine.
Collapse
|
2
|
Kakaroukas A, Abrahamse-Berkeveld M, Hayes L, McNally RJQ, Berrington JE, van Elburg RM, Embleton ND. Formula with large, milk phospholipid-coated lipid droplets in late-moderate preterm infants: a double-blind RCT. Pediatr Res 2025; 97:639-646. [PMID: 39294239 PMCID: PMC12014481 DOI: 10.1038/s41390-024-03476-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2024] [Revised: 07/24/2024] [Accepted: 08/01/2024] [Indexed: 09/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Limited evidence exists on the preferred feeding method when breastfeeding is not possible in late and moderate preterm (LMPT) infants. This RCT evaluates growth, safety, and tolerance of a concept infant formula (IF) with large, milk phospholipid-coated lipid droplets enriched in dairy lipids in LMPT infants with primary objective to demonstrate non-inferiority of daily weight gain from randomization to 3 months corrected age compared to a standard IF. METHODS LMPT infants were randomized before or around term equivalent age to either the concept (n = 21) or standard IF (n = 20). Forty-one breastfed (BF) infants served as reference. RESULTS Due to unintended low recruitment, non-inferiority in daily weight gain could not be demonstrated for the Concept compared to the Control group, but was compared to the BF group. Other outcomes were similar between the formula groups, except for an apparent larger head circumference gain in the Concept group. No apparent differences in growth and body composition outcomes were observed between the Concept and BF reference groups. CONCLUSION This small-scale study suggests the concept IF is a safe alternative for parents who choose IF to feed their LMPT infant. Larger trials are needed to better determine impacts on head growth or body composition. IMPACT In a small group of late and moderate preterm infants, growth from randomization until 3 months corrected age of infants fed with a concept infant formula with large, milk phospholipid-coated lipid droplets was not -significantly different from infants fed a standard infant formula. Infants in the Concept group had non-significant larger gain in head circumference compared to the Control group; larger trials are needed to confirm this finding. Both formulas were well-tolerated, with no differences in adverse events. The concept formula is potentially a safe alternative for parents of moderate to late preterm infants who choose to use formula milk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Kakaroukas
- Newcastle Neonatal Service, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Louise Hayes
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Richard J Q McNally
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Janet E Berrington
- Newcastle Neonatal Service, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Ruurd M van Elburg
- Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nicholas D Embleton
- Newcastle Neonatal Service, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Muts J, van Keulen BJ, van Goudoever JB, van den Akker CH. Formula protein versus human milk protein and the effects on growth in preterm born infants. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2025; 28:33-38. [PMID: 39659212 PMCID: PMC11634171 DOI: 10.1097/mco.0000000000001084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review aims to evaluate the latest available evidence on the differences between human milk proteins versus infant formula proteins and its effects on growth and development in preterm infants. RECENT FINDINGS High protein intake supports initial growth in preterm infants, although the long-term benefits remain unclear. Human milk requires adequate fortification to meet nutritional needs of preterm born infants. Formula feeding, with its higher protein content, may accelerate early weight gain but also increases the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis. Current evidence showed no significant advantages of human milk-derived fortifiers over bovine milk-derived fortifiers. Furthermore, studies published during the review period do not provide new evidence that alters the existing understanding of differences in neurodevelopmental outcomes between infants fed human milk and those fed formula. SUMMARY Both fortified human milk and preterm formula support growth in preterm infants, but human milk offers additional protective benefits, such as reducing the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis, making it the preferred option. Balancing immediate growth needs with potential long-term developmental outcomes remains crucial, highlighting the need for further research to determine the optimal protein intake for preterm infants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacqueline Muts
- Department of Pediatrics, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam
- Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC
| | - Britt J. van Keulen
- Department of Pediatrics, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam
- Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC
| | - Johannes B. van Goudoever
- Department of Pediatrics, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam
- Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC
| | - Chris H.P. van den Akker
- Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC
- Department of Pediatrics – Neonatology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lafeber AH, de Jong RC, Bosch M, van de Lagemaat M, van Veenendaal NR, Aarnoudse-Moens CSH, Boersma B, van Goudoever JB, de Groof F. Nutritional intake and growth until two years of age in moderate and late preterms. Pediatr Res 2024; 96:1258-1266. [PMID: 38769401 DOI: 10.1038/s41390-024-03231-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Revised: 04/04/2024] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Moderate and late preterm infants (MLPTI) (gestational age 32 0/7-36 6/7 weeks), are at risk for suboptimal growth. This study evaluated adherence to nutritional recommendations until 6 months corrected age (CA), growth until 2 years CA, and associations between nutritional intake and growth until 2 years CA. METHODS We prospectively collected nutritional intakes from 100 MLPTI during the first week of life and at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months CA. Anthropometry was assessed at birth, discharge, term age, and at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years CA. RESULTS On day 7, <40% reached nutritional recommendations. Thereafter, >80% reached protein recommendations until 6 months of life, but <60% reached energy recommendations. Weight z-scores increased from -0.44 at term-age to 0.59 at 3 months CA, but declined to -0.53 at 2 years CA on the TNO curves. No significant associations were found between nutritional intake and growth until 2 years CA. CONCLUSION No associations were demonstrated between nutritional intakes and growth until 2 years CA, despite not reaching recommended intakes. Despite high efforts to optimize growth, MLPTI find their own growth curve in the first 2 years of life. IMPACT This research is pioneering in identifying how nutrition influences growth in moderate and late preterm infants (MLPTI) up to 2 years corrected age (CA). MLPTI often do not meet the recommended protein and energy intake in their first week of life, suggesting that current guidelines might be too high. No association was demonstrated between nutritional intake and growth of MLPTI in the first 2 years of life. Initially, MLPTI show an increase in weight z-scores from term age up to 3 months CA but experience a decline in weight z-scores at 2 years CA, according to TNO growth charts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne H Lafeber
- Department of Pediatrics and Neonatology, North West Clinics, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
| | - Roxanne C de Jong
- Department of Pediatrics and Neonatology, North West Clinics, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
| | - Mark Bosch
- Department of Pediatrics and Neonatology, North West Clinics, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
| | - Monique van de Lagemaat
- Emma Children's Hospital Department of Pediatrics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Reproduction and Development (AR&D), Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nicole R van Veenendaal
- Emma Children's Hospital Department of Pediatrics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pediatrics and Neonatology, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelieke S H Aarnoudse-Moens
- Emma Children's Hospital Department of Pediatrics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart Boersma
- Department of Pediatrics and Neonatology, North West Clinics, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes B van Goudoever
- Emma Children's Hospital Department of Pediatrics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Reproduction and Development (AR&D), Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Femke de Groof
- Department of Pediatrics and Neonatology, North West Clinics, Alkmaar, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
van de Lagemaat M, Ruys CA, Muts J, Finken MJ, Rotteveel J, van Goudoever JB, Lafeber HN, van den Akker CH, Schrijver-Levie NS, Boonstra V, von Lindern JS, de Winter P, van Brakel MJ, Drewes AJ, Westra M. Growth and body composition of infants born moderate-to-late preterm fed a protein- and mineral-enriched postdischarge formula compared with a standard term formula until 6 months corrected age, a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr 2024; 120:111-120. [PMID: 38719093 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.04.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Revised: 04/25/2024] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/23/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Infants born moderate-to-late preterm (i.e., 32 wk-35 wk 6 d gestation) are, analogous to those born very preterm, at risk of later obesity, hypertension, and diabetes. Appropriate early life nutrition is key for ensuring optimal growth and body composition, thereby mitigating potential cardiometabolic risks. OBJECTIVES We aimed to compare growth and body composition between infants born moderate-to-late preterm fed isocaloric but protein- and mineral-enriched postdischarge formula (PDF) or standard term formula (STF) until 6 mo corrected age (CA; i.e., after term equivalent age [TEA]). METHODS After enrollment (≤7 d postpartum), infants received PDF if (fortified) mother's own milk (MOM) was insufficient. At TEA, those receiving >25% of intake as formula were randomized to either continue the same PDF (n = 47) or switch to STF (n = 50); those receiving ≥75% of intake as MOM (n = 60) served as references. At TEA and 6 mo CA, we assessed anthropometry and body composition using both dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and air displacement plethysmography (ADP). RESULTS Feeding groups had similar gestational age (median [25th percentile;75th percentile]: 34.3 [33.5; 35.1] wk), birthweight (mean ± standard deviation [SD]: 2175 ± 412 g), anthropometry, and body composition at TEA. At 6 mo CA, infants fed PDF had slightly, but significantly, greater length (67.6 ± 2.5 and 66.9 ± 2.6 cm, P < 0.05) and larger head circumference (43.9 ± 1.3 and 43.4 ± 1.5 cm, P < 0.05) compared to infants fed STF. Also, infants fed PDF had higher lean mass (LM) and bone mineral content estimated by DXA (4772 ± 675 and 4502 ± 741 g; 140 ± 20 and 131 ± 23 g, respectively; P < 0.05). ADP estimates, however, were not statistically different between feeding groups. CONCLUSIONS Infants born moderate-to-late preterm demonstrated modest increases in length, head circumference, LM, and bone mineral content when fed PDF compared to STF for 6 mo after TEA. This trial was registered at the International Clinical Trial Registry Platform as NTR5117 and NTR NL4979.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monique van de Lagemaat
- Department of Pediatrics/Neonatology, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Charlotte A Ruys
- Department of Pediatrics/Neonatology, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jacqueline Muts
- Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn Jj Finken
- Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joost Rotteveel
- Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes B van Goudoever
- Department of Pediatrics/Neonatology, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Harrie N Lafeber
- Department of Pediatrics/Neonatology, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Chris Hp van den Akker
- Department of Pediatrics/Neonatology, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gilbert L, Quansah DY, Arhab A, Schenk S, Gross J, Lanzi S, Stuijfzand B, Lacroix A, Horsch A, Puder JJ. Effect of the MySweetheart randomized controlled trial on birth, anthropometric and psychobehavioral outcomes in offspring of women with GDM. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2023; 14:1148426. [PMID: 37351105 PMCID: PMC10284133 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1148426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) may negatively affect offspring outcomes. A lifestyle intervention may therefore not only improve maternal, but also offspring outcomes. The effects of lifestyle interventions on birth, anthropometric, and psychobehavioral outcomes in offspring of women with GDM need further evidence. Design The MySweetheart trial is a monocentric single-blind randomized controlled trial in 211 women with GDM. It tested the effect of a pre- and postpartum multidimensional interdisciplinary lifestyle and psychosocial intervention focusing on both the mothers and their infants and its effects on maternal (primary outcomes) and offspring (secondary outcomes) metabolic and psychobehavioral outcomes compared with guidelines-based usual-care. This paper focuses on offspring's birth, anthropometric, and maternal report of psychobehavioral outcomes at singular timepoints. Methods Women with GDM aged ≥18 years, between 24-32 weeks of gestation, speaking French or English were included and randomly allocated to either the intervention or to an active guidelines-based usual-care group using a 1:1 allocation ratio. The intervention lasted from pregnancy until 1 year postpartum and focused on improving diet, physical activity, and mental health in the mother. For the offspring it focused on supporting breastfeeding, delaying the timing of introduction of solid foods, reducing the consumption of sweetened beverages, increasing physical activity of the family, and improving parental responsiveness to infant distress, hunger, satiety and sleeping cues, and difficult behavior. Results Adverse birth and neonatal outcomes rarely occurred overall. There were no differences between groups in offspring birth, neonatal, anthropometric, or psychobehavioral outcomes up to one year. After adjustments for maternal age and the offspring's sex and age, there was a borderline significant between-group difference in birth length (β:-0.64, CI:-1.27; -0.01, p: 0.05), i.e., offspring of mothers in the intervention group were born 0.64 cm shorter compared to those in the usual-care group. Conclusion This is the first pre- and postpartum multidimensional interdisciplinary lifestyle and psychosocial intervention in GDM focusing on both the mother and the offspring. It did not lead to a significant improvement in most birth, anthropometric, and psychobehavioral outcomes in offspring of women with GDM. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02890693.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leah Gilbert
- Nepean Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Obstetric Service, Department Woman-Mother-Child, Interdisciplinary GDM Group Lausanne, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Dan Yedu Quansah
- Nepean Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Amar Arhab
- Nepean Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Sybille Schenk
- Nepean Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Justine Gross
- Nepean Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Stefano Lanzi
- Service d’angiologie, Département Cœur-Vaisseaux, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Bobby Stuijfzand
- Nepean Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Alain Lacroix
- Nepean Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Antje Horsch
- Institute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare (IUFRS), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Neonatology Service, Department Woman-Mother-Child, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jardena J. Puder
- Nepean Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Muacevic A, Adler JR, Aldwaighri M, Almalki A, Alshiti H, Kattan W, Alqarni M, Alsulaimani S, AlShaikh T, Alsulaimani F. Impact of Breastfeeding on Low Birthweight Infants, Weight Disorders in Infants, and Child Development. Cureus 2022; 14:e32894. [PMID: 36699796 PMCID: PMC9870598 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.32894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Infancy has been proven as the best time to improve health outcomes for the later stage of life. The composition of human breast milk has evolved over millennia to support and maintain the infant's life during the early years of life. To achieve life-sustaining effects, human breast milk is packed with fats, proteins, carbohydrates, and a wide range of bioactive compounds such as immunoglobulins, lactoferrin, and cytokines. The immunological compounds in breast milk have been shown to curtail gastrointestinal tract infections, respiratory tract infections, hospital admissions, acute otitis media, allergic reactions, and urinary tract infections. Although breastfeeding causes newborns to gain less weight at the beginning of their lives than formula milk does, breast milk improves body composition by low adiposity. A higher adipose deposition in infants is linked with an increased risk of child obesity in the future. Due to significant health benefits, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends initiating breastfeeding within one hour after birth and continuing for at least six months. Breastfeeding has emerged as a superior source of nutrition that can promote healthy physiological and cognitive development and protect against disease challenges in low birthweight infants. This review summarizes potential evidence that highlights the potential health impact of breast milk in low birthweight infants.
Collapse
|