Despite limitations in content range, the SCIM-III is reproducible and a valid indicator of physical function in youths with spinal cord injury and dysfunction

Reliability validity and responsiveness of the spinal cord independence measure 4th version in a multicultural setup

OBJECTIVE

To examine the fourth version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure for reliability and validity.

DESIGN

Partly blinded comparison with the criterion standard Spinal Cord Independence Measure III, and between examiners and examinations.

SETTING

A multicultural cohort from 19 spinal cord injury units in 11 countries.

PARTICIPANTS

Six hundred and forty-eight patients with spinal cord injury.

INTERVENTION

Assessment with Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM IV) and Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM III) on admission to inpatient rehabilitation and before discharge.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

SCIM IV interrater reliability, internal consistency, correlation with and difference from SCIM III, and responsiveness.

RESULTS

Total agreement between examiners was above 80% on most SCIM IV tasks. All Kappa coefficients were above 0.70 and statistically significant (p<0.001). Pearson's coefficients of the correlation between the examiners were above 0.90, and intraclass correlation coefficients were above 0.90. Cronbach's alpha was above 0.96 for the entire SCIM IV, above 0.66 for the subscales, and usually decreased when an item was eliminated. Reliability values were lower for the subscale of respiration and sphincter management, and on admission than at discharge. SCIM IV and SCIM III mean values were very close, and the coefficients of Pearson correlation between them were 0.91-0.96 (p<0.001). The responsiveness of SCIM IV was not significantly different from that of SCIM III in most of the comparisons.

CONCLUSIONS

The validity, reliability, and responsiveness of SCIM IV, which was adjusted to assess specific patient conditions or situations that SCIM III does not address, and which includes more accurate definitions of certain scoring criteria, are very good and quite similar to those of SCIM III. SCIM IV can be used for clinical and research trials, including international multi-center studies, and its group scores can be compared with those of SCIM III.

Improvements in Function Following Inpatient Activity-Based Therapy for Children With Acute Flaccid Myelitis

BACKGROUND

Acute flaccid myelitis (AFM) is an illness defined by rapid onset of flaccid paralysis in one or more limbs or bulbar muscles, with MRI findings of predominantly spinal cord gray matter abnormalities spanning one or more spinal segments following a viral illness. Individuals with AFM may require rehabilitation to promote recovery. Activity-based restorative therapy (ABRT) has previously been shown to result in positive outcomes in children with neurologic deficits related to AFM.

OBJECTIVES

This study examined functional changes in a group of children with AFM who participated in ABRT in an inpatient setting.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of children with AFM admitted to a single inpatient rehabilitation unit from 2014 to 2018. Children were assessed using the Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIM), Manual Muscle Testing (MMT), Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM), and the Physical Abilities and Mobility Scale (PAMS) as part of routine clinical care; the Modified Rankin Scale for Neurologic Disability was completed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Children showed significant improvements across all outcome measures, with effect sizes ranging from moderate to large. Significant change was also seen across all muscle groups on MMT, with effect sizes ranging from small to large. Consistent with previous reports, children demonstrated better function in distal than proximal muscle groups at both admission and discharge.

CONCLUSION

Children with AFM who participated in ABRT increased muscle strength and made functional gains across all outcome measures. These results support the utility of rehabilitation in the long-term care of children with AFM and residual neurologic deficit.

Functional Outcomes in Spinal Tuberculosis: A Review of the Literature

Spinal tuberculosis often leads to neurological deficit and subsequent deterioration in functional outcomes. This review assesses the recent evidence on functional outcomes in spinal tuberculosis, highlighting functional recovery, assessment tools for functional measures, and associative factors for functional recovery. Using PubMed, a literature search was done using the terms “spinal tuberculosis,” “tuberculous spondylitis,” “tuberculous spondylodiscitis,” and “functional outcome” for original articles published between January 2010 and December 2019. A total of 191 search results were found. Detailed screening showed that 19 articles met the eligibility criteria: 13 of these focused on surgical methods, four on conservative management, and two on rehabilitation approaches. The outcome measures used for functional assessment were the Oswestry Disability Index (11 articles), Japanese Orthopaedic Association score (n=3), modified Barthel Index (n=2), Functional Independence Measure (n=2), and 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (n=1). Functional outcome was mainly affected by pain, spinal cord compression, and inpatient rehabilitation. No significant difference in functional outcome was found between conservative management and surgery for cases with uncomplicated spinal tuberculosis. Most studies focused on surgery as the mode of treatment and used pain-related functional measures; however, these assessed functional limitations secondary to pain, and not neurological deficits. Further studies may consider examining functional outcomes in spinal tuberculosis by utilizing spinal cord-specific functional outcome measures, to evaluate outcome measures as a prognostic tool, and to measure functional outcomes from specific rehabilitation interventions.

Comparação da incapacidade percebida e independência funcional em indivíduos com lesão medular atletas e não atletas

RESUMO Os comprometimentos da funcionalidade em indivíduos com lesão medular (LM) geram complicações secundárias, sendo o descondicionamento físico preponderante e um exacerbador das complicações da lesão. O objetivo foi avaliar em atletas e não atletas com LM a incapacidade percebida e a independência funcional. Os questionários WHODAS 2.0 e SCIM III foram aplicados em 37 voluntários com LM e seus dados sociodemográficos foram coletados. Os escores totais do WHODAS 2.0 e SCIM III de indivíduos com LM torácica e LM cervical foram comparados por meio do teste de Mann-Whitney. Quanto à incapacidade percebida observou-se diferença significativa no WHODAS 2.0 entre atletas e não atletas com LM torácica. Em relação à independência funcional não houve diferenças significativas entre os grupos no SCIM III. Apesar de a prática esportiva promover benefícios para a saúde, no grupo de indivíduos com LM cervical não foram encontradas diferenças significativas, o que pode ser explicado pelo maior grau de comprometimento motor desses indivíduos.

Interrater Reliability of the Pediatric Neuromuscular Recovery Scale for Spinal Cord Injury

Background: In synergy with the mounting scientific evidence for the capacity of recovery after spinal cord injury (SCI) and training, new evidence-based therapies advancing neuromuscular recovery are emerging. There is a parallel need for outcome instruments that specifically address recovery. The Pediatric Neuromuscular Recovery Scale (Pediatric NRS) is one example with established content validity to assess neuromuscular capacity within task performance. Objective: The objective of this study was to determine interrater reliability of the Pediatric NRS to classify motor capacity in children after SCI. Methods: Pediatric physicians (3), occupational therapists (5), and physical therapists (6) received standardized training in scoring the scale, then rated video assessments of 32 children post SCI, 2-12 years of age, 78% non-ambulatory. Interrater reliability was analyzed using Kendall coefficient of concordance for individual Pediatric NRS items and overall score. Results: The interrater reliability coefficient was determined to be near 1 for the overall Pediatric NRS score (ICC = 0.966; 95% CI, 0.89-0.98). Twelve of 16 individual items exhibited high concordance coefficients (Kendall's W ≥ 0.8) and four items demonstrated concordance coefficients, < 0.8 and > 0.69. Interrater reliability was equivalent among groups defined by age and neurological level, but lower among non-ambulatory individuals. Conclusion: Strong interrater reliability was demonstrated by pediatric clinicians who scored children with SCI using the Pediatric NRS.

Evaluation of the Capabilities of Upper Extremity Test (CUE-T) in Children With Tetraplegia

Background: The Capabilities of Upper Extremity Test (CUE-T) is a spinal cord injury (SCI)-specific instrument based on the CUE Questionnaire (CUE-Q). Objective: To evaluate the psychometric properties of CUE-T in children with cervical SCI and determine the lowest age appropriate for test administration. Method: In this repeated measures multicenter study, 39 youths, mean age 12.3 years and mean time post injury 5.14 years, completed two administrations of the CUE-T. Test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and known groups validity were measured. Concurrent and discriminant validity were measured against previously validated measures: CUE-Q, Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP), Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) III, SCIM III-Self Care (SCIM-SC), and SCIM-Mobility. Results: The CUE-T scores demonstrated strong test-retest reliability (ICC ≥ 0.95), strong internal consistency (α ≥ 0.90), and acceptable individual item agreement (κ ≥ 0.49). The hand subscale had better scores (p < .05) for the motor incomplete versus complete known groups, and the arm, hand, and side subscales had better scores (p < .05) for higher versus lower strength groups. The CUE-T had strong concurrent validity with the CUE-Q (r = 0.85-0.87), GRASSP (r = 0.78-0.90), and SCIM-SC (r = 0.70) and moderate-to-weak correlation with the total SCIM (r = 0.65) and SCIM-Mobility (r = 0.51). Children older than 6 years with mature grasp patterns were able to complete the CUE-T. Conclusion: The CUE-T scores are reliable and valid for use in children with cervical SCI older than 6 years of age.