Impact of pretransplant leukemic blast% in bone marrow and peripheral blood on transplantation outcomes of patients with acute myeloid leukemia undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation in non-CR

Long-term follow-up of haploidentical haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in paediatric patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukaemia: Report from a single centre

Data from 200 children with high-risk acute myeloid leukaemia who underwent their first haploidentical haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) between 2015 and 2021 at our institution were analysed. The 4-year overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS) and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) were 71.9%, 62.3% and 32.4% respectively. The 100-day cumulative incidences of grade II-IV and III-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) were 41.1% and 9.5% respectively. The 4-year cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD (cGVHD) was 56.1%, and that of moderate-to-severe cGVHD was 27.3%. Minimal residual disease (MRD)-positive (MRD+) status pre-HSCT was significantly associated with lower survival and a higher risk of relapse. The 4-year OS, EFS and CIR differed significantly between patients with MRD+ pre-HSCT (n = 97; 63.4%, 51.4% and 41.0% respectively) and those with MRD-negative (MRD-) pre-HSCT (n = 103; 80.5%, 73.3% and 23.8% respectively). Multivariate analysis also revealed that acute megakaryoblastic leukaemia without Down syndrome (non-DS-AMKL) was associated with extremely poor outcomes (hazard ratios and 95% CIs for OS, EFS and CIR: 3.110 (1.430-6.763), 3.145 (1.628-6.074) and 3.250 (1.529-6.910) respectively; p-values were 0.004, 0.001 and 0.002 respectively). Thus, haplo-HSCT can be a therapy option for these patients, and MRD status pre-HSCT significantly affects the outcomes. As patients with non-DS-AMKL have extremely poor outcomes, even with haplo-HSCT, a combination of novel therapies is urgently needed.

Therapeutic cancer vaccination against mutant calreticulin in myeloproliferative neoplasms induces expansion of specific T cells in the periphery but specific T cells fail to enrich in the bone marrow

Background

Therapeutic cancer vaccination against mutant calreticulin (CALR) in patients with CALR-mutant (CALRmut) myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) induces strong T-cell responses against mutant CALR yet fails to demonstrate clinical activity. Infiltration of tumor specific T cells into the tumor microenvironment is needed to attain a clinical response to therapeutic cancer vaccination.

Aim

Determine if CALRmut specific T cells isolated from vaccinated patients enrich in the bone marrow upon completion of vaccination and explore possible explanations for the lack of enrichment.

Methods

CALRmut specific T cells from four of ten vaccinated patients were expanded, enriched, and analyzed by T-cell receptor sequencing (TCRSeq). The TCRs identified were used as fingerprints of CALRmut specific T cells. Bone marrow aspirations from the four patients were acquired at baseline and at the end of trial. T cells were enriched from the bone marrow aspirations and analyzed by TCRSeq to identify the presence and fraction of CALRmut specific T cells at the two different time points. In silico calculations were performed to calculate the ratio between transformed cells and effector cells in patients with CALRmut MPN.

Results

The fraction of CALRmut specific T cells in the bone marrow did not increase upon completion of the vaccination trial. In general, the T cell repertoire in the bone marrow remains relatively constant through the vaccination trial. The enriched and expanded CALRmut specific T cells recognize peripheral blood autologous CALRmut cells. In silico analyses demonstrate a high imbalance in the fraction of CALRmut cells and CALRmut specific effector T-cells in peripheral blood.

Conclusion

CALRmut specific T cells do not enrich in the bone marrow after therapeutic cancer peptide vaccination against mutant CALR. The specific T cells recognize autologous peripheral blood derived CALRmut cells. In silico analyses demonstrate a high imbalance between the number of transformed cells and CALRmut specific effector T-cells in the periphery. We suggest that the high burden of transformed cells in the periphery compared to the number of effector cells could impact the ability of specific T cells to enrich in the bone marrow.

Peritransplantation Glucocorticoid Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation Is a Promising Strategy for AML Patients With High Leukemic Burden: Comparison With Transplantations Using Other Donor Types

Using a murine haploidentical bone marrow transplantation (BMT) model, we recently showed that peritransplantation administration of glucocorticoid (GC) redistributed donor T cells from the gastrointestinal tract to bone marrow, which resulted in a significant reduction of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) while promoting graft-versus-leukemia effects. Furthermore, in a retrospective clinical study of patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) undergoing transplantation in non-remission, we also showed that haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haplo-SCT) using peritransplantation GC administration led to a significantly lower relapse rate and better overall survival rate compared with haplo-SCT using post-transplantation cyclophosphamide. In the present study, using the same dataset of patients undergoing GC haplo-SCT, we retrospectively compared with patients with AML undergoing transplantation in non-remission using 3 other donor types: matched sibling donor (MSD), matched unrelated donor (MUD), and umbilical cord blood (UCB). For GC haplo-SCT, 44 patients underwent peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in a single center (Hyogo College of Medicine), with the conditioning treatment consisting of fludarabine, melphalan, anti-thymocyte globulin (2.5 mg/kg), and TBI 3 Gy. Methylprednisolone was given from the start of conditioning treatment, and the GVHD prophylaxis consisted of tacrolimus and methylprednisolone (1 mg/kg). The transplantation outcomes were compared with data of 1889 patients undergoing MSD-SCT (n = 449), MUD-BMT (n = 493), or UCB transplantation (UCBT) (n = 947) in non-CR, which were extracted from the Transplant Registry Unified Management Program data, the largest data registry in Japan. For donor engraftment, significantly faster neutrophil and platelet engraftment was achieved with GC haplo-SCT compared with allo-SCT using the 3 other donor types. Neutrophil engraftment was achieved at a median of 10 days for GC haplo-SCT, and 20 days for MSD-, MUD-, and UCB-transplants. Platelet engraftment was achieved at a median of 19.5 days for GC haplo-SCT, 42 days for MSD-SCT and MUD-BMT, and 43 days for UCBT, respectively. The incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD was lower after allo-SCTs using MSD (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.465, P = .003), MUD (HR = 0.524, P = .010), and UCB (HR = 0.647, P = .067) compared with GC haplo-SCT. There was no significant difference in the incidence of chronic GVHD between GC haplo-SCT and allo-SCT using the other 3 donor types. Regarding relapse, GC haplo-SCT was associated with a significantly lower risk compared with MSD-SCT (P < .001) or MUD-BMT (P = .004). GC haplo-SCT tended to have a lower risk compared with UCBT (P = .063). Especially, all the 43 evaluable GC haplo-SCT recipients achieved CR after transplantation, whereas 23.9%, 22.8%, and 27.0% of patients who underwent MSD-SCT, MUD-BMT, and UCBT could not achieve CR after transplantation, respectively. Regarding non-relapse mortality, GC haplo-SCT was associated with a significantly higher risk compared with MUD-BMT (P = .014), and tended to have a higher risk compared with MSD-SCT (P = .061). There was no significant difference between GC haplo-SCT and UCBT (P = .600). Allo-SCTs using MSD (HR = 2.548, P < .001), MUD (HR = 2.134, P = .005), and UCB (HR = 2.376, P = .001) lead to significantly higher overall mortality compared with GC haplo-SCT; the adjusted overall survival at 3 years was 19.8% for MSD, 26.1% for MUD, 28.0% for UCB, and 65.1% for GC haplo. Thus GC haplo-SCT is a promising treatment option for patients with AML with a high leukemic burden.

Comparison of transplant outcomes between haploidentical transplantation and single cord blood transplantation in non-remission acute myeloid leukaemia: A nationwide retrospective study

Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a potentially curative treatment for some patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) who are refractory to chemotherapy. Cord blood transplantation (CBT) is a reasonable option in such cases because of its rapid availability. Recently, a growing number of human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-haploidentical related donor HSCTs (haplo-HSCTs) have been performed, although its effectiveness remains undetermined. Using the Japanese nationwide transplantation registry data, we identified 2438 patients aged ≥16 years who received CBT or haplo-HSCT as their first transplant for non-remission AML between January 2008 and December 2018. After 2:1 propensity score matching, 918 patients in the CBT group and 459 patients in the haplo-HSCT group were selected. In this matched cohort, no significant difference in overall survival (OS) was observed between the CBT and haplo-HSCT groups (hazard ratio [HR] of haplo-HSCT to CBT 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.89-1.16). Similarly, no significant difference in the cumulative incidence of relapse (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.93-1.28) or non-relapse mortality (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.76-1.18). Subgroup analysis showed that CBT was significantly associated with preferable OS in patients receiving myeloablative conditioning. Our data showed comparable outcomes between haplo-HSCT and CBT recipients with non-remission AML.

Comprehensive analysis for cellular senescence-related immunogenic characteristics and immunotherapy prediction of acute myeloid leukemia

In malignancies, cellular senescence is critical for carcinogenesis, development, and immunological regulation. Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have not investigated a reliable cellular senescence-associated profile and its significance in outcomes and therapeutic response. Cellular senescence-related genes were acquired from the CellAge database, while AML data were obtained from the GEO and TCGA databases. The TCGA-AML group served as a training set to construct a prognostic risk score signature, while the GSE71014 set was used as a testing set to validate the accuracy of the signature. Through exploring the expression profiles of cellular senescence-related genes (SRGs) in AML patients, we used Lasso and Cox regression analysis to establish the SRG-based signature (SRGS), which was validated as an independent prognostic predictor for AML patients via clinical correlation. Survival analysis showed that AML patients in the low-risk score group had a longer survival time. Tumor immune infiltration and functional enrichment analysis demonstrated that AML patients with low-risk scores had higher immune infiltration and active immune-related pathways. Meanwhile, drug sensitivity analysis and the TIDE algorithm showed that the low-risk score group was more susceptible to chemotherapy and immunotherapy. Cell line analysis in vitro further confirmed that the SRGs in the proposed signature played roles in the susceptibility to cytarabine and YM155. Our results indicated that SRGS, which regulates the immunological microenvironment, is a reliable predictor of the clinical outcome and immunotherapeutic response in AML.

Chemotherapy or Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation as Salvage Therapy for Patients with Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Multicenter Analysis

Introduction

The overall outcome of patients with refractory AML (rAML) remains poor. Though allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is considered as the only curative therapy, it is routinely recommended only for patients after remission with salvage chemotherapy.

Objective

In this study, we evaluated the impact of salvage chemotherapy or allo-HSCT on the overall outcome in rAML.

Methods

We collected the clinical data of 220 patients from 4 medical centers and performed retrospective analysis of prognosis factors, including salvage chemotherapy, intensity of chemotherapy, and allo-HSCT.

Results

A total of 29 patients received allo-HSCT directly without salvage chemotherapy, 26 patients achieved complete remission (CR) or complete remission with incomplete hematological recovery (CRi) after transplantation and 4-year leukemia-free survival (LFS) and overall survival (OS) were 45.0 ± 10.7 and 51.0 ± 10.6%, respectively. Another 191 patients received salvage chemotherapy and 81 (42.2%) achieved CR or CRi. Thirty-four patients among them underwent subsequent allo-HSCT with 4-year LFS and OS of 46.0 ± 8.8 and 46.2 ± 9.0%. The 4-year LFS and OS in 26 patients who failed to obtain CR or CRi but received allo-HSCT with active disease were 32.9 ± 10.0 and 36.9 ± 10.8%, respectively. For patients who received salvage chemotherapy but not allo-HSCT, few of them became long-term survivors. In multivariate analysis, salvage chemotherapy and the intensity of chemotherapy failed to have significant impact on both OS and LFS. Allo-HSCT was the only prognostic factor for improved OS and LFS in multivariate analysis.

Conclusions

These results indicate the benefit of allo-HSCT in patients with rAML and direct allo-HSCT without salvage chemotherapy could be treatment option.

Peritransplant glucocorticoids redistribute donor T cells to the bone marrow and prevent relapse after haploidentical SCT

Patients with acute leukemia who are unable to achieve complete remission prior to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) have dismal outcomes, with relapse rates well in excess of 60%. Haplo-identical SCT (haplo-SCT) may allow enhanced graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effects by virtue of HLA class I/II donor-host disparities, but it typically requires intensive immunosuppression with posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) to prevent lethal graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Here, we demonstrate in preclinical models that glucocorticoid administration from days -1 to +5 inhibits alloantigen presentation by professional recipient antigen presenting cells in the gastrointestinal tract and prevents donor T cell priming and subsequent expansion therein. In contrast, direct glucocorticoid signaling of donor T cells promotes chemokine and integrin signatures permissive of preferential circulation and migration into the BM, promoting donor T cell residency. This results in significant reductions in GVHD while promoting potent GVL effects; relapse in recipients receiving glucocorticoids, vehicle, or PT-Cy was 12%, 56%, and 100%, respectively. Intriguingly, patients with acute myeloid leukemia not in remission who received unmanipulated haplo-SCT and peritransplant glucocorticoids also had an unexpectedly low relapse rate at 1 year (32%; 95% CI, 18%-47%) with high overall survival at 3 years (58%; 95% CI, 38%-74%). These data highlight a potentially simple and effective approach to prevent relapse in patients with otherwise incurable leukemia that could be studied in prospective randomized trials.

Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Adolescent and Young Adult Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Limited data exist regarding the outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) among adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Here we analyzed the features and outcomes of AYA patients with AML who had achieved complete remission (CR) and those who had not (non-CR) at allo-HCT. We retrospectively analyzed 2350 AYA patients with AML who underwent allo-HCT with a myeloablative conditioning regimen and who were consecutively enrolled in the Japanese nationwide HCT registry. The difference in overall survival (OS) between younger (age 16 to 29 years) and older AYA (age 30 to 39 years) patients in CR at transplantation was not significant (70.2% versus 71.7% at 3 years; P = .62). Meanwhile, this difference trended toward a statistical significance between younger and older AYA patients in non-CR at transplantation (39.5% versus 34.3% at 3 years; P = .052). In AYA patients in CR and non-CR, the age at transplantation did not affect relapse or nonrelapse mortality (NRM). In AYA patients in CR, no difference in OS was observed between those who received total body irradiation (TBI) and those who did not (71.1% versus 70.5% at 3 years; P = .43). AYA patients who received TBI-based conditioning had a significantly lower relapse rate and higher NRM than those who underwent non-TBI-based conditioning (relapse: 19.8% versus 24.1% at 3 years [P = .047]; NRM: 14.7% versus 11.1% at 3 years [P = .021]). In contrast, among the non-CR patients, there were no differences between the TBI and non-TBI groups with respect to OS (P = .094), relapse (P = .83), and NRM (P = .27). Our data indicate that outcomes may be more favorable in younger AYA patients than in older AYA patients in non-CR at transplantation, and that outcomes of TBI-based conditioning could be comparable to those of non-TBI-based conditioning for AYA patients.

Clinical Benefits of Preconditioning Intervention in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myelogenous Leukemia Who Underwent Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Kanto Study of Group for Cell Therapy Multicenter Analysis

A multicenter retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the clinical significance of preconditioning intervention (PCI) before allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) not in remission. The study cohort consisted of 519 patients classified according to the intensity (intensive/moderate) of PCI and their response to PCI. The group treated with PCI had higher blast counts in the peripheral blood (PB) and had a lower overall survival (OS) rate (P < .001) and higher nonrelapse mortality (NRM) rate (P = .035) compared with those without PCI (no PCI group). Approximately 40% of the patients (68 of 236) achieved a good response to PCI (good PCI group), and those patients had lower blast counts in the PB compared with the group with poor response to PCI (poor PCI group). OS in the good PCI group was comparable to that in the no PCI group and significantly better than that in the poor PCI group (hazard ratio, .54; 95% confidence interval, .39 to .77; P < .001). However, OS was significantly lower in patients with intensive/moderate PCI compared with the no PCI group. These results suggest that PCI increases NRM without decreasing the post-transplantation relapse rate, but may be beneficial for patients with lower blast counts in PB irrespective of its intensity.

Haploidentical related donor vs matched sibling donor allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome aged over 50 years: A single-center retrospective study

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is a potentially curative therapeutic option for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Increasing data suggest that haploidentical donor (HID) transplantation achieve comparable outcomes with HLA-matched sibling donor (MSD) in adult AML/MDS. This retrospective study compared the outcomes of AML or MDS patients age ≥50 years underwent HID and MSD transplantation. One hundred and fifty-six patients were enrolled in this study, including 75 HID and 81 MSD transplantation. The 100-day cumulative incidence of II-IV° acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was 33.3 ± 5.4% vs 22.2 ± 4.6%, respectively, in HID and MSD groups (P = .066), and III-IV° acute GVHD was not significantly different between two groups (5.3%±2.6% vs 6.2%±2.7%, respectively, P = .823). The 2-year cumulative incidence of limited and extensive chronic GVHD was not statistically different in HID and MSD groups (20.9 ± 5.5% vs 18.9 ± 4.8% and 13.0 ± 4.7% vs 19.7 ± 5.0%, P = .889 and P = .269, respectively). The 2-year cumulative incidences of relapse (27.0 ± 5.6% vs 22.7 ± 5.1%, P = .509), 2-year overall survival (63.0 ± 5.8% vs 66.7 ± 5.4%, P = .454), 2-year transplant-related mortality (17.2 ± 4.6% vs 17.4 ± 4.4%, P = .847), 2-year progression-free survival (59.3 ± 5.8% vs 64.5 ± 5.4%, P = .437), 2-year GVHD-free relapse-free survival (42.6 ± 5.9% vs 40.9 ± 5.6%, P = .964) were not significantly different in the two groups. The present data showed equivalent outcomes in AML or MDS patients age ≥50 years underwent HID and MSD transplantation.

Prognostic index for patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia who underwent hematopoietic cell transplantation: a KSGCT multicenter analysis

A multicenter retrospective study was performed to explore a prognostic scoring index in order to identify a population who are least likely to benefit from allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The cohort included 519 patients with AML, who received HCT between 2005 and 2015 at a status of relapse or primary induction failure. Multivariate analysis demonstrated five independent predictors for OS, including C-reactive protein ≥ 1 mg/dL, peripheral blood blast fraction ≥ 20%, poor-risk karyotype, performance status ≥ 2, and bone marrow unrelated donor as a stem cell source. A prognostic scoring index was explored based on these predictors, and successfully separated the cohort into four groups. At 2 years, OS was 47%, 24%, 8%, and 0% for Good (Score 0, 1: n = 118), Intermediate-1 (Score 2: n = 75), Intermediate-2 (Score 3: n = 39), and Poor (Score 4: n = 24), respectively (P < 0.001). The predicting value of the index was confirmed in a validation cohort. Although a further validation study is warranted, the scoring index may be useful to predict survival and to identify the population with the lowest survival prior to HCT in patients with relapsed or refractory AML.

Risk Stratification and Prognosticators of Acute Myeloid Leukemia with Myelodysplasia-Related Changes in Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Retrospective Study of the Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia Working Group of the Japan Society for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Although the prognosis of acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC) is worse than that of AML not otherwise specified (AML-NOS), transplantation outcomes and prognosticators of AML-MRC patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) remain unclear. Transplantation outcomes of AML-MRC (n = 4091) were compared with those of AML-NOS (n = 3964) in patients who underwent allo-SCT between 2003 and 2016 using a nationwide registration database. The 3-year overall survival (OS; 35.5% versus 50.6%) was lower and the relapse (42.3% versus 32.1%) and nonrelapse mortality (26.3% versus 22.0%) rates were higher in the AML-MRC group than in the AML-NOS group. Based on the hierarchical AML-MRC classification, myelodysplasia as the sole criterion was associated with better OS compared with AML-NOS, whereas monosomal or complex karyotype and -5/del(5q) were associated with poor OS. A history of myelodysplastic syndrome and -7/del(7q) did not affect OS. Accordingly, AML-MRC with complex karyotype or -5/del(5q) and that with monosomal karyotype were classified as intermediate and high risks, respectively, whereas the remaining cases were classified as low risk. The 3-year OS rates were 50.7%, 36.9%, and 13.8% in the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, respectively (P < .001). Risk classification, older age, and low performance status score were significant risk factors for survival in AML-MRC, independently of the disease status. Grades I to II acute graft-versus-host disease significantly reduced the 3-year relapse (24.7% versus 31.6%), leading to better survival (hazard ratio, .64). Our prognostic risk stratification can potentially aid in elucidating the diverse transplantation outcomes in patients with AML-MRC.