Nuclear actin polymerization rapidly mediates replication fork remodeling upon stress by limiting PrimPol activity

Nuclear and genome dynamics underlying DNA double-strand break repair

Changes in nuclear shape and in the spatial organization of chromosomes in the nucleus commonly occur in cancer, ageing and other clinical contexts that are characterized by increased DNA damage. However, the relationship between nuclear architecture, genome organization, chromosome stability and health remains poorly defined. Studies exploring the connections between the positioning and mobility of damaged DNA relative to various nuclear structures and genomic loci have revealed nuclear and cytoplasmic processes that affect chromosome stability. In this Review, we discuss the dynamic mechanisms that regulate nuclear and genome organization to promote DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair, genome stability and cell survival. Genome dynamics that support DSB repair rely on chromatin states, repair-protein condensates, nuclear or cytoplasmic microtubules and actin filaments, kinesin or myosin motor proteins, the nuclear envelope, various nuclear compartments, chromosome topology, chromatin loop extrusion and diverse signalling cues. These processes are commonly altered in cancer and during natural or premature ageing. Indeed, the reshaping of the genome in nuclear space during DSB repair points to new avenues for therapeutic interventions that may take advantage of new cancer cell vulnerabilities or aim to reverse age-associated defects.

ATR-hippo drives force signaling to nuclear F-actin and links mechanotransduction to neurological disorders

The mechanical environment is sensed through cell-matrix contacts with the cytoskeleton, but how signals transit the nuclear envelope to affect cell fate decisions remains unknown. Nuclear actin coordinates chromatin motility during differentiation and genome maintenance, yet it remains unclear how nuclear actin responds to mechanical force. The DNA-damage kinase ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related protein (ATR) translocates to the nuclear envelope to protect the nucleus during cell motility or compression. Here, we show that ATR drives nuclear actin assembly via recruitment of Filamin-A to the inner nuclear membrane through binding of the hippo pathway scaffold and ATR substrate, RASSF1A. Moreover, we demonstrate how germline RASSF1 mutation disables nuclear mechanotransduction resulting in cerebral cortex thinning and associates with common psychological traits. Thus, defective mechanical-regulated pathways may contribute to complex neurological disorders.

Nuclear actin filaments - a historical perspective

The view on nuclear filaments formed by non-skeletal β-actin has significantly changed over the decades. Initially, filamentous actin was observed in amphibian oocyte nuclei and only under specific cell stress conditions in mammalian cell nuclei. Improved labeling and imaging technologies have permitted insights into a transient but microscopically apparent filament network that is relevant for chromatin organization, biomechanics of the mammalian cell nucleus, gene expression, and DNA damage repair. Here, we will provide a historical perspective on the developing insight into nuclear actin filaments.

Loss of cytoplasmic actin filaments raises nuclear actin levels to drive INO80C-dependent chromosome fragmentation

Loss of cytosolic actin filaments upon TORC2 inhibition triggers chromosome fragmentation in yeast, which results from altered base excision repair of Zeocin-induced lesions. To find the link between TORC2 kinase and this yeast chromosome shattering (YCS) we performed phosphoproteomics. YCS-relevant phospho-targets included plasma membrane-associated regulators of actin polymerization, such as Las17, the yeast Wiscott-Aldrich Syndrome protein. Induced degradation of Las17 was sufficient to trigger YCS in presence of Zeocin, bypassing TORC2 inhibition. In yeast, Las17 does not act directly at damage, but instead its loss, like TORC2 inhibition, raises nuclear actin levels. Nuclear actin, in complex with Arp4, forms an essential subunit of several nucleosome remodeler complexes, including INO80C, which facilitates DNA polymerase elongation. Here we show that the genetic ablation of INO80C activity leads to partial YCS resistance, suggesting that elevated levels of nuclear G-actin may stimulate INO80C to increase DNA polymerase processivity and convert single-strand lesions into double-strand breaks.

TORC2 inhibition triggers yeast chromosome fragmentation through misregulated Base Excision Repair of clustered oxidation events

Combinational therapies provoking cell death are of major interest in oncology. Combining TORC2 kinase inhibition with the radiomimetic drug Zeocin results in a rapid accumulation of double-strand breaks (DSB) in the budding yeast genome. This lethal Yeast Chromosome Shattering (YCS) requires conserved enzymes of base excision repair. YCS can be attenuated by eliminating three N-glycosylases or endonucleases Apn1/Apn2 and Rad1, which act to convert oxidized bases into abasic sites and single-strand nicks. Adjacent lesions must be repaired in a step-wise fashion to avoid generating DSBs. Artificially increasing nuclear actin by destabilizing cytoplasmic actin filaments or by expressing a nuclear export-deficient actin interferes with this step-wise repair and generates DSBs, while mutants that impair DNA polymerase processivity reduce them. Repair factors that bind actin include Apn1, RFA and the actin-dependent chromatin remodeler INO80C. During YCS, increased INO80C activity could enhance both DNA polymerase processivity and repair factor access to convert clustered lesions into DSBs.

Telomere maintenance and the DNA damage response: a paradoxical alliance

Telomeres are the protective caps at the ends of linear chromosomes of eukaryotic organisms. Telomere binding proteins, including the six components of the complex known as shelterin, mediate the protective function of telomeres. They do this by suppressing many arms of the canonical DNA damage response, thereby preventing inappropriate fusion, resection and recombination of telomeres. One way this is achieved is by facilitation of DNA replication through telomeres, thus protecting against a "replication stress" response and activation of the master kinase ATR. On the other hand, DNA damage responses, including replication stress and ATR, serve a positive role at telomeres, acting as a trigger for recruitment of the telomere-elongating enzyme telomerase to counteract telomere loss. We postulate that repression of telomeric replication stress is a shared mechanism of control of telomerase recruitment and telomere length, common to several core telomere binding proteins including TRF1, POT1 and CTC1. The mechanisms by which replication stress and ATR cause recruitment of telomerase are not fully elucidated, but involve formation of nuclear actin filaments that serve as anchors for stressed telomeres. Perturbed control of telomeric replication stress by mutations in core telomere binding proteins can therefore cause the deregulation of telomere length control characteristic of diseases such as cancer and telomere biology disorders.

Tolerating DNA damage by repriming: Gap filling in the spotlight

Timely and accurate DNA replication is critical for safeguarding genome integrity and ensuring cell viability. Yet, this process is challenged by DNA damage blocking the progression of the replication machinery. To counteract replication fork stalling, evolutionary conserved DNA damage tolerance (DDT) mechanisms promote DNA damage bypass and fork movement. One of these mechanisms involves "skipping" DNA damage through repriming downstream of the lesion, leaving single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) gaps behind the advancing forks (also known as post-replicative gaps). In vertebrates, repriming in damaged leading templates is proposed to be mainly promoted by the primase and polymerase PRIMPOL. In this review, we discuss recent advances towards our understanding of the physiological and pathological conditions leading to repriming activation in human models, revealing a regulatory network of PRIMPOL activity. Upon repriming by PRIMPOL, post-replicative gaps formed can be filled-in by the DDT mechanisms translesion synthesis and template switching. We discuss novel findings on how these mechanisms are regulated and coordinated in time to promote gap filling. Finally, we discuss how defective gap filling and aberrant gap expansion by nucleases underlie the cytotoxicity associated with post-replicative gap accumulation. Our increasing knowledge of this repriming mechanism - from gap formation to gap filling - is revealing that targeting the last step of this pathway is a promising approach to exploit post-replicative gaps in anti-cancer therapeutic strategies.

Chromatin remodeling and spatial concerns in DNA double-strand break repair

The substrate for the repair of DNA damage in living cells is not DNA but chromatin. Chromatin bears a range of modifications, which in turn bind ligands that compact or open chromatin structure, and determine its spatial organization within the nucleus. In some cases, RNA in the form of RNA:DNA hybrids or R-loops modulates DNA accessibility. Each of these parameters can favor particular pathways of repair. Chromatin or nucleosome remodelers are key regulators of chromatin structure, and a number of remodeling complexes are implicated in DNA repair. We cover novel insights into the impact of chromatin structure, nuclear organization, R-loop formation, nuclear actin, and nucleosome remodelers in DNA double-strand break repair, focusing on factors that alter repair functional upon ablation.

Mechanisms and regulation of replication fork reversal

DNA replication is remarkably accurate with estimates of only a handful of mutations per human genome per cell division cycle. Replication stress caused by DNA lesions, transcription-replication conflicts, and other obstacles to the replication machinery must be efficiently overcome in ways that minimize errors and maximize completion of DNA synthesis. Replication fork reversal is one mechanism that helps cells tolerate replication stress. This process involves reannealing of parental template DNA strands and generation of a nascent-nascent DNA duplex. While fork reversal may be beneficial by facilitating DNA repair or template switching, it must be confined to the appropriate contexts to preserve genome stability. Many enzymes have been implicated in this process including ATP-dependent DNA translocases like SMARCAL1, ZRANB3, HLTF, and the helicase FBH1. In addition, the RAD51 recombinase is required. Many additional factors and regulatory activities also act to ensure reversal is beneficial instead of yielding undesirable outcomes. Finally, reversed forks must also be stabilized and often need to be restarted to complete DNA synthesis. Disruption or deregulation of fork reversal causes a variety of human diseases. In this review we will describe the latest models for reversal and key mechanisms of regulation.

Replication forks associated with long nuclear actin filaments in mild stress conditions display increased dynamics

Nuclear actin filaments (F-actin) form during S-phase and in response to replication stress to promote fork remodeling and repair. In mild replication stress conditions, nuclear actin polymerization is required to limit PrimPol recruitment to the fork while promoting fork reversal. Both short and long filaments form during this response, but their function in the nuclear dynamics of replication sites was unclear. Here, we show that replication centers associated with long nuclear actin filaments become more mobile than the rest of the forks, suggesting relocalization of replication sites as a response to prolonged fork stalling and/or fork breakage, even in response to mild replication stress.

Regulation of Precise DNA Repair by Nuclear Actin Polymerization: A Chance for Improving Gene Therapy?

Although more difficult to detect than in the cytoplasm, it is now clear that actin polymerization occurs in the nucleus and that it plays a role in the specific processes of the nucleus such as transcription, replication, and DNA repair. A number of studies suggest that nuclear actin polymerization is promoting precise DNA repair by homologous recombination, which could potentially be of help for precise genome editing and gene therapy. This review summarizes the findings and describes the challenges and chances in the field.

Nuclear actin dynamics and functions at a glance

Actin is well known for its cytoskeletal functions, where it helps to control and maintain cell shape and architecture, as well as regulating cell migration and intracellular cargo transport, among others. However, actin is also prevalent in the nucleus, where genome-regulating roles have been described, including it being part of chromatin-remodeling complexes. More recently, with the help of advances in microscopy techniques and specialized imaging probes, direct visualization of nuclear actin filament dynamics has helped elucidate new roles for nuclear actin, such as in cell cycle regulation, DNA replication and repair, chromatin organization and transcriptional condensate formation. In this Cell Science at a Glance article, we summarize the known signaling events driving the dynamic assembly of actin into filaments of various structures within the nuclear compartment for essential genome functions. Additionally, we highlight the physiological role of nuclear F-actin in meiosis and early embryonic development.

DNA replication and replication stress response in the context of nuclear architecture

The DNA replication process needs to be coordinated with other DNA metabolism transactions and must eventually extend to the full genome, regardless of chromatin status, gene expression, secondary structures and DNA lesions. Completeness and accuracy of DNA replication are crucial to maintain genome integrity, limiting transformation in normal cells and offering targeting opportunities for proliferating cancer cells. DNA replication is thus tightly coordinated with chromatin dynamics and 3D genome architecture, and we are only beginning to understand the underlying molecular mechanisms. While much has recently been discovered on how DNA replication initiation is organised and modulated in different genomic regions and nuclear territories-the so-called "DNA replication program"-we know much less on how the elongation of ongoing replication forks and particularly the response to replication obstacles is affected by the local nuclear organisation. Also, it is still elusive how specific components of nuclear architecture participate in the replication stress response. Here, we review known mechanisms and factors orchestrating replication initiation, and replication fork progression upon stress, focusing on recent evidence linking genome organisation and nuclear architecture with the cellular responses to replication interference, and highlighting open questions and future challenges to explore this exciting new avenue of research.