Efficacy and safety of apatinib in patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer: a real-world retrospective study

Acute inflammatory reaction during anti-angiogenesis therapy combined with immunotherapy as a possible indicator of the therapeutic effect: Three case reports and literature review

The posterior line treatment of unresectable advanced or metastatic gastrointestinal (GI) tumors has always been a challenging point. In particular, for patients with microsatellite stable (MSS)/mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) 0GI tumors, the difficulty of treatment is exacerbated due to their insensitivity to immune drugs. Accordingly, finding a new comprehensive therapy to improve the treatment effect is urgent. In this study, we report the treatment histories of three patients with MSS/pMMR GI tumors who achieved satisfactory effects by using a comprehensive treatment regimen of apatinib combined with camrelizumab and TAS-102 after the failure of first- or second-line regimens. The specific contents of the treatment plan were as follows: apatinib (500 mg/d) was administered orally for 10 days, followed by camrelizumab (200 mg, ivgtt, day 1, 14 days/cycle) and TAS-102 (20 mg, oral, days 1-21, 28 days/cycle). Apatinib (500 mg/d) was maintained during treatment. Subsequently, we discuss the possible mechanism of this combination and review the relevant literature, and introduce clinical trials on anti-angiogenesis therapy combined with immunotherapy.

Effectiveness of polyene phosphatidylcholine and its combination with other drugs in patients with liver diseases based on real-world research

OBJECTIVES

Polyene phosphatidylcholine (PPC) is a widely used hepatoprotective drug. We aim to explore the effectiveness of PPC in patients with liver diseases based on real-world research, and compare with other hepatoprotective drugs.

METHODS

This was a "three-phase" retrospective study, including a descriptive study, a self-control case study, and a specific-disease cohort study. 14,800 hospitalized patients were enrolled in phase I from January 1, 2015, to January 1, 2020, of which 793 patients using PPC alone were included for phase II & III. The major measurement of effectiveness analysis was the ALT level and its changes. Wilcoxon signed rank test, Chi-Square Test and Mann-Whitney U Test were used.

RESULTS

In patients without liver tumor, ALT level decreased after using PPC (p < 0.01), and the decrease of ALT level using PPC was greater than using glutathione or magnesium isoglycyrrhizinate alone (p=0.044; p=0.038). In patients without liver tumor but having abnormal liver function, the decrease of ALT level using PPC + glutathione was greater than using glutathione alone (p=0.047).

CONCLUSION

PPC had a beneficial effect on liver function in patients without liver tumor, and PPC could enhance the liver protective function of glutathione and magnesium isoglycyrrhizinate.

Apatinib: A Novel Antiangiogenic Drug in Monotherapy or Combination Immunotherapy for Digestive System Malignancies

Digestive system malignancies are one of the primary causes of cancer-related death. Meanwhile, angiogenesis has been proved to play an important role in the process of cancer neovascularization. Apatinib, a novel targeted antiangiogenic molecule, could generate highly selective competition in the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2, involved in tumor progression and metastasis. It has been implied as a promising cancer treatment agent that can prevent tumor cell proliferation meanwhile inhibit tumor angiogenesis. Furthermore, completed clinical trials demonstrated that apatinib could prolong the progression-free survival and overall survival in advanced gastric cancer and primary liver cancer. Recent studies revealed that apatinib had a synergistic effect with immunotherapy as a second-line and third-line treatment regimen for some other cancers. In this review, we summarize the pharmacological properties of apatinib and the latest clinical application in chemotherapy-refractory patients with advanced digestive system cancer. Based on the comparable survival results, the molecular mechanisms of apatinib are prospective to include the antiangiogenic, apoptosis-inducing, and autophagy-inducing properties in the corresponding signaling pathway. Treatment of apatinib monotherapy or combination immunotherapy remains the optimal option for patients with digestive system malignancies in the future.

Effectiveness and Economic Evaluation of Polyene Phosphatidyl Choline in Patients With Liver Diseases Based on Real-World Research

Aims: Liver disease has high prevalence, number, and disease burden in China, and polyene phosphatidyl choline (PPC) is a widely used liver protective drug. We aim to explore the effectiveness and economy of PPC in patients with liver diseases based on real-world research and compare with other hepatoprotective drugs. Methods: This is a "three-phase" study from three medical centers, including descriptive study of patients using PPC injection, self-control case study of patients using PPC injection, and specific-disease cohort study of patients using PPC injection or control drugs. The major measurements of liver function for effectiveness analysis were the alanine transaminase (ALT) level changes and recovery rate. The main statistical methods were Wilcoxon signed rank test, χ 2 test, and Mann-Whitney U test. Propensity score matching was applied to reduce bias. Cost-effectiveness analysis, cost minimization analysis, and sensitivity analysis were used for economic evaluation. Results: PPC alone or in combination with glutathione and magnesium isoglycyrrhizinate shows less total hospitalization cost (p < 0.05) and smaller cost-effectiveness ratio and was effective in protecting liver function, especially in patients with liver transplantation or postoperation of nontumor liver disease (ALT decreased significantly after PPC treatment; p < 0.05). Glutathione and magnesium isoglycyrrhizinate combined with PPC could enhance the protective function of liver. Conclusion: PPC was an effective and economic liver protective drug in patients with specific liver diseases, and PPC could enhance the liver protective function of glutathione and magnesium isoglycyrrhizinate.

Rationale and design of the PROMETCO study: a real-world, prospective, longitudinal cohort on the continuum of care of metastatic colorectal cancer from a clinical and patient perspective

The PROMETCO study is collecting real-world data on metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients with two progressions. This international, prospective, longitudinal, observational cohort study is collecting data on mCRC patients with two disease progressions since diagnosis and receiving subsequent treatment. Objectives include overall survival, treatment patterns, effectiveness and safety and patient-reported outcomes using the EuroQol 5-level, 5-dimensional questionnaire, the Brief Fatigue Inventory and a modified version of the ACCEPTance by the Patients of their Treatment (ACCEPT©) questionnaire. Data are collected retrospectively and prospectively up to 18 months. As of 13 October 2021, 544 patients from 18 countries had been enrolled. To the authors' knowledge, PROMETCO is the first international, real-world study of the continuum of care of mCRC patients in this setting.

Trial registration number: NCT03935763 ( ClinicalTrials.gov )

Low-Dose Apatinib Combined With S-1 in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-Arm, Prospective Study

Purpose

Apatinib is an approved third-line treatment for metastatic gastric cancer in China and demonstrates good safety, tolerability, and efficacy in other advanced solid tumors. The aim of this prospective, single-arm, multicenter, phase 2 study was to assess the efficacy and safety of low-dose apatinib combined with S-1 in the treatment of refractory mCRC.

Patients and Methods

Patients with refractory mCRC were enrolled and administered apatinib combined with S-1 until disease progression, patient decision to withdraw, or unacceptable toxic effects. The primary endpoint was investigator-evaluated progression-free survival (PFS) and the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR).

Results

From December 2017 to December 2018, 30 patients were enrolled and 29 patients were eligible for the evaluation of efficacy and safety. The median PFS (mPFS) and OS (mOS) were 7.9 and 12.9 months, respectively. Exploratory analysis revealed that patients administered S-1 ≥ 70 days achieved longer mPFS and mOS. Four patients achieved a partial response, 22 achieved stable disease, and three had progressive disease, attributing to an ORR of 13.79% and a DCR of 89.66%. Ten grade 3 adverse events were reported and the frequency of each grade 3 adverse event was less than 5%. No grade 4 side events were observed.

Conclusions

These results indicated that apatinib combined with S-1 showed promising efficacy and manageable toxicity in patients with progressive mCRC after at least 2 prior lines of therapy, making it a promising therapeutic option for mCRC treatment.

Clinical Trial Registration

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03397199, identifier NCT03397199.

Management of Apatinib-Related Adverse Events in Patients With Advanced Osteosarcoma From Four Prospective Trials: Chinese Sarcoma Study Group Experience

Four prospective trials have reported apatinib-related efficacy in osteosarcoma, with a high response rate of 43.2%. Currently, Adverse Events (AEs) have increasingly gained attention, as treatment with multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is potentially lifelong. For this reason, a consensus meeting of the Chinese Sarcoma Study Group (CSSG), which is a multidisciplinary panel composed of pediatric, medical and surgical oncologists specializing in sarcoma, nurse specialists, oncological senior pharmacists and gastroenterologists, was held to develop comprehensive guidelines on AEs emerging due to apatinib treatment to better assist in the prevention, management, and understanding of AE development. We summarized all AEs that arose in ≥10% of the participants as well as rare AEs that required extra caution to prevent that were observed in these four published prospective trials and arranged these AEs into 14 disorder systems according to CTCAE 5.0. In this review, we discuss strategies for the management of AEs in patients with advanced osteosarcoma, with the aim of maximizing treatment benefits and minimizing the need for apatinib treatment discontinuation. We also focus on providing recommendations for the prophylaxis and treatment of advanced osteosarcoma using apatinib to achieve optimal outcomes.

Influence of KDR Genetic Variation on the Efficacy and Safety of Patients with Chemotherapy Refractory Metastatic CRC Who Received Apatinib Treatment

Background

The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of kinase insert domain containing receptor (KDR) genetic variation on the efficacy of treatment and safety of patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) receiving apatinib.

Methods

A total of 108 patients with chemotherapy refractory metastatic CRC who were treated with apatinib participated in this study retrospectively. Efficacy of the patients' treatment was evaluated. Prognosis was carried out and safety profile was documented, respectively. Blood specimens and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of the patients were obtained for the analysis of genetic variation and KDR gene mRNA expression, respectively. The association between genotype status and clinical outcomes was presented.

Results

Objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) of the 108 patients with metastatic CRC receiving apatinib treatment were 5.6% and 69.4%, respectively. Survival analysis results exhibited that the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of the 108 patients with metastatic CRC was 3.6 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 3.03-4.17 months) and 8.9 months (95% CI: 7.57-10.23 months), respectively. Subsequently, the analysis of KDR genetic variation indicated that rs2071559 was of clinical significance. The minor allele frequency of rs2071559 was 0.22 and the genotype status corresponded with Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (P=0.949). Prognosis analysis in a dominant inheritance manner through the combination of patients with TC and CC genotype showed that the median PFS of patients with TT genotype and TC/CC genotype was 4.1 and 3.0 months, respectively (P=0.012). Furthermore, the median OS of patients with the two genotypes was 10.5 and 6.1 months, respectively (P=0.007). Additionally, multivariate Cox regression analysis of OS showed that TC/CC genotype was an independent factor for OS (Hazard ratio (HR)=0.65, P=0.021). Interestingly, mRNA expression analysis suggested that the mRNA expression of KDR in PBMC differed significantly according to rs2071559 genotype status (P<0.001).

Conclusion

Apatinib demonstrated a potentially superior clinical outcome for patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic CRC. KDR polymorphism rs2071559 could be used as a potential biomarker for the prognosis evaluation of patients with CRC receiving apatinib therapy.

Efficacy and safety of apatinib as third- or further-line therapy for patients with advanced NSCLC: a retrospective study

Background

Apatinib, an oral small-molecule angiogenesis inhibitor, selectively inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR-2), which inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) stimulated endothelial cell migration and proliferation and decreases tumour growth and metastasis. Recently, the efficacy of multi-target angiogenic drugs has been demonstrated for many cancers, including non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of apatinib in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Patients and methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 70 patients with advanced NSCLC who received second-line and later treatment from November 2015 to July 2017 with poor results. Out of the 70 patients, 36 patients received apatinib treatment after second-line or later treatment, whereas 34 patients in the control group did not receive further treatment. The patients were treated with oral apatinib 500 mg once a day every day for 4 weeks per cycle. Treatment was continued in responding and stable patients until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and side effects of the drug were recorded and reviewed.

Results

ORR, DCR, PFS, and OS were evaluated in 36 patients receiving apatinib and 34 patients in the control group. The ORR and DCR in patients receiving apatinib therapy were 22.2% and 77.8%, respectively. The median PFS and OS in the treatment group were 5.6 and 9.6 months, respectively. The median OS in the apatinib group was significantly longer than that in the control group (9.6 versus 3.8 months; p < 0.0001). In contrast, there were no differences in adverse reactions between the patients in the treatment and control groups.

Conclusion

Apatinib showed favourable efficacy and safety and can thus be used as a treatment option for patients with advanced NSCLC.

Raltitrexed Enhances the Antitumor Effect of Apatinib in Human Esophageal Squamous Carcinoma Cells via Akt and Erk Pathways

Objective

Apatinib has been proved effective in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer and a variety of solid tumors. Raltitrexed is emerging as a promising alternative for treating advanced colorectal cancer in China. This work aims to study the combinatory antitumor effect of apatinib and raltitrexed on human esophageal squamous carcinoma cells (ESCC).

Materials and Methods

Two VEGFR-2-positive human ESCC lines, KYSE-30 and TE-1, were treated with apatinib or raltitrexed, or both, then the cell proliferation rate was measured by MTS assay; cell migration and invasion were studied by transwell assays; cell apoptosis rate was determined by flow cytometry; cellular autophagy level affected was analyzed by Western blot analysis; finally, quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was used to monitor transcription and Western blot was performed to check phosphorylation of apoptotic proteins after treatment.

Results

Both apatinib and raltitrexed significantly inhibited KYSE-30 and TE-1 cell proliferation in a dose-dependent manner. Treatment with both drugs showed enhanced inhibitory effects on cell proliferation, migration, and invasiveness compared with apatinib monotherapy. Apoptosis percentages in both cell lines were also remarkably increased by the combined treatment. Moreover, the combination of apatinib and raltitrexed down-regulated mRNA level of the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2, while up-regulated pro-apoptotic protein PARP, Bax, and caspase-3 transcription. Western blot analysis showed that phosphorylation levels of Erk, Akt, and invasiveness-associated protein matrix metalloproteinases-9 (MMP-9) were decreased in the combination group.

Conclusion

Taken together, these results indicate that raltitrexed enhances the antitumor effects of apatinib on human ESCC cells by down-regulating phosphorylation of Akt and Erk, implying a combination of raltitrexed and apatinib might be an effective option for treating esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients.

Up-and-Coming Experimental Drug Options for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Colorectal cancer is one of the top causes of cancer and cancer-related deaths worldwide. The prognosis of metastatic colorectal cancer is poor and treatment options are limited. Many patients will run out of treatment options before they become medically unfit for therapy. As such, there is a need to expand upon the current understanding of disease biology as well as drug resistance mechanisms in order to create new approaches for therapy. In this review article, we will discuss the mechanistic rationale and clinical data for new drugs and therapeutic combinations under development for metastatic colorectal cancer.

Apatinib enhanced anti-PD-1 therapy for colon cancer in mice via promoting PD-L1 expression

Increasing studies confirm that anti-angiogenesis can increase the effectiveness of immunotherapy. In this study, we found that an angiogenesis inhibitor apatinib enhanced anti-PD-1 therapy for colon cancer in mice via promoting PD-L1 expression. Apatinib treatment upregulated PD-L1 expression in various colon cancer cells both at the mRNA and protein levels. Further, apatinib-treated cancer cells hampered activation and IFN-γ secretion of T cells in the co-culture system, which was reversed by the anti-PD-1 antibody. Based on this, the combination of apatinib with anti-PD-1 on colon cancer growth in mice was examined. The combination treatment showed more significant inhibition on the growth of transplanted tumors in mice than single-drug treatment. Overall, our study here showed the enhancement of anti-PD-1 antitumor efficacy in a syngeneic mouse model (CT-26 cells in Balb/c) by the angiogenesis inhibitor apatinib via upregulating PD-L1 expression as well as angiogenesis inhibition, which may provide a rationale for the combination of apatinib and anti-PD-1 antibody for colorectal cancer treatment in the clinic.

Apatinib suppresses tumor progression and enhances cisplatin sensitivity in esophageal cancer via the Akt/β-catenin pathway

Background

Esophageal cancer is the sixth leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, which is partially due to limited progress of therapy. Apatinib, an inhibitor of VEGFR2, has a promising antitumor effect on malignancies. However, the underlying mechanism of its antitumor effect on esophageal cancer remains poorly understood.

Materials and methods

Eighteen pairs of frozen esophageal cancer and their para-cancer samples and 25 paraffin specimens from advanced esophageal cancer patients treated with cisplatin-based regimen were collected. The effects of apatinib on cell growth, cell apoptosis, cell cycle and invasion/migration of esophageal cancer cells were assessed. Bioinformatics, luciferase reporter, immunoprecipitation and immunofluorescence assays were conducted for mechanic investigation. Quantitative RT-PCR, western blotting and immunohistochemistry were used to measure the expression of functional genes. Xenograft tumor growth of mice was performed.

Results

We found that VEGFR2 was highly expressed in esophageal cancer and associated with poor efficacy of cisplatin-based treatment. Apatinib displayed profound actions against tumor cell growth of human esophageal cancer via promoting cell apoptosis and cell cycle arrest. Also, apatinib displayed the inhibitory effects on cell migration and invasion. Moreover, apatinib strongly suppressed the growth of esophageal cancer xenografts in mice. The effects of apatinib on esophageal cancer were partially dependent on its block of the VEGFR2/Akt/β-catenin pathway. Specifically, apatinib induced the degradation of β-catenin and decreased its transcriptional activity through Akt/GSK-3β repression. Further in vitro and in vivo studies revealed that low dose apatinib had a synergistic antitumor effect with cisplatin on esophageal cancer.

Conclusion

Our study indicates that apatinib suppresses tumor progression and enhances cisplatin sensitivity in esophageal cancer by deactivating the Akt/β-catenin pathway. These findings provide a theoretical foundation for using apatinib as an effective therapeutic drug for esophageal cancer.

Apatinib Monotherapy for Chemotherapy-Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Multi-centre, Single-Arm, Prospective Study

Angiogenesis inhibitors are of considerable interest for treating metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of apatinib in chemotherapy-refractory mCRC. Apatinib 500 mg was administered daily to patients who had progressed after two or more lines of standard fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. Overall, 48 patients were enrolled. ORR and DCR were 8.3% (4/48) and 68.8% (33/48), respectively. Median PFS and OS were 4.8 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.653-5.887) and 9.1 months (95% CI, 5.155-13.045), respectively, and did not differ between subgroups stratified by previous anti-angiogenic therapies. The most prevalent grade 3-4 adverse events were hypertension (12.5%), hand-foot syndrome (HFS, 10.4%), thrombocytopenia (10.4%), and proteinuria (8.3%). Low baseline neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR, hazard ratios [HR], 0.619; P = 0.027), early carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) decrease (HR, 1.654; P = 0.016), and HFS (HR, 2.087; P = 0.007) were associated with improved PFS. In conclusion, apatinib monotherapy demonstrated encouraging efficacy with manageable toxicities in chemotherapy-refractory mCRC. Previous anti-angiogenic therapies did not influence outcomes. Baseline NLR, early CA19-9 decrease, and HFS could predict the efficacy of apatinib.

Clinical effects of apatinib mesylate for treatment of multiple brain micrometastases: Two case reports

BACKGROUND

Apatinib is a small-molecule multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Apatinib has demonstrated encouraging antitumor activities. This study aimed to observe the efficacy and safety of apatinib for the treatment of multiple brain micrometastases.

CASE SUMMARY

We report two patients with multiple brain micrometastases after failure of second-line treatment. Both patients had extracerebral metastases. When the patients took 250 mg/d apatinib orally, the intracerebral lesions disappeared. The extracerebral lesions were partially alleviated. Both patients had a progression-free survival of more than 12 mo and were still stable. The safety was good. The main adverse events (AEs) were mild hypertension and proteinuria, which could be controlled.

CONCLUSION

Apatinib has clear efficacy and good tolerance in patients with multiple brain micrometastases after failure of second-line treatment.

Treatment of consistent BRAF/HRAS gene mutation and MYC amplification radiation-induced abdominal wall angiosarcoma with low-dose apatinib: a case report

Background

An extremely rare condition, radiation-induced angiosarcoma is characterized by a poor prognosis, high recurrence rate and lack of effective treatment. Herein, we present a case report of a 48-year-old female patient with radiation-induced abdominal wall angiosarcoma who showed a dramatic response to low-dose apatinib.

Case presentation

The patient, who was diagnosed with cervical squamous cell carcinoma 20 years ago, had received radiotherapy and chemotherapy after operation. Angiosarcomas of the abdominal wall appeared 9 years later. After repeated surgical operations and intravenous chemotherapy for the angiosarcomas, the patient developed tumor recurrence and pulmonary metastasis. The abdominal wall tumors showed repeated rupture and bleeding, with poor wound healing. On evaluation, laboratory findings detected the negative serum tumor markers CEA, CA 125, CA 15–3 and CA 19–9. Imaging showed multiple subcutaneous nodules and masses in the abdominal wall, accompanied by suspected small subpleural nodule at the lower lobe of the right lung. Immunohistochemistry of previous surgical pathology indicated that CD31, ERG and Vim were positive. The result of whole exome sequencing suggested the mutations of BRAF and HRAS, and the amplification of MYC. Based on the above results, the patient was clinically diagnosed with radiation-induced angiosarcoma of the abdominal wall with pulmonary metastasis. The patient was treated with low-dose apatinib and rejected reoperation or chemotherapy.

Results

At the 6-month follow-up visit, the abdominal wall lesions that had previously ruptured stopped bleeding and showed significant shrinkage. Imaging showed that most of the abdominal wall lesions had partially regressed, and some of the lesions on the abdominal wall and the suspected lesion of subpleural nodule at the lower lobe of the right lung had disappeared.

Conclusions

We described this case and reviewed the literature on radiation-related angiosarcoma. Importantly, this case suggests that apatinib may be an effective and sensitive treatment for radiation-induced angiosarcoma even at the lowest dosage, without aggravating the bleeding of lesions.

Apatinib Mesylate in the treatment of advanced progressed lung adenocarcinoma patients with EGFR-TKI resistance -A Multicenter Randomized Trial

Few pieces of evidence have been published on the use of Apatinib Mesylate (AM) against EGFR-TKI resistance in lung adenocarcinoma (LA) patients. Here, we investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of AM in the treatment of advanced progressed epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI) resistant LA patients. We conducted a double-blind, randomized controlled trial in 68 patients admitted to 18 hospitals of Anhui province in China. The efficacy and safety of AM treatment were evaluated in terms of progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR), as well as related adverse events (AE). A literature knowledge database analysis and a pathway model reconstruction were performed to decipher the relevant mechanism may be involved. Our results showed that, compared to the control group, AM presented improved efficacy in PFS (P = 0.033), ORR (P < 0.001), and DCR (P < 0.001). No significant difference was observed between case and control group in terms of AE, and no drug-related death occurred. Pathway analysis supports that Apatinib can be repurposed for the treatment of LA. Our results suggested that AM could be a potential option for advanced progressed LA patients to combat EGFR-TKI resistance.

The effect of apatinib combined with chemotherapy or targeted therapy on non-small cell lung cancer in vitro and vivo

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of using a combination of apatinib in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Apatinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor which selectivelyacts on vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR-2) and has shown good efficacy in a variety of malignancies, but the drug resistance is fast in single drug therapy.

METHODS

The inhibitory effect of apatinib and other drugs on lung cancer cells was determined by CCK-8 test in vitro, and the IC50 value was determined. To establish a nude mouse xenograft model, observe the inhibitory effect of apatinib combined with other drugs on lung cancer xenografts in nude mice; immunohistochemical staining of tumor microvessel density and Ki67 expression in transplanted tumor tissues; Western blot analysis of related signaling pathways expression; immunohistochemistry was used to detect tumor microvessel density in other organs and to observe its safety.

RESULTS

In this study, we found apatinib combined with pemetrexed, the first and third generation of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, could synergistically inhibit the proliferation of non-small cell lung cancer cell (NSCLC) lines, reduce the microvessel density and Ki67 protein levels of three non-small cell lung cancer xenografts, and enhance anti-tumor activity by synergistically inhibiting the MAPK-ERK and PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling pathway. Furthermore, there were no pathological abnormalities in the heart, brain, liver and kidney of each group.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of apatinib combination is better than that of monotherapy, and there is no significant difference in toxicity of important organs, which suggests the feasibility of a combination of apatinib in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.

Apatinib as an optional treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer

Antiangiogenic therapy has shown clinical benefit in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of apatinib in patients who failed standard treatment and to explore potential factors related to its efficacy.A total of 47 patients were enrolled in this retrospective study. Patients who received apatinib therapy after failure of standard therapy from December 2014 and February 2018 were included. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and treatment-related adverse events were recorded and evaluated.The median PFS was 3.717 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.198-4.235), and the median OS was 7.335 months (95% CI, 6.738-7.932). The disease control rate was 72.34%, and the ORR was 8.51%. The most common grade 3 to 4 adverse reactions were hypertension, proteinuria, hand-foot syndrome, and diarrhea. Multivariate analysis indicated previous antiangiogenic therapy and baseline elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as independent prognostic factors.Apatinib might be a reasonable treatment option with a controlled safety profile for patients with mCRC who have failed standard therapy. Patients who previously received antiangiogenic therapy and who have baseline elevated NLR are more likely to benefit from apatinib.

Immunotherapies and Targeted Therapies in the Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third leading cause of cancer deaths, and while mortality has largely improved in the developed world, five-year survival for metastatic disease remains dismally low at only 15%. Fortunately, nearly a dozen targeted therapies and immunotherapies have been FDA approved in the past decade for certain patient profiles with metastatic CRC (mCRC), and many others are under development. Checkpoint inhibitors such as pembrolizumab have proven effective at extending survival for mismatch repair (MMR)-deficient and high microsatellite instability (MSI) mCRC patients. In combination with chemotherapy in first- and second-line treatment, antiangiogenic (anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VGEF)) agent bevacizumab has been shown to increase mCRC survival. Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) agents panitumumab and cetuximab, in combination with chemotherapy, have also prolonged survival among KRAS and all RAS wild-type mCRC patients. Among these patients, anti-EGFR therapy has been found to be more efficacious than bevacizumab. Improved selectivity has allowed small-molecule receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) inhibitors to target VEGF and EGFR with greater efficacy and tolerability. Combinations of immunotherapies, RTKs, monoclonal antibodies, and cytotoxic drugs are being investigated to provide broad-spectrum protection against relapse by simultaneously targeting many cancer hallmarks. Lastly, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) therapy has shown promise for HER2-positive mCRC patients, though larger clinical trials are required to secure FDA approval.

Efficacy and safety of apatinib in treatment of osteosarcoma after failed standard multimodal therapy: An observational study

Recently, apatinib has been shown to be effective in treating sarcoma. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of apatinib in the treatment of patients with osteosarcoma after failed of standard multimodal therapy and to compare the therapeutic effects of apatinib on osteosarcoma between high-dose group and low-dose group.A total of 27 patients with osteosarcoma who received apatinib between January 2016 and August 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Among the 27 patients, the objective response rate (ORR) and the disease control rate (DCR) were 25.93% and 66.67%, respectively. The median of progression-free survival (m-PFS) was 3.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.5-4.8 months), and the median of overall survival (m-OS) was 9.5 months (95% CI, 7.8-10.5 months). There was no statistically significant difference in ORR (36.36% vs 18.75%), DCR (63.64% vs 68.75%), m-PFS (4.3 months [95% CI, 1.8-7 months) vs 3.35 months (95% CI, 1.8-4 months]), and m-OS (9.5 months [95% CI, 7.8-10.5 months] vs 9.4 months [95% CI, 7.8-10.8 months]) (P > .05) between the high-dose group (the average dose was 659 mg/qd) and the low-dose group (the average dose was 516 mg/qd). Most of the adverse events (AEs) were in grade 1 or grade 2. The main AEs in grade 3 were hypertension, rash, weight loss, hand-foot syndrome, and diarrhea.Apatinib is safe and effective in the treatment of advanced osteosarcoma. We recommend that the initial dose of apatinib should be 500 mg/qd in the treatment of osteosarcoma.

Clinical efficacy and survival analysis of apatinib combined with docetaxel in advanced esophageal cancer

Background and aim

Standard chemotherapy has limited clinical efficacy in patients with esophageal cancer and there is a significant and unmet clinical need for effective treatment options for these patients. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy of the novel, targeted drug apatinib combined with docetaxel, and docetaxel combined with S-1 as second- or further-line treatment for patients with advanced esophageal cancer.

Methods

We enrolled 33 patients with advanced esophageal cancer in chemotherapy group or apatinib combined with chemotherapy group in this retrospective study. Apatinib (500 mg) was taken orally once daily; docetaxel was administered at a dose of 75 mg/m²; and S-1 was optional at a dose of 40–60 mg, based on body surface area. The primary endpoint of this study was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and the incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs).

Results

No complete response was observed in the two groups. However, two and five patients achieved partial response in the chemotherapy group and the apatinib combined with chemotherapy group, respectively. The ORR and DCR for the chemotherapy group was 11.1% and 33.3%, respectively. In the apatinib combination group, ORR and DCR was 88.9% and 93.3%, respectively. Anemia (11.1%) and neutropenia (5.6%) were the most frequent grade III/IV AEs observed in the chemotherapy group. In the apatinib combination group, the most frequent grade III/IV AEs were anemia (13.3%), hypertension (6.7%), and proteinuria (6.7%). Median PFS was significantly longer in the apatinib combination group than in the chemotherapy group (175 days vs 85 days, P=0.01).

Conclusion

The combination of apatinib and docetaxel has a manageable toxicity profile and may prolong survival. Therefore, this combination may be used as as second- or further-line treatment for patients with advanced esophageal cancer.

A Single-Arm, Phase II Study of Apatinib in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

LESSONS LEARNED

Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with good performance status or no liver metastasis could benefit from apatinib.Circulating tumor DNA abundance may be a predictor in serial monitoring of tumor load.

BACKGROUND

Apatinib, an oral vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor-2 inhibitor, has been approved as third-line treatment for metastatic gastric cancer in China. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of apatinib, in the treatment of patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer after failure of two or more lines of chemotherapy.

METHODS

In this open-label, single-arm, phase II study, patients with histological documentation of adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum were eligible if they had received at least two prior regimens of standard therapies including fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan. These patients were treated with apatinib in a daily dose of 500 mg, p.o., in the third-line or higher setting. Capture sequencing was dynamically performed to identify somatic variants in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) with a panel of 1,021 cancer-related genes. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) and the tumor response was determined according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. Interim analysis was applied as predefined.

RESULTS

From June 1, 2016 to December 31, 2017, 26 patients were enrolled. The median PFS of the whole group was 3.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.1-5.9). The median overall survival (OS) was 7.9 months (95% CI: 4.6-10.1+). Patients with performance status (PS) 0-1 had longer PFS than those with PS 2 (4.17 months vs. 1.93 months, p = .0014). Patients without liver metastasis also had longer PFS than those who had live metastasis (5.87 months vs. 3.33 months, p = .0274). The common side effects of apatinib were hypertension, hand-foot syndrome, proteinuria, and diarrhea. The incidence of grade 3-4 hypertension, hand-foot syndrome, proteinuria, and diarrhea was 76.92%, 11.54%, 73.08%, and 23.08%, respectively. All of the patients received dose reduction because of adverse effect. Results of capture sequencing showed APC, TP53, and KRAS were most frequently mutant genes. ctDNA abundance increased before the radiographic assessment in ten patients.

CONCLUSION

Apatinib monotherapy showed promising efficiency for patients with refractory colorectal cancer, especially in patients with PS 0-1 or no liver metastasis. ctDNA abundance may be a predictor in serial monitoring of tumor load.

Clinical efficacy and safety of apatinib in patients with advanced colorectal cancer as the late-line treatment

There is currently no standard therapeutic regimen available for patients with advanced colorectal cancer in whom the disease continues to progress after 2 or more lines of chemotherapy. The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of apatinib in patients with advanced colorectal cancer for whom at least two lines of prior chemotherapy had failed.Twenty seven patients with advanced colorectal cancer who had failed at least 2 lines chemotherapy were treated with apatinib (500 mg/day). As a comparison control, 26 advanced colorectal cancer patients with comparable clinical baseline characteristics including age, sex, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score, pathological type, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, tumor location, number and location(s) of metastasis, and previous chemotherapies were subject to observation. Survival analyses were performed via the Kaplan-Meier method. The toxicity were evaluated in all patients this study according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria 4 (NCI CTC version 4.0).A total of 53 well-matched patients with advanced colorectal cancer were retrospectively analyzed. The median follow-up time was 6.0 months (2.0-16.0 months). The median PFS was significantly longer for apatinib group than for observation group (2.0 vs. 1.1 months; HR = 3.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.91-7.88; P < .001). However, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups for median OS (5.0 vs. 4.0 months; HR = 1.03; 95% CI, 0.56-1.90; P = .914). The disease control rate of the apatinib group was significantly better than that of the observation group (70.4% vs 26.9%, P = .002). There was no significant difference in the overall remission rate between the 2 groups (3.7% vs 0%, P = .322). Advanced colorectal cancer patients with 2 or fewer metastatic sites experienced longer PFS than those with more than 2 sites. High ECOG scores, cancer localization to the right side of colon and lymph node metastasis were associated with increased risk of death and all remained independent factors affecting OS. The most common grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events were hypertension and hand-foot skin syndrome.Apatinib treatment for patients with advanced colorectal cancer who had failed chemotherapy achieved better disease control and prolonged PFS relative to untreated controls. The toxicity was manageable.

Clinical investigation of the efficacy and toxicity of apatinib (YN968D1) in stage III/IV non-small cell lung cancer after second-line chemotherapy treatment: A retrospective study

Background

This study was designed to assess the clinical efficacy and toxicity of apatinib (YN968D1) as third or subsequent‐line treatment for stage III/IV non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

A total of 100 patients with advanced NSCLC who were treated with apatinib at a daily dose of 250/425/500 mg at Shandong Cancer Hospital from January 2016 to June 2018 were enrolled in our study. The objective response, disease control, and median progression‐free survival rates were reviewed and evaluated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the prognostic factors. The main adverse events were evaluated per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0.

Results

All patients were assessable for response. No complete responses were observed, 11 patients achieved a partial response, and 56 showed stable disease. The objective response rate was 11.0%, the disease control rate was 67.0%, and the median progression‐free survival was 2.93 months (95% confidence interval 2.07–3.87). In Cox regression analysis, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score (hazard ratio 1.799; P < 0.05) and smoking history (hazard ratio 1.958; P < 0.05) were predictive indicators for apatinib treatment efficacy. Treatment‐related adverse events were tolerated, predictable, reversible, and controllable.

Conclusion

Apatinib was found to be both effective and safe in advanced NSCLC patients without a genetic driver mutation who experienced progression after two or more lines of chemotherapy treatment.

The efficacy and safety of apatinib for refractory malignancies: a review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Apatinib is a novel, oral, small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets VEGFR-2. Recent clinical trials have revealed its broad-spectrum anticancer effect. However, most recent studies of apatinib have involved single-arm studies with insufficient cases, different doses of drugs, and different incidences of adverse events (AEs), which has resulted in a lack of accurate measurement of the efficacy and safety of apatinib. Thus, we performed this meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of apatinib.

METHODS

In total, 21 studies from five databases (PubMed, ScienceDirect, ClinicalTrials.gov, China National Knowledge Infrastructure [CNKI], and Cochrane Library) were included in this meta-analysis. All statistical analyses in this meta-analysis were performed using Stata 14.0 software. We used objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) to evaluate the efficacy of apatinib for five major types of solid tumors. Additionally, we used the total incidence of AEs and the incidence of the three most common grade 3-4 AEs to evaluate the safety of apatinib.

RESULTS

The pooled results for the efficacy of apatinib in the treatment of different types of solid tumors revealed that patients treated with apatinib exhibited good disease control. In addition, it was likely that an increased dose of apatinib resulted in an increased ORR in lung and breast cancer and an increased DCR in liver and gastric cancer. Although AEs appeared in 84% of patients included in this meta-analysis, most of these AEs were of grades 1-2 and were well tolerated and controlled. The most common grade 3-4 AEs included hypertension, hand-foot syndrome, and proteinuria. Importantly, there were no significant differences in these grade 3-4 AEs with higher doses of apatinib.

CONCLUSION

Apatinib is a novel VEGFR-2 inhibitor with proven efficacy and safety for solid tumors. The meta-analysis reveals the broad-spectrum anticancer effect of apatinib.