2
|
Meretsky CR, Mahmoodi A, Knecht EM, Popovich J, Schiuma AT. The Impact of Electrocautery Smoke on Surgical Staff and the Efficacy of Normal Surgical Masks Versus N95 Masks. Cureus 2024; 16:e58106. [PMID: 38738122 PMCID: PMC11088792 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.58106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Electrocautery is a commonly used technique in surgical procedures, generating smoke that poses health risks to surgical staff. This study investigates the comparative efficacy of normal surgical masks versus N95 masks in mitigating the harmful effects of electrocautery smoke. Through a systematic review of literature spanning two decades, we explore the causes and effects of electrocautery smoke exposure, including potential long-term inhalation effects. Our findings highlight significant disparities in the protection offered by different masks and underscore the importance of adequate respiratory protection in surgical settings. In addition, we examine the factors influencing the generation and composition of electrocautery smoke, such as the power settings used, the type of tissue being cauterized, and the duration of the procedure. Furthermore, we discuss the potential health risks associated with long-term exposure to electrocautery smoke, including the possibility of respiratory conditions, cardiovascular effects, and carcinogenicity. Our analysis also addresses the importance of implementing appropriate smoke evacuation systems and optimizing operating room ventilation to minimize the concentration of smoke particles in the surgical environment. Overall, this comprehensive analysis provides valuable insights into the impact of electrocautery smoke in surgical settings and the varying levels of protection offered by different masks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Arshia Mahmoodi
- Surgery, St. George's University School of Medicine, Great River, USA
| | - Erik M Knecht
- Surgery, Chicago Medical School at Rosalind Franklin University, Chicago, USA
| | - Jay Popovich
- Internal Medicine, St. George's University School of Medicine, Great River, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Benaim EH, Jaspers I. Surgical smoke and its components, effects, and mitigation: a contemporary review. Toxicol Sci 2024; 198:157-168. [PMID: 38243717 PMCID: PMC10964745 DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfae005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Energy-based surgical instruments produce surgical smoke, which contains harmful byproducts, such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, volatile organic compounds, particulate matter, and viable microorganisms. The research setting has shifted from the laboratory to the operating room. However, significant heterogeneity in the methods of detection and placement of samplers, diversity in the tissue operated on, and types of surgeries tested has resulted in variability in detected levels and composition of surgical smoke. State regulation limiting surgical smoke exposure through local evacuators is expanding but has yet to reach the national regulatory level. However, most studies have not shown levels above standard established limits but relatively short bursts of high concentrations of these harmful by-products. This review highlights the limitations of the current research and unsupported conclusions while also suggesting further areas of interest that need more focus to improve Occupational Safety and Health Administration guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ezer H Benaim
- Center for Environmental Medicine, Asthma and Lung Biology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA
| | - Ilona Jaspers
- Center for Environmental Medicine, Asthma and Lung Biology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA
- Curriculum in Toxicology & Environmental Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA
- Center for Environmental Medicine, Asthma, and Lung Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kahramansoy N. Surgical smoke: a matter of hygiene, toxicology, and occupational health. GMS HYGIENE AND INFECTION CONTROL 2024; 19:Doc14. [PMID: 38655124 PMCID: PMC11035985 DOI: 10.3205/dgkh000469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
The use of devices for tissue dissection and hemostasis during surgery is almost unavoidable. Electrically powered devices such as electrocautery, ultrasonic and laser units produce surgical smoke containing more than a thousand different products of combustion. These include large amounts of carcinogenic, mutagenic and potentially teratogenic noxae. The smoke contains particles that range widely in size, even as small as 0.007 µm. Most of the particles (90%) in electrocautery smoke are ≤6.27 µm in size, but surgical masks cannot filter particles smaller than 5 µm. In this situation, 95% of the smoke particles which pass through the mask reach deep into the respiratory tract and frequently cause various symptoms, such as headache, dizziness, nausea, eye and respiratory tract irritation, weakness, and abdominal pain in the acute period. The smoke can transport bacteria and viruses that are mostly between 0.02 µm and 3 µm in size and there is a risk of contamination. Among these viruses, SARS-CoV-2, influenza virus, HIV, HPV, HBV must be considered. The smoke may also carry malignant cells. The long-term effects of the surgical smoke are always ignored, because causality can hardly be clarified in individual cases. The quantity of the smoke changes with the technique of the surgeon, the room ventilation system, the characteristics of the power device used, the energy level at which it is set, and the characteristics of the tissue processed. The surgical team is highly exposed to the smoke, with the surgeon experiencing the highest exposure. However, the severity of exposure differs according to certain factors, e.g., ventilation by laminar or turbulent mixed airflow or smoke evacuation system. In any case, the surgical smoke must be removed from the operation area. The most effective method is to collect the smoke from the source through an aspiration system and to evacuate it outside. Awareness and legal regulations in terms of hygiene, toxicology, as well as occupational health and safety should increase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nurettin Kahramansoy
- Department of Surgery, İzmir Bozyaka Education and Research Hospital, İzmir, Turkiye
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kawaguchi Y, Yoshizaki Y, Kawakami T, Iwamoto M, Hayakawa T, Hayashi Y, Sawa Y, Ito K, Kashiwabara K, Akamatsu N, Kaneko J, Nishikata Y, Hasegawa K. Effect of Smoke Evacuator on Reduction of Volatile Organic Compounds and Particles in Surgical Smoke: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Am Coll Surg 2024; 238:272-279. [PMID: 38063669 DOI: 10.1097/xcs.0000000000000921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical smoke is an occupational health problem and is increasingly recognized as a potential source of virus transmission. Dedicated smoke evacuators are used to protect against surgical smoke exposure. We tested the hypothesis that using smoke evacuators would reduce volatile organic compounds and the number of particles in surgical smoke during the laparotomy procedure. STUDY DESIGN A randomized, double-blind clinical trial was conducted in patients undergoing laparotomy from June 11, 2021, to March 30, 2022, to compare the effectiveness of smoke evacuators with a control (registration, UMIN000044250). The primary outcome was a change in the acetaldehyde level. Secondary outcomes were changes in the formaldehyde level and particle count assessed by the particle size of 0.3, 0.5, 1.0, and 5.0 nm. RESULTS A total of 42 patients were randomized and assessed (smoke evacuator group, n = 22 vs control group, n = 20). The acetaldehyde level was significantly lower in the smoke evacuator group than in the control group: mean (95% CI), 10.6 (3.7 to 17.5) vs 47.2 (19.9 to 74.5) μg/m 3 , p < 0.001. Similarly, the formaldehyde level was 72.2% lower in the smoke evacuator group than in the control group. Particle counts by each particle size category were 80% to 95% lower in the smoke evacuator group than in the control group (all, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Dedicated smoke evacuators reduced the level of acetaldehyde and formaldehyde, and the number of particles in surgical smoke, minimizing the potential exposure to volatile organic compounds and particle matters during surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshikuni Kawaguchi
- From the Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan (Kawaguchi, Yoshizaki, Hayakawa, Hayashi, Sawa, Ito, Akamatsu, Kaneko, Hasegawa)
| | - Yuhi Yoshizaki
- From the Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan (Kawaguchi, Yoshizaki, Hayakawa, Hayashi, Sawa, Ito, Akamatsu, Kaneko, Hasegawa)
| | - Toshiaki Kawakami
- Environmental Technology Center Co, Ltd, Saitama, Japan (Kawakami, Iwamoto, Nishikata)
| | - Mitsuru Iwamoto
- Environmental Technology Center Co, Ltd, Saitama, Japan (Kawakami, Iwamoto, Nishikata)
| | - Tomoaki Hayakawa
- From the Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan (Kawaguchi, Yoshizaki, Hayakawa, Hayashi, Sawa, Ito, Akamatsu, Kaneko, Hasegawa)
| | - Yoshihito Hayashi
- From the Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan (Kawaguchi, Yoshizaki, Hayakawa, Hayashi, Sawa, Ito, Akamatsu, Kaneko, Hasegawa)
| | - Yui Sawa
- From the Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan (Kawaguchi, Yoshizaki, Hayakawa, Hayashi, Sawa, Ito, Akamatsu, Kaneko, Hasegawa)
| | - Kyoji Ito
- From the Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan (Kawaguchi, Yoshizaki, Hayakawa, Hayashi, Sawa, Ito, Akamatsu, Kaneko, Hasegawa)
| | - Kosuke Kashiwabara
- Biostatistics Division, Central Coordinating Unit, Clinical Research Support Center, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan (Kashiwabara)
| | - Nobuhisa Akamatsu
- From the Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan (Kawaguchi, Yoshizaki, Hayakawa, Hayashi, Sawa, Ito, Akamatsu, Kaneko, Hasegawa)
| | - Junichi Kaneko
- From the Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan (Kawaguchi, Yoshizaki, Hayakawa, Hayashi, Sawa, Ito, Akamatsu, Kaneko, Hasegawa)
| | - Yasuyoshi Nishikata
- Environmental Technology Center Co, Ltd, Saitama, Japan (Kawakami, Iwamoto, Nishikata)
| | - Kiyoshi Hasegawa
- From the Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan (Kawaguchi, Yoshizaki, Hayakawa, Hayashi, Sawa, Ito, Akamatsu, Kaneko, Hasegawa)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Nolan K, Khan MF, Riva P, Kearns E, Reitano E, Irving H, Perretta S, Dallemagne B, Cahill RA. Characterisation and mitigation of gas leaks at laparoscopy: an international prospective, multi-center cohort clinical trial. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:426-436. [PMID: 37985488 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10536-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/12/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Gas leaks polluting the operating room are common in laparoscopy. Studies defining methods for sensitive leak characterisation and mechanical mitigation in real world settings are, however, lacking. METHODS Mobile optical gas imagers (both a miniaturised Schlieren system and sensitive tripod-mounted near-infrared carbon dioxide camera (GF343, FLIR)) prospectively defined trocar-related gas leaks occurring either spontaneously or with instrumentation during planned laparoscopic surgery at three hospitals. A boutique Matlab-based analyser using sequential frame subtraction categorised leaks (class 0-no observable leak; class 1-marginally detectable leak; class 2-short-lived plume; class 3-energetic, turbulent jet). Concurrently, the usefulness of a novel vacuum-ring device (LeakTrap™, Palliare, Ireland) designed as a universal adjunct for existing standard laparoscopic ports at both abdominal wall and port valve level was determined similarly in a phase I/11 clinical trial along with the device's useability through procedural observation and surgeon questionnaire. RESULTS With ethical and regulatory approval, 40 typical patients (mean age 58.6 years, 20 males) undergoing planned laparoscopic cholecystectomy (n = 36) and hernia repair (n = 4) were studied comprising both control (n = 20) and intervention (n = 20) cohorts. Dual optical gas imaging was successfully performed across all procedures with minimal impact on procedural flow. In total, 1643 trocar instrumentations were examined, 819 in the control group (mean 41 trocar instrumentations/procedure) and 824 in the intervention group (mean 41.2 trocar instrumentations/procedure). Gas leaks were detected during 948(62.6%) visualised trocar instrumentations (in 129-7.8%-the imaging was obscured). 14.8% (110/742) and 60% (445/742) of leaks in control patients were class 0 and 3, respectively, versus 59.1% (456/770) and 8.7% (67/772) in the interventional group (class 3 v non-class 3, p < 0.0001, χ2). The Leaktrap proved surgically acceptable without significant workflow disruption. CONCLUSION Laparoscopic gas leaks can be sensitively detected and consistently, effectively mitigated using straightforward available-now technology with most impact on the commonest, highest energy instrument exchange leaks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Nolan
- UCD School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Mohammad F Khan
- UCD Centre of Precision Surgery, 47 Eccles Street, Dublin 7, Ireland
| | | | - Emma Kearns
- UCD Centre of Precision Surgery, 47 Eccles Street, Dublin 7, Ireland
| | | | - Hugh Irving
- UCD School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Silvana Perretta
- IRCAD/EITS, Strasbourg, France
- University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | | | - Ronan A Cahill
- UCD School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
- UCD Centre of Precision Surgery, 47 Eccles Street, Dublin 7, Ireland.
- Department of Surgery, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
- Department of Surgery, Mater Private Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
| |
Collapse
|