Metformin enhances the antitumor activity of oncolytic herpes simplex virus HF10 (canerpaturev) in a pancreatic cell cancer subcutaneous model

Enhancing mesothelin CAR T cell therapy for pancreatic cancer with an oncolytic herpes virus boosting CAR target antigen expression

Mesothelin (MSLN) is a prominent target antigen for CAR T cell therapy due to its extensive expression in various solid tumors, including pancreatic cancer. However, the therapeutic efficacy of MSLN-targeted CAR T cell therapy has been limited in clinical trials for pancreatic cancer, often resulting in temporary stable disease as the best response. The heterogeneous expression of MSLN and its loss over time, along with the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME), are key factors restricting effectiveness. Oncolytic viruses are emerging cancer therapies that replicate in tumor cells and remodel the TME into an immunogenic state. Here, we engineered an oncolytic herpes simplex virus type 1 expressing human MSLN (HSV-MSLN) and evaluated its combination with MSLN-CAR T cells in a murine pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma model. In vitro, HSV-MSLN effectively induced MSLN expression on murine pancreatic cancer cells, with subsequent cell lysis. In co-culture, HSV-MSLN-infected cancer cells activated MSLN-CAR T cells, which effectively eliminated the infected cells. In vivo, HSV-MSLN delivered MSLN on the tumor cell surface and reprogrammed the TME toward an immunogenic state. The combination therapy significantly enhanced antitumor efficacy, inducing activated, proliferative CD8+ CAR T cells and reducing PD-1+TIM-3+ exhausted endogenous CD8+ T cells and regulatory T cells in tumors. Furthermore, the combination therapy increased migratory XCR1+CD103+ dendritic cells (DCs) in tumors and tumor-draining lymph nodes (TDLNs) while expanding CD44+CD8+ T cells with central and effector memory phenotypes. Taken together, these results demonstrate that HSV-MSLN reprograms immune cells in the TME and TDLNs and synergizes with MSLN-CAR T cells to enhance antitumor responses, leading to a more robust therapeutic effect.

Metformin as an immunomodulatory agent in enhancing head and neck squamous cell carcinoma therapies

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) remains a significant clinical challenge due to its aggressive behavior and poor prognosis, making the development of novel therapeutics with enhanced efficacy and minimal side effects critical. Metformin, a widely used antidiabetic agent, has recently emerged as a potential adjunctive therapy for HNSCC, exhibiting both direct anti-tumor and immunomodulatory effects. This review comprehensively explores the multifaceted role of metformin in shaping the tumor immune microenvironment within HNSCC. We emphasize its pivotal role in modulating immune cell populations and its potential for synergistic action with immunotherapeutic strategies. Furthermore, we address the current challenges associated with optimizing dosing regimens, identifying predictive biomarkers, and integrating metformin with immunotherapy. By dissecting these aspects, this review aims to pave the way for the development of personalized HNSCC treatment strategies that fully exploit the therapeutic potential of metformin.

Synergistic anti-tumor effects of oncolytic virus and anti-programmed cell death protein 1 antibody combination therapy: For suppression of lymph node and distant metastasis in a murine melanoma model

It is believed that oncolytic viruses (OVs) exert both direct anti-tumor effects by intratumoral injection as well as indirect anti-tumor effects by activating systemic immunity. In phase III clinical trials, OV and anti-programmed cell death-1 (aPD-1) antibody combination therapy showed no significant differences in overall survival and progression-free survival in patients with unresectable advanced melanoma. In the study, OVs can exert only indirect anti-tumor effects in non-injected, systemic lesions. If the tumor is at a stage where both direct and indirect anti-tumor effects of OVs can be expected, OVs may further enhance the therapeutic effect, in addition to the clinically expected therapeutic effect. Therefore, we investigated whether canerpaturev (C-REV) and aPD-1 antibody combination therapy suppresses tumor progression in a murine melanoma model. Our findings showed that the C-REV and aPD-1 antibody combination therapy suppressed tumor progression in a murine melanoma model. The combination therapy stimulated systemic immunity in lymphoid tissues by activating helper T cells and B cells to enhance adaptive and humoral immunity, as well as by increasing effector/memory T cell fractions. Synergistically enhanced systemic anti-tumor effects suppressed lymph node and lung metastases. These findings suggest that direct anti-tumor effects by infecting and destroying cancer cells from within and indirect anti-tumor effects enhanced by the combination therapy worked simultaneously to suppress tumor progression. Our results may provide evidence to support the usefulness of OV and aPD-1 antibody combination therapy as a neoadjuvant therapy in the surgical treatment of melanoma.

Advances in antitumour therapy with oncolytic herpes simplex virus combinations

Oncolytic Virus (OVs) is an emerging approach to tumour immunity that allows the use of natural or genetically modified viruses to specifically infect and lyse tumour cells without damaging normal cells. Oncolytic herpes simplex virus (oHSV) is one of the more widely researched and applied OVs in the field of oncology, which can directly kill tumour cells to promote anti-tumour immune responses. oHSV is one of the few viruses with good antiviral drugs, so oHSV is also more clinically safe. In recent years, in addition to monotherapy of oHSV in tumours, more and more studies have been devoted to exploring the anti-tumour effects of oHSV in combination with other therapeutic approaches. In this article we describe the progress of oHSV combination therapy against tumours in the nervous system, digestive system, reproductive system and other systems.

Frontiers and future of immunotherapy for pancreatic cancer: from molecular mechanisms to clinical application

Pancreatic cancer is a highly aggressive malignant tumor, that is becoming increasingly common in recent years. Despite advances in intensive treatment modalities including surgery, radiotherapy, biological therapy, and targeted therapy, the overall survival rate has not significantly improved in patients with pancreatic cancer. This may be attributed to the insidious onset, unknown pathophysiology, and poor prognosis of the disease. It is therefore essential to identify and develop more effective and safer treatments for pancreatic cancer. Tumor immunotherapy is the new and fourth pillar of anti-tumor therapy after surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. Significant progress has made in the use of immunotherapy for a wide variety of malignant tumors in recent years; a breakthrough has also been made in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. This review describes the advances in immune checkpoint inhibitors, cancer vaccines, adoptive cell therapy, oncolytic virus, and matrix-depletion therapies for the treatment of pancreatic cancer. At the same time, some new potential biomarkers and potential immunotherapy combinations for pancreatic cancer are discussed. The molecular mechanisms of various immunotherapies have also been elucidated, and their clinical applications have been highlighted. The current challenges associated with immunotherapy and proposed strategies that hold promise in overcoming these limitations have also been discussed, with the aim of offering new insights into immunotherapy for pancreatic cancer.

A Dual Pharmacological Strategy against COVID-19: The Therapeutic Potential of Metformin and Atorvastatin

Metformin (MET) and atorvastatin (ATO) are promising treatments for COVID-19. This review explores the potential of MET and ATO, commonly prescribed for diabetes and dyslipidemia, respectively, as versatile medicines against SARS-CoV-2. Due to their immunomodulatory and antiviral capabilities, as well as their cost-effectiveness and ubiquitous availability, they are highly suitable options for treating the virus. MET's effect extends beyond managing blood sugar, impacting pathways that can potentially decrease the severity and fatality rates linked with COVID-19. It can partially block mitochondrial complex I and stimulate AMPK, which indicates that it can be used more widely in managing viral infections. ATO, however, impacts cholesterol metabolism, a crucial element of the viral replicative cycle, and demonstrates anti-inflammatory characteristics that could modulate intense immune reactions in individuals with COVID-19. Retrospective investigations and clinical trials show decreased hospitalizations, severity, and mortality rates in patients receiving these medications. Nevertheless, the journey from observing something to applying it in a therapeutic setting is intricate, and the inherent diversity of the data necessitates carefully executed, forward-looking clinical trials. This review highlights the requirement for efficacious, easily obtainable, and secure COVID-19 therapeutics and identifies MET and ATO as promising treatments in this worldwide health emergency.

The Metformin Immunoregulatory Actions in Tumor Suppression and Normal Tissues Protection

The immune system is the key player in a wide range of responses in normal tissues and tumors to anticancer therapy. Inflammatory and fibrotic responses in normal tissues are the main limitations of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and also some newer anticancer drugs such as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Immune system responses within solid tumors including anti-tumor and tumor-promoting responses can suppress or help tumor growth. Thus, modulation of immune cells and their secretions such as cytokines, growth factors and epigenetic modulators, pro-apoptosis molecules, and some other molecules can be suggested to alleviate side effects in normal tissues and drug-resistance mechanisms in the tumor. Metformin as an anti-diabetes drug has shown intriguing properties such as anti-inflammation, anti-fibrosis, and anticancer effects. Some investigations have uncovered that metformin can ameliorate radiation/chemotherapy toxicity in normal cells and tissues through the modulation of several targets in cells and tissues. These effects of metformin may ameliorate severe inflammatory responses and fibrosis after exposure to ionizing radiation or following treatment with highly toxic chemotherapy drugs. Metformin can suppress the activity of immunosuppressive cells in the tumor through the phosphorylation of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK). In addition, metformin may stimulate antigen presentation and maturation of anticancer immune cells, which lead to the induction of anticancer immunity in the tumor. This review aims to explain the detailed mechanisms of normal tissue sparing and tumor suppression during cancer therapy using adjuvant metformin with an emphasis on immune system responses.

Adenovirus-assembled DC vaccine induces dual-targeting CTLs for tumor antigen and adenovirus to eradicate tumors

The dendritic cell (DC) vaccine is a promising cancerimmunotherapy strategy, but its efficacy in treating the solid tumor is limited. To overcome this limitation, an oncolytic adenovirus (OAV-IL-12) was developed to enhance antigen targeting ability of adenovirus-assembled DC vaccine (DCs-CD137L/CAIX) for renal carcinoma treatment. Peritumoral administration of OAV-IL-12 increased the number of tumor-infiltrating DCs and their subsets (CD8+DCs and CD103+DCs). Combining OAV-IL-12 with DCs-CD137L/CAIX significantly inhibited the growth of subcutaneous tumors by inducing potent cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) effect and improving the immune infiltration in tumor lesions. Interestingly, this treatment also reduced tumor growth distal to the OAV-IL-12 injecting side via eliciting a systemic CTL response. Furthermore, OAV-IL-12 potentiated DCs-CD137L/CAIX treatment induced dual CTL responses against both CAIX and adenovirus antigens. The therapeutic benefits of this treatment approach mainly relied on multifunctional CD8+T cell immune responses, as indicated by the depletion assay. Moreover, OAV-IL-12 potentiated DCs-CD137L/CAIX treatment generated a long-lasting protective effect against tumors by inducing memory CD8+T cell immune responses. These results suggest that the effective tumor targeting of the adenovirus-based DC vaccine, boosted by OAV-IL-12, is a promising treatment approach for renal carcinoma and other solid tumors.

The Impact of Metformin on Tumor-Infiltrated Immune Cells: Preclinical and Clinical Studies

The tumor microenvironment (TME) plays a pivotal role in the fate of cancer cells, and tumor-infiltrating immune cells have emerged as key players in shaping this complex milieu. Cancer is one of the leading causes of death in the world. The most common standard treatments for cancer are surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapeutic drugs. In the last decade, immunotherapy has had a potential effect on the treatment of cancer patients with poor prognoses. One of the immune therapeutic targeted approaches that shows anticancer efficacy is a type 2 diabetes medication, metformin. Beyond its glycemic control properties, studies have revealed intriguing immunomodulatory properties of metformin. Meanwhile, several studies focus on the impact of metformin on tumor-infiltrating immune cells in various tumor models. In several tumor models, metformin can modulate tumor-infiltrated effector immune cells, CD8+, CD4+ T cells, and natural killer (NK) cells, as well as suppressor immune cells, T regulatory cells, tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs). In this review, we discuss the role of metformin in modulating tumor-infiltrating immune cells in different preclinical models and clinical trials. Both preclinical and clinical studies suggest that metformin holds promise as adjunctive therapy in cancer treatment by modulating the immune response within the tumor microenvironment. Nonetheless, both the tumor type and the combined therapy have an impact on the specific targets of metformin in the TME. Further investigations are warranted to elucidate the precise mechanisms underlying the immunomodulatory effects of metformin and to optimize its clinical application in cancer patients.