Inhibition of the TRIM24 bromodomain reactivates latent HIV-1

Comprehensive SUMO Proteomic Analyses Identify HIV Latency-Associated Proteins in Microglia

SUMOylation, the post-translational modification of proteins by small ubiquitin-like modifiers, plays a critical role in regulating various cellular processes, including innate immunity. This modification is essential for modulating immune responses and influencing signaling pathways that govern the activation and function of immune cells. Recent studies suggest that SUMOylation also contributes to the pathophysiology of central nervous system (CNS) viral infections, where it contributes to the host response and viral replication dynamics. Here, we explore the multifaceted role of SUMOylation in innate immune signaling and its implications for viral infections within the CNS. Notably, we present novel proteomic analyses aimed at elucidating the role of the small ubiquitin-related modifier (SUMO) in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) latency in microglial cells. Our findings indicate that SUMOylation may regulate key proteins involved in maintaining viral latency, suggesting a potential mechanism by which HIV evades immune detection in the CNS. By integrating insights from proteomics with functional studies, we anticipate these findings to be the groundwork for future studies on HIV-host interactions and the mechanisms that underlie SUMOylation during latent and productive infection.

CBP/p300 lysine acetyltransferases inhibit HIV-1 expression in latently infected T cells

HIV-1 latency is regulated by chromatin modifying enzymes, and histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) cause reactivation of provirus expression. Surprisingly, we observed that inhibitors of the CBP/p300 acetyltransferases also cause reversal of latency in T cells. CBP/p300 inhibitors synergize with various latency reversing agents to cause HIV-1 reactivation. In contrast, inhibition of CBP/p300 impaired reversal of latency by the HDACi SAHA, indicating that CBP/p300 must contribute to acetylation on the HIV-1 LTR associated with HDACi-mediated latency reversal. CBP/p300 inhibition caused loss of H3K27ac and H3K4me3 from the LTR, but did not affect association of the inhibitor protein BRD4. Furthermore, inhibition of the additional lysine acetyltransferases PCAF/GCN5 or KAT6A/KAT6B also caused reversal of latency, suggesting that protein acetylation has an inhibitory effect on HIV-1 expression. Collectively, these observations indicate that transcription from the HIV-1 LTR is controlled both positively and negatively by protein acetylation, likely including both histone and non-histone regulatory targets.

Small molecule inhibitors of transcriptional cyclin-dependent kinases impose HIV-1 latency, presenting "block and lock" treatment strategies

Current antiretroviral therapy for HIV-1 infection does not represent a cure for infection as viral rebound inevitably occurs following discontinuation of treatment. The "block and lock" therapeutic strategy is intended to enforce proviral latency and durably suppress viremic reemergence in the absence of other intervention. The transcription-associated cyclin-dependent protein kinases (tCDKs) are required for expression from the 5´ HIV-1 long-terminal repeat, but the therapeutic potential of inhibiting these kinases for enforcing HIV-1 latency has not been characterized. Here, we expanded previous observations to directly compare the effect of highly selective small molecule inhibitors of CDK7 (YKL-5-124), CDK9 (LDC000067), and CDK8/19 (Senexin A), and found each of these prevented HIV-1 provirus expression at concentrations that did not cause cell toxicity. Inhibition of CDK7 caused cell cycle arrest, whereas CDK9 and CDK8/19 inhibitors did not, and could be continuously administered to establish proviral latency. Upon discontinuation of drug administration, HIV immediately rebounded in cells that had been treated with the CDK9 inhibitor, while proviral latency persisted for several days in cells that had been treated with CDK8/19 inhibitors. These results identify the mediator kinases CDK8/CDK19 as potential "block and lock" targets for therapeutic suppression of HIV-1 provirus expression.

A Canadian Survey of Research on HIV-1 Latency-Where Are We Now and Where Are We Heading?

Worldwide, almost 40 million people are currently living with HIV-1. The implementation of cART inhibits HIV-1 replication and reduces viremia but fails to eliminate HIV-1 from latently infected cells. These cells are considered viral reservoirs from which HIV-1 rebounds if cART is interrupted. Several efforts have been made to identify these cells and their niches. There has been little success in diminishing the pool of latently infected cells, underscoring the urgency to continue efforts to fully understand how HIV-1 establishes and maintains a latent state. Reactivating HIV-1 expression in these cells using latency-reversing agents (LRAs) has been successful, but only in vitro. This review aims to provide a broad view of HIV-1 latency, highlighting Canadian contributions toward these aims. We will summarize the research efforts conducted in Canadian labs to understand the establishment of latently infected cells and how this informs curative strategies, by reviewing how HIV latency is established, which cells are latently infected, what methodologies have been developed to characterize them, how new compounds are discovered and evaluated as potential LRAs, and what clinical trials aim to reverse latency in people living with HIV (PLWH).

CDK8 inhibitors antagonize HIV-1 reactivation and promote provirus latency in T cells

Latent HIV-1 provirus represents the barrier toward a cure for infection and is dependent upon the host RNA Polymerase (Pol) II machinery for reemergence. Here, we find that inhibitors of the RNA Pol II mediator kinases CDK8/19, Senexin A and BRD6989, inhibit induction of HIV-1 expression in response to latency-reversing agents and T cell signaling agonists. These inhibitors were found to impair recruitment of RNA Pol II to the HIV-1 LTR. Furthermore, HIV-1 expression in response to several latency reversal agents was impaired upon disruption of CDK8 by shRNA or gene knockout. However, the effects of CDK8 depletion did not entirely mimic CDK8/19 kinase inhibition suggesting that the mediator kinases are not functionally redundant. Additionally, treatment of CD4+ peripheral blood mononuclear cells isolated from people living with HIV-1 and who are receiving antiretroviral therapy with Senexin A inhibited induction of viral replication in response to T cell stimulation by PMA and ionomycin. These observations indicate that the mediator kinases, CDK8 and CDK19, play a significant role for regulation of HIV-1 transcription and that small molecule inhibitors of these enzymes may contribute to therapies designed to promote deep latency involving the durable suppression of provirus expression. IMPORTANCE A cure for HIV-1 infection will require novel therapies that can force elimination of cells that contain copies of the virus genome inserted into the cell chromosome, but which is shut off, or silenced. These are known as latently-infected cells, which represent the main reason why current treatment for HIV/AIDS cannot cure the infection because the virus in these cells is unaffected by current drugs. Our results indicate that chemical inhibitors of Cdk8 also inhibit the expression of latent HIV provirus. Cdk8 is an important enzyme that regulates the expression of genes in response to signals to which cells need to respond and which is produced by a gene that is frequently mutated in cancers. Our observations indicate that Cdk8 inhibitors may be employed in novel therapies to prevent expression from latent provirus, which might eventually enable infected individuals to cease treatment with antiretroviral drugs.

Inhibition of ATM-directed antiviral responses by HIV-1 Vif

Emerging evidence indicates that HIV-1 hijacks host DNA damage repair (DDR) pathways to facilitate multiple facets of virus replication. Canonically, HIV-1 engages proviral DDR responses through the accessory protein Vpr, which induces constitutive activation of DDR kinases ATM and ATR. However, in response to prolonged DDR signaling, ATM directly induces pro-inflammatory NF-κB signaling and activates multiple members of the TRIM family of antiviral restriction factors, several of which have been previously implicated in antagonizing retroviral and lentiviral replication. Here, we demonstrate that the HIV-1 accessory protein Vif blocks ATM-directed DNA repair processes, activation of NF-κB signaling responses, and TRIM protein phosphorylation. Vif function in ATM antagonism occurs in clinical isolates and in common HIV-1 Group M subtypes/clades circulating globally. Pharmacologic and functional studies combine to suggest that Vif blocks Vpr-directed activation of ATM but not ATR, signifying that HIV-1 utilizes discrete strategies to fine-tune DDR responses that promote virus replication while simultaneously inhibiting immune activation.

Upstream Stimulatory Factors Regulate HIV-1 Latency and Are Required for Robust T Cell Activation

HIV-1 provirus expression is controlled by signaling pathways that are responsive to T cell receptor engagement, including those involving Ras and downstream protein kinases. The induction of transcription from the HIV-1 LTR in response to Ras signaling requires binding of the Ras-responsive element binding factor (RBF-2) to conserved cis elements flanking the enhancer region, designated RBE3 and RBE1. RBF-2 is composed minimally of the USF1, USF2, and TFII-I transcription factors. We recently determined that TFII-I regulates transcriptional elongation from the LTR through recruitment of the co-activator TRIM24. However, the function of USF1 and USF2 for this effect are uncharacterized. Here, we find that genetic deletion of USF2 but not USF1 in T cells inhibits HIV-1 expression. The loss of USF2 caused a reduction in expression of the USF1 protein, an effect that was not associated with decreased USF1 mRNA abundance. USF1 and USF2 were previously shown to exist predominately as heterodimers and to cooperatively regulate target genes. To examine cooperativity between these factors, we performed RNA-seq analysis of T cell lines bearing knockouts of the genes encoding these factors. In untreated cells, we found limited evidence of coordinated global gene regulation between USF1 and USF2. In contrast, we observed a high degree of genome-wide cooperative regulation of RNA expression between these factors in cells stimulated with the combination of PMA and ionomycin. In particular, we found that the deletion of USF1 or USF2 restricted T cell activation response. These observations indicate that USF2, but not USF1, is crucial for HIV-1 expression, while the combined function of these factors is required for a robust T cell inflammatory response.