Crizotinib in patients with tumors harboring ALK or ROS1 rearrangements in the NCI-MATCH trial

Deciphering aging-associated prognosis and heterogeneity in gastric cancer through a machine learning-driven approach

Gastric cancer (GC) is a prevalent malignancy with a high mortality rate and limited treatment options. Aging significantly contributes to tumor progression, and GC was confirmed as an aging-related heterogeneous disease. This study established an aging-associated index (AAI) using a machine learning-derived gene panel to stratify GC patients. High AAI scores associated with poor prognosis and indicated potential benefits from adjuvant chemotherapy, while showing resistance to immunotherapy. Single-cell transcriptome analysis revealed that AAI was enriched in monocyte cells within the tumor microenvironment. Two distinct molecular subtypes of GC were identified through unsupervised clustering, leading to the development of a subtype-specific regulatory network highlighting SOX7 and ELK3 as potential therapeutic targets. Drug sensitivity analyses indicated that patients with high ELK3 expression may respond to FDA-approved drugs (axitinib, dacarbazine, crizotinib, and vincristine). Finally, a user-friendly Shiny application was created to facilitate access to the prognostic model and molecular subtype classifier for GC.

Tissue-agnostic target profiles and treatment efficacy in cancer patients: Insights from the C-CAT clinicogenomic repository

PURPOSE

Utilizing real-world data from Japan's C-CAT clinicogenomic repository, our study demonstrates a significant shift in cancer management through cancer genomic profiling (CGP) tests. The aim of this study is assessing the prevalence of cross-organ targeted genetic alterations and exploring the differences in treatment responses among cancer patients who underwent CGP tests.

METHODS

Analyzing data from 60,256 patients in the C-CAT repository, we documented the prevalence of FDA-approved biomarkers, cross-organ genetic alterations, and treatment outcomes for tissue-agnostic therapies from June 2019 to December 2023.

RESULTS

Biomarkers including RET rearrangement, BRAFV600E mutation, and NTRK rearrangement showed varied therapeutic responses, underscoring the need for universal CGP testing to optimize patient outcomes. Notably, our findings highlight variations in response across different age groups, suggesting the potential for age-specific treatment strategies. Comparisons with the AACR Project GENIE database revealed broader implications for the global genomic landscape.

CONCLUSION

This study emphasizes the crucial role of clinicogenomic repositories in advancing precision oncology across diverse populations, underscoring the utility of integrating clinical and genomic data in national repositories.

Advances in Targeted and Chemotherapeutic Strategies for Colorectal Cancer: Current Insights and Future Directions

Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide, necessitating the continuous evolution of therapeutic approaches. Despite advancements in early detection and localized treatments, metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) poses significant challenges due to low survival rates and resistance to conventional therapies. This review highlights the current landscape of CRC treatment, focusing on chemotherapy and targeted therapies. Chemotherapeutic agents, including 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin, have significantly improved survival but face limitations such as systemic toxicity and resistance. Targeted therapies, leveraging mechanisms like VEGF, EGFR, and Hedgehog pathway inhibition, offer promising alternatives, minimizing damage to healthy tissues while enhancing therapeutic precision. Furthermore, future directions in CRC treatment include exploring innovative targets such as Wnt/β-catenin, Notch, and TGF-β pathways, alongside IGF/IGF1R inhibition. These emerging strategies aim to address drug resistance and improve patient outcomes. This review emphasizes the importance of integrating molecular insights into drug development, advocating for a more personalized approach to combat CRC's complexity and heterogeneity.

Systemic approaches in biliary tract cancers: a review in the era of multidirectional precision medicine

INTRODUCTION

Despite a rising incidence, biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are still considered a rare tumor entity. The disease's subtle clinical presentation and lack of effective early detection strategies often lead to a diagnosis at an advanced or unresectable stage, where curative options are limited.

AREAS COVERED

This review provides an overview of current systemic therapies and emerging novel approaches for BTC. For decades, the combination of gemcitabine with cisplatin (GemCis) has been the standard of care for palliative treatment. However, since 2020, the diagnostic and therapeutic landscape for BTC has evolved considerably, not only in the first-line setting but also beyond, driven by the development of clinical trials exploring immunotherapy and molecularly targeted agents. Due to the high frequency of targetable genetic alterations in BTC patients, there is a growing emphasis on obtaining tissue or liquid biopsy samples to identify markers like microsatellite instability and other actionable oncogenic driver genes.

EXPERT OPINION

Early initiation of systemic therapies in combination with multimodal approaches is essential for maximizing survival outcomes in patients with BTC.

Emerging Tumor-Agnostic Molecular Targets

Advances in tumor molecular profiling have uncovered shared genomic and proteomic alterations across tumor types that can be exploited therapeutically. A biomarker-driven, disease-agnostic approach to oncology drug development can maximize the reach of novel therapeutics. To date, eight drug-biomarker pairs have been approved for the treatment of patients with advanced solid tumors with specific molecular profiles. Emerging biomarkers with the potential for clinical actionability across tumor types include gene fusions involving NRG1, FGFR1/2/3, BRAF, and ALK and mutations in TP53 Y220C, KRAS G12C, FGFR2/3, and BRAF non-V600 (class II). We explore the growing evidence for clinical actionability of these biomarkers in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Pediatric, Adolescent and Young Adult (AYA) Peritoneal and Pleural Mesothelioma: A National Cancer Database Review

PURPOSE

Malignant peritoneal and pleural mesothelioma are rare in young patients, with a paucity of data regarding clinical characteristics and outcomes. We aimed to describe the clinical characteristics, treatment strategies, and outcomes for pediatric and adolescent/young adult (AYA) patients.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for malignant peritoneal and pleural mesothelioma in pediatric and AYA patients (ages 0-39) from 2004 to 2019. Stratification was performed for pediatric (age 0-21) and young adult (age 22-39) patients. Chi-squared, multivariable cox regression, and Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed.

RESULTS

We identified 570 total patients, 46 pediatric and 524 young adult, with mesothelioma (363 peritoneal and 207 pleural). There were significant differences in sex distribution as patients with peritoneal mesothelioma were more frequently female (63.1%). Patients with peritoneal mesothelioma were more likely to have radical surgery compared to pleural mesothelioma (56.7% v. 24.6%, respectively). A majority of patients with peritoneal and pleural mesothelioma received chemotherapy (66.4% and 61.4%, respectively). For peritoneal mesothelioma, surgical resection was associated with improved overall survival, whereas male sex, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and radiation were associated with worse overall survival. For pleural mesothelioma, intraoperative chemotherapy was associated with improved overall survival, whereas Black race was associated with worse overall survival. Mean overall survival was greater for patients with peritoneal mesothelioma (125 months) compared to those with pleural mesothelioma (69 months), which remained significant after stratification of pediatric and young adult patients.

CONCLUSION

By analyzing a large cohort of pediatric and AYA mesothelioma, this study highlights clinical, prognostic, and survival differences between peritoneal and pleural disease.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

TYPE OF STUDY

Retrospective.

Basket Trials: Past, Present, and Future

Large-scale tumor molecular profiling has revealed that diverse cancer histologies are driven by common pathways with unifying biomarkers that can be exploited therapeutically. Disease-agnostic basket trials have been increasingly utilized to test biomarker-driven therapies across cancer types. These trials have led to drug approvals and improved the lives of patients while simultaneously advancing our understanding of cancer biology. This review focuses on the practicalities of implementing basket trials, with an emphasis on molecularly targeted trials. We examine the biologic subtleties of genomic biomarker and patient selection, discuss previous successes in drug development facilitated by basket trials, describe certain novel targets and drugs, and emphasize practical considerations for participant recruitment and study design. This review also highlights strategies for aiding patient access to basket trials. As basket trials become more common, steps to ensure equitable implementation of these studies will be critical for molecularly targeted drug development.

Comprehensive Review of ROS1 Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors-Classified by Structural Designs and Mutation Spectrum (Solvent Front Mutation [G2032R] and Central β-Sheet 6 [Cβ6] Mutation [L2086F])

Despite ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLC accounting for approximately 1% to 2% of NSCLC, there is a long list of ROS1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) being developed in addition to three approved ROS1 TKIs, crizotinib, entrectinib and repotrectinib. Here, we categorized ROS1 TKIs by their structures (cyclic versus noncyclic) and inhibitory abilities (active against solvent front mutation G2032R or central β-sheet #6 [Cβ6] mutation L2086F) and summarized their reported clinical activity in order to provide a dashboard on how to use these ROS1 TKIs in various clinical situations. In addition, the less known Cβ6 mutation ROS1 L2086F confer resistances to next-generation ROS1 TKIs (repotrectinib, taletrectinib, and potentially NVL-520) that can be overcome by cabozantinib as documented in published patient reports and potentially by certain L-shaped type I ROS1 TKIs including ceritinib and gilteritinib, which is approved as a FLT3 inhibitor for relapsed refractory FLT3+ acute myeloid leukemia but have published preclinical activites against ROS1 (and ALK). Future clinical trials should investigate cabozantinib and gilteritinib to repurpose them as ROS1 TKIs that can target ROS1 L2086F Cβ6 mutation.

Agnostic Administration of Targeted Anticancer Drugs: Looking for a Balance between Hype and Caution

Many tumors have well-defined vulnerabilities, thus potentially allowing highly specific and effective treatment. There is a spectrum of actionable genetic alterations which are shared across various tumor types and, therefore, can be targeted by a given drug irrespective of tumor histology. Several agnostic drug-target matches have already been approved for clinical use, e.g., immune therapy for tumors with microsatellite instability (MSI) and/or high tumor mutation burden (TMB), NTRK1-3 and RET inhibitors for cancers carrying rearrangements in these kinases, and dabrafenib plus trametinib for BRAF V600E mutated malignancies. Multiple lines of evidence suggest that this histology-independent approach is also reasonable for tumors carrying ALK and ROS1 translocations, biallelic BRCA1/2 inactivation and/or homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), strong HER2 amplification/overexpression coupled with the absence of other MAPK pathway-activating mutations, etc. On the other hand, some well-known targets are not agnostic: for example, PD-L1 expression is predictive for the efficacy of PD-L1/PD1 inhibitors only in some but not all cancer types. Unfortunately, the individual probability of finding a druggable target in a given tumor is relatively low, even with the use of comprehensive next-generation sequencing (NGS) assays. Nevertheless, the rapidly growing utilization of NGS will significantly increase the number of patients with highly unusual or exceptionally rare tumor-target combinations. Clinical trials may provide only a framework for treatment attitudes, while the decisions for individual patients usually require case-by-case consideration of the probability of deriving benefit from agnostic versus standard therapy, drug availability, associated costs, and other circumstances. The existing format of data dissemination may not be optimal for agnostic cancer medicine, as conventional scientific journals are understandably biased towards the publication of positive findings and usually discourage the submission of case reports. Despite all the limitations and concerns, histology-independent drug-target matching is certainly feasible and, therefore, will be increasingly utilized in the future.

Tumor-Specific Activity of Precision Medicines in the NCI-MATCH Trial

PURPOSE

National Cancer Institute Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (NCI-MATCH) is a precision medicine basket trial designed to test the effectiveness of treating cancers based on specific genetic changes in patients' tumors, regardless of cancer type. Multiple subprotocols have each tested different targeted therapies matched to specific genetic aberrations. Most subprotocols exhibited low rates of tumor shrinkage as evaluated across all tumor types enrolled. We hypothesized that these results may arise because these precision cancer therapies have tumor type-specific efficacy, as is common among other cancer therapies.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

To test the hypothesis that certain tumor types are more sensitive to specific therapies than other tumor types, we applied permutation testing to tumor volume change and progression-free survival data from 10 published NCI-MATCH subprotocols (together n = 435 patients). FDR was controlled by the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure.

RESULTS

Six of ten subprotocols exhibited statistically significant evidence of tumor-specific drug sensitivity, four of which were previously considered negative based on response rate across all tumors. This signal-finding analysis highlights potential uses of FGFR tyrosine kinase inhibition in urothelial carcinomas with actionable FGFR aberrations and MEK inhibition in lung cancers with BRAF non-V600E mutations. In addition, it identifies low-grade serious ovarian carcinoma with BRAF v600E mutation as especially sensitive to BRAF and MEK co-inhibition (dabrafenib plus trametinib), a treatment that received accelerated FDA approval for advanced solid tumors with BRAF v600E mutation.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings support the value of basket trials because even when precision medicines do not have tumor-agnostic activity, basket trials can identify tumor-specific activity for future study.

ALK fusions in the pan-cancer setting: another tumor-agnostic target?

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) alterations (activating mutations, amplifications, and fusions/rearrangements) occur in ~3.3% of cancers. ALK fusions/rearrangements are discerned in >50% of inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors (IMTs) and anaplastic large cell lymphomas (ALCLs), but only in ~0.2% of other cancers outside of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a rate that may be below the viability threshold of even large-scale treatment trials. Five ALK inhibitors -alectinib, brigatinib, ceritinb, crizotinib, and lorlatinib-are FDA approved for ALK-aberrant NSCLCs, and crizotinib is also approved for ALK-aberrant IMTs and ALCL, including in children. Herein, we review the pharmacologic tractability of ALK alterations, focusing beyond NSCLC. Importantly, the hallmark of approved indications is the presence of ALK fusions/rearrangements, and response rates of ~50-85%. Moreover, there are numerous reports of ALK inhibitor activity in multiple solid and hematologic tumors (e.g., histiocytosis, leiomyosarcoma, lymphoma, myeloma, and colorectal, neuroendocrine, ovarian, pancreatic, renal, and thyroid cancer) bearing ALK fusions/rearrangements. Many reports used crizotinib or alectinib, but each of the approved ALK inhibitors have shown activity. ALK inhibitor activity is also seen in neuroblastoma, which bear ALK mutations (rather than fusions/rearrangements), but response rates are lower (~10-20%). Current data suggests that ALK inhibitors have tissue-agnostic activity in neoplasms bearing ALK fusions/rearrangements.

Consensus Recommendations for the Diagnosis, Biomarker Testing, and Clinical Management of Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer With Mesenchymal-Epithelial Transition Exon 14 Skipping Mutations in the Middle East, Africa, and Russia

Mesenchymal-epithelial transition exon 14 (METex14) skipping mutations occur in about 3%-4% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This is an aggressive subtype associated with poor prognosis. METex14 skipping is a potentially targetable mutation. Targeted therapy is a promising treatment modality for patients with advanced/metastatic METex14-mutant NSCLC. Performing systematic molecular testing to detect the driver mutation is essential for initiating targeted therapy. However, there is a lack of guidelines on molecular testing for assessing the eligibility of patients for targeted therapy. Therefore, a multidisciplinary panel consisting of experts from the Middle East, Africa, and Russia convened via a virtual advisory board meeting to provide their insights on various molecular testing techniques for the diagnosis of METex14 skipping mutation, management of patients with targeted therapies, and developing consensus recommendations for improving the processes. The expert panel emphasized performing molecular testing and liquid biopsy before treatment initiation and tissue re-biopsy for patients with failed molecular testing. Liquid biopsy was recommended as complementary to tissue biopsy for disease monitoring and prognosis. Selective MET inhibitors were recommended as the first and subsequent lines of therapy. These consensus recommendations will facilitate the management of METex14 skipping NSCLC in routine practice and warrant optimum outcomes for these patients.

The NCI-MATCH trial: lessons for precision oncology

The NCI-MATCH (Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice) trial ( NCT02465060 ) was launched in 2015 as a genomically driven, signal-seeking precision medicine platform trial-largely for patients with treatment-refractory, malignant solid tumors. Having completed in 2023, it remains one of the largest tumor-agnostic, precision oncology trials undertaken to date. Nearly 6,000 patients underwent screening and molecular testing, with a total of 1,593 patients (inclusive of continued accrual from standard next-generation sequencing) being assigned to one of 38 substudies. Each substudy was a phase 2 trial of a therapy matched to a genomic alteration, with a primary endpoint of objective tumor response by RECIST criteria. In this Perspective, we summarize the outcomes of the initial 27 substudies in NCI-MATCH, which met its signal-seeking objective with 7/27 positive substudies (25.9%). We discuss key aspects of the design and operational conduct of the trial, highlighting important lessons for future precision medicine studies.

National Cancer Institute Combination Therapy Platform Trial with Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (ComboMATCH)

Over the past decade, multiple trials, including the precision medicine trial National Cancer Institute-Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (NCI-MATCH, EAY131, NCT02465060) have sought to determine if treating cancer based on specific genomic alterations is effective, irrespective of the cancer histology. Although many therapies are now approved for the treatment of cancers harboring specific genomic alterations, most patients do not respond to therapies targeting a single alteration. Further, when antitumor responses do occur, they are often not durable due to the development of drug resistance. Therefore, there is a great need to identify rational combination therapies that may be more effective. To address this need, the NCI and National Clinical Trials Network have developed NCI-ComboMATCH, the successor to NCI-MATCH. Like the original trial, NCI-ComboMATCH is a signal-seeking study. The goal of ComboMATCH is to overcome drug resistance to single-agent therapy and/or utilize novel synergies to increase efficacy by developing genomically-directed combination therapies, supported by strong preclinical in vivo evidence. Although NCI-MATCH was mainly comprised of multiple single-arm studies, NCI-ComboMATCH tests combination therapy, evaluating both combination of targeted agents as well as combinations of targeted therapy with chemotherapy. Although NCI-MATCH was histology agnostic with selected tumor exclusions, ComboMATCH has histology-specific and histology-agnostic arms. Although NCI-MATCH consisted of single-arm studies, ComboMATCH utilizes single-arm as well as randomized designs. NCI-MATCH had a separate, parallel Pediatric MATCH trial, whereas ComboMATCH will include children within the same trial. We present rationale, scientific principles, study design, and logistics supporting the ComboMATCH study.

Tumor-specific activity of precision medicines in the NCI-MATCH trial

Background

NCI-MATCH is a precision medicine basket trial designed to test the effectiveness of treating cancers based on specific genetic changes in patients' tumors, regardless of cancer type. Multiple subprotocols have each tested different targeted therapies matched to specific genetic aberrations. Most subprotocols exhibited low rates of tumor shrinkage as evaluated across all tumor types enrolled. We hypothesized that these results may arise because these precision cancer therapies have tumor type-specific efficacy, as is common among other cancer therapies.

Methods

To test the hypothesis that certain tumor types are more sensitive to specific therapies than other tumor types, we applied permutation testing to tumor volume change and progression-free survival data from ten published NCI-MATCH subprotocols (together n=435 patients). False discovery rate was controlled by the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure.

Results

Six of ten subprotocols exhibited statistically significant evidence of tumor-specific drug sensitivity, four of which were previously considered negative based on response rate across all tumors. This signal-finding analysis highlights potential uses of FGFR tyrosine kinase inhibition in urothelial carcinomas with actionable FGFR aberrations, MEK inhibition in lung cancers with BRAF non-V600E mutations, and MEK inhibition in cholangiocarcinomas with NRAS mutations.

Conclusions

These findings support the value of basket trials because even when precision medicines do not have tumor-agnostic activity, basket trials can identify tumor-specific activity for future study.

Precision Oncology: Evolving Clinical Trials across Tumor Types

Advances in molecular technologies and targeted therapeutics have accelerated the implementation of precision oncology, resulting in improved clinical outcomes in selected patients. The use of next-generation sequencing and assessments of immune and other biomarkers helps optimize patient treatment selection. In this review, selected precision oncology trials including the IMPACT, SHIVA, IMPACT2, NCI-MPACT, TAPUR, DRUP, and NCI-MATCH studies are summarized, and their challenges and opportunities are discussed. Brief summaries of the new ComboMATCH, MyeloMATCH, and iMATCH studies, which follow the example of NCI-MATCH, are also included. Despite the progress made, precision oncology is inaccessible to many patients with cancer. Some patients' tumors may not respond to these treatments, owing to the complexity of carcinogenesis, the use of ineffective therapies, or unknown mechanisms of tumor resistance to treatment. The implementation of artificial intelligence, machine learning, and bioinformatic analyses of complex multi-omic data may improve the accuracy of tumor characterization, and if used strategically with caution, may accelerate the implementation of precision medicine. Clinical trials in precision oncology continue to evolve, improving outcomes and expediting the identification of curative strategies for patients with cancer. Despite the existing challenges, significant progress has been made in the past twenty years, demonstrating the benefit of precision oncology in many patients with advanced cancer.

Analysis of histology-agnostic targets among soft tissue and bone sarcomas in the AACR GENIE database

Background

The development of novel therapies for patients with sarcoma is challenging due to the rarity and diversity of these mesenchymal neoplasms. Hence, histology-agnostic approvals can be of particular interest for the treatment of patients with soft tissue and bone sarcoma.

Methods

We queried the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) Project Genomics Evidence Neoplasia Information Exchange (GENIE) database Cohort v12.0-Public to investigate the prevalence of currently Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved and other potentially actionable histology-agnostic alterations in patients with soft tissue and bone sarcoma. Targets were identified by a literature review by the authors. Results are presented for each cohort identified in the GENIE database, namely: (1) soft tissue sarcoma (STS), (2) gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), (3) bone sarcoma, (4) uterine sarcoma, and (5) breast sarcoma.

Results

We identified 7,512 samples of 6,955 patients with sarcoma in the AAACR GENIE database v12.0-Public. Molecular alterations that could lead to the clinical use of a currently approved histology-agnostic therapy were identified in 2.1% of sarcomas (2.6% STS, 1.3% GIST, 1.4% bone, 2.7% uterine, and 0% breast). In addition, 2.9% of patients could be eligible for future histology-agnostic approvals. These specific mutations, fusions, and amplifications occurred in multiple histotypes in all cohorts.

Discussion

Exploring a public large-scale genomic database, we identified that 5% of patients with sarcoma could be eligible for current histology-agnostic FDA-approved drugs or future potential histology-agnostic indications. These actionable alterations were present in a wide variety of histologies in soft tissue and bone sarcomas, highlighting that next-generation sequencing can be considered for patients with advanced sarcoma to guide treatment strategies.

The Evolving Therapeutic Landscape for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

For patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma, prognosis is poor with extremely low 5-year survival rates and limited therapeutic options. Here, we review the current treatment landscape for mesothelioma and highlight promising future therapeutic directions.

RECENT FINDINGS

Evolving frontline therapeutic options for mesothelioma include VEGF inhibition in combination with chemotherapy and dual immune checkpoint inhibition, with synergisms between the therapies and response prediction via biomarkers also being explored. Evolving experimental treatments for mesothelioma include PARP and ALK inhibitors, dendritic and CAR T-cell therapies, anti-mesothelin vaccines, and oncolytic viral therapies, representing timely advances in the field. The therapeutic landscape for malignant pleural mesothelioma is evolving and preferred treatment in the frontline and later settings will likely evolve with it. However, this does not preclude the evidence for including multi-modal therapies spanning angiogenesis and immune checkpoint inhibitors, and biomarker utilization, in current clinical trials and management.

Evolving Role of Immunotherapy in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancers

Biliary tract cancers (BTC) comprise a rare and diverse group of malignancies that involve the gallbladder and biliary tree. These cancers typically present in later stages because they are aggressive in nature and affected patients are often asymptomatic in earlier stages of disease. Moreover, BTCs are generally refractory to cytotoxic chemotherapy, which further contributes to their associated poor survival outcomes. Novel therapy approaches are clearly needed. Molecular targeted agents have been developed based on our expanding knowledge of the genetic mutations underlying BTCs and represent a promising treatment strategy in molecularly selected subgroups of patients. In addition, the advent of immunotherapy over recent years has dramatically changed the bleak outcomes observed in malignancies such as melanoma. Our growing understanding of the complex tumor microenvironment in BTC has identified mechanisms of tumor immune evasion that could potentially be targeted with immunotherapy. As a result, different immunotherapeutic approaches including immune checkpoint inhibitors, cancer vaccines, and adoptive cell therapy, have been investigated. The use of immunotherapeutic agents is currently only approved for a small subset of treatment-refractory BTCs based on microsatellite instability (MSI) status and tumor mutational burden (TMB), but this will likely change with the potential approval of immunotherapy plus chemotherapy as a result of the TOPAZ-1 trial.