Appropriate consent and referral for general anaesthesia — a survey in the Paediatric Day Care Unit, Barnsley DGH NHS Trust, South Yorkshire

A rapid review of variation in the use of dental general anaesthetics in children

Introduction The use of dental general anaesthetics (DGAs) remains a cause for concern due to additional strains placed on health services. There are numerous factors influencing the prevalence and use of DGAs, and understanding these is an important first step in addressing the issue.Aim Conduct a rapid review of current peer-reviewed and grey literature on the variation in the use of DGAs in children.Methods Electronic searching using Medline via Ovid covering DGA articles from 1998 onwards, written in English. Publication types included primary and secondary sources from peer-reviewed journals and reports, as well as grey literature.Results From 935 results, 171 articles were included in the final review. Themes emerging from the literature included discussions of DGA variation, variations in standards of service provision by health services, and the socio-demographic and geographical characteristics of children. Prominent socio-demographic and geographical characteristics included age, other health conditions, ethnic and cultural background, socioeconomic status and deprivation, and geographical location.Conclusions This review identified numerous variations in the patterns associated with DGA provision and uptake at both a health service and individual level. The findings demonstrate the complicated and multifaceted nature of DGA practices worldwide.

Informed Consent in Pediatric Anesthesia: A Narrative Review

Informed consent for pediatric anesthesia challenges practitioners to navigate complex ethical, medical, and legal ambiguities. A patient's status as a minor does not negate the importance of his or her participation in the decision-making process but, rather, necessitates a nuanced evaluation of age and development to involve the patient to an appropriate extent. Given the complexities involved with pediatric informed consent in anesthesia practice and research, it is important to understand the experience of key stakeholders involved. For this review, we searched Medline, the Cochrane database, PROSPERO, and Clinicaltrials.gov for studies involving pediatric anesthesia informed consent. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were designed to select for studies that included issues related to informed consent as primary outcomes. The following data were extracted from included studies: title, authors, date of publication, study type, intervention, data collection method, participant type (ie, parent, pediatric patient, anesthesia provider), number of participants, pediatric patient age range, and primary outcome measures. Twenty-two articles were included for final review: studies of informed consent in pediatric anesthesia span many aspects of informed consent. Parental understanding has been studied most often (7/22 studies), followed by parental preferences (5/22 studies) and provider-related outcomes (5/22 studies) such as time spent interacting with patients, subjective reporting on amount of training related to informed consent, and provider satisfaction with the informed consent process. Outcomes pertaining to pediatric patients themselves constitute the smallest number of studies, including child anxiety (1/22), child understanding (1/22), and child refusal (1/22). Among the parties involved, parents have been most frequently identified as the subjects of these studies (2719/3805 subjects across all included studies, or 71% of all subjects). Pediatric patients are the least frequently involved subjects of studies that investigate informed consent in pediatric anesthesia (493/3805, or 13% of all subjects). Anesthesia providers and investigators have been study subjects (593/3805, or 16% of all subjects) for a range of topics including time spent interacting with patient, nature of informed consent conversation in relation to trainee status, satisfaction with informed consent process, and priorities for informed consent content. The aim of the present narrative review is to summarize the work that has been done on informed consent for pediatric anesthesia.

Dental characteristics and according treatments of children under GA in Germany

PURPOSE

Due to rising numbers of dental referral to general anesthesia, more specialized dental treatments under GA were needed in the last decades in Germany. However, there are few studies about it. Therefore, the present study aimed to assess dental treatment and characteristics of the children underwent GA at Greifswald University Clinic in comparison with specialized pediatric private practices in Germany.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This analytical comparative research reviewed the records of all children younger than 18 years old, whose underwent GA at the university dental clinic and three private practices in 2011. All cases were analyzed anonymously, including age, gender, caries levels, diagnostics and dental treatments.

RESULTS

About 54% and 50%, respectively, of children who underwent GA at both the university clinic and private practices were under 5 years old. Dental caries were mostly diagnosed among referred children (47.4% and 33.8% at university and private practices, resp.) followed by irreversible pulpitis (19.2% and 22.4%, resp.) and ECC (14.1% and 20.1%, resp.). Dental extractions were often performed at university clinic (40.2%) followed by fillings (33.9%), while more restorations and less extractions were supplied at private practices (47.8% and 16.3%, resp.).

CONCLUSIONS

Dental caries and its complications like pulpal problems were the most important reason for children who underwent GA combined with young age (< 5 years). Therefore, a primary preventive approach would be preferable to decrease the number of children in need of comprehensive dental treatment under GA.

Dental fear, communication, and behavioural management problems in children referred for dental problems

BACKGROUND

Knowledge about the influence of the interaction between child, parent, and dentist and the referral pattern is very limited.

AIM

This study intended to assess to what extent the pathways of Rachman could clarify why a child is being referred to a specialist in paediatric dentistry and if other aspects in the interaction between child, parent, and dentist play a role in the referral.

DESIGN

The referral letters of 500 children referred to a Special Dental Care Centre in Amsterdam were examined. All parents filled out the Children's Fear Survey Schedule-Dental Subscale, on behalf of the child. Information about interaction and the referral was collected from the referral letter and a semistructured interview with the parent and dentist separately.

RESULTS

Eighty pairs of parents and dentists of referred children participated in a semistructured interview. Child factors seem to contribute the most to the referral. For the cause of referral the pathways of Rachman and communication were often combined.

CONCLUSIONS

Apart from fear acquisition, as implied in Rachman's pathways, the interaction between child, dentist, and parent also contributes to the referral of a child to a specialist clinic in paediatric dentistry.

A Review of Referrals of New Patients to the Paediatric Department of a Teaching Hospital during a Six-Month Period in 2004

Aims

The aims of this review were to assess the reasons why patients were referred to a specialist dental paediatric unit and the quality of the referral letters received.

Material and Method

All patients referred to the paediatric consultation clinic at the Liverpool University Dental Hospital from January 2004 to July 2004 were included in the review. The reasons for their referral, as stated by the referring practitioners, were compared with the clinical findings from initial assessments in the consultation clinic and the quality of referral letters was assessed.

Results

Ninety-nine out of a total of 102 referrals were from general dental practitioners. Sixty were girls and 42 boys. Their mean age was 9.5 years. The commonest reason (25 patients) was for treatment under general anaesthesia. In 90 (88.2%) cases the main reason for referral stated in the letters was consistent with the findings of the clinical assessment in the consultant clinic. All 102 letters included the patient's name, address, date of birth and telephone number and 89 (87.3%) were dated. However, only 25 (24.5%) included any mention of medical history and fewer than 30% included details of any treatment provided by the referring practitioner.

Conclusions

The vast majority of patients were referred for good reasons. The quality of the referral letters was generally poor. The use of a structured referral pro forma could improve the quality of the referral.