Phase II study of liposomal doxorubicin and gemcitabine in the salvage treatment of ovarian cancer

Randomized phase II study of the PDGFRα antibody olaratumab plus liposomal doxorubicin versus liposomal doxorubicin alone in patients with platinum-refractory or platinum-resistant advanced ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

Olaratumab is a platelet-derived growth factor receptor-α (PDGFRα)-targeting monoclonal antibody blocking PDGFRα signaling. PDGFRα expression is associated with a more aggressive phenotype and poor ovarian cancer outcomes. This randomized, open label phase II study evaluated olaratumab plus liposomal doxorubicin compared with liposomal doxorubicin alone in advanced ovarian cancer patients.

METHODS

Patients with platinum-refractory or platinum-resistant advanced ovarian cancer were randomized 1:1 to receive liposomal doxorubicin (40 mg/m², intravenous infusion) administered every 4 weeks with or without olaratumab (20 mg/kg, IV infusion) every 2 weeks. Patients were stratified based on prior response to platinum therapy (refractory vs resistant). The primary efficacy endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate, duration of response, and safety.

RESULTS

A total of 123 patients were treated (62 olaratumab+liposomal doxorubicin; 61 liposomal doxorubicin). Median PFS was 4.2 months for olaratumab+liposomal doxorubicin and 4.0 months for liposomal doxorubicin (stratified hazard ratio [HR] = 1.043; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.698-1.558; p = 0.837). Median OS was 16.6 months and 16.2 months in the olaratumab+liposomal doxorubicin and liposomal doxorubicin arms, respectively (HR = 1.098; 95% CI 0.71-1.71). In the platinum-refractory subgroup, median PFS was 5.5 months (95% CI 1.6-9.2) and 3.7 months (95% CI 1.9-9.2) in the olaratumab+liposomal doxorubicin (n = 15) and liposomal doxorubicin arms (n = 16), respectively (HR = 0.85; 95% CI 0.38-1.91). Overall, 59.7% (olaratumab+liposomal doxorubicin) and 65.6% (liposomal doxorubicin) of patients reported grade ≥ 3 adverse events regardless of causality. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (all grades) regardless of causality were fatigue related (61%), nausea (57%), and constipation (52%) with olaratumab+liposomal doxorubicin and nausea (64%), fatigue related (62%), and mucositis (46%) with liposomal doxorubicin.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of olaratumab to liposomal doxorubicin did not result in significant prolongation of PFS or OS in platinum-resistant or platinum-refractory ovarian cancer.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00913835 ; registered June 2, 2009.

Intraperitoneal cisplatin and doxorubicin as maintenance chemotherapy for unresectable ovarian cancer: a case report

Background

Primary advanced, unresectable ovarian cancer (OC) is treated with palliative systemic chemotherapy. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy may be an alternative local maintenance therapy.

Case presentation

A 75 year old woman with laparoscopically and histologically confirmed unresectable OC was treated with 13 cycles of intraperitoneal cisplatin 7.5 mg/m² and doxorubicin 1.5 mg/m² over 2 years using laparoscopic pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC). Objective tumor response (tumor regression on histology, stable disease on repeated video-laparoscopy and peritoneal carcinomatosis index) was noted. No Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) > grade 3 were observed. EORTC QLQ-C30 quality of life measurements were stable throughout the therapy.

Conclusions

Repeated intraperitoneal chemotherapy with cisplatin and doxorubicin applied as PIPAC may be an effective maintenance treatment in women with primary advanced, unresectable OC.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-016-3004-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Update on the Treatment of Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death for all gynecologic malignancies in developed countries, largely owing to the late stage of diagnosis. Despite response to initial surgery and chemotherapy, more than 65% of patients will have recurrent or persistent diseases. Approximately 50% of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer are asymptomatic. Recurrences are often diagnosed using a combination of tests, including cancer antigen 125, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography scan. The most significant prognostic factor among women with recurrent ovarian cancer is the length of time from initial diagnosis to recurrence. Treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer involves chemotherapy, with or without surgery. In selected patients, secondary cytoreductive surgery might significantly improve survival. Radiotherapy may have a role in the treatment of a small group of patients with localized symptomatic masses. New treatment modalities for women with recurrent ovarian cancer are needed, as none of the available treatments are curative.

DOXIL when combined with Withaferin A (WFA) targets ALDH1 positive cancer stem cells in ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer is a highly aggressive and deadly disease. Currently, the treatment for ovarian cancer entails cytoreductive surgery followed by chemotherapy, mainly cisplatin or carboplatin combined with paclitaxel. Although this regimen is initially effective in a high percentage of cases, unfortunately, after few months of initial treatment, tumor relapse occurs due to platinum-resistance. DOXIL (liposomal preparation of doxorubicin) is a choice of drug for recurrent ovarian cancer. However, its response rate is very low and is accompanied by myocardial toxicity. Resistance to chemotherapy and recurrence of cancer is primarily attributed to the presence of cancer stem cells (CSCs), a small population of cells present in cancer. Effect of DOXIL and withaferin A (WFA), both alone and in combination, was investigated on cell proliferation of ovarian cancer cell line A2780 and tumor growth in SCID mice bearing i.p. ovarian tumors. ALDH1 cells were isolated from A2780 using cell sorter, and effect of DOXIL and WFA both alone and in combination on tumorigenic function of ALDH1 was studied using spheroids formation assays in vitro. Western blots were performed to examine the expression of ALDH1 and Notch 1 genes. In our studies, we showed, for the first time, that DOXIL when combined with withaferin A (WFA) elicits synergistic effect on inhibition of cell proliferation of ovarian cancer cells and inhibits the expression of ALDH1 protein, a marker for ALDH1 positive cancer stem cells (CSCs), and Notch1, a signaling pathway gene required for self-renewal of CSCs. Inhibition of expression of both ALDH1 and Notch1 genes by WFA was found to be dose dependent, whereas DOXIL (200 nM) was found to be ineffective. SCID mice, bearing i.p. ovarian tumors, were treated with a small dose of DOXIL (2 mg/kg) in combination with a sub-optimal dose of WFA (2 mg/kg) which resulted in a highly significant (60% to 70%) reduction in tumor growth, and complete inhibition of metastasis compared to control. In contrast, WFA treatment showed a significant reduction in tumor growth but no change in metastasis compared to control. DOXIL showed non-significant reduction in tumor growth and no change in metastasis compared to control. Isolated ALDH1 positive CSCs treated with the combination of DOXIL and WFA resulted in a significant reduction in spheroids formation (tumorigenic function of CSCs) and expression of ALDH1 protein. WFA when used alone at a concentration of 1.5 μM was found to be highly effective in suppression of ALDH1 expression, whereas DOXIL at a concentration of 200 nM was found to be ineffective. DOXIL in combination with WFA elicits synergistic effects, targets cancer stem cells, and has potential to minimize induction of drug resistance and reoccurrence of cancer. Based on our studies, we conclude that the combination of DOXIL with WFA has the potential to be an effective therapy for ovarian cancer and may ameliorate DOXIL related side effects as well as recurrence of ovarian cancer leading to increase in patients' survival rate.

Multifunctional polymersomes for cytosolic delivery of gemcitabine and doxorubicin to cancer cells

Although liposomes are widely used as carriers of drugs and imaging agents, they suffer from a lack of stability and the slow release of the encapsulated contents at the targeted site. Polymersomes (vesicles of amphiphilic polymers) are considerably more stable compared to liposomes; however, they also demonstrate a slow release for the encapsulated contents, limiting their efficacy as a drug-delivery tool. As a solution, we prepared and characterized echogenic polymersomes, which are programmed to release the encapsulated drugs rapidly when incubated with cytosolic concentrations of glutathione. These vesicles encapsulated air bubbles inside and efficiently reflected diagnostic-frequency ultrasound. Folate-targeted polymersomes showed an enhanced uptake by breast and pancreatic-cancer cells in a monolayer as well as in three-dimensional spheroid cultures. Polymersomes encapsulated with the anticancer drugs gemcitabine and doxorubicin showed significant cytotoxicity to these cells. With further improvements, these vesicles hold the promise to serve as multifunctional nanocarriers, offering a triggered release as well as diagnostic ultrasound imaging.

Clinical trials with pegylated liposomal Doxorubicin in the treatment of ovarian cancer

Among the pharmaceutical options available for treatment of ovarian cancer, increasing attention has been progressively focused on pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), whose unique formulation prolongs the persistence of the drug in the circulation and potentiates intratumor accumulation. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) has become a major component in the routine management of epithelial ovarian cancer. In 1999 it was first approved for platinum-refractory ovarian cancer and then received full approval for platinum-sensitive recurrent disease in 2005. PLD remains an important therapeutic tool in the management of recurrent ovarian cancer in 2012. Recent interest in PLD/carboplatin combination therapy has been the object of phase III trials in platinum-sensitive and chemonaïve ovarian cancer patients reporting response rates, progressive-free survival, and overall survival similar to other platinum-based combinations, but with a more favorable toxicity profile and convenient dosing schedule. This paper summarizes data clarifying the role of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in ovarian cancer, as well as researches focusing on adding novel targeted drugs to this cytotoxic agent.

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin/carboplatin combination in ovarian cancer, progressing on single-agent pegylated liposomal doxorubicin

AIM: To assess the efficacy and safety of the combination of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) and carboplatin in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma (ROC), following disease progression on single agent PLD.

METHODS: An analysis of the medical records of 10 patients with ROC, treated in our institution with a combination of PLD and carboplatin following progression on single-agent PLD therapy was performed. The median age was 59.1 years (range, 45 to 77 years). All diagnoses were histological-proven. Eight of the 10 patients were platinum-resistant. Following disease progression on single-agent PLD treatment, carboplatin area under the curve (AUC)-5 was added to PLD in all 10 patients. In order to assess disease status, Ca-125 was assessed before each PLD/carboplatin treatment. Relative changes in Ca-125 values were calculated, and response defined as a greater than 50% reduction in Ca-125 from baseline. Radiographic studies were re-evaluated and responses to therapy based on computer tomography (CT) scans carried out on a regular basis every 2-3 mo in each patient. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (V19).

RESULTS: A median of 10 cycles (range, 2-26) of the carboplatin-PLD combination was given. Of the 10 treated patients, 6 had > 50% reduction in Ca-125 levels from baseline, 4 of these had a partial response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria, and the other 2 patients had no measurable disease. In a further 2 patients with a best response of disease stabilization and < 50% reduction of Ca-125 levels, one had progression of disease after 26 cycles, and the second progressed with brain metastases following 12 cycles. Seven of the eight patients who were platinum-resistant showed evidence of clinical benefit on carboplatin-PLD combination therapy; 5 of these had > 50% reduction in Ca-125 level, 4 also showed a partial response on CT scan. The treatment was generally well-tolerated by the patients.

CONCLUSION: Addition of carboplatin to PLD, after disease progression on single-agent PLD therapy, is both effective and safe in patients with ROC, even in those with Platinum-resistant disease.

Doxorubicin-conjugated PEGylated dendrimers show similar tumoricidal activity but lower systemic toxicity when compared to PEGylated liposome and solution formulations in mouse and rat tumor models

PEGylated polylysine dendrimers show promise as novel drug delivery systems with the potential to direct site specific deposition patterns and to reduce toxicity at nontarget sites. Here the activity and toxicity profiles of a generation 5 polylysine dendrimer with 50% surface conjugation of PEG1100 and 50% surface conjugation of doxorubicin (via an acid labile 4-hydrazinosulfonyl benzoic acid linker) have been compared in a Walker 256 rat tumor model and a human MDA-MB231 xenograft in mice. A direct comparison was also made to a PEGylated liposomal formulation of doxorubicin and a doxorubicin solution. In both rat and mouse breast cancer models, the dendrimer formulation gave equivalent antitumor efficacy when compared to the liposomal or solution doxorubicin formulations and administration of all three doxorubicin formulations resulted in a significant reduction (>75%) in tumor growth in both models at doses ranging from 2 to 10 mg/kg doxorubicin equivalents. The dendrimer formulation, however, was better tolerated by both rats and mice, and approximately 2-fold higher doses were required to induce similar levels of toxicity (as assessed by organ weight, peripheral white cell counts, body weight and survival curves) when compared to administration of the doxorubicin solution or PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin. In rats the appearance of palmar plantar erythematosis (PPE), or hand foot syndrome, was also less evident after administration of dendrimer doxorubicin when compared to the liposome. Finally, even after administration to mice at 2-fold higher doses, dendrimer-doxorubicin resulted in a reduced incidence of cardiotoxicity when compared with a simple solution formulation of doxorubicin. The data suggest that dendrimer-based doxorubicin formulations may provide advantage over solution and liposomal formulations of doxorubicin via a reduction in systemic toxicity.

Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin and Gemcitabine in a Fixed Dose Rate Infusion for the Treatment of Patients With Poor Prognosis of Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: A Phase Ib Study

Introduction

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) is currently the reference treatment for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. The combination of PLD and gemcitabine and the administration of gemcitabine at a fixed dose rate infusion (FDRI) seem to have additive activity in this disease setting. We have launched a phase Ib study with the combination of FDRI gemcitabine followed by PLD in recurrent ovarian cancer with a platinum-free interval of less than 1 year, with parallel pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenetic studies.

Methods

The starting dose of gemcitabine was 1500 mg/m2, 10 mg/m2per minute, every 2 weeks (±250 mg gemcitabine titration depending on toxicity), followed by PLD 35 mg/m2every 4 weeks. Gemcitabine pharmacokinetics and equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1, deoxycytidine kinase, and ribonucleotide reductase M1 gene expression levels were studied.

Results

Thirty-five patients were treated at 3 different dose levels (DL). Dose level 1 was not tolerated. Nonfrail patients continued to be treated at DL-1 (G 1250 mg/m2on day 1 and PLD 35 mg/m2on days 1 and 15). Of 10 evaluable nonfrail patients, 4 displayed dose-limiting toxicity. Frail patients were treated at DL-2 (G 1250 mg/m2on day 1 and PLD 35 mg/m2on days 1 and 15). Of the 12 evaluable frail patients, 3 developed dose-limiting toxicity. Neutropenia, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia and stomatitis were the most common toxicities. The response rate was 42.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 34.5%-51.1%), with 17.1% (6/35) complete responses and 25.7% (9/35) partial responses. The median progression-free survival was 7.7 months (95% CI, 2.2-13.1). The median overall survival was 13.9 months (95% CI, 9.4-18.4). The administration of PLD after gemcitabine did not influence gemcitabine pharmacokinetics or its metabolites. The addition of PLD to gemcitabine caused a larger and longer induction of the ribonucleotide reductase M1 gene. Patients with higher baseline levels of deoxycytidine kinase had longer progression-free survival.

Conclusion

The recommended dose for a phase II study of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer having poor prognosis is PLD, 35 mg/m2on day 1, and gemcitabine, 1000 mg/m2on days 1 and 15 delivered at an FDRI of 10 mg/m2per minute in 28-day cycles.

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in the management of ovarian cancer

Among the pharmaceutical options available for treatment of ovarian cancer, much attention has been progressively focused on pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), whose unique formulation, which entraps conventional doxorubicin in a bilayer lipidic sphere surrounded by a polyethylene glycol layer, prolongs the persistence of the drug in the circulation and potentiates intratumor drug accumulation. These properties enable this drug to sustain its very favorable toxicity profile and to be used safely in combination with other drugs. PLD has been already approved for treatment of advanced ovarian cancer patients failing first-line platinum-based treatment. Moreover, phase III trials have been already completed, and results are eagerly awaited, which hopefully will expand the range of PLD clinical application in this neoplasia both in front-line treatment, and in the salvage setting in combination with other drugs. Moreover, attempts are continuing to enable this drug to be combined with novel cytotoxic drugs and target-based agents. This review aims at summarizing the available evidence and the new perspectives for the clinical role of PLD in the management of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer.

Carboplatin/gemcitabine alternating with carboplatin/pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and carboplatin/cyclophosphamide in platinum-refractory/resistant paclitaxel - pretreated ovarian carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

In this phase II study the efficacy and toxicity of an alternating chemotherapy regimen was examined in platinum-resistant relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients.

METHODS

Forty-five patients with platinum-refractory/resistant relapsed EOC, previously treated with carboplatin+paclitaxel+/-epirubicin were included. The regimen was consisted of gemcitabine 800 mg/m(2) (days 1+8) and carboplatin AUC 5, alternating with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 30 mg/m(2) and carboplatin AUC 5, alternating with carboplatin AUC 5 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2), every 3 weeks for a total of 9 cycles.

RESULTS

Among 38 patients with measurable disease, 39.4% (95% CI: 23.2-55.7) responded (five complete response and 10 partial response), while 30 out of 40 (75%) patients assessable by CA125 criteria had a serological response. Responses were more frequent in patients with platinum-free interval (PFI) 3-6 months than in those with PFI 0-3 months, but this was not statistically-significant. After a median follow-up of 19.5 months (range, 1.0-37+ months) the median progression-free survival was 7.1 months (95% CI: 3.4-10.8) and the median survival (OS) was 18.8 months (95% CI: 15.6-22.0). For patients with PFI 0-3 months PFS was 4.3 (95% CI: 0.8-7.8) months, while for those with PFI 3-6 months PFS was 8.9 (95% CI: 5.3-12.4) months (p=0.062). The regimen was well-tolerated and the main grade 3-4 toxicity was myelosuppression, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia, allergy and fatigue.

CONCLUSION

This alternating regimen, including carboplatin, gemcitabine, liposomal doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide, is an active and well-tolerated treatment in platinum relapsed/refractory EOC patients.

Gemcitabine and Vinorelbine Combination in Platinum-Sensitive Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

Objectives:

Most patients with ovarian cancer are candidates for second-line or salvage treatments often for prolonged periods. Patients with platinum-sensitive disease can benefit from a platinum retreatment with a likelihood of response dependents on the treatment-free interval. Alternative agents and combination chemotherapy are potential therapeutic approaches. At our institution, we carried out a phase II trial to evaluate feasibility, efficacy, and toxicity of gemcitabine and vinorelbine combination in recurrent ovarian carcinoma. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the role of this combination in patients with platinum-sensitive disease.

Patients and Methods:

Patients with platinum-sensitive disease recurring after 1 or more lines of platinum-based chemotherapy were included. Vinorelbine at 25 mg/m2followed by gemcitabine at 1000 mg/m2was administered intravenously on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors and cancer antigen 125 test (CA-125 Kinetics [Rustin criteria]) were adopted to classify responses. Toxicity was assessed according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria.

Results:

Thirty-nine patients were eligible. Platinum-free interval (PFI) was 6 to 12 months in 13 patients (33.3%; PFI 6-12) and more than 12 months in 26 patients (66.7%; PFI > 12). The overall response rate was 48.7%, with 6 complete responses. Median response duration was 38 weeks. The response rate was 23% in PFI 6-12 and 62% in PFI >12. The most frequently observed toxicity was hematological, with 23% of the patients having grade 3 or 4 neutropenia.

Conclusions:

Gemcitabine and vinorelbine combination is effective and well tolerated in recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. It may represent an option in the management of these patients because the chronic nature of the disease.

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in ovarian cancer

The encapsulation of doxorubicin in a pegylated liposomal matrix led to a reformulated agent with a different toxicity profile and improved clinical utility. Liposomal doxorubicin is devoid of the cardiac toxicity associated with doxorubicin, but is associated with predictable muco-cutaneous toxicity. The liposomal formulation leads to improved delivery to the target tumor tissue, allowing enhanced uptake by cancer cells. These properties translate into clinical utility in recurrent ovarian cancer as demonstrated by phase II and III trials, this proven clinical efficacy leading to FDA approval in second-line therapy for ovarian cancer. New combinations with cytotoxics, in particular with carboplatin, have demonstrated an acceptable toxicity profile and clinical utility in platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. A favorable toxicity profile renders liposomal doxorubicin an ideal partner for combination regimens with other cytotoxics, and more recently with biological agents. Such combinations are the subject of ongoing clinical trials.

Treatment of recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer

Epidemiologic analysis reveals that the mortality rate from ovarian cancer is continuously decreasing due to the improvement of surgery and chemotherapy. However, the prognosis of ovarian cancer patients is still unsatisfactory overall considering that only 30% of patients are alive after five years. In fact, although surgery and first-line systemic chemotherapy induces complete and partial response in up to 80% of patients with about a 25% pathological complete remission rate, recurrences occur in the majority of patients. The role of surgery in recurrent disease has been recently studied and many patients can receive an optimal secondary cytoreduction. Most of the recurrent patients are subject to a number of treatment regimens that, although palliative in nature, are also able to prolong survival. Important results have been obtained in particular in platinum-sensitive recurrent disease where a platinum-based chemotherapy is able to prolong progression-free survival and overall survival. Overall, our armamentarium for the treatment of progressive or recurrent ovarian cancer is significantly richer than in the past, and in many patients it is possible to achieve our goal of controlling the chronic behavior of the disease.

Cetuximab retargeting of adenovirus via the epidermal growth factor receptor for treatment of intraperitoneal ovarian cancer

Gene and virotherapy of ovarian cancer, using type 5 adenovirus (Ad5), has demonstrated good activity in preclinical animal studies, particularly after intraperitoneal administration of virus; however, success in clinical trials has been limited by poor infectivity of ovarian cancer cells and inflammatory responses to Ad5. We previously demonstrated that covalent modification of Ad5 with reactive copolymers on the basis of poly(hydroxypropylmethacrylamide) can shield the virus, offering protection from neutralizing antibodies and enabling retargeting to cancer-upregulated receptors with peptide ligands (basic fibroblast growth factor [bFGF] and murine epidermal growth factor [EGF]). These ligands may be less than ideal for clinical use, however, because they are potential mitogens. Accordingly, in this study we investigated the use of an anti-EGF receptor (EGFR) antibody, cetuximab, to retarget adenoviral transduction of EGFR-positives in vitro and in vivo. Cetuximab retargeting altered the physicochemical characteristics of Ad5, although it did not cause particle aggregation. Although cetuximab stimulated internalization of EGFR, similarly to EGF, it inhibited EGFR phosphorylation. Adenoviral transduction was inhibited after polymer coating, but was rescued in EGFR-positive cells (and not in EGFR-negative cells) by cetuximab retargeting. Cetuximab retargeting of wild-type adenovirus serotype 5 (Ad5WT) prolonged survival in an animal model of human ovarian cancer, similar to unmodified Ad5WT, but polymer coating ameliorated stimulation of adhesion formation. We conclude that polymer coating and covalent attachment of cetuximab successfully retargeted adenovirus to EGFR-positive cells, retained in vivo efficacy of an oncolytic adenovirus, and ameliorated side effects caused by unmodified adenovirus.

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and gemcitabine in the front-line treatment of recurrent/metastatic breast cancer: a multicentre phase II study

This multicentre phase II study was aimed at investigating the activity and safety of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) and gemcitabine (GEM) as front-line therapy in a large series of chemotherapy-naïve recurrent/metastatic breast cancer patients. From June 2003 to December 2006, a total of 71 recurrent/metastatic breast cancer patients were enrolled. Median age was 63 years (range=37-79), and 31 patients (43.7%) were > or =65 years old. Patients received PLD, 25 mg m(-2), day 1, followed by GEM, 800 mg m(-2), days 1 and 8, q21. Response was evaluable in 64 cases. Eight complete (12.5%) and 17 partial responses (26.6%) were registered, with an overall response rate of 39.1%. Thirty patients (46.9%) experienced stable disease, with an overall clinical benefit of 85.9%. Median time to progression (TTP) was 11 months, whereas median overall survival (OS) was not reached. The rate of 1- and 2-year OS was 79 and 61%, respectively. A total of 443 courses were evaluable for toxicity: grade 3 and 4 neutropaenia affected 14 patients (20.3%) and 3 patients (4.3%), respectively. Grade 3 and 4 palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome was documented in five cases (7.2%) and one case (1.4%), whereas grade 3 and 4 mucositis occurred in six cases (8.7%) and two cases (2.9%), respectively. Grade 2 cardiac toxicity was observed in only one case. Interestingly enough, there was no difference in the percentage and severity of either haematological or non-haematological toxicity according to the age of the patients (<65 vs > or =65 years). We confirmed in a large, very homogenous study sample of chemotherapy-naïve recurrent/metastatic breast cancer patients the efficacy and safety of PLD/GEM combination, providing response rates, median TTP and OS values comparable with those achieved with more toxic combinations.

Role of gemcitabine in ovarian cancer treatment

Newer agents and combinations are needed in order to improve current results in ovarian cancer treatment. Gemcitabine is a novel agent that has shown promising activity as a single agent in the treatment of platinum-resistant ovarian cancer and a favorable toxicity profile. Because of its clinical and preclinical synergism with platinum analogues, Gemcitabine has been combined with Carboplatin as a convincing approach in the treatment of platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer patients. Further combination of Gemcitabine and other agents, including paclitaxel, are also feasible and have been actively studied in order to establish the role of Gemcitabine in the management of treated and untreated ovarian cancer patients.

Gemcitabine and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin alternating with cisplatin plus cyclophosphamide in platinum refractory/resistant, paclitaxel-pretreated, ovarian carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

This phase II study conducted to investigate the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of gemcitabine (GEM) and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (LDOX) alternating with cisplatin (CDDP) and cyclophosphamide (CTX) in platinum-resistant/refractory, paclitaxel pretreated epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-eight patients with CDDP-resistant/refractory and paclitaxel pretreated patients were treated with 8 cycles of GEM 800 mg/m2 days 1 and 8 and LDOX 30 mg/m2 day 1, alternating with CDDP 60 mg/m2 and CTX 600 mg/m2 every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

Objective responses were observed in 37.5% of patients (4 complete and 11 partial responses) with measurable disease (n=40). CA125 response occurred in 30 (71.4%) of patients with elevated CA125 (n=42). After a median follow-up of 23 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.9 months (95% confidence interval, CI: 5.2-8.5), while the median overall survival (OS) was 18.2 months (95% CI: 12.7-23.6). A progression-free interval (PFI) of 0-3 months was associated with lower objective responses (10% versus 46.6%, p=0.06). Chemotherapy was well tolerated. The most frequent toxicities were myelosuppression, neurotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, nausea/vomiting, fatigue and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE). Overall 31 (65%) patients received G-CSF and 13 (27%) antibiotics because of neutropenia and/or febrile neutropenia.

CONCLUSION

This alternating combination chemotherapy is feasible for patients with platinum-resistant EOC and is associated with encouraging outcomes and a favorable toxicity profile.

Phase II trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Caelyx) plus Gemcitabine in chemotherapeutically pretreated patients with advanced breast cancer

A phase II trial was performed to investigate the efficacy and tolerance of combined gemcitabine and liposomal doxorubicin +/- recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in patients with chemotherapeutically pretreated metastatic breast cancer. Thirty-four patients were entered in this trial. Chemotherapy consisted of gemcitabine and liposomal doxorubicin +/- G-CSF. Twenty seven patients received this regimen as 2nd line therapy, five patients as 3rd line and two patients as 4th line therapy after having failed taxane- and/or anthracycline-based chemotherapy or other drug combinations. After a median of six courses, an overall response rate of 26% (9 PR in 34 enrolled patients) was observed; 14 patients had disease stabilization (41%), and eight (24%) progressed. Three patients were not evaluable for response due to anaphylaxis after the first course and protracted thrombocytopenia. The median TTP was 7.5 months, and median overall survival was 15 months. Myelosuppression was the most frequently observed toxicity. Non-haematological side effects were generally mild to moderate. Our data suggest that gemcitabine and liposomal doxorubicin +/- G-CSF is an effective and fairly well tolerated regimen for chemotherapeutically pretreated patients with advanced breast cancer.

Role of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Caelyx) in the treatment of relapsing ovarian cancer

The most significant factor predicting response to second-line chemotherapy is the time interval elapsed from the end of chemotherapy to relapse occurrence. Two types of situations may be considered: patients with platinum-sensitive relapse (relapse-free interval longer than 6 months) and patients with platinum-refractory relapse (progression during treatment or relapse-free interval under 6 months). Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin is a doxorubicin formulation. Encapsulation in liposomes confers it different pharmacokinetic characteristics and a more favorable toxicity profile. The following review examines the efficacy and safety of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin for the treatment of relapsing epithelial ovarian cancer.

Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE): a literature review with commentary on experience in a cancer centre

Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) or hand-foot syndrome (HFS) is a relatively common side effect of cytotoxic chemotherapy. Many cytotoxic drugs have been reported to cause the condition but it is more frequently associated with 5 fluorouracil (5FU), liposomal doxorubicin and cytarabine. The oral 5FU precursor, capecitabine is frequently associated with PPE and with the recent extension of its use to adjuvant treatment, the incidence of PPE is likely to increase. The initial symptoms are dysesthesia and tingling in the palms, fingers and soles of feet and erythema, which may progress to burning pain with dryness, cracking, desquamation, ulceration and oedema. Palms of the hands are more frequently affected than soles of the feet. This condition is painful and distressing to patients and in some incidences it results in patients not being able to work or perform normal daily activities. It can also result in treatment interruptions which impact on the efficacy of the treatment regimen. Effective and appropriate patient education from a specialist nurse prior to treatment is an essential part of patient management which will facilitate early identification of the symptoms and therefore prevent treatment delays and PPE progression. This article reviews current knowledge of the condition, including classification, and discussion of the findings of a clinical audit in a cancer centre. It includes the incidence, grading, management and impact of PPE on normal daily activities.

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in ovarian cancer

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin is a formulation of doxorubicin in which the molecule itself is packaged in a liposome made of various lipids with an outer coating of polyethylene glycol. Liposomal technology is being used in increasing amounts in the therapy of a variety of cancers, including ovarian cancers. This article reviews the mechanistic actions of this formulation, the Phase II and Phase III data that helped define the role of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in recurrent ovarian cancer, as well as a discussion of some of the side-effects and their management.

Optimizing gemcitabine regimens in ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer represents the leading cause of death from gynecologic neoplasms. The chance of response to secondary treatment is currently disappointing; few agents have shown notable activity in recurrent/progressive patients. Among these agents, gemcitabine represents one of the most interesting newer antineoplastic agents, showing significant activity, synergism with cisplatin, and a mild toxicity profile in both platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant (and also taxane-pretreated) recurrent/progressive patients. Moreover, first-line combination chemotherapy including gemcitabine has shown promising response rates in phase I and II studies. The ongoing phase III, five-arm, randomized Gynecologic Oncology Group Protocol 182/International Collaborative Ovarian Neoplasm 5 study should clarify the clinical impact of the addition of a third drug to the standard paclitaxel plus carboplatin treatment regimen.

Palmar–plantar erythrodysesthesia due to docetaxel–capecitabine therapy is treated with vitamin E without dose reduction

Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) is a distinctive and relatively frequent toxic reaction related to some chemotherapeutic agents. Doxorubicin, cytarabine, docetaxel, fluorouracil, and capecitabine are the most frequently implicated agents. Recently, taxanes, especially docetaxel, have been widely used in combination with capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). A high percentage of PPE has been seen in patients undergoing this combination therapy. PPE seems to be dose dependent and both peak drug concentration and total cumulative dose determine its occurrence. Withdrawal or dose reduction of the implicated drug usually gives rise to amelioration of the symptoms. Supportive treatments such as topical wound care, elevation, and cold compresses may help to relieve the pain. Use of systemic corticosteroids, pyridoxine (vitamin B6), blood flow reduction, and, recently, topical 99% dimethyl-sulfoxide have been used with variable outcomes. Vitamin E treatment has not been published before, especially without dose reduction of docetaxel-capecitabine therapy. Here we present five MBC patients treated with docetaxel-capecitabine combination therapy in whom PPE was observed during the clinical follow-up period. In all patients grade 2-3 PPE was observed. Vitamin E therapy was started at 300 mg/day p.o. without dose reduction of therapy and after 1 week of treatment PPE began to disappear. We suggest that it could be of interest to consider vitamin E as a preventive drug when drugs with a strong association with PPE are going to be administered.

Biweekly pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in patients with relapsed ovarian cancer: results of a multicenter phase-II trial

BACKGROUND

The obvious benefit of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) for tumour control in recurrent ovarian cancer is frequently offset by severe palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE). There is evidence that dose reduction from 50 to 40 mg/m(2) reduces the incidence of PPE without compromising cytotoxic activity. We set out to investigate whether biweekly application further improves the therapeutic index of PLD.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with recurrent ovarian cancer after surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy with platinum and taxane compounds were eligible to participate in this multi-institutional phase II study. PLD was administered at a dose of 20 mg/m(2) every two weeks. Eligible patients had ECOG performance status of < or =2, and sufficient organ function. We employed an optimized two-stage design to test the hypothesis that biweekly application of PLD reduces the frequency of grade III and IV PPE from 25% to 10%. Response and survival were addressed descriptively.

RESULTS

Between October 2001 and February 2004, 64 patients with median age of 59 (range 38-81) years were recruited onto this trial. We evaluated 553 (median 7, range 1-25) courses of PLD treatment. Most patients were in their third or fourth line of chemotherapy. PPE was noted in 30 patients (47.6%), but only three participants progressed to grade 3 severity (4.7%, 95% confidence interval 1.0-13.1%). Partial response, stable disease, and tumour progression were observed in 5, 13, and 24 patients, respectively. Median overall and progression-free survival were 18.2 (range, 1.4-34.0) and 4.3 (range 0.5-22.3) months.

CONCLUSIONS

Biweekly PLD may reduce the incidence of PPE while retaining efficacy in relapsed ovarian cancer. Our data support the need for a randomized trial to strengthen these assumptions.

Medical treatment of resistant or recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer

Epidemiologic analysis reveals that mortality rates from ovarian cancer are continuously decreasing due to the improvement of surgery and chemotherapy. However, overall, the prognosis of ovarian cancer patients is still unsatisfactory considering that only 30% of the patients are alive after 5 years. In fact, although surgery and first-line systemic chemotherapy induce complete and partial response in up to 80% of patients, with about a 25% pathological complete remission rate, recurrences occur in the majority of patients. Most of these patients are subject to repetitive treatment cycles that, although palliative in nature, are also able to prolong survival. Important results have been obtained, in particular in platinum sensitive recurrent disease where a platinum base chemotherapy is able to prolong progression-free survival and overall survival. Overall, our armamentarium for the treatment of progressive or recurrent ovarian cancer is significantly richer than in the past, and in many patients it is possible to achieve the objective to reach a chronic history of the disease.

Optimal therapy for platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer: doxorubicin, gemcitabine or topotecan?

Ovarian cancer is more fatal than all the other gynaecological malignancies combined. Although most patients respond to first-line combination chemotherapy, the vast majority (50-75%) of patients with advanced disease will relapse. The management of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer is based on their response profile to platinum: patients with platinum-sensitive disease can be rechallenged with platinum-based chemotherapy, whereas the management of patients with platinum-resistant or -refractory disease remains an area of active investigation. In this review, the data for second-line therapy in this latter group of patients will be summarised and recommendations for their optimal management will be made.

Preclinical in vivo activity of a combination gemcitabine/liposomal doxorubicin against cisplatin-resistant human ovarian cancer (A2780/CDDP)

Both gemcitabine and liposomal doxorubicin are antineoplastic drugs with clinical activity in platinum-refractory ovarian cancer. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the antitumor activity of a combination gemcitabine/liposomal doxorubicin administered to athymic mice bearing cisplatin-resistant human ovarian cancer (A2780/CDDP) xenografts. Emphasis was on the use of very low doses of each drug and of different dosing schedules. Data obtained showed that combined treatment with 80 mg/kg gemcitabine and 15 mg/kg liposomal doxorubicin produced a significant enhancement of antitumor activity compared with monotherapy at the same doses of these agents. Noteworthy is the fact that the majority of xenograft-bearing animals receiving the combination therapy demonstrated a complete tumor regression at the end of the study. A similar trend was observed when doses of both drugs were reduced to 20 mg/kg gemcitabine and to 6 mg/kg liposomal doxorubicin. Again, three out of ten mice receiving the combination were tumor free at the end of the study. No significant differences were observed in antitumor activity when comparing the simultaneous vs the consecutive dosing schedule. Remarkably, no additive toxicity was observed in any experimental trials. These data encourage clinical trials to prove the advantages of this combination treatment with respect to the single-agent chemotherapy in platinum-refractory ovarian cancer patients.

Gemcitabine and anthracyclines in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

Most of the patients with advanced ovarian cancer will recur after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy and need additional treatment. Gemcitabine (G) and Anthracyclines are active in this setting and their combination has shown synergistic antiproliferative activity in vitro, due to different mechanisms of action and non-overlapping toxicities.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In 2002 we began a phase II study with G 1000 mg/m(2) (day 1,8) combined to Epirubicin (E) 60 mg/m(2) (day 1), every 3 weeks for 6 cycles, in Platinum resistant/refractory ovarian carcinoma patients.

RESULTS

Among 30 patients enrolled so far (27 evaluable), receiving 149 cycles (median 6), 1 complete and 12 partial responses (48%), 9 stabilizations (33%) and 5 progressions (18%) were observed, with a good correlation with serological responses. Median time to progression was 8 months, while median time to response was 10 weeks and median duration 8 months. Grade 3-4 toxicities consisted of neutropenia (58%), thrombocytopenia (3%), anemia (10%), liver toxicity (13%), and mucositis (7%). Eight patients (27%) received G-CSF and 3 (10%) blood transfusions. No febrile neutropenia nor cardiotoxicity were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Although our results are preliminary, G/E combination appears particularly effective and safe in these platinum resistant/refractory patients.

Treatment of recurrent disease: randomized trials of monotherapy versus combination chemotherapy

Recurrent ovarian carcinoma is normally an incurable disease situation in which chemotherapy is the usual treatment for palliation. The probability of response to chemotherapy depends on the time from last chemotherapy and the previous response observed. The issue of combination chemotherapy versus monotherapy is a clinically relevant dilemma for medical and gynecologic oncologist involved in the treatment of recurrent patients. In those patients with platinum-resistant relapse, combination chemotherapy has been associated with higher toxicity without a clear clinical benefit in randomized clinical trials. Therefore, a less toxic sequential monotherapy approach should be the choice for resistant patients. On the other hand, two large randomized clinical trials have proved the superiority of a platinum-based doublet over platinum monotherapy in platinum-sensitive recurrent patients. The ICON-4/AGO-OVAR 2.2 trial demonstrated that the combination of paclitaxel-carboplatin (or cisplatin) is likely to provide a survival benefit compared with carboplatin monotherapy. This benefit was more clear in patients with a treatment free-interval >12 months. Moreover, the AGO-OVAR 2.5 trial, with the cooperation of NCIC CTG and EORTC GCG, has confirmed the advantage in response rate and progression free survival of the doublet carboplatin-gemcitabine compared to carboplatin.

Combined PEG liposomal doxorubicin and gemcitabine are active and have acceptable toxicity in patients with platinum-refractory and -resistant ovarian cancer after previous platinum-taxane therapy: a phase II Austrian AGO study

OBJECTIVES

Platinum resistance is a significant problem in patients with ovarian cancer. The aim of this phase II study was to define the response rates, the progression-free survival and the toxicity profile of the combination of PEG liposomal doxorubicin (L-DXR) and gemcitabine (GEM).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Thirty one patients with histologically confirmed platinum-refractory or -resistant epithelial ovarian cancer were scheduled to receive 6 cycles of L-DXR 30 mg/m(2) on day 1 as well as GEM 650 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 every 28 days.

RESULTS

The median number of chemotherapy cycles given was 4. The mean dose intensity for L-DXR and GEM on day 1 was 96% and 97%, respectively. The mean dose intensity for GEM on day 8 was 93%. The overall response rate was 33% (10 of 30 evaluable patients; 20% complete responses). The median progression-free survival was 3.8 months, and the median overall survival was 15.8 months, respectively. Toxicity was acceptable. One quarter of patients developed grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, but none developed febrile neutropenia. Palmoplantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) grades 2 and 3 occurred in 13% and 3% only, respectively, and no grade 4 PPE was observed. Grades 1 to 3 stomatitis was found in 58% of patients (10% grade 3).

CONCLUSION

The combination of L-DXR and GEM is an active and acceptably tolerated option in the treatment of patients with platinum-resistant and -refractory ovarian cancer. Dose reductions seem advisable in the case of > or =grade 2 stomatitis and/or PPE > or =grade 2.

Gemcitabine in epithelial ovarian cancer treatment: current role and future perspectives

Newer agents and combinations are needed in order to improve current results in ovarian cancer treatment. Gemcitabine is a novel agent that has shown consistent activity as a single agent in the treatment of platinum-resistant ovarian cancer and a favorable toxicity profile. Because of its clinical and preclinical synergism with platinum analogs, gemcitabine has been combined with carboplatin as a convincing approach in the treatment of platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer patients. Further combination of gemcitabine and other agents, including paclitaxel, is also feasible and has been actively studied in order to establish the role of gemcitabine in the management of treated and untreated ovarian cancer patients.

Gemcitabine and liposomal doxorubicin in the salvage treatment of ovarian cancer: Updated results and long-term survival

OBJECTIVE

The combination of GEM/PLD has been tested for its efficacy on survival of recurrent ovarian cancer patients.

METHODS

This is a multicenter phase II study of GEM/PLD regimen in recurrent ovarian cancer patients previously treated with at least one platinum/paclitaxel regimen, and with evidence of measurable disease. PLD, 30 mg m(-2), was administered on day 1 followed by GEM, 1000 mg m(-2), on days 1 and 8, every 21 days.

RESULTS

106 patients were available for response evaluation. 9 complete responses (8.5%) and 27 partial responses (25.5%) have been registered. 36 patients (34.0%) experienced stabilization of disease, while 34 (32.1%) cases progressed during treatment. OS was significantly shorter in platinum-resistant (median OS = 50 weeks) than in platinum-sensitive patients (median OS = 92 weeks) (P value = 0.0016). In the group of platinum-sensitive patients, cases responsive to GEM/PLD combination showed a better OS with respect to patients unresponsive to GEM/PLD (median OS = 120 weeks versus median OS = 60 weeks, P value = 0.019). The same trend was observed in platinum-resistant patients. Grade 4 hematological toxicity affected 20 patients (18%). Grade 3 palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) was registered in 16 patients (14.4%). Grades 3 and 4 mucositis was documented in 16 (14.4%) and 2 (1.8%) patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

GEM/PLD combination represents a valid approach in recurrent ovarian cancer patients. The hematological toxicity was easily managed, and the incidence and severity of PPE was low.

Review of gemcitabine-based combinations for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer

Gemcitabine, an analog of deoxycytidine, is an anticancer nucleoside with proven activity in different solid malignancies. The efficacy of gemcitabine as a single agent or as part of a combination treatment has been evaluated in several trials, and antitumor activity has been observed in patients with sensitivity and resistance to both platinum and paclitaxel. In this context, preclinical studies have shown that gemcitabine-based combinations increase the cytotoxic action of the treatment and can potentially overcome drug resistance. The toxicity profile of gemcitabine, and its proven action in relapsed ovarian cancer, allows for the development of a hypothesis stating that a specific choice of drugs with different mechanisms and non-cross-resistance can increase the chance of response and prolong its duration and that of other outcome measures. This article provides an update of new clinical approaches with gemcitabine in combination with other nonplatinum drugs for the management of patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

Clinical and pharmacokinetic phase II study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and vinorelbine in heavily pretreated recurrent ovarian carcinoma

BACKGROUND

This multicenter phase II study evaluated feasibility, clinical efficacy, toxicity and pharmacokinetics of the combination of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) and vinorelbine (VNR) in patients with platinum-paclitaxel pretreated recurrent ovarian cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients received prior treatment with platinum and paclitaxel. Thirty-two heavily pretreated (median number of chemotherapy regimens two, range one to six) ovarian cancer patients received treatment with PLD 30 mg/m(2) and VNR 30 mg/m(2) every three weeks for six cycles. Ten patients entered the pharmacokinetic study, five receiving the PLD-VNR and five the VNR-PLD sequence.

RESULTS

In 30 patients evaluated for response and toxicity, the overall response rate was 37% and 10% of patients achieved stable disease. Median time to progression and overall survival were 5.5 months (range 1-10) and 9 months (range 2-16), respectively. Toxicity was generally mild and reversible. VNR AUC(tot) and plasma levels were considerably higher in the PLD-VNR sequence.

CONCLUSIONS

The PLD-VNR regimen exhibits significant activity in heavily pretreated patients, is well tolerated and is associated with encouraging survival. Preliminary pharmacokinetic results suggest the PLD-VNR sequence for further clinical applications. This regimen should be considered as a treatment option in patients with chemotherapy-resistant ovarian cancer.

Ifosfamide/liposomal daunorubicin is a well tolerated and active first-line chemotherapy regimen in advanced soft tissue sarcoma

BACKGROUND

The anthracycline/ifosfamide combination is the most effective chemotherapy in soft tissue sarcoma. To improve the tolerability and potential efficacy of this combination, the authors combined a moderate dose of continuous infusion ifosfamide with liposomal daunorubicin (L-Dauno).

METHODS

In a single-arm, Phase II study, 40 patients with a median age of 57 years (range, 19-78 years) were enrolled. Of these, 35 patients were treated with first-line chemotherapy. The treatment regimen was comprised of ifosfamide at a dose of 5 g/m(2) over 24 hours and L-Dauno at a dose of 100 mg/m(2) every 4 weeks with granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor support.

RESULTS

Eleven (31%) of 35 anthracycline/ifosfamide-naive patients achieved a partial/complete response, 6 patients (17%) had stable disease, and 13 patients (37%) had disease progression. Three patients were not evaluable, and there were two intermittent deaths. The median time to disease progression was 6 months, the median overall survival was 14 months, and the median time to treatment failure was 15 months. Toxicity was tolerable.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of Ifosfamide and L-Dauno was found to be a highly active chemotherapy regimen for first-line treatment of soft tissue sarcoma. Therefore, we believe randomized studies with this regimen are warranted.

Liposomal anthracycline treatment for ovarian cancer

Platinum/taxane regimens induce high response rates and prolong survival in women with ovarian cancer. After recurrence, however, response to second-line chemotherapy is limited. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil/Caelyx [PLD]), is the only liposomal anthracycline indicated for second-line treatment of platinum- and paclitaxel-refractory ovarian cancer. Response rates ranged from 14% to 20% in nonrandomized trials of this patient population. In a large phase 3 randomized trial, single-agent PLD and topotecan had similar efficacy overall in response rates, but PLD-treated patients had significantly improved overall survival compared with topotecan with a pronounced advantage in platinum-sensitive patients. Another randomized trial reported that PLD and paclitaxel were comparable with regards to response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival, regardless of the degree of platinum sensitivity. Additional nonrandomized trials of PLD in combination with other active agents resulted in response rates ranging from 20% to 76%. PLD is generally well tolerated and its side-effect profile compares favorably with other commonly used chemotherapeutic agents in this clinical setting. Proper dosing and monitoring may further enhance tolerability while preserving the efficacy of this versatile agent for ovarian cancer.

Management of hand-foot syndrome in patients treated with capecitabine (Xeloda)

Comparative trials of capecitabine (Xeloda) versus 5-FU/LV in metastatic colorectal cancer have shown that hand-foot syndrome (HFS) was the only clinical adverse event occurring more frequently with capecitabine. Most patients with HFS present with dysesthesia, usually with a tingling sensation in the palms and soles of the hands and feet. This can progress in 3-4 days to burning pain plus well-defined symmetric swelling and erythema. The hands tend to be more commonly affected than the feet, and might even be the only area affected in some patients. HFS can interfere with the general activities of daily living, especially when blistering, moist desquamation, severe pain or ulceration occurs. While HFS is manageable, if ignored it can progress rapidly. However, dose interruption and reduction of capecitabine usually leads to a rapid reversal of signs and symptoms without long-term consequences. Nurses play a key role in educating patients how to recognise HFS, when to interrupt treatment and how to adjust the dose to maintain effective therapy with capecitabine over the long term. It is particularly important that patients and nurses are aware that dose interruption/reduction does not affect the overall antitumour efficacy of capecitabine.