Combined modality chemoradiation in elderly oesophageal cancer patients

Clinical outcomes of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in patients aged over 80 years

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The clinical outcomes and optimal treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in elderly patients are unclear. This study aimed to assess the clinical outcomes of ESCC in patients aged ≥ 80 years.

METHODS

Medical records of patients diagnosed with ESCC between December 2008 and February 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. In total, 479 patients with ESCC were included and divided into the elderly (n = 52) and younger (n = 427) groups based on age. The clinical outcomes and survival rates, according to treatment, were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The median ages of the two groups were 82 years (range, 80-95 yr) and 66 years (41-79 yr). The overall survival was slightly lower in the elderly group; however, no statistical significance (hazard ratio [HR] 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85-1.91; p = 0.238) was observed. No differences were observed in the outcomes or survival between the two groups according to the treatment method (surgery, chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy alone, and endoscopic resection). The elderly group was more likely to receive no treatment for cancer (30.8% vs. 13.6%, p = 0.002) than the younger group. However, when there was no treatment for cancer in the elderly group, survival was significantly lower than when treatment was administered (HR 0.08, 95% CI 0.03-020; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In patients with ESCC aged ≥ 80 years, active cancer treatment was beneficial, and the results did not differ from those of younger patients.

Radiotherapy with S-1 for the treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma 75 years or older

OBJECTIVE

Explore the efficacy and safety of involved-field irradiation (IFI) combined with S-1 as definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) for locally advanced elderly esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), under the premise of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).

METHODS

We designed a prospective single-arm phase II study. The study enrolled 91 patients aged 75 to 92 years. Eligible participants had histologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma, stage II to IV disease based on the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC). All elderly patients (EPs) received dCRT with S-1. which was administered orally twice daily for 28 days. The radiotherapy dose was 61.2 Gy delivered in 34 fractions or 50.4 Gy delivered in 28 fractions. The primary endpoint was 2-year overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), local control rate (LCR), and safety.

RESULTS

From July 2017 to July 2021, we enrolled EPs with ESCC who were treated at the Jiangsu Cancer hospital. As of August 1, 2023, the median follow-up of surviving EPs was 31.4 months (IQR: 25.2 to 72.6 months). 83 patients (91.2%) completed the whole course of treatment. The 2-year OS rate was 59.2%, and the PFS rate was 43.7%. The most common grade 1 to 2 adverse effects (AEs) were radiation esophagitis (79.1%), and then were radiation pneumonia (46.2%). Anemia (41.8%) was the most common of grade 1 to 2 hematologic toxicity. The incidence of grade 3 or above AEs was 24.2%, and the incidence of leukopenia was the highest (11.0%). There was not one death due to treatment-related toxicity. In a subgroup analysis of radiotherapy doses, we found no statistically significant differences in PFS (P = 0.465) and OS (P = 0.345) in EPs with ESCC who received 50.4 Gy and 61.2 Gy, and that patients in the 50.4 Gy group had lower dermatitis (P = 0.045) and anemia (P = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

IF-IMRT combined with S-1 is a promising regimen for elderly ESCC. And the radiotherapy dose of 50.4 Gy remains the standard dose for EPs with ESCC undergoing CCRT.

Geriatric Radiation Oncology: What We Know and What Can We Do Better?

Elderly patients represent a growing subgroup of cancer patients for whom the role of radiation therapy is poorly defined. Older patients are still clearly underrepresented in clinical trials, resulting in very limited high-level evidence. Moreover, elderly patients are less likely to receive radiation therapy in similar clinical scenarios compared to younger patients. However, there is no clear evidence for a generally reduced radiation tolerance with increasing age. Modern radiation techniques have clearly reduced acute and late side effects, thus extending the boundaries of the possible regarding treatment intensity in elderly or frail patients. Hypofractionated regimens have further decreased the socioeconomic burden of radiation treatments by reducing the overall treatment time. The current review aims at summarizing the existing data for the use of radiation therapy or chemoradiation in elderly patients focusing on the main cancer types. It provides an overview of treatment tolerability and outcomes with current standard radiation therapy regimens, including possible predictive factors in the elderly population. Strategies for patient selection for standard or tailored radiation therapy approaches based on age, performance score or comorbidity, including the use of prediction tests or geriatric assessments, are discussed. Current and future possibilities for improvements of routine care and creation of high-level evidence in elderly patients receiving radiation therapy are highlighted.

Management of elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer

This review focuses on the treatment about elderly esophageal cancer to clarify the current situation regarding our clinical question. Although there are several reviews about elderly esophageal cancer treatment, there are fundamental differences between Japan and the rest of the world. Two main differences are raised: histological differences and treatment strategies for resectable patients. We overview each status according to following clinical questions. First, there are no established evaluation criteria for frail. Second, selection criteria for surgery or non-surgery are not established. Third, few specific treatments for elderly patients (EPs) are investigated. In conclusion, there are many reports about treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma for EPs, although treatment strategy is still controversial. We have to consider well-designed prospective trial to confirm specific treatment strategy according to each stage.

Comparison of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy with Radiotherapy Alone for Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer in Elderly Patients: A Randomized, Multicenter, Phase II Clinical Trial

This randomized, multicenter, phase II clinical trial was performed to compare the safety and efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy using S-1 (CCRT) with radiotherapy alone (RT) for elderly patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). All eligible patients were randomly assigned to the CCRT group or the RT group at a 1:1 ratio. The CCRT group received 50.4 Gy radiotherapy concurrent with S-1 and the RT group received 59.4 Gy radiotherapy alone. The primary endpoints were toxicity and the overall response rate (ORR), and the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). In total, 157 elderly patients with ESCC were recruited from December 2016 to March 2020. By June 2021, the median follow-up duration had reached 38 months. No grade 5 toxicities occurred in either group and the overall rate of severe toxicities (≥grade 3) was higher in the CCRT group (19.2% to 7.6%; p=0.037), particularly neutropenia (7.7% vs. 1.3%; p=0.06). The CCRT group presented a significantly higher ORR (83.3% vs. 68.4%; p=0.009) and prolonged PFS (25.7 months vs.13.9 months; p=0.026) than the RT group. The median OS was 27.3 months in the CCRT group and 19.1 months in the RT group (p=0.59). For patients older than 70 years with locally advanced ESCC, concurrent chemoradiotherapy with S-1 had tolerable adverse effects and improved ORR and PFS compared with radiotherapy alone.

Benefit of chemotherapy based on platinum with definitive radiotherapy in older patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Objective

There is still no definitely therapeutic evidence of a beneficial effect of chemotherapy with radiotherapy for older patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). We aim to determine the influence of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and radiotherapy (RT) alone in patients aged 65 years or older with locally advanced ESCC.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 581 ESCC patients who underwent CRT and RT alone. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to analyze the impact of clinical factors on long‐term overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Finally, we compared the toxicity rates of these patients.

Results

The median OS and PFS of the overall population were 23.2 months (2.0–162.6 months) and 18.6 months (1.1–159.6 months). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that chemotherapy (p < 0.05), tumor thickness (p < 0.01), and N stage (p < 0.05) were independent prognostic factors associated with both OS and PFS. In the chemotherapy subgroup, patients who received 2–8 cycles of chemotherapy had better OS than those who received 1 cycle (p = 0.015). The results also revealed that the CRT group has better OS and PFS than RT alone group for patients aged 65–74 years (both p < 0.01). However, for patients aged 75 years or older, there was no statistically significant difference between CRT and RT alone (both p > 0.05). Besides, higher staged ESCC has the inferior OS and PFS than lower staged ESCC for patients received RT alone and aged 65–74 years (both p < 0.05). Finally, there were significantly more severe hematologic toxicities in the CRT group than in those treated with RT alone in this study (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The present study suggested that CRT for locally advanced ESCC in patients aged 65 years or older had a significant benefit over RT alone in terms of OS and PFS. However, for patients aged 75 years or older, there was no statistically significant difference between CRT and RT alone. CRT should be performed with special attention in patients aged 75 years or older.

Radiotherapy combined with nimotuzumab for elderly esophageal cancer patients: A phase II clinical trial

Objective

To investigate the safety and efficacy of nimotuzumab combined with radiotherapy for elderly patients with non-resectable esophageal carcinoma (EC).

Methods

Eligible patients were aged 70 years or older and had treatment-naïve, histologically proven inoperable locally advanced EC. Enrolled patients received radiotherapy with a total dose of 50−60 Gy in 25−30 fractions, concurrent with weekly infusion of nimotuzumab. The primary end point was the rate of more than grade 3 toxicities.

Results

From June 2011 to July 2016, 46 patients with stage II−IV EC with a median age of 76.5 years were enrolled. There were 10, 28 and 8 patients with stage II, III and IV disease, respectively. The common acute toxicities included esophagitis (grade 1−2, 75.4%; grade 3, 8.7%), pneumonitis (grade 1, 4.3%; grade 2, 6.5%; grade 3, 2.2%), leukopenia (grade 1−2, 60.9%; grade 3−4, 4.4%), gastrointestinal reaction (grade 1−2, 17.3%; grade 3, 2.2%), thrombocytopenia (grade 1−2, 21.7%; grade 3, 2.2%), and radiothermitis (grade 1−2, 39.2%). The incidence of grade 3−4 adverse effects was 17.4%. No grade 5 toxicities were observed. Clinical complete response, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease were observed in 1 (2.2%), 31 (67.4%), 12 (26.1%), and 2 (4.3%) patients, respectively. The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 17 and 10 months, respectively. The 2-, 3-, and 5-year OS and PFS rates were 30.4%, 21.7%, 19.6%, and 26.1%, 19.6%, 19.6%, respectively.

Conclusions

Nimotuzumab combined with radiotherapy is a safe and effective therapy for elderly patients who are not surgical candidates. Further studies are warranted to confirm its therapeutic effects in elderly EC patients.

Treatment of early stage (T1) esophageal adenocarcinoma: Personalizing the best therapy choice

Esophagectomy is considered the primary form of management for esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC); however, the surgery is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. For patients with early-stage EAC, endoscopic resection (ER) presents a potential curative treatment option that is less invasive and carries fewer risks procedure related risks, but it is associated with higher rates of cancer recurrence following the procedure. For some patients, age and comorbidities may prevent them from having esophagectomy as a treatment option, while other patients may be operative candidates but do not wish to undergo esophagectomy for a variety of reasons related to their values and preferences. Furthermore, while anxiety of cancer recurrence following ER may significantly diminish a patient’s quality of life (QOL), so might the morbidity surrounding esophagectomy. In addition to considering health status, patient preferences, and impacts on QOL, physicians and patients must also consider what treatments would be both beneficial and available to the patient, considering esophagectomy methods-minimally invasive vs open-or the use of chemoradiotherapy in addition to ER. Our article reviews and summarizes available treatment options for patients with early EAC and their potential effects on the health and wellbeing of patients based on the current data. We conclude with a request for more research of available options for early EAC patients, the conditions that determine when each option should be employed, and their effects not only on patient health but also QOL.

Impact of the Charlson Comorbidity Index on the treatment strategy and survival in elderly patients after non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND

In elderly patients with superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), the optimal treatment strategy after non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the validity of additional treatments after non-curative ESD and post-ESD survival predictors in elderly patients with ESCC.

METHODS

Elderly patients (age > 75 years) treated with ESD for ESCC between January 2010 and July 2014 at six tertiary referral hospitals in Japan were retrospectively investigated and stratified according to lymph node metastasis risk, based on histological findings (high-risk factors: positive lymphovascular invasion, submucosal invasion, and positive/indeterminate vertical margin) and post-ESD treatment strategy: group A (287 patients; low risk), group B (41 patients; high risk, without additional treatment), and group C (32 patients; high risk, with additional treatment). We evaluated 3- and 5-year overall survival and disease-specific survival, and prognostic factors for post-ESD survival.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 38, 40, and 49 months, respectively, there was 1 esophageal cancer-related death in group A, 1 in group B, and none in group C, whereas 22, 9, and 3 patients in groups A, B, and C died of other diseases. The groups differed significantly in overall survival (92.4%; 87.6%; 93.4%, p = 0.022), although not in disease-specific survival (99.4%; 96.3%; 100%, p = 0.217). On multivariate analysis, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) ≥ 2 was the only independent risk factor for post-ESD death (hazard ratio 7.92; 95% confidence interval 3.42-18.3; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A follow-up strategy without additional treatment after ESD for ESCC may be acceptable in high-risk elderly patients, especially for CCI ≥ 2.

Definitive Radiotherapy for Older Patients Aged ≥75 Years With Localized Esophageal Cancer

BACKGROUND/AIM

To evaluate the predictive factors in older patients with localized esophageal cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients aged ≥75 years who were treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy between 2008 and 2017. The patients were classified into the oldest-old group (≥80 years) and the old group (75-79 years).

RESULTS

Fifty patients were identified, 28 in the oldest-old group and 22 in the old group. Forty-six patients (92%) completed the planned radiotherapy. The median follow-up time was 21 months. Two-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival, and locoregional control rates were 53%, 42%, and 51%, respectively. Univariate analyses for OS showed that neither the radiotherapy field nor total radiotherapy dose was a significant factor. Clinical T stage, clinical N stage, and age were independent predictors of OS.

CONCLUSION

Age ≥80 years is an independent prognostic factor for OS. Elective nodal irradiation and total radiotherapy dose above 50.4 Gy did not improve survival. Our findings may help in the treatment decisions for localized esophageal cancer in older patients.

Feasibility and efficiency of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with a single agent or double agents vs radiotherapy alone for elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Experience of two centers

The incidence of elderly patients with esophageal cancer (OC) is increasing as the population ages. Until now, the treatment strategy in these patients has been unclear. The aim of our study was to assess the efficiency and tolerance of treatment with radiotherapy alone (RT alone), single‐agent‐based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT‐1), or double‐agent‐based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT‐2) in elderly patients (≥65 years) with OC. A total of 271 patients with OC aged 65 years or older were included in this study. The median overall survival (OS), median progression‐free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and treatment‐related toxicities were assessed. The median OS time for all patients was 23.6 ± 2.3 months, with 2‐year survival rates of 48.0 ± 3.0%. The median PFS time was 13.6 ± 1.3 months with the 2‐year PFS rate was 33.0 ± 4.0%. Among patients who received CCRT‐1, better OS, and PFS were found in patients who received docetaxel than in patients received fluorouracil and platinum. In a subgroup analysis, 118 patients who underwent RT alone had a median OS time of 15.6 ± 1.9 months and median PFS time of 10.4 ± 0.9 months. The median OS time of patients who received CCRT‐1 was 28.8 ± 10.1 months compared with 27.8 ± 2.5 months for the patients treated with CCRT‐2 (P = 0.537). The similar results were observed for median PFS, with 16.5 ± 3.2 months in the CCRT‐1 group and 17.0 ± 2.0 months in the CCRT‐2 group (P = 0.321). Grade ≥3 leukocytopenia and grade ≥2 weight loss during treatment occurred in 40.6% and 17.9% of patients, respectively, in the CCRT‐2 group, which was higher than that observed in the CCRT‐1 group. Our results suggested that CCRT could be considered as an acceptable treatment for elderly patients with OC. The CCRT‐1 group presented with a lower incidence of treatment toxicities but comparable survival outcomes, compared to the CCRT‐2 group. Docetaxel was superior to fluorouracil and platinum in terms of OS.

Concurrent chemoradiation therapy tailored to the older adults with esophageal cancer: state of the art and the future

Purpose

The aim of this study was to review the published literature addressing the question of whether geriatric assessment (GA) should be routinely applied in the treatment of older adults with esophageal cancer (EC) who have received definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (dCRT).

Materials and methods

A literature search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library was performed. Studies that contained original data outlining the inclusion and exclusion criteria, treatment compliance rate, and severe toxicity reports were reviewed. Additionally, criteria from ongoing clinical trials in the World Health Organization and National Institutes of Health registries were reviewed to evaluate the utilization of GA-related domains in elderly EC patients who received dCRT.

Results

Twenty-nine studies were identified based on the selection criteria: five were single-arm prospective studies, and the other studies were retrospective studies. All studies used chronological age and performance status as basic descriptors for this subpopulation. The comorbidity index and the malnutrition level were mentioned in several studies. However, factors such as “Demographic data and social support,” “Psychology,” “Polypharmacy,” and “Geriatric syndromes” were not described in any of the included studies. Unfortunately, the results were similar for the registered clinical trials. Finally, treatment compliance and toxicity profile were found to be acceptable in selected elderly EC patients.

Conclusion

The current experience for older adults with EC receiving dCRT is mainly based on the results of a series of retrospective studies. Ongoing clinical trials should routinely consider GA-related domains to select appropriate treatments for patients in the future.

Outcomes by treatment modality in elderly patients with localized gastric and esophageal cancer

Background

We aimed to assess current treatment patterns and outcomes in elderly patients with localized gastric and esophageal (ge) cancers.

Methods

This retrospective analysis considered patients 75 years of age or older with ge cancers treated during 2012-2014. Patient demographics and tumour characteristics were collected. Overall survival (os) and disease-free survival were assessed by univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression, adjusting for demographics. Logistic regression analyses were used to examine factors affecting treatment choices.

Results

The 110 patients in the study cohort had a median age of 81 years (range: 75-99 years). Primary disease sites were esophageal (55%) and gastric (45%). Treatment received included radiation therapy alone (29%), surgery alone (26%), surgery plus perioperative therapy (14%), chemoradiation alone (10%), and supportive care alone (14%). In multivariable analyses, surgery (hazard ratio: 0.48; 95% confidence interval: 0.26 to 0.90; p = 0.02) was the only independent predictor for improved os. Patients with a good Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (p = 0.008), gastric disease site (p = 0.02), and adenocarcinoma histology (p = 0.01) were more likely to undergo surgery.

Conclusions

At our institution, few patients 75 years of age and older received multimodality therapy for localized ge cancers. Outcomes were better for patients who underwent surgery than for those who did not. To ensure optimal treatment selection, comprehensive geriatric assessment should be considered for patients 75 years of age and older with localized ge cancers.

Management of Locally Advanced and Metastatic Esophageal Cancer in the Older Population

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to synthesise the current literature on the management of early-stage and metastatic esophageal cancers, focusing on the older population. In particular, we aim to dissect out the elderly-specific data from the relevant trials and to discuss the issues unique to this population.

RECENT FINDINGS

While surgery is the curative modality in esophageal malignancies, the CROSS, MAGIC and FLOT trials demonstrate a clear advantage to neoadjuvant therapy (chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy). These trials, however, included few elderly patients. There is a similar lack of elderly-specific data in the metastatic setting. Esophageal malignancies remain highly lethal with increasing incidence with age. Despite the relative lack of elderly-specific data, the fit older population appear to similarly benefit from multimodal therapy in early-stage and palliative therapy in metastatic disease.

Feasibility of definitive chemoradiation therapy with nedaplatin and 5-fluorouracil in elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective study

PURPOSE

This study was designed to retrospectively analyze the safety and efficacy of chemoradiation therapy with nedaplatin and 5-fluorouracil in elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Eligible patients were aged 76 years or older, had a histopathologic diagnosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, and were treated at the Kitasato University Hospital between January 2010 and March 2016. Chemotherapy consisted of nedaplatin in an intravenous dose of 90 mg/m2 on day 1 and 5-fluorouracil in an intravenous dose of 800 mg/m2 on days 1 to 5, repeated every 4 weeks for 2 cycles. Radiation therapy consisted of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions for thoracic tumors and 61.2 Gy for cervical tumors.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were studied. Patient characteristics were as follows: median age 79 years (range, 76-85 years), clinical stage I/II/III/IV (7/8/8/2, respectively), and surgically resectable/unresectable (17/8, respectively). The completion rates of radiation therapy and chemoradiation therapy were 100% and 84%, respectively. Grade ≥3 acute toxicities included neutropenia (76%), leukopenia (72%), thrombocytopenia (32%), anemia (28%), anorexia (32%), oral mucositis (20%), febrile neutropenia (12%), and esophagitis (8%). Grade ≥3 late toxicities included esophageal stenosis (12%) and pleural effusion (4%). The complete response rate was 64%. In the median follow-up period of 18.9 months, the 1-year overall survival rate was 68%.

CONCLUSIONS

Definitive chemoradiation therapy with nedaplatin and 5-fluorouracil may be a feasible treatment option for elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Treatment selection for esophageal cancer: evaluation from a nationwide database

BACKGROUND

Most elderly patients poorly tolerate the standard treatment for esophageal cancer; however, little information is available regarding the appropriateness of non-standard esophageal cancer treatments for those patients. This study aims to analyze the treatment costs and completion rates of patients undergoing a real-world treatment for esophageal cancer to elucidate the treatment selection and its quality.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed treatment costs and completion rates for patients with esophageal cancer and analyzed these data relative to patient age and center volumes. Patients with esophageal cancer [UICC, TMN, Clinical stage II/III (excluding T4)] who were diagnosed in 2013 were analyzed. Patients were classified into five groups defined as follows: surgical therapy, chemotherapy, concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), modified concurrent chemoradiotherapy (mCRT), and radiotherapy (RT).

RESULTS

Mean and median age of patients who received surgery and CCRT were comparable; however, patients who underwent mCRT and RT tended to be older. Medical costs associated with surgery were higher than costs associated with other non-surgical treatments. Cost and completion rate of chemoradiotherapy did not differ between CCRT and mCRT; however, both had higher completion rates compared to that of RT. Surgical expenses tended to be the highest in low-volume centers and the lowest in high-volume centers.

CONCLUSION

Treatment of esophageal cancer at high-volume centers seems well balanced compared with medium- to low-volume centers. mCRT was widely performed and comparable in medical cost to CCRT, although additional clinical impacts were unclear.

Outcome of esophageal cancer in the elderly - systematic review of the literature

Introduction

As the population ages, the number of elderly patients with esophageal cancer increases. Esophageal cancer has a poor prognosis and is associated with decreased life quality.

Aim

To review the literature about the outcome of esophageal cancer in patients over 65.

Material and methods

Articles published between January 2006 and November 2016 in the PubMed/Medline and ResearchGate databases were reviewed. Nineteen retrospective studies were included.

Results

Six thousand seven hundred and twenty-nine patients over 65 were analyzed. Thirty-day mortality ranges from 3.2% to 8.1%. Overall 5-year survival rates range from 0% to 49.2%, and the median survival rate ranges from 9.6 to 108.2 months. The incidence of complications in the surgery group ranges from 27% to 69%. Chemoradiotherapy grade ≥ 3 toxicity was observed in 22-36% of patients.

Conclusions

Chronological age seems to have little influence on outcome of esophageal cancer. Open esophagectomy seems to be the mainstay of treatment for patients with esophageal cancer, regardless of age. There is still high mortality and morbidity involved in this procedure. To reduce them, some less invasive methods are being trialed.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation is associated with improved overall survival in older patients with esophageal cancer

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to characterize outcomes associated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation prior to esophagectomy, compared to esophagectomy alone, in older patients with esophageal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted an observational cohort study in patients ≥70years with locally-advanced esophageal cancer undergoing esophagectomy ± neoadjuvant chemoradiation between 2006 and 2012 using the National Cancer Database. A Cox proportional hazards model with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score was developed to assess the association between trimodality therapy and overall survival. Perioperative complications and pathologic outcomes associated with trimodality therapy were identified with multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

1364 patients were included; the mean age was 75 (range 70-90). 904 (66%) were treated with trimodality therapy and 460 (34%) were treated with esophagectomy alone. On IPTW Cox analysis, neoadjuvant chemoradiation was associated with improved overall survival (HR=0.76, 95%CI [0.70-0.82], p≤0.001). Further, trimodality therapy was associated with lower rates of margin-positive resection (5% vs. 18%; OR=0.26, 95%CI [0.18-0.37], p<0.001) and in 18% of trimodality patients, there was no detectable tumor at surgery. 90-day mortality rates were not statistically different (14% vs. 12%; OR=0.99, 95%CI [0.73-1.36], p=0.22). Neoadjuvant chemoradiation was associated with lower 30-day readmission rates (5% vs. 8%; OR=0.48, 95%CI [0.31-0.73], p=0.004) and shorter surgical hospital stay (median 10 vs. 12days, p<0.001) compared to esophagectomy alone.

CONCLUSION

In older patients with esophageal cancer, trimodality therapy, compared to esophagectomy alone, is associated with improved overall survival and favorable pathologic and perioperative outcomes. Further studies are needed to identify which older patients are most suitable for trimodality therapy.

Comparison of definitive chemoradiotherapy and radiotherapy alone in patients older than 75 years with locally advanced esophageal carcinoma: A retrospective cohort study

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and acute toxicity of definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and radiotherapy (RT) alone as initial treatment in patients aged 75 years and older with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who are not eligible for surgery.Between February 2009 and February 2015, 122 patients older than 75 years with locally advanced ESCC were retrospectively reviewed, in whom 52 patients allocated to the CRT group were treated with at least 2 cycles of platinum and 5-fluorouracil, 70 patients allocated to the RT group were treated with RT alone, all patients were received a total radiation dose of 54-66 Gy, with 1.8 or 2-Gy/fraction. Response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and acute toxicities were compared between the 2 different treatment groups.In the CRT group, the median PFS and OS were 15.3 and 24.6 months, while 10.6 and 19.4 months in the RT group (P = .008 and P = .018). The 1-year survival rates of the 2 groups were 78.8% versus 64.3% (P = .081), and the 2-year survival rates were 48.1% and 30.0% (P = .042), respectively. The objective RR was 55.8% in the CRT group with 18 complete response (CR) and 18.6% in the RT group with 13 CR. Acute toxicity in the CRT group was higher than in the RT group, especially the grade 3 to 4 acute toxicities.Compared with RT alone, definitive CRT in the treatment of locally advanced ESCC can prolong the survival time in elderly patients. Definitive CRT should be considered the first-treatment choice for elderly patients like the younger patients who are not eligible for surgery.

External beam radiation and high-dose-rate brachytherapy for elderly patients with gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to retrospectively observe and analyze the long-term treatment outcomes of 96 elderly patients with gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GEJAC) who were treated with californium-252 (²⁵²Cf) neutron brachytherapy (NBT) in combination with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with or without chemotherapy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From January 2002 to November 2012, 96 patients with GEJAC underwent treatment. The total radiation dose to the reference point via NBT was 8-25 Gy-eq in 2 to 5 fractions, with 1 fraction per week. The total dose via EBRT was 40-54 Gy, which was delivered over a period of 4 to 5.5 weeks with normal fraction.

RESULTS

The median survival time for the 96 patients was 15.3 months, and the 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year rates of overall survival (OS) were 62.5%, 33.7%, 20.1%, and 7.9%, respectively. The 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year rates for local-regional control (LRC) were 78.7%, 57.9%, 41.8%, and 26.4%, respectively. The patients' age was an independent factor that was significantly associated with OS (p = 0.006) and LRC (p = 0.0005), according to univariate analysis. The 3-year OS (LRC) was 31.9% (62.9%) for patients aged 70-74 years and 16.1% (19.5%) for patients aged ≥ 75 years. From the time of treatment completion to the development of local-regional recurrence or death, 5 (5.2%) patients experienced fistula and 7 (7.3%) experienced massive bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical data indicated that NBT in combination with EBRT produced favorable local control and long-term survival rates for elderly patients with GEJAC, and that the side effects were tolerable. The patient's age could be used to select the appropriate treatment in an elderly patient.

Primary radio(chemo)therapy for esophageal cancer in elderly patients: are efficiency and toxicity comparable with younger patients?

Purpose

In elderly patients with esophageal cancer (EC), esophagectomy is associated with an increased mortality, and therefore these patients are often treated with definite (chemo)radiation. The purpose of this study was to assess the toxicity and efficiency of definite radio(chemo)therapy in patients >75 years compared with definite radio(chemo)therapy in patients <75 years.

Methods

32 patients >75 years were treated with definite radio(chemo)therapy for EC. We compared baseline parameters, efficiency and toxicity rates of these patients to 39 patients <75 years.

Results

Patients <75 years were more likely to receive simultaneous chemotherapy, and had a lower age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (ACCI). 25% of elderly patients were treated in palliative intent. There was no significant difference in progression-free survival between patient groups. No significant differences were seen for overall survival (15.7 months vs. 19.9 months; p = 0.102) and progression-free survival (10.5 months vs. 9.2 months, p = 0.470) between older patients treated with curative intent and younger patients. In addition, there were no significant differences for dysphagia and hematological side effects between elderly patients and younger patients.

Conclusion

Definite (chemo)radiation is a feasible therapy for elderly patients. OS and PFS in elderly patients with a curative treatment approach are comparable to younger patients and it is not associated with higher toxicity rates.

Cocktail without hangover: in search for the optimal chemotherapy in the combined management of non-operable esophageal carcinomas

BACKGROUND

The worldwide incidence of esophageal cancer has greatly increased over the past few decades making it the sixth deadliest cancer. The disease is often detected in advanced stages when surgery is no longer an option. The standard treatment in these situations is combined chemoradiotherapy, by employing drug cocktails that lead to optimal treatment outcomes both from the perspective of tumor control and normal tissue toxicity.

METHODS

The aim of this work was to collate the existing trials and clinical studies reported on non-operable esophageal cancer and to analyze the results based on treatment outcomes after various drug combinations.

RESULTS

Of all drug combinations, cisplatin/5-FU is the most well established chemotherapy regimen for esophageal cancer as both neoadjuvant therapy, an alternative option to surgery, and for palliative purposes. Although this regimen is associated with the most toxicity, it also appears to have the best survival benefit and relief of symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

More research is warranted to further increase the therapeutic ratio in non-operable esophageal cancers.

Definitive Chemoradiation Therapy for Esophageal Cancer in the Elderly: Clinical Outcomes for Patients Exceeding 80 Years Old

PURPOSE

The optimal treatment approach for patients ≥80 years ("elderly") with esophageal cancer is not well established. We assessed the clinical outcomes in elderly patients treated with definitive chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) at our institution.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

56 consecutive patients ≥80 years with esophageal cancer treated with conventional CCRT between 2001 and 2016 were propensity score matched 1:2 to generate 2 younger patient cohorts treated with CCRT without surgery: "intermediate" (65-79 years, n=112) and "younger" (<65 years, n=112). Treatment related toxicity was assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. The rates of overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

The median ages of the 3 cohorts were 81 years (elderly, 80-92 years), 71 years (intermediate, 65-79 years), and 58 years (younger, 20-64 years). The elderly cohort was more likely to have cardiac comorbidities. Although the clinical complete response (cCR) rate deviated significantly among the 3 cohorts, (78%, 72%, and 56%; P=.004), the data failed to identify statistically significant differences among RFS, 2-year, and 5-year OS, or in median survival, which was 15.5 months, 23.6 months, and 20.2 months (P=.468), respectively. The overall severe toxicity rates were 38%, 32%, and 30%, respectively (P=.644), including comparable rate of radiation pneumonitis (P>.05). The elderly cohort, however, did show statistically significant evidence of an increased rate of severe radiation pneumonitis (grade ≥3) which was observed to be 11% versus 4% and 0%, respectively (P=.003).

CONCLUSIONS

The studied elderly population showed evidence of similar long-term clinical efficacy after definitive CCRT when compared with cohorts of younger patients with similar prognostic status. An increased rate of pulmonary toxicity was identified, without evidence of differences for nonpulmonary severe adverse events. Understanding the prognostic risk factors of pulmonary toxicity after CCRT may effectuate improved long-term outcomes for elderly population.

Target volume delineation for radical radiotherapy of early oesophageal carcinoma in elderly patients

PURPOSE

To compare the prognosis of elderly patients with early oesophageal carcinoma between radical elective nodal prophylactic irradiation and involved-field irradiation and to estimate the failure modes and adverse effects, then to provide the patients the safe and individual therapeutic regimens.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The charts of 96 patients aged 65 and over with early stage oesophageal carcinoma receiving radical radiotherapy in our department were retrospectively analysed. Of all the patients, 49 received elective nodal prophylactic irradiation and the other 47 received involved-field irradiation. After completion of the whole treatment, we analysed short-term effects, tumour local control, overall survival of the patients, failure modes and adverse effects.

RESULTS

The 1-, 3-, and 5-year local control rate in elective nodal irradiation and involved-field irradiation groups were 80.6%, 57.4%, 54.0% and 65.4%, 46.5%, 30.5% respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (χ²=4.478, P=0.03). The differences of overall survival and progression-free survival were not significant (P>0.05). The difference of 1-, 3-, and 5-years local regional failure rate was statistically significant between elective nodal prophylactic irradiation and involved-field irradiation groups, except for the overall failure and distant metastasis rates. The overall incidence of radiation-induced oesophagitis after elective nodal irradiation or involved-field irradiation was 79.6% and 59.6%, and the difference was statistically significant (χ²=4.559, P=0.03). The difference of radiation pneumonitis between elective nodal prophylactic irradiation and involved-field irradiation was not significant (12.2% vs 14.9%; χ²=0.144, P=0.7).

CONCLUSION

For elderly patients with early stage oesophageal carcinoma receiving radical radiotherapy, although elective nodal prophylactic irradiation could increase the incidence of radiation-induced oesophagitis, patients could tolerate the treatment and benefit from local control.

Chemoradiation therapy with docetaxel in elderly patients with stage II/III esophageal cancer: A phase 2 trial

PURPOSE

The most effective treatments in elderly patients with esophageal cancer remain a subject of debate. This multicenter phase 2 study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of chemoradiation therapy (CRT) with docetaxel (DTX) in elderly patients with stage II/III (non-T4) esophageal cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients ≥70 years of age with clinical stage II/III esophageal cancer received DTX at a weekly dose of 10 mg/m2 during 6 consecutive weeks and concurrent radiation therapy (60 Gy in 30 fractions). The primary endpoint was the 2-year survival rate, and the required number of enrolled patients was 37.

RESULTS

Between July 2008 and January 2011, 16 patients were enrolled. The study was prematurely closed because of slow accrual. Characteristics of the patients were as follows: median age, 77 years (range, 73-81); performance status 0/1, 4/12; and clinical stage IIA/IIB/III, 3/4/9. Of the 16 patients, 14 (87.5%) completed the CRT. The 2-year survival rate was 62.5% (90% confidence interval [CI], 42.5-82.5). The median survival time was 27.7 months (95% CI, 23.3-32.2 months) and the median progression-free survival was 15.2 months (95% CI, 5.4-25.0 months). Seven patients achieved complete response, resulting in a complete response rate of 43.8% (95% CI, 19.8-70.1). Grade 3 or higher acute toxicities included esophagitis (31.3%), anorexia (12.5%), leukopenia (6.3%), neutropenia (6.3%), thrombocytopenia (6.3%), mucositis (6.3%), and infection (6.3%). Grade 3 or higher late toxicities included esophagitis (12.5%), pleural effusion (12.5%), pneumonitis (6.3%), and pericardial effusion (6.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

CRT with DTX might be a treatment option for elderly patients with stage II/III esophageal cancer, particularly for patients who are medically unfit for surgery or cisplatin-containing therapy. However, further improvements of this therapy are required to decrease the incidence of esophagitis.

A phase I dose escalation study of S-1 with concurrent radiotherapy in elderly patients with esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin (CDDP) are often associated with significant incidence of toxic effects in elderly patients with esophageal cancer. This phase I trial was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of S-1, an oral 5-FU derivative, when given with radiotherapy in elderly patients.

METHODS

Patients who were age of 70 years or older with histologically confirmed esophageal cancer, and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of 0-2 were eligible for this study. Radiotherapy was administered in 1.8 Gy fractions 5 times weekly to a total dose of 54 Gy. S-1 was administered on days 1-14 and 29-42 at the following dosages: 60, 70, and 80 mg/m(2)/day.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT01175447 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

RESULTS

Twelve previously untreated patients were enrolled in this study. No grade 3 or 4 toxicity was observed in six patients treated at the 60 and 70 mg/m(2) dose levels. DLT was observed in four of six patients treated at the 80 mg/m(2) dose level. Two patients developed grade 3 esophagitis, one patient developed grade 3 esophagitis and pneumonitis, and one patient developed grade 3 thrombocytopaenia. Endoscopic complete response (CR) was observed in eight patients (66.7%). The median progression free survival (PFS) was 20 months and median overall survival was 29 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The MTD of S-1 was 80 mg/m(2), and the recommended dose (RD) for phase II studies was 70 mg/m(2). This regimen was well tolerated and active in elderly patients with esophageal cancer, meriting further investigation in phase II studies.

Multicenter questionnaire survey on patterns of care for elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by the Japan Esophageal Oncology Group

OBJECTIVE

There is little information about the patterns of care for elderly esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients, and a standardized strategy has not been established. Therefore, we conducted a questionnaire survey about the patterns of care for these patients.

METHODS

On September 2014, the questionnaires were sent to all 43 institutions of the Japan Esophageal Oncology Group, which comprised five parts: (i) definition of 'elderly' (age, method), (ii) basic treatment strategy according to stage and elderly status (fit/vulnerable/frail), (iii) patterns of care in each stage, (iv) considerations about conducting future clinical trials and (v) other information about geriatric oncology concerning esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

RESULTS

All answers were obtained by January 2015. Nearly half institutions (47%) considered the chronological definition of elderly to be over 80 years old. Among 43 institutions, 36 (84%) reported that the type of comorbidity and performance status were important factors for decision-making; no institution selected geriatric scale as an indicator. The most selected treatment strategy in fit healthy elderly patients was the same as the standard treatment of non-elderly patients. Radiation alone was considered the main treatment for vulnerable and frail esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients. Most of the institutions answered that clinical trials for the elderly are warranted. Most institutions (70%) chose Stage II/III (non-T4) esophageal squamous cell carcinoma as an important investigational target.

CONCLUSIONS

Fit healthy elderly were considered the same as non-elderly patients, although there are no established treatment selection criteria. Radiation alone plays most important role in the treatment for vulnerable and frail esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients. Stage II/III (non-T4) disease is attractive and warranted for future investigations.

Phase II Study of a Platinum-Based Adapted Chemotherapy Regimen Combined with Radiotherapy in Patients 75 Years and Older with Esophageal Cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The management of elderly patients with cancer is a therapeutic challenge and a public health problem. The aim of this phase II single-arm study was to evaluate the acute toxicities and efficacy of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) comprising a single platinum-based agent combined with radiotherapy in elderly patients with esophageal cancer.

METHODS

Between March 2000 and October 2011, patients aged 75 years and older were prospectively treated with external beam radiotherapy combined with cisplatin or oxaliplatin. Other selection criteria included Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status 0-2, disease stage II-III, squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma, and an adequate biological profile. The radiotherapy dose was 50 Gy administered over 5 weeks to the primary tumor and involved lymph nodes. Cisplatin was planned at a dose of 75 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 21 and oxaliplatin at 85 mg/m(2) on days 1, 15, and 29. Treatment was delivered an outpatient setting.

RESULTS

Thirty patients with a mean age of 85.2 (range 79.4-92.0) years were included; 28 completed the treatment. Dysphagia was the only grade 4 toxicity to occur during the study; no grade 5 toxicities were observed. Six weeks after the completion of treatment, 16 patients (53.3%) were in complete response. Two patients in complete response died from pneumonitis 5 and 7 months after CRT. With a 36-month median follow-up, 18 patients died from cancer (nine from local failure, nine from metastasis). Seven patients died from other causes and two patients were alive 40.3 and 56 months after the end of their treatment. Three-year overall survival was 22.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

Selected elderly patients with esophageal cancer and adequate functional status should not be excluded from CRT and may be able to tolerate the treatment with acceptable acute toxicities. However, mid-term efficacy is mediocre. Our data also suggest that the therapeutic ratio or locoregional control might be improved by increasing the radiotherapy dose or by testing new radiosensitizer agents since half of the failures were within the treated volume.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

EudraCT no. 2009-010113-76.

Management and outcomes of localized esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer in older patients

BACKGROUND

Older patients are commonly excluded from clinical trials in esophageal and gastroesophageal junction (gej) cancer. High-level evidence to guide management in this group is lacking. In the present study, we compared outcomes and described tolerance for curative- and noncurative-intent treatments among patients 70 years of age and older.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all patients 70 years of age and older diagnosed with localized esophageal and gej cancer at our centre between 2005 and 2012.

RESULTS

The 74 patients identified had a median age of 77 years. Of those patients, 62% received curative-intent treatment, consisting mostly of concomitant chemoradiation therapy (n = 43, 93%). Median overall survival for patients receiving curative-intent treatment was 18.6 months [95% confidence interval (ci): 13.0 to 28.0 months], with 23% being long-term survivors (95% ci: 11.3% to 36.7%). In contrast, patients receiving noncurative-intent treatment had a median overall survival of 8.8 months (95% ci: 6.7 to 11.9 months), with none being long-term survivors (p < 0.0001). Improvement of dysphagia was seen after curative (81%) or palliative radiotherapy (78%) in symptomatic patients, and toxicities were manageable. The odds of not receiving curative treatment was higher by a factor of 8.5 among patients 80 years of age or older compared with those 70-79 years of age (95% ci: 2.5 to 28.7).

CONCLUSIONS

In managing older patients with esophageal and gej cancer, curative-intent treatment (compared with noncurative-intent treatment) leads to a significant survival benefit with a reasonable toxicity profile. Informed counselling of patients and their families about a curative treatment approach and efforts to increase awareness among oncology care providers are suggested.

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) with Additional Therapy for Superficial Esophageal Cancer with Submucosal Invasion

OBJECTIVE

The standard treatment for submucosal esophageal cancer is esophagectomy or chemoradiotherapy (CRT). However, these treatment modalities could deteriorate the general condition and quality of life of the patients who are intolerant to invasive therapy. It is therefore important and beneficial to develop less invasive treatment protocols for these patients.

METHODS

The study included 43 patients who were clinically suspected of mucosa or submucosal esophageal cancer but underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) as a primary treatment, due to the patients' poor performance statuses and/or preferences for less invasive therapy. According to the pathological findings and patient's general condition, whether the patient underwent additional treatments or remained hospitalized without additional treatments was thereafter decided for each patient. We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of these patients.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients underwent additional surgery, 11 patients underwent CRT/radiation therapy (RT) and 17 patients were followed without additional treatments. During the 3-year follow-up period, the relapse-free survival rates in the patients who received or did not receive additional treatments were 88% and 64%, respectively (95% confidence interval, 0.45-0.76, p=0.04). The relapse-free and overall survival rates in the patients with additional treatments were equivalent or superior to those described in previous reports of the standard treatments. Preceding ESD contributed to reduce the local relapse significantly to approximately 3.5% and additional CRT-related toxicities.

CONCLUSION

Preceding ESD is very effective for the local control of cancer, and useful for histologically confirming the high-risk factors of relapse, such as ≥submucosal layer 2 (SM2) invasion and lymphovascular involvements. ESD with additional therapy may be a promising strategy for optimizing the selection of therapy depending on the patient's general condition.

Is there a benefit in receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy for elderly patients with inoperable thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The benefit of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in elderly patients with inoperable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is controversial. This study aimed to assess the efficiency and safety of CCRT in elderly thoracic esophageal cancer patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between January 2002 and December 2011, 128 patients aged 65 years or older treated with CCRT or radiotherapy (RT) alone for inoperable thoracic esophageal SCC were analyzed retrospectively (RT alone, n = 55; CCRT, n = 73).

RESULTS

No treatment-related deaths occurred and no patients experienced any acute grade 4 non-hematologic toxicities. Patients treated with CCRT developed more severe acute toxicities than patients who received RT alone. The 3-year overall survival (OS) rate was 36.1% for CCRT compared with 28.5% following RT alone (p = 0.008). Multivariate analysis identified T stage and treatment modality as independent prognostic factors for survival. Further analysis revealed that survival was significantly better in the CCRT group than in the RT alone group for patients ≤ 72 years. Nevertheless, the CCRT group had a similar OS to the RT group for patients > 72 years.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that elderly patients with inoperable thoracic esophageal SCC could benefit from CCRT, without major toxicities. However, for patients older than 72 years, CCRT is not superior to RT alone in terms of survival benefit.

Radio(chemo)therapy in Elderly Patients with Esophageal Cancer: A Feasible Treatment with an Outcome Consistent with Younger Patients

Background: Although the prevalence of esophageal cancer increases in elderly patients, its clinical history and outcome after treatment remain poorly described.

Methods: Between January 2001 and December 2011, 58 patients (pts) older than 75 years received 3D-conformal radiotherapy (mean dose 51 Gy) in two French cancer centers. 47/58 (82%) patients received concomitant chemotherapy (with CDDP and/or FU regimens) and 8 patients underwent surgery after primary radiochemotherapy (RCT).

Results: Median age was 77.9 years and the performance status (PS) was 0 or 1 in 89%. Tumors were mainly adenocarcinoma of lower esophagus or gastroesophageal junction (n = 51, 89%), T3T4 (n = 54, 95%), and N1 (n = 44, 77%). The mean follow-up was 21.9 months. In the overall population, the median progression-free survival was 9.6 months and median overall survival (OS) was 14.5 months. Using univariate analysis, OS was significantly associated with age (p = 0.048), PS (p < 0.001), and surgery (p = 0.035). 35 (60.3%) and 18 patients (31%) experienced grade 1–2 or 3–4 toxicity, respectively (CTCAE v4.0).

Conclusion: Radiochemotherapy in elderly patients is a feasible treatment and its outcome is close to younger patient’s outcome published in the literature. Surgical resection, after comprehensive geriatric assessment, should be recommended as the standard treatment for adenocarcinoma of lower esophagus or gastroesophageal junction in elderly patients with good PS and low co-morbidity profile, as it is in younger patients.

Definitive chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine and cisplatin for elder patients with locally advanced squamous cell esophageal cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) or sequential chemoradiotherapy (SCRT) with capecitabine and cisplatin for elderly patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

METHODS

A total of 75 patients elder than 65 years with histologically proven stage II-III ESCC were enrolled, in whom 40 patients were treated with CCRT consisted of two cycles of intravenous cisplatin and oral capecitabine during and after radiotherapy and 35 patients were treated with SCRT as two cycles of capecitabine plus cisplatin before and after radiotherapy. Response rate, overall survival, progression-free survival and toxicity were compared.

RESULTS

The overall response rate (CR + PR) in the CCRT group (91.6 %) was significantly higher than that in the SCRT group (67.7 %), P = 0.023. The median PFS and median OS were significantly higher in CCRT group (19.7 and 33.6 months) than those in SCRT group (11.6 and 15.7 months), P < 0.05. The acute toxic effect was more severe in the CCRT group than in the SCRT group, but the grade 3-4 acute toxicities were similar in two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

It suggested that both CCRT and SCRT with capecitabine and cisplatin are tolerable and effective for elderly patients with locally advanced ESCC. Concurrent CRT might be superior to SCRT.

Management of localized esophageal cancer in the older patient

Most patients with gastroesophageal cancers are older than 65 years of age. The management of older patients poses challenges because they have multiple comorbidities and physiological changes associated with aging. Furthermore, data are limited on tolerance of cancer therapy and the use of combined-modality treatments in this patient population to guide their treatment. In this article, we focus on the management of older patients with localized esophageal cancer, highlighting the role of comprehensive geriatric assessment to identify and better tailor treatment approaches in this patient population. We review the literature and discuss the role of surgical resection and potential complications specific to an older patient. We review the rationale of combined-modality treatment and the potential benefits of a chemoradiotherapy-based approach in this patient population.

Short- and long-term outcomes of definitive chemoradiotherapy in patients with esophageal carcinoma aged ≥75 years

The most relevant treatment modalities in elderly patients with esophageal carcinoma (EC) remain a subject of debate. Combined definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is currently widely accepted as a non-surgical treatment for esophageal cancer. However, elderly patients were excluded from the majority of studies on CRT, or the proportion of elderly patients was relatively low in those studies and the number of available studies on the treatment of EC patients aged ≥75 years is limited. The aim of the present retrospective study was to analyze the safety and efficacy of CRT in patients aged ≥75 years in order to assess the short- and long-term outcomes of CRT for elderly patients with EC. In this study, based on further refinement of patient age groups and analysis of the Charlson comorbidity score, we performed a statistical analysis of factors such as short-term response, long-term survival and toxicity reactions. The results of the analysis indicated that the treatment of patients with EC aged ≥75 years with radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy was effective. However, we recommend that customized treatment is based on the stratification of patients into different age groups and the Charlson score, as for patients aged ≥80 years a lower-dose therapy may be more beneficial and for patients aged ≥85 years definitive CRT should be administered with greater caution.

Safety and efficacy of radiation and chemoradiation in patients over 70 years old with inoperable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

The aim of the present study was to perform a retrospective analysis to investigate the outcome and toxicity of radiation (RT) and chemoradiation (CRT) in elderly, inoperable patients >70 years old. Between 2003 and 2012, 1,024 patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the esophagus were treated at the Department of Thoracic Cancer, West China Hospital (Chengdu, China). Of these patients, 37 were >70 years old and had not undergone surgery, and were selected for analysis. Of these 37 patients, CRT had been administered to 20 (54%). Actuarial survival rates were determined by the Kaplan-Meier method. The one-year survival rate in the CRT group (n=20) was 85%, while 35% of patients in the RT group (n=17) survived for more than one year. The overall and progression-free survival in the CRT group versus the RT group were 17 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 11.861-22.139] versus eight months (95% CI, 6.674-9.326) (P=0.013) and 14 months (95% CI, 9.617-18.383) versus five months (95% CI, 2.311-7.689) (P=0.01), respectively. Patients irradiated with a dose of >50 Gy exhibited an improved survival rate compared with patients who received a dose of ≤50 Gy (18 vs. 14 months; P=0.049). Furthermore, patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of ≤1 had an improved prognosis compared with those with an ECOG score of 2 (14 vs. seven months; P=0.006). The two regimens were well-tolerated and there were no therapy-associated mortalities. The current retrospective study indicated that patients of >70 years old with inoperable esophageal SCC and a good ECOG score exhibit comparably better safety levels with CRT and improved survival rates compared with RT alone.

Is surgery in the elderly for oesophageal cancer justifiable? Results from a single centre

Aims. Advanced age is an identified risk factor for patients undergoing oncological surgical resection. The surgery for oesophageal cancer is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Our aim was to study the operative management of elderly patients (≥70 years) at a single institute. Methods. The data was collected from 206 patients who have undergone operative resection of oesophageal cancer. The demographic, operative, histological, and postoperative follow-up of all patients were analysed. Results. A total of 46 patients of ≥70 years who had surgical resection for oesophageal cancer were identified. Patients ≥70 years had poor overall survival (P = 0.00). Also elderly patients with nodal involvement had poor survival (P = 0.04). Age at the time of surgery had no impact on the incidence of postoperative complication and inpatient mortality. Both the univariate and multivariate analyses showed age, nodal stage, and positive resection margins as independent prognostic factors for patients undergoing surgery for oesophageal cancer. Conclusions. Advanced age is associated with poor outcome following oesophageal resection. However, the optimisation of both preoperative and postoperative care can significantly improve outcomes. The decision of operative management should be individualised. Age should be considered as one of the factors in surgical resection of oesophageal cancer in the elderly patients.

Targeting therapy for esophageal cancer in patients aged 70 and over

BACKGROUND

While cancer is a disease of the elderly, these patients are under-represented in randomized trials. Esophageal cancer-management in the elderly is challenging because of the morbidity and mortality associated with surgery.

OBJECTIVES

We examined a strategy of neo-adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy (naCRT), followed by surgery or surveillance, in selected patients with cancer aged 70 and older.

METHODS

A prospectively-accrued database identified 56 consecutive patients over a 90-month period, who were aged 70years and over, presented with esophageal carcinoma and were treated with neo-adjuvant CRT (naCRT)±surgery.

RESULTS

Of 129 eligible patients, 66 (51%) received palliative measures, while 63 (49%) had curative intervention, namely 7 had surgery and 56 had naCRT±surgery. Of these 56 patients, 33 (59%) had adenocarcinoma (AC) and 23 (41%) had squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Twenty-five (45%) had a complete clinical response (cCR), of which 6 had immediate resection; 4 (67%) had a complete pathological response (pCR); 19 patients with a cCR declined or were unfit for surgery and underwent surveillance; of these, 3 had interval esophagectomy; 16 were not offered or declined resection. Eight (50%) have survived ≥3years. Mean overall survival was 28months for the entire cohort; 47months for cCRs; 61months for patients undergoing primary resection, 46months for cCRs who did not undergo resection and 29months for those undergoing interval resection for recurrent disease. In cCRs, surgery did not provide a survival advantage (p=0.861).

CONCLUSION

cCR yields an overall 3-year survival of 50% without operation. As 45% of patients have a cCR to naCRT, obligatory resection in high-risk cCR patients makes little sense. With the option for salvage esophagectomy in re-emergent disease, this selective strategy is an attractive alternative for elderly patients with cancer.

Response to concurrent chemoradiotherapy as a prognostic marker in elderly patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer

AIMS AND BACKGROUND

Little is known about chemoradiotherapy in elderly patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer. We compared the efficacy and toxicity of chemoradiotherapy in elderly and non-elderly patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer and determined the variables affecting the treatment outcome in the elderly patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer who had received chemoradiotherapy.

METHODS

Fifty-seven elderly patients (age ≥ 65 years) and 30 non-elderly patients (age <65 years) were reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS

The median age of the elderly group was 69 years and in the non-elderly group, 56.5 years. Although treatment compliance appeared to be poor, the response rate and median survival were similar in both the groups (elderly versus non-elderly; 84.4% vs 87.5%, and 11.2 months vs 11.3 months) and so were G3/4 hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities. The treatment-related mortality of the elderly patients appeared to be higher than that of the non-elderly group (7.0% vs 3.3%), but did not reach statistical significance. In prognostic factor analysis, a major response to chemoradiotherapy was a good prognostic indicator in the elderly group (response versus non-response; median overall survival times of 19.5 vs 5.4 months, respectively, P <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The study suggests that chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer in elderly patients, even though treatment compliance appears to be poor, is as safe and effective as in non-elderly patients and that the response to chemoradiotherapy is related to prognosis in elderly patients.

Radiotherapy in elderly patients with inoperable esophageal cancer. Is there a benefit?

BACKGROUND

Radiation oncologists increasingly face elderly cancer patients impaired by comorbidities and reduced performance status. As less data are available for this particular group of patients, the aim of the study was to assess the prognosis of inoperable esophageal cancer patients ≥ 70 years undergoing definitive radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy. PATIENTS AND TREATMENT PROTOCOL: Patients aged ≥ 70 with inoperable carcinoma of the esophagus undergoing definitive radio(chemo)therapy between 1995 and 2006 at the University of Cologne were included retrospectively. Maximal total dose of radiotherapy administered was 63 Gy (5 × 1.8 Gy/week). Chemotherapy consisted of cisplatin (20 mg/m(2) on days 1-5 and days 29-33) and 5-fluorouracil (650-1,000 mg/m(2) on days 1-5 and days 29-33). Efficacy was compared with a cohort of 152 patients < 70 years treated with the same protocol during the same time period.

RESULTS

A total of 51 patients aged  ≥ 70 with inoperable cancer of the esophagus undergoing definitive therapy were identified (stage I/II 23.5%, stage III 56.9%, stage IV 9.8%; squamous cell carcinoma 74.5%, adenocarcinoma 25.5%). While 15 patients (29.4%) received combined radiochemotherapy (RCT), 40 patients (70.6%) were treated with radiotherapy alone (RT). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9.5 months; median overall survival (OS) was 13.9 months. Patients treated with RCT had a 2-year OS rate of 53.3% compared with 16.7% for RT patients (p = 0.039). The 2-year OS for clinically lymph node negative patients was 38.5% compared with 21.2% for lymph node positive patients (p = 0.072). Median OS was not significantly different between patients ≥ 70 years versus the patient cohort (n = 152) aged < 70 years (13.9 vs. 7.2 months, p = 0.072) but PFS showed a significant difference (4.9 vs. 9.5 months, p = 0.026) in favor of the > 70 years group.

CONCLUSION

Prognosis in elderly patients with inoperable esophageal cancer undergoing definitive radiotherapy/radiochemotherapy is limited, although it is not inferior to patients < 70 years.

Recurrence and survival after pathologic complete response to preoperative therapy followed by surgery for gastric or gastrooesophageal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

To characterise recurrence patterns and survival following pathologic complete response (pCR) in patients who received preoperative therapy for localised gastric or gastrooesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a prospective database identified patients with pCR after preoperative chemotherapy for gastric or preoperative chemoradiation for GEJ (Siewert II/III) adenocarcinoma. Recurrence patterns, overall survival, recurrence-free survival, and disease-specific survival were analysed.

RESULTS

From 1985 to 2009, 714 patients received preoperative therapy for localised gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma, and 609 (85%) underwent a subsequent R0 resection. There were 60 patients (8.4%) with a pCR. Median follow-up was 46 months. Recurrence at 5 years was significantly lower for pCR vs non-pCR patients (27% and 51%, respectively, P=0.01). The probability of recurrence for patients with pCR was similar to non-pCR patients with pathologic stage I or II disease. Although the overall pattern of local/regional (LR) vs distant recurrence was comparable (43% LR vs 57% distant) between pCR and non-pCR groups, there was a significantly higher incidence of central nervous system (CNS) first recurrences in pCR patients (36 vs 4%, P=0.01).

CONCLUSION

Patients with gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma who achieve a pCR following preoperative therapy still have a significant risk of recurrence and cancer-specific death following resection. One third of the recurrences in the pCR group were symptomatic CNS recurrences. Increased awareness of the risk of CNS metastases and selective brain imaging in patients who achieve a pCR following preoperative therapy for gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma is warranted.