Donor search or autografting in patients with acute leukaemia who lack an HLA-identical sibling? A matched-pair analysis. Acute Leukaemia Working Party of the European Cooperative Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) and the International Marrow Unrelated Search and Transplant (IMUST) Study

Reduced intensity conditioning allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for adult acute myeloid leukemia in complete remission - a review from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the EBMT

Acute myeloid leukemia is the most common indication for an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant. The introduction of reduced intensity conditioning has expanded the recipient pool for transplantation, which has importantly made transplant an option for the more commonly affected older age groups. Reduced intensity conditioning allogeneic transplantation is currently the standard of care for patients with intermediate or high-risk acute myeloid leukemia and is now most often employed in older patients and those with medical comorbidities. Despite being curative for a significant proportion of patients, post-transplant relapse remains a challenge in the reduced intensity conditioning setting. Herein we discuss the studies that demonstrate the feasibility of reduced intensity conditioning allogeneic transplants, compare the outcomes of reduced intensity conditioning versus chemotherapy and conventional myeloablative conditioning regimens, describe the optimal donor and stem cell source, and consider the impact of post-remission consolidation, comorbidities, center experience, and more intensive (reduced toxicity conditioning) regimens on outcomes. Additionally, we discuss the need for further prospective studies to optimize transplant outcomes.

Comparison of umbilical cord blood allogeneic stem cell transplantation vs. auto-SCT for adult acute myeloid leukemia patients in second complete remission at transplant: a retrospective study on behalf of the SFGM-TC

This retrospective study considered the outcomes of 181 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) transplanted in second complete remission (CR2) between January 2005 and April 2012 and who received either a myeloablative autologous stem cell transplant (Auto-SCT; n = 82; median age: 48 years; median follow-up: 45 months) or an umbilical cord blood (UCB) allogeneic SCT (n = 99, median age: 46 years; median follow-up: 36 months; conditioning regimens: myeloablative n = 21, reduced n = 78; single unit n = 37, double units n = 62). Although the Auto group showed a significant better prognostic profile at transplant, with longer median interval between diagnosis and time of graft, higher incidence of good-risk cytogenetics and lower number of previously transplanted patients, 3-year OS and LFS were similar between both groups (Auto: 59 ± 6% vs. 50 ± 6%, P = 0.45; and 57 ± 6% vs. 46 ± 6%, P = 0.37). In multivariate analysis, UCB allo-SCT was associated with lower relapse incidence (HR: 0.3, 95% CI: 0.11-0.82, P = 0.02), but higher non-relapse mortality (NRM) (HR: 4.16; 95% CI: 1.46-11.9, P = 0.008). Results from this large study suggest that UCB allo-SCT provides better disease control than auto-SCT, which is especially important in the setting of high-risk disease. However, this disease control advantage is counterbalanced by higher toxicity, highlighting the need for novel approaches aiming to decrease NRM after UCB allo-SCT.

Radiation-free allogeneic conditioning with fludarabine, carmustine, and thiotepa for acute lymphoblastic leukemia and other hematologic malignancies necessitating enhanced central nervous system activity

Total body irradiation has been the mainstay of conditioning since the inception of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation, but toxicity often precludes its use. For less-fit patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and other hematologic malignancies frequently affecting the central nervous system, we designed a radiation-free regimen with fludarabine (25 mg/m2/day on days -6 to -4), carmustine (400 mg/m2 on day -6), and thiotepa (5 mg/kg twice daily on days -5 and -4), all of which readily penetrate the blood-brain barrier and have potent antileukemic and lymphotoxic activity. Here we present a series of 30 consecutive patients with high-risk or relapsed disease who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation with this protocol. The median patient age was 60 years (range, 42-70 years), and the median follow-up was 968 days (range, 58-1989 days). Graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis consisted of cyclosporine A and alemtuzumab (10-20 mg). At 2 years, overall survival was 52% (95% confidence interval [CI], 34%-71%), event-free survival was 39% (95% CI, 22%-57%), cumulative incidence of relapse/progression was 30% (95% CI, 17%-52%), and treatment-related mortality was 31% (95% CI, 18%-53%). Neurologic toxicity is a concern, especially in older and heavily pretreated patients. Our experience indicates the feasibility of this regimen as an alternative to total body irradiation and a potentially curative option for less-fit patients who need a highly central nervous system-active conditioning.

Reduced intensity conditioning compared with myeloablative conditioning using unrelated donor transplants in patients with acute myeloid leukemia

PURPOSE

Reduced intensity conditioning regimen (RIC) is increasingly used in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Unrelated donor (UD) transplants have more complications. We wanted to examine if RIC is a valid treatment option using UD in acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1999 and 2005, 401 patients with AML were treated with RIC and 1,154 received myeloablative conditioning (MAC), using UD and reported to the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Registry. Patients < and > or = 50 years of age were analyzed separately.

RESULTS

Patients receiving RIC were older, received transplants more recently, received peripheral blood stem cells more frequently, and were treated with total-body irradiation less often. In multivariable analysis, in patients younger than 50 years of age, nonrelapse mortality (NRM) was similar using RIC (hazard ratio [HR], 0.85; P = .41), relapse was increased (HR, 1.46; P = .02) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) was the same (HR, 0.88; P = .28), as compared with MAC. In patients > or = 50 years of age, NRM was decreased in the RIC group (HR, 0.64; P = .04), relapse probability was not significantly different (HR, 1.34; P = .16) and LFS was similar (HR, 1.04; P = .79) compared with MAC. CONCLUSION RIC-UD transplants are associated with higher relapse in AML patients younger than 50 years of age and decreased NRM in those > or = 50 years compared with MAC-UD. LFS was similar after both conditioning regimens, regardless of age. Therefore, RIC-UD extend the use of allotransplants for elderly patients and strategies that decrease relapse should be considered mainly in younger patients with AML.

Outcome of patients less than 55 years of age with high-risk acute leukemia who did not have an human leukocyte antigen-identical related donor: a long-term study of 97 consecutive patients

Between January 1993 and December 2000, an unrelated donor search (UDS) was initiated for 97 consecutive patients [46 acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and 51 acute myeloid leukemia (AML)]. Leukemia was considered to be of poor prognosis in cases of refractory disease (n=70), unfavourable karyotype (n=22) or miscellaneous (n=5). All patients had previously received various chemotherapies and 9 had undergone an autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT). The median age at UDS initiation was 25 (range 2.7-55) years. The median time to identify a suitable living donor or cord blood (CB) was 60 days. Eventually, 33 patients received unrelated allo-SCT (including 9 CB), 12 auto-SCT, 39 chemotherapy and 13 palliative treatment. At a median of 54 months, 18 patients were alive, including 15 in remission. The 4-year overall survival rates were 32%, 37%, 15% and 0% for allo-SCT, auto-SCT, chemotherapy or palliative treatment, respectively. Patients who received either allo- or auto-SCT had better survival than those who did not (P<0.0001). For ALL, only allo-SCT significantly improved survival (P<0.007). Finally, patients who received allo-SCT died less often of relapse than patients who did not (P<0.0001). Unrelated allo-SCT gives a substantial long-term survival and cure in patients with high-risk acute leukemia. For patients who achieve remission and for whom UDS fails, auto-SCT may prove to be a good approach. For patients who fail to enter into remission, intensive salvage chemotherapy has a very limited effect.

Myeloablative hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute lymphoblastic leukemia: analysis of graft sources and long-term outcome

PURPOSE

Analysis of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for high-risk or recurrent acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) using different donor sources is confounded by variable conditioning and supportive care.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We studied 623 consecutive ALL myeloablative HCT (1980 to 2005). Donors were autologous (n = 209), related (RD; n = 245), unrelated (URD; n = 100), and umbilical cord blood (UCB; n = 69).

RESULTS

After median of 8.3 years of follow-up, 5-year overall survival (OS), leukemia-free survival (LFS), and relapse were 29% (95% CI, 26% to 32%), 26% (95% CI, 23% to 29%), and 43% (95% CI, 39% to 47%), respectively. Treatment-related mortality (TRM) at 2 years was 28% (95% CI, 25% to 31%). Mismatched URD sources yielded higher TRM (relative risk [RR], 2.2; P < .01) and lower OS (RR, 1.5; P = .05) than RD or UCB HCT. Autografting yielded significantly more relapse (68%; 95% CI, 59% to 77%; P < .01) and poorer LFS (14%; 95% CI, 10% to 18%; P = .01). HCT in first complete remission (CR1) yielded significantly better outcomes than later HCT. In a 1990 to 2005 allogeneic CR1/second complete response cohort, 5-year OS, LFS, and relapse rates were 41% (95% CI, 35% to 47%), 38% (95% CI, 32% to 44%), and 25% (95% CI, 19% to 31%), respectively; 2-year TRM was 34% (95% CI, 28% to 40%). With RD, well-matched URD and UCB sources, 5-year LFS was 40% (95% CI, 31% to 49%), 42% (95% CI, 14% to 70%), and 49% (95% CI, 34% to 64%), respectively, while relapse was 31% (95% CI, 22% to 40%), 17% (95% CI, 0% to 37%), and 27% (95% CI, 13% to 41%). Acute graft-versus-host disease was associated with fewer relapses. Since 1995, we noted progressive improvements in OS, LFS, and TRM.

CONCLUSION

Allogeneic, but not autologous, HCT for ALL results in durable LFS. Importantly, HCT using UCB led to similar outcomes as either RD or well-matched URD. HCT in early remission can best exploit the potent antileukemic efficacy of allografting from UCB, RD, or URD sources.

Hematopoietic transplantation from adult unrelated donors as treatment for acute myeloid leukemia

Transplantation from unrelated donors (URD) is increasingly being used as treatment for hematological malignancies, including acute myeloid leukemia (AML). This increase is the consequence of the availability of more than 11 million URD volunteers and the more efficient donor search process in the recent years. Median time to identify a suitable URD is now 2 months. More than 50% of Caucasian patients have an human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-allele donor match and a one-antigen or allele HLA-mismatched donor may also be acceptable. Complications of URD transplants are particularly frequent and severe, with long-term OS in the registries being 10-20% inferior to HLA-identical sibling transplantation. High resolution DNA techniques for donor and recipient HLA matching have contributed to the survival in experienced centres after unrelated donor SCT approaching that achieved with sibling donors. The introduction of reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) has extended URD transplants to elderly and/or debilitated patients with AML. With this approach, TRM decreases, although graft-versus-host disease-related morbidity and mortality remain a problem. Despite this complication, results after URD transplantation in this age group seem better than those achieved with chemotherapy and/or autologous transplantation. To confirm this possibility, prospective multicenter comparisons of URD transplants after RIC with other treatment options for elderly AML patients have recently been started.

Long-term outcomes of adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia after autologous or unrelated donor bone marrow transplantation: a comparative analysis by the National Marrow Donor Program and Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research

For adults with high-risk or recurrent ALL who lack a suitable sibling donor, the decision between autologous (Auto) and unrelated donor (URD) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is difficult due to variable risks of relapse and treatment-related mortality (TRM). We analysed data from two transplant registries to determine outcomes between Auto and URD HSCT for 260 adult ALL patients in first (CR1) or second (CR2) CR. All patients received a myeloablative conditioning regimen. The median follow-up was 77 (range 12-170) months. TRM at 1 year post transplant was significantly higher with URD HSCT; however, there were minimal differences in TRM according to disease status. Relapse was higher with Auto HSCT and was increased in patients transplanted in CR2. Five-year leukemia-free (37 vs 39%) and overall survival (OS) rates (38 vs 39%) were similar for Auto HSCT vs URD HSCT in CR1. There were trends favoring URD HSCT in CR2. The long-term follow-up in this analysis demonstrated that either Auto or URD HSCT could result in long-term leukaemia-free survival and OS for adult ALL patients. The optimal time (CR1 vs CR2) and technique to perform HSCT remains an important clinical question for adult ALL patients.

Alternative donor transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia: which source and when?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Acute myeloid leukemia is a heterogeneous disease with a prognosis determined mostly by the leukemic karyotype. Allogeneic transplant in first remission is offered to patients with intermediate- and poor-risk cytogenetics. Only the minority of patients, however, have a matched sibling donor.

RECENT FINDINGS

Matched unrelated, genetically haploidentical and umbilical cord blood have been increasingly used. Pros and cons of each procedure are discussed, and whenever available, comparisons are made.

SUMMARY

With the progress made in supportive care and prophylaxis of graft-versus-host disease, significant improvement in results of transplant from alternative donors has enabled its increasing use in specific disease stages. The recommended transplant for a given patient and the timing of transplant are discussed.

Hematopoietic cell transplantation from unrelated donors for treatment of patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission

Hematopoietic cell transplantation from a histocompatible sibling is generally recommended for patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first remission with intermediate or high risk disease. Two-thirds of patients lack a matched sibling raising the question of the utility of matched unrelated transplantation for such patients. Retrospective studies from single institutions and registry data report 44-50% disease-free survival at 5-years following ablative unrelated donor transplantation for adults. The German AML 01/99 is the only prospective study evaluating the utility of matched related and unrelated transplantation for AML patients in first remission with high risk disease and reported 4-year survival of 68% with matched related transplants, 56% with matched unrelated transplants and 23% with autografting. Thus, results suggest that for patients with AML in first remission with high risk features (as determined by cytogenetics or >5% blasts on day 15 of induction) who lack matched siblings, unrelated donor transplantation should be considered. Current challenges are to improve our ability to identify those patients most likely to benefit from early transplantation, to better select donors, and to develop transplant preparative regimens that are safer and more effective.

Unrelated donor bone marrow transplantation using a chemotherapy-only preparative regimen for adults with high-risk acute myelogenous leukemia

Limited data are available for adults undergoing unrelated donor (URD) BMT for AML using chemotherapy-only preparative regimens. Previous studies incorporated irradiation, included adults and children, and excluded secondary leukemia. Herein we report long-term outcomes for adults with poor-prognostic AML receiving a novel regimen of busulfan (16 mg/kg), cytarabine (8,000 mg/m(2)), and cyclophosphamide (120 mg/kg) (BAC), followed by URD BMT. From June 1995 through October 2001, 45 adults were enrolled. Adverse features included unfavorable cytogenetics (49%), secondary AML (47%), leukemia at transplant (42%), and extramedullary disease (16%). At time of BMT, 23 were in remission (12 CR1) while 22 had leukemia. Four (9%) died early. Acute and chronic GVHD rates were 44 and 67%, respectively. Seventeen (38%) were disease-free 52 months post-BMT; 13 were leukemia-free (eight CR1) at transplant. Eleven relapsed. Three-year DFS and OS were 42 and 46%, respectively. DFS and OS were longer, and relapses less, for those in CR at time of BMT. Secondary leukemia, cytogenetics, cell dose, and GVHD did not influence outcome. In poor-risk AML, BAC provided cytoreduction comparable to reported TBI-containing regimens, when administered for URD BMT. With decreasing treatment-related mortality, it is justified to proceed early to URD BMT for patients with poor prognostic features.

Autotransplantation versus HLA-matched unrelated donor transplantation for acute myeloid leukaemia: a retrospective analysis from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research

Most acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) patients lack human leucocyte antigen-identical sibling donors for transplantation. Autotransplants and unrelated donor (URD) transplants are therapeutic options. To compare autologous versus URD transplantation for AML in first (CR1) or second complete remission (CR2), we studied the outcomes of 668 autotransplants were compared with 476 URD transplants reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research. Proportional hazards regression adjusted for differences in prognostic variables. In multivariate analyses transplant-related mortality (TRM) was significantly higher and relapse lower with URD transplantation. Adjusted 3-year survival probabilities were: in CR1 57 (53-61)% with autotransplants and 44 (37-51)% URD (P = 0.002), in CR2 46 (39-53)% and 33 (28-38)% respectively (P = 0.006). Adjusted 3-year leukaemia-free survival (LFS) probabilities were: CR1 53 (48-57)% with autotransplants and 43 (36-50)% with URD (P = 0.021), CR2 39 (32-46)% and 33 (27-38)% respectively (P = 0.169). Both autologous and URD transplantation produced prolonged LFS. High TRM offsets the superior antileukaemia effect of URD transplantation. This retrospective, observational database study showed that autotransplantation, in general, offered higher 3-year survival for AML patients in CR1 and CR2. Cytogenetics, however, were known in only two-thirds of patients and treatment bias cannot be eliminated.

The Role of Cytotoxic Therapy with Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in the Therapy of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Children: An Evidence-Based Review

Evidence supporting the role of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) in the therapy of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in children is presented and critically evaluated in this systematic evidence-based review. Specific criteria were used for searching the published literature and for grading the quality and strength of the evidence and the strength of the treatment recommendations. Treatment recommendations based on the evidence are presented in a table in this review (Summary of Treatment Recommendations Made by the Expert Panel for Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia) and were reached unanimously by a panel of ALL experts. The priority areas of needed future research in pediatric ALL are unrelated marrow or blood donor versus unrelated cord blood donor allogeneic SCT; alternative, nonfamily allogeneic donor versus autologous SCT; better methods for identifying high-relapse-risk patients; assessments of the effect of current chemotherapy regimens on early relapse; and use of pre-SCT detection of minimal residual disease to predict post-SCT outcomes.

Long-term outcome after intensive therapy with etoposide, melphalan, total body irradiation and autotransplant for acute myeloid leukemia

Intensive therapy and autologous blood and marrow transplantation (ABMT) is an established post-remission treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML), although its exact role remains controversial and few data are available regarding longer-term outcomes. We examined the long-term outcome of patients with AML transplanted at a single center using uniform intensive therapy consisting of etoposide, melphalan and TBI. In all, 145 patients with AML underwent ABMT: 117 in first remission, 21 in second remission and seven beyond second remission. EFS and OS were significantly predicted by remission status (P<0.0001). For transplantation in first remission, 8 year EFS and OS were 55% (95% CI, 44-64%) and 62% (95% CI, 50-72%), respectively. By multivariate analysis, only age (P=0.04) and cytogenetic risk group (P=0.006) influenced OS. For patients transplanted in second remission, 8 year EFS and OS were 30% (95% CI, 9-55%) and 36% (95% CI, 13-60%), respectively. No pre-transplant variables significantly predicted outcome. None of the seven patients who underwent ABMT beyond second remission or in early relapse were long-term survivors. ABMT can provide long-term antileukemic control for patients with AML in first remission. For patients in second remission approximately 30% can achieve cure with ABMT, and this option may be preferable to alternate donor allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

New approaches to hematopoietic cell transplantation in oncology

The use of high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous HCT and the use of allogeneic HCT in children and adolescents with high-risk ALL, AML, and NBL has successfully improved outcomes. For other diseases, however, the role of HCT in treatment remains a subject of further research. The availability of HCT was significantly expanded by developing alternative graft sources that currently include BM, peripheral blood, and UCB from autologous and allogeneic related or unrelated donors. Progress in autologous HCT has been achieved by the identification of more effective and less toxic preparative regimens and by ex vivo purging of stem cell products. In allogeneic HCT, graft-versus-leukemia or graft-versus-tumor effects are being exploited increasingly to lower relapse rates. In addition, immunomodulation to promote tolerance, as well as allogeneic antitumor reactions have been achieved by antibody therapy, cytokine therapy, or cell-based immunotherapy. Future improvements are likely, as evidenced by promising preliminary results in the development of stem cell collection techniques, in vitro stem cell expansion, and purging techniques of stem cell grafts. The development of less intensive or nonmyeloablative preparative regimens may further reduce regimen-related morbidity and mortality Specific immunotherapy may facilitate tolerance induction in mismatched allogeneic HCT and support allogeneic HCT in the setting of donor-host HLA disparity. Ultimately, advances in cytokine therapy, tumor-specific vaccines, and gene therapy may decrease or even eradicate recurrence of the malignant disease after HCT.

Unrelated marrow transplantation for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in second remission

Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) may be curative for more patients than chemotherapy for the child with relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia. This study reviewed the outcomes of 363 children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in second remission who received unrelated donor BMT from 1988 to 2000 in order to define prognostic factors that affect leukemia-free survival (LFS). Median patient age was 9 years (range, 0-19 years), and median follow-up 29 was months (range, 0-125 months). The median duration of first remission was 24 months (range, 0-109 months). Prognostic factors, including age, duration of first remission, HLA matching, and graft-versus-host (GVH) disease, were analyzed using both univariate and multivariate analyses. Overall survival was 38%, and LFS was 36% at 5 years. LFS was significantly worse for patients 15 years or older (log-rank, P =.009). HLA matching was associated with improved LFS. Acute GVH disease developed in 71%, with 29% having grades III-IV. The incidence of chronic GVH disease was 39% for patients who survived more than 80 days and was significantly higher for female patients receiving marrow from female donors (P =.0009). Transplantation-related mortality was 42% and was associated with HLA mismatches, age 15 years and older, and first remission less than 12 months. The 5-year estimate for relapse was 22%, with first remission at least 6 months associated with a lower risk. Results of unrelated donor BMT appear similar to multi-institutional studies of matched related donor BMT, and this approach appears to be curative for many patients. However, innovative approaches are needed for patients with initial remissions of less than 6 months and for older teenagers.

Detection of a novel specificity (CTLA-4) in ATG/TMG globulins and sera from ATG-treated leukemic patients

BACKGROUND

T-cell costimulation has been shown to provide positive signals for T-cell activation and generation of effector activity. In this study, we analyzed the presence of antibodies (Abs) against the T-lymphocyte costimulatory molecules CD28, CTLA-4, CD80, and CD86 in anti-T-lymphocyte (ATG) and antithymocyte (TMG) globulin preparations to address their mechanism of action. We focused our attention on the role of CTLA-4-specific Abs in the immunosuppressive effect of ATG/TMG, because anti-CTLA-4 agonistic Abs may suppress T-cell proliferation and nonagonistic Abs may lead to T-cell depletion through an Ab-dependent cell cytotoxicity mechanism.

METHODS

ATG/TMG and patients' sera were tested for binding to recombinant human costimulatory molecules by ELISA techniques. CTLA-4 specificity was also analyzed by cytoplasmic immunofluorescence staining of a CTLA-4 transfectant by competitive inhibition immunofluorescence and by cell proliferation assay in allogeneic mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR).

RESULTS

Either ATG or TMG predominantly contained anti-CTLA-4 Abs, with higher reactivity in ATG followed by anti-CD86 and -CD28 Abs, whereas anti-CD80 Abs were found only in ATG. Anti-CTLA-4 Abs present in ATG/TMG recognized the native form of CTLA-4 molecule, and their removal reduced the effect of ATG in an allogeneic MLR. Kinetic studies indicated that such Abs were present in the sera of 12 ATG-treated leukemic patients up to 21 days after ATG administration.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that the novel anti-CTLA-4 Abs found in ATG may greatly contribute to its immunosuppressive effect, thus accounting for the absence of rejection and exceptionally low incidence of graft-versus-host disease in the group of patients analyzed.

Partially mismatched related donor bone marrow transplantation as salvage for patients with AML who failed autologous stem cell transplant

Treatment options for patients who relapse are limited and the outcome is dismal. Between August 1993 and January 1999, 17 patients, median age 26 (4-44) years, underwent T cell depleted bone marrow transplant from partially mismatched related donors (PMRD), as a salvage for AML relapsing after an autograft. The median time from auto-transplant to relapse was 7 months (1.5-24) and the interval between transplants was 10 months (3-30). All patients had active leukemia at time of transplant. Donors were siblings (n = 8), parents (n = 2), daughters (n = 4) and others (n = 3), and 82% were > or = 2 major HLA antigen mismatched with the recipient. The conditioning therapy included total body irradiation in 14 patients and was busulfan-based in three. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis consisted of partial T cell depletion along with post-transplant immunosuppression. Median day to engraftment was 16 days (12-20). Acute GVHD was seen in six patients, and chronic GVHD in four of 13 surviving beyond 100 days. Ten patients died of non-relapse causes, at 1-588 (median 77) days. Two patients relapsed at 3 and 4 months. Five patients (29%) are surviving leukemia-free 42-84 months post transplant (median 68 months). A short interval between transplants was predictive of early relapse but not mortality. Age <18 and <2 organ toxicities were marginally predictive of better survival. We conclude that BMT from PMRD is a reasonable option for patients with refractory AML post autograft.

Therapy for childhood acute myeloid leukemia: role of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has one of the lowest survival rates of childhood cancers. The first significant improvement in AML therapy started with the introduction of the now standard regimen of 3 days of anthracyclines and 7 days of cytarabine (Ara-C), the so-called 3+7 combinations. Several different therapeutic approaches have been taken in attempts to improve the outcome, including intensification of therapy both for remission induction and in the postremission phase. Intensification of postremission therapy included multiple courses of high-dose chemotherapy and/or myeloablative therapy followed by stem- cell rescue from either allogeneic or autologous sources. Furthermore, risk-tailored therapy is now possible, by cytogenetic risk stratification, promptness of remission induction, and identification of distinct clinical subgroups such as children with Down syndrome. This approach is rapidly changing potential therapeutic strategies for children with AML. It is in this changing mileu that we address the proper role of stem-cell transplantation, a modality that is changing (like chemotherapy) with expanding stem-cell sources and approaches to decrease transplant-related toxicity.

Unrelated donor marrow transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia: an update of the Seattle experience

Between 1985 and 1998, 161 patients with primary acute myeloid leukemia (AML) received T-replete bone marrow transplantation (BMT) from unrelated donors in Seattle. Median age was 30 (range 1-55) years. Conditioning for BMT consisted of cyclophosphamide and total body irradiation in 154 (96%) cases and graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis was the standard methotrexate and cyclosporine combination in 134 (83%) cases. Median post-transplant follow-up was 2.9 years. Leukemia-free survival (LFS) at 5 years was 50+/-12% for transplants during first complete remission (n = 16), 28+/-8% during second CR (n = 40), 27+/-17% during subsequent CR (n = 8), 7+/-3% during relapse (n = 81) and 19+/-10% during primary induction failure (n = 16). The cumulative incidences of relapse were 19%, 23%, 25%, 44% and 63%, for the five groups, respectively. Transplantation during remission, a marrow cell dose above 3.5 x 10(8)/kg, and cytomegalovirus seronegative status before BMT in both patient and donor were favorable prognostic factors. Adults in any CR who received a marrow cell dose above 3.5 x 10(8)/mg had a LFS of 54+/-9% at 5 years. These data extend our previous findings on the association between a high marrow cell dose and improved survival and support the use of unrelated donor BMT for treatment of patients with high risk AML when a family match is not available.

The dismal outcome in patients with acute leukaemia who relapse after an autograft is improved if a second autograft or a matched allograft is performed. Acute Leukaemia Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT)

All patients receiving autografts for acute leukaemia in remission between 1 January 1981 and 31 December 1996 and reported to the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation and had a relapse, were included. The patients underwent an allograft (n = 90, group A), were treated with chemotherapy (n = 2584, group B) or received a second autograft (n = 74, group C). The 2-year survival after relapse was 32 +/- 5%, 11 +/- 1% and 42 +/- 6% in groups A, B and C, respectively. In group A, those with an HLA-A, -B and -DR compatible related or unrelated donor had a 2-year survival of 37 +/- 7% compared to 13 +/- 8% for those receiving a graft from an HLA mismatched donor (n = 20). The following factors were associated with better survival in multivariate analyses: an interval from first autograft to relapse >5 months (P < 0.00001), a first autograft performed later than 1991 (P < 0.00001), patient age below 26 years (median, P < 0.002), group B vs HLA mismatches from group A (P = 0.002), group C vs group B (P < 0.005), patients who were not treated with total body irradiation at first autograft (P < 0.02) and patients in first remission at first autograft (P = 0.02). To conclude, the poor outcome in these patients was improved if a second autograft was feasible (P < 0.005), or if an HLA-matched allograft was performed (NS). Bone Marrow Transplantation (2000).

Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Challenges and Controversies in 2000

This article discusses ways in which pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) can be stratified to receive intensive and less intensive therapies in order to decrease morbidity and mortality. Specifically, the focus may shift away from current intensive therapies for ultra low-risk patients and away from transplantation for certain patients at relapse. In contrast, infants with ALL comprise an ultra high-risk population in need of specialized approaches.

In Section I Dr. Lange describes the need to identify ultra low-risk children. Groups around the world have improved the outcome of children with ALL by identifying the basic “total therapy” model of the 1970s and stratifying treatment according to risk of relapse. Current first-line treatment cures about 85% of children with standard-risk ALL and 70% of children with high-risk disease. However, all children receive anthracyclines, alkylating agents, or moderate- to high-dose antimetabolite infusions. While randomized clinical trials prove that these intensifications reduce relapses, they also show that half of all children with ALL can be cured with the modest therapy of the 1970s and early 1980s. The patients curable with lesser therapy may be considered an ultra low-risk group. Attempts to use age, gender, white count, morphology, and karyotype to identify the ultra low-risk group of patients with a 90-95% cure rate with minimal therapy have failed. An expanded repertoire of tools such as pharmacogenetic profiling, PCR measurement of minimal residual disease and microarray technology may make this goal achievable in this decade.

In section II Dr. Chessells addresses the management of children with relapsed ALL. The chance of successful re-treatment with conventional chemotherapy for relapse depends on the duration of first remission and the site of relapse. Bone marrow transplantation from a histocompatible sibling or other suitable donor, which is widely accepted as the treatment of choice for children with a first remission of &lt; 24 months, is associated with a high risk of relapse. Bone marrow transplantation for later bone marrow relapse improves leukemia-free survival but has significant short-term and long-term toxicities. The challenges are to develop more effective treatment for early relapse and to identify those children with relapsed ALL who are curable with chemotherapy or, failing this, those children who would be candidates for bone marrow transplantation in third remission.

In Section III Dr. Felix addresses the problem of infant ALL. ALL of infancy is clinically aggressive, and infants continue to have the worst prognosis of all pediatric patients with ALL. High white blood cell count, younger age, bulky extramedullary disease, and CNS disease at diagnosis are unfavorable characteristics. These features occur with MLL gene translocations. The probability of an MLL gene translocation and the probability of poor outcome both are greatest in younger infants. Specialized intensive chemotherapy approaches and bone marrow transplantation in first remission for this disease may lead to improved survival.

Refined recognition of pediatric patients with ALL who need more and less intensive therapies is necessary to increase survival and decrease toxicities.

Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Challenges and Controversies in 2000

This article discusses ways in which pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) can be stratified to receive intensive and less intensive therapies in order to decrease morbidity and mortality. Specifically, the focus may shift away from current intensive therapies for ultra low-risk patients and away from transplantation for certain patients at relapse. In contrast, infants with ALL comprise an ultra high-risk population in need of specialized approaches.

In Section I Dr. Lange describes the need to identify ultra low-risk children. Groups around the world have improved the outcome of children with ALL by identifying the basic “total therapy” model of the 1970s and stratifying treatment according to risk of relapse. Current first-line treatment cures about 85% of children with standard-risk ALL and 70% of children with high-risk disease. However, all children receive anthracyclines, alkylating agents, or moderate- to high-dose antimetabolite infusions. While randomized clinical trials prove that these intensifications reduce relapses, they also show that half of all children with ALL can be cured with the modest therapy of the 1970s and early 1980s. The patients curable with lesser therapy may be considered an ultra low-risk group. Attempts to use age, gender, white count, morphology, and karyotype to identify the ultra low-risk group of patients with a 90-95% cure rate with minimal therapy have failed. An expanded repertoire of tools such as pharmacogenetic profiling, PCR measurement of minimal residual disease and microarray technology may make this goal achievable in this decade.

In section II Dr. Chessells addresses the management of children with relapsed ALL. The chance of successful re-treatment with conventional chemotherapy for relapse depends on the duration of first remission and the site of relapse. Bone marrow transplantation from a histocompatible sibling or other suitable donor, which is widely accepted as the treatment of choice for children with a first remission of < 24 months, is associated with a high risk of relapse. Bone marrow transplantation for later bone marrow relapse improves leukemia-free survival but has significant short-term and long-term toxicities. The challenges are to develop more effective treatment for early relapse and to identify those children with relapsed ALL who are curable with chemotherapy or, failing this, those children who would be candidates for bone marrow transplantation in third remission.

In Section III Dr. Felix addresses the problem of infant ALL. ALL of infancy is clinically aggressive, and infants continue to have the worst prognosis of all pediatric patients with ALL. High white blood cell count, younger age, bulky extramedullary disease, and CNS disease at diagnosis are unfavorable characteristics. These features occur with MLL gene translocations. The probability of an MLL gene translocation and the probability of poor outcome both are greatest in younger infants. Specialized intensive chemotherapy approaches and bone marrow transplantation in first remission for this disease may lead to improved survival.

Refined recognition of pediatric patients with ALL who need more and less intensive therapies is necessary to increase survival and decrease toxicities.

Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for hematological malignancies--controversies and recent advances

Today more than 80000 allogeneic bone marrow transplantations (BMT) have been performed worldwide. The major indications are hematological malignancies such as acute myeloid leukemia (AML), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and myelodysplastic syndromes. Unrelated donors are increasingly used and there are around 4 million volunteer donors available in different registers, the largest being the National Marrow Donor Program. Molecular typing has improved the typing technique which has resulted in a decreased risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), lower transplant-related mortality (TRM) and improved leukemia-free survival (LFS). Using HLA-identical siblings, patients with AML in first complete remission (1 CR) and high-risk ALL in 1 CR are clear indications for BMT. However, if an HLA-identical sibling is not available, it is not known today if an unrelated bone marrow or autografting is the best option for all patients with acute leukemia in 1 CR. Because BMT is the only curable treatment for CML, a search for an unrelated donor should start as soon as it is evident that an HLA-identical sibling is not available. BMT within a year from diagnosis is of major importance for outcome. Allogeneic peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) have been used as an alternative to bone marrow. Preliminary studies indicate a faster engraftment, but prospective randomized trials are necessary to establish the role of allogeneic PBPC. Umbilical cord blood has also been used as a source of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cells. Using cord blood from HLA-identical siblings, engraftment seems to be delayed, but the probability of GVHD is low. Preliminary data using unrelated cord blood cells are encouraging. GVHD has an important antileukemic effect. Recently, a graft-versus-myeloma and a graft-versus-breast-cancer effect has been demonstrated. In patients who relapse after BMT, donor lymphocytes can induce remission, especially in patients with CML. With molecular techniques it is possible to detect relapse at an early stage, so called minimal residual disease. Liposomal amphotericin B has few side-effects and decreased the death rate by invasive fungal infection in BMT recipients. Early diagnosis and treatment of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection with new antiviral drugs have dramatically reduced the incidence and mortality in CMV disease. Cyclosporine combined with methotrexate is today the most widely used immunosuppressive regimen and has decreased GVHD and improved survival. However, several new immunosuppressive drugs need to be explored in clinical BMT. Immune modulation by for instance cytokines and cytokine inhibititors is a new exciting development.

Bone marrow transplantation using unrelated donors for haematological malignancies

Bone marrow transplantation from unrelated donors is increasingly used to treat haematological malignancies. There are almost 4 million volunteer donors now available. Therefore, it is possible to find an HLA-A, -B and -DR-identical donor for around 70% of the patients. The major obstacles to unrelated bone marrow transplantations have been rejection, severe acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and prolonged immune recovery leading to frequent infections and a high transplant-related mortality. However, with improved tissue typing using DNA techniques, immunosuppression using T-cell depletion in vitro or in vivo, the frequency of acute GVHD is acceptable and the results approach those obtained with HLA-identical siblings. For patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia, the worldwide 3-year survival is around 40%. Other indications for bone marrow transplantation with unrelated marrow include acute leukaemia and myelodysplastic syndromes with high-risk features. Unrelated cord blood cells and unrelated peripheral blood progenitor cells will be increasingly used as alternative haematopoietic stem cell sources to bone marrow. Improved immunosuppression, more accurate tissue typing, growth factors and better management of infections is expected to improve outcome using unrelated haematopoietic stem cells for transplantation in the near future.