1
|
John TD, Maron G, Abraham A, Bertaina A, Bhoopalan SV, Bidgoli A, Bonfim C, Coleman Z, DeZern A, Li J, Louis C, Oved J, Pavel-Dinu M, Purtill D, Ruggeri A, Russell A, Wynn R, Boelens JJ, Prockop S, Sharma A. Strategic infection prevention after genetically modified hematopoietic stem cell therapies: recommendations from the International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy Stem Cell Engineering Committee. Cytotherapy 2024:S1465-3249(24)00052-5. [PMID: 38483362 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2024.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Revised: 02/12/2024] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
There is lack of guidance for immune monitoring and infection prevention after administration of ex vivo genetically modified hematopoietic stem cell therapies (GMHSCT). We reviewed current infection prevention practices as reported by providers experienced with GMHSCTs across North America and Europe, and assessed potential immunologic compromise associated with the therapeutic process of GMHSCTs described to date. Based on these assessments, and with consensus from members of the International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy (ISCT) Stem Cell Engineering Committee, we propose risk-adapted recommendations for immune monitoring, infection surveillance and prophylaxis, and revaccination after receipt of GMHSCTs. Disease-specific and GMHSCT-specific considerations should guide decision making for each therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tami D John
- Division of Hematology, Oncology, Stem Cell Transplantation and Regenerative Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Gabriela Maron
- Department of Infectious Diseases, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Allistair Abraham
- Center for Cancer and Immunology Research, CETI, Children's National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Alice Bertaina
- Division of Hematology, Oncology, Stem Cell Transplantation and Regenerative Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Senthil Velan Bhoopalan
- Department of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Alan Bidgoli
- Division of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Aflac Blood and Cancer Disorders Center, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Carmem Bonfim
- Pediatric Blood and Marrow Transplantation Division and Pelé Pequeno Príncipe Research Institute, Hospital Pequeno Príncipe, Curitiba, Brazil
| | - Zane Coleman
- Department of Infectious Diseases, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Amy DeZern
- Bone Marrow Failure and MDS Program, John Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Jingjing Li
- Graduate School of Biomedical Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Joseph Oved
- Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapies Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Mara Pavel-Dinu
- Division of Hematology, Oncology, Stem Cell Transplantation and Regenerative Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Duncan Purtill
- Department of Haematology, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | | | - Athena Russell
- Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Robert Wynn
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Jaap Jan Boelens
- Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapies Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Susan Prockop
- Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Akshay Sharma
- Department of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rieger CT, Liss B, Mellinghoff S, Buchheidt D, Cornely OA, Egerer G, Heinz WJ, Hentrich M, Maschmeyer G, Mayer K, Sandherr M, Silling G, Ullmann A, Vehreschild MJGT, von Lilienfeld-Toal M, Wolf HH, Lehners N. Anti-infective vaccination strategies in patients with hematologic malignancies or solid tumors-Guideline of the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society for Hematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO). Ann Oncol 2019; 29:1354-1365. [PMID: 29688266 PMCID: PMC6005139 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Infectious complications are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with malignancies specifically when receiving anticancer treatments. Prevention of infection through vaccines is an important aspect of clinical care of cancer patients. Immunocompromising effects of the underlying disease as well as of antineoplastic therapies need to be considered when devising vaccination strategies. This guideline provides clinical recommendations on vaccine use in cancer patients including autologous stem cell transplant recipients, while allogeneic stem cell transplantation is subject of a separate guideline. The document was prepared by the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society for Hematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO) by reviewing currently available data and applying evidence-based medicine criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C T Rieger
- Hematology and Oncology Germering, Lehrpraxis der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, University of Munich, Munich.
| | - B Liss
- Department of Internal Medicine, Helios University Hospital Wuppertal, Wuppertal
| | - S Mellinghoff
- Department I of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne; CECAD Cluster of Excellence, University of Cologne, Cologne
| | - D Buchheidt
- Department of Internal Medicine - Hematology and Oncology, Mannheim University Hospital, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg
| | - O A Cornely
- Department I of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne; CECAD Cluster of Excellence, University of Cologne, Cologne; Clinical Trials Center Cologne, ZKS Köln, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne
| | - G Egerer
- Department of Hematology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg
| | - W J Heinz
- Department of Internal Medicine II - Hematology and Oncology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg
| | - M Hentrich
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Rotkreuzklinikum München, Munich
| | - G Maschmeyer
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, Klinikum Ernst von Bergmann, Potsdam
| | - K Mayer
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn
| | | | - G Silling
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Aachen, Aachen
| | - A Ullmann
- Department of Internal Medicine II - Hematology and Oncology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg
| | - M J G T Vehreschild
- Department of Internal Medicine, Helios University Hospital Wuppertal, Wuppertal
| | - M von Lilienfeld-Toal
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Jena, Jena
| | - H H Wolf
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Halle, Halle
| | - N Lehners
- Department of Hematology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg; Max-Eder-Group Experimental Therapies for Hematologic Malignancies, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cordonnier C, Einarsdottir S, Cesaro S, Di Blasi R, Mikulska M, Rieger C, de Lavallade H, Gallo G, Lehrnbecher T, Engelhard D, Ljungman P. Vaccination of haemopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: guidelines of the 2017 European Conference on Infections in Leukaemia (ECIL 7). THE LANCET. INFECTIOUS DISEASES 2019; 19:e200-e212. [PMID: 30744963 DOI: 10.1016/s1473-3099(18)30600-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 167] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2018] [Revised: 08/21/2018] [Accepted: 09/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Infection is a main concern after haemopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and a major cause of transplant-related mortality. Some of these infections are preventable by vaccination. Most HSCT recipients lose their immunity to various pathogens as soon as the first months after transplant, irrespective of the pre-transplant donor or recipient vaccinations. Vaccination with inactivated vaccines is safe after transplantation and is an effective way to reinstate protection from various pathogens (eg, influenza virus and Streptococcus pneumoniae), especially for pathogens whose risk of infection is increased by the transplant procedure. The response to vaccines in patients with transplants is usually lower than that in healthy individuals of the same age during the first months or years after transplant, but it improves over time to become close to normal 2-3 years after the procedure. However, because immunogenic vaccines have been found to induce a response in a substantial proportion of the patients as early as 3 months after transplant, we recommend to start crucial vaccinations with inactivated vaccines from 3 months after transplant, irrespectively of whether the patient has or has not developed graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) or received immunosuppressants. Patients with GvHD have higher risk of infection and are likely to benefit from vaccination. Another challenge is to provide HSCT recipients the same level of vaccine protection as healthy individuals of the same age in a given country. The use of live attenuated vaccines should be limited to specific situations because of the risk of vaccine-induced disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Cordonnier
- Haematology Department, Henri Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Créteil, France; University Paris-Est Créteil, Créteil, France.
| | - Sigrun Einarsdottir
- Section of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sahlgrenska Academy, Göteborg, Sweden
| | - Simone Cesaro
- Pediatric Hematology Oncology Unit, Department of Mother and Child, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Roberta Di Blasi
- Haematology Department, Henri Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Créteil, France
| | - Malgorzata Mikulska
- University of Genoa (DISSAL) and IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Christina Rieger
- Department of Hematology Oncology, University of Munich, Germering, Germany
| | - Hugues de Lavallade
- Department of Haematological Medicine, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Giuseppe Gallo
- Pediatric Hematology Oncology Unit, Department of Mother and Child, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Thomas Lehrnbecher
- Paediatric Haematology and Oncology Department, Hospital for Children and Adolescents, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Dan Engelhard
- Department of Pediatrics, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Ein-Kerem Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Per Ljungman
- Department of Cellular Therapy and Allogeneneic Stem Cell Transplantation, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Impfungen bei primären Immundefekten. Monatsschr Kinderheilkd 2011. [DOI: 10.1007/s00112-010-2334-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
5
|
|
6
|
Storek J. Immunological reconstitution after hematopoietic cell transplantation – its relation to the contents of the graft. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2008; 8:583-97. [DOI: 10.1517/14712598.8.5.583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
|
7
|
Brinkman DMC, Jol-van der Zijde CM, ten Dam MM, te Boekhorst PAW, ten Cate R, Wulffraat NM, Hintzen RQ, Vossen JM, van Tol MJD. Resetting the adaptive immune system after autologous stem cell transplantation: lessons from responses to vaccines. J Clin Immunol 2007; 27:647-58. [PMID: 17690955 PMCID: PMC2075528 DOI: 10.1007/s10875-007-9120-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2007] [Accepted: 07/06/2007] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) to treat autoimmune diseases (AID) is thought to reset immunological memory directed against autoantigens. This hypothesis can only be studied indirectly because the exact nature of the pathogenetic autoantigens is unknown in most AID. Therefore, 19 children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) or systemic lupus erythematodes (SLE) and 10 adults with multiple sclerosis (MS) were vaccinated with the T-cell-dependent neoantigen rabies and the recall antigen tetanus toxoid after, respectively before, bone marrow harvest. Both vaccinations were repeated after ASCT. All except two of the responders mounted a primary antibody response to rabies after revaccination, and 44% of the responders mounted a primary antibody response to tetanus boost after ASCT. These data show that immunological memory to a neoantigen is lost in most patients with AID after immunoablative pretreatment; however, memory to a recall antigen boosted before bone marrow harvest is only lost in part of the patients. Disease progression was arrested in all patients with JIA/SLE except one, but only in a minority of MS patients. Clinical outcome on a per case basis was not associated with the profile of the immune response toward the vaccination antigens after ASCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D M C Brinkman
- Department of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Rapoport AP. Immunity for tumors and microbes after autotransplantation: if you build it, they will (not) come. Bone Marrow Transplant 2005; 37:239-47. [PMID: 16327812 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1705242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Relapses after autologous stem cell transplants for hematopoietic malignancies are frequent and post-transplant infections continue to cause significant post-transplant morbidity and even mortality. The post-transplant period is typically characterized by low lymphocyte counts and impaired immune cell function. Early restoration of immune function may contribute to better disease control and enhance protection from infections. Indeed the attainment of a 'minimal residual disease' status following high-dose therapy makes the early post-transplant period ideal for the introduction of antitumor immunotherapy. Attempts to generate immunity against tumor and microbial antigens after autotransplantation have included vaccinations, T cell infusions (both resting and activated) and combinations of vaccinations and adoptive T cell infusions. One successful strategy for generating robust immune responses against microbial antigens was the combination of pre and post-transplant immunizations along with an early (post-transplant) infusion of in vivo vaccine-primed and ex vivo co-stimulated autologous T cells. Whether this or similar strategies will lead to the generation of effective antitumor immunity is unknown. The lessons gained from efforts to rebuild immune system function in the setting of autotransplantation may also be applicable to the problem of restoring immunity in other immunodeficient groups such as patients with cancer or HIV disease and the elderly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A P Rapoport
- University of Maryland Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Antin JH, Guinan EC, Avigan D, Soiffer RJ, Joyce RM, Martin VJ, Molrine DC. Protective antibody responses to pneumococcal conjugate vaccine after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2005; 11:213-22. [PMID: 15744240 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2004.12.330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Patients undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (autoHCT) are at increased risk for infection with Streptococcus pneumoniae and have impaired antibody responses to pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccines. We performed this study to examine the ability of autoHCT patients to respond to a heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7) given after transplantation and to determine whether there was a potential benefit of immunizing these patients before stem cell collection. Sixty-one patients scheduled for autoHCT were randomized to receive either PCV7 or no vaccine before stem cell collection. After stem cell reinfusion, all study patients were immunized with PCV7 at 3, 6, and 12 months. Pneumococcal immunoglobulin G antibody concentrations were measured at the time of each immunization and 1 month after the 12-month dose. Serotype-specific pneumococcal antibody concentrations were significantly higher in patients immunized with PCV7 before stem cell collection compared with patients not immunized before their stem cells were collected for 6 of 7 serotypes at 3 months, 6 of 7 serotypes at 6 months, 4 of 7 serotypes at 12 months, and 3 of 7 serotypes at 13 months. After the 3-dose series of PCV7 after autoHCT, >60% of study patients had protective concentrations of antibody to all 7 vaccine serotypes regardless of immunization before stem cell collection. Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine is immunogenic in autoHCT patients and may be an effective strategy to prevent invasive disease after transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph H Antin
- Department of Adult Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Actualización en la vacunación del adulto. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin 2004. [DOI: 10.1016/s0213-005x(04)73107-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
11
|
Gandhi MK, Egner W, Sizer L, Inman I, Zambon M, Craig JI, Marcus RE. Antibody responses to vaccinations given within the first two years after transplant are similar between autologous peripheral blood stem cell and bone marrow transplant recipients. Bone Marrow Transplant 2001; 28:775-81. [PMID: 11781630 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1703239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2001] [Accepted: 08/22/2001] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
As a consequence of the significantly larger inoculum of lymphoid cells present in peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) harvests compared to bone marrow (BM), it is possible that autoPBSCT recipients may have an earlier and*or enhanced response to vaccines. Until data to confirm this become available, the European Blood and Marrow Transplantation Association (EBMT) recommend that all transplant recipients be immunized in the same way regardless of stem cell source. We performed a prospective study comparing serological responses to influenza, pneumococcal polysaccharide and tetanus toxoid vaccines between autoPBSCT with autoBMT recipients. Antibody responses in sibling HLA-matched allogeneic BMT (alloBMT) survivors were also evaluated. All vaccines were administered within the first 2 years after stem cell transplantation. Fifty patients were enrolled. The time of vaccination after transplant was similar between autoPBSCT (mean 11 months for each vaccine) and autoBMT recipients (mean 12 months except 13 months for tetanus toxoid) (P = NS). Serological responses were poor and no significant difference in response to any of the vaccines used was seen between the three transplant cohorts. We provide no evidence that current EBMT guidelines be modified. Large prospective vaccine studies are needed to address the issue more fully.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M K Gandhi
- East Anglian BMT Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Department of Haematology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sullivan KM, Dykewicz CA, Longworth DL, Boeckh M, Baden LR, Rubin RH, Sepkowitz KA. Preventing opportunistic infections after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Infectious Diseases Society of America, and American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Practice Guidelines and beyond. HEMATOLOGY. AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEMATOLOGY. EDUCATION PROGRAM 2001; 2001:392-421. [PMID: 11722995 DOI: 10.1182/asheducation-2001.1.392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
This review presents evidence-based guidelines for the prevention of infection after blood and marrow transplantation. Recommendations apply to all myeloablative transplants regardless of recipient (adult or child), type (allogeneic or autologous) or source (peripheral blood, marrow or cord blood) of transplant. In Section I, Dr. Dykewicz describes the methods used to rate the strength and quality of published evidence supporting these recommendations and details the two dozen scholarly societies and federal agencies involved in the genesis and review of the guidelines. In Section II, Dr. Longworth presents recommendations for hospital infection control. Hand hygiene, room ventilation, health care worker and visitor policies are detailed along with guidelines for control of specific nosocomial and community-acquired pathogens. In Section III, Dr. Boeckh details effective practices to prevent viral diseases. Leukocyte-depleted blood is recommended for cytomegalovirus (CMV) seronegative allografts, while ganciclovir given as prophylaxis or preemptive therapy based on pp65 antigenemia or DNA assays is advised for individuals at risk for CMV. Guidelines for preventing varicella-zoster virus (VZV), herpes simplex virus (HSV) and community respiratory virus infections are also presented. In Section IV, Drs. Baden and Rubin review means to prevent invasive fungal infections. Hospital design and policy can reduce exposure to air contaminated with fungal spores and fluconazole prophylaxis at 400 mg/day reduces invasive yeast infection. In Section V, Dr. Sepkowitz details effective clinical practices to reduce or prevent bacterial or protozoal disease after transplantation. In Section VI, Dr. Sullivan reviews vaccine-preventable infections and guidelines for active and passive immunizations for stem cell transplant recipients, family members and health care workers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K M Sullivan
- Division of Medical Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Boulad F, Sands S, Sklar C. Late complications after bone marrow transplantation in children and adolescents. CURRENT PROBLEMS IN PEDIATRICS 1998; 28:273-97. [PMID: 9794096 DOI: 10.1016/s0045-9380(98)80030-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- F Boulad
- Department of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|