A prospective study of G-CSF effects on hemostasis in allogeneic blood stem cell donors

Balancing Benefits and Risks: A Literature Review on Hypersensitivity Reactions to Human G-CSF (Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor)

Human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is a granulopoietic growth factor used in the treatment of neutropenia following chemotherapy, myeloablative treatment, or healthy donors preparing for allogeneic transplantation. Few hypersensitivity reactions (HRs) have been reported, and its true prevalence is unknown. We aimed to systematically characterize G-CSF-induced HRs while including a comprehensive list of adverse reactions. We reviewed articles published before January 2024 by searching in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases using a combination of the keywords listed, selected the ones needed, and extracted relevant data. The search resulted in 68 entries, 17 relevant to our study and 7 others found from manually searching bibliographic sources. A total of 40 cases of G-CSF-induced HR were described and classified as immediate (29) or delayed (11). Immediate ones were mostly caused by filgrastim (13 minimum), with at least 9 being grade 5 on the WAO anaphylaxis scale. Delayed reactions were mostly maculopapular exanthemas and allowed for the continuation of G-CSF. Reactions after first exposure frequently appeared and were present in at least 11 of the 40 cases. Only five desensitization protocols have been found concerning the topic at hand in the analyzed data. We believe this study brings to light the research interest in this topic that could benefit from further exploration, and propose regular updating to include the most recently published evidence.

A global assessment of hemostatic function of healthy allogeneic stem cell donors undergoing apheresis by rotational thromboelastometry

INTRODUCTION

Peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection via apheresis requires the administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim) to stem cell donors. Several reports have shown that filgrastim administration and apheresis procedure induce a hypercoagulable state across PBSC collection, which might predispose certain donors to thrombotic complications.

METHODS

We evaluated the hemostatic functions of healthy allogeneic stem cell donors by rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM). Blood samples from healthy donors (n = 30) were collected at defined time points: before filgrastim (baseline), on the day of apheresis before and after the procedure, and 1 week after apheresis.

RESULTS

The results indicated that hemostatic changes are temporary since all parameters in both EXTEM and INTEM assays are restored to their initial values 1 week after the apheresis.

CONCLUSION

We concluded that stem cell apheresis does not induce a hypercoagulable state in healthy donors. This is the first study evaluating the hemostatic functions of stem cell donors by ROTEM.

Circulatory Neutrophils Exhibit Enhanced Neutrophil Extracellular Trap Formation in Early Puerperium: NETs at the Nexus of Thrombosis and Immunity

Pregnancy is associated with elevated maternal levels of cell-free DNA of neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) origin, as circulatory neutrophils exhibit increased spontaneous NET formation, mainly driven by G-CSF and finely modulated by sex hormones. The postpartum period, on the other hand, involves physiological alterations consistent with the need for protection against infections and fatal haemorrhage. Our findings indicate that all relevant serum markers of neutrophil degranulation and NET release are substantially augmented postpartum. Neutrophil pro-NETotic activity in vitro is also upregulated particularly in post-delivery neutrophils. Moreover, maternal puerperal neutrophils exhibit a strong pro-NETotic phenotype, associated with increased levels of all key players in the generation of NETs, namely citH3, MPO, NE, and ROS, compared to non-pregnant and pregnant controls. Intriguingly, post-delivery NET formation is independent of G-CSF in contrast to late gestation and complemented by the presence of TF on the NETs, alterations in the platelet activity status, and activation of the coagulation cascade, triggered by circulating microparticles. Taken together, our results reveal the highly pro-NETotic and potentially procoagulant nature of postpartum neutrophils, bridging an overt immune activation with possible harmful thrombotic incidence.

Maternal and Neonatal Outcome after the Use of G-CSF for Cancer Treatment during Pregnancy

Simple Summary

Treatment of pregnant cancer patients should adhere as much as possible to standard treatment protocols in order to safeguard maternal prognosis. The use of Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) can be indicated for dose dense chemotherapy in high risk breast cancer patients or for the treatment or prevention of neutropenic fever, which can be an important threat for maternal and fetal survival. However, as evidence is still scarce, physicians are still reluctant to the use of G-CSF during pregnancy. In this series, the International Network of Cancer, Infertility and Pregnancy (INCIP) reports on 42 pregnant patients who received G-CSF during oncological treatment. Reported maternal and neonatal complications are acceptable; however, a continuous evaluation of clinical practice is necessary as the limited data in numbers and follow-up do not allow robust conclusions.

Abstract

Data on the use of Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in pregnant cancer patients are scarce. The International Network of Cancer, Infertility and Pregnancy (INCIP) reviewed data of pregnant patients treated with chemotherapy and G-CSF, and their offspring. Among 2083 registered patients, 42 pregnant patients received G-CSF for the following indications: recent chemotherapy induced febrile neutropenia (5; 12%), dose dense chemotherapy (28, 67%), poly chemotherapy (7, 17%), or prevention of neutropenia at delivery (2; 5%). Among 24 women receiving dose dense chemotherapy, three (13%) patients recovered from asymptomatic neutropenia within 5 days. One patient developed pancytopenia following polychemotherapy after which the pregnancy was complicated by chorioamnionitis and intrauterine death. Nineteen singleton livebirths (49%) were born preterm. Sixteen neonates (41%) were admitted to the Neonatal Intensive care Unit (NICU). No neonatal neutropenia occurred. Two neonates had congenital malformations. Out of 21 children in follow-up, there were four children with a motor development delay and two premature infants had a delay in cognitive development. In conclusion, the rate of maternal and neonatal complications are similar to those described in (pregnant) women treated with chemotherapy. Due to small numbers and limited follow-up, rare or delayed effects among offspring exposed to G-CSF in utero cannot be ruled out yet.

Deep vein thrombosis: a less noticed complication in hematologic malignancies and immunologic disorders

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a common complication in hematologic malignancies and immunologic disorders that coagulation and inflammatory factors play a crucial role in its occurrence. The content used in this article has been obtained by PubMed database and Google Scholar search engine of English-language articles (1980-2019) using the "Deep vein thrombosis," "Hematologic malignancies," "Immunologic disorders" and "Treatment." Increased levels of coagulation factors, the presence of genetic disorders, or the use of thrombotic drugs that stimulate coagulation processes are risk factors for the development of DVT in patients with hematologic malignancies. Inflammatory and auto-anti-inflammatory factors, along with coagulant factors, play an essential role in the formation of venous thrombosis in patients with immunological disorders by increasing the recruitment of inflammatory cells and adhesion molecules. Therefore, anti-coagulants in hematologic malignancies and immunosuppressants in immune disorders can reduce the risk of developing DVT by reducing thrombotic and inflammatory activity. Considering the increased risk of DVT due to impaired coagulation and inflammation processes, analysis of coagulation and inflammatory factors have prognostic values in patients with immunologic deficiencies and hematologic malignancies. Evaluation of these factors as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in the prediction of thrombotic events could be beneficial in implementing effective treatment strategies for DVT.

Lower platelet count with increased density of platelet antigens in granulocyte colony-stimulating factor mobilized peripheral blood stem cell donors

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is widely used for prophylaxis and treatment of neutropenia in cancer patients and also for peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) mobilization. The aim of this study is to evaluate the possible changes of platelet surface antigens after G-CSF injection in PBSC donors compared with healthy control.

METHODS

Between January 1st and December 31st, 2014, 48 healthy voluntary PBSC donors were eligible for this study. Donors received G-CSF (Filgrastim) subcutaneously for five days, and then their whole blood was collected for complete blood count. Analysis of platelet antigens was performed by flow cytometry. Sixteen healthy controls were also included for comparison.

RESULTS

Lower platelet counts were found in PBSC donors after G-CSF use and in comparison with health controls. The platelet size evaluated by forward scattering (FSC) showed smaller platelets in PBSC donors after G-CSF use compared with healthy controls (39.3 vs 46.7 mean fluorescence intensity, P = 0.015). CD31 were higher in PBSC donor (203.2 vs. 120.7, P < 0.001). Except CD31, other platelet surface antigens were not different between PBSC donors and healthy controls. After adjusting by FSC data, the mean antigen intensity/FSC of CD31, CD41a, CD42a, CD42b and CD61 showed 5.45 vs 2.78 (P < 0.001), 4.35 vs 3.47 (P = 0.007), 3.87 vs 3.17 (P = 0.015), 20.45 vs 16.94 (P = 0.045), and 5.98 vs 4.88 (P = 0.018) respectively.

CONCLUSION

We noted higher density of platelet surface antigens, lower platelet count and smaller platelet size after G-CSF injection.

Extravascular coagulation in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell regulation

The hemostatic system plays pivotal roles in injury repair, innate immunity, and adaptation to inflammatory challenges. We review the evidence that these vascular-protective mechanisms have nontraditional roles in hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) maintenance in their physiological bone marrow (BM) niches at steady-state and under stress. Expression of coagulation factors and the extrinsic coagulation initiator tissue factor by osteoblasts, tissue-resident macrophages, and megakaryocytes suggests that endosteal and vascular HSC niches are functionally regulated by extravascular coagulation. The anticoagulant endothelial protein C receptor (EPCR; Procr) is highly expressed by primitive BM HSCs and endothelial cells. EPCR is associated with its major ligand, activated protein C (aPC), in proximity to thrombomodulin-positive blood vessels, enforcing HSC integrin α4 adhesion and chemotherapy resistance in the context of CXCL12-CXCR4 niche retention signals. Protease-activated receptor 1-biased signaling by EPCR-aPC also maintains HSC retention, whereas thrombin signaling activates HSC motility and BM egress. Furthermore, HSC mobilization under stress is enhanced by the fibrinolytic and complement cascades that target HSCs and their BM niches. In addition, coagulation, fibrinolysis, and HSC-derived progeny, including megakaryocytes, synergize to reestablish functional perivascular HSC niches during BM stress. Therapeutic restoration of the anticoagulant pathway has preclinical efficacy in reversing BM failure following radiation injury, but questions remain about how antithrombotic therapy influences extravascular coagulation in HSC maintenance and hematopoiesis.

Utility of the Clinical Practice of Admnistering Thrombophilic Screening and Antithrombotic Prophylaxis with Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin to Healthy Donors Treated with G-Csf for Mobilization of Peripheral Blood Stem Cells

The aim of the study was to verify the utility of the clinical practice of administering thrombophilic screening and antithrombotic prophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin to healthy donors receiving granulocyte colony-stimulating factor to mobilize peripheral blood stem cells. Thrombophilia screening comprised of testing for factor V Leiden G1691A, prothrombin G20210A, the thermolabile variant (C677T) of the methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase gene, protein C, protein S, factor VIII and homocysteine plasmatic levels, antithrombin III activity, and acquired activated protein C resistance.

We investigated prospectively 72 white Italian healthy donors, 39 men and 33 women, with a median age of 42 years (range, 18-65). Five donors (6.9%) were heterozygous carriers of Factor V Leiden G1691A; two healthy donors had the heterozygous prothrombin G20210A gene mutation; C677T mutation in the methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase gene was present in 34 (47.2%) donors in heterozygous and in 7 donors (9.7%) in homozygous.

Acquired activated protein C resistance was revealed in 8 donors of the study (11.1%). The protein C plasmatic level was decreased in 3 donors (4.2%); the protein S level was decreased in 7 donors (9.7%). An elevated factor VIII dosage was shown in 10 donors (13.9%) and hyperhomocysteinemia in 9 donors (12.5%). Concentration of antithrombin III was in the normal range for all study group donors. The factor V Leiden mutation was combined with the heterozygous prothrombin G20210A in 2 cases and with protein S deficiency in one case; 2 healthy donors presented an associated deficiency of protein C and protein S. Although none of these healthy subjects had a previous history of thrombosis, low-molecular-weight heparin was administered to all donors during granulocyte colony-stimulating factor administration to prevent thrombotic events. No donor experienced short or long-term thrombotic diseases after a median follow-up of 29.2 months.

Our data do not support this clinical practice because there is no evidence that the combination of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor to previous hypercoagulable conditions results in thrombotic events.

Venous thromboembolic events in lymphoma patients: Actual relationships between epidemiology, mechanisms, clinical profile and treatment

Venous thromboembolic events (VTE) are an underestimated health problem in patients with lymphoma. Many factors contribute to the pathogenesis of thromboembolism and the interplay between various mechanisms that provoke VTE is still poorly understood. The identification of parameters that are associated with an increased risk of VTE in lymphoma patients led to the creation of several risk-assessment models. The models that evaluate potential VTE risk in lymphoma patients in particular are quite limited, and have to be validated in larger study populations. Furthermore, the VTE prophylaxis in lymphoma patients is largely underused, despite the incidence of VTE. The lack of adequate guidelines for the prophylaxis and treatment of VTE in lymphoma patients, together with a cautious approach due to an increased risk of bleeding, demands great efforts to ensure the implementation of current knowledge in order to reduce the incidence and complications of VTE in lymphoma patients.

Extracellular molecules in hematopoietic stem cell mobilisation

Hematopoietic stem cells are a remarkable resource currently used for the life saving treatment, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Today, hematopoietic stem cells are primarily obtained from mobilized peripheral blood following treatment of the donor with the cytokine G-CSF, and in some settings, chemotherapy and/or the CXCR4 antagonist plerixafor. The collection of hematopoietic stem cells is contingent on adequate and timely mobilization of these cells into the peripheral blood. The use of healthy donors, particularly when unrelated to the patient, requires mobilization strategies be safe for the donor. While current mobilization strategies are largely successful, adequate mobilization fails to occur in a significant portion of donors. Understanding the mechanisms involved in the egress of stem cells from the bone marrow provides opportunities to further improve the process of collecting hematopoietic stem cells. Here, the role extracellular components of the blood and bone marrow in the mobilization process are discussed.

Regulation of long-term repopulating hematopoietic stem cells by EPCR/PAR1 signaling

The common developmental origin of endothelial and hematopoietic cells is manifested by coexpression of several cell surface receptors. Adult murine bone marrow (BM) long-term repopulating hematopoietic stem cells (LT-HSCs), endowed with the highest repopulation and self-renewal potential, express endothelial protein C receptor (EPCR), which is used as a marker to isolate them. EPCR/protease-activated receptor-1 (PAR1) signaling in endothelial cells has anticoagulant and anti-inflammatory roles, while thrombin/PAR1 signaling induces coagulation and inflammation. Recent studies define two new PAR1-mediated signaling cascades that regulate EPCR(+) LT-HSC BM retention and egress. EPCR/PAR1 signaling facilitates LT-HSC BM repopulation, retention, survival, and chemotherapy resistance by restricting nitric oxide (NO) production, maintaining NO(low) LT-HSC BM retention with increased VLA4 expression, affinity, and adhesion. Conversely, acute stress and clinical mobilization upregulate thrombin generation and activate different PAR1 signaling that overcomes BM EPCR(+) LT-HSC retention, inducing their recruitment to the bloodstream. Thrombin/PAR1 signaling induces NO generation, TACE-mediated EPCR shedding, and upregulation of CXCR4 and PAR1, leading to CXCL12-mediated stem and progenitor cell mobilization. This review discusses new roles for factors traditionally viewed as coagulation related, which independently act in the BM to regulate PAR1 signaling in bone- and blood-forming progenitor cells, navigating their fate by controlling NO production.

Donors' health state the year after peripheral haematopoietic progenitor cell collection: A prospective follow-up study in related and unrelated donors compared to first-time platelet donors

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) mobilized peripheral haematopoietic progenitor cells collected by apheresis (HPC-A) are the most common source used for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Retrospective short and long-term donor follow-up studies show very low risks of serious complications and do not report compelling evidence of increased cancer occurrence. Some studies reported a prolonged period of leucopenia without an obvious association with infectious complications. However, beyond the first few weeks after the procedure a relationship between events is elusive. We therefore evaluated medical service utilization by prospectively recruited HPC-A donors and first-time platelet apheresis donors for comparison for 1 year after donation. Data were prospectively collected using questionnaires and by medical record review. A total of 215 HPC-A donors (111 unrelated donors and 104 related donors) and 96 first-time platelet donors consented to participation in the study. Follow-up was available for 202 (96%): questionnaires were returned by 74% and records from nonstudy contacts were available for 94% of donors. During the 1-year follow-up, 94 of the donors who returned questionnaires sought medical attention for diagnostic evaluation and/or treatment: 41% of HPC-A donors and 40% of platelet donors. Medical service utilization the first year after HPC-A donation is similar to that after first-time platelet donation. The occurrence of serious medical conditions in both related and unrelated HPC-A donors underscores the importance of participation in long-term follow-up in large cohorts. The findings in this relatively small cohort contribute to evidence on the safety of G-CSF mobilization and HPC-A. J. Clin. Apheresis 31:523-528, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Biosimilar granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor for healthy donor stem cell mobilization: need we be afraid?

Biosimilars are approved biologics with comparable quality, safety, and efficacy to a reference product. Unlike generics, which are chemically manufactured copies of small-molecule drugs with relatively simple chemical structures, the biosimilar designation is applied to drugs that are produced by living organisms, implying much more difficult to control manufacturing and purification procedures. To account for these complexities, the European Medicines Agency (EMA), the US Food and Drug Administration, the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration, and other regulatory authorities have devised and implemented specific, markedly more demanding pathways for the evaluation and approval of biosimilars. To date, several biosimilars have been approved, including versions of somatropin, erythropoietin, and granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), and several biosimilar monoclonal antibodies are currently in development. The reference G-CSF product (Neupogen, Amgen) has been used for many years for prevention and treatment of neutropenia and also for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs). However, concerns have been raised about the safety and efficacy of biosimilar G-CSF during PBSC mobilization procedures, especially in healthy donors. This article reviews the available evidence on the use of biosimilar G-CSF in this setting. Aggregate clinical evidence supports the assessment by the EMA of biosimilar and originator G-CSF as highly biologically similar, with respect to desired and undesired effects.

Thrombosis and hemostatic abnormalities in hematological malignancies

There is a paucity of data that pertain to thrombosis in patients with hematological malignancies. Recent studies showed that patients with lymphoma, multiple myeloma, and acute leukemia have an increased thrombotic risk, particularly at the time of diagnosis and during chemotherapy. We searched the PubMed database for articles on thromboembolic complications in patients with hematological malignancies published between 1996 and 2013. The incidence of thrombotic events is variable, and is influenced by the type and the stage of hematological malignancy, the antitumor therapy, and the use of central venous devices. The pathogenesis of thromboembolic disease in hematological malignancies is multifactorial. Tumor cell-derived procoagulant, fibrinolytic, or proteolytic factors, and inflammatory cytokines affect clotting activation, and chemotherapy and immunomodulatory drugs increase the thrombotic risk in patients with lymphoma, acute leukemia, and multiple myeloma. Infections might also contribute to the pathogenesis of the thromboembolic complications: endotoxins from gram-negative bacteria induce the release of tissue factor, tumor necrosis factor and interleukin-1b, and gram-positive organisms can release bacterial mucopolysaccharides that directly activate factor XII. In the setting of plasma cell dyscrasias, hyperviscosity, decreased fibrinolysis, procoagulant autoantibody production, inflammatory cytokines, acquired activated protein C resistance, and the prothrombotic effects of antimyeloma agents might be the cause of thromboembolic complications. Anticoagulant therapy is very complicated because of high risk of hemorrhage. Therefore, an accurate estimate of a patient's thrombotic risk is essential to allow physicians to target thromboprophylaxis in high-risk patients.

Harvesting autologous stem cells from a patient with red blood cell abnormalities of β-thalassemia intermedia

BACKGROUND

Autologous stem cell transplants in patients with hemoglobinopathies are limited. Previous reports used granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for mobilization of stem cells; there are no reported cases undergoing plerixafor mobilization. We report such a patient, providing guidance for peripheral blood stem cells collection when aberrant red blood cells (RBCs) disrupt normal separation.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A patient with β-thalassemia intermedia and hereditary persistence of fetal hemoglobin presented for peripheral blood stem cell collection for autologous transplant for myeloma. He underwent splenectomy for anemia secondary to hemoglobinopathy and chemotherapy, ceasing RBC transfusions. The patient was mobilized using plerixafor after collection with G-CSF failed.

RESULTS

Collections were performed using an apheresis system, processing 24 L daily. Peripheral blood and apheresis product CD34 determinations were performed daily. On Day 1, the product yield was 0.04 × 10(6) CD34 cells/kg, less than expected based on white blood cell count and CD34-positive cells. Peripheral blood smear showed nucleated RBCs and RBC morphologic abnormalities. Changes in instrument variables were made after consultation with Terumo BCT to adjust for variable distribution of mononuclear and stem cells during centrifugation. Collecting stem cells at a deeper location and centrifuging faster improved collection, and a cumulative total of 4.40 × 10(6) CD34 cells/kg was achieved after four collections. The patient underwent tandem autologous transplantation and engrafted within 12 to 13 days of each transplant.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjustments in apheresis variables allowed successful collection of peripheral blood stem cells from a patient with RBC anomalies of β-thalassemia that interfered with standard stem cell harvesting.

Acute myocardial infarction caused by filgrastim: a case report

Common uses of the granulocyte-colony stimulating factors in the clinical practice raise the concern about side effects of these agents. We presented a case report about an acute myocardial infarction with non-ST segment elevation during filgrastim administration. A 73-year-old man had squamous cell carcinoma of larynx with lung metastasis treated with the chemotherapy. Second day after the filgrastim, patient had a chest discomfort. An ECG was performed and showed an ST segment depression and negative T waves on inferior derivations. A coronary angiography had showed a critical lesion in right coronary arteria. This is the first study thats revealed that G-CSF can cause acute myocardial infarction in cancer patients without history of cardiac disease. Patients with chest discomfort and pain who are on treatment with G-CSF or GM-CSF must alert the physicians for acute coronary events.

New strategies for stem cell mobilization

Mobilized peripheral blood (PB) is widely used as source of stem cells (PBSCs) for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). The use of cytokines, alone or in combination with chemotherapy (chemomobilization), is the most common strategy applied to mobilize and collect PBSCs. However, a significant proportion of cancer patients fail to mobilize enough PBSCs to proceed to ASCT. Plerixafor is a small molecule that reversibly and transiently disrupts the interaction between the chemokine receptor CXCR4 and its ligand CXCL12 (formerly known as stroma derived factor 1, SDF-1) leading to the rapid release of CD34⁺ hematopoietic stem cells from the bone marrow (BM) to PB. Plerixafor has been recently approved to enhance PBSC mobilization in adult patients with multiple myeloma or non-Hodgkin lymphoma and has been shown to be more effective than G-CSF alone. There is limited experience on combining plerixafor with chemotherapy plus G-CSF in patients who mobilize poorly. Current evidence suggests that the addition of plerixafor is safe and effective in the large majority of the patients with low blood CD34⁺ cell count after mobilization and/or poor yield after the first collection(s). Circulating CD34⁺ cells can be increased by several folds with plerixafor and the majority of the patients considered “poor mobilizers” can be successfully collected. Overall, its mechanism of action inducing the rapid release of CD34⁺ cells from the BM to the circulation makes plerixafor suitable for the ‘preemptive’ use in patients who are hard-to-mobilize.

Thromboembolic and bleeding complications in acute leukemia

The risk of both thromboembolic and bleeding complications is high in acute leukemia. This double hazard has a significant negative impact on the morbidity and mortality of patients with this disease. The clinical manifestations of both complications show special features specific to the form of acute leukemia. Recognition of these characteristics is important in the diagnosis and management of acute leukemia. In this article, several additional issues are addressed, including the features of bleeding and thrombosis in acute promyelocytic leukemia, the current understanding of the leukostasis syndrome and the iatrogenic complications including catheter-associated thrombosis, and the adverse effects of therapeutic agents used in acute leukemia. As regards the bleeding complications, thrombocytopenia is a major cause. Corrective measures, including recent guidelines on platelet transfusions, are provided.

Bone marrow as a source of hematopoietic stem cells for human gene therapy of β-thalassemia

β-Thalassemia is a severe inherited anemia caused by insufficient production of β-globin chains. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation is currently the only cure, and is limited by donor availability and regimen-related toxicity and mortality. Gene therapy is a promising therapeutic tool for all thalassemic patients lacking a compatible donor and potentially provides transfusion independence in the absence of transplant-related complications, such as graft rejection and graft-versus-host disease. The issue of HSC procurement is critical in this setting because of the specific features of thalassemic syndromes, which include bone marrow (BM) expansion, ineffective erythropoiesis, and splenomegaly. Little is known about the efficiency of CD34(+) cell yield from steady-state BM harvests from thalassemic patients. We have collected data on safety and cell yield from 20 pediatric patients with β-thalassemia who underwent autologous BM harvest before allogeneic HSC transplantation, and from 49 age-matched sibling donors who also underwent BM harvest. The procedure was safe, as no significant adverse events occurred. In terms of cell yield, no difference was found between patients and normal donors in the number of CD34(+) cells and total nucleated cells harvested. Most importantly, no difference was found in the proportion of myeloid and erythroid progenitors, suggesting a similar repopulating capacity. On the basis of these results, we conclude that steady-state BM can be used as a safe and efficient source of HSC for gene therapy of β-thalassemia.

Increased platelet aggregation and in vivo platelet activation after granulocyte colony-stimulating factor administration. A randomised controlled trial

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) stimulates the bone marrow to produce granulocytes and stem cells and is widely used to accelerate neutrophil recovery after chemotherapy. Interestingly, specific G-CSF receptors have been demonstrated not only on myeloid cells, but also on platelets. Data on the effects of G-CSF on platelet function are limited and partly conflicting. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of G-CSF on platelet aggregation and in vivo platelet activation. Seventy-eight, healthy volunteers were enrolled into this randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Subjects received 5 μg/kg methionyl human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (r-metHuG-CSF, filgrastim) or placebo subcutaneously for four days. We determined platelet aggregation with a whole blood impedance aggregometer with various, clinically relevant platelet agonists (adenosine diphosphate [ADP], collagen, arachidonic acid [AA], ristocetin and thrombin receptor activating peptide 6 [TRAP]). Filgrastim injection significantly enhanced ADP (+40%), collagen (+60%) and AA (+75%)-induced platelet aggregation (all p<0.01 as compared to placebo and p<0.001 as compared to baseline). In addition, G-CSF enhanced ristocetin-induced platelet aggregation (+18%) whereas TRAP-induced platelet aggregation decreased slightly (-14%) in response to filgrastim. While baseline aggregation with all agonists was only slightly but insignificantly higher in women than in men, this sex difference was enhanced by G-CSF treatment, and became most pronounced for ADP after five days (p<0.001). Enhanced platelet aggregation translated into a 75% increase in platelet activation as measured by circulating soluble P-selectin. G-CSF enhances platelet aggregation and activation in humans. This may put patients suffering from cardiovascular disease and cancer at risk for thrombotic events.

Single dose granulocyte colony-stimulating factor markedly enhances shear-dependent platelet function in humans

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) has been associated with the induction of a hypercoagulable state in patients as well as peripheral blood stem donors. Interestingly, sparse data exist on the kinetics of platelet and coagulation activation in response to G-CSF and it is unknown if G-CSF augments shear-dependent platelet function. These two issues are addressed in the current trial. Thirty-six healthy volunteers were enrolled into this study. All subjects received a single-dose of 5 microg/kg filgrastim intravenously. The effects of recombinant G-CSF on platelet and coagulation function were assessed by the platelet function analyzer PFA-100 (collagen/epinephrine (CEPI-CT), collagen/ADP (CADP-CT) closure times), von Willebrand factor activity (vWF : RiCO) ELISA, tissue factor (TF)-mRNA expression on circulating leukocytes and rotation thrombelastography (ROTEM). G-CSF time-dependently enhanced shear dependent platelet function measured by the PFA-100: CEPI-CT declined by 48% and CADP-CT by 31% with nadir values after 24 h (p < 0.001 as compared to baseline) and returned to near-baseline values after 72 hours. In accordance, VWF : RiCO increased by 59% after 24 h (p < 0.001) and returned to baseline 48 h later. TF-mRNA peaked after 4 hours (>6 fold increase p < 0.001) and reached near-baseline values after 24 hours. Nadir closure times were seen after 24 hours (-15%; p < 0.001). Single-dose administration of 5 microg/kg G-CSF significantly enhances shear-dependent platelet function and strongly induces leukocyte TF-mRNA, which translates into shortened clotting times ex vivo.

RhG-CSF improves radiation-induced myelosuppression and survival in the canine exposed to fission neutron irradiation

Fission-neutron radiation damage is hard to treat due to its critical injuries to hematopoietic and gastrointestinal systems, and so far few data are available on the therapeutic measures for neutron-radiation syndrome. This study was designed to test the effects of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) in dogs which had received 2.3 Gy mixed fission-neutron-γ irradiation with a high ratio of neutrons (~90%). Following irradiation, rhG-CSF treatment induced 100% survival versus 60% in controls. Only two of five rhG-CSF-treated dogs experienced leukopenia (white blood cells [WBC] count < 1.0 × 10(9)/L) and neutropenia (neutrophil [ANC] count < 0.5 × 10(9)/L), whereas all irradiated controls displayed a profound period of leukopenia and neutropenia. Furthermore, administration of rhG-CSF significantly delayed the onset of leukopenia and reduced the duration of leucopenia as compared with controls. In addition, individual dogs in the rhG-CSF-treated group exhibited evident differences in rhG-CSF responsiveness after neutron-irradiation. Finally, histopathological evaluation of the surviving dogs revealed that the incidence and severity of bone marrow, thymus and spleen damage decreased in rhG-CSF-treated dogs as compared with surviving controls. Thus, these results demonstrated that rhG-CSF administration enhanced recovery of myelopoiesis and survival after neutron-irradiation.

Low risk of symptomatic venous thromboembolic events during growth factor administration for PBSC mobilization

The use of erythropoietic agents has been associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolic events (VTEs), especially in patients with underlying malignancies. However, it is not known whether there is an increased risk of VTE associated with granulocyte growth factors. We reviewed 621 patients undergoing PBSC mobilization using granulocyte growth factors, alone or in combination with CY. Patients with a diagnosis of AL amyloidosis (AL: 114; 18%), multiple myeloma (MM: 278; 44%) Hodgkin lymphoma (HL: 20; 3%) or non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL: 209; 33%) were included. Symptomatic VTE occurred in six (0.97%) patients: two AL, two MM and two NHL. Of the six patients, two had pulmonary embolism, one developed deep vein thrombosis and three developed symptomatic catheter related thrombosis. Two patients with AL had heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis. We found a low incidence of VTE among patients undergoing PBSC mobilization.

Thrombotic microangiopathy during peripheral blood stem cell mobilization

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) is currently the most widely used cytokine for stem cell mobilization. There are few studies suggesting GCSF administration may induce activation of both coagulation and endothelial cells that could favor the developing of thrombotic events. We report a 58-year-old female with vasculitis and renal impairment. She was found to have an underlying monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance (MGUS). The monoclonal protein was felt to play a role in her underlying renal disease and peripheral neuropathy. She was considered a candidate for peripheral blood stem cell transplantation to manage the monoclonal protein. During stem cell mobilization with GCSF, she developed worsening of anemia; thrombocytopenia and worsening of renal function. She was diagnosed with thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) which was successfully treated with therapeutic plasma exchange and rituximab. It is possible that GCSF may have directly (activating endothelial cells) or indirectly (activation of underlying autoimmune disorder) contributed to TMA in this patient.

Ten-year follow-up of unrelated volunteer granulocyte donors who have received multiple cycles of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor and dexamethasone

BACKGROUND

The combination of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and dexamethasone is an effective granulocyte mobilization regimen. The short-term side effects of G-CSF are well studied, but the potential long-term effects of repeated G-CSF stimulation in unrelated volunteer granulocyte donors have not been reported.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Donors who had received G-CSF three or more times for granulocytapheresis between 1994 and 2002 were identified and attempts were made to contact them if they were no longer active donors. They were matched with control platelet (PLT) donors for sex, age, and approximate number of cytapheresis donations. A health history was obtained and complete blood counts (CBCs) and C-reactive protein (CRP) determined where feasible.

RESULTS

Ninety-two granulocyte donors were identified, and 83 of them were contacted. They contributed to 1120 granulocyte concentrates, or a mean of 13.5 granulocytapheresis procedures per donor (and a mean of 87.5 plateletpheresis procedures per donor). There was no difference in CBCs between the granulocyte donors and the control PLT donors. There was no difference in CRP between the two groups, and no difference in pre- and post-G-CSF CRP in a subset of 22 granulocyte donors. Predefined health events included malignancies, coronary artery disease, and thrombosis. At a median 10-year follow-up, there were seven such events in the granulocyte donors and five in the PLT donors.

CONCLUSION

Although the number of granulocyte donors studied is small and continued surveillance of healthy individuals after G-CSF is prudent, our data suggest that G-CSF/dexamethasone stimulation appears to be safe.

Effects and safety of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in healthy volunteers

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) is now widely used in normal donors for collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells for allogeneic transplantation and granulocytes for transfusion. Currently available data on biologic and molecular effects, and safety of rhG-CSF in normal healthy volunteers are reviewed.

RECENT FINDINGS

In addition to its known activating role on neutrophil kinetics and functional status, rhG-CSF administration can affect monocytes, lymphocytes and the hemostatic system. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor receptors were identified in a variety of nonmyeloid tissues, although their role and functional activity have not always been well defined. Moreover, rhG-CSF is capable of modulating complex cytokine networks and can impact the inflammatory response. In addition to its known mobilizing role for peripheral blood progenitor cells, rhG-CSF can mobilize dendritic and endothelial progenitor cells as well. On a clinical level, serious rhG-CSF-related adverse events are well described (e.g. splenic rupture) but remain rare.

SUMMARY

rhG-CSF effects in healthy volunteers, although normally transient and self-limiting, are now believed to be more complex and heterogeneous than previously thought. Although rhG-CSF administration to healthy volunteers continues to have a favorable risk-benefit profile, these new findings have implications for safeguarding the safety of normal individuals.

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor administration: adverse events

Recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) has been in clinical use for approximately 2 decades. In healthy donors, it has been used to mobilize peripheral blood progenitor cells for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and granulocytes for apheresis collection. In patients, it has been used to decrease the duration of neutropenia after chemotherapy and to offset the neutropenia due to myelodysplasia, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, and genetic disorders of granulocyte production. As the number of uses of G-CSF in clinical practice grows, more side effects of this generally safe pharmaceutical agent are being recognized. Our objective in this article is to provide an in-depth review of the reported adverse events associated with the use of G-CSF.

Effects of rhG-CSF Plus Dexamethasone on Hemostatic Parameters in Healthy Granulocyte Donors: Role of u-PA and Nitric Oxide

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is widely used to reduce the risk of infection resulting from neutropenias and to mobilize and collect CD34+ hematopoetic progenitor cells (HPCs) for autologous and allogenic transplantation. The safety of recombinant human G-CSF (rhG-CSF) administration in healthy donors has been investigated in several studies. However, there are limited cumulative data about the effects of rhG-CSF on hemostasis. Hemostatic parameters, including urokinase-type plasminogen activator antigen (u-PA:Ag) and nitric oxide in 17 healthy granulocyte apheresis donors who donated for neutropenic patients were evaluated. rhG-CSF (single dose, 10 μg/kg subcutaneously) and dexamethasone (8 mg, single dose oral) were given to donors 12 hours before granulocyte apheresis. Two blood samples were drawn at time 0 (T0) before rhG-CSF and dexamethasone administration and at time 1 (T1), immediately before the apheresis. A statistically significant rise in coagulant factor VIII (FVIII) and von Willebrand factor (vWF), and slightly rise in u-PA:Ag were observed after G-CSF plus dexamethasone administration. In addition, there were positive correlations between vWF-D-dimer and FVIII-D-dimer. A significant decrease in mean total nitric oxide (NOx), nitrite, and nitrate levels was also found after G-CSF plus dexamethasone administration. Moreover, there was a strong negative correlation between nitrite and D-dimer levels ( r = −0.611; P = .009). Even if partially compensated with u-PA and protein C, increased FVIII and vWF activity, and decreased nitric oxide levels may still partially contribute to progress of thrombosis risk in rhG-CSF plus dexamethasone administered healthy granulocyte donors. Large numbers of healthy donors exposed to G-CSF plus dexamethasone will be needed to evaluate the risk of thrombosis in this population.

Biologic and molecular effects of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in healthy individuals: recent findings and current challenges

Recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) is widely used in healthy donors for collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) for allogeneic transplantation and granulocytes for transfusion. The spectrum of its biologic and molecular activities in healthy individuals is coming into sharper focus, creating a unique set of challenges and clarifying the need to monitor and safeguard donor safety. Accumulating evidence indicates that rhG-CSF effects are not limited to the myeloid cell lineage. This may reflect the presence of functional G-CSF receptors on other cell types and tissues, as well as rhG-CSF-induced modulation of cytokine networks. While most rhG-CSF-induced effects are transient and self-limiting, preliminary, provocative data have suggested the possibility of a more durable effect on the chromosomal integrity of lymphocytes. While these reports have not been validated and have been subject to criticism, they are prompting prospective studies and monitoring efforts to determine whether there is a significant risk of long-term adverse events (eg, hematologic malignancies) in healthy PBPC and granulocyte donors. Based on the totality of information that is currently available, the administration of rhG-CSF to healthy donors for the purpose of PBPC donation continues to have a favorable risk-benefit profile.

Administration of granulocyte colony stimulating factor after liver transplantation leads to an increased incidence and severity of ischemic biliary lesions in the rat model

AIM: Recently it has been reported that granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) can induce hypercoagulability in healthy bone marrow donors. It is conceivable that the induction of a prothrombotic state in a recipient of an organ graft with already impaired perfusion might cause further deterioration in the transplanted organ. This study evaluated whether G-CSF treatment worsens liver perfusion following liver transplantation in the rat model.

METHODS: A non-arterialized rat liver transplantation model was employed to evaluate the effect of G-CSF treatment on the liver in a syngeneic and allogeneic strain combination. Study outcomes included survival time and liver damage as investigated by liver enzymes and liver histology. Observation times were 1 d, 1 wk and 12 wk.

RESULTS: Rats treated with G-CSF had increased incidence and severity of biliary damage following liver transplantation. In these animals, hepatocellular necrosis was accentuated in the centrilobular region. These lesions are indicative of impaired perfusion in G-CSF treated animals.

CONCLUSION: G-CSF should be used with caution in recipients of liver transplantation, as treatment might enhance preexisting, undetected perfusion problems and ultimately lead to ischemia induced biliary complications.

Growth factors in haematological cancers

Since their discovery just under a century ago, growth factors (GFs) have been used almost ubiquitously in haematology. Many haematological cancers are associated with bone marrow failure, either as a direct consequence of the disease or its treatment. Colony stimulating factors (CSFs) have been used to address the problems associated with the resulting cytopenias, however, concerns about the potential leukaemogenic effects of some of these CSFs led to a degree of initial hesitancy in usage, particularly in the management of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). This has now been largely overcome. Other limitations have included cost and side effect profiles (the latter particularly with the multilineage factors). There has been wide variation locally, nationally and internationally in the usage of GFs. The American Society of Clinical Oncologists (ASCO) attempted to rationalise the usage of GFs by producing a consensus document enumerating the evidence-based indications for use of GFs. There is little information on cost effectiveness, this remains an important issue for the future. Peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) has revolutionised the management of many malignant conditions and has contributed to the increased use of growth factors. Many other indications are emerging for GFs used singly or in combination. Current clinical applications of GFs include: i) amelioration of cytopenias following chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation, ii) chemotherapy dose maintenance and escalation, iii) chemosensitisation and modification of disease states, iv) optimisation of methods for mobilisation of progenitor stem cells, v) immunotherapy, and vi) as therapeutic targets for treatment of haematolgical malignancies.

Factors affecting the efficacy of peripheral blood progenitor cells collections by large-volume leukaphereses with standardized processing volumes

BACKGROUND

Peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) collections should be safe and efficient. Therefore, the influence and risk factors in large-volume leukaphereses (LVL) with standardized blood volumes was investigated.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

In a total of 724 autologous LVL performed at our center, either 4x or 6x the patient's blood volume (PBV) was processed. The group with processing 4x the PBV showed a median of 31 circulating CD34+ cells per microL, and the group with processing 6x the PBV had a median of 13 CD34+ cells per microL before LVL. Individual clinical factors, laboratory factors, and apheresis run variables influencing the yields of PBPCs were retrospectively analyzed. Furthermore, the changes of laboratory variables and adverse effects during LVL were investigated.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis identified "age,""circulating CD34+ cells," and "percentage of mononuclear cells" as only factors influencing the yields of PBPCs. Altogether, processing 6x versus 4x the PBV did not result in significantly higher yields of CD34+ cells for the total group, but requested PBPC yields were achieved more often after processing 6x the PBV in patients below 20 CD34+ cells per microL blood. Processing 6x versus 4x the PBV showed a significant difference for the decrease of platelets, but not for any other laboratory variable. Adverse effects were recorded in 4.97 percent of LVL without accumulation in one group.

CONCLUSION

In particular, patients with low amounts of circulating CD34+ cells profited from enlarged LVL demonstrating higher PBPC yields but comparable rates of adverse effects.

Administration of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor for allogeneic hematopoietic cell collection may induce the tissue factor-dependent pathway in healthy donors

The hypercoagulable state caused by the use of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) has been cited in anecdotal reports. Since tissue factor (TF) is the main initiator of the coagulation cascade, we examined if rhG-CSF had an inductive effect on the TF-dependent pathway in 18 healthy donors receiving rhG-CSF (10 microg/kg/day x 5 days) for peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization. After rhG-CSF, there were increases both in TF antigen (TF:Ag) (P=0.01) and TF procoagulant activity (TF:PCA) (P=0.06) plasma levels and in TF:Ag cytofluorimetric expression on CD33 (+) cells (P=0.04). Mean activities of FVIII and vWF also increased significantly. Thrombin time was slightly prolonged (P=0.06) due to significant increases in plasma D-dimer levels. In addition, while FIX activity remained stable, there were marked reductions in mean plasma FX and FII activities and a slight decrease in FVII activity that resulted in a significant prolongation of prothrombin time within normal ranges. In conclusion, the administration of rhG-CSF led to a "prothrombotic state" via stimulation of TF and increased endothelial markers, such as F VIII and vWF. In the light of these findings, the use of rhG-CSF for stem cell mobilization should be undertaken cautiously in healthy donors with underlying thrombotic risk factors.

Circulatory arrest during PBPC apheresis in an unrelated donor

BACKGROUND

Nowadays, the collection of PBPCs by apheresis from healthy donors is a routine method. The mobilization with rHu G-CSF and the apheresis procedures are usually well tolerated without severe side effects.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We report a severe complication in a 41-year-old unrelated female donor who was allowed to donate PBPCs and was mobilized with 10 microg of G-CSF per kg per day. During PBPC apheresis, she experienced a circulatory arrest after 132 minutes and processing of 7078 mL of blood (twice the donor's blood volume).

RESULTS

Immediate cardiopulmonary resuscitation restored sinus rhythm and regulatory respiration without sequelae. Subsequent cardiologic examinations (heart catheterization, electrophysiologic testing, tilting table test) resulted in the diagnosis of a neurocardiogenic syncope. Other cardiac or circulatory disorders could be excluded. The implantation of a cardiac pacemaker was recommended to the donor. The 4-year-old recipient was successfully transplanted with the partial product collected until the arrest occurred. The patient received a total of 2.54 x 106 CD34+ cells per kg of body weight.

CONCLUSION

After exclusion of other cardiac diseases, the diagnosed neurocardiogenic syncope probably induced the circulatory arrest during apheresis rather than the administration of G-CSF.

Induction of a hypercoagulability state and endothelial cell activation by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in peripheral blood stem cell donors

In June, 1997, we initiated a prospective study to analyze the effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) on coagulation system in peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) donors following G-CSF administration. Since, 25 consecutively healthy donors received G-CSF (filgrastim) to mobilize and collect PBSC and 20 donors were finally included in the study. Blood samples were collected immediately before starting G-CSF and prior to PBSC collection to analyze the following parameters: prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), fibrinogen, hypercoagulability markers (D-dimer, TAT complex, F1 + 2), natural anticoagulants (antithrombin, protein C, protein S), endothelial activation markers [von Willebrand factor antigen (vWF:Ag) and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE)], and resistance to activated protein C. We found a significant increase in F1 + 2 and D-dimer while a significant decrease of antithrombin and protein C activity was evidenced. Regarding endothelial cell activation markers, a significant increase of vWF:Ag with a slightly significant decrease of ACE were also observed. Therefore, in PBSC donors receiving G-CSF our results reveal activation of both coagulation and endothelial cells that could favor the developing of thrombotic events. In consequence, a careful monitoring should be considered in those cases with risk factors for thrombosis.

Donation of stem cells from blood or bone marrow: results of a randomised study of safety and complaints

Biological consequences and physical complaints were compared for donors randomly assigned either to blood stem cell (BSC) or bone marrow (BM) donation. In the period 1994-1999, 61 consecutive donors were included. The BSC donors were given G-CSF 10 microg/kg s.c., daily during 5 days before the first leukapheresis. Nineteen donors had one leukapheresis, 10 required two and one donor needed three leukaphereses in order to reach the target cell number of 2 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg bw of the recipient. A median platelet nadir of 102 x 10(9)/l was reached shortly after the last leukapheresis. Three weeks post harvest, 17 of 30 BSC donors had a mild leukopenia. Six had a leukopenia lasting more than a year before returning to normal values. Both groups were monitored prospectively through a standardised questionnaire completed by the donors. BSC donation was significantly less burdensome than BM donation and was preferred by the donors. The short-term risks of BSC mobilisation and harvest seem negligible. The potential long-term effects of G-CSF are unresolved and the donors must be followed closely.

Allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) from HLA-identical sibling donors in children with hematological diseases: a single center pilot study

Between February 1995 and July 1999 25 pediatric patients (8 months to 14 years old) underwent peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) from an HLA-identical sibling donor. Diagnoses included ALL (17), non-ALL (6), and non-malignant disease (2). GVHD prophylaxis consisted of cyclosporine plus methotrexate (15), only cyclosporine (8), cyclosporine plus prednisone (1), or nothing (1). All donors (6 months to 41 years old) received G-CSF at 10 microg/kg/day subcutaneously for 4-5 days and on day 5 underwent large volume leukapheresis. Median number of CD34(+) and CD3(+) cells collected and infused was 6.9 x 10(6) (range 2.5-32.8) and 4.5 x 10(8) (0.5-22.1) per kg of recipient body weight respectively. Median time to achieve ANC >0.5 x 10(9)/l and platelets >20 x 10(9)/l was 10 and 12 days, respectively. Acute GVHD grade > or =II developed in 10 of 24 evaluable patients (42%). Probability of acute GVHD was 62%. Median time to discharge was 25 days (range 14-52). Among 20 evaluable patients, five (25%) developed chronic GVHD at day 100. Probability of chronic GVHD was 29% after 1 year post PBSC. At a median follow-up of 558 (9-2071) days, overall survival for the whole group is 68%. Probabilities of event-free survival, overall survival and relapse for patients with malignant hematological diseases are 53%, 59% and 24% at 5 years, respectively. This study has confirmed the feasibility and safety of mobilization and collection of PBSC products and the applicability of this procedure to the pediatric population, both donors and recipients. Studies including larger numbers of pediatric patients undergoing allogeneic PBSCT are warranted to determine the long-term outcomes of such procedures.