Immunotherapy of relapsed resistant chronic myelogenous leukemia post allogeneic bone marrow transplantation with alloantigen pulsed donor lymphocytes

T-cell immune suppression in patients with hematologic malignancies: clinical implications

SUMMARY 

The reversion of immune suppression and restoration of T-cell function against leukemia remains a significant clinical challenge. However, the advent of improved antileukemia-specific T-cell induction and the generation of gene-modified T cells has extended cellular immunotherapy to hematological malignancies. Numerous immunotherapeutic protocols have been developed aiming to enhance antileukemia T-cell immune function, eliminate leukemic cells and prevent relapse. By contrast, abnormal expression of CTLA-4 and PD1/PD-L1 plays a critical role in effector T-cell responses and increases Treg suppressive activity in patients with tumors; therefore, blocking CTLA-4, PD1 and PD-L1 is a novel approach for immunotherapy.

Indications and outcomes of reduced-toxicity hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in adult patients with hematological malignancies

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) utilizing non-myeloablative (NMA) and reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens (collectively referred to as reduced-toxicity HCT, RT-HCT) has become a viable therapeutic option for patients with hematological malignancies who are ineligible for standard myeloablative conditioning transplantation (MA-HCT). RT-HCT has been shown to induce stable engraftment with low toxicity, and to produce similar overall and progression-free survival (PFS) when compared to MA-HCT in acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome. The best results for RT-HCT have been reported for patients with disease that is in remission, indolent and chemosensitive, and with a strong graft-versus-malignancy effect. Chronic graft-versus-host disease seems to correlate with a lower relapse rate and better PFS. RT-HCT is inferior when performed in poor risk or advanced disease, due to high relapse rates. A search for novel strategies that includes the most appropriate conditioning regimens and post-transplant immunomodulation protocols with more intensive anti-malignancy activity but limited toxicity is in progress. This review provides an update on the results of clinical studies of RT-HCT, and discusses possible indications and investigative strategies for improving the clinical outcomes of RT-HCT for the major hematological malignancies.

Immunotherapy in high-risk chemotherapy-resistant patients with metastatic solid tumors and hematological malignancies using intentionally mismatched donor lymphocytes activated with rIL-2: a phase I study

The feasibility and safety of immunotherapy mediated by intentionally mismatched rIL-2 activated killer lymphocytes (IMAK) with no prior stem cell engraftment was investigated in patients with advanced chemotherapy-resistant hematological malignancies and metastatic solid tumors. Our goals were to maximize anti-cancer activity by using intentionally mismatched donor lymphocytes; amplify killing of target cancer cells by rIL-2 activation of killer cells in vitro and in vivo, and avoid the risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) by anticipated rejection of alloreactive donor lymphocytes. Conditioning consisted of 5 days of fludarabine 25 mg/m(2) or a single dose of cyclophosphamide 1,000 mg/m(2), 2 subcutaneous injections of alpha interferon (IFN) 3 x 10(6) and COX2 inhibitors, followed by administration of IMAK (65 +/- 5 CD3(+)CD56(-); 17 +/- 5 CD3(-)CD56(+)) in conjunction with low dose subcutaneous rIL-2 (6 x 10(6) IU/m(2)/day) for 5 days for continuous activation of alloreactive donor lymphocytes prior to their anticipated rejection. Here, we present our phase 1 clinical study data in a cohort of 40 high-risk patients with metastatic solid tumors and hematological malignancies. Treatment was accompanied by some malaise and occasional self-limited fever but otherwise well tolerated on an outpatient basis. Transient engraftment of donor cells was documented in two patients and only one developed self-limited grade 1 GVHD. Among patients with chemotherapy-resistant disease, long-term progression-free survival was recorded in 5 of 21 evaluable patients with metastatic solid tumors and in four of five patients with hematological malignancies. We conclude that the proposed procedure is feasible, safe, and potentially effective, with some otherwise resistant cancer patients long-term disease-free, thus justifying larger Phase II studies in patients with hematological malignancies and metastatic solid tumors, preferably at a stage of minimal residual disease with the goal in mind to eradicate all malignant cells at an early stage of the disease.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the elderly

The development of reduced intensity or non-myeloablative conditioning (NST) in preparation for allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) revolutionized the field and led to reconsideration of the dogma of upper age limit that was set up by the transplant centers as an eligibility parameter. Analysis of the literature data showed that NST regimens are associated with decreased transplant related mortality, and graft-versus-host disease, in comparison with standard myeloablative conditioning, in patients above the age of 50-55 years, or in younger patients with significant comorbidities. However we have to mention, that our considerations are based on the retrospective analysis of the literature data, and that well controlled prospective randomized studies are needed in order to definitely assess the role of NST. Comorbidity indices might be proved as the most important parameters for the choice of the most proper regimen for each patient in need and should be included in future trials.

Long term disease-free survival in acute leukemia patients recovering with increased γδ T cells after partially mismatched related donor bone marrow transplantation

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has improved leukemia-free survival (LFS) in many but not all patients with acute leukemia. This is an eight-year follow-up to our previous study showing a survival advantage to patients with an increased gammadelta T cells following ASCT. gammadelta T cell levels were collected prospectively in 153 patients (acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) n = 77; acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) n = 76) undergoing partially mismatched related donor ASCT. Median age was 22 years (1-59), and 62% of the patients were in relapse at transplant. Patient-donor human leukocyte antigen (HLA) disparity of three antigens was 37% in the graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) and 29% in the rejection directions. All patients received a partially T cell-depleted graft using T10B9 (n = 46) or OKT3 (n = 107). Five years LFS and overall survival (OS) of patients with increased gammadelta compared to those with normal/decreased numbers were 54.4 vs 19.1%; P < 0.0003, and 70.8 vs 19.6% P < 0.0001, respectively, with no difference in GvHD (P = 0.96). In a Cox multivariate analysis, normal/decreased gammadelta (hazard ratio (HR) 4.26, P = 0.0002) and sex mismatch (HR 1.45 P=0.049) were associated with inferior LFS. In conclusion, gammadelta T cells may facilitate a graft-versus-leukemia (GvL) effect, without causing GvHD. Further evaluations of this effect may lead to specific immunotherapy for patients with refractory leukemia.

Safety and efficacy of donor lymphocyte infusions following mismatched stem cell transplantation

The use of a mismatched allograft necessitates T cell depletion for prevention of uncontrolled graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), thus impairing a graft-versus-leukemia effect. Data on donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) after mismatched stem cell transplantation are lacking. Our experience with 28 patients (treated with 59 mismatched DLIs; range, 1-7) is described. The procedure was prophylactic in 6 patients (9 DLIs) and therapeutic in 22 (50 DLIs). DLI dose ranged from 10(2) to 1.5 x 10(9) T cells/kg. In the 6 patients receiving prophylactic DLI, complete remission was maintained in 5; however, 2 died from GVHD. Clinical response to therapeutic DLI was seen in 6 of 22 (27.3%) patients; a greater tumor burden produced a lower response. GVHD appeared in 13 of 28 patients. Surprisingly, a greater HLA mismatch was associated with a lower risk of GVHD, with 3 of 19 DLIs in 3/6 matching and 16 of 29 DLIs in 5/6 matching with similar follow-up. Nevertheless, no correlation between efficacy and HLA mismatching was noted. Death was frequent and usually related to the basic disease rather than to DLI complications. We conclude that mismatched DLI is feasible and may be effective, especially if given soon after transplantation. Future developments using cell therapy with selective or targeted anticancer activity are warranted, with special attention to prophylactic treatment of T cell depleted mismatched allografts recipients.

Novel approaches in allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Allogeneic transplantation remains an integral part of the management of hematologic malignancies. However, transplant-related mortality, graft-versus-host disease, and disease recurrence continue to be major limitations to successful transplant outcomes and challenges to investigators in the field. Newer approaches have focused on reduction of the intensity of the conditioning regimens, harnessing the antitumor effects of the allograft, and development of adoptive immunotherapy strategies to circumvent the limitations. These developments provide physicians with the ability to tailor transplants to specific patients and their diseases.

Induction of Early Post-Transplant Graft-versus-Leukemia Effects Using Intentionally Mismatched Donor Lymphocytes and Elimination of Alloantigen-Primed Donor Lymphocytes for Prevention of Graft-versus-Host Disease

Graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effects can be induced in tolerant mixed chimeras prepared with nonmyeloablative conditioning. GVL effects can be amplified by post-grafting donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI). Unfortunately, DLI is frequently associated with graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). We investigated the feasibility of induction of potent GVL effects by DLI using intentionally mismatched lymphocytes followed by elimination of alloreactive donor T cells by cyclophosphamide for prevention of lethal GVHD following induction of very short yet most potent GVL effects. Mice inoculated with B-cell leukemia (BCL1) and mismatched donor lymphocytes were treated 2 weeks later with low-dose or high-dose cyclophosphamide. All mice receiving cyclophosphamide 2 weeks after DLI survived GVHD, and no residual disease was detected by PCR; all control mice receiving DLI alone died of GVHD. Analysis of host (female) and donor (male) DNA showed that cyclophosphamide treatment eradicated most alloreactive donor cells, yet mixed chimerism was converted to full donor chimerism following transient self-limited GVHD. Our working hypothesis suggests that short-term yet effective and safe adoptive immunotherapy of leukemia may be accomplished early post-transplantation using alloreactive donor lymphocytes, with prevention of GVHD by elimination of GVL effector cells.

Targeted immunotherapy in acute myeloblastic leukemia: from animals to humans

Immunity against acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is demonstrated in humans by the graft-versus-leukemia effect in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Specific leukemic antigens have progressively been discovered and circulating specific T lymphocytes against Wilms tumor antigen, proteinase peptide or fusion-proteins produced from aberrant oncogenic chromosomal translocations have been detected in leukemic patients. However, due to the fact that leukemic blasts develop various escape mechanisms, antileukemic specific immunity is not able to control leukemic cell proliferation. The aim of immunotherapy is to overcome tolerance and boost immunity to elicit an efficient immune response against leukemia. We review different immunotherapy strategies tested in preclinical animal models of AML and the human trials that spurred from encouraging results obtained in animal models, demonstrate the feasibility of immunotherapy in AML patients.

Nonmyeloablative stem cell transplantation using lymphoablative rather than myeloablative conditioning in the prefludarabine era by ATG and limiting doses of cyclophosphamide

The feasibility of using lymphoablative rather than myeloablative conditioning for durable engraftment of allogeneic stem cells and subsequent cell therapy with donor lymphocytes was pioneered in the prefludarabine era in patients with resistant lymphoma and metastatic solid tumors. Between July 1995 and August 1996, 15 patients, five males and 10 females, median age 50 (range 20-57) years, were enrolled in a protocol that consisted of different doses of cyclophosphamide (Cy), 50 mg/kg/day for 1, 2, 3 or 4 consecutive days in parallel with a fixed dose of rabbit antithymocyte globulin (ATG) (Fresenius) 10 mg/kg/day for 4 consecutive days. All patients, except one treated with a single dose of Cy, achieved full tri-lineage engraftment and no late graft failure was observed. Only three patients suffered from grade III-IV graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Three patients out of the 15 survived long term (follow-up >93 to >96 months). We concluded that lymphoablative conditioning with ATG and intermediate-to-high-dose Cy is well tolerated and can result in durable engraftment with acceptable GVHD in heavily pretreated patients with advanced malignancies. Hence, induction of tolerance to donor alloantigens by lymphoablative conditioning while avoiding myeloablative chemotherapy or radiation therapy may serve as a platform for subsequent cell therapy with donor lymphocytes.

Low-intensity allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for myeloid malignancies: separating graft-versus-leukemia effects from graft-versus-host disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Over the past several years, significant advances in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), specifically the development of nonablative and reduced-intensity conditioning regimens, have enabled the extension of transplantation to include older or medically infirm patients with myeloid malignancies. The regimens rely largely on graft-versus-leukemia effects rather than high-dose therapy to eliminate malignant cells. Studies have demonstrated that the regimens allow sustained engraftment with relatively low transplant-related mortality. However, conclusions regarding the ultimate efficacy of these regimens for myeloid malignancies have been limited, given the small numbers of patients who have had transplants so far. This review summarizes recent studies of nonablative or reduced-intensity regimens for patients with myeloid malignancies (acute and chronic myelogenous leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, and myeloproliferative disorders). In addition, this review evaluates what is currently known regarding the association of graft-versus-leukemia responses and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). When possible, graft-versus-leukemia responses are highlighted in the articles discussed.

RECENT FINDINGS

This review covers six articles and four abstracts that have been published since September 2003 on patients with myeloid malignancies who received HCT following nonmyeloablative or reduced-intensity conditioning. Due to the heterogeneity of the conditioning and GVHD prophylaxis regimens, direct comparisons between studies are difficult. However, these studies have demonstrated encouraging overall survivals (30 to 74%), disease-free/event-free or progression-free survivals (19 to 62%), and nonrelapse mortalities (15 to 55%). In addition, these studies demonstrated evidence for graft-versus-leukemia responses. However, relapse and progressive disease continued to be problems, particularly in patients with large tumor burdens at time of HCT.

SUMMARY

Over the past 10 years, significant advances have been made in the field of transplantation. Nonmyeloablative and reduced-intensity HCT have promised patients with hematologic and nonhematologic malignancies potential cures. However, disease relapse and nonrelapse mortality, mainly from GVHD and its therapy, continue to be problems. Future studies are needed to increase our understanding of GVHD and graft-versus-leukemia responses, which will greatly improve outcome. In addition, a better understanding of minor histocompatibility antigens may lead to more targeted immunotherapy and enhance the precision and success of transplantation.

The graft-versus-leukemia effect of nonmyeloablative stem cell allografts may not be sufficient to cure chronic myelogenous leukemia

We treated 12 patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) with a low-intensity preparative regimen followed by allogeneic stem cell transplantation in an attempt to confer a curative graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect with minimum morbidity. Seven patients in first chronic phase (CP1) and five in second chronic phase (CP2) (age 15-68 years) received a nonmyeloablative conditioning regimen of fludarabine and cyclophosphamide, followed by a G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplant from an HLA-identical sibling. Cyclosporine (CsA) was used for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. Median follow-up was 384 days. Neutrophil recovery occurred at a median of 12 days. There was no transplant-related mortality. Of the seven CP1 patients transplanted, seven achieved a stable molecular remission; two with no post-transplant intervention, three after donor lymphocytes, imatinib and interferon, and two after a myeloablative stem cell transplant. Four of five CP2 patients died in blast crisis and one survived in molecular remission. Of the 12 patients with durable engraftment, six had Grades II-IV acute GVHD; six had limited chronic GVHD. These results suggest that cytoreduction is required to optimize the curative effect of allogeneic stem cell transplantation for CML.

Allogeneic versus syngeneic killer splenocytes as effector cells for the induction of graft-versus-tumor effect

The effect of allogeneic versus syngeneic killer cells derived from normal or severe combined immunodeficiency disease (SCID) mice was evaluated for induction of antitumor reaction in a murine model of mammary carcinoma. Tumor cells of H-2d origin were injected intravenously into H-2(d/b) mice 24 hours after total body irradiation (4 Gy). On the following day, lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) splenocytes, derived from either minor (H-2d) or major (H-2b) histocompatibility complex (MHC)-mismatched parental normal mice or MHC (H-2b)-mismatched SCID mice, were given intravenously. LAK cells of H-2d normal or SCID mice, syngeneic to the tumor, were inoculated in parallel. The results show that LAK cells derived from minor histocompatibility complex-mismatched or MHC-mismatched parental normal mice improved the probability of tumor-free survival as compared with LAK cells syngeneic to the tumor cells, but they aggravated the severity of graft-versus-host disease. SCID splenocytes serving as a source of natural killer (NK) cells were expanded and activated in vitro by rIL-2 to obtain a sufficient number of DX5+ CD3- CD8- NK cells (SCID-LAK). H-2b SCID-LAK cells did not cause graft-versus-host disease and significantly delayed tumor growth compared with syngeneic H-2d SCID-LAK cells, as indicated by tumor colony assays in vitro and adoptive transfer experiments. However, the graft-versus-tumor effect was not long lasting, and treated mice finally died of tumor. Our results show an advantage of allogeneic over syngeneic cell therapy for achieving a graft-versus-tumor effect by rIL-2-activated T cells and NK cells. Periodic repetition of NK treatments may be required to achieve more durable antitumor effects.

Adoptive immunotherapy in chimeras with donor lymphocytes

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation has a well-defined indication in the treatment of hematological malignancies. The beneficial immune effect of allogeneic marrow transplantation has long been known, but only recently have methods been developed to separate the graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect from graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Animal experiments have shown that lymphocytes from the marrow donor can be transfused without causing severe GVHD if stable chimerism and tolerance is established. First clinical studies have been preformed in patients with recurrent chronic myelogenous leukemia. In these patients complete molecular remissions were induced that persist without further maintenance treatment. These results have been confirmed in larger multicenter studies in Europe and the USA. The best results were obtained in chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML); repeated successes have been reported in relapsing acute myeloid leukemia (AML), myelodysplastic syndromes and multiple myeloma (MMY), and rare responses were reported for acute lymphoid leukemia. Contrary to animal experiments GVHD has been observed in human patients although to a lesser extent than expected in transplants not given immunosuppression. Secondly myelosuppression has been observed in patients treated with relapsing CML. In CML the incidence of GVHD could be reduced by depleting CD8+ T cells from the donor lymphocyte concentrate. Alternatively only small numbers of T lymphocytes can be transfused and in the case of failing responses, the numbers of donor lymphocytes may be increased. Results in recurrent AML have been improved by the use of low-dose cytosine arabinoside, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor mobilized blood cells as compared to lymphocytes only. In MMY the response rate is higher than in AML, but the remissions are of limited duration in most patients. Several protocols have been designed to include preemptive donor lymphocyte transfusion in patients with a high relapse risk after transplantation. Problems remain to avoid chronic GVHD and to circumvent the immune escape mechanisms of leukemia.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for myeloproliferative disorders and myelodysplastic syndromes

Allogeneic SCT is the most effective method to achieve cure in patients with MPD and MDS. This approach is associated with significant risk of morbidity (eg, GVHD) and TRM, although the incidence and severity vary based on donor and recipient characteristics. For young patients with HLA-matched donors, SCT is the preferred therapy. Efforts to improve outcome for older patients and for patients with alternative donors have led to decreased treatment-associated complications with associated better long-term DFS.

Graft-versus-Host Disease, the Graft-versus-Leukemia Effect, and Mixed Chimerism following Nonmyeloablative Stem Cell Transplantation

Allogeneic bone marrow or blood stem cell transplantation represents an important therapeutic tool for the treatment of otherwise incurable cancer and a large spectrum of nonmalignant diseases. Until recently, bone marrow transplantation was used primarily to eliminate malignant, genetically abnormal, or otherwise deficient stem cells; hence, highly toxic myeloablative regimens were considered mandatory for the eradication of undesirable cells of host origin. Recent data suggest that high-dose chemoradiotherapy may be successively replaced by nonmyeloablative stem cell transplantation (NST), which represents a safer biologic tool that involves the induction of host-versus-graft transplantation tolerance. NST thus provides allogeneic donor lymphocytes with the capacity to induce immune-mediated graft-versus-malignancy effects, either against mismatched minor or major histocompatibility alloantigens or against tumor-specific or tumor-associated antigens expressed by tumor or other hematologic cells of host origin. The future goals of the wider and safer clinical application of NST for the treatment of a larger number of indications and larger numbers of patients in need depend, on the one hand, on the development of more effective and safer modalities for maximizing the antitumor potential of donor lymphocytes (T-cells as well as natural killer and natural killer T-cells). On the other hand, these goals depend on using more selective approaches for targeting anticancer effector cells to their target cells. Such changes will thus set the stage for smarter rather than stronger modalities for the treatment of malignant and life-threatening nonmalignant diseases.

A new minimally ablative stem cell transplantation procedure in high-risk patients not eligible for nonmyeloablative allogeneic bone marrow transplantation

Nonmyeloblative stem cell transplantation (NST, SCT) aims to induce host-versus-graft tolerance for subsequent immunotherapy of underlying disease with alloreactive donor lymphocytes, focusing on well-tolerated conditioning suitable for elderly individuals or for other risk factors. However, there is a subset of high-risk patients who cannot tolerate NST. A new protocol consisting of fludarabine 30 mg/m(2) x 6 days (days -8 to -2), very-low-dose busulfan (2 mg/kg x 2 days, days -6 to -5), without anti thymocyte globulin (ATG), was employed in 11 high-risk patients aged 26-58 years. Graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) prophylaxis consisted of low-dose and short-course cyclosporine-A (CSA) alone. One patient died during the nadir due to pulmonary complications. Other patients showed rapid three-lineage engraftment, without complete aplasia; 6/10 patients did not require platelet transfusion and 8/10 had full donor chimerism without transient mixed chimerism. Owing to intentional selection of highly poor-risk patients, overall mortality was high and only one patient survived. Acute GVHD (>/=grade I) occurred in 8/10 evaluable patients, 5/8 while off CSA; 5/8 developed grade III-IV acute GVHD. It appears that our modified, minimally ablative stem cell transplantation (MST) may be used for high-risk patients in need of allo-SCT. Furthermore, although the MST conditioning is not myeloablative, it results in myeloablation of the host hematopoietic system, mediated by alloreactive lymphocytes.

Nonmyeloablative therapy and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

The toxicities associated with conventional myeloablative therapy and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) limit the use of this potentially curative approach to relatively healthy young patients. The risk of treatment-related morbidity and mortality with conventional allogeneic SCT ranges from 10% to 50%, depending on the age of the patient, HLA histocompatibility, diagnosis and disease status, and presence or absence of comorbid conditions. The main goals of conventional high-dose preparative regimens are to eradicate the malignancy and induce adequate host immunosuppression to prevent graft rejection. However, accumulated data indicate that the currently used myeloablative regimens frequently do not eradicate the malignant clone, and that an immune-mediated effect between donor immunocompetent T lymphocytes and host tumor cells seems to induce a major therapeutic benefit, accounting for the significantly lower incidence of leukemic relapse seen with allogeneic SCT compared to autologous or syngeneic SCT. These observations have led to the development of newer treatment modalities focusing on the induction of host tolerance to donor cells followed by the administration of scheduled donor T-lymphocyte infusions. Preliminary clinical data are encouraging but need to be confirmed in well-designed prospective controlled trials with direct comparison to conventional allogeneic SCT and extended follow-up to determine the durability of responses and the consequences of late complications such as chronic graft-vs-host disease on the patient's quality of life.

Immunotherapy of hematologic malignancies and metastatic solid tumors in experimental animals and man

New approaches are needed for maximizing specific responses against tumor cells resistant to chemotherapy. While cytokine therapy may amplify natural resistance against minimal residual disease, more robust anti-leukemia reactivity can be provided by allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) in conjunction with myeloablative, hence hazardous, conditioning, at the cost of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Documentation of the capacity of donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) given late post BMT, when patients were off immunosuppression, in early 1987, with successful reversal of relapse and cure of patients fully resistant to maximally tolerated doses of chemoradiotherapy, with many patients alive and well >10-15 years later, indicated two important facts. First, resistant tumors are unlikely to be cured with higher doses of chemoradiotherapy that may harm the patient but not eliminate all his clonogenic tumor cells. Second, that under condition of tolerance to donor alloantigens, DLI may provide a cure to otherwise resistant patients. These observations paved the road for clinical application of non-myeloablative stem cell transplantation (NST), in the early 90s, based on a two-step procedure, first involving induction of transplantation tolerance to donor alloantigens by engraftment of donor stem cells, following safe lymphoablative rather than myeloablative conditioning. Second, use of donor lymphocytes for elimination of residual tumor or otherwise abnormal hematopoietic cells by immune-mediated graft-versus-host effects inducible by mobilized blood stem cell allografts containing larger inocula of donor T cells, or supported by post-grafting DLI when patients were off immunosuppressive modalities.

Nonmyeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia in first chronic phase

Reduced-intensity or nonmyeloablative stem cell transplantation (NST) is designed to induce host-versus-graft tolerance by engraftment of donor stem cells. The rationale behind NST is to induce optimal graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effects for elimination of all malignant cells by donor alloreactive immunocompetent cells as an alternative to standard high-dose myeloablative chemoradiotherapy. NST based on the use of fludarabine, low-dose busulfan, and anti-T-lymphocyte globulin (ATG) was employed in 24 patients aged 3 to 63 years with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in first chronic phase (CP). Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis consisted of low-dose cyclosporine (CSP), in some cases with low-dose methotrexate. Early discontinuation of CSP was attempted in cases of mixed chimerism in an attempt to amplify GVL effects. All 24 patients showed rapid 3-lineage engraftment, mostly without complete aplasia; 6 patients did not require transfusion of any blood products. NST was associated with minimal procedure-related toxicity. The incidence of acute GVHD (grade I or higher) was 54%; however, this incidence increased following CSP withdrawal. After a follow-up of up to 70 months (median, 42 months), 21 of 24 patients remained alive and disease free. The GVL effects induced by donor immunocompetent lymphocytes eradicated all host hematopoietic cells, as evidenced by molecular testing. The Kaplan-Meier probability of survival and disease-free survival at 5 years is 85% +/- 8% (95% confidence interval, 70%-100%). NST may successfully replace myeloablative stem cell transplantation, providing a safer, well-tolerated therapeutic option for all patients with CML in first CP with a matched donor. However, this conclusion must be tested in a prospective randomized clinical trial.

Rational approaches to human cancer immunotherapy

Over most of the 20th century, immunotherapy for cancer was based on empiricism. Interesting phenomena were observed in the areas of cancer, infectious diseases, or transplantation. Inferences were made and extrapolated into new approaches for the treatment of cancer. If tumors regressed, the treatment approaches could be refined further. However, until the appropriate tools and reagents were available, investigators were unable to understand the biology underlying these observations. In the early 1990s, the first human tumor T cell antigens were defined and dendritic cells were discovered to play a pivotal role in antigen presentation. The current era of cancer immunotherapy is one of translational research based on known biology and rationally designed interventions and has led to a rapid expansion of the field. The beginning of the 21st century brings the possibility of a new era of effective cancer immunotherapy, combining rational, immunological treatments with conventional therapies to improve the outcome for patients with cancer.

Emerging cancer-targeted therapies

There is reason to believe that the unfolding revolution in molecular biology and translational research will allow selective targeting of tumor cells, and radically change the way general practitioners and pediatric oncologists treat and follow children with cancer. This article highlights some of the most promising approaches being tested in the field. By learning about the underlying biology, the remaining hurdles, the projected timeline, and the possible impact of new therapies on the practice of pediatric oncology, health care professionals and patients should be better prepared for the future of pediatric oncology.

Donor lymphocyte infusion: the use of alloreactive and tumor-reactive lymphocytes for immunotherapy of malignant and nonmalignant diseases in conjunction with allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI), pioneered in Jerusalem in January 1987, represents the first proof of principle of the absolute efficacy of immunotherapy as a means of curing cancer. Immunotherapy with alloreactive donor lymphocytes can eliminate "the last tumor cell" even in patients with hematological malignancies resistant to maximally tolerated doses of chemoradiotherapy. Alloreactive lymphocytes that can mediate anti-tumor effects following induction of host-versus-graft tolerance induced by transplantation of donor stem cells, can induce graft-versus-malignancy (GVM) effects which are usually accompanied by graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). However, occasionally GVM effects may also be accomplished independently of clinically overt GVHD. Interestingly, allogeneic donor lymphocytes may also eliminate undesirable host-derived hematopoietic cells in a large number of nonmalignant indications including genetic diseases, diseases caused by deficiency of stem cell products, and autoimmune disorders mediated by self-reactive lymphocytes. The cumulative clinical experience suggests feasibility of effective induction of graft-versus-leukemia (GVL); graft-versus-lymphoma (GVLy); graft-versus-multiple myeloma, as well as graft-versus-solid tumors (GVT), well-documented in patients with renal and breast cancer, even in patients with resistant disease that have failed myeloablative chemoradiotherapy. These observations that suggested that cell therapy by donor lymphocytes is the main therapeutic benefit of bone marrow transplantation (BMT) led to development of the nonmyeloablative approach for safer allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Nonmyeloablative stem cell transplantation (NST) makes it possible to offer an option for cure to elderly patients with no upper age limit, as well as to patients with poor performance status not considered eligible for conventional BMT. Using well-tolerated NST regimen, allogeneic stem cell transplantation can be accomplished with minimal procedure-related toxicity and mortality, possibly even on an outpatient basis. Immunotherapy mediated by adoptive allogeneic cell-mediated immunotherapy can be further improved by utilizing specifically immune donor lymphocytes, thus maximizing their efficacy against undesirable target cells of host origin on the one hand, while minimizing their ontoward efficacy against normal cells of host origin that could result in GVHD on the other. Taken together, DLI and subsequently NST, may have opened new horizons for treatment of life-threatening malignant and nonmalignant disorders correctable by allogeneic stem cell transplantation. It is anticipated that further improvement of reactivity and specificity of donor lymphocytes will lead to safer clinical application of cell therapy for a larger number of indications toward improving disease-free survival in a large number of indications while minimizing immediate and late procedure-related complications.