Isolated HLA-C mismatches in unrelated donor transplantation for CML

Clinical implications of HLA locus mismatching in unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation: a meta-analysis

It remains controversial that the impacts of individual HLA locus mismatches on clinical outcomes of patients receiving unrelated-donor hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), as compared to HLA allele matched controls. We conducted a meta-analysis to address these issues. Four databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library) were searched to select eligible studies. All donor-recipient pairs were high-resolution typing for HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1, DQB1 and DPB1 loci. Multivariate-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were extracted and pooled using a random-effects model. A total of 36 studies were included, with 100,072 patients receiving HCT. Surprisingly, we found that HLA-DQB1 locus mismatches had no significantly increased risk of multiple outcomes including acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), overall mortality and disease relapse (HR, 1.07; P = .153; HR, 1.07; P = .271; HR, 1.09; P = .230; HR, 1.07; P = .142 and HR, 1.02; P = .806, respectively). Mismatched HLA-DPB1 was significantly associated with a reduced risk of disease relapse (HR, 0.74; P < .001) but not with increased risks of transplant-related mortality (TRM) and overall mortality (HR, 1.09; P = .591; I² = 74.2% and HR, 1.03; P = .460, respectively). In conclusion, HLA-DQB1 locus mismatches is a permissive mismatching. HLA-DPB1 locus mismatches significantly protect against leukemia relapse. Refining effects of individual HLA locus mismatches contributes to predicting prognosis of patients receiving unrelated donor HCT.

Impact of HLA-Mismatch in Unrelated Donor Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Meta-Analysis

The magnitude of risk associated with 9/10 mismatched unrelated donor (MMURD) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and that of mismatches at the individual HLA loci remain unclear. We performed a meta-analysis to assess the difference in clinical outcomes between matched unrelated donor (MUD) and MMURD transplantation. A comprehensive search of Medline and Embase for manuscripts regarding transplantation outcomes in primarily adult patients with hematologic malignancies was performed. The pooled effect estimates were calculated using DerSimonian-Laird random effects models. A total of 13 studies were included, reporting on 13,446 transplants. 9/10 MMURD transplantation was associated with worse overall survival compared to 10/10 MUD transplantation (pooled HR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.12-1.45; n = 7 studies). Mismatch at HLA-A, -B, or -C was associated with significantly worse overall survival compared to MUD transplantation, while there was no significant difference associated with -DQ or -DPB1 mismatch. Inferior survival associated with HLA-DRB1 mismatch could not be ruled out. Data on acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease were scarce but favored MUD transplantation. In summary, this meta-analysis of the available literature favored MUD over MMURD transplantation in hematologic malignancies and further quantifies the risks associated with specific HLA-allele mismatches. Am. J. Hematol. 91:551-555, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Mismatched unrelated alternative donors for hematological malignancies

For the majority of hematologic malignancies allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is the only curative treatment option. Sibling donors have been the standard for adult patients. Since there is not a suitable family donor for all patients, the need for alternative donors for HCT is great. Fortunately, the availability of unrelated volunteer donor registries has expanded over the years and the results of HCT with matched unrelated donors (MUD) are comparable to the results with matched related donors (MRD). Nevertheless, there are many patients lacking a well-matched donor. To increase the applicability of transplantation, alternative donors such as mismatched unrelated donors (MMURD), cord blood stem cell products and haploidentical related donors have been widely used. This review seeks to give insights into the use of MMUD donors for HCT and summarize the existing data.

Nonpermissive HLA-DPB1 mismatch increases mortality after myeloablative unrelated allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

We examined current outcomes of unrelated donor allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) to determine the clinical implications of donor-recipient HLA matching. Adult and pediatric patients who had first undergone myeloablative-unrelated bone marrow or peripheral blood HCT for acute myelogenous leukemia, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, chronic myelogenous leukemia, and myelodysplastic syndrome between 1999 and 2011 were included. All had high-resolution typing for HLA-A, -B, -C, and -DRB1. Of the total (n = 8003), cases were 8/8 (n = 5449), 7/8 (n = 2071), or 6/8 (n = 483) matched. HLA mismatch (6-7/8) conferred significantly increased risk for grades II to IV and III to IV acute graft vs host disease (GVHD), chronic GVHD, transplant-related mortality (TRM), and overall mortality compared with HLA-matched cases (8/8). Type (allele/antigen) and locus (HLA-A, -B, -C, and -DRB1) of mismatch were not associated with overall mortality. Among 8/8 matched cases, HLA-DPB1 and -DQB1 mismatch resulted in increased acute GVHD, and HLA-DPB1 mismatch had decreased relapse. Nonpermissive HLA-DPB1 allele mismatch was associated with higher TRM compared with permissive HLA-DPB1 mismatch or HLA-DPB1 match and increased overall mortality compared with permissive HLA-DPB1 mismatch in 8/8 (and 10/10) matched cases. Full matching at HLA-A, -B, -C, and -DRB1 is required for optimal unrelated donor HCT survival, and avoidance of nonpermissive HLA-DPB1 mismatches in otherwise HLA-matched pairs is indicated.

HLA-C Incompatibilities in Allogeneic Unrelated Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

An increasingly larger fraction of patients with hematological diseases are treated by hematopoietic stem cells transplantation (HSCT) from HLA matched unrelated donors. Polymorphisms of HLA genes represent a major barrier to HSCT because HLA-A, -B, -C and DRB1 incompatibilities confer a higher risk of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) and mortality. Although >22 million volunteer HLA-typed donors are available worldwide, still a significant number of patients do not find a highly matched HSC donor. Because of the large haplotypic diversity in HLA-B–C associations, incompatibilities occur most frequently at HLA-C, so that unrelated donors with a single HLA-C mismatch often represent the only possible choice. The ratio of HLA-C-mismatched HSCT over the total number of transplants varies from 15 to 30%, as determined in 12 multicenter studies. Six multicenter studies involving >1800 patients have reported a 21–43% increase in mortality risk. By using in vitro cellular assays, a large heterogeneity in T-cell allorecognition has been observed. Yet the permissiveness of individual HLA-C mismatches remains poorly defined. It could be linked to the position and nature of the mismatched residues on HLA-C molecules, but also to variability in the expression levels of the mismatched alleles. The permissive C*03:03–03:04 mismatch is characterized by full compatibility at residues 9, 97, 99, 116, 152, 156, and 163 reported to be key positions influencing T-cell allorecognition. With a single difference among these seven key residues the C*07:01–07:02 mismatch might also be considered by analogy as permissive. High variability of HLA-C expression as determined by quantitative RT-PCR has been observed within individual allotypes and shows some correlation with A–B–C–DRB1 haplotypes. Thus in addition to the position of mismatched amino acid residues, expression level of patient’s mismatched HLA-C allotype might influence T-cell allorecognition, with patients low expression-C alleles representing possible permissive mismatches.

Allogeneic transplantation in the UK: an aggregation of marginal gains?

A number of advances in clinical practice that are considered routine in modern allogeneic transplant programmes lack definitive supporting evidence, partly because they may offer modest incremental benefits that are difficult to demonstrate in a statistically robust manner given the relatively small cohorts of patients who undergo such procedures. Nevertheless, these marginal gains probably contribute therapeutically meaningful overall benefit, particularly when aggregated. We review the evidence for a number of these practices in terms of impact on transplant outcomes, with particular reference to the setting of T cell depletion as widely practiced in the United Kingdom, including high resolution tissue typing, surveillance for and therapy of infectious complications, chimerism-directed immune modulation and more sensitive monitoring for residual or progressive disease.

The Austrian Bone Marrow Donor Registry: Providing Patients in Austria with Unrelated Donors for Transplant - a Worldwide Cooperation

BACKGROUND: The Austrian Bone Marrow Donor Registry is the central search coordinating unit in charge of national and international donor searches in Austria. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1988 and 2010, a worldwide search for an unrelated donor of blood stem cells (URD) was initiated for 2,166 Austrian patients with haematological disorders, 1,671 adults and 495 children, by the Austrian Bone Marrow Donor Registry. RESULTS: An URD was identified for 78.3% of the patients between 2008 and 2010, for 76.7% of the patients between 2004 and 2007, for 71.3% between 1996 and 2003, but only for 53.4% of the patients in the initial period of 1988-1995. Thus, results of international donor searches improve over time. In contrast, search duration decreases steadily: Search times of successful searches decreased from about 8 months in the first period between 1988 and 1996 to 1.84 months in 2010. Overall, 1,558 of the 2,166 patients (71.9%) could be provided with a matching donor. However, not every patient provided with a URD was transplanted. Overall, only 1,141 of 2,166 patients (52.7%) proceeded to transplant. CONCLUSION: Figures have significantly improved for the latest period of donor searches between 2008 and 2010. In this period, a donor could be found for 78.3%, and 58.5% of the patients received a transplant.

What are a patient's current chances of finding a matched unrelated donor? Twenty years' central search experience in a small country

Between 1988 and 2007, international searches for matched unrelated donors (MUDs) were performed for 1586 Austrian patients. Between 2004 and 2007, a MUD was identified for 76.7% of the patients. Between 1996 and 2003, a donor was identified for 71.3% of the patients, and between 1988 and 1995, only for 53.4% of the patients. Search times of successful searches decreased from 7.7 months in the first period to 1.7 months in the period from 2004 to 2007. However, transplants were not performed in all cases in which a donor was found: only in 61.6% of the patients between 2004 and 2007, in 53.4% between 1996 and 2003 and in 29.6% between 1988 and 1995. Multivariate analysis determined that having a common HLA type was the most important variable impacting on finding a MUD for a patient. Factors that most strongly influence a patient's access to transplant were the patient's European origin and a short time between diagnosis and start of donor search. The strongest factor for both finding a donor and being transplanted was a search being performed during more recent years: patients' chances increased from year to year.

High-resolution, high-throughput HLA genotyping by next-generation sequencing

The human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I and class II loci are the most polymorphic genes in the human genome. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation requires allele-level HLA typing at multiple loci to select the best matched unrelated donors for recipient patients. In current methods for HLA typing, both alleles of a heterozygote are amplified and typed or sequenced simultaneously, often making it difficult to unambiguously determine the sequence of the two alleles. Next-generation sequencing methods clonally propagate in parallel millions of single DNA molecules, which are then also sequenced in parallel. Recently, the read lengths obtainable by one such next-generation sequencing method (454 Life Sciences, Inc.) have increased to >250 nucleotides. These clonal read lengths make possible setting the phase of the linked polymorphisms within an exon and thus the unambiguous determination of the sequence of each HLA allele. Here we demonstrate this capacity as well as show that the throughput of the system is sufficiently high to enable a complete, 7-locus HLA class I and II typing for 24 or 48 individual DNAs in a single GS FLX sequencing run. Highly multiplexed amplicon sequencing is facilitated by the use of sample-specific internal sequence tags (multiplex identification tags or MIDs) in the primers that allow pooling of samples yet maintain the ability to assign sequences to specific individuals. We have incorporated an HLA typing software application developed by Conexio Genomics (Freemantle, Australia) that assigns HLA genotypes for these 7 loci (HLA-A, -B, -C, DRB1, DQA1, DQB1, DPB1), as well as for DRB3, DRB4, and DRB5 from 454 sequence data. The potential of this HLA sequencing system to analyze chimeric mixtures is demonstrated here by the detection of a rare HLA-B allele in a mixture of two homozygous cell lines (1/100), as well as by the detection of the rare nontransmitted maternal allele present in the blood of a severe combined immunodeficiency disease syndrome (SCIDS) patient.

HLA-identical sibling compared with 8/8 matched and mismatched unrelated donor bone marrow transplant for chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia

PURPOSE

Transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells from an unrelated donor (URD) is an option for many patients who do not have an HLA-identical sibling donor (MSD). Current criteria for the selection of URDs include consideration for HLA alleles determined by high resolution typing methods, with preference for allele-matched donors. However, the utility and outcome associated with transplants from URDs compared with those from MSDs remains undefined.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We examined clinical outcome after patients received bone marrow transplants (BMTs) from MSDs; HLA-A, -B, -C, and DRB1 allele-matched URDs (8/8); and HLA-mismatched URDs in a homogeneous population of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in first chronic phase (CP1) where a strong allogeneic effect and hence a lower risk of relapse is anticipated. Transplantation outcomes were compared between 1,052 URD and 3,514 MSD BMT recipients with CML in CP1.

RESULTS

Five-year overall survival and leukemia-free survival (LFS) after receipt of BMTs from 8/8 matched URDs were worse than those after receipt of BMTs from MSDs (5-year survival, 55% v 63%; RR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.17 to 1.56; P < .001; LFS, 50% v 55%; RR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.40; P = .006). Survival was progressively worse with greater degrees of mismatch. Similar and low risk of relapse were observed after receipt of transplant from either MSD or URD.

CONCLUSION

In this homogeneous cohort of good risk patients with CML in CP1, 5-year overall survival and LFS after receipt of transplant from 8/8 allele-matched donors were modestly though significantly worse than those after receipt of transplant from MSDs. Additive adverse effects of multilocus mismatching are not well tolerated and should be avoided if possible.

Should all unrelated donors for transplantation be matched?

Previous analyses have suggested that hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) from an unrelated donor results in better survival if the patient is younger and, possibly also if the donor is younger. Additionally, survival is improved if HCT is performed during early disease stage and if the recipient and possibly the donor are cytomegalovirus (CMV) seronegative. Equivocal data have been published comparing bone marrow vs. (granulocyte-colony stimulating factor) G-CSF-stimulated peripheral blood stem cells for transplantation. A randomized trial is underway by the Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network that is testing the prospective comparison of bone marrow vs. primed peripheral blood grafts from unrelated donors and patients with hematologic malignancies. Of most significance, however, is that the best donor is HLA-compatible, healthy, promptly available, and willing to give the requested product for HCT.

High-resolution donor-recipient HLA matching contributes to the success of unrelated donor marrow transplantation

The relative importance of various human leukocyte antigen (HLA) loci and the resolution level at which they are matched has not been fully defined for unrelated donor transplantation. To address this question, National Marrow Donor Program data from 3857 transplantations performed from 1988 to 2003 in the United States were analyzed. Patient-donor pairs were fully typed for HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1, -DQB1, -DQA1, -DPB1, and -DPA1 alleles. High-resolution DNA matching for HLA-A, -B, -C, and -DRB1 (8/8 match) was the minimum level of matching associated with the highest survival. A single mismatch detected by low- or high-resolution DNA testing at HLA-A, -B, -C or -DRB1 (7/8 match) was associated with higher mortality (relative risk, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.13-1.38; P < .001) and 1-year survival of 43% compared with 52% for 8/8 matched pairs. Single mismatches at HLA-B or HLA-C appear better tolerated than mismatches at HLA-A or HLA-DRB1. Mismatching at 2 or more loci compounded the risk. Mismatching at HLA-DP or -DQ loci and donor factors other than HLA type were not associated with survival. In multivariate modeling, patient age, race, disease stage, and cytomegalovirus status were as predictive of survival as donor HLA matching. High-resolution DNA matching for HLA-A, -B, -C, and -DRB1 alleles is associated with higher rates of survival.

Clinical significance of donor-recipient HLA matching on survival after myeloablative hematopoietic cell transplantation from unrelated donors

The application of unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation can be expanded with the use of mismatched donors if human leukocyte antigen (HLA) disparity does not lead to increased morbidity and mortality. The rules that govern permissibility of HLA mismatches are not well defined. The International Histocompatibility Working Group in hematopoietic cell transplantation measured the risks associated with locus-specific disparity in 4796 patients transplanted for low, intermediate, or high-risk hematologic diseases. The permissibility of a given HLA mismatch is in part defined by the locus and by disease risk.

HLA mismatching within or outside of cross-reactive groups (CREGs) is associated with similar outcomes after unrelated hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

The National Marrow Donor Program maintains a registry of volunteer donors for patients in need of a hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Strategies for selecting a partially HLA-mismatched donor vary when a full match cannot be identified. Some transplantation centers limit the selection of mismatched donors to those sharing mismatched antigens within HLA-A and HLA-B cross-reactive groups (CREGs). To assess whether an HLA mismatch within a CREG group ("minor") may result in better outcome than a mismatch outside CREG groups ("major"), we analyzed validated outcomes data from 2709 bone marrow and peripheral blood stem cell transplantations. Three-hundred and ninety-six pairs (15%) were HLA-DRB1 allele matched but had an antigen-level mismatch at HLA-A or HLA-B. Univariate and multivariate analyses of engraftment, graft-versus-host disease, and survival showed that outcome is not significantly different between minor and major mismatches (P = .47, from the log-rank test for Kaplan-Meier survival). However, HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-DRB1 allele-matched cases had significantly better outcome than mismatched cases (P < .001). For patients without an HLA match, the selection of a CREG-compatible donor as tested does not improve outcome.

A High Degree of HLA Disparity Arises From Limited Allelic Diversity: Analysis of 1775 Unrelated Bone Marrow Transplant Donor-Recipient Pairs

The allelic diversity and associated human leukocyte antigen (HLA) disparity of 1775 bone marrow recipients and their unrelated donors, matched for six of six (1361/1775,77%), five of six (397/1775, 22%), or four of six (17/1775, 1%) HLA-A, -B, -DR antigens, were retrospectively evaluated. The comprehensive HLA analysis included the class I (A, B, C) and II (DRB1, DQA1, DQB1, DPA1, DPB1) loci. Most (>66%) of the predominantly Caucasian study population carried one or two of five to seven common alleles at each HLA locus. In spite of this limited diversity, 29% of the six of six antigen-matched transplants carried allele mismatches at HLA-A, -B, and/or -DRB1, and 92% carried at least one allele mismatch at one of the eight HLA loci tested. Of the 968 HLA-A,-B,-DRB1 allele-matched pairs, 89% carried mismatches at other HLA loci, predominantly at DP loci. The substantially greater than expected HLA allelic disparity between donor and recipient suggests extensive haplotypic diversity and underscores the importance of enhancing approaches to mitigate the deleterious effect of HLA mismatches.

Impact of high-resolution matching in allogeneic unrelated donor stem cell transplantation in Switzerland

It is currently unknown what degree of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-mismatching is acceptable in unrelated donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (UD-HSCT). Mismatches at some loci may be more permissive than others. We have analyzed the effect of high-resolution HLA-matching on outcome of all 214 consecutive recipients of UD-HSCT carried out in Switzerland. All typing was by the Swiss reference laboratory. Donor-recipient pairs were HLA-10/10 matched (n=130) or mismatched for either HLA-A/-B/-DRB1/multiple loci (n=33; (HLA-A/-B=10); (-DRB1=8); (multiple=15)); HLA-C (n=29) or HLA-DQ/-DRB3 (n=22; (DQ=16); (-DRB1=6)). The median follow-up was 32 months. Survival probabilities (+/-95% confidence interval) at 3 years were 57 (+/-10)% for recipients of HLA 10/10-matched transplants, 53 (+/-22)% for recipients of HLA-DQ/-DRB3-mismatched transplants, 44 (+/-20)% for recipients of HLA-C-mismatched transplants and 0% for recipients of transplants mismatched at HLA-A/-B/-DRB1/multiple loci (P<0.0001). In multivariate analyses, HLA compatibility was the variable most significantly associated with survival and treatment-related mortality. We found important differences in survival in recipients of UD-HSCT with best results for transplants from 10/10 matched donors. Single mismatches at HLA-DQ/-DRB3 were well tolerated, mismatches at HLA-C had intermediate results and mismatches at HLA-A/-B/-DRB1/multiple loci resulted in poor survival.

Donor age and degree of HLA matching have a major impact on the outcome of unrelated donor haematopoietic cell transplantation for chronic myeloid leukaemia

We analysed the outcome of 92 consecutive unrelated donor haematopoietic cell transplantations (UD-HCTs) performed in Spain to treat adult patients with CML in the first chronic phase (1CP). Patients' and donors' median age was 32 (15-49) and 36 (22-56) years, respectively. In all, 73 pairs (79%) matched for A, B+/-C and DRB1+/-DQB1 loci and 19 had > or =1 mismatch. Their probability of survival and disease-free survival at 4 years were 50 and 46%, respectively. Pretransplant factors associated with a better survival were patient age <25 years (P=0.035), donor age < or =36 years (P=0.012), use of cyclosporine since day -7 (P=0.001), and matching 8/8, 9/10 or 10/10 loci at allele level (P=0.003). In multivariate analysis only donor age (P=0.003; RR=3.1 (95% CI: 1.3-7.1)) and degree of HLA-matching (P=0.009; RR: 7.7 (95% CI: 1.8-33)) maintained their significance. The addition of these two variables to the EBMT prognostic score allowed an adequate risk assessment for patients receiving a UD-HCT during 1CP. Our analysis shows that in patients with a young and fully allele-matched donor, UD-HCT should be considered in the initial therapeutic algorithm due to its excellent outcome (92% survival at 2 years).

Human leukocyte antigen matching in unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) from unrelated donors is a curative therapy for many malignant and nonmalignant blood disorders. The success of unrelated HCT is influenced by the degree of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) compatibility between the donor and patient. When donor matching for HLA alleles is feasible, overall transplant outcome is superior. The presence of donor-recipient mismatching is associated with increased risk of post-transplant complications including graft rejection, acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and mortality; these risks are increased with multiple HLA mismatches. For the majority of patients who lack HLA-matched unrelated donors, current research is focused on the identification of permissible HLA mismatches. The influence of nongenetic factors on the tolerability of HLA mismatching has recently become evident, demonstrating a need for the integration of both genetic and nongenetic variables in donor selection.

Role of NK cells in mismatched unrelated haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation: fact or fiction?

The role of alloreactive NK cells in haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation is a controversial topic. Different studies come up with different conclusions. This is mainly due to heterogeneous patient populations, differences in the sources of haematopoietic stem cells and various conditioning regimens. International collaboration is essential to reveal in which situation NK cell alloreactivity plays a role and, if so, whether it is beneficial or detrimental for patient survival.

Impact of HLA class I high-resolution mismatches on chronic graft-versus-host disease and survival of patients given hematopoietic stem cell grafts from unrelated donors

There is consensus that matching of unrelated donors (URD) and patients for HLA class II alleles improves the outcome of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). However, the significance of HLA class I allelic mismatches for transplant outcome is under discussion and reports on long-term effects like chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) are rare. Thus, we investigated the association of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I allele mismatches and outcome in 144 patients given HSCT from URD who were matched for HLA-DRB1, DRB3/4/5, and DQB1 alleles. The risk of chronic GVHD was significantly increased in patients with class I mismatched donors, the mismatch either detected by low- or high-resolution typing. A single HLA class I allele mismatch significantly increased the risk of chronic GVHD in multivariate analysis. Overall survival was significantly reduced in patient/donor pairs with more than one-allele class I mismatch. Thus, selection of unrelated donors for transplantation should be based on high-resolution HLA class I typing.

Single-Antigen-Expressing Cell Lines Are Excellent Tools for Detecting Human Leukocyte Antigen-C???Reactive Antibodies in Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-C is expressed on nucleated cells and platelets in lower levels than HLA-A,B, and its antigens are in linkage disequilibrium with HLA-B antigens. Therefore, HLA-C antibody detection is difficult. The authors questioned whether HLA-C could serve as a target in clinical kidney transplantation using a newly developed assay.

METHODS

Flow cytometry was performed with sera from patients (n=34) awaiting a kidney retransplant using nine cell lines expressing a single HLA-C antigen (single-antigen lines [SAL]).

RESULTS

The SAL were validated with HLA-C-specific alloantisera and human monoclonal antibodies against HLA-A, -B, and -C. The results were in agreement with the specificities previously reported. Exceptions, because of new HLA-C specificities used here, could be explained by epitope sharing between the antigens. With respect to patient sera, 15 of the 34 patients tested (44%) showed serum reactivity toward one or more HLA-C SAL.

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast to peripheral blood lymphocytes, SAL are excellent targets for detecting HLA-C-reactive alloantibodies by flow cytometry. This preliminary analysis revealed that HLA-C-reactive antibodies are frequently present in sera of retransplant patients, serving as possible targets in clinical transplantation.