Therapy for severe refractory acute graft-versus-host disease with basiliximab, a selective interleukin-2 receptor antagonist

Steroid Refractory Acute GVHD: The Hope for a Better Tomorrow

Steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (SR-AGVHD) presents a significant barrier to successful outcomes following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), despite advancements in GVHD prophylaxis and management. While ruxolitinib therapy has shown improved response rates, survival benefits remain elusive. This review explores the definitions and proposed distinct pathophysiology and treatment landscape of SR-AGVHD. Emerging therapies offer potential, yet further research is critical to better define steroid-refractory populations, improve treatment precision with biomarkers, and overcome resistance, particularly in ruxolitinib-refractory cases.

Mesenchymal stromal cells plus basiliximab improve the response of steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease as a second-line therapy: a multicentre, randomized, controlled trial

BACKGROUND

For patients with steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (SR-aGVHD), effective second-line regimens are urgently needed. Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) have been used as salvage regimens for SR-aGVHD in the past. However, clinical trials and an overall understanding of the molecular mechanisms of MSCs combined with basiliximab for SR-aGVHD are limited, especially in haploidentical haemopoietic stem cell transplantation (HID HSCT).

METHODS

The primary endpoint of this multicentre, randomized, controlled trial was the 4-week complete response (CR) rate of SR-aGVHD. A total of 130 patients with SR-aGVHD were assigned in a 1:1 randomization schedule to the MSC group (receiving basiliximab plus MSCs) or control group (receiving basiliximab alone) (NCT04738981).

RESULTS

Most enrolled patients (96.2%) received HID HSCT. The 4-week CR rate of SR-aGVHD in the MSC group was obviously better than that in the control group (83.1% vs. 55.4%, P = 0.001). However, for the overall response rates at week 4, the two groups were comparable. More patients in the control group used ≥ 6 doses of basiliximab (4.6% vs. 20%, P = 0.008). We collected blood samples from 19 consecutive patients and evaluated MSC-derived immunosuppressive cytokines, including HO1, GAL1, GAL9, TNFIA6, PGE2, PDL1, TGF-β and HGF. Compared to the levels before MSC infusion, the HO1 (P = 0.0072) and TGF-β (P = 0.0243) levels increased significantly 1 day after MSC infusion. At 7 days after MSC infusion, the levels of HO1, GAL1, TNFIA6 and TGF-β tended to increase; however, the differences were not statistically significant. Although the 52-week cumulative incidence of cGVHD in the MSC group was comparable to that in the control group, fewer patients in the MSC group developed cGVHD involving ≥3 organs (14.3% vs. 43.6%, P = 0.006). MSCs were well tolerated, no infusion-related adverse events (AEs) occurred and other AEs were also comparable between the two groups. However, patients with malignant haematological diseases in the MSC group had a higher 52-week disease-free survival rate than those in the control group (84.8% vs. 65.9%, P = 0.031).

CONCLUSIONS

For SR-aGVHD after allo-HSCT, especially HID HSCT, the combination of MSCs and basiliximab as the second-line therapy led to significantly better 4-week CR rates than basiliximab alone. The addition of MSCs not only did not increase toxicity but also provided a survival benefit.

Basiliximab Treatment for Patients With Steroid-Refractory Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease Following Matched Sibling Donor Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Basiliximab is an important treatment for steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (SR-aGVHD). We performed this retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of basiliximab treatment in SR-aGVHD patients following matched sibling donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (MSD-HSCT) (n = 63). Overall response rate (ORR) was 63.5% and 54% at any time and at day 28 after basiliximab treatment. Grade III-IV aGVHD before basiliximab treatment predicted a poor ORR after basiliximab treatment. The rates of virus, bacteria, and fungi infections were 54%, 23.8%, and 3.1%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 730 (range, 67-3,042) days, the 1-year probability of overall survival and disease-free survival after basiliximab treatment were 58.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 47.6%-72.2%) and 55.4% (95% CI = 44.3%-69.2%), respectively. The 3-year cumulative incidence of relapse and non-relapse mortality after basiliximab treatment were 18.9% (95% CI = 8.3%-29.5%) and 33.8% (95% CI = 21.8%-45.7%), respectively. Comorbidities burden before allo-HSCT, severity of aGVHD and liver aGVHD before basiliximab treatment showed negative influences on survival. Thus, basiliximab was safe and effective treatment for SR-aGVHD following MSD-HSCT.

Treatment of steroid-refractory graft versus host disease in children

Systemic steroids are still the first-line approach in acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD), and the backbone of chronic GvHD management. Refractoriness to steroid represent a major cause of morbidity and non-relapse mortality after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). In both backgrounds, several second-line immunosuppressive agents have been tested with variable results in terms of efficacy and toxicity. Solid evidence regarding these approaches is still lacking in the pediatric setting where results are mainly derived from adult experiences. Furthermore, the number of treated patients is limited and the incidence of acute and chronic GvHD is lower, resulting in a very heterogeneous approach to this complication by pediatric hematologists. Some conventional therapies and anti-cytokine monoclonal antibodies used in the adult setting have been evaluated in children. In recent years, the increasing understanding of the biological mechanisms underpinning the pathogenesis of GvHD justified the efforts toward the adoption of targeted therapies and non-pharmacologic approaches, with higher response rates and lower immunosuppressive effects. Moreover, many questions regarding the precise timing and setting in which to integrate these new approaches remain unanswered. This Review aims to critically explore the current evidence regarding novel approaches to treat SR-GvHD in pediatric HSCT recipients.

Immune Reconstitution of Patients Who Recovered From Steroid-Refractory Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease After Basiliximab Treatment

We aimed to identify the characteristics of immune reconstitution (IR) in patients who recovered from steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (SR-aGVHD) after basiliximab treatment. A total of 179, 124, 80, and 92 patients were included in the analysis for IR at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, respectively, after haploidentical donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HID HSCT). We observed that IR was fastest for monocytes and CD8⁺ T cells, followed by lymphocytes, CD3⁺ T cells, and CD19⁺ B cells and slowest for CD4⁺ T cells. Almost all immune cell subsets recovered comparably between patients receiving <5 doses and ≥5 doses of basiliximab. Most immune cell subsets recovered comparably between SR-aGVHD patients who recovered after basiliximab treatment and event-free HID HSCT recipients. Patients who recovered from SR-aGVHD after basiliximab treatment experienced satisfactory IR, which suggested that basiliximab may not have prolonged the negative impact on IR in these patients.

Basiliximab for steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease: A real-world analysis

Steroid-refractory (SR) acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) is one of the leading causes of early mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). We investigated the efficacy, safety, prognostic factors, and optimal therapeutic protocol for SR-aGVHD patients treated with basiliximab in a real-world setting. Nine hundred and forty SR-aGVHD patients were recruited from 36 hospitals in China, and 3683 doses of basiliximab were administered. Basiliximab was used as monotherapy (n = 642) or in combination with other second-line treatments (n = 298). The cumulative incidence of overall response rate (ORR) at day 28 after basiliximab treatment was 79.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 76.5%-82.3%). The probabilities of nonrelapse mortality and overall survival at 3 years after basiliximab treatment were 26.8% (95% CI 24.0%-29.6%) and 64.3% (95% CI 61.2%-67.4%), respectively. A 1:1 propensity score matching was performed to compare the efficacy and safety between the monotherapy and combined therapy groups. Combined therapy did not increase the ORR; conversely, it increased the infection rates compared with monotherapy. The multivariate analysis showed that combined therapy, grade III-IV aGVHD, and high-risk refined Minnesota aGVHD risk score before basiliximab treatment were independently associated with the therapeutic response. Hence, we created a prognostic scoring system that could predict the risk of having a decreased likelihood of response after basiliximab treatment. Machine learning was used to develop a protocol that maximized the efficacy of basiliximab while maintaining acceptable levels of infection risk. Thus, real-world data suggest that basiliximab is safe and effective for treating SR-aGVHD.

Invasive Fungal Diseases in Children with Hematological Malignancies Treated with Therapies That Target Cell Surface Antigens: Monoclonal Antibodies, Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and CAR T-Cell Therapies

Since 1985 when the first agent targeting antigens on the surface of lymphocytes was approved (muromonab-CD3), a multitude of such therapies have been used in children with hematologic malignancies. A detailed literature review until January 2021 was conducted regarding pediatric patient populations treated with agents that target CD2 (alefacept), CD3 (bispecific T-cell engager [BiTE] blinatumomab), CD19 (denintuzumab mafodotin, B43, BiTEs blinatumomab and DT2219ARL, the immunotoxin combotox, and chimeric antigen receptor [CAR] T-cell therapies tisagenlecleucel and axicabtagene ciloleucel), CD20 (rituximab and biosimilars, 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan, ofatumumab, and obinutuzumab), CD22 (epratuzumab, inotuzumab ozogamicin, moxetumomab pasudotox, BiTE DT2219ARL, and the immunotoxin combotox), CD25 (basiliximab and inolimomab), CD30 (brentuximab vedotin and iratumumab), CD33 (gemtuzumab ozogamicin), CD38 (daratumumab and isatuximab), CD52 (alemtuzumab), CD66b (90Y-labelled BW 250/183), CD248 (ontuxizumab) and immune checkpoint inhibitors against CTLA-4 (CD152; abatacept, ipilimumab and tremelimumab) or with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade (CD279/CD274; atezolizumab, avelumab, camrelizumab, durvalumab, nivolumab and pembrolizumab). The aim of this narrative review is to describe treatment-related invasive fungal diseases (IFDs) of each category of agents. IFDs are very common in patients under blinatumomab, inotuzumab ozogamicin, basiliximab, gemtuzumab ozogamicin, alemtuzumab, and tisagenlecleucel and uncommon in patients treated with moxetumomab pasudotox, brentuximab vedotin, abatacept, ipilimumab, pembrolizumab and avelumab. Although this new era of precision medicine shows promising outcomes of targeted therapies in children with leukemia or lymphoma, the results of this review stress the necessity for ongoing surveillance and suggest the need for antifungal prophylaxis in cases where IFDs are very common complications.

Current Prophylaxis and Treatment Approaches for Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease in Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Children With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia

Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD) continues to be a leading cause of morbidity and mortality following allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). However, higher event-free survival (EFS) was observed in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) and grade II aGvHD vs. patients with no or grade I GvHD in the randomised, controlled, open-label, international, multicentre Phase III For Omitting Radiation Under Majority age (FORUM) trial. This finding suggests that moderate-severity aGvHD is associated with a graft-versus-leukaemia effect which protects against leukaemia recurrence. In order to optimise the benefits of HSCT for leukaemia patients, reduction of non-relapse mortality-which is predominantly caused by severe GvHD-is of utmost importance. Herein, we review contemporary prophylaxis and treatment options for aGvHD in children with ALL and the key challenges of aGvHD management, focusing on maintaining the graft-versus-leukaemia effect without increasing the severity of GvHD.

Ruxolitinib is an effective salvage treatment for multidrug-resistant graft-versus-host disease after haploidentical allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation without posttransplant cyclophosphamide

The purpose of our study is to identify the efficacy of ruxolitinib in human leukocyte antigen (HLA) haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) recipients with multidrug-resistant (MDR)-graft-versus-host disease (GVHD, n = 34). MDR-GVHD was defined as GVHD showing no improvement after at least 3 types of treatments. The median number of previous GVHD-therapies was 4 for both MDR-acute GVHD (aGVHD) and MDR-chronic GVHD (cGVHD). For MDR-aGVHD (n = 15), the median time to response was 10 days (range 2 to 65), and the overall response rate (ORR) was 60.0% (9/15), including 40.0% (6/15) complete response (CR) and 20.0% (3/15) partial response (PR). The 1-year probability of overall survival after ruxolitinib was 66.7%. The rates of hematologic and infectious toxicities were 73.3% and 46.7% after ruxolitinib treatment. For MDR-cGVHD (n = 19), the median time to response was 29 days (range 6 to 175), and the ORR was 89.5% (17/19), including 26.3% (5/19) CR and 63.2% (12/19) PR. All patients remained alive until our last follow-up. The rates of hematologic and infectious toxicities were 36.8% and 47.4% after ruxolitinib treatment. Ruxolitinib is an effective salvage treatment for MDR-GVHD in haplo-HSCT recipients.

Prognostic factors and long-term follow-up of basiliximab for steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease: Updated experience from a large-scale study

Acute graft-vs-host disease (aGVHD) is one of the most important causes of early mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), particularly for those with steroid-refractory (SR)-aGVHD. We aimed to identify the prognostic factors and long-term clinical outcomes of basiliximab treatment for SR-aGVHD. Basiliximab was administered on days 1, 3, and 8, and repeated weekly until aGVHD was less than grade II, or patients showed no response after four doses. Out of 1498 patients receiving allo-HSCT, 230 patients with SR-aGVHD were enrolled. Grade III to IV aGVHD before basiliximab treatment significantly and independently predicted a poorer response to basiliximab in multivariate analysis. And, the cumulative incidence of overall response at 14 days, 28 days, and 56 days after treatment was 41.4% vs 23.1% (P = .023), 70.2% vs 43.6% (P = .002), and 80.1% vs 66.7% (P = .013), respectively. This was for those with grade II and grade III to IV aGVHD. Patients receiving more than four doses of basiliximab had higher rates of infections. The 4-year cumulative incidence of total and severe chronic GVHD after basiliximab treatment was 44.8% (95% CI 38.3%-51.3%) and 2.2% (95% CI 0.3%-4.1%), respectively. The 4-year cumulative incidence of relapse, non-relapse mortality, disease-free survival, and overall survival after basiliximab treatment was 11.3% (95% CI 7.2%-15.4%), 30.0% (95% CI 24.1%-35.9%), 58.7% (95% CI 52.3%-65.1%), and 61.7% (95% CI 55.4%-68.0%), respectively. Comorbidities before allo-HSCT and refined Minnesota aGVHD risk score at diagnosis had significant influences on long-term survival. Thus, basiliximab was a safe and effective treatment for patients with SR-aGVHD.

Treatment and unmet needs in steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease

Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) is a common complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHCT) and is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Systemic steroid therapy is the first-line treatment for aGVHD, although about half of patients will become refractory to treatment. As the number of patients undergoing alloHCT increases, developing safe and effective treatments for aGVHD will become increasingly important, especially for those whose disease becomes refractory to systemic steroid therapy. This paper reviews current treatment options for patients with steroid-refractory aGVHD and discusses data from recently published clinical studies to outline emerging therapeutic strategies.

Direct T-cell Inhibition and Agents Targeting T-cell Migration and Chemotaxis

Lymphocyte depletion and blockade of T-cell activation and trafficking serve as therapeutic strategies for an enlarging number of immune-mediated diseases and malignancies. This review summarizes the infection risks associated to monoclonal antibodies that bind to the α chain of the interleukin-2 receptor, the cell surface glycoprotein CD52, and members of α4- and β2-integrin families acting as cell-adhesion molecules. An outline of the mechanisms of action, approved indications and off-label uses, expected impact on the host immune response, and available clinical evidence is provided for each of these agents.

Basiliximab as Treatment for Steroid-Refractory Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease in Pediatric Patients after Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Basiliximab has been used successfully as a second-line treatment for steroid-refractory (SR) acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) in adult patients after haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplant (haplo-HSCT) but has not been studied separately in the pediatric setting. We retrospectively reviewed 100 pediatric patients after haplo-HSCT receiving basiliximab for grades II (57%), III (27%), and IV (16%) SR aGVHD between January 2015 and December 2017. The median number of basiliximab doses was 4 (range, 2 to 9). The day 28 overall response rate was 85%, with complete response in 74% of patients, partial response in 11% of patients, and no response in 15% of patients. The day 28 overall response rates were 94.6% in skin SR aGVHD, 81.6% in gut SR aGVHD, and 66.7% in liver SR aGVHD. Infectious complications included bacterial infection (11%), presumed or documented fungal infections (7%), cytomegalovirus viremia (53%), Epstein-Barr virus viremia (11%), human herpesvirus-6 viremia (7%), and herpes simplex virus viremia (1%). The 3-year overall survival, disease-free survival, nonrelapse mortality, and relapse rates between responders and nonresponders were 81.3% versus 46.7% (P < .001), 79.0% versus 46.7% (P = .001), 6.1% versus 33.3% (P < .001), and 14.9% versus 20.0% (P = .46), respectively. We conclude that basiliximab is an effective second-line agent for pediatric patients with SR aGVHD after haplo-HSCT, particularly for skin SR aGVHD.

Outcome and Prognostic Factors of High-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Background

Allogeneic transplantation remains one of the best therapies for high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (HR-AML).

Material/Methods

This study retrospectively analyzed 126 patients with HR-AML after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCST).

Results

The disease-free survival (DFS) rates of 1 year and 3 years were 58.83% (95%CI: 50.75–68.20%) and 53.09% (95%CI: 44.59–63.22%) respectively. The cumulative relapse rates of 1 year and 3 years were 21.1% (95%CI: 14.4–28.8%) and 25.9% (95%CI: 18.1–34.5%) respectively. The cumulative incidences of III to IV acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) for 100 days was 8.70% (95%CI: 4.6–14.5%). The cumulative rate of extensive chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) for 1-year was 4.1% (95%CI: 1.5–8.7%). The cumulative transplantation related mortality rate of 1 year and 3 years were 20.1% (95%CI: 13.6–27.6%) and 21.0% (95%CI: 14.3–28.6%) respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that lower overall survival was correlated with age, bacterial or fungal infection, disease status at transplantation, III–IV aGVHD, post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD), white blood cell engraftment, and extramedullary involvement (P<0.05). The results of multivariate analysis were that the aforementioned factors were also related to lower overall survival except for PTLD (P<0.05). The results of univariate and multivariate analysis were that extramedullary involvement, III–IV aGVHD, and status pre-transplantation influenced DFS (P<0.05). The risk factors for relapse were status pre-transplantation and extramedullary involvement by univariate and multivariate analysis (P<0.05).

Conclusions

HR-AML has inferior prognosis. Our study indicated the necessity of achieving remission status prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and administration of preventive treatments on high-risk patients after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In addition, adequate prevention and treatment of complications are needed.

Acute and chronic Graft-versus-host disease after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is one of the main complications of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, affecting about 50% to 80% of the patients. Acute GVHD and its clinical manifestations are discussed in this article, as well as the new NIH criteria for the diagnosis and classification of chronic GVHD. Therapy for both chronic and acute GVHD is an important field of discussion, as there is no proven superiority for the majority of therapies used after primary treatment has failed. Hence, this review is meant to be a useful consultation tool for hematologists dealing with this complex transplantation procedure complication.

Combining therapeutic antibodies using basiliximab and etanercept for severe steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease: A multi-center prospective study

Acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD) remains a major problem after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Standard frontline therapy for aGVHD involves corticosteroids. However, fewer than half of patients have a lasting complete response. The long-term mortality rate of steroid-refractory aGVHD (SR-aGVHD) remains around 70%. To date, no consensus has been reached regarding the optimal salvage treatment for SR-aGVHD. We performed the first prospective, multi-center clinical trial to assess the efficacy and safety of a novel approach to treat severe (grades III-IV) SR-aGVHD with the combination of basiliximab and etanercept. Sixty-five patients with severe SR-aGVHD from six centers were included. The median number of basiliximab infusions was 4 (range 2-11) and of etanercept was 9 (range 2-12). At day 28 after starting the combination treatment, overall response (complete and partial response: CR+PR) to second-line treatment was 90.8% with 75.4% being CR. The incidences of CR per organ were 100%, 73.8%, and 79.7% for skin, liver, and gut involvement, respectively. Patients >30-y old (p = 0.043, RR = 3.169), development of grades III-IV liver aGVHD (p = 0.007, RR = 5.034) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation (p = 0.035, RR = 4.02) were independent predictors for incomplete response. Combined treatment with basiliximab and etanercept resulted in improved CR to visceral aGVHD and significantly superior 2-y overall survival (54.7% vs. 14.8%, p <0.001) compared with classical salvage treatments. Our data suggest that the combination of basiliximab and etanercept may constitute a promising new treatment option for SR-aGVHD.

T cell costimulation blockade for hyperacute steroid refractory graft versus-host disease in children undergoing haploidentical transplantation

The outcome of hyperacute grade 3-4 steroid-refractory graft-versus-host-disease (SR-GVHD) remains dismal despite a plethora of agents being tried alone or in combination. Following T replete haploidentical transplantation with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide on 75 patients, 10 patients (13%) aged 2-20years, developed hyperacute SR-GVHD. We report on the outcome of two different regimens for treatment of SR-GVHD on the outcome of these patients. Five patients were treated in Regimen A consisting of anti-thymocyte globulin, Etanercept and Basiliximab. The next 5 patients were treated combining T cell costimulation blockade with Abatacept along with Etanercept and Basiliximab. The overall response at days 29 and 56 were 40% and 0% with Regimen A and100% and 40% with Regimen B. The major cause of treatment failure was progression of GVHD and opportunistic infections. Two of the patients achieving a complete remission on Regimen B are long term disease free survivors off immunosuppression. Our study demonstrates the dismal outcome of early onset SR-GVHD in children following T replete haploidentical transplantation. However, the combination of Abatacept with anticytokine agents seems to produce encouraging early response and might warrant further investigation.

A Prospective Study of Alemtuzumab as a Second-Line Agent for Steroid-Refractory Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease in Pediatric and Young Adult Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

We describe a single-center prospective study of alemtuzumab as a second-line agent for steroid-refractory (SR) acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) in pediatric and young adult allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Alemtuzumab was administered for grades II to IV aGVHD if patients did not improve within 5 days or worsened within 48 hours after corticosteroids. Interim analyses of alemtuzumab levels and response were performed after every 5 patients enrolled, resulting in 3 dosing cohorts, as follows: (1) .2 mg/kg alemtuzumab subcutaneously on days 1 to 5 (maximum of 31 mg over 5 days) and .2 mg/kg/dose (not exceeding 10 mg/dose) on days 15, 22, and 29; (2) .2 mg/kg alemtuzumab subcutaneously on days 1 to 5 (maximum of 43 mg over 5 days) and .2 mg/kg/dose on day 7, 10, 15, 22, and 29; and (3) .2 mg/kg subcutaneously on days 1 to 5 and .2 mg/kg/dose on day 7, 10, 15, and 22. Alemtuzumab levels were assessed before starting alemtuzumab and at days 1, 3, 6, 10, and 14 and weekly until day 99, where day 1 was the day of first alemtuzumab dose. Fifteen patients (median age, 10 years; range, 1.4 to 27) received alemtuzumab for grades II (6%), III (74%), and IV (20%) SR-aGVHD. The overall response rate was 67%, with complete response (CR) in 40%, partial response (PR) in 27%, and no response in 33%. The median day 6 alemtuzumab level was 2.79 µg/mL (interquartile range, 1.34 to 4.89) in patients with CR compared with .62 µg/mL (interquartile range, .25 to 1.45) in patients with PR + no response (P < .05). Ninety percent (n = 9) of patients with a CR or PR reduced corticosteroid doses within 8 weeks from first alemtuzumab dose. Side effects included fever (26%) and transient thrombocytopenia (53%). Asymptomatic viremias occurred in all patients but invasive viral disease occurred in 2 patients. One patient developed Epstein-Barr virus-post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder. Eighty percent (n = 12) of patients were alive at 6 months, of whom 53% (n = 8) were free of GVHD whereas 13% (n = 2) developed chronic GVHD. Alemtuzumab is an effective second-line agent for children and young adults with SR-aGVHD. Higher alemtuzumab levels are associated with CR. A real-time dose adjusted alemtuzumab study is needed to further optimize the dose of alemtuzumab in aGVHD.

Immunological effects in patients with steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease following treatment with basiliximab, a CD25 monoclonal antibody

Steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) is a complication following an allogeneic stem cell transplantation with limited therapeutic options. Studies have shown a response in up to 80% of patients with this condition after treatment with the CD25 monoclonal antibody, basiliximab. Despite the good responses to treatment, around 50% of the patients experience recurrence of their GvHD symptoms 4-6 wk following cessation of therapy. The in vivo changes in the following treatment with this antibody have not been elucidated so far. We treated 14 patients with severe steroid-refractory GvHD with basiliximab weekly for 4 wk and monitored the changes in the T-, B-, NK- and dendritic cell subsets over this time period. The overall response to treatment was 92% (13/14) with 50% (7/14) achieving a complete response. Fifty four percentage (7/13) of the patients who responded showed recurrence of their GvHD symptoms. Contrary to expectations, our observations showed a significant depletion of the regulatory T-cell subset following treatment. Our findings suggest that the undesirable depletion of the regulatory T cells along with the CD25(+) acute inflammatory cells might be responsible for the high incidence of GvHD recurrence in this cohort of patients.

The use of basiliximab-infliximab combination for the treatment of severe gastrointestinal acute GvHD

After allogeneic stem cell transplant, severe grade III-IV gastrointestinal (GI) acute GvHD is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, and generally results in poor outcomes. Salvage therapy for patients who fail steroid therapy is not well defined in the literature. In the current retrospective study, we reviewed our experience with the combination of basiliximab and infliximab in 21 patients with severe, grade III-IV GI acute GvHD of whom 16 met the definition for steroid-refractory disease. The overall response rate was 76%, with 43% CR at a median time of 21 days after beginning treatment. The survival at 1 year was 24%, with most deaths due to complications from GvHD and recurrence of primary disease. All five of the long-term survivors have chronic GvHD. On the basis of a review of the literature, this regimen does not seem to be significantly more effective than other strategies for severe GI GvHD and seems to be worse than the results reported for basiliximab alone. Future studies of single-agent basiliximab and newer agents are required.

Preemptive administration of human αβ T cell receptor-targeting monoclonal antibody GZ-αβTCR potently abrogates aggressive graft-versus-host disease in vivo

GVHD, both acute and chronic, remains the major cause of morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Thus, there is still a great need for therapeutic tools for the prevention and treatment of GVHD. Several biologics have shown promising results in salvage therapies but are attendant on an increased risk for opportunistic infections, lymphoproliferative disorders, and relapse. This is partly due to efficient T cell elimination that neither dissects alloreactive from non-alloreactive T cells nor considers functional and structural distinctiveness of pathogen- and malignancy-reactive γδ and iNKT T cells. A novel, humanized monoclonal antibody, GZ-αβTCR, specific for the human αβ T cell receptor, was evaluated in a xenogeneic GVHD model for its potential to prevent or ameliorate GVHD and prolong survival. We could show that GZ-αβTCR significantly attenuated clinical signs of GVHD and prolonged survival by preferential depletion of CD4 cells and the naïve T cell compartment, the trigger and driver of GVHD. In a regimen that included a preemptive dose, GZ-αβTCR treatment sufficiently abrogated GVHD. Importantly, GZ-αβTCR's specificity spared host cell-mediated immune competence of cell types other than αβT cells: namely γδT cells. GZ-αβTCR's outstanding capacity to prevent GVHD and ameliorate an ongoing GVHD while sparing immune cells other than αβT cells strongly recommends GZ-αβTCR for the prevention and treatment of acute GVHD in clinical settings.

Myeloablative haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation using basiliximab for graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis

OBJECTIVES

We retrospectively compared the prophylactic effect of basiliximab and antithymocyte globulin (ATG) after haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in patients with leukemia.

METHODS

Haploidentical HSCT using basiliximab for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis in 10 patients with leukemia was retrospectively compared to ATG for GVHD prophylaxis in 24 patients.

RESULTS

All the patients achieved neutrophil engraftment. One patient in the ATG group did not achieve platelet engraftment. The incidence of grade II-IV and grade III-IV acute GVHD was 30 and 20%, respectively, in the basiliximab group and 16.7 and 4.2%, respectively, in the ATG group (P > 0.05). Extensive cGVHD developed in 40 and 22.2% of patients in the basiliximab group and ATG group, respectively (P > 0.05). Basiliximab resulted in mild infection and a low incidence (10%) of infection-related mortality; ATG resulted in relative severe infection with 29.2% infection-related mortality (P > 0.05). During the follow-up period, 20% of the basiliximab group and 22.7% of the ATG group relapsed (P > 0.05). In the basiliximab group and the ATG group, the 3-year accumulative overall survival rate was, respectively, 80 and 52.5% and the 3-year leukemia-free survival, respectively, was 60 and 49.6% (P > 0.05).

DISCUSSION

The incidences of grade II-IV and grade III-IV aGVHD in the basiliximab group were similar to those in halpoidentical HSCT containing ATG. Compared to the ATG group, the basiliximab group had a lower rate of transplantation-related mortality and better long-term survival, but without statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

The prophylactic regimen of basiliximab with haploidentical HSCT against GVHD seems safe and promising. More studies needed to verify this.

Alemtuzumab for severe steroid-refractory gastrointestinal acute graft-versus-host disease

Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) still remains the main cause of morbidity and mortality after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Moreover, patients who did not respond to first-line treatment with glucocorticosteroids have a very poor outcome. Some studies suggested that alemtuzumab (a humanized monoclonal antibody against the CD52 antigen) might be effective for treatment of refractory aGVHD. Here we report a single-center experience with alemtuzumab in refractory gastrointestinal aGVHD. From September 2009 to April 2012 at the Grenoble medical university center, 24 patients who had presented a refractory gastrointestinal aGVHD to corticosteroid, or after another immunosuppressive drug, were retrospectively analyzed. Most patients (n = 19) presented stage 4 gastrointestinal aGVHD. Response to treatment (either complete or partial) was observed in 15 patients (62.4%). The overall survival rate at 1 year for all patients was 33.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 15.9% to 51.9%) and for responders, 53.3% (95% CI, 26.3% to 74.4%). Two patients died from infection, 5 patients from recurrent GVHD, and 1 from an uncontrolled post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder.

The successful use of alemtuzumab for treatment of steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease in pediatric patients

SR-aGVHD remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in allogeneic HCT recipients. Alemtuzumab has been used with success in adult patients but has not been studied in the pediatric setting. To estimate the effectiveness of alemtuzumab for the treatment of SR-aGVHD in pediatric patients, we retrospectively reviewed the charts of 19 patients (median age 4 yr, range 0.5-28 years) with grades II (n = 3), III (n = 10), or IV (n = 6) SR-aGVHD who received alemtuzumab treatment. Patients received a median dose of 0.9 mg/kg alemtuzumab (range 0.3-2 mg/kg) divided over 2-6 days. Eighty-nine percent of patients received additional courses. A complete response, defined as GVHD of grade 0 at four wk following the first alemtuzumab course, was observed in nine patients (47%). A partial response, defined as an improvement in grade after four wk, was observed in five patients (26%). There was no response in five patients (26%). The overall response rate at four wk was 73%. Infectious complications included bacteremia (47%), presumed or documented fungal infections (21%), adenovirus viremia (52%), EBV viremia (36%), and CMV viremia (36%). We conclude that alemtuzumab is effective for SR-aGVHD in pediatric patients with a tolerable spectrum of complications.

Recent progress in managing graft-versus-host disease and viral infections following allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Despite recent reductions in transplant-related mortality, post-transplant complications such as graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) remain major obstacles to the successful application of allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation. Steroid-refractory GvHD has a poor outcome. Although there are a variety of new approaches to the treatment of refractory GvHD, many have limited evidence of efficacy. Other approaches appear to be unacceptably toxic. It would be preferable to improve GvHD prophylaxis. There is good evidence that rates of GvHD can be reduced without unacceptable reduction of the graft-versus-leukemia effect or compromising overall survival. However, prophylactic measures aimed at reducing T-cell numbers or functions are associated with high rates of reactivation of latent viruses. New technologies that allow rapid generation of virus-specific T-cells show promise to reduce the frequency and severity of such reactivations and have the potential to revolutionize the approach to post-transplant infectious complications.

Current practice in diagnosis and treatment of acute graft-versus-host disease: results from a survey among German-Austrian-Swiss hematopoietic stem cell transplant centers

To assess current clinical practice in diagnosis and treatment of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD), we performed a survey among German, Austrian, and Swiss allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) centers. Thirty-four of 72 contacted centers (47%) completed both the diagnostic and therapeutic sections of the survey, representing 65% of allo-HSCT activity within the participating countries in 2011. Three pediatric centers answered as requested only the diagnostic part of the survey. In the presence of diarrhea and decreased oral intake after engraftment, only 4 centers (12%) do not perform any endoscopy before the start of immunosuppressive treatment. In case of a skin rash with the differential diagnosis of drug reaction, only 12 centers (35%) perform a skin biopsy up front, whereas 19 do so after failure of systemic steroids. In the presence of rapidly increasing cholestasis occurring without any other signs of aGVHD, 11 centers (32%) perform a liver biopsy up front and 14 only after failure of steroid treatment, whereas 9 centers do not perform a liver biopsy at all. Twenty centers (59%) use a percutaneous approach, 12 a transvenous approach, and 1 mini-laparoscopy for liver biopsies. First-line treatment of cutaneous aGVHD stage 1 consists of topical treatment alone in 17 of 31 responding centers (61%), whereas isolated cutaneous aGVHD stage III is treated with systemic steroids (prednisolone below 0.5 mg/kg/day n = 2, 0.5 to 1.0 mg/kg/day n = 10, above 1.0 to 2.5 mg/kg/day n = 19) without or with topical agents (steroids n = 10; calcineurin inhibitors n = 3). In gastrointestinal manifestations of aGVHD, 9 centers (29%) add topical to systemic steroids, and 3 consider topical steroids as the only treatment for mild gastrointestinal and cutaneous aGVHD. The choice of agent for second-line treatment as well as the sequence of administration are extremely heterogeneous, most likely due to a lack of convincing data published. Most frequently used are mycophenolate mofetil (n = 14) and extracorporeal photopheresis (n = 10). Our survey also demonstrates that clinicians chose salvage therapies for steroid-refractory aGVHD based on their centers' own clinical experience.

Immunotherapies in dermatologic disorders

Treatment modalities and therapeutic response experience support the use of immunotherapy in the treatment of many diseases in all fields of medicine. The aim of this article is to conduct and present a review of literature on the use of immunotherapy in the treatment of skin diseases analyzing scientific literature available up to January 2012. Studies that presented evidence-based data were selected. The article discusses how blocking or reverting the effect of a specific immunologic disequilibrium can treat dermatoses and intends to transfer a large amount of immunotherapy knowledge into a historical perspective for physicians naive to immunotherapy practices.

Secondary treatment of acute graft-versus-host disease: a critical review

Management of steroid-resistant or steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) poses one of the most vexing and difficult problems faced by transplantation physicians. In the current study, we used 10 criteria to evaluate 67 reports describing secondary treatment of patients with aGVHD. The goal of this exercise was not only to provide a critical summary of the literature but also to offer suggestions that could improve future studies. Areas especially in need of improvement include the use of a consistent treatment regimen, the assessment of response at a consistent prespecified time point, consideration of concomitant treatment in assessing response, documentation that selection bias was minimized, and the use of methods that test a formal statistical hypothesis based on a contemporaneous or historical benchmark. Our results suggest that previous published reports collectively offer little guidance in discerning the most effective treatments for patients with steroid-resistant or steroid-refractory aGVHD. Adherence to the proposed criteria in future reports would enable meaningful comparisons across studies and thereby accelerate progress in evaluating new treatments for patients with aGVHD.

Steroid-refractory acute GVHD: lack of long-term improved survival using new generation anticytokine treatment

There is no consensus on the optimal treatment of steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (SR-aGVHD) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In our center, the treatment policy has changed over time with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) being used from 1999 to 2003, and etanercept or inolimomab after 2004. An observational study compared survival and infection rates in all consecutive patients receiving 1 of these 3 treatments. Ninety-three patients were included. The main end point was overall survival (OS). Median age was 37 years. Acute GVHD developed at a median of 15 days after transplantation. Second-line treatment was initiated a median of 12 days after aGVHD diagnosis. Therapies were MMF in 56%, inolimomab in 22%, and etanercept in 23% of the patients. Overall, second-line treatment response rate was 45% (complete response: 28%), MMF: 55%, inolimomab: 35%, and etanercept: 28%. With 74 months median follow-up, the 2-year survival was 30% (95% confidence interval: 22-41). Risk factors significantly associated with OS in multivariate analysis were disease status at transplantation; grade III-IV aGVHD at second-line treatment institution; and liver involvement. None of the second-line therapy influenced this poor outcome. Viral and fungal infections were not statistically different among the 3 treatment options; however, bacterial infections were more frequent in patients treated with anticytokines. Over an 11-year period, 3 treatment strategies, including 2 anticytokines, give similar results in patients with SR-aGVHD.

Treatment of graft-versus-host disease with monoclonal antibodies and related fusion proteins

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation has evolved from an experimental treatment approach to a widely used, curative therapy to treat malignant and nonmalignant diseases of the hematopoietic system. Despite advances in donor selection, conditioning regimens and supportive care, acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) remain a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Steroids are the standard first-line treatment and are able to control GvHD in approximately 50% of patients. Those who fail on steroids have a poor long-term prognosis. Therefore, a large number of drugs and procedures have been evaluated as second-line therapy. Monoclonal antibodies have increasingly been used to treat malignancy and autoimmune disease during the last 20 years. Their unique ability to target specific antigens theoretically enables them to directly interfere with cellular mechanisms that are involved in GvHD pathology. For this reason, monoclonal antibodies have been studied extensively as a second-line treatment for acute and chronic GvHD. The purpose of this article is to collect published data on clinical trials from the current literature and to give an overview on efficacy and toxicity of monoclonal antibody treatment for GvHD.

Current and future approaches for control of graft-versus-host disease

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), both acute and chronic, remains one of the major barriers to improving outcomes after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. The pathophysiology of GVHD is complex and incompletely understood. GVHD is believed to arise from the interaction of: tissue damage and proinflammatory cytokines causing activation of antigen-presenting cells (APCs, donor T-cell activation by APCs and cytokines and host tissue injury by effector T lymphocytes and proinflammatory cytokines. There is also a role for additional lymphocyte subtypes (naive and memory T cells, regulatory T cells, natural killer T cells and B cells) in GVHD pathogenesis. Strategies to improve donor-recipient HLA match, and to minimize conditioning toxicity, cytokine release and APC and effector T-lymphocyte activation, will likely improve prophylaxis of acute (and possibly chronic) GVHD. Therapy of established acute and chronic GVHD is still heavily dependent on corticosteroids, despite their limited efficacy and considerable toxicity. Novel agents (and/or combinations of agents) comprising pharmacologic, biologic and cellular therapies targeting specific steps or subsets involved in immune activation will likely comprise future advances in GVHD control. This article reviews the current state of knowledge regarding the prevention and treatment of acute and chronic GVHD. Novel approaches currently undergoing evaluation are also highlighted.

The use of monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of graft-versus-host disease following allogeneic stem cell transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Steroids along with calcineurin inhibitors remain the standard initial therapy, however, less than half of the patients completely respond and there is no uniformly accepted therapy for patients with steroid-resistant GVHD.

AREAS COVERED

This paper reviews the current role and ongoing development of mAbs in the treatment of GVHD. Various mAbs to cell surface antigens on GVHD effector cells have been investigated for the treatment of acute GVHD: these include anti-TNF-α antibodies, IL-2 receptor antagonists, anti-CD3 and anti-CD52 mAbs, while anti-CD20 mAb has been extensively investigated in the setting of chronic GVHD. Overall, response rates have been reported to be greater than 60%, although it should be emphasized that the long-term survival still remains suboptimal, mainly due to the detrimental side effects of infectious complications, progressive GVHD and relapse of underlying malignancy.

EXPERT OPINION

Future challenges will include more appropriate definition of these agents in the therapeutic scenario of GVHD. Combinations of mAbs or mAb combined with newer immunosuppressive drugs might potentially achieve greater success, especially if used early in the disease process.

Acute graft-versus-host disease: new treatment strategies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), despite improvements in our understanding of its pathophysiology as well as the generation of new monoclonal antibodies, immunomodulatory chemotherapy, cellular therapeutics and supportive care. Herein, we review therapies that have proven effective as well as newer agents that have recently improved GVHD response rates and survival following HCT.

RECENT FINDINGS

Novel approaches to prevent or treat GVHD are often based on evidence from experimental models. Our understanding of the pathophysiology of GVHD may lead to the development of innovative strategies that target both soluble and cellular effectors. Among such agents are sirolimus, anti-tumor necrosis factor antibodies, anti-LFA-3-IgG fusion protein, extracorporeal photopheresis, mesenchymal stem cells and regulatory T cells.

SUMMARY

Obstacles to the improvement of HCT include the tight linkage between GVHD toxicity and the beneficial graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect, as well as the impairment of immune reconstitution by immunomodulatory drugs leading to life-threatening infections. The design of newer phase I/II clinical trials are underway. Future therapies are likely to include modulation of cell types that play key roles in the GVH process, including regulatory T cells, dendritic cells, natural killer T cells and B cells.

Safety profile and clinical outcomes in a phase I, placebo-controlled study of siplizumab in acute graft-versus-host disease

BACKGROUND

Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a major complication of both bone marrow and hematologic stem cell allografts. T cells and natural killer (NK) cells have been linked to the development of GVHD. Modulation of these cells via the CD2 receptor may be a potentially important approach to the management of this disease.

METHODS

The safety profile and tolerability of siplizumab (MEDI-507), a humanized anti-CD2 IgG-1kappa monoclonal antibody, in the treatment of GVHD were evaluated in a phase I, double-blind, multiple-dose, placebo-controlled study. Thirty-four subjects with at least grade II acute GVHD were randomized to receive four doses of 0.012, 0.04, 0.12, or 0.4 mg/kg siplizumab or placebo intravenously every 3 days. Subjects received concurrent 2 mg/kg per day methylprednisolone for more than or equal to 10 days.

RESULTS

No meaningful difference occurred between siplizumab and placebo groups in the incidence or severity of adverse events or laboratory test results. No increase in incidence of infection secondary to siplizumab treatment was observed. During 100 days postinitial infusion, a modest increase in resolution of GVHD, grade 0 (67% vs. 54%, P=0.0629), was reported for the siplizumab-treated group.

CONCLUSION

Siplizumab administered with corticosteroid therapy for grade II or higher acute GVHD treatment exhibited an acceptable safety profile that would support further clinical development.

Daclizumab therapy for children with corticosteroid-resistant acute graft-vs.-host disease

MAbs such as daclizumab have shown promising results in the treatment of corticosteroid-resistant aGVHD. Data describing the efficacy of MAbs in children are limited. We describe the efficacy of daclizumab in children with corticosteroid-resistant aGVHD. Seventeen children (0.4-16.2 yr) received daclizumab for aGVHD. Safety was evaluated in all 17. Response was evaluated in the 15 children who received a full course of daclizumab. A PR was defined as improvement of aGVHD symptoms in at least one organ without worsening in other organs. We observed an overall response rate (CR plus PR) of 40% (6/15). Four children had a CR and two had a PR. aGVHD involving the gut had the highest response rate (five of 10; 50%). Adverse effects attributed to daclizumab were limited to an episode of reactive arthritis. Mortality was high (47%; eight of 17) though five of the six responders to daclizumab survived. The mean length of follow-up in the surviving nine patients was 32 months (range seven to 48). We conclude that daclizumab is effective in the treatment of children with corticosteroid-resistant aGVHD, especially in patients with gut involvement.

Innovative approaches to treat steroid-resistant or steroid refractory GVHD

First-line treatment of GVHD is based on steroids and produces sustained responses in 50-80% of patients with acute GVHD (aGVHD) and 40-50% of patients with chronic GVHD (cGVHD) depending on the initial disease severity. Non-responding children are offered second-line therapy with combinations of various agents, but currently available agents have not improved survival in these high-risk populations. In this minireview, we will focus on new agents to treat GVHD in paediatric patients.

Immunomodulation and pharmacological strategies in the treatment of graft-versus-host disease

BACKGROUND

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation offers great promise for the treatment of a variety of diseases including malignancies and other diseases of hematopoietic origin. However, morbidity and mortality due to graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) remain a major barrier to its application.

OBJECTIVE

This review will provide an overview of the pathophysiology of GVHD and discuss the recent advances in GVHD management in both preclinical and clinical studies.

METHODS

An extensive literature search on PubMed from 1995 to 2008 was performed.

RESULTS/CONCLUSION

There has been much progress in our understanding of GVHD and finding new means to control acute GVHD. While these approaches hold promise, as yet none has been able to replace the standard methods we may use routinely to decrease the incidence of the condition.

Current and novel therapies in acute GVHD

Despite improvements in our understanding of transplant immunology and clinical and supportive care, acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) remains a clinical challenge and a major cause of morbidity and mortality for patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. While systemic corticosteroid is standard primary therapy for acute GVHD, there is no established standard treatment in the steroid-refractory setting. New generations of monoclonal antibodies, biologics, and chemotherapeutics with immunomodulatory effects have been developed over the past decade, and are being tested as novel therapies in this disease. Many of these agents - including, among others, mycophenolate mofetil, anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha antibodies, denileukin diftitox, and anti-interleukin-2Ralpha-chain antibodies - have demonstrated promising activity in steroid-refractory acute GVHD. Despite the high response rates, however, long-term survival remains poor due to a high incidence of infections. The key to improving acute GVHD outcomes may, in fact, rest upon successful initial therapy, and timely taper of corticosteroids to promote healthier immune reconstitution. Clinical trials combining these newer agents with systemic corticosteroids as initial treatment are under way, and will determine whether fortifying initial therapy will indeed reduce the development of steroid-refractory GVHD and improve long-term outcomes. In this article, we review current and novel agents available for acute GVHD, and discuss newer investigational approaches - such as phototherapy and cellular therapies - in the management of this common transplant complication.