Prospective endoscopic evaluation for gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease: determination of the best diagnostic approach

Role of Endoscopic Techniques in the Diagnosis of Complications of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Review of the Literature

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (Allo-SCT) implies that a donor and a recipient are not genetically identical. Allo-SCT is used to cure a variety of conditions, including hematologic malignancies using the graft versus tumor effect, nonmalignant hematologic, immune deficiencies, and, more recently, genetic disorders and inborn errors of metabolism. Given the immunosuppressive and myeloablative nature of some of the conditioning chemotherapy regimens used during the Allo-SCT, patients are often at high risk of infection, including viral infections affecting the gastrointestinal tract, following the transplant. Furthermore, other complications such as hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) or graft-versus-host disease may occur post-transplant and may require endoscopy to assist in the diagnosis. This review will provide newer insights into the importance of endoscopic techniques in the diagnosis of post-Allo-SCT complications with a focus on safety and timing.

Role of Endoscopic Techniques in the Diagnosis of Complications of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Review of the Literature

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (Allo-SCT) implies that a donor and a recipient are not genetically identical. Allo-SCT is used to cure a variety of conditions, including hematologic malignancies using the graft versus tumor effect, nonmalignant hematologic, immune deficiencies, and, more recently, genetic disorders and inborn errors of metabolism. Given the immunosuppressive and myeloablative nature of some of the conditioning chemotherapy regimens used during the Allo-SCT, patients are often at high risk of infection, including viral infections affecting the gastrointestinal tract, following the transplant. Furthermore, other complications such as hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) or graft-versus-host disease may occur post-transplant and may require endoscopy to assist in the diagnosis. This review will provide newer insights into the importance of endoscopic techniques in the diagnosis of post-Allo-SCT complications with a focus on safety and timing.

Acute graft versus host disease after liver transplantation: where do we stand?

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a rare complication after liver transplantation (LT), with an estimated incidence rate of 0.5% to 2% and a mortality rate as high as 75%. The classical target organs of GVHD include the intestines, liver, and skin. The damage of these organs is not easy to detect for the clinician as there is no widely accepted clinical or laboratory diagnostic tests; as a result, diagnosis and initiation of therapy are often delayed. Moreover, without prospective clinical trials to reference, evidence guiding therapy is limited. This review summarized the current knowledge, the potential applications and the clinical relevance of GVHD after LT, highlighting novel approaches in grading and management of GVHD.

PET assessment of acute gastrointestinal graft versus host disease

Acute gastrointestinal graft versus host disease (GI-GVHD) is a common complication following allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), and is characterised by severe morbidity, frequent treatment-refractoriness, and high mortality. Early, accurate identification of GI-GVHD could allow for therapeutic interventions to ameliorate its severity, improve response rates and survival; however, standard endoscopic biopsy is inadequately informative in terms of diagnostic sensitivity or outcome prediction. In an era where rapid technological and laboratory advances have dramatically expanded our understanding of GI-GVHD biology and potential therapeutic targets, there is substantial scope for novel investigations that can precisely guide GI-GVHD management. In particular, the combination of tissue-based biomarker assessment (plasma cytokines, faecal microbiome) and molecular imaging by positron emission tomography (PET) offers the potential for non-invasive, real-time in vivo assessment of donor:recipient immune activity within the GI tract for GI-GVHD prediction or diagnosis. In this article, we review the evidence regarding GI-GVHD diagnosis, and examine the potential roles and translational opportunities posed by these novel diagnostic tools, with a focus on the evolving role of PET.

Diagnostic yield for video capsule endoscopy in gastrointestinal graft- versus -host disease: a systematic review and metaanalysis

BACKGROUND

The gastrointestinal tract is the second most involved organ for graft-versus-host disease where involvement of the small intestine is present in 50% of the cases. Therefore, the use of a non-invasive investigation i.e., video capsule endoscopy (VCE) seems ideal in the diagnostic work-up, but this has never been systematically evaluated before.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this systematic review was to determine the efficacy and safety of VCE, in comparison with conventional endoscopy in patients who received hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

METHOD

Databases searched were PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL. All databases were searched from their inception date until June 17, 2022. The search identified 792 publications, of which 8 studies were included in our analysis comprising of 232 unique patients. Efficacy was calculated in comparison with the golden standard i.e., histology. Risk of bias assessment was performed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool.

RESULTS

The pooled sensitivity was higher for VCE at 0.77 (95% CI: 0.60-0.89) compared to conventional endoscopy 0.62 (95% CI: 0.47-0.75) but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.155, Q = 2.02). Similarly, the pooled specificity was higher for VCE at 0.68 (95% CI: 0.46-0.84) than for conventional endoscopy at 0.58 (95% CI: 0.40-0.74) but not statistically significant (p = 0.457, Q = 0.55). Moreover, concern for adverse events such as intestinal obstruction or perforation was not justified since none of the capsules were retained in the small bowel and no perforations occurred in relation to VCE. A limitation to the study is the retrospective approach seen in 50% of the studies.

CONCLUSION

The role of video capsule endoscopy in diagnosing or dismissing graft-versus-host disease is not yet established and requires further studies. However, the modality appears safe in this cohort.

Acute graft-versus-host disease

Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a common immune complication that can occur after allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). Acute GVHD is a major health problem in these patients, and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Acute GVHD is caused by the recognition and the destruction of the recipient tissues and organs by the donor immune effector cells. This condition usually occurs within the first 3 months after alloHCT, but later onset is possible. Targeted organs include the skin, the lower and upper gastrointestinal tract and the liver. Diagnosis is mainly based on clinical examination, and complementary examinations are performed to exclude differential diagnoses. Preventive treatment for acute GVHD is administered to all patients who receive alloHCT, although it is not always effective. Steroids are used for first-line treatment, and the Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) inhibitor ruxolitinib is second-line treatment. No validated treatments are available for acute GVHD that is refractory to steroids and ruxolitinib, and therefore it remains an unmet medical need.

Round-Robin test for the histological diagnosis of acute colonic Graft-versus-Host disease validating established histological criteria and grading systems

Histomorpholgy is one of the mainstays of acute Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) diagnosis. However, concerns about reproducibility and the most appropriate grading system question its usefulness. Our aim was to assess histomorphological parameters and previously reported grading systems for GvHD regarding reproducibility and validity. Moreover, we propose that sum scores, derived by combining separately scored morphological parameters into a total score, might provide a simplified but equally effective means to grade GvHD. A total of 123 colon biopsies were assessed across four pathologists for intestinal GvHD using a Round-Robin test and results were correlated with clinical findings. Interobserver reproducibility was high for histological parameters that were evaluated as indicators of acute GvHD. Published grading systems were moderately reproducible (ICC 0.679-0.769) while simplified sum scores, in comparison, showed better interrater reliability (ICC 0.818-0.896). All grading systems and sum scores were associated with clinical signs of GvHD and in part with therapy response and survival. However, they were not able to stratify patients according to the clinical severity of GvHD. In a hot-spot analysis 1 crypt apoptotic body (CAB) in 10 crypts was a reasonable cut-off value for minimal diagnostic criteria of GvHD. In conclusion, histology can contribute to the diagnosis of GvHD and is reproducible. Published grading systems are able to reflect clinical findings as are simplified sum scores, which showed improved reproducibility and might be easier to handle as they are based on adding up histological parameters rather than transferring histological findings into a separate grading system. Sum scores will have to be further tested in a prospective setting.

Video Capsule Endoscopy in Gastroenterology

Video capsule endoscopy (VCE) is a wireless technology used by gastroenterologists for various indications in their clinical practice. There has been significant improvement in this technology since its start about two decades ago. Specific video capsules have been made to evaluate the small bowel, colon, and esophagus. Now pan-enteric video capsule is available to assess both the small bowel and colon. VCE is a non-invasive procedure that has been tremendously evaluated for various gastrointestinal disorders, particularly small intestinal bleeding. There are specific contraindications and complications of VCE. This procedure has the technical part and video reading part. Newer software programs will come to reduce the reading time. Artificial intelligence is also coming for quick and accurate diagnosis of any positive findings during VCE. VCE is an important diagnostic test in the field of gastroenterology. Although it is an addition to optical endoscopic procedures to visualize the gastrointestinal mucosa, it has advantages and disadvantages.

Endoscopic Approach in the Diagnosis of Gastrointestinal Acute Graft Versus Host Disease in Children

The objectives of this study were to describe clinical, histological, and endoscopic findings in children undergoing gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy for symptoms of digestive acute graft-versus-host disease (a-GvHD), to evaluate the rate of steroid-resistant GvHD and transplant-related mortality, and to describe the feasibility and safety of the endoscopic procedure.

Methods

This was a retrospective study conducted, at the IRCSS Istituto G. Gaslini in Genova, Italy, in 26 children undergoing upper or lower GI endoscopy after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation between 2000 and 2017.

Results

Histology confirmed a diagnosis of a-GvHD in 73% of patients; it was frequently associated with steroid-resistant a-GvHD (P = 0.001) and with an increased transplant-related mortality. Additionally, one patient developed duodenal hematoma after endoscopy for a high-grade GI a-GvHD.

Conclusions

In our experience, the endoscopic approach in the diagnosis of GI a-GvHD in children was feasible and safe. Furthermore, the histological diagnosis of GI a-GvHD was associated with an increased risk of steroid-resistant GvHD and with high transplant-related mortality.

Evaluation of gastrointestinal symptoms in pediatric patients post hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Ileo-colonoscopy versus sigmoidoscopy. A single-center experience and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a curative therapy used to treat high-risk hematological malignant disorders and other life-threatening nonmalignant diseases. Gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms post-HSCT might be due to GI graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) or GI infections or both. GI endoscopy with biopsies is safe and beneficial in guiding the management of GI symptoms in children after HSCT, justifying the therapeutic management and contributing to improved outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study including 16 children with malignant and nonmalignant diseases that underwent allogeneic HSCT who had 24 ileo-colonoscopies performed for GI symptoms. To facilitate an evidence-based approach to the endoscopic evaluation of GI symptoms in pediatric patients post HSCT, we examined whether a full ileo-colonoscopy, which includes right colon and terminal ileum (TI), as opposed to a limited sigmoidoscopy, was more accurate in the evaluation of GI symptoms in pediatric patients post HSCT.

RESULTS

Specific findings on the right colon/TI were found in nine out of 24 ileo-colonoscopies (38%, CI = 19%-59%). The macroscopic findings on ileo-colonoscopy were compared with the histopathologic findings. When macroscopic findings were present, there were matching histopathologic findings in 100% of cases. However, even in the absence of any macroscopic findings on ileo-colonoscopy, there were histopathological findings in 29% of the cases (p-value = .016).

CONCLUSIONS

This cohort favors ileo-colonoscopy over sigmoidoscopy, with systematic biopsy sampling, in evaluating GI symptoms in pediatric patients post HSCT.

Acute graft-versus-host disease after liver transplantation in a close contact with COVID-19: A case report

Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) is a rare complication after liver transplantation that characterized by high mortality. We presented a case of aGVHD after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The patient suffered from fever, oral ulcer, rashes and diarrhea and had a co-infection with Cytomegalovirus (CMV). Short tandem repeat (STR) analysis for cluster of differentiation (CD3) cells and skin biopsy indicated aGVHD. His regimens included high dose of steroids, ruxolitinib, basiliximab, local liver radiotherapy and antibiotics prophylaxis, with the withdrawal of tacrolimus and MMF. Unfortunately, he developed an acute rejection followed by cytomegalovirus infection and lung infection. Soon afterwards he was sent to “isolation ward” due to high suspicion for clinical coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Fortunately, He was excluded from COVID-19 after nucleic acid and antibody tests. Though closely contact with other COVID-19 patients for a month, the patient was not affected with COVID-19 through his careful protective measures. Finally, the patient recovered after antiviral and antifungal treatment. To our knowledge, this is the first case report of a patient recovered from aGVHD as a close contact.

Systemic manifestations - do not forget the small bowel

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Systemic diseases can afflict the small bowel (SB) but be challenging to diagnose. In this review, we aim to provide a broad overview of these conditions and to summarise their management.

RECENT FINDINGS

Small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) is an important modality to investigate pathology in the SB. SB imaging can be complementary to SBCE for mural and extramural involvement and detection of multiorgan involvement or lymphadenopathy. Device assisted enteroscopy provides a therapeutic arm, to SBCE enabling histology and therapeutics to be carried out.

SUMMARY

SB endoscopy is essential in the diagnosis, management and monitoring of these multi-system conditions. Collaboration across SB centres to combine experience will help to improve the management of some of these rarer SB conditions.

Diagnostic disagreement between clinical standard histopathological- and retrospective assessment of histopathology-based gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease in children

BACKGROUND

No previous paediatric study has evaluated the frequency of diagnostic disagreement between clinical standard histopathological assessment (CSHA) and retrospective, independent, histopathological assessment (RIHA) of gastrointestinal Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GI-GVHD) METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study, based on gastrointestinal biopsies collected from allogeneic HSCT-treated children (<18 years) with symptom-based GI-GVHD, we evaluated; disagreement of histopathology-based GI-GVHD diagnosis in CSHA vs RIHA, and potential clinical consequences of differences between the assessments. The CSHA-based diagnoses were retrieved from histopathology reports. The RIHA was performed by one pathologist, blinded to the CSHA outcomes and based on the minimal criteria for histopathology-based GI-GVHD diagnosis by the NIH 2014.

RESULTS

Seventy children with 92 endoscopic occasions (including 22 re-endoscopies) were enrolled. GI-GVHD was observed in 73% (67/92) of the endoscopies in the RIHA and in 54% (50/92) in the CSHA (P = .014). The RIHA confirmed 94% (47/50) with GI-GVHD and 52% (22/42) with non-GI-GVHD diagnoses, established in the CSHA. Disagreement, that is endoscopic occasions with GI-GVHD solely detected in RIHA or detection of GI-GVHD in CSHA but not in RIHA, was observed in 20/42 (48%) and 3/50 (6%), respectively (McNemar's test, P = .0008). The risk of a subsequent re-endoscopy was higher in endoscopic occasions with GI-GVHD detected in RIHA but not in CSHA vs if non-GI-GVHD were detected in both readings (P = .005).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that in children with symptom-based GI-GVHD without histopathological confirmation in CSHA, a second, NIH 2014 based histopathological assessment should be considered before performing a re-endoscopy.

Assessing the yield and safety of endoscopy in acute graft-vs-host disease after hematopoietic stem cell transplant

BACKGROUND

Acute gastrointestinal (GI) graft-vs-host disease (aGVHD) is the most complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) in patients with hematologic malignancy. Limited data exists on endoscopic evaluation of GVHD in post-HSCT patients with differing GI symptoms. Further, the diagnostic value of gross endoscopic findings as well as the safety of endoscopy in this commonly thrombocytopenic and neutropenic patient population remains unclear.

AIM

To understand the diagnostic value of symptoms and gross endoscopic findings as well as safety of endoscopy in aGVHD patients.

METHODS

We analyzed 195 endoscopies performed at City of Hope in patients who underwent allogeneic HSCT less than 100 d prior for hematologic malignancy and were subsequently evaluated for aGVHD via endoscopy. The yield, sensitivity, and specificity of diagnosing aGVHD were calculated for upper and lower endoscopy, various GI tract locations, and presenting symptoms.

RESULTS

Combined esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) demonstrated a greater diagnostic yield for aGVHD (83.1%) compared to EGD (66.7%) or FS (77.2%) alone with any presenting symptom. The upper and lower GI tract demonstrated similar yields regardless of whether patients presented with diarrhea (95.7% vs 99.1%) or nausea/vomiting (97.5% vs 96.8%). Normal-appearing mucosa was generally as specific (91.3%) as abnormal mucosa (58.7%-97.8%) for the presence of aGVHD. Adverse events such as bleeding (1.0%), infection (1.0%), and perforation (0.5%) only occurred in a small proportion of patients, with no significant differences in those with underlying thrombocytopenia (P = 1.000) and neutropenia (P = 0.425).

CONCLUSION

Combined EGD and FS with biopsies of normal and inflamed mucosa demonstrated the greatest diagnostic yield regardless of presenting symptom and appears to be safe in this population of patients.

Clinical relevance of endoscopy with histopathological assessment in children with suspected gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease

Endoscopy with histopathological assessment is an established practice to confirm gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease (GI-GVHD). However, the clinical relevance of this approach in children is incompletely evaluated. In a retrospective cohort study, we investigated the frequency of treatment changes in response to histopathological findings in all children (<18 years) in Sweden who underwent endoscopy for suspected GI-GVHD (2000-2013) after receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Sixty-eight children with ninety-one endoscopic occasions were enrolled. At the time of endoscopy, anti-GI-GVHD treatment was ongoing in 71% (65/91). In 18% (12/65) with ongoing treatment, no histopathological evidence of GI-GVHD or another cause to justify anti-GI-GVHD treatment was found. In 48% (44/91), endoscopy with histopathological assessment led to changes in the treatment regimen. Re-endoscopy was more frequent among those with treatment changes, versus unchanged treatment, 39% (17/44) and 13% (6/47), respectively (P = .007). Histopathological findings generating treatment changes were as follows: GI-GVHD in 68% (30/44), normal histology in 25% (11/44), and an alternative diagnosis in 7% (3/44). In conclusion, this study supports that endoscopy with histopathological assessment should be considered in all children with suspected GI-GVHD.

Histological and magnified endoscopic evaluation of villous atrophy in gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease

AIM

 To measure histological villous atrophy and to clarify the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic villous atrophy in gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease.

METHODS

 Data for patients who underwent upper and/or lower endoscopic examinations after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation were retrospectively collected. In study 1, group A included 56 patients in whom GI-GVHD was histologically confirmed and group B included 60 patients in whom GI-GVHD was not histologically confirmed. Group C included 59 patients before HSCT. The lengths of villi and crypts in the duodenum and terminal ileum were histologically measured. In study 2, the diagnostic accuracies of villous atrophy of the duodenum and of the terminal ileum using magnifying endoscopy were evaluated.

RESULTS

 In study 1, the lengths of villi and the villi/crypt (V/C) ratios of the duodenum and terminal ileum in group A were significantly smaller than those in the other groups (p < 0.05). V/C ratio was moderately correlated with clinical severity, histological grades, and endoscopic grades in the terminal ileum. In study 2, the diagnostic accuracies of magnified images for villous atrophy were 83.8% in the duodenum and 94.9% in the terminal ileum.

CONCLUSION

 Magnifying endoscopy enables evaluation of villous atrophy and is useful for optical biopsy of GVHD.

Pathology of Gastrointestinal and Liver Complications of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

CONTEXT.—

Despite advances in therapeutic and preventive measures, hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients remain at risk for a variety of gastrointestinal and liver complications.

OBJECTIVE.—

To detail the pathologic features of the various gastrointestinal and liver complications occurring after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in relation to their clinical context. The specific complications covered include graft-versus-host disease, mycophenolate mofetil-induced injury, timeline of infections, neutropenic enterocolitis, gastrointestinal thrombotic microangiopathy, sinusoidal obstruction syndrome, hepatic iron overload, and the controversy around cord colitis syndrome.

DATA SOURCES.—

The content of this article is based on pertinent peer-reviewed articles in PubMed, relevant textbooks, and on the authors' personal experiences.

CONCLUSIONS.—

The final histopathologic diagnosis requires the integration of clinical and histologic findings and the exclusion of other competing causes of injury. Review of the clinical data, including the original disease pretransplant, the type of transplant, the timing of the gastrointestinal and/or liver manifestations, the timing of the biopsy after transplant, the presence of graft-versus-host disease in other organs and sites, the list of drug regimens, and the clinical and laboratory evidence of infection, is the key to reaching the proper histologic diagnosis.

Site specific diagnostic yield of endoscopic biopsies in Gastrointestinal Graft-versus-Host Disease: A tertiary care Center experience

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal (GI) graft versus host disease (GVHD) occurs in up to 40% of patients undergoing allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). However, the optimal endoscopic approach is still unclear and the area of the GI tract with the highest diagnostic yield is still a topic of debate.

OBJECTIVE

We compared the diagnostic yield of different anatomic site biopsies in the diagnosis of GI GVHD and assessed the correlation of endoscopic findings with histopathology.

METHODS

All cases of biopsy proven GI GVHD were obtained from pathology database AUBMC between 1/1/2005 and 31/8/2017. We retrospectively analyzed the demographical, clinical and endoscopic data.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients were diagnosed with GI GVHD over 17.6 years. The most common presenting symptom was severe diarrhea (18 patients, 94.7%). Combining upper endoscopy and sigmoidoscopy with biopsies had the highest diagnostic yield of 90% in diagnosing GI GVHD compared to 63.6%, 78.6% and 77.8% for upper endoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy respectively. In macroscopically normal mucosa, the recto-sigmoid and duodenal biopsies had the highest diagnostic yield (75%). As for the macroscopically abnormal mucosa, the highest yield was for the recto-sigmoid biopsies (100%) in lower endoscopy and duodenal biopsies in the upper endoscopy (60%).

CONCLUSION

In a patient suspected to have GI GVHD, the best endoscopic approach is the combination of upper endoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy with biopsies of normal as well as abnormal mucosa. It should be emphasized that normal mucosa be biopsied especially in the duodenum and recto-sigmoid for a better diagnostic yield.

Non-invasive diagnosis of acute intestinal graft-versus-host disease by a new scoring system using ultrasound morphology, compound elastography, and contrast-enhanced ultrasound

Acute gastrointestinal (GI) graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) is a life-threating complication in patients after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT). In 60 sonographic analyses, a novel scoring system for non-invasive diagnosis of severe GI GvHD was developed. The score comprised morphological and vascular changes using B-mode and color-coded Doppler sonography, changes of mural stiffness using compound elastography, and dynamic microvascularisation using contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). Furthermore, inflammatory parameters such as CRP, Calprotectin, and regenerating islet-derived protein 3α (Reg3α) were obtained. ROC curve analysis of our novel GvHD sum score revealed an area under the curve of 1.0 (95% CI: 0.99-1.00) in diagnosing GI GvHD and 0.88 (95% CI: 0.79-0.96) for severe GI GvHD. A sum score above 5 correlated with GI GvHD with a sensitivity of 97.6% (41/42) and a specificity of 94.4% (17/18) and score values above 10 with severe GI GvHD with a sensitivity of 91.7% (11/12) and specificity of 79.2% (38/48). The additional use of inflammatory parameters did not improve the predictive power. CEUS is a promising, non-invasive tool for the diagnosis of acute GI GvHD. Together with further descriptive parameters for inflammatory processes, it gains significant diagnostic accuracy in identifying patients with severe stages of acute intestinal GvHD.

Upper gastrointestinal acute graft-versus-host disease adds minimal prognostic value in isolation or with other graft-versus-host disease symptoms as currently diagnosed and treated

Upper gastrointestinal acute graft-versus-host disease is reported in approximately 30% of hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients developing acute graft-versus-host disease. Currently classified as Grade II in consensus criteria, upper gastrointestinal acute graft-versus-host disease is often treated with systemic immunosuppression. We reviewed the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database to assess the prognostic implications of upper gastrointestinal acute graft-versus-host disease in isolation or with other acute graft-versus-host disease manifestations. 8567 adult recipients of myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant receiving T-cell replete grafts for acute leukemia, chronic myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome between 2000 and 2012 were analyzed. 51% of transplants were from unrelated donors. Reported upper gastrointestinal acute graft-versus-host disease incidence was 12.1%; 2.7% of recipients had isolated upper gastrointestinal acute graft-versus-host disease, of whom 95% received systemic steroids. Patients with isolated upper gastrointestinal involvement had similar survival, disease-free survival, transplant-related mortality, and relapse as patients with Grades 0, I, or II acute graft-versus-host disease. Unrelated donor recipients with isolated upper gastrointestinal acute graft-versus-host disease had less subsequent chronic graft-versus-host disease than those with Grades I or II disease (P=0.016 and P=0.0004, respectively). Upper gastrointestinal involvement added no significant prognostic information when present in addition to other manifestations of Grades I or II acute graft-versus-host disease. If upper gastrointestinal symptoms were reclassified as Grade 0 or I, 425 of 2083 patients (20.4%) with Grade II disease would be downgraded, potentially impacting the interpretation of clinical trial outcomes. Defining upper gastrointestinal acute graft-versus-host disease as a Grade II entity, as it is currently diagnosed and treated, is not strongly supported by this analysis. The general approach to diagnosis, treatment and grading of upper gastrointestinal symptoms and their impact on subsequent acute graft-versus-host disease therapy warrants reevaluation.

Clinicopathological comparison between acute gastrointestinal-graft-versus-host disease and infectious colitis in patients after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

The aim of this study is to elucidate the differences of the clinicopathological characteristics between acute gastrointestinal (GI)-graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and infectious colitis (IC) after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Of the 282 patients who underwent HSCT at our institution between January 1991 and December 2015, we could investigate 182 patients in detail. Of the 182 patients, we selected those who underwent colonoscopy and were diagnosed with acute GI-GVHD or IC after HSCT. Patients’ backgrounds, colonoscopic findings, and pathological findings were retrospectively analyzed. There were 30 patients who had colonoscopy performed and diagnosed with acute GI-GVHD or IC after HSCT. Of the 30 patients, 20 had acute GI-GVHD and 10 had IC. All the cases of acute GI-GVHD were diagnosed by endoscopic biopsy and 4 of the IC patients had Clostridium difficile associated colitis. In the IC group, the period from the transplantation up to diagnosis was significantly shorter than acute GI-GVHD group (10.0 days vs. 43.2 days, p = 0.03). In the acute GI-GVHD group, tortoiseshell-like mucosal patterns were significantly more common than the IC group (70% vs. 0%, p < 0.001). Furthermore, there were some cases presenting normal mucosal appearance despite the diagnosis with acute GI-GVHD by pathological findings. Clinically, we should consider IC when abdominal symptoms appeared in the early period after HSCT. Endoscopically, tortoiseshell-like mucosal pattern was a characteristic feature of acute GI-GVHD. In addition, it is essential to perform mucosal biopsy for diagnose of acute GI-GVHD even in patients showing the normal mucosal appearance.

Choice of Endoscopic Procedure in Children With Clinically Suspected Gastrointestinal Graft-versus-host Disease

OBJECTIVES

Gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease (GI-GVHD) is a potentially life-threatening complication after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Symptoms indicating GI-GVHD motivates endoscopy with biopsy sampling and histopathological confirmation. Optimal extent of endoscopy in children is, however, presently unknown. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate whether biopsies from the rectosigmoid area versus the rest of the colon/ileocolon with or without biopsies from simultaneous upper endoscopy, were equally reliable for detection of GI-GVHD and relevant differential diagnoses.

METHODS

Retrospective multicenter study based on histopathological re-evaluation of biopsies and hospital record data, collected from children with suspected GI-GVHD.

RESULTS

Forty-four children with 51 endoscopic occasions (81 procedures) were included. Thirty-nine of 51 (76.5%) were diagnosed as GI-GVHD, 14 (27.4%) received a differential diagnosis and 7 (13.7%) had normal histology findings. Comorbidity, that is, simultaneous detection of a differential diagnosis and GI-GVHD, was observed in 9 (23.1%) cases. Cytomegalovirus infection was the most frequent differential diagnosis, 6 of 7 were detected in biopsies from rectosigmoid and esophagogastroduodenal areas. Sensitivity for detection of GI-GVHD in biopsies collected from rectosigmoid-ileocolonic-, rectosigmoid-, or esophagogastroduodenal areas were 97.4%, 84.6%, 83.3%, respectively, and 97.4% when the latter 2 were merged. The difference, nondetected GI-GVHD in the rectosigmoid area versus detected elsewhere in the GI tract, was statistically significant (P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Biopsies collected from the rectosigmoid area solely were not optimal for detection of pediatric GI-GVHD. When biopsy sampling from rectosigmoid and upper GI tract areas was combined, the sensitivity for GI-GVHD was, however, equally high as for ileocolonoscopy or full upper and lower endoscopy.

Diagnostic Utility of Endoscopy and Biopsy in Suspected Acute Gastrointestinal Graft-versus-Host Disease after Hematopoietic Progenitor Cell Transplantation

Acute gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease (GI-GVHD) after hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation (HPCT) is a common and life-threatening complication. Endoscopic biopsy of the GI tract (GIT) is required for diagnosis. However, clear evidence to optimize this diagnostic approach is lacking, leading to variation in diagnostic sensitivity between institutions. We aimed to assess the clinical, endoscopic, and histologic findings of endoscopies performed for suspected acute GI-GVHD at our institution to better define the optimal use of this strategy. We performed a retrospective cohort study of adults who had undergone endoscopy for suspected acute GI-GVHD within 180 days after allogeneic HPCT for hematologic malignancy between 2011 and 2016. Details included symptoms at time of referral for endoscopy, type of procedure performed, macroscopic findings on endoscopy, and histologic findings after gut biopsy. Correlation was made with clinical GVHD severity scores. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated and compared for each procedure. Predictors of histologic GVHD and overall survival were also compared. Of the 123 patients included, acute GI-GVHD occurred in 59 (48%). Lower endoscopy demonstrated greater sensitivity than upper endoscopy (50% versus 39%). Single upper endoscopy for upper symptoms alone had the lowest yield of GI-GVHD (14%). Combination upper and lower endoscopy demonstrated strong histologic concordance between upper and lower procedures. The addition of upper endoscopy to lower endoscopy only identified an extra 2 (4%) cases of GVHD. Advanced age and the presence of lower GIT symptoms were the only pre-endoscopy predictors of histologic GVHD on multivariate analysis. Patients with isolated upper histologic GVHD showed similar survival to patients with negative biopsies. Endoscopy and biopsy only identified 74% of those ultimately requiring treatment for acute GI-GVHD. Acute GI-GVHD remains a clinical diagnosis supported by available histologic evidence. Isolated upper GI-GVHD is rare, and in the absence of lower GIT symptoms, routine upper endoscopy does not significantly improve diagnostic yield for histologic GVHD. Overall, endoscopy and biopsy underdiagnoses 26% of clinical GI-GVHD, highlighting a need for research into novel diagnostic strategies.

Acute graft-versus-host disease of the gut: considerations for the gastroenterologist

Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is central to the management of many haematological disorders. A frequent complication of HSCT is acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), a condition in which immune cells from the donor attack healthy recipient tissues. The gastrointestinal system is among the most common sites affected by acute GVHD, and severe manifestations of acute GVHD of the gut portends a poor prognosis in patients after HSCT. Acute GVHD of the gastrointestinal tract presents both diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Although the clinical manifestations are nonspecific and overlap with those of infection and drug toxicity, diagnosis is ultimately based on clinical criteria. As reliable serum biomarkers have not yet been validated outside of clinical trials, endoscopic and histopathological evaluation continue to be utilized in diagnosis. Once a diagnosis of gastrointestinal acute GVHD is established, therapy with systemic corticosteroids is typically initiated, and non-responders can be treated with a wide range of second-line therapies. In addition to treating the underlying disease, the management of complications including profuse diarrhoea, severe malnutrition and gastrointestinal bleeding is paramount. In this Review, we discuss strategies for the diagnosis and management of acute GVHD of the gastrointestinal tract as they pertain to the practising gastroenterologist.

Histologic analysis has a prognostical value in colorectal biopsies assessed for suspicion of graft-versus-host disease

Gastrointestinal (GI) graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) is a common and severe complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, but clinical and histological features are unspecific. The aim of this study was to correlate the histological GI GVHD grade with the clinical outcomes. In a retrospective study of 112 patients with clinically suspected GI GVHD, colonic biopsies were reviewed by three pathologists without knowledge of the corresponding clinical data and classified in four scores, according to the NIH Consensus Project recommendations: no GVHD, possible, probable, and unequivocal GVHD. At the end of the study, the histological and clinical data were confronted with the following results: clinical diagnosis of GI GVHD was established for 70 patients (62.5%) and histological scores correlated well with the clinical diagnosis (p < 0.001) and particularly with the prognosis (p < 0.05).When severe lesions were observed, the 1 year overall survival declined to 9%. None of the features reported in the literature to support GVHD diagnosis, eosinophil count, endocrine cells aggregate, immunohistochemical analysis (cytomegalovirus, CD123, chromogranin), did not help us for diagnosis. So routine histopathology alone without immunohistochemistry is a strong and reproducible tool to diagnose GI GVHD with the help of clinical and biological information, and most importantly, histological grading proved to be a powerful prognostic value.

Upper Versus Lower Endoscopy in the Diagnosis of Graft-Versus-Host Disease

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The optimal endoscopic approach to patients with suspected gut graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is uncertain. We aimed to assess the diagnostic yield of upper and lower endoscopies performed in patients post-HSCT.

METHODS

We identified a cohort post-HSCT with acute and chronic GVHD who underwent gastrointestinal endoscopies for GVHD diagnosis. Hospital charts were reviewed and results were stratified according to patients' symptoms.

RESULTS

From 1990 to 2013 433 HSCTs were performed. Fifty-six patients underwent 141 endoscopies, of which 117 were done to evaluate for GVHD or an alternative diagnosis. A total of 28/43 (65%) of the lower endoscopies and 41/74 (55%) of the upper endoscopies diagnosed GVHD or an alternative disease process on pathology. A total of 15/43 (35%) of lower endoscopies were flexible sigmoidoscopies, and 11/15 (73%) of these diagnosed GVHD or an alternative diagnosis. Upper endoscopy performed in patients with diarrhea as their only symptom diagnosed GVHD in 44% and an alternative diagnosis in 11%. In comparison, lower endoscopy in patients with only diarrhea diagnosed GVHD in 50%, and 18% offered an alternative diagnosis. Upper endoscopy provided a diagnosis of opportunistic viral and fungal infections of the upper gastrointestinal tract in 7 patients, while lower endoscopy diagnosed pseudomembranous colitis in 2.

CONCLUSIONS

Upper and lower endoscopy had a similar diagnostic yield in patients with known or suspected GVHD involving the gut, even for patients presenting only with diarrhea. Because of its ease and safety upper endoscopy is the preferred initial endoscopic approach in patients with suspected gut GVHD, however flexible sigmoidoscopy is a reasonable other option.

Graft Versus Host Disease After Liver Transplantation in Adults: A Case series, Review of Literature, and an Approach to Management

BACKGROUND

Graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) after liver transplantation (LT) is a deadly complication with very limited data on risk factors, diagnosis and management. We report a case series and a comprehensive review of the literature.

METHODS

Data were systematically extracted from reports of GVHD after LT, and from the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Group comparisons were performed.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-six adult patients with GVHD after LT have been reported. Median time to GVHD onset was 28 days. Clinical features were skin rash (92%), pancytopenia (78%), and diarrhea (65%). Six-month mortality with GVHD after LT was 73%. Sepsis was the most common cause of death (60%). Enterobacter bacteremia, invasive aspergillosis, and disseminated Candida infections were frequently reported. Recipient age over 50 years is a risk factor for GVHD after LT. Hepatocellular carcinoma was overrepresented, whereas chronic hepatitis C was underrepresented, in reported United States GVHD cases relative to all United Network for Organ Sharing database LT cases. Mortality rate with treatment of GVHD after LT was 84% with high-dose steroids alone, 75% to 100% with regimens using dose increases of calcineurin inhibitors, and 55% with IL-2 antagonists. Mortality was 25% in small case series using the CD2-blocker alefacept or TNF-α antagonists.

CONCLUSIONS

Age older than 50 years and hepatocellular carcinoma appear to be risk factors for GVHD. Hepatitis C may be protective. High-dose steroids and calcineurin inhibitors are ineffective in the treatment of GVHD after LT. CD2-blockers and TNF-α antagonists appear promising. We propose a diagnostic algorithm to assist clinicians in managing adults with GVHD after LT.

Graft-versus-Host Disease of the Gut: A Histologic Activity Grading System and Validation

The pathologic interpretation of gut biopsies in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients to assess graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is well accepted and supplements clinical and endoscopic findings. However, the histologic activity grading of GVHD is controversial, with attempts to predict prognosis or response to treatment largely unsuccessful. GVHD is being diagnosed earlier in its course, raising the possibility that the pathologic grading system can be profitably modified. We developed a histologic activity grading system designed to replace the commonly used modified Lerner grading systems. Our system stratifies the low-level Lerner grade I category into 4 activity grade categories, based on the average frequency of apoptotic cells. The results are expressed as ordinal categories: GVHD of minimal, mild, moderate, severe histologic activity, or severe histologic activity with destruction (activity grades 1 to 5). In a retrospective study, we studied 87 consecutive cases with 201 post-transplantation specimens (median, 48 days; range, 18 to 1479 days) of stomach, duodenum, and colorectum, which had been activity graded at the time of the original diagnosis. Most of the biopsies diagnosed as GVHD were low grade-minimal (11%) or mild (71%) histologic activity. We hypothesized that the higher activity grades would be associated with more therapeutic intervention. The odds of increased therapy in the combined all-site specimens were increased as activity grade increased (odds ratio, 2.9 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.9 to 4.5]; P = < .0001). Thus, our grading system was validated. To investigate whether the activity grade was associated with therapy within the formerly undivided Lerner grade I category, the analysis was restricted to these 174 all-site specimens. The validation result was similar (odds ratio, 3.1 [95% CI, 1.3 to 7.2]; P = .009). This result interestingly suggests that there is useful information hidden in the Lerner grade I category, which could potentially guide immediately actionable treatment decisions. This histologic activity grade system has been in use at our institution for over 2 years with good acceptance.

Imaging of Abdominal and Pelvic Manifestations of Graft-Versus-Host Disease After Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant

OBJECTIVE

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a common complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). GVHD predominantly affects the skin, gastrointestinal system and hepatobiliary systems. Imaging findings in the gastrointestinal tract include bowel wall thickening with mucosal enhancement, mesenteric edema, and vascular engorgement. In the hepatobiliary system, hepatosplenomegaly, periportal edema, bile duct dilatation, and gallbladder and biliary wall thickening are seen. Although the imaging findings of GVHD are nonspecific, with a known history of HSCT, GVHD should be considered.

CONCLUSION

GVHD is a serious complication of HSCT, which involves multiple organ systems, with imaging manifestations most commonly seen in the gastrointestinal tract and hepatobiliary system. Knowledge of the imaging manifestations of GVHD, which alone may be relatively nonspecific, taken in conjunction with clinical history including the timing and type of HSCT, laboratory values, stool studies, and dermatologic findings can increase radiologist confidence in suggesting this diagnosis.

Fecal but not serum calprotectin is a potential marker of GVHD after stem cell transplantation

Gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) represents a life-threatening complication after stem cell transplantation. Differential diagnosis between gut GvHD and other causes of diarrhea after HSCT is still subjected to endoscopy and histological findings. The research for a reliable biomarker for gut GvHD might allow an early diagnosis of this condition and a consequent prompt treatment that could reduce unfavorable outcomes. Recently, fecal calprotectin was reported as reliable marker of gut involvement. We would evaluate if serum instead of fecal calprotectin could be considered a possible biomarker of gut GvHD. Serum calprotectin was measured in a cohort of 54 patients submitted to allogeneic stem cell transplantation using ELISA assay. For a subset of 21 patients, calprotectin serum levels were compared with fecal calprotectin detection. Contrary to fecal calprotectin, we found only a trend to high level of serum calprotectin for GvHD development and gut involvement, but statistical difference was not reached. Fecal but not serum calprotectin could be considered as possible biomarker for gut GvHD.

Biopsy-Induced Duodenal Hematoma Is Not an Infrequent Complication Favored by Bone Marrow Transplantation

OBJECTIVES

Intraduodenal hematoma (IDH) is an uncommon complication of endoscopic duodenal biopsy that can cause severe obstruction of the digestive, biliary, or pancreatic tracts. We aimed to analyze the risk factors and outcomes of biopsy-induced IDH in our series.

METHODS

Between 2010 and 2014, a retrospective chart review was conducted for all children younger than 18 years of age treated for IDH. We collected their data in our tertiary pediatric center and compared them to those of controls matched for age, sex, and pathology.

RESULTS

Among 2705 upper nontherapeutic endoscopies and 1163 duodenal biopsies, 7 IDH occurred in 6 children suspected of developing graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after bone marrow transplantation (BMT) and in 1 patient with Noonan syndrome. The IDH prevalence was significantly higher after BMT compared to children who did not undergo grafting (7% vs 0.1%; P = 7.9 × 10; odds ratio = 82). After a median delay of 48 hours, patients developed intestinal obstruction with abdominal pain and vomiting. The diagnosis was confirmed by using ultrasonography or computed tomography scans. Acute pancreatitis was determined in 3 out of 7 patients. Conservative treatment allowed complete resolution in all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

IDH is not an infrequent complication of endoscopic duodenal biopsy, especially in patients who undergo BMT. Endoscopists should be especially careful during the duodenal biopsy procedure in these patients. With no early perforation due to post-biopsy IDH reported, the prognosis is good and conservative management generally leads to resolution of the symptoms in 2 to 3 weeks.

Sensitivities of Biopsy Sites in the Endoscopic Evaluation of Graft-Versus-Host Disease: Retrospective Review from a Tertiary Center

BACKGROUND

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation that frequently affects the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. The best biopsy sites to establish the diagnosis have not been clearly established.

AIMS

To determine the best sites for obtaining biopsies in evaluating GI GVHD.

METHODS

All cases of biopsy-proven GI GVHD (GVHD+) were isolated from a pathology database over a 2-year period at a single tertiary center (n = 46). Demographic, clinical, and endoscopic data were extracted. For comparison, 46 consecutive GVHD-negative cases (GVHD-) were obtained. Sensitivities in diagnosing GVHD in the upper and lower GI tract were calculated.

RESULTS

In the GVHD- group, they were commonly investigated with an esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) (60 vs. 22 % in the GVHD+ group, p < 0.01), while a colonoscopy (CLN) was commonly performed in the GVHD+ group (33 vs. 12 %, p = 0.02). Among the GVHD + patients, for EGDs, the sensitivity was highest for duodenal biopsies at 89 %. For flexible sigmoidoscopies (FSs) and CLNs, the sensitivities among all sites were similar (85 % agreement, kappa 0.58, p = 0.01). There were no cases in which GVHD was diagnosed in the right side of the colon without a positive biopsy in the left side of the colon.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort of GI GVHD patients, duodenum biopsies produced the highest yield in diagnosing GVHD when compared to other sites of the upper GI tract. Sensitivities were similar among all sites on lower endoscopies, suggesting that a FS is sufficient for diagnosing GVHD in suspected patients with diarrhea.

Gastrointestinal Infections

Gastrointestinal infections in the immunocompromised host are caused by the common bacterial, viral, fungal, and parasitic agents that also cause infections in the immunocompetent host. Of special consideration is that immunocompromised patients may be at increased risk for infection or disease severity and by pathogens not seen in the competent host. This chapter reviews the various agents, risk factors, and diagnostic approaches to detect gastrointestinal infections in this patient population.

Stepwise Endoscopy Based on Sigmoidoscopy in Evaluating Pediatric Graft-versus-Host Disease

PURPOSE

The aim of our study was to establish a safe and convenient diagnostic method for acute gastrointestinal (GI) graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in children by determining the sensitivity and negative predictive values of upper and lower endoscopic biopsies for children suspected of GI GVHD.

METHODS

Patients suspected of GI GVHD who received endoscopic evaluation within 100 days after stem cell transplantation and endoscopies between January 2012 and March 2014 in Seoul National University Children's Hospital were included in our study.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients with a total of 20 endoscopic procedures were included in our study. Sensitivity at the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum were 22.2%, 30.0%, and 80.0%, respectively. Negative predictive values at the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum were 22.2%, 30.0%, and 60.0%, respectively. Overall sensitivity and negative predictive values of upper endoscopic biopsy for GVHD were 77.8% and 50.0%, respectively. Overall sensitivity and negative predictive values of lower endoscopic biopsy for GVHD were 88.9% and 66.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

We recommend flexible sigmoidoscopy as a safe and accurate diagnostic tool for GVHD, similar to other studies reported previously. However, if there is no evidence of GVHD on sigmoidoscopy with high index of suspicion of GI bleeding, full colonoscopy and upper endoscopy should be considered.

The Diagnostic Yield of Site and Symptom-Based Biopsies for Acute Gastrointestinal Graft-Versus-Host Disease: A 5-Year Retrospective Review

BACKGROUND

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) complicates half of hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HCT), and the gastrointestinal tract is commonly affected. Endoscopic biopsies have a key role in the diagnosis. The optimal procedure(s) to perform and site(s) to biopsy remain unclear.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the charts of all adult patients who underwent allogeneic HCT at Duke University Medical Center between 1/1/05 and 1/1/11 and extracted data from those who underwent endoscopic biopsy for suspected GVHD. All histology was re-evaluated by blinded pathologists using 2006 NIH diagnostic criteria and then compared to the original clinical diagnosis of GVHD.

RESULTS

A total of 169 adult patients underwent 250 endoscopic procedures to evaluate GVHD. The sensitivity of biopsies for clinical GVHD was 76 and 72% for upper and lower tract sites, respectively. In the presence of nausea, upper tract biopsies were positive for GVHD in 65%, 70% while lower tract biopsies were positive in 61-70%. In the presence of diarrhea, lower tract biopsies were positive in 65%, while upper tract sites were positive in 64-69%. Twenty six (40%) of the sixty-five endoscopies that simultaneously sampled upper and lower tract sites had discordant results. All were histologically positive for GVHD, yet 15% of upper tract biopsies and 25% of lower tract biopsies were negative.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large review, the overall sensitivity of biopsies taken during EGD and Flex-Sig was 76 and 72%, respectively. A symptom-driven biopsy approach was not clearly supported as upper tract and lower tract biopsies were similarly diagnostic for GVHD regardless of symptoms.

Colonoscopy and Sigmoidoscopy are Equally Effective for the Diagnosis of Colonic Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease in Patients with Diarrhea after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Prospective Controlled Trial

Colonic acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) affects approximately 10% of patients who have undergone allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). Diarrhea is a major clinical sign but also a common post-transplantation symptom in these patients. Comprehensive histopathologic examination of the colon is therefore regarded as crucial to establish a diagnosis, but the colonic segment that should be targeted for a diagnostic biopsy remains a topic of debate. The primary objective of this study was to compare prospectively colonoscopy with sigmoidoscopy regarding their capabilities to provide a histopathologically proven diagnosis of colonic aGVHD. Thirty-seven allo-SCT patients with diarrhea all underwent a colonoscopy. All biopsies collected from the descending colon were regarded as also attainable by sigmoidoscopy, whereas biopsies collected in regions further up the colon (from the transverse and ascending colon) were regarded as acquirable exclusively by colonoscopy. Biopsies attainable by colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy were positive for GVHD in 25 (68%) and 24 (65%) patients, respectively (95% confidence interval for difference of proportions, -.185 to .245; P = .978; z = .0271 by the z-test). Sigmoidoscopy is as effective as colonoscopy in establishing a diagnosis of colonic aGVHD in patients who have diarrhea after allo-SCT.

Acute graft-versus-host disease is more prevalent and severe in the lower than the upper gastrointestinal tract

It is unclear whether acute gastrointestinal (GI) graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) affects all segments of the GI tract equally. Up to 45% patients reported showed discrepancy in involvement between upper GI (UGI) and lower GI (LGI) tract. We compared the prevalence and the severity of acute GVHD in UGI and LGI tract on histologic examination. A cohort of 110 cases of simultaneous UGI and LGI biopsies from 105 allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients with clinically confirmed GI GVHD were reviewed retrospectively. The χ(2) test and 1-way analysis of variance test were used for statistical analysis. Most (75%) of the cases had GVHD involvement in both UGI and LGI tracts, whereas UGI-only GVHD was found in 6% and LGI-only GVHD in 19%. GVHD prevalence was the lowest in stomach (61%) and significantly increased toward duodenum/jejunum (81%; P = .0019). The LGI tract showed similar GVHD prevalence (P = .3648); the highest was in the sigmoid colon (97%). The histologic grade was lowest in the stomach (mean ± SD, 1.6 ± 0.8) and was similar across all UGI segments (P = .0883). The histologic grade in LGI significantly increased (P = .0265) from the terminal ileum (2.0 ± 1.3) to the rectum (2.9 ± 1.0). Overall, both the prevalence and the histologic grade of GVHD in LGI were significantly higher than those of UGI (P < .0001 for both). Our results show that acute GVHD had a higher prevalence and was more severe in the LGI than in UGI tract. A small subset of patients had only UGI involvement.

Sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the quantification of human serum albumin fragment 408-423 in bodily fluids

Urinary levels of human serum albumin (hSA) fragment 408-423 have been proposed to represent an early marker for graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) and chronic kidney diseases. Here, we developed an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the quantification of hSA(408-423). The sandwich ELISA has a detection limit of 0.5ng/ml and is highly specific for hSA(408-423) because it does not cross-react with other albumin fragments or the full-length precursor. This ELISA allows rapid and convenient quantification of hSA(408-423) in bodily fluids, further clarifying the prognostic and diagnostic value of this peptide in GvHD, kidney disease, and other disorders.

NIH Consensus development project on criteria for clinical trials in chronic graft-versus-host disease: II. The 2014 Pathology Working Group Report

The 2005 National Institute of Health (NIH) Consensus Conference outlined histopathological diagnostic criteria for the major organ systems affected by both acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). The 2014 Consensus Conference led to this updated document with new information from histopathological studies of GVHD in the gut, liver, skin, and oral mucosa and an expanded discussion of GVHD in the lungs and kidneys. The recommendations for final histological diagnostic categories have been simplified from 4 categories to 3: no GVHD, possible GVHD, and likely GVHD, based on better reproducibility achieved by combining the previous categories of "consistent with GVHD" and "definite GVHD" into the single category of "likely GVHD." Issues remain in the histopathological characterization of GVHD, particularly with respect to the threshold of histological changes required for diagnostic certainty. Guidance is provided for the incorporation of biopsy information into prospective clinical studies of GVHD, particularly with respect to biomarker validation.

Early detection of acute graft-versus-host disease by wireless capsule endoscopy and probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy: results of a pilot study

OBJECTIVE

Acute gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease (GI-GVHD) is usually diagnosed using endoscopic examinations and biopsies for conventional histology. The aim of this pilot study was to determine whether mini-invasive techniques such as probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) combined with wireless capsule endoscopy (WCE) could detect early lesions of GI-GVHD prior to symptoms.

DESIGN

Fifteen patients undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) were prospectively examined with a small bowel WCE, duodenal and colorectal pCLE, and standard biopsies. Per study protocol, all these examinations were scheduled between day 21 and day 28 after allo-HSCT, independently of the presence or absence of digestive symptoms.

RESULTS

During follow up, eight patients developed acute GI-GVHD. Sensitivity of WCE, pCLE, and histology were 50, 87.5, and 50%, respectively. Specificity of WCE, pCLE, and histology were 80, 71.5, and 80%, respectively. We showed a positive correlation between the Glücksberg scoring system and WCE (rho = 0.543, p = 0.036) and pCLE (rho = 0.727, p = 0.002) but not with standard histology (rho = 0.481, p = 0.069).

CONCLUSIONS

The results from this pilot study suggest that novel methods such as pCLE and WCE could be part of a mini-invasive algorithm for early detection of GI-GVHD.

Colonic perforation in graft versus host disease: a case report

Graft versus host disease (GVHD) is a phenomenon that occurs after allogeneic bone marrow transplants. Gastrointestinal (GI) manifestations of acute GVHD are common, but severe GI GVHD complications, such as bowel perforation, occur rarely and necessitate surgical intervention. To our knowledge, there are no recorded cases of colonic perforation resulting from GVHD with negative cultures for infectious agents such as cytomegalovirus. We present a case of large bowel perforation due to GVHD.

Pancreatic atrophy in patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease

PURPOSE

To determine if patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) develop greater loss of pancreatic tissue than patients without cGVHD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is an IRB-approved, HIPAA-compliant retrospective study of patients receiving allogeneic HSCT at our institution from 01/2006 to 01/2010 with abdominal CT performed within 3 months prior to HSCT and CT performed at least 3 months after HSCT. Measurement of glandular tissue thickness of the head, body, and tail of the pancreas was performed independently by two radiologists blinded to clinical data. Statistical analysis was performed using the Student t-test, and interobserver agreement was evaluated with linear-weighted kappa.

RESULTS

117 patients underwent HSCT during study period, with 36 patients meeting inclusion criteria. 22 subjects (61%) had clinical features of cGVHD, and 14 patients (39%) did not have evidence of cGVHD. Following HSCT, there was a significant decrease in mean total thickness (10.9%, p = 0.002) of the pancreas in the group of patients with cGVHD. The change from pretreatment to the nadir in pancreatic thickness was significantly greater in patient with cGVHD (13.9 ± 12.1 mm), but not in non-cGVHD patients (5.4 ± 4.7 mm) (p = 0.02), with head of the pancreas atrophy accounting for the difference (decrease of 4.8 ± 4.6 mm in cGVHD patients vs. 1.6 ± 2.1 mm in non-cGVHD patients (p = 0.02)).

CONCLUSION

Patients with cGVHD develop significantly greater loss of pancreatic glandular tissue than patients without cGVHD following HSCT, with atrophy of pancreatic head being a major contributor.

Safety of endoscopic interventions in patients with thrombocytopenia

BACKGROUND

The risk of endoscopic interventions in thrombocytopenia has received little attention in the medical literature.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the safety of endoscopic interventions including evaluation of GI bleeding (GIB) in patients with thrombocytopenia.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Retrospective study, tertiary oncology center.

PATIENTS AND INTERVENTION

Review of consecutive endoscopies with preprocedure platelet counts (PCs) of 75 × 10(3)/μL or lower.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Risk of bleeding with routine endoscopic interventions and transfusion requirement after evaluation of GIB.

RESULTS

A total of 617 (351 upper, 266 lower [90 colonoscopies]) endoscopies were performed in 395 patients. Forceps-biopsy specimens were obtained in 398 endoscopies (mean ± standard deviation [SD] PC: 38.21 ± 11.7 × 10(3)/μL) and 45 polypectomies were performed in 17 endoscopies (mean ± SD PC: 39.65 ± 8.53 × 10(3)/μL). The risk of bleeding was 1.5% (6 of 398 endoscopies) at the biopsy site and 4% (2 of 45 polypectomies) at the polypectomy site. Active GIB (mean ± SD PC: 32.85 ± 4.0 × 10(3)/μL) was observed in 68 (11% of 617) endoscopies and intervention (mean ± SD PC: 33.68 ± 4.6 × 10(3)/μL) was performed in 41 procedures. Together, angiodysplasias and ulcers were the most common etiology (51.2% of 41). Hemostasis was achieved in 39 (95.1% of 41) procedures. Comparison of blood transfusions ± 3 days of successful therapy showed a 52% reduction (P < .001). By multivariate analysis, a higher aggregate blood transfusion 3 days preceding endoscopy (odds ratio 1.32; 95% confidence interval, 1.16-1.50; P < .001) predicted endoscopic findings of active GIB.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective design, single center.

CONCLUSIONS

In the largest endoscopic experience reported in thrombocytopenic patients (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3 or lower), bleeding caused by standard forceps biopsy and polypectomy (≤10 mm) was minor and easily controlled. Endoscopic therapy for GIB is safe and significantly reduces the packed red blood cell requirement and should be considered in patients with thrombocytopenia in the setting of an appropriate transfusion strategy.

New insight for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal acute graft-versus-host disease

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is a curative therapy for different life-threatening malignant and nonmalignant hematologic disorders. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) remains a major source of morbidity and mortality following allo-SCT, which limits the use of this treatment in a broader spectrum of patients. Early diagnostic of GVHD is essential to initiate treatment as soon as possible. Unfortunately, the diagnosis of GVHD may be difficult to establish, because of the nonspecific nature of the associated symptoms and of the numerous differential diagnosis. This is particularly true regarding gastrointestinal (GI) acute GVHD. In the recent years many progress has been made in medical imaging test and endoscopic techniques. The interest of these different techniques in the diagnosis of GI acute GVHD has been evaluated in several studies. With this background we review the contributions, limitations, and future prospect of these techniques in the diagnosis of GI acute GVHD.