Effect of CpG methylation on RAG1/RAG2 reactivity: implications of direct and indirect mechanisms for controlling V(D)J cleavage

De novo DNA Methyltransferases Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b regulate the onset of Igκ light chain rearrangement during early B-cell development

Immunoglobulin genes V(D)J rearrangement during early lymphopoiesis is a critical process involving sequential recombination of the heavy and light chain loci. A number of transcription factors act together with temporally activated recombinases and chromatin accessibility changes to regulate this complex process. Here, we deleted the de novo DNA methyltransferases Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b in early B cells of conditionally targeted mice, and monitored the process of V(D)J recombination. Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b deletion resulted in precocious recombination of the immunoglobulin κ light chain without impairing the differentiation of mature B cells or overall B-cell development. Ex vivo culture of IL-7 restricted early B-cell progenitors lacking Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b showed precocious Vκ-Jκ rearrangements that are limited to the proximal Vκ genes. Furthermore, B-cell progenitors deficient in Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b showed elevated levels of germline transcripts at the proximal Vκ genes, alterations in methylation patterns at Igκ enhancer sites and increased expression of the transcription factor E2A. Our data suggest that Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b are critical to regulate the onset of Igκ light chain rearrangement during early B-cell development.

Epigenetic regulation of monoallelic rearrangement (allelic exclusion) of antigen receptor genes

While most genes in the mammalian genome are transcribed from both parental chromosomes in cells where they are expressed, approximately 10% of genes are expressed monoallelically, so that any given cell will express either the paternal or maternal allele, but not both. The antigen receptor genes in B and T cells are well-studied examples of a gene family, which is expressed in a monoallelic manner, in a process coined "allelic exclusion." During lymphocyte development, only one allele of each antigen receptor undergoes V(D)J rearrangement at a time, and once productive rearrangement is sensed, rearrangement of the second allele is prevented. In this mini review, we discuss the epigenetic processes, including asynchronous replication, nuclear localization, chromatin condensation, histone modifications, and DNA methylation, which appear to regulate the primary rearrangement of a single allele, while blocking the rearrangement of the second allele.

A novel pax5-binding regulatory element in the igκ locus

The Igκ locus undergoes a variety of different molecular processes during B cell development, including V(D)J rearrangement and somatic hypermutations (SHM), which are influenced by cis regulatory regions (RRs) within the locus. The Igκ locus includes three characterized RRs termed the intronic (iEκ), 3′Eκ, and Ed enhancers. We had previously noted that a region of DNA upstream of the iEκ and matrix attachment region (MAR) was necessary for demethylation of the locus in cell culture. In this study, we further characterized this region, which we have termed Dm, for demethylation element. Pre-rearranged Igκ transgenes containing a deletion of the entire Dm region, or of a Pax5-binding site within the region, fail to undergo efficient CpG demethylation in mature B cells in vivo. Furthermore, we generated mice with a deletion of the full Dm region at the endogenous Igκ locus. The most prominent phenotype of these mice is reduced SHM in germinal center B cells in Peyer’s patches. In conclusion, we propose the Dm element as a novel Pax5-binding cis regulatory element, which works in concert with the known enhancers, and plays a role in Igκ demethylation and SHM.

The Interplay between Chromatin and Transcription Factor Networks during B Cell Development: Who Pulls the Trigger First?

All mature blood cells derive from hematopoietic stem cells through gradual restriction of their cell fate potential and acquisition of specialized functions. Lineage specification and cell commitment require the establishment of specific transcriptional programs involving the activation of lineage-specific genes and the repression of lineage-inappropriate genes. This process requires the concerted action of transcription factors (TFs) and epigenetic modifying enzymes. Within the hematopoietic system, B lymphopoiesis is one of the most-studied differentiation programs. Loss of function studies allowed the identification of many TFs and epigenetic modifiers required for B cell development. The usage of systematic analytical techniques such as transcriptome determination, genome-wide mapping of TF binding and epigenetic modifications, and mass spectrometry analyses, allowed to gain a systemic description of the intricate networks that guide B cell development. However, the precise mechanisms governing the interaction between TFs and chromatin are still unclear. Generally, chromatin structure can be remodeled by some TFs but in turn can also regulate (i.e., prevent or promote) the binding of other TFs. This conundrum leads to the crucial questions of who is on first, when, and how. We review here the current knowledge about TF networks and epigenetic regulation during hematopoiesis, with an emphasis on B cell development, and discuss in particular the current models about the interplay between chromatin and TFs.

Genetic and epigenetic determinants mediate proneness of oncogene breakpoint sites for involvement in TCR translocations

T-cell receptor (TCR) translocations are a genetic hallmark of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and lead to juxtaposition of oncogene and TCR loci. Oncogene loci become involved in translocations because they are accessible to the V(D)J recombination machinery. Such accessibility is predicted at cryptic recombination signal sequence (cRSS) sites ('Type 1') as well as other sites that are subject to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) ('Type 2') during early stages of thymocyte development. As chromatin accessibility markers have not been analyzed in the context of TCR-associated translocations, various genetic and epigenetic determinants of LMO2, TAL1 and TLX1 translocation breakpoint (BP) sites and BP cluster regions (BCRs) were examined in human thymocytes to establish DSB proneness and heterogeneity of BP site involvement in TCR translocations. Our data show that DSBs in BCRs are primarily induced in the presence of a genetic element of sequence vulnerability (cRSSs, transposable elements), whereas breaks at single BP sites lacking such elements are more likely induced by chance or perhaps because of patient-specific genetic vulnerability. Vulnerability to obtain DSBs is increased by features that determine chromatin organization, such as methylation status and nucleosome occupancy, although at different levels at different BP sites.

DNA methylation and B-cell autoreactivity

Although not exclusive, mounting evidence supports the fact that DNA methylation at CpG dinucleotides controls B-cell development and the progressive eliminati or inactivation of autoreactive B cell. Indeed, the expression of different B ce specific factors, including Pax5, rearrangement of the B-cell receptor (BCR) and cytokine production are tightly controlled by DNA methylation. Among normal B cells, the autoreactive CD5+ B cell sub-population presents a reduced capacity to methylate its DNA that leads to the expression of normally repressed genes, such as the human endogenous retrovirus (HERV). In systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients, the archetype ofautoimmune disease, autoreactive B cells are characterized by their inability to induce DNA methylation that prolongs their survival. Finally, treating B cells with demethylating drugs increased their autoreactivity. Altogether this suggests that a deeper comprehension ofDNA methylation in B cells may offer opportunities to develop new therapeutics to control autoreactive B cells.

Allelic exclusion of immunoglobulin genes: models and mechanisms

The allelic exclusion of immunoglobulin (Ig) genes is one of the most evolutionarily conserved features of the adaptive immune system and underlies the monospecificity of B cells. While much has been learned about how Ig allelic exclusion is established during B-cell development, the relevance of monospecificity to B-cell function remains enigmatic. Here, we review the theoretical models that have been proposed to explain the establishment of Ig allelic exclusion and focus on the molecular mechanisms utilized by developing B cells to ensure the monoallelic expression of Ig kappa and Ig lambda light chain genes. We also discuss the physiological consequences of Ig allelic exclusion and speculate on the importance of monospecificity of B cells for immune recognition.

Position-dependent silencing of germline Vß segments on TCRß alleles containing preassembled VßDJßCß1 genes

The genomic organization of TCRbeta loci enables Vbeta-to-DJbeta2 rearrangements on alleles with assembled VbetaDJbetaCbeta1 genes, which could have deleterious physiologic consequences. To determine whether such Vbeta rearrangements occur and, if so, how they might be regulated, we analyzed mice with TCRbeta alleles containing preassembled functional VbetaDJbetaCbeta1 genes. Vbeta10 segments were transcribed, rearranged, and expressed in thymocytes when located immediately upstream of a Vbeta1DJbetaCbeta1 gene, but not on alleles with a Vbeta14DJbetaCbeta1 gene. Germline Vbeta10 transcription was silenced in mature alphabeta T cells. This allele-dependent and developmental stage-specific silencing of Vbeta10 correlated with increased CpG methylation and decreased histone acetylation over the Vbeta10 promoter and coding region. Transcription, rearrangement, and expression of the Vbeta4 and Vbeta16 segments located upstream of Vbeta10 were silenced on alleles containing either VbetaDJbetaCbeta1 gene; sequences within Vbeta4, Vbeta16, and the Vbeta4/Vbeta16-Vbeta10 intergenic region exhibited constitutive high CpG methylation and low histone acetylation. Collectively, our data indicate that the position of Vbeta segments relative to assembled VbetaDJbetaCbeta1 genes influences their rearrangement and suggest that DNA sequences between Vbeta segments may form boundaries between active and inactive Vbeta chromatin domains upstream of VbetaDJbetaCbeta genes.

The weight of interleukin-6 in B cell-related autoimmune disorders

Interleukin (IL)-6 is a prevailing factor of polyclonal B-cell activation of B cells, and thereby of their tolerance breach. Its receptor (R) complex consists of a transducing unit, and a membrane-bound or soluble protein. Many activities ascribed to this cytokine are generated by the soluble IL-6R. Evidence has however been gleaned in autoimmune diseases that the system is instrumental in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), Sjögren's syndrome and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). To gain insight into the understanding of the mechanisms behind these observations, a prime example is the recombination-activating gene (Rag) machinery in B lymphocytes. It is interesting that the expression of Rags is favored by IL-6, and repressed by anti-IL-6R antibody (Ab) in RA and SLE. Not surprisingly, clinical benefits are reported in the treatment of autoimmune disorders with anti-IL-6R Ab, and other perspectives about to be open in biotherapy.

Temporal and spatial regulation of V(D)J recombination: interactions of extrinsic factors with the RAG complex

In the course of lymphoid development, V(D)J recombination is subject to stringent locus-specific and temporal regulation. These constraints are ultimately responsible for several features peculiar to lymphoid development, including the lineage specificity of antigen receptor assembly, allelic exclusion and receptor editing. In addition, cell cycle phase-dependent regulation of V(D)J recombinase activity ensures that DNA rearrangement is completed by the appropriate mechanism of DNA repair. Regulation of V(D)J recombination involves interactions between the V(D)J recombinase--a heteromeric complex consisting of RAG-1 and RAG-2 subunits--and macromolecular assemblies extrinsic to the recombinase. This chapter will focus on those features of the recombinase itself--and in particular the RAG-2 subunit--that interact with extrinsic factors to establish patterns of temporal control and locus specificity in developing lymphocytes.

Chromatin accessibility and epigenetic modifications differ between frequently and infrequently rearranging VH genes

The molecular mechanisms that control the temporal and lineage-specific accessibility, as well as the rearrangement frequency of V(H) genes for V(H)-to-DJ(H) recombination, are not fully understood. We previously found a positive correlation between the extent of histone acetylation and the differential rearrangement frequency of individual V(H) genes. Here, we demonstrated that poorly rearranging V(H) genes are more highly associated with histone H3 dimethylated at lysine 9, a marker of repressive chromatin, than frequently rearranging V(H) genes. We also observed a positive relationship between the differential binding of Pax5 to individual V(H)S107 genes and rearrangement frequency. Furthermore, we showed that accessibility of the regions flanking the Pax5 binding site and the recombination signal sequence (RSS) to restriction enzyme cleavage correspond with the differential rearrangement frequency of the V(H)S107 family members. In addition, we found that the CpG sites located in the coding regions of V(H) genes are methylated in general, while the extent of DNA methylation drops dramatically near the RSS. For the V(H)S107 family, one CpG site located 101bp upstream of the RSS showed variable methylation that correlates with rearrangement frequency, and the methylation status of a CpG site located 34bp downstream of the RSS could also favor the rearrangement of V1 over V11. These findings suggest that the extent of histone modifications, chromatin accessibility, DNA methylation, as well as the differential binding of Pax5 to V(H) coding regions, could all influence the rearrangement frequency of individual V(H) genes, although some of these mechanisms are not strictly B cell specific.

Accessibility control of V(D)J recombination

Mammals contend with a universe of evolving pathogens by generating an enormous diversity of antigen receptors during lymphocyte development. Precursor B and T cells assemble functional immunoglobulin (Ig) and T cell receptor (TCR) genes via recombination of numerous variable (V), diversity (D), and joining (J) gene segments. Although this combinatorial process generates significant diversity, genetic reorganization is inherently dangerous. Thus, V(D)J recombination must be tightly regulated to ensure proper lymphocyte development and avoid chromosomal translocations that cause lymphoid tumors. Each genomic rearrangement is mediated by a common V(D)J recombinase that recognizes sequences flanking all antigen receptor gene segments. The specificity of V(D)J recombination is due, in large part, to changes in the accessibility of chromatin at target gene segments, which either permits or restricts access to recombinase. The chromatin configuration of antigen receptor loci is governed by the concerted action of enhancers and promoters, which function as accessibility control elements (ACEs). In general, ACEs act as conduits for transcription factors, which in turn recruit enzymes that covalently modify or remodel nucleosomes. These ACE-mediated alterations are critical for activation of gene segment transcription and for opening chromatin associated with recombinase target sequences. In this chapter, we describe advances in understanding the mechanisms that control V(D)J recombination at the level of chromatin accessibility. The discussion will focus on cis-acting regulation by ACEs, the nuclear factors that control ACE function, and the epigenetic modifications that establish recombinase accessibility.

The recombination difference between mouse kappa and lambda segments is mediated by a pair-wise regulation mechanism

In mice, kappa light chains dominate over lambda in the immunoglobulin repertoire by as much as 20-fold. Although a major contributor to this difference is the recombination signal sequences (RSS), the mechanism by which RSS cause differential representation has not been determined. To elucidate the mechanism, we tested kappa and lambda RSS flanked by their natural 5' and 3' flanks in three systems that monitor V(D)J recombination. Using extra-chromosomal recombination substrates, we established that a kappa RSS and its flanks support six- to nine-fold higher levels of recombination than a lambda counterpart. In vitro cleavage assays with these same sequences demonstrated that single cleavage at individual kappa or lambda RSS (plus flanks) occurs with comparable frequencies, but that a pair of kappa RSS (plus flanks) support significantly higher levels of double cleavage than a pair of lambda RSS (plus flanks). Using EMSA with double stranded oligonucleotides containing the same kappa or lambda RSS and their respective flanks, we examined RAG/DNA complex formation. We report that, surprisingly, RAG-1/2 form only modestly higher levels of complexes on individual 12 and 23 kappa RSS (plus natural flanks) as compared to their lambda counterparts. We conclude that the overuse of kappa compared to lambda segments cannot be accounted for by differences in RAG-1/2 binding nor by cleavage at individual RSS but rather could be accounted for by enhanced pair-wise cleavage of kappa RSS by RAG-1/2. Based on the data presented, we suggest that the biased usage of light chain segments is imposed at the level of synaptic RSS pairs.

How to keep V(D)J recombination under control

Breaking apart chromosomes is not a matter to be taken lightly. The possible negative outcomes are obvious: loss of information, unstable chromosomes, chromosomal translocations, tumorigenesis, or cell death. Utilizing DNA rearrangement to generate the desired diversity in the antigen receptor loci is a risky business, and it must be carefully controlled. In general, the regulation is so precise that the negative consequences are minimal or not apparent. They are visible only when the process of V(D)J recombination goes awry, as for example in some chromosomal translocations associated with lymphoid tumors. Regulation is imposed not only to prevent the generation of random breaks in the DNA, but also to direct rearrangement to the appropriate locus or subregion of a locus in the appropriate cell at the appropriate time. Antigen receptor rearrangement is regulated essentially at four different levels: expression of the RAG1/2 recombinase, intrinsic biochemical properties of the recombinase and the cleavage reaction, the post-cleavage /DNA repair stage of the process, and accessibility of the substrate to the recombinase. Within each of these broad categories, multiple mechanisms are used to achieve the desired aims. The major focus of this review is on accessibility control and the role of chromatin and nuclear architecture in achieving this regulation, although other issues are touched upon.

DNA methylation in mouse gametogenesis

DNA methylation is involved in many biological processes and is particularly important for both development and germ cell differentiation. Several waves of demethylation and de novo methylation occur during both male and female germ line development. This has been found at both the gene and all genome levels, but there is no demonstrated correlation between them. During the postnatal germ line development of spermatogenesis, we found very complex and drastic DNA methylation changes that we could correlate with chromatin structure changes. Thus, detailed studies focused on localization and expression pattern of the chromatin proteins involved in both DNA methylation, histone tails modification, condensin and cohesin complex formation, should help to gain insights into the mechanisms at the origin of the deep changes occurring during this particular period.