Quantification of the role of temporal artery biopsy in diagnosing clinically suspected giant cell arteritis

A Predictive Model for Temporal Artery Biopsy in the Setting of Suspected Giant Cell Arteritis: A Validation Study

PURPOSE

A previously published predictive model based on threshold parameters for erythrocyte sedimentation rate, c-reactive protein, and platelet count demonstrated that 40% of patients who underwent biopsy may not have required it. The current study was performed to evaluate the model's performance on an independent data set.

METHODS

This is a retrospective consecutive series of patients undergoing temporal artery biopsy (TAB) in a single health region in Canada. The model was applied to a multicenter cohort of patients undergoing TAB by a variety of surgical services. A centralized pathological database serving multiple institutions and surgical services was used to identify patients undergoing TAB.

RESULTS

Over a 7-year period, patients undergoing TAB were identified via a central pathological database. Those who had concurrent illnesses which would likely affect erythrocyte sedimentation rate, c-reactive protein, and platelet count, patients on steroids for >2 weeks by the time of biopsy, and those with missing serum markers were excluded. The previously developed model was applied to the 222 patients enrolled. The model correctly identified 29% of patients with a pretest probability of 0% for a positive biopsy and 9% with a pretest probability of 100%, suggesting that in total, 38% of patients could have avoided TAB.

CONCLUSION

The results of this independent data set support the previously published predictive formula. Utilizing a simple, clinically applicable predictive model of the pretest probabilities, approximately 38% of TAB currently being performed may be avoided. The results suggest that evaluation with a prospective multicentre study would be appropriate.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Symptoms, Physical Signs, and Laboratory Tests for Giant Cell Arteritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Importance

Current clinical guidelines recommend selecting diagnostic tests for giant cell arteritis (GCA) based on pretest probability that the disease is present, but how pretest probability should be estimated remains unclear.

Objective

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of symptoms, physical signs, and laboratory tests for suspected GCA.

Data Sources

PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched from November 1940 through April 5, 2020.

Study Selection

Trials and observational studies describing patients with suspected GCA, using an appropriate reference standard for GCA (temporal artery biopsy, imaging test, or clinical diagnosis), and with available data for at least 1 symptom, physical sign, or laboratory test.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Screening, full text review, quality assessment, and data extraction by 2 investigators. Diagnostic test meta-analysis used a bivariate model.

Main Outcome(s) and Measures

Diagnostic accuracy parameters, including positive and negative likelihood ratios (LRs).

Results

In 68 unique studies (14 037 unique patients with suspected GCA; of 7798 patients with sex reported, 5193 were women [66.6%]), findings associated with a diagnosis of GCA included limb claudication (positive LR, 6.01; 95% CI, 1.38-26.16), jaw claudication (positive LR, 4.90; 95% CI, 3.74-6.41), temporal artery thickening (positive LR, 4.70; 95% CI, 2.65-8.33), temporal artery loss of pulse (positive LR, 3.25; 95% CI, 2.49-4.23), platelet count of greater than 400 × 103/μL (positive LR, 3.75; 95% CI, 2.12-6.64), temporal tenderness (positive LR, 3.14; 95% CI, 1.14-8.65), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate greater than 100 mm/h (positive LR, 3.11; 95% CI, 1.43-6.78). Findings that were associated with absence of GCA included the absence of erythrocyte sedimentation rate of greater than 40 mm/h (negative LR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.08-0.44), absence of C-reactive protein level of 2.5 mg/dL or more (negative LR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.25-0.59), and absence of age over 70 years (negative LR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.27-0.86).

Conclusions and Relevance

This study identifies the clinical and laboratory features that are most informative for a diagnosis of GCA, although no single feature was strong enough to confirm or refute the diagnosis if taken alone. Combinations of these symptoms might help direct further investigation, such as vascular imaging, temporal artery biopsy, or seeking evaluation for alternative diagnoses.

Sensitivity of temporal artery biopsy in the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Temporal artery biopsy (TAB) is a reference test for the diagnosis of GCA but reveals inflammatory changes only in a subset of patients. The lack of knowledge of TAB sensitivity hampers comparisons with non-invasive techniques such as temporal artery ultrasonography. We performed a systematic literature review and meta-analysis to estimate the sensitivity of TAB in GCA and to identify factors that may influence the estimate.

METHODS

A systematic literature review involved searching electronic databases and cross-references. Eligibility criteria included publications reporting at least 30 GCA cases fulfilling the original or modified 1990 ACR classification criteria. The pooled proportion of TAB-positive GCA cases was calculated by using aggregated-data meta-analysis with a random-effects model and assessment of heterogeneity with the I2 statistic. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were used to examine the effect of patient and study characteristics on TAB positivity.

RESULTS

Among 3820 publications screened, 32 studies (3092 patients) published during 1993-2017 were analysed. The pooled proportion of TAB-positive GCA cases was 77.3% (95% CI: 71.8, 81.9%), with high between-study heterogeneity (I2 = 90%). The proportion of TAB-positive cases was slightly higher in publications before than in 2012 and after (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The estimated sensitivity of 77% provides indirect evidence that TAB is not less sensitive than temporal artery imaging. The unexplained high between-study heterogeneity could result from differences in TAB sampling, processing or interpretation. The decrease in TAB-positive GCA cases over time could reflect an increasing propensity for clinicians to accept a GCA diagnosis without proof by TAB.

Development of a predictive model for temporal artery biopsies

OBJECTIVE

Temporal artery biopsy is a critical, relatively safe, and reliable test in the diagnosis of temporal arteritis. Yet, a clarification of the pre-test probabilities may provide clarity on which patients with suspected giant cell arteritis would benefit from this invasive diagnostic procedure.

DESIGN

A prospective case series PARTICIPANTS: A consecutive case series of patients referred to the Ophthalmology service for temporal artery biopsy.

METHODS

All subjects underwent standardized serum testing, and signs and symptoms assessment. Predictive models were created and evaluated.

RESULTS

119 patients were analyzed. This exploratory study found that a simple model including platelet count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and c-reactive protein was able to define a subset of patients with a pre-test probability of a positive biopsy of 0% or 100%. 40% (95% confidence interval 31%-49%) of patients fell into this category.

CONCLUSIONS

Utilizing a simple clinically applicable predictive model of the pretest probability of a temporal artery biopsy in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis, up to 31%-49% of temporal artery biopsies may be avoided. This study was a single site exploratory study with data-driven thresholds - therefore these results need to be validated with an independent sample prior to clinical use.

Clinical predictors of positive temporal artery biopsy

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the ability of known clinical signs and symptoms, as well as common laboratory tests, to correctly predict a positive temporal artery biopsy.

DESIGN

A prospective cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

Consecutive patients in a tertiary referral centre undergoing temporal artery biopsy.

METHODS

Clinical information was collected using a predesigned questionnaire. Pathology results and laboratory information were collected from digital patient records.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The predictive value of clinical signs, symptoms, and laboratory values of a positive temporal artery biopsy.

RESULTS

Over a 3-year period, 259 patients were enrolled and 251 patients were analyzed. Sixty-one patients had a positive biopsy. Clinical features most predictive of a positive biopsy were jaw claudication (positive likelihood ratio [LR+] 2.31) and abnormal temporal artery pulse (LR+ 2.62). Receiver operating characteristic curves generated for erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), and platelets values showed an area under curve (AUC) value of 0.71, 0.75, and 0.76, respectively. The initiation of steroids decreased the diagnostic utility of the ESR, CRP, and platelets values (AUC = 0.58, 0.61, and 0.63, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

A variety of clinical signs and symptoms were observed in patients referred for a temporal artery biopsy. Clinical signs and symptoms were less accurate in predicting a positive biopsy than laboratory tests. No combination of clinical signs and symptoms tested was able to predict giant cell arteritis with the certainty necessary to justify or withhold long-term steroid therapy.

Baseline clinical predictors of an ultimate giant cell arteritis diagnosis in patients referred to temporal artery biopsy

The diagnosis of giant cell arteritis (GCA) is based on clinical grounds and confirmed by characteristic histological findings on temporal artery biopsy (TAB). Patients may be diagnosed with GCA based on clinical grounds only, despite negative histological findings. We aimed to investigate which baseline clinical and laboratory features best predict an ultimate diagnosis of giant cell arteritis among patients referred to TAB. We retrospectively analyzed 224 patients who underwent TAB in our hospital between 2000 and 2014. Patients were diagnosed with GCA if TAB was positive for GCA, or by clinical grounds only despite a negative biopsy, provided they fulfilled the American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria. Baseline clinical and laboratory features were obtained from medical records. Predictors of an ultimate GCA diagnosis were investigated. Overall, 82 patients were diagnosed with GCA-57 had histological evidence of GCA and 25 were diagnosed with GCA despite a negative biopsy. One hundred and forty-two patients were not diagnosed with GCA. Predictors of an eventual diagnosis of GCA in a multivariate logistic regression analysis were headache (OR = 6; p < 0.001), jaw claudication (OR 4.5; p = 0.007), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (OR = 1.5; p = 0.032) and platelet count (OR = 1.74; p = 0.004). Among patients referred to TAB, headache, jaw claudication, ESR, and thrombocyte levels are predictors for an ultimate diagnosis of GCA. These clinical and laboratory features should be considered when contemplating the diagnosis and treatment of GCA.

Increased rho kinase activity in temporal artery biopsies from patients with giant cell arteritis

OBJECTIVE

Aberrant rho kinase (ROCK) activity is implicated in the pathogenesis of several vascular diseases and is associated with Th17 differentiation. Th17 immune response is recognized in the pathogenesis of GCA. The aim of this study was to assess ROCK activity in GCA.

METHODS

All patients who underwent temporal artery biopsy (TAB) at a tertiary care centre over 5 years were identified and charts reviewed. Subjects were categorized into three groups: TAB-positive GCA, TAB-negative GCA and age- and sex-matched controls. TABs were stained for phosphorylated ezrin/radixin/moesin (pERM), a surrogate of ROCK activity, and reviewed by a pathologist blinded to clinical status. Three areas were scored for staining intensity on a scale of 0-2, with a maximum possible score of 6.

RESULTS

Nineteen subjects with TAB-positive GCA, 17 with TAB-negative GCA and 18 controls were analysed. Compared with controls, GCA subjects with either positive or negative TABs had significantly higher pERM intensity scores (P = 0.0109). Adjusting for diabetes, hypertension, prednisone and statin use, GCA subjects still had higher pERM scores [odds ratio 7.3 (95% CI 1.9, 25.9), P = 0.0046]. The high pERM score had a sensitivity of 90% and a negative predictive value of 91% for the diagnosis of GCA in those with a negative TAB, compared with 51% sensitivity for histopathology alone.

CONCLUSION

Subjects with GCA had more intense pERM staining in TAB specimens compared with age- and sex-matched controls, regardless of whether TAB was positive or negative by routine histopathology, suggesting increased ROCK activity in GCA. The ROCK pathway warrants further investigation in GCA, as it may have diagnostic significance in enhancing the sensitivity of TAB.

Temporal artery biopsy size does not matter

This study aimed to clarify whether positive temporal artery biopsies had a greater sample length than negative biopsies in temporal arteritis. It has been suggested that biopsy length should be at least 1 cm to improve diagnostic accuracy. A retrospective review of 149 patients who had 151 temporal artery biopsies was conducted. Twenty biopsies were positive (13.3%), 124 negative (82.1%) and seven samples were insufficient (4.6%). There was no clinically significant difference in the mean biopsy size between positive (0.7 cm) and negative samples (0.65 cm) ( t-test: p = .43 NS). Ninety-four patients fulfilled all three ACR criteria prior to biopsy (62.3%) and four patients (2.6%) changed ACR score from 2 to 3 after biopsy. Treatment should not be delayed in anticipation of the biopsy or withheld in the case of a negative biopsy if the patient’s symptoms improve.

Validity of the American College of Rheumatology criteria for the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis

PURPOSE

To assess the clinical utility of the American College of Rheumatology criteria for the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis (GCA) in patients with positive and negative temporal artery biopsies.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series of all patients undergoing temporal artery biopsy.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of all patients seen in the Neuro-ophthalmology Service of the Wills Eye Institute undergoing biopsy. One hundred twelve patients were identified between October 2001 and May 2006. Charts were reviewed for American College of Rheumatology criteria, biopsy results, and progression of visual loss after diagnosis.

RESULTS

Nine of 35 patients (25.7%) with positive biopsies would not have been diagnosed with GCA using American College of Rheumatology criteria alone. An additional 16 patients (45.7%) met only 2 criteria and required the positive biopsy to establish the American College of Rheumatology diagnosis of GCA. Eleven of 39 patients (28.2%) with negative biopsies met the criteria and would have been diagnosed with GCA. Diagnostic agreement between the American College of Rheumatology criteria without biopsy results and biopsy results alone was 51.4%; with the addition of biopsy results to the criteria, this increased to 73.0%.

CONCLUSIONS

The current American College of Rheumatology criteria should not be used to diagnose GCA and all patients suspected of having GCA should undergo a temporal artery biopsy.

[Acute sectoral choroidal ischemia: a case report]

Sectoral choroidal ischemia is a classic sign of giant cell arteritis, although the latter is more typically associated with anterior ischemic optic neuropathy or central retinal artery occlusion. We report the case of an acute choroidal ischemia in a 68-year-old, one-eyed patient, who presented with deterioration of visual acuity and metamorphopsia in his left eye (his right eye was counting fingers due to high myopia). Fundus examination revealed retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) alterations and slow choroidal perfusion on fluorescein angiography. Macular Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) showed a total disruption of the photoreceptor layer. Although prompt corticosteroid therapy preserved some vision, secondary macular retinal pigment epithelial changes limited the visual outcome. No other ophthalmological signs were observed in follow-up.

Role of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of temporal arteritis

Background

Temporal artery (TA) biopsy is the current standard for diagnosing temporal arteritis, but has limited sensitivity. Colour duplex ultrasonography is a newer, non-invasive method of diagnosing temporal arteritis.

Methods

A systematic review was performed of trials comparing TA biopsy with duplex ultrasonography. Duplex results (halo sign, stenosis or vessel occlusion) were compared with either TA biospy findings or the American College of Rheumatology research criteria for diagnosing temporal arteritis. Trials were identified from MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library trials register. The performance of duplex ultrasonography was assessed with weighted independent sensitivity and specificity values, and summary receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

Results

There were 17 eligible studies containing 998 patients. When the halo sign on duplex imaging was compared with TA biopsy, the sensitivity was 75 (95 per cent confidence interval 67 to 82) per cent and the specificity was 83 (78 to 88) per cent. There was no heterogeneity across the eligible studies.

Conclusion

Duplex ultrasonography was relatively accurate for diagnosing temporal arteritis. It should become the first-line investigation, with biopsy reserved for patients with a negative scan.

Proposal to decrease the number of negative temporal artery biopsies

OBJECTIVE

The percentage of negative temporal artery biopsies (TABs) remains very high in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis (GCA). The aim of our study was to identify the clinical predictors of TAB results to improve the effectiveness of this diagnostic procedure.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional study of 125 consecutive patients who underwent TAB in the Department of Internal Medicine of a public tertiary hospital, from January 1997 to March 2002. We compared patients with a positive and a negative biopsy result.

RESULTS

Forty-six of the 125 biopsies (36.8%) were positive for GCA and 79 (63.2%) negative. Temporal artery (TA) thickening (8.01), decreased pulse (5.58), jaw claudication (4.87), and scalp tenderness (4.29) presented the highest positive likelihood ratios (LR+). Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (0.11), headache (0.39), TA thickening (0.42), and decreased pulse (0.48) had the lowest negative likelihood ratios (LR-). Only TA abnormalities [odds ratio (OR) 12.3] and scalp tenderness (OR 6) were independent predictors of biopsy results. By excluding patients with no evidence of TA abnormalities, scalp tenderness, or jaw claudication, only 48% of the 125 biopsies would have been performed; 59 negative biopsies would have been prevented, but six positive biopsies would have been missed.

CONCLUSION

Careful assessment of patients with clinically suspected GCA to rule out artery abnormalities, scalp tenderness, and jaw claudication can lead to a dramatic decrease in the percentage of negative biopsies. This observation may contribute to improving the physician's decision-making process when contemplating TAB.

EULAR recommendations for the management of large vessel vasculitis

OBJECTIVES

To develop European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for the management of large vessel vasculitis.

METHODS

An expert group (10 rheumatologists, 3 nephrologists, 2 immunolgists, 2 internists representing 8 European countries and the USA, a clinical epidemiologist and a representative from a drug regulatory agency) identified 10 topics for a systematic literature search through a modified Delphi technique. In accordance with standardised EULAR operating procedures, recommendations were derived for the management of large vessel vasculitis. In the absence of evidence, recommendations were formulated on the basis of a consensus opinion.

RESULTS

Seven recommendations were made relating to the assessment, investigation and treatment of patients with large vessel vasculitis. The strength of recommendations was restricted by the low level of evidence and EULAR standardised operating procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of evidence and expert consensus, management recommendations for large vessel vasculitis have been formulated and are commended for use in everyday clinical practice.

Intraoperative predictability of temporal artery biopsy results

PURPOSE

To determine whether inflammatory/granulomatous changes of giant cell arteritis can be grossly identified by the surgeon during temporal artery biopsy to allow institution or discontinuation of steroid therapy without delay.

METHODS

The records of 113 consecutive patients operated on by the same surgeon (R.C.K.) between November 2002 and June 2007 were reviewed. Demographic characteristics, date and site of the surgeries, surgical complications, surgeon's intraoperative presumption about the outcome (based on his assessment of the thickness, nodularity, tortuosity, and color/pallor of the arterial wall, blood flow, and the lumen size), and histopathologic biopsy results were collected from the chart review. The main outcome measure was the correspondence of the surgeon's intraoperative impression expressed in the operative note to the ultimate histopathologic diagnosis.

RESULTS

After exclusion of 5 cases with incomplete data, the study consisted of 108 patients (78 females and 30 males) with an average age of 72.4 +/- 11.4 years (range, 45-93 years). There were no complications during or after surgery. The surgeon's comment was "grossly positive" in 17 cases, and 15 of these cases were pathologically positive. For all of the cases that the surgeon's impression was negative, the pathology was negative as well (100% negative predictive value). Overall, the surgeon's intraoperative comments had a 100% sensitivity to detect giant cell arteritis. The specificity and accuracy values were 97.9% and 98.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The surgeon's intraoperative evaluation of the temporal artery may be extremely valuable in predicting the biopsy result and may allow the surgeon to determine whether steroids could be discontinued in patients in whom the clinical history is not highly suggestive of giant cell arteritis.

Temporal artery biopsy...who needs one?

OBJECTIVE

To review a 10 year period of temporal artery biopsies, using the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1990 criteria: a five point scoring system for the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis (GCA).

DESIGN

Population based, retrospective cohort analysis.

SETTING

One district general hospital in the United Kingdom, over one decade.

PARTICIPANTS

All patients who underwent temporal artery biopsy from July 1994 to June 2004.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

ACR score and temporal artery biopsy result.

RESULTS

During the 10 year period 111 patients were identified. The median (range) age at presentation was 71 (29-85) years. Seventy five patients had an initial ACR score of three or four at presentation. There were 20 positive biopsy specimens. In 19 of these cases at least three of the other criteria were positive so there was already sufficient clinical information for a confident diagnosis. In only one case did the positive result influence the diagnosis by changing the ACR score from two to three. In our series, corticosteroid treatment before biopsy did not significantly reduce the yield of the biopsy.

CONCLUSIONS

The ACR score of three or more has a sensitivity of 93.5% and specificity of 91.2% for the diagnosis of GCA. Using these criteria, 68% of patients had sufficient clinical features when referred to make a confident diagnosis of GCA. Temporal artery biopsy was therefore unnecessary in this group. In the remaining group (ACR score < or =2) there was one positive biopsy. The biopsy only changed the diagnosis in this one case-less than 3% of the uncertain cases and less than 1% of the total cases. Using the ACR criteria and restricting biopsy to those cases in which it might change the diagnosis will reduce the number of biopsies by two thirds without jeopardising diagnostic accuracy.

Does temporal artery biopsy influence the management of temporal arteritis?

BACKGROUND

Temporal arteritis (TA) is the commonest form of primary vasculitis. Symptoms are variable, and therefore the diagnosis (or exclusion) of TA is often difficult. Surgeons are frequently asked to perform a temporal artery biopsy (TAB), but whether the histological result actually influences clinical management is unclear.

AIM

To assess whether, in routine clinical practice, a TAB affects clinical decision-making in patients with suspected TA.

DESIGN

Retrospective audit.

METHODS

All patients who underwent a TAB in a single hospital over a 2-year period were identified. This included patients referred from different specialist departments. Individual patient records were examined to document the TAB result, and in particular, the timings of commencement and discontinuation of corticosteroid therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 44 patients were included. TAB was positive in seven patients and negative in 37. In 31, there was no change in their clinical management despite a negative biopsy result: 18 continued with corticosteroids for >6 months with a clinical diagnosis of TA, and in 13 patients a decision to stop steroids, or an alternative diagnosis, was made before the biopsy result was known.

DISCUSSION

In this retrospective study, only a small number of TABs provided positive histological confirmation of TA, and in most patients undergoing TAB, there was little evidence that clinical decision-making with respect to corticosteroid therapy was influenced by the TAB result.

Central nervous system manifestations of rheumatologic diseases

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarize the current literature on central nervous system manifestations of vasculitides and connective tissue diseases.

RECENT FINDINGS

There have been advances in understanding the mechanisms behind the initiation and perpetuation of inflammatory processes in vasculitic neuropathy. Clinically relevant data have been obtained on the predictive criteria for a positive biopsy result in giant cell arteritis, the imaging characteristics of primary angiitis of the central nervous system, and Behçet disease, and the clinical and radiologic features of neuro-Behçet disease. There is more clarity about the central nervous system syndromes attributable to systemic lupus erythematosus and new insights into the central mechanisms involved in the manifestations of Sjögren syndrome and rheumatoid arthritis. Novel immunomodulatory agents, such as infliximab, have shown some benefit in rheumatoid vasculitis and Sjögren syndrome.

SUMMARY

A better understanding of the clinical, radiographic, and serologic characteristics of various central nervous system complications of rheumatologic diseases has been gained in the past year. Recent advances in understanding the pathophysiology of peripheral nervous system complications and their treatment may affect the management of the central nervous system complications.