POS0244 ASSOCIATION OF PROTEINASE 3 GENE (PRTN3) Val119Ile POLYMORPHISM (SNP rs351111) WITH RISK OF RELAPSE AMONG HOMOZYGOUS PATIENTS WITH PR3 ANCA-ASSOCIATED VASCULITIS

Background

The frequency of the proteinase 3 gene (PRTN3) polymorphisms in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) is not well characterized. We hypothesize that PRTN3 gene polymorphisms induce allosteric changes in PR3 conformation which may alter its interaction with ligands and PR3-ANCA during inflammation with potential implications for disease presentation and clinical outcomes.

Objectives

To analyze the association of PRTN3 Val119Ile polymorphism (SNP rs351111) with risk of relapse risk among homozygous patients with PR3 ANCA-associated vasculitis.

Methods

DNA variant calling for SNP rs351111 (chr.19:844020, c.355G>A) in PRTN3 gene assessed the allelic frequency in patients with PR3-AAV included in the Rituximab versus Cyclophosphamide (RAVE) trial. This was followed by RNA-seq variant calling to characterize the mRNA expression. We compared clinical presentation and outcomes between patients homozygous for PR3-Ile119 or PR3-Val119.

Results

Serum samples for DNA calling were available in 188 of the 197 patients with AAV in the RAVE cohort. 75 PR3-AAV patients had the allelic variant: 13 patients were homozygous for PR3-Ile119 and 62 patients were heterozygous PR3-Val119Ile with an allele frequency threshold of 29.3 – 55.1% of reads (Figure 1A and 1B). RNA-seq was available for 89 patients and the mRNA corresponding to the allelic variant was found in 35 PR3-AAV patients: 13 patients were homozygous for PR3-Ile119 and 22 patients were heterozygous PR3-Val119Ile with an allele frequency threshold of 11.1 – 62.8% of reads (Figure 1A and 1C). The agreement between the DNA calling results and the mRNA expression of the 86 patients that overlapped was 100%. We found an additional homozygous patient for PR3-Val119 in which blood was not available for DNA calling. We compared the clinical presentation and outcomes of 74 patients with PR3-AAV: 13 homozygous for PR3-Ile119 and 51 homozygous for PR3-Val119 (Table 1). The frequency of severe flares at 18 months in homozygous PR3-Ile119 was ≥ 2x higher when compared with homozygous PR3-Val119 (46.2% vs. 19.6%, p=0.048). We found no differences in clinical presentation.

Figure 1.

RAVE trial population distribution according to the zygosity status for PRTN3 gene (PR3 and MPO-ANCA patients) and DNA or RNA variant calling (panel A). Allelic frequency for rs351111, chr.19:844020 (c.355G>A) in PRTN3 among patients with AAV (PR3 and MPO-ANCA) in the DNA (panel B) and RNA (panel C) variant calling.

Table 1.

Outcomes of patients with PR3-ANCA according with PRTN3 zygosity.

PR3-ANCA (n=64)Homozygous PR3-Val119(n=51)HomozygousPR3-Ile119(n=13)p-value Remission, n (%)45 (88.2)13 (100)0.194 Complete remission, n (%)36 (70.6)10 (76.9)0.650 Any flare 18 months, n (%)30 (58.8)7 (53.8)0.746 Severe Relapse* 18 months, n (%)10 (19.6)6 (46.2)0.048

* Relapse was considered “Severe” if Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score for Wegener’s Granulomatosis (BVAS/WG) > 3 or one major item as per the RAVE trial definition.

Abbreviations: ANCA - anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody; Ile – isoleucine; n- number; PR3 - proteinase 3; Val - valine.

Conclusion

In patients with PR3-AAV the presence of PRTN3 Val119Ile polymorphism was associated with higher frequency of severe relapse. Further studies are necessary to understand the association of this observation with the risk of severe relapse.

References

[1]Stone JH et al N Engl J Med 2010; 363:221-232

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

AB0619 Rationale and Design of the 52-week, Randomized, Phase 3, Head-to-Head MANDARA Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Benralizumab, a Humanized, Anti-interleukin–5 Receptor α Monoclonal Antibody in Refractory or Relapsing Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis

Background

Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA, formerly Churg-Strauss syndrome) is a rare, potentially organ- and life-threatening disease characterized by systemic eosinophilia, airway disease, and multi-system small-vessel vasculitis. Management of EGPA generally focuses on reducing active inflammation using corticosteroids and immunosuppressants, both of which are associated with serious adverse effects and incomplete disease control. High blood eosinophil (bEOS) levels are a central component of the pathophysiology of EGPA, and studies have shown that bEOS-reducing therapies, such as mepolizumab, are effective in some patients with EGPA. Benralizumab is a humanized, afucosylated, anti-interleukin-5 receptor α monoclonal antibody that induces direct, rapid, and near complete depletion of eosinophils through antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Eosinophil depletion by benralizumab is effective in eosinophilic asthma, corticosteroid-dependent asthma, and has shown promise in a small phase 2 trial in hypereosinophilic syndrome, which has overlapping organ systems involvement and similar clinical features to EGPA. Collectively, the evidence from these indications supports examination of the efficacy of benralizumab as an eosinophil-depleting therapy in patients with EGPA.

Objectives

The phase 3, head-to-head MANDARA (NCT04157348) study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of benralizumab versus mepolizumab in adults with relapsing or refractory EGPA.

Methods

This randomized (1:1), multicentre, double-blind (DB), active-controlled study is enrolling adults with a diagnosis of EGPA, defined as a history of asthma and eosinophilia together with ≥2 additional clinical features, a history of relapsing or refractory disease, and maintained on a stable prednisolone/prednisone dose ≥7.5 mg/day for ≥4 weeks prior to baseline. Patients will receive either benralizumab 30 mg or mepolizumab 300 mg every 4 weeks over the 52-week DB study period. Patients who complete the DB treatment period will be eligible to continue into an optional open-label extension, during which all patients will receive benralizumab (Figure 1). The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients who achieve EGPA remission, defined as a Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS)=0 and prednisolone dose of ≤4 mg/day, at both Week 36 and 48 of the DB period, and it will assess non-inferiority (NI) between benralizumab and mepolizumab. Secondary endpoints include duration of remission, time to first EGPA relapse, annualized relapse rate, average daily prednisolone dose between Weeks 48 to 52, and the proportion of patients who achieve and maintain remission from Week 24 through the end of the DB period. Other endpoints include safety, symptoms, health-related quality of life, healthcare utilization due to EGPA, and tolerability. The trial also includes a non-interventional patient interview sub-study, which will collect data related to patients’ EGPA personal experience and perceived impact on study treatment, and a mechanistic sub-study, which will explore the pharmacodynamic response and mechanism of action of benralizumab compared to mepolizumab.

Figure 1.

MANDARA Study Design

Results

The study aims to enrol 140 patients which will provide ~90% power to demonstrate NI with a NI margin of -25% at the 2.5% one-sided significance level, assuming each treatment group has a remission rate of 32%. Screening started in Oct 2019 and the trial is ongoing.

Conclusion

MANDARA is one of few multicentre randomized trials conducted to date in EGPA. Results from this phase 3, head-to-head study will characterize the efficacy and safety of benralizumab compared with mepolizumab in adults with relapsing or refractory EGPA. The trial’s active comparator design will also provide critical evidence of efficacy and safety in a disease with considerable unmet needs.

Disclosure of Interests

Michael Wechsler Speakers bureau: GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, Amgen, Sanofi, Regeneron, Novartis, Genentech, and Teva Pharmaceuticals, Grant/research support from: GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, Amgen, Sanofi, Regeneron, Novartis, Genentech, and Teva Pharmaceuticals, Peter A. Merkel Consultant of: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Boeringher-Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, ChemoCentryx, CSL Behring, Dynacure, EMDSerono, Forbius, Genentech/Roche, Genzyme/Sanofi, GlaxoSmithKline, InflaRx, Janssen, Kiniksa, Kyverna, Magenta, MiroBio, Neutrolis, Novartis, Pfizer, Sparrow, Takeda, Talaris, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Boeringher-Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, ChemoCentryx, Eicos, Forbius, Genentech/Roche, Genzyme/Sanofi, GlaxoSmithKline, InflaRx, Sanofi, Sofia Necander Shareholder of: AstraZeneca, Employee of: AstraZeneca, Lena Börjesson Sjö Shareholder of: AstraZeneca, Employee of: AstraZeneca, Elizabeth A. Duncan Shareholder of: AstraZeneca, Employee of: AstraZeneca, Natalya Makulova Shareholder of: AstraZeneca, Employee of: AstraZeneca, Gina D’Angelo Shareholder of: AstraZeneca, Employee of: AstraZeneca, Ron A. Chen Shareholder of: AstraZeneca, Employee of: AstraZeneca, Vivian H. Shih Shareholder of: AstraZeneca, Employee of: AstraZeneca, Rohit Katial Shareholder of: AstraZeneca, Employee of: AstraZeneca, Ubaldo J. Martin Shareholder of: AstraZeneca, Employee of: AstraZeneca

AB0626 Prevalence of Frailty in an Internet-Based Cohort with a Self-Reported Diagnosis of Vasculitis – The VascStrong Study

Background

Frailty is a syndrome characterized by an increased vulnerability to stressors and is associated with disability and early mortality. Frailty may be accelerated in patients with vasculitis. The prevalence of frailty in patients with vasculitis remains unexplored.

Objectives

To describe the prevalence of self-reported frailty in patients with vasculitis.

Methods

VascStrong is a longitudinal study utilizing the Vasculitis Patient-Powered Research Network (VPPRN), an internet-based prospective longitudinal cohort. Data elements collected included type of vasculitis, demographic, and use of medications. Frailty was measured by the FRAIL scale, a self-report measure which queries on 5 domains: 1. Fatigue, 2. Resistance (inability to climb 10 stairs), 3. Ambulation (inability to walk several blocks), 4. Illnesses (≥5/11 comorbidities), and 5. Loss of Weight (≥5% weight loss in the last year). Patients were classified as robust, pre-frail, and frail based on 0, 1-2, or ≥ 3 criteria, respectively.

Results

The survey collected information from October 8, 2021-January 15, 2022. For this preliminary analysis, 228 responses were included. Clinical characteristics and study data are outlined in Table 1. Prevalence of robustness, pre-frailty, and frailty was 28.5%, 47.8%, and 23.7%, respectively. The majority of patients with each form of vasculitis were rated as frail or pre-frail. Among the individual FRAIL domains, fatigue and loss of weight were the most frequent (48.7% and 42.5%, respectively) while illnesses, was the least common (3.5%). When compared to robust patients, frail and pre-frail patients were younger, more frequently female, more likely to be obese and reported more frequent use of glucocorticoids. Patients with urticarial vasculitis and Takayasu’s arteritis were more commonly pre-frail or frail, compared to patients with other types of vasculitis.

Table 1.

Characteristics for overall cohort and by frailty classification

Overall N = 228Robust N = 65Pre-frail N = 109Frail N = 54Age, years, mean (SD)57.6 (15.3)62.4 (14.8)55.1 (15.6)57.1 (14.3)Sex, female163 (71.5%)40 (61.5%)84 (77.1%)39 (72.2%)Race, white204 (89.5%)60 (92.3%)98 (89.9%)46 (85.2%)Ethnicity, non-Hispanic195 (85.5%)57 (87.7%)97 (89.0%)41 (75.9%)Disease duration, years, mean (SD)8.5 (7.9)8.6 (6.8)8.4 (8.4)8.8 (8.0)Employment statusEmployed98 (43.0%)24 (36.9%)60 (55.0%)14 (26.0%)Retired66 (28.9%)29 (44.6%)24 (22.0%)13 (24.1%)Disabled (unable to work)34 (14.9%)4 (6.2%)12 (11.0%)18 (33.3%)Other/missing30 (13.2%)8 (12.3%)13 (12.0%)9 (16.7%)DiagnosisGranulomatosis with polyangiitis89 (100.0%)29 (32.6%)42 (47.2%)18 (20.2%)Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis26 (100.0%)9 (34.6%)11 (42.3%)6 (23.1%)Microscopic polyangiitis23 (100.0%)7 (30.4%)12 (52.2%)4 (17.4%)Giant cell arteritis17 (100.0%)5 (29.4%)8 (47.1%)4 (23.5%)Urticarial vasculitis14 (100.0%)2 (14.3%)5 (35.7%)7 (50.0%)Takayasu's arteritis10 (100.0%)0 (0%)7 (70.0%)3 (30.0%)Other*49 (100.0%)8 (26.5%)16 (49.0%)8 (24.5%)Body Mass IndexaUnderweight6 (2.6%)2 (3.1%)4 (3.7%)0 (0%)Normal86 (37.7%)35 (53.8%)40 (36.7%)11 (20.4%)Overweight63 (27.6%)19 (29.2%)29 (26.6%)15 (27.8%)Obese73 (32.0%)9 (13.8%)36 (33.0%)28 (51.9%)Currently on glucocorticoids104 (45.6%)19 (29.2%)52 (47.7%)33 (61.1%)Current glucocorticoid dose, prednisone equivalent (mg/d), mean (SD)13.1 (18.0)12.6 (17.1)11.3 (18.6)16.4 (17.4)

Data presented as n (%), unless specified otherwise

*Other diagnosis: Behçet’s disease, primary angiitis central nervous system, cryoglobulinemic vasculitis, IgA vasculitis, polyarteritis nodosa, and other/suspected diagnosis

aBased on World Health Organization Body Mass Index categories

Conclusion

Self-reported frailty or pre-frailty is prevalent in the majority of patients with multiple forms of vasculitis. Future analysis will focus on identifying factors associated with frailty in patients with vasculitis, to allow earlier identification and prevention in this population at high-risk for frailty.

Acknowledgements

The investigators want to thank all participants.

Disclosure of Interests

Sebastian E. Sattui Grant/research support from: receives research funding related to clinical trials by AstraZeneca (MANDARA), John Stadler: None declared, Cristina Burroughs: None declared, Kalen Larson: None declared, Peter A. Merkel Consultant of: CSL Behring, Dynacure, EMDSerono, Immagene, Jannsen, Kiniksa, Kyverna, Magenta, MiroBio, Mitsubishi, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sparrow, Talaris, AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Boeringher-Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, ChemoCentryx, Forbius, Genentech/Roche, Genzyme/Sanofi, GlaxoSmithKline, InflaRx, Neutrolis, Takeda., Grant/research support from: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Boeringher-Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, ChemoCentryx, Forbius, Genentech/Roche, Genzyme/Sanofi, GlaxoSmithKline, InflaRx, Neutrolis, Takeda., Robert Spiera Consultant of: Chemocentryx, Grant/research support from: Chemocentryx

POS0833 DIFFERENCES BETWEEN AVACOPAN AND PREDNISONE FOR THE TREATMENT OF ANCA-ASSOCIATED VASCULITIS AT DIFFERENT THRESHOLDS OF GLUCOCORTICOID TOXICITY

Background

Treatment with glucocorticoids (GCs) for ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) is associated with substantial toxicity. The Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index (GTI) was developed to measure change in GC toxicity over time.1 Data from the composite GTI domains provide both an Aggregate Improvement Score (AIS) and a Cumulative Worsening Score (CWS) of GC toxicity, permitting the instrument to compare both improvement and worsening of GC toxicity across treatment groups. The GTI was a pre-specified secondary outcome in ADVOCATE, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients with AAV that aimed to replace a GC taper with avacopan, a complement C5a receptor inhibitor. Patients were randomized to either avacopan or a prednisone taper on a background of either cyclophosphamide or rituximab.2 In ADVOCATE, the median GC exposure was 400 mg vs. 2939 mg in the avacopan and prednisone groups, respectively, which is an 86% median reduction in GC exposure from all sources. Remission rates were comparable in the two groups at 26 weeks (72.3% vs. 70.1%, respectively), and avacopan was superior at 52 weeks (sustained remission in 65.7% vs. 54.9%).2

Objectives

To compare GC toxicity between the treatment groups at three different thresholds of GC toxicity, beginning with the minimum detectable difference (MDD) of the GTI.

Methods

The MDD for the GTI (10 points) was calculated in the initial validation phase of the instrument. Thus, any GTI score > 10 points may be considered to represent a true change in GC toxicity. We compared the two groups at GTI thresholds of 10, 20, and 30 points for both the CWS and AIS. The CWS comprises a total of all GC-related toxicities that have occurred in the GTI between baseline and 26 weeks (time of primary outcome). The AIS, in contrast, allows toxicities to be added if they are new or subtracted if they improve. Higher CWS and AIS values indicate greater severity of GC toxicity. The two scores together capture the nuances of longitudinal GC toxicity across multiple domains. We compared the percentages of those in the two treatment groups who exceeded GTI threshold values of 10, 20, and 30 points in the CWS or AIS.

Results

The percentages of patients exceeding the specified AIS thresholds differentiated the avacopan group from the prednisone group (48.2% vs. 60.4%, respectively, at the 10-point threshold, p=0.02; 29.5% vs. 45.1% at the 20-point threshold, p=0.003; and 18.1% vs. 33.5% at the 30-point threshold, p=0.001) (Table 1). The CWS differentiated avacopan from prednisone at the 20- and 30-point thresholds (57.8% vs 73.2%, respectively, at 20 points, p=0.002; 41.0% vs 55.5% at 30 points, p=0.007).

Table 1.

Percentages of Patients in ADVOCATE Exceeding Selected GTI Thresholds at Week 26

GTI threshold/study groupn (%) exceeding CWS thresholdp-valuen (%) exceeding AIS thresholdp-valueGTI worsening > 10 points Avacopan (N = 164)138 (83.1%)0.14780 (48.2%)0.022 Prednisone (N = 166)144 (87.8%)99 (60.4%)GTI worsening > 20 points Avacopan (N = 164)96 (57.8%)0.00249 (29.5%)0.003 Prednisone (N = 166)120 (73.2%)74 (45.1%)GTI worsening > 30 points Avacopan (N = 164)68 (41.0%)0.00730 (18.1%)0.001 Prednisone (N = 166)91 (55.5%)55 (33.5%)

AIS, Aggregate Improvement Score; CWS, Cumulative Worsening Score; GTI, Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index

Conclusion

Among patients with AAV, treatment with avacopan was associated with lower GC toxicity across multiple GTI thresholds compared to treatment with prednisone, consistent with the substantial reduction in total GC exposure associated with avacopan. The GTI scores differentiated the two treatment groups effectively through a composite of GC toxicity domains.

References

[1]McDowell PJ, Stone JH, Zhang Y, et al. Quantification of Glucocorticoid-Associated Morbidity in Severe Asthma Using the Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021; 9:365-72.

[2]Jayne DRW, Merkel PA, Schall TJ, et al. Avacopan for the Treatment of ANCA-Associated Vasculitis. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:599-609.

Disclosure of Interests

Naomi Patel: None declared, Yuqing Zhang: None declared, David Jayne Speakers bureau: Amgen, Vifor, Consultant of: Astra-Zeneca, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Chemocentryx, GSK, Novartis, Otsuka, Roche/Genentech, Takeda, UCB & Vifor, Grant/research support from: GSK, Roche/Genentech, Peter A Merkel Consultant of: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Boeringher-Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, ChemoCentryx, Forbius, Genentech/Roche, Genzyme/Sanofi, GlaxoSmithKline, Immagene, InflaRx, Jannsen, Kiniksa, Kyverna, Magenta, MiroBio, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sparrow, Takeda, Talaris, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Boeringher-Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, ChemoCentryx, Forbius, Genentech/Roche, Genzyme/Sanofi, GlaxoSmithKline, InflaRx, Sanofi, Takeda, Huibin Yue Shareholder of: ChemoCentryx, Employee of: ChemoCentryx, Pirow Bekker Shareholder of: ChemoCentryx, Consultant of: ChemoCentryx, Employee of: ChemoCentryx, John H. Stone Shareholder of: Steritas, Consultant of: ChemoCentryx, Roche/Genentech, Sanofi, Bristol-Myers Squib, AbbVie, InflaRx, Kyverna, Novartis, Q32Bio, Zenas, Horizon, Grant/research support from: Roche/Genentech, Horizon, Sanofi, Bristol-Myers Squib

POS0070 CONTINUED TREATMENT WITH NINTEDANIB IN PATIENTS WITH LIMITED CUTANEOUS SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS (lcSSc) AND INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE (ILD)

Background

Few data are available on the progression and management of ILD, or the management of adverse events associated with drug treatment, in patients with lcSSc. SENSCIS-ON is an open-label extension trial that is collecting data on decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) and adverse events in patients treated with nintedanib over the long term.

Objectives

To assess decline in FVC and adverse events in patients with lcSSc and ILD treated with nintedanib in SENSCIS-ON.

Methods

Patients with SSc-ILD were eligible to enter SENSCIS-ON if they completed the randomized placebo-controlled SENSCIS trial (in which patients received trial drug until the last patient reached week 52 but for ≤100 weeks) or a drug–drug interaction (DDI) study of nintedanib and oral contraceptive (in which female patients received nintedanib for ≤28 days). Among patients with lcSSc, we analysed changes from baseline in FVC and adverse events over 52 weeks of SENSCIS-ON in patients who received nintedanib in SENSCIS and continued it in SENSCIS-ON (“continued nintedanib” group) and in patients who received placebo in SENSCIS and initiated nintedanib in SENSCIS-ON or who received nintedanib for a short time in the DDI study (“initiated nintedanib” group). Analyses were descriptive.

Results

There were 98 patients with lcSSc in the continued nintedanib group and 127 patients with lcSSc (114 from SENSCIS, 13 from the DDI study) in the initiated nintedanib group. In these groups, respectively, mean (SD) FVC values at inclusion in SENSCIS-ON were 2449 (662) mL and 72.7(16.7) % predicted and 2508 (771) mL and 74.1 (17.4) % predicted. Mean (SE) changes in FVC from baseline to week 52 of SENSCIS-ON were −45.1 (19.1) mL in the continued nintedanib group, −41.5 (24.0) mL in the initiated nintedanib group, and −43.3 (15.3) mL in all patients with lcSSc, similar to the change in FVC in patients with lcSSc at week 52 of the SENSCIS trial (−39.1 [22.2] mL). The adverse event profile of nintedanib in SENSCIS-ON was consistent with that reported over 52 weeks of the SENSCIS trial (Table 1). Over 52 weeks, adverse events led to discontinuation of nintedanib in 3.1% of patients with lcSSc who continued nintedanib in SENSCIS-ON and 16.5% who initiated nintedanib in SENSCIS-ON.

Table 1.

Adverse events (irrespective of causality) reported over 52 weeks in patients with lcSSc and ILD in SENSCIS and SENSCIS-ON.

SENSCISSENSCIS-ONNintedanib(n=135)Placebo(n=142)Continued nintedanib(n=98)Initiated nintedanib(n=127)Most frequent adverse events*Diarrhoea104 (77.0)43 (30.3)70 (71.4)89 (70.1)Nausea45 (33.3)20 (14.1)19 (19.4)32 (25.2)Vomiting33 (24.4)16 (11.3)15 (15.3)31 (24.4)Nasopharyngitis21 (15.6)29 (20.4)18 (18.4)23 (18.1)Upper respiratory tract infection18 (13.3)19 (13.4)13 (13.3)18 (14.2)Skin ulcer11 (8.1)18 (12.7)11 (11.2)14 (11.0)Cough17 (12.6)25 (17.6)13 (13.3)8 (6.3)Adverse event(s) leading to permanent treatment discontinuation25 (18.5)12 (8.5)3 (3.1)21 (16.5)Adverse event(s) leading to dose reduction47 (34.8)5 (3.5)17 (17.3)62 (48.8)Serious adverse event(s)30 (22.2)26 (18.3)22 (22.4)31 (24.4)

n (%) of patients with lcSSc with ≥1 such event reported over 52 weeks (or until 28 days after last drug intake if earlier in SENSCIS or until 7 days after last trial drug intake if earlier in SENSCIS-ON). *Adverse events reported in >10% of patients with lcSSc in either group in SENSCIS-ON. Adverse events were coded according to preferred terms in the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities.

Conclusion

The change in FVC in patients with lcSSc and ILD who received nintedanib over 52 weeks, and the safety profile of nintedanib, in SENSCIS-ON were similar to that observed in patients with lcSSc and ILD who received nintedanib in SENSCIS. These analyses support a continued effect of nintedanib on slowing decline in FVC and the ability to manage adverse events of nintedanib in patients with lcSSc and ILD over the longer term.

Acknowledgements

The SENSCIS-ON trial was funded by Boehringer Ingelheim.

Disclosure of Interests

Yannick Allanore Consultant of: Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Medsenic, Mylan, Prometheus, Roche, Sanofi, Grant/research support from: Alpine Immunosciences, Medsenic, OSE immunotherapeutics, Dinesh Khanna Shareholder of: Stocks - Eicos Sciences, Inc., Consultant of: AbbVie, Acceleron, Actelion, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Corbus, CSL Behring, Galapagos NV, Genentech/Roche, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Horizon Therapeutics, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Prometheus, Sanofi-Aventis, Theraly, United Therapeutics, Grant/research support from: Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Horizon Therapeutics, Immune Tolerance Network, National Institutes of Health, Pfizer, Employee of: Leadership/Equity position – Chief Medical Officer - CiviBioPharma/Eicos Sciences, Inc, Vanessa Smith Speakers bureau: Actelion Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharma GmbH&Co, Janssen-Cilag NV, UCB Biopharma Sprl

, Consultant of: Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharma GmbH&Co, Janssen-Cilag NV

, Grant/research support from: Belgian Fund for Scientific Research in Rheumatic diseases (FWRO), Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharma GmbH&Co, Janssen-Cilag NV, Research Foundation - Flanders (FWO)

, Martin Aringer Speakers bureau: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, BristolMyersSquibb, Chugai, Galapagos, GlaxoSmithKline, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Otsuka, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, UCB

, Consultant of: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Galapagos, GlaxoSmithKline, Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi

, Anna-Maria Hoffmann-Vold Speakers bureau: Actelion, Boehringer Ingelheim, Lilly, Medscape, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Roche, Paid instructor for: Boehringer Ingelheim, Consultant of: Actelion, ARXX, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Lilly, Medscape, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Roche, Grant/research support from: Boehringer Ingelheim, Masataka Kuwana Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Asahi Kasei Pharma, Astellas, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Eisai, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Nippon Shinyaku, Ono Pharmaceuticals, Tanabe-Mitsubishi

, Consultant of: AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Corbus, Mochida

Kissei

, Grant/research support from: Boehringer Ingelheim, MBL, Ono Pharmaceuticals

, Peter A Merkel Consultant of: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Boeringher Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, ChemoCentryx, CSL Behring, Dynacure, EMDSerono, Forbius, Genentech/Roche, Genzyme/Sanofi, GlaxoSmithKline, Immagene, InflaRx, Jannsen, Kiniksa, Kyverna, Magenta, MiroBio, Neutrolis, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sparrow, Takeda, Talaris

, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Boeringher Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, ChemoCentryx, Eicos, Forbius, Genentech/Roche, Genzyme/Sanofi, GlaxoSmithKline, InflaRx, Sanofi, Takeda

, Alexandra James Employee of: Alexandra James is an employee of Elderbrook solutions GmbH that is contracted by Boehringer Ingelheim, Steven Sambevski Employee of: Steven Sambevski is an employee of Boehringer Ingelheim, Margarida Alves Employee of: Margarida Alves is an employee of Boehringer Ingelheim, Christopher P Denton Speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Consultant of: Abbvie, Acceleron, Boehringer Ingelheim, Corbus, CSL Behring, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, Grant/research support from: ARXX Therapeutics, GlaxoSmithKline, Horizon Therapeutics, Servier

OP0180 EFFECT OF AVACOPAN ON RELAPSE RATES AND RELAPSE-FREE TIME IN PATIENTS WITH ANCA-ASSOCIATED VASCULITIS, RESULTS OF THE PHASE 3 ADVOCATE STUDY

Background

For patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis, both failure to achieve remission and relapse after achieving remission are associated with worse long-term outcomes. Avacopan, an oral selective inhibitor of the C5a receptor, is approved for the treatment of ANCA-associated vasculitis. The phase 3 ADVOCATE study tested daily avacopan as a substitute for a standard oral glucocorticoid taper regimen. At week 26, the avacopan group achieved a remission rate (72.3%) comparable to the prednisone group (70.1%) and superior sustained remission at Week 52 (65.7% avacopan vs. 54.9% prednisone groups, respectively [1]). The median (mean) total glucocorticoid dose from all sources was 400 mg (1349 mg) in the avacopan group versus 2939 mg (3655 mg) in the prednisone group, representing 86% (63%) lower glucocorticoid exposure in the avacopan group. Compared with the prednisone group, the avacopan group showed a reduction in the proportion of patients who relapsed after achieving remission and, among patients who achieved remission, a longer time to relapse (1).

Objectives

To further characterize efficacy, additional post-hoc analyses compared the avacopan and prednisone groups regarding i) failure to achieve remission and ii) relapse after achieving remission.

Methods

ADVOCATE, a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial in 330 patients, evaluated the efficacy and safety of avacopan. Patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis (new-onset or relapsing disease) were randomized to receive avacopan 30 mg twice daily, or a standard 20-week oral prednisone taper, plus matching placebos, in addition to background immunosuppressant therapy. For the purpose of these analyses, remission was defined as the first timepoint when a BVAS of 0 was achieved. Relapse was defined as worsening of disease, after having previously achieved remission, that involved one or more major or three or more minor items in the BVAS, or one or two minor items in the BVAS recorded at two consecutive study visits.

Two post-hoc sensitivity analyses of patients in the intent-to-treat population examined: i) the proportion of patients who failed to achieve remission, or achieved remission and subsequently relapsed after achieving that remission, and ii) relapse-free time. For patients who achieved remission, relapse-free time was calculated as the number of days from the initial remission achieved to relapse. For patients who failed to achieve remission, relapse-free time was imputed as one day (remission and relapse on the same day). Patients who did not relapse were censored at the time of the last BVAS assessment.

Results

Baseline characteristics and time to achieve initial remission were similar between groups, and the incidence of BVAS 0 at any point in the study occurred approximately equally in both groups (158 avacopan vs. 157 prednisone). In the first sensitivity analysis, the avacopan group showed a reduction in the proportion of patients who failed to achieve remission, or relapsed after remission, compared with the prednisone group (24 [14.5% vs 40 [24.4%], p=0.011). In the second sensitivity analysis that included all patients in the trial, the hazard ratio of relapse-free time for avacopan vs prednisone was 0.57, 95% CI (0.35, 0.96), p=0.029 (log-rank test) (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Relapse-free time among patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis in ADVOCATE (intention-to-treat population).

Conclusion

In the phase 3 ADVOCATE study of ANCA-associated vasculitis, more patients in the avacopan group compared to the prednisone group achieved remission, and fewer in the avacopan group relapsed after achieving remission. Patients receiving avacopan had a longer relapse-free time compared to the prednisone group. These post-hoc sensitivity analyses provide additional evidence of the efficacy of avacopan for the treatment of ANCA-associated vasculitis.

References

[1]Jayne D et al., Avacopan for the Treatment of ANCA-Associated Vasculitis. N Engl J Med 2021 384(7):599-609.

Disclosure of Interests

Peter A. Merkel Consultant of: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Boeringher-Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, ChemoCentryx, CSL Behring, Dynacure, EMDSerono, Forbius, Genentech/Roche, Genzyme/Sanofi, GlaxoSmithKline, Immagene, InflaRx, Jannsen, Kiniksa, Kyverna, Magenta, MiroBio, Neutrolis, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sparrow, Takeda, Talaris.

Royalties: UpToDate., Grant/research support from: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Boeringher-Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, ChemoCentryx, Eicos, Forbius, Genentech/Roche, Genzyme/Sanofi, GlaxoSmithKline, InflaRx, Sanofi, Takeda, Huibin Yue Shareholder of: ChemoCentryx, Employee of: ChemoCentryx, Emil deGoma Shareholder of: ChemoCentryx, Employee of: ChemoCentryx, Pirow Bekker Shareholder of: ChemoCentryx, Consultant of: ChemoCentryx, David Jayne Paid instructor for: Lecture Fees: Amgen, Vifor, Consultant of: Astra-Zeneca, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Chemocentryx, GSK, NICE, Novartis, Otsuka, Roche/Genentech, Takeda, UCB & Vifor. Board Member: Aurinia., Grant/research support from: Commercial: GSK, Roche/Genentech; Non-commercial: EU, MRC, NIHR, Versus Arthritis

AB0373 PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF OUTCOME MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENTS FOR LARGE VESSEL VASCULITIS: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW

Background:

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) and Takayasu arteritis (TAK) are two forms of chronic progressive large-vessel vasculitis (LVV) of unknown etiology. In 2016, the OMERACT Vasculitis Working Group proposed the development of a Core Domain Set of outcome measures for LVV including organ and arterial function, fatigue, pain, biomarkers, and death (1). Understanding the psychometric properties of outcome measurement instruments is essential when selecting among instruments to use in research; a summary of such properties for measures of LVV has not been developed.

Objectives:

To systematically review and summarize the psychometric properties of outcome measurement instruments used to measure the domains of the OMERACT core domain set for LVV.

Methods:

A comprehensive search of several databases (Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane, among others) from inception to July 14, 2020 was conducted. Articles were included if they covered psychometric properties of instruments used in LVV. Following the COSMIN and OMERACT frameworks, different psychometric properties (validity, inter- and intra-observer reliability, sensitivity to change, and feasibility) of outcome measurement instruments used in LVV (GCA and TAK) were assessed. Risk of bias was assessed according to the COSMIN checklist.

Results:

Among the 3534 articles identified, 15 studies focusing on the development or validation of psychometric properties on LVV met the predefined criteria. Two were development studies and 13 were validation studies. These studies provided information on 13 instruments: 5 instruments specific to TAK, 2 specific to systemic vasculitides, and 6 general, non-disease-specific instruments. No instruments specific to GCA were identified.

Of the main psychometric properties assessed in the included studies, 40% had a low, 47% had moderate, and 13% had high risk of bias. Construct validity was the property most frequently assessed (in 93% of the tools) (Figure 1).

In TAK, the Indian Takayasu Clinical Activity Score 2010 (ITAS2010) showed good consistency (r=0.97), reliability (intra-observer, ICC=0.60; inter-observer, ICC=0.92) and validity (correlation with Physician Global Assessment (PGA) (r=0.73)) for disease activity. Regarding disease damage, the Disease Extent Index-Takayasu (DEI-Tak) showed good validity (correlation with NIH score 94%, k=0.85). Non-specific vasculitis instruments such as the Vasculitis Damage Index (VDI) and the Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS) showed moderate validity in the assessment of disease damage in GCA (cumulative glucocorticoid dose and disease duration, r=0.30 and r=0.29) and TAK (cumulative glucocorticoid dose and disease duration, r=0.29 and r=0.25) in the former and disease activity in GCA in the later (PGA, r=0.50).

Six non-vasculitis-specific patient-reported outcomes (PROs) instruments were identified, all showing low to moderate validity in GCA/TAK.

Conclusion:

The psychometric properties of 13 outcome measures to study LVV covering the OMERACT domains of disease activity, damage, and patient-reported outcomes were assessed. ITAS2010, DEI-Tak, VDI, and BVAS were the instruments with better psychometric properties for disease activity and/or damage. Disease activity and/or damage instruments specific for GCA, and validated PROs for both GCA and TAK are needed.

References:

[1]Sreih GA, Alibaz-Oner F, Kermani TA, Aydin SZ, Cronholm PF, Davis T, et al. Development of a Core Set of Outcome Measures for Large-vessel Vasculitis: Report from OMERACT 2016 | The Journal of Rheumatology [Internet]. [cité 26 avr 2020]. Disponible sur: http://www.jrheum.org/content/44/12/1933.long

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

POS0248 PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF OUTCOME MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENTS FOR ANCA-ASSOCIATED VASCULITIS: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW

Background:

The OMERACT Vasculitis Working Group has defined a Core Domain Set of outcome measures for ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV). However, the psychometric properties of available outcome measurement instruments in AAV, an essential consideration when choosing among instruments, have not been summarized.

Objectives:

To systematically review and summarize the psychometric properties of outcome measurement instruments used in AAV.

Methods:

A comprehensive search of several databases (Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane, Scopus, among others) from inception to July 14, 2020 and without language limitations was conducted. Articles were included if they covered psychometric properties of instruments used in AAV (granulomatosis with polyangiitis, GPA; microscopic polyangiitis, MPA; eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, EGPA); articles encompassing other systemic vasculitides and not presenting the data for AAV separately were excluded. Following the COSMIN and OMERACT frameworks, different psychometric properties (validity, inter- and intra-observer reliability, sensitivity to change, and feasibility) of outcome measurement instruments used in AAV were assessed. Risk of bias was assessed according to the COSMIN checklist.

Results:

From 2505 articles identified, 20 met the predefined criteria. Three were identified as development studies, 14 were validation studies, and 3 pursued both objectives.

These studies provided information on 16 instruments: 8 assessing disease activity, 1 assessing disease damage, 3 assessing patient-reported outcome, 4 assessing function (Figure 1). Overall, a few psychometric properties have been considered in each study, ranging from one to five. Most of the instruments were tested in GPA only (n=7), followed by AAV as a group (GPA, MPA and EGPA; n=5), MPA and GPA (n=3), and EGPA only (n=1). Sample sizes of the studies ranged between 27 and 626 patients. The studies with a higher risk of bias, according to COSMIN definitions, were those assessing RAPID3, MVIA, ENT/GPA DAS, and ODSS.

There was a wide heterogeneity of the psychometric proprieties assessed for each instrument. Validity was the most frequently assessed domain in 88% of the instruments, and few properties other than construct validity were reported (Figure 1).

Within each domain, BVAS/WG for activity, VDI for damage, AAV-PRO for patient-reported outcomes, and ODSS for function were the instruments with more psychometric features assessed. For the disease activity domain, BVAS/WG showed a good validity having the highest correlation with physician global assessment (r=0.90), a good reliability (intra-observer ICC=0.62; inter-observer ICC=0.97), and good feasibility and responsiveness. For disease damage, VDI showed moderate validity (correlations with BVAS/WG at 5-year with r=0.20 and BVAS/WG at 1-year with r=0.40) and good feasibility. Among patient-reported outcomes, AAV-PRO had the best performance in terms of validity (construct validity: correlations of the 6 disease domains and EQ-5D-5L, with r ranging between -0.78 and -0.55; discriminating validity between active disease versus remission of the 6 disease domains, p<0.0001 for all comparisons). The performance of instruments assessing function domain was low-to-moderate.

Conclusion:

Sixteen instruments covering the OMERACT domains of disease activity, damage, patient-reported outcome, and function had their psychometric properties assessed in the study of AAV. The majority were developed or validated for GPA only or AAV as a group. Overall, validity was the domain most frequently assessed. BVAS/WG, VDI, AAV-PRO, and ODSS were the instruments with more psychometric features assessed. More rigorous studies aimed at estimating a wider range of psychometric properties in larger numbers of patients with AAV are warranted.

References:

[1]Castrejon I, et al. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2015

[2]Merkel PA, Journal of Rheumatology, July 2011

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

OP0026 A RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED TRIAL OF RITUXIMAB VERSUS AZATHIOPRINE AFTER INDUCTION OF REMISSION WITH RITUXIMAB FOR PATIENTS WITH ANCA-ASSOCIATED VASCULITIS AND RELAPSING DISEASE

Background:

Rituximab (RTX) is an effective therapy for induction of remission in ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV). However, the effect of RTX is not sustained, and subsequent relapse rates are high, especially in patients with a history of relapse.

Objectives:

The RITAZAREM trial is an international, multi-center, open-labelled, randomized, controlled trial of patients with AAV with relapsing disease comparing the efficacy, after induction of remission with RTX, of two relapse-prevention strategies: repeat dosing of RTX or daily oral azathioprine (AZA).

Methods:

Patients with AAV were recruited at the time of relapse and received induction therapy with RTX and glucocorticoids. If remission was achieved by month 4, patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either RTX (1000 mg every 4 months for 5 doses) or AZA (2 mg/kg/day) as maintenance therapy. Patients were followed for a minimum of 36 months, with the primary outcome being time to disease relapse.

Results:

190 patients were enrolled and 170 randomized at 4 months (85 to RTX; 85 to AZA). The data are complete on all patients up to at least month 24. Median age was 59 years (range 19-89), with a prior disease duration of 5.3 years (0.4-38.5). 123/170 (72%) patients had a history of testing positive for anti-proteinase 3 ANCA; 47/170 (28%) for myeloperoxidase ANCA; 104/170 (61%) were enrolled having suffered a major relapse, and 48/170 (28%) received a pre-specified higher dose glucocorticoid induction regimen (Table 1).

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of patients enrolled in RITAZAREM trial

Rituximab (N=85)Azathioprine (N=85)Total (N=170)Age, years: median (range)57 (18-89)61 (27-83)59 (18-89)Female, number (%)42 (49.4%)44 (51.8%)86 (50.6%)Disease duration, years: median (range)5.8 (0.4-38.5)4.9 (0.4-25.8)5.3 (0.4-38.5)Prior cyclophosphamide therapyNumber of patients (%)67/85 (78.8%)66/85 (77.6%)133/170 (78.2%)Cumulative dose, grams (g): median (range)7.1 g (0.2-301)12 g (1.0-146)10 g (0.2-301)Prior rituximab therapyNumber (%) patient33/85 (38.8%)27/85 (31.8%)60/170 (35.3%)Cumulative dose, grams (g): median (range)3.2 g (2.0-16.0)5.4 g (1.5-14.0)3.9 g (1.5-16.0)Glucocorticoid induction regimen1mg/kg/day starting dose24/85 (28.2%)24/85 (28.2%)48/170 (28.2%)0.5mg/kg/day starting dose61/85 (71.8%)61/85 (71.8%)122/170 (71.8%)ANCA typeAnti-proteinase 361/85 (71.8%)62/85 (72.9%)123/170 (72.4%)Anti-myeloperoxidase24/85 (28.2%)23/85 (27.1%)47/170 (27.6%)Relapse type upon entry into trialSevere52/85 (61.2%)52/85 (61.2%)104/170 (61.2%)Non-severe33/85 (38.8%)33/85 (38.8%)66/170 (38.8%)

RTX was superior to AZA in preventing disease relapse with a preliminary overall hazard ratio (HR) estimate of 0.36 (95% CI 0.23-0.57, p <0.001) and a during-treatment HR estimate of 0.30 (95% CI 0.15-0.60, p<0.001) (Figure 1). After adjustment, none of the randomization stratification covariates (ANCA type, glucocorticoid induction regimen, or relapse severity) had a significant differential effect on the primary outcome. By 24 months after entry, 20 months after randomization, 11/85 (13%) patients in the RTX group had experienced a relapse compared to 32/85 (38%) patients in the AZA group. 19/85 (22%) patients in the RTX group and 31/85 (36%) patients in the AZA group experienced at least one severe adverse event (SAE). 25/85 (29%) and 42/85 (49%) patients in the RTX group developed hypogammaglobulinaemia (IgG <5g/l) and non-severe infections respectively, compared to 21/85 (25%) and 41/85 (48%) in the AZA group.

Figure 1.

Relapse-free survival in RITAZAREM trial: rituximab versus azathioprine

Conclusion:

In the RITAZAREM trial, following induction of remission with RTX, RTX was superior to AZA for preventing disease relapse in patients with AAV with a prior history of relapse. There were no new major safety signals for use of these medications in this population.

Disclosure of Interests:

Rona Smith Grant/research support from: Roche, David Jayne Grant/research support from: ChemoCentryx, GSK, Roche/Genentech, Sanofi-Genzyme, Consultant of: Astra-Zeneca, ChemoCentryx, GSK, InflaRx, Takeda, Insmed, Chugai, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Peter A. Merkel Grant/research support from: AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boeringher-Ingelheim, Celgene, ChemoCentryx, Genentech/Roche. Genzyme/Sanofi, GlaxoSmithKline, InflaRx, Kypha, TerumoBCT., Consultant of: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Biogen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boeringher-Ingelheim, Celgene, ChemoCentryx, Genentech/Roche, Genzyme/Sanofi, GlaxoSmithKline, InflaRx, Insmed, Jannsen, Sparrow, Kiniksa.

OP0011 A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, ACTIVE-CONTROLLED STUDY OF AVACOPAN IN ANTI-NEUTROPHIL CYTOPLASMIC ANTIBODY (ANCA)-ASSOCIATED VASCULITIS

Background:

Complement fragment C5a is strongly linked to the pathogenesis of Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV). C5a receptor (C5aR), present on neutrophils, is a G protein-coupled receptor for C5a. Avacopan (previously CCX168) is an orally-administered selective antagonist of C5aR which blocks C5a-induced cell activation. Two previous Phase 2 clinical trials provided evidence of effectiveness of avacopan in AAV and its potential to eliminate extensive use of glucocorticoids (GC) and GC-related toxicities.

Objectives:

This Phase 3 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of avacopan for the treatment of AAV.

Methods:

Eligible subjects were randomized 1:1 to receive either prednisone or avacopan in combination with either a) cyclophosphamide (oral or IV) followed by azathioprine or b) rituximab (four IV infusions). Randomization was stratified by the treatment regimen (rituximab, IV cyclophosphamide, or oral cyclophosphamide), ANCA serotype, and newly-diagnosed or relapsing disease. Treatment period was 52 weeks; primary efficacy endpoints were the proportion of subjects achieving disease remission at Week 26, and sustained disease remission at Week 52. Remission was defined as a Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS) of zero and not taking glucocorticoids for AAV within 4 weeks prior to Week 26. Sustained remission was defined as being in remission at Week 26 and also subsequently in remission as defined above at Week 52. Any relapse of AAV between Weeks 26 and 52 was considered not achieving sustained remission.

Results:

330 subjects were randomized and dosed: 166 in avacopan and 164 in prednisone arms. At Week 26, 72.3% subjects achieved remission in the avacopan arm compared to 70.1% in the prednisone arm (p<0.0001 for non-inferiority). At Week 52, 65.7% subjects achieved sustained remission in the avacopan arm compared to 54.9% in the prednisone arm achieving both non-inferiority and superiority to prednisone arm (p=0.0066 for superiority of avacopan).

The avacopan arm had a significant reduction in glucocorticoid-related toxicity compared to the prednisone arm as measured by the Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index (GTI) of Cumulative Worsening Score (p=0.0002) and Aggregate Improvement Score (p=0.0082).

In subjects with renal disease at baseline, the avacopan arm showed a mean increase in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 7.3 mL/min/1.73 m2 from baseline to week 52 as compared to 4.0 mL/min/1.73 m2 increase in the prednisone arm (p=0.0259).

Overall subject incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs) was generally consistent with previous AAV trials at 45.1% and 42.2% for prednisone and avacopan groups, respectively. Serious infections were 15.2% and 13.3%, serious hepatic adverse events 3.7% vs 5.4%, and SAEs of white blood cell count decreases were 4.9% vs 2.4% for prednisone and avacopan, respectively. No meningococcal infections were reported.

Conclusion:

Avacopan treatment resulted in remission in AAV patients receiving rituximab or cyclophosphamide/azathioprine at a rate that was non-inferior to the active comparator prednisone at week 26 and superior to prednisone in sustained remission at Week 52. A significant reduction in glucocorticoid-related toxicity was observed in the avacopan vs. prednisone arms. Significant increase in eGFR in subjects with renal disease was also observed in avacopan vs. prednisone. The safety profile of avacopan appears acceptable for development in AAV. Avacopan treatment for AAV is efficacious and exhibits benefits not seen with chronic prednisone therapy.

References:

None.

Disclosure of Interests:

Peter A Merkel Grant/research support from: AstraZeneca, Boeringher-Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, ChemoCentryx, Forbius, Genentech/Roche, Genzyme/Sanofi, GlaxoSmithKline, InflaRx, Kypha, TerumoBCT, Consultant of: Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Biogen, Boeringher-Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, ChemoCentryx, CSL Behring, Forbius, Genentech/Roche, Genzyme/Sanofi, GlaxoSmithKline, InflaRx, Insmed, Jannsen, Kiniksa, Pfizer, Sparrow, Talaris, David Jayne Grant/research support from: ChemoCentryx, GSK, Roche/Genentech, Sanofi-Genzyme, Consultant of: Astra-Zeneca, ChemoCentryx, GSK, InflaRx, Takeda, Insmed, Chugai, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Huibin Yue Shareholder of: ChemoCentryx, Employee of: ChemoCentryx, Thomas Schall Shareholder of: ChemoCentryx, Employee of: ChemoCentryx, Catherine Kelleher Shareholder of: Amgen, ChemoCentryx, Inc., Grant/research support from: Not active, Consultant of: Independent Consultant in the past, Employee of: ChemoCentryx, Inc., Pirow Bekker Shareholder of: Stock options ChemoCentryx, Consultant of: ChemoCentryx, Employee of: ChemoCentryx

THU0040 PROTEINASE 3-REACTIVE B CELL RECONSTITUTION AFTER TREATMENT WITH RITUXIMAB FOR ANCA-ASSOCIATED VASCULITIS

Background:

Proteinase 3 (PR3)-reactive B cells are present in PR3-ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) at levels higher than healthy controls.

Objectives:

To evaluate the dynamics of the PR3-reactive B cell repopulation in patients with PR3-AAV after treatment with rituximab, and to analyze possible associations between these immunological changes and long-lasting remissions.

Methods:

We analyzed all available frozen peripheral blood mononuclear cells (n=148) from 23 randomly-selected PR3-AAV patients who participated in the RAVE trial and achieved complete remission (BVAS=0, prednisone=0) after treatment with rituximab.

We measured PR3-reactive B cells and the relative subsets by a multi-color flow cytometry panel including CD19, IgD, CD27, CD38, CD24, and a biotinylated PR3 revealed by fluorescent streptavidin. The clinical data of the trial were correlated with flow-cytometry data.

Results:

10/23 (43%) patients relapsed during the follow up, 8/10 relapses were severe. At baseline, clinical features, PR3-ANCA levels, % of total PR3-reactive B cells and PR3-reactive B cell subsets were similar between relapsers and non-relapsers. All patients were followed until the end of the trial, for a mean of 44 months (25-75%IQR 31-54), without difference in follow-up time between relapsers and non-relapsers (p=0.98).

The majority of patients had B cell repopulation at 12 (range 12-24) months after rituximab. At the time of B cell repopulation, transitional (CD19+CD24+CD38+) and naïve (CD19+CD27+IgD-) B cells were higher compared to baseline, while total plasmablasts (PB) were unchanged, and mature B cells significantly decreased in both relapsers and non relapsers. PR3-reactive B cells reappeared in all the patients, and the % of PR3-reactive of B cells were higher at the B cell repopulation visit compared to baseline (5.82% vs 4.25%, p<0.05), while total B cells were lower (66/μL vs 151/μL, p<0.01), regardless of future relapse.

Within PR3-reactive B cells, only the % of PB (CD19+CD27+CD38+PR3+) were higher in relapsers vs. non-relapsers (median [25-75%IQR]; 1.95% [1.315-3.845] vs 0.84% [0.05-1.66], p=0.022) and severe relapsers vs non-severe relapsers (2.165% [1.66-4.315] vs 0.84% [0.1-1.74], p=0.015). Time-to-relapse and time-to severe-relapse were significantly shorter in patients with circulating PR3-PB higher than the median value of the cohort (1.6%) during B cell reconstitution (Figure 1A-B).

Conclusion:

In PR3-AAV, during B cell reconstitution after rituximab, the total fraction of PR3-B cells increases, due to the expansion of the transitional and naïve B cell compartments. Circulating PR3-PB within PR3-B cells are enriched in the peripheral blood of relapsing and severely relapsing patients compared to non-relapsing patients. Higher levels of PR3-PB after rituximab during B cell reappearance significantly increased the risk of subsequent relapse and severe relapse.

References:

[1]Cornec D, Berti A, Hummel A, et al. J Autoimmun. 2017

Disclosure of Interests:

Alvise Berti: None declared, Sophie Hillion: None declared, Amber Hummel: None declared, Eva Carmona: None declared, Tobias Peikert: None declared, Carol Langford: None declared, Peter A. Merkel: None declared, Paul Monach: None declared, Philip Seo: None declared, Robert Spiera Grant/research support from: Roche-Genetech, GSK, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chemocentryx, Corbus, Forbius, Sanofi, Inflarx, Consultant of: Roche-Genetech, GSK, CSL Behring, Sanofi, Janssen, Chemocentryx, Forbius, Mistubishi Tanabe, E. William St. Clair: None declared, Fernando Fervenza: None declared, Kristina Harris: None declared, John H. Stone Grant/research support from: Roche, Consultant of: Roche, Jacques-Olivier Pers: None declared, Ulrich Specks: None declared, Divi Cornec: None declared

THU0318 PATTERNS OF CLINICAL PRESENTATION IN TAKAYASU’S ARTERITIS

Background:

Takayasu’s arteritis (TAK) is a clinically heterogenous disease. Patterns of clinical presentation in TAK at diagnosis have not been well described, and a “triphasic pattern” of constitutional symptoms evolving into vascular inflammation and fibrosis has been reported but never systematically evaluated.

Objectives:

To describe patterns of clinical presentation in TAK at diagnosis and evaluate the presence of an antecedent triphasic disease pattern in patients with TAK who presented with a major ischemic event at diagnosis.

Methods:

Patients with TAK were prospectively recruited from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Vasculitis Clinical Research Consortium (VCRC). All patients fulfilled the 1990 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Classification Criteria for TAK. Based on clinical presentation at diagnosis, patients were divided into five groups from the different stages of the triphasic pattern of disease as follows: 1) constitutional symptoms (phase I), 2) carotidynia (phase II), 3) other vascular-associated symptoms (phase II), 4) major ischemic event (phase III) defined as CVA or TIA, retinal ischemia, MI, renovascular hypertension, or mesenteric ischemia, or 5) asymptomatic. Phase II was divided into two separate groups because patients with carotidynia reportedly have a higher rate of relapsing disease.

Associated clinical characteristics were evaluated in each group and differences among groups were assessed by chi square test and Kruskal-Wallis test, as appropriate. Preceding symptoms were also assessed to determine the presence of a triphasic disease pattern.

Results:

A total of 275 patients with TAK were included (VCRC=208; NIH=67). Similar heterogeneity of clinical presentation was identified in each cohort: constitutional symptoms (8%), carotidynia (13-15%), other vascular symptoms (43-47%), major ischemic event (28-30%), and asymptomatic (2-6%). Frequency of male gender was more common in patients who presented with constitutional symptoms or were asymptomatic at diagnosis (p<0.01). Patients who presented with constitutional symptoms and major ischemic events were youngest at diagnosis. Patients in the asymptomatic group were oldest at diagnosis and often were not treated (p<0.01). Involvement of the abdominal vasculature was associated with major ischemic events and asymptomatic presentations. Major ischemic events after diagnosis were infrequent in the groups who did not present with a major ischemic event, occurring in 10-20% cases. Relapse (p<0.01) and recurrent pharyngitis preceding diagnosis (p<0.01) was most frequent in patients who presented with carotidynia.

A total of 79 patients [VCRC=59 patients, NIH=20 patients] presented with a major ischemic event. The majority of these patients (53%) reported symptoms of active disease prior to the major ischemic event. Few patients (19%) who presented with a major ischemic event reported a triphasic pattern of disease.

Conclusion:

There is heterogeneity in clinical presentation at the time of diagnosis in TAK and this heterogeneity can be used to group patients according to pattern of disease presentation. Patients do not necessarily progress sequentially through phases of disease, but the majority of patients presenting with a major ischemic event report some preceding symptoms. Data from this study demonstrate distinct subgroups within TAK and supports the concept that TAK is possibly a heterogenous collection of multiple diseases.

References:

N/A

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

THU0310 CASE–CONTROL SEROPREVALENCE STUDY ON THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN BARTONELLA INFECTION AND ANTI-NEUTROPHIL CYTOPLASMIC ANTIBODY-ASSOCIATED VASCULITIS

Background:

Bartonellosis is an emerging anthropozoonosis caused by infection with intracellular Gram-negativeBartonellaspecies. It leads to necrotizing granulomas and endothelial damage and causes acute and chronic human diseases, such as cat scratch disease, bacillary angiomatosis and endocarditis. Endocarditis due toBartonella henselaeandB. quintanais reported to produce anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCAs) that disappear with effective antimicrobial treatment.

Objectives:

Hypothesizing a role forBartonellainfection in ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV), which also includes granulomatous and vascular inflammation, we studied the seroprevalence of 5Bartonellaspecies in patients with AAV.

Methods:

The study used plasma samples from patients with granulomatosis with polyangiitis and microscopic polyangiitis that were enrolled in the Rituximab for AAV (RAVE) trial and from healthy controls living in the United States. Western blot assays were used for serological testing of infection withB. quintana,B. henselaeHouston-1,B. elizabethae,B. vinsoniisubsp.berkhoffiiandB. alsatica. The associations of positive serology results and AAV were expressed as odds ratios (OR). Clinical characteristics of seropositive and seronegative patients, assessed by the BVAS/WG instrument, were compared. These comparisons were done for 9 organ systems; in case they showed differences withP<0.10, the corresponding organ system-specific clinical features were also analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed using Fisher’s exact test or Student’s t-test, as appropriate.

Results:

We analyzed blood samples of 187 patients with AAV (collected at start of the trial) and of 127 controls. There were no significant differences between the cases and controls for mean age (P=0.148) and proportion of males (P=0.36).Bartonellaspp. serological testing was positive for 112 (60%) cases and 40 (31%) controls (OR 3.25 [95% CI 2.02–5.22],P<0.001). Significant associations were also found within subsets of PR3-AAV (OR 4.00 [95% CI 2.37–6.76],P<0.001), MPO-AAV (OR 2.18 [95% CI 1.17–4.06],P=0.017), newly-diagnosed (OR 3.89 [95% CI 2.21–6.86],P<0.001) and relapsing disease (OR 2.86 [95% CI 1.65–4.98],P<0.001). Species-specific positive serological testing was found in particular againstB. henselae(cases: 27%, controls: 0.8%; OR 39.93 [95% CI 5.42–293.90];P<0.001). Compared to AAV patients without seropositivity forBartonellaspp., AAV patients testing seropositive forBartonellaspp. had significantly more bloody nasal discharge (P=0.046), sinus involvement (P=0.035) and conjunctivitis/episcleritis (P=0.016).

Conclusion:

This study reveals higher seroprevalence ofBartonella, especiallyB. henselae, in patients with AAV than in healthy controls. Although cross-reactivity ofBartonellawith other microorganisms cannot be excluded, these results may support an etiopathogenic role ofBartonellainfection in AAV that deserves further investigation.

Disclosure of Interests:

Alfred Mahr Consultant of: Celgene, Speakers bureau: Roche, Chugai, Sophie Edouard: None declared, Divi Cornec: None declared, Solange GONZALEZ-CHIAPPE: None declared, Jörg Goronzy: None declared, Philippe Guilpain: None declared, Carol Langford: None declared, Pierre-Yves Lévy: None declared, Peter A. Merkel: None declared, Paul Monach: None declared, E. William St. Clair: None declared, Philip Seo: None declared, Robert Spiera Grant/research support from: Roche-Genetech, GSK, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chemocentryx, Corbus, Forbius, Sanofi, Inflarx, Consultant of: Roche-Genetech, GSK, CSL Behring, Sanofi, Janssen, Chemocentryx, Forbius, Mistubishi Tanabe, Cornelia Weyand: None declared, John H. Stone Grant/research support from: Roche, Consultant of: Roche, Didier Rauolt: None declared, Ulrich Specks: None declared

Immunoglobulin (Ig)M antibodies to proteinase 3 in granulomatosis with polyangiitis and microscopic polyangiitis

Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) appear to play an important role in the pathogenesis of ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV). However, ANCA alone are not sufficient to generate disease, and some evidence suggests that infectious triggers may serve as inciting events for AAV disease activity. Antibodies of the immunoglobulin (Ig)M isotype often serve as markers of recent infection, and IgM ANCA have been identified previously in patients with AAV, although the frequency and clinical relevance of IgM ANCA is not well established. We sought to characterize IgM ANCA more clearly by creating a novel enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for IgM antibodies to proteinase 3 [IgM proteinase 3 (PR3)-ANCA], which we applied to two large, clinically well-characterized trial cohorts of patients with granulomatosis with polyangiitis and microscopic polyangiitis. In the first cohort, IgM PR3-ANCA occurred with a frequency of 15·0%, and were associated with a higher degree of disease severity and a trend towards a higher rate of alveolar haemorrhage (29·6 versus 15·7%, P = 0·10). Analysis of follow-up samples in this cohort showed that the presence of IgM PR3-ANCA was transient, but could recur. In the second cohort, IgM PR3-ANCA occurred with a frequency of 41·1%, and were also associated with a higher degree of disease severity. A higher rate of alveolar haemorrhage was observed among those with IgM PR3-ANCA (45·3 versus 15·8%; P < 0·001). The association of transient IgM PR3-ANCA with an acute respiratory manifestation of AAV suggests a possible link between an infectious trigger and AAV disease activity.

Clinicians' perspective on key domains in ANCA-associated vasculitis: a Delphi exercise

OBJECTIVES

The existing set of outcomes for anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) needs to incorporate views of outcome measure stakeholders to meet the current standards of outcome measurement proposed by the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) initiative. This study identifies domains that clinical experts (one group of stakeholders) consider to be important to determining the impact of AAV using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), a framework that describes health along four components: body functions, body structures, activities and participation, and contextual factors.

METHOD

An international group of clinicians with expertise in the clinical care of patients with vasculitis were identified through consultation with three major vasculitis societies. The relevant domains were determined using a three-round e-mail-based Delphi questionnaire.

RESULTS

Eighty-two clinicians were invited to participate in this study and 41 responded. Nineteen domains were identified as important by > 80% of participants: six body functions (energy, seeing, hearing, pain, respiratory, and renal function), seven body structures (peripheral nerves, eye, ear, nose, sinuses, lungs (and airways), and kidneys), three activities and participation (carrying out daily routine, remunerative employment, and recreation and leisure), and three environmental factors (medications, support and relationships, and health services, systems, and policies).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical experts focus on the physiological effects of AAV with less importance given to the effect of AAV on patients' activities and participation in life situations and the role of contextual factors. This study represents a step towards incorporating views of a range of stakeholders into disease assessment in AAV.

EULAR/ERA-EDTA recommendations for the management of ANCA-associated vasculitis

In this article, the 2009 European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for the management of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) have been updated. The 2009 recommendations were on the management of primary small and medium vessel vasculitis. The 2015 update has been developed by an international task force representing EULAR, the European Renal Association and the European Vasculitis Society (EUVAS). The recommendations are based upon evidence from systematic literature reviews, as well as expert opinion where appropriate. The evidence presented was discussed and summarised by the experts in the course of a consensus-finding and voting process. Levels of evidence and grades of recommendations were derived and levels of agreement (strengths of recommendations) determined. In addition to the voting by the task force members, the relevance of the recommendations was assessed by an online voting survey among members of EUVAS. Fifteen recommendations were developed, covering general aspects, such as attaining remission and the need for shared decision making between clinicians and patients. More specific items relate to starting immunosuppressive therapy in combination with glucocorticoids to induce remission, followed by a period of remission maintenance; for remission induction in life-threatening or organ-threatening AAV, cyclophosphamide and rituximab are considered to have similar efficacy; plasma exchange which is recommended, where licensed, in the setting of rapidly progressive renal failure or severe diffuse pulmonary haemorrhage. These recommendations are intended for use by healthcare professionals, doctors in specialist training, medical students, pharmaceutical industries and drug regulatory organisations.

Outcomes of nonsevere relapses in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis treated with glucocorticoids

OBJECTIVE

Nonsevere relapses are more common than severe relapses in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV), but their clinical course and treatment outcomes remain largely unexamined. We undertook this study to analyze the outcomes of patients with nonsevere relapses in the Rituximab in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis (RAVE) trial who were treated with prednisone according to a prespecified protocol.

METHODS

RAVE was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial comparing rituximab (RTX) to cyclophosphamide (CYC) followed by azathioprine (AZA) for induction of remission. Patients who experienced nonsevere relapses between months 1 and 18 were treated with a prednisone increase without a concomitant change in their nonglucocorticoid immunosuppressants, followed by a taper.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients with a first nonsevere relapse were analyzed. In comparison to the 71 patients who maintained relapse-free remission over 18 months, these patients were more likely to have proteinase 3-ANCAs, diagnoses of granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener's), and a history of relapsing disease at baseline. A prednisone increase led to remission in 35 patients (80%). However, only 13 patients (30%) were able to maintain second remissions through the followup period (mean 12.5 months); 31 patients (70%) had a second disease relapse, 14 of them with severe disease. The mean time to second relapse was 9.4 months (4.7 months in the group treated with RTX versus 13.7 months in the group treated with CYC/AZA; P < 0.01). Patients who experienced nonsevere relapses received more glucocorticoids than those who maintained remission (6.7 grams versus 3.8 grams; P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Treatment of nonsevere relapses in AAV with an increase in glucocorticoids is effective in restoring temporary remission in the majority of patients, but recurrent relapses within a relatively short interval remain common. Alternative treatment approaches are needed for this important subset of patients.

Rituximab for the treatment of relapses in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis

OBJECTIVE

Disease relapses are frequent in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis (AAV). This study was undertaken to evaluate outcomes in patients with AAV who are re-treated with rituximab (RTX) and prednisone for severe disease relapses.

METHODS

The Rituximab in AAV trial was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial comparing the rates of remission induction among patients treated with RTX (n = 99) and patients treated with cyclophosphamide (CYC) followed by azathioprine (AZA) (n = 98). Prednisone was tapered to discontinuation after 5.5 months. After remission was achieved, patients who experienced a severe disease relapse between months 6 and 18 were eligible to receive RTX and prednisone on an open-label basis according to a prespecified protocol. Investigators remained blinded with regard to the original treatment assignment.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients received RTX for disease relapse after remission had initially been achieved with their originally assigned treatment. Fifteen of these patients were initially randomized to receive RTX and 11 to receive CYC/AZA. Thirteen (87%) of the patients originally assigned to receive RTX and 10 (91%) originally assigned to receive CYC/AZA achieved remission again with open-label RTX (an overall percentage of 88%). In half of the patients treated with open-label RTX, prednisone could be discontinued entirely. Patients in this cohort experienced fewer adverse events compared to the overall study population (4.7 adverse events per patient-year versus 11.8 adverse events per patient-year).

CONCLUSION

Re-treatment of AAV relapses with RTX and glucocorticoids appears to be a safe and effective strategy, regardless of previous treatment.

Clinical outcomes of remission induction therapy for severe antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the reasons that complete remission is not achieved or maintained with original treatment in some patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) treated with rituximab (RTX) or with cyclophosphamide/azathioprine (CYC/AZA).

METHODS

The Rituximab in AAV trial was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial comparing the rate of remission induction among patients treated with RTX (n = 99) and patients treated with CYC followed by AZA (n = 98). Glucocorticoids were tapered over a period of 5 months. The primary outcome measure was lack of disease activity without glucocorticoid treatment at 6 months. To determine the most important reason for failure to achieve the primary outcome, 7 hierarchical categories of reasons were defined retrospectively (uncontrolled disease, adverse event leading to therapy discontinuation, severe flare, limited flare, Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score for Wegener's Granulomatosis >0, prednisone treatment at any dosage, and other).

RESULTS

Although remission (lack of disease activity) was achieved in 170 of the 197 patients (86%) in the first 6 months, the primary outcome measure was not achieved in 42%. There were 3 deaths. Twenty-four percent of the patients failed to achieve the primary end point due to active disease: 10 (5%) experienced uncontrolled disease in the first month and 37 (19%) experienced flares after initial improvement. In the majority of such patients, treatment with blinded crossover or according to best medical judgment led to disease control. Ninety-one percent of patients who had uncontrolled disease or experienced a severe flare had proteinase 3 (PR3)-ANCA. When patients with uncontrolled disease were excluded from analysis, those who were PR3-ANCA positive were found to experience fewer flares when treated with RTX compared to CYC/AZA (8 of 59 [14%] versus 20 of 62 [32%]; P = 0.02). Neither ANCA titers nor B cell counts predicted disease flare.

CONCLUSION

Current treatment regimens are largely successful in controlling AAV, but in approximately one-fourth of patients, active disease persists or recurs in the first 6 months despite treatment. PR3-ANCA positivity is a risk factor for recurrence or persistence of severe disease. ANCA titers and B cell detectability are poor predictors of both disease relapse and disease quiescence in the first 6 months.

Patterns and predictors of change in outcome measures in clinical trials in scleroderma: an individual patient meta-analysis of 629 subjects with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis

OBJECTIVE

To examine the range and responsiveness to change of clinical outcome measures and study predictors of clinical response in patients with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc) in the context of clinical trials.

METHODS

Data were combined from 629 patients with dcSSc who participated in 7 multicenter clinical therapeutic trials. Trials used common outcome measures: modified Rodnan skin thickness score (MRSS), Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index (HAQ DI), patient's global assessment of disease activity, pulmonary function tests (forced vital capacity, diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide), hand span, and oral aperture.

RESULTS

The combined database included 629 patients (82% women, mean ± SD age 46.5 ± 11.8 years, mean ± SD disease duration 19.4 ± 15.9 months). Outcomes tended to improve during trials for patients with more severe disease at study entry and to worsen for patients with less severe disease at entry. Disease duration was mildly negatively predictive of change in MRSS at 6 months (r = -0.27, P < 0.001), and substantial bidirectional variation in change in MRSS and HAQ DI score was seen across the spectrum of disease duration. Sixty-three percent of patients with "early" disease (disease duration <18 months) had a decline in MRSS, and 37% had an increase in MRSS. Eighty-one percent of patients with "late" disease (disease duration ≥ 18 months) had a decline in MRSS, and 19% had an increase in MRSS. Multivariate mixed models did not demonstrate that any baseline variables were strongly predictive of subsequent outcome.

CONCLUSION

Among patients with dcSSc enrolled in clinical trials, standard outcome measures tend to improve in those with more severe disease at study entry and to worsen in those with less severe disease at entry. Overall, the MRSS improves during trials, while HAQ DI scores and lung function are mostly static. None of these variables, including disease duration, reliably identifies groups of subjects whose MRSS will predictably increase or decrease in the course of a clinical trial. These findings have important implications for clinical trial design in scleroderma.

Nomenclature and classification of vasculitis - update on the ACR/EULAR diagnosis and classification of vasculitis study (DCVAS)

Classification of vasculitis remains unsatisfactory. This is largely because the pathogenetic mechanisms of this family of related disorders have not been fully understood. Existing classification criteria are useful but limited. This has become more apparent with the advent of more effective and more specific therapies. A rational basis for classification could significantly improve our approach to treatment. The development of diagnostic criteria in vasculitis is an even greater challenge but may ultimately provide more useful for the non-specialist clinician. International efforts are underway to provide more effective classification and diagnostic criteria.

Glycosylation of proteinase 3 (PR3) is not required for its reactivity with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) in Wegener's granulomatosis

OBJECTIVE

The glycosylation status of autoantigens appears to be crucial for the pathogenesis of some autoimmune diseases, since carbohydrates play a crucial role in the distinction of self from non-self. Proteinase 3 (PR3), the main target antigen for anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) in patients with Wegener's granulomatosis (WG), contains two Asn-linked glycosylation sites. The present study explores the influence of the glycosylation status of PR3 on the PR3 recognition by ANCA in a well characterized population of patients with WG.

METHODS

Forty-four patients with WG (459 serum samples) who participated in a multicenter randomized trial, were tested by capture ELISA for ANCA against PR3 and deglycosylated recombinant variants of PR3.

RESULTS

The patients were followed for a median of 27 months, and the median number of serum samples per patient was 10. At baseline, the correlation between the levels of ANCA against PR3 and against all the deglycosylated recombinant variants of PR3 were greater than 0.94 (?<0.001 for all the comparisons). Longitudinal analyses comparing the levels of ANCA against PR3 versus all the deglycosylated recombinant variants of PR3, using linear mixed models, showed no significant statistical differences (rho >or=0.90 in all cases).

CONCLUSION

The glycosylation status of PR3 has no impact on its recognition by ANCA in WG.

Comparison of disease activity measures for anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis

AIM

Currently, several different instruments are used to measure disease activity and extent in clinical trials of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis, leading to division among investigative groups and difficulty comparing study results. An exercise comparing six different vasculitis instruments was performed.

METHODS

A total of 10 experienced vasculitis investigators from 5 countries scored 20 cases in the literature of Wegener granulomatosis or microscopic polyangiitis using 6 disease assessment tools: the Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS), The BVAS for Wegener granulomatosis (BVAS/WG), BVAS 2003, a Physician Global Assessment (PGA), the Disease Extent Index (DEI) and the Five Factor Score (FFS). Five cases were rescored by all raters.

RESULTS

Reliability of the measures was extremely high (intraclass correlations for the six measures all = 0.98). Within each instrument, there were no significant differences or outliers among the scores from the 10 investigators. Test/retest reliability was high for each measure: range = 0.77 to 0.95. The scores of the five acute activity measures correlated extremely well with one another.

CONCLUSIONS

Currently available tools for measuring disease extent and activity in ANCA-associated vasculitis are highly correlated and reliable. These results provide investigators with confidence to compare different clinical trial data and helps form common ground as international research groups develop new, improved and universally accepted vasculitis disease assessment instruments.

EULAR recommendations for the management of primary small and medium vessel vasculitis

OBJECTIVES

To develop European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for the management of small and medium vessel vasculitis.

METHODS

An expert group (consisting of 10 rheumatologists, 3 nephrologists, 2 immunologists, 2 internists representing 8 European countries and the USA, a clinical epidemiologist and a representative from a drug regulatory agency) identified 10 topics for a systematic literature search using a modified Delphi technique. In accordance with standardised EULAR operating procedures, recommendations were derived for the management of small and medium vessel vasculitis. In the absence of evidence, recommendations were formulated on the basis of a consensus opinion.

RESULTS

In all, 15 recommendations were made for the management of small and medium vessel vasculitis. The strength of recommendations was restricted by low quality of evidence and by EULAR standardised operating procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of evidence and expert consensus, recommendations have been made for the evaluation, investigation, treatment and monitoring of patients with small and medium vessel vasculitis for use in everyday clinical practice.

EULAR recommendations for the management of large vessel vasculitis

OBJECTIVES

To develop European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for the management of large vessel vasculitis.

METHODS

An expert group (10 rheumatologists, 3 nephrologists, 2 immunolgists, 2 internists representing 8 European countries and the USA, a clinical epidemiologist and a representative from a drug regulatory agency) identified 10 topics for a systematic literature search through a modified Delphi technique. In accordance with standardised EULAR operating procedures, recommendations were derived for the management of large vessel vasculitis. In the absence of evidence, recommendations were formulated on the basis of a consensus opinion.

RESULTS

Seven recommendations were made relating to the assessment, investigation and treatment of patients with large vessel vasculitis. The strength of recommendations was restricted by the low level of evidence and EULAR standardised operating procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of evidence and expert consensus, management recommendations for large vessel vasculitis have been formulated and are commended for use in everyday clinical practice.

Outcomes from studies of antineutrophil cytoplasm antibody associated vasculitis: a systematic review by the European League Against Rheumatism systemic vasculitis task force

OBJECTIVES

We undertook a systematic literature review as a background to the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for conducting clinical trials in anti-neutrophil cytoplasm antibody associated vasculitis (AAV), and to assess the quality of evidence for outcome measures in AAV.

METHODS

Using a systematic Medline search, we categorised the identified studies according to diagnoses. Factors affecting remission, relapse, renal function and overall survival were identified.

RESULTS

A total of 44 papers were reviewed from 502 identified by our search criteria. There was considerable inconsistency in definitions of end points. Remission rates varied from 30% to 93% in Wegener granulomatosis (WG), 75% to 89% in microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) and 81% to 91% in Churg-Strauss syndrome (CSS). The 5-year survival for WG, MPA and CSS was 74-91%, 45-76% and 60-97%. Relapse (variably defined) was common in the first 2 years but the frequency varied: 18% to 60% in WG, 8% in MPA, and 35% in CSS. The rate of renal survival in WG varied from 23% at 15 months to 23% at 120 months.

METHOD

used to assess morbidity varied between studies. Ignoring the variations in definitions of the stage of disease, factors influencing remission, relapse, renal and overall survival included immunosuppressive therapy used, type of organ involvement, presence of ANCA, older age and male gender.

CONCLUSIONS

Factors influencing remission, relapse, renal and overall survival include the type of immunosuppressive therapy used, pattern of organ involvement, presence of ANCA, older age and male gender. Methodological variations between studies highlight the need for a consensus on terminology and definitions for future conduct of clinical studies in AAV.

Development of a provisional core set of response measures for clinical trials of systemic sclerosis

OBJECTIVE

To develop a provisional core set of response measures for clinical trials of systemic sclerosis (SSc).

METHODS

The Scleroderma Clinical Trials Consortium (SCTC) conducted a structured, 3-round Delphi exercise to reach consensus on a core set of measures for clinical trials of SSc. Round 1 asked the SCTC investigators to list items in 11 pre-defined domains (skin, musculoskeletal, cardiac, pulmonary, cardio-pulmonary, gastrointestinal, renal, Raynaud phenomenon and digital ulcers, health-related quality of life and function, global health, and biomarkers) for SSc clinical trials. Round 2 asked respondents to rate the importance of the chosen items and was followed by a meeting, during which the Steering Committee discussed the feasibility, reliability, redundancy and validity of the items. Round 3 sought to obtain broader consensus on the core set measures. Members also voted on items that had data on feasibility but lacked data on reliability and validity, but may still be useful research outcome measures for future trials.

RESULTS

A total of 50 SCTC investigators participated in round 1, providing 212 unique items for the 11 domains. In all, 46 (92%) participants responded in round 2 and rated 177 items. The ratings of 177 items were reviewed by the Steering Committee and 31 items from the 11 domains were judged to be appropriate for inclusion in a 1-year multi-centre clinical trial. In total, 40 SCTC investigators completed round 3 and ranked 30 of 31 items as acceptable for inclusion in the core set. The Steering Committee also proposed 14 items for a research agenda.

CONCLUSION

Using a Delphi exercise, we have developed a provisional core set of measures for assessment of disease activity and severity in clinical trials of SSc.

Epidemiology of Wegener's granulomatosis: Lessons from descriptive studies and analyses of genetic and environmental risk determinants

During the past 15 years, the epidemiology of Wegener's granulomatosis (WG) has become better understood. Descriptive epidemiological studies carried out primarily in European countries estimate a prevalence of WG ranging from 24 to 157 per million and annual incidence rates from 3 to 14 per million. These studies suggest a North-South declining gradient in disease risk in the Northern Hemisphere and an increase in incidence over time, although the latter is likely largely due to improved diagnostic ascertainment. Data also indicate the presence of potential secular and seasonal variations in WG incidence and a decreasing disease risk among non-Caucasians. Furthermore, analytic epidemiological studies have pointed out putative genetic and non-genetic risk factors for WG. Genetic investigations have identified various candidate genes, with alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency being the most consistently reported genetic susceptibility factor to date. Even though much less research has been devoted to environmental risk factors, evidence has grown for a possible relationship between WG and occupational exposure to crystalline silica. Thus far, data support the concept of WG as a multifactorial disease in which genetic and environmental determinants are involved but a major gap in understanding persists regarding the extent to which both factors contribute to its development. This and many other questions remain to be answered by future structured epidemiological research. This review focuses on the current knowledge of descriptive epidemiology and genetic and environmental factors associated with WG.

Digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis: Prevention by treatment with bosentan, an oral endothelin receptor antagonist

OBJECTIVE

Recurrent digital ulcers are a manifestation of vascular disease in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc; scleroderma) and lead to pain, impaired function, and tissue loss. We investigated whether treatment with the endothelin receptor antagonist, bosentan, decreased the development of new digital ulcers in patients with SSc.

METHODS

This was a randomized, prospective, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of 122 patients at 17 centers in Europe and North America, evaluating the effect of treatment on prevention of digital ulcers. The primary outcome variable was the number of new digital ulcers developing during the 16-week study period. Secondary assessments included healing of existing digital ulcers and evaluation of hand function using the Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire.

RESULTS

Patients receiving bosentan had a 48% reduction in the mean number of new ulcers during the treatment period (1.4 versus 2.7 new ulcers; P = 0.0083). Patients who had digital ulcers at the time of entry in the study were at higher risk for the development of new ulcers; in this subgroup the mean number of new ulcers was reduced from 3.6 to 1.8 (P = 0.0075). In patients receiving bosentan, a statistically significant improvement in hand function was observed. There was no difference between treatment groups in the healing of existing ulcers. Serum transaminase levels were elevated to >3-fold the upper limit of normal in bosentan-treated patients; this elevation is comparable with that observed in previous studies of this agent. Other side effects were similar in the 2 treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

Endothelins may play an important role in the pathogenesis of vascular disease in patients with SSc. Treatment with the endothelin receptor antagonist bosentan may be effective in preventing new digital ulcers and improving hand function in patients with SSc.

Assessment of kidney involvement

Scleroderma renal crisis (SRC) represents the classic manifestation of kidney involvement in SSc. It particularly occurs in patients with early, rapidly progressive, diffuse skin involvement. Its detection requires the assessment of a few core set variables: arterial blood pressure, serum creatinine, and urinalysis. In clinical investigations SSc patients developing arterial hypertension after the disease onset (new onset hypertension) without SRC should also be reported.

Drug-induced vasculitis

DIV is a relatively common cause of inflammatory vasculitis. Drugs from almost every pharmacologic class have been implicated in causing vasculitis in sporadic cases. The level of certainty and quality of evidence for these associations between specific agents and vasculitis vary greatly. The clinical manifestations of DIV range from single organ involvement (most commonly, skin) to life-threatening multiorgan disease. The recently described subset of cases of DIV associated with positive tests for ANCA are an interesting subset of DIV. The diagnosis of DIV is usually one of exclusion. The treatment of DIV is dependent on the severity of disease activity but should always include withdrawal of the suspected drug. If no agent can be implicated, as many drugs as feasible should be discontinued. The necessity of prescribing glucocorticoids or immunosuppressive agents depends on the disease severity and other case-specific information. Increasing understanding of the pathophysiologic characteristics of all inflammatory vasculitides should lead to better diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to DIV.

Diagnostic performance of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody tests for idiopathic vasculitides: metaanalysis with a focus on antimyeloperoxidase antibodies

OBJECTIVE

The diagnostic value of tests for antimyeloperoxidase antibodies (anti-MPO) for systemic vasculitis is less established than that for cytoplasmic antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (cANCA)/antiproteinase 3 antibodies (anti-PR3). Controversy exists regarding the optimal utilization of indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) ANCA testing versus antigen-specific ANCA testing. To summarize the pertinent data, we conducted a metaanalysis examining the diagnostic value of ANCA testing systems that include assays for anti-MPO.

METHODS

We performed a structured Medline search and reference list review. Target articles in the search strategy were those reporting the diagnostic value of immunoassays for anti-MPO for the spectrum of systemic necrotizing vasculitides that includes Wegener's granulomatosis, microscopic polyangiitis, the Churg-Strauss syndrome, and isolated pauci-immune necrotizing or crescentic glomerulonephritis, regardless of other types of ANCA tests. Inclusion criteria required specification of a consecutive or random patient selection method and the use of acceptable criteria for the diagnosis of vasculitis exclusive of ANCA test results. Weighted pooled summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity were calculated for anti-MPO alone, anti-MPO + perinuclear ANCA (pANCA), and anti-MPO/pANCA + anti-PR3/cANCA.

RESULTS

Of 457 articles reviewed, only 7 met the selection criteria. Summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity (against disease controls only) of assays for anti-MPO for the diagnosis of systemic necrotizing vasculitides were 37.1% (confidence interval 26.6% to 47.6%) and 96.3% (CI 94.1% to 98.5%), respectively. When the pANCA pattern by IIF was combined with anti-MPO testing, the specificity improved to 99.4%, with a lower sensitivity, 31.5%. The combined ANCA testing system (anti-PR3/cANCA + anti-MPO/pANCA) increased the sensitivity to 85.5% with a specificity of 98.6%.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that while anti-MPO is relatively specific for the diagnosis of systemic vasculitis, the combination system of immunoassays for anti-MPO and IIF for pANCA is highly specific and both tests should be used together given the high diagnostic precision required for these conditions. Because patients with ANCA associated vasculitis have either anti-MPO with pANCA or anti-PR3 with cANCA, and rarely both, a combined ANCA testing system including anti-PR3/cANCA and anti-MPO/pANCA is recommended to optimize the diagnostic performance of ANCA testing.

A disease-specific activity index for Wegener's granulomatosis: modification of the Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score. International Network for the Study of the Systemic Vasculitides (INSSYS)

OBJECTIVE

To refine and validate the Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS) as a disease-specific activity index for Wegener's granulomatosis (WG).

METHODS

Sixteen members of the International Network for the Study of the Systemic Vasculitides (INSSYS) revised the BVAS, with 3 goals: to reduce the redundancy of some component items, to enhance its ability to capture important disease manifestations specific to WG, and to streamline the instrument for use in clinical research. We defined the items and weighted them empirically as either minor (e.g., nasal crusting = 1 point) or major (e.g., alveolar hemorrhage = 3 points). We then validated the new, disease-specific BVAS/WG in 2 simulation exercises and a clinical case series that involved 117 patients with WG.

RESULTS

We removed 38 items from the original BVAS, revised 9 items, and added 7 new items. Correlations between the scores on the BVAS/WG and the physician's global assessment (PGA) of disease activity were high, even when patients in remission were excluded. In the clinical case series, Spearman's rank correlation coefficient between the BVAS/WG and the PGA was r = 0.81 (95% confidence interval 0.73-0.87). The interobserver reliability using intraclass (within-case) correlation coefficients in the 2 simulation exercises was r = 0.93 for the BVAS/WG and r = 0.88 for the PGA in the first and r = 0.91 for the BVAS/WG and r = 0.88 for the PGA in the second. There was no significant observer effect in the scoring of the BVAS/WG or the PGA. The discriminant validity of the BVAS/WG was good: r = 0.73 (95% confidence interval 0.43-0.83).

CONCLUSION

The BVAS/WG is a valid, disease-specific activity index for WG. Tested in simulation exercises and in actual patients, the BVAS/WG correlates well with the PGA, is sensitive to change, and has good inter- and intraobserver reliability. The INSSYS will use the BVAS/WG to assess the primary outcome in a phase II/III trial of etanercept in WG.

Evaluation of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody seroconversion induced by minocycline, sulfasalazine, or penicillamine

OBJECTIVE

Case reports have suggested that minocycline, sulfasalazine, and penicillamine are associated with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-positive vasculitis. This study evaluated ANCA seroconversion due to these agents in serum samples prospectively collected in randomized, double-blind, controlled trials.

METHODS

The sources of study sera were 3 clinical trials: 1) a 48-week trial of minocycline for early rheumatoid arthritis, with 64 patients receiving minocycline compared with 68 receiving placebo; 2) a 37-week trial of sulfasalazine for rheumatoid arthritis, with 51 receiving sulfasalazine compared with 38 receiving placebo; and 3) a 104-week trial of penicillamine for early systemic sclerosis, with 15 undergoing high-dose penicillamine treatment versus 12 receiving low-dose penicillamine. ANCA were measured in the baseline and study-end serum samples by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) for perinuclear ANCA (pANCA) and cytoplasmic ANCA (cANCA) patterns, and by antigen-specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for antibodies to myeloperoxidase (anti-MPO) and proteinase 3 (anti-PR3). Laboratory personnel were blinded to the group identity of the samples. ANCA results were interpreted using an ANCA scoring system that combines the results of IIF and ELISA testing.

RESULTS

No patient in any of the active study drug groups demonstrated ANCA seroconversion according to the final interpretation of the combined IIF and ELISA results. Twelve of the 248 patients (5%) were positive for anti-MPO with pANCA at baseline. No subject was positive for anti-PR3 with cANCA. There were no findings suggestive of vasculitis in any of these patients.

CONCLUSION

From our study results, there was no suggestion of ANCA seroconversion induced by minocycline, sulfasalazine, or penicillamine. However, these findings do not rule out the possibility of rare, sporadic cases of either ANCA seroconversion or true drug-induced vasculitis with these drugs.

Recombinant human relaxin in the treatment of scleroderma. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Relaxin is a pregnancy-related hormone that has tissue remodeling and antifibrotic effects. Systemic sclerosis (scleroderma) is characterized by fibrosis of the skin, vasculature, and internal organs.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy, safety, and dose-response effect of recombinant human relaxin in patients with scleroderma.

DESIGN

Multicenter, parallel-group, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

SETTING

Academic referral centers.

PATIENTS

68 patients who had had stable, diffuse scleroderma (moderate to severe) for less than 5 years.

INTERVENTION

Recombinant human relaxin, 25 or 100 microg/kg of body weight per day, or placebo administered by continuous subcutaneous infusion over 24 weeks.

MEASUREMENTS

Modified Rodnan skin score was the primary efficacy measure. Secondary measurements were pulmonary function, the Health Assessment Questionnaire, and other measures of scleroderma that reflected fibrosis.

RESULTS

Patients who received 25 microg/kg of recombinant human relaxin per day had significantly lower skin scores than those who received placebo (mean change, -3.6 at 4 weeks [P = 0.021], -7.5 at 12 weeks [P < 0.001], and -8.7 at 24 weeks [P = 0.040]). Similar trends were noted in other outcome measures, including forced vital capacity, measures of oral aperture and hand extension, functional status, and global assessment. Patients who received 100 microg/kg of relaxin per day did not differ from those who received placebo. Drug-related adverse events included menometrorrhagia, reversible anemia, and complications of the subcutaneous drug administration system (site irritation and local infection).

CONCLUSIONS

Twenty-four weeks of recombinant human relaxin, 25 microg/kg per day, is associated with reduced skin thickening, improved mobility, and improved function in patients with moderate to severe diffuse scleroderma.

Drug-associated antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-positive vasculitis: prevalence among patients with high titers of antimyeloperoxidase antibodies

OBJECTIVE

The triggers that induce antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-positive vasculitis (APV) are largely unknown. However, there have been reports suggesting that hydralazine, propylthiouracil, and several other drugs may cause some cases of APV, and the majority of these cases have been associated with antimyeloperoxidase (anti-MPO) ANCA. Our experience led us to hypothesize that cases of high titers of anti-MPO antibodies are often drug-associated.

METHODS

In this study, we determined the prevalence of exposure to hydralazine, propylthiouracil, and other drugs previously implicated in APV among 30 patients with vasculitis and the highest titers of anti-MPO antibodies newly detected in our laboratory between 1994 and 1998. The clinical, histologic, and other serologic features of these 30 patients were also examined.

RESULTS

The 30 study patients accounted for 12% of the 250 new patients with APV and anti-MPO who were tested during the study period. All 30 study subjects had anti-MPO titers that were more than 12 times the median titer of the 250 patients. Ten (33%) of the 30 patients had been exposed to hydralazine and 3 (10%) had been exposed to propylthiouracil. An additional 5 patients (17%) had been exposed to 1 of the other previously reported candidate drugs: 2 to penicillamine, 2 to allopurinol, and 1 to sulfasalazine. One of the patients exposed to hydralazine had also been exposed to allopurinol. In all cases, the clinical and histologic findings were typical of APV. There was a strong association between the presence of antielastase and/ or antilactoferrin antibodies and exposure to candidate drugs.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that a sizable proportion of cases of APV with high titers of anti-MPO antibodies are drug-associated, especially following exposure to hydralazine or propylthiouracil. We recommend that the use of these drugs should be sought in cases of anti-MPO-positive vasculitis, particularly among patients with high titers of these antibodies.

Subacute bacterial endocarditis with positive cytoplasmic antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies and anti-proteinase 3 antibodies

OBJECTIVE

To report a potentially important limitation of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) testing: positive results in patients with subacute bacterial endocarditis (SBE).

METHODS

We describe 3 patients with SBE who presented with features mimicking ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) and positive findings on tests for cytoplasmic ANCA (cANCA) by indirect immunofluorescence and for anti-proteinase 3 (anti-PR3)antibodies by antigen-specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). We also reviewed the published literature describing infectious diseases with (misinterpreted) positive ANCA results through a Medline search of English-language articles published between 1966 and January 1999. These previously reported cases were reinterpreted using an ANCA scoring system that combines the findings of immunofluorescence and antigen-specific ELISA testing.

RESULTS

We are now aware of a total of 7 cases of SBE with positive cANCA and anti-PR3 antibodies. We are not aware of any cases of SBE associated with antimyeloperoxidase/perinuclear ANCA. Clinical manifestations mimicking AAV included glomerulonephritis, purpura, epistaxis, or sinus symptoms in 6 of the patients. Streptococcal species were identified in 5 patients, and cardiac valvular abnormalities were demonstrated in 6. All patients except 1, who died of a complication of SBE, recovered with antibiotic therapy.

CONCLUSION

Findings of tests for anti-PR3/ cANCA antibodies may be positive in patients with SBE. When encountering ANCA positivity in patients suspected of having systemic vasculitis, physicians should take appropriate steps to rule out infectious diseases, including SBE, before committing the patient to long-term, aggressive immunosuppressive therapy.