POS0828 CONSISTENT EFFICACY WITH APREMILAST IN MEN AND WOMEN TO TREAT ORAL ULCERS ASSOCIATED WITH BEHÇET’S SYNDROME: PHASE 3 RELIEF STUDY RESULTS

Background:

Painful, recurring oral ulcers (OU) associated with Behçet’s syndrome negatively affect quality of life (QoL). Differences across sexes were reported in the frequency of disease manifestations, disease course, and response to colchicine. The phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled RELIEF study showed overall efficacy of apremilast (APR) for OU associated with Behçet’s syndrome, including improvements in OU pain, disease activity, and QoL.

Objectives:

To evaluate the consistency of efficacy with APR in men and women with Behçet’s syndrome.

Methods:

Adults with active Behçet’s syndrome and ≥3 OU at randomization or ≥2 OU at screening and randomization, without active major organ involvement, were randomized to APR 30 mg BID or PBO during the 12-wk PBO-controlled phase. Randomization was stratified by sex. The primary endpoint was area under the curve for the number of OU through Wk 12 (AUCWk0-12) to assess continued efficacy over the time period in a symptom that waxed and waned. Key secondary endpoints included OU pain, complete response (OU-free), maintenance of complete response, and QoL at Wk 12. Disease activity was also assessed using Behçet’s Syndrome Activity Score (BSAS) and Behçet’s Disease Current Activity Index Form (BDCAF). QoL was assessed using Behçet’s Disease QoL (BDQoL). Prespecified subgroup analyses in men and women were performed to assess treatment effect in primary and secondary endpoints.

Results:

Eighty men and 127 women were randomized and received ≥1 dose of study medication. Mean age was 38.7 yrs (men) and 40.8 yrs (women). Mean (SD) OU count at baseline was 3.4 (1.4) (PBO) and 3.7 (1.5) (APR) for men and 4.3 (3.2) (PBO) and 4.5 (4.5) (APR) for women. Greater improvements in favor of APR vs PBO were observed in AUCWk0-12 in men and women (Figure 1). Consistency in efficacy with APR was observed between men and women, with greater reduction in pain and achievement of OU complete response (OU-free) and maintenance of response at Wk 12 vs PBO (Table 1). In men and women, consistent treatment effects in favor of APR vs PBO were observed for disease activity and QoL measures, although moderate treatment differences were observed in BDCAI (men/women) and BDQoL (men) (Table 1).

Conclusion:

Consistent treatment effects in favor of APR vs PBO in clinically relevant outcomes, including OU number and pain, OU complete response, and disease activity measures, were observed in men and women with OU associated with Behçet’s syndrome.

Key Secondary Efficacy Outcomes at Wk 12MenWomenPBO(n = 40)APR(n = 40)Tx Difference[95% CI]PBO(n = 63)APR(n = 64)Tx Difference[95% CI]OU CR, n/N (%)8/40 (20.0)21/40 (52.5)32.6 [12.8, 52.4]15/63 (23.8)34/64 (53.1)29.3 [13.2, 45.4]OU CR 6 + 6*, n/N (%)1/40 (2.5)10/40 (25.0)22.8 [8.8, 36.8]4/63 (6.3)21/64 (32.8)26.5 [13.6, 39.3]Pain (VAS)†-12.0 (4.8)-37.6 (4.9)-25.6 [-37.2, -14.1]-17.4 (4.4)-41.5 (4.3)-24.1 [-34.9, -13.3]BSAS†-1.3 (2.4)-14.4 (2.4)-13.1 [-18.8, -7.3]-7.7 (2.4)-19.7 (2.4)-12.0 [-18.0, -6.0]BDCAF†BDCAI-0.1 (0.3)-0.5 (0.3)-0.4 [-1.1, 0.4]-0.7 (0.3)-1.3 (0.3)-0.6 [-1.2, 0.0]Patient’s Perception of Disease Activity-0.2 (0.3)-1.4 (0.3)-1.2 [-1.9, -0.5]-1.0 (0.2)-1.8 (0.2)-0.9 [-1.4, -0.3]Clinician’s Overall Perception of Disease Activity-0.2 (0.3)-1.5 (0.3)-1.3 [-1.9, -0.7]-1.0 (0.2)-1.7 (0.2)-0.7 [-1.3, -0.2]BDQoL†-0.7 (1.0)-2.2 (1.0)-1.5 [-3.8, 0.8]-0.3 (0.9)-4.4 (0.9)-4.1 [-6.3, -2.0]

LOCF analyses. *Proportion of patients achieving an OU CR by Wk 6, and remaining OU-free for ≥6 additional wks during the 12-wk PBO-controlled treatment phase. †LS mean (SE) change from baseline. BSAS = Behçet’s Syndrome Activity Scores; BDCAF = Behçet’s Disease Activity Form; CR = complete response; n = number of patients randomized to treatment; Tx = treatment.

Acknowledgements:

This study was funded by Celgene. Additional analyses were funded by Amgen Inc. Writing support was funded by Amgen Inc. and provided by Kristin Carlin, RPh, MBA, of Peloton Advantage, LLC, an OPEN Health company.

Disclosure of Interests:

Gulen Hatemi Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Novartis, and UCB, Grant/research support from: Celgene, Alfred Mahr Speakers bureau: Chugai and Roche, Consultant of: Celgene and Chugai, Mitsuhiro Takeno Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Esai, and Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Consultant of: Celgene, Grant/research support from: Novartis, Doyoung Kim: None declared, Melike Melikoglu: None declared, Sue Cheng Employee of: Amgen Inc., Sven Richter Employee of: Amgen Inc., Shauna Jardon Employee of: Amgen Inc., Maria Paris Employee of: Amgen Inc., Mindy Chen Employee of: Amgen Inc., Yusuf Yazici Consultant of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Genentech, and Sanofi

AB0388 USE OF MESNA PROPHYLAXIS IN CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE-TREATED PATIENTS WITH ANCA-ASSOCIATED VASCULITIS: RESULTS OF AN ELECTRONIC SURVEY

Background:

Co-prescribing 2-mercaptoethane sodium sulfonate (mesna) with cyclophosphamide (CYC) for ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) aims to prevent the potential urotoxic effects of CYC. The evidence for this practice is often considered weak, and there may be some diversity in what practitioners do in clinical practice.

Objectives:

To investigate current clinical practice related to prescribing mesna prophylaxis or not and the underlying rationale for CYC-treated patients with AAV.

Methods:

We searched MEDLINE for publications with the MeSH term “ANCA-associated vasculitis” over a 10-year period up to October 2020. Email addresses of authors of these publications were extracted from the online information available in MEDLINE. These authors were invited by email to participate in an anonymous online SurveyMonkey survey of 21 to 24 questions asking about the characteristics of the respondent, their experience with AAV, and their practice in using CYC to treat AAV and using mesna in CYC-treated patients with AAV and the underlying rationale. Respondents were eligible to take the full survey if they were involved in deciding and/or monitoring therapy with CYC for patients with AAV. We compared 15 response variables to identify factors associated with the use or not of mesna. Response variables with multiple categories were first analyzed across all categories; if the omnibus test result was significant, additional analyses were used to identify the categories, which were the sources of group separation. We analyzed by-country variations for only countries with ≥ 10 respondents. Statistical analyses involved Pearson’s chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate. For multiple-response variables, the Rao-Scott correction was applied.

Results:

The invitation for the electronic survey was emailed twice in October 2020 to 1,374 unique email addresses; 156 individuals responded; 139 were eligible and completed the survey. The 139 participants were from 34 countries and were essentially MDs (98%) who mainly worked in rheumatology (50%), nephrology (25%) or internal medicine/clinical immunology (18%). Mesna was given in conjunction with CYC systematically, never, or on a case-by-case basis by 68%, 19% and 13% of respondents, respectively. As compared with systematic mesna-prescribers, never/occasional mesna-prescribers reported a longer time since receiving their degree as a health professional (≥ 15 years: 80% vs 50%, P<0.001), were more frequently based in England/United States (than in France/Germany/Italy) (78% vs 21%, P<0.001), had longer involvement in care of patients with AAV (≥ 15 years: 62% vs 37%, P=0.006), had less practice in using intermittent pulse therapy as the exclusive/predominant CYC administration scheme (62% vs 89%, P<0.001), and, as a rationale underpinning their mesna practice, had less adherence to local operational procedures (47% vs 73%, P=0.002) or (inter)national management guidelines for AAV (16% vs 49%, P<0.001). Never/occasional versus systematic use of mesna did not differ across medical specialties (5 categories, P=0.192) or healthcare settings (3 categories, P=0.437), and was not associated with prior experience of CYC-related urotoxic events (3 categories, P=0.495) or severe mesna toxicity issues (3 categories, P=0.957). The confidence that their practice reflected the best possible patient care did not differ between never/occasional and systematic mesna-prescribers (7-point Likert scale, P=0.794).

Conclusion:

Practice with regard to prescribing mesna in conjunction with CYC to treat AAV is heterogeneous, although systematic mesna use prevailed over never or occasional use. The decision to prescribe or not mesna may be based more on circumstantial than structural reasons.

Disclosure of Interests:

Lukas Joos: None declared, Solange Gonzalez Chiappe: None declared, Thomas Neumann Speakers bureau: GSK, Grant/research support from: Xifor, Alfred Mahr Speakers bureau: Amgen, Celgene, Roche, Chugai, Consultant of: Amgen, Celgene, Roche, Chugai

POS0254 EFFICACY OF APREMILAST IN THE TREATMENT OF ORAL ULCERS OF BEHÇET’S SYNDROME: RESULTS FROM THE EUROPEAN SUBGROUP OF RELIEF

Background:

Behçet’s syndrome, a chronic, multi-system variable vessel vasculitis, is often characterized by painful oral ulcers (OU) affecting quality of life (QoL). Apremilast (APR), an oral PDE4 inhibitor, demonstrated efficacy in OU treatment in the phase 3 multinational RELIEF study.

Objectives:

To evaluate APR efficacy in OU treatment in patients with active Behçet’s syndrome in a prespecified subgroup of patients enrolled in 13 European RELIEF sites (France, Germany, Greece, and Italy).

Methods:

patients were adults with active Behçet’s syndrome and ≥3 OU at randomization or ≥2 OU at screening and randomization, without active major organ involvement. Patients were randomized (1:1) to APR 30 mg BID or PBO during a 12-week double-blind phase. The primary endpoint was area under the curve for the number of OU through Week 12 (AUCWk0-12). Other outcomes were OU pain visual analog scale (VAS); achievement of OU complete response (ie, OU-free) and maintenance of OU complete response (ie, complete response at Week 6 and remaining OU-free for ≥6 additional weeks); OU partial response (ie, OU reduction ≥50%); disease activity (Behçet’s Syndrome Activity Score [BSAS]; Behçet’s Disease Current Activity Form [BDCAF], including Behçet’s Disease Current Activity Index [BDCAI], and Patient’s and Clinician’s Perception of Disease Activity); and QoL (BDQoL; Short Form Health Survey version 2 [SF-36v2], including Physical Functioning [PF] scale and Physical and Mental Component Summary [PCS, MCS]).

Results:

Of 207 patients randomized and treated in RELIEF, 52 were in the European subgroup. Mean (±SD) age in the subgroup was 39 (±12) years; 54% were women. Baseline disease characteristics were similar between treatment groups (Table 1). Patients receiving APR achieved lower AUCWk0-12 for OU vs PBO (Figure 1) and greater reduction in pain. A greater proportion of patients receiving APR achieved complete, maintained, or partial OU responses at Week 12 vs those receiving PBO (Table 1). Consistent treatment effects favoring APR vs PBO were observed in disease activity, as shown by BSAS and BDCAF component scores at Week 12 (Table 1). Greater improvement in SF-36v2 MCS was observed favoring APR vs PBO at Week 12, and moderate treatment differences were seen for other QoL measures (BDQoL, SF-36v2 PF, and SF-36v2 PCS).

Conclusion:

In the European subgroup of patients with Behçet’s syndrome and OU in RELIEF, APR resulted in greater reduction in OU count, OU pain, and disease activity as well as favorable treatment effect on QoL measures than PBO. These results are consistent with the efficacy of APR treatment in the overall RELIEF population.

Baseline Disease Characteristics, Mean*PBO (n = 27)APR (n = 25)Duration of BD, years9.08.2OU count3.84.0OU pain (VAS 0-100)60.664.2BSAS (0-100)38.741.4BDCAI (0-12)3.53.6BDQoL (0-30)10.59.0Efficacy Outcomes at 12 Weeks*PBO (n = 27)APR (n = 25)Treatment Difference [95% CI]OU pain (VAS 0-100), mean†–17.7–48.7–31.0 [–44.7, –17.3]OU complete response, n (%)‡4 (14.8)16 (64.0)51.5 [29.8, 73.3]OU maintained response, n (%)‡1 (3.7)8 (32.0)26.7 [7.4, 46.0]OU partial response, n (%)‡11 (40.7)21 (84.0)46.0 [23.9, 68.0]BSAS (0-100)†,§–5.23–20.68–15.5 [–22.6, –8.3]BDCAI (0-12)†,§–0.0–1.4–1.4 [–2.2, –0.6]Patient’s Perception of Disease Activity†,§–0.4–1.6–1.2 [–2.1, –0.4]Clinician’s Overall Perception of Disease Activity†,§−0.6−1.7–1.0 [–1.7, –0.4]BDQoL (0-30)†,§–1.25–2.37–1.12 [–3.8, 1.5]SF-36v2 MCS (0-100)†,§–2.14.26.3 [2.2, 10.4]

*ITT population.†LS mean of the change from baseline at Week 12.‡Non-responder imputation for missing data.§LOCF approach. All efficacy endpoints (except BDQoL) were significant at the level of P<0.05.

Acknowledgements :

This study was funded by Celgene. Additional analyses were funded by Amgen Inc. Writing support was funded by Amgen Inc. and provided by Kristin Carlin, RPh, MBA, of Peloton Advantage, LLC, an OPEN Health company.

Disclosure of Interests:

Alfred Mahr Speakers bureau: Chugai; Roche, Consultant of: Celgene; Chugai, Gulen Hatemi Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Novartis, and UCB, Grant/research support from: Celgene, Mitsuhiro Takeno Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Esai, and Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Consultant of: Celgene, Grant/research support from: Novartis, Doyoung Kim: None declared, Melike Melikoglu: None declared, david Saadoun Consultant of: AbbVie, Celgene, Janssen, and Roche, Grant/research support from: AbbVie and Roche, Christos C. Zouboulis Speakers bureau: Amgen, Galderma, Pierre Fabre, PPM and Sobi, Consultant of: AbbVie, AccureAcne, Almirall, Bayer Healthcare, GSK/Stiefel, Incyte, Inflarx, Janssen, Novartis, PPM, Regeneron, and UCB, Grant/research support from: Celgene, NAOS-BIODERMA, and Relaxera, Sue Cheng Employee of: Amgen Inc, Sven Richter Employee of: Amgen Inc, Shauna Jardon Employee of: Amgen Inc, Maria Paris Employee of: Amgen Inc, Mindy Chen Employee of: Amgen Inc, Yusuf Yazici Consultant of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Genentech, and Sanofi

AB0481 EFFICACY OF APREMILAST FOR THE TREATMENT OF GENITAL ULCERS ASSOCIATED WITH ACTIVE BEHÇET’S SYNDROME: A COMBINED ANALYSIS OF TWO RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS

Background:

Behçet’s syndrome is a chronic, multi-system inflammatory disorder characterized by painful, recurrent oral ulcers (OU) and genital ulcers (GU).1The GU associated with Behçet’s syndrome can contribute to difficulties with sexual activity, walking, and sitting2; may cause scarring1; and may impair quality of life.1,2Apremilast (APR), an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of the OU associated with Behçet’s syndrome in the phase III, randomized RELIEF study (BCT-002).3

Objectives:

To describe the efficacy of APR for the treatment of GU associated with active Behçet’s syndrome in the RELIEF study and in a pooled data analysis of RELIEF and the phase II study.

Methods:

Adult patients (≥18 years of age) with active Behçet’s syndrome and ≥3 OU at randomization or ≥2 OU at screening and randomization, without active major organ involvement, were randomized (1:1) to APR 30 mg twice daily or placebo (PBO). In RELIEF, clinical improvement in GU was assessed by evaluating the time to the first GU recurrence after loss of complete response, the mean number of GU in patients without GU at baseline, and the proportion of patients who were GU-free (complete response) at Week 12 (regardless of baseline GU status). A pooled analysis of patients in RELIEF and a randomized, phase II study4were conducted to assess achievement of GU complete response in patients with GU at baseline. In patients with GU complete response before Week 12, the median time to the first GU recurrence after loss of complete response was based on Kaplan-Meier estimates. The mean number of GU was summarized descriptively using data as observed. Between-group differences in the proportion of patients who were GU-free at Week 12 were analyzed by Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test using non-responder imputation to handle missing data. Statistical tests were 2 sided (α=0.05).

Results:

A total of 207 patients were randomized and received ≥1 dose of study medication (APR: n=104; PBO: n=103). In all, 17 patients in the APR group and 17 in the PBO group had GU at baseline, with mean GU counts of 2.9 (APR) and 2.6 (PBO). Among patients with GU at baseline in RELIEF, 12/17 (70.6% [APR]) and 7/17 (41.2% [PBO]) achieved GU complete response at Week 12 (P=0.110). The median time to first GU recurrence in these patients occurred earlier with PBO (6.1 weeks) vs. APR (not calculable). In the pooled analysis of RELIEF and the phase II study, a significantly greater proportion of patients with GU at baseline achieved GU complete response at Week 12 with APR vs. PBO (21/27 [77.8%] vs. 9/23 [39.1%];P=0.011) (Figure 1). The proportion of patients who were GU-free was significantly greater with APR (92/104 [88.5%]) vs. PBO (72/101 [71.3%]), regardless of baseline number of GU (P=0.002) (Figure 2).

Conclusion:

The number of patients with GU was low, but the totality of the data shows a favorable trend in the treatment effect of APR on GU. Greater proportions of APR-treated patients were GU-free at Week 12 vs. patients receiving PBO, and the time to the first GU recurrence occurred earlier with PBO vs. APR.

References:

[1]Kokturk A. Patholog Res Int. 2012;2012:690390. 2. Senusi A, et al. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2015;10:117. 3. Hatemi G, et al. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:1918-1928. 4. Hatemi G, et al. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1510-1518.

Disclosure of Interests:

Gulen Hatemi Grant/research support from: BMS, Celgene Corporation, Silk Road Therapeutics – grant/research support, Consultant of: Bayer, Eli Lilly – consultant, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Mustafa Nevzat, Novartis, UCB – speaker, Alfred Mahr Consultant of: Celgene, Speakers bureau: Roche, Chugai, Mitsuhiro Takeno Speakers bureau: Esai, Tanabe-Mitsubishi – speaker; Celgene Corporation – advisory board, Doyoung Kim: None declared, Melike Melikoglu: None declared, Sue Cheng Employee of: Amgen Inc. – employment; Celgene Corporation – employment at the time of study conduct, Shannon McCue Employee of: Amgen Inc. – employment; Celgene Corporation – employment at the time of study conduct, Sven Richter Employee of: Amgen Inc. – employment; Celgene Corporation – employment at the time of study conduct, Michele Brunori Employee of: Amgen Inc. – employment; Celgene Corporation – employment at the time of study conduct, Maria Paris Employee of: Amgen Inc. – employment; Celgene Corporation – employment at the time of study conduct, Mindy Chen Employee of: Amgen Inc. – employment; Celgene Corporation – employment at the time of the conduct, Yusuf Yazici Consultant of: BMS, Celgene Corporation, Genentech, Sanofi – consultant, Consultant of: BMS, Celgene Corporation, Genentech, Sanofi – consultant

THU0310 CASE–CONTROL SEROPREVALENCE STUDY ON THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN BARTONELLA INFECTION AND ANTI-NEUTROPHIL CYTOPLASMIC ANTIBODY-ASSOCIATED VASCULITIS

Background:

Bartonellosis is an emerging anthropozoonosis caused by infection with intracellular Gram-negativeBartonellaspecies. It leads to necrotizing granulomas and endothelial damage and causes acute and chronic human diseases, such as cat scratch disease, bacillary angiomatosis and endocarditis. Endocarditis due toBartonella henselaeandB. quintanais reported to produce anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCAs) that disappear with effective antimicrobial treatment.

Objectives:

Hypothesizing a role forBartonellainfection in ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV), which also includes granulomatous and vascular inflammation, we studied the seroprevalence of 5Bartonellaspecies in patients with AAV.

Methods:

The study used plasma samples from patients with granulomatosis with polyangiitis and microscopic polyangiitis that were enrolled in the Rituximab for AAV (RAVE) trial and from healthy controls living in the United States. Western blot assays were used for serological testing of infection withB. quintana,B. henselaeHouston-1,B. elizabethae,B. vinsoniisubsp.berkhoffiiandB. alsatica. The associations of positive serology results and AAV were expressed as odds ratios (OR). Clinical characteristics of seropositive and seronegative patients, assessed by the BVAS/WG instrument, were compared. These comparisons were done for 9 organ systems; in case they showed differences withP<0.10, the corresponding organ system-specific clinical features were also analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed using Fisher’s exact test or Student’s t-test, as appropriate.

Results:

We analyzed blood samples of 187 patients with AAV (collected at start of the trial) and of 127 controls. There were no significant differences between the cases and controls for mean age (P=0.148) and proportion of males (P=0.36).Bartonellaspp. serological testing was positive for 112 (60%) cases and 40 (31%) controls (OR 3.25 [95% CI 2.02–5.22],P<0.001). Significant associations were also found within subsets of PR3-AAV (OR 4.00 [95% CI 2.37–6.76],P<0.001), MPO-AAV (OR 2.18 [95% CI 1.17–4.06],P=0.017), newly-diagnosed (OR 3.89 [95% CI 2.21–6.86],P<0.001) and relapsing disease (OR 2.86 [95% CI 1.65–4.98],P<0.001). Species-specific positive serological testing was found in particular againstB. henselae(cases: 27%, controls: 0.8%; OR 39.93 [95% CI 5.42–293.90];P<0.001). Compared to AAV patients without seropositivity forBartonellaspp., AAV patients testing seropositive forBartonellaspp. had significantly more bloody nasal discharge (P=0.046), sinus involvement (P=0.035) and conjunctivitis/episcleritis (P=0.016).

Conclusion:

This study reveals higher seroprevalence ofBartonella, especiallyB. henselae, in patients with AAV than in healthy controls. Although cross-reactivity ofBartonellawith other microorganisms cannot be excluded, these results may support an etiopathogenic role ofBartonellainfection in AAV that deserves further investigation.

Disclosure of Interests:

Alfred Mahr Consultant of: Celgene, Speakers bureau: Roche, Chugai, Sophie Edouard: None declared, Divi Cornec: None declared, Solange GONZALEZ-CHIAPPE: None declared, Jörg Goronzy: None declared, Philippe Guilpain: None declared, Carol Langford: None declared, Pierre-Yves Lévy: None declared, Peter A. Merkel: None declared, Paul Monach: None declared, E. William St. Clair: None declared, Philip Seo: None declared, Robert Spiera Grant/research support from: Roche-Genetech, GSK, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chemocentryx, Corbus, Forbius, Sanofi, Inflarx, Consultant of: Roche-Genetech, GSK, CSL Behring, Sanofi, Janssen, Chemocentryx, Forbius, Mistubishi Tanabe, Cornelia Weyand: None declared, John H. Stone Grant/research support from: Roche, Consultant of: Roche, Didier Rauolt: None declared, Ulrich Specks: None declared

OP0028 EFFICACY OF APREMILAST FOR THE PAIN OF ORAL ULCERS ASSOCIATED WITH ACTIVE BEHÇET’S SYNDROME: 12-WEEK RESULTS FROM THE RANDOMIZED, PHASE III RELIEF STUDY

Background:

Oral ulcers (OU) associated with Behçet’s syndrome are often painful, may interfere with the ability to eat and can negatively affect quality of life.1,2Apremilast (APR), an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of OU associated with Behçet’s syndrome in a phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled study (RELIEF; BCT-002).3

Objectives:

To describe the efficacy of APR treatment in improving OU pain associated with Behçet’s syndrome in RELIEF.

Methods:

Patients were randomized (1:1) to APR 30 mg twice daily (APR 30 BID) or PBO twice daily for a 12-week PBO-controlled phase, followed by a 52-week active treatment extension. Eligible patients were ≥18 years of age and had active Behçet’s syndrome with ≥3 OU at randomization or ≥2 OU at screening and randomization and without active major organ involvement. Clinical improvement in OU was evaluated by the area under the curve for the number of OU through Week 12 (AUCWk0-12; primary efficacy endpoint) and by assessments of OU number. Patient-reported OU pain was evaluated by the 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS). The statistical tests were 2-sided (α=0.05). The proportions of patients achieving the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and higher rates of improvement, defined as ≥10-mm,4≥30-mm (3-fold MCID), ≥50-mm (5-fold MCID) improvements in OU pain VAS scores, respectively, were analyzed through Week 12. An ANCOVA model was used to analyze the primary endpoint and assessments of OU number and OU pain (VAS). The proportion of patients achieving improvement in OU pain VAS scores at Week 12 were summarized descriptively.

Results:

A total of 207 patients were randomized and received ≥1 dose of study medication (APR: n=104; PBO: n=103). At baseline, the mean (SD) number of OU was 4.2 (3.7) in the APR 30 BID group and 3.9 (2.7) in the PBO group, and the mean (SD) OU pain VAS scores were 61.2 (27.6) and 60.8 (26.9), respectively. At Week 12, significantly greater improvements were observed with APR 30 BID vs. PBO in AUCWk0-12(least-squares [LS] mean [SE]: 129.5 [15.9] vs. 222.1 [15.9];P<0.0001), number of OU (LS mean [SE]: 1.1 [0.2] vs. 2.0 [0.3];P=0.0003) and OU pain VAS scores (LS mean [SE] change from baseline: −40.7 [3.3] vs. −15.9 [3.3];P<0.0001). The proportion of patients who achieved the MCID of ≥10-mm improvement in OU pain VAS scores at Week 12 was greater with APR 30 BID vs. PBO; this pattern was also observed for the higher 3- and 5-fold improvements in MCID (Figure 1). Greater proportions of APR 30 BID vs. PBO patients achieved ≥10-mm and ≥30-mm improvements in OU pain VAS scores over 12 weeks. Notably, greater achievement of ≥50-mm improvement in OU pain VAS scores was observed with APR 30 BID vs. PBO as early as Week 1 and maintained up to Week 12 (Figure 2).

Conclusion:

For patients with active Behçet’s syndrome, APR 30 BID provided significantly greater improvements vs. PBO in OU number and OU pain at Week 12, including the greater proportion of patients achieving MCID and 3- and 5-fold MCID of OU pain in the APR 30 BID group vs. the PBO group. These results indicate a clinically meaningful treatment effect of APR 30 BID on the OU associated with Behçet’s syndrome.

References:

[1]Kokturk A.Patholog Res Int. 2012;2012:690390.

[2]Hatemi G, et al.Ann Rheum Dis. 2008;67:1656-1662.

[3]Hatemi G, et al.N Engl J Med. 2019;381:1918-1928. 4. Dworkin RH, et al.J Pain. 2008;9:105-121.

Disclosure of Interests:

Gulen Hatemi Grant/research support from: BMS, Celgene Corporation, Silk Road Therapeutics – grant/research support, Consultant of: Bayer, Eli Lilly – consultant, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Mustafa Nevzat, Novartis, UCB – speaker, Alfred Mahr Consultant of: Celgene, Speakers bureau: Roche, Chugai, Mitsuhiro Takeno Speakers bureau: Esai, Tanabe-Mitsubishi – speaker; Celgene Corporation – advisory board, Doyoung Kim: None declared, Melike Melikoglu: None declared, Sue Cheng Employee of: Amgen Inc. – employment; Celgene Corporation – employment at the time of study conduct, Shannon McCue Employee of: Amgen Inc. – employment; Celgene Corporation – employment at the time of study conduct, Sven Richter Employee of: Amgen Inc. – employment; Celgene Corporation – employment at the time of study conduct, Michele Brunori Employee of: Amgen Inc. – employment; Celgene Corporation – employment at the time of study conduct, Maria Paris Employee of: Amgen Inc. – employment; Celgene Corporation – employment at the time of study conduct, Mindy Chen Employee of: Amgen Inc. – employment; Celgene Corporation – employment at the time of the conduct, Yusuf Yazici Consultant of: BMS, Celgene Corporation, Genentech, Sanofi – consultant, Consultant of: BMS, Celgene Corporation, Genentech, Sanofi – consultant

EULAR/ERA-EDTA recommendations for the management of ANCA-associated vasculitis

In this article, the 2009 European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for the management of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) have been updated. The 2009 recommendations were on the management of primary small and medium vessel vasculitis. The 2015 update has been developed by an international task force representing EULAR, the European Renal Association and the European Vasculitis Society (EUVAS). The recommendations are based upon evidence from systematic literature reviews, as well as expert opinion where appropriate. The evidence presented was discussed and summarised by the experts in the course of a consensus-finding and voting process. Levels of evidence and grades of recommendations were derived and levels of agreement (strengths of recommendations) determined. In addition to the voting by the task force members, the relevance of the recommendations was assessed by an online voting survey among members of EUVAS. Fifteen recommendations were developed, covering general aspects, such as attaining remission and the need for shared decision making between clinicians and patients. More specific items relate to starting immunosuppressive therapy in combination with glucocorticoids to induce remission, followed by a period of remission maintenance; for remission induction in life-threatening or organ-threatening AAV, cyclophosphamide and rituximab are considered to have similar efficacy; plasma exchange which is recommended, where licensed, in the setting of rapidly progressive renal failure or severe diffuse pulmonary haemorrhage. These recommendations are intended for use by healthcare professionals, doctors in specialist training, medical students, pharmaceutical industries and drug regulatory organisations.

[Epidemiology of Behçet's disease]

With more than 30 published prevalence estimates for Behçet's disease (BD), covering many different regions worldwide, the prevalence of BD is quite well described. Even though the interpretation of these data is complicated by between-study differences in methodology, which may substantially influence the results, these data suggest large geographic variations in frequency of BD, with prevalence rates of 20-420/100,000 inhabitants for Turkey, 2.1-19.5 for other Asian countries, 1.5-15.9 for southern Europe and 0.3-4.9 for northern Europe. Additional epidemiological studies or case series from North and South America, the Caribbean Islands, and individuals of sub-Saharan ancestry further suggest that the geographic distribution of BD is much wider than the boundaries of the ancient Silk Road. The few available incidence rates prevent from making strong inferences as to whether the frequency of BD has changed over time. Recent population-based studies of immigrants or migrant populations consistently indicate that migrants from areas of high BD prevalence remain at high risk for BD, which may even be close to the prevalence observed in their countries of origin. Genetic factors, which are not detailed in this review, seem to play a preponderant role in BD development, although they cannot explain the wide between-country disparities in BD prevalence. However, environmental risk factors, including infectious and non-infectious causes, remain poorly investigated and have not yet produced solid hints.