Fluconazole prophylaxis in extremely low birth weight infants: association with cholestasis

The efficacy and safety of fluconazole in preventing invasive fungal infection in very low birth weight infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis

This meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of fluconazole for the prevention of invasive fungal infections (IFI) in very low birth weight infants (VLBWI) and to provide a basis for the clinical use. A detailed search of Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library and other databases was performed to carefully screen eligible randomized controlled clinical studies to assess the safety and efficacy of fluconazole in very low birth weight infants in terms of the incidence of invasive fungal infections, fungal colonization rate, and mortality. Our research indicated that the application of fluconazole did not result in intolerable adverse reactions in patients. Fluconazole is effective in preventing invasive fungal infections in very low birth weight infants without serious adverse effects. The dose and frequency of fluconazole in very low birth weight infants still needs to be evaluated in consequent studies.

Infection prevention for extremely low birth weight infants in the NICU

Extremely preterm infants are particularly vulnerable to systemic infections secondary to their immature immune defenses, prolonged hospitalizations, delays in enteral feeding, early antibiotic exposure, and need for life-sustaining invasive interventions. There have been several evidence-based practices for infection prevention in this population, such as human milk feedings, utilization of "bundle checklists" and decolonization of pathogenic organisms. Other practices, such as the use of probiotics, human milk-derived fortifiers, and antifungal prophylaxis are more controversial and require further investigation regarding the risks and benefits of such interventions. This chapter examines the susceptibility of the preterm newborn infant to invasive infections and describes several strategies for infection prevention, along with the associated limitations of such practices. It also addresses the various gaps in our understanding of preventing infections in this population, and the need for additional large multi-center randomized controlled trials. Additionally, the role of the SARs-CoV-2 global pandemic and associated strategies for infection prevention in the NICU are discussed.

Micafungin injection for the treatment of invasive candidiasis in pediatric patients under 4 months of age

INTRODUCTION

Neonates and young infants with invasive candidiasis are particularly at increased risk of dissemination including hematogenous Candida meningoencephalitis. The echinocandins including micafungin have emerged as a preferred agent in most cases of candidemia and invasive candidiasis but data in pediatric patients under 4 months of age are limited.

AREAS COVERED

In this report, we review the micafungin use in infants younger than 4 months of age. Animal studies as well as clinical data that support its use in neonatal candidiasis are reviewed. In addition, the status of FDA approval and the rationale of micafungin dosing recommendations in infants <4 months are discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

A dose of 4 mg/kg was approved for treatment of candidemia, Candida peritonitis and abscesses excluding meningoencephalitis or ocular involvement in patients younger than 4 months of age. However, because of the risk of central nervous system dissemination as well as the difficulty in establishing this diagnosis, this dose is inadequate to treat ill infants with candidemia. More studies are needed to establish the safety and efficacy of micafungin daily dose of at least 10 mg/kg in infants younger than 4 months of age when hematogenous Candida meningoencephalitis or ocular involvement cannot be excluded.

Fluconazole prophylaxis against invasive candidiasis in very low and extremely low birth weight preterm neonates: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Evidence shows that fluconazole prophylaxis is an effective treatment against invasive fungal infections in preterm neonates, however, the most efficient schedule of fluconazole prophylaxis for the colonization and mortality of invasive candidiasis (IC) is unknown.

PURPOSE

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficiency of different prophylactic fluconazole schedules in controlling IC colonization, infection, and mortality in very low birth weight (VLBW) and extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants in neonatal intensive care units.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane databases using the keywords "candida," "invasive candidiasis," "IC," "fluconazole prophylaxis," "preterm infants," "very low birth weight infants," "VLBW," "extremely low birth weight," and "ELBW."

RESULTS

Mortality was significantly decreased in a metaanalysis of studies using different fluconazole prophylaxis regimens. The meta-analysis also indicated a significant decrease in the incidence of IC-associated mortality in ELBW infants using the same fluconazole prophylaxis schedules.

CONCLUSION

Future studies should explore the effectiveness of other different fluconazole prophylaxis schedules on IC colonization, infection, and mortality.

Oral nystatin prophylaxis to prevent systemic fungal infection in very low birth weight preterm infants: a randomized controlled trial

Background

Systemic fungal infection (SFI) is one of leading causes of morbidity and mortality in very low birth weight (VLBW) preterm infants. Because early diagnosis of SFI is challenging due to nonspecific manifestations, prophylaxis becomes crucial. This study aimed to assess effectiveness of oral nystatin as an antifungal prophylaxis to prevent SFI in VLBW preterm infants.

Methods

A prospective, open-labelled, randomized controlled trial was performed in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) of an academic hospital in Indonesia. Infants with a gestational age ≤ 32 weeks and/or birth weight of ≤ 1500 g with risk factors for fungal infection were assessed for eligibility and randomized to either an intervention group (nystatin) or control group. The intervention group received 1 ml of oral nystatin three times a day, and the control group received a dose of 1 ml of sterile water three times a day. The incidence of fungal colonization and SFI were observed and evaluated during the six-week study period. Overall mortality rates and nystatin-related adverse drug reactions during the study period were also documented.

Results

A total of 95 patients were enrolled. The incidence of fungal colonization was lower among infants in nystatin group compared to those in control group (29.8 and 56.3%, respectively; relative risk 0.559; 95% confidence interval 0.357–0.899; p-value = 0.009). There were five cases of SFI, all of which were found in the control group (p-value = 0.056). There was no difference in overall mortality between the two groups. No adverse drug reactions were noted during the study period.

Conclusions

Nystatin is effective and safe as an antifungal prophylactic medication in reducing colonization rates in the study population. Whilst the use of nystatin showed a potential protective effect against SFI among VLBW preterm infants, there was no statistical significant difference in SFI rates between groups.

Trial registration

NCT03390374. Registered 4 January 2018 - Retrospectively registered.

Fluconazole Prophylaxis of Candida Infections in Preterm Neonates

Infections belong to the most serious health problems in neonates. Invasive candidiases are one of the leading causes of mortality and morbidity in Neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). A more cautious approach is adequate when dealing with fungal infections in premature neonates. Sometimes it is necessary to cure an infection at the very beginning just before manifestation of clinical symptoms. Neonatal colonization due to Candida albicans or non-albicans Candidae predisposes to invasive candidiasis. Pregnancies complicated by preterm delivery should be considered for screening and treatment of maternal Candida colonization to decrease the occurrence of neonatal fungal colonization and its consequences. It is important to prevent infection to spread among patients and avoid complications. Prophylaxis in neonates must be safe and effective. Most authors prefer selective prophylaxis. Fluconazole is the drug of choice for prophylaxis in extremely low birth weight (ELBW) neonates. The prophylaxis is beneficial especially in NICUs with high rates of invasive candidiases. The authors describe benefits and trends in prophylaxis. They also summarize evidence on timing, dosing, and effect of fluconazole prophylaxis.

Population Pharmacokinetic Study of Prophylactic Fluconazole in Preterm Infants for Prevention of Invasive Candidiasis

Fluconazole is an antifungal agent with reported evidence for its prophylactic effect against systemic fungal infection in preterm infants. The aim of this study was to build a population pharmacokinetic model to evaluate the pharmacokinetic characteristics of intravenous and oral fluconazole in preterm infants with the current prophylactic fluconazole dosing regimen. A pharmacokinetic model was developed using 301 fluconazole concentrations from 75 preterm infants with a baseline body weight (WT) ranging from 0.5 to 1.5 kg and an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ranging from 12.9 to 58.5 ml/min/1.73 m² Eligible infants received an intravenous or oral dose of 3 mg/kg of body weight of fluconazole, twice weekly with a ≥72-h dose interval, for 4 weeks. The model was qualified with basic goodness-of-fit diagnostics, visual predictive checks, and bootstrapping. The fluconazole pharmacokinetics was well described with a one-compartment linear model with a proportional residual error. The population clearance (CL) and volume of distribution (V) were derived as 0.0197 × (WT/1.00)^0.746 × (eGFR/25.0)^0.463 × exp(η) and 1.04 × WT × exp(η), respectively. Such covariate analyses augment the awareness of the need for personalized dosing in preterm infants. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT01683760).

Usefulness of direct fluorescent in buffy coat in the diagnosis of Candida sepsis in neonates

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to assess the clinical utility of direct fluorescent assay in buffy coat in the diagnosis of Candida sepsis (CS) in neonates.

STUDY DESIGN

A cross-sectional study was conducted in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and 22 neonates with suspected CS were enrolled. Fungus isolation from blood cultures and direct fluorescent tests in buffy coat were performed and validity parameters were estimated.

RESULTS

Candida was isolated in 13/22 (59%) blood cultures. The direct fluorescent test was positive in 12/13 and 1/9 cases with positive and negative blood culture as corresponding. Estimated sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likehood ratio and negative likehood ratio were 92%, 89%, 92%, 89%, 8.31 and 0.09, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The direct fluorescent assay in buffy coat might be useful to support early and accurate diagnosis of CS in neonates.

Aggressive nutrition in extremely low birth weight infants: impact on parenteral nutrition associated cholestasis and growth

Background

Parenteral nutrition associated cholestasis (PNAC) is a frequently observed pathology in extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants. Its pathogenesis is determined by the composition and duration of parenteral nutrition (PN) as well as the tolerance of enteral feeds (EF). “Aggressive” nutrition is increasingly used in ELBW infants to improve postnatal growth. Little is known about the effect of “aggressive” nutrition on the incidence of PNAC. We analyzed the influence of implementing an “aggressive” nutritional regimen on the incidence of PNAC and growth in a cohort of ELBW infants.

Methods

ELBW infants were nourished using a “conservative” (2005–6; n = 77) or “aggressive” (2007–9; n = 85) nutritional regimen that differed in the composition of PN after birth as well as the composition and timing of advancement of EFs. We analyzed the incidence of PNAC (conjugated bilirubin > 1.5 mg/dl (25 µmol/l)) corrected for confounders of cholestasis (i.e., NEC and/or gastrointestinal surgery, sepsis, birth weight, Z-score of birth weight, time on PN and male sex), growth until discharge (as the most important secondary outcome) and neonatal morbidities.

Results

The incidence of PNAC was significantly lower during the period of “aggressive” vs. “conservative “nutrition (27% vs. 46%, P < 0.05; adjusted OR 0.275 [0.116–0.651], P < 0.01). Body weight (+411g), head circumference (+1 cm) and length (+1 cm) at discharge were significantly higher. Extra-uterine growth failure (defined as a Z-score difference from birth to discharge lower than −1) was significantly reduced for body weight (85% vs. 35%), head circumference (77% vs. 45%) and length (85% vs. 65%) (P < 0.05). The body mass index (BMI) at discharge was significantly higher (11.1 vs. 12.4) using “aggressive” nutrition and growth became more proportionate with significantly less infants being discharged below the 10th BMI percentile (44% vs. 9%), while the percentage of infants discharged over the 90th BMI percentile (3% vs. 5%) did not significantly increase.

Discussion

“Aggressive” nutrition of ELBW infants was associated with a significant decrease of PNAC and marked improvement of postnatal growth.

Risk factor analysis of parenteral nutrition-associated cholestasis in extremely low birth weight infants

AIM

Parenteral nutrition (PN) provides an alternative nutrition source for preterm infants who are intolerant of enteral nutrition. However, prolonged PN increases the risk of PN-associated cholestasis (PNAC). We conducted this study to determine the incidence and risk factors of PNAC in extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of ELBW infants from March 2010 to April 2015. PNAC was diagnosed in infants with a history of PN for at least two weeks and direct bilirubin concentrations >2 mg/dL after other causes of neonatal cholestasis were excluded.

RESULTS

Of the 114 eligible ELBW infants, 41 (36%) were diagnosed with PNAC. The multivariate analysis showed that birth weight, sepsis, necrotising enterocolitis, fluconazole prophylaxis and the duration of PN and hospitalisation were independent risk factors for the development of PNAC (p < 0.05). However, parenteral fish oil-based lipid preparation (FOLP) did not reduce the risk of PNAC. Although PNAC was not a direct cause of death, it was associated with an increased risk of mortality.

CONCLUSION

PNAC was common in ELBW infants, was associated with various clinical factors and increased the risk of mortality. However, we did not observe the protective effect of FOLP against PNAC.

Cholestasis in Preterm Infants

Cholestasis in preterm infants has a multifactorial etiology. Risk factors include degree of prematurity, lack of enteral feeding, intestinal injury, prolonged use of parenteral nutrition (PN), and sepsis. Soy-based parenteral lipid emulsions have been implicated in the pathophysiology of PN-associated liver injury. Inflammation plays an important role. Medical therapies are used; however, their effects have not consistently proven effective. Evaluation of cholestasis involves laboratory work; direct bilirubin levels are used for diagnosis and trending. Adverse outcomes include risk for hepatobiliary dysfunction, irreversible liver failure, and death. Early enteral feedings as tolerated is the best way to prevent and manage cholestasis.

Efficacy and safety of fluconazole prophylaxis in extremely low birth weight infants: multicenter pre-post cohort study

Background

There have been many studies supporting fluconazole prophylaxis in preterm infants for prevention of invasive fungal infections (IFIs). However, the routine use of fluconazole prophylaxis in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) raises concerns with respect to resistance development, including the selection of resistant Candida species. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fluconazole prophylaxis in extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants.

Methods

An interventional pre-post cohort study at two tertiary NICUs was conducted. Data from two 5-year periods with and without fluconazole prophylaxis (Mar 2008–Feb 2013 and Mar 2003–Feb 2008) was compared. Prophylactic fluconazole was administered starting on the 3rd day at a dose of 3 mg/kg twice a week for 4 weeks during the prophylaxis period.

Results

The fluconazole prophylaxis group consisted of 264 infants, and the non-prophylaxis group consisted of 159 infants. IFI occurred in a total of 19 neonates (4.7 %) during the 10-year study period. Fluconazole prophylaxis lower the fungal colonization rate significantly (59.1 % vs. 33.9 %, P <0.001). However, the incidence of IFIs in ELBW infants was not reduced after fluconazole prophylaxis (4.4 % vs. 5.5 %, P = 0.80). Rather, although the increase did not reach statistical significance, fluconazole prophylaxis tended to increase the incidence of invasive infections involving fluconazole-resistant C. parapsilosis (0 % vs. 41.7 %, P = 0.11).

Conclusions

Fluconazole prophylaxis was not efficacious in decreasing IFIs in ELBW infants. There is a need for targeting prophylaxis to greatest risk population and prospective studies to measure the long-term effect of fluconazole prophylaxis on the emergence of organisms with antifungal resistance.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12887-016-0605-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Cost Analysis of Fluconazole Prophylaxis for Prevention of Neonatal Invasive Candidiasis

BACKGROUND

Fluconazole prophylaxis (FP) in premature infants is well studied and has been shown to decrease invasive candidiasis (ICs). IC in neonates has significant financial costs; determining the cost-benefit of FP may provide additional justification for targeting high-risk neonates. We aimed to determine the IC rate in premature infants at which FP is cost-beneficial.

METHODS

A decision tree cost-analysis model using cost of FP related to costs associated with IC was used. We searched PubMed for all papers that used intravenous FP and reported rates of IC in very low birth weight neonates. Average IC rates in those who received FP (2.0%; range, 0-6.1%) and in those who did not receive FP (9.2%; range, 0-20.5%) were used. Incremental hospital costs because of IC and for FP were retrieved from the literature. Sensitivity analysis was performed to determine the incremental cost of FP across the range of published IC rates.

RESULTS

The average cost per patient attributed to IC in patients receiving FP was $785 versus $2617 in those not receiving FP. Sensitivity analysis demonstrates the rate of IC would need to be <2.8% for FP to lose its cost-benefit. In Monte Carlo simulation, targeting infants <1000 g would lead to $50,304,333 in cost savings per year in the United States.

CONCLUSIONS

FP provides a cost-advantage across most IC rates seen in the youngest premature infants. Using a rate of 2.8% for their individual high-risk neonatal intensive care unit patients, providers can determine if FP is cost-beneficial in determining for whom to provide IC prophylaxis.

Parenteral Nutrition-Associated Cholestasis in Very Low Birth Weight Infants: A Single Center Experience

PURPOSE

Parenteral nutrition (PN)-associated cholestasis (PNAC) is one of the most common complications in very low birth weight infants (VLBWIs). The aim of this study is to evaluate the risk factors of PNAC in VBLWIs.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 322 VLBWIs admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit of our hospital from July 1, 2009 to December 31, 2013. We excluded 72 dead infants; 6 infants were transferred to another hospital, and 57 infants were transferred to our hospital at 2 weeks after birth. The infants were divided into the cholestasis and the non-cholestasis groups. PNAC was defined as a direct bilirubin level of ≥2.0 mg/dL in infants administered with PN for ≥2 weeks.

RESULTS

A total of 187 VLBWI were enrolled in this study; of these, 46 infants developed PNAC. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the risk factors of PNAC in VLBWI were longer duration of antimicrobial use (odds ratio [OR] 4.49, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 4.42-4.58), longer duration of PN (OR 2.68, 95% CI 2.41-3.00), long-term lack of enteral nutrition (OR 2.89, 95% CI 2.43-3.37), occurrence of necrotizing enterocolitis (OR 2.40, 95% CI 2.16-2.83), and gastrointestinal operation (OR 2.19, 95% CI 2.03-2.58).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that shorter PN, aggressive enteral nutrition, and appropriate antimicrobial use are important strategies in preventing PNAC.

Prophylactic systemic antifungal agents to prevent mortality and morbidity in very low birth weight infants

BACKGROUND

Invasive fungal infection is an important cause of mortality and morbidity in very preterm and very low birth weight infants. Early diagnosis is difficult and treatment is often delayed. Systemically absorbed antifungal agents (usually azoles) are increasingly used as prophylaxis against invasive fungal infection in this population.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of prophylactic systemic antifungal therapy on mortality and morbidity in very preterm or very low birth weight infants.

SEARCH METHODS

We used the standard search strategy of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group. This included searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2015, Issue 8), MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL (to May 2015), conference proceedings, and previous reviews.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials or quasi-randomised controlled trials that compared the effect of prophylactic systemic antifungal therapy versus placebo or no drug or another antifungal agent or dose regimen in very low birth weight infants.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We extracted data using the standard methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group, with separate evaluation of trial quality and data extraction by two review authors.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 15 eligible trials enrolling a total of 1690 infants. Ten trials (1371 infants) compared systemic antifungal prophylaxis versus placebo or no drug. These trials were generally of good methodological quality. Meta-analysis found a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of invasive fungal infection (typical risk ratio (RR) 0.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31 to 0.59; risk difference (RD) -0.09, 95% CI -0.12 to -0.06). The average incidence of invasive fungal infection in the control groups of the trials (16%) was much higher than that generally reported from large cohort studies. Meta-analysis did not find a statistically significant difference in the risk of death prior to hospital discharge (typical RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.02; typical RD -0.04, 95% CI -0.07 to 0.00). Very limited data on long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes were available. Three trials that compared systemic versus oral or topical non-absorbed antifungal prophylaxis did not detect any statistically significant effects on invasive fungal infection or mortality. Two trials that compared different dose regimens of prophylactic intravenous fluconazole did not detect any significant differences in infection rates or mortality.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic systemic antifungal therapy reduces the incidence of invasive fungal infection in very preterm or very low birth weight infants. This finding should be interpreted and applied cautiously since the incidence of invasive fungal infection was very high in the control groups of many of the included trials. Meta-analysis does not demonstrate a statistically significant effect on mortality. There are currently only limited data on the long-term neurodevelopmental consequences for infants exposed to this intervention. In addition, there is a need for further data on the effect of the intervention on the emergence of organisms with antifungal resistance.

Advances in the treatment of invasive neonatal candidiasis

INTRODUCTION

Invasive candidiasis is responsible for ∼ 10% of nosocomial sepsis in very-low-birth-weight infants and is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Over the last two decades, the antifungal armamentarium against Candida spp. has increased; however, efficacy and safety studies in this population are lacking.

AREAS COVERED

We reviewed the medical literature and extracted information on clinical and observational studies evaluating the use of antifungal agents in neonates with invasive candidiasis.

EXPERT OPINION

Efficacy and safety data for antifungals in neonates are lacking, and the majority of studies conducted to date have concentrated on pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic evaluations. Unlike other anti-infective agents, efficacy data in the setting of neonatal candidiasis cannot be extrapolated from adult studies due to differences in the pathophysiology of the disease in this population relative to older children and adults. Data for amphotericin B deoxycholate, fluconazole, and micafungin suggest that these are the current agents of choice for this disease in neonates until data for newer antifungal agents become available. For prophylaxis, data from fluconazole randomized controlled trials will be submitted to the regulatory agencies for labeling. Ultimately, the field of therapeutics for neonatal candidiasis will require multidisciplinary collaboration given the numerous challenges associated with conducting clinical trials in neonates.

Recommendations for the management of candidemia in neonates in Latin America. Latin America Invasive Mycosis Network

Candidemia is one of the most frequent opportunistic mycoses worldwide. Limited epidemiological studies in Latin America indicate that incidence rates are higher in this region than in the Northern Hemisphere. Diagnosis is often made late in the infection, affecting the initiation of antifungal therapy. A more scientific approach, based on specific parameters, for diagnosis and management of candidemia in Latin America is warranted. 'Recommendations for the diagnosis and management of candidemia' are a series of manuscripts that have been developed by members of the Latin America Invasive Mycosis Network. They aim to provide a set of best-evidence recommendations for the diagnosis and management of candidemia. This publication, 'Recommendations for the management of candidemia in neonates in Latin America', was written to provide guidance to healthcare professionals on the management of neonates who have, or who are at risk of, candidemia. Computerized searches of existing literature were performed by PubMed. The data were extensively reviewed and analyzed by members of the group. The group also met on two occasions to pose questions, discuss conflicting views, and deliberate on a series of management recommendations. 'Recommendations for the management of candidemia in neonates in Latin America' includes prophylaxis, empirical therapy, therapy for proven candidemia, patient work-up following diagnosis of candidemia, central venous catheter management, and management of complications. This manuscript is the fourth of this series that deals with diagnosis and treatment of invasive candidiasis. Other publications in this series include: 'Recommendations for the diagnosis of candidemia in Latin America', 'Recommendations for the management of candidemia in adults in Latin America', and 'Recommendations for the management of candidemia in children in Latin America'.

[Recommendations for the management of candidemia in neonates in Latin America. Grupo Proyecto Épico]

Candidemia is one of the most frequent opportunistic mycoses worldwide. Limited epidemiological studies in Latin America indicate that incidence rates are higher in this region than in the Northern Hemisphere. Diagnosis is often made late in the infection, affecting the initiation of antifungal therapy. A more scientific approach, based on specific parameters, for diagnosis and management of candidemia in Latin America is warranted. 'Recommendations for the diagnosis and management of candidemia' are a series of manuscripts that have been developed by members of the Latin America Invasive Mycosis Network. They aim to provide a set of best-evidence recommendations for the diagnosis and management of candidemia. This publication, 'Recommendations for the management of candidemia in neonates in Latin America', was written to provide guidance to healthcare professionals on the management of neonates who have, or who are at risk of, candidemia. Computerized searches of existing literature were performed by PubMed. The data were extensively reviewed and analyzed by members of the group. The group also met on two occasions to pose questions, discuss conflicting views, and deliberate on a series of management recommendations. 'Recommendations for the management of candidemia in neonates in Latin America' includes prophylaxis, empirical therapy, therapy for proven candidemia, patient work-up following diagnosis of candidemia, central venous catheter management, and management of complications. This manuscript is the fourth of this series that deals with diagnosis and treatment of invasive candidiasis. Other publications in this series include: 'Recommendations for the diagnosis of candidemia in Latin America', 'Recommendations for the management of candidemia in adults in Latin America', and 'Recommendations for the management of candidemia in children in Latin America'.

Safety of fluconazole in paediatrics: a systematic review

PURPOSE

To determine the safety of fluconazole in neonates and other paediatric age groups by identifying adverse events (AEs) and drug interactions associated with treatment.

METHODS

A search of EMBASE (1950-January 2012), MEDLINE (1946-January 2012), the Cochrane database for systematic reviews and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (1982-2012) for any clinical study about fluconazole use that involved at least one paediatric patient (≤17 years) was performed. Only articles with sufficient quality of safety reporting after patients' exposure to fluconazole were included.

RESULTS

We identified 90 articles, reporting on 4,209 patients, which met our inclusion criteria. In total, 794 AEs from 35 studies were recorded, with hepatotoxicity accounting for 378 (47.6 %) of all AEs. When fluconazole was compared with placebo and other antifungals, the relative risk (RR) of hepatotoxicity was not statistically different [RR 1.36, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.87-2.14, P = 0.175 and RR 1.43, 95 % CI 0.67-3.03, P = 0.352, respectively]. Complete resolution of hepatoxicity was achieved by 84 % of patients with follow-up available. There was no statistical difference in the risk of gastrointestinal events of fluconazole compared with placebo and other antifungals (RR 0.81, 95 % CI 0.12-5.60, P = 0.831 and RR 1.23, 95 %CI 0.87-1.71, P = 0.235, respectively). There were 41 drug withdrawals, 17 (42 %) of which were due to elevated liver enzymes. Five reports of drug interactions occurred in children.

CONCLUSION

Fluconazole is relatively safe for paediatric patients. Hepatotoxicity and gastrointestinal toxicity are the most common adverse events. It is important to be aware that drug interactions with fluconazole can result in significant toxicity.

Prophylactic systemic antifungal agents to prevent mortality and morbidity in very low birth weight infants

BACKGROUND

Invasive fungal infection is an important cause of mortality and morbidity in very low birth weight infants. Early diagnosis is difficult and treatment is often delayed. Systemic antifungal agents (usually azoles) are increasingly used as prophylaxis against invasive fungal infection.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of prophylactic systemic antifungal therapy on mortality and morbidity in very low birth weight infants.

SEARCH METHODS

We used the standard search strategy of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group. This included searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 3), MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL (to August 2012), conference proceedings, and previous reviews.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials or quasi-randomised controlled trials that compared the effect of prophylactic systemic antifungal therapy versus placebo or no drug or another antifungal agent or dose regimen in very low birth weight infants.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We extracted data using the standard methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group, with separate evaluation of trial quality and data extraction by two review authors.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 11 eligible trials enrolling a total of 1136 infants. Seven trials (involving 880 infants) compared systemic antifungal prophylaxis versus placebo or no drug. These trials were generally small but of good methodological quality. Meta-analysis found a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of invasive fungal infection in infants who received systemic antifungal prophylaxis (typical risk ratio (RR) 0.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.27 to 0.61; risk difference (RD) -0.09, 95% CI -0.14 to -0.05). The average incidence of invasive fungal infection in the control groups of the trials (16%) was much higher than that generally reported from large cohort studies (< 5%). Meta-analysis did not find a statistically significant difference in the risk of death prior to hospital discharge (typical RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.05; RD -0.04, 95% CI -0.08 to 0.01). Very limited data on long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes were available. Two trials that compared systemic versus oral or topical non-absorbed antifungal prophylaxis did not detect any statistically significant effects on invasive fungal infection or mortality. Two trials that compared different dose regimens of prophylactic intravenous fluconazole did not detect any significant differences in infection rates or mortality.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic systemic antifungal therapy reduces the incidence of invasive fungal infection in very low birth weight infants. This finding should be interpreted and applied cautiously since the incidence of invasive fungal infection was very high in the control groups of most of the included trials. Meta-analysis does not demonstrate a statistically significant effect on mortality. There are currently only limited data on the long-term neurodevelopmental consequences for infants exposed to this intervention. In addition, there is a need for further data on the effect of the intervention on the emergence of organisms with antifungal resistance.

Fluconazole pharmacokinetics and safety in premature infants

Invasive candidiasis (IC) in the premature infant population is a common infection that results in substantial morbidity and mortality. For these patients, fluconazole is among the first line therapies to treat and prevent IC, and yet few prospective studies investigating its pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety have been performed in this vulnerable population. We review five phase I studies examining the PK of fluconazole in premature infants, which demonstrate markedly differing kinetics compared to adults. Based on these data, a treatment dose of 12 mg/kg/day, with the potential need of a loading dose of 25 mg/kg to achieve rapid steady state concentrations, achieves surrogate pharmacodynamic targets. Additionally, fluconazole appears to be safe to use in this population, with only minimal reversible hepatobiliary effects.

Treatment and prophylaxis of invasive candidiasis

Invasive candidiasis (IC) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in preterm infants. Even if successfully treated, IC can cause significant neurodevelopmental impairment. Preterm infants are at increased risk for hematogenous Candida meningoencephalitis owing to increased permeability of the blood-brain barrier, so antifungal treatment should have adequate central nervous system penetration. Amphotericin B deoxycholate, lipid preparations of amphotericin B, fluconazole, and micafungin are first-line treatments of IC. Fluconazole prophylaxis reduces the incidence of IC in extremely premature infants, but its safety has not been established for this indication, and as yet, the product has not been shown to reduce mortality in neonates. Targeted prophylaxis may have a role in reducing the burden of disease in this vulnerable population.

A review of Candida prophylaxis in the neonatal intensive care population

OBJECTIVE

To review the efficacy and safety of antifungal prophylaxis in the neonatal intensive care setting.

DATA SOURCES

English-language literature was accessed using MEDLINE (January 1988- December 2010). The following Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) search terms were used: "amphotericin B," "fluconazole," "nystatin," "itraconazole," "caspofungin," "voriconazole," "Candida," "prevention and control," and "critically ill." Literature was further limited to studies focusing on patient birth to 6 months of age. Abstracts and original research articles were included. Preference was given to published controlled trials. Articles providing descriptions of the safety and effectiveness of antifungal prophylaxis in neonatal intensive care patients were also used in this review.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies have evaluated the impact of antifungal prophylaxis on Candida colonization or invasive infections in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). The two antifungal agents most commonly studied were nystatin and fluconazole. All of the nystatin studies demonstrated that nystatin is effective at reducing fungal colonization and invasive fungal infections. All of the studies designed to evaluate the impact of fluconazole prophylaxis on fungal colonization demonstrated a reduction in the incidence of fungal colonization with fluconazole prophylaxis. A total of 12 of 16 studies that evaluated the impact of fluconazole prophylaxis on the incidence of invasive fungal infections demonstrated a reduction in invasive fungal infections with fluconazole prophylaxis. Two studies found no difference between fluconazole and nystatin when used for prophylaxis.

CONCLUSION

Antifungal prophylaxis appears to be effective in reducing the incidence of Candida colonization and invasive Candida infections in the NICU. Antifungal prophylaxis also appears to be safe in the NICU population. The impact of antifungal prophylaxis on resistance patterns could be significant and needs to be evaluated long term before widespread prophylaxis can be recommended.

Randomized controlled trial of early parenteral nutrition cycling to prevent cholestasis in very low birth weight infants

OBJECTIVES

To compare the incidence of cholestasis in very low birth weight infants receiving cycled versus continuous parenteral nutrition, and to determine factors that predispose to parenteral nutrition-associated cholestasis (PNAC).

STUDY DESIGN

Preterm infants weighing ≤ 1250 g (n = 70) at birth were randomly assigned within the first 5 postnatal days to either cycle (n = 34) or continuous (n = 36) parenteral nutrition. Liver function tests were obtained at baseline, and sequentially thereafter. Cholestasis was defined as direct bilirubin >2 mg/dL. Infants with major congenital anomalies, congenital hepatic disease, clinically apparent congenital viral infection, and those who required major abdominal surgery were excluded.

RESULTS

The incidence of PNAC was similar in the 2 groups (cycle 32% vs continuous 31%; P = 1.0). Bilirubin and transaminases were similar in both groups by repeated measures of ANOVA. Gestational age, birth weight, and Apgar scores were significantly lower, and Clinical Risk Index for Babies II scores were significantly higher in infants who developed PNAC. Using backward selection logistic regression, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, duration of parenteral nutrition, and days to full enteral nutrition emerged as factors independently associated with PNAC.

CONCLUSIONS

Early prophylactic parenteral nutrition cycling in very low birth weight infants in this study did not reduce cholestasis. Time to full feedings is a significant predictor for PNAC in very low birth weight infants. Preterm infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia are more likely to have PNAC as a comorbidity. The Clinical Risk Index for Babies II score may help identify those preterm infants who might benefit from future prospective prevention trials.

Trends in Candida central line-associated bloodstream infections among NICUs, 1999-2009

OBJECTIVES

To assess trends in incidence of Candida spp. central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) in US NICUs, 1999-2009.

METHODS

Data from NICUs participating in the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (1999-2004) and National Healthcare Safety Network (2006-2009) were analyzed. Overall and birth weight-specific incidence rates of Candida spp. CLABSIs per 1000 central line-days were calculated. Trends in incidence were assessed by using Poisson regression, and trends in proportion of CLABSIs identified as Candida albicans were assessed by using weighted-linear regression.

RESULTS

Overall, 398 NICUs reported 1407 Candida spp. CLABSIs (706 due to C albicans) among 1400 neonates. Of the 1400 neonates, 963 (69%) were ≤ 1000 g at the time of birth, and 182 (13%) died. From 1999 to 2009, the overall incidence decreased significantly for CLABSIs due to Candida spp. (0.92 vs 0.2), C albicans (0.53 vs 0.09), and non-albicans Candida spp. (0.39 vs 0.1). Birth weight-specific incidence significantly decreased across all birth weight categories for C albicans. For CLABSIs due to non-albicans Candida spp., significant decreases were detected among all birth weight categories, except among neonates 1501 to 2500 g. The proportion of Candida spp. CLABSIs due to C albicans did not significantly change over time, remaining at ~50%.

CONCLUSIONS

Incidence of Candida spp. CLABSIs decreased substantially among NICU patients, regardless of birth weight. Decreases in incidence across all birth weight categories, and not only among neonates ≤ 1000 g in whom antifungal prophylaxis may be more common, suggest that multiple factors contributed to the declining incidence.

"Getting to Zero": preventing invasive Candida infections and eliminating infection-related mortality and morbidity in extremely preterm infants

Prevention of invasive Candida infections (ICI) is an achievable goal for every NICU and supported by A-1 evidence. Due to the incidence of ICI, high infection-associated mortality and neurodevelopmental impairment, antifungal prophylaxis should be targeted to infants <1000 g or ≤ 27 weeks gestation. There is A-1 evidence for both fluconazole and nystatin prophylaxis for the prevention of ICI. Evidence currently would favour fluconazole prophylaxis in high-risk preterm infants since intravenous fluconazole prophylaxis has greater efficacy compared to enteral nystatin prophylaxis, efficacy in the most immature patients in whom mortality is the highest, requires less dosing, and can be given to infants with gastrointestinal disease or haemodynamic instability. All NICUs caring for extremely preterm infants should use antifungal prophylaxis. Even in NICUs with low rates of ICI, antifungal prophylaxis is crucial to improving survival and neurodevelopmental outcomes for this vulnerable population. For infants 1000-1500 g if there is concern for ICI in the NICU, either drug could be chosen for prophylaxis. Fluconazole prophylaxis administered at 3 mg/kg twice a week, while intravenous access is required, appears to be the safest and most effective schedule in preventing ICI while attenuating the emergence of fungal resistance. Invasive Candida infections are one group of infections we can prevent.

Strategies for the prevention of neonatal candidiasis

Invasive fungal infections represent the third-leading cause of late-onset sepsis in very-low-birth-weight infants (VLBWI) and have a high rate of infection-associated mortality. The infants at high risk for fungal sepsis are VLBWI with presence of additional risk factors that contribute to increased colonization and concentration of fungal organisms. Colonization with Candida spp. in neonates is secondary to either maternal vertical transmission or nosocomial acquisition in the nursery. Multiple sites may become colonized and a direct correlation between fungal colonization and subsequent progression to invasive candidemia was determined. Randomized, single and multiple-center, placebo-controlled trials found intravenous fluconazole prophylaxis to be effective in decreasing fungal colonization and sepsis for at-risk preterm infants <1500 g birth weight. The prophylactic use of fluconazole was found to be safe with no significant development of fungal resistance. Fluconazole prophylaxis administered to preterm neonates with birth weight <1000 g and/or 27 weeks' gestation or less has the potential of reducing and potentially eliminating invasive fungal infections and Candida-related mortality.

European survey on the use of prophylactic fluconazole in neonatal intensive care units

Neonatal fungal infections are associated with substantial mortality and morbidity. Although prophylactic use of several antifungals has been proposed, this practice remains controversial. In order to evaluate the use of fluconazole prophylaxis in European NICUs, we conducted a cross-sectional survey by means of a structured questionnaire that was sent to European level II and III neonatal intensive care units, over a 9-month period, as part of a neonatal research FP7 European project. A total of 193 questionnaires from 28 countries were analysed. Use of antifungal prophylaxis was reported by 55% of the responders, and the most frequently used antifungal agent was fluconazole (92%). Main indications for prophylaxis were low gestational age (<28 weeks) and birth weight (<1,000 g). A dose of 3 mg/kg was used in 66% of NICUs using fluconazole, with an administration interval of 72 h in 52% of them. All responders acknowledged the need for additional trials on the efficacy of prophylactic fluconazole. Non-users of fluconazole prophylaxis were more likely to be influenced by the local incidence of candidiasis, the risk of increasing antifungal resistance and the absence of specific recommendations by paediatric societies.

CONCLUSIONS

Major concerns about the use of fluconazole prophylaxis include its efficacy, the risk of emergence of resistant species and the absence of clear consensus to support routine use. Future studies that address these issues will contribute to a more rational use of fluconazole prophylaxis.

Twice-weekly fluconazole prophylaxis in premature infants: association with cholestasis

BACKGROUND

Fluconazole prophylaxis is effective in preventing invasive candidiasis in extremely low-birthweight (ELBW) infants. The authors previously reported an increased incidence of cholestasis with fluconazole prophylaxis in ELBW infants, which led to fluconazole prophylaxis being changed to a less frequent dosing (LFD) schedule of twice a week at their institution. The purpose of the present study was therefore to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of LFD fluconazole prophylaxis in preventing invasive candidiasis in ELBW infants.

METHODS

ELBW infants who received the LFD regimen of fluconazole (twice a week for up to 6 weeks) were compared with infants who received the frequent dosing (FD) schedule (every 72 h for first 2 weeks, every 48 h for next 2 weeks and every 24 h for the final 2 weeks). The two groups were compared for baseline demographics, risk factors for candidiasis, the rate of invasive fungal infection and the incidence and severity of cholestasis.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the incidence of invasive candidiasis in infants who received the LFD (2/104, 2%) compared to FD (0/140, 0%; P= 0.4) fluconazole prophylaxis. The severity of cholestasis was lower and a trend towards decreased incidence of cholestasis was observed on the LFD schedule.

CONCLUSION

The LFD regimen of fluconazole prophylaxis is effective in preventing invasive fungal infection in ELBW infants. The severity of cholestasis was decreased with the LFD schedule.

Fluconazole to prevent systemic fungal infections in infants: reviewing the evidence

IN NEONATOLOGY, EVIDENCE-BASED practice (EBP) relies on well-designed, adequately powered trials to guide practitioners. Several large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been conducted to explore the use of fluconazole for fungal prophylaxis in premature infants. Despite the findings of these studies, practice varies among units. In a recent survey of members of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), 34 percent of clinicians indicated that they have used antifungal prophylaxis and only 11 percent of clinicians indicated that a written protocol was in place in their NICU. Intravenous (IV) fluconazole (66 percent), oral nystatin (59 percent), and IV amphotericin (21 percent) were the three most commonly used agents among the respondents.1.

Strategies to prevent invasive candidal infection in extremely preterm infants

The highest incidence of invasive candidal infection (ICI) occurs in extremely preterm infants (<1000 g birth weight and <or=27 weeks' gestation). In this population, ICI has high mortality, leads to significant neurodevelopmental impairment, and results in increased length of hospital stay and costs. Randomized clinical trials in infants of less than 1000 g birth weight have demonstrated that ICI is decreased 88% by antifungal prophylaxis with fluconazole compared to 54% by nystatin prophylaxis from retrospective studies. Fluconazole is more efficacious than nystatin prophylaxis in infants weighing less than 1000 g, is less expense, requires less frequent dosing (twice weekly intravenous [IV] dosing), and can be given when infants are not feeding. While antifungal prophylaxis is inexpensive, cost-effective, and easy to administer, yet has not been instituted universally despite A-1 evidence from single and multicenter studies demonstrating efficacy and safety. Debate is ongoing over whether empiric therapy or improved infection control practices are superior to prophylaxis, whether prophylaxis should be instituted only in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) with a relatively high ICI rate, and whether fluconazole prophylaxis is safe or risks emergence of resistance. To date, azole resistance has not emerged with targeted treatment of high-risk infants for the duration of IV catheter use. Empiric therapy for suspected ICI and standardized therapy for candidemia, including central venous catheter removal, may decrease mortality; however, these approaches still risk neurodevelopmental impairment in ICI survivors. Infection control practices have not been subjected to prospective or randomized trials to demonstrate efficacy in reducing fungal infections. Evidence is presented in this article from clinical trials demonstrating efficacy and safety of antifungal prophylaxis in preventing ICI in preterm infants. The greatest impact of antifungal prophylaxis preventing ICI and decreasing Candida-related mortality and neurodevelopmental impairment would be achieved with a universal approach in all NICUs.

Challenging issues in neonatal candidiasis

In an era of quality improvement and 'getting to zero (infections and/or related mortality),' neonatal candidiasis is ripe for evidence-based initiatives. Knowledge of each institution's invasive Candida infection (ICI) incidence and infection-related mortality is critical to evaluate disease burden and effective interventions. Evidenced-based interventions include: antifungal prophylaxis, starting with appropriate dosing, and prompt removal of central venous catheters (CVC). There is A-I evidence supporting antifungal prophylaxis with fluconazole, and it should be considered in every neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). The literature supports targeting infants <1000 g and/or <or=27 weeks, because this group has high infection-related mortality and neurodevelopmental impairment in 57% of survivors. Antifungal prophylaxis has been shown to nearly eliminate infection-related mortality. Interventions start with prenatal initiatives, with women being treated for vaginal candidiasis, especially with preterm labor or complications. Targeting modifiable risk factors, including restriction policies for use of third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins, carbapenems, H2-antagonists, proton pump inhibitors, and postnatal steroids; guidelines for CVC care and removal; and feeding practices, with promotion of early feedings and breast milk, may also reduce risk. A few studies have emerged on empiric antifungal therapy with sepsis evaluations for preterm infants <1500 g and other high-risk patients that have shown favorable effects of eliminating mortality, but these have not been compared to appropriate antifungal therapy and central line removal. Further study of empiric therapy, prospective treatment studies with higher targeted dosing of amphotericin B preparations, fluconazole, and new antifungals with prompt CVC removal may contribute to a 100% survival rate for those infants >1000 g and >or=28 weeks not receiving antifungal prophylaxis. Evaluation of ICI incidence and mortality by gestational age and birth week should be followed in each NICU, to evaluate infection control and prevention.

Efficacy of fluconazole prophylaxis for prevention of invasive fungal infection in extremely low birth weight infants

BACKGROUND

Invasive fungal infections (IFI) are an important cause of late-onset disease in extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants. Despite prior trials of fluconazole prophylaxis in neonates, application of this regimen remains controversial. Review of our neonatal intensive care unit aggregate annual number of fungal isolates from sterile sites in ELBW infants from 1997 to 2006 suggested a significant decrease following the institution of routine prophylactic fluconazole in February 2002. We undertook a retrospective study to document the efficacy and adverse effects of routine fluconazole prophylaxis.

METHODS

ELBW infants admitted during 2000 to 2006 were divided into 2 groups: Control group-admitted before the institution of fluconazole prophylaxis, and Fluconazole group-admitted after institution of fluconazole prophylaxis. Primary outcome was the frequency of IFI. Secondary outcome was the frequency of cholestasis, which has been rarely reported with fluconazole use.

RESULTS

Data were extracted from 262 infant records: control 99, fluconazole 163. Baseline demographics and potentially confounding variables differed between the 2 groups with greater birth weight, greater gestational age, shorter durations of ventilation and central catheter use, and earlier start of feeding in the control group, reflecting healthier control infants. Frequency of IFI was 7.1% in the control group versus 1.8% in the fluconazole group, P = 0.045. Logistic regression revealed that fluconazole prophylaxis was independently associated with a lower risk of IFI. There was no difference in the frequency of cholestasis between the control and fluconazole groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic administration of fluconazole to all ELBW infants was associated with significantly decreased rates of IFI without associated adverse effects.

Fluconazole Prophylaxis in High-Risk Neonates

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the literature regarding the use of fluconazole prophylaxis in high-risk neonates.

DATA SOURCES

Literature was accessed through MEDLINE (February 2001-August 2009) using the search terms fluconazole and prophylaxis, with limits for age group (ie, birth-18 y). Reference citations from identified articles were also reviewed.

DATA SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

All prospective and retrospective studies in English identified from MEDLINE were evaluated.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Critically ill neonates possess a number of risk factors that predispose them to fungal colonization with Candida spp. In many cases, colonization may progress to invasive systemic infections despite efforts aimed at early diagnosis and treatment. Because of its success among immunocompromised patients, fluconazole prophylaxis has been suggested as a possible approach for reducing the rates of both colonization and invasive fungal infections among at-risk neonates. To date, 4 prospective randomized controlled trials and 8 retrospective cohort studies have examined fluconazole prophylaxis in neonates. Although fluconazole prophylaxis appears to reduce the rates of colonization and invasive fungal infections, no trial in this review was able to demonstrate a significant difference in long-term morbidity or mortality. Concerns also remain regarding the adverse effects associated with prolonged exposure to fluconazole therapy. Lack of standardized study designs and treatment regimens also limit widespread recommendation for the use of fluconazole prophylaxis in clinical practice.

CONCLUSIONS

While it may be beneficial for critically ill neonates with certain predisposing risk factors (eg, central venous access, sustained exposure to broad-spectrum antibiotics, or units with significantly high incidence of invasive fungal infections), existing research does not support the use of fluconazole prophylaxis based on birth weight or gestational age alone. Multifactor analysis evaluating the effect of fluconazole prophylaxis is necessary to establish which neonates would benefit from this practice.

Strategies to prevent bacterial and fungal infection in the neonatal intensive care unit

Hospital-acquired infections are one of the leading causes of preventable morbidity and mortality in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Device-related infections, such as catheter-associated blood stream infections (CABSIs) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), are the most common nosocomial infections. This review examines the pathogenesis of CABSIs and methods, widely accepted and novel, that can be used to help prevent them. Strategies to prevent fungal infections, which are often associated with the presence of a central venous catheter, are also reviewed. Finally, the dilemmas in the diagnosis and prevention of VAP in the NICU are discussed.

Therapeutic strategies for invasive fungal infections in neonatal and pediatric patients

Invasive Candida and Aspergillus infections are the most commonly encountered fungal infections. They appear to be life threatening in the setting of profound immunosuppression, whereas cases that are resistant to antifungal therapy are occasionally encountered. Novel antifungal triazole and echinocandin agents appear to exhibit good activity as first-line or salvage therapy, whereas the use of amphotericin B formulations is particularly valuable in neonates. Significant differences in toxicity have been demonstrated among various antifungal agents with in vitro activity from available comparative data on fungal infections in children: however, no clear difference in treatment efficacy has been demonstrated. However, very little data are available about neonates. Host factors and responsible fungal species most frequently guide the choice of therapy.

Fungal prophylaxis in very low birth weight neonates: nystatin, fluconazole or nothing?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To examine recent evidence on the efficacy of antifungal prophylaxis to prevent neonatal systemic fungal infection. The review also aims to examine other relevant data, including the incidence of fungal infection, adverse effects of antifungal therapy and avoidable risk factors.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is strong evidence that systemic fluconazole prophylaxis reduces the incidence of systemic fungal infections, with a trend towards reduction in mortality. However, the preprophylaxis incidence of fungal infection has been very high in the published studies. Fluconazole use is sometimes associated with cholestasis and there are theoretical concerns as well that prophylactic fluconazole will select for fluconazole-resistant organisms and nonalbicans Candida infections. There is reasonable evidence that oral nystatin is effective in preventing fungal infections and at the same time it is inexpensive and well tolerated. The reported incidence of systemic fungal infections is much lower in the UK than in the USA and Italy.

SUMMARY

Oral nystatin prophylaxis is inexpensive, effective and nontoxic and should be used routinely for babies of birth weight less than 1500 g. Systemic fluconazole, which is more toxic and may select for resistant fungi, is probably only indicated when the rate of fungal infection remains high despite introducing measures targeting known risk factors for fungal infection. These measures include introducing enteral feeds early, reducing the duration of parenteral feeding, and reducing the use of broad spectrum antibiotics, particularly cephalosporins. Future studies of prophylactic fluconazole should use oral nystatin, not placebo, as the comparator.

Candidemia neonatal, em hospital público do Mato Grosso do Sul

O objetivo de nosso estudo foi realizar tipagem molecular de 25 amostras clínicas de Candida spp, isoladas de crianças com candidemia, internadas na unidade de terapia intensiva neonatal de um Hospital Universitário entre 1998 a 2006. Dados demográficos e clínicos foram obtidos de prontuários para conhecimento dos aspectos clínicos e epidemiológicos. Identificação das leveduras foi feita por método convencional e a susceptibilidade antifúngica por método de microdiluição. O perfil genético foi determinado pela técnica de RAPD-PCR. Candida albicans (11; 44%) e Candida parapsilosis (10; 40%) foram as mais isoladas. Dezessete (68%) dos recém-nascidos tinham peso inferior a 1.500g. Prematuridade (92%), uso de cateter venoso central (100%), foram as condições de risco mais associados. Dezenove (76%) pacientes foram a óbito. Apenas uma cepa de Candida parapsilosis, mostrou ser sensível dose dependente ao fluconazol. Na análise molecular, foram observados 11 padrões genéticos distintos. Somente em dois casos foi observada relação epidemiológica, sugerindo mesma fonte de infecção.

Fluconazole prophylaxis: can we eliminate invasive Candida infections in the neonatal ICU?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Owing to the high mortality, risk of neurodevelopmental impairment and end-organ involvement with fungal infections in the neonate, prevention of invasive Candida infections in extremely preterm infants should be a priority for each neonatal ICU.

RECENT FINDINGS

Even with prompt or empiric treatment, mortality and neurodevelopmental impairment is high (57%) in infants <1000 g. Multiple studies have been performed with fluconazole prophylaxis, including a recent multicenter randomized controlled trial. All of the studies have demonstrated efficacy and safety with no increase or emergence of fungal resistance. Analysis of these studies demonstrates that fluconazole prophylaxis decreased the incidence of invasive Candida infections in high-risk infants <1000 g by 91% (P = 0.0004) and all infants <1500 g by 85% (P < 0.0001). The mortality rate from all causes was 25% lower (P = 0.029). Furthermore, studies have demonstrated that all Candida-related mortality can be eliminated in an entire neonatal ICU by targeting fluconazole prophylaxis in infants <1000 g.

SUMMARY

Targeting fluconazole prophylaxis to infants who are either <1000 g or < or =27 weeks is highly effective, safe and inexpensive, and can eliminate these infections as a cause of neurodevelopmental impairment and mortality.

Fluconazole prophylaxis for prevention of invasive fungal infections in targeted highest risk preterm infants limits drug exposure

OBJECTIVE

Previous reports suggest a benefit of fluconazole prophylaxis in extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants <1000 g. Our aim was to evaluate if limiting fluconazole prophylaxis to targeted highest risk infants effectively prevents invasive fungal infections, has no undesired side effects and limits unnecessary drug exposure.

STUDY DESIGN

This nonrandomized retrospective pre-post intervention study compared two groups of infants: (1) Infants <26 weeks gestation and/or <750 g birth weight, requiring central vascular access and admitted to the Monroe Carell Jr Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) prior to 5 days of age, who received fluconazole prophylaxis and (2) a matched control group from the year prior to prophylaxis. This target population was selected for fluconazole prophylaxis based on prior infection control data from our institution and a number needed to treat of <15 to prevent one episode of fungemia. Following implementation and integration through the institution's computerized physician order entry (CPOE) system, provider adherence to the protocol was assessed during the prophylaxis period.

RESULT

A total of 86 patients were included in the study, 44 in the no-prophylaxis group and 42 in the prophylaxis group. In the targeted prophylaxis group, no invasive fungal infections were observed as compared to nine infants with invasive infections in the no-prophylaxis group (P=0.004). No significant adverse effects were recorded. Targeting the highest risk infants reduced the number of infants <1000 g requiring prophylaxis from 80 to 42 (48% reduction) with no preventable infection missed. Provider compliance was 91% following implementation of this protocol through the CPOE system using a standardized order set.

CONCLUSION

Targeting the highest risk infants for fluconazole prophylaxis through CPOE can effectively prevent invasive fungal infections and limit drug exposure with no unwanted side effects.

Fluconazole prophylaxis in extremely low birth weight neonates reduces invasive candidiasis mortality rates without emergence of fluconazole-resistant Candida species

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the impact of fluconazole prophylaxis for extremely low birth weight infants on invasive candidiasis incidence, invasive candidiasis-related mortality rates, and fluconazole susceptibility of Candida isolates.

METHODS

Extremely low birth weight infants <5 days of age, except those with liver dysfunction, were eligible for fluconazole prophylaxis. NICU infants (all birth weights) with invasive candidiasis between April 2002 and March 2006 were compared with those with invasive candidiasis before fluconazole prophylaxis (2000-2001).

RESULTS

Twenty-two infants had invasive candidiasis (all candidemia) during fluconazole prophylaxis; before fluconazole prophylaxis, there were 19 cases (candidemia: 17 cases; meningitis: 2 cases). Invasive candidiasis incidence in NICU infants decreased from 0.6% (19 of 3012 infants) before fluconazole prophylaxis to 0.3% (22 of 6393 infants) in 2002-2006 and that in extremely low birth weight infants decreased 3.6-fold. No Candida-attributable deaths occurred during 2002-2006 fluconazole prophylaxis, compared with 4 (21%) before fluconazole prophylaxis. The onset of invasive candidiasis was later during 2002-2006 (23.5 vs 12 days), but risk factors were similar. The invasive candidiasis species distribution remained stable. Of 409 infants who received fluconazole prophylaxis, 119 (29%) received 42 days. Shorter fluconazole prophylaxis duration was related to intravenous access no longer being necessary in 242 cases (59%), noninvasive candidiasis-related death in 29 (7%), hospital transfer in 8 (2%), invasive candidiasis diagnosis in 8 (2%), and transient increase in serum transaminase levels in 4 (1%). One hundred twenty-seven infants (31%) who received fluconazole prophylaxis developed cholestasis during hospitalization, two thirds of whom had other predisposing conditions. On multivariate logistic regression necrotizing enterocolitis and increasing days of total parenteral nutrition, but not increasing number of doses on days of fluconazole, were significantly associated with the development of cholestasis.

CONCLUSION

During 4 years of fluconazole prophylaxis, the incidence of invasive candidiasis and invasive candidiasis-associated mortality rates in extremely low birth weight infants were reduced significantly, without the emergence of fluconazole-resistant Candida species.

Antifungal prophylaxis for the prevention of neonatal candidiasis?

BACKGROUND

Randomized controlled trials suggest that prophylactic administration of antifungal agents reduce the rate of colonization and invasive Candida infection in a subgroup of high-risk very low birth weight (VLBW) neonates. The extent of antifungal prophylaxis use in the United Kingdom and Ireland is unknown.

METHODS

A postal questionnaire was administered to neonatologists practicing in the United Kingdom and Ireland caring for VLBW infants. Information was requested on the prophylactic agents used, dosing schedules and duration of therapy. The rationale for reported practices was also ascertained.

RESULTS

The response rate was 55% (125/228). Antifungal prophylaxis use was reported by 66 (53%) respondents. First-line agents utilized included oral nystatin (53%) and intravenous fluconazole (41%). The most frequent indications for antifungal prophylaxis included antibiotic administration in 45 (68%) and decreased birth weight in 33 (50%) respondents. The majority of respondents who did not use antifungal prophylaxis felt that the perceived rate of invasive fungal disease within their unit was not high enough to justify its use.

CONCLUSIONS

A small majority of clinicians caring for VLBW neonates routinely use antifungal prophylaxis. This reflects the wide variation in the incidence of invasive disease, lack of guidelines supporting a role for prophylaxis and concerns related to emergence of resistant strains.