Glomerular binding of anti-dsDNA autoantibodies: the dispute resolved?

SLE: a cognitive step forward-a synthesis of rethinking theories, causality, and ignored DNA structures

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is classified by instinctual classification criteria. A valid proclamation is that these formally accepted SLE classification criteria legitimate the syndrome as being difficult to explain and therefore enigmatic. SLE involves scientific problems linked to etiological factors and criteria. Our insufficient understanding of the clinical condition uniformly denoted SLE depends on the still open question of whether SLE is, according to classification criteria, a well-defined one disease entity or represents a variety of overlapping indistinct syndromes. Without rational hypotheses, these problems harm clear definition(s) of the syndrome. Why SLE is not anchored in logic, consequent, downstream interdependent and interactive inflammatory networks may rely on ignored predictive causality principles. Authoritative classification criteria do not reflect consequent causality criteria and do not unify characterization principles such as diagnostic criteria. We need now to reconcile legendary scientific achievements to concretize the delimitation of what SLE really is. Not all classified SLE syndromes are "genuine SLE"; many are theoretically "SLE-like non-SLE" syndromes. In this study, progressive theories imply imperative challenges to reconsider the fundamental impact of "the causality principle". This may offer us logic classification and diagnostic criteria aimed at identifying concise SLE syndromes as research objects. Can a systems science approach solve this problem?

The greatest contribution to medical science is the transformation from studying symptoms to studying their causes-the unrelenting legacy of Robert Koch and Louis Pasteur-and a causality perspective to approach a definition of SLE

The basic initiative related to this study is derived from the fact that systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a unique and fertile system science subject. We are, however, still far from understanding its nature. It may be fair to indicate that we are spending more time and resources on studying the complexity of classified SLE than studying the validity of classification criteria. This study represents a theoretical analysis of current instinctual SLE classification criteria based on "the causality principle." The discussion has its basis on the radical scientific traditions introduced by Robert Koch and Louis Pasteur. They announced significant changes in our thinking of disease etiology through the implementation of the modern version of "the causality principle." They influenced all aspects of today's medical concepts and research: the transformation of medical science from studies of symptoms to study their causes, relevant for monosymptomatic diseases as for syndromes. Their studies focused on bacteria as causes of infectious diseases and on how the immune system adapts to control and prevent contagious spreading. This is the most significant paradigm shift in the modern history of medicine and resulted in radical changes in our view of the immune system. They described acquired post-infection immunity and active immunization by antigen-specific vaccines. The paradigm "transformation" has a great theoretical impact also on current studies of autoimmune diseases like SLE: symptoms and their cause(s). In this study, the evolution of SLE classification and diagnostic criteria is discussed from "the causality principle" perspective, and if contemporary SLE classification criteria are as useful as believed today for SLE research. This skepticism is based on the fact that classification criteria are not selected based on cogent causal strategies. The SLE classification criteria do not harmonize with Koch's and Pasteur's causality principle paradigms and not with Witebsky's Koch-derived postulates for autoimmune and infectious diseases. It is not established whether the classification criteria can separate SLE as a "one disease entity" from "SLE-like non-SLE disorders"-the latter in terms of SLE imitations. This is discussed here in terms of weight, rank, and impact of the classification criteria: Do they all originate from "one basic causal etiology"? Probably not.

SLE classification criteria: Is "The causality principle" integrated and operative - and do the molecular and genetical network, on which criteria depend on, support the definition of SLE as "a one disease entity" - A theoretical discussion

Molecular and cellular aspects of the autoimmune pathophysiology in SLE is linked to the "The causality principle". SLE Classification Criteria identify per definition disease measures (here: synonymous with classification criteria), but not diagnostic criteria within a classical framework. These two mostly theoretical criteria collections represent a salient conflict between phenomenology and the causality principle - between disease measures and molecular interactions that promote such measures, in other words their cause(s). Essentially, each criterion evolves from immunogenic and inflammatory signals - some are interconnected, some are not. Disparate signals instigated by disparate causes. These may promote clinically heterogenous SLE cohorts with respect to organ affection, autoimmunity, and disease course. There is today no concise measures or arguments that settle whether SLE cohorts evolve from one decisive etiological factor (homogenous cohorts), or if disparate patho-biological factors promote SLE (heterogenous cohorts). Current SLE cohorts are not ideal substrates to serve as study objects if the research aims are to describe etiology, and molecular interactions that cause - and link - primary and secondary pathophysiological events together - events that account for early and progressive SLE. We have to develop SLE criteria allowing us to identify definable categories of SLE in order to describe etiology, pathophysiology and diagnostic criteria of delimitated SLE versions. In this regard, the causality principle is central to define dominant etiologies of individual SLE categories, and subsequent and consequent down-stream diagnostic disease measures. In this sense, we may whether we like it or not identify different SLE categories like "genuine SLE" and "SLE-like non-SLE" syndromes. Many aspects of this problem are thoroughly discussed in this study.

Autoantibodies to dsDNA in the diagnosis, classification and follow-up of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Autoantibodies, in particular anti-dsDNA antibodies, are increasingly used for diagnosis, classification and follow-up of patients with SLE. Since standardization of autoantibody assays is a major challenge, more attention should be paid to harmonization initiatives and better definition of required test characteristics in classification criteria. For diagnosis and follow-up separate multi-center studies are required to establish test characteristics of distinct immuno-assays for both purposes. Finally, such studies should consider not to evaluate SLE as a single disease, but as a disease with distinct subtypes.

The Anti-DNA Antibodies: Their Specificities for Unique DNA Structures and Their Unresolved Clinical Impact-A System Criticism and a Hypothesis

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is diagnosed and classified by criteria, or by experience, intuition and traditions, and not by scientifically well-defined etiology(ies) or pathogenicity(ies). One central criterion and diagnostic factor is founded on theoretical and analytical approaches based on our imperfect definition of the term “The anti-dsDNA antibody”. “The anti-dsDNA antibody” holds an archaic position in SLE as a unique classification criterium and pathogenic factor. In a wider sense, antibodies to unique transcriptionally active or silent DNA structures and chromatin components may have individual and profound nephritogenic impact although not considered yet – not in theoretical nor in descriptive or experimental contexts. This hypothesis is contemplated here. In this analysis, our state-of-the-art conception of these antibodies is probed and found too deficient with respect to their origin, structural DNA specificities and clinical/pathogenic impact. Discoveries of DNA structures and functions started with Miescher’s Nuclein (1871), via Chargaff, Franklin, Watson and Crick, and continues today. The discoveries have left us with a DNA helix that presents distinct structures expressing unique operations of DNA. All structures are proven immunogenic! Unique autoimmune antibodies are described against e.g. ssDNA, elongated B DNA, bent B DNA, Z DNA, cruciform DNA, or individual components of chromatin. In light of the massive scientific interest in anti-DNA antibodies over decades, it is an unexpected observation that the spectrum of DNA structures has been known for decades without being implemented in clinical immunology. This leads consequently to a critical analysis of historical and contemporary evidence-based data and of ignored and one-dimensional contexts and hypotheses: i.e. “one antibody - one disease”. In this study radical viewpoints on the impact of DNA and chromatin immunity/autoimmunity are considered and discussed in context of the pathogenesis of lupus nephritis.

Autoimmunity and SLE: Factual and Semantic Evidence-Based Critical Analyses of Definitions, Etiology, and Pathogenesis

One cannot discuss anti-dsDNA antibodies and lupus nephritis without discussing the nature of Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). SLE is insistently described as a prototype autoimmune syndrome, with anti-dsDNA antibodies as a central biomarker and a pathogenic factor. The two entities, "SLE" and "The Anti-dsDNA Antibody," have been linked in previous and contemporary studies although serious criticism to this mutual linkage have been raised: Anti-dsDNA antibodies were first described in bacterial infections and not in SLE; later in SLE, viral and parasitic infections and in malignancies. An increasing number of studies on classification criteria for SLE have been published in the aftermath of the canonical 1982 American College of Rheumatology SLE classification sets of criteria. Considering these studies, it is surprising to observe a nearby complete absence of fundamental critical/theoretical discussions aimed to explain how and why the classification criteria are linked in context of etiology, pathogenicity, or biology. This study is an attempt to prioritize critical comments on the contemporary definition and classification of SLE and of anti-dsDNA antibodies in context of lupus nephritis. Epidemiology, etiology, pathogenesis, and measures of therapy efficacy are implemented as problems in the present discussion. In order to understand whether or not disparate clinical SLE phenotypes are useful to determine its basic biological processes accounting for the syndrome is problematic. A central problem is discussed on whether the clinical role of anti-dsDNA antibodies from principal reasons can be accepted as a biomarker for SLE without clarifying what we define as an anti-dsDNA antibody, and in which biologic contexts the antibodies appear. In sum, this study is an attempt to bring to the forum critical comments on the contemporary definition and classification of SLE, lupus nephritis and anti-dsDNA antibodies. Four concise hypotheses are suggested for future science at the end of this analytical study.

Utilization of Biomarkers in Lupus Nephritis

Lupus nephritis (LN) occurs in up to 60% of SLE patients, and is a leading cause of disability and death. Current treatment of LN consists of a combination of high dose corticosteroids that non-specifically decrease inflammation and cytotoxic medications that reduce auto-antibody production. That combination of therapy is associated with significant side effects while remission rates remain inadequate. Since the introduction of biologics into the pharmacological armamentarium, there has been hope for less toxic and more effective therapies for LN. Unfortunately, after multiple clinical trials, no biologic has improved efficacy over standard of care therapies for LN. This is likely, in part, due to disease heterogeneity. The utilization of biomarkers in LN may provide a way to stratify patients and guide therapeutic options. In this review, we summarize traditional and novel LN biomarkers and discuss how they may be used to diagnose, stratify, and guide therapy in patients with LN, bringing precision medicine to the forefront of LN therapy.

[Lupus nephritis]

Systemic lupus erythematosus is the most characteristic of auto-immune disorders that can lead to tissue damage in many organs, including kidney. Lupus nephritis occurs in 10 to 40% of lupus patients. Its clinical hallmark is the appearance of a proteinuria as soon as a 0.5 g/g or 0.5 g/d threshold, which calls for a renal histological evaluation in order to determine the lupus nephritis severity and the need for specific therapy. More than half of renal biopsies lead to the diagnosis of active lupus nephritis-class III or class IV A according to the ISN/RPS classification-that are the most severe in regards to renal prognosis and mortality. Their treatment aims to their clinical remission and to the prevention of relapse with minimal adverse effects for eventually the preservation of renal function, the prevention of other irreversible damage, and the reduction of risk of death. The remission is obtained through induction therapies of which the association of high dose steroids and cyclophosphamide is the most experienced. When this association must be challenged by the prevention of side-effect, in particular infertility, mycophenolate can be given instead of cyclophosphamide. Maintenance therapy, for the prevention of relapse, consists in mycophenolate or in azathioprine, mycophenolate being the most efficient however associated with a high risk of teratogenicity. Withdrawal of maintenance therapy is possible after two to three years in absence of high risk factors of relapse of lupus nephritis, however a reliable assessment of the risk of relapse is still lacking. Only pure membranous lupus nephritis (pure class V) associated with high level proteinuria requires specific therapies that usually associates steroids and an immunosuppressive drug. However, their choice hierarchy and even the use of less immunosuppressive strategies remain to be determined in terms of benefice over risk ratios. In spite of its trigger effect on lupus activity, pregnancy can be safe and successful if scheduled in the lowest risk periods with close multidisciplinary monitoring before, during and after. When necessary, renal replacement therapy does not require specific adaptation, renal transplantation is the best option when possible, as early as possible.

The dsDNA, Anti-dsDNA Antibody, and Lupus Nephritis: What We Agree on, What Must Be Done, and What the Best Strategy Forward Could Be

This study aims to understand what lupus nephritis is, its origin, clinical context, and its pathogenesis. Truly, we encounter many conceptual and immanent tribulations in our attempts to search for the pathogenesis of this disease—and how to explain its assumed link to SLE. Central in the present landscape stay a short history of the early studies that substantiated the structures of isolated or chromatin-assembled mammalian dsDNA, and its assumed, highly controversial role in induction of anti-dsDNA antibodies. Arguments discussed here may provoke the view that anti-dsDNA antibodies are not what we think they are, as they may be antibodies operational in quite different biological contexts, although they bind dsDNA by chance. This may not mean that these antibodies are not pathogenic but they do not inform how they are so. This theoretical study centers the content around the origin and impact of extra-cellular DNA, and if dsDNA has an effect on the adaptive immune system. The pathogenic potential of chromatin-anti-dsDNA antibody interactions is limited to incite lupus nephritis and dermatitis which may be linked in a common pathogenic process. These are major criteria in SLE classification systems but are not shared with other defined manifestations in SLE, which may mean that they are their own disease entities, and not integrated in SLE. Today, the models thought to explain lupus nephritis are divergent and inconsistent. We miss a comprehensive perspective to try the different models against each other. To do this, we need to take all elements of the syndrome SLE into account. This can only be achieved by concentrating on the interactions between autoimmunity, immunopathology, deviant cell death and necrotic chromatin in context of elements of system science. System science provides a framework where data generated by experts can be compared, and tested against each other. This approach open for consensus on central elements making up “lupus nephritis” to separate what we agree on and how to understand the basis for conflicting models. This has not been done yet in a systematic context.

Lupus-Associated Immune Complexes Activate Human Neutrophils in an FcγRIIA-Dependent but TLR-Independent Response

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease characterized by the presence of autoantibodies against nucleic acids and nucleoproteins. Anti-dsDNA Abs are considered a hallmark of SLE, and previous studies have indicated that nucleic acid-containing immune complexes (ICs) induce B cell and dendritic cell activation in a TLR-dependent process. How ICs containing nucleic acids affect neutrophil function has not been well investigated. In this study, we report that nucleic acid-containing ICs derived from the sera of SLE patients induce human and mouse neutrophil activation through TLR-independent mechanisms. Soluble ICs containing Sm/RNP, an RNA Ag, activate human neutrophils to produce reactive oxygen species (ROS) and IL-8. In contrast, ICs containing DNA have to be immobilized to efficiently activate neutrophils. We found that deleting TLR7 or TLR9, the receptors for RNA and DNA, had no effect on mouse neutrophil activation induced by RNA-containing and immobilized DNA-containing ICs. Binding of ICs are mediated through FcγRIIA and FcγRIIIB. However, neutrophil activation induced by RNA- and DNA-containing ICs requires FcγRIIA, as blocking FcγRIIA inhibited ROS release from neutrophils. RNA-containing ICs induce calcium flux, whereas TLR7/8 ligand R848 do not. Surprisingly, chloroquine inhibits calcium flux induced by RNA-containing ICs, suggesting that this lesser known function of chloroquine is involved in the neutrophil activation induced by ICs. These data indicate the SLE-derived ICs activate neutrophils to release ROS and chemokines in an FcγRIIA-dependent and TLR7- and TLR9-independent manner that likely contributes to local tissue inflammation and damage.

Precision medicine in lupus nephritis: can biomarkers get us there?

Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus frequently develop lupus nephritis (LN), a condition that can lead to end-stage kidney disease. Multiple serum and urine biomarkers for LN have been proposed in recent years, yet none have become incorporated into clinical use. The majority of studies have been single center with significant variability in cohorts, assays, and sample storage, leading to inconclusive results. It has become clear that no single biomarker is likely to be sufficient to diagnose LN, identify flares, and define the response to therapy and prognosis. A more likely scenario is a panel of urine, serum, tissue, and genetic biomarkers. In this review, we summarize traditional and novel biomarkers and discuss how they may be utilized in order to bring precision medicine to clinical practice in LN.

Anti-heparan sulfate antibody and functional loss of glomerular heparan sulfate proteoglycans in lupus nephritis

Background The purpose of this study was to evaluate the features of heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) as agrins of the glomerular basement membrane (GBM) and circulating anti-heparan sulfate (HS) antibodies in lupus nephritis, comparing titers among the following groups: lupus nephritis (LN), non-renal lupus, non-lupus nephritis, and healthy controls. Methods The stage of nephritis was determined based on the kidney biopsy. Alcian blue staining and immunohistochemical (IHC) staining for agrin were performed for histological evaluation of GBM HSPGs in normal glomeruli, non-lupus membranous glomerulonephritis (MGN), and lupus MGN. The results were used for measurement of the serum anti-HS antibody titers using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in the following groups: 38 healthy controls, 38 non-lupus nephritis, 37 non-renal lupus, and 38 LN. Results Glomerulus HSPGs were stained bluish-green along the GBM with Alcian blue. However, IHC staining against agrin was almost completely negative in the lupus MGN group compared with the normal and non-lupus MGN groups, which showed brown staining of GBM. A higher level of anti-HS IgG was detected in LN compared with other groups, respectively. Higher titers were associated with the presence of SLE and nephritis. A higher degree of proteinuria normalized to glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was observed in association with higher anti-HS antibody titers in LN. Conclusion This study demonstrated a functional loss of GBM HSPGs and higher levels of circulating anti-HS antibodies as a characteristic feature of lupus nephritis, suggesting their involvement in the pathogenesis of lupus nephritis and proteinuria.

Future Perspectives on Pathogenesis of Lupus Nephritis: Facts, Problems, and Potential Causal Therapy Modalities

Divergent incommensurable models have been developed to explain the pathogenesis of lupus nephritis. Most contemporary models favor a central role for anti-chromatin antibodies. How they exert their pathogenic effect has, however, endorsed conflicts that at least for now preclude insight into definitive pathogenic pathways. The following paradigms are contemporarily in conflict with each other: i) the impact of anti-double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) antibodies that cross-react with inherent renal antigens, ii) the impact of anti-dsDNA antibodies targeting exposed chromatin in glomeruli, and iii) the impact of relative antibody avidity for dsDNA, chromatin fragments, or cross-reacting antigens. Aside from these three themes, the pathogenic role of T cells in lupus nephritis is not clear. These different models should be tested through a collaboration between scientists belonging to the different paradigms. If it turns out that there are different pathogenic pathways in lupus nephritis, the emerging pathogenic mechanism(s) may be encountered with new individual causal therapy modalities. Today, therapy is still unspecific and far from interfering with the cause(s) of the disorder. This review attempts to describe what we know about processes that may cause lupus nephritis and how such basic processes may be affected if we can specifically interrupt them. Secondary inflammatory mechanisms, cytokine signatures, activation of complement, and other contributors to inflammation will not be discussed herein; rather, the events that trigger these factors will be discussed.

Murine and Human Lupus Nephritis: Pathogenic Mechanisms and Theoretical Strategies for Therapy

Lupus nephritis is one of the most serious manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus, and represents one of the criteria implemented to classify systemic lupus erythematosus. Although studied for decades, no consensus has been reached related to the basic cellular, molecular, and immunologic mechanism(s) responsible for lupus nephritis. No causal treatments have been developed; therapy is approached mainly with nonspecific immunosuppressive medications. More detailed insight into disease mechanisms therefore is indispensable to develop new therapeutic strategies. In this review, contemporary knowledge on the pathogenic mechanisms of lupus nephritis is discussed based on recent data in murine and human lupus nephritis. Specific focus is given to the effect of anti-double-stranded DNA/antinucleosome antibodies in the kidneys and whether they bind exposed chromatin fragments in glomeruli or whether they bind inherent glomerular structures by cross-recognition. Overall, the data presented here favor the exposed chromatin model because we did not find any indication to substantiate the anti-double-stranded DNA antibody cross-reacting model. At the end of this review we present data on why chromatin fragments are expressed in the glomeruli of patients with lupus nephritis, and discuss how this knowledge can be used to direct the development of future therapies.

The Role of Anti-DNA Antibodies in the Development of Lupus Nephritis: A Complementary, or Alternative, Viewpoint?

Kidney disease, or lupus nephritis, is the organ involvement that is most closely associated with specific autoantibodies in patients with SLE. The concept of anti-DNA antibodies being instrumental in the pathogenesis of lupus nephritis emerged ~50 years ago, and has been a topic of debate ever since. This article focuses on the description of the renal sub-cellular targets of nephritogenic autoantibodies and offers a counter-point opinion to the article by Pedersen et al. In addition, we provide an overview of some of the mechanisms by which anti-DNA antibodies bind to their renal targets and the pathogenic relevance to clinical nephritis.

Apoptotic Debris Accumulates on Hematopoietic Cells and Promotes Disease in Murine and Human Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Apoptotic debris, autoantibody, and IgG-immune complexes (ICs) have long been implicated in the inflammation associated with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE); however, it remains unclear whether they initiate immune-mediated events that promote disease. In this study, we show that PBMCs from SLE patients experiencing active disease, and hematopoietic cells from lupus-prone MRL/lpr and NZM2410 mice accumulate markedly elevated levels of surface-bound nuclear self-antigens. On dendritic cells (DCs) and macrophages (MFs), the self-antigens are part of IgG-ICs that promote FcγRI-mediated signal transduction. Accumulation of IgG-ICs is evident on ex vivo myeloid cells from MRL/lpr mice by 10 wk of age and steadily increases prior to lupus nephritis. IgG and FcγRI play a critical role in disease pathology. Passive transfer of pathogenic IgG into IgG-deficient MRL/lpr mice promotes the accumulation of IgG-ICs prior to significant B cell expansion, BAFF secretion, and lupus nephritis. In contrast, diminishing the burden IgG-ICs in MRL/lpr mice through deficiency in FcγRI markedly improves these lupus pathologies. Taken together, our findings reveal a previously unappreciated role for the cell surface accumulation of IgG-ICs in human and murine lupus.

TNFα Amplifies DNaseI Expression in Renal Tubular Cells while IL-1β Promotes Nuclear DNaseI Translocation in an Endonuclease-Inactive Form

We have demonstrated that the renal endonuclease DNaseI is up-regulated in mesangial nephritis while down-regulated during progression of the disease. To determine the basis for these reciprocal DNaseI expression profiles we analyse processes accounting for an early increase in renal DNaseI expression. Main hypotheses were that i. the mesangial inflammation and secreted pro-inflammatory cytokines directly increase DNaseI protein expression in tubular cells, ii. the anti-apoptotic protein tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated protein 1 (Trap 1) is down-regulated by increased expression of DNaseI due to transcriptional interference, and iii. pro-inflammatory cytokines promote nuclear translocation of a variant of DNaseI. The latter hypothesis emerges from the fact that anti-DNaseI antibodies stained tubular cell nuclei in murine and human lupus nephritis. The present study was performed on human tubular epithelial cells stimulated with pro-inflammatory cytokines. Expression of the DNaseI and Trap 1 genes was determined by qPCR, confocal microscopy, gel zymography, western blot and by immune electron microscopy. Results from in vitro cell culture experiments were analysed for biological relevance in kidneys from (NZBxNZW)F1 mice and human patients with lupus nephritis. Central data indicate that stimulating the tubular cells with TNFα promoted increased DNaseI and reduced Trap 1 expression, while TNFα and IL-1β stimulation induced nuclear translocation of the DNaseI. TNFα-stimulation resulted in 3 distinct effects; increased DNaseI and IL-1β gene expression, and nuclear translocation of DNaseI. IL-1β-stimulation solely induced nuclear DNaseI translocation. Tubular cells stimulated with TNFα and simultaneously transfected with IL-1β siRNA resulted in increased DNaseI expression but no nuclear translocation. This demonstrates that IL-1β promotes nuclear translocation of a cytoplasmic variant of DNaseI since translocation clearly was not dependent on DNaseI gene activation. Nuclear translocated DNaseI is shown to be enzymatically inactive, which may point at a new, yet unknown function of renal DNaseI.

The pathogenesis and diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus: still not resolved

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a systemic autoimmune disease with various clinical manifestations affecting different tissues. A characteristic feature of SLE is the presence of autoantibodies against double-stranded (ds)DNA, histones and nucleosomes, and other chromatin components. SLE is a prototype type III hypersensitivity reaction. Local deposition of anti-nuclear antibodies in complex with released chromatin induces serious inflammatory conditions by activation of the complement system. The severe renal manifestation, lupus nephritis, is classified based on histological findings in renal biopsies. Apoptotic debris, including chromatin, is present in the extracellular matrix and circulation of patients with SLE. This may be due to an aberrant process of apoptosis and/or insufficient clearance of apoptotic cells/chromatin. The non-cleared apoptotic debris may lead to activation of both the innate and adaptive immune systems. In addition, an aberrant presentation of peptides by antigen-presenting cells, disturbed selection processes for lymphocytes, and deregulated lymphocyte responses may be involved in the development of autoimmunity. In the present review, we briefly will summarize current knowledge on the pathogenesis of SLE. We will also critically discuss and challenge central issues that need to be addressed in order to fully understand the pathogenic mechanisms involved in the development of SLE and in order to have an improved diagnosis for SLE. Disappointingly, in our opinion, there are still more questions than answers for the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of SLE.

Elevated subclinical double-stranded DNA antibodies and future proliferative lupus nephritis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Elevated anti-double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) antibody and C-reactive protein are associated with proliferative lupus nephritis (PLN). Progression of quantitative anti-dsDNA antibody in patients with PLN has not been compared with that in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) without LN before diagnosis. The temporal relationship between anti-dsDNA antibody and C-reactive protein elevation has also not been evaluated.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

This case-control Department of Defense Serum Repository (established in 1985) study compared longitudinal prediagnostic quantitative anti-dsDNA antibody and C-reactive protein levels in 23 patients with biopsy-proven PLN (Walter Reed Army Medical Center, 1993-2009) with levels in 21 controls with SLE but without LN matched for patient age, sex, race, and age of serum sample. The oldest (median, 2601 days; 25%, 1245 days, 75%, 3075 days), the second to last (368; 212, 635 days), and the last (180; 135, 477 days) serum sample before diagnosis were analyzed.

RESULTS

More patients with PLN had an elevated anti-dsDNA antibody level than did the matched controls at any point (78% versus 5%; P<0.001), <1 year (82% versus 8%; P<0.001), 1-4 years (53% versus 0%; P<0.001), and >4 years (33% versus 0%; P=0.04) before diagnosis. A rate of increase >1 IU/ml per year (70% versus 0%; P<0.001) was most specific for PLN. The anti-dsDNA antibody levels increased before C-reactive protein did in most patients with an antecedent elevation (92% versus 8%; P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated anti-dsDNA antibody usually precedes both clinical and subclinical evidence of proliferative LN, which suggests direct pathogenicity. Absolute anti-dsDNA antibody level and rate of increase could better establish risk of future PLN in patients with SLE.

Nephritogenic-antinephritogenic antibody network in lupus glomerulonephritis

Lupus glomerulonephritis (LGN) is one of the most threatening manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and a major predictor of poor prognosis. The mechanisms leading to kidney inflammation are not completely clear; however, autoantibodies seem to play a pivotal role. Apoptosis dysregulation in SLE is likely to trigger generation of autoantibodies, the released nucleosomes being the driving autoantigen for further epitope amplification and selection of DNA or nucleosome-specific B cells. Growing evidence supports a multistep path to LGN involving initial autoantibody binding to chromatin fragments in the mesangial matrix, where they can induce mesangial inflammation leading to a shut-down of the renal DNase gene, generation and deposition of secondary necrotic chromatin on the glomerular basement membrane favouring antibody binding, complement activation and development of membrano-proliferative glomerular lesions. Anti-DNA IgG antibodies display the major pathogenetic potential in LGN initiation; however, other isotypes (IgA or IgE) as well as autoantibodies targeting other molecules (e.g. anti-C1q, anti-C reactive protein) can perpetuate renal injury. Conversely, protective autoantibodies are also likely in SLE which can contain renal damage targeting either DNA (i.e. IgM anti-DNA) or other molecules (e.g. pentraxin 3). Thus, lupus nephritogenic-antinephritogenic antibodies orchestrate the balance between harm and defence of renal tissue.

Anti-DNA autoantibodies initiate experimental lupus nephritis by binding directly to the glomerular basement membrane in mice

The strongest serological correlate for lupus nephritis is antibody to double-stranded DNA although the mechanism by which anti-DNA antibodies initiate lupus nephritis is unresolved. Most recent reports indicate that anti-DNA must bind chromatin in the glomerular basement membrane or mesangial matrix to form glomerular deposits. Here we determined whether direct binding of anti-DNA antibody to glomerular basement membrane is critical to initiate glomerular binding of anti-DNA in experimental lupus nephritis. Mice were co-injected with IgG monoclonal antibodies or hybridomas with similar specificity for DNA and chromatin but different IgG subclass and different relative affinity for basement membrane. Only anti-DNA antibodies that bound basement membrane bound to glomeruli, activated complement, and induced proteinuria whether injected alone or co-injected with a non-basement membrane-binding anti-DNA antibody. Basement membrane-binding anti-DNA antibodies co-localized with heparan sulfate proteoglycan in glomerular basement membrane and mesangial matrix but not with chromatin. Thus, direct binding of anti-DNA antibody to antigens in the glomerular basement membrane or mesangial matrix may be critical to initiate glomerular inflammation. This may accelerate and exacerbate glomerular immune complex formation in human and murine lupus nephritis.

Lupus nephritis: role of antinucleosome autoantibodies

The discovery of autoantigen clustering in blebs at the surface of apoptotic cells boosted research on the role of apoptosis in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and led to the discovery of autoantigen modification during apoptosis. Normally, apoptotic cells are cleared efficiently and swiftly. However, it became clear that in SLE insufficient removal of apoptotic material leads to the release of these modified autoantigens. This creates the danger that these modified autoantigens are recognized by the immune system. Indeed, dendritic cells, the professional antigen-presenting cells, phagocytose these modified autoantigens, which leads to maturation and induction of a proinflammatory state of these dendritic cells. As a consequence, they present these modified autoantigens to T cells in an immunogenic way, which become activated and stimulate autoreactive B cells to secrete autoantibodies. In this review the currently available evidence for the sequential steps in the pathogenesis of SLE is discussed. Furthermore, the mechanisms responsible for the nephritogenicity of antinucleosome antibodies are reviewed. This will reveal that nucleosomes are not only a major driving force in the formation of antinuclear antibodies, but also play a pivotal role in the development of tissue lesions by mediating binding of autoantibodies to basement membranes as exemplified for the kidney.

Heparin exerts a dual effect on murine lupus nephritis by enhancing enzymatic chromatin degradation and preventing chromatin binding in glomerular membranes

OBJECTIVE

Association of nucleosome-IgG immune complexes with glomerular basement membranes (GBMs) is an important event in the development of lupus nephritis. Preventing this binding and/or increasing nuclease sensitivity of nucleosomes may be viable strategies for the prevention of the disease. Theoretically, heparin may alter nucleosomal structure and increase sensitivity to proteinases and nucleases, and may also inhibit binding of nucleosomes and nucleosome-IgG complexes to basement membrane structures. The aim of this study was to investigate whether and eventually how heparin prevents murine lupus nephritis.

METHODS

Surface plasmon resonance was used to analyze if heparin inhibits binding of nucleosomes to laminin and collagen. The effect of heparin on nuclease- and proteinase-mediated degradation of nucleosomes was analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and agarose gel electrophoresis. In vitro results were compared with analyses in vivo in heparin-treated (NZB × NZW)F(1) mice. Anti-double-stranded DNA antibody production, deposition of nucleosome-IgG complexes in GBMs, and development of proteinuria were monitored, and circulating chromatin fragments were quantified using quantitative polymerase chain reaction.

RESULTS

In vitro studies demonstrated that heparin increased enzymatic degradation of nucleosomes and almost completely inhibited binding of nucleosomes to laminin and collagen. (NZB × NZW)F(1) mice treated with heparin demonstrated delayed or no antibody production and higher variation of circulating chromatin levels compared with untreated control mice. This effect was accompanied by highly reduced nucleosome-IgG complexes in GBMs and delayed development of nephritis.

CONCLUSION

Increasing the degradation of nucleosomes, reducing their immunogenicity, and preventing binding of nucleosome-IgG complexes in glomeruli together provide an alternative basis for the treatment of lupus nephritis.

Chromatin as a target antigen in human and murine lupus nephritis

The present review focuses on pathogenic molecular and transcriptional events in patients with lupus nephritis. These factors are renal DNaseI, exposed chromatin fragments and the corresponding chromatin-reactive autoantibodies. Lupus nephritis is the most serious complication in human systemic lupus erythematosus, and is characterised by deposition of chromatin fragment-IgG complexes in the mesangial matrix and glomerular basement membranes. The latter deposition defines end-stage disease. This event is stringently linked to a renal-restricted shutdown of expression of the DNaseI gene, as determined by loss of DNaseI mRNA level and DNaseI enzyme activity. The major aim of the present review is to generate new therapeutic strategies based on new insight into the disease pathogenesis.

In situ B cell-mediated immune responses and tubulointerstitial inflammation in human lupus nephritis

The most prevalent severe manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus is nephritis, which is characterized by immune complex deposition, inflammation, and scarring in glomeruli and the tubulointerstitium. Numerous studies indicated that glomerulonephritis results from a systemic break in B cell tolerance, resulting in the local deposition of immune complexes containing Abs reactive with ubiquitous self-Ags. However, the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus tubulointerstitial disease is not known. In this article, we demonstrate that in more than half of a cohort of 68 lupus nephritis biopsies, the tubulointerstitial infiltrate was organized into well-circumscribed T:B cell aggregates or germinal centers (GCs) containing follicular dendritic cells. Sampling of the in situ-expressed Ig repertoire revealed that both histological patterns were associated with intrarenal B cell clonal expansion and ongoing somatic hypermutation. However, in the GC histology, the proliferating cells were CD138(-)CD20(+) centroblasts, whereas they were CD138(+)CD20(low/-) plasmablasts in T:B aggregates. The presence of GCs or T:B aggregates was strongly associated with tubular basement membrane immune complexes. These data implicate tertiary lymphoid neogenesis in the pathogenesis of lupus tubulointerstitial inflammation.

Nuclease deficiencies promote end-stage lupus nephritis but not nephritogenic autoimmunity in (NZB × NZW) F1 mice

New information has profoundly improved our insight into the processes that account for lupus nephritis. This review summarizes the data proving that secondary necrotic chromatin fragments are generated and retained in kidneys at time-points when the major renal nuclease Dnase-1 is selectively and severely downregulated. Second, we discuss data, which may indicate that nuclease deficiencies are not associated with autoimmunity to chromatin. Secondary to downregulation of renal Dnase-1, large chromatin fragment-immunoglobulin G complexes are accumulated in glomerular basement membranes of patients producing anti-chromatin autoantibodies. Exposure of chromatin in situ in glomeruli is the factor that renders anti-chromatin (anti-dsDNA and anti-nucleosome) antibodies nephritogenic. Without exposed chromatin, they circulate as non-pathogenic antibodies. This shows that acquired loss of renal Dnase-1 enzyme activity is a dominant event responsible for the progression of lupus nephritis into end-stage disease. Before the loss of Dnase-1, lupus-prone (NZB × NZW) F1 mice develop mild or silent nephritis with mesangial immune complex deposits, which correlates solely with onset of anti-dsDNA antibody production. The principal cellular and molecular requirements needed to produce these autoantibodies have been explained experimentally, but the mechanism(s) accounting for them in vivo in context of lupus nephritis have not yet been determined. However, published data show that defects in nucleases operational in apoptotic or necrotic cell death are not associated with the induction of nephritogenic anti-dsDNA autoantibodies. The data discussed in this study explain how an unusual exposure of chromatin may be a central factor in the evolution of lupus nephritis in (NZB x NZW) F1 mice, but not in promoting nephritogenic chromatin-specific autoimmunity.

Identification of new pathogenic players in lupus: autoantibody-secreting cells are present in nephritic kidneys of (NZBxNZW)F1 mice

An important hallmark of systemic lupus erythematosus is the production of autoantibodies specific for nuclear Ags, among which nucleosomes and their constituents, DNA and histones. It is widely admitted that some of these autoantibodies contribute largely in lupus pathogenesis because of their nephritogenic potential. However, the underlying mechanisms are still debated. In this study, we analyzed the autoimmune response against histone H2B during the course of the disease in lupus-prone (NZBxNZW)F1 mice, both in lymphoid organs and kidneys, and we assessed its potential involvement in lupus pathogenicity. We found that the N-terminal region of histone H2B represents a preferential target for circulating autoantibodies, which kinetics of appearance positively correlates with disease development. Furthermore, immunization of preautoimmune (NZBxNZW)F1 mice with H2B peptide 1-25 accelerates the disease. Kidney eluates from diseased (NZBxNZW)F1 mice do contain IgG Abs reacting with this peptide, and this H2B sequence was found to be accessible to specific Ab probes in Ag-containing deposits detected in nephritic kidneys. Finally, compared with control normal mice and to young preautoimmune (NZBxNZW)F1 animals, the frequency of cells secreting autoantibodies reacting with peptide 1-25 was significantly raised in the spleen and bone marrow and most importantly on a pathophysiological point of view, locally, in nephritic kidneys of diseased (NZBxNZW)F1 mice. Altogether our results demonstrate the existence in (NZBxNZW)F1 mice of both a systemic and local B cell response targeting the N-terminal region of histone H2B, and highlight the potential implication of this nuclear domain in lupus pathology.

Sensitivity and specificity of autoantibody tests in the differential diagnosis of lupus nephritis

Several studies have investigated the potential of various autoantibody tests in the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Many lupus patients initially present with glomerulonephritis. In that clinical situation the main differential diagnosis are other forms of glomerulonephritis. In this study the diagnostic value of nine test kits for autoantibody against ANA, dsDNA, circulating immune complexes, C1q, nucleosomes, histones and Sm as well as C3 and C4 levels was evaluated in 39 patients with biopsy-proven lupus nephritis in comparison to 43 patients suffering from other forms of glomerulonephritis. The most useful test was an anti-nucleosome antibody enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 88%. All tests for anti-dsDNA antibodies (Crithidia luciliae Anti-dsDNA, BINDAZYME Anti-dsDNA, FARRZYME high avidity Anti-dsDNA) were of moderate sensitivity and very good specificity. Decreasing the cut-off for the conventional anti-dsDNA ELISA (BINDAZYME) considerably increased its sensitivity (87%) without loss of specificity (90%). Tests for anti-C1q and immune complexes performed worse than the antidsDNA tests. As anti-histone and Sm antibodies are present only in a minority of lupus nephritis patients they are of limited value in diagnosing the disease. In conclusion, testing for anti-nucleosome antibodies and the conventional anti-dsDNA ELISA with lower cut-off provide the best diagnostic aids for differentiation of lupus nephritis from other forms of glomerulonephritis. Lupus (2009) 18, 1276—1280.

Anti-nucleosome and anti-chromatin antibodies are present in active systemic lupus erythematosus but not in the cutaneous form of the disease

The objective of this study is to investigate the presence of anti-nucleosome (anti-NCS) and anti-chromatin (anti-CRT) antibodies in patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) compared with active and inactive systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). A total of 154 subjects were evaluated: 54 patients presenting CLE, 66 patients with active SLE and 34 with inactive SLE. Lupus activity was assessed using the disease activity index (SLEDAI). Anti-NCS and anti-CRT antibodies were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Only one of 54 patients with CLE tested positive for both anti-NCS and anti-CRT antibodies. The prevalence of anti-CRT antibodies was significantly higher in active SLE (84.8%) when compared with inactive SLE (26.4%) and CLE (1.8%) ( P < 0.001). Anti-NCS antibodies were also more prevalent in active SLE patients (74.2%) than inactive SLE (11.7%) and CLE patients (1.8%) ( P < 0.001). The presence of anti-CRT and anti-NCS antibodies was correlated to disease activity in patients with SLE ( r = 0.4937, r = 0.5621, respectively). Furthermore, the detection of both antibodies was correlated with disease activity in patients with SLE who tested negative for anti-dsDNA antibodies ( r = 0.4754 for anti-NCS and r = 0.4281 for anti-CRT). The presence of these two auto-antibodies was strongly associated with renal damage in patients with SLE (OR = 13.1, for anti-CRT antibodies and OR = 25.83, for anti-NCS antibodies). The anti-NCS and anti-CRT antibodies were not found in CLE. In patients with SLE, there is a correlation of these antibodies with disease activity and active nephritis. When compared with anti-dsDNA antibodies, anti-NCS and anti-CRT antibodies were more sensitive in detecting disease activity and kidney damage in lupus patients.

Genetic contributions to the autoantibody profile in a rabbit model of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)

For the development of rabbit models of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), immunoglobulin allotype-defined pedigreed rabbits from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases rabbit resource more closely approximate human populations due to their non-inbred pedigreed structure. In an initial study from this laboratory, peptides (SM and GR) from the spliceosomal Smith (Sm) and the NMDA glutamate receptor NR2b, on branched polylysine backbones (BB) elicited antinuclear and anti-dsDNA autoantibodies typical of SLE, as well as seizures and nystagmus sometimes observed as neurological manifestations in SLE patients. This suggested the feasibility of further selective breeding to develop a more reproducible rabbit model for investigations of SLE. Here we report the results of GR-MAP-8 and control BB immunization on autoantibody responses in a group of 24 rabbits specifically bred and developed from parents and ancestors tested for autoantibody responses. The changes in hematological profile and blood chemistry in the experimental rabbits were evaluated along with autoantibody responses. Elevations of total white blood cell (WBC), monocyte, eosinophil and basophil counts that developed following immunizations were moderately influenced by litter and presence of the antibody heavy chain allotype VH1a1. Autoantibody development followed a sequential pattern with anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA) followed by anti-dsDNA and subsequently anti-Sm and anti-RNP similar to SLE patients. High autoantibody levels to one autoantigen were not always associated with antibody response to another. Female rabbits had higher prevalence and levels of autoantibodies similar to human SLE. Higher autoantibody levels of anti-dsDNA and -ANA were observed among some full sibs and the presence of high responder ancestors in the pedigree was associated the augmented responses. We observed significant association between highest antibody responses to GR-MAP-8 and highest anti-dsDNA levels. Naturally occurring autoantibodies were found in some pre-immune sera and some unique ANA fluorescent staining patterns within the experimental group were observed. Background immunofluorescence in pre-immune sera, distinct patterns of programmed autoantibody responses unique among individual rabbits may have been modulated by genetic constitution, gender and environmental factors including exposure to antigens. The high incidence and intensity of autoantibody responses among descendants of high responders suggest that there may be an additive mode of inheritance with high heritability. It is conceivable that further rigorous pedigree selection for autoantibody responses could lead to development of rabbit models with spontaneous occurrence of SLE like serology and disease phenotypes.

Pathogenic anti-nucleosome antibodies

There is increasing evidence that in systemic lupus erythematosus, nucleosomes, the basic chromatin component, represent both a driving immunogen and a major in vivo target for antibodies. Either a disturbed apoptosis or a reduced clearance of apoptotic cells by phagocytes may lead to an increased exposure of apoptotic nucleosomes to the immune system. These nucleosomes, which have been cleaved and modified during the process of apoptosis, escape normal clearance and encompass epitopes that normally are not encountered by the immune system. This may then lead to tolerance breaking and autoimmunity by the activation of nucleosome-specific autoreactive T cells (that help B cells) and subsequently to the production of anti-nucleosome, anti-histone and anti-DNA autoantibodies. Some anti-nucleosome antibody subsets are pathogenic and are involved in the nephritogenic process in systemic lupus erythematosus. Accordingly, several studies reported: (i) increased plasma circulating nucleosomes that positively correlated with an active disease, (ii) nucleosomes in typical glomerular deposits as well as in the basement membrane of non-lesional skin of systemic lupus erythematosus patients and (iii) a close correlation between nephritis and the presence of anti-nucleosome antibodies. Recent studies reported anti-nucleosome antibodies also in primary anti-phospholipid syndrome and particularly in patients with associated lupus-like disease.