A prospective study of autologous bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell transplantation after intensive chemotherapy in myelodysplastic syndromes. Groupe Français des Myélodysplasies. Group Ouest-Est d'étude des Leucémies aiguës myéloïdes

How we manage adults with myelodysplastic syndrome

The prognosis in Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), although recently refined by molecular studies, remains largely based on conventional prognostic scores [International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS), revised IPSS], classifying patients into "lower risk" MDS (LR-MDS) and "higher risk" MDS (HR-MDS). In LR-MDS, treatment mainly aims at improving cytopenias, principally anaemia, while in HR-MDS it aims at delaying disease progression and prolonging survival. In LR-MDS without deletion 5q, anaemia is generally treated first by erythropoietic stimulating factors, while second line treatments are currently not approved [lenalidomide, hypomethylating agents (HMA), luspatercept] or rarely indicated (antithymocyte globulin). Lenalidomide has major efficacy in LR-MDS with deletion 5q. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is sometimes considered in LR-MDS, and iron chelation can be considered when multiple red blood cell transfusions are required. Allo-SCT is the only potentially curative treatment for HR-MDS; however, it is rarely applicable. It is generally preceded by intensive chemotherapy (IC) or HMA in patients with excess of marrow blasts (especially if >10%). In other patients, HMA can improve survival. The role of new drugs, including venetoclax or, in case of specific mutations, IDH1 or IDH2 inhibitors, is investigated. IC is mainly indicated as a bridge to allo-SCT, in the absence of unfavourable karyotype.

An update on treatment of higher risk myelodysplastic syndromes

INTRODUCTION

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are clonal stem cell disorders mostly affecting the elderly. They are classified into lower and higher risk MDS according to prognostic scoring systems. In higher risk patients, treatments should aim to modify the disease course by avoiding progression to acute myeloid leukemia and, therefore, to improve survival. Areas covered: Stem cell transplantation remains the only curative treatment when feasible, but this concerns a small minority of patients. Treatment is principally based on hypomethylating agents (HMAs). Our understanding of MDS biology has led to the development of drugs targeting key cellular processes such as apoptosis or posttranslational protein changes, microenvironment-like immunotherapy, and gene mutations. Currently, new drugs are mainly being tested in combination with HMAs in several clinical trials. Expert commentary: Significant advances have been made in the field of MDS, especially in molecular typing, which are improving our ability to offer patients risk-adapted therapies. The current challenge in the management of higher risk MDS is to improve outcome by combining classical HMAs with novel drugs.

Myelodysplastic syndromes

Myelodysplastic syndromes are clonal marrow stem-cell disorders, characterised by ineffective haemopoiesis leading to blood cytopenias, and by progression to acute myeloid leukaemia in a third of patients. 15% of cases occur after chemotherapy or radiotherapy for a previous cancer; the syndromes are most common in elderly people. The pathophysiology involves cytogenetic changes with or without gene mutations and widespread gene hypermethylation at advanced stages. Clinical manifestations result from cytopenias (anaemia, infection, and bleeding). Diagnosis is based on examination of blood and bone marrow showing blood cytopenias and hypercellular marrow with dysplasia, with or without excess of blasts. Prognosis depends largely on the marrow blast percentage, number and extent of cytopenias, and cytogenetic abnormalities. Treatment of patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes, especially for anaemia, includes growth factors, lenalidomide, and transfusions. Treatment of higher-risk patients is with hypomethylating agents and, whenever possible, allogeneic stem-cell transplantation.

Hypomethylating agents and chemotherapy in MDS

Until recently, the treatment of higher risk myelodysplastic syndrome was based on [1] Intensive chemotherapy using anthracycline-AraC combinations, leading to a lower complete remission rates and a shorter CR duration compared with de novo AML [2], low dose chemotherapy with limited CR rate mainly restricted to patients with normal karyotype. Azacitidine was the first drug to significantly improve survival in higher risk MDS, although it is not curative. Thus, the survival improvement obtained with azacitidine must be the starting point for combination studies, and for utilization of this drug in other situations (before allo SCT, or after chemotherapy or allo SCT as maintenance treatment).

Diagnosis and treatment of primary myelodysplastic syndromes in adults: recommendations from the European LeukemiaNet

Within the myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) work package of the European LeukemiaNet, an Expert Panel was selected according to the framework elements of the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Program. A systematic review of the literature was performed that included indexed original papers, indexed reviews and educational papers, and abstracts of conference proceedings. Guidelines were developed on the basis of a list of patient- and therapy-oriented questions, and recommendations were formulated and ranked according to the supporting level of evidence. MDSs should be classified according to the 2008 World Health Organization criteria. An accurate risk assessment requires the evaluation of not only disease-related factors but also of those related to extrahematologic comorbidity. The assessment of individual risk enables the identification of fit patients with a poor prognosis who are candidates for up-front intensive treatments, primarily allogeneic stem cell transplantation. A high proportion of MDS patients are not eligible for potentially curative treatment because of advanced age and/or clinically relevant comorbidities and poor performance status. In these patients, the therapeutic intervention is aimed at preventing cytopenia-related morbidity and preserving quality of life. A number of new agents are being developed for which the available evidence is not sufficient to recommend routine use. The inclusion of patients into prospective clinical trials is strongly recommended.

Value of allogeneic versus autologous stem cell transplantation and chemotherapy in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes and secondary acute myeloid leukemia. Final results of a prospective randomized European Intergroup Trial

BACKGROUND

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation is usually considered the only curative treatment option for patients with advanced or transformed myelodysplastic syndromes in complete remission, but post-remission chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation are potential alternatives, especially in patients over 45 years old.

DESIGN AND METHODS

We evaluated, after intensive anti-leukemic remission-induction chemotherapy, the impact of the availability of an HLA-identical sibling donor on an intention-to treat basis. Additionally, all patients without a sibling donor in complete remission after the first consolidation course were randomized to either autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation or a second consolidation course consisting of high-dose cytarabine.

RESULTS

The 4-year survival of the 341 evaluable patients was 28%. After achieving complete remission, the 4-year survival rates of patients under 55 years old with or without a donor were 54% and 41%, respectively, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.81 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.49-1.35) for survival and of 0.67 (95% CI, 0.42-1.06) for disease-free survival. In patients with intermediate/high risk cytogenetic abnormalities the hazard ratio in multivariate analysis was 0.58 (99% CI, 0.22-1.50) (P=0.14) for survival and 0.46 (99% CI, 0.22-1.50) for disease-free survival (P=0.03). In contrast, in patients with low risk cytogenetic characteristics the hazard ratio for survival was 1.17 (99% CI, 0.40-3.42) and that for disease-free survival was 1.02 (99% CI, 0.40-2.56). The 4-year survival of the 65 patients randomized to autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation or a second consolidation course of high-dose cytarabine was 37% and 27%, respectively. The hazard ratio in multivariate analysis was 1.22 (95% CI, 0.65-2.27) for survival and 1.02 (95% CI, 0.56-1.85) for disease-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with a donor and candidates for allogeneic stem cell transplantation in first complete remission may have a better disease-free survival than those without a donor in case of myelodysplastic syndromes with intermediate/high-risk cytogenetics. Autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation does not provide longer survival than intensive chemotherapy.

Maintenance treatment with azacytidine for patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) or acute myeloid leukaemia following MDS in complete remission after induction chemotherapy

This prospective Phase II study is the first to assess the feasibility and efficacy of maintenance 5-azacytidine for older patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia and MDS-acute myeloid leukaemia syndromes in complete remission (CR) after induction chemotherapy. Sixty patients were enrolled and treated by standard induction chemotherapy. Patients that reached CR started maintenance therapy with subcutaneous azacytidine, 5/28 d until relapse. Promoter-methylation status of CDKN2B (P15 ink4b), CDH1 and HIC1 was examined pre-induction, in CR and 6, 12 and 24 months post CR. Twenty-four (40%) patients achieved CR after induction chemotherapy and 23 started maintenance treatment with azacytidine. Median CR duration was 13.5 months, >24 months in 17% of the patients, and 18-30.5 months in the four patients with trisomy 8. CR duration was not associated with CDKN2B methylation status or karyotype. Median overall survival was 20 months. Hypermethylation of CDH1 was significantly associated with low CR rate, early relapse, and short overall survival (P = 0.003). 5-azacytidine treatment, at a dose of 60 mg/m(2) was well tolerated. Grade III-IV thrombocytopenia and neutropenia occurred after 9.5 and 30% of the cycles, respectively, while haemoglobin levels increased during treatment. 5-azacytidine treatment is safe, feasible and may be of benefit in a subset of patients.

A retrospective comparison of autologous and unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation in myelodysplastic syndrome and secondary acute myeloid leukemia: a report on behalf of the Chronic Leukemia Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT)

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is an effective treatment for myelodysplasia (MDS) and secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML). In this study, outcome of 593 patients with MDS/sAML after autologous and allogeneic HCT from a matched unrelated donor (MUD) were compared. A total of 167 (28%) patients received HCT from MUD without prior chemotherapy (MUD-U). The rest received HCT in first complete remission (CR1) (Autologous (Auto-CR1), n=290 (49%), HCT from MUD (MUD-CR1), n=136 (23%)). Survival at 3 years was best in MUD-CR1 (50%) compared to Auto-CR1 (41%) and MUD-U (40%) (P=0.01). Similarly, disease-free survival was 44% for MUD-CR1 compared to Auto-CR1 (28%) and MUD-U (34%) (P=0.03). Treatment-related mortality was 17% in Auto-CR1 compared to MUD-CR1 (38%) and MUD-U (49%) (P<0.001). Relapse for Auto-CR1 was 62% compared to 24 and 30% for MUD-CR1 and MUD-U, respectively (P<0.001). Outcome was best for patients with low tumor burden transplanted 6-12 months after diagnosis. Factors influencing outcome at 3 years were mainly significant in the first 6 months. Only, relapse after autologous HCT remained constant over time. Outcomes after allogeneic HCT in patients of 20-40 and >40 years were similar. Autologous and Allogeneic HCT from MUD offer the possibility of long-term survival to patients with MDS/sAML.

Stem cell transplantation for myelodysplastic syndromes: the lure of a cure

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation is the only known curative therapy for myelodysplastic syndromes. However, the morbidity and mortality from this approach is high, especially in a population that tends to be elderly with comorbid conditions. In order to achieve a good outcome, the key is wise choice of the patient to undergo transplantation and appropriate timing of the therapy. Furthermore, consideration should be given to choosing whether the regimen should be fully myeloablative or reduced-intensity and whether marrow, peripheral-blood stem cells, or cord blood should be chosen for stem cell replacement. This article reviews the history of transplantation for this indication and the newer data driving decisions regarding the type of transplant and the optimal timing for best results.

Hemopoietic cell transplantation as curative therapy of myelodysplastic syndromes and myeloproliferative disorders

Hemopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is presently the only therapy with curative potential for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and myeloproliferative disorders (MPD). Among patients with less advanced MDS, 3-year survival figures of 65-80% are achieved with human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-identical related and unrelated donors. The probability of relapse is less than 5%. Among patients with advanced MDS (> or = 5% marrow blasts), about 35-50% of patients transplanted from related donors, and 25-40% transplanted from unrelated donors are surviving in remission beyond 3 years. The incidence of post-transplant relapse is 10-35%. Criteria of the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) predict relapse and survival following HCT. In patients with myelofibrosis, allogeneic transplantation is successful in 50-80%, if performed during the fibrosis stage. The success rate declines to 25-40%, if the transplant is performed after leukemic transformation has occurred. About 40% of patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia survive in remission after transplantation. Results obtained with low/reduced-intensity conditioning regimens are encouraging because of a low incidence of early mortality. However, retrospective analyses comparing low intensity and conventional conditioning regimens have yielded inconclusive results regarding long-term outcome. Co-morbid conditions present at the time of transplantation have a major negative effect on transplant outcome. Controlled prospective trials are needed.

Autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantation for myelodysplastic syndrome

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) is the treatment of choice in the majority of young patients with advanced stages MDS if they have a suitable donor. Since outcome of transplantation is superior for patients with a low blast percentage, this supports the use of chemotherapy prior to transplantation in patients with high blast marrow infiltration. The allogeneic transplant procedure continues to carry a high treatment-related risk, but results have improved progressively over the years. The transplantation results using phenotypically matched voluntary unrelated donors have improved impressingly, mainly due to significantly reduced transplantation-related mortality rate. The upper age limit for transplantation has moved to 65-70 years after the introduction of reduced intensity conditioning regimens (RIC). The place of RIC remains to be determined also in older patients in view of the associated higher relapse risk. For patients lacking a suitable donor the choice is ambiguous. Although the number of reports on autologous stem cell transplantation is still limited, the outcome seems similar to allogeneicSCT with donors other than HLA-identical siblings. Further development of accurate prognostic classification systems will allow a risk-adapted strategy for an individual patient.

Autologous stem cell transplantation for therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome

We report the results of 65 patients with treatment-related myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)/acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) who were transplanted from an autograft and reported to the EBMT. The median age was 39 years (range, 3-69), and stem cell source was bone marrow (n = 31), or peripheral blood progenitor cells (n = 30), or the combination of both (n = 4). The primary disease was solid tumors (n = 37), Hodgkin's disease (n = 13), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (n = 10), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (n = 2) or myeloproliferative syndromes (n = 3). The types of MDS were as follows: RAEB (n = 1; 2%), RAEB-t (n = 3; 5%), or AML (n = 56; 87%). The median time between diagnosis and transplantation was 5 months (range, 3-86). The Kaplan-Meier estimates of the probability of 3-year overall and disease-free survival were 35% (95% CI: 21-49%) and 32% (95% CI: 18-45%), respectively. The median leukocyte engraftment was faster after transplantation with peripheral blood stem cells than with bone marrow: 12 (range, 9-26) vs 29 (range, 11-67) days (P<0.001). The cumulative incidence of relapse was 58% (95% CI: 44-72%) and of treatment-related mortality 12% (95% CI: 6-38%). Lower relapse rate was seen in patients transplanted in first complete remission (CR1 vs non-CR1: 3 years: 48 vs 89%; P = 0.05). Furthermore, age beyond 40 years resulted in a higher treatment-related mortality (47 vs 7%; P = 0.01). In a multivariate analysis, transplantation in CR1 age as well as their interaction influenced overall survival significantly. Autologous transplantation may cure a substantial number of patients with treatment-related MDS/AML, especially if they are in CR1 and of younger age.

The myelodysplastic syndromes: diagnosis and treatment

The myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) are common, acquired, clinically challenging hematologic conditions that are characterized by bone marrow failure and a risk of progression to acute leukemia. These disorders can arise de novo, especially in elderly patients or, less often, as a consequence of prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy for an unrelated disease. The MDS classification systems were revised recently and updated. These refined classification and prognostic schemes help stratify patients by their risk of leukemia progression and death; this knowledge can help clinicians select appropriate therapy. Although many treatments for MDS have been proposed and evaluated, at present, only hematopoietic stem cell transplantation offers any real hope for cure, and no available therapy beyond general supportive care offers benefit to more than a minority of patients. However, recent clinical trials enrolling patients with MDS have reported encouraging results with use of newer drugs, including lenalidomide, decitabine, and darbepoetin alfa. Other exciting treatment regimens are being tested. Here, we present a contemporary, practical clinical approach to the diagnosis and risk-stratified treatment of MDS. We review when to suspect MDS, detail how to evaluate patients who may have a form of the condition, explain key features of treatments that are currently available in the United States, and summarize a general, common-sense therapeutic approach to patients with MDS.

Emerging drugs for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a heterogeneous group of clonal haematopoietic stem cell disorders characterised by ineffective haematopoiesis and an increased risk of developing acute myeloid leukaemia. At present, the only curative option is allogeneic stem cell transplantation. However, the majority of patients are not eligible for this therapy, due to excessive treatment-related morbidity and mortality or lack of a suitable donor. As a result, the need for alternative therapies is great. Our improved understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of MDS has resulted in several new promising therapeutic agents. This review will consider the rational development of new agents based on the molecular biology of MDS.

Mesenchymal cells generated from patients with myelodysplastic syndromes are devoid of chromosomal clonal markers and support short- and long-term hematopoiesis in vitro

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are clonal malignant stem cell disorders characterized by inefficient hematopoiesis. The role of the marrow microenvironment in the pathogenesis of the disease has been controversial and no study has been performed so far to characterize mesenchymal cells (MC) from MDS patients and to analyse their ability to support hematopoiesis. To this end, we have isolated and characterized MC at diagnostic marrow samples (n=12) and have purified their CD34+CD38- and CD34+CD38+ counterparts (n=7) before using MC as a short- and long-term hematopoietic support. We show that MC can be readily isolated from MDS marrow and exhibit a major expansion potential as well as an intact osteoblastic differentiation ability. They do not harbor the abnormal marker identified by FISH in the hematopoietic cells and they stimulate the growth of autologous clonogenic cells. Conversely, highly purified stem cells and their cytokine-expanded progeny harbor the clonal marker with variable frequencies, and both normal and abnormal long-term culture-initiating cell-derived progeny can be effectively supported by autologous MC. Thus, we demonstrate that MDS marrow is an abundant source of MC appearing both cytogenetically and functionally noninvolved by the malignant process and able to support hematopoiesis, suggesting their possible usefulness in future cell therapy approaches.

Leukemic cells and the cytokine patchwork

BACKGROUND

In leukemia, the clonal population is characterized by a hierarchical organization. Although the majority of the leukemic population is generated after post-determinic divisions, a subset of cells retain undifferentiated "blast" morphology. In addition, leukemic cells often have numerical or structural chromosomal abnormalities, aberrant gene expression patterns, and abnormal cell surface marker profiles. Despite these differences when compared to normal bone marrow and blood cells, leukemic cell survival and proliferation, just like that of normal progenitor cells, is influenced by hematopoietic growth factors. A major issue is whether differential regulation of normal and leukemic hematopoietic cells by cytokines can be exploited in antileukemic treatment or, in contrast, whether in vivo cytokine therapy may even be harmful to the patients.

PROCEDURE

Here we review the results of recent experimental and clinical observations that investigated the influence of cytokines on leukemic cell growth and differentiation in vitro and in vivo.

RESULTS

The majority of studies indicate that hematopoietic growth factors are involved in the regulation of proliferation and terminal differentiation of leukemic blast cells. Genetic aberrations involving cytokines or their receptors may contribute to leukemogenesis. Abundant interactions, cross-lineage stimulation, and aberrant response patterns seem to transform the complex cytokine network regulation of normal hematopoiesis into an even more interlaced "patchwork" that controls leukemic hematopoiesis.

CONCLUSIONS

Since hematopoietic growth factors are present in high serum concentrations in patients with acute leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes, consequences of possible interactions should be kept in mind even when well-defined human recombinant factors in single application are to be involved in antileukemic protocols.

Myelodysplastic Syndromes

The development of new therapeutic strategies for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) has gained new momentum fueled by improved characterization of the disease’s natural history and biology and by the recent US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of the first agent with an indication for MDS. By integrating morphologic and cytogenetic features with greater discriminatory power, the World Health Organization (WHO) has refined the classification of these stem cell malignancies and enhanced its prognostic utility. Recognition that the malignant phenotype, which characterizes MDS, may arise from mechanistically diverse biological processes has raised new awareness that treatment strategies must be tailored to the pathobiology of the disease. Therapeutics targeting chromatin structure, angiogenesis and the microenvironment that nurtures the MDS phenotype have demonstrated remarkable activity and offer an opportunity to alter the natural history of the disease. This chapter provides an overview of recent developments in the characterization of MDS from the microscope to the laboratory and the translation of these findings into promising therapeutics.

In Section I, Dr. James Vardiman reviews the cytogenetic abnormalities that characterize MDS, their clinical and pathologic significance, and the application of the WHO classification. In Section II, Dr. Alan List reviews treatment goals driven by prognostic variables and biological features of the disease that have led to promising small molecule, selective therapeutics. In Section III, Dr. Jean-Pierre Issa provides an overview of epigenetic events regulating gene expression, which may be exploited therapeutically by chromatin remodeling agents. In Section IV, Dr. Theo DeWitte discusses new developments in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, including reduced-intensity and myeloablative approaches.

Hematopoietic cell transplantation for adult patients with myelodysplastic syndromes and myeloproliferative disorders

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is currently the only treatment with curative potential for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and myeloproliferative disorders (MPD). Among patients with less advanced MDS, 3-year survival rates of 65% to 75% are achieved with HLA-identical related and unrelated donors. The probability of relapse is less than 5%. Among patients with advanced MDS (> or = 5% marrow blasts), about 35% to 45% who receive transplants from related donors and 25% to 30% who receive transplants from unrelated donors are in remission beyond 3 years. The incidence of posttransplantation relapse is 10% to 35%. Criteria of the International Prognostic Scoring System (originally developed for nontransplant patients) also predict relapse and survival after HCT. Transplantation is successful in 50% to 80% of patients with MPD if performed before leukemic transformation. Depending on the individual risk profile, a considerable number of patients with MDS or MPD are cured by allogeneic HCT. However, HCT should be performed before disease progression. Outcome of patients with treatment-related MDS or with relapse after transplantation remains poor. At present, no definite conclusions can be made with regard to reduced-intensity transplantation regimens.

The presence of an HLA-identical sibling donor has no impact on outcome of patients with high-risk MDS or secondary AML (sAML) treated with intensive chemotherapy followed by transplantation: results of a prospective study of the EORTC, EBMT, SAKK and GIMEMA Leukemia Groups (EORTC study 06921)

This report used the framework of a large European study to investigate the outcome of patients with and without an HLA-identical sibling donor on an intention-to-treat basis. After a common remission-induction and consolidation course, patients with an HLA-identical sibling donor were scheduled for allogeneic transplantation and patients lacking a donor for autologous transplantation. In all, 159 patients alive at 8 weeks from the start of treatment were included in the present analysis. In total, 52 patients had a donor, 65 patients did not have a donor and in 42 patients the availability of a donor was not assessed. Out of 52 patients, 36 (69%) with a donor underwent allogeneic transplantation (28 in CR1). Out of 65 patients, 33 (49%) received an autograft (27 in CR1). The actuarial survival rates at 4 years were 33.3% (s.e. = 6.7%) for patients with a donor and 39.0% (s.e. = 6.5%) for patients without a donor (P = 0.18). Event-free survival rates were 23.1% (s.e. = 6.2%) and 21.5% (s.e. = 5.3%), respectively (P = 0.66). Correction for alternative donor transplants did not substantially alter the survival of the group without a donor. Also, the survival in the various cytogenetic risk groups was not significantly different when comparing the donor vs the no-donor group. This analysis shows that patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome and secondary acute myeloid leukemia may benefit from both allogeneic and autologous transplantation. We were unable to demonstrate a survival advantage for patients with a donor compared to patients without a donor.

The myelodysplastic syndrome(s): a perspective and review highlighting current controversies

The myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) includes a diverse group of clonal and potentially malignant bone marrow disorders characterized by ineffective and inadequate hematopoiesis. The presumed source of MDS is a genetically injured early marrow progenitor cell or pluripotential hematopoietic stem cell. The blood dyscrasias that fall under the broad diagnostic rubric of MDS appear to be quite heterogeneous, which has made it very difficult to construct a coherent, universally applicable MDS classification scheme. A recent re-classification proposal sponsored by the World Health Organization (WHO) has engendered considerable controversy. Although the precise incidence of MDS is uncertain, it has become clear that MDS is at least as common as acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). There is considerable overlap between these two conditions, and the former often segues into the latter; indeed, the distinction between AML and MDS can be murky, and some have argued that the current definitions are arbitrary. Despite the discovery of several tantalizing pathophysiological clues, the basic biology of MDS is incompletely understood. Treatment at present is generally frustrating and ineffective, and except for the small subset of patients who exhibit mild marrow dysfunction and low-risk cytogenetic lesions, the overall prognosis remains rather grim. In this narrative review, we highlight recent developments and controversies within the context of current knowledge about this mysterious and fascinating cluster of bone marrow failure states.

Bone marrow transplantation for myelodysplastic syndrome--who? when? and which?

Although allogeneic transplantation has resulted in long-term disease-free survival in some patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), the morbidity and mortality of this approach remains high. Additionally, many patients are not candidates for such an approach because of their age or comorbid factors. Autologous transplantation and the use of reduced intensity conditioning prior to allogeneic stem cell transplantation has provided less toxic alternatives as well as increased the numbers of patients eligible for some form of transplantation. While bone marrow transplantation clearly has a role in the treatment of MDS, the decision to proceed to transplantation is not always easy and the optimal approach has not been clearly defined. Improvement in patient selection and novel approaches to transplantation will hopefully allow for more effective, less toxic results.

Unrelated donor marrow transplantation for myelodysplastic syndromes: outcome analysis in 510 transplants facilitated by the National Marrow Donor Program

Between April 1988 and July 1998, 510 patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) underwent unrelated donor bone marrow transplantation (BMT) facilitated by the National Marrow Donor Program. Median age was 38 years (range, <1-62 years). Several conditioning regimens and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis methods were used, and T-cell depletion was used in 121 patients. Donors were serologically matched for HLA-A, -B, and -DRB1 antigens for 74% of patients. Of 437 patients evaluable for engraftment, 24 (5% cumulative incidence, with 95% confidence interval [CI] of 3%-7%) failed to engraft, and an additional 33 (8% cumulative incidence; 95% CI, 6%-10%) had late graft failure. Grades II to IV GVHD developed in 47% of patients (95% CI, 43%-49%), and limited and extensive chronic GVHD developed at 2 years in 27% (95% CI, 24%-30%). The incidence of relapse at 2 years was 14% (95% CI, 11%-17%). Greater relapse was independently associated with advanced MDS subtype and no acute GVHD. The estimated probability of disease-free survival (DFS) at 2 years was 29% (95% CI, 25%-33%). Improved DFS was independently associated with less advanced MDS subtype, higher cell dose, recipient cytomegalovirus (CMV) seronegativity, shorter interval from diagnosis to transplantation, and transplantation in recent years. Common causes of death were treatment-related complications accounting for 82% of fatalities. The 2-year cumulative incidence of treatment-related mortality (TRM) was 54% (95% CI, 53%-61%). Sixty-nine percent of TRM occurred within the first 100 days, and 93% occurred within the first year of transplantation. Higher TRM was independently associated with older recipient and donor age, HLA mismatch, and recipient CMV seropositivity. This study demonstrates that unrelated donor BMT cures a significant proportion of patients with MDS. TRM is the major problem limiting the success of unrelated donor BMT in MDS. The observations made in this study should facilitate the design of prospective trials aimed at improving the results of unrelated donor stem cell transplantation for MDS.

Genotypically nonidentical related donors for transplantation of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes: comparison with unrelated donor transplantation and autologous stem cell transplantation

Transplantation with histocompatible identical siblings is a curative treatment for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Alternative treatments, such as transplantation with other family donors, are an option for patients without HLA-identical siblings. This study evaluated transplantation with genotypically nonidentical family donors and compared the results to those obtained with unrelated donors and autologous stem cell transplantation. Overall 3-year survival was 35% for the 79 patients transplanted using genotypically nonidentical donors, DFS was 31%, relapse risk 16%, and the treatment-related mortality (TRM) 62%. Patients transplanted using phenotypically identical family donors had a significantly superior survival and a lower TRM than patients transplanted with mismatched family donors. Age had no influence on the outcome of transplantation. The DFS of patients transplanted in early stage of the disease was 42% compared to 28% in patients transplanted with more advanced disease (P = 0.03). The results of transplantation with mismatched family donors were comparable to those obtained with unrelated donor transplantation. This suggests that nonidentical family donors may be considered if a fully matched unrelated donor is not available. The TRM of patients transplanted with nonidentical family donors is significantly higher than the TRM of patients transplanted with autologous stem cells. The disease-free survival of ASCT is not inferior to allogeneic transplantation using nonidentical family donors, and the intensity of the treatment is much lower. The choice of ASCT or alternative donor transplantation must be influenced by the age of the patient and the risk of relapse. For patients under the age of 20 years the treatment of choice may indeed be an alternative donor transplantation.

Intensive treatment strategies in patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome and secondary acute myeloid leukemia

Stem cell transplantation may lead to prolonged disease-free survival in young patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and secondary acute myeloid leukemia. About one-third of patients transplanted with an HLA-identical family donor will experience long-term disease-free survival. Outcome appears to be better for younger patients, patients with less advanced stages of MDS and treatment early in the course of the disease. The results of transplantation using partially matched family donors and phenotypically matched voluntary unrelated donors are still unsatisfactory, mainly due to significantly higher transplantation related mortality rate. For patients lacking a suitable sibling donor autologous stem cell transplantation may constitute an alternative. The presence of sufficient residual polyclonal stem cells and achieving a complete remission after chemotherapy forms a prerequisite for a successful transplantation. Further development of accurate prognostic classification systems will allow a risk-adapted strategy for an individual patient.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome

Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is a stem cell disorder, and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is currently the only therapeutic modality that is potentially curative. Among patients with less advanced MDS (<5% marrow blasts), 3-year survivals of 65-70% are achievable with HLA-identical related and HLA-matched unrelated donors. The overall probability of disease recurrence in these patients is <5%. Among patients with advanced disease (>/=5% marrow blasts), about 35-45% and 25-30%, respectively, are surviving in remission after transplantation from a related or from an unrelated donor; the incidence of post-transplant relapse is 10-35%. The criteria proposed by the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) derived from non-transplanted patients, also predict survival following transplantation. The development of new conditioning regimens has permitted successful hematopoietic stem cell transplants even in patients more than 60 years of age. Improved survival with transplants from unrelated volunteer donors may, in part, reflect selection of donors on the basis of high resolution (allele-level) HLA typing. Autologous stem cell transplantation may be beneficial for selected patients who have obtained a complete remission with conventional chemotherapy. Treatment-related morbidity and mortality, in particular after allogeneic transplantation, remain challenges that need to be addressed with innovative approaches.

Cytokine therapy for myelodysplastic syndrome

The myelodysplastic syndromes are a heterogeneous family of hematologic disorders characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis. Because of the interpatient variability regarding prognosis and morbidity, management of myelodysplastic syndromes continues to be a challenge to clinical hematologists. Pancytopenia and defective function of neutrophils and platelets carry a high risk of infectious or hemorrhagic complications. Erythropoietin is perhaps the most commonly used therapeutic option, second only to transfusion; improvement of erythropoiesis is seen in approximately 20% of patients, mainly in those with relatively preserved erythroid function and no or low transfusion requirements. Coadministration of erythropoietin with either granulocyte colony-stimulating factor or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor may increase the response rate up to 50%. Although prophylactic administration of granulocyte- or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor cannot be recommended, treatment of febrile neutropenia might benefit from administration of granulocyte- or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in addition to antibiotics.

Hemopoietic stem cell transplantation for myelodysplastic syndrome

The term myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) describes a spectrum of disorders that are characterized by dysplastic marrow cell morphology, the development of peripheral blood cytopenias, and a tendency to evolve into acute myeloid leukemia. MDS has been recognized as a stem-cell disease, and hemopoietic stem-cell transplantation is currently the only potentially curative therapy. In patients with less advanced MDS (<5% blasts in the marrow), 3-year survival rates of 70% and 65% can be achieved with HLA-identical related and HLA-matched unrelated donors, respectively. The overall probability of disease recurrence in these patients is less than 5%. Of patients with advanced disease (5% marrow blasts or more), about 40% to 45% and 25% to 30% are surviving in remission after transplantation from a related or an unrelated donor, respectively. This inferior outcome is largely due to a higher incidence of post-transplantation relapse (20% to 30%). Inclusion of the International Prognostic Scoring System criteria into outcome analyses shows an inverse correlation between overall risk category and relapse-free survival after transplantation. Future trials should explore the usefulness of different transplantation regimens for different risk categories. Among patients with less advanced disease, use of a conditioning regimen that combines cyclophosphamide and busulfan, dose adjusted to reach target plasma levels, has been associated with improved survival in recipients of transplants from related and unrelated donors. It has also permitted successful hemopoietic stem-cell transplantation in patients as old as 66 years of age. Improved survival with transplants from unrelated volunteer donors has been achieved with selection of donors based on high-resolution HLA typing. Autologous stem-cell transplantation may provide excellent consolidation for selected patients who have obtained complete remission with conventional chemotherapy. High treatment-related morbidity and mortality rates, particularly after allogeneic transplantation, remain challenges that must be addressed with innovative approaches.

Acute myeloblastic leukemia secondary to myelodysplasia (MDS-AML): a comparison of remission induction with three drugs versus standard two-drugs induction

To evaluate the addition of a third drug to standard induction chemotherapy in patients with MDS-AML, 23 patients (males/females 13/10, median age 54.3 years, range 24-74 years, median MDS duration 9.8 months, range 2-39 months) who received a standard 2-drugs induction were compared with 23 patients (males/females 11/12, median age 45.6 months, range 21-60 years, median MDS duration 8.3 months, range 2-29 months) who received an intensified 3-drugs induction with etoposide. CR rate, median CR duration and median OS were similar in both groups (48% vs 56%, 4.8 vs 5.9 months, 6.5 vs 7.0 months respectively). Among responding patients, all but one, who underwent allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, relapsed. In conclusion, addition of a third drug (etoposide) does not seem to significantly improve the poor prognosis of MDS-AML patients.

Achievements in Understanding and Treatment of Myelodysplastic Syndromes

The myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) constitute a challenge for the biologist as well as for the treating physician. In Section I, Dr. Willman reviews the current classifications and disease mechanisms involved in this heterogeneous clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorder. A stepwise genetic progression model is proposed in which inherited or acquired genetic lesions promote the acquisition of “secondary” genetic events mainly characterized by gains and losses of specific chromosome regions. The genetic risk to develop MDS is likely multifactorial and dependent on various constellations of risk-producing and -protecting alleles. In Section II Dr. Barrett with Dr. Saunthararajah addresses the immunologic factors that may act as important secondary events in the development of severe pancytopenia. T cells from patients with MDS may suppress autologous erythroid and granulocytic growth in vitro, and T cell suppression by antithymocyte globulin or cyclosporine may significantly improve cytopenia, especially in refractory anemia. Recent studies have also demonstrated an increased vessel density in MDS bone marrow, and a phase II trial of thalidomide showed responses in a subgroup of MDS patients especially in those with low blast counts. In Section III Dr. Hellström-Lindberg presents results of allogeneic and autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT), intensive and low-dose chemotherapy. The results of allogeneic SCT in MDS are slowly improving but are still poor for patients with unfavorable cytogenetics and/or a high score according to the International Prognostic Scoring System. A recently published study of patients between 55-65 years old showed a disease-free survival (DFS) at 3 years of 39%. Consolidation treatment with autologous SCT after intensive chemotherapy may result in long-term DFS in a proportion of patients with high-risk MDS. Low-dose treatment with 5-azacytidine has been shown to significantly prolong the time to leukemic transformation or death in patients with high-risk MSA. Erythropoietin and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor may synergistically improve hemoglobin levels, particularly in sideroblastic anemia. Recent therapeutic advances have made it clear that new biological information may lead to new treatment modalities and, in combination with statistically developed predictive models, help select patients for different therapeutic options.

Myelodysplasia

The epidemiology of myelodysplasia, or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), is in evolution. As populations are aging and therapies for cancer are improving, the frequency of this disease is increasing. Recent population surveys and case-control studies are reviewed. Knowledge of the molecular pathogenesis and pathophysiology of MDS is advancing at a remarkable pace and new information on molecular events is presented. The treatment of MDS is complex and highly individualized. Although many patients are older and may have significant co-morbid disease or poor performance status, there are curative options with allogeneic transplantation for selected patients. The recent transplant publications are reviewed. Other investigative treatment approaches, including the use of new chemotherapy agents, growth factor combinations, and antithymocyte globulin appear promising and are reviewed.

Achievements in Understanding and Treatment of Myelodysplastic Syndromes

The myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) constitute a challenge for the biologist as well as for the treating physician. In Section I, Dr. Willman reviews the current classifications and disease mechanisms involved in this heterogeneous clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorder. A stepwise genetic progression model is proposed in which inherited or acquired genetic lesions promote the acquisition of “secondary” genetic events mainly characterized by gains and losses of specific chromosome regions. The genetic risk to develop MDS is likely multifactorial and dependent on various constellations of risk-producing and -protecting alleles. In Section II Dr. Barrett with Dr. Saunthararajah addresses the immunologic factors that may act as important secondary events in the development of severe pancytopenia. T cells from patients with MDS may suppress autologous erythroid and granulocytic growth in vitro, and T cell suppression by antithymocyte globulin or cyclosporine may significantly improve cytopenia, especially in refractory anemia. Recent studies have also demonstrated an increased vessel density in MDS bone marrow, and a phase II trial of thalidomide showed responses in a subgroup of MDS patients especially in those with low blast counts. In Section III Dr. Hellström-Lindberg presents results of allogeneic and autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT), intensive and low-dose chemotherapy. The results of allogeneic SCT in MDS are slowly improving but are still poor for patients with unfavorable cytogenetics and/or a high score according to the International Prognostic Scoring System. A recently published study of patients between 55-65 years old showed a disease-free survival (DFS) at 3 years of 39%. Consolidation treatment with autologous SCT after intensive chemotherapy may result in long-term DFS in a proportion of patients with high-risk MDS. Low-dose treatment with 5-azacytidine has been shown to significantly prolong the time to leukemic transformation or death in patients with high-risk MSA. Erythropoietin and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor may synergistically improve hemoglobin levels, particularly in sideroblastic anemia. Recent therapeutic advances have made it clear that new biological information may lead to new treatment modalities and, in combination with statistically developed predictive models, help select patients for different therapeutic options.