Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation boosts synaptic plasticity and memory in mice via epigenetic regulation of Bdnf expression

Repeated tDCS at Clinically Relevant Field Intensity Can Boost Concurrent Motor Learning in Rats

Clinical trials with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) use weak electric fields that have yet to demonstrate measurable behavioral effects in animal models. We hypothesized that weak stimulation will produce sizable effects, provided it is applied concurrently with behavioral training and repeated over multiple sessions. We tested this in a rodent model of dexterous motor skill learning using a pellet-reaching task in ad libitum behaving rats. The task was automated to minimize experimenter bias. We measured field magnitudes intracranially to calibrate the stimulation current. Male rats were trained for 20 min with concurrent epicranial tDCS over 10 daily sessions. We developed a new electrode montage that enabled stable stimulation over the 10 sessions with a field intensity of 2 V/m at the motor cortex. Behavior was recorded with high-speed video to quantify reaching dynamics. We also measured motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) bilaterally with epidural microstimulation. The number of successful reaches improved across days of training, and the rate of learning was higher in the anodal group as compared with sham-control animals (F (1) = 7.12; p = 0.008; N = 24). MEPs were not systematically affected by tDCS. Post hoc analysis suggests that tDCS modulated motor learning only for right-pawed animals, improving success of reaching but limiting stereotypy in these animals. Repeated and concurrent anodal tDCS can boost motor skill learning at clinically relevant field intensities. In this animal model, the effect interacted with paw preference and was not associated with corticospinal excitability.

Transcranial direct current stimulation and motor function in children with cerebral palsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

To provide meta-analytical evidence regarding the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on motor function in children with cerebral palsy (CP) across different stimulation protocols.

METHOD

Using JBI methodology, we applied a random effects model to quantify motor function changes after tDCS. Moderator analyses examined the impact of electrode polarity and stimulation site. Subgroup analyses evaluated the impact of therapy inclusion and the number of sessions.

RESULTS

tDCS improved motor function in children with CP (Hedges' g = 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.24-0.81). Moderator analyses revealed statistically significant efficacy of anodal tDCS (Hedges' g = 0.73; 95% CI = 0.45-1.02), especially applied to the primary motor cortex (M1) (Hedges' g = 0.81; 95% CI = 0.52-1.11). Subgroup analyses showed tDCS efficacy with (Hedges' g = 0.86; 95% CI = 0.52-1.20) and without therapy (Hedges' g = 0.70; 95% CI = 0.21-1.19), and in single (Hedges' g = 0.85; 95% CI = 0.39-1.31) and multiple sessions (Hedges' g = 0.78; 95% CI = 0.42-1.14). Limb-specific analysis showed positive effects for lower-limb function (Hedges' g = 0.88; 95% CI = 0.50-1.25). When anodal tDCS was applied to the M1, both lower (Hedges' g = 1.02; 95% CI = 0.70-1.35) and upper (Hedges' g = 0.50; 95% CI = 0.16-0.83) limbs showed improvements.

INTERPRETATION

Anodal tDCS, particularly when applied to the M1, may effectively improve motor function in children with CP.

Physical activity and anodal-transcranial direct current stimulation: a synergistic approach to boost motor cortex plasticity

The application of anodal-transcranial direct current stimulation (A-tDCS) over the primary motor cortex (M1) increases its structural and functional plasticity, as also physical exercise. Combining both interventions has a boosting effect, thus revealing a crucial role of the brain state during stimulation. Although brain slice and anesthetized animal studies support this, further investigation in awake animals is necessary. In the present study, we analyzed the effects of coupling A-tDCS with low-intensity physical activity on the mouse M1 structural and functional plasticity. C57BL/6 mice were monolaterally treated with M1 A-tDCS while walking on a rotarod or at rest. To assess the impact of our interventions, we analyzed both motor cortices for changes in neuronal activation, dendritic spine density, and functional synchronisation as measured by local field potential coherence. The combination of physical activity and M1 stimulation revealed a synergistic interhemispheric effect on cortical activation in both layers II/III and V, not present when using a single type of intervention. These data were accompanied by increased M1-M1 synchrony in the low-theta frequency, a hallmark of motor network activity in mice. Dendritic spine density revealed an effect of the combo, which was significantly higher only in layer II/III, accompanied by increased post-synaptic density protein 95 expression in the same area. Based on our findings, we propose that the efficacy of tDCS hinges on brain state rather than being merely a direct causal factor. The observed outcomes contribute to a deeper comprehension of the mechanisms governing structural and functional reorganisation within the motor cortex under physiological conditions, with potential implications for research on learning, memory, and neurological disorders such as stroke.

Home-Based Tele-tDCS in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Feasibility, Safety, and Preliminary Efficacy

OBJECTIVE

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease with limited treatment options. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) shows promise as a neuromodulatory intervention in various neurological disorders, but its application in ALS, particularly in a remote, home-based format, remains underexplored. This study investigates the feasibility, safety, and preliminary efficacy of remotely supervised tele-tDCS in ALS patients.

METHODS

This double-blinded pilot study included 14 spinal-onset ALS participants randomized into two groups: the intervention group received 72 tele-tDCS sessions over 24 weeks, and the delayed-start group received 36 sham sessions followed by 36 tele-tDCS sessions. Stimulation was delivered at 2 mA for 20 min 3 times a week. Primary outcomes included feasibility, safety, and disease progression measured by the ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R). Adherence and adverse effects were monitored throughout.

RESULTS

Ten participants completed the study, with an overall compliance rate of 98.3%. No serious adverse events were reported, and mild side effects, like itching and tingling, were consistent with tDCS literature. The intervention group demonstrated a significantly slower decline in ALSFRS-R scores than the delayed-start group. At 24 weeks, the intervention group had a mean ALSFRS-R change of -1.7, compared to -13.6 in the delayed-start group (p = 0.0018). Additionally, the change in ALSFRS-R between pre- and mid-intervention significantly differed between groups (p = 0.0071).

INTERPRETATION

Tele-tDCS was feasible, safe, and well-tolerated in individuals with ALS. Preliminary efficacy results suggest that tele-tDCS may slow disease progression, underscoring the potential of tele-tDCS as a promising home-based neuromodulatory intervention in ALS management.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical trial registration: NCT04866771.

Comparison of Physiological Brain Responses Evoked by Visual and Electrical Stimulation

Purpose

Noninvasive current stimulation (nCS or electrical stimulation) is a rapidly developing technique to support recovery from eye and brain dysfunctions. One of the most commonly used forms of nCS for treating the visual system is transcranial and transcorneal alternating current stimulation. This technique can exert neuromodulatory effects on the brain through eye stimulation. The mechanism of such stimulation is still poorly understood.

Materials and Methods

To understand the pattern of activation evoked by nCS, a series of electrical impulses were delivered directly to the rat eye, alternating with the visual stimulus (VS), and subsequent responses were tested in the Superior colliculus and the primary visual cortex. Additionally, we tested two stimulation electrode placements, eyeball-eyeball, and eyeball-neck.

Results

The results indicate that nCS and VS evoke different activation patterns in the recorded structures. In particular, the electrically evoked potentials are characterized by shorter latency and a different shape than the corresponding visually evoked potentials. The transcorneal alternating current stimulation (tACS) evoked shorter sinks and sources in all recorded structures than the visual stimulation. This suggests emerging of a different pattern of extracellular current flow in response to different stimulations.

Conclusions

We demonstrate that the eye-eye paradigm of electrical stimulation elicited responses more similar to those evoked by VS. Individual transcorneal electrical impulses evoke a consistent pattern of neuronal activation across the visual system. This consistency is particularly promising for the development of neurotherapy aimed at restoring or improving vision, nCS can effectively activate visual circuits despite variations in stimulus delivery and shape.

Repetitive prefrontal tDCS activates VTA dopaminergic neurons, resulting in attenuation of Alzheimer's Disease-like deficits in Tg2576 mice

BACKGROUND

Emerging evidence implicates early dysfunction of dopaminergic neurons in the Ventral Tegmental Area (VTA) as a key contributor to Alzheimer's Disease (AD) pathophysiology. Specifically, the VTA dopaminergic neurodegeneration and the consequent reduction of dopamine (DA) in mesocorticolimbic targets are associated with the onset of cognitive impairments and neuropsychiatric-like manifestations in AD animal models. Moreover, decreased midbrain volume and functional VTA disconnection are identified as predictors of accelerated progression from Mild Cognitive Impairment to AD-dementia in clinical populations. Given these findings, interventions capable of directly modulating VTA activity and augmenting DA release, despite the ongoing neurodegeneration, may hold therapeutic potential for mitigating DA-related deficits in AD. This study aims at evaluating the therapeutic potential of prefrontal transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in the Tg2576 mouse model of AD, exhibiting early VTA dopaminergic neurodegeneration.

METHODS

Repeated tDCS was applied to assess its ability to activate VTA DA neurons. We also evaluated tDCS effects on synaptic plasticity, cognitive and non-cognitive behaviours and AD-related pathology. Hippocampal DA release and Nucleus Accumbens (NAc) DA transporter (DAT) expression were measured. With immunohistochemistry we examined microglial density and morphological complexity at different disease stages. Additionally, intracellular amyloid-β (Aβ) levels and plaque burden were evaluated to determine the impact of tDCS on AD pathology.

RESULTS

Prefrontal tDCS enhanced the activity of VTA dopaminergic neurons, leading to increased hippocampal DA release and higher DAT levels in the NAc. The enhanced DA outflow is associated with restored CA3-CA1 synaptic plasticity and improvements in recognition memory and motivational behaviours. tDCS reduced microglial numbers and morphological complexity in Tg2576 mice at both pre-plaque stage (7-months) and at an advanced stage characterized by plaque accumulation (12-months). Notably, tDCS also decreased Aβ plaque burden, although no changes in intracellular Aβ levels were observed in younger Tg2576 mice.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings highlight the multifaceted therapeutic potential of prefrontal tDCS in targeting key AD pathophysiological hallmarks, including dopaminergic dysfunction, synaptic impairments, neuroinflammation and plaque deposition. As a non-invasive neuromodulatory approach, prefrontal tDCS emerges as a promising early intervention strategy to complement existing AD treatments, with the potential to improve patient outcomes and quality of life.

Anodal direct current stimulation of the auditory cortex at the onset of presbycusis delays cortical aging

Presbycusis or age-related hearing loss (ARHL) affects millions of people worldwide, increasing their risk of cognitive decline and poor quality of life. However, ARHL remains an irreversible condition due to our inability to induce inner-ear hair cell regeneration. Nevertheless, multisession epidural stimulation of the auditory cortex (AC) at the onset of ARHL prevents hearing threshold elevation in naturally aging Wistar rats. Accordingly, we hypothesized that anodal direct current (DC) stimulation of the AC may also compensate for age-related maladaptive, activity-dependent changes. Here, we examined immunocytochemical markers in the AC, including early genes (c-fos and Arc), AMPA receptors (GluR2/3), parvalbumin (PV), and GAD67, along with auditory-evoked potentials (CAEPs) recorded in both auditory and visual (VC) cortices. When comparing 6 and 18.13-month-old rats without AC simulation, we observed loss of c-fos and Arc-positive neurons and decreased GluR2/3 expression, confirming altered AC neuronal network plasticity and activation. In addition, we noted changes in PV and decreased GAD67 immunoreactivity suggesting disrupted inhibition and significantly increased wave amplitudes in CAEPs, altered AC latencies, and decreased VC responses. By contrast, electrically stimulated rats showed no significant variations in early gene markers, GluR2/3, PV, or GAD67 with age, and the amplitudes and latencies of CAEPs recorded in their AC and VC resembled those of young rat. These findings indicate that anodal DC stimulation at the onset of ARHL delays AC aging by minimizing the loss of inhibition and preventing increases in cortical excitability in Wistar rats.

Evaluating the efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in managing neuropathic pain-induced emotional consequences: Insights from animal models

Neuropathic pain is a global health concern due to its severity and its detrimental impact on patients' quality of life. It is primarily characterized by sensory alterations, most commonly hyperalgesia and allodynia. As the disease progresses, patients with neuropathic pain develop co-occurring emotional disorders, such as anxiety and depression, which further complicate therapeutic management. While pharmacotherapy remains the first-line treatment, limitations in its efficacy and the prevalence of side effects often leave patients with insufficient pain relief. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a non-invasive brain stimulation technique, has recently emerged as a promising alternative for chronic pain management. This review provides an overview of preclinical studies examining the effects of tDCS in rodent models of neuropathic pain. It specifically highlights the potential of tDCS to modulate the emotional-affective component of pain, with a focus on identifying optimal cortical targets for stimulation to enhance the translational application of tDCS in managing pain-related emotional disorders.

Targeting Neural Oscillations for Cognitive Enhancement in Alzheimer's Disease

Alzheimer's disease (AD), the most prevalent form of dementia, is marked by progressive cognitive decline, affecting memory, language, orientation, and behavior. Pathological hallmarks include extracellular amyloid plaques and intracellular tau tangles, which disrupt synaptic function and connectivity. Neural oscillations, the rhythmic synchronization of neuronal activity across frequency bands, are integral to cognitive processes but become dysregulated in AD, contributing to network dysfunction and memory impairments. Targeting these oscillations has emerged as a promising therapeutic strategy. Preclinical studies have demonstrated that specific frequency modulations can restore oscillatory balance, improve synaptic plasticity, and reduce amyloid and tau pathology. In animal models, interventions, such as gamma entrainment using sensory stimulation and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), have shown efficacy in enhancing memory function and modulating neuroinflammatory responses. Clinical trials have reported promising cognitive improvements with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and deep brain stimulation (DBS), particularly when targeting key hubs in memory-related networks, such as the default mode network (DMN) and frontal-parietal network. Moreover, gamma-tACS has been linked to increased cholinergic activity and enhanced network connectivity, which are correlated with improved cognitive outcomes in AD patients. Despite these advancements, challenges remain in optimizing stimulation parameters, individualizing treatment protocols, and understanding long-term effects. Emerging approaches, including transcranial pulse stimulation (TPS) and closed-loop adaptive neuromodulation, hold promise for refining therapeutic strategies. Integrating neuromodulation with pharmacological and lifestyle interventions may maximize cognitive benefits. Continued interdisciplinary efforts are essential to refine these approaches and translate them into clinical practice, advancing the potential for neural oscillation-based therapies in AD.

Homeostatic plasticity in patients with disorders of consciousness detected by combined stimulation: a study protocol

Background

Non-invasive neuromodulation (NIN) techniques have been widely utilized in treating patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC), but their therapeutic effects have been inconsistent. Given the reliance of NIN techniques on synaptic plasticity, and the potential impairment of synaptic plasticity (particularly homeostatic plasticity) resulting from severe brain injury, it is possible that the variation in therapeutic effects is due to alterations in homeostatic plasticity in patients with DoC. Therefore, this study will use preconditioning TMS to examine the retention of homeostatic plasticity in patients with DoC.

Methods

We will enroll 30 patients with DoC and 15 healthy controls and randomize the order of their sessions. According to the priming protocol, the trial was divided into three different sessions with a 2-day break between each session. The session will involve a 10-min duration of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) priming, followed by a 192-s period of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) test. Transcranial stimulation will be specifically targeted toward the left primary motor cortex. Measurements of motor evoked potentials will be taken at several time points: baseline, after tDCS, and after TMS. Coma Recovery Scale-Revised will be conducted both baseline and after TMS.

Discussion

Studying whether homeostatic plasticity is preserved in patients with DoC is beneficial for gaining a better understanding of their brain condition. If the homeostatic plasticity of patients with DoC is impaired, then NIN, which are based on altering synaptic plasticity in healthy individuals to achieve stimulating effects, may not be directly translatable to the therapeutic interventions for patients with DoC. Instead, the homeostatic plasticity of patients should be restored before implementing the intervention.

Repeated tDCS at clinically-relevant field intensity can boost concurrent motor learning in rats

Electric fields used in clinical trials with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are small, with magnitudes that have yet to demonstrate measurable effects in preclinical animal models. We hypothesized that weak stimulation will nevertheless produce sizable effects, provided that it is applied concurrently with behavioral training, and repeated over multiple sessions. We tested this here in a rodent model of dexterous motor-skill learning. We developed a preparation that allows concurrent stimulation during the performance of a pellet-reaching task in freely behaving rats. The task was automated to minimize experimenter bias. We measured field magnitudes intracranially to calibrate the stimulation current. In this study, only male rats were used. Animals were trained for 20 min with concurrent epicranial tDCS over 10 daily sessions. Behavior was recorded with high-speed video to quantify reaching dynamics. We also measured motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) bilaterally with epidural microstimulation. The new electrode montage enabled stable stimulation over 10 sessions with a field intensity of 2V/m at the motor cortex. The number of successful reaches improved across days of training, and the rate of learning was higher in the anodal group as compared to sham-control animals (F(1)=7.12, p=0.008, N=24). MEPs were not systematically affected by tDCS. Posthoc analysis suggests that tDCS modulated motor learning only for right-pawed animals, improving success of reaching, but limiting stereotypy in these animals. Repeated and concurrent anodal tDCS can boost motor-skill learning at clinically-relevant field intensities. In this animal model the effect interacted with paw preference and was not associated with corticospinal excitability.

Adult Hippocampal Neurogenesis as a Therapeutic Target in Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder

This review is focused on adult hippocampal neurogenesis as a potential therapeutic target in fetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD). Adult hippocampal neurogenesis refers to the production of new hippocampal dentate granule cells (DGCs) from a replenishable pool of neural stem and progenitor cells throughout life. Adult-generated DGCs have been shown to exert a profound influence on hippocampal network activity in experimental animals and have been implicated in the regulation of many hippocampal-dependent behaviors and emotional states, including certain forms of learning and memory, anxiety, mood, and stress resilience. While adult hippocampal neurogenesis in humans remains controversial, many studies support its existence and impact on hippocampal function in human health and disease. Here, we review mechanisms of adult hippocampal neurogenesis under physiological conditions, as described primarily in rodent brain, its impact on network activity and behavior, and the negative effects of developmental alcohol exposure on this process. We then explore hippocampal neurogenesis as a potential target for FASD therapy using pharmacological and neurophysiological approaches known to stimulate adult hippocampal neurogenesis, currently available for clinical use in FASD patients.

Independent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation and social influence on pain

ABSTRACT

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a noninvasive neuromodulatory technique with the potential to provide pain relief. However, tDCS effects on pain are variable across existing studies, possibly related to differences in stimulation protocols and expectancy effects. We investigated the independent and joint effects of contralateral motor cortex tDCS (anodal vs cathodal) and socially induced expectations (analgesia vs hyperalgesia) about tDCS on thermal pain. We employed a double-blind, randomized 2 × 2 factorial cross-over design, with 5 sessions per participant on separate days. After calibration in Session 1, Sessions 2 to 5 crossed anodal or cathodal tDCS (20 minutes 2 mA) with socially induced analgesic or hyperalgesic expectations, with 6 to 7 days between the sessions. The social manipulation involved videos of previous "participants" (confederates) describing tDCS as inducing a low-pain state ("analgesic expectancy") or hypersensitivity to sensation ("hyperalgesic expectancy"). Anodal tDCS reduced pain compared with cathodal stimulation (F(1,19.9) = 19.53, P < 0.001, Cohen d = 0.86) and analgesic expectancy reduced pain compared with hyperalgesic expectancy (F(1,19.8) = 5.62, P = 0.027, Cohen d = 0.56). There was no significant interaction between tDCS and social expectations. Effects of social suggestions were related to expectations, whereas tDCS effects were unrelated to expectancies. The observed additive effects provide novel evidence that tDCS and socially induced expectations operate through independent processes. They extend clinical tDCS studies by showing tDCS effects on controlled nociceptive pain independent of expectancy effects. In addition, they show that social suggestions about neurostimulation effects can elicit potent placebo effects.

Boosting Psychotherapy With Noninvasive Brain Stimulation: The Whys and Wherefores of Modulating Neural Plasticity to Promote Therapeutic Change

The phenomenon of neural plasticity pertains to the intrinsic capacity of neurons to undergo structural and functional reconfiguration through learning and experiential interaction with the environment. These changes could manifest themselves not only as a consequence of various life experiences but also following therapeutic interventions, including the application of noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) and psychotherapy. As standalone therapies, both NIBS and psychotherapy have demonstrated their efficacy in the amelioration of psychiatric disorders' symptoms, with a certain variability in terms of effect sizes and duration. Consequently, scholars suggested the convenience of integrating the two interventions into a multimodal treatment to boost and prolong the therapeutic outcomes. Such an approach is still in its infancy, and the physiological underpinnings substantiating the effectiveness and utility of combined interventions are still to be clarified. Therefore, this opinion paper aims to provide a theoretical framework consisting of compelling arguments as to why adding NIBS to psychotherapy can promote therapeutic change. Namely, we will discuss the physiological effects of the two interventions, thus providing a rationale to explain the potential advantages of a combined approach.

Can transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the motor cortex increase endurance running performance? a randomized crossover-controlled trial

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a non-invasive brain stimulation technique, has been shown to increase exercise performance in strength and cycling studies but its effects on running endurance remain unclear. The objectives of this randomized sham-controlled crossover trial were to assess tDCS efficacy on submaximal treadmill running time to exhaustion (TTE). Forty-five healthy male runners aged between 18 and 32 years (mean maximal oxygen consumption: 46.6 mL/min/kg) performed two constant-load tests at 90% of their maximal aerobic speed preceded by 20 minutes of active or sham multichannel (5 anodes, 3 cathodes) tDCS applied over the bilateral motor cortex with a total intensity of 4 mA. Ratings of perceived exertion (RPE), blood lactate, VO2, and heart rate were monitored every five minutes until volitional exhaustion. The median [IQR] TTE was similar following active (12.2 [10.5, 16.1] minutes) or sham (12.5 [10.2, 15.1] minutes) tDCS (p = 0.96). Likewise, there were no significant differences between active and sham conditions for RPE, blood lactate, final VO2, and final heart rate (all p ≥0.05). No difference in TTE was found when stratifying groups according to their VO2max (i.e., VO2max ≥ 45 mL/min/Kg, p = 0.53; VO2max < 45 mL/min/Kg, p = 0.45) but there was a trend for a significant correlation between VO2max and change in TTE (p = 0.06). TDCS applied over the bilateral motor cortex did not improve endurance performance in a large sample of trained runners. Characterization of individual tDCS responsiveness deserves further consideration. In our experimental conditions, tDCS had no ergogenic effect on endurance running performance. Trial registration: Clinical trial registration: NCT04005846.

Transcranial direct current stimulation as a potential remyelinating therapy: Visual evoked potentials recovery in cuprizone demyelination

AIMS

Non-invasive neuromodulation by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), owing to its reported beneficial effects on neuronal plasticity, has been proposed as a treatment to promote functional recovery in several neurological conditions, including demyelinating diseases like multiple sclerosis. Less information is available on the effects of tDCS in major pathological mechanisms of multiple sclerosis, such as demyelination and inflammation. To learn more about the latter effects, we applied multi-session anodal tDCS in mice exposed to long-term cuprizone (CPZ) diet, known to induce chronic demyelination.

METHODS

Visual evoked potentials (VEP) and motor performance (beam test) were employed for longitudinal monitoring of visual and motor pathways in 28 mice undergoing CPZ diet, compared with 12 control (H) mice. After randomization, anodal tDCS was applied for 5 days in awake, freely-moving surviving animals: 12 CPZ-anodal, 10 CPZ-sham, 5H-anodal, 5 h-sham. At the end of the experiment, histological analysis was performed on the optic nerves and corpus callosum for myelin, axons and microglia/macrophages.

KEY FINDINGS

CPZ diet was associated with significantly delayed VEPs starting at 4 weeks compared with their baseline, significant compared with controls at 8 weeks. After 5-day tDCS, VEPs latency significantly recovered in the active group compared with the sham group. Similar findings were observed in the time to cross on the beam test Optic nerve histology revealed higher myelin content and lower microglia/macrophage counts in the CPZ-Anodal group compared with CPZ-Sham.

SIGNIFICANCE

Multiple sessions of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in freely moving mice induced recovery of visual nervous conduction and significant beneficial effects in myelin content and inflammatory cells in the cuprizone model of demyelination. Altogether, these promising findings prompt further exploration of tDCS as a potential therapeutic approach for remyelination.

Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Craving, Cognitive Functions, and Serum Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Level in Individuals on Maintenance Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder, A Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels, craving, and executive functions in individuals on maintenance treatment for opioid use.

METHODS

We randomized 70 right-handed men aged 18-55 years into 2 groups: the intervention group and the sham group. The intervention was 10 sessions of 2 mA stimulation over 5 days. Each session in the sham group ended after 30 seconds. Craving was measured using the Desire for Drug Questionnaire (DDQ), Obsessive Compulsive Drug Use Scale (OCDUS), and visual analog scale (VAS). The measurements were taken before and after the intervention, as well as 2 months later. BDNF was measured before and after the intervention. Repeated-measures analysis of variance, the generalized estimating equation model, and independent t test were used for data analysis.

RESULTS

The mean differences (95% confidence intervals) in pre and post craving scores in the intervention group were (12.71 [9.10 to 16.32], P = 0.167) for VAS, (1.54 [1.12 to 1.96], P = 0.012) for OCDUS, and (1.71 [1.27 to 2.15], P = 0.125) for DDQ. These measures in the control group were -0.44 (-1.19 to 0.30), 0.01 (-0.21 to 0.23), and 0.126 (-0.11 to 0.36), respectively. BDNF serum levels significantly increased after the intervention (difference, 0.84 [0.69 to 0.99], P < 0.001); however, this change was not significant in the generalized estimating equation model. The effect of tDCS on craving was significant in OCDUS, but not significant in VAS and DDQ.

CONCLUSIONS

The tDCS reduces craving and improves executive functions in the short term. BDNF serum level was not associated with tDCS.

Towards multimodal cognition-based treatment for cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease: drugs, exercise, non-invasive brain stimulation and technologies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cognitive impairment is one of the most challenging non-motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD) and may occur during all PD stages. There are no established pharmacological treatments for PD-related cognitive impairment, which may be improved by cognition-based interventions (i.e., cognitive stimulation, cognitive training, cognitive rehabilitation). Multimodal cognition-based interventions by adjunctive drugs, exercise, non-invasive brain stimulation and technologies may be effective in PD.

RECENT FINDINGS

Exercise combined with cognitive training may enhance global, memory, visuospatial and executive functioning, transcranial direct current stimulation delivered alongside cognitive training may improve attention and executive functioning, and exergames, semi-immersive virtual reality (VR) and telerehabilitation plus non-immersive VR combined with cognitive training may ameliorate global and executive functioning in PD patients.

SUMMARY

The evidence reviewed here, despite preliminary, is very encouraging and suggests strong rationale for combining pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions with cognition-based treatments in PD. To overcome limitations of current studies, we propose some recommendations for future trials on drugs, exercise, non-invasive brain stimulation and technologies combined with cognition-based treatments for cognitive impairment in PD.

Machine learning-optimized non-invasive brain stimulation and treatment response classification for major depression

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation intervention that shows promise as a potential treatment for depression. However, the clinical efficacy of tDCS varies, possibly due to individual differences in head anatomy affecting tDCS dosage. While functional changes in brain activity are more commonly reported in major depressive disorder (MDD), some studies suggest that subtle macroscopic structural differences, such as cortical thickness or brain volume reductions, may occur in MDD and could influence tDCS electric field (E-field) distributions. Therefore, accounting for individual anatomical differences may provide a pathway to optimize functional gains in MDD by formulating personalized tDCS dosage.

METHODS

To address the dosing variability of tDCS, we examined a subsample of sixteen active-tDCS participants' data from the larger ELECT clinical trial (NCT01894815). With this dataset, individualized neuroimaging-derived computational models of tDCS current were generated for (1) classifying treatment response, (2) elucidating essential stimulation features associated with treatment response, and (3) computing a personalized dose of tDCS to maximize the likelihood of treatment response in MDD.

RESULTS

In the ELECT trial, tDCS was superior to placebo (3.2 points [95% CI, 0.7 to 5.5; P = 0.01]). Our algorithm achieved over 90% overall accuracy in classifying treatment responders from the active-tDCS group (AUC = 0.90, F1 = 0.92, MCC = 0.79). Computed precision doses also achieved an average response likelihood of 99.981% and decreased dosing variability by 91.9%.

CONCLUSION

These findings support our previously developed precision-dosing method for a new application in psychiatry by optimizing the statistical likelihood of tDCS treatment response in MDD.

Evaluating the effects of tDCS on depressive and anxiety symptoms from a transdiagnostic perspective: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Depressive and anxiety symptoms are prevalent among patients with various clinical conditions, resulting in diminished emotional well-being and impaired daily functioning. The neural mechanisms underlying these symptoms, particularly across different disorders, remain unclear, limiting the effectiveness of conventional treatments. Therefore, it is crucial to elucidate the neural underpinnings of depressive and anxiety symptoms and investigate novel, effective treatments across clinical conditions. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a neuromodulatory technique that can help understand the neural underpinnings of symptoms and facilitate the development of interventions, addressing the two research gaps at both neural and clinical levels. Thus, this systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the existing evidence regarding the therapeutic efficacy of tDCS in reducing depressive and anxiety symptoms among individuals with diverse clinical diagnoses. This review evaluated evidence from fifty-six randomized, sham-controlled trials that administered repeated tDCS sessions with a parallel design, applying a three-level meta-analytic model. tDCS targeting the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) at 2-mA intensity demonstrates moderate efficacy in alleviating depressive symptoms, identifying the left DLPFC as a transdiagnostic neural mechanism of depressive symptoms across clinical conditions. In comparison, the findings on anxiety symptoms demonstrate greater heterogeneity. tDCS over the left DLPFC is effective in reducing depressive symptoms and shows promising effects in alleviating anxiety symptoms among individuals with diverse diagnoses. These findings enhance our understanding of the neuropsychological basis of depressive and anxiety symptoms, laying the groundwork for the development of more effective tDCS interventions applicable across clinical conditions.

Brain complexity in stroke recovery after bihemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation in mice

Stroke is one of the leading causes of disability worldwide. There are many different rehabilitation approaches aimed at improving clinical outcomes for stroke survivors. One of the latest therapeutic techniques is the non-invasive brain stimulation. Among non-invasive brain stimulation, transcranial direct current stimulation has shown promising results in enhancing motor and cognitive recovery both in animal models of stroke and stroke survivors. In this framework, one of the most innovative methods is the bihemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation that simultaneously increases excitability in one hemisphere and decreases excitability in the contralateral one. As bihemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation can create a more balanced modulation of brain activity, this approach may be particularly useful in counteracting imbalanced brain activity, such as in stroke. Given these premises, the aim of the current study has been to explore the recovery after stroke in mice that underwent a bihemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation treatment, by recording their electric brain activity with local field potential and by measuring behavioural outcomes of Grip Strength test. An innovative parameter that explores the complexity of signals, namely the Entropy, recently adopted to describe brain activity in physiopathological states, was evaluated to analyse local field potential data. Results showed that stroke mice had higher values of Entropy compared to healthy mice, indicating an increase in brain complexity and signal disorder due to the stroke. Additionally, the bihemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation reduced Entropy in both healthy and stroke mice compared to sham stimulated mice, with a greater effect in stroke mice. Moreover, correlation analysis showed a negative correlation between Entropy and Grip Strength values, indicating that higher Entropy values resulted in lower Grip Strength engagement. Concluding, the current evidence suggests that the Entropy index of brain complexity characterizes stroke pathology and recovery. Together with this, bihemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation can modulate brain rhythms in animal models of stroke, providing potentially new avenues for rehabilitation in humans.

Transcranial electric stimulation modulates firing rate at clinically relevant intensities

BACKGROUND

Notwithstanding advances with low-intensity transcranial electrical stimulation (tES), there remain questions about the efficacy of clinically realistic electric fields on neuronal function.

OBJECTIVE

To measure electric fields magnitude and their effects on neuronal firing rate of hippocampal neurons in freely moving rats, and to establish calibrated computational models of current flow.

METHODS

Current flow models were calibrated on electric field measures in the motor cortex (n = 2 anesthetized rats) and hippocampus. A Neuropixels 2.0 probe with 384 channels was used in an in-vivo rat model of tES (n = 4 freely moving and 2 urethane anesthetized rats) to detect effects of weak fields on neuronal firing rate. High-density field mapping and computational models verified field intensity (1 V/m in hippocampus per 50 μA of applied skull currents).

RESULTS

Electric fields of as low as 0.35 V/m (0.25-0.47) acutely modulated average firing rate in the hippocampus. At these intensities, firing rate effects increased monotonically with electric field intensity at a rate of 11.5 % per V/m (7.2-18.3). For the majority of excitatory neurons, firing increased for soma-depolarizing stimulation and diminished for soma-hyperpolarizing stimulation. While more diverse, the response of inhibitory neurons followed a similar pattern on average, likely as a result of excitatory drive.

CONCLUSION

In awake animals, electric fields modulate spiking rate above levels previously observed in vitro. Firing rate effects are likely mediated by somatic polarization of pyramidal neurons. We recommend that all future rodent experiments directly measure electric fields to insure rigor and reproducibility.

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in neurogenetic syndromes: new treatment perspectives for Down syndrome?

This perspective review aims to explore the potential neurobiological mechanisms involved in the application of transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) for Down syndrome (DS), the leading cause of genetically-based intellectual disability. The neural mechanisms underlying tDCS interventions in genetic disorders, typically characterized by cognitive deficits, are grounded in the concept of brain plasticity. We initially present the neurobiological and functional effects elicited by tDCS applications in enhancing neuroplasticity and in regulating the excitatory/inhibitory balance, both associated with cognitive improvement in the general population. The review begins with evidence on tDCS applications in five neurogenetic disorders, including Rett, Prader-Willi, Phelan-McDermid, and Neurofibromatosis 1 syndromes, as well as DS. Available evidence supports tDCS as a potential intervention tool and underscores the importance of advancing neurobiological research into the mechanisms of tDCS action in these conditions. We then discuss the potential of tDCS as a promising non-invasive strategy to mitigate deficits in plasticity and promote fine-tuning of the excitatory/inhibitory balance in DS, exploring implications for cognitive treatment perspectives in this population.

Can transcranial direct current stimulation combined with interactive computerized cognitive training boost cognition and gait performance in older adults with mild cognitive impairment? a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Older adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) are often subject to cognitive and gait deficits. Interactive Computerized Cognitive Training (ICCT) may improve cognitive function; however, the effect of such training on gait performance is limited. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) improves cognition and gait performance. It remains unclear whether combining tDCS with ICCT produces an enhanced synergistic effect on cognition and complex gait performance relative to ICCT alone. This study aimed to compare the effects of tDCS combined with ICCT on cognition and gait performance in older adults with MCI.

METHOD

Twenty-one older adults with MCI were randomly assigned to groups receiving either anodal tDCS and ICCT ( tDCS + ICCT ) or sham tDCS and ICCT ( sham + ICCT ). Participants played Nintendo Switch cognitive games for 40 min per session, simultaneously receiving either anodal or sham tDCS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex for the first 20 min. Cognitive and gait assessments were performed before and after 15 training sessions.

RESULTS

The global cognition, executive function, and working-memory scores improved in both groups, but there were no significant interaction effects on cognitive outcomes. Additionally, the group × time interactions indicated that tDCS + ICCT significantly enhanced dual-task gait performance in terms of gait speed (p = 0.045), variability (p = 0.016), and dual-task cost (p = 0.039) compared to sham + ICCT.

CONCLUSION

The combined effect of tDCS and ICCT on cognition was not superior to that of ICCT alone; however, it had a significant impact on dual-task gait performance. Administering tDCS as an adjunct to ICCT may thus provide additional benefits for older adults with MCI.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial was registered at http://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

in.th/ (TCTR 20,220,328,009).

Safety of ipsilesional anodal transcranial direct current stimulation in acute photothrombotic stroke: implications for early neurorehabilitation

Early rehabilitation in the acute phase of stroke, that bears unique neuroplastic properties, is the current standard to reduce disability. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation can augment neurorehabilitation in chronic stroke. Studies in the acute phase are sparse and held back by inconclusive preclinical data pointing towards potential negative interaction of the excitability increasing tDCS modality with stroke-induced glutamate toxicity. In this present study, we aimed to evaluate structural and behavioral safety of anodal tDCS applied in the acute phase of stroke. Photothrombotic stroke including the right primary motor cortex was induced in rats. 24 h after stroke anodal tDCS was applied for 20 min ipsilesionally at one of four different current densities in freely moving animals. Effects on the infarct volume and on stroke induced neuroinflammation were assessed. Behavioral consequences were monitored. Infarct volume and the modified Neurological Severity Score were not affected by anodal tDCS. Pasta handling, a more sensitive task for sensorimotor deficits, and microglia reactivity indicated potentially harmful effects at the highest tDCS current density tested (47.8 A/m2), which is more than 60 times higher than intensities commonly used in humans. Compared to published safety limits of anodal tDCS in healthy rats, recent stroke does not increase the sensitivity of the brain to anodal tDCS, as assessed by lesion size and neuroinflammatory response. Behavioral deficits only occurred at the highest intensity, which was associated with increased neuroinflammation. When safety limits of commonly used clinical tDCS are met, augmentation of early neurorehabilitation after stroke by anodal tDCS appears to be feasible.

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Ameliorates Stress-Induced Sleep Disruption via Activating Infralimbic-Ventrolateral Preoptic Projections

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is acknowledged for its non-invasive modulation of neuronal activity in psychiatric disorders. However, its application in insomnia research yields varied outcomes depending on different tDCS types and patient conditions. Our primary objective is to elucidate its efficiency and uncover the underlying mechanisms in insomnia treatment. We hypothesized that anodal prefrontal cortex stimulation activates glutamatergic projections from the infralimbic cortex (IL) to the ventrolateral preoptic area (VLPO) to promote sleep. After administering 0.06 mA of electrical currents for 8 min, our results indicate significant non-rapid eye movement (NREM) enhancement in naïve mice within the initial 3 h post-stimulation, persisting up to 16-24 h. In the insomnia group, tDCS enhanced NREM sleep bout numbers during acute stress response and improved NREM and REM sleep duration in subsequent acute insomnia. Sleep quality, assessed through NREM delta powers, remains unaffected. Interference of the IL-VLPO pathway, utilizing designer receptors exclusively activated by designer drugs (DREADDs) with the cre-DIO system, partially blocked tDCS's sleep improvement in stress-induced insomnia. This study elucidated that the activation of the IL-VLPO pathway mediates tDCS's effect on stress-induced insomnia. These findings support the understanding of tDCS effects on sleep disturbances, providing valuable insights for future research and clinical applications in sleep therapy.

Brain Stimulation in Alzheimer's Disease Trials

Alzheimer's disease (AD) continues to lack definitive curative therapies, necessitating an urgent exploration of innovative approaches. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of recent clinical trials focusing on invasive and non-invasive brain stimulation techniques as potential interventions for AD. Deep brain stimulation (DBS), repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) are evaluated for their therapeutic efficacy, safety, and applicability. DBS, though invasive, has shown promising results in mitigating cognitive decline, but concerns over surgical risks and long-term effects persist. On the other hand, non-invasive methods like rTMS, tDCS, and tACS have demonstrated potential in enhancing cognitive performance and delaying disease progression, with minimal side effects, but with varied consistency. The evidence hints towards an individualized, patient-centric approach to brain stimulation, considering factors such as disease stage, genetic traits, and stimulation parameters. The review also highlights emerging technologies and potential future directions, emphasizing the need for larger, multi-center trials to confirm preliminary findings and establish robust clinical guidelines. In conclusion, while brain stimulation techniques present a promising avenue in AD therapy, further research is imperative for more comprehensive understanding and successful clinical implementation. Through this review, we aim to catalyze the scientific discourse and stimulate further investigation into these novel interventions for AD.

Different paradigms of transcranial electrical stimulation induce structural changes in the CA1 region of the hippocampus in a rat model of Alzheimer's disease

One of the prominent sign of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is structural changes in the hippocampus. Recently, the new methods used to treat this disease is transcranial electrical stimulation (tES). This study evaluated the effect of four primary standards of tES, including tDCS, tACS, tRNS, and tPCS on beta-amyloid 25-35 (Aβ25-35)-induced structural changes in the CA1 region of hippocampus in male rats. For this purpose, rats weighing 250-275 g were selected, the cannula was embedded reciprocally into the hippocampi. Aβ25-35 (5 μg/ 2.5 ml/ day) was infused reciprocally for four continuous days.Then, animals were then given tES for 6 days.Subsequently, structural changes in the hippocampal CA1 were evaluated using the stereological method. Aβ25-35 resulted in loss of neurons (P < 0.01) and decreased hippocampal volume (P < 0.05). However, the administration of tES paradigms prevented these changes. The results proposed that through the improvement of hippocampal cell number and volume, tES paradigms can retain efficiency in remediating structural impairments in AD. From this, it can be concluded that other tES paradigms besides tDCS can also be considered for the treatment of AD.

Cx3cr1 deficiency interferes with learning- and direct current stimulation-mediated neuroplasticity of the motor cortex

Microglia are essential contributors to synaptic transmission and stability and communicate with neurons via the fractalkine pathway. Transcranial direct current stimulation [(t)DCS], a form of non-invasive electrical brain stimulation, modulates cortical excitability and promotes neuroplasticity, which has been extensively demonstrated in the motor cortex and for motor learning. The role of microglia and their fractalkine receptor CX3CR1 in motor cortical neuroplasticity mediated by DCS or motor learning requires further elucidation. We demonstrate the effects of pharmacological microglial depletion and genetic Cx3cr1 deficiency on the induction of DCS-induced long-term potentiation (DCS-LTP) ex vivo. The relevance of microglia-neuron communication for DCS response and structural neuroplasticity underlying motor learning are assessed via 2-photon in vivo imaging. The behavioural consequences of impaired CX3CR1 signalling are investigated for both gross and fine motor learning. We show that DCS-mediated neuroplasticity in the motor cortex depends on the presence of microglia and is driven in part by CX3CR1 signalling ex vivo and provide the first evidence of microglia interacting with neurons during DCS in vivo. Furthermore, CX3CR1 signalling is required for motor learning and underlying structural neuroplasticity in concert with microglia interaction. Although we have recently demonstrated the microglial response to DCS in vivo, we now provide a link between microglial integrity and neuronal activity for the expression of DCS-dependent neuroplasticity. In addition, we extend the knowledge on the relevance of CX3CR1 signalling for motor learning and structural neuroplasticity. The underlying molecular mechanisms and the potential impact of DCS in rescuing CX3CR1 deficits remain to be addressed in the future.

Transcranial electric stimulation modulates firing rate at clinically relevant intensities

Notwithstanding advances with low-intensity transcranial electrical stimulation (TES), there remain questions about the efficacy of clinically realistic electric fields on neuronal function. We used Neuropixels 2.0 probe with 384 channels in an in-vivo rat model of TES to detect effects of weak fields on neuronal firing rate. High-density field mapping and computational models verified field intensity (1 V/m in hippocampus per 50 μA of applied skull currents). We demonstrate that electric fields below 0.5 V/m acutely modulate firing rate in 5% of neurons recorded in the hippocampus. At these intensities, average firing rate effects increased monotonically with electric field intensity at a rate of 7 % per V/m. For the majority of excitatory neurons, firing increased for cathodal stimulation and diminished for anodal stimulation. While more diverse, the response of inhibitory neurons followed a similar pattern on average, likely as a result of excitatory drive. Our results indicate that responses to TES at clinically relevant intensities are driven by a fraction of high-responder excitatory neurons, with polarity-specific effects. We conclude that transcranial electric stimulation is an effective neuromodulator at clinically realistic intensities.

Preclinical Evidence for the Mechanisms of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in the Treatment of Psychiatric Disorders; A Systematic Review

Backgrounds. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique for the treatment of several psychiatric disorders, eg, mood disorders and schizophrenia. Although tDCS provides a promising approach, its neurobiological mechanisms remain to be explored. Objectives. To provide a systematic review of animal studies, and consider how tDCS ameliorates psychiatric conditions. Methods. A literature search was conducted on English articles identified by PubMed. We defined the inclusion criteria as follows: (1) articles published from the original data; (2) experimental studies in animals; (3) studies delivering direct current transcranially, ie, positioning electrodes onto the skull. Results. 138 papers met the inclusion criteria. 62 papers deal with model animals without any dysfunctions, followed by 52 papers for neurological disorder models, and 12 for psychiatric disorder models. The most studied category of functional areas is neurocognition, followed by motor functions and pain. These studies overall suggest the role for the late long-term potentiation (LTP) via anodal stimulation in the therapeutic effects of tDCS. Conclusions. tDCS Anodal stimulation may provide a novel therapeutic strategy to particularly enhance neurocognition in psychiatric disorders. Its mechanisms are likely to involve facilitation of the late LTP.

Preemptive transcranial direct current stimulation induces analgesia, prevents chronic inflammation and fibrosis, and promotes tissue repair in a rat model of postoperative pain

This study evaluated the effects of previous exposure to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on nociceptive, neuroinflammatory, and neurochemical parameters, in rats subjected to an incisional pain model. Forty adult male Wistar rats (60 days old; weighing ∼ 250 g) were divided into five groups: 1. control (C); 2. drugs (D); 3. surgery (S); 4. surgery + sham-tDCS (SsT) and 5. surgery + tDCS (ST). Bimodal tDCS (0.5 mA) was applied for 20 min/day/8 days before the incisional model. Mechanical allodynia (von Frey) was evaluated at different time points after surgery. Cytokines and BDNF levels were evaluated in the cerebral cortex, hippocampus, brainstem, and spinal cord. Histology and activity of myeloperoxidase (MPO) and N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase (NAGase) were evaluated in the surgical lesion sites in the right hind paw. The results demonstrate that the surgery procedure increased BDNF and IL-6 levels in the spinal cord levels in the hippocampus, and decreased IL-1β and IL-6 levels in the cerebral cortex, IL-6 levels in the hippocampus, and IL-10 levels in the brainstem and hippocampus. In addition, preemptive tDCS was effective in controlling postoperative pain, increasing BDNF, IL-6, and IL-10 levels in the spinal cord and brainstem, increasing IL-1β in the spinal cord, and decreasing IL-6 levels in the cerebral cortex and hippocampus, IL-1β and IL-10 levels in the hippocampus. Preemptive tDCS also contributes to tissue repair, preventing chronic inflammation, and consequent fibrosis. Thus, these findings imply that preemptive methods for postoperative pain management should be considered an interesting pain management strategy, and may contribute to the development of clinical applications for tDCS in surgical situations.

Comparison of bihemispheric and unihemispheric M1 transcranial direct current stimulations during physical therapy in subacute stroke patients: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Despite the central origin of stroke affecting the primary motor cortex M1, most physical and occupational rehabilitation programs focus on peripheral treatments rather than addressing the central origin of the problem. This highlights the urgent need for effective protocols to improve neurological rehabilitation and achieve better long-term functional outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

Our hypothesis was that the bihemispheric delivery of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is superior to unihemispheric in enhancing motor function after stroke, in both the upper and lower extremities.

METHODS

35 sub-acute ischemic stroke survivors were randomly divided into three groups: bihemispheric and unihemispheric treatment groups, or sham groups. Each participant received a 20-minute session of tDCS with an intensity of 2 mA during physical therapy sessions, three days a week, for four weeks. The outcomes were measured using Fugl-Meyer assessment scale, modified Ashworth scale, Berg balance scale, and serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels.

RESULTS

One-way ANOVA test indicated a significant effect of both treatment protocols on the upper extremity (p = < 0.001) and lower extremity (p = .034) for motor measures, but there was no difference between the two (p = .939). Kruskal Wallis test for spasticity showed a significant improvement in both treatment groups for elbow (p = .036) and wrist flexors (p = .025), compared to the sham group. However, there was no statistically significant difference in spasticity between uni- and bihemispheric stimulation for elbow (p = .731) or wrist flexors (p = .910).

CONCLUSION

There is no statistically significant difference in efficacy between bihemispheric and unihemispheric tDCS in patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke. .

Machine-learning defined precision tDCS for improving cognitive function

BACKGROUND

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) paired with cognitive training (CT) is widely investigated as a therapeutic tool to enhance cognitive function in older adults with and without neurodegenerative disease. Prior research demonstrates that the level of benefit from tDCS paired with CT varies from person to person, likely due to individual differences in neuroanatomical structure.

OBJECTIVE

The current study aims to develop a method to objectively optimize and personalize current dosage to maximize the functional gains of non-invasive brain stimulation.

METHODS

A support vector machine (SVM) model was trained to predict treatment response based on computational models of current density in a sample dataset (n = 14). Feature weights of the deployed SVM were used in a weighted Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) to maximize the likelihood of converting tDCS non-responders to responders by finding the most optimum electrode montage and applied current intensity (optimized models).

RESULTS

Current distributions optimized by the proposed SVM-GMM model demonstrated 93% voxel-wise coherence within target brain regions between the originally non-responders and responders. The optimized current distribution in original non-responders was 3.38 standard deviations closer to the current dose of responders compared to the pre-optimized models. Optimized models also achieved an average treatment response likelihood and normalized mutual information of 99.993% and 91.21%, respectively. Following tDCS dose optimization, the SVM model successfully predicted all tDCS non-responders with optimized doses as responders.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study serve as a foundation for a custom dose optimization strategy towards precision medicine in tDCS to improve outcomes in cognitive decline remediation for older adults.

Peripheral nerve stimulation: A neuromodulation-based approach

Recent technological improvements have positioned us at the threshold of innovative discoveries that will assist in new perspectives and avenues of research. Increased attention has been directed towards peripheral nerve stimulation, particularly of the vagus, trigeminal, or greater occipital nerve, due to their unique pathway that engages neural circuits within networks involved in higher cognitive processes. Here, we question whether the effects of transcutaneous electrical stimulation are mediated by synergistic interactions of multiple neuromodulatory networks, considering this pathway is shared by more than one neuromodulatory system. By spotlighting this attractive transcutaneous pathway, this opinion piece aims to acknowledge the contributions of four vital neuromodulators and prompt researchers to consider them in future investigations or explanations.

Self-Regulatory Neuronal Mechanisms and Long-Term Challenges in Schizophrenia Treatment

Schizophrenia is a chronic and relapsing disorder that is characterized not only by delusions and hallucinations but also mainly by the progressive development of cognitive and social deficits. These deficits are related to impaired synaptic plasticity and impaired neurotransmission in the nervous system. Currently, technological innovations and medical advances make it possible to use various self-regulatory methods to improve impaired synaptic plasticity. To evaluate the therapeutic effect of various rehabilitation methods, we reviewed methods that modify synaptic plasticity and improve the cognitive and executive processes of patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia. PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar bibliographic databases were searched with the keywords mentioned below. A total of 555 records were identified. Modern methods of schizophrenia therapy with neuroplastic potential, including neurofeedback, transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial direct current stimulation, vagus nerve stimulation, virtual reality therapy, and cognitive remediation therapy, were reviewed and analyzed. Since randomized controlled studies of long-term schizophrenia treatment do not exceed 2-3 years, and the pharmacological treatment itself has an incompletely estimated benefit-risk ratio, treatment methods based on other paradigms, including neuronal self-regulatory and neural plasticity mechanisms, should be considered. Methods available for monitoring neuroplastic effects in vivo (e.g., fMRI, neuropeptides in serum), as well as unfavorable parameters (e.g., features of the metabolic syndrome), enable individualized monitoring of the effectiveness of long-term treatment of schizophrenia.

Hippocampal-prefrontal long-term potentiation-like plasticity with transcranial direct current stimulation in rats

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been explored as a new treatment method for improving cognitive and motor functions. However, the neuronal mechanisms of tDCS in modulating brain functions, especially cognitive and memory functions, are not well understood. In the present study, we assessed whether tDCS could promote neuronal plasticity between the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex in rats. This is important because the hippocampus-prefrontal pathway is a key pathway in cognitive and memory functions and is involved in various psychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders. Specifically, the effect of anodal or cathodal tDCS on the medial prefrontal cortex was investigated in rats by measuring the medial prefrontal cortex response to electrical stimulation applied to the CA1 region of the hippocampus. Following anodal tDCS, the evoked prefrontal response was potentiated compared to that in the pre-tDCS condition. However, the evoked prefrontal response did not show any significant changes following cathodal tDCS. Furthermore, the plastic change of the prefrontal response following anodal tDCS was only induced when hippocampal stimulation was continuously applied during tDCS. Anodal tDCS without hippocampal activation showed little or no changes. These results indicate that combining anodal tDCS of the prefrontal cortex with hippocampal activation induces long-term potentiation (LTP)-like plasticity in the hippocampus-prefrontal pathway. This LTP-like plasticity can facilitate smooth information transmission between the hippocampus and the prefrontal cortex and may lead to improvements in cognitive and memory function.

Identifying factors influencing cognitive outcomes after anodal transcranial direct current stimulation in older adults with and without cognitive impairment: A systematic review

Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can improve cognition in healthy older adults, those with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI), albeit with considerable variability in response. This systematic review identifies interindividual factors that may influence tDCS outcomes in older individuals with or without cognitive impairment. Peer-reviewed articles were included if they assessed whether cognitive outcomes (memory or global cognition) after tDCS were associated with pre-intervention factors in healthy older adults or individuals with AD/MCI. We identified eight factors that may affect cognitive outcomes after tDCS. Improved tDCS outcomes were predicted by lower baseline cognitive function when tDCS was combined with a co-intervention (but not when used alone). Preserved brain structure and better baseline functional connectivity, genetic polymorphisms, and the use of concomitant medications may predict better tDCS outcomes, but further research is warranted. tDCS outcomes were not consistently associated with age, cognitive reserve, sex, and AD risk factors. Accounting for individual differences in baseline cognition, particularly for combined interventions, may thus maximize the therapeutic potential of tDCS.

Clinical Implementation of Noninvasive Brain Stimulation in an Outpatient Neurorehabilitation Program

ABSTRACT

Motor, speech, and cognitive impairments are the most common consequences of neurological disorders. There has been an increasing interest in the use of noninvasive brain stimulation techniques such as transcranial direct current stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation to augment the effects of neurorehabilitation. Numerous research studies have shown that transcranial direct current stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation are highly promising neuromodulation tools that can work as adjuvants to standard neurorehabilitation services, including physical therapy, occupational therapy, and speech-language pathology. However, to date, there are vast differences in methodology in studies including noninvasive brain stimulation parameters, patient characteristics, time point of intervention after injury, and outcome measures, making it difficult to translate and implement transcranial direct current stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation in the clinical setting. Despite this, a series of principles are thought to underlie the effectiveness of noninvasive brain stimulation techniques. We developed a noninvasive brain stimulation rehabilitation program using these principles to provide best practices for applying transcranial direct current stimulation and/or transcranial magnetic stimulation as rehabilitation adjuvants in the clinical setting to help improve neurorehabilitation outcomes. This article outlines our approach, philosophy, and experience.

Multisession Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Enhances Adult Hippocampal Neurogenesis and Context Discrimination in Mice

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising noninvasive neuromodulatory treatment option for multiple neurologic and psychiatric disorders, but its mechanism of action is still poorly understood. Adult hippocampal neurogenesis (AHN) continues throughout life and is crucial for preserving several aspects of hippocampal-dependent cognitive functions. Nevertheless, the contribution of AHN in the neuromodulatory effects of tDCS remains unexplored. Here, we sought to investigate whether multisession anodal tDCS may modulate AHN and its associated cognitive functions. Multisession anodal tDCS were applied on the skull over the hippocampus of adult male mice for 20 min at 0.25 mA once daily for 10 d totally. We found that multisession anodal tDCS enhances AHN by increasing the proliferation, differentiation and survival of neural stem/progenitor cells (NSPCs). In addition, tDCS treatment increased cell cycle reentry and reduced cell cycle exit of NSPCs. The tDCS-treated mice exhibited a reduced GABAergic inhibitory tone in the dentate gyrus compared with sham-treated mice. The effect of tDCS on the proliferation of NSPCs was blocked by pharmacological restoration of GABA_B receptor-mediated inhibition. Functionally, multisession anodal tDCS enhances performance on a contextual fear discrimination task, and this enhancement was prevented by blocking AHN using the DNA alkylating agent temozolomide (TMZ). Our results emphasize an important role for AHN in mediating the beneficial effects of tDCS on cognitive functions that substantially broadens the mechanistic understanding of tDCS beyond its well-described in hippocampal synaptic plasticity.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been shown to effectively enhance cognitive functions in healthy and pathologic conditions. However, the mechanisms underlying its effects are largely unknown and need to be better understood to enable its optimal clinical use. This study shows that multisession anodal tDCS enhances adult hippocampal neurogenesis (AHN) and therefore contributes to enhance context discrimination in mice. Our results also show that the effect of tDCS on AHN is associated with reduced GABAergic inhibition in the dentate gyrus. Our study uncovers a novel mechanism of anodal tDCS to elicit cognitive-enhancing effects and may have the potential to improve cognitive decline associated with normal aging and neurodegenerative disorders.

¬Transcranial direct current stimulation improves sleep quality in patients with insomnia after traumatic brain injury

INTRODUCTION

Insomnia is a serious problem after traumatic brain injury (TBI) and partially improves via sleeping pills. We investigated the efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with a focus on the role of age and gender.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a randomized double-blind clinical trial, 60 eligible TBI-induced insomnia patients were assigned to real and sham tDCS groups and were treated for three weeks. Sham but not real tDCS took sleeping pills for the first three weeks of the study and then used the placebo until the end of the study. The placebo was used by the real-tDCS group throughout the study. Sleep quality and insomnia severity were respectively evaluated by Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) at three time points.

RESULTS

Real tDCS group reported lower mean ISI and PSQI scores at 3 weeks post treatment onset and maintained this decline for six weeks post treatment onset (P < 0.001). In younger participants and those identified as men, the treatment-induced attenuation of the mean PSQI score was reported higher and more lasting in real than sham tDCS groups.

CONCLUSION

Gender and age-specific tDCS protocols may be warranted to optimize the therapeutic effect of tDCS.

Robust enhancement of motor sequence learning with 4 mA transcranial electric stimulation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Motor learning experiments with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) at 2 mA have produced mixed results. We hypothesize that tDCS boosts motor learning provided sufficiently high field intensity on the motor cortex.

METHODS

In a single-blinded design, 108 healthy participants received either anodal (N = 36) or cathodal (N = 36) tDCS at 4 mA total, or no stimulation (N = 36) while they practiced a 12-min sequence learning task. Anodal stimulation was delivered across four electrode pairs (1 mA each), with anodes above the right parietal lobe and cathodes above the right frontal lobe. Cathodal stimulation, with reversed polarities, served as an active control for sensation, while the no-stimulation condition established baseline performance. fMRI-localized targets on the primary motor cortex in 10 subjects were used in current flow models to optimize electrode placement for maximal field intensity. A single electrode montage was then selected for all participants.

RESULTS

We found a significant difference in performance with anodal vs. cathodal stimulation (Cohen's d = 0.71) and vs. no stimulation (d = 0.56). This effect persisted for at least 1 h, and subsequent learning for a new sequence and the opposite hand also improved. Sensation ratings were comparable in the active groups and did not exceed moderate levels. Current flow models suggest the new electrode montage can achieve stronger motor cortex polarization than alternative montages.

CONCLUSION

The present paradigm shows a medium to large effect size and is well-tolerated. It may serve as a go-to experiment for future studies on motor learning and tDCS.

Transcranial cortex-wide Ca2+ imaging for the functional mapping of cortical dynamics

Visualization and tracking of the information flow in the broader brain area are essential because nerve cells make a vast network in the brain. Fluorescence Ca²⁺ imaging is a simultaneous visualization of brain cell activities in a wide area. Instead of classical chemical indicators, developing various types of transgenic animals that express Ca²⁺-sensitive fluorescent proteins enables us to observe brain activities in living animals at a larger scale for a long time. Multiple kinds of literature have reported that transcranial imaging of such transgenic animals is practical for monitoring the wide-field information flow across the broad brain regions, although it has a lower spatial resolution. Notably, this technique is helpful for the initial evaluation of cortical function in disease models. This review will introduce fully intact transcranial macroscopic imaging and cortex-wide Ca²⁺ imaging as practical applications.

Efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation on postoperative delirium in elderly patients undergoing lower limb major arthroplasty: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Postoperative delirium (POD) is a common and severe postoperative complication in elderly patients undergoing major surgery linked to increased morbidity and mortality. It is reported that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) effectively enhances cognitive function and improves impaired consciousness.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of tDCS on POD in elderly patients undergoing lower limb major arthroplasty, including total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

Patients aged ≥65 years scheduled for THA or TKA were randomly assigned to receive 2 mA tDCS for 20 min active-tDCS (n = 61) or sham-tDCS (n = 61). The primary outcome was the incidence of POD during the first 3 postoperative days.

RESULTS

All 122 patients (median age, 70 years; 80 women [65.6%]) completed the trial. The incident delirium risk was 4.9% (n = 3) vs. 19.7% (n = 12) in active-tDCS and sham-tDCS groups, respectively (relative risk, 0.250; 95% CI, 0.074 to 0.842; P = 0.013). Compared to the sham-tDCS group, the anxiety and depression scores of patients in the active-tDCS group were lower at 2 h and one day after surgery (P < 0.001 for each), and pain scores of patients in the active-tDCS group were lower during the first three days after surgery (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

One session of anodal tDCS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex may decrease the incidence of POD in elderly patients undergoing lower limb major arthroplasty.

Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on brain cytokine levels in rats

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has shown therapeutic potential to mitigate symptoms of various neurological disorders. Studies from our group and others used rodent models to demonstrate that tDCS modulates synaptic plasticity. We previously showed that 30 min of 0.25 mA tDCS administered to rats induced significant enhancement in the synaptic plasticity of hippocampal neurons. It has also been shown that tDCS induces expression of proteins known to mediate synaptic plasticity. This increase in synaptic plasticity may underly the observed therapeutic benefits of tDCS. However, the anti-inflammatory benefits of tDCS have not been thoroughly elucidated. Here we report that three sessions of tDCS spaced 1-3 weeks apart can significantly reduce levels of several inflammatory cytokines in brains of healthy rats. Rats receiving tDCS experienced enhanced synaptic plasticity without detectable improvement in behavioral tests or significant changes in astrocyte activation. The tDCS-mediated reduction in inflammatory cytokine levels supports the potential use of tDCS as a countermeasure against inflammation and offers additional support for the hypothesis that cytokines contribute to the modulation of synaptic plasticity.

Is non-invasive brain stimulation effective for cognitive enhancement in Alzheimer's disease? An updated meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Alzheimer's disease dementia (AD) and its preclinical stage, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), are critical issues confronting the aging society. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques have the potential to be effective tools for enhancing cognitive functioning. The main objective of our meta-analysis was to quantify and update the status of the efficacy of repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) when applied in AD and MCI.

METHODS

The systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed and Web of Science according to PRISMA statement.

RESULTS

Pooled effect sizes (Hedges' g) from 32 studies were analyzed using random effect models. We found both, rTMS and tDCS to have significant immediate cognition-enhancing effect in AD with rTMS inducing also beneficial long-term effects. We found no evidence for synergistic effect of cognitive training with NIBS.

CONCLUSIONS

In AD a clinical recommendation can be made for NEURO-AD^TM system and for high-frequency rTMS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) as probably effective protocols (B-level of evidence) and for anodal tDCS over the left DLPFC as a possibly effective.

SIGNIFICANCE

According to scientific literature, NIBS may be an effective method for improving cognition in AD and possibly in MCI.

The benefits of simultaneous tDCS and working memory training on transfer outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has shown potential as an effective aid to facilitate learning. A popular application of this technology has been in combination with working memory training (WMT) in order to enhance transfer effects to other cognitive measures after training.

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analytic review aims to synthesize the existing literature on tDCS-enhanced WMT to quantify the extent to which tDCS can improve performance on transfer tasks after training. Furthermore, we were interested to evaluate the moderating effects of assessment time point (immediate post-test vs. follow-up) and transfer distance, i.e., the degree of similarity between transfer and training tasks.

METHODS

Using robust variance estimation, we performed a systematic meta-analysis of all studies to date that compared WMT with tDCS to WMT with sham in healthy adults. All procedures conformed to PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

Across 265 transfer measures in 18 studies, we found a small positive net effect of tDCS on improving overall performance on transfer measures after WMT. These effects were sustained at follow-up, which ranged from 1 week to one year after training, with a median of 1 month. Additionally, although there were no significant differences as a function of transfer distance, effects were most pronounced for non-trained working memory tasks.

CONCLUSIONS

This review provides evidence that tDCS can be effective in promoting learning over and above WMT alone, and can durably improve performance on trained and untrained measures for weeks to months after the initial training and stimulation period. In particular, boosting performance on dissimilar working memory tasks may present the most promising target for tDCS-augmented WMT.

The effects of aerobic exercise and transcranial direct current stimulation on cognitive function in older adults with and without cognitive impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Aerobic exercise (AE) may slow age-related cognitive decline. However, such cognition-sparing effects are not uniform across cognitive domains and studies. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a form of non-invasive brain stimulation and is also emerging as a potential alternative to pharmaceutical therapies. Like AE, the effectiveness of tDCS is also inconsistent for reducing cognitive impairment in ageing. The unexplored possibility exists that pairing AE and tDCS could produce synergistic effects and reciprocally augment cognition-improving effects in older individuals with and without cognitive impairments. Previous research found such synergistic effects on cognition when cognitive training is paired with tDCS in older individuals with and without mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia.

AIM

The purpose of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to explore if pairing AE with tDCS could augment singular effects of AE and tDCS on global cognition (GC), working memory (WM) and executive function (EF) in older individuals with or without MCI and dementia.

METHODS

Using a PRISMA-based systematic review, we compiled studies that examined the effects of AE alone, tDCS alone, and AE and tDCS combined on cognitive function in older individuals with and without mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia. Using a PICOS approach, we systematically searched PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science searches up to December 2021, we focused on 'MoCA', 'MMSE', 'Mini-Cog' (measures) and 'cognition', 'cognitive function', 'cognitive', 'cognitive performance', 'executive function', 'executive process', 'attention', 'memory', 'memory performance' (outcome terms). We included only randomized controlled trials (RTC) in humans if available in English full text over the past 20 years, with participants' age over 60. We assessed the methodological quality of the included studies (RTC) by the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale.

RESULTS

Overall, 68 studies were included in the meta-analyses. AE (ES = 0.56 [95% CI: 0.28-0.83], p = 0.01) and tDCS (ES = 0.69 [95% CI: 0.12-1.26], p = 0.02) improved GC in all three groups of older adults combined (healthy, MCI, demented). In healthy population, AE improved GC (ES = 0.46 [95% CI: 0.22-0.69], p = 0.01) and EF (ES = 0.27 [95% CI: 0.05-0.49], p = 0.02). AE improved GC in older adults with MCI (ES = 0.76 [95% CI: 0.21-1.32], p = 0.01). tDCS improved GC (ES = 0.69 [90% CI: 0.12-1.26], p = 0.02), all three cognitive function (GC, WM and EF) combined in older adults with dementia (ES = 1.12 [95% CI: 0.04-2.19], p = 0.04) and improved cognitive function in older adults overall (ES = 0.69 [95% CI: 0.20-1,18], p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Our systematic review with meta-analysis provided evidence that beyond the cardiovascular and fitness benefits of AE, pairing AE with tDCS may have the potential to slow symptom progression of cognitive decline in MCI and dementia. Future studies will examine the hypothesis of this present review that a potentiating effect would incrementally improve cognition with increasing severity of cognitive impairment.

Forsythoside B ameliorates diabetic cognitive dysfunction by inhibiting hippocampal neuroinflammation and reducing synaptic dysfunction in ovariectomized mice

BACKGROUND

Diabetes-associated cognitive impairment (DACI) is a common complication of diabetes, and studies have shown that DACI is more severe in postmenopausal patients with diabetes. Forsythoside B (FTS⋅B) can inhibit inflammation and reduce synaptic dysfunction, which can improve cognitive function. However, it has not been confirmed whether FTS⋅B has a reversing or retarding effect on postmenopausal diabetic encephalopathy.

METHODS

Seven days after bilateral ovariectomy (OVX) or sham surgery, adult female C57 mice (n = 15/group) received intraperitoneal injection of streptozotocin (60 mg/kg/day/L) and citrate buffer for 5 consecutive days to induce diabetes mellitus (DM). Fourteen days later, ovariectomized diabetic mice were given intraperitoneal injection of FTS⋅B (100, 150 mg/kg/day/L) and subcutaneous injection of 17β-estradiol (1 mg/kg) for 8 weeks [OVX + DM + low-FTS⋅B group (L-F), OVX + DM + high-FTS⋅B group (H-F), and OVX + DM + 17β-estradiol (ER)]. In addition, the following control groups were defined: Sham, OVX, DM, and OVX + DM (O + D). Fasting plasma glucose, body weight and blood insulin levels were determined in each group of mice. Next, their cognitive function was tested through behavioral experiments. Hematoxylin & eosin (H&E) and Nissl staining were used to detect the morphological changes in the hippocampus. The aggregation of amyloid beta (Aβ) and the hyperaggregation of p-tau were assessed by immunohistochemistry. Interleukin-1β (IL-1β), interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), post-synaptic density-95 (PSD-95), synaptophysin, and synapsin-1 expression in the hippocampus was detected by real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and western blot analysis.

RESULTS

FTS⋅B can decrease fasting glucose and blood insulin level. Behavioral results showed that cognitive decline was the most severe in the O + D group, and the ER, L-F, and H-F groups revised the cognitive decline. Compared to the O + D group, more normal morphology, which has obvious nucleoli and clear nuclear membrane, was observed by H&E and Nissl staining in the ER, L-F, and H-F groups. FTS⋅B alleviated DACI by reducing the aggregation of Aβ and the hyperaggregation of p-tau in the hippocampus. Moreover, the protein and mRNA expression showed that FTS⋅B not only inhibited inflammation by decreasing IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α but also modulated synaptic plasticity by increasing BDNF, PSD-95, synaptophysin, and synapsin-1.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that FTS⋅B may be a novel therapeutic target for postmenopausal diabetic encephalopathy treatment.