Evidence for Mössbauer spectroscopy for different forms of iron core in Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacterial ferritin

Ferritins: furnishing proteins with iron

Ferritins are a superfamily of iron oxidation, storage and mineralization proteins found throughout the animal, plant, and microbial kingdoms. The majority of ferritins consist of 24 subunits that individually fold into 4-α-helix bundles and assemble in a highly symmetric manner to form an approximately spherical protein coat around a central cavity into which an iron-containing mineral can be formed. Channels through the coat at inter-subunit contact points facilitate passage of iron ions to and from the central cavity, and intrasubunit catalytic sites, called ferroxidase centers, drive Fe²⁺ oxidation and O₂ reduction. Though the different members of the superfamily share a common structure, there is often little amino acid sequence identity between them. Even where there is a high degree of sequence identity between two ferritins there can be major differences in how the proteins handle iron. In this review we describe some of the important structural features of ferritins and their mineralized iron cores, consider how iron might be released from ferritins, and examine in detail how three selected ferritins oxidise Fe²⁺ to explore the mechanistic variations that exist amongst ferritins. We suggest that the mechanistic differences reflect differing evolutionary pressures on amino acid sequences, and that these differing pressures are a consequence of different primary functions for different ferritins.

Iron core mineralisation in prokaryotic ferritins

BACKGROUND

To satisfy their requirement for iron while at the same time countering the toxicity of this highly reactive metal ion, prokaryotes have evolved proteins belonging to two distinct sub-families of the ferritin family: the bacterioferritins (BFRs) and the bacterial ferritins (Ftns). Recently, Ftn homologues have also been identified and characterised in archaeon species. All of these prokaryotic ferritins function by solubilising and storing large amounts of iron in the form of a safe but bio-available mineral.

SCOPE OF REVIEW

The mechanism(s) by which the iron mineral is formed by these proteins is the subject of much current interest. Here we review the available information on these proteins, with particular emphasis on significant advances resulting from recent structural, spectroscopic and kinetic studies.

MAJOR CONCLUSIONS

Current understanding indicates that at least two distinct mechanisms are in operation in prokaryotic ferritins. In one, the ferroxidase centre acts as a true catalytic centre in driving Fe(2+) oxidation in the cavity; in the other, the centre acts as a gated iron pore by oxidising Fe(2+) and transferring the resulting Fe(3+) into the central cavity.

GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE

The prokaryotic ferritins exhibit a wide variation in mechanisms of iron core mineralisation. The basis of these differences lies, at least in part, in structural differences at and around the catalytic centre. However, it appears that more subtle differences must also be important in controlling the iron chemistry of these remarkable proteins.

The Mössbauer and magnetic properties of ferritin cores

BACKGROUND

Mössbauer and magnetization measurements, singly or in combination, extract detailed information on the microscopic or internal magnetism of iron-based materials and their macroscopic or bulk magnetization. The combination of the two techniques affords a powerful investigatory probe into spin relaxation processes of nanosize magnetic systems. The ferritin core constitutes a paradigm of such nano-magnetic system where Mössbauer and magnetization studies have been broadly combined in order to elucidate its composition, the initial steps of iron nucleation and biomineralization, particle growth and core-size distribution. In vivo produced and in vitro reconstituted wild-type and variant ferritins have been extensively studied in order to elucidate structure/function correlations and ferritin's role in iron overloading or neurodegenerative disorders.

SCOPE OF REVIEW

Studies on the initial stages of iron biomineralization, biomimetic synthetic analogues and ferrous ion retention within the ferritin core are presented. The dynamical magnetic properties of ferritin by Mössbauer and magnetization measurements are critically reviewed. The focus is on experiments that reveal the internal magnetic structure of the ferritin core. Novel magnetic measurements on individual ferritin molecules via AFM and nanoSQUID investigations are also mentioned.

MAJOR CONCLUSIONS

A complex two-phase spin system is revealed due to finite-size effects and non-compensated spins at the surface of the anti-ferromagnetic ferritin core. Below the blocking temperature surface spins participate in relaxation processes much faster than those associated with collective magnetic excitations of interior spins.

GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE

The studies reviewed contribute uniquely to the elucidation of the spin-structure and spin-dynamics of anti-ferromagnetic nanolattices and their possible applications to nano/bio-technology.

Formation of protein-coated iron minerals

The ability of iron to cycle between Fe(2+) and Fe(3+) forms has led to the evolution, in different forms, of several iron-containing protein cofactors that are essential for a wide variety of cellular processes, to the extent that virtually all cells require iron for survival and prosperity. The redox properties of iron, however, also mean that this metal is potentially highly toxic and this, coupled with the extreme insolubility of Fe(3+), presents the cell with the significant problem of how to maintain this essential metal in a safe and bioavailable form. This has been overcome through the evolution of proteins capable of reversibly storing iron in the form of a Fe(3+) mineral. For several decades the ferritins have been synonymous with the function of iron storage. Within this family are subfamilies of mammalian, plant and bacterial ferritins which are all composed of 24 subunits assembled to form an essentially spherical protein with a central cavity in which the mineral is laid down. In the past few years it has become clear that other proteins, belonging to the family of DNA-binding proteins from starved cells (the Dps family), which are oligomers of 12 subunits, and to the frataxin family, which may contain up to 48 subunits, are also able to lay down a Fe(3+) mineral core. Here we present an overview of the formation of protein-coated iron minerals, with particular emphasis on the structures of the protein coats and the mechanisms by which they promote core formation. We show on the one hand that significant mechanistic similarities exist between structurally dissimilar proteins, while on the other that relatively small structural differences between otherwise similar proteins result in quite dramatic mechanistic differences.

Iron storage in bacteria

Iron is an essential nutrient for nearly all organisms but presents problems of toxicity, poor solubility and low availability. These problems are alleviated through the use of iron-storage proteins. Bacteria possess two types of iron-storage protein, the haem-containing bacterioferritins and the haem-free ferritins. These proteins are widespread in bacteria, with at least 39 examples known so far in eubacteria and archaebacteria. The bacterioferritins and ferritins are distantly related but retain similar structural and functional properties. Both are composed of 24 identical or similar subunits (approximately 19 kDa) that form a roughly spherical protein (approximately 450 kDa, approximately 120 A diameter) containing a large hollow centre (approximately 80 A diameter). The hollow centre acts as an iron-storage cavity with the capacity to accommodate at least 2000 iron atoms in the form of a ferric-hydroxyphosphate core. Each subunit contains a four-helix bundle which carries the active site or ferroxidase centre of the protein. The ferroxidase centres endow ferrous-iron-oxidizing activity and are able to form a di-iron species that is an intermediate in the iron uptake, oxidation and core formation process. Bacterioferritins contain up to 12 protoporphyrin IX haem groups located at the two-fold interfaces between pairs of two-fold related subunits. The role of the haem is unknown, although it may be involved in mediating iron-core reduction and iron release. Some bacterioferritins are composed of two subunit types, one conferring haem-binding ability (alpha) and the other (beta) bestowing ferroxidase activity. Bacterioferritin genes are often adjacent to genes encoding a small [2Fe-2S]-ferredoxin (bacterioferritin-associated ferredoxin or Bfd). Bfd may directly interact with bacterioferritin and could be involved in releasing iron from (or delivering iron to) bacterioferritin or other iron complexes. Some bacteria contain two bacterioferritin subunits, or two ferritin subunits, that in most cases co-assemble. Others possess both a bacterioferritin and a ferritin, while some appear to lack any type of iron-storage protein. The reason for these differences is not understood. Studies on ferritin mutants have shown that ferritin enhances growth during iron starvation and is also involved in iron accumulation in the stationary phase of growth. The ferritin of Campylobacter jejuni is involved in redox stress resistance, although this does not appear to be the case for Escherichia coli ferritin (FtnA). No phenotype has been determined for E. coli bacterioferritin mutants and the precise role of bacterioferritin in E. coli remains uncertain.

Purification, characterization and function of bacterioferritin from the cyanobacterium Synechocystis P.C.C. 6803

Storage and buffering of iron is achieved by a class of proteins, the ferritins, widely distributed throughout the living kingdoms. All ferritins have in common their three-dimensional structure and their ability to store large amounts of iron in their central cavity. However, eukaryotic ferritins from plants and animals and bacterioferritins have no sequence similarity, and besides non-haem iron bacterioferritins contain haem residues whereas eukaryotic ferritins do not. In this paper we report the first purification and characterization of a bacterioferritin from a cyanobacterium. It has a molecular mass of 400 kDa and is built up from 19 kDa subunits. Its N-terminal sequence shows 73% identity with that of the Escherichia coli bacterioferritin subunit. It contains 2300 atoms of iron and 1500 molecules of phosphate per ferritin molecule and 0.25 haem residue per subunit; the alpha-peak of the cytochrome has its maximum at 559 nm. In contrast with what is known for eukaryotic ferritins, we found that bacterioferritin from Synechocystis is not inducible by iron under the conditions that we have tested and that it has a constant concentration whatever the iron status of the cells, even at very low iron concentration. Bacterioferritin from Synechocystis P.C.C. 6803 is fully assembled in vivo and it is shown by labelling with 59Fe that it is able to load iron in vitro as well as in vivo. Bacterioferritin from Synechocystis is shown to have an iron-buffering function while the bulk of cellular iron is found associated with a pool of low-molecular-mass electronegative molecules. The role of Synechocystis bacterioferritin in iron metabolism is discussed.

Bacterial 4-alpha-helical bundle cytochromes

The biological functions of cytochrome c' and bacterioferritin, both haemoproteins with a common 4-alpha-helical bundle structure, are discussed and an example given of one of Kamen's laws, namely: comparative studies of prokaryotic cytochromes and their eukaryotic counterparts are useful. In the present case, the comparison is between bacterioferritin and its animal counterpart, haemoferritin.