Pressurized Wideband Absorbance Findings in Healthy Neonates: A Preliminary Study

Use of Wideband Acoustic Immittance in Neonates and Infants

With widespread agreement on the importance of early identification of hearing loss, universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) has become the standard of care in several countries. Despite advancements in screening technology, UNHS and early hearing detection and intervention programs continue to be burdened by high referral rates of false-positive cases due to temporary obstruction of sound in the outer/middle ear at birth. A sensitive adjunct test of middle ear at the time of screening would aid in the interpretation of screening outcomes, minimize unnecessary rescreens, and prioritize referral to diagnostic assessment for infants with permanent congenital hearing loss. Determination of middle ear status is also an important aspect of diagnostic assessment in infants. Standard single-frequency tympanometry used to determine middle ear status in infants is neither efficient nor accurate in newborns and young infants. A growing body of research has demonstrated the utility of wideband acoustic immittance (WAI) testing in both screening and diagnostic settings. Wideband power absorbance (WBA), a WAI measure, has been shown to be more sensitive than tympanometry in the assessment of outer/middle ear function in newborns. Furthermore, age-graded norms also support successful application of WBA in young infants. Despite its merits, uptake of this technology is low among pediatric audiologists and hearing screening health workers. This report describes normative data, methods for assessment and interpretation of WBA, test-retest variations, and other factors pertinent to clinical use of WAI in newborns and infants. Clinical cases illustrate the use of WAI testing in newborn and infant hearing assessment.

Wideband Tympanometry Findings in Healthy Neonates

OBJECTIVES

 The objective of the present study was to describe pressurized wideband absorbance at tympanometric peak pressure (WBATPP) and 0 daPa (WBA0) in healthy Caucasian neonates.

SUBJECTS

 A total of 249 ears from 249 neonates who passed a test battery of 1,000-Hz tympanometry, distortion product otoacoustic emissions and automated auditory brainstem response were included in the study.

METHOD

 WBATPP and WBA0 were averaged in one-third octave frequencies from 0.25 to 8 kHz. Data were statistically analyzed for effects of frequency, ear, and gender.

RESULTS

 Normative WBATPP and WBA0 data obtained from healthy neonates are presented. There was no significant difference between WBATPP and WBA0 at all frequencies. Both WBATPP and WBA0 demonstrated a multipeaked pattern with maxima of 0.80 and 0.72 at 1.25 to 1.5 and 6 kHz, respectively, and two minima of 0.45 and 0.49 at 0.4 to 0.5 and 4 kHz, respectively. The effects of ear and gender were not significant for both WBA measures.

CONCLUSION

 Pressurized WBATPP and WBA0 data were provided for healthy Caucasian neonates. They will be useful for the assessment of middle ear function and assist in differentiating between conductive and sensorineural hearing losses in neonates.

Assessment of Pediatric Middle Ear Effusions With Wideband Tympanometry

OBJECTIVE

To determine if wideband tympanometry (WBT) can differentiate types of middle ear effusion (MEE): serous, mucoid, and purulent.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary care children's hospital.

METHODS

Children who met American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery's guidelines for ventilation tube insertion had WBT after anesthesia induction but before tympanotomy. MEE was categorized into 1 of 4 comparison groups: serous effusion, mucoid effusion, purulent effusion, or no effusion. WBT measurements were averaged to 16 one-third octave frequency bands, and comparison of the absorbance patterns for each MEE type was performed through a linear mixed effects model.

RESULTS

A total of 118 children (211 ears) were included: 47 females (39.8%) and 71 males (60.2%). The mean age was 2.73 years (95% CI, 2.25-3.22); mean weight, 14.35 kg (95% CI, 12.85-15.85); and mean Z score, 1.13 (95% CI, -0.64 to 2.33). Effusions included 61 mucoid (28.9%), 30 purulent (14.2%), and 14 serous (6.6%), with 106 (50.2%) having no effusion. No significant differences were found for sex, race, age, weight, or Z score among the 4 types of effusion (P < .05). WBT showed a significant difference in median absorption among the effusion groups (P < .001), with a medium effect size of 0.35.

CONCLUSIONS

WBT has potential use to differentiate types of MEE and should be studied further as a tool for investigating how the natural history and management of serous and mucoid effusions may differ.

Refining Measurements of Power Absorbance in Newborns: Probe Fit and Intrasubject Variability

OBJECTIVES

Because unresolved debris in the ear canal or middle ear of newborns may produce high false positive rates on hearing screening tests, it has been suggested that an outer/middle ear measure can be included at the time of hearing screening. A potential measure is power absorbance (absorbance), which indicates the proportion of power in a broadband acoustic stimulus that is absorbed through the outer/middle ear. Although absorbance is sensitive to outer/middle dysfunction at birth, there is large variability that limits its accuracy. Acoustic leaks caused by poor probe fitting further exacerbate this issue. The objectives of this work were to: (1) develop criteria to indicate whether a change in absorbance occurs in association with probe fit; (2) describe the variability in absorbance due to poor fitting; and (3) evaluate test-retest variability with probe reinsertions, excluding poor fits.

DESIGN

An observational cross-sectional design was used to evaluate changes in absorbance due to probe fit and probe reinsertion. Repeated measurements were recorded in 50 newborns (98 ears) who passed TEOAE screenings and were <48 hours of age. One absorbance measurement was chosen as the baseline that served as a best-fit reference in each ear. Changes in absorbance, called absorbance probe-fit Δ, were calculated relative to the baseline in each ear. Correlations were assessed between the absorbance probe-fit Δ and low-frequency absorbance, impedance magnitude, impedance phase, and equivalent volume, to determine which measures predicted poor fits. Criteria were derived from the strongest of these correlations and their performance was analyzed. Next, measurements with poor/leaky fits were identified, and the changes in absorbance that they introduced were analyzed. Excluding the poor fits, test-retest differences in absorbance, called reinsertion Δ, were determined. Variability was assessed using the SDs associated with absorbance, absorbance probe-fit Δ, and reinsertion Δ.

RESULTS

Based on the analysis of 12 moderate-strong correlations, the following criteria were adopted to identify measurements with poor fits: (1) impedance phase-based criterion (500 to 1000 Hz) > -0.11 cycles and (2) absorbance-based criterion (250 to 1000 Hz) > 0.58. Poor-fit measurements introduced statistically significant increases in absorbance up to 0.1 for 1000 to 6000 Hz, and up to 0.4 for frequencies <1000 Hz. Reinsertion Δ were ≤0.02, and were significant for 500 to 5000 Hz. The SDs of absorbance probe-fit Δ were greatest and similar to overall absorbance SD in the low frequencies. Separately, the SDs of reinsertion Δ were also greatest and similar to low-frequency absorbance SD.

CONCLUSIONS

Poor probe fits introduced the greatest inflation in absorbance for frequencies < 500 Hz, and a smaller but significant inflation for higher frequencies, consistent with controlled experiments on acoustic leaks in adults. Importantly, inflation of absorbance in diagnostically sensitive 1000 to 2000 Hz may impact its clinical performance. Test-retest with probe reinsertion contributed significantly to absorbance variability, especially in the low frequencies, consistent with reports in adults, even though changes were smaller than those associated with poor probe fit. The results indicate that variability in absorbance was reduced by minimizing acoustic leaks. Pending further validation, the probe-fit criteria developed in this work can be recommended to ensure proper probe fit.

Normative Wideband Acoustic Immittance Measurements in Caucasian and Aboriginal Children

Purpose The aims of this study were to develop normative data for wideband acoustic immittance (WAI) measures in Caucasian and Australian Aboriginal children and compare absorbance measured at 0 daPa (WBA0) and tympanometric peak pressure (TPP; WBATPP) between the 2 groups of children. Additional WAI measures included resonance frequency, equivalent ear canal volume, TPP, admittance magnitude (YM), and phase angle (YA). Method A total of 171 ears from 171 Caucasian children and 87 ears from 87 Aboriginal children who passed a test battery consisting of 226-Hz tympanometry, transient evoked otoacoustic emissions, and pure tone audiometry were included in the study. WAI measures were obtained under pressurized conditions using wideband tympanometry. Data for WBA0, WBATPP, YM, and YA were averaged in one-third octave frequencies from 0.25 to 8 kHz. Results There was no significant ear effect on all of the 7 measures for both groups of children. Similarly, there was no significant gender effect on all measures except for WBATPP in Aboriginal children. Aboriginal boys had significantly higher WBATPP than girls at 1.5 and 2 kHz. A significant effect of ethnicity was also noted for WBATPP at 3, 4, and 8 kHz, with Caucasian children demonstrating higher WBATPP than Aboriginal children. However, the effect size and observed power of the analyses were small for both effects. Conclusion This study developed normative data for 7 WAI measures, namely, WBA0, WBATPP, TPP, Veq, RF, YM, and YA, for Caucasian and Aboriginal children. In view of the high similarity of the normative data between Caucasian and Aboriginal children, it was concluded that separate ethnic-specific norms are not required for diagnostic purposes.

A Longitudinal Analysis of Pressurized Wideband Absorbance Measures in Healthy Young Infants

OBJECTIVES

Wideband absorbance (WBA) is an emerging technology to evaluate the conductive pathway (outer and middle ear) in young infants. While a wealth of research has been devoted to measuring WBA at ambient pressure, few studies have investigated the use of pressurized WBA with this population. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of age on WBA measured under pressurized conditions in healthy infants from 0 to 6 months of age.

DESIGN

Forty-four full-term healthy neonates (17 males and 27 females) participated in a longitudinal study. The neonates were assessed at 1-month intervals from 0 to 6 months of age using high-frequency tympanometry, acoustic stapedial reflex, distortion product otoacoustic emissions, and pressurized WBA. The values of WBA at tympanometric peak pressure (TPP) and 0 daPa across the frequencies from 0.25 to 8 kHz were analyzed as a function of age.

RESULTS

A linear mixed model analysis, applied to the data, revealed significantly different WBA patterns among the age groups. In general, WBA measured at TPP and 0 daPa decreased at low frequencies (<0.4 kHz) and increased at high frequencies (2 to 5and 8 kHz) with age. Specifically, WBA measured at TPP and 0 daPa in 3- to 6-month-olds was significantly different from that of 0- to 2-month-olds at low (0.25 to 0.31 kHz) and high (2 to 5 and 8 kHz) frequencies. However, there were no significant differences between WBA measured at TPP and 0 daPa for infants from 3 to 6 months of age.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study provided clear evidence of maturation of the outer and middle ear system in healthy infants from birth to 6 months. Therefore, age-specific normative data of pressurized WBA are warranted.