Citric acid or orange juice for the 13C-urea breath test: the impact of pH and gastric emptying

Chitosan as a fluorescent probe for the detection of the AIE-active food colorant quinoline yellow

The greenish-yellow synthetic dye quinoline yellow (Qy) is widely used in the food and pharmaceutical industries. However, this dye may lead to health and environmental problems. Therefore, investigating how Qy interacts with biological macromolecules is of great interest. In this work, Qy was found to be a novel AIEgen having strong solid-state emission and water-solubility. Adding tetrahydrofuran to an aqueous solution of Qy induced Qy to form nanoaggregates, which increased its fluorescence intensity. Moreover, we found that Qy was able to interact with typical biological macromolecules, such as chitosan, BSA, and DNA, and quench these biomolecules' intrinsic fluorescence. Therefore, chitosan was chosen as a probe for Qy detection. The results showed that chitosan could detect Qy in the presence of interfering ions, other dyes, and sucrose, as well as in an acidic environment. Finally, chitosan was used to determine the quantity of Qy in orange juice and wine. This is the first report of the identification of a food colorant as an AIEgen, and this AIE activity has been wisely harnessed to visualize molecular interactions between Qy and biological macromolecules, as well as to detect Qy in beverages.

Application of citric acid can enhance the accuracy for 13C-urea breath tests in the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in Chinese patients

Previous published data have confirmed that the addition of a citric acid meal improves the accuracy of the 13C-urea breath test (13C-UBT). However, some studies have suggested that a citric acid test meal may not be necessary. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the combination of a 13C-UBT with a citric acid meal for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori (Hp) infection in a Chinese population, particularly for patients with results in the gray zone. In this paired self-controlled study, all subjects had previously undergone 13C-UBTs without citric acid meals and were randomly divided into two groups based on different doses of citric acid (a low-dose citric acid group and a high-dose citric acid group, comprising meals with 0.68 g and 3.84 g citric acid powder, respectively). Positive rapid urease test (CLO) test and histology results were considered the 'gold standard'. The mean delta over baseline (DOB) value, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy were compared between the two groups, particularly for patients with results in the gray zone. In total, 285 patients were tested. Of these patients, 189 were included in the low-dose citric acid group, and 96 were included in the high-dose citric acid group. Among patients with a positive 13C-UBT result without citric acid [delta over baseline (DOB) value ≥ 4‰, n = 174] and a negative 13C-UBT result without citric acid (DOB value < 4‰, n = 111), 8.0% (14/174) were false positive, and 0.9% (1/111) was false negative as determined by gold standard. Of 14 patients with false positive, 78.6% (11/14) false positive were in the gray zone of 4-10‰. However, there were no false positive 13C-UBT results with citric acid in the the gray zone of 4-10‰. In the comparison of the commercial 13C-UBT with the 13C-UBT in the low-dose citric acid group, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy at 15 min were as follows: 99.1% vs. 99.1%, 97.5% vs. 88.9%, 98.2% vs. 92.2%, 98.8% vs. 98.6% and 98.4% vs. 94.7%, respectively. In the the gray zone of 4.0-10.0‰, the comparison of the commercial 13C-UBT with the 13C-UBT in the low-dose citric acid group, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and accuracy at 15 min were as follows: 94.4% vs. 100.0%, 100.0% vs. 0%, 100.0% vs. 75.0% and 95.8% vs. 75.0%, respectively. No significant difference was observed between the 15-min and 30-min measurement intervals in the low- and high-dose citric acid groups, including patients with results in the gray zone. The low-dose citric acid test, with an optimal measurement interval of 15 min, was highly accurate in the diagnosis of Hp infection in the Chinese population, especially for individuals with results in the gray zone.

Urea breath test for Helicobacter pylori infection in adult dyspeptic patients: A meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection has been well-established as a significant risk factor for several gastrointestinal disorders. The urea breath test (UBT) has emerged as a leading non-invasive method for detecting H. pylori. Despite numerous studies confirming its substantial accuracy, the reliability of UBT results is often compromised by inherent limitations. These findings underscore the need for a rigorous statistical synthesis to clarify and reconcile the diagnostic accuracy of the UBT for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection.

AIM

To determine and compare the diagnostic accuracy of 13C-UBT and 14C-UBT for H. pylori infection in adult patients with dyspepsia.

METHODS

We conducted an independent search of the PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central databases until April 2022. Our search included diagnostic accuracy studies that evaluated at least one of the index tests (13C-UBT or 14C-UBT) against a reference standard. We used the QUADAS-2 tool to assess the methodological quality of the studies. We utilized the bivariate random-effects model to calculate sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative test likelihood ratios (LR+ and LR-), as well as the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and their 95% confidence intervals. We conducted subgroup analyses based on urea dosing, time after urea administration, and assessment technique. To investigate a possible threshold effect, we conducted Spearman correlation analysis, and we generated summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves to assess heterogeneity. Finally, we visually inspected a funnel plot and used Egger's test to evaluate publication bias.

RESULTS

The titles and abstracts of 4621 studies were screened; 79 articles were retrieved and selected for full-text reading. Finally, 60 studies were included in the diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis. Our analysis demonstrates superior diagnostic accuracy of 13C-UBT over 14C-UBT, indicated by higher sensitivity (96.60% vs 96.15%), specificity (96.93% vs 89.84%), likelihood ratios (LR+ 22.00 vs 10.10; LR- 0.05 vs 0.06), and area under the curve (AUC; 0.979 vs 0.968). Notably, 13C-UBT's DOR (586.47) significantly outperforms 14C-UBT (DOR 226.50), making it the preferred diagnostic tool for dyspeptic individuals with H. pylori infection. Correlation analysis revealed no threshold effect (13C-UBT: r = 0.48; 14C-UBT: r = -0.01), and SROC curves showed consistent accuracy. Both 13C-UBT and 14C-UBT showed high AUC values (13C-UBT 0.979; 14C-UBT 0.968) near 1.00, reinforcing their excellent accuracy and endorsing both as reliable diagnostic tools in clinical practice.

CONCLUSION

In summary, our study has demonstrated that 13C-UBT has been found to outperform the 14C-UBT, making it the preferred diagnostic approach. Additionally, our results emphasize the significance of carefully considering urea dosage, assessment timing, and measurement techniques for both tests to enhance diagnostic precision. Nevertheless, it is crucial for researchers and clinicians to evaluate the strengths and limitations of our findings before implementing them in practice.

Personalized Approach in Eradication of Helicobacter pylori Infection

The increase in antibiotic resistance to Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is associated with a decrease in the effectiveness of eradication therapy. Although some success has been achieved by adjusting therapeutic regimens according to local data on resistance to certain antibiotics, a new approach is needed to ensure a better therapeutic response. Tailored therapy, based on sensitivity tests to antibiotics, is increasingly proving to be a superior therapeutic option, even as a first-line therapy. Moreover, the recently published Maastricht VI guidelines emphasize utilizing a susceptibility-guided strategy in respect to antibiotic stewardship as the first choice for eradication therapy. In addition, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technology is becoming a standard tool in the diagnosis of H. pylori infections through non-invasive testing, which further optimizes the eradication process. We provide a review regarding the current position of the individualized approach in eradication therapy and its future prospects. Based on novel understandings, the personalized approach is an effective strategy to increase the successful eradication of H. pylori infections.

The key statements of the Maastricht VI consensus

An analysis of the most important changes and provisions of the Maastricht VI consensus published in August 2022 is presented. 41 experts from 29 countries took part in the creation of the consensus. Recommendations have been developed in five areas: (1) indications for treatment and clinical associations of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection, (2) diagnosis, (3) treatment, (4) prevention of gastric cancer, (5) H. pylori and gastric microbiota -intestinal tract (GIT), taking into account the level of evidence and the strength of recommendations. Emphasis is placed on molecular testing, which is becoming an increasingly accessible research method in the world to identify both H. pylori itself and its sensitivity to antibiotics. The growing resistance of H. pylori strains to previously effective antibacterial agents requires a treatment strategy that implies the ability to determine the sensitivity of H. pylori to antibacterial agents both in the population and in a particular individual. The use of modern diagnostic tests expands the possibilities of individualization of therapy, since it allows determining not only the presence of H. pylori in the gastric mucosa, but also the sensitivity of the infection to antibacterial drugs. Along with individual approaches to treatment, the most effective empirical therapy regimens are given in case of impossibility to determine individual resistance to antibiotics. New data on the effectiveness and results of the use of primary and secondary preventive strategies for gastric cancer are presented. Given the important role of the entire microbiome of the gastrointestinal tract in the functioning of the body, the question of the interaction of H. pylori with other microorganisms is discussed. The critical issues of the near future are related to the global prevention of gastric cancer; the need to control antibiotic resistance, and the development of new methods of therapy and prevention of Helicobacter pylori infection.

Management of Helicobacter pylori infection: the Maastricht VI/Florence consensus report

Helicobacter pyloriInfection is formally recognised as an infectious disease, an entity that is now included in the International Classification of Diseases 11th Revision. This in principle leads to the recommendation that all infected patients should receive treatment. In the context of the wide clinical spectrum associated with Helicobacter pylori gastritis, specific issues persist and require regular updates for optimised management.The identification of distinct clinical scenarios, proper testing and adoption of effective strategies for prevention of gastric cancer and other complications are addressed. H. pylori treatment is challenged by the continuously rising antibiotic resistance and demands for susceptibility testing with consideration of novel molecular technologies and careful selection of first line and rescue therapies. The role of H. pylori and antibiotic therapies and their impact on the gut microbiota are also considered.Progress made in the management of H. pylori infection is covered in the present sixth edition of the Maastricht/Florence 2021 Consensus Report, key aspects related to the clinical role of H. pylori infection were re-evaluated and updated. Forty-one experts from 29 countries representing a global community, examined the new data related to H. pylori infection in five working groups: (1) indications/associations, (2) diagnosis, (3) treatment, (4) prevention/gastric cancer and (5) H. pylori and the gut microbiota. The results of the individual working groups were presented for a final consensus voting that included all participants. Recommendations are provided on the basis of the best available evidence and relevance to the management of H. pylori infection in various clinical fields.

European guideline on indications, performance and clinical impact of 13 C-breath tests in adult and pediatric patients: An EAGEN, ESNM, and ESPGHAN consensus, supported by EPC

Introduction

¹³C‐breath tests are valuable, noninvasive diagnostic tests that can be widely applied for the assessment of gastroenterological symptoms and diseases. Currently, the potential of these tests is compromised by a lack of standardization regarding performance and interpretation among expert centers.

Methods

This consensus‐based clinical practice guideline defines the clinical indications, performance, and interpretation of ¹³C‐breath tests in adult and pediatric patients. A balance between scientific evidence and clinical experience was achieved by a Delphi consensus that involved 43 experts from 18 European countries. Consensus on individual statements and recommendations was established if ≥ 80% of reviewers agreed and <10% disagreed.

Results

The guideline gives an overview over general methodology of ¹³C‐breath testing and provides recommendations for the use of ¹³C‐breath tests to diagnose Helicobacter pylori infection, measure gastric emptying time, and monitor pancreatic exocrine and liver function in adult and pediatric patients. Other potential applications of ¹³C‐breath testing are summarized briefly. The recommendations specifically detail when and how individual ¹³C‐breath tests should be performed including examples for well‐established test protocols, patient preparation, and reporting of test results.

Conclusion

This clinical practice guideline should improve pan‐European harmonization of diagnostic approaches to symptoms and disorders, which are very common in specialist and primary care gastroenterology practice, both in adult and pediatric patients. In addition, this guideline identifies areas of future clinical research involving the use of ¹³C‐breath tests.

Effectiveness of concomitant use of green tea and polyethylene glycol in bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND

Polyethylene glycol solution (PEG) is widely used for bowel preparation prior to colonoscopies. However, patients often exhibited adverse events as nausea, vomit and distention due to its uncomfortable tastes and potential side affects. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of concomitant use of green tea (GT) with PEG in bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy.

METHODS

This was a prospective, randomized controlled study. It was conducted at an outpatient setting of colorectal surgery in a tertiary hospital. Patients aged 18 through 80 who were scheduled to undergo colonoscopy between August 2015 and February 2016 were randomly assigned into two groups, admitting either 2 L-PEG solutions with 1 L GT liquids or 2 L-PEG solutions only for bowel preparation. Admitted doses of PEG solutions, taste evaluation, adverse reactions (nausea and vomiting, distention and abdominal pain) were investigated by questionnaires. The bowel cleanliness of each patient was evaluated according to the Aronchick indicators.

RESULTS

A total of 116 patients were enrolled in this study (PEG+GT 59, PEG 57). Full compliances were achieved in 93.2% patients of group PEG+GT and 59.6% of group PEG (p < 0.001). Mean Aronchick scale between two groups were 2.0 ± 0.9 versus 2.2 ± 0.7 respectively (PEG+GT vs PEG, p = 0.296). Rates of adverse events as nausea and vomiting, abdominal pain in bowel preparation were significantly different between two groups (55.9% vs 77.2%, p = 0.015 and 13.6% vs 33.3%, p = 0.012). Patients in group PEG+GT who have probabilities to receive repeating colonoscopy had a higher willingness to accept PEG+GT again for bowel preparation, compared with PEG group (94.9% vs 57.9%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Concomitant use of green tea and polyethylene glycol may effectively reduce incidence of adverse events, increase compliances, with comparable bowel cleanliness in bowel preparation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial was retrospectively registered on Feb 1st, 2019 (ChiCTR1900021178).

Current status of first- and second-line Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy in the metropolitan area: a multicenter study with a large number of patients

BACKGROUND

The environment surrounding Helicobacter pylori eradication treatment is dramatically changing. Recently, vonoprazan, a first-in-class potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB), was introduced onto the market in 2015. The aging of Japan's demographic structure is becoming pronounced. In this study, we examined the trend of the eradication rate of H. pylori in the metropolitan area and examined factors concerning successful eradication.

METHODS

We collected data from 20 hospitals in the Tokyo metropolitan area on patients who received first-line eradication therapy with a proton-pump inhibitor (PPI)/P-CAB, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin for 1 week and second-line eradication therapy with a PPI/P-CAB, amoxicillin, and metronidazole for 1 week from 2013 to 2018. The annual eradication rate and associated factors for successful eradication were analyzed.

RESULTS

We collected data of 4097 and 3572 patients in the first- and second-line eradication therapies, respectively. The eradication rate decreased from 2013 to 2014 and increased again from 2015 to 2018 with the first-line therapy [the eradication rates in 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018 were 71.8%, 63.7%, 78.5%, 84.6%, 89.7 and 90.1%, respectively, in the per protocol (PP)]. The second-line eradication rates were 90.0%, 82.6%, 88.8%, 87.5%, 91.8% and 90.1% in 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018, respectively, in PP. Vonoprazan was an independent factor for successful eradication in not only first-line, but also second-line eradication. Age over 75 years was an independent factor for eradication failure in both first- and second-line eradication therapies.

CONCLUSION

The eradication rate improved from 2015 to 2018 with the first-line therapy because of the introduction of vonoprazan in the market. The eradication rates with first- and second-line regimens in elderly patients were lower than those in younger patients.

Non-invasive tests for the diagnosis of helicobacter pylori: state of the art

Usually, non-invasive tests are the first methods for diagnosing Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection. Among these, serological test, stool antigen research and urea breath test are the most used. Antibodies anti-HP are not recommended in low prevalence population, moreover they cannot reveal an ongoing infection, but they only prove a contact with the bacterium. Also, they can persist for a long time after the eradication of the infection, therefore, they should not be used to verify the success of eradication therapy. Stool antigen research and Urea Breath Test (UBT) are useful both in diagnosis and during follow-up after eradication treatment. The stool antigen test is cheaper than Urea breath test with similar sensitivity and specificity. Non-invasive tests are not able to diagnose the associated complications to HP infection. (www.actabiomedica.it)

Non-invasive diagnostic tests for Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori (H pylori) infection has been implicated in a number of malignancies and non-malignant conditions including peptic ulcers, non-ulcer dyspepsia, recurrent peptic ulcer bleeding, unexplained iron deficiency anaemia, idiopathic thrombocytopaenia purpura, and colorectal adenomas. The confirmatory diagnosis of H pylori is by endoscopic biopsy, followed by histopathological examination using haemotoxylin and eosin (H & E) stain or special stains such as Giemsa stain and Warthin-Starry stain. Special stains are more accurate than H & E stain. There is significant uncertainty about the diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive tests for diagnosis of H pylori.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the diagnostic accuracy of urea breath test, serology, and stool antigen test, used alone or in combination, for diagnosis of H pylori infection in symptomatic and asymptomatic people, so that eradication therapy for H pylori can be started.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Science Citation Index and the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment Database on 4 March 2016. We screened references in the included studies to identify additional studies. We also conducted citation searches of relevant studies, most recently on 4 December 2016. We did not restrict studies by language or publication status, or whether data were collected prospectively or retrospectively.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included diagnostic accuracy studies that evaluated at least one of the index tests (urea breath test using isotopes such as 13C or 14C, serology and stool antigen test) against the reference standard (histopathological examination using H & E stain, special stains or immunohistochemical stain) in people suspected of having H pylori infection.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened the references to identify relevant studies and independently extracted data. We assessed the methodological quality of studies using the QUADAS-2 tool. We performed meta-analysis by using the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) model to estimate and compare SROC curves. Where appropriate, we used bivariate or univariate logistic regression models to estimate summary sensitivities and specificities.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 101 studies involving 11,003 participants, of which 5839 participants (53.1%) had H pylori infection. The prevalence of H pylori infection in the studies ranged from 15.2% to 94.7%, with a median prevalence of 53.7% (interquartile range 42.0% to 66.5%). Most of the studies (57%) included participants with dyspepsia and 53 studies excluded participants who recently had proton pump inhibitors or antibiotics.There was at least an unclear risk of bias or unclear applicability concern for each study.Of the 101 studies, 15 compared the accuracy of two index tests and two studies compared the accuracy of three index tests. Thirty-four studies (4242 participants) evaluated serology; 29 studies (2988 participants) evaluated stool antigen test; 34 studies (3139 participants) evaluated urea breath test-13C; 21 studies (1810 participants) evaluated urea breath test-14C; and two studies (127 participants) evaluated urea breath test but did not report the isotope used. The thresholds used to define test positivity and the staining techniques used for histopathological examination (reference standard) varied between studies. Due to sparse data for each threshold reported, it was not possible to identify the best threshold for each test.Using data from 99 studies in an indirect test comparison, there was statistical evidence of a difference in diagnostic accuracy between urea breath test-13C, urea breath test-14C, serology and stool antigen test (P = 0.024). The diagnostic odds ratios for urea breath test-13C, urea breath test-14C, serology, and stool antigen test were 153 (95% confidence interval (CI) 73.7 to 316), 105 (95% CI 74.0 to 150), 47.4 (95% CI 25.5 to 88.1) and 45.1 (95% CI 24.2 to 84.1). The sensitivity (95% CI) estimated at a fixed specificity of 0.90 (median from studies across the four tests), was 0.94 (95% CI 0.89 to 0.97) for urea breath test-13C, 0.92 (95% CI 0.89 to 0.94) for urea breath test-14C, 0.84 (95% CI 0.74 to 0.91) for serology, and 0.83 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.90) for stool antigen test. This implies that on average, given a specificity of 0.90 and prevalence of 53.7% (median specificity and prevalence in the studies), out of 1000 people tested for H pylori infection, there will be 46 false positives (people without H pylori infection who will be diagnosed as having H pylori infection). In this hypothetical cohort, urea breath test-13C, urea breath test-14C, serology, and stool antigen test will give 30 (95% CI 15 to 58), 42 (95% CI 30 to 58), 86 (95% CI 50 to 140), and 89 (95% CI 52 to 146) false negatives respectively (people with H pylori infection for whom the diagnosis of H pylori will be missed).Direct comparisons were based on few head-to-head studies. The ratios of diagnostic odds ratios (DORs) were 0.68 (95% CI 0.12 to 3.70; P = 0.56) for urea breath test-13C versus serology (seven studies), and 0.88 (95% CI 0.14 to 5.56; P = 0.84) for urea breath test-13C versus stool antigen test (seven studies). The 95% CIs of these estimates overlap with those of the ratios of DORs from the indirect comparison. Data were limited or unavailable for meta-analysis of other direct comparisons.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In people without a history of gastrectomy and those who have not recently had antibiotics or proton ,pump inhibitors, urea breath tests had high diagnostic accuracy while serology and stool antigen tests were less accurate for diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection.This is based on an indirect test comparison (with potential for bias due to confounding), as evidence from direct comparisons was limited or unavailable. The thresholds used for these tests were highly variable and we were unable to identify specific thresholds that might be useful in clinical practice.We need further comparative studies of high methodological quality to obtain more reliable evidence of relative accuracy between the tests. Such studies should be conducted prospectively in a representative spectrum of participants and clearly reported to ensure low risk of bias. Most importantly, studies should prespecify and clearly report thresholds used, and should avoid inappropriate exclusions.

Exhaled nitric oxide as a potential marker for detecting non-ulcer dyspepsia and peptic ulcer disease

Nitric oxide (NO) plays a key role in the development of peptic ulcer disease (PUD). Conversely, the gastric pathogen Helicobacter pylori colonizes the human stomach and contributes to the development of non-ulcer dyspepsia (NUD) and PUD. However, the underlying relation between molecular NO in exhaled breath and H. pylori-associated NUD and PUD remains largely unknown. Here, we found that the excretion kinetics of NO profiles in exhaled breath are altered markedly in H. pylori-infected NUD and PUD subjects. In our observations, PUD led to considerably higher enrichments of NO in exhaled breath compared to NUD, thus revealing a potential link between exhaled NO and ulcer and non-ulcer complications. Our findings therefore suggest that molecular NO in exhaled breath could be used as a potential biomarker for non-invasive diagnosis and selective differentiation of NUD from PUD. Our observations also highlight that alterations of NO in the gastric environment can play an important role in the pathogenesis of peptic ulcers and thus may provide a new strategy for precise evolution of the actual disease state without the need for endoscopic biopsy, even after the eradication of H. pylori infection.

Occult H. pylori infection partially explains 'false-positive' results of (13)C-urea breath test

BACKGROUND

In a previous study, UBiT-100 mg, (Otsuka, Spain), a commercial (13)C-urea breath test omitting citric acid pre-treatment, had a high rate of false-positive results; however, it is possible that UBiT detected low-density 'occult' infection missed by other routine reference tests. We aimed to validate previous results in a new cohort and to rule out the possibility that false-positive UBiT were due to an 'occult' infection missed by reference tests.

METHODS

Dyspeptic patients (n = 272) were prospectively enrolled and UBiT was performed, according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Helicobacter pylori infection was determined by combining culture, histology and rapid urease test results. We calculated UBiT sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (with 95% CI). In addition, we evaluated 'occult' H. pylori infection using two previously-validated polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods for urease A (UreA) and 16 S sequences in gastric biopsies. We included 44 patients with a false-positive UBiT, and two control groups of 25 patients each, that were positive and negative for all H. pylori tests.

RESULTS

UBiT showed a false-positive rate of 17%, with a specificity of 83%. All the positive controls and 12 of 44 patients (27%) with false-positive UBiT were positive for all two PCR tests; by contrast, none of our negative controls had two positive PCR tests.

CONCLUSIONS

UBiT suffers from a high rate of false-positive results and sub-optimal specificity, and the protocol skipping citric acid pre-treatment should be revised; however, low-density 'occult' H. pylori infection that was undetectable by conventional tests accounted for around 25% of the 'false-positive' results.

Evaluation of Exalenz Bioscience's BreathID for Helicobacter pylori detection

Carbon-labeled urea breath tests, which have high sensitivity and specificity, are the preferred method used in epidemiological studies, screening dyspeptic patients and assessing eradication or recurrence of Helicobacter pylori infection. The principle of the (13)C-urea breath test relies upon the ability of the H. pylori urease to hydrolyze the orally administered (13)C-urea. The BreathID (Exalenz Bioscience Inc., Union, NJ, USA) provides a competitive solution for breath testing, including unique features such as automatic continuous breath collection and analysis. This is an unattended convenient test, with no human error as the correct part of the breath is collected and patients' assistance is not required. The test results are available in real time at the point of care and enable shortened breath testing procedures. Additionally, several studies showing expanded utility of the BreathID in pediatrics, after therapy and during proton pump inhibitors intake, further support the safety and performance of the BreathID in the diagnosis of H. pylori.

Orange juice intake reduces patient discomfort and is effective for bowel cleansing with polyethylene glycol during bowel preparation

BACKGROUND

Many patients report discomfort because of the unpleasant taste of bowel preparation solutions.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine whether adding orange juice to 2 L of polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid is effective for reducing patient discomfort and improving palatability during bowel preparation.

DESIGN

This was a single-blinded, randomized controlled trial.

SETTINGS

The study was conducted at a tertiary referral hospital and a generalized hospital.

PATIENTS

Consecutive outpatients and inpatients were randomly allocated to drink 2 L of polyethylene glycol-ascorbic acid or 2 L of polyethylene glycol-ascorbic acid with orange juice in a single dose or a split dose.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Tolerability, palatability score, willingness, and related adverse events were investigated by questionnaires. Bowel cleansing was rated using the Aronchick scale. Each score was graded on a 5-point scale.

RESULTS

A total of 107 patients, 53 in the orange juice group and 54 in the polyethylene glycol-ascorbic acid group who underwent elective colonoscopy were enrolled. The palatability score (mean ± SD) was higher in the orange juice group than in the control group (2.36 ± 0.76 vs 1.78 ± 0.88; p = 0.005). Nausea was less frequent in the orange juice group (26.4% vs 59.3%; p = 0.001). Total amount of bowel preparation ingested was not significantly different between the groups (p = 0.44). The bowel preparation score (mean ± SD) was not significantly different (1.49 ± 0.80 vs 1.43 ± 0.77; p = 0.94). Willingness to repeat the same process was higher in the orange juice group (90.4% vs 66.7%; p = 0.003).

LIMITATIONS

This study is limited because only ambulatory patients were enrolled.

CONCLUSIONS

Orange juice intake before drinking 2 L of polyethylene glycol-ascorbic acid for colonoscopy can reduce patient discomfort, resulting in improved acceptability and patient compliance. This method is as effective for bowel cleansing as polyethylene glycol.

Gastric infection by Helicobacter pylori

Helicobacter pylori infects half of the world's population and plays a causal role in ulcer disease and gastric cancer. This pathogenic neutralophile uniquely colonizes the acidic gastric milieu through the process of acid acclimation. Acid acclimation is the ability of the organism to maintain periplasmic pH near neutrality in an acidic environment to prevent a fall in cytoplasmic pH in order to maintain viability and growth in acid. Recently, due to an increase in antibiotic resistance, the rate of H. pylori eradication has fallen below 80% generating renewed interest in novel eradication regimens and targets. In this article, we review the gastric biology of H. pylori and acid acclimation, various detection procedures, antibiotic resistance and the role that gastric acidity plays in the susceptibility of the organism to antibiotics currently in use and propose several novel drug targets that would promote eradication in the absence of antibiotics.

Applicability of a short/rapid 13C-urea breath test for Helicobacter pylori: retrospective multicenter chart review study

BACKGROUND

Carbon labeled urea breath tests usually entail a two point sampling with a 20 to 30-minute gap. Our aim was to evaluate the duration of time needed for diagnosing Helicobacter pylori by the BreathID® System.

METHODS

This is a retrospective multicenter chart review study. Test location, date, delta over baseline, and duration of the entire test were recorded. Consecutively 13C urea breath tests results were extracted from the files over a nine year period.

RESULTS

Of the 12,791 tests results, 35.1% were positively diagnosed and only 0.1% were inconclusive. A statistically significant difference in prevalence among the countries was found: Germany showing the lowest, 13.3%, and Israel the highest, 44.1%. Significant differences were found in time to diagnosis: a positive diagnosis had the shortest and an inconclusive result had the longest. Overall test duration averaged 15.1 minutes in Germany versus approximately 13 minutes in other countries. Diagnosis was achieved after approximately 9 minutes in Israel, Italy and Switzerland, but after 10 on average in the others. The mean delta over baseline value for a negative diagnosis was 1.03 ± 0.86, (range, 0.9 - 5), versus 20.2 ± 18.9, (range, 5.1 - 159.4) for a positive one.

CONCLUSIONS

The BreathID® System used in diagnosing Helicobacter pylori can safely shorten test duration on average of 10-13 minutes without any loss of sensitivity or specificity and with no test lasting more than 21 minutes.

Performance of acidified 14C-urea capsule breath test during pantoprazole and ranitidine treatment

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Urea breath test (UBT) results could be false negative in patients taking antisecretory drugs. This effect would be prevented by citric acid administration during UBT. We prospectively investigated whether acidified 14C-urea capsule prevents false negative UBT results in patients taking antisecretory drugs and show interference with the duration of medications.

METHODS

Sixty Helicobacter pylori positive patients were included. Pantoprazole (40 mg/day) was given to 27 patients for 28 days and ranitidine (300 mg. o.d.) to 33 patients for 60 days. Urea breath tests were repeated on days 14 and 28 in both groups and on day 60 in the ranitidine group.

RESULTS

The baseline mean breath counts of two groups did not show any significant difference. Pantoprazole led to a significant decrease in mean breath counts on day 14 (P < 0.005). Six of 27 and 3 of 25 patients taking pantoprazole developed negative or equivocal UBT results on days 14 and 28, respectively. Two of 32, 2 of 32 and 3 of 21 patients taking ranitidine developed negative or equivocal UBT results on days 14, 28 and 60, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of acidified 14C-urea capsule did not prevent false negative UBT results in patients taking pantoprazole and ranitidine, and the duration of medication does not affect the test results.

An optimized 13C-urea breath test for the diagnosis of H pylori infection

AIM: To validate an optimized 13C-urea breath test (¹³C-UBT) protocol for the diagnosis of H pylori infection that is cost-efficient and maintains excellent diagnostic accuracy.

METHODS: 70 healthy volunteers were tested with two simplified ¹³C-UBT protocols, with test meal (Protocol 2) and without test meal (Protocol 1). Breath samples were collected at 10, 20 and 30 min after ingestion of 50 mg ¹³C-urea dissolved in 10 mL of water, taken as a single swallow, followed by 200 mL of water (pH 6.0) and a circular motion around the waistline to homogenize the urea solution. Performance of both protocols was analyzed at various cut-off values. Results were validated against the European protocol.

RESULTS: According to the reference protocol, 65.7% individuals were positive for H pylori infection and 34.3% were negative. There were no significant differences in the ability of both protocols to correctly identify positive and negative H pylori individuals. However, only Protocol 1 with no test meal achieved accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of 100%. The highest values achieved by Protocol 2 were 98.57%, 97.83%, 100%, 100% and 100%, respectively.

CONCLUSION: A 10 min, 50 mg ¹³C-UBT with no test meal using a cut-off value of 2-2.5 is a highly accurate test for the diagnosis of H pylori infection at a reduced cost.

Helicobacter pylori detection and antimicrobial susceptibility testing

The discovery of Helicobacter pylori in 1982 was the starting point of a revolution concerning the concepts and management of gastroduodenal diseases. It is now well accepted that the most common stomach disease, peptic ulcer disease, is an infectious disease, and all consensus conferences agree that the causative agent, H. pylori, must be treated with antibiotics. Furthermore, the concept emerged that this bacterium could be the trigger of various malignant diseases of the stomach, and it is now a model for chronic bacterial infections causing cancer. Most of the many different techniques involved in diagnosis of H. pylori infection are performed in clinical microbiology laboratories. The aim of this article is to review the current status of these methods and their application, highlighting the important progress which has been made in the past decade. Both invasive and noninvasive techniques will be reviewed.

The use of citric acid to prolong the in vivo gastro-retention of a floating dosage form in the fasted state

Gastro-retentive dosage forms have the potential to improve local therapy and decrease the variation in bioavailability that is observed with a number of commercially available immediate and modified release preparations. In this study, a dosage form has been developed, utilising freeze-dried calcium alginate beads, designed to float on the surface of the stomach contents thus prolonging the retention time. The aim of the study was to also assess the in vivo behaviour of the radio-labelled calcium alginate beads when they were administered under fasting conditions with either water or an aqueous solution of citric acid, a potential gut transit delaying substance. The study was performed in healthy male volunteers who swallowed the radio-labelled calcium alginate beads after a 10h overnight fast. Gamma scintigraphy was selected as the method to monitor the movement of the calcium alginate beads. The volunteers consumed no further food or drink until gastric emptying of the calcium alginate beads was complete. The results indicated that prolonged gastric retention was achieved when the dosage form was administered with the citric acid solution when compared to retention in the absence of citric acid. Citric acid, therefore, has the potential to delay the gastric emptying of the calcium alginate beads when administered to fasted volunteers.

Long-term follow-up of 13C-urea breath test results after Helicobacter pylori eradication: frequency and significance of borderline delta13CO2 values

BACKGROUND

The precise choice of cut-off point for the 13C-urea breath test to define whether it is positive or negative represents a controversial issue.

AIM

To quantify the 13C-urea breath test result for several years following Helicobacter pylori eradication, and to evaluate the frequency and the significance of borderline delta13CO2 values.

METHODS

Two-hundred H. pylori eradicated patients confirmed by 13C-urea breath test (100 mg of urea, citric acid), and having had repeated this test yearly up to 5 years, were studied. Delta13CO2 values between 2 and 5/1000 were considered as borderline results.

RESULTS

Eight H. pylori recurrences were observed during 406 patient-years of follow-up (1.97% yearly). In two of eight reinfected patients, the reinfection was preceded by a negative delta13CO2 value >2/1000. Borderline delta13CO2 values were detected in 4% of the 606 urea breath tests performed, and in 25% when only patients in whom H. pylori recurrence was detected in subsequent urea breath tests were included (P < 0.05). The negative-predictive value of a post-treatment delta13CO2 >2/1000 for the diagnosis of H. pylori recurrence was 99%.

CONCLUSIONS

Positive and negative urea breath test results tend to cluster outside the range between 2/1000 and 5/1000. Nevertheless, a borderline urea breath test delta value (e.g. very close to the selected cut-off point) should be interpreted cautiously, and the result should probably be confirmed either by repeating the urea breath test or by other diagnostic methods. On the contrary, a delta13CO2 value <2/1000 very confidently confirms H. pylori eradication.

Comparison of different protocols for 13C-urea breath test for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in healthy volunteers

OBJECTIVE

The (13)C-urea breath test ((13)C-UBT) is the most accurate non-invasive method for diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection. However, several methodological issues have not been resolved yet. The aim of this study was to test different protocols of (13)C-UBT to find the optimal test drink and sampling interval.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

(13)C-UBT was performed at 3-day intervals in 27 healthy volunteers using citric acid (test A), orange juice (B) and still water (C) as test drinks. Breath samples were collected from time 5 to 60 min. A total number of 2106 breath samples were analysed by isotope ratio mass spectrometry (cut-off value 3.5).

RESULTS

Differences in delta values were greater than would be expected by chance (A versus B and A versus C at times 20, 25, 30, 35 and 40 min, p<0.05, Dunnett's method). There were no grey zone- or false-negative results among H. pylori-positive persons in test A at any time, but some were found in tests B and C. Optimal intervals for breath sampling are at times 20 or 25 min after (13)C-urea ingestion.

CONCLUSIONS

Citric acid solution as a test drink and 20- or 25-min breath sampling intervals are optimal for the (13)C-UBT in healthy volunteers.

[Breath tests in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal diseases]

Determination of carbon or hydrogen markers in breath has allowed closer investigation of the pathogenic mechanisms of several gastrointestinal diseases. Thus, the 13C-urea breath test is a nonaggressive, simple and safe test with excellent accuracy both in the initial diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection and in confirmation of its eradication following treatment. Moreover, because of the simplicity, reproducibility and safety of these types of procedure, they have tended to substitute more uncomfortable and expensive techniques that were traditionally used in gastroenterology. Several breath tests have been developed that allow reliable evaluation of liver or exocrine pancreatic function, gastrointestinal motility, as related to gastric emptying or orocecal transit time, and a diagnostic approach to clinical problems that could be due to bacterial overgrowth or malabsorption of various sugars.

Review article: 13C-urea breath test in the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection -- a critical review

The urea breath test is a non-invasive, simple and safe test which provides excellent accuracy both for the initial diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection and for the confirmation of its eradication after treatment. Some studies have found no differences between urea breath test performed under non-fasting conditions. The simplicity, good tolerance and economy of the citric acid test meal probably make its systematic use advisable. The urea breath test protocol may be performed with relatively low doses (<100 mg) of urea: 75 mg or even 50 mg seem to be sufficient. With the most widely used protocol (with citric acid and 75 mg of urea), excellent accuracy is obtained when breath samples are collected as early as 10-15 min after urea ingestion. A unique and generally proposed cut-off level is not possible because it has to be adapted to different factors, such as the test meal, the dose and type of urea, or the pre-/post-treatment setting. Fortunately, because positive and negative urea breath test results tend to cluster outside of the range between 2 and 5 per thousand, a change in cut-off value within this range would be expected to have little effect on clinical accuracy of the test.

Dietary Amelioration of Helicobacter pylori Infection: Design Criteria for a Clinical Trial

The longitudinal stability of the urea breath test (UBT), which measures urease as a biomarker for infection with Helicobacter pylori (a major risk factor for gastric cancer), was evaluated in the environs of Tsukuba, Japan. 13C-UBT measurements were monitored at four time points in 46 free-living, H. pylori–infected, asymptomatic volunteers over a period of 7 weeks. Subjects were asked to refrain from eating cruciferous vegetables, which might confound interpretation of results. Their compliance was monitored using both dietary records and direct biochemical testing of overnight urine. There was large between-subject UBT variation in this population (logUBT mean, 3.34; SD, 0.67). Within-subject (longitudinal) UBT values were remarkably stable in about one-quarter of the subjects (coefficients of variations for these individuals were &lt;21%), whereas coefficients of variations in the highest quartile of variability ranged from 40% to 80%. About half of the sequential UBTs (63 of 138 such measurement pairs) changed &gt;10‰ “delta over baseline” between measurements. This study provides the elements to optimize the design of a clinical trial in this population to examine the efficacy of a dietary intervention to reduce H. pylori infection. The number of subjects required to detect a 30% difference in average UBT value is highly dependent on the baseline stability of UBT measurements. For the least variable quartile, as few as 12 subjects would be needed; for the most variable quartile, at least 147 subjects would be required in each arm.

Validation of a novel real time 13C urea breath test for rapid evaluation of Helicobacter pylori in children and adolescents

We prospectively evaluated a (13)C urea breath test (UBT) that involves passive continuous sampling for diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori in 72 children. Results were obtained within 10 minutes in 96% of patients. The test is rapid, user-friendly, and has 100% concordance with conventional diagnostic methods.

Effect of proton pump inhibitors and antacid therapy on 13C urea breath tests and stool test for Helicobacter pylori infection

OBJECTIVE

There is uncertainty about the best method of testing patients for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection while they are taking proton pump inhibitors. The aim of this study was to determine: (i) if the decreased sensitivity of the urea breath test during proton pump inhibitor is corrected by different techniques for breath testing and (ii) if the sensitivity of stool test is decreased with the administration of proton pump inhibitors.

METHODS

Prospective randomized single-blind study was performed in a tertiary care university hospital. Out of 72 H. pylori infected patients endoscoped for upper abdominal symptoms 48 were randomized to proton pump inhibitors (omeprazole 20 mg each day or esomeprazole 40 mg each day) and 24 to antacid (aluminum hydroxide 800 mg each day) for 14 days. Several breath tests (standard 75 mg (13)C-UBT with citric acid, with orange juice, a tablet breath test with 100 and 50 mg of (13)C), and a stool test were carried out. Baseline samples were collected before and after treatment.

RESULTS

The baseline sensitivity for all breath tests was 100% in both groups; for stool test it was 97.8% (95% CI: 88.7-96.6) and 90% (95% CI: 69.9-97.2) in the proton pump inhibitor and antacid group, respectively. After treatment, the sensitivity of tests was significantly low (UBTs range: 77.1%-85.4%; stool test: 83%; 95% CI: 63.9-91.1), while it was unchanged in the antacid group.

CONCLUSIONS

False negative breath and stool tests are equally common in patients taking proton pump inhibitors. Antacids do not impair the sensitivity of the breath tests or the stool test.

Effect of proton pump inhibitors on the continuous real time (13)C-urea breath test

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of a new, continuous real time (13)C-urea breath test, BreathID, for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori in patients taking proton pump inhibitors (PPIs).

METHODS

Fifty-two consecutive patients, positive for H. pylori by BreathID, were prospectively evaluated. Patients were randomized to receive either omeprazole 20 mg/day or pantoprazole 40 mg/day for 14 days. A repeat breath test was performed on day 14 while patients received their last PPI pill. Patients were given a test drink containing 75 mg (13)C-urea and 4.0 g citric acid. Real time, continuously sampled expired (13)CO(2), obtained within 6-20 min, was compared with measurement of expired (13)CO(2) by isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS).

RESULTS

A full set of test data was available for 43 patients. After 14 days of treatment with PPIs, false negative detection of H. pylori occurred in only 1/43 (2.3%) patients examined by continuous real time (13)C-urea breath test compared with 2/43 (4.6%) patients examined by IRMS. With the exception of one case, complete agreement was observed between BreathID and the IRMS breath tests at both baseline and after PPI treatment. PPI treatment was associated with three different types of responses on UBT: 1) one third of the patients developed a significant decrease in the (13)CO(2)/(12)CO(2) excretion, 2) roughly one third developed a significant increase in the post-PPI breath test results, and 3) results did not change significantly in the remaining patients. Linear regression analysis of 43 H. pylori-positive subjects indicated a significant positive association between baseline and post-PPI Delta (13)CO(2)/(12)CO(2) excretion.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a single test drink containing 4.0 g citric acid in BreathID, resulted in a low number of false negative results associated with sustained PPI treatment. Although there were some differences between BreathID versus IRMS, the type of PPI and the sampling method used do not appear to play a critical role in the detection of H. pylori by BreathID. According to these results, BreathID is a reliable tool for testing H. pylori in patients taking PPIs.

Using breath tests wisely in a gastroenterology practice: an evidence-based review of indications and pitfalls in interpretation

Breath tests are a simple and safe alternative to more invasive investigation strategies for many gastroenterological conditions. Both the hydrogen breath tests and the new 13C stable radioisotope breath tests are nonradioactive and safe in children and pregnancy. The range of diseases that can be identified include Helicobacter pylori infection, lactose and fructose intolerance, bacterial overgrowth, bile salt wastage, pancreatic insufficiency, liver dysfunction, and abnormal small bowel transit. In this review, the physiology supporting these tests and the principles of normal gas dynamics in the gut are briefly reviewed and then related to the test preparation and interpretation in two parts: 1) detection of H. pylori and 2) small bowel, pancreatic, and hepatobiliary disorders. A MEDLINE search reviewing all English language abstracts from 1966 to March, 2001 was performed, with an additional review of abstracts from major national meetings from 1997 to 2001. Using the information from this review, the performance characteristics of the various tests were detailed, and an attempt is made to provide some literature-based guidance regarding their indications and limitations. The interpretation of "flat" breath tests and the selective use of methane collection and colonic alkalinization are discussed. Breath tests are valuable tools that are, in general, underutilized in evaluating dyspepsia and functional bloating and diarrhea, as well as suspected malabsorption, including lactose intolerance.

Influence of the physiological changes of gastric emptying on the simplified single sample 14 C-urea breath test

The aim of this study was to assess the influence of the physiological changes of gastric emptying on the simplified 14C-urea breath test. Thirty patients performed the test in fasting conditions. Patients were orally administered 0.074 mega Bq of 14C-urea, mixed with 0.0185 mega Bq of 99mTc-S colloids in 25 ml water. A breath sample was taken before and 10 min after intake of the tracers and followed by a 2 min planar anterior scintigraphic image of the abdomen to measure gastric activity. Gastric emptying was estimated by dividing the residual gastric activity at 10 min by the total activity in the abdomen. The procedure was performed twice for each patient after a 24 h interval. The repeatability of both the gastric emptying test and the urea breath test was assessed by the method described by Bland and Altman. The coefficient of repeatability of the urea breath test was 1.18 for a confidence interval of 95%. The coefficient of repeatability of gastric emptying was 27.4. There was no significant correlation (r= 0.08) between the plot of the individual modifications of urea breath test and residual gastric activity in two successive tests. It is concluded that the physiological changes of gastric emptying do not influence the results obtained by the simplified, single-sample 14C-urea breath test.

[Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infections]

Hardly any other bacterial infection can be diagnosed with a similar variety of non-invasive and invasive tests as infection with H. pylori. Efficacy and specificity of well-proven tests such as urease test in biopsy specimens, histology, culture, and 13C breath test have been uniformly evidenced in numerous studies. Novel tests include molecular microbiological procedures, providing new opportunities for rapid detection of virulence factors and resistance genes, as well as antigen detection in feces. Though some open questions still need to be clarified, the latter test will gain major importance in the future. With the availability of the breath test and antigen detection in stool the need for the use of serological tests has been reduced, all the more so as the majority of the available quick tests have been shown to be of inadequate reliability. Well defined indications for the treatment of H. pylori infections are a major prerequisite for a reasonable use of this diagnostic armory.

Review article:invasive and non-invasive tests for Helicobacter pylori infection

There are two general ways in which a diagnosis of infection by Helicobacter pylori can be made: by using either an invasive or non-invasive procedure. The invasive procedures involve an endoscopy and biopsy. A biopsy is essential because often the mucosa may appear macroscopically normal but nevertheless be inflamed. A biopsy is obtained by histological examination, culture, polymerase chain reaction or detection of the presence of urease activity in biopsy material. The non-invasive tests that can be used to diagnose the infection are serology, detection of labelled metabolic products of urea hydrolysis in the breath (13CO2, 14CO2), the urine or the blood, and detection of H, pylori antigen in a stool specimen. At present no single test can be relied upon to detect definitely colonization by H. pylori, and a combination of two is recommended if this is feasible. The choice of the test to be used is not straightforward and may vary according to the clinical condition and local expertise.

13C-urea breath test for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection before treatment: is citric acid necessary?

AIM

13C-urea breath test is one of the best methods for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection. Although a citric acid solution is generally used prior to urea intake, the superiority of this strategy has not been sufficiently demonstrated. Thus, our aim was to compare 13C-urea breath test with and without citric acid solution, to evaluate whether 13C-urea breath test can also achieve favourable results when the test meal is omitted.

METHODS

13C-urea breath test with and without citric acid were compared prospectively in 53 subjects without prior Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy prescription. Basal samples and at 15', 30', and 45' after taking 100 mg of 13C-urea were obtained. The gold standard for Helicobacter pylori diagnosis was the 13C-urea breath test result with citric acid at 30', and "Delta Over Baseline" values >5 at that time were considered positive.

RESULTS

The prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection was 68%. Mean Delta Over Baseline values with citric acid at 15', 30' and 45' were: 29.6+/-39, 30.8+/-37 and 24.6+/-27; whereas respective values without citric acid were lower: 14.9+/-22, 12.2+/-17 and 10D+/-13 (p<O. 001 for all comparisons, Wilcoxon test for paired data). Thus, the area under the curve (constructed with Delta Over Baseline values at different times) with citric acid was 85+/- 102, and 37+/-50 without citric acid [p<0.001). Correlation coefficient between Delta Over Baseline values with and without citric acid at 30' was 0.73 (p<0.0001). The percentage of subjects achieving the highest Delta Over Baseline value at 15', 30' and 45' with citric acid was 51%, 30% and 19%, whereas without citric acid it was 51%, 26% and 23% (non-significant differences). The area under receiver operating characteristic curve for 13C-urea breath test without citric acid was: 0.98 at 15', 1 at 30' and 0.97 at 45'. The best cut-off point for 13C-urea breath test without citric acid at 30' was anywhere between 3. 3 and 3.9 (that is, a lower value than that usually considered with citric acid), with 100% (95% confidence interval, 90-100%) sensitivity and 100% [82-100%) specificity

CONCLUSIONS

13C-urea breath test values with citric acid are higher than those obtained without citric acid, although this difference does not imply a diagnostic superiority in untreated patients when considering 13C-urea breath test without citric acid at 30'. Therefore, for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in untreated patients, citric acid solution in 13C-urea breath test protocol can be omitted.