Omeprazole therapy decreases the need for dilatation of peptic oesophageal strictures

ESNM/ANMS consensus paper: Diagnosis and management of refractory gastro-esophageal reflux disease

Up to 40% of patients with symptoms suspicious of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) do not respond completely to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. The term "refractory GERD" has been used loosely in the literature. A distinction should be made between refractory symptoms (ie, symptoms may or may not be GERD-related), refractory GERD symptoms (ie, persisting symptoms in patients with proven GERD, regardless of relationship to ongoing reflux), and refractory GERD (ie, objective evidence of GERD despite adequate medical management). The present ESNM/ANMS consensus paper proposes use the term "refractory GERD symptoms" only in patients with persisting symptoms and previously proven GERD by either endoscopy or esophageal pH monitoring. Even in this context, symptoms may or may not be reflux related. Objective evaluation, including endoscopy and esophageal physiologic testing, is requisite to provide insights into mechanisms of symptom generation and evidence of true refractory GERD. Some patients may have true ongoing refractory acid or weakly acidic reflux despite PPIs, while others have no evidence of ongoing reflux, and yet others have functional esophageal disorders (overlapping with proven GERD confirmed off therapy). In this context, attention should also be paid to supragastric belching and rumination syndrome, which may be important contributors to refractory symptoms.

UK guidelines on oesophageal dilatation in clinical practice

These are updated guidelines which supersede the original version published in 2004. This work has been endorsed by the Clinical Services and Standards Committee of the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) under the auspices of the oesophageal section of the BSG. The original guidelines have undergone extensive revision by the 16 members of the Guideline Development Group with representation from individuals across all relevant disciplines, including the Heartburn Cancer UK charity, a nursing representative and a patient representative. The methodological rigour and transparency of the guideline development processes were appraised using the revised Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) tool.Dilatation of the oesophagus is a relatively high-risk intervention, and is required by an increasing range of disease states. Moreover, there is scarcity of evidence in the literature to guide clinicians on how to safely perform this procedure. These guidelines deal specifically with the dilatation procedure using balloon or bougie devices as a primary treatment strategy for non-malignant narrowing of the oesophagus. The use of stents is outside the remit of this paper; however, for cases of dilatation failure, alternative techniques-including stents-will be listed. The guideline is divided into the following subheadings: (1) patient preparation; (2) the dilatation procedure; (3) aftercare and (4) disease-specific considerations. A systematic literature search was performed. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Develop-ment and Evaluation (GRADE) tool was used to evaluate the quality of evidence and decide on the strength of recommendations made.

Esophageal dysphagia

Esophageal dysphagia can arise from a variety of causes such as motility disorders, mechanical and inflammatory diseases. Adequate management includes a detailed history, evaluation with upper endoscopy, barium radiography and manometry. Treatment is usually tailored to the underlying disease process and in some cases, as in inoperable cancer, palliative management may be necessary.

Esophageal and pharyngeal strictures: report on 1,862 endoscopic dilatations using the Savary-Gilliard technique

Treatment of symptomatic pharyngeal and esophageal strictures requires endoscopic dilatation. The Savary-Gilliard bougienage was developed by our department and has been used since 1980 for this purpose. We report our experience using this technique. The records of patients seen from January 1, 1963 to December 31, 2005, who had pharyngeal and esophageal strictures needing dilatation, were reviewed. The prevalence of different etiologies, and the incidence of complications using the Savary-Gilliard dilators were assessed. Efficiency of dilatation was assessed over a 17-year segment of this period, using number of dilatations and time intervals between dilatations until resolution of symptoms as outcome measures. Of the 2,652 pharyngeal and esophageal strictures reviewed, 90% were of organic origin (45% benign and 55% malignant stenoses), and 10% were of functional etiology. The most common etiologies were peptic strictures before the era of proton pump inhibitors, and postoperative anastomotic strictures thereafter. A total of 1,862 dilatations using the Savary-Gilliard technique were analyzed. Complication and mortality rates were 0.18 and 0.09% for benign and 4.58 and 0.81% for malignant etiologies, respectively. The number of dilatations per stricture and the time interval between different sessions were dependent on the type of strictures, varying from 1 to 23 dilatations and 7 days to 16 years, respectively. Pharyngeal and esophageal dilatations using the Savary-Gilliard technique were safe when used together with fluoroscopy. Overall, the efficiency of the dilatation procedure was good, but some types of strictures (e.g., caustic, post-surgical and/or post radiotherapy) were refractory to treatment and required repeated dilatations.

Temporal trends in new and recurrent oesophageal strictures in a Medicare population

BACKGROUND

The widespread use of proton pump inhibitors for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease could result in a decline in new as well as recurrent gastro-oesophageal reflux disease-related oesophageal strictures. The temporal trends of strictures have not been examined in population-based studies.

METHODS

To examine the temporal trends in strictures, we calculated the age-adjusted incidence rates of new oesophageal strictures with or without oesophageal dilation in a sample of Medicare beneficiaries between 1992 and 2000. We also examined recurrent dilations recorded at least 3 months after a new stricture or the preceding recurrent stricture.

RESULTS

The age-adjusted rates for strictures accompanied with dilation declined by approximately 11% from 215 per million to 192 per million. New oesophageal strictures with dilation declined as a proportion of all upper endoscopies procedures (from 2.6% to 1.9%). Recurrent dilation within 1 year declined dramatically from 16% (9.5% CI: 12.5-20.3) in 1992 to 8% (95% CI: 4.43-10.62) in 2000. In multivariable proportional hazards model, there was a 30% risk reduction of recurrent oesophageal strictures.

CONCLUSIONS

This population-based study indicates that the incidence of new as well as recurrent oesophageal strictures has been declining. In the face of rising incidence of other gastro-oesophageal reflux disease-related complications, it is important to understand the explanation of the present observations.

Esophageal stricture: incidence, treatment patterns, and recurrence rate

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to determine the incidence, natural history, and recurrence rate of esophageal stricture diagnosed in primary care.

METHODS

From the U.K. General Practice Research Database, we identified patients with a stricture diagnosis recorded between 1994 and 2000. Diagnoses were confirmed by general practitioner-completed questionnaires. Patients with stricture were compared to an age- and sex-matched sample of controls from the original source population. We estimated the incidence of stricture, potential risk factors, and comorbidities, and relative risk (RR) for subsequent stricture recurrence and mortality.

RESULTS

The incidence of esophageal stricture was 1.1 per 10,000 person-years and increased markedly with age. Incidence of stricture decreased from 1994 to 2000, concomitant with a substantial increase in proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use. The majority of stricture cases (68%) were peptic. Prior dysphagia, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), hiatus hernia, peptic ulcer disease, and heavy alcohol use were associated with an increased risk of stricture. The rate of stricture recurrence was 11.1 per 100 person-years. Risk of recurrence associated with long-term PPI use adjusting for other factors was 0.6 (95% CI 0.3-1.1). Mortality in patients with peptic stricture was similar to that in the control population.

CONCLUSIONS

Esophageal stricture is a rare event, and most cases in primary care are peptic strictures. Prior GERD, hiatus hernia, and peptic ulcer are associated with an increased risk of peptic stricture. Incidence of stricture decreased from 1994 to 2000.

Temporal trends in new and recurrent esophageal strictures in Department of Veterans Affairs

BACKGROUND

Anecdotal experience suggests that gastroenterologists are encountering fewer patients with esophageal strictures; however, the temporal trends of esophageal strictures have not been well examined in large studies.

METHODS

We examined the incidence rates of new esophageal strictures as well as esophageal dilations among patients presenting to VA facilities between 1998 and 2003 as a proportion of the annual frequency of all endoscopic procedures and/or imaging procedures. Recurrent strictures were defined as those recorded at least 3 months after the index date of a new stricture or the date of the preceding recurrent stricture. Stricture was defined only in the presence of an upper endoscopy or upper gastrointestinal (UGI) contrast imaging within 30 days before or after the date of diagnosis. This algorithm was validated by manually reviewing the medical records of 180 patients; the positive predictive value was approximately 84%. The risk of recurrent strictures was examined using Cox proportional hazards model for multiple failures.

RESULTS

There were 19,157 patients identified between fiscal year (FY) 1998 and FY 2003 with new esophageal strictures. New strictures comprised a constant annual proportion of total EGD and UGI imaging studies. New strictures declined by 11.6% as a proportion of all upper endoscopies (not including UGI imaging). However, esophageal dilations associated with new stricture diagnoses declined among patients with new esophageal strictures, 16.8% had at least one episode of recurrence. The 1-yr incidence rate of recurrent strictures declined significantly (-36.0%) from 13.9 per 100 person-years for patients diagnosed with new strictures in 1998 to 8.9 per 100 person-years in patients diagnosed with new strictures in 2003. In the full multivariable model, new strictures diagnoses during 2001-2003 were associated with a reduced risk of having recurrent strictures (19% in the first year and 13% throughout follow-up) independent of age, gender, race, geographic region, or the presence of Barrett's esophagus.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of recurrent strictures has declined between 1998 and 2003 by approximately one-third. Although there has been only a small decline in the incidence of new esophageal strictures among patients undergoing endoscopy, the use of esophageal dilations has declined considerably among these patients. The role of proton pump inhibitors needs to be examined.

Dysphagia in aging

Dysphagia is a common problem in older patients and is becoming a larger health care problem as the populations of the United States and other developed countries rapidly age. Changes in physiology with aging are seen in the upper esophageal sphincter and pharyngeal region in both symptomatic and asymptomatic older individuals. Age related changes in the esophageal body and lower esophageal sphincter are more difficult to identify, while esophageal sensation certainly is blunted with age. Stroke, Parkinson's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Zenker's diverticula, and several other motility and structural disorders may cause oropharyngeal dysphagia in an older patient. Esophageal dysphagia can also be caused by both disorders of motility (achalasia, diffuse esophageal spasm, scleroderma and others) and structure (malignancy, strictures, rings, external compression, and others). Many of these disorders have an increased prevalence in older patients and should be sought with an appropriate diagnostic evaluation in older patients. The treatment of dysphagia in older patients is similar to that in younger patients, but more invasive therapies such as surgery may not be possible in some older patients making less aggressive medical and endoscopic therapy more attractive.

Clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease

GERD is ubiquitous throughout the adult population in the United States. It commonly adversely affects quality of life and occasionally causes life-threatening complications. The new and emerging medical and endoscopic therapies for GERD and the new management strategies for BE should dramatically reduce the clinical toll of this disease on society.

Different patterns of oesophageal acid exposure distinguish complicated reflux disease from either erosive reflux oesophagitis or non-erosive reflux disease

BACKGROUND

The reason why less than one-half of patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease develop complicated reflux disease (ulcerative oesophagitis, oesophageal strictures and Barrett's oesophagus) and erosive reflux oesophagitis is not fully understood. Supine nocturnal oesophageal acid reflux is considered to be critically involved in this phenomenon, but reliable data are lacking.

AIM

To clarify whether high levels of supine nocturnal oesophageal acid exposure are associated with complicated reflux disease.

METHODS

Ambulatory 24-h oesophageal pH monitoring was performed in 220 patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (56 with complicated reflux disease, 76 with erosive reflux oesophagitis and 88 with non-erosive reflux disease). The total, supine nocturnal and upright diurnal percentage acid reflux times were calculated.

RESULTS

The total percentage acid reflux time was significantly greater in complicated reflux disease than in either erosive reflux oesophagitis (P = 0.024) or non-erosive reflux disease (P = 0.000). These differences were entirely due to a greater supine nocturnal percentage acid reflux time (P = 0.038 and P = 0.000, respectively), whereas no difference was observed in the upright diurnal percentage acid reflux time.

CONCLUSIONS

Complicated reflux disease is characterized by high levels of supine nocturnal percentage acid reflux time. Prospective studies would be appropriate to clarify whether the normalization of this parameter is relevant to the effective management of this subset of patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Oesophageal acid-peptic strictures in the histamine H2 receptor antagonist and proton pump inhibitor era

BACKGROUND AND AIM

We present a survey on the incidence, demography and natural history (re-dilatation rates) of patients with oesophageal acid-peptic stricture seen between 1977 and 1995.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Prospective, cohort observational study. Stricture severity was graded mild, moderate or severe (needing forcible dilatation with bougies). Most were treated with histamine H2 receptor antagonists or proton pump inhibitors, and were followed up by serial check endoscopy.

RESULTS

A total of 156 of 7429 (2%) reflux patients had stricture: mild, n=56; moderate, n=25; severe, n=75. The prevalence of reflux disease is rising, paralleled by an increase in the number of patients with stricture; hence the incidence of stricture is unchanged: 1977-1982, 1.8% (18/986); 1983-1989, 2.4% (61/2595); 1990-1995, 2% (77/3848). Demography: mean age 68 years; mean length of reflux history 6.4 years; 15% on non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs/aspirin; 18% with Barrett's metaplasia. Mean follow-up: 5.6 years.

OUTCOME

of the 75 with severe stricture, 36 (48%) needed forcible dilatation only once, and 39 more often (13 twice, nine three times), most within 2 years. Only six of these patients need > or = 6 re-dilatations.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of stricture is low and remains unchanged, despite the increased prevalence of reflux disease. Most patients have a good prognosis, only half needing further forcible dilatation, mainly within the first 2 years.

Effective intra-oesophageal acid suppression in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: lansoprazole vs. pantoprazole

BACKGROUND

: Effective intra-oesophageal acid suppression is an important therapeutic goal in complicated and atypical gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

AIM

: To compare the efficacy of lansoprazole and pantoprazole in normalizing oesophageal acid exposure.

METHODS

: Fifty patients with complicated or atypical gastro-oesophageal reflux disease were randomly assigned to receive 30 mg lansoprazole (n = 26) or 40 mg pantoprazole (n = 24) once daily. Three to four weeks after the start of treatment, patients underwent 24-h oesophageal pH monitoring whilst on therapy. If the results were improved but still abnormal, the dosage was doubled and pH monitoring was repeated. If oesophageal acid exposure was not improved, the patient was shifted to the alternative drug regimen.

RESULTS

: Oesophageal acid exposure was normalized in all 26 patients treated with lansoprazole (in 35% of cases with a double daily dosage), whereas in six of the 24 (25%) patients treated with pantoprazole it was neither normalized nor lowered (P = 0.008). Accordingly, the mean percentage acid reflux time was significantly lower for the lansoprazole group (2.1) than for the pantoprazole group (5.8) (P = 0.032).

CONCLUSIONS

: Effective intra-oesophageal acid suppression can be accomplished more reliably with lansoprazole than with pantoprazole in patients with complicated and atypical gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Acid suppression in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: Why? How? How much and when?

For patients with suboptimal relief from lifestyle modifications, acid suppressive therapy remains a cornerstone of treatment for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD). While a great deal of attention is focused on complications of GORD, adequate symptom relief remains an important and practical therapeutic goal. Adequate symptom relief is an achievable and easily measurable endpoint that both restores quality of life and prevents many potential complications.

Hiatal hernia is the key factor determining the lansoprazole dosage required for effective intra-oesophageal acid suppression

BACKGROUND

Effective intra-oesophageal acid suppression can be achieved with lansoprazole. The daily dosage could be influenced by the presence of hiatal hernia.

AIM

To assess the lansoprazole daily dosage required to normalize oesophageal acid exposure in patients with and without hiatal hernia.

METHODS

Fifty patients with complications or atypical manifestations of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease were given lansoprazole, 30 mg once daily. Three to four weeks after the start of treatment, patients underwent oesophageal pH monitoring while on therapy. If the results were still abnormal, the lansoprazole dosage was doubled and 24-h pH-metry was repeated 20-30 days thereafter.

RESULTS

A 30-mg daily dosage of lansoprazole normalized oesophageal acid exposure in 70% of cases, whilst a 60-mg daily dosage was necessary in the remainder: the two groups differed only in the presence of hiatal hernia (28% vs. 100%, respectively; P=0.000). Effective intra-oesophageal acid suppression was obtained in all 25 patients without hiatal hernia with the 30-mg daily dosage of lansoprazole.

CONCLUSIONS

Hiatal hernia is the key factor determining the lansoprazole dosage required for effective intra-oesophageal acid suppression in complicated and atypical gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. High efficacy of a 30-mg daily dosage of lansoprazole can be predicted in the absence of hiatal hernia.