Enhanced bioavailability of azathioprine compared to 6-mercaptopurine therapy in inflammatory bowel disease: correlation with treatment efficacy

Systematic review: The effectiveness of 6-thioguanine nucleotide-based dose optimisation of thiopurines in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease

Introduction: Clinical guidelines highlight the potential utility of metabolite-based thiopurine dose optimisation strategies in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The aim of this review was to summarise the evidence of effectiveness and safety of a 6-thioguanine nucleotide (6-TGN) metabolite-based dosing strategy for maintenance of remission using azathioprine or mercaptopurine in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Methods: We searched the Cochrane central register of controlled trials, EMBASE, clinicaltrials.gov, the WHO international clinical trials registry platform, and relevant grey literature, up to 1 December 2021. Inclusion criteria were: all randomised (active comparator) controlled trials of azathioprine or mercaptopurine used for the purposes of maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis where the dose in the intervention arm was optimised based on 6-TGN metabolite assay results. Studies of any duration were eligible for inclusion, and no age restrictions were applied. Results: No studies met the eligibility criteria for this review. Four randomised controlled studies (two of which are currently underway) were identified that assessed the effectiveness of metabolite-based dose optimisation for thiopurine therapy, but were not eligible either because they did not differentiate between induction and maintenance therapy or because of a lack of an appropriate active comparator. Conclusions: There is no RCT-based evidence for dose optimisation using a 6-TGN metabolite-based dosing strategy for maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis. Where evidence is available from combination induction and maintenance trials, it suggests that such a strategy is no better than weight-based dosing. Cochrane protocol registration: CD014795

Drug monitoring in systemic lupus erythematosus

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is not yet accepted by systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) treatment guidelines. Studies in SLE, however, have proven benefit in three areas: identification of non-adherence or poor adherence; targets for clinical benefit; and ranges of toxicity. This review covers the data on three medications commonly used for SLE, drawing on studies from both the SLE and non-SLE literature.

Increased DNA-incorporated thiopurine metabolite as a possible mechanism for leukocytopenia through cell apoptosis in inflammatory bowel disease patients with NUDT15 mutation

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Polymorphisms in the nucleotide diphosphate-linked moiety X-type motif 15 (NUDT15) gene are associated with thiopurine-induced leukopenia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). NUDT15-associated subcellular thiopurine metabolism has not been investigated in primary lymphocytes. We hypothesized that NUDT15 mutation increases DNA-incorporated deoxythioguanosine (dTG) and induces apoptosis in lymphocytes.

METHODS

DNA-incorporated dTG in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and 6-thioguanine nucleotides (6-TGN) in red blood cells were measured in patients with IBD undergoing thiopurine treatment. The association of a single nucleotide polymorphism for NUDT15 (rs116855232) with dTG^PBMC was examined. The pro-apoptotic effect of DNA-incorporated dTG was examined ex vivo in association with NUDT15 genotypes by co-culturing patient-derived peripheral CD4⁺ T lymphocytes with 6-thioguanine (6-TG).

RESULTS

dTG^PBMC was significantly higher in NUDT15 variants than in non-variants. dTG^PBMC, but not 6-TGN^RBC, negatively correlated with peripheral lymphocyte counts (r =  - 0.31 and  - 0.12, p = 0.012 and 0.173, respectively). DNA-incorporated dTG significantly accumulated to a greater extent in lymphocytes from NUDT15 variants when co-cultured with 6-TG ex vivo than in those from non-variants and was associated with decreased proliferation and increased apoptosis.

CONCLUSION

Increased DNA-incorporated dTG may be responsible for thiopurine-induced leukocytopenia through cell apoptosis in IBD patients with NUDT15 mutation.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of immunosuppressive drugs in hepatology and gastroenterology

Immunosuppressive drugs have been key to the success of liver transplantation and are essential components of the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). For many but not all immunosuppressants, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is recommended to guide therapy. In this article, the rationale and evidence for TDM of tacrolimus, mycophenolic acid, the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, and azathioprine in liver transplantation, IBD, and AIH is reviewed. New developments, including algorithm-based/computer-assisted immunosuppressant dosing, measurement of immunosuppressants in alternative matrices for whole blood, and pharmacodynamic monitoring of these agents is discussed. It is expected that these novel techniques will be incorporate into the standard TDM in the next few years.

Limited added value of laboratory monitoring in thiopurine maintenance monotherapy in inflammatory bowel disease patients

BACKGROUND

To timely detect myelotoxicity and hepatotoxicity, laboratory monitoring at 3-month intervals is advised throughout thiopurine maintenance treatment for IBD. However, reported incidence rates of myelotoxicity and hepatotoxicity in maintenance treatment are low.

AIM

To assess incidence rates and clinical consequences of myelotoxicity and hepatotoxicity in thiopurine maintenance therapy after at least 1 year of thiopurine treatment.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of therapy adjustment for laboratory toxicity in adult IBD patients after 12 consecutive months of azathioprine (AZA) or mercaptopurine monotherapy (ie baseline) between 2000 and 2016. Incidence rates of laboratory toxicity (ie myelotoxicity [leucocyte count <4.0 × 10e9/L, and/or platelet count <150 × 10e9/L] and/or hepatotoxicity (gamma-glutamyltransferase [GGT], alkaline phosphatase [AP], ALT and/or AST above ULN, excluding isolated increased AST/AP]) and associated diagnostic procedures and complications were assessed.

RESULTS

In total, 12,391 laboratory assessments were performed on 1132 patients (56% female, AZA 74%) during 3.3 years of median follow-up. Median monitoring frequency was 3.1 assessments/treatment year. Only 83/12,391 (0.7%) assessments resulted in therapy adjustment, dose reduction in 46 patients, cessation in 28 and allopurinol initiation in nine; risk of therapy adjustment was 1.9% per treatment year. Incidence rates of myelotoxicity were 7.1% (5.1% mild/1.8% moderate/0.1% severe) and hepatotoxicity 5.1% (3.8% mild/1.1% moderate/0.2% severe) per treatment year. Treatment-related complications with concurrent laboratory toxicity occurred in 12 patients (1.1%) and would not have been prevented by monitoring.

CONCLUSION

Severe laboratory toxicity is uncommon after 1 year of thiopurine monotherapy at 4-month monitoring intervals. Therapy adjustments are rare after detection of laboratory toxicity. After 1 year of thiopurine monotherapy, laboratory monitoring may be lowered to less than a 4-month interval.

Clinical Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Considerations in the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

According to recent clinical consensus, pharmacotherapy of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is, or should be, personalized medicine. IBD treatment is complex, with highly different treatment classes and relatively few data on treatment strategy. Although thorough evidence-based international IBD guidelines currently exist, appropriate drug and dose choice remains challenging as many disease (disease type, location of disease, disease activity and course, extraintestinal manifestations, complications) and patient characteristics [(pharmaco-)genetic predisposition, response to previous medications, side-effect profile, necessary onset of response, convenience, concurrent therapy, adherence to (maintenance) therapy] are involved. Detailed pharmacological knowledge of the IBD drug arsenal is essential for choosing the right drug, in the right dose, in the right administration form, at the right time, for each individual patient. In this in-depth review, clinical pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic considerations are provided for tailoring treatment with the most common IBD drugs. Development (with consequent prospective validation) of easy-to-use treatment algorithms based on these considerations and new pharmacological data may facilitate optimal and effective IBD treatment, preferably corroborated by effectiveness and safety registries.

Thiopurine Therapy in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Focus on Metabolism and Pharmacogenetics

Thiopurines have been widely used for the maintenance of remission or steroid sparing in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. However, potential drug-related adverse events frequently interfere with their use. Indeed, drug withdrawals associated with adverse reactions have been reported in approximately 25% of patients. To balance the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of thiopurines, regular monitoring of biomarkers (complete blood cell count, liver function test, and metabolic profiles), steady dose escalation, and pretreatment thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) genotype screening have been routinely recommended. However, the complex thiopurine metabolic pathway and individual differences attributed to pharmacogenetic diversity limit the effectiveness of these strategies in the optimization of thiopurine therapy. Recently, in an effort to facilitate more accurate and personalized prediction of thiopurine response or toxicity, novel genetic markers including NUDT15 and FTO genes were discovered. These discoveries are remarkable because TPMT screening has minimal efficacy for predicting myelosuppression especially in Asian populations, despite the fact that thee populations have a higher frequency of myelosuppression than Western populations. This review focuses on the current understanding of the metabolic pathway and the pharmacogenetics of thiopurines and suggests a personalized preventive strategy against potential adverse drug reactions to optimize their therapeutic application.

Thiopurines in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: New Findings and Perspectives

Thiopurines, available as azathioprine, mercaptopurine, and thioguanine, are immunomodulating agents primarily used to maintain corticosteroid-free remission in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. To provide a state-of-the-art overview of thiopurine treatment in inflammatory bowel disease, this clinical review critically summarises the available literature, as assessed by several experts in the field of thiopurine treatment and research in inflammatory bowel disease.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 6-Thioguanine Nucleotide Levels and Clinical Remission in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Thiopurines are widely used in the management of inflammatory bowel diseases. However, their minimum effective dose and dose-response relationship remain undefined, and evidence about their use in clinical practice is mostly heterogeneous. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed: i] to assess the clinical value of 6-thioguanine nucleotide thresholds; and ii] to compare mean 6-thioguanine nucleotide concentrations between patients in clinical remission vs. those with active disease.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was carried out using four databases. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed with the I2 statistic followed by subgroup and sensitivity analyses. Odds ratios were computed using the random-effects model.

RESULTS

A total of 1384 records were identified in the systematic search, of which 25 were retained for further analysis: 22 were used in the cut-off comparisons and 12 were used in the 6-thioguanine nucleotide mean differences analysis. The global odds ratio for remission in patients with 6-thioguanine nucleotide levels above the predefined thresholds was 3.95 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.63-5.94; p < 0.001]. When considering the different thresholds individually, the odd ratios were significant for values above 235 pmol/8 × 108 and 250 pmol/8 × 108 red blood cells [2.25 and 4.71, respectively]. Mean 6-thioguanine nucleotide levels were higher among patients in clinical remission, with a pooled difference of 63.37 pmol/8 × 108 red blood cells [95% CI, 31.81-94.93; p < 0.001].

CONCLUSIONS

This study reinforces the link between 6-thioguanine nucleotide levels and clinical remission in inflammatory bowel diseases, also exploring the validity of specific 6-thioguanine nucleotide thresholds to predict clinical outcomes.

More Dose-dependent Side Effects with Mercaptopurine over Azathioprine in IBD Treatment Due to Relatively Higher Dosing

BACKGROUND

There are substantial global differences in the preference for mercaptopurine (MP) or its prodrug azathioprine (AZA) as first-choice thiopurine to treat inflammatory bowel diseases. Studies comparing both agents are scarce. Our aim was to compare AZA and MP in thiopurine-naive patients with inflammatory bowel disease for the frequency of side effects and efficacy.

METHODS

Post hoc analysis of the "Thiopurine response Optimization by Pharmacogenetic testing in Inflammatory bowel disease Clinics" (TOPIC) trial, in which thiopurine-naive patients with inflammatory bowel disease with an indication for a thiopurine were randomized for a genotype-based dose versus standard of care. For this study, Cox proportional hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated to compare AZA and MP for discontinuation rates within 5 months, incidence of hepatotoxicity, leukopenia, and gastrointestinal side effects. Treatment efficacy was compared by logistic regression.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics were similar for patients treated with AZA (n = 494, 64.4%) and MP (n = 273, 35.6%), yet patients with MP were relatively higher dosed compared with those on AZA. Discontinuation rates within 5 months were not different, 39.3% (AZA) and 38.1% (MP), HR 0.92 (95% confidence interval, 0.72-1.17; P = 0.50); however, patients on MP were more often subjected to dose reductions (30% versus 14%, P < 0.01). Higher rates of hepatotoxicity, HR 1.93 (95% confidence interval, 1.35-2.76; P < 0.01) and leukopenia, HR 2.55 (95% confidence interval, 1.51-4.30; P < 0.01) were observed with MP, which annulled in a secondary analysis with adjustment for the higher dose and metabolite levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated with MP were relatively higher dosed, which resulted in more dose-dependent side effects and a higher rate of dose reductions.

Azathioprine, Mercaptopurine, and 5-Aminosalicylic Acid Affect the Growth of IBD-Associated Campylobacter Species and Other Enteric Microbes

Campylobacter concisus is a bacterium that is associated with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Immunosuppressive drugs including azathioprine (AZA) and mercaptopurine (MP), and anti-inflammatory drug such as 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) are commonly used to treat patients with IBD. This study aimed to examine the effects of AZA, MP, and 5-ASA on the growth of IBD-associated bacterial species and to identify bacterial enzymes involved in immunosuppressive drug metabolism. A total of 15 bacterial strains of five species including 11 C. concisus strains, Bacteroides fragilis, Bacteroides vulgatus, Enterococcus faecalis, and Escherichia coli were examined. The impact of AZA, MP, and 5-ASA on the growth of these bacterial species was examined quantitatively using a plate counting method. The presence of enzymes involved in AZA and MP metabolism in these bacterial species was identified using bioinformatics tools. AZA and MP significantly inhibited the growth of all 11 C. concisus strains. C. concisus strains were more sensitive to AZA than MP. 5-ASA showed inhibitory effects to some C. concisus strains, while it promoted the growth of other C. concisus strains. AZA and MP also significantly inhibited the growth of B. fragilis and B. vulgatus. The growth of E. coli was significantly inhibited by 200 μg/ml of AZA as well as 100 and 200 μg/ml of 5-ASA. Bacterial enzymes related to AZA and MP metabolism were found, which varied in different bacterial species. In conclusion, AZA and MP have inhibitory effects to IBD-associated C. concisus and other enteric microbes, suggesting an additional therapeutic mechanism of these drugs in the treatment of IBD. The strain dependent differential impact of 5-ASA on the growth of C. concisus may also have clinical implication given that in some cases 5-ASA medications were found to cause exacerbations of colitis.

Pharmacology and Optimization of Thiopurines and Methotrexate in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Improving the efficacy and reducing the toxicity of thiopurines and methotrexate (MTX) have been areas of intense basic and clinical research. An increased knowledge on pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of these immunomodulators has optimized treatment strategies in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). This review focuses on the metabolism and mode of action of thiopurines and MTX, and provides an updated overview of individualized treatment strategies in which efficacy in IBD can be increased without compromising safety. The patient-based monitoring instruments adapted into clinical practice include pretreatment thiopurine S-methyltransferase testing, thiopurine metabolite monitoring, and blood count measurements that may help guiding the dosage to improve clinical outcome. Other approaches for optimizing thiopurine therapy in IBD include combination therapy with allopurinol, 5-aminosalicylates, and/or biologics. Similar strategies are yet to be proven effective in improving the outcome of MTX therapy. Important challenges for the management of IBD in the future relate to individualized dosing of immunomodulators for maximal efficacy with minimal risk of side effects. As low-cost conventional immunomodulators still remain a mainstay in pharmacotherapy of IBD, more research remains warranted, especially to substantiate these tailored management strategies in controlled clinical trials.

The Impact of Azathioprine-Associated Lymphopenia on the Onset of Opportunistic Infections in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Background

Thiopurines are known to cause lymphopenia (<1,500 lymphocytes/μl). As severe lymphopenia (<500C/μl) is associated with opportunistic infections, we investigated severity of thiopurine-related lymphopenia and development of opportunistic infections in our tertiary referral centre.

Methods

We retrospectively screened medical records of 1,070 IBD patients and identified 100 individuals that developed a total of 161 episodes of lymphopenia during thiopurine treatment between 2002 and 2014. Occurrence of opportunistic infections was documented. A control group consisted of IBD patients receiving thiopurines but without developing lymphopenia.

Results

Of a total of 161 episodes of lymphopenia, 23% were severe (<500C/μl). In this subgroup, thiopurine dosing was modified in 64% (dosage reduction: 32%, medication discontinued: 32%). We identified 9 cases (5.5%) of opportunistic infections, of which only two occurred during severe lymphopenia. One opportunistic infection (4.5%) was identified in the control group. No association was found between opportunistic infections and severity of lymphopenia. All patients who suffered from opportunistic infections were receiving additional immunosuppressive medication.

Conclusion

Our patients treated with thiopurines rarely developed severe lymphopenia and opportunistic infections did not occur more often than in the control group. A careful monitoring of lymphocytes and prophylactic adjustment of thiopurine therapy might contribute to this low incidence.

Association between 6-thioguanine nucleotides levels and clinical remission in inflammatory disease: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

A previous meta-analysis suggested that 6-thioguanine nucleotides levels are associated with clinical remission in inflammatory bowel disease. It was criticized because of the relatively small number of patients included in this meta-analysis and heterogeneity between studies. Recent studies provided conflicting results, and the source of those discrepancies has yet to be explored.

METHODS

A comprehensive, computerized literature search was conducted in Medline, ISI Web of Science, and EMBASE until December 31, 2012. A combined odd ratio with its 95% confidence interval was calculated using a fixed effects model based on the Mantel-Haenszel method. Between-study heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q statistic.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies enrolling 2049 patients with inflammatory bowel disease were analyzed. A significant heterogeneity was found in the overall analysis (P = 0.005). As heterogeneity among studies could be explained by differences in metabolite assay methods, an analysis including only studies using the reference method by Lennard et al (N = 10) was performed, and the pooled odds ratio for clinical remission among patients with 6-thioguanine nucleotides levels over a cut-off value between 230 and 260 pmol/8.10^8 RBC was 3.15 (95% confidence interval, 2.41-4.11).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis clearly establishes an association between 6-thioguanine nucleotides levels and clinical remission rates in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and explains the heterogeneity of results among selected studies. The lack of standardization in 6-thioguanine nucleotides assays is responsible for recent contradictory results. Whether therapeutic drug monitoring of thiopurines should be systematically used in clinical practice in inflammatory bowel disease to improve disease outcomes will require further investigation.

Role of thiopurine metabolite testing and thiopurine methyltransferase determination in pediatric IBD

Thiopurines have been used in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) for >30 years, and measurements of both thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) and thiopurine (TP) metabolites, 6-thioguanine nucleotides (6-TGN) and 6-methylmercaptopurine (6-MMP), have been readily available. The North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (NASPGHAN) Committee on Inflammatory Bowel Disease thought it appropriate to review the present indications for use of TPMT and TP metabolite testing. Substantial evidence demonstrates that TP therapy is useful for both Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis. Review of the existing data yielded the following recommendations. TPMT testing is recommended before initiation of TPs to identify individuals who are homozygote recessive or have extremely low TPMT activity, with the latter having more reliability than the former. Individuals who are homozygous recessive or have extremely low TPMT activity should avoid the use of TPs because of concerns for significant leukopenia. TMPT testing does not predict all cases of leukopenia and has no value to predict hypersensitivity adverse effects such as pancreatitis. Any potential value to reduce the risk of malignancy has not been studied. All individuals taking TPs should have routine monitoring with complete blood cell count and white blood cell count differential to evaluate for leukopenia regardless of TPMT testing results. Metabolite testing can be used to determine adherence with TP therapy. Metabolite testing can be used to guide dose increases or modifications in patients with active disease. Consideration would include either increasing the dose, changing therapy or for those with elevated transaminases or an elevated 6-MMP, using adjunctive allopurinol to help raise 6-thioguanine metabolites and suppress formation of 6-MMP. Routine and repetitive metabolite testing has little or no role in patients who are doing well and taking an acceptable dose of a TP.

Use of thiopurines in inflammatory bowel disease

The use of thiopurines as immunosuppression for the treatment of refractory or chronic active inflammatory bowel disease is established for both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Nevertheless, many questions remain concerning the optimal treatment regimens of azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine and thioguanine. We will briefly summarize dose recommendations, indications for thiopurine therapy and side effects which are relevant in clinical practice. We discuss some currently debated topics, including the combination of azathioprine and allopurinol, switching of thiopurine therapy in case of side effects, the use of azathioprine in pregnancy, the infection risk using thiopurines and the evidence when to stop thiopurines. Excellent reviews have been published on the thiopurine metabolic pathway which will not be discussed here in detail.

Recent advances using immunomodulators for inflammatory bowel disease

Use of the immunomodulators thiopurines and methotrexate (MTX) in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), i.e., Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis (UC), is considered to be good clinical practice. However, despite being administered to a considerable number of IBD patients over the years, questions remain about the most rational treatment regimens of azathioprine (AZA), 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP), and MTX, and results from a range of recent studies necessitate increased attention to how to optimize the use of these immunomodulators. First and foremost, it is of utmost importance to define the subgroup of IBD patients in need of immunomodulators, including those in need of combination therapy with biologic agents, especially because some side effects may be rather severe. Second, colorectal cancer is observed more often in IBD patients than in the background population. However, a recent nationwide Dutch study pointed to a preventive effect of thiopurines. Finally, the need for an appropriate approach to the discontinuation of immunomodulators is emphasized. Since controversy continues regarding the most appropriate use of immunomodulators, this paper is focusing on pharmacokinetics, pharmacogenetics, and therapeutic blood testing, as well as the occurrence of adverse events, when using AZA, 6-MP, and MTX in an attempt to determine a more up-to-date and rational treatment regimen in IBD.

Azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine for maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Maintenance of remission is a major issue in inflammatory bowel disease. In ulcerative colitis, the evidence for the effectiveness of azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine for the maintenance of remission is still controversial.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and safety of azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine for maintaining remission of ulcerative colitis.

SEARCH METHODS

The MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to June 2012. A manual search was also performed using references from these articles as well as review articles, and proceedings from major gastrointestinal meetings. Authors of maintenance trials were asked about unpublished studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials of at least 12 months duration that compared azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine with placebo or standard maintenance therapy (e.g. mesalazine) were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently extracted data using standard forms. Disagreements were solved by consensus including a third author. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. The primary outcome was failure to maintain clinical or endoscopic remission. Secondary outcomes included adverse events and withdrawal due to adverse events. Analyses were performed separately by type of control (placebo, or active comparator). Pooled risk ratios were calculated based on the fixed-effect model unless heterogeneity was shown. The GRADE approach was used to assess the overall quality of evidence for pooled outcomes.

MAIN RESULTS

Six studies including 286 patients with ulcerative colitis were included in the review. The risk of bias was high in three of the studies due to lack of blinding. Azathioprine was shown to be significantly superior to placebo for maintenance of remission. Fourty-four per cent (51/115) of azathioprine patients failed to maintain remission compared to 65% (76/117) of placebo patients (4 studies, 232 patients; RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.86). A GRADE analysis rated the overall quality of the evidence for this outcome as low due to risk of bias and imprecision (sparse data). Two trials that compared 6-mercaptopurine to mesalazine, or azathioprine to sulfasalazine showed significant heterogeneity and thus were not pooled. Fifty per cent (7/14) of 6-mercaptopurine patients failed to maintain remission compared to 100% (8/8) of mesalamine patients (1 study, 22 patients; RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.90). Fifty-eight per cent (7/12) of azathioprine patients failed to maintain remission compared to 38% (5/13) of sulfasalazine patients (1 study, 25 patients; RR 1.52, 95% CI 0.66 to 3.50). One small study found that 6-mercaptopurine was superior to methotrexate for maintenance of remission. In the study, 50% (7/14) of 6-mercaptopurine patients and 92% (11/12) of methotrexate patients failed to maintain remission (1 study, 26 patients; RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.95). All of the studies which used active comparators were open label. When placebo and active comparator studies were pooled to assess adverse events, there was no statistically significant difference between azathioprine and control in the incidence of adverse events. Nine per cent (11/127) of azathioprine patients experienced at least one adverse event compared to 2% (3/130) of placebo patients (5 studies, 257 patients; RR 2.82, 95% CI 0.99 to 8.01). Patients receiving azathioprine were at significantly increased risk of withdrawing due to adverse events. Eight per cent (8/101) of azathioprine patients withdrew due to adverse events compared to 0% (0/98) of control patients (5 studies, 199 patients; RR 5.43, 95% CI 1.02 to 28.75). Adverse events related to study medication included acute pancreatitis (3 cases) and significant bone marrow suppression (5 cases). Deaths, opportunistic infection or neoplasia were not reported.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Azathioprine therapy appears to be more effective than placebo for maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis. Azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine may be effective as maintenance therapy for patients who have failed or cannot tolerate mesalazine or sulfasalazine and for patients who require repeated courses of steroids. More research is needed to evaluate superiority over standard maintenance therapy, especially in the light of a potential for adverse events from azathioprine. This review updates the existing review of azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine for maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis which was published in the Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2007).

A prospective evaluation of the impact of allopurinol in pediatric and adult IBD patients with preferential metabolism of 6-mercaptopurine to 6-methylmercaptopurine

BACKGROUND

6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) is used for the induction and maintenance of remission of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). 6-MP is converted into 6-methylmercaptopurine (6-MMP) or 6-thioguanine nucleotides (6-TGN) intracellularly. Treatment response in IBD patients correlates with 6-TGN levels. This study prospectively evaluated the effect of allopurinol on 6-MP metabolites in adult and pediatric IBD patients. Additionally, we quantified the prevalence of preferential metabolism towards 6-MMP through a retrospective analysis of IBD patients.

METHODS

Twenty patients (10 adult; 10 pediatric) with evidence of preferential metabolism towards 6-MMP, (6-TGN<250 pmol/8×10⁸ RBCs and 6-MMP>5000 pmol/8×10⁸ RBCs) were prospectively treated with allopurinol 100 mg daily and up to 100 mg of 6-MP. 6-MP dose was adjusted after a 3-week metabolite measurement.

RESULTS

The median dose of 6-MP for adults decreased from 100mg daily (range: 37.5-150 mg) to 25mg daily (range: 12.5-50 mg). The median dose of 6-MP for pediatric patients decreased from 50 mg (range: 25-50 mg) to 10.7 mg (range: 10.7 to 21.4 mg). Mean 6-TGN levels in all subjects increased from 197.4 (± 59) to 284.8 (± 107) pmol/8×10⁸ RBCs (p=0.0005). Mean 6-MMP levels in all subjects decreased from a mean of 7719.8 (± 4716) to 404.8 (± 332) pmol/8×10⁸ RBCs (p=0.0004). There were no complications associated with allopurinol therapy. Eighty-eight (30.9%) of 285 IBD patients had evidence of preferential metabolism towards 6-MMP. The proportion of preferential metabolism was equal in adults and pediatric patients.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that the addition of allopurinol safely shifts metabolite production in both adult and pediatric IBD patients and that there is a high prevalence of preferential metabolism towards 6-MMP among IBD patients.

Thiopurines in Crohn's disease, is there something new?

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

traditional immunosuppressants, including azathioprine, remain the mainstay of therapy in steroid dependent/refractory patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). The main limitations of its use are its side effects appearing in about a fifth of the patients, including myelosuppression and liver toxicity. Major complications occur in patients with low thiopurine-S-methyltransferase (TPMT) enzyme activity; however, the clinical relevance of these tests remains conflictive.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

in this review, the authors aim to summarize the new data regarding the relationship between the pharmacology of thiopurines and pathogenesis of adverse events.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

readers will gain an understanding of the metabolism of thiopurines, side effect profile, pharmacological background of side effects, importance of metabolite monitoring, clinical relevance of inherited differences in drug metabolism and other conditions (e.g., concomitant use of allopurinol) which can modify enzyme activity. By gaining an understanding of the pharmacology and metabolism of thiopurines, clinicians will be able to optimize thiopurine therapy in IBD.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

TPMT testing and metabolite monitoring are still not considered the standard of care, and clinicians will continue to choose the approach that best suits their clinical practice and patient needs. Regardless of what strategy is chosen, patients need to be carefully monitored and well informed about the potential risks.

Thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) assessment prior to starting thiopurine drug treatment; a pharmacogenomic test whose time has come

Thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) is involved in the metabolism of thiopurine drugs. Patients that due to genetic variation lack this enzyme or have lower levels than normal, can be adversely affected if normal doses of thiopurines are prescribed. The evidence for measuring TPMT prior to starting patients on thiopurine drug therapy has been reviewed and the various approaches to establishing a service considered. Until recently clinical guidelines on the use of the TPMT varied by medical specialty. This has now changed, with clear guidance encouraging clinicians to use the TPMT test prior to starting any patient on thiopurine therapy. The TPMT test is the first pharmacogenomic test that has crossed from research to routine use. Several analytical approaches can be taken to assess TPMT status. The use of phenotyping supported with genotyping on selected samples has emerged as the analytical model that has enabled national referral services to be developed to a high level in the UK. The National Health Service now has access to cost-effective and timely TPMT assay services, with two laboratories undertaking the majority of the work at national level and with several local services developing. There appears to be adequate capacity and an appropriate internal market to ensure that TPMT assay services are commensurate with the clinical demand.

Limited stability of thiopurine metabolites in blood samples: relevant in research and clinical practise

BACKGROUND

Monitoring of thiopurine metabolites 6-thioguanine nucleotides (6-TGN) and 6-methylmercaptopurine (6-MMP) is used to assess compliance and explain adverse reactions in IBD-patients. Correlations between dosage, metabolite concentrations and therapeutic efficacy or toxicity are contradictive. Research is complicated by analytical problems as matrices analyzed and analytical procedures vary widely. Moreover, stability of thiopurine metabolites is not well documented, yet pivotal for interpretation of analytical outcomes. Therefore, we prospectively investigated metabolite stability in blood samples under standard storage conditions.

METHODS

Stability at room temperature and refrigeration (22 degrees C, 4 degrees C) was investigated during 1 week and frozen samples (-20 degrees C, -80 degrees C) were analyzed during 6 months storage. Ten patient samples were analyzed for each study period.

RESULTS

Median 6-TGN concentrations on day 7 decreased significantly to 53% and 90% during storage at ambient temperature or refrigeration. Median 6-MMP concentrations on day 7 decreased significantly to 55% and 86%, respectively. Samples stored at -20 degrees C also showed significant decreases in both 6-TGN and 6-MMP in comparison with baseline values. At -80 degrees C, only 6-MMP showed a significant decrease in values compared to baseline.

CONCLUSION

The stability of thiopurine metabolites is clearly a limiting factor in studies investigating utilisation of TDM and correlations with therapeutic outcome in IBD-patients. This has to be accounted for in clinical practice and (multi-center) trials investigating thiopurine drugs.

Microprocessor in controlled transdermal drug delivery of anti-cancer drugs

Microprocessor controlled transdermal delivery of anticancer drugs 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) and 6-Mercaptopurine (6-MP) was developed and in vitro evaluation was done. Drugs were loaded based on the pharmacokinetics parameters. In vitro diffusion studies were carried at different current density (0.0, 0.1, 0.22, 0.50 mA/cm2). The patches were evaluated for the drug content, thickness, weight, folding endurance, flatness, thumb tack test and adhesive properties all were well with in the specification of transdermal patches with elegant and transparent in appearance. In vitro permeation studies through human cadaver skin showed, passive delivery (0.0 mA/cm2) of 6-MP was low. As the current density was progressively increased, the flux also increased. the flux also increased with 0.1 mA/cm2 for 15-20 min, but it was less than desired flux, 0.2 mA/cm2 for 30 min showed better flux than 0.1 mA/cm2 current, but lag time was more than 4 h, 0.5 mA/cm2 current for more than 1 h, flux was >159 microg/cm2 h which was desired flux for 6-MP. 5-FU flux reached the minimum effective concentration (MEC) of 54 microg/cm2 h with 0.5 mA/cm2 current for 30-45 min, drug concentration were within the therapeutic window in post-current phase. We concluded from Ohm's Law that as the resistance decreases, current increases. Skin resistance decrease with increase in time and current, increase in the drug permeation. Interestingly, for all investigated current densities, as soon as the current was switched off, 5-FU and 6-MP flux decreased fairly, but the controlled drug delivery can be achieved by switching the current for required period of time.

Thiopurine methyltransferase and thiopurine metabolite testing in patients with inflammatory bowel disease who are taking thiopurine drugs

Thiopurine methyltransferase genotyping and thiopurine metabolite testing has been established as an adjunct to monitoring patients taking thiopurine drugs. This special report describes the clinical implications for this type of testing for patients with inflammatory bowel disease who are taking thiopurine drugs. A total of 10% of patients were found to be intermediate metabolizers and the mean dosage (in mg/kg equivalent) was lower in intermediate metabolizers than extensive metabolizers. The metabolite levels did not correlate with scores measuring clinical severity but levels of 6-methylmercaptopurine were related to the dosage of the drugs. Despite considerable study of thiopurine methyltransferase testing in the literature, it is still not widely used in many geographical areas. This study adds to the evidence about using such testing as well as expanding the role of simultaneously measuring thiopurine metabolites. Further work is planned to evaluate the uptake when such testing becomes available locally as a clinical service.

Use of Pharmacogenetics, Enzymatic Phenotyping, and Metabolite Monitoring to Guide Treatment with Azathioprine in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Objective.

Individualized therapy based on genetic background and monitoring of metabolites can optimize drug safety and efficacy. Such an approach is available for azathioprine (AZA), the thiopurine antimetabolite. AZA exerts therapeutic effects when metabolized to the active thiopurine nucleotide, 6-thioguanine (6-TGN). In inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), 6-TGN levels in the target range of 235–400 pmol/8 ×108 red blood cells (RBC) are associated with a high likelihood of response. Our objective was to evaluate whether drug escalation based on metabolite levels improves efficacy and maintains safety in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

Methods.

We conducted a 6-month open-label dose-escalation clinical study of patients with active SLE treated with azathioprine dosed by body weight and metabolite levels. The primary endpoint was ≥50% improvement in any one parameter of disease activity, or 50% decrease in glucocorticoid dose.

Results.

Of 50 patients enrolled in the study, 21 achieved clinical responses, 13 of whom had 6-TGN < 235 pmol/8 ×108 RBC. Ten patients had no clinical response at 6 months, yet achieved either therapeutic IBD 6-TGN levels (> 235, n = 4) or received maximum AZA dose ≥3.5 mg/kg (n = 6). In 19 patients the drug was discontinued prematurely due to side effects or SLE activity. For those patients in whom either liver function test or white blood cell count abnormalities were encountered, metabolites guided attribution to drug or disease activity.

Conclusion.

Clinical responses in SLE can occur at levels of 6-TGN lower than the target range established for IBD. During followup, measurements of AZA metabolites may provide a rational approach to safety.

Increased dosing requirements for 6-mercaptopurine and azathioprine in inflammatory bowel disease patients six years and younger

BACKGROUND

6-Mercaptopurine (6-MP) and its prodrug azathioprine (AZA) are effective for the induction and maintenance of remission and reduction of corticosteroid exposure for pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The standard dose of 6-MP is 1.0-1.5 mg/kg/day and for AZA is 2.0-2.5 mg/kg/day. The aim of this study was to determine whether IBD patients 6 years of age and younger require higher than standard doses of 6-MP/AZA to achieve clinical remission.

METHODS

Clinical data was collected retrospectively for all IBD patients 6 years of age or younger treated with 6-MP/AZA at The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.

RESULTS

Thirty patients met the inclusion criteria. IBD was diagnosed at a median age of 3.3 years (25-75th %ile 2.3-4.6 years) and 6-MP/AZA was initiated at a median age of 3.9 years (range 0.8-6.8 years). After dose escalation, the median AZA-equivalent dose was 3.1 mg/kg/day (25-75th %ile 2.5-3.5, max. dose 5.1 mg/kg/day). At the final recorded dose, 8/13 (62%) patients receiving AZA >3.0 mg/kg/day achieved clinical remission, compared to 2/12 (17%) receiving 2-3 mg/kg/day (P = 0.02). The risk of having active disease was on average 85% lower if the AZA-equivalent dose was >3.0 mg/kg/day (95% confidence interval [CI] 72%-93%). Adverse events were experienced by 4/30 patients (hepatitis, n = 2; leukopenia, n = 2). No patients had to discontinue 6-MP/AZA, and all laboratory abnormalities improved spontaneously or with dose reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

The standard dose of 6-MP/AZA may not be adequate for IBD patients 6 years of age and younger. Closely monitored dose escalation beyond the standard dosing range is effective and well-tolerated.

The role of xanthine oxidase in thiopurine metabolism: a case report

Azathioprine (AZA) is widely used in the treatment of autoimmune inflammatory diseases. AZA is normally rapidly and almost completely converted to 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) in the liver, which is further metabolized into a variety of pharmacologic active thiopurine metabolites. 6-MP is catabolized by xanthine oxidase (XO) to the inactive metabolite 6-thiouric acid. The authors report the case of a woman with chronic autoimmune pancreatitis unable to form active thiopurine metabolites. The 55-year-old woman presented with weight loss, progressive elevation of liver transaminases, and serum amylase. She was treated with prednisolone 30 mg/day (1 mg/kg) and AZA was increased to 75 mg/day (2.5 mg/kg); this was later increased to 150 mg/day (5 mg/kg). Despite good patient compliance, the active metabolites of AZA, 6-thioguanine nucleotides (6-TGN), and 6-methylmercaptopurine ribonucleotides (6-MMPR) could not be detected in the erythrocytes (RBC). Subsequently, AZA was switched to high-dose 6-MP (2.5 mg/kg) and the XO inhibitor allopurinol was added. After 1 week, this combination led to a high 6-TGN level of 616 pmol/8 x 10(8) RBC and a 6-MMPR level of 1319 pmol/8 x 10(8) RBC. Three weeks after starting treatment, 6-TGN and 6-MMPR even reached toxic levels (1163 pmol/8 x 10(8) RBC and 10015 pmol/8 x 10(8) RBC, respectively) so that 6-MP treatment was discontinued. To elucidate this finding, 6-MP (1.7 mg/kg) was prescribed for 3 days without allopurinol. The woman was not able to form active thiopurine metabolites. According to the authors, this is the first report of a patient unable to form detectable active thiopurine metabolites on AZA and 6-MP therapy despite good patient compliance. High XO activity led to an inability to form detectable levels of active thiopurine metabolites 6-TGN and 6-MMPR. This finding emphasizes the important role of XO in the biotransformation of thiopurines.

6-Thioguanine Nucleotide–Adapted Azathioprine Therapy Does Not Lead to Higher Remission Rates Than Standard Therapy in Chronic Active Crohn Disease: Results from a Randomized, Controlled, Open Trial

Background: A prospective randomized trial in patients with Crohn disease studied whether 6-thioguanine nucleotide (6-TGN) concentration–adapted azathioprine (AZA) therapy is clinically superior to a standard dose of 2.5 mg/kg/day AZA.

Methods: After 2 weeks of standard therapy, patients (n = 71) were randomized into standard (n = 32) or adapted-dose (n = 25) groups; 14 patients dropped out before randomization. In the adapted group, the AZA dose was adjusted to maintain 6-TGN concentrations between 250 and 400 pmol/8 × 108 erythrocytes (Ery). Response criteria were the number of patients in remission after 16 weeks without steroids (primary) and remission after 24 weeks, frequency of side effects, and quality of life (secondary).

Results: After 16 weeks, 14 of 32 (43.8%) patients in the standard group vs 11 of 25 (44%) in the adapted group were in remission without steroids (intent-to-treat analysis). After 24 weeks, 43.8% vs 40% were in remission. No significant differences were found concerning quality of life, disease activity, 6-TGN concentrations, AZA dose, or dropouts due to side effects. Sixty-six patients had a wild-type thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) genotype, with TPMT activities of 8 to 20 nmol/(mL Ery × h). Five patients (dropouts after randomization) were heterozygous, with TPMT activities &lt;8 nmol/(mL Ery × h). 6-Methyl mercaptopurine (6-MMP) concentrations &gt;5700 pmol/8 × 108 Ery were not associated with hepatotoxicity.

Conclusion: Standard and adapted dosing with the provided dosing scheme led to identical 6-TGN concentrations and remission rates. Adapted dosing had no apparent clinical benefit for patients with TPMT activity between 8 and 20 nmol/(mL Ery × h). Additionally, 6-MMP monitoring had no predictive value for hepatotoxicity.

MDR1 polymorphisms and response to azathioprine therapy in patients with Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND

To investigate the contribution of multidrug resistance 1 (MDR1) gene pharmacogenetics (G2677T/A and C3435T) to the efficacy of azathioprine in inducing remission in patients with Crohn's disease (CD).

METHODS

A cohort of 327 unrelated Spanish patients with CD recruited from a single center was studied. All patients were rigorously followed up for at least 2 years (mean time, 11.5 years). A case-control analysis of MDR1 G2677T/A and C3435T SNPs and 2 loci haplotypes in 112 steroid-dependent CD patients treated with azathioprine was performed. Patients were classified on the basis of response to azathioprine.

RESULTS

A total 76 patients treated with azathioprine for longer than 3 months were included. Remission was achieved in 42 CD patients (55.3%). A higher frequency of the 2677TT genotype was found in nonresponders than in responders (17.65% versus 7.14%; OR = 2.8; 95% CI; 0.6-12.1; P = 0.11). Nonresponders to azathioprine were found to have a higher frequency of the 3435TT genotype than did CD patients who had achieved clinical remission (17.64% versus 4.76%; OR = 4.3; 95% CI, 0.8-22.8; P = 0.06). The 2677T/3435T haplotype was also more abundant in nonresponders (29.4% versus 20.2%), whereas the 2677G/3435C haplotype was more frequent in responders (58.3% versus 47.1%). Lack of response to azathioprine therapy in CD patients was 1.8-fold greater in carriers of the 2677T/3435T haplotype than in carriers of the 2677G/3435C haplotype (OR = 1.8; 95% CI, 0.82-3.9; P = 0.14).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our study indicate higher frequencies of the 2677TT and 3435TT genotypes and the 2677T/3435T haplotype in CD patients who did not respond to azathioprine. Additional replications in independent populations would confirm the real impact of these polymorphisms in response to azathioprine therapy.

Thiopurine treatment in inflammatory bowel disease: clinical pharmacology and implication of pharmacogenetically guided dosing

This review summarises clinical pharmacological aspects of thiopurines in the treatment of chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Current knowledge of pharmacogenetically guided dosing is discussed for individualisation of thiopurine therapy, particularly to avoid severe adverse effects. Both azathioprine and mercaptopurine are pro-drugs that undergo extensive metabolism. The catabolic enzyme thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) is polymorphically expressed, and currently 23 genetic variants have been described. On the basis of an excellent phenotype-genotype correlation for TPMT, genotyping has become a safe and reliable tool for determination of a patient's individual phenotype. Thiopurine-related adverse drug reactions are frequent, ranging from 5% up to 40%, in both a dose-dependent and -independent manner. IBD patients with low TPMT activity are at high risk of developing severe haematotoxicity if pharmacogenetically guided dosing is not performed. Based on several cost-benefit analyses, assessment of TPMT activity is recommended prior to thiopurine therapy in patients with IBD. The underlying mechanisms of azathioprine/mercaptopurine-related hepatotoxicity, pancreatitis and azathioprine intolerance are still unknown. Although the therapeutic response appears to be related to 6-thioguanine nucleotide (6-TGN) concentrations above a threshold of 230-260 pmol per 8 x 10(8) red blood cells, at present therapeutic drug monitoring of 6-TGN can be recommended only to estimate patients' compliance.Drug-drug interactions between azathioprine/mercaptopurine and aminosalicylates, diuretics, NSAIDs, warfarin and infliximab are discussed. The concomitant use of allopurinol without dosage adjustment of azathioprine/mercaptopurine leads to clinically relevant severe haematotoxicity due to elevated thiopurine levels. Several studies indicate that thiopurine therapy in IBD during pregnancy is safe. Thus, azathioprine/mercaptopurine should not be withdrawn in strictly indicated cases of pregnant IBD patients. However, breastfeeding is contraindicated during azathioprine/mercaptopurine therapy. Use of azathioprine/mercaptopurine for induction and maintenance of remission in corticosteroid-dependent or corticosteroid-refractory IBD, particularly Crohn's disease, is evidence based. To improve response rates in thiopurine therapy of IBD, comprehensive analyses including metabolic patterns and genome-wide profiling in patients with azathioprine/mercaptopurine treatment are required to identify novel candidate genes.

[Monitoring of thiopurine methyltransferase and thiopurine metabolites to optimize azathioprine therapy in inflammatory bowel disease]

Determination of the activity of thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) and of thiopurine metabolites (6-thioguanine and 6-methylmercaptopurine nucleotides) could be useful for individualized monitoring of azathioprine (AZA) and 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) doses. TPMT activity in the general population follows a trimodal distribution, in which approximately 0.3% of the population is homozygotic for the low-activity allele. A notable correlation has been observed between the low TPMP activity genotype or phenotype and the risk of myelotoxicity. Patients with a high TPMT activity genotype or homozygous phenotype should receive immunosuppressive doses that have clearly been demonstrated to be effective. In contrast, in patients with a low TPMT activity genotype or homozygous phenotype, the use of AZA/6-MP should be contraindicated or only very small doses should be administered. Importantly, TPMP deficiency explains only some cases of myelotoxicity and consequently periodic laboratory testing should be performed in patients receiving AZA/6-MP, even though TPMP function may be normal. Currently, the utility of routine thiopurine metabolite determinations in patients undergoing AZA/6-MP therapy has not been established and this practice should be limited to specific situations such as lack of response to thiopurine therapy or the occurrence of thiopurine-related adverse effects. Randomized trials comparing the routine strategy of AZA/6-MP dosing (based exclusively on the patient's weight) versus individualized monitoring (based on quantification of TPMP activity and/or thiopurine metabolites) are required before definitive conclusions on the most effective alternative can be drawn.

Long-term results with azathioprine therapy in patients with corticosteroid-dependent Crohn's disease: open-label prospective study

BACKGROUND

A substantial number of patients with Crohn's disease (CD) become dependent on steroids after induction therapy. Treatment with azathioprine (AZA) may be beneficial in such patients. The present open-label study evaluated the long-term safety and efficacy of AZA in steroid-dependent CD patients.

METHODS

Adult patients with steroid-dependent CD were enrolled for AZA therapy over a 7-year period. The average dose of AZA was 2.0-3.0 mg/kg per day, adjusted according to clinical response and occurrence of adverse effects. Steroid therapy was tapered off according to a predefined schedule. Long-term outcome and adverse reactions were evaluated.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine patients were prospectively included. Steroid-free remission was achieved in 68-81% of patients, partial response in 14.5-27.3% and failure to respond to AZA in 4-15.9% over the initial 48 months. However, the rate of wean from steroid therapy decreased to 53-60% while the rate of failure increased from 6.7% to 17.6% after this period. A breakthrough of symptoms during continuous AZA therapy was common, particularly after 48 months on AZA. The mean leukocyte count at the end of 12 months of therapy was significantly lower in patients who achieved complete response on AZA than in the non-responders (5197 +/- 1250 cells/mm(3) vs 8340 +/- 1310 cells/mm(3), respectively; P < 0.01). Azathioprine was relatively well-tolerated and the incidence of serious adverse effects was small.

CONCLUSIONS

Azathioprine was relatively safe and moderately effective for long-term maintenance of steroid-free clinical remission in corticosteroid-dependent CD patients. Patients were more successfully weaned from prednisone treatment, and clinical remission was more often maintained during the first 48 months of AZA therapy. A significant decrease in the white blood cell count at the end of 12 months on AZA was the single factor associated with weaning from steroid dependence.

Pancytopenia due to high 6-methylmercaptopurine levels in a 6-mercaptopurine treated patient with Crohn's disease

In a 23-year-old female with colonic Crohn's disease 6-mercaptopurine 100 mg daily (1.7 mg/kg) was added to mesalamine and prednisolone therapy because of ongoing disease activity. One month later she had fever and a pancytopenia. 6-methylmercaptopurine ribonucleotides levels were extremely elevated (57,000 pmol/8x10(8) red blood cells) and 6-thioguanine nucleotides levels were subtherapeutically (126 pmol/8x10(8) red blood cells). Genotyping showed a wildtype thiopurine S-methyltransferase TPMT(H/H) (*1/*1) genotype and a wildtype inosine triphosphate pyrophosphatase gene. TPMT and inosine triphosphate pyrophosphatase activity were normal. The pancytopenia recovered spontaneously within a few weeks, parallel with decreasing 6-methylmercaptopurine ribonucleotides levels after interrupting 6-mercaptopurine treatment. Epstein-Barrvirus, Cytomegalovirus and Herpesvirus infections were excluded by serology. This is the first report of pancytopenia due to extremely high 6-methylmercaptopurine ribonucleotides levels. No relation was found with the genotype of TPMT and inosine triphosphate pyrophosphatase enzymes, which play key roles in the thiopurine metabolic pathway. Apparently, 6-methylmercaptopurine ribonucleotides metabolites can cause pancytopenia, as was already known for 6-thioguanine nucleotides.

Azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine for maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Maintenance of remission is a major issue in inflammatory bowel disease. In ulcerative colitis, the evidence for the effectiveness of azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine for the maintenance of remission is still controversial.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and safety of azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine for maintaining remission of ulcerative colitis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The MEDLINE database was used to search literature from 1966 to 2006. A manual search was also performed using references from these articles as well as review articles, proceedings from major gastrointestinal meetings and data available from the Cochrane Collaboration database. Authors of maintenance trials were asked about unpublished studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials of at least 12 months duration that compared azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine with placebo or standard maintenance therapy (mesalamine) were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were extracted by two raters using standard forms. Disagreements were solved by informal consent, including a third rater. Jadad scores were applied to assess study quality. Analyses were performed separately by type of control (placebo, or active comparator). Pooled odds ratios were calculated based on the fixed effects model unless heterogeneity was shown.

MAIN RESULTS

Six studies were identified including 286 patients with ulcerative colitis. The study quality was mostly poor. Azathioprine was shown to be superior for the maintenance of remission as compared to placebo based on four trials (failure to maintain remission: OR 0.41; 95% CI 0.24 to 0.70). Two trials that compared 6-mercaptopurine to mesalazine, or azathioprine to sulfasalazine showed significant heterogeneity. Both studies using active comparators were open label. Adverse effects occurred in 11 of 127 patients receiving azathioprine, including acute pancreatitis (3 cases) and significant bone marrow suppression (5 cases).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Azathioprine may be an effective maintenance therapy for patients who have failed or cannot tolerate mesalazine or sulfasalazine and for patients who require repeated courses of steroids. More research is needed to evaluate superiority over standard maintenance therapy, especially in the light of a potential for adverse events from azathioprine.

Review article: thiopurines in inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

In the past 10-20 years, knowledge of both thiopurine pharmacology and -pharmacogenetics has been extended dramatically and used to develop new strategies to improve efficacy and reduce toxicity.

AIM

To review thiopurine efficacy, toxicity, pharmacology, pharmacogenetics, interactions in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Special attention was paid to new strategies for optimization of pharmacotherapy.

METHODS

To collect relevant scientific articles, a Pubmed search was performed from 1966 through January 2006 with the following key words (MeSH terms preferentially) in multiple combinations: 'azathioprine', '6-mercaptopurine', '6-MP', '6-thioguanine', '6-TG', 'thiopurine(s)', 'metabolites', 'level(s)', 'TDM', 'TMPT', 'ITPA', 'genotype(s)', 'phenotype(s)', 'inflammatory bowel disease', 'Crohn('s) disease', 'ulcerative colitis'.

RESULTS

Strategies for optimization of pharmacotherapy include therapeutic drug monitoring of thiopurine metabolites, geno- or phenotyping crucial enzymes in thiopurine metabolism like thiopurine S-methyltransferase and inosine triphosphate pyrophosphatase, and the use of thioguanine as such.

CONCLUSIONS

Thiopurine S-methyltransferase genotyping and therapeutic drug monitoring are useful instruments for individualizing thiopurine pharmacotherapy of inflammatory bowel disease. Inosine triphosphate pyrophosphatase genotyping may be helpful in case of unexplainable myelotoxicity. In case of azathioprine- or mercaptopurine-intolerance, thioguanine seems a promising alternative. However, more knowledge needs to be gathered about its potential hepatotoxicity.

Inhibition of inducible nitric oxide synthesis by azathioprine in a macrophage cell line

Azathioprine is used as an anti-inflammatory agent. Although there are numerous data demonstrating cytotoxic and immunosuppressive properties of azathioprine and its metabolite 6-mercaptopurine, the mechanism of the anti-inflammatory action of azathioprine has not yet been fully clarified. During our study, we investigated the effects of azathioprine on the inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) in lipopolysaccharide stimulated murine macrophages (RAW 264.7) by measurement of iNOS protein (immunoblotting), iNOS mRNA (semiquantitative competitive RT-PCR), and NO production (nitrite levels). Azathioprine (0-210 muM) induces a concentration dependent inhibition of inducible nitric oxide synthesis (IC50: 33.5 muM). iNOS protein expression showed a concentration dependent reduction as revealed by immunoblotting when cells were incubated with increasing amounts of azathioprine. Azathioprine decreases iNOS mRNA levels as shown by semiquantitative competitive RT-PCR. In contrast, 6-mercaptopurine showed no inhibition of inducible nitric oxide synthesis. Azathioprine did not reduce iNOS mRNA stability after the addition of actinomycin D. Enzymatic activity assays with increasing concentrations of azathioprine (0-210 muM) showed no statistically significant inhibition of iNOS enzyme activity compared to cell lysates without azathioprine. Nuclear translocation of NF-kappaB p65 subunit and binding of NF-kappaB p50 subunit from nuclear extracts to a biotinylated-consensus sequence was unaffected by azathioprine treatment. iNOS inhibition by azathioprine was associated with a decreased expression of IRF-1 (interferon regulatory factor 1) and IFN-beta (beta-interferon) mRNA. Azathioprine induced iNOS inhibition seems to be associated with an action of the methylnitroimidazolyl substituent. This suggests a route to the rational design of nontoxic anti-inflammatory agents by replacing the 6-mercaptopurine component of azathioprine with other substituents. The inhibition of inducible nitric oxide synthesis might contribute to the anti-inflammatory activities of azathioprine.

The pharmacokinetic effect of discontinuation of mesalazine on mercaptopurine metabolite levels in inflammatory bowel disease patients

BACKGROUND

In vitro studies suggest interactions between mesalazine (mesalamine) and thiopurines by thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) inhibition, influencing the balance of hepatotoxic 6-methylmercaptopurine ribonucleotide and immunosuppressive tioguanine (thioguanine) metabolites.

AIM

To examine the in vivo pharmacokinetic interaction between mesalazine and mercaptopurine.

METHODS

A prospective study was performed in quiescent inflammatory bowel disease patients using the combination of mercaptopurine and mesalazine. Laboratory parameters, 6-methylmercaptopurine ribonucleotide and tioguanine levels and thiopurine S-methyltransferase activity in erythrocytes were measured at stable medication, after mesalazine discontinuation and mesalazine reintroduction, further mercaptopurine was continued.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients were participated. Mean mercaptopurine dose was 0.78 mg/kg/day and median of mesalazine dose was 3000 mg/day. After mesalazine discontinuation, mean tioguanine levels changed significantly from 262 to 209 pmol/8 x 10(8) red blood cell, increasing to 270 after reintroduction. Mean 6-methylmercaptopurine ribonucleotide levels were 1422, 2149 and 1503 pmol/8 x 10(8) red blood cell respectively. Mean 6-methylmercaptopurine ribonucleotide/tioguanine ratio increased significantly from 6.3 at baseline to 11.2. Mean baseline thiopurine S-methyltransferase activity was 0.58 pmol/10(6) red blood cell/h and stable. All patients had wild-type thiopurine S-methyltransferase genotypes however, leucocyte counts were stable.

DISCUSSION

A significantly higher tioguanine levels and improving 6-methylmercaptopurine ribonucleotide/tioguanine ratio were found during mesalazine/mercaptopurine combination. Theoretically, mesalazine inhibits thiopurine S-methyltransferase activity. In vivo thiopurine S-methyltransferase activity did not change, however.

CONCLUSION

Mesalazine has synergistic effects on mercaptopurine therapy, but the mechanism is unclear. Combining these drugs may be further indication for mesalazine in inflammatory bowel disease treatment.

Review article: practical management of inflammatory bowel disease patients taking immunomodulators

Azathioprine, mercaptopurine, methotrexate, ciclosporin and tacrolimus all have their respective niches in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. These immunomodulators are potent and effective medications; however, they potentially have serious toxicity. To maximize benefit and minimize risk, clinicians must understand the mechanism of action, appropriate indications, range of toxicity and proper dosing of these medications. Furthermore, once initiating therapy, patients need to be monitored appropriately for evidence of efficacy and toxicity. This review includes the rationale behind recommendations for the management and monitoring of patients using immunomodulators. For the purine antagonists--azathioprine and mercaptopurine--the evidence for utility of thiopurine methyltransferase testing and mercaptopurine metabolite monitoring is addressed. The roles of liver biopsy and screening for methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase mutations in patients taking methotrexate are reviewed. With appropriate monitoring, the calcineurin inhibitors--ciclosporin and tacrolimus--can be used safely and effectively. Immunomodulators are important agents for the treatment of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, and prescribing clinicians should be comfortable recognizing both their value and their limitations.

Azathioprine formulation optimizes metabolite profile in inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have suggested that mercaptopurine metabolism is influenced by drug formulation (mercaptopurine vs. azathioprine) and concomitant use of 5-aminosalicylic acid medications.

AIM

To determine the influence of dose, formulation and 5-aminosalicylic acid use on mercaptopurine metabolism.

METHODS

Metabolites from 131 inflammatory bowel disease patients were analysed. Logistic regression was used to analyse correlations between dose and metabolite levels. Multivariate analysis was used to determine the effects of drug formulation and 5-aminosalicylic acid use.

RESULTS

A positive correlation was detected between dose and 6-tioguanine nucleotides levels for azathioprine/Imuran formulation (P = 0.005) but not for mercaptopurine formulation. Adjusted mean 6-tioguanine nucleotides levels were similar for both formulations. Adjusted mean 6-methylmercaptopurine levels were higher for mercaptopurine formulation than for azathioprine formulation (1950 vs. 1056, P = 0.04). 5-Aminosalicylic acid use: 6-tioguanine nucleotides levels did not differ based on concomitant 5-aminosalicylic acid use. However, 5-aminosalicylic acid use did result in higher adjusted mean 6-methylmercaptopurine levels: 2078 on 5-aminosalicylic acid vs. 991 off 5-aminosalicylic acid (P = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

(i) Azathioprine may have metabolic benefits by achieving a correlation of dose with 6-tioguanine nucleotides levels and by leading to lower mean 6-methylmercaptopurine levels. (ii) 5-aminosalicylic acid use does not significantly impact 6-tioguanine levels and may lead to higher 6-methylmercaptopurine levels.

Clinical relevance of advances in genetics and pharmacogenetics of IBD

Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis result from an inappropriate response of the mucosal immune system to the normal enteric flora in a genetically susceptible individual. During the past decade, exciting progress has been made in our understanding of the contribution of genetics to inflammatory bowel disease susceptibility and phenotype. This article reviews recent advances in the genetics of inflammatory bowel disease and explores how they might impact on clinical practice. Current knowledge of the genetic basis for disease susceptibility, phenotype, and response to therapy is explored and the factors currently limiting the translation of this knowledge to clinical practice is discussed.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in???Patients with Inflammatory Bowel???Disease and Established Azathioprine Therapy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Azathioprine is widely used in the treatment of corticosteroid-dependent and refractory inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The efficacy of this treatment is based on the production of 6-thioguanine nucleotides, but extremely elevated levels may cause bone marrow suppression. Other azathioprine metabolites, 6-methylmercaptopurine ribonucleotides, are associated with hepatotoxicity. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) may be of help in optimising azathioprine treatment, but data on TDM in established azathioprine therapy are lacking. We therefore measured metabolite levels in a small cohort of patients established on azathioprine therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

6-Thioguanine (6-TGN) and 6-methylmercaptopurine (6-MMP) levels in erythrocytes were measured in 15 IBD outpatients established on azathioprine therapy for at least 3 months at baseline and 1, 4 and 8 weeks after inclusion (mean duration of treatment 28 months; range 7-67 months). Disease activity was evaluated by the Crohn's Disease Activity Index (Crohn's disease) or Truelove-Witts (ulcerative colitis) scores. Metabolite levels were measured by modified high-performance liquid chromatography assay (HPLC). Primary outcome measures were 6-TGN and 6-MMP metabolite levels and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). SECONDARY OUTCOMES were correlations between metabolite levels, drug dose, disease activity and laboratory parameters and compliance.

RESULTS

One patient had active disease during the study period. Eleven of 15 patients (73%) completed the 8-week study period. Dropout reasons were noncompliance in three patients (20%) and intolerance in one patient (7%).

PRIMARY OUTCOMES

At baseline mean 6-TGN levels were 158 (95% CI 113, 203) pmol/8.10(8) RBC (red blood cells), steadily increasing over the 8-week study period, but not significantly. Two patients had zero levels. Another two had significantly increasing levels also suggesting noncompliance. Mean 6-MMP levels showed almost a similar pattern. At baseline, levels were 2213 (95% CI 722, 3704) pmol/8.10(8) RBC.

SECONDARY OUTCOMES

A correlation was found between all RBC 6-MMP levels and azathioprine dose (mg/kg bodyweight) [r = 0.43, p = 0.001] and also between the 6-MMP/6-TGN ratio and azathioprine dose (mg/kg) [r = 0.36, p = 0.010). There was no correlation between RBC 6-TGN or 6-MMP levels and haematological parameters or disease activity scores. No hepatic, pancreatic or myelotoxicity occurred.Thirteen of 15 patients (87%) had baseline steady-state 6-TGN levels below the therapeutic threshold of 235 pmol/8.10(8) RBC. Forty percent (6/15) of our patients were noncompliant; TDM revealed this noncompliance in four of the six patients (27% of all patients).

CONCLUSION

Our small study demonstrates that TDM may provide insight into individual pharmacokinetics. However, TDM does not seem to be useful in patients with IBD established on azathioprine therapy and without disease activity, although it may be helpful in cases of worsening IBD activity to elucidate noncompliance or inefficient treatment.

Report of the American Society of Transplantation conference on immunosuppressive drugs and the use of generic immunosuppressants

Considerable economic and health-related costs are associated with the life-long maintenance immunosuppressive therapy required to prevent transplant rejection. Generic medications have the potential of providing equivalent therapeutic efficacy at a lower economic cost. In 2001, the American Society of Transplantation invited experts to review the data and issues associated with the approval and use of generic immunosuppressants. A summary of that meeting is reported here. The generic medication approval process has been in effect for more than 30 years. All marketed generic cyclosporin formulations have met FDA criteria demonstrating bioequivalence in healthy subjects, and some were also tested in transplant recipients. Most participants agreed that generic narrow therapeutic index immunosuppressive agents provide adequate de novo immunosuppression in low-risk transplant recipients. However, some participants expressed concern regarding the currently unquantified risk that may be associated with switching immunosuppressive agents under uncontrolled circumstances. There was broad agreement among the participants that generic medications should be clearly labeled and distinguishable from innovator drugs, and that patients should be educated to inform their physicians of any switch to or among generic alternatives. There was also strong support in favor of requiring studies to demonstrate bioequivalence in potentially at-risk patient populations, specifically African-Americans and pediatric patients.