Effects of postoperative sedation with propofol and midazolam on pancreatic function assessed by pancreatitis-associated protein

The Effects of Propofol Anesthesia on Lipid Profile and Some Biochemical Indices in Cats

The aim of the present study was to evaluate lipid profile (triglyceride, total cholesterol, HDL, LDL, and VLDL), pancreas (lipase and amylase), liver (AST, ALT, and ALP), blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, uric acid, sodium and potassium function indicators in cats undergoing two different durations of anesthesia with propofol. Ten adult female cats were randomly divided into two groups (n= 5) and anaesthetized with propofol 1% (induction: 8 mg/kg; infusion: 0.3 mg/kg/min) for either 45 or 90 minutes. Blood samples were collected at predetermined intervals up to 72 hours later. Comparison of the measured variables between treatments did not show significant differences. Triglyceride and cholesterol levels showed significant increase after induction of anesthesia (P < .05). The highest triglyceride and cholesterol values were recorded at 6 and 24 hours. HDL was lower while LDL and VLDL were higher at several time points after anesthesia (P < .05). Higher values of lipase, ALT and AST were detected after induction (P < .05). All the observed alterations were within normal ranges. In conclusion, propofol anesthesia was associated with some changes in lipid profile, as well as pancreatic and liver function indices, which should be considered in clinical situations. It seems that in the absence of pre- or co-existing disturbances, induction and maintenance of anesthesia with propofol did not carry additional risk to cats.

Effect of short-term propofol administration on pancreatic enzymes and lipid biochemistry in children between 1 month and 36 months

BACKGROUND

Use of propofol in pediatric age group has been marred by reports of its adverse effects like hypertriglyceridemia and acute pancreatitis, although a causal relation has not yet been established.

OBJECTIVES

This prospective, clinical trial was carried out to evaluate the effects of short-term propofol administration on serum lipid profile and serum pancreatic enzymes in children of ASA physical status I and II aged between 1 month and 36 months.

METHODS

Anesthesia was induced with Propofol (1%) in the dose of 3 mg·kg(-1) intravenously and was maintained by propofol infusion (0.5%) at the rate of 12 mg·kg(-1·) h(-1) for the first 20 min and at 8 mg·kg(-1·) h(-1) thereafter. The mean dose of propofol administered was 12.02 ± 2.75 mg·kg(-1) (fat load of 120.2 ± 27.5 mg·kg(-1) ). Lipid profile, serum amylase, and lipase were measured before induction of anesthesia, at 90 min, 4 h, and finally 24 h after induction.

RESULTS

Serum lipase levels (P < 0.05), serum triglyceride levels (P < 0.05), and serum very low-density lipoproteins VLDL levels (P < 0.05) were raised significantly after propofol administration from baseline although remained within normal limits. Serum cholesterol levels and serum low-density lipoproteins LDL levels showed a statistically significant fall over 24 h. No significant changes in serum pancreatic amylase levels were seen (P > 0.05). None of the patients developed any clinical features of pancreatitis in the postoperative period.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that despite a small, transient increase in serum triglycerides and pancreatic enzymes, short-term propofol administration in recommended dosages in children of ASA status I and II aged between 1 month and 36 months does not produce any clinically significant effect on serum lipids and pancreatic enzymes.

Effects of medications on post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Drug-induced pancreatitis accounts for about 2% of acute pancreatitis. The aim of this study is to determine whether propofol and other medications are associated with increased risk for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted at a single tertiary care hospital. All patients who underwent ERCP from 2001 to 2004 were included. Diagnosis of acute post-ERCP pancreatitis was based on a consensus definition.

RESULTS

A total of 506 patients underwent ERCP. The total incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis was 7.1%. There was no significant difference in post-ERCP pancreatitis between patients who received propofol compared to patients who received midazolam and fentanyl (9.0 vs. 5.9%, p = 0.18). Patients receiving an angiotensin receptor blocker were approximately 4 times more likely to develop post-ERCP pancreatitis (OR = 4.1, 95% CI 1.6-10.9). Patients younger than 65 years and smokers also had higher risk of developing acute post-ERCP pancreatitis than those who were older than 65 years (OR = 3.9, 95% CI 1.7-9.1) and non-smokers (OR = 2.8, 95% CI 1.3-6.2).

CONCLUSIONS

Propofol is a safe sedative drug for ERCP without additional risk of developing acute post-ERCP pancreatitis. Use of angiotensin receptor blockers, smoking and younger age are independent risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis.

Short-term sevoflurane sedation using the Anaesthetic Conserving Device after cardiothoracic surgery

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the procedure of postoperative inhalational sedation with sevoflurane using the Anaesthetic Conserving Device (ACD) with regard to recovery times, feasibility and consumption of anaesthetics in comparison to propofol.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Prospective, randomised, single-blinded, controlled study in a surgical intensive care unit (ICU) of a 1,000-bed academic hospital.

PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS

A total of 70 patients after elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery either received sevoflurane via ACD (n = 35) or propofol (n = 35) for short-term postoperative sedation in the ICU.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The primary endpoint was extubation time from termination of sedation. Recovery times, consumption of anaesthetics, endtidal sevoflurane concentrations, length of ICU and hospital stay, and side effects were documented. Mean recovery times were significantly shorter with sevoflurane than with propofol (extubation time: 22 vs. 151 min; following commands: 7 vs. 42 min). The mean (SD) sevoflurane consumption was 3.2 +/- 1.4 mL/h to obtain mean endtidal concentrations of 0.76 vol%. No serious complications occurred during sedation with either sedative drug. The length of ICU stay was comparable in both groups, but hospital length of stay was significantly shorter in the sevoflurane group. Drug costs (in Euro) for sedation per patient were similar in both groups (sevoflurane: 15.1 +/- 9.5 <euro>; propofol: 12.5 +/- 5.8 <euro>), while sevoflurane sedation costs that included use of the ACD were significantly higher.

CONCLUSIONS

Sevoflurane administration via ACD is an effective and safe alternative to propofol to provide postoperative short-term ICU sedation. Recovery from sedation was facilitated with sevoflurane instead of propofol and resulted in shorter extubation and ventilator times.

DESCRIPTOR

Neurology/sedation, Sedation and anaesthesia.

Propofol-induced hyperamylasaemia in a general intensive care unit

This study examined the incidence of hyperamylasaemia, in the absence of other plausible causes of pancreatic dysfunction, in intensive care unit (ICU) patients who received propofol. One-hundred-and-seventy-two consecutive patients of a general ICU who stayed for more than 24 hours were studied. Patients with a diagnosis consistent with elevated serum amylase levels at admission were excluded from the study, as were patients who had received medications known to raise serum amylase levels. Forty-four patients 53 +/- 20 years of age and median duration of ICU stay of five days (range two to 55) were eligible. Thirty of those, aged 54 +/- 21 years and median duration of ICU stay of five days (range two to 27) received continuous infusion of propofol for sedation (maximum dose 45 microg/kg/min). Of the 30 patients who received propofol, 16 (53%) developed hyperamylasaemia (125 to 466 IU/l) after two to nine days of continuous infusion. Liver and kidney function remained normal throughout the observation period. Of the 14 patients who did not receive propofol (aged 51 +/- 18 years), only two (14%) developed hyperamylasaemia, a significantly lower incidence (P = 0.021). Propofol infusion is associated with biochemical evidence of pancreatic injury. Amylase levels monitoring of propofol-sedated patients is warranted.

Organ toxicity and mortality in propofol-sedated rabbits under prolonged mechanical ventilation

BACKGROUND

Prolonged administration of propofol at large doses has been implicated in propofol infusion syndrome in intensive care unit patients. In this study we investigated organ toxicity and mortality of propofol sedation at large doses in prolonged mechanically ventilated rabbits and determined the role of propofol's lipid vehicle.

METHODS

Eighteen healthy male rabbits were endotracheally intubated and sedated with propofol 2% (Group P), sevoflurane (Group S) or sevoflurane while receiving Intralipid 10% (Group SI). Sedation lasted 48 h or until death (Group P) or the maximum surviving period of Group P (Groups S and SI). The initial propofol infusion rate (20 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1)) or sevoflurane concentration (1.5%) was adjusted, if needed, to maintain a standard level of sedation. Blood biochemical analysis was performed in serial blood samples and histologic examination in the heart, lungs, liver, gallbladder, kidneys, urinary bladder, and quadriceps femoris muscle at autopsy.

RESULTS

The mortality rate was 100% (surviving period, 26-38 h) for Group P, whereas 0% for Groups S and SI. The initial propofol infusion rate had to be increased up to 65.7 +/- 4.6 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1) and sevoflurane concentration up to 4%. Serum liver function indices, lipids and creatine kinase were significantly increased (P < 0.05) in Groups P and SI and lactate was increased only in Group P, whereas amylase was increased in all groups. In Group P, histologic examination revealed myocarditis, pulmonary edema with interstitial pneumonia, hepatitis, steatosis, and focal liver necrosis, cholangitis, gallbladder necrosis, acute tubular necrosis of the kidneys, focal loss of the urinary bladder epithelium, and rhabdomyolysis of skeletal muscles; in Group S, low-grade bronchitis and incipient inflammation of the liver and the kidneys; and in Group SI, low-grade bronchitis, liver steatosis and hepatitis, and incipient inflammation of the gallbladder, kidneys, and urinary bladder.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous infusion of 2% propofol at large doses for the sedation of rabbits undergoing prolonged mechanical ventilation induced fatal multiorgan dysfunction syndrome similar to the propofol infusion syndrome seen in humans. Our novel findings including lung, liver, gallbladder, and urinary bladder injury were also noted. The role of propofol's lipid vehicle in the manifestation of the syndrome was minor. Sevoflurane proved to be a safe alternative medication for prolonged sedation.

Effects of Propofol and Midazolam on Lipids, Glucose, and Plasma Osmolality during and in the Early Postoperative Period Following Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Randomized Trial

It is not clear how levels of serum lipids and glucose and plasma osmolality change during propofol infusion in the pre- and postoperative period of coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). This prospective, randomized, controlled trial evaluated changes in these parameters during propofol or midazolam infusion during and in the early postoperative period following surgery. Twenty patients undergoing CABG were randomized preoperatively into two groups: 10 patients received propofol (induction 1.5 mg/kg, maintenance 1.5 mg kg(-1) h(-1)) and 10 patients received midazolam (induction 0.5 mg/kg, maintenance 0.1 mg kg(-1) h(-1)). Both groups also received fentanyl (induction 20 mug/kg, maintenance 10 microg kg(-1)). Serum lipids, glucose, and plasma osmolality were measured preinduction, precardiopulmonary bypass, at the end of cardiopulmonary bypass, at the end of surgery, and 4 and 24 h postoperatively. In the propofol group, we observed a significant increase in triglycerides and very low-density lipoprotein levels 4 h postoperatively. In the midazolam group, we observed a significant decrease in low-density lipoprotein, cholesterol at the end of cardiopulmonary bypass, end of surgery, and 4 and 24 h postoperatively and significant increase in osmolality at the end of cardiovascular bypass. Changes in glucose levels did not differ significantly different between the two groups. In patients with normal serum lipids, glucose, and plasma osmolality undergoing CABG, propofol infusion for maintenance anesthesia is not associated with dangerous changes in serum lipids, glucose, and plasma osmolality compared with midazolam. A propofol infusion technique for maintenance of anesthesia for cardiac surgery where serum lipids and glucose may be of concern could be recommended as an alternative to midazolam.

Acute pancreatitis induced by short-term propofol administration

The incidence of a drug-induced pancreatitis is rare and so far more than 85 different drugs have been reported to have induced pancreatitis. Some case reports consider a relationship between propofol and acute pancreatitis. However, in these cases a number of different drugs were coadministered, thus preventing a clear causal link being established. We report a case of a drug-induced acute pancreatitis that was most likely triggered by a single dosage of propofol. It occurred in a young girl who underwent elective magnetic resonance imaging. She developed pancreatitis within hours after exposure to propofol. Other possible triggers, e.g. gallstones or infection were ruled out. Physicians should consider pancreatitis as a potentially life-threatening adverse event associated with propofol sedation, which is nowadays extensively used.

Propofol-Associated Hypertriglyceridemia and Pancreatitis in the Intensive Care Unit: An Analysis of Frequency and Risk Factors

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To characterize the frequency, severity, risk factors, and clinician response to propofol-associated hypertriglyceridemia and hypertriglyceridemia-associated pancreatitis.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis.

SETTING

Medical and surgical intensive care units.

PATIENTS

One hundred fifty-nine adult intensive care patients administered propofol for 24 hours or longer and who had at least one serum triglyceride concentration.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Patient records were reviewed to identify the frequency of hypertriglyceridemia (serum triglyceride concentration > or = 400 mg/dl) and pancreatitis (amylase concentration > or = 125 IU/L, lipase concentration > or = 60 IU/L, and abdominal computed tomography scan or clinical examination findings consistent with pancreatitis). Of the 159 patients, 29 (18%) developed hypertriglyceridemia; six (21%) of the 29 had a serum triglyceride concentration of 1000 mg/dl or greater. The median maximum serum triglyceride concentration was 696 mg/dl (range 403-1737 mg/dl). At the time when hypertriglyceridemia was detected, the median infusion rate of propofol was 50 microg/kg/minute (range 5-110 microg/kg/min). The median time from the start of propofol therapy to identification of hypertriglyceridemia was 54 hours (range 14-319 hrs). Propofol was discontinued within 24 hours of detecting the hypertriglyceridemia 84% of the time. Compared with those who did not develop hypertriglyceridemia, patients who developed hypertriglyceridemia were older, had a longer intensive care unit stay, and received propofol for a longer duration; they were also more likely to be admitted to the medical versus the surgical intensive care unit. Pancreatitis developed in three (10%) of the 29 patients with hypertriglyceridemia.

CONCLUSION

Hypertriglyceridemia and hypertriglyceridemia-associated pancreatitis are often seen in intensive care patients receiving propofol. Serum triglyceride concentrations should be routinely monitored in these patients. In addition, alternative sedation strategies should be considered when hypertriglyceridemia is detected.

Effects of short-term propofol administration on pancreatic enzymes and triglyceride levels in children

This prospective, clinical trial evaluated the effects of short-term propofol administration on triglyceride levels and serum pancreatic enzymes in children undergoing sedation for magnetic resonance imaging. Laboratory parameters of 40 children, mean age (SD; range) 67 (66; 4-178) months undergoing short-term sedation were assessed before and 4 h after having received propofol. Mean (SD) propofol loading dose was 2.2 (1.1) mg.kg(-1) followed by continuous propofol infusion of 6.9 (0.9) mg.kg(-1).h(-1). Serum lipase levels (p = 0.035) and serum triglyceride levels (p = 0.003) were raised significantly after propofol administration but remained within normal limits. No significant changes in serum pancreatic-amylase levels were seen (p = 0.127). In two (5%) children, pancreatic enzymes and in four (10%) children triglyceride levels were raised above normal limits; however, no child showed clinical symptoms of pancreatitis. We conclude that even short-term propofol administration with standard doses of propofol may have a significant effect on serum triglyceride and pancreatic enzyme levels in children.

Pancréatite postopératoire après chirurgie non abdominale

A 35-year-old man developed two episodes of postoperative pancreatitis. The first one occurred after knee surgery and the second one 6 years after surgery for excision of haemorrhoids. Induction of anaesthesia associated propofol 200 mg and sufentanil 15 microg. Anaesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane administered through a laryngeal mask. The possible association between the drugs used during anaesthesia and the postoperative pancreatitis is discussed.