1
|
Galvão FHF, Traldi MCC, Araújo RSS, Stefano JT, D'Albuquerque LAC, Oliveira CP. PRECLINICAL MODELS OF LIVER CÂNCER. ARQUIVOS DE GASTROENTEROLOGIA 2023; 60:383-392. [PMID: 37792769 DOI: 10.1590/s0004-2803.230302023-58] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2023] [Accepted: 05/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
Abstract
•In this review, we described different murine models of carcinogenesis: classic models, new transgenic and combined models, that reproduce the key points for HCC and CCA genesis allowing a better understanding of its genetic physiopathological, and environmental abnormalities. •Each model has its advantages, disadvantages, similarities, and differences with the corresponding human disease and should be chosen according to the specificity of the study. Ultimately, those models can also be used for testing new anticancer therapeutic approaches. •Cholangiocarcinoma has been highlighted, with an increase in prevalence. This review has an important role in understanding the pathophysiology and the development of new drugs. Background - This manuscript provides an overview of liver carcinogenesis in murine models of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). Objective - A review through MEDLINE and EMBASE was performed to assess articles until August 2022.Methods - Search was conducted of the entire electronic databases and the keywords used was HCC, CCA, carcinogenesis, animal models and liver. Articles exclusion was based on the lack of close relation to the subject. Carcinogenesis models of HCC include HCC induced by senescence in transgenic animals, HCC diet-induced, HCC induced by chemotoxicagents, xenograft, oncogenes, and HCC in transgenic animals inoculated with B and C virus. The models of CCA include the use of dimethylnitrosamine (DMN), diethylnitrosamine (DEN), thioacetamide (TAA), and carbon tetrachloride (CCl4). CCA murine models may also be induced by: CCA cells, genetic manipulation, Smad4, PTEN and p53 knockout, xenograft, and DEN-left median bile duct ligation. Results - In this review, we described different murine models of carcinogenesis that reproduce the key points for HCC and CCA genesis allowing a better understanding of its genetic, physiopathological, and environmental abnormalities. Conclusion - Each model has its advantages, disadvantages, similarities, and differences with the corresponding human disease and should be chosen according to the specificity of the study. Ultimately, those models can also be used for testing new anticancer therapeutic approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Flávio Henrique Ferreira Galvão
- Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
- Laboratório de Transplante e Cirurgia do Fígado (LIM-37), São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Maria Clara Camargo Traldi
- Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
- Laboratório de Transplante e Cirurgia do Fígado (LIM-37), São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | | | - Jose Tadeu Stefano
- Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
- Laboratório de Gastroenterologia Clínica e Experimental (LIM-07), São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Luiz Augusto Carneiro D'Albuquerque
- Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
- Laboratório de Transplante e Cirurgia do Fígado (LIM-37), São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Claudia P Oliveira
- Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
- Laboratório de Gastroenterologia Clínica e Experimental (LIM-07), São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yosudjai J, Wongkham S, Jirawatnotai S, Kaewkong W. Aberrant mRNA splicing generates oncogenic RNA isoforms and contributes to the development and progression of cholangiocarcinoma. Biomed Rep 2019; 10:147-155. [PMID: 30906543 PMCID: PMC6403481 DOI: 10.3892/br.2019.1188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2018] [Accepted: 01/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma is a lethal biliary cancer, with an unclear molecular pathogenesis. Alternative splicing is a post-transcriptional modification that generates mature mRNAs, which are subsequently translated into proteins. Aberrant alternative splicing has been reported to serve a role in tumor initiation, maintenance and metastasis in several types of human cancer, including cholangiocarcinoma. In this review, the aberrant splicing of genes and the functional contributions of the spliced genes, in the carcinogenesis, progression and aggressiveness of cholangiocarcinoma are summarized. In addition, factors that influence this aberrant splicing that may be relevant as therapeutic targets or prognosis markers for cholangiocarcinoma are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juthamas Yosudjai
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medical Science, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok 65000, Thailand
| | - Sopit Wongkham
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
| | - Siwanon Jirawatnotai
- Siriraj Center for Research of Excellence (SiCORE) for System Pharmacology, Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Medical School, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
| | - Worasak Kaewkong
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medical Science, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok 65000, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Reames BN, Pawlik TM. Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma. SURGICAL DISEASES OF THE PANCREAS AND BILIARY TREE 2018:345-389. [DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-8755-4_14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2025]
|
4
|
Poruk KE, Pawlik TM, Weiss MJ. Perioperative Management of Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 2015; 19:1889-99. [PMID: 26022776 PMCID: PMC4858933 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-015-2854-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2015] [Accepted: 05/04/2015] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cholangiocarcinoma is the most common primary tumor of the biliary tract although it accounts for only 2 % of all human malignancies. We herein review hilar cholangiocarcinoma including its risk factors, the main classification systems for tumors, current surgical management of the disease, and the role chemotherapy and liver transplantation may play in selected patients. METHODS We performed a comprehensive literature search using PubMed, Medline, and the Cochrane library for the period 1980-2015 using the following MeSH terms: "hilar cholangiocarcinoma", "biliary cancer", and "cholangiocarcinoma". Only recent studies that were published in English and in peer reviewed journals were included. FINDINGS Hilar cholangiocarcinoma is a disease of advanced age with an unclear etiology, most frequently found in Southeast Asia and relatively rare in Western countries. The best chance of long-term survival and potential cure is surgical resection with negative surgical margins, but many patients are unresectable due to locally advanced or metastatic disease at diagnosis. As a result of recent efforts, new methods of management have been identified for these patients, including preoperative portal vein embolism and biliary drainage, neoadjuvant chemotherapy with subsequent transplantation, and chemoradiation therapy. CONCLUSION Current management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma depends on extent of the tumor at presentation and includes surgical resection, liver transplantation, portal vein embolization, and chemoradiation therapy. Our understanding of hilar cholangiocarcinoma has improved in recent years and further research offers hope to improve the outcome in patients with these rare tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine E Poruk
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Halsted 614 600 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Halsted 614 600 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Matthew J Weiss
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Halsted 614 600 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Borad MJ, Champion MD, Egan JB, Liang WS, Fonseca R, Bryce AH, McCullough AE, Barrett MT, Hunt K, Patel MD, Young SW, Collins JM, Silva AC, Condjella RM, Block M, McWilliams RR, Lazaridis KN, Klee EW, Bible KC, Harris P, Oliver GR, Bhavsar JD, Nair AA, Middha S, Asmann Y, Kocher JP, Schahl K, Kipp BR, Barr Fritcher EG, Baker A, Aldrich J, Kurdoglu A, Izatt T, Christoforides A, Cherni I, Nasser S, Reiman R, Phillips L, McDonald J, Adkins J, Mastrian SD, Placek P, Watanabe AT, LoBello J, Han H, Von Hoff D, Craig DW, Stewart AK, Carpten JD. Integrated genomic characterization reveals novel, therapeutically relevant drug targets in FGFR and EGFR pathways in sporadic intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. PLoS Genet 2014; 10:e1004135. [PMID: 24550739 PMCID: PMC3923676 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 273] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2013] [Accepted: 12/06/2013] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Advanced cholangiocarcinoma continues to harbor a difficult prognosis and therapeutic options have been limited. During the course of a clinical trial of whole genomic sequencing seeking druggable targets, we examined six patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma. Integrated genome-wide and whole transcriptome sequence analyses were performed on tumors from six patients with advanced, sporadic intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (SIC) to identify potential therapeutically actionable events. Among the somatic events captured in our analysis, we uncovered two novel therapeutically relevant genomic contexts that when acted upon, resulted in preliminary evidence of anti-tumor activity. Genome-wide structural analysis of sequence data revealed recurrent translocation events involving the FGFR2 locus in three of six assessed patients. These observations and supporting evidence triggered the use of FGFR inhibitors in these patients. In one example, preliminary anti-tumor activity of pazopanib (in vitro FGFR2 IC50≈350 nM) was noted in a patient with an FGFR2-TACC3 fusion. After progression on pazopanib, the same patient also had stable disease on ponatinib, a pan-FGFR inhibitor (in vitro, FGFR2 IC50≈8 nM). In an independent non-FGFR2 translocation patient, exome and transcriptome analysis revealed an allele specific somatic nonsense mutation (E384X) in ERRFI1, a direct negative regulator of EGFR activation. Rapid and robust disease regression was noted in this ERRFI1 inactivated tumor when treated with erlotinib, an EGFR kinase inhibitor. FGFR2 fusions and ERRFI mutations may represent novel targets in sporadic intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and trials should be characterized in larger cohorts of patients with these aberrations. Cholangiocarcinoma is a cancer that affects the bile ducts. Unfortunately, many patients diagnosed with cholangiocarcinoma have disease that cannot be treated with surgery or has spread to other parts of the body, thus severely limiting treatment options. New advances in drug treatment have enabled treatment of these cancers with “targeted therapy” that exploits an error in the normal functioning of a tumor cell, compared to other cells in the body, thus allowing only tumor cells to be killed by the drug. We sought to identify changes in the genetic material of cholangiocarcinoma patient tumors in order to identify potential errors in cellular functioning by utilizing cutting edge genetic sequencing technology. We identified three patient tumors possessing an FGFR2 gene that was aberrantly fused to another gene. Two of these patients were able to receive targeted therapy for FGFR2 with resulting tumor shrinkage. A fourth tumor contained an error in a gene that controls a very important cellular mechanism in cancer, termed epidermal growth factor pathway (EGFR). This patient received therapy targeting this mechanism and also demonstrated response to treatment. Thus, we have been able to utilize cutting edge technology with targeted drug treatment to personalize medical treatment for cancer in cholangiocarcinoma patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitesh J. Borad
- Division of Hematology/Oncology Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, United States of America
- Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Scottsdale, Arizona, United States of America
- Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America
- * E-mail: (MJB); (JDC)
| | - Mia D. Champion
- Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America
- Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Jan B. Egan
- Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Winnie S. Liang
- Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Rafael Fonseca
- Division of Hematology/Oncology Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, United States of America
- Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Scottsdale, Arizona, United States of America
- Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Alan H. Bryce
- Division of Hematology/Oncology Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, United States of America
- Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Scottsdale, Arizona, United States of America
- Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Ann E. McCullough
- Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Michael T. Barrett
- Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Scottsdale, Arizona, United States of America
- Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Katherine Hunt
- Division of Hematology/Oncology Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Maitray D. Patel
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Scott W. Young
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Joseph M. Collins
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Alvin C. Silva
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, United States of America
| | | | - Matthew Block
- Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America
- Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Robert R. McWilliams
- Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America
- Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America
| | | | - Eric W. Klee
- Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America
- Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Keith C. Bible
- Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Pamela Harris
- Investigational Drug Branch, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Gavin R. Oliver
- Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America
- Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Jaysheel D. Bhavsar
- Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America
- Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Asha A. Nair
- Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America
- Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Sumit Middha
- Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America
- Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Yan Asmann
- Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America
- Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Jean-Pierre Kocher
- Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America
- Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Kimberly Schahl
- Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Benjamin R. Kipp
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Emily G. Barr Fritcher
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Angela Baker
- Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Jessica Aldrich
- Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Ahmet Kurdoglu
- Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Tyler Izatt
- Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Alexis Christoforides
- Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Irene Cherni
- Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Sara Nasser
- Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Rebecca Reiman
- Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Lori Phillips
- Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Jackie McDonald
- Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Jonathan Adkins
- Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Stephen D. Mastrian
- Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Pamela Placek
- Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Aprill T. Watanabe
- Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Janine LoBello
- Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Haiyong Han
- Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Daniel Von Hoff
- Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Scottsdale, Arizona, United States of America
- Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - David W. Craig
- Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - A. Keith Stewart
- Division of Hematology/Oncology Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, United States of America
- Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Scottsdale, Arizona, United States of America
- Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - John D. Carpten
- Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
- * E-mail: (MJB); (JDC)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Minicis SD, Kisseleva T, Francis H, Baroni GS, Benedetti A, Brenner D, Alvaro D, Alpini G, Marzioni M. Liver carcinogenesis: rodent models of hepatocarcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma. Dig Liver Dis 2013; 45. [PMID: 23177172 PMCID: PMC3716909 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2012.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma are primary liver cancers, both represent a growing challenge for clinicians due to their increasing morbidity and mortality. In the last few years a number of in vivo models of hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma have been developed. The study of these models is providing a significant contribution in unveiling the pathophysiology of primary liver malignancies. They are also fundamental tools to evaluate newly designed molecules to be tested as new potential therapeutic agents in a pre-clinical set. Technical aspects of each model are critical steps, and they should always be considered in order to appropriately interpret the findings of a study or its planning. The purpose of this review is to describe the technical and experimental features of the most significant rodent models, highlighting similarities or differences between the corresponding human diseases. The first part is dedicated to the discussion of models of hepatocellular carcinoma, developed using toxic agents, or through dietary or genetic manipulations. In the second we will address models of cholangiocarcinoma developed in rats or mice by toxin administration, genetic manipulation and/or bile duct incannulation or surgery. Xenograft or syngenic models are also proposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuele De Minicis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Tatiana Kisseleva
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, School of Medicine, CA, United States
| | - Heather Francis
- Division Research, Central Texas Veterans Health Care System, Scott & White Digestive Disease Research Center, Department of Medicine, Division Gastroenterology, Scott & White Hospital and Texas A&M Health Science Center, College of Medicine, Temple, TX, United States
| | | | - Antonio Benedetti
- Department of Gastroenterology, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - David Brenner
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, School of Medicine, CA, United States
| | - Domenico Alvaro
- Division of Gastroenterology, Polo Pontino, Università degli Studi “La Sapienza”, Rome, Italy
| | - Gianfranco Alpini
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, School of Medicine, CA, United States,Co-corresponding author. Tel.: +1 254 743 1041/1044; fax: +1 254 743 0378/0555. (M. Marzioni)
| | - Marco Marzioni
- Department of Gastroenterology, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy,Corresponding author at: Department of Gastroenterology, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Nuovo Polo Didattico, III Piano, Via Tronto 10, 60020 Ancona, Italy. Tel.: +39 0712206043; fax: +39 0712206044
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wiedmann M, Witzigmann H, Mössner J. Malignant Tumors. CLINICAL HEPATOLOGY 2010:1519-1566. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-04519-6_62] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2025]
|
8
|
Kojima Y, Honda K, Hamada H, Kobayashi N. Oncolytic Gene Therapy Combined with Double Suicide Genes for Human Bile Duct Cancer in Nude Mouse Models. J Surg Res 2009; 157:e63-70. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2008.12.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2008] [Revised: 11/22/2008] [Accepted: 12/10/2008] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
9
|
Sertznig P, Seifert M, Tilgen W, Reichrath J. Present concepts and future outlook: function of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) for pathogenesis, progression, and therapy of cancer. J Cell Physiol 2007; 212:1-12. [PMID: 17443682 DOI: 10.1002/jcp.20998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are members of the nuclear receptor superfamily of transcriptional regulators that regulate lipid, glucose, and amino acid metabolism. In recent studies it also has been shown that these receptors are implicated in tumor progression, cellular differentiation, and apoptosis and modulation of their function is therefore considered as a potential target for cancer prevention and treatment. PPAR ligands and other agents influencing PPAR signalling pathways have been shown to reveal chemopreventive potential by mediating tumor suppressive activities in a variety of human cancers and could represent a potential novel strategy to inhibit tumor carcinogenesis and progression. This review summarizes the currently available data on the roles of PPARs in relation to the processes of cell differentiation and carcinogenesis as well as their role as promising future therapeutic targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Sertznig
- Department of Dermatology, The Saarland University Hospital, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Farazi PA, Zeisberg M, Glickman J, Zhang Y, Kalluri R, DePinho RA. Chronic bile duct injury associated with fibrotic matrix microenvironment provokes cholangiocarcinoma in p53-deficient mice. Cancer Res 2006; 66:6622-7. [PMID: 16818635 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-05-4609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a lethal malignancy of the biliary epithelium associated with p53 mutations, bile duct injury, inflammation, and fibrosis. Here, to validate these processes in CCA, we developed a liver cirrhosis model driven by chronic intermittent toxin exposure, which provokes bile duct injury/necrosis and proliferation, fibroblast recruitment, and progressive extracellular matrix (ECM) changes. Fibrotic changes in the matrix microenvironment, typified by increased type I and III collagens and fibroblast recruitment, were shown to stimulate biliary epithelium hyperplasia with subsequent progression to malignant intrahepatic CCA only in mice harboring a p53 mutant allele. These murine CCAs bear histologic and genetic features of human intrahepatic CCA, including dense peritumoral fibrosis, increased inducible nitric oxide synthase, nitrotyrosine, and cyclooxygenase-2 expression, c-Met activation, cErbB2 overexpression, down-regulation of membrane-associated E-cadherin, and p53 codon 248 mutation. Thus, p53 deficiency, chronic bile duct injury/proliferation, and the fibrotic matrix microenvironment cooperate to induce intrahepatic CCA, highlighting the key role of the ECM microenvironment in this common liver cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paraskevi A Farazi
- Department of Medical Oncology and Center for Applied Cancer Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, 44 Binney Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hughes NR, Pairojkul C, Royce SG, Clouston A, Bhathal PS. Liver fluke-associated and sporadic cholangiocarcinoma: an immunohistochemical study of bile duct, peribiliary gland and tumour cell phenotypes. J Clin Pathol 2006; 59:1073-8. [PMID: 16679351 PMCID: PMC1861757 DOI: 10.1136/jcp.2005.033712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
AIM To compare cell phenotypes displayed by cholangiocarcinomas and adjacent bile duct lesions in patients from an area endemic in liver-fluke infestation and those with sporadic cholangiocarcinoma. METHODS 65 fluke-associated and 47 sporadic cholangiocarcinomas and 6 normal livers were studied. Serial paraffin-wax sections were stained immunohistochemically with monoclonal antibodies characterising a Brunner or pyloric gland metaplasia cell phenotype (antigens D10 and 1F6), intestinal goblet cells (antigen 17NM), gastric foveolar apomucin (MUC5AC), a gastrointestinal epithelium cytokeratin (CK20) and the p53 protein. RESULTS 60% of the 112 cholangiocarcinomas expressed antigen D10, 68% MUC5AC, 33% antigen 17NM and 20% CK20; 37% showed overexpression of p53. When present together in a cholangiocarcinoma, cancer cells expressing D10 were distinct from those displaying 17NM or MUC5AC. Many more fluke-associated cholangiocarcinomas than sporadic cholangiocarcinomas displayed 17NM and p53 expression. Most cases of hyperplastic and dysplastic biliary epithelium expressed D10 strongly. Pyloric gland metaplasia and peribiliary glands displayed D10 and 1F6, with peribiliary gland hyperplasia more evident in the livers with fluke-associated cholangiocarcinoma; goblet cells in intestinal metaplasia stained for 17NM. No notable association of expression between any two antigens (including p53) was found in the cancers. CONCLUSIONS Most cases of dysplastic biliary epithelium and cholangiocarcinoma display a Brunner or pyloric gland cell phenotype and a gastric foveolar cell phenotype. The expression of D10 in hyperplastic and dysplastic epithelium and in cholangiocarcinoma is consistent with a dysplasia-carcinoma sequence. Many more fluke-associated cholangiocarcinomas than sporadic cholangiocarcinoma display an intestinal goblet cell phenotype and overexpress p53, indicating differences in the aetiopathology of the cancers in the two groups of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N R Hughes
- Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Chariyalertsak S, Khuhaprema T, Bhudisawasdi V, Sripa B, Wongkham S, Petmitr S. Novel DNA amplification on chromosomes 2p25.3 and 7q11.23 in cholangiocarcinoma identified by arbitrarily primed polymerase chain reaction. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2005; 131:821-8. [PMID: 16180024 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-005-0031-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2005] [Accepted: 08/22/2005] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To detect and characterize amplified DNA sequences in cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). PATIENTS AND METHODS We extracted DNA from tumor and corresponding normal tissues of 30 patients with CCA and amplified with 30 random ten-mer arbitrary primers by the arbitrarily primed polymerase chain reaction (AP-PCR) technique. RESULTS Our results showed gains of genomic sequences at high frequency. Using the AX-11 arbitrary primer, we determined an amplified DNA fragment occurred frequently in the tumors analyzed. The DNA fragment was isolated and identified as two sequences mapped to chromosomes 2p25.3 and 7q11.23. Specific primers were designed employing these sequences and used for detecting amplification by real-time quantitative PCR. The amplification of the DNA sequences on chromosomes 2p25.3 and 7q11.23 was detected in 10 (33%) and 6 (20%) cases, respectively. Thirteen (43%) cases showed amplification on both or one of the chromosomes. In addition, amplification of the DNA on chromosome 2p25.3 was predominantly observed in poorly differentiated tumors. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that the novel amplified DNA on chromosomal regions at 2p25.3 and 7q11.23 might be involved in the development and progression of CCA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Chariyalertsak
- Department of Tropical Nutrition and Food Science, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Rajvithi Road, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma is a devastating malignancy that presents late, is notoriously difficult to diagnose, and is associated with a high mortality. The incidence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is increasing worldwide. The cause for this rise is unclear, although it could be related to an interplay between predisposing genetic factors and environmental triggers. MRI and CT with endoscopic ultrasound and PET provide useful diagnostic information in certain patients. Surgical resection is the only chance for cure, with results depending on careful technique and patient selection. Data suggest that liver transplantation could offer long-term survival in selected patients when combined with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy have been ineffective for patients with inoperable tumours. For most of these patients biliary drainage is the mainstay of palliation. However, controversy exists over the type and positioning of biliary stents. Photodynamic treatment is a new palliative technique that might improve quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shahid A Khan
- Liver Unit, Division of Medicine, St Mary's Hospital Campus, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
The reported mortality from intrahepatic bile duct tumours is increasing markedly in industrialised countries, for reasons that remain unknown. Inactivation of the tumour suppressor gene p53, is the commonest genetic abnormality in human cancer and has been implicated in the genesis of cholangiocarcinoma in various immunohistochemical and molecular epidemiological investigations, including gene sequencing studies. The structure and function of p53 and its role in linking cancer to specific carcinogens by way of mutational signatures is reviewed. The findings of previous p53 studies and their relevance in human cholangiocarcinoma are summarised.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shahid A Khan
- Liver Unit, St Mary's Campus, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, London, UK.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Han C, Demetris AJ, Michalopoulos GK, Zhan Q, Shelhamer JH, Wu T. PPARgamma ligands inhibit cholangiocarcinoma cell growth through p53-dependent GADD45 and p21 pathway. Hepatology 2003; 38:167-177. [PMID: 12829999 DOI: 10.1053/jhep.2003.50296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Ligands of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPARgamma) induce differentiation and growth inhibition in several human cancers. However, the role of PPARgamma ligands in the growth control of human cholangiocarcinoma cells remains unknown. This study was designed to investigate the biological functions and molecular mechanisms of PPARgamma ligands in the growth regulation of human cholangiocarcinoma cells. Western blot analysis showed that PPARgamma is expressed in all of the three human cholangiocarcinoma cell lines used in this study (SG231, CC-LP-1, and HuCCT1). Transient transfection assays using a peroxisome proliferator response element (PPRE) reporter construct showed that the PPARgamma expressed in human cholangiocarcinoma cells is functional as a transcription activator. Exposure of SG231, CC-LP-1, and HuCCT1 cells to PPARgamma ligands 15-deoxy-delta12, 14-prostaglandin J(2) (15d-PGJ(2)) and troglitazone for 24 to 96 hours resulted in a dose-dependent inhibition of cell growth. Flow cytometry analysis showed that 15d-PGJ(2) and troglitazone-induced cell cycle arrest at the G2/M checkpoint. Consistent with these findings, both 15d-PGJ(2) and troglitazone significantly inhibited the G2/M cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) Cdc2 activity. Furthermore, cells treated with 15d-PGJ(2) and troglitazone showed elevated expression of p53 and two p53-controlled downstream genes, GADD45 and p21(WAF1/Cip1). Dominant negative inhibition of p53 in SG231 cells significantly blocked the 15d-PGJ(2) and troglitazone-induced growth inhibition, G2/M arrest, and GADD45/p21 induction. 15d-PGJ(2) and troglitazone failed to directly inhibit Cdc2 activity in a cell-free system in spite of direct association between GADD45 and PPARgamma proteins. In conclusion, these results show a novel p53-dependent mechanism in the PPARgamma ligand-mediated inhibition of cholangiocarcinoma growth and suggest a potential therapeutic role of PPARgamma ligands in the treatment of human cholangiocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chang Han
- Department of Pathology, Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
Cancer of the biliary tract has been associated with point mutations of K-ras and beta-catenin proto-oncogenes; alterations of p53, p16, APC, and DPC4 tumor suppressor genes by a combination of chromosomal deletion, mutation, or methylation; and infrequently microsatellite instability. The frequencies of these alterations vary by location and race of the patient, tumor subsite, histology, and associated disease. Advances in the understanding of the genetics of this disease will help in diagnosing biliary tract cancer, screening at-risk patients, and developing therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asif Rashid
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Box 85, Houston, TX 77030-4095, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Shimonishi T, Zen Y, Chen TC, Chen MF, Jan YY, Yeh TS, Nimura Y, Nakanuma Y. Increasing expression of gastrointestinal phenotypes and p53 along with histologic progression of intraductal papillary neoplasia of the liver. Hum Pathol 2002; 33:503-11. [PMID: 12094375 DOI: 10.1053/hupa.2002.124030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Intraductal papillary neoplasia of the liver (IPN-L) was recently proposed as the name for intraductal papillary proliferation of neoplastic biliary epithelium with a fine fibrovascular stalk resembling intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas. We histochemically and immunohistochemically examined IPN-L alone or associated with hepatolithiasis, with an emphasis on the gastrointestinal metaplasia, nuclear p53 expression, and histologic progression. A total of 66 cases of IPN-L were divided into 4 groups: group 1, IPN-L with low-grade dysplasia (13 cases); group 2, IPN-L with high-grade dysplasia (20 cases); group 3, IPN-L lined with carcinoma in situ and no or microinvasion (19 cases); and group 4, group 3 with distinct invasive carcinoma (14 cases). It is suggested that IPN-L progresses from group 1 to group 4. As controls, 20 cases of nonneoplastic intrahepatic large bile ducts and 17 cases of nonpapillary invasive intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) were used. Biliary epithelial hypersecretion of sialomucin rather than sulfomucin was prevalent in IPN-L, and this was associated with the progression of INP-L. Immunohistochemically, cytokeratin (CK) 20 and MUC2, a gastrointestinal marker, were expressed more frequently in IPN-L than in nonneoplastic bile ducts and nonpapillary ICC (P <0.01), and their incidence were significantly increased in parallel with the progression of IPN-L (P < 0.01). In contrast, expression of CK 7, a biliary marker, was decreased in IPN-L compared with nonpapillary ICC. Nuclear p53 immunostaining was detected in 30% of IPN-L as a whole and increased in tandem with the progression of IPN-L (P < 0.01). It is suggested that IPN-L forms a spectrum of biliary epithelial neoplasia with frequent gastrointestinal metaplasia, different from the usual nonpapillary ICC, and shows stepwise progression from the perspective of mucin profile, gastrointestinal metaplasia, and p53 nuclear expression.
Collapse
|
18
|
Caca K, Feisthammel J, Klee K, Tannapfel A, Witzigmann H, Wittekind C, Mössner J, Berr F. Inactivation of the INK4a/ARF locus and p53 in sporadic extrahepatic bile duct cancers and bile tract cancer cell lines. Int J Cancer 2002; 97:481-8. [PMID: 11802210 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.1639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
The tumor-suppressor genes p14(ARF), p16(INK4a) and Tp53 are commonly inactivated in many tumors. We investigated their role in the pathogenesis of 9 bile tract cancer cell lines and 21 primary sporadic extrahepatic bile duct carcinomas. p53 and p16 protein expression was examined by Western blot analysis and immunohistochemistry. Mutation screening of p53 was done by SSCP and direct sequencing. Inactivating mechanisms of p14 and p16 were addressed by screening for mutations, homozygous deletions, chromosomal loss of 9p21 (loss of heterozygosity [LOH] analysis) and promoter hypermethylation of the p14/p16 genes. p53 overexpression could be detected in 7 of 9 cell lines and 7 of 21 primary tumors, but mutations were found in 3 cell lines only. p16 expression was absent in all cell lines, due to homozygous deletion of the gene in 8 of 9 cell lines and hypermethylation of the p16 promoter in one cell line (CC-LP-1). p14 exon 1beta was homozygously deleted in 6 of 9 cell lines, while retained in CC-LP-1 and 2 additional lines. No p14 promoter hypermethylation could be detected. p16 expression was lost in 11 of 21 primary tumors. p16 promoter hypermethylation was present in 9 of 21 primary tumors, all with lost p16 expression. Allelic loss at 9p21 was detected in 13 of 21 primary tumors, 10 of 11 with lost p16 expression and 8 of 9 with methylated p16 promoter. No p14 promoter hypermethylation or p14/p16 mutations could be detected. Neither Tp53 nor p16 alterations showed obvious association with histopathologic or clinical characteristics. In conclusion, inactivation of the p16 gene is a frequent event in primary sporadic extrahepatic bile duct cancers, 9p21 LOH and promoter hypermethylation being the principal inactivating mechanisms. Therefore, p16, but not p14, seems to be the primary target of inactivation at the INK4a locus in bile duct cancers. Other mechanisms than Tp53 mutations seems to be predominantly responsible for stabilization of nuclear p53 protein in bile duct cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karel Caca
- Department of Medicine II, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Affiliation(s)
- M Alison
- Department of Histopathology, ICSM at Hammersmith Campus Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK.
| |
Collapse
|