Solid alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma of the thorax in a child

The impact of immunohistochemistry on the classification of lung tumors

INTRODUCTION

To highlight the role of immunohistochemistry to lung cancer classification on the basis of existing guidelines and future perspectives.

AREAS COVERED

Four orienting key-issues were structured according to an extensive review on the English literature: a) cancer subtyping; b) best biomarkers and rules to follow; c) negative and positive profiling; d) suggestions towards an evidence-based proposal for lung cancer subtyping. A sparing material approach based on a limited number of specific markers is highly desirable. It includes p40 for squamous cell carcinoma ('no p40, no squamous'), TTF1 for adenocarcinoma, synaptophysin for neuroendocrine tumors and vimentin for sarcomatoid carcinoma. A close relationship between genotype and phenotype also supports a diagnostic role for negative profiles. Expert commentary: Highly specific and sensitive IHC markers according to positive and negative diagnostic algorithms seem appropriate for individual patients' lung cancer subtyping.

Mesenchymal tumours of the mediastinum--part II

This is the second part of a two-part review on soft tissue tumours which may be encountered in the mediastinum. This review is based on the 2013 WHO classification of soft tissue tumours and the 2015 WHO classification of tumours of the lung, pleura, thymus and heart and provides an updated overview of mesenchymal tumours that have been reported in the mediastinum.

FOXO1-FGFR1 fusion and amplification in a solid variant of alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma

Rhabdomyosarcoma is the most common pediatric soft tissue malignancy. Two major subtypes, alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma and embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma, constitute 20 and 60% of all cases, respectively. Approximately 80% of alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma carry two signature chromosomal translocations, t(2;13)(q35;q14) resulting in PAX3-FOXO1 fusion, and t(1;13)(p36;q14) resulting in PAX7-FOXO1 fusion. Whether the remaining cases are truly negative for gene fusion has been questioned. We are reporting the case of a 9-month-old girl with a metastatic neck mass diagnosed histologically as solid variant alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma. Chromosome analysis showed a t(8;13;9)(p11.2;q14;9q32) three-way translocation as the sole clonal aberration. Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) demonstrated a rearrangement at the FOXO1 locus and an amplification of its centromeric region. Single-nucleotide polymorphism-based microarray analysis illustrated a co-amplification of the FOXO1 gene at 13q14 and the FGFR1 gene at 8p12p11.2, suggesting formation and amplification of a chimerical FOXO1-FGFR1 gene. This is the first report to identify a novel fusion partner FGFR1 for the known anchor gene FOXO1 in alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma.

Solid variant of alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma mimicking non-Hodgkin lymphoma: case report and review of literature

Alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma is a high-grade neoplasm, which forms about 30% of rhabdomyosarcomas. A rare solid variant has been described. A 14-year-old girl presented with inguinal lymph nodal mass and was treated with 6 cycles of CHOP chemotherapy and local radiation. After 3 months, she presented with generalized lymphadenopathy, pleural and pericardial effusions. A histopathologic diagnosis of solid variant of alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma was made. The skeletal muscle origin was confirmed by positive immunostaining for desmin. A primary site was identified in the lower limb muscles. The patient was treated with salvage chemotherapy but had progressive disease. The pediatric and adolescent cases of this rare tumor reported in English language literature are reviewed. In addition, the importance of biopsy in the diagnosis of suspected lymphomas and the pitfalls of needle aspirations are briefly discussed.

Multimodal genetic diagnosis of solid variant alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma

The most common types of rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) are alveolar RMS (ARMS), which are characterized by the specific translocation t(2;13)(q35;q14) or its rarer variant, t(1;13)(p36;q14), producing the fusion genes PAX3-FKHR and PAX7-FKHR, respectively, and embryonal RMS (ERMS), which is characterized by multiple numeric chromosome changes. A solid variant of ARMS that is morphologically indistinguishable from ERMS has been described recently. We present two cases with an initial histopathologic diagnosis of ERMS in which the combined findings by cytogenetic, reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), and comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) analyses demonstrate that both tumors were in fact the solid variant of ARMS. The cytogenetic analysis of patient 1 revealed a t(2;13)(q35;q14) and the RT-PCR study detected the corresponding PAX3-FKHR chimeric transcript. In patient 2, the cytogenetic finding of multiple trisomies was compatible with the initial histopathologic diagnosis of ERMS, but the finding of a PAX7-FKHR fusion transcript by RT-PCR pointed to the diagnosis of ARMS. Interestingly, the CGH findings of this case reconciled the molecular and cytogenetic data by detecting, in addition to the trisomies, amplification of chromosomal bands 1p36 and 13q14, where the PAX7 and FKHR genes are located, respectively. Our data indicate that this multimodal genetic analysis could be important for the differential diagnosis of these tumors. Furthermore, our findings and previous studies indicate that there are no apparent genetic differences between solid variant and typical ARMS.

NCAM (neural cell adhesion molecules) expression in malignant mesotheliomas

Neural cell adhesion molecules (NCAM) are adhesion molecules expressed by neural and neuroendocrine tumors and a few biphasic tumors such as synovialosarcomas and breast phyllode tumors. To investigate NCAM expression in mesotheliomas, we studied 26 cases of epithelioid (n = 12), biphasic (n = 11), and sarcomatoid (n = 3) malignant mesotheliomas (MM), in comparison with normal mesothelium, and 50 primary non-small cell lung carcinomas (NSCLC) (25 adenocarcinomas [ADC] and 25 squamous cell carcinomas [SCC]), using electron microscopy as a gold standard for recognition of MM. NCAM reactivity using 123C3 antibody was compared with that of NE markers such as chromogranin A and synaptophysin. Although normal mesothelium remains negative, NCAM was expressed in 19 of 26 MM (73%) with a membranous staining on frozen or paraffin sections. In 6 of 12 epithelioid MM, the tumor cells expressed NCAM, whereas in 5 cases stromal fibroblasts showed a strong but focal staining. In 11 biphasic MM, 4 presented an NCAM reactivity of both epithelioid and spindle cell components, whereas in 7, only fusiform component was NCAM positive. Two of 3 sarcomatoid MM showed an NCAM expression. Chromogranin expression was never seen, whereas synaptophysin was noticed in 2 cases. No case of NSCLC showed membranous 123C3 staining, whereas 2 ADC weakly expressed synaptophysin. We conclude that NCAM expression in MM is reminiscent of its expression in mesoderm during fetal life and consistent with that reported in other biphasic tumors. These data show that NCAM expression occurs in 73% of MM, highly exceeding that observed in lung cancer.