Influence of Helicobacter pylori infection and cetraxate on gastric mucosal blood flow during healing of endoscopic mucosal resection-induced ulcers

Imaging of the Intestinal Microcirculation during Acute and Chronic Inflammation

Because of its unique microvascular anatomy, the intestine is particularly vulnerable to microcirculatory disturbances. During inflammation, pathological changes in blood flow, vessel integrity and capillary density result in impaired tissue oxygenation. In severe cases, these changes can progress to multiorgan failure and possibly death. Microcirculation may be evaluated in superficial tissues in patients using video microscopy devices, but these techniques do not allow the assessment of intestinal microcirculation. The gold standard for the experimental evaluation of intestinal microcirculation is intravital microscopy, a technique that allows for the in vivo examination of many pathophysiological processes including leukocyte-endothelial interactions and capillary blood flow. This review provides an overview of changes in the intestinal microcirculation in various acute and chronic inflammatory conditions. Acute conditions discussed include local infections, severe acute pancreatitis, necrotizing enterocolitis and sepsis. Inflammatory bowel disease and irritable bowel syndrome are included as examples of chronic conditions of the intestine.

Helicobacter pylori Infection following Endoscopic Resection of Early Gastric Cancer

The role of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection in patients following endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer (EGC) remains unclear. This article presents a review of literature published in the past 15 years. H. pylori-mediated persistent methylation levels are associated with the development of metachronous gastric cancer. The methylation of certain specific genes can be used to identify patients with a high risk of metachronous gastric cancer even after H. pylori eradication. H. pylori eradication after endoscopic resection should be performed as early as possible for eradication success and prevention of metachronous precancerous lesions. Although whether the eradication of H. pylori could prevent the development of metachronous cancer after endoscopic resection is controversial, several meta-analyses concluded that H. pylori eradication could reduce the incidence of metachronous gastric cancer significantly. In addition, H. pylori eradication in gastric cancer survivors after endoscopic resection could reduce healthcare cost and save lives in a cost-effective way. Taken together, H. pylori eradication after endoscopic resection of EGC is recommended as prevention for metachronous precancerous lesions and metachronous gastric cancer.

The effect of early Helicobacter pylori eradication on the healing of ESD-induced artificial ulcers: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

The role of Helicobacter pylori eradication is still not clear in endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)-induced artificial ulcer. This study investigates the therapeutic effects of H. pylori eradication on ESD-induced artificial ulcers.

METHODS

Eighty-four patients with ESD-induced artificial ulcers were enrolled. H. pylori eradication success subgroup (Group A1) and H. pylori eradication failure subgroups (Group A2) received standard triple therapy orally for 7 days, followed by esomeprazole 20 mg bis in die (bid) orally for the remainder of the treatment period (4 weeks in total). The H. pylori positive (Group B1) and H. pylori negative subgroups (Group B2) received esomeprazole 20 mg bid orally for 4 weeks. Ulcer healing was evaluated by gastroscopy, and H. pylori was identified by a C13 breath test or an Hp-RUT 2 and 6 months after treatment.

RESULTS

Successful eradication of H. pylori can promote healing of ESD-induced artificial ulcers. The ESD-induced artificial ulcer healing rate in Group A1 was statistically higher than that in Groups A2, B1, and B2.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicated that early H. pylori eradication therapy can promote ESD-induced artificial ulcer healing in H. pylori positive patients with ESD-induced artificial ulcers.

Efficacy of Rebamipide in Organic and Functional Dyspepsia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

The role of gastritis in dyspepsia remains controversial. We aimed to examine the efficacy of rebamipide, a gastric mucosal protective agent, in both organic and functional dyspepsia.

DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. The following databases were searched using the keywords ("rebamipide" OR "gastroprotective agent*" OR "mucosta") AND ("dyspepsia" OR "indigestion" OR "gastrointestinal symptoms"): PubMed, Wed of Science, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Clinical Trials Register. The primary outcome was dyspepsia or upper GI symptom score improvement. Pooled analysis of the main outcome data were presented as risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous data and standardized mean difference (SMD) for continuous data.

RESULTS

From an initial 248 records, 17 randomised controlled trial (RCT) publications involving 2170 subjects (1224 rebamipide, 946 placebo/control) were included in the final analysis. Twelve RCTs were conducted in subjects with organic dyspepsia (peptic ulcer disease, reflux esophagitis or NSAID-induced gastropathy) and five RCTs were conducted in patients with functional dyspepsia (FD). Overall, dyspepsia symptom improvement was significantly better with rebamipide compared to placebo/control drug (RR 0.77, 95% CI = 0.64-0.93; SMD -0.46, 95% CI = -0.83 to -0.09). Significant symptom improvement was observed both in pooled RR and SMD in subjects with organic dyspepsia (RR 0.72, 95% CI = 0.61-0.86; SMD -0.23, 95% CI = -0.4 to -0.07), while symptom improvement in FD was observed in pooled SMD but not RR (SMD -0.62, 95% CI = -1.16 to -0.08; RR 1.01, 95% CI = 0.71-1.45).

CONCLUSION

Rebamipide is effective in organic dyspepsia and may improve symptoms in functional dyspepsia.

The effect of sequential therapy with lansoprazole and ecabet sodium in treating iatrogenic gastric ulcer after endoscopic submucosal dissection: a randomized prospective study

OBJECTIVE

Ecabet sodium (ES) is a new non-systemic anti-ulcer agent belonging to the category of gastroprotective agents. In this study we aimed to compare the efficacy of a combination therapy with lansoprazole (LS) followed by ES with LS alone in treating endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)-induced iatrogenic gastric ulcers.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with gastric adenomas or early gastric cancer were randomly divided into either the LS group (30 mg once daily for 4 weeks; n = 45) or the LS + ES group (LS 30 mg once daily for one week followed by ES 1500 mg twice daily for 3 weeks; n = 45). Four weeks after ESD, a follow-up endoscopy was conducted to evaluate the proportions of ulcer reduction and ulcer stages in the two groups.

RESULTS

In all, 79 patients were included in the final analyses. Both treatment modalities were well-tolerated in most patients, with a drug compliance of over 80%. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of the proportions of ulcer reduction (0.9503 ± 0.1215 in the LS group vs 0.9192 ± 0.0700 in the LS + ES group, P = 0.169) or ulcer stage (P = 0.446). The prevalence of adverse events related to drugs and bleeding were also similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Sequential therapy with LS + ES is as effective as LS alone against ESD-induced gastric ulcers.

Tranexamic acid for upper gastrointestinal bleeding

Background Tranexamic acid reduces haemorrhage through its antifibrinolytic effects. In a previous version of the present review, we found that tranexamic acid may reduce mortality. This review includes updated searches and new trials.Objectives To assess the effects of tranexamic acid versus no intervention, placebo or other antiulcer drugs for upper gastrointestinal bleeding.Search methods We updated the review by performing electronic database searches (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL),MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index) and manual searches in July 2014.Selection criteriaRandomised controlled trials, irrespective of language or publication status.Data collection and analysis We used the standard methodological procedures of the The Cochrane Collaboration. All-cause mortality, bleeding and adverse events were the primary outcome measures. We performed fixed-effect and random-effects model meta-analyses and presented results as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and used I² as a measure of between-trial heterogeneity. We analysed tranexamic acid versus placebo or no intervention and tranexamic acid versus antiulcer drugs separately. To analyse sources of heterogeneity and robustness of the overall results, we performed subgroup, sensitivity and sequential analyses.Main results We included eight randomised controlled trials on tranexamic acid for upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Additionally, we identified one large ongoing pragmatic randomised controlled trial from which data are not yet available. Control groups were randomly assigned to placebo (seven trials) or no intervention (one trial). Two trials also included a control group randomly assigned to antiulcer drugs(lansoprazole or cimetidine). The included studies were published from 1973 to 2011. The number of participants randomly assigned ranged from 47 to 216 (median 204). All trials reported mortality. In total, 42 of 851 participants randomly assigned to tranexamic acid and 71 of 850 in the control group died (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.87; P value 0.007; I² = 0%). The analysis was not confirmed when all participants in the intervention group with missing outcome data were included as treatment failures, or when the analysis was limited to trials with low risk of attrition bias. Rebleeding was diagnosed for 117 of 826 participants in the tranexamic acid group and for 146 of 825 participants in the control group (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.00; P value 0.07; I² = 49%).We were able to evaluate the risk of serious adverse events on the basis of only four trials. Our analyses showed 'no evidence of a difference between tranexamic acid and control interventions regarding the risk of thromboembolic events.’ Tranexamic acid appeared to reduce the risk of surgery ina fixed-effect meta-analysis (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.95), but this result was no longer statistically significant in a random-effects meta-analysis (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.04; P value 0.07). No difference was apparent between tranexamic acid and placebo in the assessment of transfusion (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.11; I² = 0%), and meta-analyses that compared tranexamic acid versus antiulcer drugs did not identify beneficial or detrimental effects of tranexamic acid for any of the outcomes assessed.Authors' conclusions This review found that tranexamic acid appears to have a beneficial effect on mortality, but a high dropout rate in some trials means that we cannot be sure of this until the findings of additional research are published. At the time of this update in 2014, one large study(8000 participants) is in progress, so this review will be much more informative in a few years. Further examination of tranexamic acid would require inclusion of high-quality randomised controlled trials. Timing of randomisation is essential to avoid attrition bias and to limit the number of withdrawals. Future trials may use a pragmatic design and should include all participants with suspected bleeding or with endoscopically verified bleeding, as well as a tranexamic placebo arm and co-administration of pump inhibitors and endoscopic therapy. Assessment of outcome measures in such studies should be clearly defined. Endoscopic examination with appropriate control of severe bleeding should be performed, as should endoscopic verification of clinically significant rebleeding. In addition, clinical measures of rebleeding should be included. Other important outcome measures include mortality (30-day or in-hospital), need for emergency surgery or blood transfusion and adverse events (major or minor).

Helicobacter pylori eradication on iatrogenic ulcer by endoscopic resection of gastric tumour: a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled multi-centre trial

INTRODUCTION

The role of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication has not been clarified in the healing of iatrogenic ulcer after endoscopic resection of gastric neoplasm. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether H. pylori eradication could facilitate the healing of iatrogenic ulcer after endoscopic resection of gastric neoplasm.

METHODS

A total of 232 patients with H. pylori-positive early gastric cancer or gastric adenoma underwent endoscopic resection and were randomly allocated to eradication or placebo group in a prospective, double-blinded, and placebo-controlled manner. The primary outcome was measured by healing rate of ulcer, and the secondary outcomes by reduction rate of ulcer size, relief rate from ulcer-related symptoms, and adverse event rates.

RESULTS

The healing rate of ulcer was 53% in eradication group and 51.6% in placebo group, respectively (p value=0.95). The reduction rate of ulcer size, relief rate from ulcer-related symptoms and adverse event rates were also not different between two groups. In multivariate analysis, initial ulcer size more than 3 cm and histology of cancer were significant factors affecting iatrogenic ulcer healing.

CONCLUSIONS

H. pylori eradication did not facilitate iatrogenic ulcer healing at early and late phase after endoscopic resection of gastric neoplasm.

Can rebamipide and proton pump inhibitor combination therapy promote the healing of endoscopic submucosal dissection-induced ulcers? A randomized, prospective, multicenter study

BACKGROUND

There has been no consensus regarding the optimal treatment durations and drug regimens in patients with endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)-induced ulcers.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and rebamipide combination therapy compared with PPI monotherapy for ESD-induced ulcer healing.

DESIGN

Randomized, prospective, controlled study; clinical trial.

SETTING

Five hospitals in a University Medical Center group in Korea.

PATIENTS

This study involved 290 adults (309 lesions) who underwent ESD for gastric adenoma or early gastric cancer.

INTERVENTION

PPI and rebamipide combination therapy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

The ulcer healing rate at 4 weeks after ESD.

RESULTS

The ulcer healing rates at 4 weeks after ESD in the PPI and rebamipide combination therapy group were significantly higher than those in the PPI alone group, both in the full analysis (94.9% vs 89.9%; P < .0001) and in the per-protocol analysis (94.5% vs 91.2%; P = .020). This combination therapy was an independent predictive factor for a high ulcer healing rate (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 5.572; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.615-11.876; P = .014). Additionally, the combination therapy group exhibited a higher quality of ulcer healing than the PPI monotherapy group (reviewer 1: P = .027; OR 1.949; 95% CI, 1.077-3.527; reviewer 2: P = .027; OR 1.933; 95% CI, 1.074-3.481).

LIMITATIONS

Open-label study.

CONCLUSION

PPI and rebamipide combination therapy had a superior 4-week ESD-induced ulcer healing rate and quality of ulcer healing compared with PPI monotherapy. (

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01167101.).

Tranexamic acid for upper gastrointestinal bleeding

BACKGROUND

Tranexamic acid reduces haemorrhage through its antifibrinolytic effects. In a previous version of the present review, we found that tranexamic acid may reduce mortality. The present review includes updated searches of randomised trials on tranexamic acid versus placebo, cimetidine or lansoprazole.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of tranexamic acid for upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

SEARCH METHODS

Electronic searches (The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index) and manual searches were combined. The last search update was in October 2011.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Trials in which patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding were randomised to receive either tranexamic acid or placebo, or any anti-ulcer drug, were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently extracted data. All-cause mortality was the primary outcome measure. Random-effects model meta-analyses were performed and results presented as relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Subgroup, sensitivity, regression and sequential analyses were performed to analyse sources of intertrial heterogeneity and the robustness of the overall result.

MAIN RESULTS

Seven double blind randomised trials on tranexamic acid versus placebo, cimetidine, or lanzoprazole were included. One trial offered endoscopic treatment to all patients that were randomised. Random-effects model meta-analysis found that tranexmic acid reduced mortality compared with placebo (41 of 829 versus 68 of 825 patients; RR: 0.61, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.89). The beneficial effect was not confirmed in subgroup analysis stratified for the quality of bias control, in worst case scenario analyses (in which 21% of the randomised patients were excluded), or in sequential analyses. No significant differences were found between tranexamic acid and placebo on bleeding, surgery, or transfusion requirements. No clear effects of tranexamic acid were identified in trials using endoscopic therapy or in the trials comparing tranexamic acid with cimetidine or lansoprazole. In the tranexamic acid group, five cases of serious thromboembolic events occurred (myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, and cerebral infarction). Overall, the number of patients with any thrombotic event was not significantly increased in the tranexamic acid group (RR 1.87, 95% CI 0.60 to 5.85).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Considering the internal and external validity of the evidence, tranexamic acid cannot be recommended for routine use. Additional trials in which tranexamic acid is used in combination with the currently recommended interventions are required.

A Planned Prospective, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Multicenter Trial Assessing the Effect of Helicobacter pylori Eradication on the Healing of Iatrogenic Ulcer after Endoscopic Resection of Gastric Neoplasm

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Helicobacter pylori eradication may facilitate the healing of iatrogenic ulcer after endoscopic resection of gastric neoplasm. This study involved designing a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial, performed by the Korean College of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research and the Medical Research Collaboration Center, Seoul National University Hospital.

METHODS

We intend to enroll up to 232 patients H.-pylori-positive patients who have gastric adenoma or early gastric cancer after endoscopic resection. The enrolled patients are being randomly allocated to the H.-pylori-eradication-plus-proton-pump-inhibitor group or the placebo-plus-proton-pump-inhibitor group based on their histology results and the size of the resected specimen. After random allocation, the iatrogenic ulcer size and stage are evaluated at 4- and 8-week follow-ups (with a window of ±7 days). The primary end point is the healing rate of the ulcer by stage, and the secondary end point is the rate of ulcer size reduction, relief rate from ulcer-related symptoms, and adverse-event rates.

RESULTS

More than 90% of the target subjects have already been enrolled into the study and are receiving ongoing periodic monitoring by the Medical Research Collaboration Center.

CONCLUSIONS

Completion of the study should reveal whether H. pylori eradication can facilitate the healing of ulcer after endoscopic resection in Korea.

Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy may facilitate gastric ulcer healing after endoscopic mucosal resection: a prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

It remains unclear whether Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy affects the healing rate of iatrogenic ulcers following endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for gastric tumors. The aim of our study was to prospectively evaluate the effect of H. pylori eradication therapy on gastric ulcer healing after EMR.

METHODS

After EMR, patients were randomly assigned to either the H. pylori eradication group (Hp group) (lansoprazole 30 mg, amoxicillin 1000 mg, and clarithromycin 500 mg, twice a day for 7 days) or the noneradication group (proton pump inhibitor, PPI group) (lansoprazole 30 mg, twice a day for 7 days). Four weeks after EMR, the ulcer stages and size were compared between the two groups. Moreover, ulcer-related symptoms, bleeding rates, adverse effects, and drug compliance were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 64 patients were enrolled. Of these, 17 patients were excluded from the study. The two groups were comparable in terms of baseline clinicopathologic characteristics. Four weeks after EMR, the two groups did not differ with respect to ulcer stage (p = .475) or ulcer-related symptoms (p = .399). However, the ulcer reduction ratio was significantly higher in the Hp group (0.028 +/- 0.024 vs. 0.065 +/- 0.055, p < .05). No differences were observed between the two groups with regard to drug compliance, adverse drug event rates, or bleeding rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that H. pylori eradication therapy might improve the ulcer healing rate after EMR.

Effect of a gastro-protective agent, rebamipide, on symptom improvement in patients with functional dyspepsia: a double-blind placebo-controlled study in Japan

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Although mucosal protective agents have been used frequently for treatment of symptomatic gastritis, there has been no well-controlled study of functional dyspepsia. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of a 4-week treatment with rebamipide for the relief of overall dyspeptic symptoms and the improvement in quality of life from an untreated baseline in Japanese patients with functional dyspepsia.

METHODS

In a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled, single-center study, 81 patients with functional dyspepsia were recruited and treated with rebamipide (100 mg, t.i.d.) or placebo for 4 weeks. Symptoms were assessed at baseline and at the end of the study period by a symptom questionnaire. Quality of life was evaluated by the QPD 32.

RESULTS

Data was analyzed for symptoms from 38 patients who received rebamipide and 33 patients who received placebo treatment. Overall symptoms were significantly improved in both the rebamipide and placebo treatment groups from the untreated baseline after 4 weeks of treatment, and the mean changes in overall symptoms were not significantly different between the groups. However, the improvement in symptom score was significantly greater in the treatment arm than in the placebo arm for three items, which were bloating, belching, and pain or discomfort that was relieved after a meal. Regarding quality of life, social restriction and pain intensity were significantly improved in the rebamipide treatment group in per-protocol analysis (P = 0.048 and P = 0.031, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Although rebamipide was not significantly better than placebo in reducing overall symptoms by 4 weeks' treatment, it may partially improve the symptoms. It may also be beneficial in improvement of quality of life in Japanese patients with functional dyspepsia.

Healing rate of EMR-induced ulcer in relation to the duration of treatment with omeprazole

BACKGROUND

Although EMR-induced ulcers heal faster and recur less often than noniatrogenic gastric ulcers, there is no consensus regarding the duration of therapy for these ulcers. This study prospectively evaluated healing of EMR-induced ulcers according to the duration of omeprazole therapy.

METHODS

A total of 69 patients were randomly assigned, after EMR, to treatment with omeprazole (20 mg per day) for 7 days (1-week group) or with omeprazole (20 mg per day) for 28 days (4-week group). Four weeks after EMR, ulcer size and stage were compared with those of the initial EMR-induced ulcer. Each patient kept a daily diary of drugs consumed and ulcer-related symptoms during the 4-week period after EMR.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients were randomized to the 4-week group, and 26 were randomized to the 1-week group. No significant differences were observed between the two groups at 4 weeks after EMR in terms of ulcer reduction ratio (p=0.29) or stage (p=0.11). In addition, no difference was observed between the two groups with respect to ulcer-related symptoms or use of additional gastric-coating medication (p=0.48).

CONCLUSIONS

For EMR-induced ulcer, treatment with omeprazole for 1 week is equivalent to treatment for 4 weeks. Short-term therapy with omeprazole can be considered for EMR-induced ulcer.

Which types of non-bleeding visible vessels in gastric peptic ulcers should be treated by endoscopic hemostasis?

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Because non-bleeding visible vessels (NBVV) of gastric peptic ulcers have the potential to re-bleed, endoscopic hemostatic treatment may be necessary during the first emergency endoscopy. However, not all NBVV re-bleed, and endoscopic hemostasis sometimes causes fatal side-effects. Therefore, we have evaluated the risk of re-bleeding from various NBVV in gastric peptic ulcers to determine which types should be treated by endoscopy to prevent re-bleeding.

METHODS

A total of 227 NBVV in 202 patients with gastric peptic ulcers that were endoscopically followed without endoscopic hemostatic procedures were classified by the following factors: vessel color, form, location of the NBVV in the ulcer crater, and location of the ulcer in the stomach. The re-bleeding rate was then analyzed for each type of NBVV.

RESULTS

Significantly high rates of re-bleeding were observed in cases with white, protruded and peripheral NBVV. In particular, white NBVV located in the peripheral zone of the ulcer crater were frequent re-bleeding sources. The location of the ulcer in the stomach was not a statistically significant factor in determining re-bleeding rates.

CONCLUSION

We found that white, protruded and peripherally located NBVV in gastric ulcers have a higher chance of re-bleeding if preventive endoscopic hemostatic procedures are not performed.

Protective effects of endothelin-1 antibody on stress induced lesion of gastric mucosa in rats

AIM

To explore the protective effects of endothelin-1 antibody (ET-1Ab) on acute gastric mucosa lesions induced by stress in rats.

METHODS

Stress ulcer induced by cold-restraint-stress(CRS) was used as model in this study, different dose ET-1Ab were administered by left femoral vein prior to stress so as to observe the effects of the drug on ET-1 levels in plasma and gastric mucosa, gastric mucosa blood flow(GMBF)and ulcer index(UI) of CRS rats.

RESULTS

(1) Compared with the normal control group, ET-1 levels of plasma and gastric mucosa and UI were increased significantly in the stress groups (116.2±4.7 mv and 125.1±4.2 mv vs 49.1±9.7 mv, 113.8±9.3 mv and 122.9±19.6 mv vs 52.3±10.3 mv, 28.6±1.85 mv and 51.2±5.93 mv vs 0, P<0.01), while GMBF were decreased markedly in stress groups (227.8±13.5 mv and 150.8±11.5 mv vs 405.8±23.3 mv, P<0.01).There was significantly positive correlation between ET-1 and UI (r = 0.96, P<0.01), and significantly negative correlation between ET-1 and GMBF(r = -0.91, P<0.01). (2) However, compared with the single-stress groups, ET-1 levels of plasma and gastric mucosa and UI were decreased significantly in ET-1Ab-stress groups (69.2±7.3 mv vs 116.2±24.7 mv, 80.6±12.3 mv vs 125.1±24.2 mv, 58.5±6.3 mv vs 113.8±29.3 mv, 68.9±9.6 mvvs 122.9±19.6 mv, 13.2±2.05 mv vs 28.6±1.85 mv, 25.8±3.62 mv vs 51.2±5.93 mv, P<0.01), GMBF were increased dramatically (329.8±16.3 mv vs 227.8±13.5 mv, 251.9±11.3 mv vs 150.8±1.5 mv, P<0.01), ET-1Ab can dose-dependently reduce levels of the ET-1 and UI, and improve GMBF significantly in cold-restraint-stress.

CONCLUSION

In the course of CRS-induced ulcers, endogenous ET-1 levels of plasma and gastric mucosa were increased significantly, and there were close relationship between ET-1 levels and UI. The increased ET-1 may involve in the pathogenesis of CRS-induced ulcers in rats by its vasoconstriction and marked reduction of GMBF. ET-1Ab can dose-dependently attenuate the degree of gastric mucosa lesions induced by CRS significantly. So it may have therapeutic effect for SU.